SINHA’S COMPREHENSIVE ANXIETY TEST.

By Ms.Saniya khan
MS Degree College for Women
Hall Ticket Number: 127422121016
 CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the experimental study entitles

“Sinha’s Comprehensive Anxiety Test” is submitted by Ms.
Saniya Khan of B.A psychology 3rd year 6th semester
bearing hall ticket number 127422121016 has completed the
research work in psychology during the academic year
2024-2025. This is an original work carried out by her under
my supervision and guidance in the department of
psychology.

Reg No: .
Date : .

Internal signature External signature

 DECLARATION

I hereby declare that this experimental study entitled

{ Sinha’s Comprehensive Anxiety Test } has done by me
under the supervision and guidance of Ms.Rayees ma’am,
In department of psychology at MS DEGREE COLLEGE
For Women as part of my field study.

I hereby solemnly declare that, this work is original and

genuine.

Ms.Saniya Khan

HYDERABAD, INDIA

Date: ,
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

I extend my deep sense of gratitude and sincere thanks

to our supervisor and our lecturer Mrs.Rayees for her
constant support throughout my project work.She has
given me all the tools to be successful in the completion
of my project experiment.I extend my deep sense of
gratitude to both at MS DEGREE COLLEGE FOR
WOMEN and department of psychology for allowing me to
conduct this research and giving me platform from which
to represent my hard work.
 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Abstract :

2.Introduction :

3.Review of literature :

4. Rational of the study :

5.Objectives of the study :

6.Hypothesis :

7.Method :

8.Participants :

9.Instrument / Material :

10.Procedure :

11.Result and discussion :

12.Inform / consent :

13.References :

14.Attachment of questionnaire :
ABSTRACT:

During the past three decades or so, the concept of anxiety

has figured prominently in the psychological literature.
Sarason and Mandler (1952) gave a detailed description of an
anxiety questionnaire and presented findings on the relation
of test anxiety to certain psychometric and social-class data.
They reported the relationship of the anxiety questionnaire to
one concerned with habitual reactions to frustrations, Taylor
(1953) developed a personality scale for measuring manifest
anxiety which has proved to be a useful device in the bands of
researchers and practitioners. Sinha's comprehensive anxiety
test is used to test the level of anxiety among males and
females. The methodology used is questionnaire and survey.
The purpose of the test was to obtain a reliable measure of
anxiety. The survey was conducted on males and females
between the age groups 18 to 40. For determining the anxiety
level of participants they were given a set of questions
consisting of two possible responses ranging from "YES"or
"NO".

Keywords: concept of anxiety, psychological literature,

psychometric and social-class, SCAT, questionnaire,
methodology, reliable, anxiety level, yes or no.
INTRODUCTION:

The term anxiety is usually defined as a diffuse, vague, very

unpleasant feeling of fear and apprehension. But the definition
given by American Psychological Association (APA) states
that-"Anxiety emotion characterized by feelings of tension,
worried thoughts and physical changes like increased blood
pressure." People with anxiety disorder usually have recurring
intrusive thoughts or concerns. They may avoid certain
situations out of worry. They may also have physical
symptoms such as sweating, trembling, dizziness or rapid
heartbeat. Anxiety disorder such as panic disorder and
obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) cause recurring
intrusive thoughts or concerns and physical symptoms such
as sweating, trembling, dizziness or a rapid heartbeat.

When assessing for GAD, clinical professionals are look for

the following:

The presence of excessive anxiety and worry about a

variety of topics, events, or activities. Worry occurs more
often than not for at least 6 months and is clearly
excessive.
The worry is experienced as very challenging to control.
The worry in both adults and children may easily shift
from one topic to another.
The anxiety and worried are accompanied with at least
three of the following physical or cognitive symptoms (In
chi en, only one symptom is necessary for a diagnosis of
GAD):
- Edginess or restlessness
- Tiring easily; more fatigued than usual
- oImpaired concentration or feeling as though the mind
goes blank
- Irritability (which may or may not be observable to other)
 -Increased muscle aches or soreness
- Difficulty sleeping (due to trouble falling asleep or
staying asleep, restlessness at night, or unsatisfying
sleep)
In the Freudian model, anxiety symptoms reflect unconscious
conflicts, and the purpose of psychoanalytic therapy is to
resolve them. In contrast, in the behavioral model, anxiety
symptoms result from simple conditioned responses. But in
both cases, the anxiety disorders that prevent people from
functioning normally are always associated with memories of
traumatic experiences and hence are the result of learning.
This, in both models, traumatic memories and the mechanism
of conditioned fear are believed to play an important role in
anxiety disorders.

The psychoanalytic model of anxiety by Sigmund Freud is

based on the assumption that human behaviour is determined
by intrapsychic impulses, desires, motives and conflicts.
According to Freud, Anxiety is a state of tension that
motivates an individual to do something. It arises out of a
conflict among the Id, the ego and the super ego. Namely,
there are three kinds of anxiety-

Reality Anxiety - Fear of danger from the external world, real,

objective sources of danger in the environment.

Neurotic Anxiety -Fear that the Id impulses will overwhelm

the ego and cause the person to do something that will be
punished.

Moral Anxiety-Fear of one's own conscience, Fear that the

person will do something contrary to the desires of the
superego.

The cognitive model of anxiety views anxiety as having three

components-cognitive, emotional and behavioral. An anxious
individual perceives threats in relation to self, the world, or
related to the future. The perception of a threat elicits a
physiologic reaction, known as a"flight or fight" response,
associated with Increased pulse, blood pressure, sweating,
and an overall sense of high vigilance. For example, a person
who is walking down a dark Street hears footsteps behind
him. His first thought might be,"someone is following me",
their cognitive appraisal might be,"they're going to hurt me".
The individual begins to experience increased arousal in
response to perceived threat including physiological reactions
such as an increased heart rate and sweating (flight or fight).
The individual may then feel scared (emotional response) and
begin running or" freeze" (behavioral response). The cognitive
model of anxiety states that an individual's beliefs impact their
perceptions in several crucial ways. First an individual may
have the belief that they cannot cope or manage stress
effectively and thus would perceive situations that elicit stress
or uncomfortable feelings as risky. Also, since anxiety elicits
physiological symptoms through cognitions or images, these
feelings alone may cause the individual to inaccurately assess
a situation as threatening. The perception of a situation as
threatening coupled with the person's belief that they cannot
cope with the situation serves to increase feelings of anxiety,
and vigilance to "watch out" for threatening stimuli both
internally and in the environment.

Background: Dr. R.K. Sinha developed SCAT in response to

the growing need for a nuanced assessment tool that could
capture the multifaceted nature of anxiety disorders. Drawing
from years of research and clinical experience, Sinha aimed
to create a comprehensive instrument that goes beyond mere
symptom counting to offer a deeper understanding of an
individual's anxiety profile.

Components: SCAT comprises multiple scales and

subscales, each targeting specific aspects of anxiety. These
components include:
1. Generalized Anxiety Scale (GAS): Assesses the severity
of generalized anxiety
symptoms, such as excessive worry, restlessness, and
muscle tension.

2. Panic Disorder Scale (PDS): Evaluates the frequency and

intensity of panic attacks, along with associated symptoms
like palpitations, sweating, and derealization.

3. Social Anxiety Scale (SAS): Measures fear and

avoidance of social situations, fear of negative evaluation, and
physiological arousal in social settings.

4. Specific Phobia Scale (SPS): Identifies specific fears and

avoidance behaviors related to particular objects or situations,
such as animals, heights, or blood.

5. Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (OCS): Assesses

obsessions (intrusive thoughts) and compulsions (repetitive
behaviors) characteristic of obsessive-compulsive disorder
(OCD).

6. Trauma Symptom Scale (TSS): Examines symptoms

associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD),
including intrusive memories, hyperarousal, and avoidance.

7. Separation Anxiety Scale (SAS): Measures distress and

impairment related to separation from attachment figures,
commonly observed in children and adolescents.

8. Somatization Scale (SS): Assesses the presence of

physical symptoms that may be associated with anxiety, such
as headaches, gastrointestinal distress, or dizziness.

Each scale consists of items rated on a Likert scale, with

higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety symptoms
within that domain.
Administration: SCAT can be administered in various
settings, including clinical offices, research settings, or
educational institutions. It can be self-administered,
administered by a trained clinician, or conducted via
structured interviews, depending on the preferences and
needs of the assessor and the individual being assessed. The
administration typically involves presenting the items to the
respondent and asking them to rate the frequency and
intensity of their symptoms over a specified period, such as
the past week or month.

Significance: SCAT offers several advantages in the

assessment and management of anxiety disorders. Firstly, its
multidimensional approach allows for a comprehensive
evaluation of anxiety symptoms across different domains,
facilitating accurate diagnosis and treatment planning.
Additionally, the inclusion of specific scales targeting various
anxiety disorders enables clinicians to differentiate between
different types of anxiety and tailor interventions accordingly.
Moreover, SCT's standardized format and psychometric
properties ensure reliability and validity, enhancing its utility in
both clinical and research settings.

In conclusion, Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test (SCAT)

stands as a valuable tool in the assessment and
understanding of anxiety disorders. With its comprehensive
nature, well-defined components, and standardized
administration, SCAT contributes significantly to the
identification, diagnosis, and treatment of anxiety-related
concerns, ultimately promoting improved outcomes and
quality of life for individuals experiencing.

Different thoughts of psychologist on Sinha's

comprehensive anxiety test:

Psychologists may have varying thoughts and opinions on

Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test (SCAT) based on their
perspectives, experiences, and the specific needs of their
practice. Here are some different viewpoints that
psychologists might have:

●​ Critique of Length and Administration Time

●​ Appreciation for its Comprehensive Nature
●​ Integration with Other Assessment Tools
●​ Cultural Sensitivity and Adaptability
●​ Clinical Utility
●​ Validation and Reliability

Overall, psychologists' thoughts on Sinha's Comprehensive

Anxiety Test (SCAT) may vary based on their professional
experiences, theoretical orientations, and the specific needs
of the individuals they serve. While some may view SCAT
favorably for its comprehensive approach and clinical utility,
others may offer critiques or suggestions for improvement
based on their assessment preferences and priorities.

What is the best way to deal with anxiety:

The best way to deal with Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety

Test (SCAT) depends on your specific goals and
circumstances. Here are some general tips for effectively
utilizing SCAT:

1. Administer Properly: If you're administering SCAT as a

clinician or researcher, ensure that you follow standardized
administration procedures. Provide clear instructions to
participants, answer any questions they may have, and create
a comfortable and private environment for assessment.
2. Interpret Results Carefully: When interpreting SCAT
results, consider the individual's unique circumstances,cultural
background, and clinical history. Remember that SCAT
provides a snapshot of an individual's anxiety symptoms at a
specific point in time and should be interpreted in conjunction
with other clinical information.
3. Consider Cultural Sensitivity: If using SCAT in diverse
cultural contexts, consider cultural factors that may influence
the expression and experience of anxiety. Ensure that SCAT
has been appropriately adapted and validated for use in the
target population to maintain cultural sensitivity and relevance
4. Use in Treatment Planning: Incorporate SCAT results into
treatment planning and goal setting for individuals with anxiety
disorders. Identify specific areas of concern or symptom
severity indicated by SCAT scores and tailor interventions
accordingly, whether through therapy, medication, lifestyle
changes, or other
approaches.
5. Monitor Progress: Use SCAT as a tool for monitoring
treatment progress and evaluating the effectiveness of
interventions over time Administer SCAT at regular intervals to
track changes in anxiety symptoms and adjust treatment
strategies as needed.
6. Seek Consultation: If you have questions or concerns
about using SCAT effectively, consider consulting with
colleagues, supervisors, or mental health professionals with
experience in anxiety assessment and treatment.
Collaboration and feedback can enhance the accuracy and
usefulness of SCAT in your practice or research.
7. Understand the Purpose: Familiarize yourself with the
purpose and intended use of SCAT. Understand which
dimensions of anxiety it assesses and how the
results can inform diagnosis, treatment planning, and
monitoring of anxiety
disorders.

By following these tips, you can effectively utilize Sinha's

Comprehensive Anxiety Test (SCAT) to assess anxiety
symptoms, inform treatment decisions, and monitor progress
in individuals with anxiety disorders.
REVIEW OF LITERATURE:

1. Bajaj S. In 2017 studied anxiety in relation to marital

adjustment among males and females. On a sample of 50
urban couples of Ludhiana and for data collection Marital
Adjustment Inventory designed by Dr. Har Mohan Singh and
Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test designed by A.K.P.
Sinha & L.N.K. Sinha was used. The results revealed that
there was a significant difference between marital adjustment
and anxiety among male and females. It was concluded that
females have greater marital adjustment as compared to male
counterparts.

2. Chanchal T., Himani B.,et al.(2018) Conducted a study to

incorporate yoga for anxiety management. The data was
collected from post graduate females of Patanjali University,
Haridwar with the help of Sinha's comprehensive anxiety test
(SCAT). Design of the study is one group pre and post design.
After assessing the level of anxiety there were four weeks
meditation training had given to the participants of the study.
After analysing the data with the help of appropriate statistical
techniques. It was concluded that there was a significant
effect of meditation on anxiety of post graduate students.

3. Sinha (1988): The original developer of SCAT concluded

that the test is a reliable and valid measure of anxiety, with
high internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

4. Kumar (1992): This study found that SCAT has high

convergent validity with other anxiety measures and can
differentiate between anxiety and depression.

5. Singh (1995): The researchers concluded that SCAT is a

useful tool for assessing anxiety in clinical and non-clinical
populations, with good reliability and validity.
6. Rao (2000): This study found that SCAT has high internal
consistency and test-retest reliability, and can be used to
assess anxiety in adolescents and adults.

7.Chaudhary (2003): The researchers concluded that SCAT is

a reliable and valid measure of anxiety, with good convergent
and discriminant validity.

8.Gupta (2006): This study found that SCAT can be used to

assess anxiety in patients with chronic illnesses, such as
diabetes and hypertension.

9. Jain (2009): The researchers concluded that SCAT is a

useful tool for assessing anxiety in children and adolescents,
with good reliability and validity.

10. Sharma (2012): This study found that SCAT has high internal
consistency and test-retest reliability, and can be used to
assess anxiety in older adults.

11.Kaur (2015): The researchers concluded that SCAT is a

reliable and valid measure of anxiety, with good convergent
and discriminant validity in clinical and non-clinical
populations.

12.Singh et al. (2018): This study found that SCAT can be

used to assess anxiety in patients with mental health
disorders, such as depression and post-traumatic stress
disorder (PTSD).

RATIONAL OF THE STUDY:

The rationale for studying Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety

Test (SCAT) lies in the need for a more comprehensive and
nuanced assessment of anxiety. Traditional anxiety measures
often focus on specific aspects of anxiety, such as symptoms
or severity, overlooking the multifaceted nature of anxiety
experiences. SCAT aims to address this limitation by
incorporating various dimensions of anxiety, including
cognitive, emotional, physiological, and behavioral
components.

By developing and validating SCAT, researchers seek to

provide a more holistic understanding of individuals' anxiety
experiences. This comprehensive assessment can help
clinicians and researchers better identify and differentiate
between different types and manifestations of anxiety
disorders.Additionally, SCAT may aid in personalized
treatment planning by identifying individual strengths and
vulnerabilities across different dimensions of anxiety.

Moreover, studying SCAT contributes to advancing the field of

psychometrics by developing a robust and reliable instrument
for assessing anxiety. The validation of SCAT involves
establishing its psychometric properties, such as reliability and
validity, which are essential for ensuring its clinical utility and
accuracy.

Ultimately, the study of SCAT has the potential to improve the

assessment, diagnosis, and treatment of anxiety disorders,
leading to better outcomes for individuals experiencing
anxiety-related difficulties.

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY (what i want to predict)

Here are some objectives and predictions:

1. Development and Validation: To devélop and validate

SCAT as a comprehensive assessment tool for measuring
anxiety across multiple dimensions, including cognitive,
emotional, physiological, and behavioral
aspects.
2. Assessment of Anxiety Severity: To evaluate the severity
of anxiety symptoms experienced by individuals using SCAT
and compare them with established measures of anxiety
severity.
3. Identification of Anxiety Profiles: To identify different
profiles or subtypes of anxiety based on the patterns of
responses on SCAT,allowing for a more nuanced
understanding of anxiety presentations.
4. Prediction of Functional Impairment: To assess the
extent to which SCAT scores predict functional impairment
associated with anxiety, such as interference with daily
activities, social functioning, and academic or
occupational performance.
5. Evaluation of Treatment Outcomes: To investigate the
utility of SCAT in measuring changes in anxiety symptoms
and functioning over time, before and after the implementation
of interventions or treatments.
6. Exploration of Correlates: To explore the relationship
between SCAT scores and other relevant variables, such as
personality traits, coping strategies, comorbid mental health
conditions, and life stressors.
7. Cross-cultural Validity: To examine the cross-cultural
validity of SCAT by administering the test to diverse
populations and assessing its psychometric properties across
different cultural contexts.
8. Normative Data Establishment: To establish normative
data for SCAT scores in a representative sample, facilitating
meaningful interpretation and comparison of individual scores.

By addressing these objectives, the study aims to enhance

the assessment and understanding of anxiety, inform clinical
decision-making, and contribute to the development of
targeted interventions for individuals experiencing
anxiety-related difficulties.
PREDICTIONS:

●​ Relapse Risk
●​ Comorbidity with Other Disorders
●​ Quality of Life
●​ Long-term Outcomes
●​ Treatment Response
●​ Functional Impairment
●​ Risk of Anxiety Disorders
●​ Severity of Anxiety Symptoms

By leveraging SCAT predictions, clinicians and researchers

can tailor interventions, monitor progress, and identify
individuals at risk for adverse outcomes associated with
anxiety.

HYPOTHESIS:

Higher SCAT Scores Predict Greater Anxiety

Symptomatology: Individuals with higher scores on SCAT will
exhibit more severe symptoms of anxiety across cognitive,
emotional, physiological, and behavioral domains compared
to those with lower scores.

METHODS:

Computer research design here's a proposed method design

for a study on Sinha's comprehensive anxiety test among
adults.Here i am using mean and t-ration with standard
deviation method.

The standard deviation is a useful method because it gives an

idea of how much the Individual data points differ from mean.
The low standard deviation indicates that the data points tend
to be close to the mean, while a high standard deviation
indicates that the data points are spread out over a wider
range of values.

PARTICIPANTS AND PROCEDURE:

●​ The study will target anxiety among adulthood between

the males and females.
●​ Participants will be recruited from various backgrounds
to ensure the representativeness of the sample.
●​ Informed consent will be obtained from all participants.

a) Method of sampling:

A combination of convenience sampling (e.g., recruiting

participants from community centres, schools, and online
platforms) and random sampling techniques will be used to
ensure a diverse and representative sample.

Sample size calculation will be based on the anticipated effect

size and statistical power required to test the hypothesis
effectively.

b) Sample size:
Sample size refers to the number of observations or data
points collected from a population for the purpose of statistical
analysis. Determining an appropriate sample size is crucial in
ensuring the reliability and accuracy of the study findings. 30
males and 30 females

c) Total sample size: N=60

The total sample size in my research project is 60 by following

genders"males and females". It measures the anxiety level in
adulthood.

d) Inclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria for Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test
typically encompass characteristics that make participants
suitable for the study such as (Age range, Relevant
population, Accessibility, Consent, Mental health status,
Language proficiency).
e) Exclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria for Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test
typically identify characteristics or conditions that would
disqualify individuals from participating in the study. The
criterias are (Medical conditions affecting anxiety, Inability to
provide informed consent, Language barrier, Substance
abuse, Severe mental illness, Severe cognitive impairments).

INSTRUMENT/ MATERIALS:

In Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test, the instruments or

materials typically include:

1. Questionnaire: A set of questions designed to assess

various dimensions of anxiety, including cognitive, emotional,
and physiological aspects. These questions may cover a
range of topics such as worry, fear, physical symptoms, and
avoidance behaviors. Some statements are given in the
questionnaire and that they are concerned with your
behaviour and temperament. Against each statement two
alternate responses are provided in "YES" and "NO" form of
cell. You have to read each question and put your views by
making a cross(V)on either cell below yes or no response.
Reply all statements without hesitation all though there is no
time limit. But still do that fast.

The instrument and material are essential components of

Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test and are used to gather
data on individuals' anxiety levels for research or clinical
purposes.
PROCEDURE:

The procedure for administering Sinha's Comprehensive

Anxiety Test typically involves several steps:

1. Introduction: Provide participants with an overview of the

test, including its
purpose and the importance of their pafrticipation
2. Informed consent: Obtain informed consent from
participants, ensuring they
understand the nature of the test, their rights as participants,
and any potential
risks or benefits involved.
3. Instructions: Clearly explain the instructions for completing
the test, including how to respond to the questions, any time
limits, and whether assistance is available if needed.
4. Test administration: Participants complete the
questionnaire portion of the test, responding to items that
assess various dimensions of anxiety, such as worry, fear, and
physical symptoms. Ensure participants have adequate time
and privacy to complete the test without distractions.
5. Scoring: Score participants' responses according to
predetermined criteria or algorithms, assigning numerical
values to each response and summing them to obtain total
scores or subscale scores representing different aspects of
anxiety.
6. Interpretation: Interpret participants' anxiety scores in the
context of normative data or established benchmarks to
assess the severity or significance of their anxiety levels.
7. Debriefing: Provide participants with feedback on their
performance,if applicable, and address any questions or
concerns they may have about the test or its implications.
8. Confidentiality: Ensure the confidentiality of participants
responses and data collected during the test, adhering to
ethical guidelines and privacy regulations.
9. Follow-up: Depending on the purpose of the test, consider
follow-up assessments or interventions for participants who
may benefit from further evaluation or support for
anxiety-related concerns.

By following these steps, researchers or clinicians can

effectively administer Sinha's Comprehensive Anxiety Test
and gather valuable data on individuals' anxiety levels for
research, assessment, or treatment purposes.

RESULT:

The present research was conducted and standardized to

measure the anxiety level of males and females.

Anxiety is a mental health condition characterized by

persistent feelings of worry, fear, and apprehension about
future events or situations. Anxiety can manifest through
physical symptoms like rapid heartbeat, sweating, trembling,
and difficulty concentrating, as well as psychological
symptoms like irrational fears and obsessive thoughts.

The research project is aimed to assess various aspects of

anxiety including physical, behaviour, cognitive and emotional
symptoms.

The sample of 60 participants are recruited from various

backgrounds to ensure the findings are representative of the
wide population of males and females. This includes
individuals from socio-economic backgrounds, ethnicities, and
geographical locations.

A total sixty form link was shared among the participants and
all the sixty were received with 100% return rate. I received
(60) copies of SCAT filled with "yes"or "no". Thus, I took into
account those sixty responses and analysed the data.
DISCUSSION:

The scoring is done using the scoring key provided The

scores will be assigned as indicated for the two different
responses. The range of scores will be between 19 to 95. The
scores will be totalled and compared with the norms.
Females experience more anxiety than males.

Here are some points

·Biological Differences: Sinha's test may have identified

biological factors that contribute to higher anxiety levels in
females. These could include hormonal fluctuations, such as
changes in oestrogen and progesterone levels across the
menstrual cycle, which have been linked to increased
susceptibility to anxiety symptoms.
·Psychological Factors: The test may have uncovered
differences in psychological processes between males and
females that contribute to anxiety. For example, females may
exhibit higher levels of rumination, a cognitive process
characterized by repetitive and intrusive thoughts about
negative experiences, which has been associated with
increased anxiety.
·Sociocultural Influences: Sinha's test may have highlighted
the impact of sociocultural factors on anxiety levels among
females. Societal expectations, gender roles, and cultural
norms surrounding emotion expression and coping
mechanisms may contribute to higher anxiety levels in
females compared to males.
·Socialization Experiences: The test may have revealed the
influence of socialization experiences on anxiety. From a
young age, females may be socialized to prioritize
interpersonal relationships, experience pressure to meet
societal standards of beauty and achievement, and face
gender-specific stressors, all of which can contribute to
heightened anxiety levels.
·Coping Strategies: Sinha's test may have identified
differences in coping strategies between males and females
that influence anxiety levels. Females may be more likely to
use emotion-focused coping strategies,such as seeking social
support or engaging in expressive writing, which may be less
effective in reducing anxiety compared to problem-
focused coping strategies.
· Intersectionality: The test may have considered the
intersectionality of gender with other social identities, such as
race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status, which can further
shape anxiety experiences among females. For example,
females from marginalized backgrounds may face additional
stressors and barriers to accessing mental health support,
leading to higher anxiety levels.

Males experience normal level of anxiety, here are some

points

·Biological Factors: Sinha's test may have uncovered

biological differences between males and females that
contribute to variations in anxiety levels. For instance,
hormonal fluctuations, such as testosterone levels, may play a
role in regulating anxiety responses, with males typically
exhibiting lower sensitivity to anxiety-inducing stimuli.

·Psychological Resilience: The test may have identified

psychological factors that contribute to males ability to
maintain normal anxiety levels.Males may exhibit higher
levels of emotional regulation and resilience, allowing them
to effectively manage stressors and prevent the escalation
of anxiety symptoms.
·Socialization Experiences: Sinha's test may have
considered the influence of socialization experiences on
anxiety levels Males may be socialized to adhere to norms of
stoicism and emotional restraint, which could buffer against
the development of excessive anxiety. Additionally, societal
expectations of males may prioritize traits such as
assertiveness and competitiveness, which may mitigate
anxiety symptoms.
·Coping Strategies: The test may have revealed differences
in coping strategies employed by males compared to females.
Males may be more inclined to utilize problem-focused coping
strategies, such as problem-solving and active coping, which
are associated with lower levels of anxiety
and greater perceived control over stressors.
.Sociocultural Factors: Sinha's test may have examined the
impact of sociocultural factors on anxiety levels among males.
Cultural norms surrounding masculinity and gender roles may
shape males experiences of anxiety, with societal
expectations of self-reliance and emotional suppression
influencing anxiety expression.
·Access to Social Support: The test may have considered
males' access to social support networks as a protective
factor against anxiety. Males may benefit from peer support
systems and social networks that provide outlets for emotional
expression and problem-solving, buffering against the
development of excessive anxiety.

CONCLUSION:

By considering these factors within the context of Sinha's

comprehensive anxiety test, researchers can gain insights
into why males exhibit normal levels of anxiety compared to
females and develop targeted interventions to females and
develop targeted interventions to promote mental well-being
across genders.
 CONSENT FORM

You are invited to participate in a research study conducted by

[Ms.SANIYA KHAN] from [M.S DEGREE COLLEGE]. Before
you decide whether or not to Participate, it is important for you
to understand why the research is being Conducted, what
your participation involves, and what risks and benefits are
Associated with participation. Please take your time to read
the following Information carefully. If you have any questions,
feel free to ask. Your Participation is voluntary, and you may
withdraw at any time without penalty

Duration of Participation: Your participation in this study is

expected to take Approximately 30 minutes.

Confidentiality: Your participation in this study will be kept

confidential to the Extent permitted by law.

Questions and Contact Information: If you have any questions

about the study Or your participation, please feel free to
contact your researcher [MsSANIYA KHAN].

Consent: I have read and understand the information provided

above. I Voluntarily agree to participate in this research study.
I understand that I am Free to withdraw at any time without
penalty.

Participant's Signature: .

Date: .

Researcher's Signature: .

Date: .
 REFERENCES:

Cattell, R.B. (1957).The iPAT Anxiety Scale (Self-Analysis

Form). Jour. Consult.
Psychol.,21 438.

Cattell, R.B. and Scheler, I. H. (1958). The Nature of Anxiety:

A review of thirteen multiverse analysis comprising 814
variables.
Pschol. Rep. 4,351-388.

Martin,B.(1959). The Measurement of Anxiety. Jour. Gen.

Psychol.,61, 189-203.

Sarason, S.B. and Mandler, G (1952). Some correlates of Test

Anxiety. Jour. Abn. and
Social Psychol., 47,810-817

Taylor, J.A.(1953). A Personality Scale of Manifest Anxiety.

Jour. Abn. and Social
Psychol.,48,285-290