The theory of evolution...

an
illusion and lies that have become
entrenched in people's minds.

This book is free and is not subject to any copyright or intellectual property
rights.

Please, if possible, distribute it widely, send it to biology colleges and institutes around the world, and place copies in
libraries...

Mohamed Ababou
 There is no doubt that it is true and cannot be refuted or even
criticized when the person has a sound mind and thinks well
(she/he) will certainly be realized that the universe was created and
that all kinds of beings were designed by a great Creator.
However, on the other hand, we find failed claims and even
ambitions that persist, using a tendency of selfishness, narcissism,
and confronting the facts. These are, of course, the sayings of
evolutionists who deny the real life that creatures have followed
since their first existence on Earth. There are also other atheists
who deny the existence of God while believing in the myth of
chance.
Lucy, the common ancestor, Neanderthals, Archaeopteryx, Piltdown
Man, the missing link...these are all terms invented by evolutionists to try
to create an ideology that serves their personal, political, and financial
interests. But all the deception they practiced faded and did not last.
Rather, science is the one that won.
Transitional fossils are a term coined by evolutionists to promote
Darwinian ideology. However, in reality, no paleontologist has ever
obtained a fossil that justifies a link between a current organism and a
common ancestor. On the contrary, all fossils are living fossils that refute
evolution.
If you obtain a fossil that justifies evolution, it means you will
receive $1000 000 000 ...it's just a fossil, and you will become the
richest person in the world.
Charles Dawson committed a hoax, and if real scientists had not realized
that it was merely a forgery, it would have been one of the greatest
pieces of evidence that evolutionists rely on and use to debate scientific
facts...and real scientists in the current era are still exposing many of the
tricks of evolutionists. You, evolutionists, cannot escape the grip of
science.
« In 1953, advanced analytical and dating techniques proved
Piltdown Man to be a fake. The mandible was stained with
potassium bichromate and the teeth had been filed down. Fluorine
testing proved that the pieces of the skull were of different ages.
This was confirmed in 1959 by carbon dating, which provided a date
of about 600 years for the skull! » By Fran Dorey

There are frauds committed by evolutionists, which is burying fossils

carved by an artist and then claiming to excavate them so that people
will find them and believe in evolution.

I advise all those who want to spread the truth that evolution is just an
illusion and a myth to send emails or faxes to various institutes and
colleges of evolutionary biology around the world with a message that
reads as follows:

" Are you sure that evolution has fossils and scientific evidence, or do
you practice the belief in evolution only based on false teachings and
propaganda that are ingrained in your mind?

If the answer is yes, please show me any authentic fossil evidence or

creatures that have evolved, and I am ready to say yes to evolution.
Darwin and his sect were truly right."

When Richard Dawkins criticized Harun Yahya's book Atlas of Creation,

he thought he would be able to eliminate Harun Yahya's book. However,
the truth has proven that even evolutionists have begun to doubt
evolution and said that it is time to say goodbye to Darwin... The book
Atlas of Creation is evidence and proof that proves that there is no
evolution. Rather, it justifies the truth that all the founders of evolution
relied on deception, deception, and lies.

The theory of evolution is nothing but a formulation of the ideas of

Darwin, who suffered from psychological disorders, and many have
found it to be a valid ideology to influence the world...

The theory of evolution has only led to the spread of museums to deceive
visitors + books containing anthropological and biological fairy tales...and the
reason is that it is a theory formulated by a mentally ill person called Darwin
and followed by the ignorant and liars.

The theory of evolution is a heinous educational and ideological crime that has
only led to the creation of false fossils and the spread of extremist thought
based on Darwin's psychological state and the psychopathic sayings of Herbert
Spencer...

Richard Weikart (A professor of history at California State University,

Stanislaus) has contributed to the writing of many books and articles
accompanied by evidence proving the fact that Darwinism is merely an
ideology and a heinous policy whose aim is to establish what is used to control
and dominate the world.

Here are the titles of books proving the truth behind the promotion of
Darwinism:

Hitler's Ethic: The Nazi Pursuit of Evolutionary Progress (Palgrave Macmillan,

2009)

From Darwin to Hitler: Evolutionary Ethics, Eugenics, and Racism in Germany -

(Palgrave Macmillan, 2004)

Socialist Darwinism: Evolution in German Socialist Thought from

Marx to Bernstein - (International Scholars Publications, 1999) –

These are also articles by the same author:

ARTICLES IN SCHOLARLY JOURNALS

"The Role of Darwinism in Nazi Racial Thought," German Studies Review 36
(2013): 537-556.

"A History of the Impact of Darwinism on Bioethics," in 150 Years of Evolution:

Darwin's Impact of Contemporary Thought and Culture, ed. Mark Richard
Wheeler (San Diego State University Press, 2011), pp. 91-109.

"So Many Different Dietrich Bonhoeffers," Trinity Journal 32 NS (2011): 69-81.

"Was Darwin or Spencer the Father of Laissez-Faire Social Darwinism?" Journal

of Economic Behavior and Organization (special issue on social Darwinism) 71
(2009): 20-28.

"Progress through Racial Extermination: Social Darwinism, Eugenics, and

Pacifism in Germany, 1860-1918," German Studies Review 26 (2003): 273-94.

"Darwinism and Death: Devaluing Human Life in Germany, 1860-1920," Journal

of the History of Ideas 63 (2002): 323-344.

"Laissez-Faire Social Darwinism and Individualist Competition in Darwin and

Huxley," The European Legacy 3 (1998): 17-30.

"A Recently Discovered Darwin Letter on Social Darwinism," Isis 86 (1995): 609-
11.

"The Origins of Social Darwinism in Germany, 1859-1895," Journal of the

History of Ideas 54 (1993): 469-488.

ON-LINE ARTICLES:

Was Hitler Influenced by Darwinism?

Metaxas's Counterfeit Bonhoeffer (2010)

"Does Darwinism Devalue Human Life?" (2004)

"Killing Them Kindly: Lessons from the Euthanasia Movement" (2004)

"The Roots of Hitler's Evil" (2001)

"The Dehumanizing Impact of Modern Thought" (2008)

 Evolutionary biology is an ideology that transforms
the student from humanity nature to practicing
brutality, racism and evil because he is subjected to
brainwashing that contains the lies of natural
selection and survival of the fittest.
Human is an intelligent being and unique from other creatures in terms of
structure and mind... The human skeleton contains evidence that refutes
common ancestor and refutes evolution.

Being an evolutionist means that you are ignorant, psychologically disturbed,

and brainwashed, so you find it difficult to believe scientific facts that refute
evolution... What you should do is visit a psychologist to treat your Darwin
complex.

Darwin was mentally ill, but unfortunately his delusions are now present in
education under the name of evolutionary biology... This is the state of global
education, which is built on a mere ideological idea, deceptions, lies, or
delusions created by a mentally ill person.

The theory of evolution is just ideas created by Darwin based on his

psychological state that he was suffering from, then his ideas turned into an
ideology that was the reason for the 20th and 21st centuries being the
bloodiest in human history due to the existence of wars and conflicts, then that
ideology was used in education under the name of evolutionary biology... This
is the brief history of the myth of evolution and the ways to establish it in the
minds of the people.

Archaeopteryx is just a fake fossil that does not represent any real creature and
cannot justify that it is the ancestor of birds... Archaeopteryx is actually a duck
skeleton mixed with some sticks, so evolutionists exploited the lack of clarity in
the fossil image to call for Darwinian delusions.
« Beddard declared, "So emphatically were all these creatures birds ..." [Here
he means Archaeopteryx. ]

Another threat to the notion that Archaeopteryx was intermediate between

reptiles and birds are the claims of Sir Fred Hoyle, the famous British
astronomer, fellow astronomer Chandra Wickramasinghe, and Israeli scientist
Lee Spetner, based on detailed photographic evidence, that Archaeopteryx is a
fraud.15,16 They maintain that an artificial matrix was placed on a reptilian
fossil and that modern feathers were used to impress the matrix, to leave a
likeness of fossil feathers. Scientists of the British Museum of Natural History
have defended the authenticity of the fossil.17 If the allegations of Hoyle,
Wickramasinghe, and Spetner turn out to be correct, it would be a devastating
blow to evolutionists. If the fossil is a forgery, however, it would have to be a
devilishly clever one, because the forger would not only have to fake the
feathers, but also somehow emplace the many bird-like features described in
this article. » By DUANE GISH, PH.D

Evolutionists live in a strange, unscientific world far from

biological reality and anthropological facts... They are a sect
that practices Darwinian rituals that are contrary to science.
Evolutionists are just a sect that practices Darwinian rituals of
believing in myths and lies about creatures...
There are no evolution of creatures. They are merely Darwinian claims
stemming from a psychological condition that Darwin suffered from, which is
why he began to say strange and surreal things about creatures... All
evolutionists suffer from a psychological disorder called the Darwin complex.

he world lives in the 21st century, the year 2025, but

unfortunately there are still people who have the
mentality of the ages in which ignorance and
superstitions that contradict science prevailed, and
they are of course the group of evolutionists who still
believe that their ancestors shared a common ancestor
with apes, that birds were dinosaurs, that man walked
on the surface of the moon, and that Elon Musk is able
to control the human brain....Hhhhhhhhh+LOL
The evolutionists suffer from psychological disturbances, so they practice
delusions and surrealism instead of understanding the concrete scientific truth
of creatures... and the reason is that they are subject to false educational
indoctrination that promotes Darwinian ideology.

The theory of evolution has led to the creation of a false biological education
led by misguided teachers who subject students to brainwashing with
Darwinian ideology... Evolutionary biology is a curriculum established by
demons.

Criminology should be concerned with educational criminology, which concerns

the false curriculum called evolutionary biology, which contributes to the
creation of a generation of fake scientists + the practice of inhumane behaviors
represented by racism and school shootings... It is necessary to consider
evolutionary biology as a criminological curriculum.
 Belief in evolution has become the bane of modern
biological education because the development of
science has led to the discovery of more of the
evolutionists' deceptions and misleadings.
It is necessary for every biology college around the
world to have a statue of Darwin holding a sign that
reads:
"Don't believe me... I only claimed evolution based on
my own thinking and it has no scientific basis."
Evolutionists cannot be sane because it is impossible for a normal human being
to doubt the truth of humans origin and consider that meets with the ape in a
common ancestor.

It was made by evolutionists... You know at first glance from looking at the
picture that it is a satirical anthropological comedy.

A correct and in-depth study and correct tracing of human DNA dictates that
our ancestors are human and not a common ancestor with apes... Since the
emergence of the myth of evolution, evolutionists have been living in conflict
with science, and of course science always wins, while evolutionists are
exposed as deceivers and liars...

<<"The Dark Side of Darwin" by Jerry Bergman, PhD

Did Darwinism pave the way for Nazism? Charles Darwin is often represented
as a hero of science, but what was he really like? Learn the shocking truth
about his barbaric ideas and their sad consequences.

My guest Dr. Jerry Bergman has taught biology, biochemistry, anatomy,

genetics and psychology at universities around the country. Dr. Bergman holds
9 degrees, including a Ph.D. from Wayne State University. With over 1,000
publications to his name, including over 20 books, his work has been translated
into 13 languages.>>

This explains a lot that Darwin's ambitions and starting points were the result
of psychopathic symptoms. The origin of species or the books of evolutionary
biologists cannot be science, but rather they are merely ideologies and
conspiracies against humanity, ...Darwin was seeking to establish a sect
through his misguided and ugly philosophy...It is impossible for a sane person
to believe that Darwin is a scientist.

Evolution cannot be proven, but evolutionists continue

to be stubborn, hostile to scientific facts, and
deliberately misread fossils...which means that
evolutionists are psychopaths.
Evolution cannot be scientific facts, but rather ridiculous, comical,
anthropologically satirical, and biologically trivial claims.

When I hear an evolutionist say that we are related to apes through a common
ancestor, it makes me laugh out loud.

There are no evolutionary scientists, but rather liars and fossil criminals...who
distort facts and manufacture fossils to promote Darwinian ideology.
 If all evolutionists were to meet, they would not be
able to justify evolution. On the contrary, they would
find that science, with a single piece of evidence, would
overturn and refute all their imaginary books and false
fossils.
If the common ancestor was real, then people in the present age would be
experiencing many mutations, which means that you would see a human being
whose father and mother are apes, or you would see a human couple giving
birth to an ape, or a chicken egg hatching a dinosaur.
 Through handwriting psychology and graphological analysis, it is clear that the
owner of this handwriting suffers from psychological disorders and anxiety, and
it is of course Darwin’s handwriting... This means that Darwin was not of sound
mind, and this is what led him to say strange and surreal things about
creatures.
 There can be no scientific evidence for evolution, and the theory of evolution
cannot continue in the future because scientific progress will inevitably
eliminate Darwinian illusions.

Stopping believing in the theory of evolution is the correct development of the

mind and thinking... It is a shame to believe in Darwinian illusions while you live
in the year 2025.

It is a shame to be a professor of biology and you teach students biological

myths and lies that support the illusion and myth of the theory of evolution... It
is the noble and honorable professor of biology who tells the students of
biology that everything that Darwin and his follower Richard Dawkins said
about evolution is just attempts to influence the weak Minds and drag them
towards ignorance and biological illiteracy.
 « Time to Unlearn the Evolutionary March of Human
Progress »
« New discovery adds more evidence
against the human evolution progression »
Jerry Bergman, PhD

The theory of evolution is the greatest pseudoscience, misleading and

educational deception because it causes fanaticism and selfishness among its
followers, which makes them face difficulties in believing in science and
abandoning the Darwinian sect.
As for talking about the evolution of humans, what denies this and supports
that humans did not evolve in their morphological and physiological structure is
"Ötzi", which is the mummy that was found by two tourists in the Alps in an
area between the borders of Austria and Italy in 1991.

Despite the fact that the mummy belongs to the human who lived in the
copper age, there is no difference, even a slight one, in the physical and
morphological structure between the mummy and the human who lives in the
current century.

The mummy of Ötzi

Source: Max Planck Society- Germany

Charles Dawson, Richard Dawkins...

This is not a coincidence in the literal similarity between the name and
surname of these people.

There is a story and a secret behind it:

Which means that there is a secret organization that began since the time of
Charles Darwin, through which members work to practice falsification and
biological, paleontological, and anthropological deceptions in order to promote
the illusion and myth of the theory of evolution.

Therefore, you find that many evolutionists have almost the same literal
structure in their name or surname.

Some of them may have a different real name and surname at birth, but they
work to take a special name/surname that confirms their identity of belonging
to that criminal organization that practices biological deception.

About half of the currently existing fossils are deliberately forged and
fabricated (In order to serve the claim of evolution)

Therefore, the International Palaeontological Association must establish a

project through which all fossils are reviewed and a report is issued stating the
fact that there is a fossil forgery.

You should know that currently, in this time, and at this moment, there are
false and deceitful biologists, paleontologists, and anthropologists who are
thinking about how to make fossils and skeletons in strange and absurd shapes
and claim that they belong to the ancestors of humans and other
organisms...this is the scheme and plan through which the illusion and myth of
the theory of evolution continues to be promoted.

This is one of the actions of evolutionists to deceive people with the illusion
and myth of the theory of evolution:

It is necessary for the International Literacy Association to issue a decree

stating that belief in the theory of evolution is illiteracy and ignorance that
must be eradicated within global education.
This picture expresses the psychological state that Darwin was suffering from
during the years in which he began writing "The Origin of Species"... In fact, he
was writing under the influence of a psychological disorder that made him use
strange, absurd, and imaginary words about organisms, all of which became
known as the theory of evolution. ..It is a theory that stems from a
psychological disorder.

Even according to graphology and its relationship to the psychological state, his
handwriting shows that the writing did not reflect the handwriting of a
mentally healthy man (see Charles Darwin’s manuscripts).
The psychomotor of this movement situation that Richard Dawkins appears in
is actually explained as a physical movement and action carried out by a person
who often suffers from mental wandering and diving into imaginary thinking far
from reality.

This is one of the characteristics of those who want to make imaginary ideas
and arguments based on lies in order to support a theory or say that is
impossible to justify realistically and naturally, and this is what Richard Dawkins
does in order to make false statements through which he promotes the illusion
and myth of the theory of evolution.

Answer these questions if you are an evolutionist:

Have you really watched an organism evolve?

Do you consider that the book “The Origin of Species” by Richard Dawkins
contains biological facts and anthropological validity?

Is Richard Dawkins a biologist or is he just quoting the words of his predecessor

Darwin?

Have you seen a transitional fossil that indicates and proves evolution?

Are those skeletons displayed in museums all real skeletons?

What do you know about heredity and genetics and their relationship to the
existence of the offspring of organisms?
Do you still believe that organisms evolve... Wake up, nature and reality refute
the illusion and myth of the theory of evolution.

You must consider that the time you wasted while believing in the theory of
evolution is nothing more than a stage of ignorance, illiteracy, and educational
deception.

If you believe in the theory of evolution and I tell you this:

I was in the forest and saw a lion evolving and starting to transform into
another form?

Would you believe this, of course not.

Although you believe in the theory of evolution, you do not believe what I say.

Therefore, you must understand the truth and not believe in what contradicts
nature and reality.

The biological evolution of organisms is incorrect and cannot occur, but true
evolution is the evolution of human thinking that leads the way to stop wars,
armaments, and the use of force between human and human.

True evolution is for peace, humanity and love to prevail among all human
beings.
Because evolutionists create lies and falsifications to support the illusion and
myth of the theory of evolution:

Evolutionists may consider the penguin to be a transitional organism, and it is

considered a living fossil that expresses the reality of the evolution of fish into
birds, or vice versa.

Evolutionists have been fooling and deceiving people for more than 150 years,
but that was just the dark history of biological education. The time has come
for biological educational reform by educating those interested in biology
about the reality of organisms that are actually based on nature, reality, and
scientific explanation... If you are an evolutionist, you should To divest yourself
of your false biological belief and accept the scientific truth of beings.

One of the workshops used by evolutionists to make fake fossils and

skeletons:
What can be discovered and observed through discussion and dialogue with
evolutionists about the reality of oraganisms and the fossil record is that
instead of adhering to the etiquette of scientific dialogue, they deviate towards
using sarcasm, and this is one of the effects of the influence of the theory of
evolution on a person’s behavior.

Richard Dawkins continues to contribute to the deterioration of biological

knowledge because he continues to speak and give lectures claiming that
organisms evolve... He condemns himself to being labeled by history as one of
the worst deceivers and fraudsters in the educational history of biology.
How come you use modern science and technology and live in the world of the
21st century, and you are still subject to believing a myth about organisms
called the theory of evolution?

There are more than 200 critical books that refute the theory of evolution, with
natural and realistic justifications and scientific arguments, but evolutionists
cannot justify the theory of evolution even with one natural argument.

Who is the winner scientifically, the evolutionists or those who reject the
theory of evolution?

This diagram proves the fact that the theory of evolution is merely an ideology
that generated conflict between human and human because it was a theory
that led to what is known as the theory of racial superiority, which created
hostility and hatred between humans and led to wars, genocides, and crimes
against humanity :
The name “evolutionists” has come to refer only to a group of practitioners of
fossil and biological lies and deception, because all their proofs and evidence
contradict what is approved by correct science. Therefore, you must withdraw
and abandon your affiliation with the Evolutionists party and acknowledge the
fact that the theory of evolution is just an illusion and a myth.

Evolutionists must acknowledge the fact that they are victims of false biological
teachings and adopt correct and scientific knowledge that confirms that
evolution is impossible according to natural study and observation based on
fossil record and the ancient history of organisms estimated at millions of years
of existence.

Evolution has not happened yet...

Have organisms overcome and defeated the mechanism of evolution and are
no longer subject to natural selection?

Why is evolution only a fictional story and narrative about the past?

How do evolutionists answer this?

It would be better to write a play called "Waiting for Evolution"

Where the story of the play contains that two evolutionary people want to
prove evolution, but despite the long wait, nature does not dictate and prove
that organisms evolve.

Thus, the end of the play shows that the two evolutionists fail to justify what
Charles Darwin claimed.

You cannot be a successful biology student while you are subject to Darwin’s
delusions that made you live a disturbed and absurd life while you believe that
your ancestors were great apes or that the birds you hear chirping in the
morning were once dinosaurs... It is truly a shame to hear such childish and
strange beliefs that contradict the truth of science in the current time, when
that we are enjoying scientific and technological progress in the 21st century.

The question evolutionists avoid answering, and which causes them a

disturbing nightmare, is when someone asks them:

Where are the transitional fossils, and why is there no current scientific
evidence to justify evolution?

The thing that made the illusion and myth of the theory of evolution spread
and be included within the global biological education system is the absence of
biologists interested in the correct biological history of organisms ... and this is
what led to the emergence of false biologists who created illusions and fallacies
known as the theory of evolution…One of the characteristics of correct
biological education is the acknowledgment that the theory of evolution is just
an illusion and a myth that is not based on any real, correct, scientific or natural
justifications.
Fraud rediscovered :

It has long been known that one of the most effective popularizers of evolution
fudged some drawings, but only now has the breathtaking extent of his deceit
been revealed. by Russell Grigg

Haeckel’s famous (infamous) set of 24 drawings purporting to show eight

different embryos in three stages of development, as published by him in
Anthropogenie, in Germany, 1874.

Fraud examined and exposed

Photos by Michael Richardson (second row)747-richardson-embryos

Top row: Haeckel’s drawings of several different embryos, showing incredible

similarity in their early ‘tailbud’ stage.

Bottom Row: Richardson’s photographs of how the embryos really look at the
same stage. (From left: Salmo salar, Cryptobranchus allegheniensis, Emys
orbicularis, Gallus gallus, Oryctolagus cuniculus, Homo sapiens.) Many modern
evolutionists no longer claim that the human embryo repeats the adult stages
of its alleged evolutionary ancestors, but point to Haeckel’s drawings (top row)
to claim that it repeats the embryonic stages. However, even this alleged
support for evolution is now revealed as being based on faked drawings.

Michael Richardson, a lecturer and embryologist at St George’s Hospital

Medical School, London, has exposed this further fraud, in an article in the
journal Anatomy and Embryology, recently reviewed in Science and New
Scientist.

Darwin's finches are just an illusion created by Darwin while he was seeing
different types of birds that permanently inhabit the Galapagos or even other
migratory ones without knowing that the reason for the difference in the size
of the beak is a different type and far removed from the claims of Darwin and
the evolutionists after him. It can be confirmed that Darwin's finches are a
biological lies and hoax this requires resorting to ornithology and studying their
sizes and following their lifestyle.

Evolutionary biology professors are just educational criminals who trade in

students' minds because they brainwash them, making students subject to
Darwinian education.

(Even evolutionary paleontologists are largely convinced that the media’s

recent promotion of a new “missing link” is a monumental overstatement.
There is little doubt that the hype surrounding the fossilized lemur “Ida” is
primarily bluff and bluster. But her media campaign may actually be a more
significant story than the fossil itself. Why is the publicity about Ida such a
radical mismatch with the data?

It has been fairly common for the evolutionary establishment to strongly

promote a particular fossil as a “missing link” only to later quietly acknowledge
it as an evolutionary “dead end” or even a fraud. Historically, most fossils or
natural phenomena that were claimed as representations of Darwinian
evolution have eventually been recognized by evolutionary researchers to be
bad examples that offered no evidentiary.) BY BRIAN THOMAS, PH.D

(...But what about Ida? It is 95 percent complete, and even the contents of its
last dinner are visibly preserved in the fossil. Surely, all the hype must indicate
that it is good proof of evolution.

Unfortunately for evolutionists, as it turns out, Ida is a fraud too.

Professor Hurum and the professors at the University of Oslo purchased the Ida
fossil from a private collector, who had purchased the fossil from other black
market dealers, who had purchased it from amateur fossil hunters in 1983. But
even disregarding the atrocious second- and third-hand chain of custody that
would typically invalidate normal scientific procedure, other evidence has come
to light...Sorry, evolutionists: For all the big headlines and grand proclamations,
this “missing link” is another—if beautifully preserved—fraud, another in a long
line of distinguished frauds.) BY ROBERT MORLEY

Evolution theory fundamentalists believe is that fish crawled out of the

primordial soup that billion dollar driven labs cannot recreate today, then
sprouting lungs and legs because random lightning caused a genetic
disturbance..and the little fishy walked along the strand to create music art
science and literature...
 The primordial soup is just a myth and a deception created by evolutionists to
try to falsify the facts and create perceptions that serve Darwinian ideology.

How could evolution have happened from a single cell in the past, but not now,
given the existence of scientific laboratories with billions of dollars in capital?
Are you certain of what you are saying, are you ignorant by nature, or do you
need a psychologist?

The secret behind clinging to the illusion of evolution and promoting those
fake myths and relying on a farcical educational curricula called evolutionary
biology and that fuss that is made across the world and museums and
institutes and magazines run by pseudo-scientists, all of this is for one reason
only, which is spreading atheism and distancing people from the facts that
confirm time and again that there is a miracle through which the universe
was made and created.

There is no doubt that these deliberate atheists are addressing themselves

about the mystery of the universe's existence, but they do not want to disclose
this publicly. Rather, they practice a kind of hypocrisy and continue to deviate.
There is no doubt that, as an atheist, you cannot explain the following and
deduce a great truth from this question:

Would you believe it if someone told you that the smallest screw in your phone
was found by chance without mechanical design?

Of course, you will not believe this, you will find it impossible and illogical for
that screw to exist by mere coincidence. while claiming that the universe,
which contains dynamics and a complex system, exists by pure chance. Is this
reasonable and logical?

How can a cell, which contains a complex structure and system, be a mere
coincidence? Can you place a piece of iron somewhere and leave it for days,
then come back to find that piece of iron has transformed into a car or a bicycle
without human intervention?

Atheism is actually a psychopathic symptom called the Beckett complex.

It is really a psychological complex because it appears from the behavior of
evolutionists that they suffer from selfishness, narcissism and deliberate
ignorance and they do not want to engage in scientific dialogue and debate in
order to justify the cosmic facts that are considered great explanations that
cannot exist by chance or in an absurd way... Science is what explains life and
this is always proof and evidence of the confirmation of the Creator and the
Great Designer... You should not act in a childish way, you atheist. You must
adopt the facts and not the weak fixations and the Propaganda entrenchment
resulting from brainwashing.

[« …All fossilized creatures appear suddenly and fully formed in the rock
record, with no clear history of evolutionary transitions. This is consistent
with that God created life forms to reproduce within their own kinds… »

By Dr. John Morris]

It is impossible for the fossil record to exist by chance. Rather, it is a scientific

miracle, as it has helped scientists understand organisms by tracing their
history and confirming that evolution is merely an illusion. This is based on
living fossils, which are solid evidence and a powerful against evolutionists who
deny the existence of God.

The theory of evolution is living its last days because science always wins,
which means that the evolutionists sect will dissolve and the evolutionists will
regret all those years they spent just learning a pseudoscience and a comic
theory that claims that birds were dinosaurs and that human and ape have a
common ancestor.

The theory of evolution has contributed to the creation of educational

deception and the establishment of museums whose purpose is money by
deceiving visitors with fake skeletons and fossils made in workshops run by
evolutionists as institutions for Darwinian propaganda.

"There I stood staring at the “whale evolution” display in the National Museum
of Natural History (a fraudulent title: “nature” cannot do anything. To say
something like “natural selection” is a fallacy because ‘nature’ cannot choose)
frustrated that what I was looking at actually does not exist. I stood on top of
one of the displays and began to point out the many false statements,
drawings, and displays to the people standing around. Ok, I did this in my mind
not wanting to be escorted from the premises. So I decided to keep quiet.

Evolutionist Richard Dawkins said “Evolution has been observed. It’s just that it
hasn’t been observed while it’s happening.” (pbs.org, 3 December, 2004).
What? Mr. Dawkins believes, like most evolutionists that we are descendants
of ape-like ancestors, apes are descendants of more primitive animals, living
things share common ancestors, and evolutionary changes (mutations, natural
selection) give rise to new species, etc. Basically from goo to you via the zoo.

So where is the evidence? Where can we find life from non-life? Transitional
fossils? The geological column (the published column doesn’t actually exist
anywhere in the world). New species appearing? Beneficial mutations?
Increasing complexity in living organisms?

David Stone, Ph.D. physics said ““Evolution does not warrant being called a
theory or a hypothesis…A theory arises when a hypothesis has stood up to
repeated tests under a wide variety of conditions and cannot be broken.
Evolution warrants neither term. Evolution qualifies as a philosophical, even a
religious idea, void of scientific support, and intended to replace biblical truth
with stories…evolution cannot rightly be called a ‘theory’.” (Dr. Stone, e-mail to
David Cloud, August 21, 2011)." By: Larry Blythe

« If you had asked me during my years studying science at Berkeley whether or

not I believed what I read in my science textbooks, I would have responded
much as any of my fellow students: puzzled that such a question would be
asked in the first place. One might find tiny errors, of course, typos and
misprints. And science is always discovering new things. But I believed — took
it as a given — that my science textbooks represented the best scientific
knowledge available at that time. It was only when I was finishing my Ph.D. in
cell and development biology, however, that I noticed what at first I took to be
a strange anomaly. The textbook I was using prominently featured drawings of
vertebrate embryos — fish, chickens, humans, etc. — where similarities were
presented as evidence for descent from a common ancestor. Indeed, the
drawings did appear very similar. But I’d been studying embryos for some time,
looking at them under a microscope. And I knew that the drawings were just
plain wrong.

I re-checked all my other textbooks. They all had similar drawings, and they
were all obviously wrong. Not only did they distort the embryos they pictured;
they omitted earlier stages in which the embryos look very different from one
another.

Like most other science students, like most scientists themselves, I let it pass. It
didn’t immediately affect my work, and I assumed that while the texts had
somehow gotten this particular issue wrong, it was the exception to the rule. In
1997, however, my interest in the embryo drawings was revived when British
embryologist Michael Richardson and his colleagues published the result of
their study comparing the textbook drawings with actual embryos. As
Richardson himself was quoted in the prestigious journal Science: “It looks like
it’s turning out to be one of the most famous fakes in biology.”

Worse, this was no recent fraud. Nor was its discovery recent. The embryo
drawings that appear in most every high school and college textbook are either
reproductions of, or based on, a famous series of drawings by the 19th century
German biologist and fervent Darwinian, Ernst Haeckel, and they have been
known to scholars of Darwin and evolutionary theory to be forgeries for over a
hundred years. But none of them, apparently, have seen fit to correct this
almost ubiquitous misinformation.

Still thinking this an exceptional circumstance, I became curious to see if I could

find other mistakes in the standard biology texts dealing with evolution. My
search revealed a startling fact however: Far from being exceptions, such
blatant misrepresentations are more often the rule. In my recent book I call
them “Icons of Evolution,” because so many of them are represented by classic
oftrepeated illustrations which, like the Haeckel drawings, have served their
pedagogical purpose only too well — fixing basic misinformation about
evolutionary theory in the public’s mind…Darwin was convinced that in the
course of evolution, “Natural Selection has been the most important, but not
the exclusive means of modification,” but he had no direct evidence of this. The
best he could do in The Origin of Species was give “one or two imaginary
illustrations.”- By Jonathan Wells. PhD »

Fabricated evidence: Since peppered moths don’t naturally rest on tree trunks, researches simply
glued them in place. (From Biology, by Burton S. Guttman, published by McGraw-Hill.)
 Darwin’s branching “Tree of Life” has been seriously undermined by the fossil record and modern
molecular biology. (From Biology, by Miller and Levine, published by Prentice Hall.)

Darwinist “homology” arguments (top) are a classic case of circular reasoning. Blatant distortion
(below): Human embryos never have gills — not even rudimentary ones. (From Biology, 5th Edition,
by Raven & Johnson, McGraw-Hill.)

The same author mentioned above says:

The misrepresentations and omissions I’ve examined here are just a small sampling. There are
many more. For too long the debate about evolution has assumed “facts” that aren’t true. It's time
to clear away the lies...and insist that theories conform to the evidence. In other words, it’s time to
do science as it’s supposed to be done.
It is necessary that biology books that contain the theory of evolution be
classified as books that do not qualify for academic accreditation as
references and sources because they lead to the spread of biological fallacies.

Adnan Oktar or Harun Yahya says:

« No Intermediate Fossils The "intermediate life forms" in this conjectural

picture never existed. imaginary intermediate forms out of plaster and bakelite,
and producing "reconstructions" and "artist's conceptions" to illustrate the
supposed lives of those intermediate forms, Darwinists seek to breathe life into
a supposed evolution. The fact is, however, that their efforts can never bear
fruit. Conditions now are different from those in Darwin's time. Scientific facts
are now emerging into the light, and new discoveries constantly reveal proofs
of the fact of Creation. No Darwinist can any longer maintain that the fossil
record is insufficient. Scientific data and the fossil record have revealed
incontrovertible facts. The of any intermediate fossils is too obvious absence
for evolutionists to cover up any longer... »

Of course, it is a convincing proof and evidence formulated by Harun Yahya to

respond to the evolutionists who claim and speak without justification.
... Prof Schwartz claims that instead of filling in the gaps in the fossil record
with so-called missing links, most paleontologists found themselves facing a
situation in which there were only gaps in the fossil record, with no evidence of
transformational intermediates between documented fossil species. Not only
are the links missing, but professional evolutionists now admit they cannot
even imagine how one species could be linked with another.

In the American Scientist review of the book In Search of Deep Time by Henry
Gee, Peter J. Bowler writes: "We cannot identify ancestors or `missing links',
and we cannot devise testable theories how particular episodes of evolution
came about.

"Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians
conquered the dry land, how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying,
how the dinosaurs went extinct, and how humans evolved from apes are just
products of our imagination, driven by prejudices and preconceptions"

There is no evidence of evolution at the molecular level. Even with DNA

sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so
objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative
imagination.4) Geological timescale questioned. Evolution theory depends
upon the great age of rocks calculated by the geologic timescale. This scale was
based upon principles of geology recently invalidated by laboratory
experiments. (French Academy of Science 1986, 1988, Geological Society 1993,
Fusion, May-June 2000).
If this fact had been known in the 19th century, Darwin could never have
formulated his theory. Evolution depends upon geological formations taking
millions of years to form, and Darwin's geologist friend Charles Lyell provided
those years with his principles of geology. It is these principles that now stand
refuted.

The fossil record contains no transitional forms of animals, only extinct forms.
The fossil record has been studied so thoroughly that it is safe to conclude
that the alleged “gaps” or “missing links” will never be found.

"Recently, a top geneticist used a computer to classify known mutations; his

results were 186 beneficial mutations vs. 453,732 harmful mutations. That's a
ratio of 1 to 2,439! There's no way any species could live long enough to evolve
if every "good" change in a genotype or phenotype was followed by thousands
of bad ones." (Sanford, J., Genetic Entropy and the Mystery of the Genome,
2005, pg. 26)

It is a shame that you believe in the theory of evolution while you live in the
21st century...superstitions have become extinct and science has triumphed, so
no more childish and selfish behavior, you evolutionists...trust in science, for
science will not let you down, while the theory of evolution has deceived you.
The contributions of evolutionists to science are like someone who finds a
water source but destroys it so that people cannot drink from it. Every time
evolutionists find a fossil, they hide it or falsify it and display it in order to
mislead people and conceal the truth of creation from them... Being an
evolutionist means that you are scientifically misguided and stupid.

It is necessary to create a branch of paleontology called "paleontological

crime," which refers to the behaviors of forgery and distortion of fossils
committed by evolutionists in order to promote the illusion and myth of
evolution.

There is no evolution and all the fossils of the evolutionists are sculptures made
by an artist working for the Darwinian sect... Evolutionists also have machines
to make fossils.
"Crazy Darwinism Needs Shaming...Censorship of Darwin skeptics has given
license for absurd speculations…Recent presentations reveal hoaxes in
paleoanthropology that still are continuing today ; Big Science and its legacy
media refuse to reveal the truth about frauds in “early man” studies. Since the
Darwinians exercise totalitarian control over public education and what passes
for “science media” these days, engaging in censorship against anything
embarrassing to Darwinism, it’s up to Darwin skeptics to do the investigative
journalism into cases of potential fraud. We urge our readers to watch these
recent presentations that expose major hoaxes by paleoanthropologists. These
frauds would be internationally scandalous if enough people heard about
them. Dr Bergman shows artist reconstructions that intentionally put ape-like
skulls onto upright-walking, human-like bodies (look at today’s artwork of Lucy
at The Conversation to see that this deception still goes on)... Jerry Bergman is
author of over 40 books and was a co-author of Apes as Ancestors." By David
Coppedge

Commenting on Lucy, the official author of the article adds the following:

"Lucy “Missing Link” Fossils and the Pygmy Human Hypothesis (Dr Chris Rupe,
Back2Genesis, 8 March 2025). Dr Rupe, recently awarded his PhD in geology, is
a young board member of Logos Research Associates, co-author of the book
Contested Bones with Dr John Sanford, and producer of the documentary film
Dismantled that refutes all the major arguments for evolution. When it comes
to icons of human evolution, “Lucy” (Australopithecus afarensis) is the best
known to the public... Chris Rupe proves with journal papers and bone
comparisons that Lucy is a composite of human bones placed with an ape skull
that was not found with them. He demonstrates in citations that’s what Donald
Johanson said himself in his initial publications about the skeleton."

"Stop the Darwin Silliness OK, lazy materialists in the press: it is WAY past time
to shape up" By David F. Coppedge

« First of all, Darwinian macro-evolution teaches that the first one-celled living
thing must have somehow come from non-living chemicals -- despite the fact
that the Law of Biogenesis, proven as fact by scientists such as Francesco Redi
(1688), Lazzaro Spallanzani (1780), Rudolf Virchow (1858) and Louis Pasteur
(1860), says that "spontaneous generation" is impossible...

And if one species can "evolve" into another species, then why isn't the fossil
record loaded with examples of transitionary creatures? Listen to Charles
Darwin himself, from his 1859 book "On The Origin Of Species":

"... Why then is not every geological formation and every stratum full of such
intermediate links? Geology assuredly does not reveal any such finely
graduated organic chain; and this, perhaps, is the most obvious and gravest
objection which can be urged against my theory." » By Kirk Hastings
"Do I have proof of Darwin's racism that was carried on in history? You bet.
Below are two paper ads for what' known as Human Zoos. It's where they took
dark skinned peoples from around the world and rounded them up to display
like animals. This was to show how white man was superior in every way
including more evolved.

If you want more on how they treated these people in these Human Zoos
Google these phrases:

1) Venus Mottentote.

2) Evolution human zoos.

And then go to youtube and look at the documentary named: Science's dirty
secret. They have actual footage of what went on in these zoos."
Darwin was not the first to think up man evolving from animals.

And his theory was based in racism. Even the other people who had the same
ideas had those ideas based in racism as well.

Also because Darwin had zero degrees in biology science he often relied and
stole ideas from other people to write his own book and come up with his own
theory never giving credit to those he took from (plagiarism).

1) His book is actually based on another book written by his grandfather

named: Zoonomia, the laws of organic life.

2) The idea of humans evolving from animals can be traced back to Egyptian
pagan beliefs. And a book written 2 years before Darwin's had the idea of
blacks being somewhere in between primates and whites.
Connecting Hitler and Darwin :

One man – Charles Darwin – says: “In the struggle for survival, the fittest win
out at the expense of their rivals. …” Another man – Adolf Hitler …

There is no doubt that the theory of evolution will soon become extinct
because it has led to the creation of deceptions and false education, and both
specialists and ordinary people who think well have become aware that it is
only a theory for misleading and promoting evil policies.
Leading Atheist and Oxford zoologist Richard Dawkins claims there is no God.

But also admits animals appear designed:

"Animals give the appearance of having been designed by a theoretically

sophisticated and practically ingenious physicist or engineer. . . .”

Richard Dawkins -The Blind Watchmaker (New York: Norton, 1987, p. 36).

It's funny and also sad when they admit design but in the next breath claim
there was no Designer!

This confirms the fact that atheists practice a kind of hypocrisy, deception,
and manipulation of minds...There is no doubt that atheists are psychopaths.

"In fact, when the first platypus specimen reached England in 1799 (it was long
dead), it was regarded as a hoax, a ‘high frolic practised on the scientific
community by some colonial prankster’. Experts of the day could not reconcile
the fact that a duck-billed mammal with webbed feet and claws and a beaver-
like tail could really exist. One zoologist, sure it was fraudulent, tried to remove
the ‘duck’s bill’ from the pelt; his scissor-marks can still be seen on the original,
in London’s British Museum of Natural History." by Paula Weston

« ‘When you think you know what they’re doing—they do something different’,
said one platypus expert, describing this latest observation as ‘incredible’. » By
Dr David Catchpoole
If all the evolutionists around the world come together, including Richard
Dawkins, as well as Darwin, Charles Dawson, and Ernst Haeckel come back to
life... they cannot justify that evolution is real.

If evolution were real, you, evolutionist, would be today perhaps in a new

evolutionary form...and you would be astonished and start screaming after
looking in the mirror and going out screaming in the street:

Am in real or I am in dream?

Recognizing that the theory of evolution is merely an illusion and a myth is an

indication of the correct and scientific understanding of the biology.

Biology as a science means that evolution is just a lie, but practicing lying in
biological education means an illusion and a myth of the theory of evolution.

The theory of evolution has become the most popular deception in education,
and it is an indication that there is no review and corrections to biology
education, but this may be done now to rid biological education of the lies of
evolution.

Advice to all students around the world;

In order to truly be a true student of science, you must avoid enrolling in

evolutionary biology colleges and institutes because they only make you a
biological ignorant and gain false knowledge and the false belief that
organisms evolve... Try to enroll in another scientific major that is beneficial
to you and to all of humanity.

Everyone is waiting for organisms to evolve, but organisms have not evolved.

Where is evolutionists to explain this non-evolutionary phenomenon?

Could evolutionists cardiologists make the heart capable of beating
continuously so that humans could live eternally?

Can astronomers travel beyond the boundaries of the universe?

Can time scientists control day and night?

These questions remain a puzzling puzzle. In fact, cardiologists, astronomers,

and time scientists are incapable of performing these tasks. This means that we
must think more deeply:

Why are there mysteries that humans cannot explain?

Why can't humans create a parallel universe?

Why can't CERN scientists create black holes or wormholes?

Why is there a natural force that humans cannot resist?

Why are there so many creatures, each living in a specific system and
environment?

Why does the earth contain precious minerals that benefit humans?

Why are there other planets and moons, but humans are only allowed to live
on planet Earth?

Why does good always win?

If the common ancestor was real, then people in the present age would be
experiencing many mutations, which means that you would see a human
being whose father and mother are apes, or you would see a human couple
giving birth to an ape, or a chicken egg hatching a dinosaur.

Students are tired of being taught a false biology education that teaches them
that organisms evolve based on mere claims, but they are confronted with a
scientific reality that confirms the invalidity of evolution... No more evasions,
evolutionists, and it is better that you change your job from evolutionary
biology to another correct scientific biology.
How you make a fossil conform to the evolution theory in 3 steps. Add what
does not already exist just because you think it used to. And bingo, a missing
link.

Living Fossils disprove evolution and the Fossil Record being a record of time.

1) They are always found unchanged aka unevolved.

2) They are never found in more than one layer pointing to the conclusion that
they survived.

If they keep finding supposed extinct fossils alive. Soon there won’t be no fossil
record. Because right now we have hundreds of living fossils AKA fossils that
are supposed to be extinct but are not.
"Prior to 1938, if you had asked a zoologist to name some of the oldest fish
known to science, you’d probably hear about an oddly named lobe-fish, known
as the coelacanth. The name itself sounds ancient... a little over 400 million
years ago. What this zoologist would not have told you is that this ancient fish
could still be found in the ocean today. In fact, they probably would have
chuckled at the idea. Scholars, prior to the coelacanth’s rediscovery in 1938,
presumed that the coelacanth had gone extinct during the late Cretaceous
period, 65-70 million years ago." By Scott Travers

"The primitive-looking coelacanth (pronounced SEEL-uh-kanth) was thought to

have gone extinct with the dinosaurs [supposedly] 65 million years ago. But its
discovery in 1938 by a South African museum curator on a local fishing trawler
fascinated the world and ignited a debate about how this bizarre lobe-finned
fish fits into the [supposedly] evolution of land animals."
 Living fossils also have a major problem for evolution. No matter what
supposed time era they are found in and alive, their physical appearance is
always unchanged aka unevolved.

Organisms did not evolve. They were created and designed to live a
programmed life in a period between birth, hatching, and death. Organisms
do not evolve. Rather, evolutionists have been lied a lot for two centuries,
and it is time for them to surrender to science.

« The “Evolution” Hoax:

Evolution crumbles under the weight of real science Despite what you’ve
been told, this theory is a house of cards.

Let’s take it apart, piece by piece, and see why both evidence and faith
demand better answers.

The Missing Link Problem:

If evolution were true, the fossil record should be full of transitional forms,
yet we see species appearing suddenly, fully formed. Even Darwin saw this as
a major flaw. Many so-called “transitional” fossils, like Piltdown Man and
Archaeoraptor, turned out to be hoaxes, while others can be explained by
natural variation within species rather than evolutionary change. This lack of
true transitional fossils points to intentional design rather than gradual
evolution.

Reproduction by Kind:

Every species reproduces according to its kind. And there is incredible

diversity within kinds. But no observable instance has ever shown a creature
evolving into a completely different kind. Cats don’t give birth to dogs. This
fact alone defies the core mechanism of evolution.

Genetic Complexity:

The human genome is staggeringly complex, containing codes that function

like advanced software. Mutations are typically harmful, rarely beneficial,
The human genome contains over 3 billion DNA base pairs, ...This intricate
code is so sophisticated that it would take over 50 years to type out all the
DNA letters by hand, and its precise order governs everything from eye color
to immune function—showing a remarkable level of design that far exceeds
human engineering.

Information Loss, Not Gain:

Evolution requires an increase in information to build new species. Yet,

mutations tend to degrade genetic information, not enhance it. It’s like trying
to build a library by burning books—genetic entropy proves this.

The Fossil Record is a Desert:

Despite over a century of searching, we still lack the abundance of

transitional fossils evolutionists promised. Fossils show species appearing
suddenly, fully formed, and disappearing—completely skipping the stages
evolution predicts. » - Quoted from a scientific writer.

"Evolution-the greatest hoax ever perpetuated on mankind.

SCIENTIFIC CONFERENCE CONCLUDES THAT DARWINIAN EVOLUTION THEORY

IS BROKEN!

"Darwinian evolution theory is broken and may not be fixable." That was the
takeaway from a meeting in 2016, organized by the world's most
distinguished and historic scientific organization. The 3-day conference at the
Royal Society in London was remarkable in confirming something that
advocates of Intelligent Design, a controversial scientific alternative to
evolution.

World class biologists are now routinely expressing doubts about various
aspects of neo Darwinistic Evolution Theory.

Some of the discussion was on the origin of new forms throughout the history
of life. For example, the mammalian radiation, in which the major order of
mammals, such as cetaceans, bats, carnivores suddenly appear without
transitional forms. Even more dramatic, how fully formed complex organisms
entered the fossil record from out of nowhere such as the Cambrian
explosion.
 They also discuss the non-gradual forms or models of transition, where you
see abrupt discontinuities in the fossil record between different types. In
other words, we have no intermediate transitions in the fossil records
showing the gradual change from one organism to another.

The Neo-darwinian mechanism of mutation and natural selection lack the

creative power to generate the novel anatomical traits and forms, like those
that have arisen during the history of life. The conference did an excellent job
in defining the problems that Evolution theory has failed to solve.

Other topics that were discussed were -Niche, Construction, Phenotypic

Plasticity, natural genetic engineering and so on. They did not discuss the
origin of information and morphological novelty at all.

The conference failed to offer anything new that could help remedy the main
"explanatory deficit" of Neo-Darwinism synthesis - it's inability to account for
the origins of phenotypic and epigenetic information necessary to produce it.
These are still problems that evolutionary theory tells us little about -
constituting, in our own judgment, an invitation to scientists to consider the
alternative of Intelligent Design."

by Dr. Paul Nelson and Mr. David Klinghoffer

Evolution is a hoax.

It was pushed and made up by racists, progressives and eugenicists.

"...We hear the phrase “dinosaurs evolved into birds.” Problem is, it is all one
big HOAX used to support a failing theory that never happened - Evolution..."
By Eric Hovind and Dr. Gabriela Haynes

When you read a book about evolutionary biology, you'd better realize that
you're reading myths and fairy tales...

Evolutionists and atheists live absurd and ridiculous lives because they are
subject to false educational and ideological indoctrinations...
Yet there are countless millions of fossils, all of which are non-transitional. Prof
Schwartz claims that instead of filling in the gaps in the fossil record with so-
called missing links, most paleontologists found themselves facing a situation in
which there were only gaps in the fossil record, with no evidence of
transformational intermediates between documented fossil species. Not only
are the links missing, but professional evolutionists now admit they cannot
even imagine how one species could be linked with another.

In the American Scientist review of the book In Search of Deep Time by Henry
Gee, Peter J. Bowler writes: "We cannot identify ancestors or `missing links',
and we cannot devise testable theories how particular episodes of evolution
came about.

"Gee is adamant that all the popular stories about how the first amphibians
conquered the dry land, how the birds developed wings and feathers for flying,
how the dinosaurs went extinct, and how humans evolved from apes are just
products of our imagination, driven by prejudices and preconceptions"

There is no evidence of evolution at the molecular level. Even with DNA

sequence data, we have no direct access to the processes of evolution, so
objective reconstruction of the vanished past can be achieved only by creative
imagination.

Geological timescale questioned. Evolution theory depends upon the great age
of rocks calculated by the geologic timescale. This scale was based upon
principles of geology recently invalidated by laboratory experiments. (French
Academy of Science 1986, 1988, Geological Society 1993, Fusion, May-June
2000).

If this fact had been known in the 19th century, Darwin could never have
formulated his theory. Evolution depends upon geological formations taking
millions of years to form, and Darwin's geologist friend Charles Lyell provided
those years with his principles of geology. It is these principles that now stand
refuted.

New knowledge of geology allows the reconstruction of the original conditions

in which the rocks were formed. These original conditions include the time
taken for formation. In reconstructions, the time taken is shown to have been
in weeks or even days rather than millions of years (see
www.geology.ref.ac/berthault)

Evolution ignores laws of physics. The supposed evolutionary process breaks

the most universal and best-proved law of physics, the law of increasing
entropy, known as the second law of thermodynamics.

It applies not only in physical and chemical systems, but also in biological and
geological systems, in fact all systems, without exception. The law stipulates
that all systems tend to lose order. They go towards disorganisation and loss of
complexity.

Irreducible Complexity seems to be a huge stumbling block for evolutionists. So

much so, they almost always ‘plead the fifth’ without further comment. This is
rightly so, as irreducible complexity can be found everywhere in the natural
world and it most certainly points to a complete and original creation.

Let’s first consider how it’s not evolution. For something that contains many
components to become irreducibly complex, all of these components would
have to have some way of ‘knowing what the others are doing’. Even if ‘natural
forces’ are building these individual components together or in sequence, there
would have to be a knowledge of the end product in order that each
component converges and is integrated with the others. If natural forces are
building the components separately, not only would it require even greater
knowledge/communication, but would necessitate tremendous coordination to
achieve the same goal (convergence, integration). You see, things don’t
converge or integrate randomly. Evolutionists most often say that the
components are built in sequence. Let’s just say they are. If traveling in series,
decisions still have to be made so as not to take tangential routes or stop
altogether. Thus, these decisions would, not only have to be made, but the
logic would have to be known beforehand.

If components are made simultaneously or in parallel, the same decisions

would have to be made as well, as in coordination with each of the others.

Either way, knowledge of the outcome has to be known and has to be known
before construction takes place.
Finally, as with any construction, and as I’ve demonstrated, knowledge must
precede construction, any time we see irreducible complexity there must be
foreknowledge and an origin. Especially if components are ‘dead’ or
‘disorganized’, what can they do to prearrange, not only their existence (as part
of a future complexity), but their ‘life’ and any ‘action’.

Modern Biology has opened the Black Boxes that Darwin couldn't....

Observation of this problem is not limited to Darwin-critics. A paper by a

prominent evolutionary biologist in the prestigious journal Proceedings of the
U.S. National Academy of Science. acknowledges that “simultaneous
emergence of all components of a system is implausible.”Likewise, University
of Chicago evolutionary biologist Jerry Coyne — a staunch defender of
Darwinism — admits that “natural selection cannot build any feature in which
intermediate steps do not confer a net benefit on the organism.”

Even Darwin intuitively recognized this problem, as he wrote in Origin of

Species:

If it could be demonstrated that any complex organ existed, which could not
possibly have been formed by numerous, successive, slight modifications, my
theory would absolutely break down.

Evolutionary scientists like Darwin and Coyne claim they know of no real-world
case where Darwinian selection gets blocked in this manner. But they would
agree, at least in principle, that there are theoretical limits to what Darwinian
evolution can accomplish: If a feature cannot be built by “numerous,
successive, slight modifications,” and if “intermediate steps do not confer a net
benefit on the organism,” then Darwinian evolution will “absolutely break
down.”

The problems are real. Modern biology continues to uncover more and more
examples where biological complexity seems to outstrip the information-
generative capacity of Darwinian evolution....

Evolution theory remains unproven and unprovable....but understandable in a

world that finds the idea of a God profoundly uncomfortable.
Horse Evolution: Wrong

For more than 70 years we have known that science textbooks which teach
that horses evolved have been wrong. In fact, we have written about this in
past Discovery issues. I was excited to see that the Natural History Museum
now admits that the “evidence” once used to teach horse evolution has been
proven to be inaccurate. Of course, I hoped that the authors would be honest
and admit that there is no real scientific evidence that horses evolved from any
other kind of animal. I hoped that they would change from the false view of
evolution to the correct view that God created horses and all other kinds of
animals. Unfortunately, that is not what the writers of the new horse
“evolution” exhibit did.
Instead, they admitted that “evidence” for horse evolution that was used in the
past was wrong, but then they just presented more wrong information. The
placard at the exhibit says, “Scientists concluded that there was no single line
of evolution.” That means the material that showed horse evolution as a
“single line” is all false. Then they stated, “This doesn’t mean that the original
story was entirely wrong.” Actually, the story of horse evolution that is
presented in the old textbooks as well as the new exhibit is all wrong. Horses
never evolved from a different kind of animal. God created them..., we will
probably see another revision of horse “evolution.” It will not be due to the fact
that new information has been discovered which shows how horses really
evolved. Instead, it will be because horses never evolved and all of the
information that supposedly proves it is wrong.
July 22, 2010, marked the 100th anniversary of genetic investigations using
fruit flies. The first such study appeared in Science in 1910 and described the
unexpected appearance of a male fruit fly with white eyes after generations of
flies with pigmented eyes. This began a century of focused studies on fruit fly
mutations, but what has really been learned by all this tinkering?

For most of the past century--and especially since the discovery of DNA as a
physical molecule carrying heritable information--the prevailing concept of
neo-Darwinian evolution has held mutations to be the central generator of new
and useful information. Thus, mutations have been given ample opportunity to
prove themselves, if they are naturally selected, as having "the power to drive
the evolution of all living things in the direction of positive improvement."2

Fruit flies, with their short generation times and only four pairs of
chromosomes, presented prime testing ground for evolution. In laboratories
worldwide, they have been subjected to all manner of mutation-inducing
phenomena, including hosts of chemicals and radiation treatments, to try and
accelerate evolution-mimicking mutations. After all this, fruit flies should have
certainly exemplified evolution by now. But they haven't.

So, having achieved no evolutionary progression in fruit flies b these random

means, researchers made them the focus of countless purposeful gene
manipulation studies. The most popular, from an evolutionary perspective,
were experiments with what are called HOX genes.

HOX, an abbreviation of "homeobox," are genes used by the organism during

embryonic development. Many reasoned that it would be simpler for evolution
to operate by mutating these genes, since a small alteration could produce a
large effect in the fly's body. However, this was before recent studies showed
that embyronic development is more heavily influenced by DNA, not genes.
And mutating (through substituting, deleting, or duplicating) developmental
genes like HOX has only ever yielded a dead fly, a normal fly (if the mutation
happened to have no noticeable effect), or a tiny monster. None of these
results match the "positive improvement" expected of Darwinian evolution.
 One kind of animal not once has EVER been observed changing into another,
and the means to do so has never been observed either. Genetic information
when things adapt never increases in complexity to the next generation, so you
won't ever see this occur. Fruit flys will always remain fruit flys, dogs will
remain dogs,cats cats, and on and on and so forth.

If organisms were evolving, then evolutionists would have a real fossil record
based on a series of fossils starting with the dinosaur and ending with birds in
general or the chicken in particular. But on the contrary, evolutionists have
only fossils carved by artists working as mercenaries to serve Darwinian
ideology.

Evolutionist museums should be classified as surrealist art galleries because

they contain fossils deliberately made as sculptures and skeletons
deliberately constructed and not original...

"The way of preparing fossil mounts often used adhesives and paints to make
fake parts of the bone look like the real ones..." According to Marilyn Fox
and Christina Lutz - preparators at the Yale Peabody Museum

How These Frauds Shaped Evolutionary Practice:

These weren’t just minor blips—they were critical pieces of the evolutionary
puzzle, held up as the smoking gun evidence. During the early 20th century,
evolution was still trying to shake off the skeptics, and these frauds were the
perfect ammunition. They gave the illusion of a solid fossil record, a steady
march from ape to man. It made it easier to shrug off the doubters and solidify
the theory as a cornerstone of modern science—never mind that the
cornerstones were made of plaster and lies.

Without these faked fossils propping up the theory, evolution might not have
gained the momentum it did. The gaps in the fossil record would have been
harder to ignore, and the theory might have stayed in the “we’re still working
on it” category. Instead of being spoon-fed fraudulent evidence, the world
might have been more critical, more skeptical, and more open to alternatives.
But alas, those frauds gave evolution the push it needed to become
mainstream, and here we are, still debating it.

So, let’s talk about evolution, shall we? You know, that theory that got rolling in
the 1800s when Darwin decided to take a little cruise, saw some finches, and
thought, “Hey, maybe everything just sort of…changed…over millions of years.”
Because who needs solid proof when you’ve got imagination, right? I mean, if
you squint hard enough, a bird’s beak starts looking like the missing link
between a T-Rex and a chicken nugget.

But hold up—Darwin wasn’t even the first guy on the scene with these wild
ideas. Before him, we had Jean-Baptiste Lamarck, the man who figured giraffes
got long necks because they really, really wanted those high-up leaves.

So let’s sum this up: Evolution wasn’t exactly kickstarted by science, but more
by a dream and a whole lot of guesswork. Darwin and Lamarck took some
observations, sprinkled in their best guesses, and voila—a theory was born. But
even now, that grand theory still hasn’t been proven in any real, scientific way.
It’s been 150 years, and we’re still waiting for the evidence to catch up with the
imagination.

So, next time someone brings up evolution, just remember: it’s less about
scientific experiment and more about a wild idea that’s still just a hopeful
guess.

“Neo-Darwinism has failed as an evolutionary theory because it fails to account

for the creative agency of life itself.” - J. Scott Turner, “Purpose and Desire:
What Makes Something ‘Alive’ and Why Modern Darwinism Has Failed to
Explain It”

It would be better if a project were launched in biology college and institute

libraries around the world, whereby all evolutionary biology books would be
labeled with a label on their covers bearing the following statement:

"This book is not approved for educational adoption because it contains

misleading information"

Returning to the discussion of evolutionary delusions about the ancestors of

birds, or the discussion about Archaeopteryx, which is in fact merely a
mythical creature and not real, we can rely on the documented facts upon
which ornithology depends. This means that it is imperative to discuss the
correct history of birds and who was the first bird to exist on Earth.

True science must be a path to knowing the truth about the existence of the
Creator. If genetics and the DNA of various birds are used and studied in
depth, this may lead to the conclusion that the oldest bird to have existed on
Earth is the raven. Even according to the story of Cain and Abel, God sent a
raven to be a guide and teacher to Cain, the criminal who killed Abel. Thus,
the raven taught Cain how to bury Abel's body. This means that the first bird
God created was the raven, and before it, there was no other bird, not even
an egg... which means that the bird( The raven) existed before the egg. This
means that if someone asks you the question: "Which came first, the egg or
the chicken?" you must answer without hesitation. Or a suspicion of the
following:

The chicken came before the egg...

Evolutionary biology colleges and institutes are merely training centers for
creating an army of evolutionists who seek to spread biological misinformation,
but science is the one that wins, while evolutionists constantly lose battles...
Don't be stubborn, evolutionist, and you must surrender and admit that you
are defeated and that Darwin deceived you.

Harun Yahya, emphasizing the defeat suffered by Darwinism, says the

following:

« Why have Darwinists been silent for so long?

We have heard nothing for a long time now from the Darwinists and Darwinist
press who for decades constantly issued false tales of evolution, endlessly
manufactured imaginary fossils and then announced that “the missing link has
been discovered,” and who came up with countless theories to the effect that
the cell could have emerged spontaneously and who related such tall tales as if
they had actually happened. Reports of missing links have ceased, the long
statements about evolution given to newspapers have come to an end and the
Darwinists who used to appear on different TV programs every week are now
no longer to be seen. What could be the reason for such a major change?

The reason is THE HUGE DEFEAT INFLICTED ON DARWINISTS.

Darwinists have been applying systematic mass hypnosis for the past 150 years,
ever since Darwin’s day. They have silenced all those voices raised against
them. They found their way into schools and universities. A large part of the
press was under their control. The press went into action the moment
Darwinist propaganda needed and the immediate appearance of the
“imaginary missing link” was thus ensured. The system operated highly
systematically and successfully. The mass hypnosis continued just as it was
designed to do. The antichrist had been at work for 150 years. The antichrist
continued with this profound hypnosis until he had made them Darwinist,
materialist and even irreligious. He cast a most wide-ranging spell over people
by telling them “You are Darwinists, and you came into being by chance.”
Under the influence of this spell of the antichrist, people came to believe over
the years that they had come into existence by chance...But the exposure of
this mass hypnosis was something that Darwinists never expected. "

Why is it that Darwinists, already in a state of grave disappointment due to the

collapse of their theory in recent years in particular, humiliate themselves in
such a determined manner? Although all their trickery has been exposed and
people have been made aware of how they were deceived by propaganda and
demagoguery, though it has been shown, with supporting evidence, that not a
single transitional form fossil exists, although 300 million fossils have
eliminated the theory entirely and, most important of all, it has been revealed
how they are unable to account for the formation of even a single protein, how
is it they are able to keep raising the same old claims? Are Darwinists unaware
that people just laugh at such claims and that they themselves are humiliated
by them? Do they ignore the fact that school students ridicule the theory of
evolution and argue with their teachers about it and outdo them? Do they
hope to still be able to deceive people who have seen, with full clarity, that
evolution has been demolished? Are they trying to send the message that “we
are still unbeaten” by such feeble methods as these?

A Call to Darwinists Trying to Convince Themselves They Have Not Been Routed

Darwinists are in fact well aware of what is happening to them. They know full
well that they have suffered a sure and comprehensive defeat. Yet they are
merely representing a philosophy of “nothing has happened.” They are actually
trying to convince themselves they have not been defeated, and moreover
hope that others will also believe it.

But they are mistaken. No matter what their aims may be, Darwinists are
humiliated so long as they stand up for their false theories. In recent days,
Darwinist publications and their usual supporters in Turkey have been trying to
raise the issue that “we have a Homo habilis fossil.” The interesting thing is that
Darwinists used to publish fossil skeletons discovered (or tiny bones they
found) while seeking to give the impression, through misleading wording, that
these were transitional forms, though they in fact represented perfect life
forms and exhibited no transitional characteristics at all, but in this case they
feel no need to produce a fossil at all. Furthermore, the scientists who found
the fossil referred to in these Darwinist publications have kept silent, and we
are explicitly told they have provided no details about the fossil. Bu despite all
this, a fully detailed ape-man was already drawn in the Darwinist publications
in question. As if the way that Darwinists produced pictures of a fictitious ape-
man together with his family on the basis of a single pig’s tooth were not
sufficiently astonishing, this time they have amazingly produced an ape-man in
the absence of a single fossil whatsoever. The speculation about this fictitious
fossil alleged to have been discovered in South Africa reveals the same futile
and fraudulent policy pursued by Darwinists for the last 150 years, and which
has begun to be tiresome now. The propaganda is driven with news headlines
adorned with the same false terminology: The imaginary fossil supposedly
“sheds light on evolution,” “is the missing link sought for so long,” represents
“the cradle of mankind” and will “rewrite human history”...

It is a shame to be a professor of biology and you teach students biological

myths and lies that support the illusion and myth of the theory of evolution... It
is the noble and honorable professor of biology who tells the students of
biology that everything that Darwin and his follower Richard Dawkins said
about evolution is just attempts to influence the weak Minds and drag them
towards ignorance and biological illiteracy.

The Absence of a Single Transitional Fossil Spells the End of Darwinism

There are more than 300 million fossils in existence today. Not a single one is a
transitional form. There is not a trace of all the imaginary transitional forms
that must have existed in their billions or even trillions, according to Darwinists.
To reiterate; THERE EXISTS NOT A SINGLE TRANSITIONAL FORM. This fossil, like
Ida, Ardi and all the other fossils that have been the subject of such
speculation, is merely being used for making a furore, which is all Darwinists
have left. The only reason why no detail has been provided about the fossil is
either that it does not exist or merely belongs to a monkey. Indeed, in the
event that any information is provided about this imaginary fossil, by Allah’s
leave, the requisite scientific response will certainly be forthcoming, as always.
It has always been an easy matter to expose fraud and reveal the true scientific
evidence. Since evolution never happened, the only thing to be done with this
fossil is to expose the fraudulent speculation surrounding it and reveal the
genuine scientific evidence concerning it. The way the works of Harun Yahya
have rebutted Darwinism and inflicted a comprehensive and stunning global
defeat on Darwinists has happened… »
 Darwinian myths have become a feature to
express the reality of educational deception that
continues to contribute to the graduation of
successive batches of students who hold degrees
confirming that they hold licenses to serve the
Darwinian sect... It is truly an academic crime.
About the author:

Mohamed Ababou

Obtained a Master's degree in theatrical criticism.

Writer of short and very short stories, plays, and scientific and philosophical
articles.

Amateur of sciences