CHARAN SALWAN, CIVIL JUDGE, sh. RAJU KUMAR VERSUS pinnst KUMAR & ANK sation u/o | rule 14 Lion 151 CPC 1. Appl read with sec on, behalf of supporting affidavit. tho plaintiff along with h documents “hist of documen alongwi ZList of oe ongwith documents _____—. pelpi to peta. ae Through Qe VANDNA RUNELLA Advocate ogf£-1972 , Street No.3 Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31IN THE COURT OF Ms, CHARAN SALWAN, CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZART COURTS, DELHI CIVIL 'SUIT NO....../2022 IN THE MATTER OF:- SH.RAJU KUMAR PLALNGT VERSUS DINESH KUMAR & ANR sone] E EEN DANES APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF THE APPLICANT/PLAINTIFF UNDER ORDER 7 RULE 14 READ WITH SECTION 151_CPC FOR FILING DOCUMENTS RELATED TO OWNERSHIP OF LT SOMWATI DEVI Six/Madam, fully submits as under Most respe 1. Thal the above noted case iS pending adjudication before this Hon’ble court and is fixed for ZAlorl2e2S. .. 2. Thal the plaintiff wants lo. fide on record the the documents showing the ownership right of hate Somwati Devi in the suit property3. That the above mentioned document j not j 8 n Possession or traceable at tho timo of Filing Une present petition or at the Lime of Siding replication or evidence of the plaintiff, aid document is in 4. That now at this stage, Lhe ion of the plaintif£ and the samo is posse very necessary for proper adjudication of the above said case as the whole case is based on the ownership right. of hate Somwati Devi in the endant has not suit property. The de intentionally filed any document of ownership Somwati Devi in the present cas right of Dt The plaintiff is Co-sharer in the property of Late. Somwati as one of ber legal hair so the above said document is very necessary. 5. That the non filing of the above said document entional ther ‘py the plaintiff in time is ne nor deliberate but due lo the above said— bonafid i reas 7 ason so he has filed the present application, 6. That : hat the plaintiff will suffer irreparable loss ated in any and injury which cannot be- compens manner iff Lhe application of the plaintiff may not be allowed. Praye: It is therefore most respectfully prayed that the Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to allow the application of the plaintiff and the above \ mentioned document may kindly be taken on record, interest of justice. in the Delhi Aihe Dated: ain, Through VANDNA RUBELLA Advocate Off-1972, Street No.3 Kailash Nagar, Delhi-31ne IN THE co URT OF MS. CHARAN SALWAN, CIVIL JUDGE, TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI CIVIL SUIT No...../2022 IN THE MATTER OF:- SH. RAJU KUMAR sowBLBINTIFF VERSUS DINESH KUMAR & ANR vw: DEFENDANT AFFIDAVIT I, Sh, Raju Kumar,.’S/o Sh. pinesh Kumar, R/O sant Nagar, Burariy HeNe: (2y.GaliNa: 2%, - H.No.14, Gali No.29, A-Block, Noxth Delhi-110084 present Ate. pcmack Sank Nagar » Sve do hereb: Noe Oelliw- 110 084 \ in y solemnly affirm and declare as unde hat the deponent is the Plaintiff in the Wn fully conversant with apove noted petition and I am the facts of the case and competent to swear this affidavit. ag. That all application order 7 rule 14 read wi cpe has been cre exyotion and the contents of the wed Herein for the sake of brevity and nave peen read over and explained to me in content ‘of my accompanying th section 151 grafted by my counsel .under my same has not peen reP 2023 “py So sett ie fy. eth igh Court Amp By iar07/2023 se Jay, 1018 03/2028 “erent court, DOA Pt iG in ° vernacular and are true and correct to my knowledge and belief. 7 We : DEPONENT Verification: Bast 0s Verified at Delhi‘on this... day of January, 2025 that the contents of my above affidavit are true and correct to my knowledge, no part of it is false and nothing material has been concealed therefrom. a Sp IAN OS