0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 14 views 7 pages HOI-VI (Modern India)
The course DSC-2: History of India - VI covers the period from 1750 to 1857, focusing on the transition from 18th century kingdoms to British colonial rule. It explores the establishment of the British East India Company, its governance, economic impacts, and social changes, culminating in the 1857 revolt. Students will analyze key historical developments, colonial ideologies, and the resistance of various social groups during this transformative era.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content,
claim it here .
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
Carousel Previous Carousel Next
Save HOI-VI (Modern India) For Later DISCIPLINE SPECIFIC CORE COURSE ~ 2 (DSC-2): History of India - VI: c. 1750-1857
Credit distribution, Eligibility and Prerequisites of the Course
History of India — 12 th Pass
1750 - 1857
Learning Objectives
The paper introduces students to key features of the 18th century in the Indian subcontinent. It
analyses the interface between the 18th century kingdoms and the early colonial state. The pa-per
also discusses the processes by which the British East India Company transformed itself into a state
and gradually consolidated its position over a vast expanse. Apart from the evolution of colonial
institutions of governance and developing forms of colonial exploitation, the paper also highlights
the interface between Company Raj and indigenous elite on various social issues. The paper
concludes with a critical survey of peasant resistance to colonial agrarian policies, and the 1857
revolt against the Company Raj
Learning outcomes
Upon completion of this course the student shall be able to:
© Outline key developments of the 18th century in the Indian subcontinent.
© Explain the establishment of Company rule and important features of theearly
colonial regime.
© Explain the peculiarities of evolving colonial institutions and their impact.
Elucidate the impact of colonial rule on the economy.
‘© Discuss the social churning on questions of tradition, reform, etc. during thefirst
century of British colonial rule.
‘© Assess the issues of landed elites, and those of struggling peasants, tribals and
artisans during the Company Raj
SYLLABUS OF DSC
Unit I: India in the mid-18th Century: society, economy, polity and culture1. Issues and Debates
2. Continuity and change
Unit Il: Colonial expansion: policies and methods with reference to any two of the following
Bengal, Mysore, Marathas, Awadh, Punjab and the North- East
Unit I: Colonial state and ideology
1. Imperial ideologies: Orientalism, Utilitarianism, and Evangelicalism
2. Indigenous and colonial education
Unit IV: Economy and Society
1. Land revenue systems and its impact
2. Commercialization of agriculture
3. De-industrialization
Unit V: 19th Century: Reforms and Revival
1. Young Bengal, Brahmo Samaj, Prathana Samaj, Faraizis and Wahabis, AryaSamaj
2. Discourse on Gender and Caste in Reform and revival movement
Unit VI: Popular resistance
1. The Uprising of 1857
2. Peasant resistance to colonial rule: Santhal Upr'
Kol Uprising (1830-32)
ing (1856); Indigo Rebellion(1860).
Practical component (if any) - NIL
Essential/recommended readings
Unit-t: This Unit enables the students to outline key developments of the 18th
century in the Indian subcontinent. These developments are discussed through key debates
‘on the varied historical evidence used by historians when examining the weakening Mughal
state, growth of regional kingdoms, changing dynamics of the economy, evolving social
structures, cultural patterns, etc. (Teaching Time: 9 hrs. approx.)
* Alavi, Seema(ed.). (2002). The Eighteenth Century in India. New Del
(introduction).
© Bayly, C.A. 1988. Indian Society and the making of the British Empire. Cambridge: CUP
(Chapter1, pp. 7-44).
© Parthasarathi, Prasannan. 2011. Why Europe Grew Rich and Asia Did Not: Global
Economic Divergence, 1600- 1850. Cambridge: CUP (Introduction and Part |, pp. 1-88;
Part Ill, pp. 185- 269).
© Faruqui, Munis D. 2013. “At Empire's End: The Nizam, Hyderabad and Eighteenth
Century India,” in Richard M. Eaton, Munis . Faruqui, David Gilmartin and Sunil
Kumar (Eds.), Expanding Frontiers in South Asian andWorld History: Essays in Honour
of John
i: OUP
87F. Richards (pp. 1- 38).
Unit- II: This Unit introduces the students to the political process by which Company rules was
established in the Indian subcontinent. The unit shall also acquaint students with the
important features of the 18th century states and how they came to be positioned vis-a-vis
an expanding Company state. (Teaching Time: 6 hrs. approx.)
Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar. (2004). From Plassey to Partition:
New Delhi: Orient Blackswan (Chapter 1, ‘Transition to the
37-62).
Bayly, C. A. (2008). indian Society and the making of the British Empire. Cambridge:
CuP (Chapter 2, ‘indian Capital and the Emergence of Colonial Society’ pp. 45- 78;
Chapter 3, ‘The Crisis of the Indian State’, pp. 79- 105).
Fisher, Michael H. (1996).The Politics of British Annexation of India 1757-1857.
Oxford: OUP (Introduction).
Marshall, P.J. (1990). Bengal: The British Bridgehead. Cambridge: CUP.
Cederlof, Gunnel. (2014). Founding an Empire on India’s North- Eastern Frontiers
1790- 1840: Climate, Commerce, Polity. OUP.
Farooqui, Amar, (2013), Zafar and The Raj: Anglo- Mughal Delhi c. 1800-1850, Primus
Books, Delhi.
History of Modern India.
hteenth Century’, pp.
Unit-ilt: The unit shall discuss in detail and familiarise students with the evolving ideological
underpinnings of the Company state, the idea of difference which developed within the
imperial discourse and the manner in which colonial education policy and system evolved.
(Teaching Time: 6 hrs. approx.)
Metcalf, Thomas R. (2007 reprint). ideologies of the Raj, Cambridge: CUP(Chapters 1,2
&3).
‘Wagoner, Phillip 8. (October 2003). “Pre- colonial Intellectuals and the Production of
Colonial Knowledge”. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 45 (4), pp. 783-814.
Stokes, Eric. (1982 reprint). The English Utilitarians and India. Oxford: OUP (Chapter
“Doctrine and its Setting’)
Rocher, Rosanne. (1993). “British Orientalism in the Eighteenth Century: The Dialectics
of Knowledge and Government”, in Peter van der Veer and Carol Breckenridge eds.
Oriental- ism and the Post- colonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia.
University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 215-250.
‘Viswanathan, Gauri. (2014 reprint). Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule
in India. New York: Columbia University Press (Introduction and Chapters 1 to 4).
Copland, lan. (2007). “The Limits of Hegemony: Elite Responses to Nineteenth-
Century Imperial and Missionary Acculturation Strategies in India’. Comparative
Studies in Society and History. Vol. 49. No. 3. (637- 665).
Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi (ed.). (1998). The Contested Terrain: Perspectives on
Education in India. New Delhi: Orient Blackswan (“Introduction”).
Dharampal. The Beautiful Tree: Indigenous Indian Education in the Eighteenth
Century. Vol Ill, Goa, Other India PressUnit-1V: This Unit shall familiarise students with the key debates on the economic impact of
Company Raj. Students shall assess this impact by looking at changing agrarian relations, crop
cultivation, and handicraft production. (Teaching Time: 9 hrs.approx.)
Unit-V: This Unit shall acquaint students with the social churning on ques
Stein, Burton. (ed.). (1992).The Making of Agrarian Policy in British India 1770-1900.
Ox- ford: OUP (Introduction (pp.1-32)8 Chapter 4(pp.113-149)).
Tomlinson, B.R. (2005).The Economy of Modern India 1860-1970. Cambridge: CUP
(Chapter 2, pp.47-67)
Bose, Sugata. (Ed.). (1994).Credit, Markets and the Agrarian Economy of Colonial
India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press (Introduction (pp. 1-28) & Chapter 2 (pp. 57-
79)).
Chandra, Bipan. (1999). “Colonialism, Stages of Colonialism and the Colonial State”,
in- Bipan Chandra, Essays on Colonialism, New Delhi: Orient Longman, pp. 58-78.
Ray, Indrajit. (2016). “The Myth and Reality of Deindustrialization in Early Modern
India”, in LatikaChaudhary et al. (Eds.) A New Economic History of Colonial India. New
York: Routledge. (S2- 66).
‘Sumit Sarkar (2014) Modern Times, India 1880s ~ 1950s, Permanent Black, New Delhi.
Chapters 3 & 4
Shrivastava, Sharmila, Slopes of struggle: Coffee on Baba Budan hills, Indian Economic
and Social History Review, Volume LVI, Number 2, (April - June 2020) pp. 199 - 228
ns of tradition,
modernity, reform, etc. that unfolded during first century of British colonialrule. Through
special focus on gender concerns, gender roles in the household and ideas of ‘ideal
womanhood’, the unit shall enable students to contextualize theendeavours of nineteenth
century social reformers and nationalists. (Teaching Time: 9 hrs. approx.)
Jones, Kenneth. (2003). Socio-Religious Reform Movements in British India(pp. 15-
47; pp. 122- 131).
Joshi, V.C. (ed.). (1975).Rammohun Roy and the Process of Modernization in India.
Vikas Publishing House (essays by A.K. Majumdar and Sumit Sarkar).
Singh, Hulas. (2015). Rise of Reason: Intellectual History of 19th-century Maharashtra.
Taylor and Francis (pp. 1-197).
Sarkar, Sumit and Tanika Sarkar (eds.).(2008). Women and Social Reform in India: A
Reader. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press (Chapters 1, 2 and 4).
Loomba, Ania. (Autumn 1993). “Dead Women Tell No Tales: Issues of Female
Subjectivity, Subaltern Agency and Tradition in Colonial and Post- Colonial Writings on
Widow Immola- tion in India” History Workshop, 36, pp.209-227.
Kopf, David, (1969). British Orientalism and the Bengal Renaissance: The Dynamics of
Modernization. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press (Introduction).
89Panikkar, K.N. (1995). Culture, Ideology, Hegemony: Intellectuals
and Social Consciousness in Colonial India. New Delhi:
Tulika(pp. 1-26 & pp. 47-53).
Chakravarti, Uma. (1998). Rewriting History: The Life and Times of Pandita Ramabai.
New Delhi: Kali for Women (Chapter, ‘Caste, Gender and the State in€ighteenth
Century Maha- rashtra’, pp. 3-42).
Unit-Vi: This Unit shall enable students to identify and discuss the issues reflected in the
major uprisings of the nineteenth century. In the context of heavy revenueassessment,
changing land rights, deepening stratification within the rural society, emergence of new
social forces in agrarian economy, etc., students shall discuss the discontent of the landed
elite, and those of struggling peasants and tribals during theCompany Raj. (Teaching Time: 6
hrs. approx.)
Stokes, Eric and C.A. Bayly. (1986). The Peasant Armed: the Indian Revolt of1857.
Claren- don Press (Introduction).
Mukherjee, Rudrangshu. (1993). “The Sepoy Mutinies Revisited”, in MushirulHasan
and
Narayani Gupta (Eds.), India’s Colonial Encounter, New Delhi: Manohar
David, Saul. (2010). “Greased Cartridges and the Great Mutiny of 1857: A Pretext to
Rebel or the Final Straw”, In Kaushik Roy (ed.)War and Society in Colonial india(82-
113).
Hardiman, David. (1993). Peasant Resistance in India, 1858- 1914. New Delhi: OUP.
Introduction & pp. 1-125.
Desai, A.R, (ed.) (1979). Peasant Struggles in India. Bombay: UP.(136- 158)
Mukherjee, Rudrangshu. (1984) Awadh in Revolt 1857-1858. New Delhi: Oxford
University Press.
Suggestive readings (if any)
Alavi, Seema ed, (2002).The Eighteenth Century in India. New Delhi: OUP. Bara, Joseph
(2002) “Tribal Education, the Colonial State and Christian Missionaries: Chotanagpur
1839-1870." In Education and the Disprivileged : Nineteenth and Twentieth Century
India, edited by Sabyasachi Bhattacharya. New Delhi: Orient Longman, pp. 123-152.
Bayly, Susan. (1999). "Chapter 2: Kings and Service People 1700-1830.” Caste, Society
andPolitics in India from the 18th Century to the Modern Age. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. The New Cambridge History of India Series, pp. 64-79.
Bhattacharya, Sabyasachi ed. (2007).Rethinking 1857. Delhi: Orient Longman.
Chaudhury, Sushil. (2000). The Prelude to Empire: Plassey Revolution of 1757. Delhi:
Man- ohar.
Constable, Philip. (2001). “The Marginalization of a Dalit Martial Race in the Late
Nineteenth and Early Twentieth Century Western India” Journal of Asian Studies, 60
(2), pp. 439-78.
Dirks, Nicholas B. (2001).Castes of Mind.Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University
Press,
90Green, William A. et al.(Spring 1985). “Unifying Themes in the History ofBritish India,
1757-1857: An Historiographical Analysis” Albion: A Quarterlylournal Concerned with
British Studies, 17 (1), pp. 15-45. [pp. 20-24 is a surveyof British strategy/calculations
during its territorial expansion]
Guha, Ranajit.(1983) Elementary Aspects of Peasant Insurgency in Colonial India. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press (Introduction & Chapter ‘Territoriality’).
Hutchins, Francis. (1967). The Illusion of Permanence. Princeton, New Jersey:
Princeton University Press.
Jones, Kenneth. (2003)Socio-Religious Reform Movements in British India. New
Cambridge
History of India, Vol.3.1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapila, Shruti ed. (2010). An intellectual History for India.Delhi: Cambridge University
Press.
Ludden, David ed. (2005). Agricultural Production and South Asian History. New Delhi:
Oxford University Press.
Metcalf, Thomas. (1995). Ideologies of the Raj. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press (Chapter 4, Ordering Difference, pp. 92-.128).
Mukherjee, Mithi. (2010) India in the Shadows of Empire: A Legal and Political History
1774- 1950. New Delhi: Oxford University Press (Introduction andChapter 1, ‘The
Colonial and the Imperial’, pp. 1- 44).
Mukherjee, Rudrangshu. (2018). “The Azimgarh Proclamation and Some Questions on
the Revolt of 1857 in the North western Provinces”. The Year of Blood: Essays on the
Revolt of 1857. New Delhi: Social Science Press and Routledge.
Pollock, Sheldon ed. (2011). Forms of Knowledge in Early Modern Asia. Delhi
Manohar. introduction (1- 16)
Parthasarathi, Prasannan. (2001). The Transition to a Colonial Economy: Weavers,
Mer- chants and Kings in South India, 1720-1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University
Press.
Raj, KN. et al ed. (1985). Essays on the Commercialization of Indian Agriculture. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Robb, Peter, ed. (1993). Dalit movements and the meanings of labour in india. New
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Roy, Tirthankar. (2010). Company of Kinsmen: Enterprise and Community in South
Asian History 1700-1940. New Delhi: OUP (Chapter 6, pp. 190- 219)
Skuy, David, (July 1998). “Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code of 1862: The Myth of
the Inherent Superiority and Modernity of the English Legal System Compared to
India's Legal System in the Nineteenth Century”, Modern Asian Studies, 32 (3), pp.
513-557.
Stein, Burton (ed.) (1992). The Making of Agrarian Policy in British India, 1770-1900.
Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Stern, Phillip. (2011). The Company-State: Corporate Sovereignty and the Early
Modern Foundations of the British Empire in India. New York: Oxford University Press.* Stokes, Eric. (1986). The Peasant Armed: The Indian Rebellion of 1857 InC.A. Bayly
{ed.). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
© Tilak, Lakshmibai. (2017, 1973). Smritichitre: The Memoirs of a Spirited Wife. New
Delhi: Speaking Tiger. (Translated by Shanta Gokhale).
© Rosanne Rocher, “British Orientalism in the Eighteenth century: The Dialectics of
Know-
* ledge and Government”, in Peter van der Veer and Carol Breckenridge eds.
Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, University
of Pennsylvania Press, 1993,
© Books in Hindi:
© Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar, (2007), Plassey se vibhajan tak aur uske baad, Orient
Blackswan, New Delhi
© Shukla, R. L. (ed). Adhunik Bharat Ka Itihas, Hindi Madhyam KaryanvayanNideshalay,
Delhi University
© Bipan Chandra, Mridula Mukherjee, Aditya Mukherjee, K. N. Panikkar, Sucheta
Mahajan, Bharat ka Swatantrata Sangharsh Hindi Madhyam Karyanvayan Nideshalay,
Delhi University
‘Sumit Sarkar, Adhunik Bharat (1885 — 1947) Rajkamal Prakashan
‘Sumit Sarkar, Adhunik Kaal (1880 - 1950), Rajkamal Prakashan
Bipan Chandra, Adhunik Bharat Ka Itihas, Orient Blackswan
Bipan Chandra, Adhunik Bharat Mein Upniveshvad aur Rashtravad, Medha
Publishing House
8. L. Grover, Alka Mehta, Yashpal, Adhunik Bharat Ka Itihas, S. Chand
© Lakshami Subramanian, Bharat Ka Itihas: 1707 - 1857, Orient Blackswan
.
Note: Examination scheme and mode shall be as prescribed by the Examination
Branch, University of Delhi, from time to time.