Is Cancel Culture Justified?
In modern media, cancel culture is defined as a cultural phenomenon where an individual
speaks out or acts in an unacceptable manner, which often results in severe consequences where
that individual is ostracized, shunned, boycotted, fired, assaulted, etc. This phenomenon usually
takes place on social media. But is this activity justified? Absolutely not, and here are 3 main
reasons why--1. cancel culture incites bullying, 2. It is unproductive and doesn't foster genuine
social change, and 3. It leads to intolerance and systemic exclusion.
Firstly, cancel culture leads to extensive cyberbullying. When someone is “canceled”, it
often causes widespread harassment on social media. The individual becomes a target of
coordinated groups of people who might threaten, doxx and publicly humiliate them. This
creates an environment of mob mentality, where people are not only held accountable, but also
subjected to relentless cruelty. This can cause devastating effects on their mental health,
potentially causing anxiety, depression, and even suicidal thoughts. Instead of creating dialogue
and understanding, cancel culture repeats a cycle of aggression, turning accountability into
vengeance. This is not just harmful to a single individual, but to the overall community, since it
poses a risk of normalizing cyberbullying as a response to disagreements.
Next, the practice itself is not productive and does not create real social change. Cancel
culture rarely leads to a meaningful discussion or a change in behavior. Instead, the individuals
become defensive and entrenched in their own views. Furthermore, cancel culture prioritizes
punishment over rehabilitation, frequently overlooking its potential for education and growth.
Instead of fostering a society where people learn from their mistakes, cancel culture often
reinforces division and misunderstanding.
Finally, cancel culture leads to intolerance and systemic exclusion. It makes a society
where differing opinions are not just challenged, but actively silenced. This environment
discourages open debate and stifles free speech. This is because people fear backlash for
expressing their opinions and views. In fact, individuals from minority groups may find
themselves at higher risks of being canceled due to their already vulnerable position of being a
minority. Instead of creating inclusive communities, cancel culture reinforces existing power
dynamics.
In conclusion, cancel culture is not a justified response to unacceptable behavior. Its
probability of inciting bullying, lack of productivity in fostering genuine social change, and its
role in promoting intolerance and systemic exclusion completely invalidates the whole culture
altogether.