Unit -5 cerOseR case Study and, ulus, Sobbwaxe project Manager ent = ent practices - ceppstR Stands Command Ceinler Processihq an pteplay System Replacement (cerps-p). 5 1 ceppe-e proftet wae performed fox usm A% Race by TRA Space and defence Fo I cal?fornia The entfre project frcludes software engtneeatog , hardware and soflwase deielopment: The schedule spared 198, theough t994.- : ‘ This append premsentsia detafled case uly . guccesoful soflwase process that followed” many cr the techniques presented. fr the, book - cuccessful means on budgets en Schedule and sat&fa ction wh to the custormems ante 4} : The process of CBPpSs-R bas keo phases 4: Concept Definttfon phase (co). a. P Full écale Developement phase (rsp). Le Concept beFibt Hon phase = Fundamental procla che ave = 4 systero epecffitatfon ‘hich % ed 3 document» ~ A Soflware development plan- ie - A weview of system design: ~ Conteact deliverable “docursent i ~ The meeting wrth gaan eke lees:as Pull scale development phase + Fundamental products ae 3 - A dietPbuted gorldsare * pack? tecture = & Flextble user Mterface - Poop’ Responsibilities 3 ced FSD Software development plan: a) Respons?ble fov chief siduilels t = providing the software’ ‘epecthitation? = Defiing the stake bsldes! fete! b) Responsible’ lox betta Engireeting = Deffitng a Sofllaane process. sash ~ Developfog & Software Yoo! ©) Responsble fox softisiiee: “Adelopmeot ¢ ca Mafrtafotng Compo es Develo ptrg 4 ent, dew te d) Responsfble for software test ~ Bufldtog Integ ralteo testing. = gateare bevelophment resting. Servite “Components.» ~e) Reeponetbilflies of AdmihPelration ¢ Pog - Coet and Schedule eetfinattag- = Qualfly Accu’ geoponerbt lites of, Concept, defrrthibn, phase & 1 te define and generate top-level arch?tectuve: onganfee ithe; process and evelopment envionment ‘ dean Project Proftles & Hee ee = 1 Modern pooject proftle Sousce % Onkque. prcfect. + Th could —be one Afme, profect Stke coebette Gurldiy. tt typteally Focludes: am Overvitio Oy \proféct and outline, of ithe, profect goals.» fe ports «Th may aleo fheludes timelfnes',! Codt eStimates and othés velevant. frformation, 1 Modern Proféct” proftles ave move Flextble = too% > 1 Ceotaths. ‘Integsation | (% Percentage) 2 e— Project Completion’ iar Estimation, completed tfme "1 produces feasfble and manageable decir by delayfng the “destyn Breakage”, atdeCare-derrem bea+ Next Generation © a Te Rleoducee! sevedal ‘prove use of! project abe 0 0A ey + Th% can be done by malig Ulisare economtce % befra pracltced anced eofluopre Organiealfons | by Some adh cotfue bypothess about + 2 Economics", ; the future of Softwar 1 ; tag foo Coot ectitra « The general Stouctuve % peoposed -tion model: “att ecalled "by advdnced * 1) Sethe’ Rapaovements, all! enabled by Softwave Development fenvitooment= plesigp ‘nodele!” ave” + Many of, the techniquee» procese!, Aescr®bed +f the books: developed be the)? The next Genesation cost reodtel bas’s off lPrchttecluse a2 Shown below} cespult « Aachftectuse Engibeeving Stage - aS Nag + A plan with high FidelPty apd high ak. + Tk & technology (oo) Schedule based 34 ss + The aschitectuse team Constls “of, Smal sofhware engineers: 1 The appliialtin team Consitis of emall number of domi engineers - j je) avchitectuve , + The output wfill be-lan: exedutalbh Production and vequivements . vests AurAachttecture| effort” afc and Complexity Applteatton Product¥on stage g- a plan with low Rely and lowe vib. «Tt %& cost hacen Tre archilecture Ae consfets | % email dene oO Software engiheess i ' Otet eo The Application tear Consfete HH may have any ‘bor af, domains: - 1 se selena Boi) The output will be function, whbfch. 1% sdelRerable and useful - ' Applicatie - effort - ere and ComplexityModern Procese Teanettion® = oe eee ee Sl » Succeseful Software Managerment % hard + « Technical beeakttbughe > Process break’ throughs and new tools eofll make ot east: + New technological advances will be gecompained by new oppurtucittes fox Software applitations , new ditmematons. o ComplexPly 3 et? avenues aurtornattin, 2 90, and new customers with different priorities - « will be sestoitted by + Some of, these change cestats stakeholders within project (or) } didn Silage. ait to seperate cultural | > Oaganieation: + Tt f% not always easy accfetandé! from ‘ObjectHie’ wes&tances fughuc 4h « key -pofrte The trane?ton to modesm Sofkwave” S- + Pooceeces and technologies ove cultuse will net always be easy to achfeve- + A SepFhtant teans?tfos Shoiild “be: dttempk 00 SunPFrcank prefect: =. phreclqoes han