Activity (Chapter 4) STS
Activity (Chapter 4) STS
Watch the movie clip (Youtube) The Magician’s Twin: CS Lewis and the Case against Scientism
(https://youtu.be/FPeyJvXU68k?si=8AKt6FfKRsTkahLL)
2. Why did CS Lewis think that modern science is far more dangerous than magic?
-Lewis never criticizes science, simply scientism, the abuse of knowledge that has an
unexpected connection with magic. World wars were driven by scientific excesses. Lewis
associated science with magic. Actually, they are twins. Three reasons:
1. Religion - Something exceptional out there. Can provide you with a sense of meaning. It
strikes a deep resonance in people who believe in something beyond themselves. For some,
this wonderful picture of the world - Narnia, Lord of the Rings, etc. - can be a religion.
2. People in the present society will believe nearly anything if it is dressed up as science.
Lewis was fascinated by Freud's psychoanalysis. Everything's disintegration leaves you with
nothing. The book of the Pilgrim's Regress. Another term for evolutionism. That matter may
be able to guide itself unintentionally. How can I trust my own mind about evolutionism if it is
a product of the irrational?
3. Power - the desire for power. Magicians desired authority over the world in order to govern it.
Modern science is considerably more harmful than magic since magic does not work in the
end, whereas modern science can control and influence people. So, if you don't have a
moral foundation outside of science to govern it, you're in for a catastrophic future.
3. Do you agree or disagree with the different quotes cited in the movie? Explain your answer.
• Only science can save us from natural catastrophe – John Gray
- Though I appreciate science, I respectfully disagree with this quote. Yes, science and
technology can foresee natural disasters, but they cannot forecast when or where they will
occur. For example, as far as I am aware, scientists or the USGS have never forecast a
significant earthquake. They can only compute the likelihood of a large earthquake
occurring in a specific place within a given number of years. Also, if science can save us
from natural disasters, how come the PHILVOLCS could not predict that Taal Volcano
will erupt in January 2020? Also, if a tsunami strikes our country, do you believe
telephones, helicopters, vehicles, and current technology will be able to save millions of
people? People can be saved by helicopters. But do you believe they will save those who
are not as fortunate as they are? No, I don't believe so.