0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views9 pages

Econometricsass

The document discusses the differences between multiple linear regression and binary logistic regression, highlighting the structure of dependent and independent variables in each model. It outlines the assumptions necessary for multiple linear regression, such as randomness of error and normality, and explains how to test for significance in regression coefficients. Additionally, it contrasts the logistic regression model's handling of binary dependent variables with linear regression's treatment of continuous dependent variables.

Uploaded by

Wiz Nati Xv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views9 pages

Econometricsass

The document discusses the differences between multiple linear regression and binary logistic regression, highlighting the structure of dependent and independent variables in each model. It outlines the assumptions necessary for multiple linear regression, such as randomness of error and normality, and explains how to test for significance in regression coefficients. Additionally, it contrasts the logistic regression model's handling of binary dependent variables with linear regression's treatment of continuous dependent variables.

Uploaded by

Wiz Nati Xv
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9
ty) Differe bIN SimPle ling vesyvecii MUUiPle Viney YeSve S50 tics => Sj, - ‘ Sate mes YeSvessidn comprises ane A ane de hendent Vaviaisle, Where as, Mur Pe Yea Sra ssion cambrised twa ay Mave inde PeEAdeAt Vari and ane derendent Vayiabla. a Caz AssumPHAAS of muliPia bincay Re Sve mubizeriacerit7 * meant tharIhe Wderendear Variables ave ye lated te ach athey- Tm fertect mv piaotinearity |2ads dot > Spandaya revs ad cantidence intervals tend tooe widey, So often We connat Yesect the He ofthe 4-4es+ > The ®- S4uaved Valve is very high, aver Tftka Ye Sv2 sSion Loethiaiente are Sted iA Cally insignitieam 16, 9) wortte wo advantage of MUHIPE lacey, Resveccion Dvey gimelé linear Regyassion Mod cue? > The fir the abisity Jo deeming the relative | | lnfive nce Gane GY MOE Predictoy Variable $ fo the cyte yion Valve. ‘ a >The Saad 16 the awility 40 1d eaKey Odi 4 oY andmeli 2s: A ; See Wel te \ Bemus 5) b) The ex i Estimated Simple yes ssi Ving (4) ayy ALEXA Bae and tke Sloe cette B= TiO) (vid) = (98 pacts Ca Bao = 2S =P “ag OY) da the intay ce Pr 4, we vse %= 6S- (5:28) = pig WiAneay 1a aS Oa | fant B, we y6a the Formulry, ) (s5- 69 402-G6 Ot gs yen eG ane Forvie) a3 98y eya fA evessjon line 1s | ghee So, the egrimore. —pyi= ates 7a Covavian Ze. cavls,7)* FT iO -¥) = (<. (63-63) lief) G68 mara 2-1 a sim oto (88) (648) => Zovl%7) = |= 1418/7 MW A) Zorrelatian cov (41) CORRLYYT) = re ee —+ NARGO= Y Cia ee x) - — ana VARLY)= tO | > VAR) = (aera es) te 4 (8-9) Y2-1 => VAR 6d = Ha = 4367 Vt Lae var OY) = (69-6 NF Gb639 A + (646\ —>WAR 8S pag Ge ot alea7 Core (x,7) = 128 (ag) (62D) >) ee oat] @) Zoahcvieding R™ Rr (Zeke Gy) = (0:98) EO Sb More Cow FFiaeAT. 46 AP OVE yfavn F) Te Ging Ane Significance at the esi To tag if the egimated Co eHticie™ Signincany aitferem From 0, We Zan Pe To jest. ster tL: galcviatin eThe +t; sadist soy & is caleviared as ta= io athe t - ca Stic for? 1s Zalcviaded a4! Ge ORB ove calcu ge 3378 and > To Calcuiaie +7 xa SHS; Aye Standard @ Vv of the Wwereear find the yaria Vay- cov7 6 Cx Seats. am Pin Oe one rf bE AHI SHE lated IA the FrAViOUS cal ‘ cul mace OHOnG we herd +0 CAlaiore conryicieMt $+ Foy Ady NCR SvoN eh mary 5 0 Find dy We FiYS4 Need Iv Calculate the cum OF suave s atthe ery (SSE) » ee y= Tl (as es) 55 EG > (0.94 5 24g Cert 20) 7 eect (4 = (og +20(8))) SSO = Rbty wba = Hsy pee ce > 6 oa nr i © Now, WE Can Zalculade the variance Covariance MorWxX eb -4 NVer-Gev= HS] A” Tz se Cogs” Nn eae 12 (48) -or9t Zork Fram the Variance GOVaviance mortvix, We CaN EAA Bieicinacya 7s of he DOCS CEMA, TEER re, pes ea) a 0:08% 1 = 1-88 VY, SE (8) = \)2026X ae = 24 n CAlolote dice 4 -—Stodi Are ¢ Ea NaY- 2oV = AS ie e es Frnaily, we Be SBA = 19-07 a sed) ~ 168s a Las ioe zaveolly, rae Bap) 23.5 SHEP 2: To Avrermine Hf the Coa HHacMs oe Gradshati Bigndl cans, we need +0 Comfave the + -Sodi Gigs ro he i cyitizal {-vawe pd tag desired Significance |eVE laa fs ——— = degrees of f idem. > fareu- ——e ot a Significance level and 2 desreccoffrerdom (MEA END BH = 4) Ahe evitical + Value 7¢ aftroximalay 2162 Stes S Since dhe Caicuiated + = goth sta O48 andor) o The firct Coeticiens Win oA - Gedictic of 1A-BF Greater) Jhon the Crviticol Value, So 14 16 SA OF ical) Signifizar « o The <2 cand Loe Flier with a4 - resrGic of ott eG (0 oS oe hon tne Critical Value, S° o Cohdu cing or F- +e to 46% jhe Signiicane OF Ake Whole Mod El. FA farravm the F-yect, WE IVA NEG oa gaa the Sum ak ssuaves of the ye gre ssion (662) aNdthe mean SThe P-vawe nebo Gasca With Wie Ff -Sfoai aie Tf 6:000!9, Wwhtenid ess than she tyeiZal significance 14vel of or. theve-fore, the model i$ Godtf Giga Signinizant Ves On Bo 513, Whi A meen. that 80S1% don FAKE [A come of tour Suides 16 explained THiS IAdiZedes & cavang Fit OF the modal +e 5) The RY val 0 Fhe varie bythe model the date ¥) the coacticien 0" liner ce py) yerrecemt the exPedied \awe Bey production when oll independent Variables oe Zero The Lo tqHrcnenrs ey FNCAVC, FA lols) Taferd, ard at the peverMtofe chanfe iATA Production jake yesre Ae jndepende mt pVariable ¢ ove held Zagat. (QQ: S Loammanly vse binary derendent VAriawle med HlegiGnd yesre ion ce Pyobi+ YE FrehGON ONA - Fhe lingay Probabi ity Mode) (pm) Se ee es Oe am R | or . 2 QO Difference bin linear # logi she vesreccon > Th oe y sey fe Me ere ae berwean Vin cov re Pression A Jositgie ye Sve esion Wes Inthe tyPe of defended Variable they Zan handle, linzor resve-stion 16 used When the dependent Variable Fe cangnous, While the rosie ye sre ssion 1S Ysed Wheathe acrenden Veriavle 16 inary it faves 0% only twe valued Sychas oandd) Cul) AS ineay Probaviiity mode (LEA) ae y. Sogregiaal Medel hot Al She rélodioasniP dent and acpendent yvarviablel between the 1A deren 16 lingo 4 7) Limitarans af the near Probability Node) (Lem) incldes Boe par Produce Predied Pro babilitic! outside The Copy verse: © T+ Aces nat aecoum Fev hetero ceed acHeity, whidk Con ead +o jaerfrcien poyametcy Ei modes © 4 Aoel nay addye s¢ she 166ue OF Non =Conttant Vayianct 2 T+ moy violate the & Keumpaion OF Normally distyibutel ayvrt WB) Difference iA losit aPowit Meee @The main ditfarcae beeen lesit and Pryovit Modes FSthe link funchan VSed ~ Josi4 UGadthe Josrane dein butian, Uohile Probit Wes tae Aoyntal distibutin. 6 forthe variable 6a 5 Flaws, © fav \mawied”. The odd! yativ 16 070936 466, whi} Te ah hot violas Zanstan, we oat ment movies Tadivet val’ Ove OF 076 ee ne foe ate inci vidvals: Thi en a) went movies a scoaated with lowe? OIde emeioyment

You might also like