Data Governance Diagnostic Tool MENA Tech Initiative - Workbank
Data Governance Diagnostic Tool MENA Tech Initiative - Workbank
Draft 4.0
October 2020
1
Version Control
2
Table of Content
3
MNA Tech Initiative
There is currently a proliferation of data typologies. A distinction can be drawn between “raw” data and
data as information1. The scope of data can be broadened to include both data and metadata. Data can be
differentiated according to its source, i.e. distinguishing between public and private sector data and
information. Data can also be classified in relation to its access, on a spectrum from closed to open. Finally,
personal data protection regimes are often based on the distinction between personal and non-personal data.
Within personal data, a distinction is sometimes made between volunteered, observed and inferred data.2
Data Governance is a necessary process of managing the availability, usability, integrity, security and
responsible collection, processing and use of these types of data in public and private systems. This is
usually based on identified set of data standards and policies that also guide data usage. The process also
includes strengthening the institutional, regulatory, capacity and technical foundations to better control and
manage data across its value cycle, i.e. collecting, generating, storing, securing, processing, sharing and
(re)using data in a trusted manner to deliver development value.
This activity considers several data typologies. A comprehensive approach to embracing various types
of data is adopted to better understand how each of these data types is to be treated. Both data and metadata
as well as public and private sector data are included in the scope of the assessment. The emphasis is also
on the degree of openness of public sector data to distinct between “open” and “closed” data. A separation
between personal and non-personal data is also included to provide the appropriate safeguards to the data
rights of individuals.
This diagnostic also aims to promote effective data governance. There is a need to govern the use and
reuse of these types of data for value creation, in both the public and private sectors as well as by civil
society. In this vein, data “governance” includes elements structured around the following building blocks:
a) enabling and safeguarding policies, laws and regulation to create a framework for trusted data
transactions, b) hard and soft technical infrastructure (including broadband, platforms and protocols) to
enable data transfers, interoperability and portability for more effective usage; and c) institutions that enable
data-driven usage by supporting enforcement and implementation of data governance frameworks.
It remains critical for Governments to foster public trust in the responsible use of data by developing robust
and effectively enforced legal and regulatory mechanisms to protect the fundamental rights of data subjects
1
where information is understood as “the meaning resulting from the interpretation of data (OECD, 2015).
2
Volunteered data is created and explicitly shared by individuals (e.g. social network profiles). Observed data is
captured by recording the actions of individuals (e.g. location data from mobile phones). Inferred data is data
about individuals based on an analysis of volunteered information (e.g. credit scores) (WEF, 2011).
4
in their personal data, ensure the integrity and security of data, and creating incentives for the
sharing/pooling of private sector data for public good.
The premise for this activity is on building trustworthy data governance systems that enables
effective harnessing of data for development. By successfully implementing a robust data governance
framework on top of an adequate digital infrastructure, governments in the MENA region will create an
enabling environment to achieve an inclusive, safe, innovative and dynamic digital economy. They will
also be sending an important signal of accountability and transparency to incentivize individuals, civil
society organizations and businesses to trust the public and private platforms and services whose
development can respond to user needs and generate value from data.
The responsible implementation of data governance standards will also support MENA’s aspirations
to become a competitive actor in the digital economy. It also paves the way for the establishment of
common data environment principles and foundations of a digital single market in the region.
The focus of this ASA’s first phase is on developing two case studies informed by in-country collection
of data and practices on data governance based on a modular diagnostic tool. This tool is adapted to
the MENA context and designed around the conceptual framework laid out below.
1. Enabling data infrastructure which focuses on the policies and technical architecture enabling
the collection, storage, sharing, analysis, and management of data for value creation
2. Trust in the use of data which covers personal data protection, cybersecurity, cybercrime,
consumer protection and e-transactions3 that enable the use and reuse of data while safeguarding
the fundamental rights of data subjects. Together, these “safeguards” are designed to promote trust
in data protection and security, incentivizing usage of data-driven platforms and services, and
potentially leading to improved trust in public sector institutions.
3. Value through data which includes innovation, digital skills and capacity development, increased
usage of e-services, etc. that can be enabled by an effective governance framework (pillars I & II)
In Phase II, sectoral use-cases could also be presented to illustrate the data governance practice as
articulated in the three pillars above. The suggested focus is currently on digital financial payments but may
be expanded to other verticals downstream.
In its current format, the diagnostic tool has been designed to provide a high-level landscape analysis
(a snapshot) of current data governance practices in MNA countries. It is designed as a modular,
outcome-oriented tool that is structured around key building blocks to enable an initial identification of
opportunities and gaps in the policy, legal, technical and institutional foundations of a robust data
governance ecosystem. These foundational elements are required for enabling an effective and trusted use
of data. The diagnostic tool is also taking into consideration the emerging guiding principles of data for
development illustrated in Box 1.
3
The emphasis is on e-transactions as safeguards for enabling data protection rather than enabling the process of
data transactions (i.e., part of enablers).
5
The tool is designed to be able to be undertaken by non-specialist operational teams to identify entry
points for client dialogue with a view to analytically preparing future operational engagements and
technical assistance. As such, it is intended to help identify key issues based on urgency or government
priorities that may require more granular assessment. To address such recognized limitations, the use of
additional specialized diagnostic tools that were developed by the World Bank, can prove beneficial, for
example, in the case of project preparation. These additional tools cover areas such as broadband, cloud,
cybersecurity, government platforms, digital identification, and open data assessments.
In phase I, Jordan and Morocco are two countries in MENA that were selected to provide diverse
contexts and practices of data governance. Technical missions to Jordan and Morocco were planned for
March 2020 during which the draft diagnostic tool would be disseminated in the two countries to elaborate
a “snapshot” overview of existing data governance practices.
However, the COVID-19 pandemic affected this plan, requiring an agile revision of the sequencing
and methodology of the activity components. While the Jordan mission took place in early March, the
subsequent mission to Morocco was conducted virtually due to travel restrictions. The team relied on local
capacity in the CMU to lead the various engagements with Moroccan stakeholders. Logistical
complications aside, the shift in priorities by most governments towards the emergency COVID response
led to an understandable deprioritizing of data collection efforts and response to the survey. These
conditions were particularly challenging without the assistance of a dedicated localized technical support
within public sector entities, despite effective preparation and engagement with counterparts at the high
level. There were also limitations in terms of the data information the team was able to access, and the
comprehensiveness and comparability of the information from one country to another, as data governance
remains a nascent topic in the region.
Gaps in the findings of the preliminary missions were supplemented with desk research by the team,
using externally published secondary material, existing ASAs conducted as part of project
preparation for other activities, and support from local consultants. These have been distilled into two
deep dive case studies that seek to highlight emerging good practices and challenges that could be addressed
in downstream operational work and technical assistance in MENA and inform policy dialogue.
The data collection exercise and the findings in the two case studies were used to refine the survey
questionnaire in this diagnostic tool. Inputs and comments were also provided by World Bank teams in
Nigeria and Vietnam where the MNA questionnaire is being leveraged. Once disseminated, the refined
diagnostic tool could enable the collection of information on data governance practices across all countries
in the MNA region, to enable a country-by-country analysis of practices and identify both regional gaps
and emerging best practices. Moreover, the modular diagnostic tool will be provided as a public good
available for adaptation by operational teams seeking to undertake country assessments in other regions.
6
Finally, while the COVID crisis required a shifting of priorities for the development of this activity,
it has also created opportunities for downstream engagement. Indeed, the crisis has propelled digital
transformation in the region, with more Governments open to enable a responsible data governance practice
as part of enhancing their resilience and accelerating their recovery. This context provides an opportunity
for consultation and policy dialogue on data governance through a series of outreach events to take place
following the launch of WDR21 on Data for Development and as part of events organized around and
during the Marrakesh 2021 Annual Meetings. The findings of the case studies will also continue to be
leveraged to support on-going and new operations in the region, including as inputs to the technical
preparation of two P4Rs in Jordan and Morocco in FY21.
7
Box 1: Emerging Guiding Principles of the Data Revolution
The UN Secretary General’s Data Revolution Independent Experts’ Advisory Group has advanced
10 principles. A preliminary digest is provided below as guiding principles:
Data disaggregation
To the extent possible and with due safeguards for individual privacy and data quality,
disaggregated data can provide a better comparative picture of what works and help inform and
promote evidence-based policymaking.
Data timeliness
Data delayed is data denied. The data cycle must match the decision cycle.
Data transparency
Publicly funded datasets, as well as data on public spending, should be available to other public
ministries or the general public. Underlying data design and sampling, methods, tools and datasets
should be explained and published alongside findings to enable greater scrutiny, understanding and
independent analysis.
Data openness
Data should be made public in ways that encourage greater use and be complete, machine-
readable, freely available for reuse without restrictions, and transparent about underlying
assumptions.
Data rights
Rights include (but are not limited to) the right to be counted, the right to an identity, the right to
privacy and shared control, the right to due process, the right to freedom of expression, the right to
participation, the right to non-discrimination and equality, and the right to principles of consent.
Source: WEF. 2015. Data-Driven Development: Pathways for Progress. Advisory Group on a Data Revolution for
Sustainable Development.
8
IV. OVERVIEW
2. Safeguards: Trust in Data 2.1. Legal system and sources of • Description of the Legal
law System
• International Conventions and
Treaties
2.2. E-Commerce and E- • E-Commerce Law Adoption
Transactions • Robustness of the Law
• Effective Enforcement
2.3. Personal Data Protection • Data Protection Law adoption
• Robustness of the Law
• Obligations on Data Processors
• Rights of Data Subjects
2.4. Cybersecurity / Cybercrime • Cybercrime Law adoption
• Robustness of the Law
• Substantive Protections
• Effective Enforcement
2.5. Consumer Protections • Consumer Protection Law
adoption
• Robustness of the Law
• Effective Enforcement
2.6. Cross-Border Data Transfers • International Standards
• Local Processing of Data
• Adequacy and Mutual
Recognition Arrangements
9
• Regional Integration and
Harmonization
• Data Localization
10
Pillar 1 – Enablers
ENABLING DATA INFRASTRUCTURE
11
• Is there a national Broadband network? If so, what is the
penetration of fixed-based Broadband (i.e., fiber)? # of
active fixed broadband subscribers (per 100 households)
• Are there incentives in place to expand and accelerate
broadband deployment? such as accelerated depreciation for
connectivity infrastructure investments, tax credits for
research and development, loans or subsidies for connectivity,
and/or PPP for Infrastructure sharing.
1.2.2. 5G Deployment
12
• If Yes, does the accessibility include local government data
centers?
• If Yes, does the accessibility include local commercial data
centers?
• If No, is there a plan to build a local data center, a virtual
network operations center (NOC)? What is the expected
launch date?
• Does the Government use Cloud services?
• If Yes, what share of government data are stored on the
cloud?
• If Yes, are data stored on the cloud easily accessible across
departments and different levels of government
(national/local) for analysis?
• What share of cloud services are provided by international
(commercial) versus local government vs. local commercial
providers?
• What services are most used on cloud services? (e.g., AI-
enabled applications such as chatbots and machine learning
analytics tools; data storage; online services; …etc.)
• If No, is the Government planning for Cloud migration?
13
1.4. Whole-of-Government Framework
14
• Does the policy or directive prescribe the categories of
common data classification?
• Is it mandatory to use the common data classification
categories across government database applications or
document management systems?
15
• Re. usage, is data collected from various sources / devices
(mobile, reactors, sensors, etc.) used within the government
for economic and/or social development purposes? Are these
datasets open to Businesses and/or third parties?
• Is government data available and used by policy makers and
service providers?
• Are government datasets accessible by businesses and
academic institutions? Are these open datasets earmarked
(e.g., for public good; for commercial services; ... etc.)?
• Has the government adopted an open licensing regime (such
as a Creative Common License by Attribution) to enable the
reuse of public sector data?
• Does the Open License apply to all government data?
16
1.5. Institutional Capacity
17
1.5.3. Access to Talent
18
Pillar 2 – Safeguards
19
2.2.2 E-commerce law robustness
20
o Both public and private entities
Please specify the relevant legal basis (law/regulation)
• Do the law/implementing regulations provide for the creation
of a Certification Authority (CA)?
• If Yes, does the Certification Authority’s mandate including
the following roles and responsibilities?
o Issuing digital certificates
o Authenticating and validating e-transactions
o Managing or regulating PKI infrastructure
• Have any licenses been issued for private CAs?
If yes, how many?
21
o Council of Europe Convention 108+
o EU Police and Criminal Justice Data Protection Directive
2016/680
o Other (please specify)
Scope
• Does the scope of application of the law extend to
o Natural persons
o Legal persons
• Does the law or regulation apply to anyone (citizen or not)
residing within the country?
• Does the law specify any exceptions to its application?
If yes, to which?
o Public sector entities/government
o SMEs
o Other categories of natural or legal persons
• If yes, are these exceptions subject to due process limitations,
such as a “necessary and proportionate” test to determine
whether the exception is legitimately applied?
Obligations
• Does the law or regulation or require that the collection and
use of personal data be done on any of the following lawful
bases? (please mark all as appropriate):
o collection undertaken with consent,
o due to contractual necessity,
o in compliance with legal obligation,
o for the protection of vital interests,
o for the public interest
o other legitimate interest (please specify)
• What are the legal grounds under which “consent” is deemed
“legitimate”?
o Consent must be freely given
o Consent must be informed
o Consent must be unambiguous
o Consent must be specific
• Does the law or regulation require that the collection and use
of personal data be done fairly and transparently (or similar
standard)?
Examples of “fair and transparent” including requiring the
data subject to be informed of the purpose of data collection
and intended use and sharing of the data
• Does the law or regulation require that the collection and use
of personal data be made for a stated purpose (or similar
standard)? (Purpose limitation)
• Does the law or regulation require that the data collected be
proportionate, adequate, relevant and limited to what is
necessary in relation to the purposes for which they are
processed (Data minimization)
• Does the law or regulation require that the collection and use
of personal data be accurate, complete and up to date (or
similar standard)? (Data integrity)
22
• Does the law or regulation require that persons or entities
collecting and using personal data take responsibility for and
be capable of demonstrating compliance with applicable data
protection requirements? (Accountability)
• Does the law or regulation require additional protections for
collection and use of sensitive personal data (e.g., information
relating to race, ethnicity, religion, political beliefs, sexual
orientation, health, etc.)?
• Does the law or regulation require that personal data not be
kept longer than is necessary for the purposes for which it is
processed (or similar standard)? (Storage limitations)
• Does the law or regulation require data processors to
incorporate to incorporate privacy-by-design or data
protection-by-default principles or use privacy-enhancing
technologies (PETs) in the design and implementation of data
processing systems? For example, de-
identification/pseudonymization requirements.
• Do any policies, laws or regulations restrict the sharing of
personal data with third parties?
• Are there exceptions to limitations on the sharing of personal
data for national security or law enforcement (or other
reasons)?
• Are these exceptions subject to review by an independent
body?
Individual rights
• Do individuals have the right to be notified in a timely manner
when the security of their data or their data rights have been
breached during processing? (notification of breach)
• Do data subjects have the right to access and review use of
personal data about them held by data controllers/processors?
If YES, under which conditions?
o Unconditional full data access
o Unconditional access to limited categories of data (e.g.
categories of personal data, purposes of data processing,
etc.)
o Conditional limited data access
• Do data subjects have the right to challenge the accuracy of
information and have it rectified, completed, and amended?
• Do data subjects have the right to have personal data about
them (including data trails) deleted?
• If YES, under which conditions?
o All personal data/PII, unconditionally
o All personal data/PII, under certain conditions
o Depends on the type of data (please specify)
• Do individuals have the right to withdraw their consent to data
processing at any time?
• Do data subjects have the right to move, copy, or transfer
personal data from one system to another electronic
environment? (data portability)
23
• Does the law include mandatory breach notification?
o If yes, within which time period? and
o What is the fine (if any) for breach of regulations?
• Are there rights to limit the making of decisions about
individuals solely as a result of automated processing of
personal data (i.e. without any human intervention)
• Do individuals have a right to object to the use of personal
data about them, file complaints and seek redress?
24
• Can the institution be considered effectively accountable and
transparent, based on the following criteria?
o Are appointment criteria objective and transparent?
o Are removal criteria objective and transparent?
o Is there a policy obligating member to avoid and disclose
ethical, legal, financial or other conflicts of interest
involving the agency, and removing themselves from a
position of decision-making authority?
• Is the entity sufficiently resourced to undertake its functions
effectively, based on the following criteria?
o What sources of revenue does the authority rely on to
cover its costs? (Fees, public funds, penalties,
international aid, private investment, other)
o Please provide number and structure of entity staff
o Is there a formal methodology to collect business
requirements?
o Is there a methodology for project management?
o Do staff have current certification in their area of
expertise?
o Are there incentives to mitigate the risks of staff attrition?
25
o Confidentiality of data and systems that use or generate
personal data
o Integrity of data and systems that use or generate personal
data
o Availability of data and systems that use or generate
personal data
o Ability to restore data and systems that use or generate
personal data after a physical or technical incident
o Ongoing tests, assessments and evaluation of security of
systems that use or generate personal data
o Other (please specify)
• Do data processors/controllers have to comply with the
following cybersecurity requirements?
o Adoption of an internal policy establishing procedures for
preventing and detecting violations
o Confidentiality of data and systems that use or generate
personal data
o Appointment of a personal data processing office/manager
o Performance of internal controls
o Assessment of the harm that might be caused by a data
breach
o Awareness program among employees
Cybercrime: criminalized activities
• Does the country have any laws or regulations criminalize the
following activities? Please check all that are applicable:
Criminalize unauthorized access to systems or other databases
holding personal data?
• Criminalize unauthorized interception of data from systems or
other databases holding personal data?
• Criminalize unauthorized damaging deletion, deterioration,
alteration or suppression of data collected or stored as part of
databases holding personal data?
• Criminalize unauthorized interference with databases holding
personal data?
• Criminalize the misuse of devices or data for the purpose of
committing any of the above criminal behavior?
• Criminalize unauthorized input, alteration, deletion or
interference with a computer system or platform to procure an
economic benefit which would apply to databases holding
personal data?
• Criminalize fraudulent use or alteration of data or interference
with a computer system to procure an economic benefit which
would apply to databases holding personal data?
• Were any of the below international/regional models or
guidelines used as the basis for developing the cybercrime
legislation? Please mark all as appropriate
o Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime (Budapest
Convention) 2001
o ECOWAS Directive (01/08/11)
26
o Commonwealth Model Law on Computer and Computer
Related Crime
o AU Convention on Cybersecurity and Personal Data
Protection
• Other (please specify)
27
2.5.2 Consumer protection law robustness
28
o Privacy policy
o Dispute resolution and redress options
• Does the law mandate that businesses provide enough
information to enable consumers to make informed decisions
regarding transactions?
o Functionality and interoperability features
o Technical or contractual requirements
o Age restrictions
• Does the e-payment system include limitations on consumer
liability for unauthorized or fraudulent charges?
• Does the law provide consumers with access to fair, easy-to
use, transparent and effective dispute resolution mechanisms?
• If YES, do these protections apply to resolve domestic and
cross-border disputes?
29
o Do staff have current certification in their area of
expertise?
o Are there incentives to mitigate the risks of staff attrition?
30
• If the regime requires an “adequacy” or similar mechanism,
what circumstances constitute an “adequate level of
protection” when transferring personal data internationally?
Please check all that apply:
o The nature of the personal data
o The country of origin of the information contained in the
data
o The country of destination
o The purposes for which and period during which the
data are intended to be processed
o The domestic law in force in the host country
(general application and sectoral, including defense
and access of public authorities to personal data)
o The existence and effective functioning of one or more
independent supervisory authorities in the third country to
enforce compliance
o Presence of effective rule of law and judicial redress for
data subjects (individuals)
o The international treaties the host country is a party
to
o Relevant codes of conduct or other rules enforceable
in the host country (SCCs; BCRs)
o Other (please specify)
• Is there a regional "One Stop Shop" Agency (e.g. European
Data Protection Bureau equivalent in the case of personal data
protection) to harmonize processing of decisions and
regulatory enforcement?
31
Pillar 3 – Outcomes
32
3.3. Data-Driven Business Services
3.3.1. Business e-Services
Questions Y/N Comments
Add Links / Attachments
• Does the private sector offer its services or products to
Citizens, Businesses and Government digitally?
• If Yes, what specific data-enabled services are currently being
offered by the private sector digitally?
o Government (B2G)
o Citizens (B2C)
o Businesses (B2B)
• Please specify the size / number of e-transactions related to
B2G; B2C; and B2B
33
• Does the policy and regulatory framework in the country
support the creation / existence of a single data-driven digital
market?
• If Yes, are there facilities (i.e., incubators, labs, tech parks,
sandboxes) to enhance the start-up ecosystem? What kind of
data-driven services or products do they provide?
• Specifically, what technology corporate accelerators (e.g.,
by AWS, Google, Microsoft, etc.) are established to support
data-driven startups in country? What services are provided
(e.g., accessing cloud infrastructure)?
• If No, are there any plans to strengthen a data-driven digital
market?
• Are there female entrepreneurs in the country?
• If Yes, what is the extent of female participation in the founder
team and contractor team of data-driven start-up businesses in
the country?
• What is the top source(s) of funding for startups (e.g.
government grants, venture capital, angel investment,
strategic investors)?
• How many startups were contracted directly for digital
government contracts in the last year?
• Does the government crowdsource solutions form
startups (e.g., via open source platforms like GitHub or
others like InnoCentive4)?
** Specific sectors can include: Digital Financial Services; e-Commerce; e-Health; etc.
4
InnoCentive is an open platform for crowdsourcing data-driven solutions. https://www.innocentive.com/
34
35
36