0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Adobe Scan Aug 18, 2024

The document is a court complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, involving a dispute between a complainant and two accused parties regarding unpaid debts for Plain Printing Board. The complainant alleges that the accused issued cheques that were later dishonored due to insufficient funds, despite promises to settle the debt. The court proceedings have included the issuance and subsequent cancellation of a non-bailable warrant against one of the respondents, with the case currently at the notice framing stage.

Uploaded by

SHALINI JHA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
7 views4 pages

Adobe Scan Aug 18, 2024

The document is a court complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, involving a dispute between a complainant and two accused parties regarding unpaid debts for Plain Printing Board. The complainant alleges that the accused issued cheques that were later dishonored due to insufficient funds, despite promises to settle the debt. The court proceedings have included the issuance and subsequent cancellation of a non-bailable warrant against one of the respondents, with the case currently at the notice framing stage.

Uploaded by

SHALINI JHA
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

No.

24
Date 2g107 124

BEFORE THE COURT OF SHRI GAURAV KATARIY


JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NT ACT
WEST TIS HAZARI CoURTS, DELHD
CoURT ROOM NO. 207/Et.
CASE NO.COMPLAINT CASE NO 335/202.2.
In he ma tter of:

Through its frop Sh.Amupan Manhas


office at A -37, Back Side,fhase-I
Naraina Thdustrial Area, Neus Delhi -li0028
Versus
Editive frints
Through. is Managing larther Direc lor
-H,
OPfie at. Proberty o. 212, Block-t
Naraina Tndustril trea Phase-I Delhi-02g
2: Sh: Varun Ra
fartner of Editive rints
Ro House No. 748, Eour Storey Flat
Vishal Enclaue, Rajpuri Gharden Nes Delhi-l024
No 25

Date

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138 READ WItH


SECTION 141 AND 142 0F NE h0TIABLE
INSTRUMENT3 ACT. 188|

Facts of the Case:

The comblainant was iwvolwed in the business of


trading Plain Printing Board at te negd. otfice in the.
rame of nubam 'fabers. at The comblainant came
in the contact of accused þersons as accUsed No.22
is Partner of accsed No.1 for about four years
for business urboses. Aecused No. 2. used to demand
Plain friating Baard from the complainant.
The comblainant ised to raise invoies and ten
Used to Subely Plain frinliag Baard on the demand
of acused ersons hroagh delivery challans. The
canplinant subblicd Main fointing Boardfor onan difleren
amount
t
dates trom O. 07.202| -I4- (0202-|
of Rs .52, 22,429/- (Rs.Fifty two lakhs buenty taa
bhousand faur hundred tuenty nin e) and raised invoices
at dicferent dates. The accused No.2 bramised
Complaiant from time ta tine in between ol. 10-2021
and Mar 2022. that he wold bay the above lebi 'ky in
No. 26
Date

months tree months and So oO


one month two discharge
In te ast week of May, 2022. to
þurchased materials from compais
the Liability of to the complainant
accused No 22 issued chegues
doted 30-07 202,2 . The accused o 2 bromised
comblaiant that the aforesaid ehegues would
the
be banored on fresentation if þresented on
guen dates.

The comlairant believed te bromises af the


aceosed o. 2. and waited for the bresantation of
aore-Said chegues till Tly 2022. He presented tha
cheques on 30-07. 2022 to his banker but all o
he 9 chegues were returned with remarks
'Funds Tsuficient " on he neyt day f heir
þresentation. The complainant innediately contacted
He accused No. 2 on 0Q.08- 202 2- over the bhone
and atbrised him about dishancuyr of cegues but
he comlainant was shocked when aceused No:2
laughed at tte complainant and tald hin that he
lwould not be abde to do anything too recouer his
Lobilydebt.The complainat cns onstrained b send
legol nice on jo-o8
lo-08- 2022. but cven alty
after exiry of 5days
gal
LhereCeiueda reyand dence fikd thebresent conhad
No. 2.2.

Date:

Observations for the day (2o7-2024)


NON- BAI LABLE LARRANT issued against reskondent
NO- 2 on he last date of hearing was cancelled
ubon aication for cancellation "of Ngw filed by
respondent No-2 the matter was but up lor
NOTICE FRAMING

Outcomes - Recined aluable experience of


LearningCourt þroceedings in
the cheque bouncee cases.
NDOH - LO 12- 2.024

You might also like