7 Sem Project 1911 - (90,100,102,138)
7 Sem Project 1911 - (90,100,102,138)
Submitted by
Bikram Saikia(1911090)
Sahil Mahala(1911100)
Harshit Kumar(1911102)
Bhishma Patle(1911138)
7th semester
Batch of 2019-2023 UG
Under the supervision and guidance of
Prof. P.S. Choudhary
Department of Civil Engineering
National Institute of Technology, Silchar
DECLARATION
Project Title: ANALYSIS AND DESIGN OF A G+4 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING Degree for which
the project is submitted for: Bachelor of Technology
I declare that the presented project represents largely my own ideas and work in my own words.
Where others ideas or words have been included,
I have adequately cited and listed in the reference materials. The Project has been prepared without
restoring to plagiarism. I have adhered to all the principles of academic honesty and integrity. No
falsified or fabricated data have been presented in the project. I understand that my violation of the
above will cause for disciplinary action by the institute, including revoking the conferred degree, if
conferred, and can also evoke penal action from the sources which have not been properly cited or
from whom permission has not been taken.
CERTIFICATE
This is to certify that the project work entitled "Analysis and Design of G+4
Residential Building" submitted for partial fulfillment of the award of the degree
of Bachelor of Technology in Civil Engineering under the Department of Civil
Engineering, NIT Silchar, has been carried out by the undersigned students of
7th Semester B.Tech, under the supervision and guidance of Prof P.S
Choudhary.
Bikram Saikia(1911090)
Sahil Mahala(1911100)
Harshit Kumar(1911102)
Bhishma Patle(1911138)
Signature of supervisior
Prof P.S Choudhary
Department of Civil Engineering
NIT SILCHAR
Abstract
The design and analysis are the two most important factors considered in
creation of any building, whether residential or non-residential. Building
design and analysis is a complex task and requires in-depth knowledge of Civil
Engineering. It is thus very important for a Civil Engineer to understand the
complexities and maximize the possibilities on site, in order to build any
structure which is structurally safe and at the same time meet the economic
demands.
The main objective of this project work is to analyze and design a G+4
Residential Building.
A proposed architectural plan is made, meeting the requirements of the building laws
using AutoCAD.
Frame Analysis under DL, LL, wind load (WL) and earthquake load (EL) is done.
The results and data obtained after the analysis can be taken into the consideration for the
actual and practical design of any similar structur
Acknowledgement
On the very outset of this report, we would like to extend our sincere and
heartful obligations towards all the personages who have helped us in
this endeavor. Without their active guidance and support, cooperation
and encouragement, we would have not made head away in this project.
First and foremost, we would like to express our sincere gratitude to all
the faculty members of Department of Civil Engineering, NIT Silchar for
not only providing us with such a learning opportunity but also for
imparting the core and in-depth knowledge of Building Design.
1 Introduction
3 Design plan
4 Elevation
5 Grid plan
6 Design Philosophy
7 Description Of IS code
9 Role of Autocad
13 Frame Analysis
14 Wind load
15 Design of beam
16 Design of Column
17 Design of footing
18 Conclusion
INTRODUCTION
Now a days, most of the structures are constructed using reinforced cement concrete. Due to
the increasing population and scarcity of land resources, it has become utmost important for
both residential as well as office purposes to opt for the construction of multi storied
buildings. For multi storied buildings, the framed is used which consists of a network of
beams and columns built rigidly at their joints replacing the conventional load bearing
structures as it is uneconomical and require larger sections. Because of this rigidity at the
joints, there will be reduction in moments and also the structure tends to distribute the loads
more uniformly and eliminate the excessive effects of localized loads, Due to that, there is a
reduction in sections of the members. As the walls don't take any load, they are also of thinner
dimensions, This also results in a cheaper foundation. In addition to the above-mentioned
advantages the framed structure is more effective is resisting wind loads and earthquake
loads.
India is divided into 5 seismic zones(viz. zone I to zone V). We have selected the location as
Guwahati city which belongs to zone V. Moreover for residential building the permissible
number of storeys is ranged from 4 to 8 based on the soil condition. Thus we have selected a
G+4 residential building meeting ductile detailing meeting ductile detailing requirements.
A plot has been selected for the construction of a multi stored residential building. In the
building the functions will be different and it plays a major role because of different slabs.
The frame analysis and design is done as per guidelines of code IS 456:2000, SP 16:1980. IS
13920:1993, IS 1893:2002 and IS 875(Part3) 1987.
PROBLEM STATEMENT AND
DESIGN DATA
Design and draw the complete structural details of a multistoryed
reinforced concrete framed residential building as per following data:
Type : Residential
Plot size: 21m x 30 m
1800mm
A reinforced concrete structure should be designed such that it fulfill its intended lifetime with:
In the working stress method it is seen that the permissible stresses for concrete and steel are not
exceeded anywhere in the structure when it is subjected to the worst combination of working loads.
A linear variation of stress from zero at neutral axis to the maximum stress at the extreme fiber is
assumed.
Practically the stress strain curve for concrete is not linear as it was assumed in working stress
method. So, in ultimate load design an idealized form of actual stress strain diagram is used and the
working loads are increased by multiplying them with the load factors.
The basis of limit state method is a structure with appropriate degrees of reliability should be able
to withstand safely all loads that are liable to act on it throughout its life and it should also satisfy
the serviceability requirements such as limitations on deflection and cracking.
Limit state method is the most rational method of all the three methods. It considers the actual
behavior of the materials at failure and also it takes serviceability also into consideration.
Section 1: General
Section 2: Materials, workmanship, Inspection and testing
IS 875 (Part 1): 1987 - This Indian standard code covers unit weight/mass of the materials,
and the parts or components in a building that apply to the determination of dead loads in the
design of buildings. The unit weight/mass of the materials that are likely to be stored in a
building are also specified for the purpose of load calculations along with the angles of
internal friction as appropriate.
IS 875 (Part 2): 1987 - This Indian standard code covers imposed loads to be assumed in the
design of buildings. The imposed loads, specific herein, are the minimum loads which should
be taken into consideration for the purpose of structural safety of buildings. This code does
not cover detailed provisions for loads incidental to construction and special cases of
vibration, such as moving machinery, heavy acceleration from cranes. Such loads shall be
dealt with individually in each case.
IS 875 (Part 3): 1987 - This Indian standard code covers the wind forces and their effects (static
and dynamic) that should be taken into account when designing buildings, structures and
components thereof. It is believed that ultimately wind load estimation will be made by taking into
account the random variation of wind speed with time but available theoretical methods have not
matured sufficiently at present for use in the code. For this reason, static wind method of load
estimation which implies a steady wind speed, which has proven to be satisfactory for normal, short
and heavy structures, is given in 5 and 6. However, a beginning has been made to take account of
the random nature of the wind speed by requiring that the along-wind or drag load on structures
which are prone to wind induced oscillations, be also determined by the gust factor method and the
more severe of two estimates be taken for design.
SP 16: 1980 - Design Aids for Reinforced Concrete to IS 4561978 is a structural practice
handbook that has charts and tables that helps structural engineers to rapidly design simple
sections.
IS 1893 (Part 1): 1987 - This Indian standard code deals with assessment of seismic loads
on various structures and earthquake resistant design of buildings. Its basic provisions are
applicable to buildings, elevated structures, industrial and stack like structures, bridges,
concrete masonry and earth dams,
IS 13920: 2016 - The standard code which covers the requirements for the designing and
detailing of monolithic reinforced concrete buildings so as to give them toughness and
ductility to resist severe earthquake shocks without collapse.
Requires buildings to be designed, constructed or altered so as to structurally safe and robust, and
so as not to impair the structural stability of other buildings. It stipulates design standards for use
on all buildings and give simple design rules for most masonry and timber elements for traditional
domestic buildings. It includes diagrams of structures such as roof frames and brick walls, and
tables of material strengths.
Ventilation:
It includes standards for ventilation and air quality for all buildings. It also covers requirements for
the prevention of condensation.
Natural Lighting:
The building should be designed in such a way that each and every room should receive natural
lighting from sunlight in that sunlight in the daytime to reduce electricity expenses.
Brick Wall:
By considering all the set backs, we provided a plot size of (16.2*21,2)m instead of given plot size
of (21*30)m.
STAIRCASE:
AutoCAD architecture allows designers to draw 3D objects such as walls, doors and windows, with
more intelligent data associated with them rather than simple objects. The data can be programmed
to represent products sold in the industry, or it can be extracted into a file for pricing material
estimation etc.
AutoCAD is a very helpful tool in drafting and designing any structure. AutoCAD uses a graphical
design interface for the purpose of drafting and designing any structure. The software has various
inbuilt tools for complex drafting. Also AutoCAD can be used for 2D and 3D design and also for
perspective design.
With the help of AutoCAD all the drafting for the project has been done. It has made the life of a
drafter quite easy than the conventional drafter using pencil and paper. It has made possible to make
easy changes in the drawing as and when required. Also various commands such as COPY,
OFFSET, ROTATE, MOVE have made the tedious process of redundant work quite easy and faster.
Also one of the important features of AutoCAD is the import and export feature which allows users
to move their plans and drawn using AutoCAD to other software such as STAAD Pro and ETABS
with the help of DXF file format which has in turn reduced load on the designer. Also, structural
designs made on STAAD and ETABS are also exportable to AutoCAD for minute detailing
required.
Design of Floor slab
Assume overall depth of slab as 150 mm and diameter of bars in both directions as 10 mm.
Assume a clear cover of 20mm
Effective depths dx = 150-20-5 = 125 mm
dy = 150-20-10-5 = 115 mm
Support width = 250 mm
Load Calculations:
Slab S1 at floor:
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.047*11.92*3.4302 = 6.59 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀+ = 𝛼+ × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.035*11.92*3.4302 = 4.90 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Moment 𝑀− = 7.71 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 =
Ast,x = 146.14mm²
For 10 mm bar ast = 78.54 mm2
Spacing = 1000/no. of bars = 1000*ast/Ast =463.33mm
Check for spacing:
As per Clause (26.3.3 (b)) of IS-456:2000
Spacing should be not more than the least of the following:
1) 3 d = 3*125=375 mm
2) 300 mm
3) 463.33mm
Hence provide 10mm diameter bars @ 300 mm c/c.
Ast provided = 1000*78.54/300 = 261.8 mm2
Moment 𝑀− = 6.59 𝐾𝑁 – 𝑚
𝑢𝑦
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏 𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑
= 124.47mm²
Slab S2 at floor:
Shorter span
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.0495
𝑥
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.0372
𝑥
Longer span
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.037
𝑦
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.028
Moments: 𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙𝑦2 =0.0495*11.92*3.432 = 6.94 KN-m
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Moment 𝑀− = 6.94 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑
=132.24mm²
−
𝑢𝑦 = 5.18 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Moment 𝑀
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑
= 97.26mm²
Moment Calculations:
As per Clause (D-1.1 and Table 26) of IS-456:2000 Slab with one short edge discontinuous
Shorter span:
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.051
𝑥
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.039
𝑥
Longer span:
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.037
𝑦
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.028
Moments: 𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙𝑦2 =0.051*11.92*3.4502 = 7.23 KN-m
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀+ = 𝛼+ × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.039*11.92*3.4502 = 5.53 KN-m
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.037*11.92*3.4502 = 5.24 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀 = 𝛼 × 𝑤 × 𝑙 =0.028*11.92*3.4502 = 3.97 KN-m
+ + 2
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Moment 𝑀− = 7.23 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast ,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑
=137.53 mm²
Moment 𝑀− = 5.24 𝐾𝑁 – 𝑚
𝑢𝑦
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast ,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 99.47mm²
Moment Calculations:
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀 = 𝛼 × 𝑤 × 𝑙 =0.028*11.92*3.92 = 5.07 KN-m
+ + 2
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Check for depth:
Moment 𝑀− = 6.70 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast ,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 126.97mm²
−
𝑢𝑦 = 6.7 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Moment 𝑀
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast ,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 =126.97mm²
Moment Calculations:
Shorter span:
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.032
𝑥
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.024
𝑥
Longer span:
-ve moment at continuous edge = 𝛼− = 0.032
𝑦
+ve moment at mid span = 𝛼+ = 0.024
Moments: 𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙𝑦2 =0.032*11.92*3.97 2 = 6.01 KN-m
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀+ = 𝛼+ × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.024*11.92*3.972 = 4.50 KN-m
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.032*11.92*3.972 = 6.01 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀+ = 𝛼+ × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.024*11.92*3.972 = 4.50 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Moment 𝑀− = 6.01 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,x= 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 113.84mm²
−
𝑢𝑦 = 6.01 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Moment 𝑀
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 113.84mm²
𝑢𝑥 𝑥 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀− = 𝛼− × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.032*11.92*3.4502 = 4.54KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
𝑀+ = 𝛼+ × 𝑤 × 𝑙2 =0.024*11.92*3.4502 = 3.40 KN-m
𝑢𝑦 𝑦 𝑢 𝑥
Moment 𝑀− = 5.67 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 107.30mm²
−
𝑢𝑦 = 4.54 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Moment 𝑀
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 85.20mm²
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Area of steel along shorter span (main bar) Ast,x = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 147.40mm2
Area of steel along longer span (dist. Bar) Ast,y = 0.12%bD = 240 mm2
Minimum area of steel, Ast,min = 0.12%bD = 240 mm2
Spacing of bars along shorter span = 1000×50.24/240 = 209.33 mm [controls]
= 3d = 528 mm
= 300 mm
Spacing of bars along longer span = 1000×50.24/240 = 209.33 mm [controls]
= 5d = 530 mm
= 450 mm
Provide 8 mm Փ bar @ 200 mm c/c along shorter span.
Provide 8 mm Փ bar @ 200 mm c/c along longer span.
Check for shear, τv = 16.92 × 1000/( 1000 × 176) = 0.09 MPa
Pt=100As/bd = 100*240/(1000*176) = 0.13%
𝜏𝑐 = 0.27 MPa > 0.14 MPa (OK) [table 19 , IS 456]
Check for deflection, fs = 0.58×500×251.2/240 = 303.53 Mpa
% steel = 0.0012
MF = 1.5
L/dreq = 1.5×7 = 11.5
L/dprovided = 1060/176 = 6.02 < 11.5 (OK)
Slab Depth Reinforcement Reinforcement
along shorter span along longer span
(mm)
Load Calculations:
Moment 𝑀− = 6.30 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
𝑢𝑥
d = 125 mm
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,x= 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏𝑑2 ) 𝑏𝑑 = 118.82²
−
𝑢𝑦 = 5.38 𝐾𝑁 − 𝑚
Moment 𝑀
0.5𝑓𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast,y = 𝑓𝑦
(1 − √1 − 𝑓𝑐𝑘𝑏 𝑑2) 𝑏𝑑 = 102.08mm²
51
Slab S4 at roof:
52
Length of shorter span Lx = 3450 mm
Ly/Lx = 1.15< 2
Therefore, the slab is two way.
Support width = 250 mm
Reinforcement along X-direction:
Hence provide 10mm diameter bars @ 300 mm c/c.
Ast provided = 1000*78.54/300 = 261.8 mm2
Reinforcement along Y-direction:
Provide 10mm diameter bars @ 300 mm c/c.
Ast provided = 1000*78.54/300 = 261.8 mm2
Reinforcement in edge strip:
Therefore, provide 3 no of bars in each edge strip along both X and Y directions.
Torsion reinforcement:
Provide 10 mm bars @ 400 c/c upto length of 690 mm.
Slab S7 at roof:
M = wl2/8;
= (10,725 x
4.6452)/8 M =
28925 Nm
Mu,limit = 0.138fckbd2;
If 10 mm diameter bars are provided, the effective cover = clear cover + half bar
diameter = 15 mm + 5 mm = 20 mm
= 1000/[660 / 78.5]
= 120 mm c/c
Provide main reinforcement of 10 mm diameter bars at 120 mm c/c
Distribution Reinforcement for Stairs
Provide 0.12% of cross-sectional area as distribution rebars as per IS:456-2000,
= 190 mm c/c
Let,
Load Calculation
Load on Waist Slab
= 5500 N/m2
= 300 N/m2
Therefore, total load on waist slab 'ws'= 5500 + 300 = 5800 N/m2
The above load obtained is inclined. This must be converted into a horizontal load (w) by
multiplying it with the factor. If the length of riser and thread is 'R' and 'T,' then,
Corresponding horizontal load per sq.m = 5800* 1462+2702 ÷270= 6600 N/m2
Total load on waist slab = 6600 + 1825 + 300 + 2000 = 10,725 N/m2
M = wl2/8;
= (10,725 x 4.6452)/8
M = 28925 Nm
Ultimate Moment, Mu = 1.5 x M = 1.5 x 28925 = 43388 Nm
Mu,limit = 0.138fckbd2;
If 10 mm diameter bars are provided, the effective cover = clear cover + half bar diameter = 15
mm + 5 mm = 20 mm
Ast,req = (pt x bd)/100 = (0.33 x 1000 x 200)/100 = 660 mm2 Assume 10 mm diameter
bars;
= 120 mm c/c
Hence,
At roof level
+2601.96
= 15239.738KN
Floor Wi hi Wihi2 Qi Vi
Σ 1740572.676
Column shear:
=> P5 = 20.67 KN
For storey 4: 14 P4 = 224.92+ 289.43=> P4 = 36.73 KN
Column Moment:
K1 = 1
k3 = 1
k2 -> Interpolation
Height(m) K2
10 0.88
15 0.94
20 0.98
Height Vb K1 K2 K3 Vz
10 50 1 0.88 1 44
15 50 1 0.94 1 47
16.5 50 1 0.955 1 47.75
Height Vz Pz Pz =
0.6
10 44 1161.6 Vz2
15 47 1325.4
F = Cf . Ae . Pz
Calculation of Cf:
Storey No. Loading Level Ht. Of Storey Design Force Force at each
story level
5 13.2-16.5 3.3 4.23 13.959
4 9.9-13.2 3.3 4.93 16.269
3 6.6-9.9 3.3 4.32 13.824
2 3.3-6.6 3.3 4.32 13.824
1 1-3.3 3.3 4.32 13.824
Design of Beams
A beam is a structural member that is capable of withstanding load by primarily
resisting bending. The designing of the beam mainly consists of fixing the breadth
and depth of the beam and arriving at the area of steel and the diameter of bars to be
used. The breadth of the beam is generally kept equal to the thickness of the wall to
avoid offset inside the room. It shall also not exceed the width of the column for
effective transfer of load from beam to column. The depth of the beam is taken
between L/10 to L/16. The dimensions of the beam that we have chosen are 350 x
350.
Analysis: The beam is analysed first in order to calculate the internal actions such
as Bending Moment and Shear Force. A simplified substitute frame analysis can be
used for determining the bending moments and shearing forces at any floor or roof
level due to gravity loads. The Moment distribution method is used for this purpose.
2) Loads: In order to analyse the frame, it is needed to calculate the loads to which
the beams are subjected to. The different loadings are as follows:
i) Uniformly Distributed Load: (w) in kN/m
The load transferred from the slab per metre length will be either rectangular
from one way slab or trapezoidal/triangular from two-way slab. Depending on the
position of the slab, the loading may be decided. In the case of two-way slabs,
trapezoidal load comes from the longer side while the triangular load comes from
the shorter side.
Design Parameters used:
Nominal Cover = 25 mm
Rebar Diameter = 25 mm
f/g height = 3 m
Load Specifications
Live Load:
Dead Load:
Structural Analysis
Once the loads have been calculated, the next part is analysis. The structural analysis part can be
done with the help of the Moment distribution method. Moment distribution method offers a
convenient way to analyse statically indeterminate beams and rigid
frames. In the moment distribution method, every joint of the structure to be analysed is fixed to
develop the fixed-end moments. Then, each fixed joint is sequentially released, and the fixed-end
moments are distributed to adjacent members until equilibrium is achieved. It falls into the
category of displacement method of structural analysis.
Fixed end moments
Fixed end moments are the moments produced at member ends when the joints are fixed.
For a uniformly distributed load acting on a beam, the Fixed end moments is calculated as shown
below: -
Flexural Stiffness
The flexural stiffness (EI/L) of a member is represented as the product of the modulus of elasticity
(E) and the second moment of area (I) divided by the length (L) of the member. Additionally, what
is needed in the moment distribution method is not the exact value but the ratio of flexural stiffness
of all members.
Distribution Factor
Distribution factor can be defined as the ratio of relative stiffness to the total stiffness.
Unbalanced moments are carried over to the other end of the member when the joint is released.
Added to that, the ratio of the carried-over moment at the other end to the fixed-end moment of
the initial end is the carryover factor. Lastly, For prismatic members, the carryover moment in
each span has the same sign as the distribution end moment, but is one-half as large.
Procedure
3)Determine the distribution factors for various members framing into a particular
joint.
4) Distribute the net fixed end moments at the joints to various members by
multiplying the net moment by their respective distribution factors in the first
cycle.
5) In the second and subsequent cycles, carry-over moments from the far ends of
the same member (carry-over moment will be half of the distributed moment).
6) Consider this carry-over moment as a fixed end moment and determine the balancing moment.
This procedure is repeated from the second cycle onwards till convergence.
Once the moment distribution process has been completed, we will be able to obtain the bending
moment diagram for the respective loads i.e. Dead Load and Live load.
Shearing forces occur when a perpendicular force is applied to static material (in this case a beam).
These forces occur along with numerous points of a beam, and it is important to determine where
these shears are at the greatest points as this may be where a beam fails.
To calculate the shear forces of a beam, the following steps should be followed:
If there is an upward force (i.e., a support) then the SFD will start at this force above the x-axis. If
there is a downward point load and no support, then the shear force diagram will start as a negative
at the value of the point load. Move across the beam as you come across loads, you simply add (or
subtract) these loads from the value you
already have, keeping a cumulative total.
Distribution factor:
The respective design value of shear is obtained by multiplying 1.5 with the summation
of shear due to dead and live load.
Similarly bending moments are calculated from the bending moment diagrams for all the
beams at the right and left end and at the centre. However in the case of calculating
shear forces we don't consider the mid-section or the shear because shear is most likely
to be very small at the centre.
The design value of bending moment is calculated by adding the bending moments of
the loads and by multiplying it to 1.5.
Sagging moment takes place in the centre and hogging moment occurs at the supports i.e left and
right end. In order to design Mu/bd2 value is calculated for each beams(for both hogging and
sagging) from Table 2( SP 16 IS handbook) Pt value is obtained. Ast value is calculated by
Ast= Pt x bd/100
We take the value of Ast for further calculation only if it's greater than check Ast.
Otherwise the value of check Ast is considered.
If the value of Mu/bd^2 is too small for obtaining the value of Pt from SP 16 Handbook IS code.
Ast value is considered as 312.375.
(Minimum reinforcement (clause 26.5.1.1 , IS:456-2000))
The no of bar required is calculated by
4 x Ast/ 3.14 x d^2.
After the calculations the no of bars are provided accordingly. (Minimum 2 bars are usually
provided)
Seismic design
Seismic design is a vital process of structural analysis while designing a building, which
is subjected to earthquake ground motions. Design code IS:1893-2001(Part 1 ) is
followed in India for designing against seismic load. This IS code divides Indian terrain
into 4 specific zones namely: Zone II, Zone III, Zone IV and Zone V established on the
basis of vulnerability of a specific location to seismic activity. Zone I is obsolete in India
and hence not mentioned in IS:1893(part 1).
For earthquake-resistant buildings, adequate vertical and lateral stiffness and strength
is recommended while designing.
A) Lateral Stiffness of a building is governed by the shape of the plan. If the building
shape is irregular with protrusions of rooms from the central structure, then that building
is considered laterally irregular and has lesser lateral stiffness.
B) Vertical Stiffness in a multi storeyed building is determined by the distribution of load
on each floor. If consecutive floors are loaded with vast disparity then , that building will
be considered as vertically irregular.
C)Redundancy is possibly one of the most important safety characteristics when
designing for safety. Redundancy ensures there are multiple strategies in place in case
one fails
There are 3 types of redundancies in a structure:
i) Structural redundancy: It is defined as redundancy that exists as a result of the
continuity within the load path. Any statically indeterminate structure may be said to be
redundant.
ii) Load path redundancy: It refers to the number of supporting elements, usually
parallel, such as girders or trusses. For a structure to be non-redundant, it must have
two or fewer load paths The greater the number of girders, the greater the capacity to
share peak load by the adjacent members
iii) Internal redundancy is when a structural component has alternative and sufficient
load paths existing within the component itself.
iv) A stable foundation is a major characteristic of building a large structure regardless
of natural disaster risks. It is critical for a building’s long-term survival, and a stronger
foundation is necessary to resist an earthquake's powerful force.
Analysis of lateral load (seismic load)
Three basic methods are available for analysing the responses of a structure subjected
to seismic ground waves: Static analysis. Response spectra analysis. Time history
analysis.
Seismic analysis is explained using Static analysis in this document.
Load Calculation
Factored seismic load (base shear, Vb) is distributed as lateral forces into different
floors, with the topmost floor experiencing maximum lateral seismic force. Following
expressions are used for the calculation of seismic loads and lateral forces.
i)For calculating seismic weight of each floor:
Wi = Total dead load of the slab of floor in consideration + Total weight of beams in that
floor + Dead load of half of upper floor & lower floor +25% of (Total live load of the slab
of floor in consideration + Live load of half of upper floor & lower floor)
Total seismic weight , W=𝛴Wi
ii)For the calculation of design base shear Vb :
iii)Calculation of Time period:
iv)Lateral Force on each floor is given by the expression
S3 1.12 2.1
S6 1.14 2.1
S8 0.84 1.6
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 8.353125
C2 - 8.353125
C3 - 8.353125
C4 - 8.353125
C5 - 8.353125
C6 - 8.353125
C7 - 8.353125
C8 - 8.353125
Column C9 - 8.353125
Above floor
level - -
Below floor
Brickwork level - 14.262875
S3 1.12 2.1
S9 0.46 0.9
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 8.353125
C2 - 8.353125
C3 - 8.353125
C4 - 8.353125
C5 - 8.353125
C6 - 8.353125
C7 - 8.353125
C8 - 8.353125
Column C9 - 8.353125
Above floor
level - 14.262875
Below floor
Brickwork level - 14.262875
S3 1.12 2.1
S6 1.14 2.1
S8 0.84 1.6
S9 0.46 0.9
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 16.70625
C2 - 16.70625
C3 - 16.70625
C4 - 16.70625
C5 - 16.70625
C6 - 16.70625
C7 - 16.70625
C8 - 16.70625
Column C9 - 16.70625
Above floor
W4 Brickwork level - 14.262875 233.573
Below floor
level - 14.262875
S3 1.12 2.1
S6 1.14 2.1
S8 0.84 1.6
S9 0.46 0.9
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 16.70625
C2 - 16.70625
C3 - 16.70625
C4 - 16.70625
C5 - 16.70625
C6 - 16.70625
C7 - 16.70625
C8 - 16.70625
Below floor
Brickwork level - 14.262875
S3 1.12 2.1
S6 1.14 2.1
S8 0.84 1.6
S9 0.46 0.9
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 16.70625
C2 - 16.70625
C3 - 16.70625
C4 - 16.70625
C5 - 16.70625
C6 - 16.70625
C9 - 16.70625
Above floor
level - 14.262875
Below floor
Brickwork level - 14.262875
B1 - 7.651875
B2 - 7.555625
B3 - 6.545
B4 - 4.860625
B5 - 6.545
Beam B6 - 7.5075
C1 - 9.365625
C2 - 9.365625
C3 - 9.365625
C4 - 9.365625
C5 - 9.365625
C6 - 9.365625
C7 - 9.365625
C8 - 9.365625
Column C9 - 9.365625
Above floor
level - 14.262875
Below floor
W1 Brickwork level - - 139.219
Fig:Calculation of seismic weights
Force calculation
The 2D building frame can be analyzed using approximate methods of lateral analysis
such as
i)Portal Method
ii)Cantilever method
Portal method
The portal method is based on the assumption that, for each storey of the frame, the
interior columns will take twice as much shear force as the exterior columns.This
method is more appropriate for low rise buildings with uniform framing.
There are three major assumptions that apply in the approximate portal method of
analysis. These assumptions are as follow:
1. An inflection point is located at mid-height of each column.
2. An inflection point is located at the center of each beam.
3. The horizontal shear is divided among all the columns on the basis that each interior
column takes twice as much as the exterior column.
Calculation of forces:
i)The column shears are determined by balancing it against the lateral forces in
horizontal direction
ii)The column moments are then calculated by multiplying with half the height of their
respective column .
iii)The beam moments are calculated by equating total moment at a joint to 0
iv) The beam shears are finally determined by dividing the beam moments by the length
of the respective beams.
Cantilever method
The cantilever method is very similar to the portal method. Point of contraflexure is still
assumed at the center of beams. The only difference is that for the cantilever method,
instead of finding the shears in the columns first using an assumption, we will find the
axial force in the columns using an assumption.
The cantilever method assumes that the whole frame will deform laterally in the same
way as the vertical cantilever. The location of the neutral axis of the whole frame is
found by considering the cross-sectional areas and locations of the columns at each
storey:
where, x=the horizontal distance between the location of the neutral axis and the zero
point
Ai=the area of column i
xi =the horizontal distance between column i and the zero point.
The location zero does not matter, but is commonly set as the location of the leftmost
column.
Once we know the location of the neutral axis, using the assumption that the frame
behaves as a vertical cantilever, we know that the axial strain in each column will be
proportional to that column's distance from the neutral axis, just like the strain in any
fiber a distance x away from the neutral axis of a cantilever is proportional to the
distance x. Since we are assuming that all of our materials are linear (stress is linear to
strain), then this also means that the axial stress in each column is proportional to its
distance from the neutral axis of the frame. Also, columns on one side of the neutral
axis will be in tension, and columns on the other side of the neutral axis will be in
compression.
Since this method relies on the frame behaving like a bending cantilever beam, it should
generally be more accurate for more slender or taller structures, whereas the portal
method may be more accurate for shear critical frames, such as squat or short
structures.
Fig: Portal method of analysis of forces in structural elements
Design of structural elements for earthquake load
(i)Typical Floor:
(ii)Roof:
(iii)External wall:
Weight of External Wall = [Width of wall x (Height of each floor – Depth of Beam)] x
Density
Now,
Load on Column in KN
Total = 234.7kN
Total = 488.45 kN
Total = 742.20 kN
Total = 995.952 kN
Total = 1249.70 kN
=13.365KN
Total =1271.43kN
As here we are calculating approximate load we have to take an increment value as allowance for
bending due to effect of fixity
Therefore,
Pu = 1700 kN
Ley/D=1917.5/450 =4.26< 12
Pu=1700 kN
p/fck = 0.14
SP16 Chart 49
P= 0.14 x 20 = 2.8 %
n x Π / 4 x 25² = 5670
n = 11.55 ~= 12 bars
To find Mux1;
d’/D=0.15
∴Mux1 = 328.05kNm
To find Muy1 :
p/fck = 0.145
d’/D = 0.15
Pu/fckbD = 0.42
To find Puz;
From Table
Pu/Puz µn
0.2 1.0
0.8 2.0
∴µn = 1.4
= 0.95 < 1
(ii) 16mm
Pitch
Least of
(i) Least lateral Dimension = 450mm
(iii) 300 mm
Given
Depth of the foundation below ground level = 1800 mm
Column size = 450 x 450 mm
Safe Bearing Capacity of soil ( SBC ) = 200 KN/m2
(assume)
𝑀1 = 𝑃𝑜𝐵× (𝐿 − 𝑎) 2 /8
176.89(3.1−.45)2 ×3.1
M1= = 481.35KNm
8
1
Depth required, d=√𝑀𝑢
0.138×20×B
=290.49m
Area of reinforcement:
.5𝐹𝑐𝑘 4.6𝑀𝑢
Ast= (1-√1 − 𝐹𝑐𝑘𝐵𝑑2 )×Bd
𝑓𝑦
2
=2883 mm
𝐴𝑠𝑡
%𝑃𝑡 (p)= × 100=.19%
𝐵𝑑
Provide= 27 bars
1
𝑉𝑥 = 𝑃𝑜B×{ (𝐵 − 𝑏) − 𝑑}
2
Vx= 397.56 Kn
Ultimate shear = 𝑉𝑥𝑢 = 1.5 × 397.56 = 596.34𝐾𝑁
=.32 N/mm2
𝝉𝒄 ′ = 𝝉𝒄 × 𝒌
.87𝐹𝑦𝐴𝑠𝑣𝑑
Sv = = 176mm
𝑉𝑢𝑠
F=Qu[B2-b02]=1504.89 KN
=2257.33 Kn
Now, page no 57 IS 456 of clause 31.6.2
𝝉v=Fu/4b0d
=0.89N/mm2
𝝉𝒄 = 0.25√𝑓𝑐𝑘 =1.11N/mm2
IS Codes and Aids are used as per requirement. The plan and elevation are done using
Autocad. However all the calculations and analysis are done manually without using
any software.
NIT SILCHAR