Scribd
Upload
11 views4 pages

Delay Analysis Methods

The document outlines various delay analysis methodologies used to quantify project delays, including impacted as-planned, collapsed as-built, as-planned vs. as-built, time impact analysis, and windows analysis. Each method has its strengths and limitations, and the choice of methodology should consider factors such as contractual requirements and data availability. The document emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate method to accurately assess delays and offers assistance for projects facing delays.

Uploaded by

syedrashidali2024
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
11 views4 pages

Delay Analysis Methods

The document outlines various delay analysis methodologies used to quantify project delays, including impacted as-planned, collapsed as-built, as-planned vs. as-built, time impact analysis, and windows analysis. Each method has its strengths and limitations, and the choice of methodology should consider factors such as contractual requirements and data availability. The document emphasizes the importance of selecting the appropriate method to accurately assess delays and offers assistance for projects facing delays.

Uploaded by

syedrashidali2024
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

 ABOUT
 SERVICES
 INDUSTRIES
 EXPERIENCE
 INSIGHTS
 CAREERS
 CONTACT US

512-637-0845
DELAY ANALYSIS METHODOLOGIES
FEBRUARY 27, 2021

Delay Analysis Methodologies | There are numerous forensic schedule


analysis methods that can be used to quantify delays that occurred
during a project. The most common delay analysis methods are as
following

Impacted As-Planned
The impacted as-planned analysis involves the insertion of delay
events into a baseline or as-planned schedule to determine the
hypothetical impact of such events. This method involves modifying
the baseline or as-planned schedule to include new activities and logic
to represent delay events. The difference between the project
completion date in the impacted as-planned schedule and the original
as-planned schedule quantifies the delay. This methodology is simple
and does not require an as-built schedule. However, it is considered a
hypothetical model as it does not rely on as-built data.

Collapsed As-Built
The collapsed as-built analysis is essentially the opposite of an
impacted as-planned analysis. This method involves removing delay
events from the as-built schedule to determine when the project
should have been completed ‘but for’ the delay events. This
methodology is easy to understand and does not require an as-planned
schedule or contemporaneous schedule updates. However, it can be
manipulated with the insertion of after-the-fact logic ties and delay
events.

As-Planned vs. As-Built


The as-planned vs. as-built analysis is a simple technique used to
compare the baseline or as-planned schedule to the as-built schedule
or a schedule update reflecting progress. This method compares
planned start and finish dates with the actual start and finish dates of
activities on the as-planned critical and near-critical paths. This
identifies delayed starts, extended durations, and late finishes. This
method is most effective on simple projects with short durations and
one clear critical path that remains consistent throughout the entire
project. Its accuracy diminishes as the actual critical path deviates
from the planned schedule.
Time Impact Analysis (TIA)
The time impact analysis (TIA) is a comprehensive technique used to
analyze each delay event individually in chronological order to
calculate its impact. This methodology quantifies each delay based on
the schedule immediately before and after the delay event took place.
The difference between the project completion date before and after
the event determines the extent of the delay. TIA does not require an
as-built schedule and is typically easy and quick to perform. This
technique is widely accepted when used during the project to timely
resolve delayed performance. However, it is considered a hypothetical
model as it does not rely on as-built data, and it can be overwhelming
to perform if there are numerous delay events.

Windows Analysis
The windows analysis is a retrospective technique that divides the total
project duration into smaller periods (commonly referred to as
“windows”) and quantifies the as-built critical path delays for each of
these periods. This form of analysis compares the baseline or as-
planned schedule’s forecasted critical path to the as-built schedule,
reflecting the as-built conditions for each selected period. This method
typically relies upon the schedules in their contemporaneous state of
submission (“as-is”). The windows analysis is easy to calculate and
understand. It identifies delays as well as acceleration quantities and
considers real-time conditions and actual construction progress.
However, the windows analysis is time-consuming, requires complete
project records, and depends on a reliable baseline or as-planned
schedule and as-built performance information.
Conclusion
The appropriate selection of a delay analysis method is important to
accurately quantify delays. Analysts must be aware of the strengths
and limitations of each method to determine which one is most
suitable for the case at hand. Several factors must be considered when
selecting a delay analysis methodology including, but not limited to,
contractual requirements, source data availability, budget, and time
allowed for the analysis and size of the dispute.

If your project is suffering from delays or other issues, don’t hesitate


to contact us. Our team of delay analysis and resolution experts can
help you get your project back on track.

You might also like