(备份)9868 Example Candidate Responses Paper 2 (for Examination From 2024) 加水印
(备份)9868 Example Candidate Responses Paper 2 (for Examination From 2024) 加水印
Cambridge University Press & Assessment retains the copyright on all its publications. Registered centres are permitted to copy
material from this booklet for their own internal use. However, we cannot give permission to centres to photocopy any material that
is acknowledged to a third party even for internal use within a centre.
Contents
Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................................... 4
.
Question 1 ....................................................................................................................................................................... 6
.
Example Candidate Response – high ............................................................................................................................. 6
.
Example Candidate Response – middle ......................................................................................................................... 8
.
Example Candidate Response – low............................................................................................................................. 10
Question 2 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 13
.
Example Candidate Response – high ........................................................................................................................... 13
.
Example Candidate Response – middle ....................................................................................................................... 15
.
Example Candidate Response – low............................................................................................................................. 17
Question 3 ..................................................................................................................................................................... 20
.
Example Candidate Response – high ........................................................................................................................... 20
.
Example Candidate Response – middle ....................................................................................................................... 23
.
Example Candidate Response – low............................................................................................................................. 26
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
Introduction
The main aim of this booklet is to exemplify standards for those teaching Cambridge International A Level Chinese
Language & Literature and to show how different levels of candidates’ performance (high, middle and low) relate to the
syllabus requirements. This document helps teachers to assess the standards required to achieve marks beyond the
guidance of the mark scheme.
In this booklet candidate responses have been chosen from the June 2024 exam series to exemplify a range of
answers.
For each question, the response is annotated with examiner comments about where and why marks were awarded or
omitted. This is followed by comments on how the answer could be improved. There is also a list of common mistakes
and guidance for candidates for each question.
Please refer to the June 2024 Examiner Report for further details and guidance.
The questions and mark schemes are available on the School Support Hub
Past exam resources and other teaching and learning resources are available on the School Support Hub
4
How to use this booklet
This booklet goes through the paper one question at a time, showing you a high-, middle- and low-level response for
11/24, 3:10 PM
each question. The candidate answers arePrintset in a table. In the left-hand column are the candidate answers, and in
Script
the right-hand column are the examiner comments.
5
Question 1
1/24, 3:10 PM Print Script
2 " "
" "
3
1
2
" "
' '
3
4
5 " "
5
"
"
6
6
ps://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109809105&PageCount=8&CanNum=6443&pbc=&URL= 3/10
6
7/11/24, 3:10 PM Print Script
https://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109809105&PageCount=8&CanNum=6443&pbc=&URL= 4/10
7
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
/24, 3:13 PM Print Script
2.
5 3.
4.
6
7 5.
6.
7.
s://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109750810&PageCount=8&CanNum=149&pbc=&URL= 3/10
8
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
7/11/24, 3:13 PM Print Script
8.
9
9.
* " "
9
11/24, 3:17 PM Print Script
s://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109751896&PageCount=8&CanNum=2401&pbc=&URL= 3/10
10
7/11/24, 3:17 PM Print Script
11
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
12
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
Question 2
/11/24, 3:11 PM Print Script
1.
2
2.
3.
3
4.
ttps://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109751765&PageCount=8&CanNum=61&pbc=&URL= 5/10
13
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
7/11/24, 3:11 PM Print Script
6 6.
"
" " " "
" " " " "
" " " " "
"
5
7
7.
8 8.
6
9 9.
8
*
*
*
* " " " " *
14
1/24, 3:14 PM Print Script
ps://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109227793&PageCount=8&CanNum=311&pbc=&URL= 5/10
15
7/11/24, 3:14 PM Print Script
8
Mark for Content = 6 out of 8
9 Mark for Linguistic range and
organisation = 5 out of 6
Mark for Language accuracy =
5 out of 6
Total mark awarded = 16 out of 20
https://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109227793&PageCount=8&CanNum=311&pbc=&URL= 6/10
16
11/24, 3:18 PM Print Script
17
7/11/24, 3:18 PM Print Script
18
Common mistakes and guidance for candidates
• Some candidates missed the key word ‘后’ (after) in the question, not realising that they needed to describe
the scene and feelings following the birthday party. As a result, some focused on the preparations or the
celebration itself.
• Some candidates wrote the essay as a narrative, detailing the events of the birthday, instead of focusing on
the required descriptions. The focus needed to be on describing the scene and feelings after the party, not
narrating the events of the party itself.
• Some candidates lacked clear order or logic in their descriptions, resulting in disorganised essays with no
clear structure. It is advisable to follow a logical flow, perhaps describing the scene by moving from one
room to another or from general to specific details. Several candidates missed the opportunity to use spatial
organisation effectively, jumping between areas of the house without a clear pattern. A logical progression
through the space would create a more coherent and engaging image.
• A number of candidates overlooked the importance of sensory details in their descriptions. Engaging multiple
senses – sight, sound, smell, touch – can greatly enhance the vividness of the scene, such as mentioning the
lingering smell of food or the quiet after the guests have left.
• Some candidates presented scenes in a straightforward manner, but adding literary devices or rhetorical
techniques would make the descriptions more vivid and emotionally engaging. Using figurative language can
bring the scene to life. A portion of candidates focused heavily on their feelings, with little to no descriptions.
Some other candidates provided detailed descriptions but overlooked their personal emotions. It is important
to balance both description of the scene and personal feelings in the response, as both elements are crucial.
• Some candidates separated the description of the home scene and personal feelings into two distinct parts.
It is recommended to integrate the description of the room with one’s feelings, creating a fusion of scene and
emotion for a more cohesive essay. It is important to show how specific details of the scene trigger or reflect
particular feelings.
• Some candidates used simple language in their essays, but incorporating more varied vocabulary and
expressive language would make the writing more engaging and dynamic.
• Some candidates used similar sentence structures throughout their essays. By mixing short and long
sentences, they can add rhythm and maintain the reader’s interest more effectively.
19
Question 3
11/24, 3:13 PM Print Script
" "
" "
2
3 4
s://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109098325&PageCou
nt=8&CanNum=65&pbc=&URL= 5/10
20
Example Candidate Responses – Paper 2
7/11/24, 3:13 PM Print Script
5 6 6
.
7
7
8
8
9
9
10
10
11
11
12 12
13
13
14 14
21
How the candidate could improve their answer
• The candidate should focus on using ‘的’ and ‘地’ correctly.
• Avoid overusing ‘我’ to prevent repetition and enhance the flow.
• Consider refining punctuation choices; ellipses (…) could be used effectively to suggest pauses or unfinished
thoughts.
• Ensure that the growth and insights mentioned in the conclusion connect with the rest of the essay, to create
a cohesive and impactful ending.
22
/11/24, 3:15 PM Print Script
3 " "
" "
2 5
3
4
6 " "
5 6
7 " "
7
8
8 " " " "
9
9 " "
s://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109818038&PageCou
nt=8&CanNum=2366&pbc=&URL= 5/10
23
7/11/24, 3:15 PM Print Script
12
12
14 " "
" "
15
15
16 " " " "
17 " "
16 " "
17
" " 21
https://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109818038&PageCount=8&CanNum=2366&pbc=&URL= 6/10
1 " " " " "
/ / "
2 " "
" ... ..."
3 " / / "
22 " "
4
" " " / "
" " " "
5
" " 24
Example Candidate Response – middle, continued Examiner comments
Mark for Content = 7 out of 8
Mark for Linguistic range and
organisation = 5 out of 6
Mark for Language accuracy =
4 out of 6
Total mark awarded = 16 out of 20
25
11/24, 3:19 PM Print Script
6
7
s://ca-ai.assessor.rm.com/tools/CandidateEnquiry/PrintDocument.aspx?CSID=109754099&PageCount=8&CanNum=159&pbc=&UR
L= 5/10
26
7/11/24, 3:19 PM Print Script
Focusing on the correct use of ‘的’, ‘地’, and ‘得’ will help maintain grammatical accuracy.
• Adding more punctuation will improve the overall readability and flow of the text.
27
Common mistakes and guidance for candidates
• Some candidates focused more on descriptive elements than the narrative. While descriptions of airport
scenes or views from the airplane window add to the story, the main focus should be on narrating the air
travel experience.
• Some candidates emphasised their feelings with minimal narrative, which shifted the response off-topic.
A balanced approach, blending personal emotions with the flow of events, would make the narrative more
engaging.
• Some candidates chose a diary format, which affected the overall narrative development. It is crucial to
create a cohesive and structured story, including key plot elements and character development, rather than
simply listing events.
• Some candidates devoted disproportionate attention to the early stages of the journey or background details,
overlooking crucial parts, particularly the climax. A well-balanced narrative should allocate appropriate space
to each part of the experience, with emphasis on key moments.
• Building an engaging plot with a clear and impactful climax will make the story more interesting. Some
candidates struggled to establish this tension, but this is an opportunity to improve.
• Turbulence during a flight can be a great narrative moment. Candidates who mentioned it could develop this
further by describing the sequence of events, personal reactions and outcomes to create a more engaging
story.
• Some candidates narrated every small detail of their journey. It is important to exercise judgement in
selecting which events to elaborate on and which to summarise briefly, maintaining a smooth narrative flow.
• Incorporating sensory details such as sight, sound, smell and touch can greatly enhance the vividness of the
experience and help immerse the reader in the experience.
• Some candidates used internet slang or colloquial expressions. It is advisable to use more sophisticated and
formal vocabulary and expressions suitable for a written response.
• Some candidates faced challenges with Chinese expression, likely due to directly translating structures from
another language. This led to incorrect phrasing or grammatical errors. Candidates should aim to think and
express ideas naturally in Chinese, avoiding literal translations.
• A small number of candidates wrote about experiences unrelated to air travel. It is crucial to focus on the
given theme and ensure the content is relevant.
28
Cambridge Assessment International Education
The Triangle Building, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8EA, United Kingdom
t: +44 1223 553554
e: info@cambridgeinternational.org www.cambridgeinternational.org