0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views6 pages

Lecture_41 ModelingSimilarity

The lecture discusses the principles of modeling and similarity in engineering, focusing on dimensional analysis and the Buckingham Π theorem. It explains the importance of selecting relevant variables and achieving geometric, kinematic, and dynamic similarity between models and prototypes. Various similarity criteria, including the Froude number and non-dimensional relations, are highlighted to ensure accurate experimental representation of physical phenomena.

Uploaded by

Tomislav Sertić
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views6 pages

Lecture_41 ModelingSimilarity

The lecture discusses the principles of modeling and similarity in engineering, focusing on dimensional analysis and the Buckingham Π theorem. It explains the importance of selecting relevant variables and achieving geometric, kinematic, and dynamic similarity between models and prototypes. Various similarity criteria, including the Froude number and non-dimensional relations, are highlighted to ensure accurate experimental representation of physical phenomena.

Uploaded by

Tomislav Sertić
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

LECTURE 41

21- APRIL -2017

MODELLING and SIMILARITY

 The dimensional analysis what you are studying is used in modelling studies.
 You saw the Buckingham Π theorem.

 How will you do it practically?

 Selection of variables is important. It requires good experience to decide which


variable is important, etc.
 Based on the requirement, the engineer can judge and suggest
 That viscous flows can be neglected or not.
 Temperature effects can be neglected or not.
 Whether surface tension is important or not.
 Gravitational force is important or not, etc.

 Once the variables are selected, you need to perform analysis. Identify  ’s.
 The experimenters will try to seek similarity between the model and the
prototype designed.

 On any phenomena, the engineer may come up with a non-dimensional relation.


1  f  1 ,  2 ,  3 ,................,  k 
 The flow conditions of a model test will be completely similar to the prototype, if all
the dimensionless parameters of the model (say  2,  3,  4,……  k) is same as the
prototype.

i.e. You require


 2m =  2p ;  3m =  3p ; ……

 It is very difficult to achieve complete similarity between a model and a prototype.


 However, by compromising various features, you can have:
 Geometric similarity between model and prototype
 Kinematic similarity
 Dynamic similarity
 Thermal similarity
 Geometric similarity
If all the length dimensions [L] of the model and the prototype are having same linear
scale ratio, the model and prototype is said to be geometrically similar.

For a body, if the dimensions in the x, y, z directions are Lxp, Lyp, Lzp
Then, if you have a miniature model of dimensions Lxm, Lym, Lzm .

Lxm Lym Lzm


And if    constant,
Lx p Ly p Lz p
Then this model is geometrically similar to the prototype)

 You can visualise homologous points between the model and prototype.

 Kinematic Similarity
 If the model and prototype have same length scale ratio (i.e. geometric
similarity) and in addition have same time scale ratio, then they are
kinematically similar.
 For time scale equilibrium, you may require evidence of Reynolds Number and
Mach Number, etc.
 For fluid flows you have seen that one can neglect or incorporate effects of
viscosity (or friction).
 For a frictionless flow like free surface flow, the model and prototype can be
made kinematically similar. (How???)
 You have to provide the same Froude Number.

U
 Recall earlier, we had described Froude’s Number as Fr 
gL
For example in a Wave Motion Modelling Studies:
The prototype wave:

(Source :https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Alevel_Physics_(Advancing_Physics)/What_is_a_wave%3F)

 In the wave modelling studies, the actual or prototype wave may be large and its wave
length can be large.
 A model of the wave can be developed in laboratory by providing kinematically similar
conditions.
 In kinematic similarity, the Froude number have to be equal.

Vm Vp
i.e. Frm    Fr p
gLm gL p

2 2
Vm Vp
or 
gLm gL p

Vm Lm
or 
Vp Lp

Lm V
If =  , Then m  
Lp Vp

Lm
tm Vm
  
t p Lp
Vp

 If viscosity, and surface tension, etc. play important role in flow of the fluid, then
kinematic similarity may not be sufficient. You may have to go for dynamic similarity.
Dynamic Similarity:
 The model and the prototype are dynamically similar, if they have same length scale
ratio, same time scale ratio and same force ratio.
 From Newton’s law,for any fluid particle-the sum of pressure force , gravity force, and
friction force is equal to the net force or inertial force.

Fp Fg Ff Fi
i.e.       
Pressure Gravity Friction Inertia
force force force force or
Net force

 The dynamic similarity consider that


  
Fp m Fg m Ff m
    
Fp p Fg p Ff p

 In this flow through the sluice gate experiment, the force polygon at homologous points
will have exactly the same shape if they are dynamically similar. This is possible, only
if Rep = Rem and Frm = Frp.

Example (Adopted from FM White’s Fluid Mechanics)


 The pressure drop due to friction in a long circular pipe is a function of average
velocity,density,viscosity,and pipe length and diameter.

i.e. ΔP = f( V,ρ,µ,L,D)

 Try to interpret how ΔP varies with V and use Pi-Theorem to rewrite the above function
in dimensionless form.
Solution:
You are provided the information ΔP = f( V,ρ,µ,L,D)
 These are six basic variables ΔP,V,ρ,µ,L,D (i.e. n=6)
 The basic dimensions are M,L,T (i.e. k=3)
 We expect j = n-k = 6-3 = 3 ∏ groups.
D L Q ΔP ρ µ V
(cm) (cm) (m3/h) (Pa) (kg/m3) (kg/ms) (m/s)
1.0 5.0 0.30 4680 680 2.92 * 10-4 1.06
1.0 7.0 0.60 22300 680 2.92 * 10-4 2.12
1.0 9.0 1.00 70800 680 2.92 * 10-4 3.54
2.0 4.0 1.00 2080 998 0.0010 0.88
2.0 6.0 2.00 10500 998 0.0010 1.77
2.0 8.0 3.10 30400 998 0.0010 2.74
3.0 3.0 0.50 540 13550 1.56 * 10-3 0.20
3.0 6.0 1.70 9600 13550 1.56 * 10-3 0.67
3.0 4.0 1.00 2480 13550 1.56 * 10-3 0.39
 As we went to see how ΔP varies with V, we are not going to keep it as repeating
variable.

We will keep ρ,µ,D as repeating variable

1   a  b D c p  M 0 L0T 0

2   d  eD f V  M 0 L0T 0

3   g  h Di L  M 0 L0T 0

Solving for exponents, you get:

D 2 P VD L
1  , 2  , 3 
 2
 D

We will get a dimensionless expression

D 2 P  VD L 
 f  , 
   D
2

1  f ( 2 ,  3 )

As our objective is to find ΔP versus V,

We have to plot 1 versus  2 with  3 as a parameter.


L
i.e.  500 for the first row of the data
D

 D2 P
 3.73 109
 2

VD
 24700

From second row of the data,

L  D2 P
 700 ,  1.78 1010
D  2

VD
 49370

Like this you evaluate for each row. Nine data points you will get.

L
 For same ratio , you will see ΔP is increasing linearly with L.
D

You might also like