Lecture_1
Lecture_1
⎛ dU ⎞ ⎛ ∂S ⎞ ⎛ ∂S ⎞
dQ = dU + dW = dU + PdV ⇒ CV = ⎜ ⎟ dQ = TdS ⇒ C P = T ⎜ ⎟ ; CV = T ⎜ ⎟
⎝ dT ⎠V ⎝ ∂T ⎠ P ⎝ ∂T ⎠V
neglect the volume expansion when reversible system in equilibrium with its environment
solid is heated, dW ~ 0
sum over all T1
∫
Ei
− possible states (i) S (T1 ) = C
dT
Free energy: F = − k BT ln Z Z = ∑e k BT with energies Ei T
0
⎛ ∂S ⎞ ⎛∂ F ⎞ i 2
dF = d (U − TS ) = − SdT − PdV ⇒ CV = T ⎜ ⎟ = −T ⎜⎜ 2 ⎟⎟
⎝ ∂T ⎠V ⎝ ∂T ⎠V
Note lower boundary
On integration
• Powerful method in materials characterization
⎛ dQ ⎞ ⎛ ∂H ⎞
dH = TdS = dQ ⇒ C P = ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟
• Modern time: high level of automatization (PPMS) ⎝ dT ⎠ P ⎝ ∂T ⎠ P
• Notice that what we calculate is CV and what we measure is CP. For isobaric conditions
Coupled equations of motion: See textbook, also Aschroft/Mermin “Solid State Physics”
..
M 1 u1 (na) = − K [u1(na) − u2 (na)] − G[u1(na) − u2 ((n − 1)a )] K +G 1
ω 2 (k ) = ± K 2 + G 2 + 2 KG cos qa
.. M eff M eff
M 2 u 2 (na) = − K [u2(na) − u1 (na )] − G[u 2(na) − u1 ((n − 1)a )]
Optical branch. Atoms vibrate
against each other with their
center of mass fixed
There are N 2π n Long wavelength modes can interact with
q= electromagnetic radiation (oppositely charged
values of q, a N ions can be excited by E of the light wave
N={1…N}:
For each q, there are 2 solutions, Acoustic branch. Atoms and their
total of 2N normal modes - phonons center of mass move together as in
acoustical vibration
ω~ck (sound waves)
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
General Case and Phonon Density of States
If there is s ions per unit cell and N cells, there will be r
3Ns degrees of freedom and 3s normal modes for each q
phonon. The lowest 3 branches are acoustic. Remaining
3(s-1) branches are optical.
Each mode has its own polarization vector:
r
paralel to q - longitudinal mode mixed excitations are
r
perpendicular to q - transverse mode of course possible
dω
Group Velocity: vg =
dK
e
) Mod GaAs
(LA
Frequency, ω
c
s ti
LO LO
ou
8
TO TO
A c
al
i t
ng A )M LA LA
Lo (T 4
stic
u
A co 2 TA
TA
rse
s ve 0
an
0.4 0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
† † 2 †
aψ n = cn ψ n +1 ⇒ ψ n aa ψ n = ψ n +1 c n∗ c n ψ n +1 = cn = c n2 = ψ n aa + 1ψ n = n + 1 → cn = n +1
†
aψ n = n +1ψ n +1
† 2
aψ n = dn ψ n −1 ⇒ ψ n aa ψ n =n= ψ n −1 d n∗ d n ψ n −1 = dn = dn ⇒ dn = n
aψ n = nψ n −1
( − ip + m ω x )( ip + m ω x ) 1 ⎛ p2 mω 2x2 mωh ⎞
†
aa =
2mωh
=
1
2mωh
2 2
[
p + ( m ω x ) + im ω ( xp − px ) = ⎜
ω h ⎜⎝ 2 m
+
2
−
2m
] ⎟⎟
⎠
⎛ † 1⎞ ⎛ † 1⎞
H = h ω ⎜ aa + ⎟ = h ω ⎜ aa − ⎟
⎝ 2⎠ ⎝ 2⎠ energy of linear harmonic oscillator
of frequency ω is quantized in ħω
Average energy:
<n> = average quantum number for oscillator = [exp(βħω)-1]-1 (Bose-Einstein distribution)
∞ ∞
⎛ 1⎞
∑ ⎜ n + ⎟hω e
⎝ 2 ⎠
− β nhω
hω ∑ nhω e − β nhω
hω ∂ ⎛ ∞ ⎞ hω ∂ 1 hω hω ⎛ 1⎞
E (T ) = n
= + n
= − ln ⎜ ∑ e − β n h ω ⎟ = − ln − β hω
= + − β hω
= ⎜ n + ⎟hω
∞
2 ∞
2 ∂β ⎝ n ⎠ 2 ∂β 1− e 2 1− e ⎝ 2⎠
∑e
n
− β nhω
∑e
n
− β nhω
C V = 3 R (Θ E / T )2 e − ( Θ E /T )
Enter discrete nature of the solid: total number of vibrational modes is normalized to 3NA
V 4 dN 4π V 2
N = π q 3 ⇒ ρ (ω ) = = ω
8π 3
3 dω c3
12 π V 12 π V 9N A
Real solid, elastic waves for each q have ρ (ω ) = ω2 Total number of oscillators ω 2dω = ω 2dω
longitudinal component and 2 transverse: c
3
in interval ω, ω+dω: c
3
ω 3
D
ωD ωD 3 Θ /T
⎛ ∂U ⎞ ∂ 1 ⎛ hω ⎞ e hω / k BT 9N ⎛ T ⎞ D
x 4 e x dx
CV =⎜ ⎟ = ∫ ρ (ω )( n + )h ω d ω = ∫0 B ⎜⎝ k B T ⎟⎠ ( e h ω / k B T − 1) 2 ω D3 A ω d ω = 9 R ⎜⎜⎝ Θ D
k ⎜ ⎟ 2
⎟⎟ ∫ (e
⎝ ∂T ⎠V ∂T 0
2 ⎠ 0
x
−1 )
2
High temperatures: T>>ΘD we replace exponential with Low temperatures T<<ΘD , upper limit of integral is ∞ and we get
series function and obtain Dulong Petit result
3
⎡ 1 ⎛ΘD ⎞
2
⎤ 12 4 ⎛ T ⎞ N 234 R
CV = 3 R ⎢1 − ⎜ ⎟ + ... ⎥ CV = π R ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = β T 3 = 234 R θ −D3T 3 θ D ( N atoms) = 3
⎣⎢ 20 ⎝ T ⎠ ⎦⎥ 5 ⎝ ΘD ⎠ β
Usually good for T < (ΘD/10 - ΘD/50). For T > Debuye region:
ρ (ω ) = α 1ω 2 + α 2 ω 4 + α 3ω 6 + ... ⇒ C V = β 1T 3 + β 2 T 5 + β 3T 7 + ....
Physical significance: Debuye temperature is a measure of the stiffnes of the crystal: above ΘD all modes are getting
excited, and below ΘD modes begin to be “frozen out”, marking rapid reduction in CV with decreasing temperature.
Cp/T (J/mol.K2)
At T > θD the model is not valid. 0.3
Optical phonon mode contribution
is not negligible. Thermal
expansion may not be negligible 0.2
Debye temperatures of solids:
0.1
2 2
T (K )
0.0
0 100 200 300 400 500
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Specific Heat Dominated by ~ T3 Phonon Contribution
10 7
C = 3 ηkB = 4.7 ×10 6 J
m3 −K
6
10
Diamond
3
5
Specific Heat, C (J/m -K)
10
Each atom has
a thermal energy
10 4
of 3kBT
C ∝ T3
10 3 Classical
Regime
2
10
θ D = 1860 K
10 1 1
10 10 2 10 3 10 4
Temperature, T (K)
At T<TF, fraction of electrons with ε~kBT is of the order of T/TF, contributing to U ~ NA(T/TF)kBT and to C ~ 2RT/TF
Since TF ~ (104 – 105)K → Ce ~ 10-2R which is ~ 1% of lattice contribution (think Dulong Petit).
∞ ∞
Internal energy of a system of N electrons is: U = ∫ εf (ε )n(ε )dε where N = ∫ f (ε )n(ε )dε
0 0
Total density of states for both spin directions is n(ε), so that n(ε)dε is the number of energy levels in interval ε, ε+dε
∞
∂N ∂f
At very low temperatures T<<TF, we can write 0 = ε F = ∫εF n(ε )dε
∂T 0 ∂T
Nonzero only in the vicinity of εF.
∞ ∞ ∞
⎛ ∂U ⎞ ∂ ∂f x 2 e x dx
CV = ⎜ ⎟ = ∫ εf (ε )n(ε )dε = n(ε F ) ∫ (ε − ε F ) dε = k BT ∫ x
2 For x0 = -∞
~ π2/3
⎝ ∂T ⎠V ∂T 0 0
∂T x0
(e + 1) 2
3π ⎝ h ⎠ dε 2π 2 ⎝h ⎠
1/ 3
m ⎛⎜ 3 zN AV m ⎞⎟
2
Where z=N/NA is the conduction electron/atom
Density of states at εF: n(ε F ) = 2
πh ⎜⎝ π ⎟
⎠
ratio and Vm is the molar volume
2/3
π2 m 1 / 3 ⎛ πVm ⎞
Ce = n(ε F ) k T = γ 0T ⇒ γ 0 = 2 ( zN A ) ⎜
2
⎟ kB
2
Ce/T in free electron model
3 B
h ⎝ 3 ⎠
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Thermal Relaxation Calorimetry 1
Sample of unknown heat capacity Cx is attached to
Based on a measurement of thermal response
a sample platform with a thermal grease (e.g.,
of a sample calorimeter assembly to a change
apiezone N grease).
in heating conditins.
The platform consists of a thin sapphire or silicon
disc, which has high thermal conductivity. A thin-
film heater is evaporated onto the bottom of the
platform, and the platform temperature Tp is
determined from a bare temperature sensor attached
to it.
Tp (t ) = T0 + ΔTe −t /τ ;τ = (Ca + C x ) / K1
For small ΔT (ΔT/T << 1), we can ignore T dependence of Ca, Cx and K1 and get Cx via τ
In this method (using single τ) a steady state at constant P and Tp > T0 followed by relaxation
to T0 can be used to determine both K1 and Cx. K1 is determined by measuring the temperature
change ΔT that results when power P is applied. , Addenda heat capacity Ca can be determined
from a decay measurement with no sample attached to the platform.
Cryogenics 43, 369 (2003) Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Thermal Relaxation Calorimetry: Double τ
This method is applied when K2 >> K1 due to poor sample - platform thermal link. Therefore
Tx ≠ Tp. Thermal decay of Tp is described using two exponentials:
Tp (t ) = T0 + Ae − t /τ1 + Be − t /τ 2
Time constant τ2 is usually much shorter than the other. Thus, there are two relaxation times:
1. Shorter relaxation process (τ2) between the sample and platform
2. Longer gradual process (τ1) due to thermal relaxation between the platform/sample and the
heat-sink temperature bath.
By measuring decay curves it is possible to determine τ1, τ2, K2, and Cx given known values for
Ca and K1. Series of decays cycles (10–100) can be averaged at each temperature to obtain data
scatter of less than 1%.
sample grease
vacuum
platform
T base
T base
(3x3 mm)
wires
heater thermometer
We choose heat ⎧P (0 ≤ t ≤ t 0 )
P(t ) = ⎨ 0
pulse as: ⎩0 (t > t0 )
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Quantum Design Two τ Method
34.00
33.86
33.71
33.57
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
We obtain T(t): T (t ) = ⎨
( )
⎧Ton (t ) = P0τ 1 − e−t /τ / Ctotal + Tb (0 ≤ t ≤ t0 ) Where:
(
⎩Toff (t ) = P0τ 1 − e )
−t0 /τ −(t −t0 ) /τ
e / Ctotal + Tb (t > t0 ) τ = Ctotal / Kw
In the real case of non-ideal coupling, more unknowns are fitted at the same time. The
process is more extensive numerically. We fit only to the expression for Tp since the
thermometer in the system is on the platform, no thermometer is attached to the sample
and we assume T(sample) = T (platform) = T(wires).
⎪ ∑
exp⎜⎜
k T
⎟⎟
⎜ ∑ exp⎜⎜
k T
⎟⎟ ⎟ ⎪
⎪
i =0
⎩ i =0 ⎝ B ⎠ ⎝ i = 0 ⎝ B ⎠ ⎠ ⎭ TΔ=Δ/kB
Now reduce this to a two level system with energies ε0=0 and ε1=Δ Level
with degeneracies g0 and g1: separation
2 in K
N A g1Δe − ( Δ / k BT )
dU g0 ⎛ Δ ⎞ e ( Δ / k BT )
U= ⇒ Cschottky = = R ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
g 0 + g1e −( Δ / k BT ) dT [
g1 ⎝ k BT ⎠ 1 + ( g 0 / g1 )e ( Δ / k BT ) ]
2
In everyday life presents a problem since separation of other contributions is non - trivial
Nuclear Schottky anomaly – when interaction removes degeneracies of nuclear levels – could be
produced by external magnetic field, by hyperfine magnetic field from conduction electrons or by
CEF gradients. Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Schottky Anomaly Example
Given the Hund’s rule, groundstate multiplet J we would expect Rln(2J + 1) entropy
associated with the magnetic state. This is what we find for Gd: (S = 7/2, L = 0 and J = 7/2)
therefore S ~ R ln(8). For other rare earths the spin-orbit coupling gives rise to crystalline
electric field (CEF) splitting.
Δ = 18 K
This can be seen in the Cp as a
Schottky anomaly. This is
clearly shown at the right in
PrAgSb2. CP is modeled as a
two level system.
Think of Schottky for two single level system with energy configurations ±ε:
2
⎛T ⎞ ⎛T ⎞
Cschottky = k B ⎜ Δ ⎟ sec h 2 ⎜ Δ ⎟
⎝T ⎠ ⎝T ⎠
Specific heat of disordered two level system has linear T contribution to heat capacity:
π2
CV = P0 k B2T
6
Cp = aT + bT3
Clean separation of a and b is usually done by plotting C/T versus T2.
As we have seen a is proportional to N(EF) and b is proportional to the Debye temperature.
60
50
β
Cp/T (mJ/mol.K2)
40
LuNiAl Electronic specific heat coefficient γ can
30 be estimated from the low-temperature
Au specific-heat data, where the lattice part
20
reduces to ~T3 dependence.
10 Cu
γ In real metals, the γ value is often different
0 from that obtained by free electron model.
0 20 40 60 80 100
2 2
2 T (K ) We can introduce an effective mass m* to
Cp / T = γ + βT account for this difference, since n(EF) is
γ (mJmol-1K-2): proportional to the carrier mass me.
Li Na K Fe Mn Cu Zn Ag Au Al Ga m * γexp
Free e 0.8 1.1 1.7 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 =
me γf.e.
exp. 1.6 1.4 2.1 4.6 15.2 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 1.3 0.6
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Heavy Fermions
The electronic specific heat can be used as a measure of the electron effective mass, based on
the free electron result of:
γ = kB2T ·(mkF/3ħ2)
2.5
8
2.0
HoNiAl
UO2
6
Cp/T (J/mol.K2)
Cp /T (J/mol.K )
2
1.5
4
1.0
2
0.5 T2
T1
0 0.0
20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 0 4 8 12 16 20
T (K) T (K)
Not ideal δ function but sharp anomaly. TC can be determined e.g. by idealization of the
Clear identification of TC. specific heat jump under the constraint of entropy
⎛ ∂S ⎞ conservation. Circles are real experimental points,
Think that C P = T ⎜ ⎟
⎝ ∂T ⎠ P red line is the idealization drawn in the way that
So if S has discontinuity, Cp will have sharper the yellow and green areas are equal to satisfy the
(like ∂ρ/∂T at magnetic transition) entropy conservation.
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Specific Heat and Critical Region
Basic scaling in the critical region (near
critical temperature that corresponds to
order – disorder transition):
−α −α '
C p,V ≈ t for T > TC and C p,V ≈ t T < TC
T − Tc
α is the critical exponent and t= )
Tc
Magnetic specific heat in Heisenberg
magnetic systems scales with α = α’ ≈
0.01 (Fe, Ni, EuO…)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 137002 (2002) Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Specific Heat of Spin Waves 1
For T > 0 thermal excitations create spin waves in magnetically ordered materials that propagate due to
Gyromagnetic ratio
exchange coupling between neighboring spins. Heisenberg hamiltonian:
rr Sum over all spins i and all j of their NN’s
H = −2J ∑ Si S j
ˆ Each spin has associated magnetic moment
r r
i, j μl = γhSl
Consider spin oscillations along linear ferromagnet. Ground state: all spins are aligned along z with excitation:
r r r 2J r r r rr Effective magnetic
− 2JSl (Sl −1 + Sl +1 ) = − μl (Sl −1 + Sl +1 ) = −μl Be (exchange) field
γh r r
r d (hS ) r r dSl 2J r r r
Exchange field Be will induce a torque on spin Sl : l
= γhSl × Be ⇒ = Sl × (Sl −1 + Sl +1 )
dt dt h
With approximation of small spin deviation (good at low T) : Slz ≈ S , Slx , Sly << S
d (Slx ) 2JS d (Sly ) 2JS dSlz
= (2Sl − Sl −1 − Sl +1 ),
y y y
=− (2Sl − Sl −1 − Sl +1 ),
x x x
=0
dt h dt h dt
We look for wave solutions (a = lattice parameter): Slx = ξ xei (ωt +lqa) , Sly = ξ y ei (ωt +lqa)
4JS
And get new sets of equations: − iωξx + (1− cosqa)ξ y = 0, 4JS (1− cosqa)ξx + iωξy = 0
h h
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Specific Heat of Spin Waves 2
CM = ⎜ ⎟ = ca N AkB ⎜ B ⎟
In insulators: In metals: ⎝ dT ⎠V ⎝ 2J ' S ⎠
(see Rev. Mod. Phys. 30, 1 (1950))
CP = βT + δT
3 3/ 2
CP = γT + βT + δT
3 3/ 2
Hard to resolve lattice vs magnons,
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques in metallic AFM linear term as well
Entropy Associated with Magnetic Order
For these local moment
systems S ~ R ln D
S = ∫(Cp/T)dT
We can determine how much entropy (change) is
associated with a given state. For magnetic systems we
need to use the magnetic Cp. In practice, this is done by
subtracting off the Cp(T) data from a non-magnetic
analogue (e.g. LuAgGe from TmAgGe).
Attraction of electron pairs by virtual phonon exchange, leading to T – dependent gap 2Δ at the
Fermi level. At T = 0: 2Δ(0)=3.52kBTC
Other complications may involve : strong coupling, gap anisotropy, presence of two distinct
energy scales (two gaps).
Spin fluctuations (critically – damped spin waves) in nearly ferromagnetic systems when
exchange interaction is not strong enough to produce ordered state, for T << Tsf:
3
⎛T ⎞ ⎛T ⎞
Ce = γT + α ⎜ ⎟ ln⎜ ⎟ (Phys. Rev. Lett 17, 750 (1966))
⎜T ⎟ ⎜T ⎟
⎝ sf ⎠ ⎝ sf ⎠
ΔC
γTC
(
= 1.426 1 − 4 a 2 )
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques Phys. Rev. B 75, 064517 (2007)
Superconducting and Magnetic Entropy
Nd1-xCexCoIn5
4 1.2
TN(C) TN(χ) TCOH (ρ)
x=1 TC(ρ) TC(C) TM (C)
1.0
x = 0.9
0.8 x = 0.7
SMAG (Rln2)
x = 0.6 10 10
3
0.6 x = 0.4 HEAVY FERMION
x = 0.2
0.4
T (K)
X=
x=0
[C-Clatt]/T (J/mol K )
2
0.2
LMM
0.0 1 1
2 0 2 4 6 8 10
T(K)
MAGNETIC ORDER SUPER
CONDUCTOR
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
1 X
⎛ dQ ⎞ ⎛ ∂H ⎞
At T = 0 CP = CV (entropy S = 0): C P = ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟
⎝ dT ⎠P ⎝ ∂T ⎠P
At T ≠ 0 CP is always greater than CV (heating with P = const for dT cost energy to do
work expanding against external pressure; if V = const, there is no work done):
β 2VmT
General relation between CP and CV at T ≠ 0 is C p − CV =
B
β (volumetric expansion) 1 ⎛ ∂V ⎞
1 ⎛ ∂L 3
⎞ 3 ⎛ ∂L ⎞ α (linear expansion) B=− ⎜ ⎟
β = 3 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ = 3α Vm (molar volume) V ⎝ ∂P ⎠T
L ⎝ ∂T ⎠P L ⎝ ∂T ⎠P B (isothermal compressibility)
Cu
1 ⎛ ∂V ⎞
βT = ⎜ ⎟
V ⎝ ∂T ⎠ P
1 ⎛ ∂V ⎞ ⎛ ∂P ⎞ 1 ⎛ ∂P ⎞ ⎛ ∂S ⎞ ⎛ ∂U ⎞ ⎛ 1⎞ hω hω
βT = − ⎜ ⎟ ⎜ ⎟ = ⎜ ⎟ T⎜ ⎟ =⎜ ⎟ P = −⎛⎜ ∂F ⎞⎟ U = ⎜ n + ⎟hω + U eq = +
V ⎝ ∂P ⎠T ⎝ ∂T ⎠V B ⎝ ∂T ⎠V ⎝ ∂T ⎠V ⎝ ∂T ⎠V ⎝ ∂V ⎠T ⎝ 2⎠ 2 1 − e − β hω
this
Harmonic = 0 We get γs,q ~ 2 γ s ,q = ∂ (ln ωs (q))
∂ ⎡ 1 ⎤ ⎡ ∂ (hωs (q ) ) ⎤ 1 ⎡ ∂ ⎤ ∂ r ∂ (ln V )
P=− ⎢ eq ∑
U + h ω s ( q ) ⎥ + ∑ ⎢− β hωs ( q ) ⎥ ⇒ β T = ∑ ⎢ − h ω s ( q ) ⎥ n s ( q )
∂V ⎣ q,s 2 ⎦ q , s ⎣ ∂V (e − 1) ⎦ B q , s ⎣ ∂V ⎦ ∂T
∂ r
CV = ∑ hω s (q ) ns ( q ) γCV
s ,q ∂T
Grüneisen
βT =
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques BV
Thermal Expansion by Capacitive Dilatometry 1
Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 123907 (2006)
In a capacitive dilatometer the dilation L of a sample of length L manifests as a change in the
gap D between a pair of capacitor plates. For an ideal parallel-plate capacitive dilatometer in
vacuum the relationship between the measured capacitance C and D is
[ L(T ) − L(0)]
ε 0 A ε = 8.854·1019 pF/m Thermal expansivity ε =
L(0)
C= 0
Commercial capacitance bridges have ~ 10-7 pF resolution at 1kHz → 3·10-3Å for dilatometer
operation at 18 pF.
Part of calibration processs is to find an appropriate functional relationship between the
capacitor gap D and the measured capacitance C. This is done using a sample platform e long
enough to adjust the capacitor gap from its largest zero-force to its smallest shorted value.
A protractor (with an appropriately sized hole in its center)
is attached to the main flange o. The dilatometer is inverted
and the sample platform e is then rotated and tightened in
small steps; after each step the angular position of the sample
platform (read off the protractor) and the capacitance C
are measured. The capacitor gap is: Angle of dilatometer shorting
1 c
D = c1 (θ m − θ ) ⇒ = 1 (θ m − θ )
C ε0 A
Thread pitch, # threads/mm → #μm/mm
Distance from straight to tilted plate
ε 0 A ⎛⎜ ⎛ C ⎞
2
Deviation from linear behavior ⎞ ⎟ C when they short
since plates are not perfectly D= 1 + ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟
c1 ⎜ C ⎟
parallel. Can be estimated as: ⎝ ⎝ max ⎠ ⎠
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Thermal Expansion by Capacitive Dilatometry 3
Rev. Sci. Instr. 77, 123907 (2006)
α=
1 dL 1 d
= [Dc − Ds ] + α Cu ⎡⎢1 + Ds − Dc ⎤⎥ When the reference Cu or Sample are mounted
L dT L dT ⎣ L ⎦
For long samples with thermal expansion close to Cu [Ds-Dc]/L ≈ 0, therefore (since dL = -dD):
Cell effect, measurement with Cu standard installed
1 dL 1 ⎛ dL ⎞ 1 ⎛ dL ⎞
α= = ⎜ ⎟ − ⎜ ⎟ + α Cu
L dT L ⎝ dT ⎠ cell + sample L ⎝ dT ⎠ cell +Cu Resolution ~ 0.03 – 0.11Å
Depends on cryogenic
⎛ dD ⎞ 1 ⎡ Di +1 − Di Di − Di −1 ⎤ system used and cell
Derivatives are evaluated as: ⎜ ⎟ = ⎢ + ⎥
⎝ dT ⎠i 2 ⎣ Ti +1 − Ti Ti − Ti −1 ⎦
Dilatometer is surrounded by Cu can to provide electrical and thermal insulation.
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Thermal Expansion by Diffraction
Based on the measurement of unit cell by X-ray, neutron methods (will be discussed later in the course).
20
50
-6
15
α(1/K)*10
40
30 c-axis
10 b-axis
a-axis
20
-6
α (1/K)*10
5 10
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
T(K)
0
0 100 200 300 400 500
T(K)
High resolution data are required. Resolution comparable or smaller
than for capacitive dilatometry. Advantage: bond length, angles, atomic
Phys. Rev. B 72, 045103 (2005)
position information is available
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques
Thermal Expansion in CeCoIn5
Introduction to thermal and transport techniques Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 136401 (2008)