GENDER, Diversity and Inclusion
GENDER, Diversity and Inclusion
Gender mainstreaming
Gender mainstreaming: the process of accessing the implication for women and men for any
planned action including legislation, policy and programs in any areas and at all levels. Before
decisions are made and taken, gender analysis is undertaken to assess the effect of the action on
both men and women.
Gender mainstreaming is a strategy for the achievement of gender equality and equity.
• Gender Mainstreaming includes gender-specific activities and affirmative action,
whenever women or men are in a particularly disadvantageous position.
• Gender-specific interventions can target women exclusively, men and women together, or
only men, to enable them to participate in and benefit equally from development efforts.
• These are necessary temporary measures designed to combat the direct and indirect
consequences of past discrimination
Purpose of gender mainstreaming
• To Reduce gender inequities that may exist in a given project area;
• To Ensure women and men’s specific needs are satisfied, that they benefit from the
project and that the project impacts positively on their lives;
• To Create the conditions for the equitable access of men and women to project resources
and benefits;
• To Create the conditions for the equitable participation in project implementation and
decision making processes.
Levels of gender mainstreaming
• Gender mainstreaming can be done at the following levels:
1. Policy
2. Institutional /organizational
3. Programmes/project
1. Programmatic gender mainstreaming
Based on human rights principles of equality, participation and non- discrimination,
programmatic approaches systematically apply gender analysis methods to health problems to
better understand how gender norms, roles and relations affect the health of women and men
across the life course.
Programmatic gender mainstreaming can do the following:
a) Address how health problems affect women and men of all ages and groups
differently.
b) Focus on women empowerment and women-specific conditions to address historic and
current wrongs women and girls face
c)Examine how gender norms, roles and relations male behaviour and health outcomes
and how these shape the role of men in promoting gender equality
d) Adopt a broad equity approach to look at issues of age, socioeconomic status, ethnic
diversity, autonomy, empowerment, sexuality, etc. that may lead to inequities
e) Provide an evidence base to enable appropriate, effective and efficient health planning,
policy-making and service delivery.
2. Institutional Gender Mainstreaming:
a) This aspect looks at how organisations function: policy development and governance,
agenda-setting, administrative functions and overall system related issues.
b) Institutional gender mainstreaming acknowledges that an institution must be equipped
with mechanisms to create an enabling environment for programmatic approaches to
succeed.
c) It also ensures that organizational procedures and mechanisms do not reinforce patterns
of gender inequality in staffing, functions or governance.
d) Institutional gender mainstreaming seeks structural changes, calling for a transformation
of the public health agenda so as to include the participation of women and men from all
population groups in defining and implementing public health priorities and activities.
Institutional gender mainstreaming addresses the alignment of human and financial resources
and organizational policies, which include:
Recruitment and staff benefit policies, such as:
Establishing work-life balance
Sex parity and gender balance in staff
Equal opportunities for upward mobility
Role of CHA in Gender mainstreaming
1. Recommending appropriate action for gaps in relation to health
2. Sensitising community members on gender mainstreaming issues
3. Identifying and taking appropriate action for common issues in relation to gender
mainstreaming
4. Training CHCs and CHVs on the importance on gender issues in the community
5. Follow up and monitor actions emerging from gender mainstreaming and planning
implementation sessions
Response to GBV
Referral systems
Safety/security measures
Health interventions
Psychosocial support
Legal measures
Human rights
Human Rights they are internationally agreed standards which apply to all human beings.
Everybody is equally entitled to their human rights e.g. right to education, adequate food,
housing and social security, regardless of nationality, place of residence, sex, nationality, ethnic
group, colour, religion, or other status.
Human rights awareness: Educational frameworks that consider non-discrimination, gender
equality, anti-racism, and more help build an understanding and respect for human rights.
Categories of Human rights
There are three categories:
1. Civil and political rights
2. Economic, social, and cultural rights
3. Solidarity rights.
It has been typically understood that individuals and certain groups are bearers of human rights,
while the state is the prime organ that can protect and/or violate human rights.
Indivisibility
Human rights are indivisible. Whether they relate to civil, cultural, economic, political or social
issues, human rights are inherent to the dignity of every human person. Consequently, all human
rights have equal status, and cannot be positioned in a hierarchical order. Denial of one right
invariably impedes enjoyment of other rights. Thus, the right of everyone to an adequate
standard of living cannot be compromised at the expense of other rights, such as the right to
health or the right to education.
Health disparities means the structural health differences that adversely affect groups of people
who systematically experience greater economic, social, or environmental obstacles to health
based on their racial or ethnic group, religion, socioeconomic-status, gender, age, or mental
health; cognitive, sensory, or physical disability, sexual orientation or gender identity;
geographic location; or other characteristics historically linked to discrimination or exclusion.
Health disparities are the metric used to measure progress toward achieving health equity.
Social determinants of equity means systems of power that govern the equitable distribution of
resources and populations through decision making structures, policies, practices, norms and
values. Differential distribution of resources and populations can result in group-based structured
inequity including, but not limited to: racism, sexism, heterosexism, cissexism, classism and
able-ism and the intersections among them.
Social determinants of health means the conditions into which individuals are born and in which
individuals grow, live, work and age, including but not limited to:
a) Housing
b) Education
c) Criminal justice
d) Employment
e) Neighborhood environment
f) Food insecurity
g) Health care access
h) Discrimination and social exclusion
i) Transportation.
“Health equity means ensuring that everyone has the chance to be as healthy as possible.
However, factors outside of a person’s control, such as discrimination and lack of resources,
can prevent them from achieving their best health. Working toward health equity is a way to
correct or challenge these factors. Health equity is the absence of systematic disparities in
health (or its social determinants) between more and less advantaged social groups. Social
advantage means wealth, power, and/or prestige—the attributes defining how people are
grouped in social hierarchies.
Health inequities put disadvantaged groups at further disadvantage with respect to health,
diminishing opportunities to be healthy. Health equity, an ethical concept based on the principle
of distributive justice, is also linked to human rights.”
People use many different terms when it comes to accessing healthcare, including health
disparity, health equality, and health equity.
Disparity is the quantity that separates a group from a reference point on a particular measure of
health that is expressed in terms of a rate, proportion, mean, or some other quantitative measure.
(HP2010)
Health equity is the fair distribution of health determinants, outcomes, and resources within and
between segments of the population, regardless of social standing
Inequity is a difference in the distribution or allocation of a resource between groups (usually
expressed as group specific rates)
Resources relevant to health include:
Health insurance
Education
Flu vaccine
Fresh food
Clean air
Health disparity
Health disparity is a difference that affects a person’s ability to achieve their best health.
Examples of health disparities include race, gender, education, income, disability, geographic
location, and sexual orientation.
Health disparities create health inequities: Due to their differences or situation, some people do
not always have access to the same opportunities to better their health that other people have. A
health disparity is often beyond an individual’s control.
Two concepts refer to how to correct these health disparities: health equality and health equity.
Health equality means everyone has the same opportunities. Examples could include a
community center offering free or low-cost checkups to everyone.
Health equity means that people have opportunities based on their needs. An example could be
the same health center charging people based on their ability to pay. A person who cannot afford
care may receive it for free while another person may pay for the same care.
In short, health equality means everyone receives the same standard, while health equity means
everyone receives individualized care to bring them to the same level of health.
Health equality is not always preferable. For example, if a clinic offers free checkups every
morning, a person who must work during the morning cannot take advantage of this service.
While the clinic offers checkups to everyone on the same terms, some people still cannot take
advantage of the service.
Health equity would involve offering alternative checkup times in the afternoon or evening, so
everyone can access the service at a time that suits them.
Examples of services that promote health equity include:
Providing health seminars and courses that are specific to the needs of certain ethnic
communities and racial groups.
Using mobile health screenings to help those who may not have access to transportation.
Offering evening or late-night health appointments to those who work long hours and are
unable to access care.
To promote health equity, government and community organizations must acknowledge and
attempt to remove barriers to care.
Work with trusted local media (such as local or community newspapers, radio, TV) to share
information from CDC and other reputable public health organizations in formats and languages
suitable for diverse audiences.
Reach out to the local public health department to offer to be a community testing or vaccination
site, provide a platform for information-sharing, and share community insights.
Health promotion strategies to create awareness.
Summary
A basic principle of public health is that all people have a right to health. Differences in the
incidence and prevalence of health conditions and health status between groups are commonly
referred to as health disparities. Most health disparities affect groups marginalized because of
socioeconomic status, race/ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, disability status, geographic
location, or some combination of these. People in such groups not only experience worse health
but also tend to have less access to the social determinants or conditions (e.g., healthy food, good
housing, good education, safe neighborhoods, freedom from racism and other forms of
discrimination) that support health. Health disparities are referred to as health inequities when
they are the result of the systematic and unjust distribution of these critical conditions. Health
equity, then, as understood in public health literature and practice, is when everyone has the
opportunity to “attain their full health potential” and no one is “disadvantaged from achieving
this potential because of their social position or other socially determined circumstance.”
Definitions
Race
A categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally
viewed as distinct within a given society.
Ethnicity
Ethnicity is a grouping of people who identify with each other on the basis of shared attributes
that distinguish them from other groups. Those attributes can include common sets of traditions,
ancestry, language, history, society, culture, nation, religion, or social treatment within their
residing area.
Sexual Orientation
National Origin
National origin is the nation where a person was born, or where that person's ancestors came
from. It also includes the diaspora of multi-ethnic states and societies that have a shared sense of
common identity identical to that of a nation while being made up of several component ethnic
groups.
Tribe
Category of human social group. It’s an aggregate of people united by ties of descent from a
common ancestor, a community of customs and traditions, adherence to the same leaders.
Caste
Thinking Style
Thinking style is an exploration of one’s experiences intentionally done for a purpose dealing
with comprehension, decision making, planning, problem solving, evaluation, action, and so on.
It is an approach as well as tips that are helpful for someone to solve and analyze problems he or
she is facing.
Learning Style
Learning style encompasses a process where an individual keeps information and new skills. It’s
an approach or a way applied in learning. In addition, every individual has their own way of
learning that he prefers the most compared to that of others.
Communication style
Communication style deals with one’s way to communicate with others using language,
behavior, gestures, etc. to make what the speaker is thinking and saying understood by his or her
listeners. One for example uses language with more body gestures while others with less body
gestures. The purpose is to make the speaker accepted by his or her listeners during interaction.
Many references report that communication style is viewed as accumulation of spoken and
illustrative communication elements. The one’s verbal messages is communicated to others in
words including (tone, stress, and intonation) as the main characteristic of communication style.
(1) How one collects and processes information to make decision, and what type of information
one should reserve;
(3) How one faces a certain situation, organizes actions, makes relations, solves problems, and
adapts with different environments and situation.
There are a lot of differences in communication style between males and females;
The differences are due to communication contexts;
There is connotation difference about who speaks more than the others;
Males speak more than female informal groups or in meetings of males and females;
Males always let females to speak more in informal meetings or when formal meetings
have changed to informal ones;
Males and females who have similar expertise, will perform differently when speaking in
front of public(audience), that is males tend to speak more and longer than females,
Males initiate more interaction and create more communication than females do.
Interactive communication and the ability to consider feedback are critical for linking
community Health workers and the community.
It’s of importance that creating a better work environment as well as a training system at the
organizational level that encourages community health workers to learn about health literacy and
to improve their communication skills. This could improve professional/community
relationships, increase the accessibility of health information for the public, and ultimately
improve community health (Yumiya et al., 2020).
Improving health literacy skills helps people to understand and use Feedback mechanisms and
accountability go hand in hand; feedback mechanisms hold organizations to account. Outside of
accountability, there are many benefits associated with feedback mechanisms which
organizations should consider when assessing whether or not to invest in feedback mechanisms.
Helps to make sure your program is meeting people’s needs and rights. People have a
very good idea of what they need if we listen to them, it helps us to make sure that we are
helping to address these needs.
Ensures the most vulnerable are included and benefit from projects. Accountability helps
to ensure that people are not being left out of projects or programs, especially the most
vulnerable. It can also reduce tensions if the community is involved in determining the
selection and entitlement criteria.
Improves an organization’s relationship with communities. Trust and open
communication lead to efficiency and better outcomes.
Increases sustainability through empowerment and ownership. The process of working
and achieving things together can strengthen communities. It builds confidence, skills,
capacity to co-operate, consciousness, and critical appraisal. This gives more power to
tackling their own challenges individually and collectively.
Improves quality of programs. Addressing people’s concerns and feedback can lead to
adapting project activities and resulting in better impact.
Generates learning and best practice. There is increasing donor interest and funding being
directed at accountability to communities, given the desire to bridge the gap between
service providers and end users. Learning from community feedback can strengthen
future project design.
Protect staff from claims of violence. Being transparent through good information
provision and having a good community feedback and response system helps us to be
open to community perspectives and this helps to reduce unfair acquisitions and build
trust.
When illness occurs, some individuals recover quickly while others with similar symptoms
recover slowly or progress to chronic conditions. Perhaps most importantly, some people live
long lives while their peers succumb to death at a younger age. What are the sources of these
variations in individual health outcomes? Personality – a person’s biopsychosocial patterns of
reactions and behaviors – is a useful concept for addressing these issues because it is broad,
relatively stable, and multi-faceted. Personality is partly biologically based, develops in a family
and cultural environment, guides one onto certain life paths, and is evoked by social and
situational forces.
The most obvious causal link between personality and health involves risky behaviors such as
smoking, substance abuse, and unprotected sex; and protective behaviors such as proper
nutrition, weight control, physical activity, sleep, immunizations, safe driving, and regular
physical and dental examinations. The strongest associations are for smoking and tobacco use.
Health behaviors do mediate personality-health links to some extent, but significant variation
remains, indicating that other pathways are also relevant. personality influences the quality and
quantity of social relationships, socially dependent health behaviors, and associated health
outcomes. Conscientious individuals are more likely to have stable careers and marriages, which
in turn enhance their health and their levels of subsequent conscientiousness.
Personality influences the habits we form, the behaviors we engage in, the relationships we
develop, our appraisals and experiences of stressful challenges, the situations we commonly
choose, the reactions we evoke in others, and the lifelong pathways that we follow. Personality
itself is influenced by genetics, early experiences, life changes, maturation, illness, and social
and cultural relationships across time. These various pathways in turn link to health outcomes,
including physical fitness and long life, or decline and premature death.
Life trajectories begin early and are altered by a complex array of influences across the lifespan.
Personality plays an important role in understanding who gets sick and who stays healthy, but
links are neither straightforward nor simple. Multiple pathways are clearly relevant; the need
now is for more vigorous empirical investigation of these multiple causal pathways and
interactive effects. Only by being cognizant of the complex nature of personality’s relations to
health can we distill valid models, and then intervene appropriately.
Over time, exclusion can also contribute to social tensions and even risks of violence and
conflict, with significant long-term social and economic costs.
Inclusive society
An inclusive society is a society that over-rides differences of race, gender, class, generation, and
geography, and ensures inclusion, equality of opportunity as well as capability of all members of
the society to determine an agreed set of social institutions that govern social interaction.
Elements of an inclusive society
The Social Summit defined that the aim of social integration is to create an inclusive society, in
which every individual, each with rights and responsibilities, has an active role to play. But what
makes some societies more inclusive than others? What are the critical elements for creating and
maintaining an inclusive society in practical terms? An inclusive society is based on the
fundamental human rights value, that is, “all human beings are born free and equal in dignity and
rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a
spirit of brotherhood ” It is a society in which all members, regardless of their backgrounds, are
able and motivated to participate in civic, social, economic and political activities. For this to
happen, legal, regulatory and policy frameworks must be inclusive, and uphold and promote just
and inclusive processes in all areas of implementation, so that equal access to basic education,
public space, facilities and information are ensured, and diversity and cultural pluralism are
respected and accommodated. As a pre-requisite, respect for all human rights, freedoms, and the
rule of law, both at national and international levels, are fundamental. Every member of society,
no matter what his or her economic resources, political status, or social standing, must be treated
equally under the law. Legal instruments ensure the guiding principles that will guarantee equity.
Justice and equal opportunities for all citizens. Violators of human rights should be brought to
justice. The judiciary which serves to protect just societies must be impartial, accountable and
inclusive to giving weight to the opinions of those who defend the inclusiveness of the society at
the local, regional and national levels. Maintaining the security of all individuals and their living
environment is paramount in creating a feeling of inclusion and an atmosphere of participation in
society.
To create and sustain inclusive societies, it is critical that all members of society are able and
motivated to participate in civic, social, economic and political activities, both at the local and
national levels. A society where most members, if not all, feel that they are playing a part, have
access to their basic needs/livelihoods, and are provided with the opportunity to participate in
decision-making processes that affect their lives, is a society that will best foster principles of
inclusiveness.
The existence of a strong civil society is fundamental for active participation and making public
policies and institutions accountable. It fosters a respect for the rights, dignity and privileges of
all people, while assuming that they fulfill their responsibilities within their society. There must
be freedom for people to express diverse views and develop unconventional unique ideas.
Members of society must have the confidence to engage and interact with each other, and build
mutual trust while acknowledging their differences.
In order to encourage all-inclusive participation, there must be universal access to public
infrastructure and facilities (such as community centers, recreational facilities, public libraries,
resource centers with internet facilities, well maintained public schools, clinics, water supplies
and sanitations). These are the basic services which will create, when partly or fully put into
place, conditions for people to have a sense of belonging by not suffering the painful
consequence of being unable to afford them. As long as both the advantaged and disadvantaged
have equal access to or benefit from these public facilities and services, they will all feel less
burdened by their differences in socio-economic status, thus alleviating a possible sense of
exclusion or frustration.
It is important to note though, that access alone does not necessarily ensure use of public
facilities, as unequal relations within communities and households may inhibit the use of
facilities by vulnerable groups. Addressing the unequal power relations is therefore a necessary
step to increase participation. Similarly, equal access to public information plays an important
role in creating an inclusive society, as it will make popular participation possible with well-
informed members of society. Information that pertains to the society, such as what a community
owns, generates, or benefits from, should be made available to all. Collective participation,
through accepted representations of all classes and backgrounds, in the planning, implementation
and evaluation of community activities should be sought after. Publication/information sharing
and increasing the accessibility of the community’s activities will eliminate doubts and
suspicions which could otherwise create a sense of exclusion. The mass media can be used as an
effective tool to educate and enlighten members of society.
Equity in the distribution of wealth and resources is another critical element of inclusive
societies. How the resources are allocated and utilized will significantly affect the orientation of
a society, either towards a more integrated, inclusive society, or an exclusive, polarized, and
disintegrated one. Therefore, socio-economic policies should be geared towards managing
equitable distribution and equal opportunities. Inclusive policies, instructions and programs that
are sensitive to and cater to the less advantaged and vulnerable need to be put in place in all
areas/sectors, including public health, and effectively implemented. There is a need for a strong
monitoring and evaluation tools to demonstrate whether inclusiveness was actually achieved, as
well as highlight areas for improvement.
Another dimension of inclusive societies is tolerance for and appreciation of cultural diversity.
This includes societies that celebrate multiple and diverse expressions of identities. By
celebrating diversity, there is a recognition and affirmation of the differences between and
among members of society, which enables societies to move away from labeling, categorizing,
and classifying people, towards more inclusive policies. Also, enabling a diversity of opinions
provides the checks and balances crucial for the development of society, while allowing for the
greatest amount of diverse opinions to enter every discourse.
Education plays a critical role in this area, as it will provide opportunities to learn the history and
culture of one's own and other societies, which will cultivate the understanding and appreciation
of other societies, cultures and religions. Particularly for young people, education provides the
opportunity to instill values of respect and appreciation of diversity. At the same time, education
can empower those who are marginalized or excluded from participating in discussions and
decision-making. Learning about the historical processes and changes allows people to
understand the way in which they and others have been affected by socially inclusive or
exclusive policies, which ultimately influences the values, choices and judgments of individuals,
in particular, those who are in decision-making positions.
Effective leadership is crucial to the development of an inclusive society. Where leadership is
not representative of the society, a disconnection between the people and their leaders may
eventually result. The most common way of addressing this critical element at the local level is
by engaging in open consultations with members of society about municipal issues such as the
budget, and enhancing the free and timely flow of information to citizens and other stakeholders.
Popular participation in decision-making and policy formulation processes could be sought for at
all levels of governance. At the same time, there must be an effort made to achieve transparency
and accountability by all decision-makers and stakeholders.
Finally, there is a need to create positive narratives of an inclusive society of the future, and
enable each member of society to share, understand and contribute to those narratives. Potent
narratives on the future can act like a magnet drawing society towards its envisioned future. A
society with no vision for the future indicates a society in decline. Societies that maintain a unity
of purpose, or a shared vision embraced by the community, and encourage broad-based
stakeholder participation in the formulation of that goal, will be more inclusive as every member
will be working synergistically towards a unified objective.
Disability
Disability: a physical, sensory, mental, or other impairment including visual, hearing or
physical disability which has a substantial long term adverse effect on a person’s ability to carry
out usual day to day activities. Any restriction or lack (resulting from impairment) ability to
perform an activity in a manner or range considered normal for human beings.
Impairment: any loss or abnormality of a psychological or anatomical structure or function
Handicap: is a disadvantage for a given individual resulting from an impairment or a disability
that prevents the fulfilment of a role for the individual
Activity Limitation: An activity limitation is a difficulty encountered by an individual in
executing a task or action.
Disability discrimination is the act of treating someone with a disability less favorably than
someone without a disability.
Rehabilitation: is a process that assists people with disabilities to develop or strengthen their
physical, mental and social skills to meet their individual/collective specific skills. It involves
provision of therapy in various settings like institutions or in the community.
Historical background
Historically disability was largely understood in mythological or religious terms:-
People with disabilities were considered to be possessed by devils or spirits
It was often seen as a punishment for past wrongdoing.
Development of science and medicine in 19 th and 20th centuries has help to create an
understanding that disability has biological or medical basis
Most common causes of disability include: chronic diseases, injuries, mental health problems,
birth defects, malnutrition, HIV/AIDS and other communicable diseases
Disability domains
They include mental, physical, emotional, behavioural disturbances, speech, sensory, seizure
disorder, congenital disorders and multiple disabilities.
Special interest disability groups: autism, epilepsy, Down’s syndrome, albinism, cerebral palsy,
impairment and congenital disabilities, deaf and dumbness, attention deficit disorder.
Principles of disability mainstreaming
It is a proactive process
It is a process that ensures joint responsibility among stakeholders based on interventions
and services
It promotes disability prevention strategies , rehabilitation treatment concepts and safe
programs designed to control injury and disability
Roles of CHAs in disability mainstreaming
Advocate for improved accessibility and inclusion of people with disabilities by making
contact with health facilities, schools and workplaces
Providing information about services available within the community and linking people
with disabilities and their families with these services via referral and follow up
Provide technical assistance, resources and training for CHVs and community resource
persons
Supporting the development of referral networks between stakeholders
Supporting community based rehabilitation programmes to build the capacity of
stakeholders and mainstreaming disability into existing programmes and services
Supporting the evaluation, research and development of community based rehabilitation
representing the interests of people with disabilities
Identifying people with disabilities, carrying out basic assessment of their function and
supporting them to form self-help groups
Raising awareness in the community about disability to encourage the inclusion of
disabled people in the community
CBR Matrix
In light of the evolution of CBR into a broader multisectoral development strategy a matrix was
developed in 2004 to provide a common framework for CBR programmes.
The matrix consists of five key components – the health, education, livelihood, social and
empowerment.
Matrix has been designed to allow programmes to select options which best meet their local
needs, priorities and resources.
Principles of CBR
Inclusion – It is the act or practice which ensures including people with disabilities in
community life. It also means placing disability issues and people with disabilities in the
mainstream of activities, rather than as an afterthought.
Inclusion also means ‘convergence’ – that is, the involvement of people with disabilities in the
campaigns, struggles and activities of other oppressed groups which are not centered exclusively
on disability issues.
Participation – Means the involvement of disabled people as active contributors to the CBR
programmes from policy – making to implementation and evaluation for the simple reason that
they know best what they need.
Participation also means people with disability being a critical resource within CBR programme
– providing training, making decision.
Sustainability – The benefits of the programme must be lasting. This means an approach to
poverty alleviation where the socio-economic gains last beyond the short –term and benefit not
just the present but future generations.
The CBR activity must be sustainable beyond the immediate life of the programme itself – able
to continue beyond the initial intervention and thrive independently of the initiating agency.
Empowerment – Means that local people – and specifically people with disabilities and their
families make the programme decisions and control the resources. It means PWDs taking
leadership roles within programmes. It means ensuring that CBR workers, service providers and
facilitators are people with disabilities and all are adequately trained and supported.
It necessitates capacity building – that is the developing and using of the skills necessary to act
with authority and responsibility, independent of the initiating agencies and CBR programme.
Self –Advocacy – Means the central and consistent involvement of people with disabilities
defining for themselves the goals and processes for poverty alleviation.
Self- advocacy is collective notion not an individualistic one. It means self-determination. It
means mobilizing, organizing, representing, creating space for interaction and demands.
Person–with-Disabilities Act
An Act of parliament to provide for the rights and rehabilitation of persons with disabilities; to
achieve equalization of opportunities for persons with disabilities; to establish the National
Council for persons with disabilities; and for connected purposes (Act No .14 of 2003.)
The tutor to take the learners through the disability act.
References/Further Readings
1. Chang W-C. The meaning and goals of equity in health. J Epidemiol Community Health
2002;56:488–91.
2. Baker E, Metzler M, Galea S. Addressing social determinants of health inequities:
learning from doing. American Journal of Public Health 2005;95(4):553–555.
3. Baker, I. (1994). The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy. London: Zed books
4. Government of Kenya (2010) Constitution of Kenya 2010. Nairobi: Government of
Kenya
5. Elson, D., (1993) Gender Aware Analysis and Development Economics. Journal of
International Development, Policy and planning, 5(2) 237-247
6. GoK (2011) Gender Mainstreaming Guidelines: Working Towards Gender Equality
through Gender Responsive National Planning
7. Moser, C. (1993) Gender Planning and Development: Theory Practice and Training.
Routledge, London