Get Selenium scribd download
Get Selenium scribd download
Visit the link below to download the full version of this book:
https://medidownload.com/product/selenium/
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Editorial
Selenium
v
vi Editorial
section of the book covers selenium related to genes, proteins, pathways, and its
metabolism followed from health effects. These include the involvement in redox
systems and the protective role of Se against oxidative stress, having close correla-
tion to inflammation, thyroid, or disease protection. Neurological aspects are also a
matter of particular interest. Selenium is of paramount importance during infantile
neurodevelopment, and it is discussed being crucial after stroke or in autism.
Respective chapters in this book spot light on these issues. As an interesting coun-
terpoint, a chapter focuses on detrimental effects on peripheral nerves and from an
epidemiological viewpoint about neurotoxicity of some inorganic selenium forms.
A further paragraph with various chapters is centered around selenium and cancer.
The roles of specific seleno-compounds like selenoprotein P or seleno-cysteine in
cancer are discussed aside from aspects of cell proliferation, cytotoxicity, and finally
the action of selenium in radiotherapy. A couple of chapters are dedicated to sele-
nium and various diseases, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, muscle dis-
ease, de-balanced immune response, or risks of Se-deficiency. Important aspects of
selenium biology are also addressed regarding new health challenges, e.g., caused
by Se-nanoparticles or interactions of selenium with other trace elements, vitamins,
or pharmaceuticals. It is fundamental for the above chapters to have knowledge
about cellular bioavailability and cytotoxicity, ruled out on cell culture experiments,
and in general, information about reliable selenium analytics. The latter must
include solid analytical approaches, validated selenium speciation techniques, and
biomonitoring studies. Each of these aspects is concerned within individual chap-
ters of this book.
Although this book cannot cover all aspects in the wide selenium field, I think it
nevertheless covers a comprehensive and relevant range of topics being of interest
to the reader. It will be a success of this book when, specifically, young researchers
are motivated to focus their new ideas and research into selenium biochemistry and
related health effects. However, it will be also within the intention of this book to
provide updated information from selenium research to all interested readers, either
being already settled in this fast-growing field or whether still being at the beginning
of their professional career and looking for an interesting research topic for their
scientific journey.
Part I Overview
1 Selenium in Human Health and Disease: An Overview ���������������������� 3
Regina Brigelius-Flohé
vii
viii Contents
Index������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������ 513
Contributors
xi
xii Contributors
Xin Gen Lei Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Alain Lescure Université de Strasbourg, CNRS, Architecture et Réactivité de
l’ARN, UPR 9002, IBMC-15, Strasbourg, France
Xinli Li Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health,
Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
Jessica Mandrioli Department of Neurosciences, Azienda Ospedaliero-
Universitaria di Modena, Sant Agostino Estense Hospital, Modena, Italy
Aksana N. Mazilina Institute of Chemical Physics of N. N. Semenov of the
Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Clinical Hospital No 123 Federal Medical-Biological Agency of Russia, Moscow,
Russia
Miguel Melo Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Centro
Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde (I3S), Porto, Portugal
Institute of Pathology and Immunology of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Soeren Meyer Department of Food Chemistry, Institute of Nutritional Science,
University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Bernhard Michalke Research Unit: Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholtz
Zentrum München – German Research Center for Environmental Health GmbH,
Neuherberg, Germany
Oliver Micke Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Franziskus
Hospital Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
Sougat Misra Division of Pathology F42, Department of Laboratory Medicine,
Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Stockholm,
Sweden
Ralph Mücke Strahlentherapie RheinMainNahe, Bad Kreuznach, Germany
Sandra M. Müller Department of Food Chemistry, Institute of Nutritional Science,
University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany
Yasumitsu Ogra Laboratory of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Graduate
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
Théophile Ohlmann Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie, CIRI,
Lyon, France
Inserm U1111, Lyon, France
CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure de Lyon, Université de Lyon 1, UMR5308, Lyon,
France
xiv Contributors
Regina Brigelius-Flohé
Abstract Since its detection in 1817 selenium underwent an adventurous trip from
a toxic to an essential element. As integral part of selenoproteins it was assumed that
it is capable to prevent or even cure diseases. The trip was slowed with the findings
that, when overdosed, selenium still can have toxic effects. Thus, an optimal intake
and status had to be evaluated. It became clear that the plasma selenium level should
neither substantially fall below nor exceed a value around 120 μg/L. Success and
failure of human studies undertaken to find a beneficial effect of selenium supple-
mentation in cancer, inflammation and immune response, cardiovascular diseases,
thyroiditis, male fertility, and the surprising adverse effect, diabetes, are shortly
summarized, and functions of involved selenoproteins and underlying mechanisms
discussed. To provide recommendations, more studies with better comparability
regarding form, dosage, and duration of a supplementation are needed and still
unknown functions of selenoproteins identified.
Since its detection in 1817 by Jöns Jakob Berzelius, selenium underwent a remark-
able change in its image. It was considered to be a toxic element until Klaus Schwarz
recognized in 1957 (Schwarz and Foltz 1957) that rats fed a highly purified casein
diet deficient in vitamin E and a “factor 3” developed hepatic necrosis which was
prevented by each of these substances. Analysis of a fraction of pig kidney identi-
fied selenium as essential part of factor 3. Having thus recognized that selenium was
an essential trace element, further consequences of selenium deficiency and its
hypothetic ability to prevent diseases were investigated (reviewed in Flohé 2009).
R. Brigelius-Flohé (*)
German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany
e-mail: [email protected]
Keshan and Kashin-Beck disease were the first diseases recognized to be associ-
ated with selenium deficiency in humans.
The Keshan disease is an endemic cardiomyopathy observed in 1935 in the
Keshan county in the Heilongjiang province in China (Yang et al. 1988), reviewed
in Loscalzo (2014). Samples of heart tissue of patients who had died from Keshan
disease showed similarities with samples from sheep with white muscle disease
appearing when animals were raised on selenium-deficient meadows. The livestock
could be protected from the disease by adding selenium to the diet (Muth et al.
1958). Selenium deficiency was made responsible for the Keshan disease too, and
selenium supplementation as sodium selenite proved to be lifesaving (Ge and Yang
1993). Infection of mice with a Coxsackie virus isolated from a Keshan disease
victim led to a severe heart pathology, especially when the animals were selenium
deficient or had their GPX1 deleted (Ge and Yang 1993). Moreover, under these
conditions the avirulent form of the virus mutated to a virulent form (Beck et al.
1995). This acquisition of virulence could be attributed to point mutations in the
viral genome, presumably resulting from the mutagenic potential of hydroperox-
ides, which were not adequately metabolized in the selenium-deficient animals or
by the lack of GPX1. Collectively, these observations support the conclusion that
selenium, via GPX-dependent hydroperoxide removal, dampens any overreaction
of the innate immune response and also prevents the collateral damage typically
associated with the oxidative burst against bacterial or viral infections.
The Kashin-Beck disease is an endemic degenerative osteoarthropathy present in
selenium-deficient areas, not only in China. The etiology is largely unknown, but
the mycotoxin T-2 (trichothecene mycotoxin) might be an important risk factor
apart from selenium deficiency (Stone 2009). As mechanism, an inhibition of aggre-
can synthesis in chondrocytes, and promotion of aggrecanases and production of
pro-inflammatory cytokines by T-2, which can be blocked by selenium, is being
discussed (Chen et al. 2006).
With the early detection of links between selenium intakes and disease it
became likely that selenium is not only essential for grazing livestock but also for
humans. Also for long known to be toxic, selenium became an issue of fierce
debates about its risks and benefits. The scope of this chapter is to present the
consensus achieved on selenium requirements of humans, to briefly compile the
functions of selenoproteins putatively involved in expected benefits, and to discuss
the underlying mechanisms.
Dietary reference intakes (DRI) and tolerable upper intake levels (UL) vary
between geographic areas. Up to 2015 the recommendation of the German,
Austrian, and Swiss nutritional societies (DACH) was 30–70 μg/day and then was
enhanced to 60 (female) and 70 (male) μg/day (Kipp et al. 2015). Other European
countries recommend 40–75 μg/day, the UK for example 75 for males and 60 for
1 Selenium in Human Health and Disease: An Overview 5
Main nutritional sources of selenium are crop plants. The Se content varies depend-
ing on the Se content in the soil they are growing on. Cereals contain selenite, sele-
nomethionine (SeMet), and selenocysteine (Sec), wheat contains also Se-methyl-Sec.
Nuts contain mainly SeMet, Brazil nuts up to 2.5 μg/g. Se-rich vegetables are broc-
coli, cabbage, onions, and garlic. They contain Se-methyl-Sec, SeMet, and selenate,
which can be enriched by growing these vegetables on Se-enriched soil (Fairweather-
Tait et al. 2010; Rayman 2008). Sec and SeMet are present in meat and fish (0.1–4
μg/g), and selenite also in tuna and crustaceans. Selenium-enriched dietary supple-
ments (garlic, yeast) apart from SeMet, Sec, and γ-glutamyl-Se-methyl-Sec also
contain inorganic compounds such as selenite and selenite (Ip et al. 2000). Milk and
dairy products contain Sec and selenate, if cows are supplemented with selenium-
enriched yeast and also SeMet. Eggs mainly contain Sec and SeMet. The content
depends on the feeding of the hens and can reach up to 0.5 mg/kg (Fairweather-Tait
et al. 2010; Rayman 2008). (For more details see Chaps. 2, 3, 20, and 25)
Physiologically, selenium and selenium compounds are not effective as such, but
selenium has to be incorporated into proteins as selenocysteine (for details see
Chap. 4). The human genome contains 25 genes for selenoproteins. These proteins
are involved in redox homeostasis, redox regulation of signaling cascades and tran-
scription factors, and thyroid hormone metabolism, but the function is not yet
known for about 50% of them. Known functions are listed and described in
6 R. Brigelius-Flohé
Brigelius-Flohé and Flohé (2017) and Labunskyy et al. (2014). The nomenclature of
selenoproteins has recently been harmonized (Gladyshev et al. 2016). Selenoproteins
with known enzyme function are named according to these functions, as before:
TXNRD1–3 (thioredoxin reductase 1–3), GPX1–4 and 6 (glutathione peroxidases),
DIO1–3 (iodothyronine deiodinase 1–3), MSRB1 (methionine sulfoxide reductase
B1), and SEPHS2 (selenophosphate synthetase 2). Selenoproteins without known
functions were previously named “selenoprotein,” followed by a letter. They now
are characterized by the root symbol SELENO followed by the same letter, e.g.,
SELENOP for selenoprotein P.
To get an idea about the selenium status of individuals, plasma selenium levels have
often been used. However, the different forms of selenium found in plasma are func-
tionally not equally identical. Inorganic and organic compounds of selenium
absorbed from food are metabolized in the liver into selenide (H2Se), the selenium
form required for incorporation into selenoproteins as Sec. Also SeMet can be
metabolized into selenide. However, if applied in excess, it is unspecifically incor-
porated into plasma proteins instead of methionine. As such it is functionally not
active, but contributes to the plasma selenium status. In order to get information on
the biologically relevant selenium content, selenoproteins are determined that fulfill
two requirements: (1) responsiveness to already minor selenium deficiency and (2)
easy availability. Two selenoproteins fulfill these criteria: GPX3 and SELENOP, the
main selenoproteins in plasma. Both together constitute a concentration of 80–90
μg selenium/L (Burk et al. 2001). SELENOP can be measured by immunoassay
(Combs Jr. et al. 2011; Hollenbach et al. 2008; Hybsier et al. 2017), and GPX3 via
its activity (Flohé and Günzler 1984). For long plasma GPX3 has been considered
the biomarker of choice. More recently, however, SELENOP has been promoted,
since the selenium level required for reaching the plateau of SELENOP is 110–125
ng/mL, which can be reached by a selenium intake of about 100 μg/day, whereas
that for maximal GPX3 activity was only 70–90 ng/mL (Fairweather-Tait et al.
2011; Hurst et al. 2010). However, the selenium status varies in different parts of the
world and depends on the dietary selenium intake. In a Chinese study with an aver-
age intake of 10 μg/day, 37 μg/day as SeMet was sufficient to optimize GPX3,
whereas of selenite 66 μg was needed. SELENOP did not reach a maximum with
these doses (Xia et al. 2005). In the following study, in subjects with a baseline
intake of 14 μg selenium/day, a supplementation of 49 and 35 μg/day of SeMet was
found to optimize SELENOP and GPX3 levels, respectively. From these findings,
about 75 μg/day as SeMet was postulated for US residents (Xia et al. 2010). Thus,
SELENOP appears to be the most suitable biomarker for the selenium status. (For
more details see Chap. 23)