Scribd
Upload
15 views5 pages

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Phase 1 - Identification and Selection of Innovative Assessment Trends

The document outlines a collaborative activity for a course on Testing and Evaluation in English Language Teaching (ELT), focusing on innovative assessment trends related to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Students are required to individually select and justify an assessment trend, participate in a forum to discuss their findings, and collaboratively create a comparative chart summarizing their research. The final submission must include evidence of individual and group contributions, adhering to APA citation style and avoiding academic misconduct.

Uploaded by

karitovargas2018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
15 views5 pages

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 1 - Phase 1 - Identification and Selection of Innovative Assessment Trends

The document outlines a collaborative activity for a course on Testing and Evaluation in English Language Teaching (ELT), focusing on innovative assessment trends related to Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Students are required to individually select and justify an assessment trend, participate in a forum to discuss their findings, and collaboratively create a comparative chart summarizing their research. The final submission must include evidence of individual and group contributions, adhering to APA citation style and avoiding academic misconduct.

Uploaded by

karitovargas2018
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 5

Universidad Nacional Abierta y a Distancia

Vicerrectoría Académica y de Investigación


Course: Testing and Evaluation in ELT
Code: 518023

Activity Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Phase 1 - Identification and Selection of


Innovative Assessment Trends
Activity Description
Type of activity: Collaborative
Evaluation moment: Initial
Highest score of the activity: 25 points
The activity starts on: Monday, February The activity ends on: Sunday, February
3, 2025 16, 2025
With this activity, you are expected to achieve the following learning
outcomes:

Describe innovative assessment trends in English Language Teaching (ELT) that align
with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

The activity consists of:

The students individually provide an overview of the Sustainable Development Goals


and their relevance to education. Collaboratively conduct research on innovative
assessment trends in ELT, Share and justify their selected assessment trends in the
forum supported by citations and references

Part 1: Go to the learning environment Unit 1: Sustainable Development Goals and


Innovative ELT Assessment Trends and read the bibliographic references.

Part 2: Trend Selection:

The students individually select one assessment trend from the list provided in annex
1: New Trends in Testing and Evaluation in ELT

The students must explain their choice and its significance for educational settings in
the forum.

Part 3: Collaborative Work Forum:

1
Provide a definition and their own opinion on the selected trend, supported by up-to-
date bibliographical references on course content unit 1

Explain why the chosen trend is important for students and its potential impact on
education.

After sharing their individual explanations, students work collaboratively in the forum
phase 1 building a comparative chart and provide at least one feedback for peer
‘contributions on time.

The comparative chart must include the definition, purpose, importance, and main
aspects of each trend discussed.

Part 4: Final Submission:

One student will submit a PDF file for the whole group to the Evaluation environment.
This file must include:

-Individual Trend Selection


-Evidence of their participation in the forum.
Feedback peers´çontributions
-The completed comparative chart with citations and references in APA style.

For the development of the activity consider that:

In the Initial Information Environment, you must:

N/A
In the Learning Environment, you must:

Participate in the social forum titled: Discussion forum: Phase 1 - Selection of


Innovative Assessment Trends. Share your thoughts and insights about the selected
trend from Annex 1: New Trends in Testing and Evaluation in ELT and collaborate in
the construction of the comparative chart.

In the Evaluation Environment, you must:

Upload the final PDF document in the space: Phase 1 Selection of Innovative
Assessment Trends. The file contains the evidences of the students’ participations in

2
the collaborative forum and the comparative chart including citations and references
in APA style.

Evidence of individual work:


The individual evidence to be submitted is:
• Each student selects one trend for assessment and evaluation from Annex 1
and conducts thorough research about it.
• Before participating in the forum, students should check that it meets all the
requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

Evidence of collaborative work:


The collaborative evidence to be submitted is:
• All group members must participate in the collaborative forum for phase 1 with
their contributions in the development of the activity.
• Each student individually must participate in the creation of the comparative
chart. They must include proper citations and references in APA style.

1. General Guidelines for the Development of Evidences to Submit

For Collaborative evidences, consider the following:

• All members of the group must participate with their contributions in the
development of the activity.

• In each group a single member will be chosen to submit the requested product in
the environment indicated by the teacher.

• Before submitting the requested product, students should check that it meets all
the requirements mentioned in this activity guide.

• Only the members of the group that participated with contributions during the
time assigned for the activity should be included as authors of the submitted
product.

Please keep in mind that all individual or collaborative written products must comply
with the spelling rules and presentation conditions defined in this activity guide.
Regarding the use of references, consider that the product of this activity must
comply with APA style.

3
In any case, make sure you comply with the rules and avoid academic plagiarism.
You can review your written products using the Turnitin tool found in the virtual
campus.

Under the Academic Code of Conduct, the actions that infringe the academic order,
among others, are the following: paragraph e) Plagiarism is to present as your own
work all or part of a written report, task or document of invention carried out by
another person. It also implies the use of citations or lack of references, or it
includes citations where there is no match between these and the reference and
paragraph f) To reproduce, or copy for profit, educational resources or results of
research products, which have rights reserved for the University. (Acuerdo 029 - 13
de diciembre de 2013, artículo 99)

The academic penalties students will face are:


a) In case of academic fraud demonstrated in the academic work or evaluation, the
score obtained will be zero (0.0) without any disciplinary measures being derived.
b) In case of proven plagiarism in academic work of any nature, the score obtained
will be zero (0.0), without any disciplinary measures being derived.

2. Evaluation Rubric Template

Type of activity: Collaborative


Evaluation moment: Initial
The highest score in this activity is 25 points
First evaluation High level: The student justifies in a clear and detailed
criterion: manner why the selected trend is relevant and how it
addresses current educational needs.
The student justifies
the selected trend If your work is at this level, you can get between 8 points
with relevance and 10 points
using the provided
information. Average level: The student justifies the chosen trend, but not
clearly or adequately; there are limited details on the relevance
This criterion of the selected trends.
represents 10
points of the total If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points
and 7 points

4
of 25 points of
the activity. Low level: The student justifies the chosen trend in a
superficial, incomplete, or limited-detail manner.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0


points and 3 points
Second evaluation High level: The student actively and meaningfully participates
criterion: in the forum with thoughtful contributions, constructive feedback
to peers, and a significant contribution to the creation of the
The student actively comparative chart aligned with inclusivity and the Sustainable
and meaningfully Development Goals (SDGs).
participates by
submitting If your work is at this level, you can get between 10 points
thoughtful and 15 points
contributions
according to the Average level: The student participates in the collaborative
criteria provided in work forum to a limited extent by submitting their contributions;
the activity guide. the creation of the comparative chart with partial alignment
towards inclusivity and the Sustainable Development Goals.
This criterion
represents 15 If your work is at this level, you can get between 4 points
points of the total and 9 points
of 25 points of
the activity. Low level: The student does not actively participate in the
collaborative work forum; the creation of the comparative chart
is not significantly aligned with inclusivity and the Sustainable
Development Goals according to the given criteria.

If your work is at this level, you can get between 0 points


and 3 points

You might also like