Accelerating Diagnostics in A Time of Crisis The Response To COVID 19 and A Roadmap For Future Pandemics Reference Book Download
Accelerating Diagnostics in A Time of Crisis The Response To COVID 19 and A Roadmap For Future Pandemics Reference Book Download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medipdf.com/product/accelerating-diagnostics-in-a-time-of-crisis-the-res
ponse-to-covid-19-and-a-roadmap-for-future-pandemics/
Wade E. Bolton
RADx–VentureWell
www.cambridge.org
Information on this title: www.cambridge.org/9781009396981
DOI: 10.1017/9781009396998
© Cambridge University Press & Assessment 2024
This publication is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions
of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take
place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press & Assessment.
First published 2024
A catalogue record for this publication is available from the British Library.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Names: Schachter, Steven C., editor. | Bolton, Wade E., 1947– editor.
Title: Accelerating diagnostics in a time of crisis : the response to COVID-19 and a roadmap for future pandemics /
edited by Steven C. Schachter, Wade E. Bolton.
Description: Cambridge, United Kingdom ; New York, NY : Cambridge University Press, 2023. | Includes
bibliographical references and index.
Identifiers: LCCN 2023023826 (print) | LCCN 2023023827 (ebook) | ISBN 9781009396981 (paperback) | ISBN
9781009396998 (ebook)
Subjects: MESH: COVID-19 – diagnosis | Pandemics | Emergencies | Rapid Diagnostic Tests | Process Assessment,
Health Care | United States
Classification: LCC RA644.C67 (print) | LCC RA644.C67 (ebook) | NLM WC 506.1 | DDC 616.2/4144–dc23/eng/
20230828
LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023023826
LC ebook record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2023023827
ISBN 978-1-009-39698-1 Paperback
Cambridge University Press & Assessment has no responsibility for the persistence
or accuracy of URLs for external or third-party internet websites referred to in this
publication and does not guarantee that any content on such websites is, or will
remain, accurate or appropriate.
.................................................................................................................................................................
Every effort has been made in preparing this book to provide accurate and up-to-date information that is in
accord with accepted standards and practice at the time of publication. Although case histories are drawn
from actual cases, every effort has been made to disguise the identities of the individuals involved.
Nevertheless, the authors, editors, and publishers can make no warranties that the information contained
herein is totally free from error, not least because clinical standards are constantly changing through
research and regulation. The authors, editors, and publishers therefore disclaim all liability for direct or
consequential damages resulting from the use of material contained in this book. Readers are strongly
advised to pay careful attention to information provided by the manufacturer of any drugs or equipment
that they plan to use.
A deadly pandemic demands a response at multiple levels of government and society and
across myriad needs for public health and medical care. As the COVID-19 pandemic took
hold in early 2020, the US response faltered. Hospitals lacked sufficient personal protective
equipment for staff and, as cases surged, some were overwhelmed by sick patients. Optimal
care for extremely ill patients was uncertain. The federal response lacked a clear leadership
structure and chain of command. Antivirals were lacking, and an effective vaccine was yet to
be developed. Moreover, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention initially distrib-
uted a test kit with a faulty reagent, setting back the national testing strategy for COVID-19.
The nation’s premier biomedical research organization, the National Institutes of Health
(NIH), focused its COVID-19 efforts on three main goals of research: vaccines, therapeutics,
and diagnostics. By April 2020, the NIH had activated a public–private partnership to
accelerate the development of COVID-19 therapeutics and vaccines. Through funding and
active collaboration, the NIH was instrumental in the development of the Moderna vaccine.
With the active engagement of 20 companies and scores of scientists, the NIH screened
hundreds of therapeutic candidates, embarked on clinical trials for more than three dozen of
the most promising, and obtained six therapeutics approved for clinical use. Fueled by
a special congressional appropriation in April 2020, the NIH launched the Rapid
Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx®) initiative. Within six months, the Food and Drug
Administration granted emergency use authorization to the first point-of-care – rapid
COVID-19 tests funded through RADx – and since then more than four dozen RADx-
supported tests (20 point-of-care, 16 laboratory-based, and 13 home-based tests) have
received emergency use authorization.
The pandemic demanded unaccustomed speed, intensity, and flexibility in research. All
of the institutes of the NIH responded to these pandemic exigencies. However, RADx stands
out for its degree of innovativeness and readiness to embrace non-traditional ways of doing
business at the NIH.
Led by the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering, RADx built on
years of experience gained through CIMIT and the Point-of-Care Technology Research
Network that is coordinated by CIMIT. Rather than consider the aim to be funding brilliant
research, RADx adopted an outcomes-oriented approach that embraced every stage, from
scientific idea through proof of concept, product development, manufacturing, clinical
evaluation, regulatory review, and authorization for use. Rather than traditional peer
review, RADx developed a shark-tank approach of presentation, assessment of promise,
and investment, followed by an innovation funnel with development milestones and
sequential winnowing or intensifying investment. Rather than a hands-off approach after
grant approval, RADx adopted venture-capital-like continued support and coaching to
overcome any obstacles along the way.
These innovations meant that RADx would seek and foster ideas that had the promise of
success and not simply look for reasons that a project might fail. Thus, RADx did not accept
an inevitable “valley of death” for biomedical product development; RADx established oases
of support that carried easier-to-use, faster, and more reliable diagnostic tests from scientific
xiii
ideas to clinical laboratories, sites of clinical care, and homes. Because of RADx, as many as
3 billion COVID-19 tests have entered the US market, and rapid home and point-of-care
tests have become the norm.
This book describes the concept, organization, implementation, and results of the RADx
initiative. It provides many cases to illustrate the varied ways that the RADx model,
combining the best of public and private capacities, contributed to the success. It shows
how RADx adapted and learned from failures in real time to strengthen its approach. The
book positions the quest for more and better diagnostic tests – accurate, easy to use, and
widely available – against the backdrop of multiple pandemic demands on clinical care and
public health. The RADx experience holds lessons not only for the development of future
diagnostics but also for any situation in which multiple scientific scenarios may yield
technologies to help meet an urgent health need.
More than three years after the start of COVID-19, the United States and much of the
world appear to have weathered the brunt of the pandemic, although the toll on lives and the
financial impact continue to mount, and post-acute sequelae of severe acute respiratory
syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain an ongoing clinical dilemma. China, whose
zero-tolerance policies held off the full force of COVID-19 for a couple of years, has since
found itself in the throes of the pandemic and has lent its weight to the growing, global
burden of disease.
With time, we can anticipate many assessments of the pandemic response at the global,
national, and subnational levels. Many will proffer lessons, and some will be worth heeding.
The RADx story told here meets that high standard, worthy of heeding, in preparing for the
next pandemic or for any similarly severe and urgent health threat.