02 Synopsis
02 Synopsis
MUTUAL FUNDS
Mutual fund is the pool of the money, based on the trust who invests the savings of a
number of investors who shares a common financial goal, like the capital appreciation and
dividend earning. The money thus collect is then invested in capital market instruments
such as shares, debenture, and foreign market. Investors invest money and get the units as
per the unit value which we called as NAV (net assets value). Mutual fund is the most
suitable investment for the common man as it offers an opportunity to invest in diversified
portfolio management, good research team, professionally managed Indian stock as well
as the foreign market, the main aim of the fund manager is to taking the scrip that have
under value and future will rising, then fund manager sell out the stock. Fund manager
concentration on risk – return trade off, where minimize the risk and maximize the return
through diversification of the portfolio. The most common features of the mutual fund
unit are low cost.
• Less Risk Investors acquire a diversified portfolio of securities even with a small
investment in a Mutual Fund. The risk in a diversified portfolio is lesser than
investing in merely 2 or 3 securities.
2
• Liquidity: An investor may not be able to sell some of the shares held by him very
easily and quickly, whereas units of a mutual fund are far more liquid.
• Choice of Schemes: Mutual funds provide investors with various schemes with
different investment objectives. Investors have the option of investing in a scheme
having a correlation between its investment objectives and their own financial
goals. These schemes further have different plans/options
• Flexibility: Investors also benefit from the convenience and flexibility offered by
Mutual Funds. Investors can switch their holdings from a debt scheme to an equity
scheme and vice-versa. Option of systematic (at regular intervals) investment and
withdrawal is also offered to the investors in most open-end schemes.
The mutual fund not just advantage of investor but also has disadvantages for the funds.
The fund manager not always made profits but might creates loss for not properly
managed. The fund have own strategy for investment to hold, to sell, to purchase unit at
particular time period.
• Costs Control Not in the Hands of an Investor: Investor has to pay investment
management fees and fund distribution costs as a percentage of the value of his
investments (as long as he holds the units), irrespective of the performance of the
fund
3
• Difficulty in Selecting a Suitable Fund Scheme: Many investors find it difficult to
select one option from the plethora of funds/schemes/plans available. For this, they
may have to take advice from financial planners in order to invest in the right fund
to achieve their objectives
4
STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM
Savings are excess of income over expenditure for any economic unit. Savings flows
into investment for a return but savings kept as cash are non productive and do not
earn anything. Savings are invested in assets depending on their risk and return
perception of investors like return but at the same time they dislike risks making an
investment a difficult art which people lacks.
There are different investment methods. Mutual funds are one among them. An
investment program funded by shareholders that trade in diversified holdings and is
professionally managed. The mutual fund companies appoint efficient and
professional fund managers but the selection for the scheme lies in the hands of the
investors himself. It requires adequate skills here comes role of financial firms. This
study analysis various mutual funds schemes and it will help to evaluate which
scheme is better.
5
RESEARCH PAPERS REVIEWED
Author
& year Topic Objectives Methodology Findings
A Study of Investors To know investor view Source : primary data Most of the people are
1 Perception towards towards Mutual fund Sample Size: 30 hesitant in going for
Mutual Funds in the To know the awareness Tools : Chi Square new age investments
Mane, P.
City of Aurangabad of mutual fund in like mutual funds.
(2016)
Aurangabad people People prefer less
To know the preference riskier investment
of people for investment
A comparative study To compare mutual fund source: primary data Equity investment is
6
variability and volatility
To identify security
market return with fund
return for the study
period.
Growth and To analyse Growth of descriptive research Private sector have
Performance of Asset Under Management Source: secondary increased their asset
4 Indian Mutual Fund To analyse the growth of data base manifold
Ramanujam, Industry during Past Asset under Management
V., Decade Institution Wise. The asset under
Bhuvaneswari To examine Sector wise management has
,A mutual fund sales and shown growth in all
(2015) mutual fund redemption. the sectors
To analyse the Scheme
wise resource
mobilization by mutual
fund
To examine the total
number of Schemes and
Number of folios
Comparative To study the various Source: Secondary Election result, Crisis,
7
their performance.
To compare the similar
schemes of Kotak
Mutual Fund with HDFC
Mutual Fund and
find out the reasons behind
the difference in their
performances.
Investors’ Perception To analysis the impact of Source: Primary data
Investors’ perception
6 And Attitude demographic factors in Size:50 respondents
is dependent on the
Towards Mutual influencing buyers Method: Random
demographic profile.
Fund As An decision. sampling method
Sharma, P., Liquidity, flexibility,
Investment Option To identify the intensity Descriptive statistical
Agarwal, P. tax savings, service
of various factors that Tool: Rank and Chi –
(2015) quality and
positively and adversely Square
transparency etc. are
affect buyer’s decision.
the factors which have
a higher impact on
perception of investors
Perceptions of To explore the important Source: primary data. Mutual funds are
Investors towards
7 aspects of Mutual Funds Secondary data looked upon as a
Mutual Funds: An
Analytical Study in affecting the perception Size: 136respondents transparent and low
Odisha
of mutual fund investors. Tools: descriptive cost investment
Mishra, R.
To examine the statistics, Exploratory vehicle.
(2015)
difference of perception factor Analysis and ‘t’ Return and future
of large and small mutual test respective ar important
fund investors on the factors.
basis of the explored
aspects of mutual funds
8
Performance To examine the risk and Data: secondary data Open-ended debt
evaluation of debt return component among Tool: arithmetic mean, mutual funds have not
9 mutual fund schemes these mutual funds. standard deviation, performed better than
in india To study the relationship beta, co-efficient of
KAUR,R. between NAV and determination, Sharpe, The benchmark
(2014) market portfolio return Treynor, Jensen Alpha indicators.
(BSE Sensex). and Fama‟s Measure. average return of the
To evaluate the return of schemes is less than
these mutual funds the market index.
according to the Fama‟s
model
Investor’s To analyze to what Size:100 respondents Investors prefer high
Preferences towards extend the mutual fund is Method: convenient return at low level of
10 Mutual Fund Industry effective as an Source: Primary data risk, safety liquidity.
in Trichy investment mode to the Secondary data. Investors are willing to
investors. Tools : Chi-square take moderate and low
Rathnamani,
To study the growth of test, Pearson level risk.
V.
mutual fund industry in Correlation, cross
(2013)
India. tabulation
To analyze the investors
awareness and
perception regarding
Mutual fund investment.
To find preference of
investors about different
investment avenue
To find out which factors
attracts investors to
invest in mutual fund
A Study On The To evaluate the Source: secondary large cap schemes
9
category of funds using
risk adjusted measures as
suggested by Sharpe,
Treynor and Jensen.
To find out if there is a
significant difference in
the performance of
different category of
funds.
Performance To study the Source: secondary All the funds have
13 investors for that influences the Secondary Data benefits are preferred
investment in mutual preferences of the Method: Descriptive factors.
funds in india investors for investment research
Rana, D.
in mutual funds Tools: factor analysis, Bank is the main
(2013)
To analyze investment and Chi- square test factor as distribution
options other than mutual channel for
funds investment.
To plan for promotion of
mutual fund investment
in Kumaun Division of
India.
10
Performance To investigate the Tools: Standard For Indian small
evaluation of mutual financial performance deviation , (Beta investors mutual funds
14 funds in India with of the mutual funds value) covariance, are best investment
special reference to with the tools of return, Sharpe’s ratio option.
Zaheeruddin,
selected financial standard deviation and ,Treynor's ratio
M.,
intermediaries beta.
Sivakumar, P.
To evaluate the selected
Reddy, S.
funds assessment on the
(2013)
basis of various
performance ratios
(Sharpe, Treynor,
Jensen)
To compare HDFC,
Birla sun life and ICICI
equity performance
with the S&P CNX
Nifty Index, to give
rankings of mutual
funds by their
outstanding
performance
A Study on To find out the Source: Secondary
HDFC fund has
Performance performance of equity data
outperformed
15 Evaluation of mutual funds in selected Tools : Sharpe’s
the benchmark from
Selected Banks banks. Performance Index,
Revathy, S. sundram growth funds.
Equity Mutual Funds To analyze the risk and Treynor Performance
Santhi, V.
return of selected banks index, Standard
(2013)
in equity mutual funds. Deviation
To compare the
performance among the
selected banks in equity
mutual funds.
To identify the suitable
equity mutual fund
among selected banks
equity mutual funds
11
Investor’s preference To find out the most Size: 300 Investors. Maximum investors
16 towards mutual fund preferred Investment Source: Primary Data are aware about Banks
in comparison to Avenue of the investors Method: Snowball & LIC investment
other investment of Mathura. Sampling avenues only.
Agrawal, G.,
avenues To analyze the Return is the main
Jain, M.
investor’s preference criterion of investors
(2013)
towards investment in regarding their
mutual funds when investments .
other investment
avenues are also
available in the market.
To find the main bases
of different investment
avenues, an investor
thinks before investing.
To find out the overall
criterion of investors
regarding investment.
Evaluating the To evaluate the Source: secondary HDFC Top when
12
Performance To analyse Risk and Data: Secondary data Mutual funds are best
18 evaluation of select Returns of select equity Tools: Average option for small
equity funds in india funds Growth Rate (AGR), investors.
Burlakan,K.
To evaluate equity Compounded Annual
Chiruvoori,R.
funds and suggest Growth Rate (CAGR),
V.
investors about Standard Deviation,
(2013)
outperforming funds Beta, Sharpe Index
model, Treynor model
A study on To study the socio- Risk free returns are
13
Performance To classify the mutual Source: secondary Competition among
21 evaluation of private fund schemes into data the private and public
and public sponsored different categories and Tool; Treynor ratio, players has increased
Kumar, l.n.,
mutual funds in india analyze the performance Sharpe Ratio and the choice of mutual
Devi, v.R.
of different private and Jensen ratio. funds schemes to the
(2011)
public mutual funds. investors
To evaluate performance
of different mutual funds .
schemes on the basis of
risk- return parameters
and benchmark indices.
To appraise performance
of private and public
mutual funds using risk
adjusted measures as
suggested by Sharpe,
Treynor, and Jensen.
To find out if there is a
significant difference in
the performance of
private and public
mutual funds.
Performance To examine the funds Tools: return, standard Future of Mutual
22 evaluation of open sensitivity to the market deviation, coefficient Funds in India has lot
ended schemes fluctuation in the terms of determination, Beta, of positive things.
KUMAR, V.
of mutual funds of Beta. Sharpe ratio, Treynor Competition between
(2011)
To appraise the ratio, Jenson’s private and public
performance of mutual measures. players is increasing.
funds with regard to
risk-return adjustment,
the model suggested by
Sharp, Treynore and
Jensen
14
An empirical study To gain practical Data collection- Mutual fund is a
15
BOOK REVIEWED
16
Part 2 Investment Analysis
Consisting three chapters
Chapter 1 helps to understand the basic methods of analyzing fixed income
instruments this chapter seeks to provide such grounding.
Chapter 2 this chapter looks at the determinants of intrinsic value and examines a
frame work helpful in estimating them.
Chapter 3 this chapter discusses the basic premises of technical analysis, explains
the more commonly used tools of technical analysis, and evaluate the usefulness of
technical analysis.
17
RESEARCH GAP
The study done here has few gaps which are to be filled up and studied further.
Analysis of performance and comparison of mutual funds in India, in terms of
growth, size and volume has to be provided to build up a strong study. A degree of
correlation is very important between funds and market return and the impact of
funds specific characteristic on the fund performance. This correlation has to be
developed so as to have a better idea on how one parameter can affect the other.
Evaluation of ratios performance and ranks has to be focused more on the basis of
foreside ratios so as to get a better understanding of interdependence among funds
and index.
18
JUSTIFICATION
The mutual fund is an important financial institution which can play a significance
role in the development of any country. If they perform in an efficient way and to
the expectation of the investing public, then a large number of investors can be
attracted towards these.
Today it is noticed that s large number of mutual funds schemes has been floated in
the market. It is very difficult for average investors to examine their performance.
Thus, it is very important to evaluate the performance of the mutual funds so that
the retail investors can make valued judgment for selecting the mutual funds for
their investment purpose. Further, it is also significant to know which mutual funds
is functioning as the prescribed regulatory norms whether the investment decisions
have been taken by the fund managers as per the guideline, or not. It is essential to
ensure due diligence, transparency and safety in portfolio selection by the mutual
funds.
19
OBJECTIVES
To examine the trends in term of growth and volume of mutual funds in India.
20
HYPOTHESIS
21
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
TYPE OF STUDY:
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE
SAMPLINF DESIGN
To study the financial performance of mutual funds, the sampling frame will be selected
after considering the number og mutual funds, asset under management and the
schemes of mutual funds currently operating in India. Out of 44 mutual funds
companies having total AUM of ₹ 1447431.49, top seven companies will be selected
which are having 70 percent AUM of the total schemes in the market. There schemes
will be divided under 4 broad categories – Equity funds, Debt Funds, Hybrid funds and
Liquid funds. Further 25 percent of the total current schemes prevailing in the market
will be taken. Schemes comparison will be made on the basis of their year of inception.
The time period of the study will be from 2013-14 to 2017-18.The schemes launched
after 31’Mar’2015 will not be considered.
DATA COLLECTION
For the purpose of the study, two sets of data have been collected. One set of data has
been collected from secondary sources which include the Capital Market, Chartered
Financial Analyst, Outlook, SEBI annual reports, RBI Reports on Currency and Finance,
RBI Bulletin, Management Accountant, Portfolio Organizer, Economic and Political
Weekly, Finance India etc. The data relating to growth of mutual fund industry and
regulatory framework of mutual fund will be collected from www.sebi.gov.in. Mutual
22
fund schemes will be collected on quarterly basis (first date of each quarter) for the
study period from the Financial Express, Economic Times, Business Standard and
various websites such as www.amfiindia.com, www.mutualfundindia.com. In case, first
day of any quarter being a holiday, NAV of the next working day was taken as NAV of
a fund does not change on a holiday. For evaluating market return and risk, S&P CNX
Nifty, BSE Sensex, BSE 100, BSE 200 have been taken as benchmark indices.
ANALYSIS OF DATA
The performance of selected funds will be evaluated using average rate of return of fund,
standard deviation, Risk/Return, Sharpe Ratio, Treynor ratio and Jensen ratio. Return
alone should not be considered as the basis of measurement of the performance of a
mutual fund scheme. Risk associated with a fund, in a general, can be defined as
variability or fluctuations in the returns generated by it. The higher the fluctuations in
the returns of a fund during a given period, higher will be the risk associated with it.
Standard deviation is a statistical measure of the range of a fund's performance, and is
reported as an annual number. When a fund has a high standard deviation, its range of
performance has been very wide, indicating that there is a greater potential for volatility.
The most common measures that combine both risk and reward are Treynor ratio,
Sharpe Ratio and Jensen ratio
RISK ANALYSIS;
RETURN ANALYSIS;
23
PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS
1. Treynor’s index :
(Rp – Rf) ÷ βp
Higher value of Treynor’s index indicates better performance of portfolio and vice versa.
The Treynor’s measure of portfolio performance is relative measure that ranks the funds
in terms of risk (market risk) and return. The index is also termed as reward to volatility
ratio.
2. Sharpe’s index :
(Rp – Rf) ÷ σp
Higher value of Sharpe’s index indicates better performance of portfolio and vice versa.
The Sharpe’s measure of portfolio performance is also relative measure that ranks the
funds in terms of risk (total risk) and return. The ratio is also termed as reward to
variability ratio.
3. Jensen’s Measure :
αP = rP – [rf + βP ( rm – rf ) ]
Jensen's measure is one of the ways to help determine if a portfolio is earning the proper
return for its level of risk. If the value is positive, then the portfolio is earning excess
returns..
4. R Squared:
This is a measure of correlation of a fund’s movement to that of an index.
24
CHAPTERIZATION
Chapter-1: INTRIDUCTION
2.1Review of literature
2.2Research Gap
2.3Objective of the study
2.4Hypothesis of the study
2.5Sampling design
2.6Data collection
2.7Data analysis tools
25
Chapter-5: REGULATORY FRAMEWORK AND ORGANIZATION OF
MUTUAL FUNDS IN INDIA
5.1 Introductions
5.2Regulation of mutual funds
5.3SEBI guideline for mutual funds
5.4General guidelines
5.5Key financial terms
5.6Schems of mutual funds
5.7Organization of mutual funds
5.8Fund manager of the asset management company
5.9Role of Association of mutual funds of India
5.10Major Mutual funds companies in India
26
REFERENCES
(as on 1’Sep’2016)
Mane.P. (2016). A Study of Investors Perception towards Mutual Funds in the City of
Aurangabad. The SIJ Transactions on Industrial, Financial & Business Management
(IFBM) , 4(2),30-38.Retrieved fromhttp://www.thesij.com/papers/IFBM/2016/February/IFBM-
04020060202.pdf
Ramanujam, V., & Bhuvaneswari, A. (2015). Growth and Performance of Indian Mutual Fund
Industry during Past Decades. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science
and Management Studies.3 (2) 283-290. Retrieved
fromhttp://www.ijarcsms.com/docs/paper/volume3/issue2/V3I2-0059.pdf
Bhutada, M. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Mutual Fund Schemes available at Kotak Mutual
Fund and HDFC Mutual Fund. International Journal of Research in Finance and
Marketing, 5(4), 69-90.Rtrieved from
http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:ijrfm&volume=5&issue=4&article=008&ty
pe=pdf
Sharma, P., Agarwal, P. (2015). Investors’ Perception And Attitude Towards Mutual Fund As
An Investment Option. Journal of Business Management & Social Sciences Research
(JBM&SSR), 4(2), 115-119.Retrieved From
http://www.borjournals.com/a/index.php/jbmssr/article/download/1955/1286
27
Kaur,R.(2014). Performance evaluation of debt mutual fund schemes in India. International
Interdisciplinary Research Journal.2(2),180-192.Retrived from
http://indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2013/May/7.pdf
Rathnamani, V. (2013). Investor’s preferences towards mutual fund industry in Trichy. IOSR
Journal of Business and Management, 6(6), 48-55.Retrieved from
http://iosrjournals.org/iosr-jbm/papers/Vol6-issue6/F0664855.pdf
Karrupasamy, R., & Vanaja, V. (2013). A Study On The Performance Of Selected Large Cap
And Small & Mid Cap Mutual Fund Schemes In India. The international journal of
management.7-13.Retrieved from http://www.theijm.com/vol2issue3/2.222.pdf
Narayanasamy, R., & Rathnamani, V. (2013). Performance Evaluation of Equity Mutual Funds
(on Selected Equity Large Cap Funds). Journal of Business and Management Invention, 18-
24.Retreieved from http://www.ijbmi.org/papers/Vol(2)4/version-2/C241824.pdf
Rana, D. (2013). Preferences of investors for investment in mutual funds in India. International
Journal of Current Research.5(8),2353-2367.Retrived from
http://www.journalcra.com/sites/default/files/Download%203842.pdf
Agrawal, G., & Jain, M. (2013). Investor’s Preference towards Mutual Fund In Comparison To
Other Investment Avenues. Journal of Indian research 1(4), 115-131.Retrived from
http://mujournal.mewaruniversity.in/JIR%201-4/15.pdf
Subashini, K. (2013). Evaluating the performance of some selected open ended equity diversified
mutual fund in Indian mutual fund industry. International Journal of Innovative Research in
Science, Engineering and Technology, 2(9), 4735-4744.Retrived from
http://www.rroij.com/open-access/evaluating-the-performance-of-some-selected-open-ended-
28
equity-diversified-mutual-fund-in-indian-mutual-fund-industry.pdf
Burlakan,K. Chiruvoori,R.V.(2013). Performance evaluation of select equity funds in India.
International Journal of Social Science & Interdisciplinary Research.2(5),69-78.Retrived from
http://indianresearchjournals.com/pdf/IJSSIR/2013/May/7.pdf
Prajapati, K. P., & Patel, M. K. (2012). Comparative study on performance evaluation of mutual
fund schemes of Indian companies. Researchers World, 3(3), (47-59)
Retrieved from
http://www.researchersworld.com/vol3/issue3/vol3_issue3_3/Paper_07.pdf
Kumar, N. L., Devi, D. V. R., & Vaddeswaram, G. (2011). Performance evaluation of private
and public sponsored mutual funds in India. International journal of research in commerce, it &
management.1(2).(1-156).Retrieved from
http://ijrcm.org.in/download.php?name=ijrcm-4-Ivol-1_issue-2_art-
5.pdf&path=uploaddata/ijrcm-4-Ivol-1_issue-2_art-5.pdf
Ali, S. (2009). An Empirical Study on Indian Mutual Funds Equity Diversified Growth Schemes
and their Performance Evaluation. International Journal of Research in IT, Management and
Engineering, 2(2), 1-18.Reterived from
https://www.scribd.com/document/263514868/AN-EMPIRICAL-STUDY-ON-INDIAN-
MUTUAL-FUNDS-EQUITY-DIVERSIFIED-GROWTH-SCHEMES-AND-THEIR-
PERFORMANCE-EVALUATION.
Subha, M. V., & Bharathi, S. J. (2013). An empirical study on the performance of select mutual
fund schemes in India. Journal of Contemporary research in Management, 1(1) (9-23).
Retrieved from
http://www.psgim.ac.in/journals/index.php/jcrm/article/viewFile/160/167
29
1020091107121118019081127088088067014028091113120085106&EXT=pdf
30