Methodology Writing 4.9.22
Methodology Writing 4.9.22
Methods
• Research design
• Setting
• Developing intervention protocols
• Sample and Sampling
• Data collection methods
• Ethical consideration
• Data analysis plan
Design
Strongest Weakest
Design Non Experimental Designs Design
______________________________________________________________________________
_
Other Research Designs:
1. Survey
2. Methodological research
3. Case study
4. Secondary analysis
5. Meta-analysis and meta-synthesis
6. Evaluation research
Example: Design
•A randomized controlled trial, with
pre-, post-test design with two
groups (intervention and control
group) will be used.
Setting:
•The specific location where
information is gathered.
Setting: example
• The study sample was derived from an antenatal
clinic of a major, large, teaching, maternity, referral
hospital in the North of Jordan. This hospital is
controlled by the government and directed by the
Ministry of Health, and it provided health care
services free of charge for all pregnant women. Nearly
2,500 women visited its antenatal clinics each month,
and around 30,000 women through all of 2015.
Sampling Plans
• Target population
• Accessible population
• Sampling
• Eligibility criteria
• Inclusion criteria:
• Exclusion criteria:
Elsevier items and derived items © 2009, 2005, 2001, 1997 by Saunders, an imprint of Elsevier Inc.
14
Sampling Goal in Quantitative Research
•Representative sample
•Probability sampling
•Nonprobability sampling
Types of Nonprobability Sampling
1. Convenience sampling
2. Snowball (network) sampling
3. Quota sampling
4. Purposive sampling
5. Consecutive sampling
Types of Probability Sampling
• Beneficence
• Respect for Human Dignity
• Justice
Procedures for Protecting Study Participants
1. Risk-benefit assessments
2. Informed consent
3. Confidentiality procedures
4. Debriefings (ask questions )and referrals
5. Special treatment of vulnerable groups
6. Institutional Review Boards
Ethical Considerations: example
•Ethical approvals from the Institutional Review
Board at Jordan University of Science and
Technology and the Ministry of Health were
obtained
•Signed informed consent was obtained from all
participants
•The researcher assured the participants that no
harmful effects
Ethical Considerations: example
•The researcher explained to the participants that
their participation would assist with the
development of a new strategy
•assured that their privacy as well as the
confidentiality of their response was protected.
•their participation in this study was voluntary
and that they could withdraw from the study at
any time, without bearing any consequences.
Statistical Analysis
1. Descriptive statistics
2. Inferential statistics
Statistics: Descriptive
1. Univaraite
1. “frequency distribution”.
2. Measures of central tendency (mode,
median, mean), and
3. measures of variability (standard deviation
, variance, range).
2. Bivaraite analysis:
1. contingency table,
2. correlation- such as:
1. Pearson or Product Moment Correlation
Coefficient, and
2. Spearman’s correlation coefficient).
Inferential Statistics
The most common used inferential statistics are:
1. t-test,
2. ANOVA,
3. Chi-square,
4. Mann-Whitney U,
5. correlation coefficient,
6. simple linear regression,
7. multiple regression,
8. ANCOVA,
9. MANOVA, and
10. path analysis.
Hypothesis Testing
• Based on rules of negative inference:
• research hypotheses are supported if null
hypotheses can be rejected.
• Involves statistical decision-making to either:
1. accept the null hypothesis (no relation ship)
or
2. reject the null hypothesis (there is a
relationship)
Hypothesis Testing
• 1. Researchers compute a test statistic with their data
(using appropriate formulas ) and
• 2. then determine whether the statistic falls beyond
the critical region in the relevant theoretical
distribution.
• Values beyond the critical region indicate that the
null hypothesis is improbable (impossible), at a
specified probability level.
critical region
Data Analysis: example
• The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package For Social
Sciences, SPSS, for Windows, version 20.
• Descriptive statistics were used to demonstrate demographic
characteristics
• A Chi-square analysis was used to compare the study groups for
categorical demographic variables.
• Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed to identify potential
effects of the health information package program
• A p value of 0.05 or less was considered as statistically significant