Lecture 4 - How to write an introduction
Lecture 4 - How to write an introduction
Currently,
the control of water resources
has emerged as potential cause of international friction.
Since 2008
electric vehicles
have become a serious commercial proposition.
The introduction should be written with these steps, moving from the known
information (in the literature) to the unknown one (knowledge gap).
The three “C” (Citation + Critique + Constructive) should be applied in the whole
writing process.
Citation should be given to all important statement and data. Try to avoid sources
from predatory journals and non peer-reviewed journals (very popular mistakes in
VN). Use sources within 5 years, exceptional 10 years.
Critique is used when you try to establishing a niche. However, critique should be
polite – never say other researcher’s result are completely wrong. Never use the
tone of lecturing or moralizing in the introduction. All the critique should be in
a constructive manor.
The introduction should not be too long. Being written too long would make the
readers think you are too talkative, but being too short would make them think you
are lacking of ideas or just too lazy.
Very often the experience writers would write the introduction after the Result and
Discussion (they write later, although they have read and form it in their heads
before)
(b) It is useful to remind the reader of the wider context of your work. This may
also show the value of the study you have carried out:
Learning is one of the most vital components of the contemporary knowledge-based
economy. With the development of computing power and technology the internet has
become an essential medium for knowledge transfer.
(c) While a longer article may have a separate literature review, in a shorter
essay it is still important to show familiarity with researchers who have studied
this topic previously. This may also reveal a gap in research that justifies your
work:
Various researchers (Webb and Kirstin, 2003; Honig et al., 2006) have evaluated e-
learning in a healthcare and business context, but little attention so far has been
paid to the reactions of students in higher education to this method of teaching.
(e) The method demonstrates the process that you undertook to achieve the aim given
before:
A range of studies was first reviewed, and then a survey of 200 students from a
variety of disciplines was conducted to assess their experience of e-learning.
(f) You cannot deal with every aspect of this topic in an essay, so you must make
clear the boundaries of your study:
Clearly a study of this type is inevitably restricted by various constraints,
notably the size of the student sample, and this was limited to students of
Pharmacy and Agriculture.
(g) Understanding the structure of your work will help the reader to follow your
argument:
The paper is structured as follows. The first section presents an analysis of the
relevant research, focusing on the current limited knowledge regarding the student
experience. The second part . . .
Practice#Opening sentences
You have to write an essay with the title
‘Can everyone benefit from higher education?’
Use the notes below to write the introduction in about 150 words
Definition: Higher education (HE) = university education
Background: Increasing demand for HE worldwide puts pressure on national budgets >
many states seek to shift costs to students. In most countries degree = key to
better jobs and opportunities
Purpose: To decide if access to HE should be restricted or open to all, given costs
involved
Method/Outline: Discussion of following points: HE is expensive, so who will pay?
Increasing numbers = lower quality Is it fair for all taxpayers to support students
who will earn high salaries? How to keep HE open to clever students from poor
backgrounds?
Limitations: The use of your own country as an example
What is normally found in an essay introduction? Choose from the list below.
Practice
(b) Read the extracts below from introductions to articles and decide which of the
functions listed above (i – viii) they are examples of.
(m) In the past 20 years the ability of juries to assess complex or lengthy cases
has been widely debated.
(n) The rest of the paper is organised as follows. The second section explains why
corporate governance is important for economic prosperity. The third section
presents the model specification and describes the data and variables used in our
empirical analysis. The fourth section reports and discusses the empirical results.
The fifth section concludes.
(l) The purpose of this paper is to investigate changes in the incidence of extreme
warm and cold temperatures over the globe since 1870.
(o) There is no clear empirical evidence sustaining a ‘managerial myopia’ argument.
Pugh et al. (1992) find evidence that supports such theory, but Meulbrook et al.
(1990), Mahoney et al. (1997), Garvey and Hanka (1999) and a study by the Office of
the Chief Economist of the Securities and Exchange Commission (1985) find no
evidence.
(u) ‘Social cohesion’ is usually defined in reference to common aims and
objectives, social order, social solidarity and the sense of place attachment.
(p) This study will focus on mergers in the media business between 1990 and 2005,
since with more recent examples an accurate assessment of the consequences cannot
yet be made
Practice
Which are essential and which are optional?
There is no standard pattern for an introduction, since much depends on the type of
research you are conducting and the length of your work, but a common framework is:
A
Definition of key terms, if needed.
Essential / optional?
B
Relevant background information
C
Review of work by other writers on the topic
D
Purpose or aim of the paper
E
Your methods and the results you found.
F
Any limitations you imposed
G
The organisation of your work