IPR 1 Assignment Answer - E Commerce and E Contract
IPR 1 Assignment Answer - E Commerce and E Contract
1) Introduction
2) Legal Aspect as to Electronic Commerce in
India
3) Modes of E-Commerce
4) Case Laws Related to E-Commerce
5) Essential elements of e-contracts
6) Issues relating to e-contracts
7) E-contract and Indian law
8) Conclusion
1.Introduction
What is E-commerce? E-commerce is the buying and selling of goods or
services via the internet, and the transfer of money and data to complete
the sales. It’s also known as electronic commerce or internet commerce.
[1] It uses internet, where consumers can access different stores and
place their orders online for products and services on their own devices.
It eliminates the need to go to retail stores and provides convenience at
the fingertip to look at options and make a choice. After an order is
placed the customer’s browser communicates constantly with the server
hosting the online store website. Data is shared back and forth. Common
E-commerce marketplace platform we use regularly are Amazon, eBay,
Wayfare etc. Vendors offering E-commerce platform services for clients
hosting their own online store sites include Shopify, WooCommerce etc.
Our lives have always included contracts. Without our knowledge,
we are constantly entering into contracts, from purchasing goods to
offering services. A contract might be as simple as making an internet
purchase or as complex as signing a global peace accord.
3.Modes of E-Commerce
The Electronic commerce can be operated in four major segments of
marketing:
Business to Business (B-B)
Business to Consumer (B-C)
Consumer to Consumer (C-C)
Consumer to Business (C-B)
Kent Ro Systems Ltd & Anr Versus Amit Kotak & Ors (Ebay –
January 2017)
Kent RO had lodged Complaint with eBay as to IPR violation of its rights
by a seller on latter’s platform and wanted Ebay to verify the products
before it is uploaded on the platform.
. Court said the IT Intermediary Rules only require the intermediary to
publish the Rules and Regulations and Privacy Policy and to inform the
users of its computer resources not to host, display, uphold or publish
any information that infringes any Intellectual Proprietary Rights.
Google India Pvt Ltd VS. Visaka Industries Limited (2009)
In this case, Google was held liable as Intermediary on guilt being
proved as criminal complaint instituted before the Information technology
(Amendment) Act 2008 came into force.
Vyakti Vikas Kendra & other vs Jitender Bagga & Google
(2012)
In this case, the Art of Living Foundation filed for interim relief
against a blogger and the intermediary Google owned Blogger.com
for cyber defamation where the latter was ordered to remove all
the defamatory content within 36 hours.
5.Essential elements of e-contracts
To validate an E-Contract under Indian Contract Act, of 1872 there are
some essential elements. These are-
Lawful offer
Lawful acceptance
Lawful object
Competent parties to contract
Certainty of terms
a)Capacity to contract-
It is one of the most essential elements to consider to enforce an
agreement to become a contract. It is mentioned in sections 10, 11,
and 12 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872 which includes soundness,
major and not disqualified by law to be competent to contract. E-
contracts also holds with these basic requirements.
. The issue in E-contract is that both parties are unaware of each
other. The party providing the service or goods has no idea about the
other party if he/she is legally competent to contract or not. Ex- if a minor
of 16 years orders something through any shopping site.
b).Choice of law-
It is one of the issues in E-contracts which needs special attention. This
issue arises when the contracting parties are from two different nations
or states. In this case, the rules and regulations of both nations clash
and become difficulty to choose which rules should be followed.
Another problem is seen when the court applies the jurisdiction
where the bulk contracting transactions occurred. It is a complex issue in
E-contracts for fixing a surety as to the choice of law when the dispute
occurs. Ex- one (Originator) contracting party is from India and the other
(addressee) from the USA.
c)Choice of the forum-
This problem is similar to the problem discussed above in choice of law.
In any dispute the parties residing in different nations make their local
forums as the governing forums.
Parties to the contract may have different preferences, like if one
chooses arbitration and the other commercial suit to settle the dispute.
This is one of the never-ending dispute when the parties choose to E-
contract.
d).Electronic authentication-
Previously the contracts were based on pen and paper following the
rules and regulations of Indian Contract Act, 1872, but nowadays by the
innovation of electronics the contracts are done through this medium.
Therefore, the need of specific guidelines was a major concern.
The Information Technology Act of 2000 was then set up to
ensure the authentication of contracts by issuing the legal framework. If
the guidelines are not followed by any of the parties or both then the
contract will loss its legal validity. The things validated under this law are
electronic signatures, electronic records and electronic documents.
e).Free consent-
The free consent is the essential element for a binding contract on both
parties. Free consent has been given a special recognition in the section
13 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, but there is no provision for free
consent in Information Technology Act, 2000 to form an E-Contract.
In fact, the concept of consent is not even possible in E-contracts. It
is only possible in physical traditional contracts. The Supreme Court of
India in the case of LIC of India v. Consumer education and
research Held that the user should be careful while giving the consent to
avoid implications in future as the duty was of the user only to accept or
reject.
f).Theft of identity-
Theft of identity is as the name only suggests, when the identity of the
original user is driven by any other person either knowingly or
unknowingly. The theft of identity is the wrongdoing for a purpose like
money.
It is normally done by hacking the device. Section 66 with Section 43
expresses that if this happens then the doer will be awarded either
imprisonment for 3 years or a fine of 5 lakhs or with both.
.
The Indian Contract Act of 1872 lays down all the essentials for a
contract to be legal and enforceable. It also lays down the provisions for
if the breach of contracts takes place. Either its E-contract or traditional
contract, must fulfill the legal framework mentioned in the Act.
.
B).The Information Technology Act, 2000
Though the Indian Contract Act talks about the contracts, it did not
mentioned the validity of E-contract. The validity or legality of an E-
Contract is recognized by the Information Technology Act, 2000. Section
3 of this act talks about the verification of the E-contract by fixing the
electronic signatures by both the parties. In this way E-contracts are now
recognized as valid and not void.
8.Conclusion
Website - https://lawbhoomi.com ›
https://www.lkouniv.ac.in
to