https://www.eejournals.

org/ Open Access

EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND
SOCIAL SCIENCES (EEJHSS) ISSN: 2992-4111

©EEJHSS Publications Volume 7 Issue 1 2025

Page | 69

Creating Safe Spaces for LGBTQ+ Students in

Education
Kato Bukenya T.

Faculty of Business and Management Kampala International University Uganda

ABSTRACT
LGBTQ+ students often face discrimination, exclusion, and bullying within educational settings, making
it crucial to establish safe and inclusive spaces in schools. This paper examines the challenges LGBTQ+
students encounter, including social alienation, lack of institutional support, and systemic discrimination.
It also examines the benefits of safe spaces, such as improved mental health, academic performance, and
overall well-being. Strategies for fostering inclusivity, including educator training, policy development,
and student support programs, are discussed. Case studies highlight successful initiatives that have
created safer learning environments for LGBTQ+ students. The paper concludes with recommendations
for further research and policy advancements to ensure the continuous improvement of safe spaces in
education.
Keywords: LGBTQ+ students, safe spaces, inclusivity, educational policies, discrimination, mental
health, gender identity.
INTRODUCTION
In school settings, many educational professionals agree about the necessity of creating a safe space and
inclusive environment for all students. More and more frequently, educators and schools are recognizing
the diverse identities among students, including those in the LGBTQ+ community. However, achieving
and ensuring inclusivity in educational settings has been fraught with difficulty, particularly for teachers
and some educators who may not fully understand the experiences and needs of LGBTQ+ individuals.
Many LGBTQ+ folks are subject to ostracization from peers, face harsh discrimination from those around
them, and are unfortunately estranged by members of their households because of their identities.
Therefore, they must seek solace by spending more time in school under the supervision of educators.
Unfortunately, this is hardly better for these individuals, as schools are one of the least safe and accepting
places for them [1, 2]. Economic disparities cultivate and fertilize aggressive and negative perceptions
among teachers and those in power. Being the microcosm of society, much prejudice and hate from the
outside can be projected to schools via its educators. Naturally, these kinds of disdainful attitudes are
picked up by the students, leading to more rejection. This unfortunate and unlucky cycle can only burn
the potential, shattering the dreams and limiting the opportunities of these individuals. Many talented
kids get consumed and worn out just to keep themselves alive and breathing. Thus, the studies conducted
were motivated by the goal of engaging, exploring, and initiating discussions about the circumstances and
experiences of LGBTQ+ students in Turkish high schools. Moreover, the main purpose of the paper is to
allow readers to explore first-hand accounts of LGBTQ+ students in their educational experiences in the
hopes of improving school awareness and understanding of this topic. To this end, numerous interviews
in high schools across Turkey were conducted with LGBTQ+ students. It is hoped that these accounts
will help the reader understand a small sliver of the challenges and conditions they face due to their
identities. Additionally, some terminology and concepts related to the LGBTQ+ community are provided;
some readers may not be familiar with them. In summary, it is hoped that this publication will motivate
further studies and reflections on the topic of LGBTQ+ students in hopes of fostering a safe and
supportive environment for the betterment of all students [3, 4].

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
Understanding the LGBTQ+ Community
The LGBTQ+ community is a complex, diverse, and historically marginalized group of individuals. It has
many facets, including sexual orientation, gender, gender identity, and gender expression. One way to
understand sexual orientation is to think of the “two poles of the sexuality continuum,” which include
heterosexuality and homosexuality, and everyone fits somewhere on this spectrum. Asexuality also exists
asexuality on a continuum, which is defined as the lack of sexual attraction. Gender is a way that society
sees individuals as masculine or feminine. Gender identity is how someone identifies themselves as male, Page | 70
female, or non-binary. Non-binary is an umbrella term for a multitude of gender identities outside the
constrictions of being a man or a woman. Gender expression is the demonstration of one’s gender identity
through gender roles, dress, and other behaviors. The LGBTQ+ community has not always been seen in
a positive light. Horrifying events have happened to LGBTQ+ individuals; for example, the Stonewall
Riots, the murders of individuals, or the Pulse shooting. This violent history has left an indelible impact
on today’s LGBTQ+ society, such as persisting transphobia and a desire for safe spaces. Being able to
create safe spaces for the LGBTQ+ community is critically important in supporting the continued fight
for equal rights in the modern day and offering reprieve from the oppressive society. Essentially, the need
for them within any community is crucial, especially within the education system. To fully understand the
concept of a safe space, it is important to realize the issues that various groups within the LGBTQ+
community experience. Race, for example, is a critical subject for the LGBTQ+ community. There is a
stigma in today’s society that being both LGBTQ+ and a minority is paradoxical. Embodying both
identities exasperates the issues that come with them. The idea of the “Model Minority Myth” is harmful
because it paints minorities as successful, hardworking, and well-off. Individuals already face a difficult
time coming out due to traditional values within their culture, so being seen as the perfect child
exacerbates the issue. There is evidence of discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community in the
workplace, so the concept of being a “model” in the eyes of the community is damaging and perpetuates
the idea that they do not require resources. Socioeconomics is also a crucial component of the safe spaces
that must be created to fully protect the community. Class is another barrier faced by the LGBTQ+
community. The idea of being both poor and a part of the community is already met with resistance.
Coming to terms with being both adds guilt and disillusionment to the mix, turning what should be one’s
main resource into a symbol of anxiety. Statistically, the LGBTQ+ community is facing a higher level of
poverty due to the higher levels of education needed to get jobs and the glass ceiling that still exists for
transgender individuals. For some, maintaining two separate facades is necessary to blend in with either
group. Well-off individuals are already excluded from services designed for the poor, which is why they
are often shamed for asking for assistance. In contrast, the poor feel they do not belong in wealthy
environments. Additionally, it is critical to understand that different members of the LGBTQ+
community will have unique experiences. These unique experiences make it challenging to create a single,
universal institutional effort to systematically support the community. Instead, cultivating empathy
within an educational setting, so others can understand the specific needs of that individual, is key. For
example, cis women and trans women both experience misogyny in society; however, the misogyny that
affects each of them is different. Cis women are judged and paid less due to being seen as weak. A trans
woman is a target of hatred because of the patriarchy. Sexual orientation, on the other hand, affects both
binary and non-binary people differently, so a one-size-fits-all service is meaningless [5, 6].
Challenges Faced by LGBTQ+ Students in Education
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, questioning, and gender diverse (LGBQGD) students enter educational
environments with unique identities that warrant increased support and resources. However, many
LGBQGD students encounter oppressive school climates that exacerbate social alienation. Research
consistently shows that these students face additional psychological stressors as a result of experiencing
routine incidents of bullying, harassment, and discrimination in educational settings based on their sexual
and gender minority identities. The existence of GSA clubs significantly reduces reported sightings of
homophobic name calling, physical assault, and perception of bullying when schools include LGBTQ
issues in the curriculum and offer students GSAs; gender nonconforming students, particularly boys,
benefit the most in terms of safety and school approval. Educator intervention is critical, such that LGBQ
students are more likely to feel safer at school and report fewer incidents of LGBTQ-inclusive discussion
by creating safety plans and intervening in instances of bullying. Further, LGB students' performance in
school suffers at the hands of an oppressive school climate. In turn, lack of support and visibility can
exacerbate feelings of alienation and erase their contributions to society. Queer students are marginalized,
even within student activist organizations that fight for educational justice. With a patchwork of
legislated protection, QueerIing students become invisible and subject to discrimination and harassment;
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
training for educators will only be successful if the awareness campaign sparks critical self-reflection on
the part of those individuals holding power; otherwise, OWIs could result not in gender/Queer peoples
feeling safer, but in further rigidifying discipline and safety practices. Exhausted by prejudices at school,
LGBTQ students are deprived of psychological stability. This unstable state, combined with different
forms of oppression, instigates an accumulation of grievances among LGBTQ school students [7, 8].
Benefits of Creating Safe Spaces
While the last decade has seen progress in the acceptance and celebration of diverse sexual orientations Page | 71
and gender identities, LGBTQ+ students in schools continue to face persistent stigma, discrimination,
and violence. Inclusive policies and programs are fundamental to overcoming this challenge, yet only 50
percent of students have such supports available. To create a more inclusive and welcoming environment
for LGBTQ students, safe spaces must become more accessible in school systems. The advocacy and
provision of safe spaces are important for a myriad of reasons. First, students' mental health and
emotional well-being are significantly improved when they can express their sexual orientation or gender
identity in school. This support grants students safety from violence or bullying while creating a
comfortable space to convey and explore identity. Students can wholeheartedly take part in class when
shunning the disquieting act of hiding who they are. An embrace of such knowledge strengthens
instructors’ respect and acknowledgment for him or her. This helps nurture a longstanding feeling of
inclusion and dignity for students of all sexual or gender diversity. Safe spaces characteristically stimulate
occurrences and exchanges between individuals unalike in their orientation or gender identity. Moreover,
they create dimensions that allow a mutual understanding and respect between students that do not
deliberate equality in their sexuality or gender identity. This kind of plan can be used to fight
discrimination, bringing down its pervasive aspects. Safe spaces can significantly profit LGBTQ
individuals in the school atmosphere, thus making schools safer and more inclusive settings. So long as
there persists a significant amount of bullying in schools against LGBTQ students, safety is preferred
significantly. Yet, as much as an exclusive screen can protect and assist a student, it cannot alter its
system. Respondent reports on the occasional creation of a safe space-like sphere around a bullied student
or a peer experiencing other acts of ridicule. Still, since the same setting simultaneously accommodates
bullying behaviour elsewhere, this respondent universe frequently feels composed by false walls. Overall,
students significantly benefit from disclosing their sexual orientation or gender identity [9, 10].
Strategies for Establishing Safe Spaces
School should be a safe space for LGBTQ+ students, but all too often, LGBTQ+ students face a hostile,
unsafe environment at school. According to the social ecological model, the interaction between a person
and his or her environment affects personal growth and development. Observations of negative actions in
recent years have inspired genuinely different strategies. Most Americans are in favor of strategies and
restrictions on particular actions that fall under the general category of hate speech or hate crimes,
designed to change the treatment of demonstrably mistreated populations in educational environments.
Fewer back, among high school adults for case, report 2009 New Jersey state legislation and 2011 for
federal rules preferences for extremely hostile experiences. Another feasible move for hostile schools is
district-level changes. School attendants may recognize the institution-inclusive changes listed in the
“Dear Colleague” letter in 2010 on prohibitory language schools district usage of anti-gay slang or
supporting learning policies to protect transgender people’s political skills NSP, development, they may
be uncertain of their ability to successfully implement those practices. Alternative safer space strategies
include asking teachers to stay present in hallways during periods between classes when the proposition
exists to reduce the likelihood of the goal of transferring anti-gay slang [11, 12].
Training and Support for Educators
Research and experience have demonstrated that one of the most critical elements in creating safe and
inclusive school environments for LGBTTQQIAAP students is training and support for educators.
Ongoing professional development is essential in building educators’ awareness and understanding of
LGBTTQQIAAP identities and rights and in providing them with strategies to create welcoming and
supportive classrooms and schools. Educator support can take many forms, including initial training
courses, guest speakers, webinars, workshops, reading materials, guidelines, and toolkits. Furthermore,
sustaining school environments where effective support, social support, and safety are restored relies on
the maintenance and availability of equity-focused teachers. This also includes the use of expert guest
speakers who provide students with an understanding of LGBTTQQIAAP oppression and how to disrupt
prejudice and discrimination. This is particularly important as many frequently observed student teachers
may not incorporate the experiences and academic achievements of LGBTTQQIAAP people, creating a
non-inclusive classroom. With the increased exposure to creative instruction strategies and curriculum
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
ideas presented by the guest speakers, student teachers feel better equipped to represent and support
LGBTTQQIAAP learners and to challenge discrimination and heteronormativity [13, 14]. Further
support may include professional organizations that offer LGBTTQQIAAP resources and mentorship
opportunities. Mentor teachers may pair with the student teacher in the training course or practicum
placement. This type of collaborative learning relationship is intended to facilitate an exchange of
resources and increase understanding, action, and capacity through sharing knowledge and effective
teaching strategies that help to create safe and inclusive communities. The services received by mentored Page | 72
educators may also include attendance at a panel discussion with senior staff who engage in practices that
advocate for LGBTTQQIAAP-inclusive schools, thus enhancing the creation and implementation of
positive policy and driving the development of further resources. Over time, a network of peers becomes
engaged, exchanging stories that inform their practice and facilitate the creation of a more accepting
environment where they are more confident in creating safe and inclusive spaces for all students [15, 16].
Case Studies of Successful Safe Space Initiatives
In Chicago, IL, a community member was moved by the Pink Dot Safe Space initiative, which used the
color dots found on many office supplies as a metaphor and signifier. After some serious violence in the
Palm Coast, FL community, the community members decided that something similar was needed there.
Flyers were designed and distributed throughout community centers, schools, libraries, and the local
youth center, Centerway. The flyer defined the pink dot symbology and invited interested people to an
open community meeting at the Palm Coast city hall [17, 18]. After some time, the Palm Coast Safe
Space Alliance came into being. With the enthusiastic support of a friendly commissioner, the alliance
staged additional sessions around town, focusing on a different minority each time. The dot idea was used
each time. Decals were produced and freely given out. With the help of a lesbian police officer working
out of the local police department, the sheriff’s department was persuaded to sponsor a training session
conducted by a prominent gay-friendly psychologist. There was much private eye-rolling among the
officers in attendance, but the psychologist was able to show the correlation between a safe/out work
environment and reduced suicide rates among teenage minorities. Over a year, the word got through.
Safety Patrol officers (for it was they who were the major offenders) got sacked, and the general level of
incivility could be said to have been somewhat reduced. With the consent of the superintendent, large
pink dots were painted at the entrances of the local schools, indicating that these were safe environments
for LGBT people. The decals remained in use. Attracting 340 participants, it became the largest fly-out of
its kind in the nation. Safe Space clubs were instituted in two of the four local high schools as an
alternative to detention for hate crimes against known or perceived minorities [19, 20].
Future Directions
Across the globe, a variety of concerns and issues face LGBTQ+ students as they navigate through
educational systems and learning environments. These students are frequently at an increased risk for
various forms of violence, harassment, and discrimination. The education system should be a safe space
for all LGBTQ+ students to learn and gain a better understanding of themselves, the world, and each
other. This paper has illustrated how educators can create safe spaces for LGBTQ+ students in
educational environments through the fostering of supportive climates, inclusive curriculums and
resources, intentional language practices, and the utilization of gender-neutral signs. These suggested
practices are not exhaustive: creating truly safe spaces will involve continuous efforts and the collective
responsibility of educators, students, and communities, as well as ongoing listening, learning, and
reflection. In sum, the projected challenges are significant and numerous; yet, the call and drive to nurture
safe, affirming spaces for these very students is only more pressing. Through hard work and imagined
care and attention, it is at least thus hoped there can be progress and safety secured for all LGBTQ+
youth in and out of classrooms [21, 22]. There is still much work to be done to nurture safe spaces for
LGBTQ+ students at all levels of education. Safe spaces in education will remain an ongoing battle and
opportunity for advocacy and promoting support needs, and the impetus rests on the collective
responsibility of all educators, students, and communities. Training programs and policy changes must
continue to evolve and be put in place. There is a pressing need to conduct additional research on the
long-term effects of safe spaces on the personal and academic growth of LGBTQ+ students throughout
their educational careers. At the heart of such efforts must be an acknowledgment of the constantly
shifting and varied attitudes toward LGBTQ+ issues. As societal understandings and commitments
regarding these issues grow and evolve, future efforts and approaches with students, training, and policy
supervision must be similarly adaptive to maintain their attentiveness and determination. Finally, creative
and informed methodology and partnerships that invite a variety of voices and modalities are required to

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
enact meaningful and lasting changes within education to prompt the engagement of educators, students,
and community members alike [23, 24, 25].
CONCLUSION
Creating safe spaces for LGBTQ+ students in education is not just a moral imperative but also a
necessity for fostering equitable learning environments. Schools must implement policies and programs
that actively support and protect LGBTQ+ students from discrimination and harassment. This requires
collective action from educators, administrators, students, and the broader community. While progress Page | 73
has been made, ongoing research, training, and advocacy efforts are essential to sustain and expand these
safe spaces. By prioritizing inclusivity and understanding, educational institutions can play a crucial role
in empowering LGBTQ+ students and ensuring their right to a supportive and respectful learning
experience.
REFERENCES
1. Harris R, Wilson-Daily AE, Fuller G. ‘I just want to feel like I’m part of everyone else’: How
schools unintentionally contribute to the isolation of students who identify as LGBT+.
Cambridge Journal of Education. 2022 Mar 4;52(2):155-73. tandfonline.com
2. Russell ST, Bishop MD, Saba VC, James I, Ioverno S. Promoting school safety for LGBTQ and
all students. Policy insights from the behavioral and brain sciences. 2021 Oct;8(2):160-6. nih.gov
3. Montagno MJ, Garrett‐Walker JJ, Ho JT. Two, four, six, eight… why we want to participate:
Motivations and barriers to LGBTQ+ activism. Journal of Community & Applied Social
Psychology. 2021 Nov;31(6):644-58. [HTML]
4. Kiperman S, Schacter HL, Judge M, DeLong G. LGBTQ+ youth’s identity development in the
context of peer victimization: A mixed methods investigation. International journal of
environmental research and public health. 2022 Mar 25;19(7):3921. mdpi.com
5. McCartan A, Nash CJ. Creating queer safe space: relational space-making at a grassroots LGBT
pride event in Scotland. Gender, Place & Culture. 2023 Jun 3;30(6):770-90.
6. Quinan C. Safe space. Critical concepts in queer studies and education: An international guide for
the twenty-first century. 2016:361-8.
7. Kosciw JG, Clark CM, Truong NL, Zongrone AD. The 2019 National School Climate Survey:
The Experiences of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer Youth in Our Nation's
Schools. A Report from GLSEN. Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN). 121
West 27th Street Suite 804, New York, NY 10001; 2020.
8. Kokozos M, Gonzalez M. Critical inclusion: Disrupting LGBTQ normative frameworks in
school contexts. Equity & Excellence in Education. 2020 Apr 2;53(1-2):151-64.
9. Hackman CL, Bettergarcia JN, Wedell E, Simmons A. Qualitative exploration of perceptions of
sexual assault and associated consequences among LGBTQ+ college students. Psychology of
Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity. 2022 Mar;9(1):81.
centerforcollaborativetransformations.com
10. Suarez NA, McKinnon II, Krause KH, Rasberry CN, Pampati S, Underwood JM. Disparities in
behaviors and experiences among transgender and cisgender high school students—18 US
states, 2021. Annals of epidemiology. 2024 Jun 1;94:113-9.
11. Harris R, Wilson-Daily AE, Fuller G. Exploring the secondary school experience of LGBT+
youth: An examination of school culture and school climate as understood by teachers and
experienced by LGBT+ students. Intercultural Education. 2021 Jul 4;32(4):368-85.
12. Cardinal H. Creating Safe and Inclusive Schools for LGTBQ Students. BU Journal of Graduate
Studies in Education. 2021;13(2):17-21.
13. Stephens RD. Safe schools: A handbook for violence prevention. National Educational Service,
1252 Loesch Road, PO Box 8, Bloomington, IN 47402-0008; 1995.
14. Minkos ML, Gelbar NW. Considerations for educators in supporting student learning in the
midst of COVID‐19. Psychology in the Schools. 2021 Feb;58(2):416-26.
15. Soto-Lillo P, Quiroga-Lobos M. University tutors and school mentors: Evaluators in the
practical training of future teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2021 Nov 1;107:103489.
16. Ploj Virtič M, Du Plessis A, Šorgo A. In the search for the ideal mentor by applying the
‘Mentoring for effective teaching practice instrument’. European Journal of Teacher Education.
2023 Aug 8;46(4):688-706. tandfonline.com
17. Jackson M. Race issues brought to. forefront. Chronicle [November 3, 1997].;11:3-1997.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited
https://www.eejournals.org/ Open Access
18. Cerulo KA. Talking about race. InSociological Forum 2007 Jun 1 (Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 219-219).
Wiley/Blackwell (10.1111).
19. Autelitano F, Giuliani F. Colored bicycle lanes and intersection treatments: International
overview and best practices. Journal of traffic and transportation engineering (English edition).
2021 Jun 1;8(3):399-420. sciencedirect.com
20. Xie K, Zhang Y, Han W. Architectural heritage preservation for rural revitalization: Typical
case of traditional village Retrofitting in China. Sustainability. 2024 Jan 12;16(2):681. Page | 74
21. Fields X, Wotipka CM. Effect of LGBT anti-discrimination laws on school climate and outcomes
for lesbian, gay, and bisexual high school students. Journal of LGBT Youth. 2022 Jul
3;19(3):307-29.
22. Ogenyi FC, Eze VH, Ugwu CN. Navigating Challenges and Maximizing Benefits in the
Integration of Information and Communication Technology in African Primary Schools.
International Journal of Humanities, Management and Social Science (IJ-HuMaSS). 2023 Dec
20;6(2):101-8.
23. Gallardo-Nieto EM, Espinosa-Spínola M, Ríos-González O, García-Yeste C. Transphobic
violence in educational centers: Risk factors and consequences in the victims’ wellbeing and
health. Sustainability. 2021 Feb 3;13(4):1638. mdpi.com
24. Awada M, Becerik-Gerber B, Hoque S, O'Neill Z, Pedrielli G, Wen J, Wu T. Ten questions
concerning occupant health in buildings during normal operations and extreme events including
the COVID-19 pandemic. Building and Environment. 2021 Jan 15;188:107480. sciencedirect.com
25. Fakih MG, Bufalino A, Sturm L, Huang RH, Ottenbacher A, Saake K, Winegar A, Fogel R,
Cacchione J. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, central-line–associated
bloodstream infection (CLABSI), and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI): the
urgent need to refocus on hardwiring prevention efforts. Infection Control & Hospital
Epidemiology. 2022 Jan;43(1):26-31. cambridge.org

CITE AS: Kato Bukenya T. (2025). Creating Safe Spaces for LGBTQ+
Students in Education. EURASIAN EXPERIMENT JOURNAL OF
HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 7(1):69-74

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium,
provided the original work is properly cited