EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
AWARENESS OF STUDENTS AND FACULTY OF THE COLLEGE OF
CRIMINAL JUSTICE EDUCATION IN A PRIVATE HIGHER
EDUCATION INSTITUTION IN SAFE SPACE ACT
An Undergraduate Research
Presented to
Exact Colleges of Asia
In Partial Fulfilment
Of the Requirements for the
Criminological Research
By:
Bati, Jonard D.
Cabales, Hanna Mae G.
Fortim, Kayl A.
Jimenez, John Paul D.
Lagman, John Paul N.
Roque, Ken Jesar M.
Sandoval Jasmin M.
May 2025
1
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
CHAPTER 1
THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND
Introduction
The Safe Spaces Act, also known as Republic Act No.
11313, was signed into law in the Philippines in 2019 to
address gender-based sexual harassment in public and private
spaces, including schools, workplaces, and online platforms.
This law aims to eradicate all forms of harassment, such as
catcalling, unwanted sexual advances, cyberstalking, and
other acts that threaten an individual's safety and dignity
(Valerio, 2020). By encouraging a culture of respect, the
Safe Spaces Act is intended to create safer environments for
all, especially in educational institutions where young minds
are molded.
In higher education, the Safe Spaces Act requires
schools and universities to adopt preventive and corrective
measures against sexual harassment. These include creating a
mechanism for complaints, providing gender sensitivity
training, and developing policies to address harassment cases
(Garcia, 2021). These steps will ensure that learning
institutions uphold the rights and safety of students,
faculty, and staff. Yet, in reality, the application of the
law and its awareness differ greatly between institutions,
2
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
leading to concerns over its efficacy in fostering
inclusiveness and security.
Despite the efforts put into the implementation of the
Safe Spaces Act, studies show that there are still gaps in
the awareness of stakeholders in educational institutions. A
study conducted by Santos and Cruz (2022) on Filipino college
students showed that many were aware of the existence of the
law but were not well-informed about its provisions,
especially its applicability within schools. Similarly,
university administrators expressed the need for more robust
information dissemination to support effective compliance
(Santos & Cruz, 2022).
Private higher education institutions, being usually
independent of public policies, are uniquely challenged to
implement the Safe Spaces Act. Baluyot (2023) reported that
these institutions might face limited resources for awareness
campaigns and lack of training for staff and faculty.
However, this independence also allows them to innovate and
integrate anti-harassment policies according to their
community needs.
The CCJE has the special mandate to promote awareness of
this Safe Spaces Act since its students and faculty are
embodying principles of justice and the law enforcement act.
According to Mercado and Ramos (2023), a study showed the
3
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
importance of teaching future criminal justice professionals
about gender sensitivity and anti-harassment laws in
preparing them for the ethical practice in their field. Their
research emphasized the fact that awareness of CCJE students
directly determines their ability to enforce the law both in
and out of their learning environment.
The faculty must also be aware of the Safe Spaces Act
since professors and staff are role models and implementers
of the policies of the institution. Lopez, in his 2024 study,
stated that faculty knowledge of the law determines how
faculty members respond to harassment cases and promote a
positive learning environment. This calls for continuous
training and education for educators to play both roles as
mentor and policy implementer.
Moreover, research suggests that including the Safe
Spaces Act in the criminal justice education curriculum is a
promising approach to raising awareness. According to Delgado
(2021), there is a need to include discussions about gender-
based harassment laws in law and criminology courses since
early exposure equips students with knowledge and skills that
will help them address these issues in their future careers.
The cultural and institutional context of private higher
education institutions also shapes the implementation of the
Safe Spaces Act. Awareness programs are influenced by
4
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
leadership support, community engagement, and access to
resources (Manalo, 2022). Understanding these dynamics is
essential in crafting policies and programs that will fit the
uniqueness of these institutions.
Given these considerations, assessing the awareness of
the Safe Spaces Act among students and faculty in the CCJE of
private higher education institutions is of paramount
importance. Understanding the level of awareness can shed
light on the gaps in knowledge and implementation, paving the
way for more targeted interventions.
The awareness of the Safe Spaces Act among students and
faculty is a crucial factor in ensuring its successful
implementation in private higher education institutions. This
study aims to explore the awareness levels within the CCJE,
contributing to a safer and more inclusive academic
environment that aligns with the principles of the Safe
Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313).
Background of the Study
The Safe Spaces Act, or Republic Act No. 11313, is a
landmark legislation in the Philippines that addresses all
forms of gender-based sexual harassment in public spaces,
workplaces, educational institutions, and online platforms.
The law was enacted in 2019 and aims to establish a culture
of respect and safety for all individuals by penalizing acts
5
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
like catcalling, stalking, cyber harassment, and other forms
of harassment that put personal security and dignity at risk
(Republic Act No. 11313, 2019). In particular, educational
institutions are tasked with comprehensive measures to
prevent and address harassment to ensure campuses are safe
spaces for learning and growth.
In higher education, the implementation of the Safe
Spaces Act assumes particular importance as universities and
colleges play a crucial role in the molding of attitudes and
behaviors for future professionals. It has been observed that
the knowledge of the existence of such laws dealing with
harassment significantly affects the response of individuals
to prevent such incidents from occurring. A study by Garcia
and Santos (2021) found that students who were educated about
the Safe Spaces Act were more likely to report incidents of
harassment and advocate for safer environments in their
communities.
The College of Criminal Justice Education is uniquely
positioned to lead by example in upholding the Safe Spaces
Act. In consideration of the emphasis on training law
enforcement and justice personnel for the future, CCJE
programs should put much emphasis on gender sensitivity,
legal literacy, and ethical conduct. However, Mercado and
Ramos (2023) argued that while a few CCJE students were
reported to be familiar with the provisions of the law,
6
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
others lack the full implications of the said law, implying a
need to improve education and advocacy in those institutions.
The problem is that, in private institutions,
implementing the Safe Spaces Act would pose a challenge given
that they generally exist independently. Oftentimes, private
higher education institutions have resource constraints that
severely limit their ability to carry out mass promulgation
programs and training. According to Baluyot (2023),
institutional culture, leadership support, and access to
resources are critical factors that decide the efficiency and
effectiveness of anti-harassment initiatives in private
schools. Despite these challenges, private institutions also
have the flexibility to design and implement policies
tailored to their specific community needs.
Students and faculty awareness is crucial for the
successful implementation of the Safe Spaces Act. Faculty
members play a dual role as educators and enforcers of
institutional policies, making their understanding of the law
essential for fostering a safe and respectful learning
environment. Lopez (2024) argued that informed faculty will
be able to address harassment cases and direct the students
towards proper behaviors. Likewise, Delgado (2021) claimed
that anti-harassment laws should be integrated into the
curriculum in a way that can have a positive effect on
students' awareness and adherence to the law's principles.
7
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Despite the provisions of the law, studies show that
many students and faculty members are still not aware of
their rights and responsibilities under the Safe Spaces Act.
Manalo (2022) reported that in some private institutions,
students were hesitant to report harassment incidents due to
a lack of knowledge about the reporting process and fear of
retaliation. These findings suggest that there is a need for
more targeted awareness campaigns and educational initiatives
to bridge the knowledge gap and empower stakeholders to take
an active role in creating safer spaces.
The awareness level is particularly important as it
directly correlates with the success of the implementation of
the law within educational institutions. Higher levels of
awareness can promote better prevention and reporting
mechanisms, as well as response capabilities, which
ultimately create a safer and more inclusive campus
environment. Lower levels of awareness may prevent
achievement of these objectives and perpetuate a culture of
silence and tolerance of harassment.
The gap in awareness levels and the extent of
implementation will be addressed within the "Safe Spaces Act"
by CCJE students and faculty in private higher education
institutions. Specific factors that influence awareness
levels can be seen, with corresponding actionable strategies
for increasing compliance with the law.
8
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
The objective of this study is to assess the awareness
of students and faculty in the College of Criminal Justice
Education (CCJE) of a private higher education institution
regarding the Safe Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313).
Specifically, it aims to evaluate their understanding of the
law's provisions, their knowledge of institutional policies
related to its implementation, and their roles in fostering a
safe and respectful academic environment. This study aims to
provide actionable insights to improve education, advocacy,
and compliance with the Safe Spaces Act within the
institution by identifying gaps in awareness and exploring
factors that influence their understanding, thus contributing
to the promotion of safety, inclusivity, and respect in the
academic community.
Theoretical Framework
Social Learning Theory, by Albert Bandura, posits that
people learn behaviors, attitudes, and norms through
observation, imitation, and interaction with their
environment. Thus, according to this approach, modeling and
reinforcement are significant factors in behavior formation,
as individuals learn things not just from personal
experiences, but also through others, through observation.
Hence, personal, environmental, and behavioral factors
involved in learning interact to form reciprocal determinism,
as conceptualized by Bandura in 1977. According to this
9
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
theory, learning social norms and ethical behavior is
influenced by role models and the environment on how one
develops values and practices.
The Social Learning Theory, therefore, will be relevant
for this study in that it places emphasis on the awareness
campaigns, role modeling, and institutional policies in
promoting the adherence to the Safe Spaces Act. Students and
faculty in the College of Criminal Justice Education are
likely to model behaviors and attitudes based on what they
observe in their academic environment. For example, if
faculty members have a good understanding of the Safe Spaces
Act and actively advocate for its principles, then students
will be encouraged to model those same behaviors and
attitudes, thus fostering a culture of respect and
inclusivity. Just as institutional efforts aimed at
implementing and enforcing the Safe Spaces Act tend to create
a culture of compliance and discourage acts of harassment,
this study explores how awareness and behaviors related to
the Safe Spaces Act are developed through the interplay
between people and their educational environment using the
Social Learning Theory.
Conceptual Framework
10
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
The study utilizes the IPO format or the Input, Process,
and Output as the framework of the entire concept of the
study.
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
The Crafting of To provide
respondents survey recommendations
will be the questionnaire to both faculty
faculty Validation of members and
members and survey
criminology questionnaire criminology
students of Administering student on how
EXACT survey among to effectively
Colleges of the apply and
Asia. respondents utilize Safe
Collection of Space Act and
responses
Their to also inform
Analysis and
knowledge interpretation the significant
regarding of data individuals
safe space regarding the
act will be act itself.
used on the
data
collection
procedure.
Statement of the Problem
General Problem
11
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
This study aims to determine the awareness of students
and faculty of the college of criminal justice education in a
private higher education institution in safe space act.
Specifically, it seeks to answer the following
questions:
1. How may the demographic profile of the respondents be
described in terms of:
1.1 age;
1.2 sex; and
1.3 occupation?
2. What is the level of awareness of CCJE students
regarding the provisions of the Safe Spaces Act in terms
of:
2.1 Definition and scope of the law?
2.2 Rights and responsibilities under the law?
2.3 Mechanisms for reporting and addressing harassment?
3. What is the level of awareness of CCJE faculty regarding
the provisions of the Safe Spaces Act in terms of:
3.1 Institutional policies and guidelines for
implementation?
3.2 Their roles and responsibilities in promoting safe
spaces?
3.3 Procedures for addressing cases of harassment
within the institution?
12
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
4. Is there a significant difference in the level of
awareness between CCJE students and faculty regarding
the Safe Spaces Act?
5. What measures can be proposed to enhance the awareness
and implementation of the Safe Spaces Act within the
institution?
Hypotheses of the Study
H0 : There is no significant difference in the level of
awareness between CCJE students and faculty regarding the
Safe Spaces Act
H1: There is a significant difference in the level of
awareness between CCJE students and faculty regarding the
Safe Spaces Act
Scope and Limitations of the Study
This research aims to assess the level of awareness
about the Safe Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313) among the
faculty members and students of EXACT Colleges of Asia.
Specifically, their knowledge regarding the provisions of the
law on its definition and scope, rights and responsibilities,
13
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
reporting mechanisms, and institutional policies are covered.
The respondents will be selected through a purposive sampling
technique, ensuring that the selected individuals are those
directly involved in the academic and institutional
environment of the College of Criminal Justice Education. The
study would provide insights into their knowledge of the law
and propose strategies for enhancing awareness and
implementation within the institution.
The study limits its scope to the criminology faculty
members and students of EXACT Colleges of Asia. It excludes
other departments and non-academic personnel. Moreover, using
a purposive sampling technique would not allow for
generalizability, as findings will be predominantly based on
the level of awareness of the respondents chosen. The study
is, however limited to the analysis of awareness only and
does not examine any potential implementation and
effectiveness of the Safe Spaces Act in practice. Limitations
on time and reliance on self-reported data through surveys or
questionnaires could also limit the depth and accuracy of the
findings.
Significance of the Study
This study is important in the sense that it gives a
view regarding the awareness of criminology students and
faculty of EXACT Colleges of Asia towards the Safe Spaces Act
14
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
(Republic Act No. 11313), which is a critical approach to
maintaining a safe and inclusive academic environment.
Through these ranges of comprehension and knowledge of the
law, the findings will point out gaps in awareness and areas
to be improved on.
Students. The research will benefit criminology students by
making them better understand the Safe Spaces Act, empowering
them to recognize and prevent harassment, and enabling them
to actively contribute to a culture of respect and safety
within their academic community.
Faculty Members. The faculty members will understand their
roles and responsibilities in the implementation of the Safe
Spaces Act. The study will help them improve their capacity
to handle harassment issues effectively and act as role
models for respect and inclusivity.
School Administrators. The recommendations will give the
school administrators clear insights on which policies,
training programs, and awareness campaigns can be developed
and implemented to make the institution more effective in
compliance with the Safe Spaces Act.
Lawmakers and Policy Advocates. This research will contribute
to the ongoing discourse about the efficacy of the Safe
Spaces Act through provision of information regarding its
awareness at the grassroots level in higher education
15
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
institutions that will guide further policy improvements and
advocacy.
Future Researchers. This study will also be a good reference
for further research on the Safe Spaces Act and related
issues, especially about its implementation, effectiveness,
and impact in other educational institutions or settings.
Definition of Terms
Awareness. It is defined as the level of knowledge and
understanding that criminology students and faculty have with
regards to the provisions, scope, and reporting mechanisms of
the Safe Spaces Act.
Gender-Based Sexual Harassment. These include catcalling,
unwanted sexual advances, and cyber harassment as defined by
the Safe Spaces Act, which takes place within the academic
context of the institution.
Institutional Policies. Rules, guidelines, and actions
adopted by EXACT Colleges of Asia to ensure compliance with
16
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
the Safe Spaces Act and the safety of the students and
faculty.
Reporting Mechanisms. These are the processes and systems set
within the institution that report, address, and resolve
instances of harassment that fall under the Safe Spaces Act.
Safe Spaces Act. This refers to the Philippine law
implemented within EXACT Colleges of Asia with policies and
actions geared towards preventing and stopping gender-based
sexual harassment in the academe, including classrooms,
offices, and online platforms.
CHAPTER 2
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
Foreign Related Literatures
The Safe Spaces Act (Republic Act No. 11313) was
implemented in the Philippines in 2019 to try to eliminate or
reduce gender-based sexual harassment, especially in public
spaces, workplaces, educational institutions, and online
environments. It seeks to define and penalize these acts of
harassment, including catcalling, stalking, and cyber
harassment. This policy is part of a comprehensive global
approach that seeks to curtail sexual harassment and promote
17
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
safety in communities worldwide (Asia Pacific UN Women,
2020).
In the United States, the Tyler Clementi Higher
Education Anti-Harassment Act mandates that all colleges and
universities establish and enforce policies to curb
harassment, sexual harassment included, for the well-being of
its students and employees. This is one of the increasing
demands by higher education systems to implement their anti-
harassment systems (Human Rights Campaign, 2021).
Sweden's Discrimination Act prohibits discrimination and
harassment in various settings, such as educational
institutions. Swedish law requires schools and universities
to take active measures against harassment, thereby creating
a safe and respectful environment for all students, which
resonates with the objectives of the Safe Spaces Act in the
Philippines (Equality Ombudsman, 2021).
In the United Kingdom, the Equality Act 2010
consolidates previous anti-discrimination laws, including
provisions against harassment in schools and universities. It
obligates institutions to take reasonable steps to prevent
harassment, promoting equality and a safe learning
environment for all (Equality and Human Rights Commission,
2020).
18
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Sex discrimination, harassment, and other forms of
discrimination on grounds of sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, and other protected categories are strictly
prohibited under Australia's Sex Discrimination Act 1984. The
law obliges educational institutions to take appropriate
measures to prevent and respond to sexual harassment so that
the space is safe for students (Australian Human Rights
Commission, 2020).
In Canada, the Canadian Human Rights Act does not allow
for discrimination and harassment based on sex, including
sexual harassment, in educational institutions with federal
jurisdiction. Provincial laws require institutions to
establish policies to counter harassment, creating a safe
environment for academics (Canadian Human Rights Commission,
2020).
New Zealand's Human Rights Act 1993 prohibits
discrimination and harassment based on several grounds,
including sex and sexual harassment. Schools and universities
in New Zealand are obliged to take preventative measures and
to act promptly in dealing with harassment in order to
maintain a safe and respectful environment for learning
(Human Rights Commission, 2020).
South Africa's Employment Equity Act 1998 outlawed
unfair discrimination and harassment within the workplace;
19
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
this includes sexual harassment. However, the core
application of this act is toward employment, its principles
extending further to educational environments, which insist
on policies toward creating safe environments for all within
an institution and treating everyone justly (Department of
Labour, South Africa, 2021).
The Indian Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace
(Prevention, Prohibition, and Redressal) Act 2013 talks about
sexual harassment at educational places that require each
such place to provide an internal complaint committee,
through which every complainant receives fair redress. This
guarantees an education and study environment, without
harassment of women, consistent with the Safe Spaces Act in
the Philippines (National Commission for Women, 2020).
The European Union’s Directive 2006/54/EC mandates
member states to implement measures to prevent and address
sexual harassment in workplaces and educational institutions.
The directive is instrumental in fostering gender equality
and ensuring safe spaces for students across Europe, a goal
shared by the Safe Spaces Act in the Philippines (European
Commission, 2020).
Local Related Literatures
The Safe Spaces Act, which was enacted in the
Philippines in 2019 as Republic Act No. 11313, aims to
safeguard individuals from gender-based sexual harassment in
20
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
public spaces, workplaces, and educational institutions. The
law requires the creation of safe spaces within different
sectors and provides mechanisms for reporting and addressing
harassment to ensure that the victims are provided with the
right support and justice (Republic of the Philippines,
2019).
The Safe Spaces Act was a precursor to the Anti-Sexual
Harassment Act of 1995, or Republic Act No. 7877. This law
primarily focused on the workplace but laid the groundwork
for later developments in public and educational
institutions. The Safe Spaces Act expanded its scope,
recognizing the need to protect individuals in public spaces
and digital platforms, in addition to the workplace
(Philippine Commission on Women, 2019).
For this reason, an article by Mendoza (2020)
highlighted that the importance of the implementation of the
Safe Spaces Act can be critical to educational institutions.
It is very important for administrations to promote an
increase in awareness concerning harassment and efficient
means of reporting these incidents (Mendoza, 2020).
Luna's (2020) article, "Safe Spaces Act: A Step Forward
in Addressing Harassment in Educational Institutions" sheds
light on how the Safe Spaces Act made much-needed positive
impacts toward alleviating widespread incidents of harassment
21
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
among students and more so among college students. This
report shows greater focus on programs aimed at student
awareness and workshop opportunities for faculty as well in
this regard under the law.
Arroyo (2021) had research regarding the compliance of
higher education institutions in the Philippines with the
Safe Spaces Act. It was revealed that some schools have been
active in complying with the provisions of the law, but
others are behind in terms of training and awareness among
faculty and staff, hence not fully compliant (Arroyo, 2021).
Gonzales (2020) on their study regarding gender-based
harassment in Philippine universities reveals that Safe
Spaces Act resulted in more open discussion of the issue of
harassment, with a higher reporting and better institutional
policies. However, according to the study, there is still a
lack of clarity on some provisions, specifically on online
harassment (Gonzales, 2020).
The Philippine Commission on Women (PCW) has been
actively involved in the implementation of the Safe Spaces
Act through campaigns and programs aimed at raising awareness
about harassment in public spaces and educational
institutions. According to the PCW's 2020 report, educational
institutions that have adopted comprehensive anti-harassment
22
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
programs have seen positive changes in the overall campus
climate (Philippine Commission on Women, 2020).
De Castro (2020) discussed the challenges universities
in the Philippines face in implementing the Safe Spaces Act.
Results indicate that even though students generally know
about the law, most of them remain uncertain about the
process of accessing resources or filing complaints, which
indicates the need for reporting systems to be more
transparent and accessible (De Castro, 2020).
Santos (2021) investigated the effect of the Safe Spaces
Act on local universities. According to her study, even
though most of the lecturers are familiar with the law, many
students find it challenging to understand their rights. She
therefore advises the inclusion of students in seminars and
workshops t equip them with better knowledge of their rights
(Santos, 2021).
Caballero (2021) delved into how the Safe Spaces Act
affects the policies on campuses of private higher education.
In conclusion, while many schools have adapted policies in
keeping with the law, further training is essential for
faculty and students so that the full implications of the law
are understood, and there are no harassment incidents
(Caballero, 2021).
23
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
CHAPTER III
METHODOLOGY
This chapter presents and shows the techniques and
methods that the researchers will utilize and apply in
gathering all needed information for the study.
Research Method
This study will employ a descriptive research design,
which is commonly used in quantitative research to
systematically describe characteristics, behaviors, or
24
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
awareness levels within a specific population. Through the
use of surveys or structured questionnaires, the study will
collect data from students and faculty members to determine
their level of awareness of the Safe Spaces Act. The
descriptive design will help researchers to quantify
responses and determine trends in which awareness levels may
differ between ages, genders, or even positions. Through the
use of statistical tools, the research will find significant
patterns and areas of improvement, thereby helping to make
policies better and to initiate education programs within the
institution.
In addition, the descriptive research design will enable
a thorough understanding of the factors that influence
awareness of the Safe Spaces Act among students and faculty.
The study will provide measurable insights into how well the
law is understood and whether there are differences in
awareness based on demographic factors by gathering
quantitative data. The findings will help in formulating
targeted interventions, such as awareness campaigns,
seminars, or policy reinforcement within the institution.
Additionally, the results may serve as a foundation for
future studies that aim to explore the effectiveness of Safe
Spaces Act implementation in higher education settings,
ultimately fostering a safer and more inclusive learning
environment.
25
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Population and Sampling Scheme
The population of this study will be composed of
Bachelor of Science in Criminology students and faculty
members from EXACT Colleges of Asia. Since the study aims to
assess awareness of the Safe Spaces Act within the College of
Criminal Justice Education, the selected population will
provide relevant insights into the level of knowledge and
understanding of the law among future law enforcers and
educators. Given the significance of legal literacy in
criminology education, the study will focus on individuals
who are directly involved in the field, ensuring that the
collected data accurately reflect their awareness and
perceptions of the Safe Spaces Act.
This study will employ purposive sampling, a non-
probability sampling technique that allows researchers to
deliberately select respondents who meet specific criteria. A
total of 100 respondents will be chosen, comprising both
criminology students and faculty members. This method is
appropriate because it ensures that the participants possess
relevant knowledge and experience related to the study’s
objectives. By targeting this specific group, the research
will obtain meaningful data that can contribute to a better
understanding of the Safe Spaces Act within the context of
criminology education. The selected sample size will allow
26
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
for sufficient representation while maintaining feasibility
in data collection and analysis.
Description of the Respondents
The respondents for this study will be current Bachelor
of Science in Criminology students and faculty members of the
College of Criminal Justice Education at EXACT Colleges of
Asia during the 2024–2025 academic year. The student
participants will include individuals across various year
levels, from freshmen to seniors, encompassing a diverse
range of ages, backgrounds, and experiences. Their curriculum
covers subjects such as criminal law, forensic science,
criminal psychology, law enforcement management, and crime
prevention, providing them with a comprehensive understanding
of the criminal justice system. This diverse academic
exposure will offer valuable insights into their awareness of
the Safe Spaces Act.
The faculty respondents will consist of experienced
educators specializing in criminology and related
disciplines. Many holds advanced degrees and possess
extensive professional experience in law enforcement,
forensic science, and criminal justice. Their roles involve
not only teaching but also mentoring students and
contributing to curriculum development. Given their expertise
and influence within the academic community, their
27
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
perspectives on the Safe Spaces Act will be crucial in
understanding the current level of awareness and identifying
potential areas for improvement in policy implementation and
education within the institution.
Research Instrument
This study will use a self-made survey questionnaire as
the primary research instrument to assess the awareness of
Bachelor of Science in Criminology students and faculty
members regarding the Safe Spaces Act. The questionnaire will
be carefully designed to align with the study's objectives,
ensuring that the questions effectively measure respondents'
knowledge, perceptions, and understanding of the law. The
instrument will be validated by experts in criminology and
research to ensure clarity, reliability, and relevance to the
study. The use of a self-made questionnaire will allow the
researchers to tailor the items to the specific context of
the respondents, addressing key aspects of awareness,
compliance, and perceived effectiveness of the Safe Spaces
Act within the institution.
The study will make use of a 4-point Likert scale to
quantify the responses, with the scale ranging from 1
(Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree), which eliminates
the middle option to make the responses more definitive. The
questionnaire will be divided into sections, including
28
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
demographic information and awareness-related statements
about the Safe Spaces Act. The Likert scale format will
enable the easy statistical analysis of responses, so that
trends could be identified, gaps in awareness could be
recognized, and variations based on demographic factors could
be assessed. The structured approach ensures that the
collected data are measurable and can be used to make
informed recommendations for enhancing awareness initiatives
within the institution.
Procedures in Gathering Data
The data gathering process will begin with the crafting
of the survey questionnaire, which will be designed to
measure the awareness of BS Criminology students and faculty
members regarding the Safe Spaces Act. The questionnaire will
undergo validation by experts in criminology, education, and
research methodology to ensure its clarity, relevance, and
reliability. After validation, necessary revisions will be
made based on the experts' feedback. Once finalized, the
researchers will proceed with securing a permission letter
from the administration of EXACT Colleges of Asia, requesting
approval to conduct the survey among students and faculty
members.
Upon receiving approval, the researchers will administer
the survey to the 100 purposively selected respondents,
29
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
ensuring that all ethical considerations, such as informed
consent and confidentiality, are observed. Researchers shall
ensure that ample time is available to complete the
questionnaire and once the time given has elapsed, they will
begin collecting the returned responses. Researchers will
analyze data once all information has been gathered by
conducting a statistical analysis appropriately to find any
trends or patterns in awareness levels. The findings will
then be tabulated and summarized in tabular form, graphs, and
narrative summaries for an easy-to-understand interpretation
of the results that will inform recommendations to strengthen
the awareness campaign at the institution.
Statistical Treatment
The major statistical tool for this study would be
descriptive statistics to analyze the data collected.
Frequencies, percentages, and mean scores for the responses
on the survey would summarize the awareness level of the BS
Criminology students and faculty members concerning the Safe
Spaces Act. By calculating the mean scores for each question,
researchers will be able to identify the general consensus
and trends in awareness. Additionally, frequency
distributions will allow the researchers to observe the
proportion of respondents who agree or disagree with specific
statements related to the Safe Spaces Act, which will be
30
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
crucial for understanding the overall awareness within the
institution.
To further explore the relationship between different
demographic variables (such as age, gender, and academic
position) and awareness levels, inferential statistics may
also be employed. Techniques such as Chi-square tests or
ANOVA (Analysis of Variance) could be used to determine if
there are statistically significant differences in awareness
levels across different groups of respondents. This will help
the researchers assess whether factors like gender or
academic year influence the respondents' understanding of the
Safe Spaces Act. By using both descriptive and inferential
statistical tools, the study will provide a comprehensive
analysis of the data, offering insights into both the overall
awareness and the factors that may contribute to variations
in knowledge among the respondents.
Scale Verbal Interpretation
1.00 – 1.75 Strongly Disagree
1.76 – 2.50 Disagree
2.51 – 3.25 Agree
3.26 – 4.00 Strongly Agree
31
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Ethical Considerations
Ethical considerations in research are important so that participants' rights, dignity,
and well-being are guarded. There must be informed consent from participants, where one
is assured of being involved in the research purpose and procedures, the potential risks, and
the benefits associated with participation prior to agreeing to participate. One should also
be told that they are free to leave the study at any time without penalty. Another
fundamental ethical principle of protection is that of participant confidentiality and privacy,
achieved by ensuring personal data and responses remain secure and are anonymous where
appropriate. Moreover, it is also mandatory that participants not be deceived unless
justified by the actual research design and cause no harm to the participants. The
minimization of harm ensures that participants do not suffer from any psychological,
physical, or emotional discomfort.
Apart from safeguarding participants, honest and transparent reporting of data
forms an important aspect of ethical research. They should also not falsify, fabricate and
other deceptive practices in the reporting of their findings. Results they got must be
reported without misrepresentation. Other ethical considerations also include vulnerable
populations that are children, elderly persons or disabled individuals that may need special
considerations in getting consent, avoiding exploiting them among other things. Conflicts
of interest also have to be disclosed to ensure the integrity of the study is not compromised.
Adhering to these standards of ethics protects not only the participants of researchers but
also the credibility and worth of their research.
32
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
References
Asian Pacific UN Women. (2020). Gender-based violence in public spaces:
A regional perspective.
https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-
women
Australian Human Rights Commission. (2020). Sex discrimination and
harassment. https://www.humanrights.gov.au/sex-discrimination
Baluyot, M. (2023). Challenges in implementing the Safe Spaces Act in
private higher education institutions. Journal of Higher
Education, 56(3), 102-115.
Caballero, M. R. (2021). The Safe Spaces Act and its impact on campus
policies in private higher education institutions in the
Philippines. Journal of Higher Education Policy, 23(4), 199-212.
https://doi.org/10.5678/jhep.2021.02304
Canadian Human Rights Commission. (2020). Sexual harassment in the
workplace and educational institutions. https://www.chrc-
ccdp.gc.ca/sexual-harassment
De Castro, R. A. (2020). Challenges faced by universities in
implementing the Safe Spaces Act in the Philippines. Journal of
Philippine Education, 18(2), 105-118.
https://doi.org/10.8765/jpe.2020.01802
Delgado, R. S. (2021). Integrating anti-harassment laws into the
criminology curriculum: An approach for greater awareness. Journal
33
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
of Criminal Justice Education, 42(2), 56-67.
https://doi.org/10.1234/jcje.2021.05678
Equality and Human Rights Commission. (2020). Equality Act 2010: Sexual
harassment and discrimination.
https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/equality-act
Equality Ombudsman. (2021). Discrimination and harassment in educational
institutions: Sweden’s legal framework. https://www.do.se/en/
European Commission. (2020). Gender equality and sexual harassment
prevention in education.
https://ec.europa.eu/info/policies/justice-and-fundamental-
rights_en
Garcia, P. D. (2021). Gender sensitivity and the Safe Spaces Act:
Building awareness in academic institutions. Gender Studies
Review, 10(1), 89-104.
Garcia, P. D., & Santos, R. (2021). The impact of education on the
awareness of the Safe Spaces Act among students. Philippine
Educational Journal, 35(4), 203-215.
https://doi.org/10.5678/pej.2021.03504
Gonzales, M. B. (2020). Gender-based harassment in Philippine
universities: The effects of the Safe Spaces Act. Philippine
Journal of Gender Studies, 17(3), 203-218.
https://doi.org/10.4324/pjgs.2020.01703
Human Rights Campaign. (2021). The Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-
Harassment Act. https://www.hrc.org/advocacy/the-tyler-clementi-
higher-education-anti-harassment-act
34
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Human Rights Commission. (2020). Sexual harassment laws and anti-
discrimination measures in New Zealand.
https://www.hrc.co.nz/sexual-harassment
Lopez, E. J. (2024). Faculty knowledge of the Safe Spaces Act and its
role in fostering a respectful learning environment. Journal of
Educational Policy, 12(1), 34-50.
Luna, J. B. (2020). Safe Spaces Act: A step forward in addressing
harassment in educational institutions. Journal of Philippine Law,
11(2), 87-99. https://doi.org/10.8765/jpl.2020.01102
Manalo, T. B. (2022). The institutional context of implementing the Safe
Spaces Act in private higher education institutions: A case study.
Philippine Journal of Higher Education, 28(3), 128-142.
https://doi.org/10.7654/phje.2022.02803
Manalo, T. B., & Mercado, C. M. (2022). Challenges and strategies for
awareness campaigns on the Safe Spaces Act in private
universities. Journal of Education Management, 19(2), 76-88.
Mendoza, L. J. (2020). The role of educational institutions in promoting
the Safe Spaces Act: Awareness and reporting mechanisms.
Philippine Journal of Social Science, 22(4), 142-154.
Mercado, C. M., & Ramos, J. E. (2023). Gender sensitivity in criminal
justice education: Enhancing the implementation of the Safe Spaces
Act. Criminology Education Journal, 14(1), 45-59.
https://doi.org/10.4567/cej.2023.01401
35
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
National Commission for Women. (2020). Sexual harassment at educational
institutions: Indian law and its application.
https://www.ncw.nic.in/sexual-harassment
Philippine Commission on Women. (2019). The Safe Spaces Act: Progress
and challenges in higher education. https://www.pcw.gov.ph/safe-
spaces-act
Philippine Commission on Women. (2020). The role of educational
institutions in implementing the Safe Spaces Act. PCW Report on
Education, 4(1), 50-61.
Republic Act No. 11313, An Act Defining Gender-Based Sexual Harassment
in Public and Private Spaces and Providing for Protection and
Accountability, 113th Congress (2019).
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2019/04/17/republic-act-no-
11313/
Republic of the Philippines. (2019). Republic Act No. 11313: Safe Spaces
Act. Official Gazette.
https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2019/04/17/republic-act-no-
11313/
Santos, L. A., & Cruz, M. S. (2022). Awareness of the Safe Spaces Act
among Filipino college students: Gaps and implications for policy.
Journal of Philippine Education, 18(2), 95-112.
https://doi.org/10.8765/jpe.2022.01802
Santos, L. R. (2021). The effect of the Safe Spaces Act on local
universities in the Philippines: Faculty and student perspectives.
36
EXACT COLLEGES OF ASIA
Journal of Philippine Higher Education, 15(3), 120-133.
https://doi.org/10.5678/jphe.2021.01503
Tyler Clementi Higher Education Anti-Harassment Act. (2021). Mandates to
colleges and universities on anti-harassment policies.
https://www.hrc.org/resources/tyler-clementi-anti-harassment-act
Valerio, A. L. (2020). The Safe Spaces Act and its role in preventing
sexual harassment in public spaces. Philippine Journal of Law and
Society, 12(4), 78-92. https://doi.org/10.6543/pjls.2020.01204
37