0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17K views

EPA Filing

Daniel Coogan, Deputy Assistant Administrator at the EPA, outlines the agency's review process for grant awards during the transition to the new Presidential Administration. The review resulted in the continuation of all IIJA grants and many IRA grants, while some IRA grants are being terminated based on alignment with Administration priorities. The EPA is pausing access to funding for certain IRA grants that are set to be terminated, while ensuring reimbursement for costs incurred prior to termination.

Uploaded by

Nick Pope
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
17K views

EPA Filing

Daniel Coogan, Deputy Assistant Administrator at the EPA, outlines the agency's review process for grant awards during the transition to the new Presidential Administration. The review resulted in the continuation of all IIJA grants and many IRA grants, while some IRA grants are being terminated based on alignment with Administration priorities. The EPA is pausing access to funding for certain IRA grants that are set to be terminated, while ensuring reimbursement for costs incurred prior to termination.

Uploaded by

Nick Pope
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Case 1:25-cv-00097-MSM-PAS Document 51-1 Filed 04/23/25 Page 1 of 3 PageID #:

966

1 DECLARATION OF DANIEL COOGAN


2 I, Daniel Coogan, declare and state as follows:
3 1. I am the Deputy Assistant Administrator for Infrastructure and
4 Extramural Resources in the Office of Mission Support, for the United States
5 Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") located at 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue,
6 NW, Washington, D.C. 20460. I have been in my current position since December
7 2023, and I have been at the agency since November 2004. I make the following
8 factual statements based on my personal knowledge and belief. If called as a
9 witness, I could and would competently testify thereto.
10 2. During the transition between the last Presidential Administration and
11 the current Administration, EPA has limited activity on grant awards and actions so
12 career staff can brief the new Administration on the on-going grants and programs
13 and help the new Administration understand how the program aligns with their
14 priorities including ensuring the safeguard of Agency funds.
15 3. As part of this effort, and distinct from any Executive Orders or OMB
16 memorandums, EPA leadership conducted an individualized, grant-by-grant review
17 to determine which grants should continue, which should be modified, and which
18 should be terminated based on alignment with Administration priorities or the
19 purposes for which the Federal award was made. EPA began this process for the
20 Administration in January 2025.
21 4. The review process resulted in EPA continuing all Infrastructure
22 Investments and Jobs Act (“IIJA”) grants, which include 2,004 active grants totaling
23 $27.5 billion. Many Inflation Reduction Act (“IRA”) grants remain active following
24 review, including 979 active grants totaling $39.5 billion.
25 5. The above review process occurred prior to the issuance of the
26 preliminary injunction on April 15, with decisions to terminate tranches of IRA
27 grants made on the following dates: February 13, March 3, March 10, and April 14.
28
1
Case 1:25-cv-00097-MSM-PAS Document 51-1 Filed 04/23/25 Page 2 of 3 PageID #:
967

1 EPA is in the process of sending out the formal termination/cancellation notices to


2 all of the impacted grantees. EPA has already sent out formal notices to
3 approximately 377 grantees. For the remaining approximately 404 grantees, EPA
4 plans to issue notices within the next two weeks.
5 6. EPA has only paused access to funding in Automatic Standard
6 Application for Payments (“ASAP”) for recipients of the following IRA grant
7 programs which are slated to be terminated as mentioned above: Environmental
8 Justice Collaborative Problem-Solving Cooperative Agreement Program; Surveys,
9 Studies, Investigations, Training and Special Purpose Activities Relating to
10 Environmental Justice; Environmental Justice Government-to-Government
11 (EJG2G) Program; Environmental Justice Small Grant Program; Financial
12 Assistance For Community Support Activities To Address Environmental Justice
13 Issues; Environmental Justice Thriving Communities Grantmaking Program (EJ
14 TCGM); Environmental and Climate Justice Block Grant Program; and Reducing
15 Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Construction Materials and Products.
16 7. EPA understands the Court’s Order to require that all funds
17 appropriated under the IRA or IIJA be unfrozen unless there is a pre-existing
18 determination (from before entry of the preliminary injunction) to pause that funding
19 on an individualized basis for some other, independent reason (i.e., apart from the
20 fact that it was appropriated under the IRA or IIJA). The above still-paused, soon-
21 to-be-terminated IRA grants meet those criteria. Accordingly, EPA believes that
22 continued pauses of those grants complies with the Court’s Order. EPA is not
23 “freezing, halting, or pausing on a non-individualized basis the processing and
24 payment of funding that (1) was appropriated under the Inflation Reduction Act or
25 the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and (2) has already been awarded.”
26 Woonasquatucket River Watershed Council v. United States Dep't of Agric., No.
27
28
2
Case 1:25-cv-00097-MSM-PAS Document 51-1 Filed 04/23/25 Page 3 of 3 PageID #:
968

1 1:25-cv-00097-MSM-PAS, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 71378 (D.R.I. Apr. 15, 2025)
2 (order granting preliminary injunction).
3 8. Despite the current pause on these grants, EPA will still reimburse all
4 costs incurred prior to the grant formally being terminated, once recipients submit
5 final invoices as part of the grant close-out process as detailed in the grant
6 termination letter and at 2 CFR § 200.334.
7 9. Restoring access to the paused grants would expose EPA and taxpayers
8 to tremendous risk as recipients would have the ability to draw-down large portions
9 of grant funding in ASAP, and could believe that they have an incentive to make
10 such draws if they believed the pause on the suspension was temporary. Recouping
11 these funds upon termination of the grants would be difficult.
12 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
13
14 DANIEL Digitally signed by
DANIEL COOGAN
Date: 2025.04.23
15 COOGAN 10:45:40 -04'00'

Daniel Coogan
16 Deputy Assistant Administrator for
17 Infrastructure and Extramural
Resources
18 Office of Mission Support
U.S. Environmental Protection
19 Agency
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3

You might also like