Minimizing Surgical Blood Loss at Cesarean
Minimizing Surgical Blood Loss at Cesarean
org
especially those with intraoperative surgical outcomes using this classifica- ligation; the principal risk of bleeding is
confirmation at delivery of placenta tion system at the time of delivery, and from excessive upward traction on the
previa with evidence of extensive that authors use this system in future uterus by lateral straight clamps, rather
placenta percreta, directly resorting to a studies to facilitate subsequent system- than by manual elevation.
cesarean hysterectomy is a definitive atic review and meta-analysis of in-
strategy to secure hemostasis. As many terventions. This discussion will focus Step 3: retroperitoneal dissection
elements of multidisciplinary care on the surgical management of Inter- The uterus is skeletonized down to the
continue to improve for women with national Federation of Gynecology and cardinal ligaments and the para-vesical
PAS disorders, especially in surgical Obstetrics Class 2 and 3 (a-c) cases of spaces are opened, using electro-
strategy and expertise, they challenge the placenta previa with evidence of dissection. This step may also include a
relevance of 2 key approaches to limit abnormal placental invasion, which cephalad pelvic sidewall dissection,
blood loss at cesarean hysterectomy, encompasses focal placenta increta (eg, medial to the psoas muscles, to locate the
namely the use of interventional radi- invasion of the cervix) and placenta bifurcation of the common iliac arteries,
ology techniques and ligation of the percreta (complete loss of myometrium the external iliac vein and the medially
anterior divisions of the internal iliac in areas of the anterior lower segment, located proximal ureters. This adjunct
arteries. with or without bladder and/or para- step leads to exposure of the anterior
metrial involvement). divisions of the internal iliac arteries as
Surgical Difficulty Based on Placental shown in Figure 1 and Video 1, and can
Location Risk of Hemorrhage During Cesarean be followed by ureterolysis in a distal
Placental adherence and invasion pre- Hysterectomy for Placenta Previa- direction to establish the spatial rela-
sent as a disease spectrum rather than as Percreta tionship of the ureters to the cardinal
a singular common pathology. Varying The procedure of cesarean hysterectomy ligaments.
degrees of invasion may be found in the for placenta previa-percreta can be
individual placenta, and the areas of divided into 5 key steps, with varying Step 4: bladder dissection
involvement varies widely between risks of major hemorrhage. Separation of the hypervascular
cases. Low placental implantation and bladder wall away from the extremely
invasion such as that which occurs in Step 1: midline access and hysterotomy thin lower uterine segment often is
the setting of placenta previa poses First, gently expose the entire gravid prolonged. It is here that protracted
distinct technical surgical challenges. uterus and visually confirm the venous bleeding may be first encoun-
Specifically, the placental bulk lies in the external features of this disease. Hys- tered by experienced surgeons if
narrowest portion of the bony pelvis; terotomy is then made to deliver the inadvertent injury to the thin lower
extrauterine invasion within this tech- fetus, avoiding the placenta using an uterine segment occurs. Meticulous
nically challenging region potentially incision placed to avoid the placenta, lateral-to-medial dissection of this
obscures or envelopes critical struc- usually toward the fundus. This inci- plane on each side, including dividing
tures, including both the origin of the sion may be placed vertically and the the engorged blood vessels and adipose
uterine arteries from the internal iliac placenta localized by ultrasound, if not layer down with the bladder, may
arteries, and the distal portions of the already known. Blood loss may be as exceed 30e60 minutes. It is at this
ureters. Even though these structures low as 20 cc at this stage by using a stage that significant blood collection
may not actually be invaded by uterine stapler if the myometrium is often begins when using a cell salvage
trophoblast, their proximity to the suitably thin13; if opened by knife system. Step 4 is concluded when there
highly perfused placental tissue, and incision, elevating the uterine edges is sufficient inferior dissection of the
surrounding neovascularization that with a series of clamps followed by an bladder wall down to the level of the
accompanies placental invasion, greatly efficient single layer closure will also anterior vaginal fornix. Filling the
increases the risk of severe maternal minimize blood loss.6 bladder with 100e300 mL of methy-
morbidity from hemorrhage or uro- lene blue colored saline also may be
logic injury.9,10 To more accurately Step 2: superior devascularization helpful in identifying the superior
categorize and compare cases, including Release and ligation of the round liga- bladder wall margin, especially in
those managed conservatively, mem- ments and utero-ovarian pedicles bilat- difficult cases. In rare instances with
bers of the International Society for erally. This may be achieved using bladder invasion, confirmation and
Abnormally Invasive Placenta devel- traditional methods or with a bipolar localization by cystoscopy is advised14;
oped a clinically-based grading sys- sealing device, taking care to advance this step is then modified to include
tem,11 which was subsequently adopted incrementally, perpendicular to the ves- intentional cystotomy and resection of
by the International Federation of Gy- sels, within the optimal sealing width of the affected portion of the posterior
necology and Obstetrics.12 It is recom- the blades. Blood loss at this step again is bladder wall with the uterus, followed
mended that clinicians prospectively often minimal and is normally not by bladder repair.15 In rare instances
report their imaging findings and excessive using traditional suture in which parametrial placental
FIGURE 1
Exposing the branches of the left common iliac artery during Cesarean hysterectomy
invasion is found, more extensive likely to be minimal, and easily with considerable bleeding. Inferior
retroperitoneal dissection is required controlled, such that the risk of intra- dissection of the paravesical spaces,
to excise the specimen and secure he- operative hemorrhage has largely passed. below the vault, risks injury to the
mostasis,16 or alternatively a subtotal Steps 4 and 5 represent periods of surrounding venous plexus supplied
hysterectomy is performed, thereby much greater risks of hemorrhage than by the external iliac artery territory.
omitting the final step. in steps 1e3. Furthermore, if the placenta extends
In the context of blood loss control into the cervix or parametrial tissues,
Step 5: colpotomy across steps 4 and 5, several points the vault margins may be extremely
Once adequate exposure for vault entry deserve consideration. First, the arte- vascular. Clear identification of the
is created, the main uterine artery pedi- rial blood supply relevant to steps 4 anterior and posterior vault margins
cles are ligated, followed by securing the and 5 may involve the territories of may be facilitated either using an EEA-
vaginal angles, each containing well- both the internal and the external iliac Sizer for posterior entry13 or a Breisky
developed branches of the vaginal and arteries, and may even involve the retractor for anterior entry, as shown
internal pudendal arteries.17 Colpotomy, aorta. Consequently, the predominant in Figure 2 and Video 2. Both ap-
followed by a circumferential incision internal iliac arterial blood supply to proaches afford greater control during
around the cervicovaginal margin, re- the nonpregnant uterus may switch, in colpotomy, without sacrificing vaginal
sults in removal of the uterus. The the presence of placenta previa- length. In the context of limiting
incised edges are clamped incrementally percreta, to one in which substantial blood loss, there is no substitute for a
as the vault is opened, to minimize blood contributions arise from branches of slow, meticulous execution of each of
loss from the margins, followed by su- the external iliac arteries. Second, step these steps as the principal strategy.
turing of the vault. Once step 5 is 5 gives the illusion of being straight- Each of these steps take time, with
completed, any ongoing bleeding is forward; however, it may be associated skin-to-skin surgery typically taking
FIGURE 2
Use of the Breisky retractor to identify the upper margin of the anterior fornix, opened using electro-cautery (A).
Saggital view of the retractor (B).
2e3 hours, even in experienced a subsequent publication that distin- short mean operating time (84 mi-
teams.2 guished a subset of patients with PAS nutes) in each arm.
and placenta percreta demonstrated a With evolving team-based surgical
Percutaneous Internal Iliac Artery statistically significant reduction in operating expertise, especially with
(IIA) Balloons mean blood loss (933 vs 1507 cc).20 In being patient during the steps of
Previously, the preoperative percuta- both reports, mean operating time was bladder dissection (step 4) and colpot-
neous placement of IIA balloons 2.5e3 hours. The more recent publi- omy (step 5), the overall risk of major
before surgery for PAS, to be inflated cation of a pilot randomized blood loss (>2 L) has diminished.
following delivery of the fetus, gained controlled trial, involving 27 subjects, Consequently, it is not surprising that
popularity as a safety measure to avoid found no reduction in mean estimated preoperative IIA balloon placement has
massive blood loss.18 The literature is blood loss (1600 cc in both arms) in not been shown to improve outcomes,
challenging to assess due the inclusion women undergoing cesarean delivery yet this intervention extends resource
of all stages of suspected PAS, for suspected PAS with balloon place- use and overall costs and is not without
including those not pathologically ment and routine inflation.21 These serious potential risks to pelvic struc-
confirmed and false-positive cases. As data are difficult to interpret in the tures and blood supply to the lower
examples, an early caseecontrol series specific context of surgery for mag- limbs.19,22
of patients with PAS demonstrated netic resonance imaging (MRI)e
no significant reduction in mean confirmed placenta previa-percreta. Surgical Ligation of the IIAs
blood loss with the use of internal iliac Only one half of the subjects had a An alternative to IIA balloon place-
artery ligation balloons compared with hysterectomy (which was always sub- ment, surgical exposure and ligation of
controls (2700 vs 3000 cc),19 whereas total), which may explain the relatively the anterior divisions of each IIA, as an
extension of step 3, typically requires massive blood loss during surgery for bulging vascular placenta previa un-
only 20 minutes to perform bilaterally. placenta previa-percreta. Clearly this is disturbed, then performing surgery in
This technique is illustrated in Figure 1 a highly undesirable and stressful a controlled and meticulous 5-step
and Video 1. Care must be taken to experience. No method of limiting fashion. Reassuringly, these Chinese
avoid injury to the laterally adjacent blood flow to the anterior divisions of groups reported minimal rates of
external iliac vein. Ligating the vessel at the IIAs is effective in these acute sit- vascular complications,26 and in 1 se-
least 3e5 cm distal to its separation uations. Fluoroscopic placement of a ries, 53% (105/197) of women fol-
from the posterior division will avoid balloon in the infrarenal portion of the lowed up had return of normal
inadvertent ligation of posterior divi- descending aorta in theory will permit menses.27 The utility of routine aortic
sion branches that arise as anatomical temporary occlusion of arterial perfu- balloon placement for placenta previa-
variants.23 The exposed anterior divi- sion from most sources to the pelvis percreta surgery in our settings is
sion arteries may either be sutured or during surgery for placenta previa- questionable, since predicted mean
left exposed with a suture loop, for percreta. However, this scenario is not blood loss is reduced to an acceptable
later rapid ligation if excessive bleeding readily predicted, and thus balloon level (<1.5 L) via our 5-step approach
is encountered. Alternatively, they may placement may be performed electively to cesarean hysterectomy. One recent
be occluded using a vessel clip. Classic directly before surgery commences. A North American publication in this
experiments observed that bilateral recent meta-analysis of 7 comparative context compared blood loss in 16
ligation of the IIAs (in 17 nonpregnant cohort studies of more than 500 cases with an aortic balloon with 19
women undergoing laparotomy) women with a range of suspected PAS cases without a balloon over a 7-year
immediately reduced mean arterial disorders reported on outcomes with period and found no significant dif-
pressure in the distal iliac artery elective infrarenal aortic temporary ference in mean blood loss,28 con-
segment by 24%, accompanied by a placement and intra-operative occlu- firming our view. A variant of this
48% reduction in blood flow.24 Aorto- sion.26 These studies are impressive for strategy, originally described in
grams demonstrated that the low im- their reduced blood loss (mean reduc- Taiwan,29 and subsequently adopted
mediate effectiveness of this type of tion 1495 cc) and their significantly both in Denmark30 and in Japan31
vascular ligation was substantially lower rates of hysterectomy (odds ratio, with favorable initial results, is bilat-
diminished by the presence of ilio- 0.3; 95% confidence interval, eral placement of balloons in the
lumbar, sacral, and hemorrhoidal 0.19e0.48). In 1 series of 230 women common iliac arteries. More recently,
anastomoses to the distal iliac vascula- undergoing delivery for placenta previa a Chinese group has compared out-
ture24; consequently, any clinically with suspected PAS and preoperative comes between all 3 levels of balloons
meaningful benefit of this intervention aortic balloon placement, no woman (infrarenal aortic, common iliac, and
is only likely to be short term and less required a hysterectomy, despite 88 anterior divisions of the IIAs) in a
than 20 minutes in duration of effect. having a final diagnosis of placenta retrospective cohort of 112 women
Therefore, if ligation is performed early previa percreta, among whom 29 had delivered with suspected PAS, where
on during the procedure, any benefit bladder wall penetration.27 only 11.6% had confirmed placenta
may be greatly diminished should sig- This literature is challenging to percreta at delivery.32 Surgery with
nificant bleeding be encountered dur- interpret and apply widely for 2 rea- balloons placed in the infrarenal aorta
ing the prolonged meticulous step of sons. First, a common surgical strategy or common iliac arteries had signifi-
bladder dissection, during uterine ar- in these publications was to attempt cantly lower mean blood loss (mean
tery and cardinal ligament ligation, or removal of the placenta even in the 1000 cc) that surgery with IIA bal-
finally during colpotomy. It is of in- context of a severe PAS disorder loons (mean 2900 cc), and cases with
terest that a recent Egyptian pilot ran- (placenta previa percreta). Second, these higher-level balloons had
domized control trial found no benefit mean reported operating times are significantly lower rates of hysterec-
of routine vessel ligation during cesar- remarkably short—only 64 minutes in tomy. Only 2 procedure-related com-
ean hysterectomy for placenta increta the largest series reported to date.27 plications were described, namely
or percreta.25 The need for an aortic balloon, to thrombosis in the IIAs, without long-
control blood loss in the context of term complications.32
Percutaneous Aortic Balloon attempting placental removal for an Our interpretation of this literature is
Placement intraoperative clinical diagnosis of that a subset of women with placenta
The fear of encountering complex placenta previa percreta, may indeed previa and features of either placenta
blood supplies to the uterus persis- be an essential life-saving approach. increta or percreta are at risk of excessive
tently lurks in the minds of even the Combining this approach with a fast blood loss at cesarean delivery of their
most experienced PAS surgical teams. operative technique is in stark contrast baby, despite well-developed team-based
Each of our respective teams have had to our approach, along with that surgical skills. However, contemporary
to resort to occasional infrarenal aortic described in current international outcomes for such women in large cen-
compression, or clamping, to control guidelines, which is to leave the ters does not justify the routine use of an
importance of nurturing such teams, 11. Collins SL, Stevenson GN, Al-Khan A, et al. Anatomic variations and clinical applications.
including the careful mentoring of our Three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasonography Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:658.e1–5.
for diagnosing abnormally invasive placenta 24. Burchell RC. Arterial blood flow into the
next generation of PAS surgeons, is and quantifying the risk. Obstet Gynecol human intervillous space. Am J Obstet Gynecol
key to advancing our ability to tackle 2015;126:645–53. 1967;98:303–11.
this evolving problem in a safe and 12. Jauniaux E, Ayres-de-Campos D, Langhoff- 25. Hussein AM, Dakhly DMR, Raslan AN,
expert fashion. - Roos J, Fox KA, Collins S. FIGO Placenta et al. The role of prophylactic internal iliac
Accreta Diagnosis and Management Expert artery ligation in abnormally invasive
Consensus Panel. FIGO classification for the placenta undergoing caesarean hysterec-
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS clinical diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum tomy: a randomized control trial. J Matern
E.M. wishes to thank Dr Michael Corrin, MSc, disorders. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2019;146: Fetal Neonatal Med 2018;32:3386–92.
Associate Professor of Biology & Associate Di- 20–4. 26. Chen L, Wang X, Wang H, Li Q, Shan N,
rector, Biomedical Communications Graduate 13. Belfort MA, Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA. Qi H. Clinical evaluation of prophylactic
Program, Department of Biology, University of A technique to positively identify the vaginal abdominal aortic balloon occlusion in patients
Toronto at Mississauga, Canada for his guid- fornices during complicated postpartum hys- with placenta accreta: a systematic review and
ance in preparing her illustrations. terectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;217:222. meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
e1–3. 2019;19:30–8.
14. Murji A, Kingdom J. Placenta percreta 27. Wu Q, Liu Z, Zhao X, et al. Outcome of
REFERENCES involving maternal bladder. N Engl J Med pregnancies after balloon occlusion of
1. Melcer Y, Jauniaux E, Maymon S, et al. 2019;381:e12. the infrarenal abdominal aorta during
Impact of targeted scanning protocols on peri- 15. Matsubara S, Ohkuchi A, Yashi M, et al. caesarean in 230 patients with placenta prae-
natal outcomes in pregnancies at risk of Opening the bladder for cesarean hysterec- via accreta. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
placenta accreta spectrum or vasa previa. Am J tomy for placenta previa percreta with bladder 2016;39:1573–9.
Obstet Gynecol 2018;218:443.e1–8. invasion. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009;35: 28. Blumenthal E, Rao R, Murphy A, et al.
2. Shamshirsaz AA, Fox KA, Erfani H, et al. 359–63. Pilot study of intra-aortic balloon occlusion
Multidisciplinary team learning in the manage- 16. Borekci B, Ingec M, Kumtepe Y, to limit morbidity in patients with adherent
ment of the morbidly adherent placenta: Gundogdu C, Kadanali S. Difficulty of the surgi- placentation undergoing cesarean hysterec-
outcome improvements over time. Am J Obstet cal management of a case with placenta per- tomy. AJP Rep 2018;8:e57–63.
Gynecol 2017;216:612.e1–5. creta invading towards parametrium. J Obstet 29. Shih J-C, Liu K-L, Shyu M-K. Temporary
3. Panaiotova J, Tokunaka M, Krajewska K, Gynaecol Res 2008;34:402–4. balloon occlusion of the common iliac artery:
Zosmer N, Nicolaides KH. Screening for 17. Palacios-Jaraquemada JM, García new approach to bleeding control during
morbidly adherent placenta in early preg- Mónaco R, Barbosa NE, Ferle L, Iriarte H, cesarean hysterectomy for placenta per-
nancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019;53: Conesa HA. Lower uterine blood supply: creta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:
101–6. extrauterine anastomotic system and its 1756–8.
4. Jauniaux E, Alfirevic Z, Bhide AG, et al. application in surgical devascularization tech- 30. Clausen C, Stensballe J, Albrechtsen CK,
Placenta Praevia and placenta accreta: diag- niques. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007;86: Hansen MA, Lönn L, Roos JL. Balloon oc-
nosis and management: Green-top Guideline 228–34. clusion of the internal iliac arteries in the
No. 27a. BJOG 2019;126:e1–48. 18. Petrov DA, Karlberg B, Singh K, Hartman M, multidisciplinary management of placenta
5. Hobson SR, Kingdom JC, Murji A, et al. No. Mittal PK. Perioperative internal iliac artery percreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
383—Screening, diagnosis, and management balloon occlusion, in the setting of placenta 2013;92:386–91.
of placenta accreta spectrum disorders. accreta and its variants: the role of the inter- 31. Matsubara S, Kuwata T, Usui R, et al.
J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2019;41:1035–49. ventional radiologist. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol Important surgical measures and techniques at
6. Cahill AG, Beigi R, Heine RP, Silver RM, 2018;47:445–51. cesarean hysterectomy for placenta previa
Wax JR. Placenta accreta spectrum. Am J 19. Shrivastava V, Nageotte M, Major C, accreta. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:
Obstet Gynecol 2018;219:B2–16. Haydon M, Wing D. Case-control comparison 372–7.
7. Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Pesaresi M, of cesarean hysterectomy with and without 32. Li K, Zou Y, Sun J, Wen H. Prophylactic
Nassif JC, Hermosid S. Anterior placenta per- prophylactic placement of intravascular balloon occlusion of internal iliac arteries,
creta: surgical approach, hemostasis and uter- balloon catheters for placenta accreta. Am J common iliac arteries and infrarenal
ine repair. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2004;83: Obstet Gynecol 2007;197:402.e1–5. abdominal aorta in pregnancies complicated
738–44. 20. Cali G, Forlani F, Giambanco L, et al. Pro- by placenta accreta: a retrospective cohort
8. Chandraharan E, Rao S, Belli A-M, phylactic use of intravascular balloon catheters study. Eur Radiol 2018;28:4959–67.
Arulkumaran S. The Triple-P procedure as a in women with placenta accreta, increta and 33. Meller CH, Garcia-Monaco RD,
conservative surgical alternative to peripartum percreta. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol Izbizky G, et al. Non-conservative manage-
hysterectomy for placenta percreta. Int J Gyne- 2014;179:36–41. ment of placenta accreta spectrum in the
col Obstet 2012;117:191–4. 21. Salim R, Chulski A, Romano S, Garmi G, hybrid operating room: a retrospective
9. Marcellin L, Delorme P, Bonnet MP, et al. Rudin M, Shalev E. Precesarean prophylactic cohort study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Placenta percreta is associated with more balloon catheters for suspected placenta 2019;42:365–70.
frequent severe maternal morbidity than accreta: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet 34. Ordoñez CA, Parra MW, Manzano-
placenta accreta. Am J Obstet Gynecol Gynecol 2015;126:1022–8. Nunez R, et al. Intraoperative combination
2018;219:193.e1–9. 22. Papillon-Smith J, Singh SS, Ziegler C. In- of resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion
10. Collins SL, Alemdar B, van ternal iliac artery rupture caused by endovas- of the aorta and a median sternotomy in hemo-
Beekhuizen HJ, et al. Evidence-based guide- cular balloons in a woman with placenta dynamically unstable patients with penetrating
lines for the management of abnormally inva- percreta. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2016;38: chest trauma: is this feasible? J Trauma Acute
sive placenta: recommendations from the 1024–7. Care Surg 2018;84:752–7.
International Society for Abnormally Invasive 23. Bleich AT, Rahn DD, Wieslander CK, 35. Parra MW, Ordoñez CA, Herrera-
Placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;220: Wai CY, Roshanravan SM, Corton MM. Escobar JP, Gonzalez-Garcia A, Guben J.
511–26. Posterior division of the internal iliac artery: Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of
the aorta for placenta percreta/previa. J Trauma 38. Jauniaux E, Bhide A. Prenatal ultrasound invasive placenta: the added value of intrave-
Acute Care Surg 2018;84:403–5. diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa nous gadolinium injection. BJOG 2017;124:
36. England EC, Spear CR, Huang D-D, et al. accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic 88–95.
REBOA as a rescue strategy for catastrophic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 41. Ghaghada KB, Starosolski ZA, Bhayana S,
vascular injury during robotic surgery. J Robot 2017;217:27–36. et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of a nanoparticle-
Surg 2019;22:1059-5. 39. Morel O, Collins SL, Uzan-Augui J, et al. based blood-pool contrast agent for MR im-
37. Manzano-Nunez R, Escobar-Vidarte MF, A proposal for standardized magnetic reso- aging of the placenta. Placenta 2017;57:
Naranjo MP, et al. Expanding the field of nance imaging (MRI) descriptors of abnormally 60–70.
acute care surgery: a systematic review of invasive placenta (AIP)—From the International 42. Sussman D, Saini BS, Schneiderman JE,
the use of resuscitative endovascular balloon Society for AIP. Diagn Interv Imaging 2019;100: et al. Uterine artery and umbilical vein blood flow
occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) in cases of 319–25. are unaffected by moderate habitual physical
morbidly adherent placenta. Eur J Trauma 40. Millischer A-E, Salomon LJ, Porcher R, et al. activity during pregnancy. Prenat Diagn
Emerg Surg 2018;44:519–26. Magnetic resonance imaging for abnormally 2019;10:1.