Module 3 - Tender and Contract - Lecture Notes
Module 3 - Tender and Contract - Lecture Notes
in
Click to Edit and final completion, iv) Defects liability period, v) Latent and patent defects, vi) Liquidated and un-liquidated
damages, vii) Extension of time, delays and penalty, viii) Non tendered items, extras, extra work, additional
works, variations, rate analysis and architect’s role in certification of variations,
ix) Prime cost, provisional sum.
Supervision and Contract Administration: Site visits, site meeting, co-ordination with various agencies, site
book, site instructions, clerk of works and site office.
Bill checking, quality auditing, handover procedures and final certification.
Disputes in contract and architect’s role in resolving disputes. Case studies from practice highlighting disputes
in contract and methods adopted to solve such disputes.
● It is an invitation from the
Click to Edit owner to the contractor to
execute some work at
specified cost in specified
time.
● It is published in the form of
tender notice in news
papers, notice boards, online
etc. according to the cost of
works.
Click to Edit
Step-by-Step Procedure of Tender Process:
Project Planning:
● Define project scope, objectives, and requirements.
● Develop a detailed project plan, including timelines and budget estimates.
Preparation of Tender Documents:
● Develop comprehensive tender documents outlining project details, specifications, and
expectations.
● Include technical drawings, project timelines, and any specific criteria for evaluation.
Advertisement:
Click to Edit ● Advertise the tender in relevant channels to attract potential bidders.
● Ensure wide visibility to encourage competitive bids.
Site Visit and Pre-Bid Meeting:
● Arrange a site visit for potential bidders to understand the project context.
● Conduct a pre-bid meeting to clarify any queries and provide additional project information.
Bid Submission:
● Bidders prepare and submit their proposals within the specified deadline.
● Ensure all necessary documentation and qualifications are included.
Step-by-Step Procedure of Tender Process:
Bid Opening:
● Open bids publicly to maintain transparency.
● Record and document all bids received.
Bid Evaluation:
● Evaluate bids based on predefined criteria, considering factors such as expertise, cost, and
timeline.
● May involve a committee or external evaluators.
Selection of Winning Bid:
● Select the bid that best meets project requirements and evaluation criteria.
● Notify the winning bidder and initiate further contractual discussions.
Click to Edit
Contract Negotiation:
● Negotiate contract terms, including scope, timelines, and payment schedules.
● Ensure legal and regulatory compliance.
Award of Contract:
● Once negotiations are successful, formally award the contract to the selected bidder.
● Issue a formal acceptance letter or contract agreement.
Project Commencement:
● Begin the project as per the agreed-upon terms and conditions.
● Monitor progress and ensure adherence to the contract.
1. Tender Notices:
● Procedure: The opening of tenders is a public process where the submitted bids are
opened and read aloud. This is usually done on a specified date and time.
● Public Access: The tender opening process is often open to the public, ensuring
transparency and accountability.
● Recording: Details of the bids, including names of bidders and bid amounts, are
recorded during the opening process.
● Shortlisting: Based on the scrutiny, a shortlist of qualified bidders is created. This may
involve prequalification or a detailed assessment of the submitted bids.
● Selection Criteria: The final selection is based on various factors, including the
competitiveness of the bid, the bidder's experience, and their ability to meet project
requirements.
● Approval: The selected bidder is usually subject to approval by relevant authorities or
decision-makers within the procuring entity.
5. Award Process:
Click to Edit
● Notification: The successful bidder is formally notified of the award decision. Unsuccessful
bidders are also notified.
● Contract Negotiation: After the award, negotiations may take place to finalize contract
terms, including scope, timelines, and payment terms.
● Contract Signing: Once negotiations are complete, the contract is signed between the
procuring entity and the successful bidder.
● Performance Bond: In many cases, the successful bidder is required to provide a
performance bond or security deposit.
TENDERS BASED ON ECONOMIC CLASSIFICATION
(viii) Other works: Piece work or days work cannot be strictly classified as tenders. They do
not involve security deposit or penalty as they do not involve Large sums of money.
(ix) Day work: This method of execution is good for small works, which cannot be measured or
valued, (e.g. decorative work, craftwork, artwork, etc.). Payment for the same shall be decided
on the basis of site observation plus reasonable profit.
(xi) Consultancy Selection: Choose consultants based on professional capacity, experience,
and advertise with a two-cover system. Consultant cost is minimal compared to the project
cost; consider past performance, professionalism, personnel strength, and attitude.
(xii) Proof Consultants: Engage for specific periods and circumstances, avoid focusing solely
Click to Edit on the least cost option, and encourage collaboration between main and proof consultants.
Selection Criteria:
Quality-Based Selection (QBS): For highly specialized assignments.
Best Expert Advice: Applicable for major projects like dams.
Fixed Budget (FBS): Simple, precisely defined assignments.
Least Cost Selection (LCS): Routine or standard nature assignments.
Consultant's Qualification (CQS): Small assignments where competitive evaluation is not
justified.
PREREQUISITES FOR TENDERING
1. It is the Client who calls tenders, not the Architect, consequently it is the Client’s prerogative to
state the terms and conditions of the tender.
2. The Architect’s roles is to:
a) Prepare the tender documents
b) Distribute them to the respondents
c) Manage the process which includes the confidential closing of tenders at the specified date and time and
to provide a recommendation on which tender is most suitable.
d) The tender should be opened in the presence of owner or member with the architect. If the owner doesn’t
Click to Edit not remain present, the tenders should be opened by the architect himself. The practice of receiving and
opening of the tenders by the clients should be discouraged.
e) Once selected, it is generally the architect’s role to scrutinize the tender and advise the preferred
tenderer, in writing, of the Client’s acceptance and to prepare the formal contracts between Client and
builder.
f) The lowest tender should as far as possible be accepted depending upon the Contractor’s financial
stability, Intelligence, capacity to organize, credit in market, previous works executed, works at present in
hand, general behavior and temperament.
Issues Arising out of Tendering Process:
Click to Edit
Security Deposit:
● Definition: A Security Deposit is a sum of money retained by the client or employer from the
contractor as a guarantee against any potential default or non-performance.
● In short security deposit is a percentage of contract value held to cover defaults.
● Purpose: It provides financial security to the client and can be used to cover costs in case of
the contractor's failure to meet contractual obligations.
● Refund: The security deposit is typically refunded to the contractor upon successful
completion of the contract.
Short notes :
Retention Amount:
● Definition: Retention is a percentage of each payment made to the contractor that is
withheld by the client until the completion of the project.
● In short Retention amount is a Part of payment withheld until project completion.
● Purpose: It ensures that the contractor addresses any defects or issues that may arise
during the defects liability period.
● Release: The retention amount is released to the contractor after the defects liability period,
provided that all contractual obligations are met.
8. Performance of the Contract: The parties are obligated to fulfill their respective
responsibilities as outlined in the contract. In architecture, this involves the architect providing the
agreed-upon services, and the client making the required payments.
9. Termination and Breach: The contract should outline conditions under which it can be
terminated and the consequences of a breach. Termination might occur due to mutual
agreement, completion of services, or a breach of contract terms.
11. Dispute Resolution: The contract may include mechanisms for resolving disputes, such as
mediation, arbitration, or litigation. Defining these processes in the contract helps in case
disagreements arise.
12. Insurance and Liability: Contracts often include provisions related to liability and insurance
coverage. Architects may be required to have professional liability insurance to cover potential
errors or omissions.
Click to Edit
Click to Edit
Click to Edit
TECHNICAL TERMS
(xi) Deviation: Increase or decrease with respect to contract, plan, and estimate.
(xii) DPR: Detailed Project Report
(xiii) Escalation: Escalation is Compensation for price rise, or allocation for the risk of price rise.
(xiv) Extra item: Any item of work not included in schedule of quantities forming part of the
agreement.
(xv) Force majuere: An unexpected event. An irresistible and superior force.
(xvi) Frustration of contract: Duty to perform a promise made in the contract is discharged.
(xvii) Latent defects: Latent defects are those which could only have been identified after the
Click to Edit
issue of the final certificate. For latent defects of materials, other than those due to faulty
specification or workmanship, the Architect is not liable to his client, but the contractor is liable to
his owner. For latent defects of design, or specification, the contractor is not liable to the owner,
but the Architect is liable to his client, if it can be proved that there was negligence or
incompetence on the Architect's part.
(xviii) Lien: Legal right to hold other's property until debt on it is paid.
(xix) Negotiation: A process of amicable settlement of an issue in the spirit of give and take.
TECHNICAL TERMS
(xx) Patent defects: Patent defects are those which should have identified before the issue of
final certificate. The Architect is liable to his client for patent defects which he should have
noticed in the course of his - supervision but which he failed to notice or failed to instruct whose
list is generally sent to the contractor at the end of defect liability period.
(xxi) Prime cost: If the specifications for any item or material or fixtures or fittings are not
finalized by the architect the contractors are asked to quote prime cost to be adjusted later when
the same is selected/
or approved. Prime cost relates to materials to be supplied by the vendors. (vide Clause 26 & 27
of IIA contract form)
Click to Edit (xx.ii) Promisee: A person accepting the proposal.
(xx.iii) Promisor: A person making the proposal.
(xx.iv) Quantum meruit: As much as one deserves. It is paid for the work done or services
rendered when the price thereof is not cost fixed by the contract.
(xxv) Surety: One who promises for the debt, default, or miscarriage of another.
(xxvi) Variations: Alterations, or modifications, of designs, quality, quantity, or specification of
work shown in the contract.
(xxvii) Work order: It is written order issued by the owner or his authorized architect or
engineer to the contractor, intimating him that his contract has been accepted for
commencement of the work.
Types of Contracts
Classification of Building Contracts may be considered for proper modes of execution of
the building works.
Broadly speaking there are two classifications of contract which are popular with
the architects/engineers namely:
i. Lump-sum contract
ii. Item rate contract
Advantages
1. Low risk on the owner, Higher risk to the contractor
2. Cost known at outset
3. Contractor will assign best personnel
4. Contractor selection is easy.
Disadvantages
Click to Edit
1. Changes are difficult and costly.
2. Contractor is free to use the lowest cost of material equipment, methods.
3. The contractor carries much of the risks. The tendered price may include high risk
contingency.
4. Competent contractors may decide not to bid to avoid a high-risk lump sum contract.
Types of Contracts
Item Rate Contract
● The item rate contract is most commonly used for all types of engineering works of the
government undertakings including railway department.
● It is suitable for works which can be distinctly split into various items and quantities
under each item can be estimated accurately. Item rate contract is also known as unit
price contract or schedule contract
● A contractor undertakes the execution of working an item rate basis. He is required to quote
rate for individual item of work on the basis of schedule of quantities (i.e., bill of quantities)
furnished by the department.
Click to Edit ● The amount to be received by the contractor, depends upon the quantities of work actually
performed.
● The payment to the contractor is made on the basis of the detailed measurements of
different items of work actually executed by him.
● This contract deals in measurement of each item of the work as given in the bill of
quantities and sum to be paid is arrived at based on the rates quoted against each item. In
the bill of quantities all the items are described in detail along with the quantities.
● Here the rates are the part of the contract and the quantities can carry the prefix
“approximate”, do not form part of the contract in as much as variations in the quantities will
not vitiate the contract.
Types of Contracts
Item Rate Contract
Merits
• This method ensures a very detailed analysis of cost and payment to the contractor and also is
based upon detailed measurements of each item actually done, so this method is more scientific.
• Changes in drawings and quantities of individual item can be made as per requirements within agreed
limits.
• There is no urgency of providing detailed drawings at the time of awarding the contract. It can be
prepared later on.
• A contractor is asked to write down the rate of individual item in figures and words both so it is not
easy to form a cartel during the submission of tender.
• An engineer can compare the rates quoted by the contractor with that of schedule of rates prepared
Click to Edit by the departments to find out whether the tender is unbalanced.
Demerits
• As by wise anticipation or perhaps outside information, a contractor may quote high for items that are
likely to be increased and low rate for items likely to be decreased, making an unbalanced tender.
• Comparative statement of item rate tenders are more elaborate and comprehensive and intelligent
scrutiny is required.
• A contractor may quote some items in words intentionally in order to tamper in rates.
• The total cost of work can only be known after completion. As such the owner may face financial
difficulty if the final cost is substantially high.
• The scope of saving with use of inferior quality may prompt the contractor to do so.
Types of Contracts
Cost Plus Percentage or Cost-Plus Fee Contract
● This contract requires the contractor to provide materials, labor, and tools for the work, with the owner
reimbursing the cost plus a specified profit percentage.
● Despite potential issues like fictitious bills and arguments about pilferage, the key concern may arise from
ambiguity regarding whether the specified percentage covers only profit or includes overhead charges.
● This ambiguity becomes relevant when considering factors like the nature of work, site conditions, contractor
status, establishment charges, office expenses, and potential disputes over wasteful expenditure.
● Project Oversight: Architects are responsible for regularly monitoring the construction
progress to ensure that it aligns with the project schedule and meets the specified
quality standards.
● Documentation: Architects maintain thorough documentation of the construction
process, including any changes, deviations, or issues that may arise. Proper
documentation is crucial for dispute resolution and accountability.
● Inspections and Approvals: Architects conduct site inspections to verify that the work
meets the approved plans. They provide approvals at key milestones, allowing the
Click to Edit project to proceed in accordance with the contract.
● Project Closeout: Architects contribute to the successful closeout of the project by
ensuring that all contractual obligations are met, conducting final inspections, and
facilitating the handover of the completed project to the client.
● Termination for Convenience: Allows a party to terminate the contract without specifying any
particular reason.
● Termination for Cause: Occurs due to a specific breach or violation of terms by one of the
parties.
● Mutual Termination: Both parties agree to end the contract by mutual consent.
● Termination Clauses: Specific conditions and procedures for termination are usually outlined in
the contract.
● Virtual Completion: Refers to the completion of a substantial part of the work, often allowing
partial handover.
● Final Completion: The formal completion of the entire project, meeting all requirements and
standards.
Issues arising in Contract:
iv) Defects Liability Period:
● Post-Completion Period: The duration during which the contractor is responsible for rectifying
defects at their own cost.
● Defects Identification: Any issues arising during this period are typically rectified by the contractor.
● Latent Defects: Defects that are not apparent or visible during normal inspection.
● Patent Defects: Obvious defects that can be identified through ordinary inspection.
● Extension of Time: Additional time granted due to unforeseen delays, often outlined in the
contract.
● Delays and Penalty: Penalties imposed for delays in completion beyond the agreed-upon
timeline.
Issues arising in Contract:
● Non-Tendered Items: Items not included in the original tender but required during the
project.
● Extras/Extra Work: Additional work not initially specified in the contract.
● Variations: Changes to the original contract scope, often requiring adjustments in cost and
time.
● Rate Analysis: Evaluation of rates for additional work or variations.
Click to Edit ● Architect’s Role: Certifying variations, ensuring compliance with design, and facilitating
communication between parties.
● Prime Cost: Includes the cost of materials, labor, and other direct expenses for items not
yet determined at the time of contract.
● Provisional Sum: An estimated amount set aside in the contract for specific items of work
with uncertain costs.
Supervision and Contract Administration:
1. Site Visits:
● Frequency: Regular visits to monitor construction progress, quality, and adherence to plans.
● Purpose: Identify and address issues, ensure compliance with specifications, and maintain
project alignment with the design.
2. Site Meetings:
● Regular Meetings: Facilitate communication between stakeholders.
● Agenda: Discuss project progress, resolve issues, and coordinate future activities.
4. Site Book:
● Documentation: Maintains records of site activities, instructions, and changes.
● Communication: An essential tool for tracking the project's history and decisions made.
5. Site Instructions:
● Formal Communication: Written directives issued by the architect to the contractor during
construction.
● Clarifications: Used to provide additional information or modify aspects of the construction.
Supervision and Contract Administration:
7. Bill Checking:
● Verification: Ensures that the contractor's payment requests align with the work completed.
● Accuracy: Crucial for maintaining budgetary control and preventing disputes.
8. Quality Auditing:
Click to Edit
● Quality Control: Regular checks to ensure that the construction meets specified standards.
● Documentation: Records instances of non-compliance and corrective actions taken.
1. Identifying Disputes:
● Communication Breakdown: Often arises due to misunderstandings or
misinterpretations.
● Breach of Contract: When one party fails to meet contractual obligations.
2. Architect’s Role:
Click to Edit ● Mediation: Facilitate discussions between parties to reach a mutually agreeable
solution.
● Documentation: Provide evidence and documentation to support or refute claims.
● Expert Opinion: Offer professional judgment on technical matters.
Supervision and Contract Administration:
Case studies from practice highlighting disputes in contract and methods
adopted to solve disputes
1.Intellectual Property Contract Dispute: An intellectual property contract dispute can arise
when one party violates the terms of the contract related to the use of intellectual property. In one
case, a company sued a former employee for violating a non-compete clause in their contract by
using the company's proprietary information to start a competing business. The case went to
court, where the parties presented their arguments. Ultimately, the court ruled in favor of the
company and issued an injunction to prevent the former employee from using the proprietary
information.
2.Real Estate Contract Dispute: A real estate contract dispute may arise when one party fails to
Click to Edit fulfill their obligations related to the sale or purchase of property. In one case, a buyer sued a
seller for breach of contract, claiming that the seller failed to disclose known defects in the
property. The case went to mediation, where the parties discussed their concerns and reached a
settlement. The seller agreed to make repairs to the property, and the buyer agreed to pay the
agreed purchase price.
3.Distribution Contract Dispute: A distribution contract dispute can arise when one party fails to
fulfill their obligations related to the distribution of goods. In one case, a distributor sued a
manufacturer for breach of contract, claiming that the manufacturer failed to provide the agreed
quantity of goods. The case went to arbitration, where the arbitrator listened to both parties'
arguments and ultimately ruled in favor of the distributor, awarding them damages for lost profits.
Supervision and Contract Administration:
4.IT Contract Dispute: An IT contract dispute may arise when one party fails to deliver the
agreed IT services or the other party fails to pay the agreed amount. In one case, an IT service
provider sued a client for breach of contract, claiming that the client failed to pay for the
services provided. The case went to negotiation, where the parties discussed their concerns
and reached a settlement. The client agreed to pay the outstanding amount, and the IT service
provider agreed to provide additional support at no extra cost.
Click to Edit
5. Construction Contract Dispute: In 2017, a construction company was awarded a contract
to build a new office building for a government agency in New Delhi, India. The contract was
for a fixed price of INR 500 million and was to be completed within two years. However, due to
unforeseen site conditions, labor issues, and changes in the scope of work, the project was
delayed and the construction company requested an extension of time and additional payment.
The government agency refused to grant the extension of time and additional payment, citing
the terms of the contract. The construction company filed a claim for INR 150 million in
damages, alleging that the government agency was responsible for the delays and additional
costs.
Supervision and Contract Administration:
Methods Adopted to Solve the Dispute:
a) Negotiation: Initially, the construction company and the government agency attempted to
resolve the dispute through negotiation. They held several meetings to discuss the issues and
explore possible solutions. However, they were unable to reach an agreement, and the dispute
escalated.
b) Mediation: In 2018, the construction company and the government agency agreed to
participate in mediation. A neutral mediator was appointed to help the parties reach a
settlement. The mediator listened to both parties' arguments and facilitated discussions
between them. Through mediation, the construction company and the government agency
Click to Edit were able to reach a settlement. The government agency agreed to grant a partial extension of
time and additional payment of INR 50 million, and the construction company agreed to
complete the project within the revised timeline.
c) Adjudication: Despite the settlement reached through mediation, the construction company
continued to pursue their claim for INR 100 million in damages. In 2019, the case went to
adjudication, which is a process in which a neutral third party makes a binding decision on the
dispute. An adjudicator was appointed, and after hearing both parties' arguments, the
adjudicator ruled in favor of the construction company, finding that the government agency was
responsible for the delays and additional costs. The adjudicator awarded the construction
company INR 75 million in damages.
1. https://www.slideshare.net/gayathriselvasegar/architectur
e-professional-practice-81138327
3. https://sist.sathyabama.ac.in/sist_coursematerial/uploads
/SAR1504.pdf