3/3/25, 2:50 AM Globe Telecom Inc. vs.
National Telecommunications Commission
Title
Globe Telecom Inc. vs. National Telecommunications Commission
Case Decision Date
G.R. No. 143964 Jul 26, 2004
Globe challenged NTC's authority to regulate SMS as a value-added service, alleging
due process and equal protection violations. Supreme Court ruled SMS is deregulated,
NTC overstepped, and violated Globe's rights.
Jur.ph - Question & Answer (G.R. No. 143964)
Show All
1.) What is the historical context of telecommunications regulation in the
Philippines?
Telecommunications services have historically been regulated as common
carriers under the 1936 Public Service Act, which classified wire and wireless
communications systems as public services.
2.) What significant legislative act aimed to deregulate the telecommunications
sector in the Philippines?
The Public Telecommunications Act of 1995 (PTA) aimed to dismantle barriers to
entry and replace government control with market mechanisms.
3.) What role does the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC) play in the
telecommunications sector?
The NTC is responsible for regulating the telecommunications sector, ensuring
compliance with legal mandates, and protecting consumer interests.
4.) What was the basis of Smart Communications' complaint against Globe
Telecom?
Smart filed a complaint alleging that Globe acted in bad faith by refusing to
interconnect their SMS services.
5.) What was the NTC's finding regarding the interconnection impasse between
Globe and Smart?
https://jur.ph/jurisprudence/v/facts/globe-telecom-inc-v-national-telecommunications-commission?q=6.+Globe+Telecom+v.+NTC%2C+July+26%2C+20… 1/3
3/3/25, 2:50 AM Globe Telecom Inc. vs. National Telecommunications Commission
The NTC found both companies equally responsible for the interconnection
impasse and mandated SMS interconnection as a value-added service.
6.) What legal action did Globe take in response to the NTC's order?
Globe filed a petition for certiorari and prohibition with the Court of Appeals,
challenging the NTC's order and claiming violations of due process.
7.) What was the outcome of the Court of Appeals' review of the NTC's order?
The Court of Appeals issued a temporary restraining order but later affirmed the
NTC's order.
8.) How did Smart Communications change its position during the oral arguments?
Smart argued that SMS should not be classified as a value-added service and that
prior approval from the NTC was not legally required.
9.) What principles did Globe rely on to argue for exemption from prior approval?
Globe relied on deregulation principles outlined in the PTA and NTC
Memorandum Circular No. 14-11-97.
10.) What confusion arose from the NTC's regulatory framework?
The NTC's reliance on various circulars and regulations created confusion
regarding the classification of SMS as VAS or a special feature.
11.) What due process violations were identified in the NTC's order?
The NTC's order lacked substantial evidence, failed to adequately explain its
reasoning, and denied Globe and Smart the opportunity to present evidence.
12.) What was the Court's conclusion regarding the NTC's order?
The Court concluded that the NTC's order lacked legal basis and violated due
process, setting aside the NTC's order and the Court of Appeals' decision.
https://jur.ph/jurisprudence/v/facts/globe-telecom-inc-v-national-telecommunications-commission?q=6.+Globe+Telecom+v.+NTC%2C+July+26%2C+20… 2/3
3/3/25, 2:50 AM Globe Telecom Inc. vs. National Telecommunications Commission
13.) What does the ruling emphasize regarding telecommunications regulations?
The ruling emphasizes the need for clear regulations and fair treatment of all
telecommunications entities to avoid confusion and ensure compliance with the
law.
14.) What is the significance of the PTA in the context of telecommunications?
The PTA defines value-added services and requires prior approval for
telecommunications entities to offer such services, while also promoting fair
competition.
15.) What implications does this case have for future telecommunications
regulation in the Philippines?
The case highlights the importance of clear regulatory frameworks and the
necessity for due process in regulatory actions, which may influence future
telecommunications policies.
For a comprehensive understanding of the case, use Ask AI.
https://jur.ph/jurisprudence/v/facts/globe-telecom-inc-v-national-telecommunications-commission?q=6.+Globe+Telecom+v.+NTC%2C+July+26%2C+20… 3/3
