House Breaking Assingment
House Breaking Assingment
ASSIGNMENT
1. If Dele in the process of breaking into the house of Tayo with intent to steal
from it projects the instrument into the window in order to force open the window
and thereby gain entry into the building. When Tayo heard the noise being made
by the force exerted on the window, raised an alarm which made Dele to take to his
heels abandoning his instrument. Has Dele committed any offence?
3. What is the punishment for the offence of housebreaking under the Criminal
Codeand housebreaking by night under the Penal Code?
4. If Okemkpi approached his bank for a loan and offered to pledge his Rolex gold
Wristwatch on account of which he was advanced a loan. Later, it was
discovered that the said Rolex gold wristwatch is in fact a fake. What offence has
Okemkpi committed, if any?
ANSWERS
1. Considering the definition of breaking according to section 410 of
the criminal code which states that, the act of breaking constitutes
the actual breaking of any external orinternal part of a building or by
unlocking, pulling, pushing, lifting of a door,window shutter which
are ordinarily used for closing or opening a building or used as
giving passage to the building or from one part of the building to
another. Dele with the use of an instrument and an intent to steal
from Tayo tried to gain access into the house forcefully, he fulfiledl
all the elements that ought to be present in order to constitute a house
breaking or burglary which include;
a. that the building in question is a dwelling-house and the
defendant broke into it;
b. that there is breaking in and/or out, and entry into the building.
c. That the breaking was with intent to commit a felony (a crime)
therein.
Dele has the intent to commit a crime and has achieved breaking and
entering the house by means of using an instrument before an alarm
was raised and as such is guilty of house breaking or burglary. It was
held in the case ofUKO V.STATE (1972) 10 SC 31, when the
appellant appealed to the supreme court that charges against the
appellant for breaking and entering into the house of PW1could not
be sustained as it had not been shown that the appellant broke and
entered into the house. He was only seen around the house premises
according to the evidence given by PW3. Following the above case,
Dele is not guilty of any offence, either of house breaking or
burglary.