ISSF Rule Book 2023 V 02-Part-1
ISSF Rule Book 2023 V 02-Part-1
STATUTES,
RULES
AND
REGULATIONS
OFFICIAL
STATUTES,
RULES
AND
REGULATIONS
Competitions
Entry Fee (except OG and YOG) (set by General Assembly) Euro 170.00
Late Entry Fee (between 30 and 3 days before the Official Arrival Day Euro 220.00
providing that entry can be accepted by the OC) per start Euro 170.00 plus
additional 50.00
The Organizing Committee must pay a fee to the ISSF for each entry within Euro 5.00
30 days
Entry fee for each Official in any ISSF Championship (set by General Euro 50.00
Assembly)
Protest fee in competitions Euro 50.00
Appeal fee in competitions Euro 100.00
Training fee for shotgun trap / skeet Euro 8.00
Training fee for shotgun double trap Euro 10.00
Replacement of “Equipment Control Card” Euro 10.00
Clothing Re-inspection fee if resubmitted for the second or subsequent test Euro 20.00
during the same championship (per item / per subsequent inspection
1.7 COUNCIL
1.7.1 The Council may hold ordinary or extraordinary meetings.
1.7.2 The Council consists of the following members, representing both genders
(minimum 4 per gender):
1.7.2.1 The Executive Committee members;
1.9 PRESIDENT
1.9.1 The President of the ISSF:
1.9.1.1 Provides leadership and direction to the ISSF;
1.9.1.2 Represents the ISSF and presides over all its activities;
1.9.1.3 Represents the ISSF in international sports organizations and in all legal
matters with the right for single representation of the ISSF;
1.9.1.4 Acts on behalf of the ISSF as circumstances require;
1.9.1.5. Chairs the meetings of the General Assembly, of the Council as well as of the
Executive Committee;
1.9.1.6 Ensures the proper observance of the Constitution and ISSF Regulations,
Rules as well as the decisions taken under them;
1.9.1.7 Supervises the execution of decisions and activities of ISSF Bodies;
1.9.1.8 Ensures that the decisions taken by the Executive Committee are put into
effect;
1.22 AUDITORS
1.22.1 The Executive Committee must appoint an external professional auditing
company.
1.22.2 The appointed company must examine the accounts as well as financial
documents and transactions and give a report to the Council and the General
Assembly.
1.24 LANGUAGES
1.24.1 The following seven languages are recognized as the official languages of the
ISSF during meetings: English, French, German, Russian, Spanish, Chinese
and Arabic. The Executive Committee may permit the use of other languages
in the meetings and the General Assemblies.
1.24.2 However, English is the permanent working language in which the Constitution,
the regulations, rules and minutes as well as legal or official communications
must be provided and published. The resolution of disputes must be conducted
in the English language. The matters to be proposed for discussions at the
General Assemblies must be sent by the Member Federations to the President
or the Secretary General in the English language only.
1.24.3 In World and Continental Championships, the language of the host country
may be used in the programme, instructions, announcements, etc. in addition
to English.
1.24.4 Simultaneous translation into English, French and Spanish must be provided at
General Assemblies. Simultaneous translation into Russian, German, Chinese
and Arabic may be also provided at the General Assemblies upon request at
1.30 APPROVAL
This Constitution was approved by the Extraordinary General Assembly of the
UIT on July 27th, 1980 in Moscow, and replaced the “Constitution of the UIT,
Edition 1978”. This edition includes amendments and corrections approved by
the General Assemblies on July 15th, 1998 in Barcelona, ESP, on March 21st,
2000 in Sydney, AUS, on April 18th, 2004 in Athens, GRE, on April 10th, 2008
in Beijing, CHN, and on 7th December 2019 in Munich, GER.
1.31 TRANSITORY
1.31.1 All decisions taken according to the previous version of the Constitution will
stay effective until they are realized or changed. All persons elected to any
ISSF Body before this version of the Constitution became effective must
complete their term of office. All amendments decided in the Extraordinary
General Assembly on December 7th, 2019 in Munich, GER, shall become
effective immediately, except indicated otherwise and except all changes in
respect to the composition of ISSF Bodies and Articles 1.4.6.3 and 1.4.6.4
which shall become effective for and as of the first elections after 7th
December 2019.
1.31.2 The Member Federations have to amend their Constitutions to be compliant
with this new ISSF Constitution until 31 December 2020.
1.31.3 The Continental Confederations have to amend their Constitutions to be
compliant with this new ISSF Constitution until 31 December 2021.
Name of Event
10m Air Rifle
50m Rifle 3 Positions
50m Rifle Prone
300m Rifle 3 Positions
300m Rifle Prone
300m Standard Rifle
10m Air Pistol
25m Pistol
25m Rapid Fire Pistol
25m Centre Fire Pistol
25m Standard Pistol
50m Pistol
Trap
Double Trap
Skeet
10m Running Target
10m Running Target Mixed
50m Running Target
50m Running Target Mixed
Target Sprint
3.3.2 The ISSF recognizes individual, Mixed Team, Team and Open events.
3.3.2.1 Individual events are events in which individual athletes of the same gender
compete against each other.
3.3.2.2 Mixed Team events are for the Teams with two members, one of each gender.
3.3.2.3 Team events are for Teams with three (3) members of the same gender. Only
full Teams of three (3) athletes will be ranked in the Team results list.
3.3.2.4 Open events are individual events with athletes of both genders competing
together in one event.
3.3.3 Formats of the ISSF recognized events must be approved by the Executive
Committee.
3.3.4 New events can be added to the list of ISSF recognized events after the
following conditions have been met:
3.3.4.1 the appropriate ISSF Committee develops rules for the event,
3.6.1.1 Upon any proposal of the Organizers and approval of the Executive Committee
the number of 10m and 50m targets in the Qualification Hall can be lower than
indicted in 6.4.1, dependent on the expected number of participants and the
preliminary competition schedule.
3.6.1.2 Upon any proposal of the Organizers and approval of the Executive Committee
the number of Trap and Skeet ranges for Qualification can be lower than
indicated in 6.4.1, but a Final Range must be provided.
3.6.2 Result Production
3.6.2.1 The competitions venue must be equipped in accordance with the official ISSF
General Technical Rules.
3.6.2.2 Electronic target systems, of makers and models approved by the ISSF must
be used for Rifle and Pistol events Qualification and Final stages at all ISSF
Championships.
3.6.2.3 The ISSF Technical Delegates are responsible for examining the ranges and
other facilities to ensure that they meet ISSF standards and are suitable for
conducting Championships. The Technical Committee will provide checklists
in accordance with the ISSF Rules and Regulations for use by the Technical
Delegates in examining the ranges and facilities (available from ISSF
Headquarters).
3.6.2.4 Ranges to be used for World Championships should be completed one (1)
year in advance. If the range is not completed, the detailed plans, construction
schedule and financial plan must be submitted to the Secretary General one
(1) year in advance, and the range must be completed three (3) months in
advance.
3.9 PROTOCOL
3.9.1 The holding and the format of an opening and closing ceremonies at ISSF
Championships are guided by the applicable ISSF Guidelines for Organizing
ISSF Championship.
3.9.2 In the ISSF Championships the Organizing Committee must award:
3.9.2.1 Championship medals in gold, silver and bronze colours to the first three (3)
individual event winners. A minimum of 15 athletes in individual events or 10
athletes in junior individual events must participate in order that individual
medals shall be awarded.
3.9.2.2 Championship medals in gold, silver and bronze colours to each member of
the first three (3) Mixed Team events winners. A minimum of ten (10) Mixed
Teams in each of the events must participate in order that Mixed Team medals
shall be awarded.
3.9.2.3 Championship medals in gold, silver and bronze colours to each member of
the first three (3) Team events winners. A minimum of five (5) Teams in each
event must participate in order that Team medals shall be awarded.
3.9.3 If the above-mentioned minimums of participants are not reached, the event
will be declared an “International Championship” of the nation which organized
the competitions.
3.10 RECORDS
3.10.1 Records may be established in all recognized ISSF events in the Olympic
Games and all ISSF Championships.
3.10.2 ISSF recognizes Historical records, Olympic records, World records,
Qualification World records and Championship records.
3.10.2.1 Historical records are records established before December 31, 2020 in all
recognized ISSF men’s, women’s, and juniors’ events in Olympic Games
and World Championships, World Cups, World Cup Finals, Continental
Championships and Continental Games conducted according to the ISSF
Rules and Regulations.
3.10.2.2 Olympic records are records established at the Olympic Games and Youth
Olympic Games.
3.10.2.3 World Championship records are records established at the World
Championships and World Championships for Juniors.
3.10.2.4 World records are records established during a Final in any ISSF
Championship.
3.10.2.5 Records can be established in Qualification (Qualification part 1, if there is
more than one part in Qualification) and Eliminations.
3.10.3 The ISSF will issue a Record diploma to individual athletes, Mixed Team or
Team members who establish a Record.
3.10.4 The Technical Delegate(s) must submit reports for recognition of all Records.
3.13 ANNEXES
3.13.1 The General Regulations may be extended by the Council or the Executive
Committee by annexes.
3.13.2 The annexes to the General Regulations may not contravene the General
Regulations.
3.14 APPROVAL
These General Regulations were approved by the Ordinary General Assembly
of the ISSF on October 30th, 1982 in Caracas, Venezuela, and replace the
“General Regulations, edition 1977” and became effective on November
15th,1982 (revised, amended and corrected by the General Assembly of ISSF
on July29th, 1988 in Madrid, ESP). This edition includes amendments and
corrections approved by the General Assemblies of the ISSF on August 14th,
1990 in Moscow, URS and on April 27th, 1992 in Barcelona, ESP and on July
22nd, 1994 in Milan, ITA, on April 20th, 1996 in Atlanta, USA and on July 15th,
1998 in Barcelona, ESP, on 21st March 2000 in Sydney, AUS, on April 18th,
2004 in Athens, GRE, on April 10th, 2008 in Beijing, CHN on June 25th, 2017
in Munich, Germany, by the Extraordinary General Assembly on November
30th, 2019 in Munich, Germany and by the ISSF Council in January, June and
September 2020 and June 2022.
Date Place
Signature athlete
herewith applies for the issue of an ISSF ID Number which is necessary for the
participation in ISSF supervised competitions and championships for the following athlete:
Family Name(s):
Given Name(s):
Maiden Name(s):
Nationality:
German:
1. Ich erkläre hiermit, dass mir die Bestimmungen und Strafen bekannt sind, die
für offizielle Wettkämpfe der ISSF zur Bekämpfung des Dopings in Kraft sind.
Ich erkläre mein Einverständnis, mich den Dopingkontrolluntersuchungen
zu unterziehen, die Ergebnisse solcher Untersuchungen anzunehmen und
die entsprechenden Vorschriften in ihrer jeweils gültigen Form zu jeder Zeit
einzuhalten.
2. Ich erkläre mein Einverständnis, dass jeder Streit, der zwischen mir und
der ISSF entsteht und nicht freundschaftlich erledigt werden kann, und
der nach Ausschöpfung der Verfahrensvorschriften, die in den ISSF
Regeln vorgesehen sind, offen bleibt, endgültig durch ein Schiedsgericht
entschieden werden soll, welches in Übereinstimmung mit den Statuten und
Regeln des Schiedsgerichts für Sport in Lausanne (CAS) zusammengestellt
wird unter Ausschluss der Anrufung ordentlicher Gerichte. Die Parteien
verpflichten sich, die erwähnten Statuten und Regeln zu beachten und die
Entscheidung im guten Glauben anzunehmen und ihre Durchsetzung in
keiner Weise zu behindern.
Espanol:
50m Rifle/Pistol
25m Pistol
Skeet n/a
Other ___________________________________
Rifle
Pistol
Shotgun
Running Target
to be held at on
Organizing Committee:
Name of OC Secretary:
Fax:
E-mail:
Rifle/Pistol Ranges: Please answer the following questions for Rifle/Pistol only:
Other ___________________________________
Previous Events:
Please specify the last ISSF World Cup or similar event that your Federation has hosted
at this venue:
Event: Date:
Name of airport:
Internet:
What kind of internet connections are available at the venue for
Upload: Download:
Regulations:
Please give an explanation below of any National Laws or Local Regulations of which the
ISSF and its National Federations should be informed, e.g. ‘Importation of firearms and
ammunition’:
Submitted:
PREAMBLE
In accordance with the ISSF Constitution, the objectives of the ISSF are to promote and
encourage the development of the shooting sport throughout the world, to provide drug-
free sport and to promote and encourage the development of international relations.
The purpose of this Code is to guarantee that the objectives of the ISSF will be executed
in a fair manner, without improper interference, and to sanction incidents that damage the
image of ISSF activities or bring them into disrepute.
ISSF members, continental organizations, teams, officials and athletes shall participate
in ISSF Championships and activities in accordance with the standards of ethics, fair
play and sportsmanship established by the ISSF Statutes, Rules and Regulations and
by this Code. This Code provides basic standards for fair play and moral behaviour and
procedures for judging and sanctioning violations of those standards.
With the following regulations the ISSF adopts its own code of ethics based on the
principles and rules of the IOC Code of Ethics.
Furthermore, acknowledging the danger to sports integrity from the manipulation of
sports competitions, ISSF restates its commitment to safeguarding the integrity of sport,
including the protection of clean athletes and competitions as stated in the Olympic
Agenda 2020. Therefore, ISSF with these regulations also implements the new IOC
Olympic Movement Code on the Prevention of the Manipulation of Competitions. The
Definitions used in version 2016 of such IOC Code also apply to the following rules.
These Ethics Rules had been ammended by decision of the ISSF Executive Committee in
its meeting on February 21, 2017.
For enforcement of this Code, the ISSF will establish an Ethics Committee.
1 SCOPE OF APPLICATION
2 RULES OF CONDUCT
2.1 DUTIES
2.1.1 General Rules of conduct
Persons bound by this Code are expected to be aware of the importance of
their duties and associated obligations and responsibilities.
Persons bound by this Code are obliged to respect all applicable laws and
regulations, as well as ISSF Statutes, Rules and Regulations, and decisions
taken by the competent ISSF bodies to the extent applicable to them.
Persons bound by this Code shall behave in a dignified manner and act with
complete credibility and integrity. They shall respect universal fundamental
ethical principles that include:
a) Respect for the Olympic spirit, which requires mutual understanding with a
spirit of friendship, solidarity and fair play;
b) Respect for principles of universality, political neutrality and autonomy of the
Olympic Movement;
c) Respect for international conventions on protecting human rights insofar as
they apply to the Olympic Games and ISSF Championship activities and which
ensure in particular:
• respect for human dignity;
• rejection of discrimination of any kind on whatever grounds, be it race, color,
sex, sexual orientation, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or
social origin, property, birth or other status;
• rejection of all forms of harassment, be it physical, professional or sexual,
and any physical or mental injuries;
d) ensuring the participants’ conditions of safety, well-being and medical care
favorable to their physical and mental equilibrium.
Persons bound by this Code may not abuse their position in any way,
especially to take advantage of their position for personal or private aims or
gains.
2.1.2 Duty of fair behavior / sportsmanlike behaviour
Persons bound by this Code are expected to behave in a fair way and shall in
particular refrain from any form of cheating including, but not limited to doping,
manipulation of equipment or scores to give an advantage to an athlete or to
a team, falsification or alteration of documents indicating false age, nationality,
2.5 NON-DISCRIMINATION
Persons bound by this Code may not offend the dignity or integrity of a country,
private person or group of people through contemptuous, discriminatory or
denigrating words or actions on account of race, skin color, ethnic, national or
social origin, gender, language, religion, political opinion or any other opinion,
wealth, birth or any other status, sexual orientation or for any other reason.
3 PREVENTION OF MANIPULATION
The following conduct as defined in this Article constitutes a violation of this
Code:
3.1 BETTING
Betting in relation either:
a) to a Competition in which the Participant is directly participating; or
b) to the Participant’s sport; or
c) to any event of a multisport Competition in which he/she is a participant.
4.1 GENERAL
Breaches of this Code or any other ISSF Statutes, Rules and Regulations by
persons bound by this Code are punishable by one or more of the following
sanctions:
a) warning;
b) fine;
c) return of awards;
d) disqualification;
e) suspension;
f) expulsion;
g) ban on entering a competition or a venue;
h) ban on taking part in any shooting-related activity.
The Ethics Committee may decide that the notification of a case be made to
the appropriate law enforcement authorities.
4.2 INVESTIGATIONS
The Participant who is alleged to have committed a violation of this Code must
be informed of the alleged violations that have been committed, details of the
alleged acts and/or omissions, and the range of possible sanctions.
4.4 CONFIDENTIALITY
The principle of confidentiality must be strictly respected by the ISSF during all
the procedure; information should only be exchanged with entities on a need
to know basis. Confidentiality must also be strictly respected by any person
concerned by the procedure until there is public disclosure of the case.
5 LIMITATION PERIOD
As a general rule, breaches of the provisions of this Code may no longer be
prosecuted after a lapse of ten years.
The limitation period, when applicable, shall be prolonged if proceedings are
opened and/or suspended.
6 PROCEDURES
7 APPEALS
Decisions by the Ethics Committee may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration
for Sport in Lausanne, Switzerland, (“CAS”) which will resolve the dispute
definitively in accordance with the Code of sports-related arbitration. The
time limit for appeal is twenty-one days after the reception of the decision
concerning the appeal.
8 MUTUAL RECOGNITION
Subject to the right of appeal, any decision in compliance with this Code by an
International Sporting Organisation shall be recognised and respected by the
ISSF.
This ISSF Code of Ehtics was approved by the ISSF Executive Committee
in its meeting on March 1, 2016. This edition includes ammendments and
corrections approved by the ISSF Executive Committee on February 21, 2017.
This verifies that this record(s) was established in an ISSF Championship 1) that was conducted
according to ISSF Rules and Regulations, 2) that ISSF participation requirements (3.9) were fulfilled
and that ISSF Anti-Doping were followed:
Date: Signature:
Date: Signature:
1 BACKGROUND
1.1 Special ISSF training courses for coaches were approved by the Executive
Committee in 1992 and ammended in 2011.
1.2 These diploma courses are designed for national coaches from Member
Federations to achieve an international coaching qualification.
1.3 Coaching Diplomas are of three categories: “A,” “B” and “C.”
1.4 It is necessary first to attend a “C” course. Thereafter, coaches having
achieved a Diploma can apply to attend a “B” course, and if successful an “A”
Course.
1.5 The ISSF Training Academy also offers a regional or national coaching course
“D,” which is held in the local language of the region in which the course is
hosted. Material and certificates will be provided by the ISSF Traing Academy.
1.6 A course fee is payable by each student attending a Coaching Diploma
course. This covers the cost of running the course and any associated
accommodation, meals and local transportation.
3 APPEALS
3.1 Any student may appeal in writing against the decision that he has failed a
course. The appeal will be considered by the ISSF Executive Committee.
SPECIAL NOTE:
In the context of this Annex, the word “Judge” refers to an accredited ISSF Judge’s
Licence holder. The word “Jury” refers to those Licenced judges who are appointed to
Jury duties at specified Championships.
4 EXPIRATION OF A LICENCE.
4.1 When an ISSF Judge’s Licence expires after five (5) years, Licence holders
will be taken off the ISSF list if not renewed by application within one (1) year.
In such a case any future Licence must be applied for in accordance with the
acquisition of a Licence, including attendance at course(s). Licences renewed
late within the one (1) year will only be valid for five (5) years from the previous
expiry date.
4.2 The Licence holders’ National Federation, at any time, has the right to apply for
cancellation of an ISSF Judge’s Licence. The Licence holder may be taken off
the list, in such a case the Licence should be returned to the ISSF.
4.3 A judge’s Licence may be cancelled if a holder does not fulfil his duties as a
judge or harms the interest or reputation of the ISSF. The holder will be taken
off the ISSF list and the Licence must be returned to the ISSF. All ISSF Judges’
Licences remain the property of the ISSF.
Judges’ Courses.
4.4
4.5 Only courses that have been approved and recognized by the ISSF will be
considered as official training courses for judges. The location and dates of
such courses are to be agreed with the Secretary General and Chairman of
the Judges’ Committee. Once agreed, the Chairman of the Judges’ Committee
and the Secretary General will appoint a qualified ISSF Instructor, from the
approved list of ISSF Instructor licence holders, to deliver each course. After
authorisation by the ISSF Judges’ Committee, the ISSF will publish the annual
courses programme by January of that year. Applications for recognition must
be submitted to the ISSF Headquarters using the form “Application for Judges
Courses” (available on ISSF web site). The application must be sent to ISSF
at least 3 months before the date of the intended course. All applications and
subsequent publication of courses must include the following details:
4.5.1 Where the course will be held;
4.5.2 The dates of the course;
4.5.3 The name(s) of the shooting disciplines that will be covered;
4.5.4 The name(s) of the ISSF Instructor. The name of the course coordinator and,
if different, of the person who is to conduct the instruction on the General
Aspects of the Rules;
5 UPGRADING.
5.1 The basis for upgrading of a “B” judges’ Licence to an “A” judges’ Licence is
the experience acquired as the judge over a number of years:
5.1.1 A minimum period of four (4) years recent experience is required as an active
“B” Licence holder ; and
5.1.2 The applicant must have officiated in at least five (5) international competitions,
which have a minimum of five (5) participating nations, at least three (3)
must be ISSF or WSPS Championships. For at least two (2) appointments
7 ASSIGNMENT OF JUDGES
7.1 The nomination and designation of the Jury Members is made according to the
Constitution of the ISSF. It is recommended and all appointed Jury members
are encouraged to take out their own individual travel and medical insurance
prior to deploying on an assignment, this is in addition to any ISSF insurance.
7.1.1 The Secretary General and the Chairman of the Judges Committee of the
ISSF will nominate to the Executive Committee the required number of Jury
Members and substitutes for World Championships, Olympic Games and for
World Cups and Grand Prix in accordance with the Guidelines. The Executive
9 INSTRUCTORS LICENCE.
9.1 The instructors must be highly qualified, be holders of a valid ISSF “A” licence
and have regularly conducted and delivered previous courses. Instructors
should have attended and passed the ISSF “A” Licence Instructors Workshop
and where deemed appropriate acted as an assistant instructor prior to
appointment themselves.
9.2 The “Instructor’ Licence, authorises the holder to act in all situations as
described for “A” Licence holder. In addition, Judges in this category are
permitted to instruct and conduct official ISSF judge’s courses. In order to
archieve this level, selected judges need to have successfully attended an
ISSF instructors workshop.
9.3 Continental Confederations must nominate their own candidate to participate
at the Instructors workshop, depending on their requirement and need for
instructors.
9.4 The ISSF instructors workshop will be organised by the ISSF Secretary
General and ISSF Judges’ committee.
9.5 The ISSF Education programme will be developed.
9.6 The same support material in English for the Judges’ training course will be
given to the Instructors.
This is to certify that the information given is correct, that the applicant has experience as a national
judge, and that the photograph is of the applicant.
Signed for the send a digital photo (300dpi) to
Federation: the ISSF Headquarters
Name typed or
printed:
Disability
I do not have any physical impairment that would prevent me from performing all duties required as a
judge for the disciplines for which the Licence is required.
Criminal Record
Do you have a criminal record relating to harassment and abuse, illegal drugs Yes
or substances and/or any law designed to protect minors? No
Language Capability
Provide an assessment of your language capability in the ISSF languages:
Language Speak Understand
Fluent Well Basic Fluent Well Basic
English
Arabic
French
German
Russian
Spanish
Applicant’s Declaration
The Applicant has been an official ISSF Judge on the following FIVE occasions:
1
2
3
4
5
This is to certify that the information given is correct, that the applicant is conversant with the current
ISSF Rules, and the two photographs are of the applicant.
Signed for the send a digital photo (300dpi) to
Federation: the ISSF Headquarters
Name typed or
printed:
Applicant’s Declaration
Disciplines:
The ISSF Member Federation confirms that the applicant has obtained experiences as a Jury Member
in international, regional or national level competitions during the last Five (5) year period.
The applicant has good knowledge of the current ISSF Rules and Regulations.
This is to certify that the information given is correct, and the photograph(s) are of the applicant.
SPECIAL NOTE:
In the context of this Annex, the word “Referee” refers to an accredited ISSF Shotgun
Referee licence holder.
4 EXPIRATION OF A LICENCE
4.1 When an ISSF Shotgun Referees’ licence expires after five (5) years, licence
holders will be taken off the ISSF list if not renewed by application within one
(1) year. In such a case any future licence must be applied for in accordance
with the Acquisition of a licence, including attendance at course(s).
4.2 The licence holder’s National Federation, at any time, has the right to apply for
cancellation of an ISSF Shotgun Referees’ licence. The licence holder may be
taken off the list, in such a case the licence must be returned to the ISSF.
4.3 A Shotgun Referees’ licence may be cancelled if an eyesight test shows the
licence holder does not meet the required standard any longer, or if a holder
does not fulfil his duties as a Referee, or harms the interest or reputation of
the ISSF. The holder will be taken off the ISSF list and the licence must be
returned to the ISSF. All ISSF International Shotgun Referees’ licences remain
the property of the International Shooting Sport Federation.
The Applicant has attended official ISSF Shotgun Referees’ Course(s) as follows:
Events Course Dates Location Instructor
With the signature the ISSF Member Federation certifies that the information given is correct, that the
applicant has experience as a national Referee, and that the photographs are of the applicant.
This is to certify that the information given is correct, that the applicant has experience as a national
judge, and that the photograph is of the applicant.
Signed for the send a digital photo (300dpi) to
Federation: the ISSF Headquarters
Name typed or
printed:
Applicant’s Declaration
I consent to the ISSF’s use of my health data as provided in the Eyesight Test Form and Certificate.
I am aware that I have the right to withdraw my consent, but that such withdrawal does not affect the
lawfulness of any processing that was based on my consent before the withdrawal. I am aware that a
withdrawal of my consent could prevent my continued engagement as ISSF Shotgun Referee.
Date: Signature of Applicant:
Licence Number:
The ISSF Member Federation confirms that the applicant has obtained experiences as a Shotgun
Referee in competitions under ISSF rules and regulations during the last five (5) year period.
The applicant has good knowledge of the current ISSF Rules and Regulations.
With the signature the ISSF Member Federation certifies that the information given is correct and the
photograph is of the applicant.
Signed for the send a digital photo (300dpi) to
Federation: the ISSF Headquarters
Name typed or
printed:
Date of
birth
Day Month Year
Certifying medical practitioner / ophthalmologist:
Name, qualifications and medical specialty (for example: Dr AB Cook, MD, General Practitioner:)
Name
Address
Phone Fax
Mobile
phone
1. Is the visual acuity 0.7 (6/9 or 20/30) or better on each eye? No
Yes, without correction Yes, but only with correction
Corrections: Left: ………………… Right: ………..…………
2. Is there any evidence or history of impaired night vision? Yes
No
3. Is there any defect in colour vision? If yes, what kind of defect: Yes
No
4. Is there any sign of diplopia? Yes
No
5. Are there any defects in the binocular visual field? If yes, attach vision field Yes
maps! No
6. Is there any evidence of other ophthalmic pathological conditions or Yes
diabetes? If yes, what condition(s): No
Medical practitioner’s / ophthalmologist’s declaration:
I, certify that I have examined the above named person, confirmed his/her identity and that I have
correctly answered the questions above.
Date of examination: Name:
Further details are available in the “Guidelines for Organizing ISSF Championships” and
“Guidelines for the Organization of the Media Work”.
100 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
Article 3.12.3.12, Annex “B”
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 101
Article 3.12.3.13, Annex “AC”
Athletes Committee
2 STRUCTURE
2.1 The ISSF Athletes Committee must be composed of seven (7) members,
four (4) of them elected by the athletes participating in the ISSF World
Championships which are held every four (4) years and three (3) members
appointed by the ISSF Executive Committee.
2.1.1 In addition to the four (4) elected athletes, three (3) additional athletes will
be appointed by the ISSF Executive Committee as equal members of the
committee in order to guarantee a balance between continents, genders and
disciplines.
2.2 The following elections will be held during the World Championships.
2.2.1 The appointment of three (3) additional members by the ISSF Executive
Committee will follow in a meeting after the athletes have elected the four (4)
committee members.
2.3 To qualify as a candidate, an athlete must never have been found guilty of a
doping offence and must have participated in either the last Olympic Games or
in the previous or present World Championships.
2.4 The Chairman of the ISSF Athletes Committee will be elected by the ISSF
Executive Committee in its meeting following the election of the committee
members.
2.5 The term of office is four (4) years, and all members may be re-elected. A
member can serve on the committee for no longer than four (4) years after his/
her retirement from international competition.
2.6 The Chairman will become a member of the Executive Committee and will
participate in all meetings of the Executive Committee as a representative of
the athletes with full voice and vote.
2.7 The ISSF Athletes Committee may hold one (1) or two (2) meetings per year.
102 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
3 ELECTION PROCEDURE
3.1 The ISSF Member Federations may present a candidate for the ISSF Athletes
Committee according to the Guidelines to the Constitution, but not earlier than
two (2) months before and not later than 15 days before the day of the opening
ceremony of the World Championships.
3.2 The ISSF Headquarters will establish a list of all nominated candidates
including a brief biography. This list will be published on the ISSF website.
3.3 With the accreditation of all participating athletes in the World Championships,
each athlete entered in the men or women categories will be issued a voting
paper showing all candidates and the information on the voting procedure.
3.4 Each athlete may only vote for a maximum of four (4) candidates from the
voting ballot.
3.5 The four (4) athletes, who have received the highest number of votes, will be
considered elected as members of the ISSF Athletes Committee.
6 METHOD OF COMMUNICATION
6.1 There will be an official website for the ISSF Athletes Committee within the
framework of the ISSF website. The internet can be one of the communication
tools.
6.2 Announcements will be made in the ISSF NEWS magazine.
7 REMARKS
7.1 Athletes elected or appointed to the Athletes Committee must be aware of their
responsibilities as representatives of the athletes.
7.2 They must make every effort to attend all meetings.
7.3 They should be motivated to contribute to the shooting sport and the Olympic
Movement.
7.4 They should also be responsible for the education of young athletes.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 103
7.5 They should be educated in respect of positions as representatives, or officials,
in both international and national federations during the duration of their
appointment as members of the Athletes Committee.
104 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
4
ISSF ELIGIBILITY,
ISSF COMMERCIAL
RIGHTS AND ISSF
SPONSORSHIP /
ADVERTISING
RULES
NOTE:
Where figures and tables contain specific information, these have the same authority as
the numbered rules.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 105
4.1 ELIGIBILITY OF ATHLETES 107
4.2 ISSF COMMERCIAL RIGHTS 108
4.3 SPONSORSHIPS AND ADVERTISING 109
4.4 IDENTIFICATIONS ON ATHLETES’ EQUIPMENT, CLOTHING,
ACCESSORIES AND FOOTWEAR 110
4.5 RULES FOR MANUFACTURER IDENTIFICATION 110
4.6 RULES FOR SPONSOR MARKINGS 111
4.7 CONTROLS AND SANCTIONS 111
4.8 APPROVAL 112
106 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
4.1 ELIGIBILITY OF ATHLETES
4.1.1 The ISSF Eligibility Rules specify the conditions under which athletes are
eligible to participate in ISSF Championships (see ISSF General Regulations).
These Eligibility Rules must be applied strictly in all ISSF Championships.
4.1.2 The ISSF recognizes Rule 40 (Participation in the Olympic Games), Rule 41
(Nationality of Competitors) and Rule 50 (Advertising, Demonstrations and
Propaganda) of the Olympic Charter and their corresponding Bye-Laws as
basic documents for the ISSF Eligibility Rules.
4.1.3 To be eligible to participate in ISSF Championships, an athlete must be entered
in the Championship in accordance with Article 3.7 of the ISSF General
Regulations by his/her National Federation, which must be an ISSF Member
Federation in good standing. For the Olympic Games or Continental Games, it
is the respective NOC that enters the athlete. The athletes entered must:
4.1.3.1 Be selected to participate in accordance with procedures established by the
athlete’s National Federation, except that athletes entered in the Olympic
Games also must comply with the “Special Regulations for the Participation in
the Shooting Sport Events of the Olympic Games” (Annex “Q”, ISSF General
Regulations);
4.1.3.2 Be a national of the country they represent in accordance with the Olympic
Charter and ISSF General Regulations;
4.1.3.3 Not have been guilty of improper or unsportsmanlike conduct, particularly
through the use of doping, violence, racism and irregular or illegal betting
activities;
4.1.3.4 Not have violated ISSF rules for sponsorship or advertising as specified in
these Rules.
4.1.4 Athletes who compete in ISSF Championships may accept, directly or
indirectly, money payments or other prizes as awards or as an inducement to
take part in a competition, except that no athlete’s participation in the Olympic
Games may be conditional on any financial consideration (Olympic Charter,
Bye-law to Rule 40).
4.1.5 An athlete who knowingly takes part in a competition vetoed by the ISSF
may be excluded from ISSF Championships for a prescribed period by the
Executive Committee.
4.1.6 A National Federation that enters an athlete in an ISSF Championships who is
excluded from competition in accordance with ISSF Anti-Doping Regulations or
other ISSF Rules shall lose all its privileges except the right to be represented
at the next General Assembly.
4.1.7 Athletes from a nation with a suspended National Federation may participate
in ISSF Championships upon decision of the Executive Board, but they must
compete as Independent Shooting Participants (ISP) under the ISSF flag, not
the flag of their nation.
4.1.8 Where the eligibility of a female athlete is questioned due to possible
hyperandrogenism, and a formal written request has been made to do so to
the ISSF Medical Committee, an Expert Panel comprised of members of the
ISSF Medical Committee and other experts shall be appointed to make an
evidence-based determination on the eligibility of the athlete. In so doing, the
ISSF Medical Committee shall generally and substantially follow the principles
of the IOC framework on fairness, inclusion and non-discrimination on the
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 107
basis of gender identity and sex variations.
4.1.9 ISSF follows the principles of the IOC framework on fairness, inclusion
and non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and sex variations.
Transgender athletes must first request from the ISSF Medical Committee that
they be deemed eligible to participate in ISSF Championships prior to seeking
an ISSF ID. The Medical Committee shall then make a determination on
eligibility based on its evidence-based eligibility criteria, which shall be posted
on the ISSF website.
4.1.10 Any determination made under article 4.1.7 or article 4.1.8 may be appealed
exclusively to the International Court of Arbitration for Sport.
4.1.11 In order to help protect the dignity and privacy of the athlete concerned,
requests for investigations, information gathered during investigations, results
of investigations and decisions regarding a case (or potential case) of female
hyperandrogenism or a case involving a transexual athlete shall be kept
confidential and not released or made public by the ISSF.
108 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
4.2.4 MARKETING RIGHTS AND ADVERTISING RULES
These rules apply to all official parts of ISSF Championships (training and
competition, opening, closing and award ceremonies).
Marketing rights include all marketing, licencing and/or merchandising rights
available or yet to be invented for a sport competition. The sale of these rights
includes advertising and other appropriate benefits.
Sponsor markings on signs, banners, posters or other material may be
displayed on athlete’s clothing and equipment on the ranges and on other
facilities at ISSF Championships, if such sponsor markings are in accordance
with these Regulations.
During the Olympic Games, no advertising with signs, banners, posters or
other means is permitted unless such advertising is authorized by IOC Rules,
in particular by the Advertising, Demonstrations, Propaganda Code of the
Olympic Charter Rule. For the Olympic Games, sponsor markings are not
permitted and must be removed or covered if possible, with the same material
and colour providing it continues to meet ISSF Rules for thickness and
stiffness.
4.2.5 ON-SITE ADVERTISING
Advertising on the ranges of ISSF Championships may not be placed in
the target areas in such a way that it interferes with the sight picture of the
athletes.
The ISSF reserves the right to control sponsor signs at the main entrance of
ISSF Championship ranges, official scoreboards, and official score monitors,
target frames and Bib Numbers.
The site planning and the sizes of the above advertising spaces require prior
approval of the ISSF.
All or part of the available spaces may be contracted to one (1) advertising
agency as a package. If an agency is decided upon, the Secretary General
must transmit the name of the agency and details of the contract to the
organizing country’s Member Federation three (3) months before the ISSF
Championship or official event.
All other available advertising spaces are the property of the organizer.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 109
4.3.6 Sponsorship contracts may authorize the pictures, names or athletic
performances of athletes to appear in the advertisements of contracting
commercial firms.
4.3.7 Payments to individual athletes under such contracts may be made either to
the athlete or the National Federation.
110 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
Manufacturer identification will be measured as follows:
Regular Shapes. Where the manufacturer identification appears as a
rectangle or a square, the mathematical rules used to calculate the surface
area of the shape will be applied.
Irregular Shapes. Where the manufacturer identification is an irregular shape,
a rectangle will be traced around the entire area of the identification and the
mathematical rules used to calculate the surface area of the rectangle shall be
applied.
Combined Shapes. Where the manufacturer identification combines the
manufacturer name with the manufacturer logo, a rectangle will be traced
around the entire area of the identification and the mathematical rules used to
calculate the surface area of the rectangle shall be applied.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 111
In case of a violation, the Jury must issue an oral or written warning. An athlete
not complying with this warning must not be permitted to start or to continue in
the competition.
Decisions by the Competition Juries concerning infringement of these rules
may be appealed to the Jury of Appeal whose decision is FINAL.
If an advertiser exploits the use of the name, title, or individual picture of an
athlete in connection with any advertisement, endorsement or sale of goods
without the approval or the knowledge of the athlete, the athlete may give
“power of attorney” to his/her National Federation or to the ISSF to enable
them, if necessary, to take legal action against the advertiser in question. If
the athlete concerned fails to do so, the ISSF shall judge the situation as if the
athlete had given full permission to the advertiser.
4.8 APPROVAL
These Eligibility Rules were amended and approved by the Executive
Committee of the ISSF on 7th April 2008 in Beijing, CH; on 12th November
2012 in Acapulco, MEX; on 24th November 2013 in Munich, GER; on 1st
March 2016 in Munich, GER and on 28th November, 2022 in Sharm el Sheikh,
EGY. They replace previous editions of the ISSF Eligibility Rules and became
effective immediately.
The following rules are part of these ISSF Eligibility Rule and are available on
the IOC website.
Olympic Charter Rule 40 - Participation in the Olympic Games – Bye-Law to
Rule 40
Olympic Charter Rule 41 – Nationality of Competitors - Bye-Law to Rule 41
Olympic Charter Rule 50 – Advertising, Demonstrations, Propaganda – Bye-
Law to Rule 50
112 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
TABLE 1: Special Rules for Sponsor Markings
Category/Item Applicable Rule
Equipment
4.6.1.1 Guns No restrictions apply.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 113
4.6.1.11 Formal Uniforms Applicable Rule A dress uniform
Dress Uniforms Official dress uniforms includes all clothing
may carry the name or worn by the athlete and
trademark of up to five the members of the
(5) sponsors regulated team
by the National during all official parts
Federation. of the Championships,
where protocol
requires a display of
the emblem, name
or abbreviation of the
national federation
on the clothing. The
single occurrence
of manufacturer
identification or
product technology
identification on a dress
uniform item does
not count as sponsor
marking.
4.6.1.12 Casual Clothing Applicable Rule Includes all clothing
Casual Clothing No restrictions apply. worn by the athlete
on the competition
venues under other
circumstances than
competing or following
the protocol in a dress
uniform.
Accessories Applicable Rule Other restrictions
4.6.1.13 Belt
Towel
Socks
Water Bottle
Gloves Eyewear No restrictions apply. None
Shooting Glasses
Side Blinders
Ear Protection
Footwear
4.6.1.14 Headgear Front and/or back only None
for country, national
federation emblem,
ISSF emblem or
emblem of an ISSF
competition organizer
4.6.1.15 Front / Rear Sight No sponsor marking
Blinders
114 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 115
116 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 117
118 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
5
ANTI-DOPING
RULES
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 119
INTRODUCTION 121
ARTICLE 1 DEFINITION OF DOPING 123
ARTICLE 2 ANTI-DOPING RULE VIOLATIONS 123
ARTICLE 3 PROOF OF DOPING 126
ARTICLE 4 THE PROHIBITED LIST 127
ARTICLE 5 TESTING AND INVESTIGATIONS 131
ARTICLE 6 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES 134
ARTICLE 7 RESULTS MANAGEMENT: RESPONSIBILITY, INITIAL REVIEW,
NOTICE AND PROVISIONAL SUSPENSIONS 136
ARTICLE 8 RESULTS MANAGEMENT: RIGHT TO A FAIR HEARING AND NOTICE
OF HEARING DECISION 139
ARTICLE 9 AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION OF INDIVIDUAL RESULTS 141
ARTICLE 10 SANCTIONS ON INDIVIDUALS 141
ARTICLE 11 CONSEQUENCES TO TEAMS 150
ARTICLE 12 SANCTIONS BY ISSF AGAINST OTHER SPORTING BODIES 151
ARTICLE 13 RESULTS MANAGEMENT: APPEALS 152
ARTICLE 14 CONFIDENTIALITY AND REPORTING 155
ARTICLE 15 IMPLEMENTATION OF DECISIONS 159
ARTICLE 16 STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS 160
ARTICLE 17 EDUCATION 160
ARTICLE 18 ADDITIONAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF NATIONAL
FEDERATIONS 160
ARTICLE 19 ADDITIONAL Roles and responsibilities OF ISSF 161
ARTICLE 20 ADDITIONAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ATHLETES 162
ARTICLE 21 ADDITIONAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF ATHLETE
SUPPORT PERSONNEL 162
ARTICLE 22 ADDITIONAL ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF OTHER PERSONS
SUBJECT TO THESE ANTI-DOPING RULES 162
ARTICLE 23 INTERPRETATION OF THE CODE 163
ARTICLE 24 FINAL PROVISIONS 163
APPENDIX 1 DEFINITIONS 165
120 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
INTRODUCTION
Preface
These Anti-Doping Rules are adopted and implemented in accordance with ISSF’s
responsibilities under the World Anti-Doping Code (Code), and in furtherance of ISSF’s
continuing efforts to eradicate doping in sport.
These Anti-Doping Rules are sport rules governing the conditions under which sport is
played. Aimed at enforcing anti-doping rules in a global and harmonized manner, they
are distinct in nature from criminal and civil laws. They are not intended to be subject to
or limited by any national requirements and legal standards applicable to criminal or civil
proceedings, although they are intended to be applied in a manner which respects the
principles of proportionality and human rights. When reviewing the facts and the law of a
given case, all courts, arbitral tribunals and other adjudicating bodies should be aware of
and respect the distinct nature of these Anti-Doping Rules, which implement the Code,
and the fact that these rules represent the consensus of a broad spectrum of stakeholders
around the world as to what is necessary to protect and ensure fair sport.
As provided in the Code, ISSF shall be responsible for conducting all aspects of Doping
Control. Any aspect of Doping Control or anti-doping Education may be delegated by
ISSF to a Delegated Third Party, however, ISSF shall require the Delegated Third Party
to perform such aspects in compliance with the Code, International Standards, and these
Anti-Doping Rules. ISSF may delegate the relevant part of the Results Management to
the CAS Anti-Doping Division. ISSF shall always remain fully responsible for ensuring that
any delegated aspects are performed in compliance with the Code.
Terms used in these Anti-Doping Rules that are defined terms from the Code are
italicized.
Unless otherwise specified, references to Articles are references to Articles of these Anti-
Doping Rules.
Fundamental Rationale for the Code and ISSF ‘s Anti-Doping Rules
Anti-doping Programmes are founded on the intrinsic value of sport. This intrinsic value
is often referred to as “the spirit of sport”: the ethical pursuit of human excellence through
the dedicated perfection of each Athlete’s natural talents.
Anti-doping Programmes seek to protect the health of Athletes and to provide the
opportunity for Athletes to pursue human excellence without the Use of Prohibited
Substances and Methods.
Anti-doping Programmes seek to maintain the integrity of sport in terms of respect for
rules, other competitors, fair competition, a level playing field, and the value of clean sport
to the world.
The spirit of sport is the celebration of the human spirit, body and mind. It is the essence
of Olympism and is reflected in the values we find in and through sport, including:
• Health
• Ethics, fair play and honesty
• Athletes’ rights as set forth in the Code
• Excellence in performance
• Character and Education
• Fun and joy
• Teamwork
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 121
• Dedication and commitment
• Respect for rules and laws
• Respect for self and other Participants
• Courage
• Community and solidarity
The spirit of sport is expressed in how we play true.
Doping is fundamentally contrary to the spirit of sport.
The first ISSF Anti-Doping Rules were approved by the ordinary General Assembly
of the UIT (ISSF) on October 30, 1982 in Caracas, Venezuela and were modified as
needed and required by decisions of the Administrative Council since that time. These
Anti-Doping Rules are therefore adopted and implemented in conformity with the ISSF’s
responsibilities under the Code and are a furtherance of the ISSF’s continuing efforts of
eradicating doping in shooting sport.
Scope of these Anti-Doping Rules
These Anti-Doping Rules shall apply to:
(a) ISSF,
including its board members, directors, officers and specified employees and
Delegated Third Parties and their employees, who are involved in any aspect of
Doping Control;
(b) each
of its National Federations, including their board members, directors, officers
and specified employees, and Delegated Third Parties and their employees, who are
involved in any aspect of Doping Control;
(c) the following Athletes, Athlete Support Personnel and other Persons:
all Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel who are members of ISSF, or of any National
Federation, or of any member or affiliate organization of any National Federation
(including any clubs, teams, associations, or leagues);
(i) all Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel who participate in such capacity in Events,
Competitions and other activities organized, convened, authorized or recognized by
ISSF , or any National Federation, or by any member or affiliate organization of any
National Federation (including any clubs, teams, associations, or leagues), wherever
held;
(ii) any other Athlete or Athlete Support Personnel or other Person who, by virtue of an
accreditation, a licence or other contractual arrangement, or otherwise, is subject
to the authority of ISSF, or of any National Federation, or of any member or affiliate
organization of any National Federation (including any clubs, teams, associations, or
leagues), for purposes of anti-doping; and
(iii) A
thletes who are not regular members of ISSF or of one of its National Federations
but who want to be eligible to compete in a particular International Event.
Each of the above-mentioned Persons is deemed, as a condition of his or her
participation or involvement in the sport, to have agreed to and be bound by these Anti-
Doping Rules, and to have submitted to the authority of ISSF to enforce these Anti-Doping
Rules, including any Consequences for the breach thereof, and to the jurisdiction of the
hearing panels specified in Article 8 and Article 13 to hear and determine cases and
appeals brought under these Anti-Doping Rules.
Within the overall pool of Athletes set out above who are bound by and required to
comply with these Anti-Doping Rules, the following Athletes shall be considered to be
122 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
International-Level Athletes for the purposes of these Anti-Doping Rules, and, therefore,
the specific provisions in these Anti-Doping Rules applicable to International-Level
Athletes (e.g., Testing, TUEs, whereabouts, and Results Management) shall apply to such
Athletes:
• All Athletes who hold an ISSF ID, and,
• All Athletes who have qualified for or intend to compete at an ISSF Event, or a Major
Event Organizer’s Event.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 123
2.2 Use or Attempted Use by an Athlete of a Prohibited Substance or a
Prohibited Method
2.2.1 It is the Athletes’ personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters
their bodies and that no Prohibited Method is Used. Accordingly, it is not
necessary that intent, Fault, negligence or knowing Use on the Athlete’s part
be demonstrated in order to establish an anti-doping rule violation for Use of a
Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method.
2.2.2 The success or failure of the Use or Attempted Use of a Prohibited Substance
or Prohibited Method is not material. It is sufficient that the Prohibited
Substance or Prohibited Method was Used or Attempted to be Used for an
anti-doping rule violation to be committed.
2.3 Evading, Refusing or Failing to Submit to Sample Collection by an
Athlete
Evading Sample collection; or refusing or failing to submit to Sample collection
without compelling justification after notification by a duly authorized Person.
2.4 Whereabouts Failures by an Athlete
Any combination of three (3) missed tests and/or filing failures, as defined in
the International Standard for Results Management, within a twelve (12) month
period by an Athlete in a Registered Testing Pool.
2.5 Tampering or Attempted Tampering with any part of Doping Control by
an Athlete or Other Person
2.6 Possession of a Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method by an
Athlete or Athlete Support Person
2.6.1
Possession by an Athlete In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any
Prohibited Method, or Possession by an Athlete Out-of-Competition of any
Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method which is prohibited Out-of-
Competition unless the Athlete establishes that the Possession is consistent
with a Therapeutic Use Exemption (“TUE”) granted in accordance with Article
4.4 or other acceptable justification.
2.6.2 Possession by an Athlete Support Person In-Competition of any Prohibited
Substance or any Prohibited Method, or Possession by an Athlete Support
Person Out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited
Method which is prohibited Out-of-Competition in connection with an Athlete,
Competition or training, unless the Athlete Support Person establishes that the
Possession is consistent with a TUE granted to an Athlete in accordance with
Article 4.4 or other acceptable justification.
2.7 Trafficking or Attempted Trafficking in any Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method by an Athlete or Other Person
2.8 Administration or Attempted Administration by an Athlete or Other
Person to any Athlete In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method, or Administration or Attempted Administration to
any Athlete Out-of-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any
Prohibited Method that is Prohibited Out-of-Competition
2.9 Complicity or Attempted Complicity by an Athlete or Other Person
Assisting, encouraging, aiding, abetting, conspiring, covering up or any other
type of intentional complicity or Attempted complicity involving an anti-doping
124 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
rule violation, Attempted anti-doping rule violation or violation of Article 10.14.1
by another Person.
2.10 Prohibited Association by an Athlete or Other Person
2.10.1 Association by an Athlete or other Person subject to the authority of an Anti-
Doping Organization in a professional or sport-related capacity with any
Athlete Support Person who:
2.10.1.1 If subject to the authority of an Anti-Doping Organization, is serving a period of
Ineligibility; or
2.10.1.2 If not subject to the authority of an Anti-Doping Organization and where
Ineligibility has not been addressed in a Results Management process
pursuant to the Code, has been convicted or found in a criminal, disciplinary
or professional proceeding to have engaged in conduct which would have
constituted a violation of anti-doping rules if Code-compliant rules had been
applicable to such Person. The disqualifying status of such Person shall
be in force for the longer of six (6) years from the criminal, professional or
disciplinary decision or the duration of the criminal, disciplinary or professional
sanction imposed; or
2.10.1.3 Is serving as a front or intermediary for an individual described in Article
2.10.1.1 or 2.10.1.2.
2.10.2 To establish a violation of Article 2.10, an Anti-Doping Organization must
establish that the Athlete or other Person knew of the Athlete Support Person’s
disqualifying status.
The burden shall be on the Athlete or other Person to establish that any
association with an Athlete Support Person described in Article 2.10.1.1 or
2.10.1.2 is not in a professional or sport-related capacity and/or that such
association could not have been reasonably avoided.
Anti-Doping Organizations that are aware of Athlete Support Personnel who
meet the criteria described in Article 2.10.1.1, 2.10.1.2, or 2.10.1.3 shall submit
that information to WADA.
2.11 Acts by an Athlete or Other Person to Discourage or Retaliate Against
Reporting to Authorities
Where such conduct does not otherwise constitute a violation of Article 2.5:
2.11.1 Any act which threatens or seeks to intimidate another Person with the intent
of discouraging the Person from the good-faith reporting of information that
relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation or alleged non-compliance with
the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping Organization, law enforcement, regulatory
or professional disciplinary body, hearing body or Person conducting an
investigation for WADA or an Anti-Doping Organization.
2.11.2 Retaliation against a Person who, in good faith, has provided evidence or
information that relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation or alleged
non-compliance with the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping Organization, law
enforcement, regulatory or professional disciplinary body, hearing body or
Person conducting an investigation for WADA or an Anti-Doping Organization.
For purposes of Article 2.11, retaliation, threatening and intimidation include an
act taken against such Person either because the act lacks a good faith basis
or is a disproportionate response.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 125
ARTICLE 3 PROOF OF DOPING
3.1 Burdens and Standards of Proof
ISSF shall have the burden of establishing that an anti-doping rule violation
has occurred. The standard of proof shall be whether ISSF has established an
anti-doping rule violation to the comfortable satisfaction of the hearing panel
bearing in mind the seriousness of the allegation which is made. This standard
of proof in all cases is greater than a mere balance of probability but less than
proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Where these Anti-Doping Rules place the
burden of proof upon the Athlete or other Person alleged to have committed an
anti-doping rule violation to rebut a presumption or establish specified facts or
circumstances, except as provided in Articles 3.2.2 and 3.2.3, the standard of
proof shall be by a balance of probability.
3.2 Methods of Establishing Facts and Presumptions
Facts related to anti-doping rule violations may be established by any reliable
means, including admissions. The following rules of proof shall be applicable in
doping cases:
3.2.1 Analytical methods or Decision Limits approved by WADA after consultation
within the relevant scientific community or which have been the subject of peer
review are presumed to be scientifically valid. Any Athlete or other Person
seeking to challenge whether the conditions for such presumption have been
met or to rebut this presumption of scientific validity shall, as a condition
precedent to any such challenge, first notify WADA of the challenge and the
basis of the challenge. The initial hearing body, appellate body or CAS, on
its own initiative, may also inform WADA of any such challenge. Within ten
(10) days of WADA’s receipt of such notice and the case file related to such
challenge, WADA shall also have the right to intervene as a party, appear as
amicus curiae or otherwise provide evidence in such proceeding. In cases
before CAS, at WADA’s request, the CAS panel shall appoint an appropriate
scientific expert to assist the panel in its evaluation of the challenge.
3.2.2 WADA-accredited laboratories, and other laboratories approved by WADA,
are presumed to have conducted Sample analysis and custodial procedures
in accordance with the International Standard for Laboratories. The Athlete or
other Person may rebut this presumption by establishing that a departure from
the International Standard for Laboratories occurred which could reasonably
have caused the Adverse Analytical Finding.
If the Athlete or other Person rebuts the preceding presumption by showing
that a departure from the International Standard for Laboratories occurred
which could reasonably have caused the Adverse Analytical Finding, then
ISSF shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the
Adverse Analytical Finding.
3.2.3 Departures from any other International Standard or other anti-doping rule
or policy set forth in the Code or these Anti-Doping Rules shall not invalidate
analytical results or other evidence of an anti-doping rule violation, and shall
not constitute a defense to an anti-doping rule violation; provided, however,
if the Athlete or other Person establishes that a departure from one of the
specific International Standard provisions listed below could reasonably have
caused an anti-doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding
or whereabouts failure, then ISSF shall have the burden to establish that such
departure did not cause the Adverse Analytical Finding or the whereabouts
failure:
126 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
(i) a departure from the International Standard for Testing and Investigations
related to Sample collection or Sample handling which could reasonably
have caused an anti-doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical
Finding, in which case ISSF shall have the burden to establish that such
departure did not cause the Adverse Analytical Finding;
(ii) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management or
International Standard for Testing and Investigations related to an Adverse
Passport Finding which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule
violation, in which case ISSF shall have the burden to establish that such
departure did not cause the anti-doping rule violation;
(iii) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management
related to the requirement to provide notice to the Athlete of the B Sample
opening which could reasonably have caused an anti-doping rule violation
based on an Adverse Analytical Finding, in which case ISSF shall have
the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the Adverse
Analytical Finding;
(iv) a departure from the International Standard for Results Management
related to Athlete notification which could reasonably have caused an anti-
doping rule violation based on a whereabouts failure, in which case ISSF
shall have the burden to establish that such departure did not cause the
whereabouts failure.
3.2.4 The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary
tribunal of competent jurisdiction which is not the subject of a pending appeal
shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom the
decision pertained of those facts unless the Athlete or other Person establishes
that the decision violated principles of natural justice.
3.2.5 The hearing panel in a hearing on an anti-doping rule violation may draw
an inference adverse to the Athlete or other Person who is asserted to
have committed an anti-doping rule violation based on the Athlete’s or other
Person’s refusal, after a request made in a reasonable time in advance of the
hearing, to appear at the hearing (either in person or telephonically as directed
by the hearing panel) and to answer questions from the hearing panel or ISSF.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 127
4.2 Prohibited Substances and Prohibited Methods Identified on the
Prohibited List
4.2.1 Prohibited Substances and Prohibited Methods
The Prohibited List shall identify those Prohibited Substances and Prohibited
Methods which are prohibited as doping at all times (both In-Competition
and Out-of-Competition) because of their potential to enhance performance
in future Competitions or their masking potential, and those substances and
methods which are prohibited In-Competition only. The Prohibited List may
be expanded by WADA for a particular sport. Prohibited Substances and
Prohibited Methods may be included in the Prohibited List by general category
(e.g., anabolic agents) or by specific reference to a particular substance or
method.
4.2.2
Specified Substances or Specified Methods
For purposes of the application of Article 10, all Prohibited Substances shall be
Specified Substances except as identified on the Prohibited List. No Prohibited
Method shall be a Specified Method unless it is specifically identified as a
Specified Method on the Prohibited List.
4.2.3
Substances of Abuse
For purposes of applying Article 10, Substances of Abuse shall include those
Prohibited Substances which are specifically identified as Substances of Abuse
on the Prohibited List because they are frequently abused in society outside of
the context of sport.
4.3 WADA’s Determination of the Prohibited List
WADA’s determination of the Prohibited Substances and Prohibited Methods
that will be included on the Prohibited List, the classification of substances into
categories on the Prohibited List, the classification of a substance as prohibited
at all times or In-Competition only, the classification of a substance or method
as a Specified Substance, Specified Method or Substance of Abuse is final and
shall not be subject to any challenge by an Athlete or other Person including,
but not limited to, any challenge based on an argument that the substance
or method was not a masking agent or did not have the potential to enhance
performance, represent a health risk or violate the spirit of sport.
4.4 Therapeutic Use Exemptions (“TUEs”)
4.4.1 The presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers, and/
or the Use or Attempted Use, Possession or Administration or Attempted
Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method, shall not be
considered an anti-doping rule violation if it is consistent with the provisions of
a TUE granted in accordance with the International Standard for Therapeutic
Use Exemptions.
4.4.2 TUE Applications
4.4.2.1 Athletes who are not International-Level Athletes shall apply to their National
Anti-Doping Organization for a TUE. If the National Anti-Doping Organization
denies the application, the Athlete may appeal exclusively to the national-level
appeal body described in Article 13.2.2.
4.4.2.2 Athletes who are International-Level Athletes shall apply to ISSF for a TUE.
4.4.3
TUE Recognition
128 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
4.4.3.1 Where the Athlete already has a TUE granted by their National Anti-Doping
Organization for the substance or method in question, even if that TUE
meets the criteria set out in the International Standard for Therapeutic Use
Exemptions, the TUE is not automatically recognized by ISSF for purposes
of international-level Competition. An international-level Athlete must apply
to ISSF for a recognition of a TUE granted by their National Anti-Doping
Organization before their next International-level Competition.
If ISSF upon receipt considers that the TUE does not meet those criteria
and so refuses to recognize it, ISSF must notify the Athlete and the Athlete’s
National Anti-Doping Organization promptly, with reasons. The Athlete or the
National Anti-Doping Organization shall have twenty-one (21) days from such
notification to refer the matter to WADA for review in accordance with Article
4.4.7.
If the matter is referred to WADA for review, the TUE granted by the National
Anti-Doping Organization remains valid for national-level Competition and
Out-of-Competition Testing (but is not valid for international-level Competition)
pending WADA’s decision. If the matter is not referred to WADA for review
within the twenty-one (21) day deadline, the Athlete’s National Anti-Doping
Organization must determine whether the original TUE granted by that National
Anti-Doping Organization should nevertheless remain valid for national-level
Competition and Out-of-Competition Testing (provided that the Athlete ceases
to be an International-Level Athlete and does not participate in international-
level Competition). Pending the National Anti-Doping Organization’s decision,
the TUE remains valid for national-level Competition and Out-of-Competition
Testing (but is not valid for international-level Competition).
4.4.3.2 If ISSF chooses to test an Athlete who is not an International-Level Athlete,
ISSF must recognize a TUE granted to that Athlete by their National Anti-
Doping Organization unless the Athlete is required to apply for recognition
of the TUE pursuant to Articles 5.8 and 7.0 of the International Standard for
Therapeutic Use Exemptions.
4.4.4 TUE Application Process
4.4.4.1 If the Athlete does not already have a TUE granted by their National Anti-
Doping Organization for the substance or method in question, the Athlete must
apply directly to ISSF.
4.4.4.2 An application to ISSF for grant or recognition of a TUE must be made as
soon as possible and in all cases before the Athlete’s next International-level
Competition, save where Articles 4.1 or 4.3 of the International Standard
for Therapeutic Use Exemptions apply. The application shall be made in
accordance with Article 6 of the International Standard for Therapeutic Use
Exemptions as posted on ISSF ’s website.
4.4.4.3 ISSF shall establish a Therapeutic Use Exemption Committee (“TUEC”) to
consider applications for the grant or recognition of TUEs:
(a) The TUEC shall consist of a Chair and two (2) other members with
experience in the care and treatment of Athletes and sound knowledge of
clinical, sports and exercise medicine.
(b) Before serving as a member of the TUEC, each member must sign a
conflict of interest and confidentiality declaration. The appointed members
shall not be employees of ISSF.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 129
(c) When an application to ISSF for the grant or recognition of a TUE is made,
the Chair of the TUEC shall appoint three (3) members (which may include
the Chair) to consider the application.
(d) Before considering a TUE application, each member shall disclose to the
Chair any circumstances likely to affect their impartiality with respect to the
Athlete making the application.
4.4.4.4 The TUEC shall promptly evaluate and decide upon the application in
accordance with the relevant provisions of the International Standard
for Therapeutic Use Exemptions and usually (i.e., unless exceptional
circumstances apply) within no more than twenty-one (21) days of receipt of a
complete application. Where the application is made in a reasonable time prior
to an Event, the TUEC must use its best endeavors to issue its decision before
the start of the Event.
4.4.4.5 The TUEC decision shall be the final decision of ISSF and may be appealed in
accordance with Article 4.4.7. ISSF TUEC decision shall be notified in writing to
the Athlete, and to WADA and other Anti-Doping Organizations in accordance
with the International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions. It shall also
promptly be reported into ADAMS.
4.4.4.6 If ISSF (or the National Anti-Doping Organization, where it has agreed to
consider the application on behalf of ISSF) denies the Athlete’s application,
it must notify the Athlete promptly, with reasons. If ISSF grants the Athlete’s
application, it must notify not only the Athlete but also their National Anti-
Doping Organization. If the National Anti-Doping Organization considers that
the TUE granted by ISSF does not meet the criteria set out in the International
Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions, it has twenty-one (21) days from
such notification to refer the matter to WADA for review in accordance with
Article 4.4.7.
If the National Anti-Doping Organization refers the matter to WADA for review,
the TUE granted by ISSF remains valid for international-level Competition
and Out-of-Competition Testing (but is not valid for national-level Competition)
pending WADA’s decision. If the National Anti-Doping Organization does not
refer the matter to WADA for review, the TUE granted by ISSF becomes valid
for national-level Competition as well when the twenty-one (21) day review
deadline expires.
4.4.5 Retroactive TUE Applications
If ISSF chooses to collect a Sample from an Athlete who is not an
International-Level Athlete or a National-Level Athlete, and that Athlete is Using
a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method for therapeutic reasons, ISSF
must permit that Athlete to apply for a retroactive TUE.
4.4.6 Expiration, Withdrawal or Reversal of a TUE
4.4.6.1 A TUE granted pursuant to these Anti-Doping Rules: (a) shall expire
automatically at the end of any term for which it was granted, without the need
for any further notice or other formality; (b) will be withdrawn if the Athlete does
not promptly comply with any requirements or conditions imposed by the TUEC
upon grant of the TUE; (c) may be withdrawn by the TUEC if it is subsequently
determined that the criteria for grant of a TUE are not in fact met; or (d) may be
reversed on review by WADA or on appeal.
4.4.6.2 In such event, the Athlete shall not be subject to any Consequences based
on their Use or Possession or Administration of the Prohibited Substance or
130 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
Prohibited Method in question in accordance with the TUE prior to the effective
date of expiry, withdrawal, or reversal of the TUE. The review pursuant to
Article 5.1.1.1 of the International Standard for Results Management of an
Adverse Analytical Finding, reported shortly after the TUE expiry, withdrawal
or reversal, shall include consideration of whether such finding is consistent
with Use of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method prior to that date, in
which event no anti-doping rule violation shall be asserted.
4.4.7 Reviews and Appeals of TUE Decisions
4.4.7.1 WADA must review ISSF’s decision not to recognize a TUE granted by the
National Anti-Doping Organization that is referred to WADA by the Athlete
or the Athlete’s National Anti-Doping Organization. In addition, WADA must
review ISSF’s decision to grant a TUE that is referred to WADA by the
Athlete’s National Anti-Doping Organization. WADA may review any other TUE
decisions at any time, whether upon request by those affected or on its own
initiative.
If the TUE decision being reviewed meets the criteria set out in the
International Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions, WADA will not
interfere with it. If the TUE decision does not meet those criteria, WADA will
reverse it.
4.4.7.2 Any TUE decision by ISSF (or by a National Anti-Doping Organization where it
has agreed to consider the application on behalf of ISSF) that is not reviewed
by WADA, or that is reviewed by WADA but is not reversed upon review,
may be appealed by the Athlete and/or the Athlete’s National Anti-Doping
Organization, exclusively to CAS.
4.4.7.3 A decision by WADA to reverse a TUE decision may be appealed by the
Athlete, the National Anti-Doping Organization and/or ISSF, exclusively to
CAS.
4.4.7.4 A failure to render a decision within a reasonable time on a properly submitted
application for grant/recognition of a TUE or for review of a TUE decision shall
be considered a denial of the application thus triggering the applicable rights of
review/appeal.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 131
5.2.2 ISSF may require any Athlete over whom it has Testing authority (including any
Athlete serving a period of Ineligibility) to provide a Sample at any time and at
any place.
5.2.3 WADA shall have In-Competition and Out-of-Competition Testing authority as
set out in Article 20.7.10 of the Code.
5.2.4 If ISSF delegates or contracts any part of Testing to a National Anti-Doping
Organization directly or through a National Federation, that National Anti-
Doping Organization may collect additional Samples or direct the laboratory to
perform additional types of analysis at the National Anti-Doping Organization’s
expense. If additional Samples are collected or additional types of analysis are
performed, ISSF shall be notified.
5.3 Event Testing
5.3.1 Except as otherwise provided below, only a single organization shall have
authority to conduct Testing at Event Venues during an Event Period. At
International Events, ISSF (or other international organization which is the
ruling body for an Event) shall have authority to conduct Testing. At National
Events, the National Anti-Doping Organization of that country shall have
authority to conduct Testing. At the request of ISSF (or other international
organization which is the ruling body for an Event), any Testing during the
Event Period outside of the Event Venues shall be coordinated with ISSF (or
the relevant ruling body of the Event).
5.3.2 If an Anti-Doping Organization, which would otherwise have Testing authority
but is not responsible for initiating and directing Testing at an Event, desires to
conduct Testing of Athletes at the Event Venues during the Event Period, the
Anti-Doping Organization shall first confer with ISSF (or other international
organization which is the ruling body of the Event) to obtain permission to
conduct and coordinate such Testing. If the Anti-Doping Organization is not
satisfied with the response from ISSF (or other international organization
which is the ruling body of the Event), the Anti-Doping Organization may, in
accordance with the procedures described in the International Standard for
Testing and Investigations, ask WADA for permission to conduct Testing and to
determine how to coordinate such Testing. WADA shall not grant approval for
such Testing before consulting with and informing ISSF (or other international
organization which is the ruling body for the Event). WADA’s decision shall be
final and not subject to appeal. Unless otherwise provided in the authorization
to conduct Testing, such tests shall be considered Out-of-Competition tests.
Results Management for any such test shall be the responsibility of the Anti-
Doping Organization initiating the test unless provided otherwise in the rules of
the ruling body of the Event.
5.4
Testing Requirements
5.4.1 ISSF shall conduct test distribution planning and Testing as required by the
International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
5.4.2 Where reasonably feasible, Testing shall be coordinated through ADAMS in
order to maximize the effectiveness of the combined Testing effort and to avoid
unnecessary repetitive Testing
5.5
Athlete Whereabouts Information
5.5.1 ISSF has established a Registered Testing Pool of those Athletes who are
required to provide whereabouts information in the manner specified in the
International Standard for Testing and Investigations and who shall be subject
132 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
to Consequences for Article 2.4 violations as provided in Article 10.3.2. ISSF
shall coordinate with National Anti-Doping Organizations to identify such
Athletes and to collect their whereabouts information.
5.5.2 ISSF shall make available through ADAMS a list which identifies those
Athletes included in its Registered Testing Pool by name. ISSF shall regularly
review and update as necessary its criteria for including Athletes in its
Registered Testing Pool, and shall periodically (but not less than quarterly)
review the list of Athletes in its Registered Testing Pool to ensure that each
listed Athlete continues to meet the relevant criteria. Athletes shall be notified
before they are included in the Registered Testing Pool and when they are
removed from that pool. The notification shall contain the information set out in
the International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
5.5.3 Where an Athlete is included in an international Registered Testing Pool by
ISSF and in a national Registered Testing Pool by their National Anti-Doping
Organization, the National Anti-Doping Organization and ISSF shall agree
between themselves which of them shall accept that Athlete’s whereabouts
filings; in no case shall an Athlete be required to make whereabouts filings to
more than one of them.
5.5.4 In accordance with the International Standard for Testing and Investigations,
each Athlete in the Registered Testing Pool shall do the following: (a) advise
ISSF of his/her whereabouts on a quarterly basis; (b) update that information
as necessary so that it remains accurate and complete at all times; and (c)
make himself or herself available for Testing at such whereabouts.
5.5.5 For purposes of Article 2.4, an Athlete’s failure to comply with the requirements
of the International Standard for Testing and Investigations shall be deemed
a filing failure or a missed test, as defined in Annex B of the International
Standard for Results Management, where the conditions set forth in Annex B
are met.
5.5.6 An Athlete in ISSF’s Registered Testing Pool shall continue to be subject to the
obligation to comply with the whereabouts requirements set in the International
Standard for Testing and Investigations unless and until (a) the Athlete gives
written notice to ISSF that he or she has retired or (b) ISSF has informed
him or her that he or she no longer satisfies the criteria for inclusion in ISSF’s
Registered Testing Pool.
5.5.7 Whereabouts information provided by an Athlete while in the Registered
Testing Pool will be accessible through ADAMS to WADA and to other Anti-
Doping Organizations having authority to test that Athlete as provided in
Article 5.2. Whereabouts information shall be maintained in strict confidence
at all times; it shall be used exclusively for purposes of planning, coordinating
or conducting Doping Control, providing information relevant to the Athlete
Biological Passport or other analytical results, to support an investigation into
a potential anti-doping rule violation, or to support proceedings alleging an
anti-doping rule violation; and shall be destroyed after it is no longer relevant
for these purposes in accordance with the International Standard for the
Protection of Privacy and Personal Information.
5.5.8 In accordance with the International Standard for Testing and Investigations,
ISSF may establish a Testing Pool, which includes Athletes who are subject
to less stringent whereabouts requirements than Athletes included in ISSF’s
Registered Testing Pool.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 133
5.5.9 ISSF shall notify Athletes before they are included in the Testing Pool and
when they are removed. Such notification shall include the whereabouts
requirements and the consequences that apply in case of non-compliance, as
indicated in Articles 5.5.10 and 5.5.11.
5.5.10 Athletes included in the Testing Pool shall provide ISSF with the following
whereabouts information so that they may be located and subjected to Testing:
(a) An overnight address;
(b) Competition / Event schedule; and
(c) Regular training activities.
Such whereabouts information shall be filed in ADAMS to enable better Testing
coordination with other Anti-Doping Organizations.
5.5.11 An Athlete’s failure to provide whereabouts information on or before the date
required by ISSF or the Athlete’s failure to provide accurate whereabouts
information shall result in ISSF elevating the Athlete to ISSF’s Registered
Testing Pool.
5.6 Retired Athletes Returning to Competition
5.6.1 If an International-Level Athlete or National-Level Athlete in ISSF’s Registered
Testing Pool retires and then wishes to return to active participation in sport,
the Athlete shall not compete in International Events or National Events
until the Athlete has made himself or herself available for Testing, by giving
six (6) months prior written notice to ISSF and their National Anti-Doping
Organization.
WADA, in consultation with ISSF and the Athlete’s National Anti-Doping
Organization, may grant an exemption to the six (6) month written notice rule
where the strict application of that rule would be unfair to the Athlete. This
decision may be appealed under Article 13.
Any competitive results obtained in violation of this Article 5.6.1 shall be
Disqualified unless the Athlete can establish that he or she could not have
reasonably known that this was an International Event or a National Event.
5.6.2 If an Athlete retires from sport while subject to a period of Ineligibility, the
Athlete must notify the Anti-Doping Organization that imposed the period of
Ineligibility in writing of such retirement. If the Athlete then wishes to return
to active competition in sport, the Athlete shall not compete in International
Events or National Events until the Athlete has made himself or herself
available for Testing by giving six (6) months prior written notice (or notice
equivalent to the period of Ineligibility remaining as of the date the Athlete
retired, if that period was longer than six (6) months) to ISSF and to their
National Anti-Doping Organization.
5.7
Independent Observer Programme
ISSF and the organizing committees for ISSF’s Events, as well as the National
Federations and the organizing committees for National Events, shall authorize
and facilitate the Independent Observer Programme at such Events.
134 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
6.1 Use of Accredited, Approved Laboratories and Other Laboratories
6.1.1 For purposes of directly establishing an Adverse Analytical Finding under
Article 2.1, Samples shall be analyzed only in WADA-accredited laboratories
or laboratories otherwise approved by WADA. The choice of the WADA-
accredited or WADA-approved laboratory used for the Sample analysis shall
be determined exclusively by ISSF.
6.1.2 As provided in Article 3.2, facts related to anti-doping rule violations may be
established by any reliable means. This would include, for example, reliable
laboratory or other forensic testing conducted outside of WADA-accredited or
approved laboratories.
6.2 Purpose of Analysis of Samples and Data
6.2.1 Samples and related analytical data or Doping Control information shall be
analyzed to detect Prohibited Substances and Prohibited Methods identified
on the Prohibited List and other substances as may be directed by WADA
pursuant to the monitoring Programme described in Article 4.5 of the Code, or
to assist ISSF in profiling relevant parameters in an Athlete’s urine, blood or
other matrix, including for DNA or genomic profiling, or for any other legitimate
anti-doping purpose.
6.3 Research on Samples and Data
Samples, related analytical data and Doping Control information may be used
for anti-doping research purposes, although no Sample may be used for
research without the Athlete’s written consent. Samples and related analytical
data or Doping Control information used for research purposes shall first be
processed in such a manner as to prevent Samples and related analytical
data or Doping Control information being traced back to a particular Athlete.
Any research involving Samples and related analytical data or Doping Control
information shall adhere to the principles set out in Article 19 of the Code.
6.4 Standards for Sample Analysis and Reporting
In accordance with Article 6.4 of the Code, ISSF shall ask laboratories to
analyze Samples in conformity with the International Standard for Laboratories
and Article 4.7 of the International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
Laboratories at their own initiative and expense may analyze Samples
for Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods not included on the
standard Sample analysis menu, or as requested by ISSF. Results from
any such analysis shall be reported to ISSF and have the same validity and
Consequences as any other analytical result.
6.5 Further Analysis of a Sample Prior to or During Results Management or
Hearing Process
There shall be no limitation on the authority of a laboratory to conduct repeat
or additional analysis on a Sample prior to the time ISSF notifies an Athlete
that the Sample is the basis for an Article 2.1 anti-doping rule violation charge.
If after such notification ISSF wishes to conduct additional analysis on that
Sample, it may do so with the consent of the Athlete or approval from a
hearing body.
6.6 Further Analysis of a Sample After it has been Reported as Negative or
has Otherwise not Resulted in an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Charge
After a laboratory has reported a Sample as negative, or the Sample has
not otherwise resulted in an anti-doping rule violation charge, it may be
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 135
stored and subjected to further analyses for the purpose of Article 6.2 at any
time exclusively at the direction of either the Anti-Doping Organization that
initiated and directed Sample collection or WADA. Any other Anti-Doping
Organization with authority to test the Athlete that wishes to conduct further
analysis on a stored Sample may do so with the permission of the Anti-Doping
Organization that initiated and directed Sample collection or WADA, and shall
be responsible for any follow-up Results Management. Any Sample storage
or further analysis initiated by WADA or another Anti-Doping Organization
shall be at WADA’s or that organization’s expense. Further analysis of
Samples shall conform with the requirements of the International Standard for
Laboratories.
6.7 Split of A or B Sample
Where WADA, an Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management
authority, and/or a WADA-accredited laboratory (with approval from WADA
or the Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management authority) wishes
to split an A or B Sample for the purpose of using the first part of the split
Sample for an A Sample analysis and the second part of the split Sample for
confirmation, then the procedures set forth in the International Standard for
Laboratories shall be followed.
6.8 WADA’s Right to Take Possession of Samples and Data
WADA may, in its sole discretion at any time, with or without prior notice, take
physical possession of any Sample and related analytical data or information
in the possession of a laboratory or Anti-Doping Organization. Upon request
by WADA, the laboratory or Anti-Doping Organization in possession of
the Sample shall immediately grant access to and enable WADA to take
physical possession of the Sample. If WADA has not provided prior notice
to the laboratory or Anti-Doping Organization before taking possession of a
Sample, it shall provide such notice to the laboratory and each Anti-Doping
Organization whose Samples have been taken by WADA within a reasonable
time after taking possession. After analysis and any investigation of a seized
Sample, WADA may direct another Anti-Doping Organization with authority to
test the Athlete to assume Results Management responsibility for the Sample if
a potential anti-doping rule violation is discovered.
136 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
to exercise such authority, Results Management shall be conducted by the
applicable International Federation or by a third party with authority over the
Athlete or other Person as directed by the rules of the applicable International
Federation.
7.1.3 In the event the Major Event Organization assumes only limited Results
Management responsibility relating to a Sample initiated and taken during
an Event conducted by a Major Event Organization, or an anti-doping rule
violation occurring during such Event, the case shall be referred by the Major
Event Organization to the applicable International Federation for completion of
Results Management.
7.1.4
Results Management in relation to a potential whereabouts failure (a filing
failure or a missed test) shall be administered by ISSF or the National Anti-
Doping Organization with whom the Athlete in question files whereabouts
information, as provided in the International Standard for Results Management.
If ISSF determines a filing failure or a missed test, it shall submit that
information to WADA through ADAMS, where it will be made available to other
relevant Anti-Doping Organizations.
7.1.5 Other circumstances in which ISSF shall take responsibility for conducting
Results Management in respect of anti-doping rule violations involving Athletes
and other Persons under its authority shall be determined by reference to and
in accordance with Article 7 of the Code.
7.1.6
WADA may direct ISSF to conduct Results Management in particular
circumstances. If ISSF refuses to conduct Results Management within a
reasonable deadline set by WADA, such refusal shall be considered an act
of non-compliance, and WADA may direct another Anti-Doping Organization
with authority over the Athlete or other Person, that is willing to do so, to take
Results Management responsibility in place of ISSF or, if there is no such
Anti-Doping Organization, any other Anti-Doping Organization that is willing
to do so. In such case, ISSF shall reimburse the costs and attorney’s fees
of conducting Results Management to the other Anti-Doping Organization
designated by WADA, and a failure to reimburse costs and attorney’s fees
shall be considered an act of non-compliance.
7.2 Review and Notification Regarding Potential Anti-Doping Rule Violations
ISSF shall carry out the review and notification with respect to any potential
anti-doping rule violation in accordance with the International Standard for
Results Management.
7.3 Identification of Prior Anti-Doping Rule Violations
Before giving an Athlete or other Person notice of a potential anti-doping rule
violation as provided above, ISSF shall refer to ADAMS and contact WADA
and other relevant Anti-Doping Organizations to determine whether any prior
anti-doping rule violation exists.
7.4
Provisional Suspensions
7.4.1 Mandatory Provisional Suspension after an Adverse Analytical Finding or
Adverse Passport Finding
If ISSF receives an Adverse Analytical Finding or an Adverse Passport Finding
(upon completion of the Adverse Passport Finding review process) for a
Prohibited Substance or a Prohibited Method that is not a Specified Substance
or a Specified Method, it shall impose a Provisional Suspension on the Athlete
promptly upon or after the review and notification required by Article 7.2.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 137
A mandatory Provisional Suspension may be eliminated if: (i) the Athlete
demonstrates to the CAS Anti-Doping Division (“CAS ADD”) that the violation
is likely to have involved a Contaminated Product, or (ii) the violation involves
a Substance of Abuse and the Athlete establishes entitlement to a reduced
period of Ineligibility under Article 10.2.4.1.
The CAS ADD’s decision not to eliminate a mandatory Provisional Suspension
on account of the Athlete’s assertion regarding a Contaminated Product shall
not be appealable.
7.4.2 Optional Provisional Suspension Based on an Adverse Analytical Finding for
Specified Substances, Specified Methods, Contaminated Products, or Other
Anti-Doping Rule Violations
ISSF may impose a Provisional Suspension for anti-doping rule violations not
covered by Article 7.4.1 prior to the analysis of the Athlete’s B Sample or final
hearing as described in Article 8.
An optional Provisional Suspension may be lifted at the discretion of ISSF
at any time prior to the CAS ADD’s decision under Article 8, unless provided
otherwise in the International Standard for Results Management.
7.4.3 Opportunity for Hearing or Appeal
Notwithstanding Articles 7.4.1 and 7.4.2, a Provisional Suspension may not
be imposed unless the Athlete or other Person is given: (a) an opportunity for
a Provisional Hearing, either before or on a timely basis after imposition of
the Provisional Suspension; or (b) an opportunity for an expedited hearing in
accordance with Article 8 on a timely basis after imposition of the Provisional
Suspension.
The imposition of a Provisional Suspension, or the decision not to impose
a Provisional Suspension, may be appealed in an expedited process in
accordance with Article 13.2.
7.4.4 Voluntary Acceptance of Provisional Suspension
Athletes on their own initiative may voluntarily accept a Provisional Suspension
if done so prior to the later of: (i) the expiration of ten (10) days from the report
of the B Sample (or waiver of the B Sample) or ten (10) days from the notice
of any other anti-doping rule violation, or (ii) the date on which the Athlete first
competes after such report or notice.
Other Persons on their own initiative may voluntarily accept a Provisional
Suspension if done so within ten (10) days from the notice of the anti-doping
rule violation.
Upon such voluntary acceptance, the Provisional Suspension shall have the
full effect and be treated in the same manner as if the Provisional Suspension
had been imposed under Article 7.4.1 or 7.4.2; provided, however, at any
time after voluntarily accepting a Provisional Suspension, the Athlete or other
Person may withdraw such acceptance, in which event the Athlete or other
Person shall not receive any credit for time previously served during the
Provisional Suspension.
7.4.5 If a Provisional Suspension is imposed based on an A Sample Adverse
Analytical Finding and a subsequent B Sample analysis (if requested by the
Athlete or ISSF) does not confirm the A Sample analysis, then the Athlete shall
not be subject to any further Provisional Suspension on account of a violation
of Article 2.1. In circumstances where the Athlete or the Athlete’s team has
138 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
been removed from an Event based on a violation of Article 2.1 and the
subsequent B Sample analysis does not confirm the A Sample finding, then,
if it is still possible for the Athlete or team to be reinserted, without otherwise
affecting the Event, the Athlete or team may continue to take part in the Event.
7.5
Results Management Decisions
Results Management decisions or adjudications by ISSF must not purport to
be limited to a particular geographic area or the ISSF’s sport and shall address
and determine without limitation the following issues: (i) whether an anti-doping
rule violation was committed or a Provisional Suspension should be imposed,
the factual basis for such determination, and the specific Articles that have
been violated, and (ii) all Consequences flowing from the anti-doping rule
violation(s), including applicable Disqualifications under Articles 9 and 10.10,
any forfeiture of medals or prizes, any period of Ineligibility (and the date it
begins to run) and any Financial Consequences.
7.6 Notification of Results Management Decisions
ISSF shall notify Athletes, other Persons, Signatories and WADA of Results
Management decisions as provided in Article 14.2 and in the International
Standard for Results Management.
7.7 Retirement from Sport
If an Athlete or other Person retires while the ISSF’s Results Management
process is underway, ISSF retains authority to complete its Results
Management process. If an Athlete or other Person retires before any
Results Management process has begun, and ISSF would have had Results
Management authority over the Athlete or other Person at the time the Athlete
or other Person committed an anti-doping rule violation, ISSF has authority to
conduct Results Management.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 139
8.1.2.1 When ISSF sends a notice to an Athlete or other Person notifying them of a
potential anti-doping rule violation, and the Athlete or other Person does not
waive a hearing in accordance with Article 8.3.1 or Article 8.3.2, then the case
shall be referred to the CAS ADD for hearing and adjudication, which shall be
conducted in accordance with the principles described in Articles 8 and 9 of the
International Standard for Results Management.
8.1.2.2 Hearings held in connection with Events in respect to Athletes and other
Persons who are subject to these Anti-Doping Rules may be conducted by an
expedited process where permitted by the CAS ADD.
8.1.2.3 WADA, the National Federation and the National Anti-Doping Organization of
the Athlete or other Person may attend the hearing as observers. In any event,
ISSF shall keep them fully apprised as to the status of pending cases and the
result of all hearings.
8.2 Notice of Decisions
8.2.1 At the end of the hearing, or promptly thereafter, the CAS ADD shall issue a
written decision that conforms with Article 9 of the International Standard for
Results Management and which includes the full reasons for the decision, the
period of Ineligibility imposed, the Disqualification of results under Article 10.10
and, if applicable, a justification for why the greatest potential Consequences
were not imposed.
8.2.2 ISSF shall notify that decision to the Athlete or other Person and to other
Anti-Doping Organizations with a right to appeal under Article 13.2.3 and shall
promptly report it into ADAMS. The decision may be appealed as provided in
Article 13.
8.3 Waiver of Hearing
8.3.1 An Athlete or other Person against whom an anti-doping violation is
asserted may admit that violation at any time, waive a hearing and accept
the Consequences proposed by ISSF and may, if applicable, benefit from a
Results Management agreement under the conditions set out in Article 10.8.
8.3.2 However, if the Athlete or other Person against whom an anti-doping rule
violation is asserted fails to dispute that assertion within the deadline specified
in the notice sent by the ISSF asserting the violation, then they shall be
deemed to have admitted the violation, to have waived a hearing, and to have
accepted the proposed Consequences.
8.3.3 In cases where Article 8.3.1 or 8.3.2 applies, a hearing before the CAS ADD
shall not be required. Instead ISSF shall promptly issue a written decision that
conforms with Article 9 of the International Standard for Results Management
and which includes the full reasons for the decision, the period of Ineligibility
imposed, the Disqualification of results under Article 10.10 and, if applicable, a
justification for why the greatest potential Consequences were not imposed.
8.3.4 ISSF shall notify that decision to the Athlete or other Person and to other
Anti-Doping Organizations with a right to appeal under Article 13.2.3 and shall
promptly report it into ADAMS. ISSF shall Publicly Disclose that decision in
accordance with Article 14.3.2.
8.4 Single Hearing Before CAS
Anti-doping rule violations asserted against International-Level Athletes,
National-Level Athletes or other Persons may, with the consent of the Athlete
or other Person, ISSF (where it has Results Management responsibility in
140 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
accordance with Article 7) and WADA, be heard in a single hearing directly at
CAS.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 141
Substance and the Athlete can establish that the Prohibited Substance
was Used Out-of-Competition. An anti-doping rule violation resulting from
an Adverse Analytical Finding for a substance which is only prohibited In-
Competition shall not be considered “intentional” if the substance is not
a Specified Substance and the Athlete can establish that the Prohibited
Substance was Used Out-of-Competition in a context unrelated to sport
performance.
10.2.4 Notwithstanding any other provision in Article 10.2, where the anti-doping rule
violation involves a Substance of Abuse:
10.2.4.1 If the Athlete can establish that any ingestion or Use occurred Out-of-
Competition and was unrelated to sport performance, then the period of
Ineligibility shall be three (3) months Ineligibility.
In addition, the period of Ineligibility calculated under this Article 10.2.4.1
may be reduced to one (1) month if the Athlete or other Person satisfactorily
completes a Substance of Abuse treatment Programme approved by ISSF.
The period of Ineligibility established in this Article 10.2.4.1 is not subject to
any reduction based on any provision in Article 10.6.
10.2.4.2 If the ingestion, Use or Possession occurred In-Competition, and the Athlete
can establish that the context of the ingestion, Use or Possession was
unrelated to sport performance, then the ingestion, Use or Possession shall
not be considered intentional for purposes of Article 10.2.1 and shall not
provide a basis for a finding of Aggravating Circumstances under Article 10.4.
10.3 Ineligibility for Other Anti-Doping Rule Violations
The period of Ineligibility for anti-doping rule violations other than as provided
in Article 10.2 shall be as follows, unless Article 10.6 or 10.7 are applicable:
10.3.1 For violations of Article 2.3 or 2.5, the period of Ineligibility shall be four (4)
years except: (i) in the case of failing to submit to Sample collection, if the
Athlete can establish that the commission of the anti-doping rule violation was
not intentional, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years; (ii) in all other
cases, if the Athlete or other Person can establish exceptional circumstances
that justify a reduction of the period of Ineligibility, the period of Ineligibility shall
be in a range from two (2) years to four (4) years depending on the Athlete or
other Person’s degree of Fault; or (iii) in a case involving a Protected Person
or Recreational Athlete, the period of Ineligibility shall be in a range between
a maximum of two (2) years and, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period
of Ineligibility, depending on the Protected Person or Recreational Athlete’s
degree of Fault.
10.3.2 For violations of Article 2.4, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years,
subject to reduction down to a minimum of one (1) year, depending on the
Athlete’s degree of Fault. The flexibility between two (2) years and one (1) year
of Ineligibility in this Article is not available to Athletes where a pattern of last-
minute whereabouts changes or other conduct raises a serious suspicion that
the Athlete was trying to avoid being available for Testing.
10.3.3 For violations of Article 2.7 or 2.8, the period of Ineligibility shall be a minimum
of four (4) years up to lifetime Ineligibility, depending on the seriousness
of the violation. An Article 2.7 or Article 2.8 violation involving a Protected
Person shall be considered a particularly serious violation and, if committed by
Athlete Support Personnel for violations other than for Specified Substances,
shall result in lifetime Ineligibility for Athlete Support Personnel. In addition,
significant violations of Article 2.7 or 2.8 which may also violate non-sporting
142 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
laws and regulations, shall be reported to the competent administrative,
professional or judicial authorities.
10.3.4 For violations of Article 2.9, the period of Ineligibility imposed shall be a
minimum of two (2) years, up to lifetime Ineligibility, depending on the
seriousness of the violation.
10.3.5 For violations of Article 2.10, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years,
subject to reduction down to a minimum of one (1) year, depending on the
Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault and other circumstances of the case.
10.3.6 For violations of Article 2.11, the period of Ineligibility shall be a minimum of
two (2) years, up to lifetime Ineligibility, depending on the seriousness of the
violation by the Athlete or other Person.
10.4
Aggravating Circumstances which may Increase the Period of Ineligibility
If ISSF establishes in an individual case involving an anti-doping rule violation
other than violations under Article 2.7 (Trafficking or Attempted Trafficking), 2.8
(Administration or Attempted Administration), 2.9 (Complicity) or 2.11 (Acts by
an Athlete or Other Person to Discourage or Retaliate Against Reporting) that
Aggravating Circumstances are present which justify the imposition of a period
of Ineligibility greater than the standard sanction, then the period of Ineligibility
otherwise applicable shall be increased by an additional period of Ineligibility
of up to two (2) years depending on the seriousness of the violation and the
nature of the Aggravating Circumstances, unless the Athlete or other Person
can establish that he or she did not knowingly commit the anti-doping rule
violation.
10.5 Elimination of the Period of Ineligibility where there is No Fault or
Negligence
If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case that he or
she bears No Fault or Negligence, then the otherwise applicable period of
Ineligibility shall be eliminated.
10.6 Reduction of the Period of Ineligibility based on No Significant Fault or
Negligence
10.6.1 Reduction of Sanctions in Particular Circumstances for Violations of Article 2.1,
2.2 or 2.6.
All reductions under Article 10.6.1 are mutually exclusive and not cumulative.
10.6.1.1 Specified Substances or Specified Methods
Where the anti-doping rule violation involves a Specified Substance (other than
a Substance of Abuse) or Specified Method, and the Athlete or other Person
can establish No Significant Fault or Negligence, then the period of Ineligibility
shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility, and at a
maximum, two (2) years of Ineligibility, depending on the Athlete’s or other
Person’s degree of Fault.
10.6.1.2 Contaminated Products
In cases where the Athlete or other Person can establish both No Significant
Fault or Negligence and that the detected Prohibited Substance (other than a
Substance of Abuse) came from a Contaminated Product, then the period of
Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility,
and at a maximum, two (2) years Ineligibility, depending on the Athlete or other
Person’s degree of Fault.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 143
10.6.1.3 Protected Persons or Recreational Athletes
Where the anti-doping rule violation not involving a Substance of Abuse is
committed by a Protected Person or Recreational Athlete, and the Protected
Person or Recreational Athlete can establish No Significant Fault or
Negligence, then the period of Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a reprimand
and no period of Ineligibility, and at a maximum, two (2) years Ineligibility,
depending on the Protected Person or Recreational Athlete’s degree of Fault.
10.6.2 Application of No Significant Fault or Negligence beyond the Application of
Article 10.6.1
If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case where
Article 10.6.1 is not applicable that he or she bears No Significant Fault or
Negligence, then, subject to further reduction or elimination as provided in
Article 10.7, the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility may be reduced
based on the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault, but the reduced
period of Ineligibility may not be less than one-half of the period of Ineligibility
otherwise applicable. If the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility is a
lifetime, the reduced period under this Article may be no less than eight (8)
years.
10.7 Elimination, Reduction, or Suspension of Period of Ineligibility or other
Consequences for Reasons other than Fault
10.7.1
Substantial Assistance in Discovering or Establishing Code Violations
10.7.1.1 ISSF may, prior to an appellate decision under Article 13 or the expiration
of the time to appeal, suspend a part of the Consequences (other than
Disqualification and mandatory Public Disclosure) imposed in an individual
case where the Athlete or other Person has provided Substantial Assistance
to an Anti-Doping Organization, criminal authority or professional disciplinary
body which results in: (i) the Anti-Doping Organization discovering or
bringing forward an anti-doping rule violation by another Person; or (ii) which
results in a criminal or disciplinary body discovering or bringing forward a
criminal offense or the breach of professional rules committed by another
Person and the information provided by the Person providing Substantial
Assistance is made available to ISSF or other Anti-Doping Organization with
Results Management responsibility; or (iii) which results in WADA initiating
a proceeding against a Signatory, WADA-accredited laboratory, or Athlete
passport management unit (as defined in the International Standard for Testing
and Investigations) for non-compliance with the Code, International Standard
or Technical Document; or (iv) with the approval by WADA, which results in a
criminal or disciplinary body bringing forward a criminal offense or the breach
of professional or sport rules arising out of a sport integrity violation other than
doping.
After an appellate decision under Article 13 or the expiration of time to appeal,
ISSF may only suspend a part of the otherwise applicable Consequences with
the approval of WADA.
The extent to which the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility may
be suspended shall be based on the seriousness of the anti-doping rule
violation committed by the Athlete or other Person and the significance of the
Substantial Assistance provided by the Athlete or other Person to the effort to
eliminate doping in sport, non-compliance with the Code and/or sport integrity
violations. No more than three-quarters of the otherwise applicable period of
Ineligibility may be suspended. If the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility
144 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
is a lifetime, the non-suspended period under this Article must be no less than
eight (8) years. For purposes of this paragraph, the otherwise applicable period
of Ineligibility shall not include any period of Ineligibility that could be added
under Article 10.9.3.2 of these Anti-Doping Rules.
If requested by an Athlete or other Person who seeks to provide Substantial
Assistance, ISSF shall allow the Athlete or other Person to provide the
information to it subject to a Without Prejudice Agreement.
If the Athlete or other Person fails to continue to cooperate and to provide the
complete and credible Substantial Assistance upon which a suspension of
Consequences was based, ISSF shall reinstate the original Consequences.
If ISSF decides to reinstate suspended Consequences or decides not to
reinstate suspended Consequences, that decision may be appealed by any
Person entitled to appeal under Article 13.
10.7.1.2 To further encourage Athletes and other Persons to provide Substantial
Assistance to Anti-Doping Organizations, at the request of ISSF or at the
request of the Athlete or other Person who has, or has been asserted to
have, committed an anti-doping rule violation, or other violation of the Code,
WADA may agree at any stage of the Results Management process, including
after an appellate decision under Article 13, to what it considers to be an
appropriate suspension of the otherwise-applicable period of Ineligibility
and other Consequences. In exceptional circumstances, WADA may agree
to suspensions of the period of Ineligibility and other Consequences for
Substantial Assistance greater than those otherwise provided in this Article, or
even no period of Ineligibility, no mandatory Public Disclosure and/or no return
of prize money or payment of fines or costs. WADA’s approval shall be subject
to reinstatement of Consequences, as otherwise provided in this Article.
Notwithstanding Article 13, WADA’s decisions in the context of this Article
10.7.1.2 may not be appealed.
10.7.1.3 If ISSF suspends any part of an otherwise applicable sanction because of
Substantial Assistance, then notice providing justification for the decision
shall be provided to the other Anti-Doping Organizations with a right to appeal
under Article 13.2.3 as provided in Article 14.2. In unique circumstances where
WADA determines that it would be in the best interest of anti-doping, WADA
may authorize ISSF to enter into appropriate confidentiality agreements limiting
or delaying the disclosure of the Substantial Assistance agreement or the
nature of Substantial Assistance being provided.
10.7.2 Admission of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation in the Absence of Other Evidence
Where an Athlete or other Person voluntarily admits the commission of an
anti-doping rule violation before having received notice of a Sample collection
which could establish an anti-doping rule violation (or, in the case of an anti-
doping rule violation other than Article 2.1, before receiving first notice of the
admitted violation pursuant to Article 7) and that admission is the only reliable
evidence of the violation at the time of admission, then the period of Ineligibility
may be reduced, but not below one-half of the period of Ineligibility otherwise
applicable.
10.7.3 Application of Multiple Grounds for Reduction of a Sanction
Where an Athlete or other Person establishes entitlement to reduction in
sanction under more than one provision of Article 10.5, 10.6 or 10.7, before
applying any reduction or suspension under Article 10.7, the otherwise
applicable period of Ineligibility shall be determined in accordance with
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 145
Articles 10.2, 10.3, 10.5, and 10.6. If the Athlete or other Person establishes
entitlement to a reduction or suspension of the period of Ineligibility under
Article 10.7, then the period of Ineligibility may be reduced or suspended, but
not below one-fourth of the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility.
10.8 Results Management Agreements
10.8.1 One (1) Year Reduction for Certain Anti-Doping Rule Violations Based on Early
Admission and Acceptance of Sanction
Where an Athlete or other Person, after being notified by ISSF of a potential
anti-doping rule violation that carries an asserted period of Ineligibility of four
(4) or more years (including any period of Ineligibility asserted under Article
10.4), admits the violation and accepts the asserted period of Ineligibility no
later than twenty (20) days after receiving notice of an anti-doping rule violation
charge, the Athlete or other Person may receive a one (1) year reduction in
the period of Ineligibility asserted by ISSF . Where the Athlete or other Person
receives the one (1) year reduction in the asserted period of Ineligibility under
this Article 10.8.1, no further reduction in the asserted period of Ineligibility
shall be allowed under any other Article.
10.8.2 Case Resolution Agreement
Where the Athlete or other Person admits an anti-doping rule violation after
being confronted with the anti-doping rule violation by ISSF and agrees
to Consequences acceptable to ISSF and WADA, at their sole discretion,
then: (a) the Athlete or other Person may receive a reduction in the period of
Ineligibility based on an assessment by ISSF and WADA of the application
of Articles 10.1 through 10.7 to the asserted anti-doping rule violation, the
seriousness of the violation, the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault and
how promptly the Athlete or other Person admitted the violation; and (b) the
period of Ineligibility may start as early as the date of Sample collection or the
date on which another anti-doping rule violation last occurred. In each case,
however, where this Article is applied, the Athlete or other Person shall serve
at least one-half of the agreed-upon period of Ineligibility going forward from
the earlier of the date the Athlete or other Person accepted the imposition of
a sanction or a Provisional Suspension which was subsequently respected
by the Athlete or other Person. The decision by WADA and ISSF to enter or
not enter into a case resolution agreement, and the amount of the reduction
to, and the starting date of, the period of Ineligibility are not matters for
determination or review by a hearing body and are not subject to appeal under
Article 13.
If so requested by an Athlete or other Person who seeks to enter into a case
resolution agreement under this Article, ISSF shall allow the Athlete or other
Person to discuss an admission of the anti-doping rule violation with it subject
to a Without Prejudice Agreement.
10.9 Multiple Violations
10.9.1 Second or Third Anti-Doping Rule Violation
10.9.1.1 For an Athlete or other Person’s second anti-doping rule violation, the period of
Ineligibility shall be the greater of:
(a) A six (6) month period of Ineligibility; or
(b) A period of Ineligibility in the range between:
146 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
(i) the sum of the period of Ineligibility imposed for the first anti-doping rule
violation plus the period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable to the second
anti-doping rule violation treated as if it were a first violation, and
(ii) twice the period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable to the second anti-
doping rule violation treated as if it were a first violation, with the period
of Ineligibility within this range to be determined based on the entirety of
the circumstances and the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault with
respect to the second violation.
10.9.1.2 A third anti-doping rule violation will always result in a lifetime period of
Ineligibility, except if the third violation fulfills the condition for elimination or
reduction of the period of Ineligibility under Article 10.5 or 10.6, or involves a
violation of Article 2.4. In these particular cases, the period of Ineligibility shall
be from eight (8) years to lifetime Ineligibility.
10.9.1.3 The period of Ineligibility established in Articles 10.9.1.1 and 10.9.1.2 may then
be further reduced by the application of Article 10.7.
10.9.2 An anti-doping rule violation for which an Athlete or other Person has
established No Fault or Negligence shall not be considered a violation
for purposes of this Article 10.9. In addition, an anti-doping rule violation
sanctioned under Article 10.2.4.1 shall not be considered a violation for
purposes of Article 10.9.
10.9.3 Additional Rules for Certain Potential Multiple Violations
10.9.3.1 For purposes of imposing sanctions under Article 10.9, except as provided
in Articles 10.9.3.2 and 10.9.3.3, an anti-doping rule violation will only be
considered a second violation if ISSF can establish that the Athlete or other
Person committed the additional anti-doping rule violation after the Athlete
or other Person received notice pursuant to Article 7, or after ISSF made
reasonable efforts to give notice of the first anti-doping rule violation. If ISSF
cannot establish this, the violations shall be considered together as one single
first violation, and the sanction imposed shall be based on the violation that
carries the more severe sanction, including the application of Aggravating
Circumstances. Results in all Competitions dating back to the earlier anti-
doping rule violation will be Disqualified as provided in Article 10.10.
10.9.3.2 If ISSF establishes that an Athlete or other Person committed an additional
anti-doping rule violation prior to notification, and that the additional violation
occurred twelve (12) months or more before or after the first-noticed violation,
then the period of Ineligibility for the additional violation shall be calculated as
if the additional violation were a stand-alone first violation and this period of
Ineligibility is served consecutively, rather than concurrently, with the period of
Ineligibility imposed for the earlier-noticed violation. Where this Article 10.9.3.2
applies, the violations taken together shall constitute a single violation for
purposes of Article 10.9.1.
10.9.3.3 If ISSF establishes that an Athlete or other Person committed a violation of
Article 2.5 in connection with the Doping Control process for an underlying
asserted anti-doping rule violation, the violation of Article 2.5 shall be treated
as a stand-alone first violation and the period of Ineligibility for such violation
shall be served consecutively, rather than concurrently, with the period of
Ineligibility, if any, imposed for the underlying anti-doping rule violation. Where
this Article 10.9.3.3 is applied, the violations taken together shall constitute a
single violation for purposes of Article 10.9.1.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 147
10.9.3.4 If ISSF establishes that a Person has committed a second or third anti-doping
rule violation during a period of Ineligibility, the periods of Ineligibility for the
multiple violations shall run consecutively, rather than concurrently.
10.9.4 Multiple Anti-Doping Rule Violations during Ten (10) Year Period
For purposes of Article 10.9, each anti-doping rule violation must take place
within the same ten (10) year period in order to be considered multiple
violations.
10.10
Disqualification of Results in Competitions Subsequent to Sample
Collection or Commission of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation
In addition to the automatic Disqualification of the results in the Competition
which produced the positive Sample under Article 9, all other competitive
results of the Athlete obtained from the date a positive Sample was collected
(whether In-Competition or Out-of-Competition), or other anti-doping rule
violation occurred, through the commencement of any Provisional Suspension
or Ineligibility period, shall, unless fairness requires otherwise, be Disqualified
with all of the resulting Consequences including forfeiture of any medals,
points and prizes.
10.11 Forfeited Prize Money
If ISSF recovers prize money forfeited as a result of an anti-doping rule
violation, it shall take reasonable measures to allocate and distribute this prize
money to the Athletes who would have been entitled to it had the forfeiting
Athlete not competed.
10.12
Financial Consequences
10.12.1 Where an Athlete or other Person commits an anti-doping rule violation, ISSF
may, in its discretion and subject to the principle of proportionality, elect to (a)
recover from the Athlete or other Person costs associated with the anti-doping
rule violation, regardless of the period of Ineligibility imposed and/or (b) fine
the Athlete or other Person in an amount up to 5000 Euro, only in cases where
the maximum period of Ineligibility otherwise applicable has already been
imposed.
10.12.2 The imposition of a financial sanction or the ISSF’s recovery of costs shall
not be considered a basis for reducing the Ineligibility or other sanction which
would otherwise be applicable under these Anti-Doping Rules.
10.13 Commencement of Ineligibility Period
Where an Athlete is already serving a period of Ineligibility for an anti-doping
rule violation, any new period of Ineligibility shall commence on the first day
after the current period of Ineligibility has been served. Otherwise, except as
provided below, the period of Ineligibility shall start on the date of the final
hearing decision providing for Ineligibility or, if the hearing is waived or there is
no hearing, on the date Ineligibility is accepted or otherwise imposed.
10.13.1 Delays Not Attributable to the Athlete or other Person
Where there have been substantial delays in the hearing process or other
aspects of Doping Control, and the Athlete or other Person can establish
that such delays are not attributable to the Athlete or other Person, ISSF or
CAS ADD, if applicable, may start the period of Ineligibility at an earlier date
commencing as early as the date of Sample collection or the date on which
another anti-doping rule violation last occurred. All competitive results achieved
148 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
during the period of Ineligibility, including retroactive Ineligibility, shall be
Disqualified.
10.13.2 Credit for Provisional Suspension or Period of Ineligibility Served
10.13.2.1 If a Provisional Suspension is respected by the Athlete or other Person, then
the Athlete or other Person shall receive a credit for such period of Provisional
Suspension against any period of Ineligibility which may ultimately be imposed.
If the Athlete or other Person does not respect a Provisional Suspension, then
the Athlete or other Person shall receive no credit for any period of Provisional
Suspension served. If a period of Ineligibility is served pursuant to a decision
that is subsequently appealed, then the Athlete or other Person shall receive
a credit for such period of Ineligibility served against any period of Ineligibility
which may ultimately be imposed on appeal.
10.13.2.2 If an Athlete or other Person voluntarily accepts a Provisional Suspension
in writing from ISSF and thereafter respects the Provisional Suspension, the
Athlete or other Person shall receive a credit for such period of voluntary
Provisional Suspension against any period of Ineligibility which may ultimately
be imposed. A copy of the Athlete or other Person’s voluntary acceptance of
a Provisional Suspension shall be provided promptly to each party entitled to
receive notice of an asserted anti-doping rule violation under Article 14.1.
10.13.2.3 No credit against a period of Ineligibility shall be given for any time period
before the effective date of the Provisional Suspension or voluntary Provisional
Suspension regardless of whether the Athlete elected not to compete or was
suspended by a team.
10.13.2.4 In Team Sports, where a period of Ineligibility is imposed upon a team, unless
fairness requires otherwise, the period of Ineligibility shall start on the date of
the final hearing decision providing for Ineligibility or, if the hearing is waived,
on the date Ineligibility is accepted or otherwise imposed. Any period of team
Provisional Suspension (whether imposed or voluntarily accepted) shall be
credited against the total period of Ineligibility to be served.
10.14 Status During Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension
10.14.1 Prohibition Against Participation During Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension
No Athlete or other Person who has been declared Ineligible or is subject to
a Provisional Suspension may, during a period of Ineligibility or Provisional
Suspension, participate in any capacity in a Competition or activity (other than
authorized anti-doping Education or rehabilitation Programmes) authorized
or organized by any Signatory, Signatory’s member organization, or a club
or other member organization of a Signatory’s member organization, or in
Competitions authorized or organized by any professional league or any
international- or national-level Event organization or any elite or national-level
sporting activity funded by a governmental agency.
An Athlete or other Person subject to a period of Ineligibility longer than four
(4) years may, after completing four (4) years of the period of Ineligibility,
participate as an Athlete in local sport events not sanctioned or otherwise
under the authority of a Code Signatory or member of a Code Signatory, but
only so long as the local sport event is not at a level that could otherwise
qualify such Athlete or other Person directly or indirectly to compete in (or
accumulate points toward) a national championship or International Event,
and does not involve the Athlete or other Person working in any capacity with
Protected Persons.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 149
An Athlete or other Person subject to a period of Ineligibility shall remain
subject to Testing and any requirement by ISSF to provide whereabouts
information.
10.14.2 Return to Training
As an exception to Article 10.14.1, an Athlete may return to train with a team or
to use the facilities of a club or other member organization of ISSF’s or other
Signatory’s member organization during the shorter of: (1) the last two months
of the Athlete’s period of Ineligibility, or (2) the last one-quarter of the period of
Ineligibility imposed.
10.14.3 Violation of the Prohibition of Participation During Ineligibility or Provisional
Suspension
Where an Athlete or other Person who has been declared Ineligible violates
the prohibition against participation during Ineligibility described in Article
10.14.1, the results of such participation shall be Disqualified and a new period
of Ineligibility equal in length to the original period of Ineligibility shall be added
to the end of the original period of Ineligibility. The new period of Ineligibility,
including a reprimand and no period of Ineligibility, may be adjusted based on
the Athlete or other Person’s degree of Fault and other circumstances of the
case. The determination of whether an Athlete or other Person has violated
the prohibition against participation, and whether an adjustment is appropriate,
shall be made by the Anti-Doping Organization whose Results Management
led to the imposition of the initial period of Ineligibility. This decision may be
appealed under Article 13.
An Athlete or other Person who violates the prohibition against participation
during a Provisional Suspension described in Article 10.14.1 shall receive no
credit for any period of Provisional Suspension served and the results of such
participation shall be Disqualified.
Where an Athlete Support Person or other Person assists a Person in
violating the prohibition against participation during Ineligibility or a Provisional
Suspension, ISSF shall impose sanctions for a violation of Article 2.9 for such
assistance.
10.14.4 Withholding of Financial Support during Ineligibility
In addition, for any anti-doping rule violation not involving a reduced sanction
as described in Article 10.5 or 10.6, some or all sport-related financial support
or other sport-related benefits received by such Person will be withheld by
ISSF and its National Federations.
10.15 Automatic Publication of Sanction
A mandatory part of each sanction shall include automatic publication, as
provided in Article 14.3.
150 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
11.2
Consequences for Teams
11.2.1 An anti-doping rule violation committed by a member of a team in connection
with an In-Competition test automatically leads to Disqualification of the result
obtained by the team in that Competition, with all resulting Consequences
for the team and its members, including forfeiture of any medals, points and
prizes.
11.2.2 An anti-doping rule violation committed by a member of a team occurring
during or in connection with an Event may lead to Disqualification of all of the
results obtained by the team in that Event with all Consequences for the team
and its members, including forfeiture of all medals, points and prizes, except as
provided in Article 11.2.3.
11.2.3 Where an Athlete who is a member of a team committed an anti-doping rule
violation during or in connection with one (1) Competition in an Event, if the
other member(s) of the team establish(es) that he or she/they bear(s) No
Fault or Negligence for that violation, the results of the team in any other
Competition(s) in that Event shall not be Disqualified unless the results of the
team in the Competition(s) other than the Competition in which the anti-doping
rule violation occurred were likely to have been affected by the Athlete’s anti-
doping rule violation.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 151
an amount up to 2000 Euro per Athlete, in addition to reimbursement of all of
the ISSF costs incurred in Testing that organization’s or body’s Athletes.
12.3 Withhold some or all funding or other financial and non-financial support to that
organization or body.
12.4 Get that organization or body to reimburse ISSF for all costs (including but not
limited to laboratory fees, hearing expenses and travel) related to a violation of
these Anti-Doping Rules committed by an Athlete or other Person affiliated with
that organization or body.
152 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
alleged anti-doping rule violation or its Consequences; a decision to suspend,
or not suspend, Consequences or to reinstate, or not reinstate, Consequences
under Article 10.7.1; failure to comply with Articles 7.1.4 and 7.1.5 of the Code;
failure to comply with Article 10.8.1; a decision under Article 10.14.3; a decision
by ISSF not to implement another Anti-Doping Organization’s decision under
Article 15; and a decision under Article 27.3 of the Code may be appealed
exclusively as provided in this Article 13.2.
13.2.1 Appeals Involving International-Level Athletes or International Events
In cases arising from participation in an International Event or in cases
involving International-Level Athletes, the decision may be appealed
exclusively to CAS.
13.2.2 Appeals Involving Other Athletes or Other Persons
In cases where Article 13.2.1 is not applicable, the decision may be appealed
to an appellate body, in accordance with rules adopted by the National Anti-
Doping Organization having authority over the Athlete or other Person.
The rules for such appeal shall respect the following principles: a timely
hearing; a fair, impartial, Operationally Independent and Institutionally
Independent hearing panel; the right to be represented by counsel at the
Person’s own expense; and a timely, written, reasoned decision.
If no such body as described above is in place and available at the time of
the appeal, the decision may be appealed to CAS in accordance with the
applicable procedural rules.
13.2.3 Persons Entitled to Appeal
13.2.3.1 Appeals Involving International-Level Athletes or International Events
In cases under Article 13.2.1, the following parties shall have the right to
appeal to CAS: (a) the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the
decision being appealed; (b) the other party to the case in which the decision
was rendered; (c) ISSF; (d) the National Anti-Doping Organization of the
Person’s country of residence or countries where the Person is a national
or license holder; (e) the International Olympic Committee or International
Paralympic Committee, as applicable, where the decision may have an effect
in relation to the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions
affecting eligibility for the Olympic Games or Paralympic Games; and (f)
WADA.
13.2.3.2 Appeals Involving Other Athletes or Other Persons
In cases under Article 13.2.2, the parties having the right to appeal to the
national-level appeal body shall be as provided in the National Anti-Doping
Organization’s rules but, at a minimum, shall include the following parties:
(a) the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the decision being
appealed; (b) the other party to the case in which the decision was rendered;
(c) ISSF; (d) the National Anti-Doping Organization of the Person’s country of
residence or countries where the Person is a national or license holder; (e) the
International Olympic Committee or International Paralympic Committee, as
applicable, where the decision may have an effect in relation to the Olympic
Games or Paralympic Games, including decisions affecting eligibility for the
Olympic Games or Paralympic Games; and (f) WADA.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 153
For cases under Article 13.2.2, WADA, the International Olympic Committee,
the International Paralympic Committee, and ISSF shall also have the right to
appeal to CAS with respect to the decision of the national-level appeal body.
Any party filing an appeal shall be entitled to assistance from CAS to obtain
all relevant information from the Anti-Doping Organization whose decision is
being appealed and the information shall be provided if CAS so directs.
13.2.3.3 Duty to Notify
All parties to any CAS appeal must ensure that WADA and all other parties
with a right to appeal have been given timely notice of the appeal.
13.2.3.4 Appeal from Imposition of Provisional Suspension
Notwithstanding any other provision herein, the only Person who may appeal
from the imposition of a Provisional Suspension is the Athlete or other Person
upon whom the Provisional Suspension is imposed.
13.2.3.5 Appeal from Decisions under Article 12
Decisions by ISSF pursuant to Article 12 may be appealed exclusively to CAS
by the National Federation or other body.
13.2.4 Cross Appeals and other Subsequent Appeals Allowed
Cross appeals and other subsequent appeals by any respondent named in
cases brought to CAS under the Code are specifically permitted. Any party with
a right to appeal under this Article 13 must file a cross appeal or subsequent
appeal at the latest with the party’s answer.
13.3 Failure to Render a Timely Decision by ISSF
Where, in a particular case, ISSF fails to render a decision with respect to
whether an anti-doping rule violation was committed within a reasonable
deadline set by WADA, WADA may elect to appeal directly to CAS as if ISSF
had rendered a decision finding no anti-doping rule violation. If the CAS
hearing panel determines that an anti-doping rule violation was committed
and that WADA acted reasonably in electing to appeal directly to CAS, then
WADA’s costs and attorney fees in prosecuting the appeal shall be reimbursed
to WADA by ISSF.
13.4 Appeals Relating to TUEs
TUE decisions may be appealed exclusively as provided in Article 4.4.
13.5 Notification of Appeal Decisions
ISSF shall promptly provide the appeal decision to the Athlete or other Person
and to the other Anti-Doping Organizations that would have been entitled to
appeal under Article 13.2.3 as provided under Article 14.2.
13.6 Time for Filing Appeals
13.6.1 Appeals to CAS
The time to file an appeal to CAS shall be twenty-one (21) days from the date
of receipt of the decision by the appealing party. The above notwithstanding,
the following shall apply in connection with appeals filed by a party entitled to
appeal but which was not a party to the proceedings that led to the decision
being appealed:
(a) Within fifteen (15) days from the notice of the decision, such party/ies
shall have the right to request a copy of the full case file pertaining to the
154 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
decision from the Anti-Doping Organization that had Results Management
authority;
(b) If such a request is made within the fifteen (15) day period, then the party
making such request shall have twenty-one (21) days from receipt of the
file to file an appeal to CAS.
The above notwithstanding, the filing deadline for an appeal filed by WADA
shall be the later of:
(a) Twenty-one (21) days after the last day on which any other party having a
right to appeal could have appealed, or
(b) Twenty-one (21) days after WADA’s receipt of the complete file relating to
the decision.
13.6.2 Appeals Under Article 13.2.2
The time to file an appeal to an independent and impartial body in accordance
with rules established by the National Anti-Doping Organization shall be
indicated by the same rules of the National Anti-Doping Organization.
The above notwithstanding, the filing deadline for an appeal filed by WADA
shall be the later of:
(a) Twenty-one (21) days after the last day on which any other party having a
right to appeal could have appealed, or
(b) Twenty-one (21) days after WADA’s receipt of the complete file relating to
the decision.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 155
14.1.3 Content of an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Notice
Notification of an anti-doping rule violation shall include: the Athlete’s or other
Person’s name, country, sport and discipline within the sport, the Athlete’s
competitive level, whether the test was In-Competition or Out-of-Competition,
the date of Sample collection, the analytical result reported by the laboratory,
and other information as required by the International Standard for Testing and
Investigations and International Standard for Results Management.
Notification of anti-doping rule violations other than under Article 2.1 shall also i
14.1.4 Status Reports
Except with respect to investigations which have not resulted in a notice of
an anti-doping rule violation pursuant to Article 14.1.1, the Athlete’s or other
Person’s National Anti-Doping Organization and WADA shall be regularly
updated on the status and findings of any review or proceedings conducted
pursuant to Article 7, 8 or 13 and shall be provided with a prompt written
reasoned explanation or decision explaining the resolution of the matter.
14.1.5 Confidentiality
The recipient organizations shall not disclose this information beyond those
Persons with a need to know (which would include the appropriate personnel
at the applicable National Olympic Committee, National Federation, and team
in a Team Sport) until ISSF has made Public Disclosure as permitted by Article
14.3.
14.1.6 Protection of Confidential Information by an Employee or Agent of the ISSF
ISSF shall ensure that information concerning Adverse Analytical Findings,
Atypical Findings, and other asserted anti-doping rule violations remains
confidential until such information is Publicly Disclosed in accordance with
Article 14.3. ISSF shall ensure that its employees (whether permanent or
otherwise), contractors, agents, consultants, and Delegated Third Parties
are subject to fully enforceable contractual duty of confidentiality and to fully
enforceable procedures for the investigation and disciplining of improper and/
or unauthorized disclosure of such confidential information.
14.2 Notice of Anti-Doping Rule Violation or violations of Ineligibility or
Provisional Suspension Decisions and Request for Files
14.2.1 Anti-doping rule violation decisions or decisions related to violations of
Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension rendered pursuant to Article 7.6, 8.2,
10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.14.3 or 13.5 shall include the full reasons for the decision,
including, if applicable, a justification for why the maximum potential sanction
was not imposed. Where the decision is not in English or French, ISSF shall
provide an English or French summary of the decision and the supporting
reasons.
14.2.2 An Anti-Doping Organization having a right to appeal a decision received
pursuant to Article 14.2.1 may, within fifteen (15) days of receipt, request a
copy of the full case file pertaining to the decision.
14.3
Public Disclosure
14.3.1 After notice has been provided to the Athlete or other Person in accordance
with the International Standard for Results Management, and to the applicable
Anti-Doping Organizations in accordance with Article 14.1.2, the identity of any
Athlete or other Person who is notified of a potential anti-doping rule violation,
156 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method and the nature of the violation
involved, and whether the Athlete or other Person is subject to a Provisional
Suspension may be Publicly Disclosed by ISSF.
14.3.2 No later than twenty (20) days after it has been determined in an appellate
decision under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2, or such appeal has been waived, or
a hearing in accordance with Article 8 has been waived, or the assertion of
an anti-doping rule violation has not otherwise been timely challenged, or the
matter has been resolved under Article 10.8, or a new period of Ineligibility,
or reprimand, has been imposed under Article 10.14.3, ISSF must Publicly
Disclose the disposition of the anti-doping matter, including the sport, the
anti-doping rule violated, the name of the Athlete or other Person committing
the violation, the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method involved (if any)
and the Consequences imposed. ISSF must also Publicly Disclose within
twenty (20) days the results of appellate decisions concerning anti-doping rule
violations, including the information described above, unless such disclosure
would result in ISSF breaching applicable national laws. In such a case, ISSF
will provide for alternative Public Disclosure process.
14.3.3 After an anti-doping rule violation has been determined to have been
committed in an appellate decision under Article 13.2.1 or 13.2.2 or such
appeal has been waived, or in a hearing in accordance with Article 8 or where
such hearing has been waived, or the assertion of an anti-doping rule violation
has not otherwise been timely challenged, or the matter has been resolved
under Article 10.8, ISSF may make public such determination or decision and
may comment publicly on the matter.
14.3.4 In any case where it is determined, after a hearing or appeal, that the Athlete
or other Person did not commit an anti-doping rule violation, the fact that the
decision has been appealed may be Publicly Disclosed. However, the decision
itself and the underlying facts may not be Publicly Disclosed except with the
consent of the Athlete or other Person who is the subject of the decision. ISSF
shall use reasonable efforts to obtain such consent, and if consent is obtained,
shall Publicly Disclose the decision in its entirety or in such redacted form as
the Athlete or other Person may approve.
14.3.5 Publication shall be accomplished at a minimum by placing the required
information on the ISSF ’s website and leaving the information up for the
longer of one (1) month or the duration of any period of Ineligibility. Publication
shall be removed immediately after the expiry of the period of Ineligibility or
otherwise indicated time period.
14.3.6 Except as provided in Articles 14.3.1 and 14.3.3, no Anti-Doping Organization,
National Federation, or WADA-accredited laboratory, or any official of any such
body, shall publicly comment on the specific facts of any pending case (as
opposed to general description of process and science) except in response
to public comments attributed to, or based on information provided by, the
Athlete, other Person or their entourage or other representatives.
14.3.7 The mandatory Public Disclosure required in Article 14.3.2 shall not be
required where the Athlete or other Person who has been found to have
committed an anti-doping rule violation is a Minor, Protected Person or
Recreational Athlete. Any optional Public Disclosure in a case involving a
Minor, Protected Person or Recreational Athlete shall be proportionate to the
facts and circumstances of the case.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 157
14.4 Statistical Reporting
ISSF shall, at least annually, publish publicly a general statistical report of
its Doping Control activities, with a copy provided to WADA. ISSF may also
publish reports showing the name of each Athlete tested and the date of each
Testing.
14.5
Doping Control Information Database and Monitoring of Compliance
To enable WADA to perform its compliance monitoring role and to ensure the
effective use of resources and sharing of applicable Doping Control information
among Anti-Doping Organizations, ISSF shall report to WADA through ADAMS
Doping Control-related information, including, in particular:
(a) Athlete Biological Passport data for International-Level Athletes and
National-Level Athletes,
(b) W
hereabouts information for Athletes including those in Registered Testing
Pools,
(c) TUE decisions, and
(d) Results Management decisions,
as required under the applicable International Standard(s).
14.5.1 To facilitate coordinated test distribution planning, avoid unnecessary
duplication in Testing by various Anti-Doping Organizations, and to ensure
that Athlete Biological Passport profiles are updated, ISSF shall report all In-
Competition and Out-of-Competition tests to WADA by entering the Doping
Control forms into ADAMS in accordance with the requirements and timelines
contained in the International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
14.5.2 To facilitate WADA’s oversight and appeal rights for TUEs, ISSF shall report all
TUE applications, decisions and supporting documentation using ADAMS in
accordance with the requirements and timelines contained in the International
Standard for Therapeutic Use Exemptions.
14.5.3 To facilitate WADA’s oversight and appeal rights for Results Management,
ISSF shall report the following information into ADAMS in accordance with
the requirements and timelines outlined in the International Standard for
Results Management: (a) notifications of anti-doping rule violations and
related decisions for Adverse Analytical Findings; (b) notifications and related
decisions for other anti-doping rule violations that are not Adverse Analytical
Findings; (c) whereabouts failures; and (d) any decision imposing, lifting or
reinstating a Provisional Suspension.
14.5.4 The information described in this Article will be made accessible, where
appropriate and in accordance with the applicable rules, to the Athlete, the
Athlete’s National Anti-Doping Organization, and any other Anti-Doping
Organizations with Testing authority over the Athlete.
14.6 Data Privacy
14.6.1 ISSF may collect, store, process or disclose personal information relating to
Athletes and other Persons where necessary and appropriate to conduct its
Anti-Doping Activities under the Code, the International Standards (including
specifically the International Standard for the Protection of Privacy and
Personal Information), these Anti-Doping Rules, and in compliance with
applicable law.
158 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
14.6.2 Without limiting the foregoing, ISSF shall:
(a) Only process personal information in accordance with a valid legal ground;
(b) Notify any Participant or Person subject to these Anti-Doping Rules, in a
manner and form that complies with applicable laws and the International
Standard for the Protection of Privacy and Personal Information, that their
personal information may be processed by ISSF and other Persons for the
purpose of the implementation of these Anti-Doping Rules;
(c) Ensure that any third-party agents (including any Delegated Third Party)
with whom ISSF shares the personal information of any Participant or
Person is subject to appropriate technical and contractual controls to
protect the confidentiality and privacy of such information.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 159
expedited process during an Event shall not be binding on ISSF or its National
Federations unless the rules of the Major Event Organization provide the
Athlete or other Person with an opportunity to an appeal under non-expedited
procedures.
15.2 Implementation of Other Decisions by Anti-Doping Organizations
ISSF and its National Federations may decide to implement other anti-doping
decisions rendered by Anti-Doping Organizations not described in Article
15.1.1 above, such as a Provisional Suspension prior to a Provisional Hearing
or acceptance by the Athlete or other Person.
15.3 Implementation of Decisions by Body that is not a Signatory
An anti-doping decision by a body that is not a Signatory to the Code shall
be implemented by ISSF and its National Federations, if ISSF finds that the
decision purports to be within the authority of that body and the anti-doping
rules of that body are otherwise consistent with the Code.
ARTICLE 17 EDUCATION
ISSF shall plan, implement, evaluate and promote Education in line with the requirements
of Article 18.2 of the Code and the International Standard for Education.
160 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
(i) conducting Testing only under the documented authority of ISSF and using
their National Anti-Doping Organization or other Sample collection authority
to collect Samples in compliance with the International Standard for Testing
and Investigations;
(ii) recognizing the authority of the National Anti-Doping Organization in their
country in accordance with Article 5.2.1 of the Code and assisting as
appropriate with the National Anti-Doping Organization’s implementation of
the national Testing Programme for their sport;
(iii) analyzing all Samples collected using a WADA-accredited or WADA-
approved laboratory in accordance with Article 6.1; and
(iv) ensuring that any national level anti-doping rule violation cases discovered
by National Federations are adjudicated by an Operationally Independent
hearing panel in accordance with Article 8.1 and the International Standard
for Results Management.
18.5 All National Federations shall establish rules requiring all Athletes preparing
for or participating in a Competition or activity authorized or organized by
a National Federation or one of its member organizations, and all Athlete
Support Personnel associated with such Athletes, to agree to be bound by
these Anti-Doping Rules and to submit to the Results Management authority
of the Anti-Doping Organization in conformity with the Code as a condition of
such participation.
18.6 All National Federations shall report any information suggesting or relating
to an anti-doping rule violation to ISSF and to their National Anti-Doping
Organizations and shall cooperate with investigations conducted by any Anti-
Doping Organization with authority to conduct the investigation.
18.7 All National Federations shall have disciplinary rules in place to prevent
Athlete Support Personnel who are Using Prohibited Substances or Prohibited
Methods without valid justification from providing support to Athletes under the
authority of ISSF or the National Federation.
18.8 All National Federations shall conduct anti-doping Education in coordination
with their National Anti-Doping Organizations.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 161
constituted a violation of anti-doping rules if Code-compliant rules had been
applicable to them.
162 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
22.2 To disclose to ISSF and their National Anti-Doping Organization any decision
by a non-Signatory finding that they committed an anti-doping rule violation
within the previous ten (10) years.
22.3 To cooperate with Anti-Doping Organizations investigating anti-doping rule
violations.
22.4 Not to Use or Possess any Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method without
valid justification.
22.5 Offensive conduct towards a Doping Control official or other Person involved in
Doping Control by a Person, which does not otherwise constitute Tampering,
may result in a charge of misconduct under ISSF’s Code of Ethics].
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 163
24.5 The comments annotating various provisions of the Code are incorporated
by reference into these Anti-Doping Rules, shall be treated as if set out fully
herein, and shall be used to interpret these Anti-Doping Rules.
24.6 These Anti-Doping Rules shall enter into force on 1 January 2021 (the
“Effective Date”). They repeal ISSF’s Anti-Doping Rules that came into effect
on 1 January 2018.
24.7 These Anti-Doping Rules shall not apply retroactively to matters pending
before the Effective Date. However:
24.7.1 Anti-doping rule violations taking place prior to the Effective Date count as “first
violations” or “second violations” for purposes of determining sanctions under
Article 10 for violations taking place after the Effective Date.
24.7.2 Any anti-doping rule violation case which is pending as of the Effective Date
and any anti-doping rule violation case brought after the Effective Date based
on an anti-doping rule violation which occurred prior to the Effective Date,
shall be governed by the substantive anti-doping rules in effect at the time the
alleged anti-doping rule violation occurred, and not by the substantive anti-
doping rules set out in these Anti-Doping Rules, unless the panel hearing the
case determines the principle of “lex mitior” appropriately applies under the
circumstances of the case.
For these purposes, the retrospective periods in which prior violations can
be considered for purposes of multiple violations under Article 10.9.4 and the
statute of limitations set forth in Article 16 are procedural rules, not substantive
rules, and should be applied retroactively along with all of the other procedural
rules in these Anti-Doping Rules (provided, however, that Article 16 shall
only be applied retroactively if the statute of limitation period has not already
expired by the Effective Date).
24.7.3 Any Article 2.4 whereabouts failure (whether a filing failure or a missed test, as
those terms are defined in the International Standard for Results Management)
prior to the Effective Date shall be carried forward and may be relied upon,
prior to expiry, in accordance with the International Standard for Results
Management, but it shall be deemed to have expired twelve (12) months after
it occurred.
24.7.4 With respect to cases where a final decision finding an anti-doping rule
violation has been rendered prior to the Effective Date, but the Athlete or other
Person is still serving the period of Ineligibility as of the Effective Date, the
Athlete or other Person may apply to ISSF or other Anti-Doping Organization
which had Results Management responsibility for the anti-doping rule violation
to consider a reduction in the period of Ineligibility in light of these Anti-Doping
Rules. Such application must be made before the period of Ineligibility has
expired. The decision rendered may be appealed pursuant to Article 13.2.
These Anti-Doping Rules shall have no application to any case where a final
decision finding an anti-doping rule violation has been rendered and the period
of Ineligibility has expired.
24.7.5 For purposes of assessing the period of Ineligibility for a second violation
under Article 10.9.1, where the sanction for the first violation was determined
based on rules in force prior to the Effective Date, the period of Ineligibility
which would have been assessed for that first violation had these Anti-Doping
Rules been applicable, shall be applied.
24.7.6 Changes to the Prohibited List and Technical Documents relating to
substances on the Prohibited List shall not, unless they specifically provide
164 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
otherwise, be applied retroactively. As an exception, however, when a
Prohibited Substance has been removed from the Prohibited List, an Athlete
or other Person currently serving a period of Ineligibility on account of the
formerly Prohibited Substance may apply to ISSF or other Anti-Doping
Organization which had Results Management responsibility for the anti-doping
rule violation to consider a reduction in the period of Ineligibility in light of the
removal of the substance from the Prohibited List.
APPENDIX 1 DEFINITIONS
ADAMS: The Anti-Doping Administration and Management System is a Web-based
database management tool for data entry, storage, sharing, and reporting designed
to assist stakeholders and WADA in their anti-doping operations in conjunction with
data protection legislation.
Administration: Providing, supplying, supervising, facilitating, or otherwise participating
in the Use or Attempted Use by another Person of a Prohibited Substance or
Prohibited Method. However, this definition shall not include the actions of bona fide
medical personnel involving a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method used for
genuine and legal therapeutic purposes or other acceptable justification and shall
not include actions involving Prohibited Substances which are not prohibited in Out-
of-Competition Testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate that such
Prohibited Substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes
or are intended to enhance sport performance.
Adverse Analytical Finding: A report from a WADA-accredited laboratory or other WADA-
approved laboratory that, consistent with the International Standard for Laboratories,
establishes in a Sample the presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or
Markers or evidence of the Use of a Prohibited Method.
Adverse Passport Finding: A report identified as an Adverse Passport Finding as
described in the applicable International Standards.
Aggravating Circumstances: Circumstances involving, or actions by, an Athlete or other
Person which may justify the imposition of a period of Ineligibility greater than the
standard sanction. Such circumstances and actions shall include, but are not limited
to: the Athlete or other Person Used or Possessed multiple Prohibited Substances
or Prohibited Methods, Used or Possessed a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited
Method on multiple occasions or committed multiple other anti-doping rule violations;
a normal individual would be likely to enjoy the performance-enhancing effects of the
anti-doping rule violation(s) beyond the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility;
the Athlete or Person engaged in deceptive or obstructive conduct to avoid the
detection or adjudication of an anti-doping rule violation; or the Athlete or other
Person engaged in Tampering during Results Management or the hearing process.
For the avoidance of doubt, the examples of circumstances and conduct described
herein are not exclusive and other similar circumstances or conduct may also justify
the imposition of a longer period of Ineligibility.
Anti-Doping Activities: Anti-doping Education and information, test distribution planning,
maintenance of a Registered Testing Pool, managing Athlete Biological Passports,
conducting Testing, organizing analysis of Samples, gathering of intelligence and
conduct of investigations, processing of TUE applications, Results Management,
hearings, monitoring and enforcing compliance with any Consequences imposed,
and all other activities related to anti-doping to be carried out by or on behalf of an
Anti-Doping Organization, as set out in the Code and/or the International Standards.
Anti-Doping Organization: WADA or a Signatory that is responsible for adopting rules
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 165
for initiating, implementing or enforcing any part of the Doping Control process.
This includes, for example, the International Olympic Committee, the International
Paralympic Committee, other Major Event Organizations that conduct Testing at
their Events, International Federations, and National Anti-Doping Organizations.
Athlete: Any Person who competes in sport at the international level (as defined by
each International Federation) or the national level (as defined by each National
Anti-Doping Organization). An Anti-Doping Organization has discretion to apply
anti-doping rules to an Athlete who is neither an International-Level Athlete nor a
National-Level Athlete, and thus to bring them within the definition of “Athlete”. In
relation to Athletes who are neither International-Level nor National-Level Athletes,
an Anti-Doping Organization may elect to: conduct limited Testing or no Testing at
all; analyze Samples for less than the full menu of Prohibited Substances; require
limited or no whereabouts information; or not require advance TUEs. However, if
an Article 2.1, 2.3 or 2.5 anti-doping rule violation is committed by any Athlete over
whom an Anti-Doping Organization has elected to exercise its authority to test and
who competes below the international or national level, then the Consequences set
forth in the Code must be applied. For purposes of Article 2.8 and Article 2.9 and for
purposes of anti-doping information and Education, any Person who participates in
sport under the authority of any Signatory, government, or other sports organization
accepting the Code is an Athlete.
Athlete Biological Passport: The Programme and methods of gathering and collating
data as described in the International Standard for Testing and Investigations and
International Standard for Laboratories.
Athlete Support Personnel: Any coach, trainer, manager, agent, team staff, official,
medical, paramedical personnel, parent or any other Person working with, treating
or assisting an Athlete participating in or preparing for sports competition.
Attempt: Purposely engaging in conduct that constitutes a substantial step in a course
of conduct planned to culminate in the commission of an anti-doping rule violation.
Provided, however, there shall be no anti-doping rule violation based solely on an
Attempt to commit a violation if the Person renounces the Attempt prior to it being
discovered by a third party not involved in the Attempt.
Atypical Finding: A report from a WADA-accredited laboratory or other WADA-approved
laboratory which requires further investigation as provided by the International
Standard for Laboratories or related Technical Documents prior to the determination
of an Adverse Analytical Finding.
Atypical Passport Finding: A report described as an Atypical Passport Finding as
described in the applicable International Standards.
CAS: The Court of Arbitration for Sport.
Code: The World Anti-Doping Code.
Competition: A single race, match, game or singular sport contest. For example, a
basketball game or the finals of the Olympic 100-meter race in athletics.
Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations (“Consequences”): An Athlete’s or other
Person’s violation of an anti-doping rule may result in one or more of the following:
(a) Disqualification means the Athlete’s results in a particular Competition or
Event are invalidated, with all resulting Consequences including forfeiture of any
medals, points and prizes; (b) Ineligibility means the Athlete or other Person is
barred on account of an anti-doping rule violation for a specified period of time
from participating in any Competition or other activity or funding as provided in
Article 10.14; (c) Provisional Suspension means the Athlete or other Person is
166 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
barred temporarily from participating in any Competition or activity prior to the final
decision at a hearing conducted under Article 8; (d) Financial Consequences means
a financial sanction imposed for an anti-doping rule violation or to recover costs
associated with an anti-doping rule violation; and (e) Public Disclosure means the
dissemination or distribution of information to the general public or Persons beyond
those Persons entitled to earlier notification in accordance with Article 14. Teams in
Team Sports may also be subject to Consequences as provided in Article 11.
Contaminated Product: A product that contains a Prohibited Substance that is not
disclosed on the product label or in information available in a reasonable Internet
search.
Decision Limit: The value of the result for a threshold substance in a Sample, above
which an Adverse Analytical Finding shall be reported, as defined in the International
Standard for Laboratories.
Delegated Third Party: Any Person to which ISSF delegates any aspect of Doping Control
or anti-doping Education Programmes including, but not limited to, third parties or
other Anti-Doping Organizations that conduct Sample collection or other Doping
Control services or anti-doping Educational Programmes for ISSF, or individuals
serving as independent contractors who perform Doping Control services for ISSF
(e.g., non-employee Doping Control officers or chaperones). This definition does not
include CAS.
Disqualification: See Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations above.
Doping Control: All steps and processes from test distribution planning through to ultimate
disposition of any appeal and the enforcement of Consequences, including all
steps and processes in between, including but not limited to Testing, investigations,
whereabouts, TUEs, Sample collection and handling, laboratory analysis, Results
Management, hearings and appeals, and investigations or proceedings relating to
violations of Article 10.14 (Status During Ineligibility or Provisional Suspension).
Education: The process of learning to instill values and develop behaviors that foster and
protect the spirit of sport, and to prevent intentional and unintentional doping.
Event: A series of individual Competitions conducted together under one ruling body (e.g.,
the Olympic Games, World Championships of an International Federation, or Pan
American Games).
Nota bene: For the purpose of all shooting sport regulatory documents other than these
Anti-Doping Rules, the word “Event” still means a completed match with or without
Final or Shoot-off, as may be further defined in those ISSF documents.
Event Period: The time between the beginning and end of an Event, as established by the
ruling body of the Event.
Event Venues: Those venues so designated by the ruling body for the Event.
Fault: Fault is any breach of duty or any lack of care appropriate to a particular situation.
Factors to be taken into consideration in assessing an Athlete’s or other Person’s
degree of Fault include, for example, the Athlete’s or other Person’s experience,
whether the Athlete or other Person is a Protected Person, special considerations
such as impairment, the degree of risk that should have been perceived by the
Athlete and the level of care and investigation exercised by the Athlete in relation
to what should have been the perceived level of risk. In assessing the Athlete’s
or other Person’s degree of Fault, the circumstances considered must be specific
and relevant to explain the Athlete’s or other Person’s departure from the expected
standard of behavior. Thus, for example, the fact that an Athlete would lose the
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 167
opportunity to earn large sums of money during a period of Ineligibility, or the fact
that the Athlete only has a short time left in a career, or the timing of the sporting
calendar, would not be relevant factors to be considered in reducing the period of
Ineligibility under Article 10.6.1 or 10.6.2.
Financial Consequences: See Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations above.
In-Competition: The period commencing at 11:59 p.m. on the day before a Competition
in which the Athlete is scheduled to participate through the end of such Competition
and the Sample collection process related to such Competition.
Independent Observer Programme: A team of observers and/or auditors, under the
supervision of WADA, who observe and provide guidance on the Doping Control
process prior to or during certain Events and report on their observations as part of
WADA’s compliance monitoring Programme.
Individual Sport: Any sport that is not a Team Sport.
Ineligibility: See Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations above.
Institutional Independence: Hearing panels on appeal shall be fully independent
institutionally from the Anti-Doping Organization responsible for Results
Management. They must therefore not in any way be administered by, connected or
subject to the Anti-Doping Organization responsible for Results Management.
International Event: An Event or Competition where the International Olympic Committee,
the International Paralympic Committee, an International Federation, a Major Event
Organization, or another international sport organization is the ruling body for the
Event or appoints the technical officials for the Event.
International-Level Athlete: Athletes who compete in sport at the international level, as
defined by each International Federation, consistent with the International Standard
for Testing and Investigations. For shooting sport, International-Level Athletes are
defined as set out in the Scope section of the Introduction to these Anti-Doping
Rules.
International Standard: A standard adopted by WADA in support of the Code. Compliance
with an International Standard (as opposed to another alternative standard, practice
or procedure) shall be sufficient to conclude that the procedures addressed by
the International Standard were performed properly. International Standards shall
include any Technical Documents issued pursuant to the International Standard.
Major Event Organizations: The continental associations of National Olympic Committees
and other international multi-sport organizations that function as the ruling body for
any continental, regional or other International Event.
Marker: A compound, group of compounds or biological variable(s) that indicates the Use
of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
Metabolite: Any substance produced by a biotransformation process.
Minimum Reporting Level: The estimated concentration of a Prohibited Substance or its
Metabolite(s) or Marker(s) in a Sample below which WADA-accredited laboratories
should not report that Sample as an Adverse Analytical Finding.
Minor: A natural Person who has not reached the age of eighteen (18) years.
National Anti-Doping Organization: The entity(ies) designated by each country as
possessing the primary authority and responsibility to adopt and implement anti-
doping rules, direct the collection of Samples, the management of test results, and
168 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
the conduct of hearings at the national level. If this designation has not been made
by the competent public authority(ies), the entity shall be the country’s National
Olympic Committee or its designee.
National Event: A sport Event or Competition involving International- or National-Level
Athletes that is not an International Event.
National Federation: A national or regional entity which is a member of or is recognized by
ISSF as the entity governing ISSF’s sport in that nation or region.
National-Level Athlete: Athletes who compete in sport at the national level, as defined by
each National Anti-Doping Organization, consistent with the International Standard
for Testing and Investigations.
National Olympic Committee: The organization recognized by the International Olympic
Committee. The term National Olympic Committee shall also include the National
Sport Confederation in those countries where the National Sport Confederation
assumes typical National Olympic Committee responsibilities in the anti-doping area.
No Fault or Negligence: The Athlete or other Person’s establishing that he or she did not
know or suspect, and could not reasonably have known or suspected even with
the exercise of utmost caution, that he or she had Used or been administered the
Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method or otherwise violated an anti-doping rule.
Except in the case of a Protected Person or Recreational Athlete, for any violation
of Article 2.1, the Athlete must also establish how the Prohibited Substance entered
the Athlete’s system.
No Significant Fault or Negligence: The Athlete or other Person’s establishing that any
Fault or negligence, when viewed in the totality of the circumstances and taking into
account the criteria for No Fault or Negligence, was not significant in relationship
to the anti-doping rule violation. Except in the case of a Protected Person or
Recreational Athlete, for any violation of Article 2.1, the Athlete must also establish
how the Prohibited Substance entered the Athlete’s system.
Operational Independence: This means that (1) board members, staff members,
commission members, consultants and officials of the Anti-Doping Organization
with responsibility for Results Management or its affiliates (e.g., member federation
or confederation), as well as any Person involved in the investigation and pre-
adjudication of the matter cannot be appointed as members and/or clerks (to the
extent that such clerk is involved in the deliberation process and/or drafting of any
decision) of hearing panels of that Anti-Doping Organization with responsibility for
Results Management and (2) hearing panels shall be in a position to conduct the
hearing and decision-making process without interference from the Anti-Doping
Organization or any third party. The objective is to ensure that members of the
hearing panel or individuals otherwise involved in the decision of the hearing panel,
are not involved in the investigation of, or decisions to proceed with, the case.
Out-of-Competition: Any period which is not In-Competition.
Participant: Any Athlete or Athlete Support Person.
Person: A natural Person or an organization or other entity.
Possession: The actual, physical Possession, or the constructive Possession (which
shall be found only if the Person has exclusive control or intends to exercise control
over the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method or the premises in which a
Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method exists); provided, however, that if the
Person does not have exclusive control over the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited
Method or the premises in which a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method
exists, constructive Possession shall only be found if the Person knew about the
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 169
presence of the Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method and intended to exercise
control over it. Provided, however, there shall be no anti-doping rule violation
based solely on Possession if, prior to receiving notification of any kind that the
Person has committed an anti-doping rule violation, the Person has taken concrete
action demonstrating that the Person never intended to have Possession and has
renounced Possession by explicitly declaring it to an Anti-Doping Organization.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this definition, the purchase (including
by any electronic or other means) of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method
constitutes Possession by the Person who makes the purchase.
Prohibited List: The List identifying the Prohibited Substances and Prohibited Methods.
Prohibited Method: Any method so described on the Prohibited List.
Prohibited Substance: Any substance, or class of substances, so described on the
Prohibited List.
Protected Person: An Athlete or other natural Person who at the time of the anti-doping
rule violation: (i) has not reached the age of sixteen (16) years; (ii) has not reached
the age of eighteen (18) years and is not included in any Registered Testing Pool
and has never competed in any International Event in an open category; or (iii) for
reasons other than age has been determined to lack legal capacity under applicable
national legislation.
Provisional Hearing: For purposes of Article 7.4.3, an expedited abbreviated hearing
occurring prior to a hearing under Article 8 that provides the Athlete with notice and
an opportunity to be heard in either written or oral form.
Provisional Suspension: See Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations above.
Publicly Disclose: See Consequences of Anti-Doping Rule Violations above.
Recreational Athlete: A natural Person who is so defined by the relevant National Anti-
Doping Organization; provided, however, the term shall not include any Person
who, within the five (5) years prior to committing any anti-doping rule violation, has
been an International-Level Athlete (as defined by each International Federation
consistent with the International Standard for Testing and Investigations) or National-
Level Athlete (as defined by each National Anti-Doping Organization consistent
with the International Standard for Testing and Investigations), has represented any
country in an International Event in an open category or has been included within
any Registered Testing Pool or other whereabouts information pool maintained by
any International Federation or National Anti-Doping Organization.
Regional Anti-Doping Organization: A regional entity designated by member countries to
coordinate and manage delegated areas of their national anti-doping Programmes,
which may include the adoption and implementation of anti-doping rules, the
planning and collection of Samples, the management of results, the review of TUEs,
the conduct of hearings, and the conduct of Educational Programmes at a regional
level.
Registered Testing Pool: The pool of highest-priority Athletes established separately
at the international level by International Federations and at the national level by
National Anti-Doping Organizations, who are subject to focused In-Competition and
Out-of-Competition Testing as part of that International Federation’s or National Anti-
Doping Organization’s test distribution plan and therefore are required to provide
whereabouts information as provided in Article 5.5 and the International Standard for
Testing and Investigations.
Results Management: The process encompassing the timeframe between notification
as per Article 5 of the International Standard for Results Management, or in certain
170 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF
cases (e.g., Atypical Finding, Athlete Biological Passport, whereabouts failure), such
pre-notification steps expressly provided for in Article 5 of the International Standard
for Results Management, through the charge until the final resolution of the matter,
including the end of the hearing process at first instance or on appeal (if an appeal
was lodged).
Sample or Specimen: Any biological material collected for the purposes of Doping
Control.
Signatories: Those entities accepting the Code and agreeing to implement the Code, as
provided in Article 23 of the Code.
Specified Method: See Article 4.2.2.
Specified Substance: See Article 4.2.2.
Strict Liability: The rule which provides that under Article 2.1 and Article 2.2, it is not
necessary that intent, Fault, negligence, or knowing Use on the Athlete’s part be
demonstrated by the Anti-Doping Organization in order to establish an anti-doping
rule violation.
Substance of Abuse: See Article 4.2.3.
Substantial Assistance: For purposes of Article 10.7.1, a Person providing Substantial
Assistance must: (1) fully disclose in a signed written statement or recorded
interview all information he or she possesses in relation to anti-doping rule violations
or other proceeding described in Article 10.7.1.1, and (2) fully cooperate with the
investigation and adjudication of any case or matter related to that information,
including, for example, presenting testimony at a hearing if requested to do so by an
Anti-Doping Organization or hearing panel. Further, the information provided must
be credible and must comprise an important part of any case or proceeding which
is initiated or, if no case or proceeding is initiated, must have provided a sufficient
basis on which a case or proceeding could have been brought.
Tampering: Intentional conduct which subverts the Doping Control process, but which
would not otherwise be included in the definition of Prohibited Methods. Tampering
shall include, without limitation, offering or accepting a bribe to perform or fail to
perform an act, preventing the collection of a Sample, affecting or making impossible
the analysis of a Sample, falsifying documents submitted to an Anti-Doping
Organization or TUE committee or hearing panel, procuring false testimony from
witnesses, committing any other fraudulent act upon the Anti-Doping Organization or
hearing body to affect Results Management or the imposition of Consequences, and
any other similar intentional interference or Attempted interference with any aspect
of Doping Control.
Target Testing: Selection of specific Athletes for Testing based on criteria set forth in the
International Standard for Testing and Investigations.
Team Sport: A sport in which the substitution of players is permitted during a Competition.
Technical Document: A document adopted and published by WADA from time to time
containing mandatory technical requirements on specific anti-doping topics as set
forth in an International Standard.
Testing: The parts of the Doping Control process involving test distribution planning,
Sample collection, Sample handling, and Sample transport to the laboratory.
Testing Pool: The tier below the Registered Testing Pool which includes Athletes from
whom some whereabouts information is required in order to locate and Test the
Athlete Out-of-Competition.
EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF 171
Therapeutic Use Exemption (TUE): A Therapeutic Use Exemption allows an Athlete with
a medical condition to use a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method, but only if
the conditions set out in Article 4.4 and the International Standard for Therapeutic
Use Exemptions are met.
Trafficking: Selling, giving, transporting, sending, delivering or distributing (or Possessing
for any such purpose) a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method (either
physically or by any electronic or other means) by an Athlete, Athlete Support
Person or any other Person subject to the authority of an Anti-Doping Organization
to any third party; provided, however, this definition shall not include the actions
of bona fide medical personnel involving a Prohibited Substance used for genuine
and legal therapeutic purposes or other acceptable justification, and shall not
include actions involving Prohibited Substances which are not prohibited in Out-
of-Competition Testing unless the circumstances as a whole demonstrate such
Prohibited Substances are not intended for genuine and legal therapeutic purposes
or are intended to enhance sport performance.
UNESCO Convention: The International Convention against Doping in Sport adopted by
the 33rd session of the UNESCO General Conference on 19 October 2005 including
any and all amendments adopted by the States Parties to the Convention and the
Conference of Parties to the International Convention against Doping in Sport.
Use: The utilization, application, ingestion, injection or consumption by any means
whatsoever of any Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method.
WADA: The World Anti-Doping Agency.
Without Prejudice Agreement: For purposes of Articles 10.7.1.1 and 10.8.2, a written
agreement between an Anti-Doping Organization and an Athlete or other Person
that allows the Athlete or other Person to provide information to the Anti-Doping
Organization in a defined time-limited setting with the understanding that, if an
agreement for Substantial Assistance or a case resolution agreement is not
finalized, the information provided by the Athlete or other Person in this particular
setting may not be used by the Anti-Doping Organization against the Athlete or
other Person in any Results Management proceeding under the Code, and that the
information provided by the Anti-Doping Organization in this particular setting may
not be used by the Athlete or other Person against the Anti-Doping Organization
in any Results Management proceeding under the Code. Such an agreement shall
not preclude the Anti-Doping Organization, Athlete or other Person from using any
information or evidence gathered from any source other than during the specific
time-limited setting described in the agreement.
172 EDITION 2022 (First Print 01/2023) Effective 1 January 2022 © ISSF