1.Grounded Theory vs.

Interpretative Phenomenology

• Grounded Theory: A qualitative research method aimed at generating a theory grounded in data
systematically gathered and analyzed. It focuses on developing theories that explain social
processes.

• Example: A researcher studying how patients cope with chronic illness might collect
interviews and develop a theory about the coping mechanisms used by different
individuals.

• Interpretative Phenomenology: A qualitative approach that seeks to understand how individuals

make sense of their experiences. It emphasizes the subjective interpretation of experiences.

• Example: A study exploring the lived experiences of first-time mothers would analyze
how they interpret and make sense of motherhood.

2. Independent vs. Dependent Variables

 • Independent Variable: The variable that is manipulated or controlled in an experiment to test its
effects on the dependent variable.

• Example: In a study examining the effect of study time on exam scores, the amount of
study time is the independent variable.

• Dependent Variable: The variable that is measured in an experiment. It is affected by changes in

the independent variable.

• Example: In the same study, the exam scores are the dependent variable, as they
depend on the amount of study time.

3. Theoretical Framework for Research

A theoretical framework is a structure that supports a theory in a research study. It provides a lens
through which to analyze and interpret data, guiding the research design and methodology.

• Example: In a study on educational outcomes, a theoretical framework might include theories of

motivation and learning styles to explain the relationship between teaching methods and
student performance.

4. Al'A's Code of Ethics on Deception

The American Psychological Association (APA) Code of Ethics states that deception can only be used
when it is justified by the study's significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and
when alternative procedures are not feasible. Participants must be debriefed afterward.

• Example: If a study on social behavior requires participants to believe they are interacting with
another person when they are actually interacting with a computer, this may be permissible if it
is essential for the research.

5. Directional vs. Non-Directional Hypotheses

• Directional Hypothesis: A hypothesis that specifies the expected direction of the relationship
between variables.

• Example: "Increasing study time will lead to higher exam scores."

• Non-Directional Hypothesis: A hypothesis that predicts a relationship but does not specify the
direction.

• Example: "There will be a relationship between study time and exam scores."

Long

1. Non-Probability Sampling Techniques

Non-probability sampling techniques are methods of selecting samples from a population where not all
individuals have a chance of being selected. These techniques are often used in qualitative research,
exploratory research, or when probability sampling is impractical. Here are the main types of non-
probability sampling techniques:
Types of Non-Probability Sampling

• Convenience Sampling: This involves selecting individuals who are easiest to reach. It is often
used when time and resources are limited.

• Example: A researcher studying student attitudes toward campus facilities might survey
students who are available in the cafeteria during lunch hours.

• Judgmental or Purposive Sampling: In this method, the researcher selects participants based on
specific characteristics or criteria relevant to the study.

• Example: If a researcher is studying the experiences of elderly patients in a healthcare

setting, they might purposefully select participants who are over 65 and have recently
undergone surgery.

• Snowball Sampling: This technique is often used in studies involving hard-to-reach populations.
Existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances.

• Example: In a study of homeless individuals, a researcher might interview one person

who then refers others they know who are also experiencing homelessness.

• Quota Sampling: This method involves dividing the population into subgroups and then selecting
a predetermined number of participants from each subgroup.

• Example: A market researcher might want to ensure that 50% of their sample consists of
women and 50% consists of men, so they would continue sampling until these quotas
are met.

Advantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages:

• Cost-effective and time-efficient.

• Useful for exploratory research where the goal is to gather preliminary insights.

• Allows for the study of specific subgroups.

• Disadvantages:

• Higher risk of bias due to non-random selection.

• Results may not be generalizable to the entire population.

• Limited ability to draw causal conclusions.

2. Experimental Method of Research

The experimental method of research is a systematic and scientific approach to investigating causal
relationships between variables. It involves manipulating one variable (the independent variable) to
observe the effect on another variable (the dependent variable). This method is primarily used in
quantitative research.
Key Components of Experimental Research

• Control Group and Experimental Group: In a typical experiment, participants are divided into at
least two groups. The experimental group receives the treatment or manipulation, while the
control group does not.

• Example: In a study testing a new medication, one group of participants receives the
medication (experimental group), while another group receives a placebo (control
group).

• Random Assignment: Participants are randomly assigned to groups to minimize bias and ensure
that any differences observed are due to the manipulation of the independent variable.

• Example: In a classroom study, students might be randomly assigned to receive different

teaching methods to evaluate their effectiveness.

• Manipulation of Variables: The researcher intentionally changes the independent variable to

observe its effect on the dependent variable.

• Example: A researcher might manipulate the amount of study time (independent

variable) to see how it affects test scores (dependent variable).

Advantages and Disadvantages

• Advantages:

• Allows for the establishment of cause-and-effect relationships.

• High level of control over extraneous variables.

• Results can be replicated and generalized to larger populations.

• Disadvantages:

• Ethical concerns may arise in manipulating certain variables (e.g., withholding

treatment).

• Artificial settings may limit the ecological validity of the findings.

• Not all variables can be manipulated (e.g., age, gender).

3. Limitations of Scientific Research

Scientific research is a powerful tool for understanding the world, but it has several limitations that
researchers must consider:

Limitations

• Bias and Subjectivity: Despite efforts to maintain objectivity, researchers' biases can influence
study design, data collection, and interpretation of results.

• Example: A researcher with a strong belief in a particular treatment may unconsciously

favor data that supports their hypothesis.
 • Generalizability: Findings from a specific sample may not be applicable to the broader
population. Non-probability sampling methods can exacerbate this issue.

• Example: A study conducted on a small group of college students may not reflect the
experiences of older adults or individuals from different cultural backgrounds.

• Complexity of Human Behavior: Human behavior is influenced by numerous factors, making it

difficult to isolate variables and establish clear cause-and-effect relationships.

• Example: In psychological research, multiple factors (such as genetics, environment, and

personal experiences) can influence behavior, complicating the analysis.

• Ethical Constraints: Ethical considerations can limit the scope of research, particularly in
experiments involving human subjects. Researchers must balance the pursuit of knowledge with
the welfare of participants.

• Example: Researchers cannot ethically manipulate harmful situations to study their

effects, limiting the ability to explore certain questions.

• Temporal Limitations: Research findings may become outdated as new information emerges or
as societal norms and conditions change.

• Example: A study on social media use from five years ago may not accurately reflect
current behaviors or attitudes.

In summary, while scientific research is a valuable method for gaining knowledge, it is essential to
recognize its limitations to interpret findings critically and responsibly.
i. Basic vs. Applied Research

• Basic Research: This type of research aims to enhance understanding of fundamental principles
and theories without immediate practical application. It focuses on generating new knowledge.

• Example: A study investigating the properties of a new material at the molecular level.

• Applied Research: This research seeks to solve specific, practical problems using the knowledge
gained from basic research. It often has immediate real-world applications.

• Example: Research developing a new drug to treat a specific disease based on findings
from basic research.

ii. Different Online Literature Search Websites

• Google Scholar: A freely accessible web search engine that indexes scholarly articles, theses,
books, and conference papers.

• PubMed: A database of references and abstracts on life sciences and biomedical topics,
maintained by the National Institutes of Health.

• JSTOR: A digital library for academic journals, books, and primary sources across various
disciplines.
 • Scopus: A comprehensive abstract and citation database of peer-reviewed literature, covering
scientific, technical, and medical fields.

• Web of Science: A multidisciplinary citation database that provides access to research articles
and conference proceedings.

iii. Snowball Sampling

Snowball sampling is a non-probability sampling technique used in qualitative research where existing
study subjects recruit future subjects from among their acquaintances. This method is particularly useful
for accessing hard-to-reach populations.

• Example: A researcher studying the experiences of refugees might interview one refugee, who
then refers others they know, creating a "snowball" effect for participant recruitment.

iv. Professional Review vs. Literature Review

• Professional Review: This type of review evaluates the work of professionals in a specific field,
often focusing on practical applications and implications. It may include peer reviews of articles
or presentations.

• Example: A panel reviewing a medical professional's case study for publication in a

medical journal.

• Literature Review: A systematic examination of existing research on a particular topic,

summarizing and synthesizing findings to identify gaps in knowledge and inform future research.

• Example: A literature review on the effectiveness of different teaching methods in higher

education.

v. Characteristics of a Good Hypothesis

• Testable: It can be tested through experiments or observations.

• Falsifiable: It can be proven false if evidence contradicts it.

• Specific: It clearly defines the variables and the expected relationship between them.

• Consistent with Existing Knowledge: It should align with established theories and findings.

• Simple: It should be straightforward and not overly complex.

vi. Qualitative Research vs. Quantitative Research

• Qualitative Research: This approach focuses on understanding human behavior, experiences,

and social phenomena through non-numerical data. It often involves interviews, focus groups,
and observations.

• Example: A study exploring patients' feelings about their healthcare experience through
in-depth interviews.

• Quantitative Research: This approach involves the collection and analysis of numerical data to
identify patterns, relationships, or causal effects. It often uses statistical methods.
 • Example: A survey measuring the impact of exercise on mental health by analyzing
participants' survey responses quantitatively.

Long

i. Probability Sampling Methods

Probability sampling methods are techniques that ensure every individual in a population has a known,
non-zero chance of being selected for the sample. This allows for the generalization of results to the
larger population. The main types of probability sampling methods include:

1. Simple Random Sampling: Every member of the population has an equal chance of being
selected. This can be achieved through random number generators or drawing lots.

• Example: A researcher wants to survey 100 students from a university with 1,000
students. They assign each student a number and use a random number generator to
select 100 numbers.

2. Systematic Sampling: Researchers select every nth individual from a list of the population. The
starting point is usually chosen randomly.

• Example: If a researcher wants to survey every 10th person in a list of 500 individuals,
they might randomly choose a starting point between 1 and 10 and then select every
10th person from that point onward.

3. Stratified Sampling: The population is divided into subgroups (strata) based on specific
characteristics (e.g., age, gender), and samples are drawn from each stratum proportionately or
equally.

• Example: In a study examining student satisfaction, a researcher might stratify the

sample by year (freshman, sophomore, etc.) and ensure that each year is represented
according to its proportion in the overall student body.

4. Cluster Sampling: The population is divided into clusters (often geographically), and entire
clusters are randomly selected to be included in the sample.

• Example: A researcher studying health behaviors might randomly select several schools
(clusters) from a district and survey all students within those selected schools.

ii. Steps in Research

The research process generally follows a systematic series of steps, which can vary slightly depending on
the field of study, but typically includes the following:

1. Identifying the Research Problem: The first step involves recognizing a gap in knowledge or a
specific question that needs to be answered.

• Example: A researcher may notice a lack of studies on the impact of remote learning on
high school students' mental health.
 2. Reviewing the Literature: Conducting a thorough review of existing research to understand what
has already been studied and to refine the research question.

• Example: The researcher reviews articles, books, and studies related to remote learning
and mental health to identify gaps and formulate hypotheses.

3. Formulating Hypotheses or Research Questions: Based on the literature review, researchers

develop specific hypotheses or questions that guide their study.

• Example: The researcher hypothesizes that remote learning negatively impacts high
school students' mental health.

4. Choosing the Research Design: Selecting an appropriate research design (qualitative,

quantitative, or mixed methods) and methodology (e.g., surveys, experiments) to address the
research question.

• Example: The researcher decides to conduct a quantitative survey among high school
students to assess their mental health during remote learning.

5. Collecting Data: Gathering data using the chosen methods, ensuring to follow ethical guidelines
and protocols.

• Example: The researcher distributes an online survey to students, collecting responses

on their mental health status and experiences with remote learning.

6. Analyzing Data: Analyzing the collected data using statistical methods or qualitative analysis
techniques to draw conclusions.

• Example: The researcher uses statistical software to analyze survey responses and
identify patterns or correlations.

7. Interpreting Results: Drawing conclusions based on the data analysis and relating them back to
the original research question or hypothesis.

• Example: The researcher finds that students report higher levels of anxiety during
remote learning compared to traditional classroom settings.

8. Reporting Findings: Writing up the research findings in a structured format, often including an
introduction, methodology, results, and discussion sections.

• Example: The researcher prepares a manuscript for publication in an education journal,

detailing their findings and implications.

9. Reflecting on the Research Process: Evaluating the research process, considering limitations,
and suggesting areas for future research.

• Example: The researcher notes potential biases in self-reported data and recommends
further studies with larger, more diverse samples.

iii. Basic Guidelines for Experiments

Conducting experiments requires careful planning and adherence to certain guidelines to ensure valid
and reliable results. Here are some basic guidelines:

1. Define the Research Question: Clearly articulate the hypothesis or research question you aim to
address through the experiment.

• Example: "Does increasing study time improve exam scores among high school
students?"

2. Select Appropriate Variables:

• Independent Variable: The variable that is manipulated (e.g., amount of study time).

• Dependent Variable: The variable that is measured (e.g., exam scores).

3. Random Assignment: Randomly assign participants to different groups (e.g., control and
experimental groups) to minimize bias and ensure that each group is similar at the start of the
experiment.

• Example: Randomly assign students to either a group that studies for 1 hour or a group
that studies for 3 hours.

4. Control Extraneous Variables: Identify and control for any extraneous variables that could
influence the results, ensuring that any changes in the dependent variable are due to the
manipulation of the independent variable.

• Example: Ensure that all participants take the exam under similar conditions (same time
of day, same environment).

5. Use a Sufficient Sample Size: Ensure that the sample size is large enough to detect significant
effects and to enhance the generalizability of the findings.

• Example: Aim for at least 30 participants in each group to achieve statistical power.

6. Implement a Control Group: Include a control group that does not receive the experimental
treatment to provide a baseline for comparison.

• Example: The control group studies for no additional time, while the experimental group
studies for the specified duration.

7. Conduct Ethical Considerations: Ensure that the experiment adheres to ethical guidelines,
including informed consent, confidentiality, and the right to withdraw.

• Example: Obtain consent from participants and inform them of their right to leave the
study at any time without penalty.

8. Analyze Data Appropriately: Use appropriate statistical methods to analyze the data collected,
ensuring accurate interpretation of results.

• Example: Use t-tests to compare the exam scores between the two groups.
 9. Report Results Transparently: Present the findings clearly, including data analysis, limitations,
and implications, ensuring transparency in the research process.

• Example: Publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal, detailing methodologies and

results for scrutiny by the scientific community.

By adhering to these guidelines, researchers can enhance the validity and reliability of their experimental
studies.

1. Limitations of the Use of Scientific Method in Psychology

• Complexity of Human Behavior: Human behavior is influenced by numerous variables, making it

difficult to isolate and study specific factors.

• Example: Emotions, social contexts, and individual differences can all affect behavior in
ways that are hard to quantify.
 • Ethical Constraints: Certain experiments may be unethical, limiting the ability to conduct
research that could provide valuable insights.

• Example: It would be unethical to manipulate participants' mental health conditions for

experimental purposes.

• Subjectivity: Psychological constructs (like happiness or intelligence) can be subjective and

difficult to measure accurately.

• Example: Different people may define and experience happiness in various ways,
complicating measurement.

2. How Hypotheses Are Framed and Types of Hypotheses

• Framing Hypotheses: Hypotheses are framed based on existing theories, literature reviews, and
observations. They should be clear, testable statements predicting the relationship between
variables.

• Example: After reviewing literature on sleep and cognition, a researcher might

hypothesize that "Increased sleep duration improves cognitive performance in adults."

• Types of Hypotheses:

• Null Hypothesis (H0): States that there is no effect or relationship between variables.

• Example: "There is no difference in test scores between students who study with
music and those who study in silence."

• Alternative Hypothesis (H1): Indicates that there is an effect or relationship.

• Example: "Students who study with music will have higher test scores than those
who study in silence."

3. Basic vs. Applied Research

• Basic Research: Aims to enhance understanding of fundamental principles without immediate

practical application.

• Example: A study exploring the neural mechanisms of memory formation.

• Applied Research: Seeks to solve specific, practical problems using the knowledge gained from
basic research.

• Example: Research developing interventions to improve memory in patients with

Alzheimer’s disease.

4. Scientific Research and Steps of Psychological Research Process

• Definition: Scientific research is a systematic investigation aimed at discovering, interpreting, or

revising facts, theories, or applications in a structured manner.

• Steps of Psychological Research Process:

 i. Identify the Research Problem: Determine a specific question or issue to investigate.

ii. Review the Literature: Examine existing research related to the problem.

iii. Formulate Hypotheses: Develop testable predictions based on the literature.

iv. Choose Research Design: Select appropriate methods for data collection (e.g.,
experiments, surveys).

v. Collect Data: Gather information through the chosen methods.

vi. Analyze Data: Use statistical methods to interpret the results.

vii. Report Findings: Present the research in a structured format, discussing implications and
limitations.

5. Validity and Types of Validity

• Definition: Validity refers to the extent to which a test or measurement accurately reflects what
it is intended to measure.

• Types of Validity:

• Content Validity: Ensures the measurement covers the entire construct being studied.

• Example: A math test that includes questions from all relevant topics (e.g.,
algebra, geometry) has good content validity.

• Construct Validity: Assesses whether a test truly measures the theoretical construct it
claims to measure.

• Example: A test measuring intelligence should correlate with other established

measures of intelligence.

• Criterion-related Validity: Evaluates how well one measure predicts an outcome based
on another measure.

• Example: A college entrance exam's scores should correlate with students'

future academic performance.

6. Definitions of Terms

• Informed Consent: The process of providing potential research participants with comprehensive
information about the study, including its purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits, allowing
them to make an informed decision about their participation.

• Example: A researcher explains the study's goals and potential risks to participants
before they agree to participate.

• Deception: The practice of misleading participants about certain aspects of a study, typically to
prevent bias or to maintain the integrity of the research.
 • Example: A study on social interactions may involve deception if participants are told
they are part of a study on communication when it is actually about group dynamics.

• Debriefing: The process of informing participants about the true nature of the study after their
participation, especially if deception was involved. It also provides an opportunity to address any
questions or concerns.

• Example: After a study, participants are informed about the purpose of the deception
and are given resources for any psychological distress caused by the study.

Long

1. Major Types of Research Design in Psychological Research

Psychological research employs various research designs to address different types of questions. The
major types include:

a. Descriptive Research Design

• Definition: This design aims to provide a detailed account of a phenomenon or behavior without
manipulating variables. It focuses on "what" is happening rather than "why."

• Example: A researcher conducts a survey to assess the prevalence of anxiety among college
students. They gather data on students' self-reported anxiety levels and demographic
information.

b. Correlational Research Design

• Definition: This design examines the relationship between two or more variables to determine if
they are associated. It does not imply causation.

• Example: A study investigates the correlation between sleep quality and academic performance
among high school students, finding that better sleep is associated with higher grades.

c. Experimental Research Design

• Definition: This design involves manipulating one or more independent variables to observe the
effect on a dependent variable, allowing for causal inferences.

• Example: A researcher conducts an experiment to test the effect of different study methods on
test scores. Participants are randomly assigned to either a group using flashcards or a group
using summarization techniques, and their test scores are compared.

d. Longitudinal Research Design

• Definition: This design involves studying the same group of individuals over an extended period
to observe changes and developments.

• Example: A researcher follows a cohort of children from age 5 to age 15 to study the long-term
effects of early childhood education on academic achievement.
e. Cross-Sectional Research Design

• Definition: This design involves collecting data from different individuals at a single point in time
to compare different groups.

• Example: A researcher surveys adults of various ages to compare their attitudes toward
technology use, analyzing differences across age groups.

2. Sample Selection

Sample selection refers to the process of choosing a subset of individuals from a larger population for
the purpose of conducting research. The quality of the sample affects the generalizability of the research
findings.

Probability Sampling Methods

Probability sampling methods ensure that every individual in the population has a known chance of
being selected. This allows for more representative samples and facilitates generalization to the larger
population.

1. Simple Random Sampling: Every member of the population has an equal chance of being
selected.

• Example: A researcher uses a random number generator to select participants from a list
of all students in a university.

2. Systematic Sampling: Researchers select every nth individual from a list of the population.

• Example: A researcher wants to survey every 5th student on a list of 200 students.

3. Stratified Sampling: The population is divided into subgroups (strata) based on certain
characteristics, and samples are drawn from each stratum.

• Example: A researcher studying job satisfaction might stratify the sample by job type
(e.g., full-time, part-time) and ensure proportional representation from each group.

4. Cluster Sampling: The population is divided into clusters (often geographically), and entire
clusters are randomly selected.

• Example: A researcher studying educational outcomes might randomly select several

schools (clusters) and survey all students within those schools.

Non-Probability Sampling Methods

Non-probability sampling methods do not give every individual a known chance of being selected, which
can introduce bias but may be more practical in certain situations.

1. Convenience Sampling: Participants are selected based on their availability and willingness to
participate.

• Example: A researcher surveys students in a classroom because they are easily

accessible.
 2. Judgmental Sampling: The researcher selects participants based on their judgment about who
would be most informative.

• Example: A researcher studying expert opinions on mental health might selectively

sample psychologists known for their work in that area.

3. Snowball Sampling: Existing study subjects recruit future subjects from among their
acquaintances, useful for hard-to-reach populations.

• Example: A researcher studying drug addiction might ask participants to refer others
they know who are also struggling with addiction.

4. Quota Sampling: The researcher ensures equal representation of specific characteristics by

setting quotas.

• Example: A researcher studying consumer behavior might aim to include 50 men and 50
women in their sample.

3. APA Ethical Guidelines for Conducting and Writing Psychological Research

The American Psychological Association (APA) has established ethical guidelines to protect research
participants and ensure the integrity of psychological research. Key principles include:

a. Informed Consent

• Definition: Participants must be fully informed about the nature of the research, including its
purpose, procedures, risks, and benefits, and must voluntarily agree to participate.

• Example: Before participating in a study on stress management, participants receive a detailed

explanation and sign a consent form.

b. Confidentiality and Anonymity

• Definition: Researchers must protect participants' privacy by keeping their data confidential and,
when possible, anonymous.

• Example: Data collected from participants is stored securely, and identifying information is
removed before analysis.

c. Deception

• Definition: Deception may only be used when it is necessary for the study, and when there are
no feasible alternatives. Participants must be debriefed afterward.

• Example: A study on social behavior may involve misleading participants about the true purpose
of the research, but they are informed afterward.

d. Debriefing

• Definition: After participation, researchers must provide participants with information about the
study's purpose and any deception used, as well as offer support for any distress caused.
 • Example: After a study on anxiety, participants are informed about the study's true aims and
provided with resources for managing anxiety.

e. Minimizing Harm

• Definition: Researchers should avoid causing physical or psychological harm to participants and
ensure that the benefits of the research outweigh any potential risks.

• Example: A researcher conducting a study on trauma should ensure that participants are not re-
traumatized and provide counseling resources if needed.

f. Respect for Vulnerable Populations

• Definition: Special care must be taken when conducting research with vulnerable populations
(e.g., children, individuals with disabilities) to ensure their protection and well-being.

• Example: Researchers working with children must obtain consent from parents and ensure that
the research is suitable for the age group.

By adhering to these ethical guidelines, researchers can conduct psychological studies responsibly and
ethically, ensuring the welfare of participants while contributing to the field of psychology.
1. Goals of the Scientific Method

The scientific method aims to achieve the following goals:

• Objective Understanding: To develop an objective understanding of phenomena through

systematic observation and experimentation.

• Example: A psychologist studies the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive

performance using controlled experiments.

• Predictability: To create reliable predictions based on empirical evidence.

• Example: By understanding how stress affects performance, a researcher can predict

that increased stress will lead to decreased test scores.

• Control: To control variables to determine cause-and-effect relationships.

• Example: In an experiment on the impact of study time on grades, researchers control

for factors like prior knowledge and test difficulty.

• Replication: To enable findings to be replicated by other researchers, enhancing reliability.

• Example: A study showing that exercise improves mood can be replicated in different
settings to confirm results.

2. Basic vs. Applied Research

• Basic Research: Aims to expand knowledge and understanding of fundamental principles

without immediate practical application.

• Example: A study investigating the neural mechanisms of memory formation without a

specific application in mind.

• Applied Research: Focuses on solving specific, practical problems using knowledge gained from
basic research.

• Example: Research developing interventions to improve memory in patients with

Alzheimer’s disease.

3. Focus Group as a Qualitative Research Method

• Definition: A focus group is a qualitative research method that involves gathering a small group
of participants to discuss a specific topic guided by a facilitator. It aims to explore participants’
perceptions, opinions, and attitudes.

• Example: A company conducts a focus group with potential customers to gather

feedback on a new product design, allowing participants to express their thoughts and
feelings in a discussion format.

4. True Experimental vs. Quasi-Experimental Designs

• True Experimental Design: Involves random assignment of participants to different groups

(experimental and control) to establish cause-and-effect relationships.
 • Example: A researcher randomly assigns participants to either a treatment group
receiving a new therapy or a control group receiving no treatment to evaluate the
therapy's effectiveness.

• Quasi-Experimental Design: Lacks random assignment and often uses pre-existing groups,
making it harder to establish causality.

• Example: A researcher studies the effects of a school program on student performance

by comparing test scores of students in schools that implemented the program with
those in schools that did not, without random assignment.

5. Probability Sampling

• Definition: Probability sampling is a sampling technique in which every individual in the

population has a known, non-zero chance of being selected for the sample. This method
enhances the representativeness of the sample and allows for generalization of findings.

• Example: A researcher wanting to survey college students randomly selects participants

from a complete list of all enrolled students, ensuring that each student has an equal
chance of being chosen.

6. Interview and Types of Interviews

• Definition: An interview is a qualitative data collection method that involves direct, face-to-face
interaction between the researcher and the participant to gather information, opinions, or
experiences.

• Types of Interviews:

• Structured Interview: Follows a predetermined set of questions, ensuring consistency

across interviews.

• Example: A researcher conducts structured interviews with job applicants using

the same questions to assess their qualifications.

• Semi-Structured Interview: Combines predetermined questions with the flexibility to

explore topics in more depth based on participants' responses.

• Example: A researcher interviews patients about their experiences with a new

treatment, starting with specific questions but allowing for follow-up based on
their answers.

• Unstructured Interview: Has no set questions, allowing for open-ended discussions and
exploration of topics as they arise.

• Example: A researcher conducts an unstructured interview with a community

leader to understand their views on local health issues, letting the conversation
flow naturally.
Long

Q1. Designing Experimental Research Design

Experimental Research Design involves manipulating one or more independent variables to observe the
effect on a dependent variable, allowing researchers to establish cause-and-effect relationships. Here are
the steps involved in conducting an experiment in psychological research:

Steps of Experiment in Psychological Research

1. Identify the Research Question:

• Define what you want to investigate.

• Example: Does sleep deprivation affect cognitive performance?

2. Review the Literature:

• Conduct a thorough review of existing research related to your question to inform your
hypothesis.

• Example: Review studies on sleep and cognitive function to understand previous

findings.

3. Formulate Hypotheses:

• Develop clear, testable predictions based on the literature.

• Example: "Participants who are sleep-deprived will perform worse on cognitive tasks
compared to well-rested participants."

4. Select the Participants:

• Decide on the population and how to sample participants.

• Example: Recruit 60 college students, ensuring a mix of genders and backgrounds.

5. Random Assignment:

• Randomly assign participants to experimental and control groups to eliminate selection

bias.

• Example: Randomly assign 30 students to the sleep-deprivation group and 30 to the

control group who will have normal sleep.

6. Manipulate the Independent Variable:

• Implement the experimental conditions.

• Example: The sleep-deprivation group stays awake for 24 hours, while the control group
sleeps normally.

7. Measure the Dependent Variable:

• Collect data on the outcomes of interest.

 • Example: Administer cognitive tests (e.g., memory recall tasks) to assess performance
after the sleep manipulation.

8. Analyze the Data:

• Use statistical methods to analyze the results and determine if there are significant
differences between groups.

• Example: Conduct a t-test to compare the cognitive performance scores of both groups.

9. Interpret the Results:

• Discuss findings in the context of the hypothesis and existing literature.

• Example: If the sleep-deprivation group scores significantly lower, conclude that sleep
deprivation negatively impacts cognitive performance.

10. Report the Findings:

• Write a detailed report or paper presenting the methodology, results, and implications.

• Example: Publish the study in a psychology journal, outlining the experiment and its
contributions to understanding sleep and cognition.

Q2. Process of Carrying Out Ethnographic Research

Ethnographic Research is a qualitative research method focused on exploring cultural phenomena from
the perspective of the subject population. The process involves immersive observation and participation
in the participants' environment.

Key Characteristics of Ethnographic Research

1. Immersion in the Field:

• Researchers spend extended periods in the community or environment they are

studying to gain an in-depth understanding.

• Example: A researcher studying the social dynamics of a rural community might live
there for several months, participating in daily activities.

2. Participant Observation:

• Researchers actively engage with participants while observing their behaviors and
interactions.

• Example: While studying a local school, the researcher might attend classes, interact
with students and teachers, and observe school events.

3. In-Depth Interviews:

• Conducting interviews with participants to gather personal narratives and insights about
their experiences and beliefs.
 • Example: The researcher may interview community leaders to understand cultural
values and traditions.

4. Data Collection:

• Collect various forms of data, including field notes, audio recordings, photographs, and
artifacts.

• Example: The researcher documents observations in a journal, records interviews, and

takes photos of community events.

5. Reflexivity:

• Researchers reflect on their own biases, perspectives, and influence on the research
process.

• Example: The researcher acknowledges their background and how it may affect
interactions with participants.

6. Analysis and Interpretation:

• Analyze the collected data to identify patterns, themes, and insights about the culture
being studied.

• Example: The researcher might find that community gatherings play a crucial role in
maintaining social cohesion.

7. Reporting Findings:

• Present findings in a comprehensive manner, often emphasizing the participants' voices

and experiences.

• Example: The researcher writes a detailed ethnography, highlighting key cultural

practices and their significance to the community.

Q3. Sampling and Types of Sampling in Research

Sampling is the process of selecting a subset of individuals from a larger population for the purpose of
conducting research. The choice of sampling method affects the validity and generalizability of research
findings.

Types of Sampling

1. Probability Sampling:

• Each member of the population has a known chance of being selected. This method
enhances the representativeness of the sample.

a. Simple Random Sampling:

• Every individual has an equal chance of being selected.

 • Example: A researcher randomly selects participants from a complete list of students in a
university.

b. Systematic Sampling:

• Researchers select every nth individual from a list.

• Example: A researcher surveys every 10th person on a list of registered voters.

c. Stratified Sampling:

• The population is divided into strata (subgroups), and random samples are drawn from
each stratum.

• Example: A researcher studying health behaviors might stratify by age groups and ensure
equal representation from each age category.

d. Cluster Sampling:

• The population is divided into clusters, and entire clusters are randomly selected.

• Example: A researcher studying educational outcomes might randomly select several

schools (clusters) and survey all students within those schools.

2. Non-Probability Sampling:

• Not every individual has a known chance of being selected, which can introduce bias but
may be more practical in certain situations.

a. Convenience Sampling:

• Participants are selected based on their availability and willingness.

• Example: A researcher surveys people at a local mall because they are easily accessible.

b. Judgmental Sampling:

• The researcher selects participants based on their judgment about who would be most
informative.

• Example: A researcher studying expert opinions on mental health might selectively

sample recognized psychologists.

c. Snowball Sampling:

• Existing participants recruit future participants from among their acquaintances.

• Example: A researcher studying addiction might ask initial participants to refer others
they know who are also struggling with addiction.

d. Quota Sampling:

• The researcher ensures equal representation of specific characteristics by setting quotas.

 • Example: A researcher studying consumer preferences might aim to include 50 men and
50 women in their sample.

Importance of Sampling

• Generalizability: Proper sampling ensures that research findings can be generalized to the larger
population.

• Bias Reduction: Using probability sampling methods helps minimize selection bias, leading to
more reliable results.

• Cost-Effectiveness: Sampling allows researchers to study a manageable number of participants

rather than the entire population, saving time and resources.