No.
24
Date 2g107 124
BEFORE THE COURT OF SHRI GAURAV KATARIY
JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE FIRST CLASS (NT ACT
WEST TIS HAZARI CoURTS, DELHD
CoURT ROOM NO. 207/Et.
CASE NO.COMPLAINT CASE NO 335/202.2.
In he ma tter of:
Through its frop Sh.Amupan Manhas
office at A -37, Back Side,fhase-I
Naraina Thdustrial Area, Neus Delhi -li0028
Versus
Editive frints
Through. is Managing larther Direc lor
-H,
OPfie at. Proberty o. 212, Block-t
Naraina Tndustril trea Phase-I Delhi-02g
2: Sh: Varun Ra
fartner of Editive rints
Ro House No. 748, Eour Storey Flat
Vishal Enclaue, Rajpuri Gharden Nes Delhi-l024
No 25
Date
COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 138 READ WItH
SECTION 141 AND 142 0F NE h0TIABLE
INSTRUMENT3 ACT. 188|
Facts of the Case:
The comblainant was iwvolwed in the business of
trading Plain Printing Board at te negd. otfice in the.
rame of nubam 'fabers. at The comblainant came
in the contact of accused þersons as accUsed No.22
is Partner of accsed No.1 for about four years
for business urboses. Aecused No. 2. used to demand
Plain friating Baard from the complainant.
The comblainant ised to raise invoies and ten
Used to Subely Plain frinliag Baard on the demand
of acused ersons hroagh delivery challans. The
canplinant subblicd Main fointing Boardfor onan difleren
amount
t
dates trom O. 07.202| -I4- (0202-|
of Rs .52, 22,429/- (Rs.Fifty two lakhs buenty taa
bhousand faur hundred tuenty nin e) and raised invoices
at dicferent dates. The accused No.2 bramised
Complaiant from time ta tine in between ol. 10-2021
and Mar 2022. that he wold bay the above lebi 'ky in
No. 26
Date
months tree months and So oO
one month two discharge
In te ast week of May, 2022. to
þurchased materials from compais
the Liability of to the complainant
accused No 22 issued chegues
doted 30-07 202,2 . The accused o 2 bromised
comblaiant that the aforesaid ehegues would
the
be banored on fresentation if þresented on
guen dates.
The comlairant believed te bromises af the
aceosed o. 2. and waited for the bresantation of
aore-Said chegues till Tly 2022. He presented tha
cheques on 30-07. 2022 to his banker but all o
he 9 chegues were returned with remarks
'Funds Tsuficient " on he neyt day f heir
þresentation. The complainant innediately contacted
He accused No. 2 on 0Q.08- 202 2- over the bhone
and atbrised him about dishancuyr of cegues but
he comlainant was shocked when aceused No:2
laughed at tte complainant and tald hin that he
lwould not be abde to do anything too recouer his
Lobilydebt.The complainat cns onstrained b send
legol nice on jo-o8
lo-08- 2022. but cven alty
after exiry of 5days
gal
LhereCeiueda reyand dence fikd thebresent conhad
No. 2.2.
Date:
Observations for the day (2o7-2024)
NON- BAI LABLE LARRANT issued against reskondent
NO- 2 on he last date of hearing was cancelled
ubon aication for cancellation "of Ngw filed by
respondent No-2 the matter was but up lor
NOTICE FRAMING
Outcomes - Recined aluable experience of
LearningCourt þroceedings in
the cheque bouncee cases.
NDOH - LO 12- 2.024