3854-Article Text-12512-1-10-20230820
3854-Article Text-12512-1-10-20230820
Abstract
This paper aims at examining some of the challenges confronting peaceful
elections in Nigeria, using the 2023 general elections conducted by INEC
as a case study. Several presidential and general elections have been held
over the years in Africa. Some countries such as Angola, Kenya, Senegal
etc. succeeded in conducting free and fair elections, whereas, countries
such as DR Congo and Nigeria still resulted in widespread rigging and
violence despite several strategies put in place to ensure credible elections.
In fact, of 20 armed conflicts worldwide mapped by Global Conflict
Barometer in 2021, three were in DR Congo and three in Nigeria.
Elections in Nigeria have been characterized by massive violence, rigging,
snatching and burning of ballot papers, vote buying and killings. These
electoral challenges have for years prevented Nigeria from holding free
and fair elections. The Independent National Electoral Commission
reported attacks on at least 53 of its offices across the country before the
2023 elections and the violence is still ongoing. However, this paper tends
to critically examine these challenges hindering peaceful elections to
unravel the causes and at the same time proffer remedy for overcoming
these challenges for transparent and credible elections in Nigeria.
Employing the method of critical analysis, this paper submits that
politicians, citizens, INEC, judiciary and the government must take
responsibility for ensuring that the polls are conducted successfully. The
politicians should also adopt the strategies those countries like Senegal,
Angola and Kenya used during their elections that enabled them to win.
Introduction
Since 1999 when Nigeria returned to democratic rule, the country had witnessed
complete seven cycles of general elections. These are; the 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015,
2019 and 2023 general elections. These elections from 1999 to 2023 were marred with a
lot of irregularities, and in the end, the candidates presented by INEC as the right winners
are not always the people’s choice. This is a result of irregularities on the side of INEC to
adhere to its functions strictly. This was quite noticeable in the just concluded 2023
general elections which were the seventh elections since the return of democracy in
Nigeria. The elections were marred with many shortcomings starting with the high cost of
purchasing nomination forms which made many competent candidates decline due to the
huge money involved. Before this 2023 general elections, the government of Nigeria
together with the election Umpire (INEC) promised Nigerians that they will conduct the
freest and fairest elections using the new device (BVAS). But, it was quite very
unfortunate that the people of Nigeria were once again brainwashed and deceived by
INEC. INEC failed woefully to deliver its promises to Nigerians. The 2023 general
elections were the worse election since Nigeria returned to democracy in 1999. The
presidential and National Assembly elections witnessed a lot of rigging, underage voting,
vote buying, burning of ballot papers, killings, delays, disenfranchisements, cancellation
of results, poor physical arrangements, the inability of BVAS to upload results and
widespread violence. What transpired in the 2023 elections was totally against what was
written in the 1999 constitution of the federal republic of Nigeria as amended in 2011. In
section 133 of the constitution of Nigeria, it says:
A candidate for an election to the office of the president shall be deemed to have
been duly elected to such office where being the only candidate nominated for the
election- (a) he has a majority of YES over NO votes cast at the election; and (b)
he has not less than one-quarter of the votes cast at the election in each of at least
two-thirds of all the States in the federation and the Federal Capital Territory,
Abuja, but where the only candidate fails to be elected in accordance with this
section, then there shall be fresh nominations1.
From the above constitution, it is obvious that INEC was compromised. The candidate
declared winner by the INEC was not duly nominated and secondly, he did not have the
majority YES because the election was massively rigged. Lastly, the candidate declared
winner did not win in all the States including the Federal Capital Territory. All these
irregularities and challenges are what this paper tends to critically examine to see ways to
overcome them. Importantly, it is good to begin by analyzing a few concepts here; this
will go a long way to help achieve clarification.
Conceptual Analysis
Election
Electoral Malpractice
Electoral malpractice can also be termed electoral fraud. This involves “any wrongdoing
affecting the electoral procedure, electorate, and electoral material which influences the
election outcomes to choose personal benefit over the public interest”4. It also has to do
with those acts that are illegal, wrong, and unjustly carried out before, during, and after
elections. These unjust acts can be done by some desperate politicians, security agents,
electoral commission staff, political parties, party supporters, thugs etc. to win an election.
Election malpractice can take any form of the following forms; destruction of ballot
boxes, underage voting, ballot box stuffing, manipulation of votes, vote rigging,
intimidation of the electorates, disenfranchisement, manipulation of electoral devices and
vote-buying.
INEC
Functions of INEC
● Electoral Education: The function of INEC officials is to properly educate all voters
to ensure that they do not make mistakes as they cast their votes. This is done by
giving the voters orientations and guidelines on how to thumbprint at the ballot paper
in order not to make mistakes, avoid multiple voting and how fold the ballot paper to
prevent the ink from staining the ballot paper. This is done either through media or
going to churches, workplaces and even marketplaces. Due to the low number of
INEC officials and the large population of people in Nigeria, INEC employs ad-hoc
staff that assists INEC during elections. These people need to be properly trained
before elections commence to avoid mistakes while working on the results. However,
the question is, do INEC properly educate these people? Some of the discrepancies
and cancellations noticed in the 2023 elections are indications that INEC did not carry
out its function as it was supposed to. To ensure credible elections, comprehensive
voter education and voter awareness programmes with special focus given to women,
youth, and marginalized groups
● Political Party Registration: Before any election can take place in the country,
people must form political parties. It is the function of INEC to register them after
their formation following the laid down rules in the constitution of Nigeria as seen in
section 221, sub-section (a) which says “no association by whatever name called shall
function as a political party unless the names and addresses of its national officers are
registered with the independent National Electoral Commission”5. Over registration
of political Parties in Nigeria has given rise to incessant cross-carpeting of politicians
most seen during election campaigns. This has become a problem facing free and fair
elections in Nigeria.
the democratic knowledge that they have acquired. From the look of things, INEC is
undemocratic and not independent as it should be.
● Delegation of Powers: INEC has a hierarchy in its offices. From the Chairman to
Residential Electoral Commissioners to Electoral Officers, to Returning Officers, to
Collation Officers downward. It is the function of INEC to delegate its power to
whomever it deems fit to perform a function on its behalf. Sometimes, why INEC
fails to adhere to its functions is caused by the government in power. When the
government in power is corrupt and selfish, it will likely manipulate the functions of
INEC to remain in control. The beauty of democracy is its credibility; INEC begins to
fail when it begins to dance to the tune of external bodies.
In Nigeria today, there are a lot of challenges confronting peaceful elections and these are;
● Persistence of Violence ahead of, and During Elections: Electoral violence is the
bane of elections in Nigeria. Nigeria has a long history of violence during elections,
and it is very appalling that it repeats in the 2023 general elections. This violence took
place in almost all 36 States in Nigeria. Lagos for instance was the epic centre. Thugs
were largely used by political parties to disrupt elections in some places like Rivers,
Lagos, Enugu, Abia, Adamawa etc. in Enugu for instance, a Labour Party House of
Representatives candidate was brutally murdered two days before the HOA election.
In Rivers State, a REC was threatened not to call the presidential results of a
particular local government. In Lagos State cases of violence were recorded which
later resulted in an ethnic crisis between the Igbos and Yorubas. In Anambra State, a
voter was shot dead at the poll during the election in Njikoka LGA. Policemen also
foil hoodlums who came to snatch ballot boxes at Ihiala LGA in Anambra State. This
persistent violence during and after elections has caused serious damage in elections
in Nigeria. It is also one of the reasons INEC records low turnouts during elections.
● Vote Buying: In Nigeria, money plays an important role in choosing who becomes a
leader. Election in Nigeria is no longer based on competency, but on who has more
money that is why it is a “do or die affair”. Money politics has become a common
feature in Africa. That is why Nigeria is still so unlucky to have competent and
incorrupt leaders. The majority of Nigerian politicians still buy votes, and this has
become a serious challenge facing the electoral process as it makes election results
not to be a true representation of the right people. The 2022 APC primaries brought to
light the reality of vote buying. This was an important factor in the electoral victory
of most candidates at the primaries. All efforts to end vote-buying in the 2023 general
elections proved abortive. The more government is devising means to curb it the more
the politicians are discovering other means to promote it. The major cause of this
vote-buying has been attributed to the high cost of purchasing nomination forms. No
one would like to lose an election after spending huge money on purchasing
nomination forms and the high cost of running a campaign. Furthermore, this
phenomenon of vote-buying is another thing that gives the political elites the
privilege to remain in power; this is because they will fight to make sure that they
retain the position by all means.
● Multi-Party System
This is a serious challenge and a waste of money for INEC. Nigeria has too many
political parties and this contributes to huge waste of money during elections. This
equally gives room for incessant cross-carpeting/ decamping of politicians from one
political party to another. Everybody wants to form a political party, and INEC finds
it difficult to fix all the parties on one ballot paper.
● Poor Funding
Poor funding is another serious problem facing INEC. Despite the millions of naira
mapped out for organizing elections, INEC still complains of poor funding. The ad-
hoc staff that worked during elections needs to be paid well. The inability to pay them
well has resulted in all these criminal means of engaging in vote-buying. So, the
INEC needs to increase their honoraria and ensures they are paid on time.
● Electoral Acts
In as much as INEC is independent, sometimes the HOA enacts Laws that can hinder
INEC in its operations. Electronic voting had been on for so long, but INEC cannot
implement it unless permitted by an electoral act. Sometimes INEC violates the law
to favour the government in power. The law says in Electoral Acts that for someone
to become a president, the candidate must get 25% of votes in all 36 states and also
win in FCT. But this law is not applied in the 2023 general elections. Even, when the
electoral act says that where there is violence, supplementary election should be
conducted. But the INEC did not put all these things into consideration in the 2023
general elections.
● Underage Voter
The underage voter is another challenge facing the electoral process in Nigeria.
Despite the deployment of the new technology BVAS, these underage voters surfaced
again in the 2023 general elections and were seen voting on election days. The
questions are who registered these people? Why were they allowed to vote since they
are underage? This reveals the weakness on the side of the INEC to adhere to its
functions.
● Logistics
During elections, there is always difficulty in moving people, sensitive and non-
sensitive materials to different destinations. This logistic problem has been the reason
elections do not start on time or even do not hold at all. In as much as that there are
places that are difficult to discover or get to on time, those places in the river line
areas and those violent places. Still, INEC equally contributes to worsening these
problems. Sometimes INEC fails to plan ahead of time. These delays can be
prevented by planning ahead of time and not making arrangements on the day of the
elections. The INEC should also ensure that they make provisions for safe places
where the ad-hoc staff will stay. The issue of allowing them to convey at the INEC
offices on the day of the election is improper and can cause delays.
● Growing Population
The population of the country is creasing daily. Many people are advancing in age;
some are relocating to different places, while some people are dead. Tracing these
persons that have advanced and those that have relocated to include their names to
avoid disenfranchising them and tracing the names of the dead ones to remove their
names from the register become a serious challenge on the side of the INEC.
Before the 2023 general elections were held, the ex-president Mr Buhari together with the
INEC chairman Prof. Mahmood Yakubu assured Nigerians that the elections will be free,
fair and credible. The sum of N355 billion was budgeted by the umpire body, INEC to
take care of the logistical expenses and the deployment of the innovations BVAS and the
INEC Result Viewing, IREV, portal. This is to ensure that the elections would be
peaceful devoid of manipulation and rigging. The INEC chairman repeatedly assures
Nigeria that the introduction of BVAS will help reduce drastically all forms of electoral
malpractices during elections. As Uzoanya puts it:
Many Nigerians looked forward to the 2023 general elections for many reasons,
among which were: the fact that the elections were not the traditional two-horse
race; the repeated assurances from the Independent National Electoral
Commission, INEC; the signing of the 2022 Electoral Act which contained the
deployment of technology; the increasingly depressing state of the economy,
among others. So, the build-up to the elections was one filled with a nostalgia of
anxiety, apprehension, and hope that the time has come for us to get things right.
But did we? 6
The need to make Nigeria’s elections more credible and transparent made the INEC
introduce Bimodal Voter Accreditation System. This BVAS deployed is expected to help
reduce the cases of manual manipulation of figures. Its role is to verify the genuineness of
voters’ cards and authenticate voters during the accreditation. This device was first used
in the Isoko South Constituency by-election in Delta State in September 2021 and it
worked perfectly. But unfortunately, the almighty BVAS failed woefully, despite the
assurances made by the government and INEC that all the results would be uploaded
immediately by the IRAV during the accreditation and voting processes. The question
remains, did the umpire body fulfil its promise? No!
Nigerians on February 25, 2023, all came out en masse, unlike in other elections with all
the passion and enthusiasm under the sun to cast their votes believing that those election
malpractices that characterized the formal elections would not be noticed again. Frankly,
there was a massive turnout. Some people were at the polling units as early as 6 am.
Some even slept at the polling units; some even donated their generators to ensure that
there was no manipulation of any kind. All these efforts were to ensure that their votes
count and the results were uploaded to the IREV portal as promised by the umpire. The
people of Nigeria were eager to see in practice those promises and assurances made to
them by the umpire boss. But, unfortunately, the reverse was the case. They witnessed
disappointment, deception, intimidation and failure. The February 25, 2023 elections
were marred by those things Nigerians taught that they have defeated. Only to realize that
they have been brainwashed, deceived and cajoled by the INEC boss. Uzoanya in his
words observes that:
The election was marred by irregularities, ranging from voter suppression,
intimidation, raw violence, sporadic shootings, snatching of ballot papers, and
vote buying, among others. Both international and local observers attested to the
fact that the election was grossly below standard. A key factor of uploading
results from the polling units to the IREV portal looked like ‘the more you look,
the less you see’! 7
We would recall that the basic aim of redesigning the Nigerian currency was to ensure
that the phenomenon of vote-buying is reduced drastically. But, unfortunately, on the day
of the elections, these politicians were seen sharing Dollars with the voters at the polls.
We can equally recall vividly that many lives were lost during this period of Naira swap
due to the restriction on the amount of money to withdraw in banks by the CBN governor.
All these sufferings and pains that Nigerians passed through to ensure that there is good
governance became a waste. Sadly, many people were killed during the elections. The
violence witnessed in Lagos, Rivers, Kano and Adamawa States was nothing to write
home about. As confirmed by reports of local and international observers, there were
many problems associated with the 2023 elections. In the area of logistics, INEC failed to
provide enough vehicles that will convey ad-hoc staff and sensible materials to some
places. This has resulted in disenfranchisement of many eligible voters in some states.
Also, the collation and announcement of results were so slow, this created worries and
tension among the electorate. The ad-hoc staff that were used during the elections were
not paid their honoraria.
Nigerian state during the 2023 general elections was worse than Thomas Hobbes’ “state
of nature.” Most people lose confidence in government because of their unfaithfulness
and lack of trust. To the extent of destroying their voters’ cards due to the betrayal they
experienced. From what happened in the 2023 general elections, it seems that after 23
years, electioneering in Nigeria has virtually remained the same. The question now is
what went wrong. The truth is not far-fetched, the problem is simply bad leadership and
failure on the side of the INEC to carry out its functions as an independent body it is. The
politicians have, no doubt, been the weakest link in the electioneering process. It is very
shameful that our leaders today are the ones inflicting these pains and sufferings on their
citizens. After all the monies spent to conduct these elections, nothing has changed,
instead, things became worse. No wonder Sowore in one of his interviews laments that
unless a revolution happens in this country the same way they had in Sudan or probably
Algeria, it’s going to be difficult to have free and fair elections8. He maintains that
Nigeria must understand that unless something drastic happens, we cannot have elections
that are won based on ideas9. He points out that politicians have destroyed the basis for
any progressive politics10. However, it is in Nigeria that one can see brilliant young
people who will be asked to go and run for councillor while people with antiquated ideas
are recommended to be presidential candidates.
Despite these disappointments with INEC, some improvements were made by INEC.
Unlike in the previous elections, the introduction of the use of BVAS reduced the issues
of overvoting, unlike what we used to have before it was manually done. It was recently
through the help of BVAS that Nigerians were able to know the number of voters in those
areas in the north that always have the high numbers. The level of awareness and
participation made the 2023 elections bring about the most diverse political parties PDP,
LP, APC, YPP, NNPC, and APGA into office, unlike those years we normally have only
two parties.
One thing is identifying the problems; another thing is proffering solutions to curb such
problems identified. Some problems marred the 2023 general elections. The first problem
is the poor performance of Nigeria’s political parties. The second problem is the inability
of the INEC to fulfil its promises and adhere to its main functions. The third challenge is
the failure and manipulation of BVAS. Having noticed all these problems, as giants of
Africa that Nigeria is known for, what are the necessary things we as Nigerians need to
put in place to overcome these challenges? Firstly, INEC must ensure that it keeps to its
functions and avoid compromising. It must ensure that those ad-hoc staff and its existing
staff are well qualified, trained and drilled properly on how to carry out their duties very
well during elections. This will go a long way to reducing the rate of too many
cancellations and disparities in election results. Secondly, on the part of the government,
the progress and sustainability of this country lie in their hands. They know what to do to
move this country forward. They should allow those that have good plans for Nigeria to
fix this country back. On the part of the masses, they must not give up. They must ensure
they stand on truth and keep coming out en masse to vote for the right leaders, knowing
well that one-day justice must stand. On the part of the judiciary, they must ensure that
they always stand on truth and allow the rule of law to prevail. On the part of the
desperate politicians, if they must rule, they should emulate the lives of the leaders of
these African countries that have a stable democracy. Countries like Botswana etc. This
task is a collective job, when all these people keep to their functions, this will go a long
way to help fix the nation back.
Conclusion
Nigeria is the way it is because the political elites at the corridor of power have refused to
leave the stage for leaders who are competent and committed to saving this country.
Nigeria can become great again if our leaders can rethink and fashion out good ways to
improve Nigeria. They need to emulate the leaders of these countries, Senegal, Angola,
and Kenya that had credible elections and apply the same in Nigeria. Senegal, Angola
and Kenya all participated in President Biden’s democracy summit. The experiences of
these three countries highlight the need to bolster independent institutions, particularly
electoral bodies and the judiciary, as well as campaign finance reforms that diversify
participation and mitigate patronage. Such a step they took is paramount for dissuading
citizens in Africa from destabilizing violence as well as for enhancing confidence in the
legitimacy of elections as a genuine mechanism to foster democratization.
ENDNOTES