Behavioral Finance (Topic 1 notes)
Behavioral Finance (Topic 1 notes)
LEARNING OBJECTIVES:
□ Understand why there is a need for behavioral □ Explain why people make irrational financial
finance. decisions.
□ Differentiate traditional and behavioral finance. □ Discuss the key concepts of behavioral finance.
BEHAVIORAL FINANCE
➢ It is a concept developed with the inputs taken from the field of psychology and finance.
➢ It tries to understand various puzzling observations in stock markets with better explanations.
➢ The behavior of individuals, practitioners, markets and managers is sometimes characterized as irrational.
➢ It focuses on the fact that investors are not always rational, have limits to their self-control and are influenced
by their own biases.
➢ Behavioral finance denotes the study of finance based on credible assumptions about how people behave, often
confirmed by psychological experiments.
➢ Shefrin (2005) in his book on behavioral asset pricing states “Behavioral finance is the study of how psychology
phenomena impact financial behavior”.
➢ People in traditional finance are rational. People in behavioral finance are normal. - Meir Stratman
• It is something which is much broader and wider and includes the insights from behavioral
economics, psychology and microeconomic theory
• The main theme of the traditional finance is to avoid all the possible effects of individual’s
personality and mindset.
1. Limited empirical evidence: While there is a growing body of evidence in behavioral finance, some of the
theories and models have not been fully tested and remain subject to debate and revision.
2. Complexity: Behavioral finance can be a complex field, and some of the theories and models can be difficult to
understand and apply.
3. Potential for overreliance on psychological factors: While psychological and emotional factors do play a role in
financial decision making, it is important to recognize that there are many other factors that can impact financial
decisions, including economic, political, and cultural factors.
2. FRAMING
➢ The decision-makers perception about a problem and its possible outcomes is what is referred to as the
decision frame.
➢ It is affected by the presentation, person’s characteristics, and perception about the question despite the fact
remaining the same.
➢ Psychologists refer this behavior as a “frame dependence” behavior.
3. EMOTIONS
➢ Most human decisions are driven by human needs, desires, fear, fantasies, etc.
➢ The term “animal spirit” given by John Keynes’s indicates the inner urge of market participants to engage in
more investment and consumption.
➢ Emotions have a very important role in explaining investor choices, which thereby shape the financial
markets.
➢ Most of the times emotions are the main reason for people not making a rational choice.
2. FRAMING
➢ The decision-makers perception about a problem and its possible outcomes is what is referred to as the
decision frame.
➢ It is affected by the presentation, person’s characteristics, and perception about the question despite the fact
remaining the same.
➢ Psychologists refer this behavior as a “frame dependence” behavior.
4. Anchoring
➢ Anchoring refers to attaching a spending level to a certain reference. Examples may include spending
consistently based on a budget level or rationalizing spending based on different satisfaction utilities.
➢ The concept of anchoring draws on the tendency to attach or “anchor” our thoughts to a reference point- even
though it may have no logical relevance to the decision at hand. Although it may seem an unlikely phenomenon,
anchoring is fairly prevalent in situations where people are dealing with concepts that are new and novel.
5. Self-attribution or Overconfidence
➢ Self-attribution refers to a tendency to make choices based on overconfidence in one's own knowledge or skill.
Self-attribution usually stems from an intrinsic knack in a particular area. Within this category, individuals tend
to rank their knowledge higher than others, even when it objectively falls short.
➢ Overconfidence (i.e. overestimating or exaggerating one’s ability to successfully perform a particular task) is not
a trait that applies only to fund managers. Consider the number of times that you’ve participated in a competition
or contest with the attitude that you have what it takes to win - regardless of the number of competitors or the
fact that there can only be one winner.
➢ Keep in mind that there’s a fine line between confidence and overconfidence. Confidece, implies realistically
trusting in one’s abilities, while overconfidence usually implies an overly optimistic assessment of one’s
knowledge or control over a situation.