Exploring The Different Technological Distractions on Abellana National Schools’ Senior
High School Students Academic Concentration
Rationale
Technology is an indisputable fact that exists in today's technologically advanced
world, especially for students juggling the demands of a modern education. Although there are
certain advantages to this widespread use of technology in terms of communication and
information availability, it also poses a serious obstacle to students' ability to concentrate on their
academic goals. Excessive dependence on gadgets can negatively impact attention spans, hinder
cognitive function, and ultimately lower academic attainment, according to a growing body of
studies. Research such as Ezemenaka (2013) has started to illuminate these deleterious
consequences, emphasizing the possible harm that computer and phone use may cause to
learning. Nevertheless, a thorough comprehension of the exact mechanisms via which
sophisticated technologies impair scholastic focus is still unclear.
Although earlier studies have successfully brought attention to students' concerns
about distractions, a more thorough and detailed investigation is required to identify specific
distractions coming from these gadgets that disrupt academic focus. This study requires a further
exploration of the complex interactions between technology, learning, and attention, taking into
account elements like the types of distractions, students' different exposure, and the particular
learning environments in which these distractions occur. Teachers and researchers can create
workable solutions that successfully reduce distractions and promote focused learning settings in
the classroom by knowing more about this intricate problem
This knowledge is crucial for developing a digitally age-appropriate environment
of study for pupils. It calls for a change in approach from merely recognizing the issue of
technology-induced distractions to actively locating, examining, and resolving the particular
processes by which these distractions impair the curriculum. Thus, this study offers the potential
to guide the creation of treatments and techniques that allow learners to deal manage the
difficulties posed by technological advances to their academic lives, and ultimately promote a
more concentrated and productive learning
Theoretical background
This study is anchored in three theories, namely Cognitive Load Theory,
Attention Restoration Theory, and Intrinsic Motivation Theory.
According to Sweller (1988), the Cognitive Load Theory (CLT) suggests that
individuals are able to keep an unlimited amount of knowledge in our working memory at any
given time. In the context of technology, CLT emphasizes how, despite providing tools and
information access, technology may also provide distractions that overwhelm working memory,
possibly impairing academic focus. Further highlighting the negative impacts of technology's
continuous stimulation is Attention Restoration Theory (ART), which contends that it might
cause "directed attention fatigue" by draining our attention and cognitive resources (Kaplan,
1995). Lastly, the theory of intrinsic motivation emphasizes the significance of internal
motivation in learning, which might be compromised by the attraction of technology-mediated
other, more engaging activities like social media or gaming. This research attempts to provide a
detailed knowledge of how technology may assist or hinder students' learning by integrating
these perspectives, eventually guiding techniques for maximizing its use in educational contexts.
Statement of the Problem
The aim of the study was to ascertain how students' use of technology affected
their academic focus as senior high school students at Abellana National School. The research
for this project will be carried out in the 2024–2025 school year. It is critical to understand how
social media, online games, and messaging apps cause students to become distracted from their
studies and hinder their academic progress. This study aimed to ascertain the relationship
between students' use of technology and their academic concentration of senior high school
students at Abellana National School. The research for this project will be carried out in the
2024–2025 school year. It's critical to comprehend how social media, online gaming, and
messaging applications detract from academic work and harm students' academic achievement as
their use of these delays grows.
1. What is the profile of the respondents in terms:
a. Age
b. Gender
2. How much screen time did you spend on your electronic device?
3. What do you do if you can’t concentrate?
4. Which technology options are most frequent among Abellana National School senior
high school students?
5. What electronic distractions do learners at Abellana National School encounter, and how
do these distractions impact their ability to concentrate in class, particularly with regard
to:
a. Emotion regulation
b. Attention impulsiveness
c. Multitasking
d. Motivation
e. Concentration
Statement of the Null Hypothesis
H0: There is not a significant difference in the degree of technological distraction experienced by
pupils according to their age or gender.
H0: Students' level of technological distraction is unaffected by the amount of time they spend in
front of screens.
H0: If pupils are distracted by technology, there is no discernible difference in the effectiveness
of various methods of concentration.
H0: The manner that students use their phones, laptops, and other electronic devices does not
affect how distracted they are.
H0: Students' ability to concentrate on their academics is not hampered by technological
distractions.
H0: Students' motivation to learn isn't affected by technological distractions.
H0: Students' ability to regulate their emotions while attempting to learn is not influenced by
technological distractions.
H0: Students aren't less likely to become sidetracked from their work by technological
distractions.
H0: Students' ability to multitask is unaffected by technological distractions.
Scope and Delimitation
The impact of technology on senior high school students' academic concentration
at Abellana National School is the main topic of this study. It attempts to identify the variety of
devices that students use and how they impact their focus, establish the connection between
technology use and academic focus, and investigate methods for reducing technological
interruptions and optimizing output. The study will concentrate on the direct consequences of
technology on concentration, eliminating other potential factors that may influence student
performance, and it will be restricted to senior high school students enrolled at Abellana National
School for the current academic year. The long-term consequences of technology on academic
performance as well as the particular psychological mechanisms underlying technology-induced
distractions will not be explored in this study.
Significance of the Study
The findings in this research will have crucial significance to improving the
achievement of learners in a world with advanced technology. The findings will prove helpful.
Students. This could assist establish procedures for enhancing concentration control
interruptions and manage education settings by identifying the precise technological advances
components that impact attention additionally by using this knowledge to mold learning
strategies to the particular requirements of each student methods for overcoming the addiction to
technology can be guided.
Teachers. Possess an essential role of establishing successful environments for learning by
supporting ethical technology use and personalizing instruction. Students can develop engaging
learning settings, provide clear guidelines regarding the use of electronic devices in the
classroom, and give children the abilities and understanding required to reduce distractions.
Professors may adapt their lessons to satisfy many different kinds of the needs of learners by
knowing how electronics impacts each individual student. Furthermore, by encouraging screen
breaks, offline activities, as well as time managerial abilities, they observe the early warning
signs of technology and addiction and promote good tech habits.
Guardians or Parents. This way that parents and guardians engage with electronics and the way
it affects the learners capacity to pay attention in class was significant these are in charge of
defining specific rules for the use of technology imposing limitations on time designating areas
free of technology and enforcing standards for proper conduct along with material online parents
may assist kids avoid unnecessary temptations and develop healthy technological habits by
establishing these boundaries
School administrators. Are essential in controlling whether technology affects the capacity of
pupils to pay attention in class. They influence how computers are utilized in classrooms to
improve learning outcomes by establishing guidelines and restrictions. That entails establishing
rules about using gadgets, educating teachers, and motivating kids to utilize technology
thoughtfully.
Future Researcher. Regarding the way the internet affects students' ability to focus
academically will be important in determining the way schools develop in the future. Through
their research, we may better understand how technology impacts focus, identify distraction-
causing elements, and devise solutions to mitigate adverse consequences. The development of
more effective educational technology tools that improve interest and concentration may result
from this research. Furthermore, studies can look into how technology affects student behavior
and thinking abilities over a period of time, which can give parents, legislators, and teachers
important information.
Definition of Terms
Academic Attainment: This refers to how well students perform in school, like their grades
and test scores.
Academic Focus: This means how well students can concentrate on their schoolwork and
learning.
Attention Restoration Theory (ART): This theory says that being constantly bombarded by
technology can tire out our brains, making it harder to focus later.
Cognitive Load Theory (CLT): This theory says our brains can only hold a certain amount of
information at once. Technology can overload our brains with distractions, making it harder to
focus.
Deleterious Consequences: These are harmful effects, in this case, the negative impacts
technology can have on learning.
Digitally Age-Appropriate Environment of Study: This means creating a learning
environment that works well with technology, but also helps students use it responsibly.
Exposure: This refers to how much time students spend using technology.
Gadget Dependence: This means relying too much on electronic devices, making it hard to
focus on anything else.
Intrinsic Motivation: This means being driven to learn because you find it interesting or
enjoyable. Technology can sometimes make us less motivated to learn because it offers more
exciting things to do.
Learning Environments: These are the places where students learn, like classrooms or libraries.
Long-Term Consequences: These are the effects technology can have on students' brains and
learning habits over time.
Psychological Mechanisms: These are the mental processes that contribute to technology
distractions, like impulsiveness or getting easily drawn to new things.
Scholastic Focus: This is another word for academic focus, meaning the concentration needed to
learn in school.
Technology-Induced Distractions: These are things that distract students from their studies
because of technology, like notifications on phones, social media, or games.
Treatments and Techniques: These are strategies and methods to help students manage the
challenges of technology and improve their learning.
Types of Distractions: These are the specific things that distract students, like notifications,
social media, or games.
Workable Solutions: These are practical ways to reduce distractions and help students focus
better in the classroom.
Reference
Feng, S., Wong, Y. K., Wong, L. Y., & Hossain, L. (2019b). The Internet and Facebook Usage
on Academic Distraction of College Students. Computers & Education, 134, 41–49.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.005
Ezemenaka, E. (2013d, December 27). The usage and impact of internet enabled phones on
academic concentration among students of tertiary institutions: A study of University of Ibadan,
Nigeria. Learning & Technology Library (LearnTechLib).
https://www.learntechlib.org/p/130268/
A, Y., Bakarbessy, N. Y., Hasyim, R., & Irjayanti, D. (2024d, February 29). Factors Affecting
Students’ Concentration in Online English Learning.
https://www.ejournal.um-sorong.ac.id/index.php/juliet/article/view/3226
Attia, N. A., Baig, L., Marzouk, Y. I., & Khan, A. (2017b). The potential effect of technology
and distractions on undergraduate students’ concentration. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences,
33(4). https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.334.12560
Le, H. V. (2021b). An Investigation into Factors Affecting Concentration of University Students.
Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(6), 07–12.
https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.6.2
The importance of cognitive load theory | Society for Education and Training. (n.d.-b).
https://set.et-foundation.co.uk/resources/the-importance-of-cognitive-load-
theory#:~:text=Cognitive%20Load%20Theory%20(CLT)%20%2D,learning%20(Sweller%2C
%201988)
Attention Restoration Theory: A systematic review | ECEHH. (2024d, March 25). European
Centre for Environment and Human Health | ECEHH. https://www.ecehh.org/research/attention-
restoration-theory-a-systematic-review/#:~:text=Attention%20Restoration%20Theory%20(ART)
%20(,in%20'directed%20attention%20fatigue'.
3
Oudeyer, P. Y., & Kaplan, F. (2007b). What is intrinsic motivation? A typology of
computational approaches. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 1.
https://doi.org/10.3389/neuro.12.006.2007
Zhao X, Hu T, Qiao G, Li C, Wu M, Yang F, Zhou J. Psychometric Properties of the
Smartphone Distraction Scale in Chinese College Students: Validity, Reliability and Influencing
Factors. Front Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 16;13:859640. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.859640. PMID:
35782432; PMCID: PMC9243416.
An Investigation into Factors Affecting Concentration of University Students. (2021, May 2).
Retrieved from https://www.al-kindipublisher.com/index.php/jeltal/article/view/1783
Ghasemi, M. R. (2018, June). Student-related factors affecting academic engagement: A
qualitative study exploring the experiences of Iranian undergraduate nursing students. Retrieved
from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6092140/