Green's Function

Hermisticity of
um
#
wi

N
a
with
TG(x S(K-E)
Let ,
, 4) =

condition
boundary
and B

e
1
L
↑ (x, 2) = Slu - )
with adjoint
se
roundary
T
condition B
*

Tam[(t) *
G,

(oT I ,
3)) I o
(3)
=
g[G+ ]a
un
in
Bi-linear
and
Get and their

desivative
first
9 [G Ge
+

]/e Jan (3-4) G(x , 43)

*

(GT 3-5)]
,

u , 4))

L
an

Defende eals of !
on

operatorsand (G +
0
G = 0
The
provi
,

as D B are mutually &

3))
, +

(g
! G (3 3) =
(G ,

adjoint .

# A

(G(x 3))
+
G (G x) ,
: ,

↓
row column

interchanged

=>
 Inhomogenous boundary
condition
mmm

2g : -
2 =
g() ,
Y(d = a
,
y(1 = 1

for
*
We know the
Green
function
0
y(
=

>2 y : 0
(0)
- =
y(x , y ,

I
Gag (1-2)
G(4 3) :
x(1 -2)
, u(40
edg
-

adjoint ! ,
as
G (2 , 3)
and y(x)
Now ,
nee
eq for

-(4) T
I
an

2) 2(
5)
(( 3)
-

7 ,

un
S(x 2)
-

01
(03) y(4)
S G(* 3)
-

= ,
 4) I) - G(3)
= -

(((
mem
,

Total Derivative
&

y(3) +
6(0 6) %
3)
(06(3
,
=
+
-
: 0

8
~
G(1 , 3)
83 : 2

=
J(y) und
-

ut
P= %.

O
S(u y)
B)

si
-

G(3) = 0
(from
:

Coy(7
43)y(
=
(G(2
= ,

(0 , 3) C
-

C
(1-4)y(8
Gy(1)
-

-
=

Ac GallSee -
 L 1 .
S
In .

by y(x)
,

=
us
-

we
,

a)]
j((x)a(a y(a)s(
-

,
3) -

dx

=>
y(s) =

*
Jf(x)G( ,
4)

+
+ 54(
(1 5) y(0)

is arbitrary Final solt is

,
E
x
, .

#
FagasSo -

-
↓
particular complementary
Integral Function .
 .

:
g Do this
for ,

acta
* content G (x , 4) as
for
this
case

!
self-adjoint
Ti
not

pansion
Eigenfunction
mum have a
we

* For self-adjoint operator .

set eigenfunctions
of
complete
functions
the Green
We can
expan
them .
in terms of
 Normalized !
eigenfunctions
-

[q = Ni -
Accume" In to
#n

·
checks -
:

n
*

=
z0(k)0S
roun
using completenes
1 relation

LG (4 , 97 = S(x -

3)
 fronnation
Come
O

Function : -

Gen
Modifiedmmm
um
mode)
(i e
zero
cignatures
.

If
have
wo zoro
will
Function
Grow
Then the modified

Capri a
we
,

G
Nut
o tracted
But
↓ earlier !
Ther , *
1
Plus Pla 2
G modifi S(x- 4)o
-
 about
Some comments analytic
Function
Properties of
Green

mmmmm
Function
Green
a Causal
* Consider

0
Alz
G(t
-

2) =

F .
T
(improper
Integral)
*
icut
G(t)dt
& (a)
=

Se
8 T

e (t)
=
LineSet ]
it
M real co
,
then

converge yar T
betta
will converge
WatiW I,
imaginary -
part .
W-
0
- wI)
-
 valued and
(a) a complex entire
the
defined
in
well

plane
upfer-no
WI
E analytic

F
ive Taylor i on

We
empane
around any
!
converges
print

E terrencies
t
29:-
,

ace) :

to

V > .
0

F .
T (a)
=iv) +

analytic
in
upper-half
compli plane
 W = - i IR

the
lower-
in
has
pale
half

-
-
X
iV-e
T -
X
is

in
the

it can
have
pare
Only way it was
a

-
growing
plane if
upper half i
unstable
E system
exponential
!
to the pertulation
(
can real co (frequency
6 F T
- duen at
even
exist ! )
D

Nyquist
on
Criteri
devices !
electronic
yar stability of
 Inverting : -

(t)
w is comple
Pretend i WI
G : Up +
W
i
Wat
-

o a langa
C
It-
"

Far t < 01 e

wyo
clasethe ne

I
[

-
Im
-
F L
upper
pul
X X

the aren says

reside
Junchy
it is Zero him
coutint

?
-
comes
t > 0 than
from
as w L
D
two puls
+ givers t
-
- which the

e
G (t) =
↓ e-Utsin (nt) to
2 ,

O ,
to
I

combining !
vt
(et)
-

O(t) & sin

-

C Analyticity
ality mmm
Care

um

·
Formula
Premely m
b

f(o) : ir
at
a the
wilin

If alies encounter pale

have
will we

enun
we which
=
w ! ead !
at w to

but pulling
wic
a >
 ↓
Principal
Port

=principal part
sim

them
(a) amalylic , e
If the line going theent
i a

beach
cut !

I branch
at
singularities
2 = a,
l
 ↓ I station

"I 1.

-
↓ ↓
symmetrically sharply peaked
cut-off by
al
at we
w

to ~ITS(N-w)
This give rise
↓
Plata) t - 0

InT + (4)
in - 0 give

Symbolically :-
 is real
* If p(a)

=>
f(w + it) =
(f(w -

ie))
Hence ,
& (1(N + +e) + f (w
-i
x)
um
Real
Purely

& (f(w + iz)

-

y(w
-

it)
um
Purely Imaginary

r
a

#arti
Give rise to "Framers -
relation !
Knowing