Inventory Management and Financial Performance of Nse Listed Glaxosmithkline Consumer Nigeria PLC
Inventory Management and Financial Performance of Nse Listed Glaxosmithkline Consumer Nigeria PLC
United Kingdom ISSN 2348 0386 Vol. VIII, Issue 6, June 2020
http://ijecm.co.uk/
Lyndon M. Etale
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Sciences, Niger Delta University,
Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
[email protected]
Ayaundu E. Sawyerr
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Management Sciences, Niger Delta University,
Wilberforce Island, Bayelsa State, Nigeria
[email protected]
Abstract
This study examined the relationship between inventory management and financial performance
of GlaxoSmithKline Nigeria PLC in a case study. The study adopted inventory to assets ratio
and inflation as the predictive variables while return on assets representing financial
performance was used as the response variable. Secondary data for the study was collected
from the annual reports of GSK and CBN Statistical Bulletin for the period 2011 to 2018. The
study employed descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis based on the E-view 10
software to analyse data. The results showed that all the predictive variables had positive
relationship with return on assets, but only inventory to assets ratio was significant at 5% level.
The regression results also showed that the coefficient of determination (R-squared) value of
approximately 0.89 indicating that 89% of changes in the response variable were accounted for
by the combined effect of changes in the predictive variables. The combined effect of variations
of the predictive variables significantly explained changes in the response variable with
probability of F-statistic value of 0.004325 (at 5% level of significance). Furthermore, the
adjusted R- squared value of 0.84 indicates that the model used for the analysis is a proper and
good fit. The study concluded that inventory management is significant and positively related to
financial performance. Based on the findings the study recommended that management should
maintain their current inventory management systems in order to sustain the long run growth
and success of the company but take steps that would mitigate the effects of inflation.
INTRODUCTION
The topic of inventory management is important because for most manufacturing firms inventory
constitutes a large proportion of the firms’ productive or current assets. This is also true for
merchandise or commercial outfits because the nature of the trade is built around their stock-in-
trade (inventory). The performance and efficiency of any organization as well as its expansions
depend on how effective and efficient its inventories otherwise known as stock are managed. In
essence, inventory management is core to any business organization. In fact, inventory
management is the reason why organizations survive its numerous competitors. Hence Pandey
(2010) put it concisely that it is imperative to manage inventory efficiently and effectively to
avoid unnecessary investment; and that to neglect the management of inventory is to jeopardize
the long run profitability of the firm. Control of inventory includes all necessary action taken by
management of an organization from procurement of resources through their transformation,
and consequent disposal as finished goods or products.
Pandey (2010) stated that inventories are stock of the product a company is
manufacturing for sale and the component that make up the product. Inventory for the
manufacturing company consists of raw materials, goods-in-process and finished goods ready
for final consumption. A manufacturing firm maintains raw materials inventory which are the
basic inputs that can be converted later into finished goods ready for sale. When the production
process is not completed, the raw materials undergoing the production process are counted as
work-in-progress or goods-in-process. The inventories of finished goods are the raw materials
that have finally gone through the production process or cycle; these are stored ready for sale to
consumers. For merchandise or commercial business inventory is the stock in trade or the core
activity that defines its existence is built around those items which constitutes its inventory.
Inventories comprise assets that are in constant usage and replacement. It could be classified
as a merchandise (trade goods), manufacturing raw materials, work-in-progress and finished
goods) and miscellaneous inventories such as prepaid expenses until used (office supplies).
Therefore, from the definition given above, one can deduce an inventory as asset represented
by goods owned by the company and those held for the purpose of future sale or for utilization
in the manufacture of goods for sale. It equally includes those components that are in the
production process.
A company should hold adequate inventory in store to meet customers’ demand or to
ensure uninterrupted production. It is not possible for a firm to receive supply of inventory
whenever it is needed because suppliers may delay or run out of stock; and that could
jeopardize the firms business. Firms hold inventory in store for three reasons: to ensure smooth
business operations; to edge against changes in demand and supply forces which may not be
predictable; and to take advantage of price changes. The recent economic depression which
Nigeria experienced has made raw materials to be scarce and costly. As a result, many
companies have abandoned the old rule of thumb approach of inventory control to a more
reliable scientific approach. Managers and management of companies are consequently left
with two basic inventory decisions how much to order, and when to order. Positive answers to
these questions offer a sound and veritable solutions to efficient management of inventories.
Managers and management of organizations have cost to incur for both over-inventories and
under-inventories. The cost associated with over-inventories includes, pilferage, handling and
storage cost, obsolescence; whereas under-inventory causes loss in sale as well as profit,
customer dissatisfaction, idle labor as well as capital, etc. Management base their decision on
those which strike balance on over-inventory and under-inventory. Therefore, effective and
efficient management of inventory is expected to boost profit or organizational performance.
This topic of inventory management and performance is being revisited here in a case
study of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Nigeria PLC (GSK). GSK is an affiliate of a global
healthcare company and listed on the Nigerian Stock Exchange. It is in the business of
manufacturing, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical and consumer healthcare products.
Incorporated in Nigeria in 1971 and started business in 1972, the company has head offices at
1, Industrial Avenue at Ilupeju in Ikeja, Lagos. GKS was quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange
in 1977 and presently produces Panadol, Andrew Liver Salt, Horlicks, Macleans, Sensodyne,
Voltaren and Otrivin among others for health and wellbeing of its customers. As a manufacturing
company GSK is required to maintain stock of raw materials for its wide range of products, hold
inventory of goods-in-process for her different products, and keep finished goods inventory for
her wide range of products to ensure smooth operations; and because of the company’s wide
product line, it is very likely to invest heavy sum of money on inventory.
The forgoing underpins the importance of this topic and ultimately this study would be
useful to the management of GlaxoSmithKline and similar manufacturing companies.
However, the recent economic lockdown in the whole world due to the corona virus disease
(COVID 19) pandemic would pose serious challenge to whatever inventory management
system that a company may have put in place. The lockdown has no doubt made it difficult to
receive supplies of raw materials and even block distribution outlets for finished products
making it difficult to properly manage inventory of raw materials and finished goods. It would
have been hard for a company to stock inventory to guide against stock-outs even if
continuous production where possible because of the sudden nature of the pandemic and the
resultant economic lockdown.
Besides, several studies have been carried out in the past to examine the relationship
between inventory management and the financial performance of companies in both
developed economies, less developed and emerging economies. However, the findings of
these studies lack consistency pointing to the fact that further studies are needed to determine
the actual direction of the relationship between inventory management and firm profitability.
For instance, the research works on this topic by Ndubuisi, Ezechukwu, Egolum and Obi
(2018), Etale and Bingilar (2016), Kung’u (2016) and Prempeh (2015) established a positive
association between inventory management and profitability. But the studies of Muturi,
Wachira and Lyria (2015) and Panigrahi (2013) showed that inventory management had
negative effect on profitability. While Otuya and Eginiwin (2017) and Sekeroglu and Altan
(2014) reported mixed findings; and Bawa, Asamoah and Kissi (2018) reported that inventory
management had no effect on firm performance. The lack of consensus in the study findings
of previous researchers on this topic motivated this current study to examine the relationship
between inventory management and profitability using GSK as a case study. The study
adopted return on assets (ROA) and inventory to assets ratio (IAR) to represent profitability
and inventory management respectively; and inflation (INF) was introduced as a moderating
variable.
The remainder of this paper is divided into four parts. Part two which follows the
introduction above deals with the review of past empirical literature. The methodology of the study
is covered in part three. The results of data analysis and discussion of findings are covered in part
four; while the summary, conclusion and recommendations are presented in part five.
management was used as the independent variable. Secondary data was collected from the
financial statements of the sampled company. The study employed descriptive statistics and
simple regression techniques based on E-views 7.0 software as the tools for data analysis. The
results revealed that there was a significant relationship between inventory management and
ROA.
Sekeroglu and Altan (2014) investigated the relationship between inventory
management and profitability of Borsa Istanbul (BIST) listed firms in Turkey for the period 2003
to 2012. The study sample included 41 firms comprising 16 firms in weaving, 14 in eatables and
11 in the wholesale and retail industries. In their study model, inventory turnover ratio used as
proxy for inventory management was regressed against four measures of performance
(profitability) namely; gross profit margin, net profit margin, return on assets and return on
equity. Secondary data for the ten years period covered in the study were obtained from annual
financial statements of the sampled firms. They employed simple regression and correlation
techniques based on windows SPSS version 20 computer software for data analysis. The
results indicated that there was a positive relationship between inventory management and
profitability in the eatables industry, but no relationship was established between inventory
management and profitability in the weaving and wholesale and retail industries.
Panigrahi (2013) examined the relationship between inventory conversion period and
profitability of 5 cement companies listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange in India for the period
2001 to 2010. The model of the study adopted gross operating profit (proxy for profitability) as
the response variable while inventory conversion period (proxy for inventory management)
among three other control variables were used as the explanatory variables. Secondary data for
the study was collected from annual reports of the selected companies. The researcher
employed correlation and multiple regression techniques as methods of data analysis. The
results indicated the existence of a significant negative relationship between inventory
conversion period and profitability of listed cement companies in India.
Bawa, Asamoah and Kissi (2018) investigated the impact of inventory management on the
performance of firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange for the period 2007 to 2014. They
adopted inventory conversion period and return on assets among others as proxies for inventory
management (independent variable) and performance (dependent variable) respectively.
Secondary data for the study variables was collected from annual reports of sampled 14 listed
manufacturing companies. The study employed Pearson’s correlation and multiple regression
techniques based on windows SPSS software for data analysis. The results indicated that
inventory management had no effect on firm performance.
Kung’u (2016) investigated the effect of inventory control practices on profitability of
industrial and allied firms in Kenya for the period 2009 to 2014. The study sample involved 71
companies. The researcher used both primary and secondary data for the study. Primary data
was collected through the use of a questionnaire, while secondary data was collected from the
annual reports of sampled companies. The study employed descriptive statistics, Pearson’s
correlation, ANOVA and linear regression analysis based on windows SPSS software as the
techniques for data analysis. The results provided evidence that inventory control practices had
positive significant relationship with profitability. Muturi, Wachira and Lyria (2015) investigated
the effect of inventory management on profitability of tea companies in Kenya for the period
2009 to 2013 with primary data collected through the use of a questionnaire. They adopted
return on assets as proxy for profitability (the dependent variable), and inventory conversion
period as the independent variable. The study employed descriptive statistics and simple
regression techniques as the statistical tools for data analysis. Their findings revealed that
inventory management had a significantly negative effect on profitability.
Prempeh (2015) evaluated the impact of inventory management on profitability of
manufacturing firms listed on the Ghana Stock Exchange for the period 2004 to 2014.
Secondary data for the study was collected from published financial statements of sampled 4
breweries for the period. The study regressed raw materials inventory (proxy for inventory
management) against net profit (the response variable) using Pearson correlation and multiple
regression analysis based on OLS. The findings revealed that raw materials inventory had a
significantly strong positive impact on the profitability of manufacturing firms in Ghana.
Studies in Nigeria
Kolawole, Akomolafe and Olusipe (2019) evaluated the relationship between inventory
management and profitability of manufacturing firms in Nigeria using International Breweries
PLC as a case study. The study adopted gross profit as proxy for profitability (the dependent
variable), while components of inventory management such as raw materials inventory, work-in-
progress, finished goods inventories among others were used as the explanatory variables
representing inventory management. Secondary data for the study were collected from the
annual reports of the company for the period 2002 to 2011. They employed simple linear
regression technique as the statistical tool for data analysis. The results showed that inventory
management had strong influence on profitability of International Breweries PLC in Nigeria.
Ndubuisi et al (2018) examined the relationship between inventory management and financial
performance of brewery firms in Nigeria for the period 2010 to 2016. The study adopted ROA,
revenue growth and ROE to proxy financial performance (the dependent variable), while
inventory conversion period was used as the independent variable. Secondary data for the
study was collected from annual reports of 7 sampled breweries and NSE fact book. They
employed OLS regression method based on STRATA version 13 software for data analysis.
The results indicated a significant positive relationship between inventory conversion period,
ROA and growth in revenue; but the relationship between inventory conversion period and ROE
was positive though not significant.
Otuya and Eginiwin (2017) investigated the effect of inventory management on
profitability of SMEs in Delta State involving a sample of 30 firms. The study adopted inventory
turnover, inventory conversion period and inventory leanness to represent inventory
management, while gross profit margin was used as proxy for profitability (the dependent
variable). Primary data for the study was obtained through the use of a questionnaire. They
employed descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis to evaluate data. The results
revealed mixed findings: inventory turnover had significant positive relationship with gross profit
margin; inventory conversion period had significant negative relationship with profitability; and
inventory leanness had positive but insignificant link with profitability. Agu, Obi-Anike and Eke
(2016) examined the relationship between inventory management and profitability of
manufacturing companies in Nigeria. The study made use of both primary and secondary data.
Primary data for the study was collected through the use of a questionnaire which was
administered on employees of sampled companies (Nigerian Breweries, PZ Industries and
Innoson Nigeria Limited) with a response rate of 270 out of 285. Secondary data was obtained
from annual reports of the sampled companies. They employed descriptive statistics, Pearson’s
correlation and regression techniques for the analysis of data. The results provided evidence
that inventory control significantly affected the productivity of manufacturing firms.
Etale and Bingilar (2016) examined the effect of inventory cost management on the
profitability of listed brewery firms in Nigeria for the period 2005 to 2014 using time series
secondary data. The study adopted raw materials cost, working-in-progress cost and finished
goods cost as proxies for inventory cost management, while gross profit margin was used as
proxy for profitability. They employed multiple regression technique based on windows SPSS
version 20 software for data analysis. The results indicated that inventory cost management had
positive effect on the profitability of brewery companies in Nigeria. Ahmed, Modibbo, Modu and
Mohammad (2015) investigated the relationship between inventory management and financial
performance of conglomerate companies quoted on the Nigerian Stock Exchange for the period
2010 to 2014. The study regressed annual absolute values of inventory (raw materials, work-in-
progress and finished goods) against return on assets (proxy for financial performance).
Secondary data for the study were collected from the annual reports of sampled companies.
They employed descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation and linear regression techniques for
data analysis. Their findings indicated that inventory management was significantly related to
financial performance.
METHODOLOGY
Research Design
This study adopted the export facto research design. The export facto research design was
used because the study made use of already existing data, meaning that the study was
conducted after the event had taken place. This also meant that the researchers had no powers
to manipulate the data used in the study. Besides, the researchers adopted the case study
approach as GSK was conveniently sampled for study.
Source of Data
This study examined the relationship between inventory management and profitability of GSK
using return on assets (proxy for financial performance) as the response variable, inventory to
assets ratio (representing inventory management) as the predictive variable, while inflation was
used as a moderating variable. Secondary data for return on assets and inventory to assets ratio
were collected from the annual financial statements of GSK for the period 2011 to 2018. The
financial statements were downloaded from the company’s website. Data on the moderating
variable (inflation) was obtained from CBN Statistical Bulletin for the number of years. The
particular time series date (2011 – 2018) was covered in the study because the period coincided
with IFRS adoption, and only this period provided a uniform set of financial statements with the
relevant data available and accessible on the company’s website for this period.
Inventory to assets ratio: This is the value of inventory stated in the statement of financial
position scaled by total assets, computed for every year. It was used as the proxy for inventory
management.
Inflation: This refers to overall changes in the consumer price index. It is used as a moderating
variable as it would affect prices of manufacturing inputs and goods in trade.
Model Specification
To make easy the analysis of data, the study adopted a commonly used econometric model
which has previously been used by Etale and Bingilar (2016) as stated below:
ROA = ƒ (IAR, INF)
The above model was translated into a regression equation as follows;
ROA = α + β₁IAR + β₂INF + е Equation 1
Where,
ROA = Return on assets, proxy for financial performance, the response variable.
IAR = Inventory to assets ratio representing inventory management.
INF = Inflation used as a moderating variable.
α = is the intercept or constant
β₁ and β₂ = are the coefficients of the predictive variables to be determined, which defined the
extent of the relationship between the response variable and the predictive variables.
е = is the error term of the equation.
Descriptive Statistics
The summary of the descriptive statistics of the variables are shown in Table 2. Table 2 shows
that ROA, IAR and INF have mean of 9.55, 21.60 and 11.49 respectively. The maximum values
respectively for ROA, IAR and INF are 15.10, 27.10 and 16.50. While their respective minimum
values are 3.10, 12.70 and 8.00. Table 2 further shows that the standard deviation of ROA, IAR
and INF are 4.63, 5.08 and 3.22 respectively; indicating that IAR is the most dispersed variable,
while INF is the least dispersed among the variables of the study. The Jarque-Bera statistics
and the associated probability values also shows that ROA, IAR and INF are normally
distributed with probabilities of 0.62, 0.65 and 0.69 (which are greater than 5 per cent),
respectively.
Regression Results
Discussion of Findings
Table 3 shows the results of the multiple regression analysis based on the E-views 10 computer
software. Therefore Equation 1 can re-casted as follows:
ROA = -10.34 + 0.89IAR + 0.07INF + 1.84 Equation 2
The results in Table 3 and more simply Equation 2 which would facilitate the testing of the study
hypotheses provide answers to the research questions made obvious by the study variables.
From the results of analysis, the independent variables combined significantly explained
changes in the dependent variable with probability of F-statistic value of 0.004325 (at 5% level
of significance). Secondly, the coefficient of determination (R-squared) value of 0.886655
indicates that 89% of changes in the dependent variable are accounted for by the combined
effect of changes in the independent variables. Also, the adjusted R- squared value of 0.841317
indicates that the model used is a proper and good fit for testing the hypotheses of the study.
This provides a high confidence level (at approximately 84% for acceptance of the goodness of
the study model. The Durbin- Watson statistics value of 2.334906 which is approximately equal
to the 2.0 benchmark indicates that there was no serial auto correlation among the independent
variables.
Overall, the regression results used to verify the relationship between inventory
management, (IAR) and return on assets (ROA) proxy for financial performance indicated a
strong significant relationship between the predictive variable (IAR) with p-value of 0.0048 and
response variable (ROA). Also, the probability of F-statistic value (0.004325) of the regression
model used implies that inventory management of GSK has a strong statistically significant
positive relationship with return on assets (with beta value of IAR equal to 0.885376). The
regression results have revealed that inventory management has a positive statistically
significant link with return on assets. The findings of this study are in agreement with the study
findings of Ndubuisi et al (2018), Etale and Bingilar (2016), Kung’u (2016) and Prempeh (2015).
However, the findings of this study did not support the study findings of Bawa et al (2018),
Muturi et al (2015) and Panigrahi (2013)
find it difficult to receive supplies of raw materials and even her distribution channels would be
adversely affected making it hard-put to effectively manage inventory of raw materials and
finished goods which may lead to complete stoppage of production for as long as the lockdown
persists. The lockdown has even affected the annual audit of the accounts of most listed
companies as a result of which the year 2019 financial statements of most companies are not
accessible online even close to the end of the first half of the year 2020 for researchers. The
company like most others should be prepared to think-outside-the-box to get back to her optimal
operating capacity when normalcy returns.
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Summary
This study examined the relationship between inventory management and financial performance
using GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Nigeria PLC (GSK) as a case study. Inventory to assets ratio
(IAR) and inflation (INF), were used as the predictive variables; while return on assets (ROA)
was used as proxy for financial performance (the response variable). The findings of the study
are summarized as follows:
1. Inventory to assets ratio (IAR) had positive statistically significant relationship with return on
assets (ROA) with p-value of 0.0048 and co-efficient of determination of about 0.89.
2. Inflation (INF) had positive relationship with return on assets (ROA), but the relationship is
not significant (with a p-value of 0.8277).
3. This study has shown that inventory management has significant positive relationship with
the financial performance of GSK, meaning that the company has an effective and efficient
inventory management system in place.
Conclusion
This study examined the relationship between inventory management and financial performance
of GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Nigeria PLC in a case study. The study adopted inventory to
assets ratio (IAR) and inflation (INF) as the predictive variables while return on assets (ROA)
representing financial performance was adopted as the response variable. Secondary data for
the study was collected from the annual reports of GSK and CBN Statistical Bulletin for the
period 2011 to 2018. The study employed descriptive statistics and multiple regression analysis
based on the E-view 10 software as techniques for data analysis. The results showed that all
the predictive variables had positive relationship with return on assets, but only inventory to
assets ratio was significant at 5% level. The regression results also showed that the coefficient
of determination (R-squared) value of approximately 0.89 indicating that 89% of changes in the
response variable were accounted for by the combined effect of changes in the predictive
variables. The combined effect of variations of the predictive variables significantly explained
changes in the response variable with probability of F-statistic value of 0.004325 (at 5% level of
significance). Furthermore, the adjusted R- squared value of 0.84 indicates that the model used
for the analysis is a proper and good fit. The study concluded that inventory management is
significant and positively related to financial performance.
Recommendations
Based on the findings of the study the following recommendations are made:
1. The management of GSK should maintain their present inventory management policies in
order to sustain the long run growth and success of the company, but be willing to maintain
regular review of her policies to be able to re-invent and innovate;
2. Also, management of the company should put in place a mechanism to mitigate the effect of
inflation on raw materials, spares and other production inputs, one way to do this may be by
way of backward integration where the company may engage in mechanized production of
raw materials and supplies, and train her staff to acquire new skills and knowledge; and
3. The company like most others should be prepared to think-outside-the-box to get back to
their optimal operating capacity when normalcy returns to the economies of the world
beyond the COVID 19 economic lockdown. The company could take control of her own
distribution channels and review her processes to identify any excess capacity that can be
deployed for more productive use.
4. It is suggested that a study in the future on this topic would address the whole healthcare
sector and cover a longer time period to highlight the long term relationship between the
variables.
REFERENCES
Agu, O. A., Obi-Anike, H. O. & Eke, C. N. (2016) Effect of inventory management on the organizational performance
of the selected manufacturing firms, Singaporean Journal of Business, Economics and Management Studies, 5(4),
56-69
Ahmed, A. D., Modibbo, S. A., Modu, K. H. & Muhammad, B. S. (2015) Effect of inventory management on financial
performance: Evidence from Nigerian conglomerate companies, Nigeria Journal of Accounting and Finance, 7(1&2),
96-107
Atnafu, D. & Balda, A. (2018) The impact of inventory management practices on firms’ competitiveness and
organizational performance: Empirical evidence from micro and small enterprises in Ethiopia, Cogent Business &
Management, 5(1), 1-16
Bawa, S., Asamoah, G. E. & Kissi, E. (2018) Impact of inventory management on firm performance: A case study of
listed manufacturing firms in Ghana, International Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(4), 83-96
Etale, L. M. & Bingilar, P. F. (2016) The effect of inventory management on profitability: A study of listed brewery
companies in Nigeria, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 4(6), 446-455
Kolawole, A. D., Akomolafe, A. B. & Olusipe, B. J. (2019) Inventory management: An impetus for increased
profitability in manufacturing firms, International Journal of Accounting, Finance and Risk Management, 4(4), 110-115
Kung’u, J. N. (2016) Effect of inventory control on profitability of industrial and allied firms in Kenya, IOSR Journal of
Economics and Finance, 7(6/1), 9-15
Mohamad, S. J., Suraidi, N. N., Rahman, N. A. & Suhaimi, R. D. (2016) A study on relationship between inventory
management and company performance: A case study of textile chain store, Journal of Advanced Management
Science, 4(4), 299-304
Muturi, H. M., Wachira, V. & Lyria, R. K. (2015) Effects of inventory conversion period on profitability of tea factories
in Meru County, Kenya, International Journal of Economics, Commerce and Management, 3(10), 366-378
Ndubuisi, A. N., Ezechukwu, B. O., Egolum, P. U. & Obi, J. C. (2018) Inventory management and financial
performance: Evidence from brewery firms listed on Nigeria Stock Exchange, International Journal of Research in
Business, Economics and Management, 2(3), 72-93
Otuya, S. & Eginiwin, E. J. (2017) Inventory management and SMEs profitability: A study of furniture manufacturing,
wholesale and eatery industry in Delta State, Nigeria, Journal of Finance and Accounting, 5(3), 75-79
Pandey, I. M. (2010) Financial Management, 10th Edition, Vikas Publishing House PVT Ltd, New Delhi
Panigrahi, A. K. (2013) Relationship between inventory management and profitability: An empirical analysis of Indian
cement companies, Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Management Review, 2(7), 107-120
Prempeh, K. B. (2015) The impact of efficient inventory management on profitability: Evidence from selected
manufacturing firms in Ghana, Munich Personal RePEc Archive, MPRA Paper No. 67889, 1-6, https://mpra.ub.uni-
muenchen.de/67889/ Accessed 22/06/2019
Sekeroglu, G. & Altan, M. (2014) The relationship between inventory management and profitability: A comparative
research of Turkish firms operating in weaving industry, eatables industry, wholesale and retail industry, International
Journal of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, 8(6), 1698-1703