Mfi 2008 4648017
Mfi 2008 4648017
Abstract— In recent years, many dangerous tasks are to learn the motion activity of humans.
performed by robots. In most contact tasks, however, humans First, the extraction of the central nerve signal is
are far superior to their robotic counterparts. To control robot achievable via the electroencephalogram (EEG)
manipulators in contact tasks, the characteristics of human measurement. In using the EEG measurement, a
movements should be investigated through biological signals, non-invasive method cannot accurately acquire data due to
such as EMG, which reflects the dexterity of human noise, and an invasive method has the possibility of
manipulation. In this study, EMG signal is analyzed through
damaging neural tissues. Second, the extraction of the
direct and numerical comparison with force estimation. The
EMG and force signals were analyzed in the perspective of peripheral nerve signal is possible through the
Fitts' law, which is a general estimation method on speed and electroneurogram (ENG) and the electromyogram (EMG)
accuracy. The results of this study show that both EMG and measurements. The ENG measurement can damage the
force controls follow Fitts’ law, which suggests that both neural tissues due to an electrode transplant. The EMG
controls can be applicable as a control modality for robot measurement is more suitable since it can be done in a more
control. non-invasive way without the danger of damaging neural
tissues.
I. INTRODUCTION The EMG signal has been actively studied in the past
ranging from the on/off control method [2] to the latest
I n many industrial applications, robots are replacing
humans in various tasks. Tasks performed in dangerous
surroundings, such as space, underwater and high/low
Human Computer Interface (HCI) development [3]. In a
recent study, Choi et al. developed a computer device for
temperature environments, are all unsuitable for humans, as disabled people using a pattern analysis of the EMG signal
well as simple and repetitive tasks. Industrial robots can [4]. In Artemiadis et al.’s research, they controlled the
perfectly carry out highly repetitive actions requiring precise robot’s arm by using an EMG signal [5]. B.D. Kang et al.
placement over long periods of time. Those conventional predicted the human’s multi-joint stiffness by utilizing a
robot, however, are poor at contact tasks, such as opening neural network and the EMG signal [6]. W. Herzog et al.
doors, inserting keys, and fastening bolts, compared to estimated the magnitude of a force with the EMG signal by
humans. In performing particular tasks, humans are able to dynamically contracting the plantaris muscle of a cat [7].
adjust their physical characteristics in order to proficiently These studies were on the analysis of EMG signal patterns,
perform the required task. The physical advantage of the rather than on the quantification or applications of EMG
human body lies in one’s ability to skillfully cope with signals.
dynamic and complex tasks. This means that, for robots to be By using Fitts' law, Fimbel et al. applied the EMG signal
used in more diverse fields, characteristics of the human from the finger and eyebrows to motor control [8]. In their
body must be studied. In order to effectively imitate the study, for the wider application of the EMG signal, the
human body, the movement process of humans must be control ability of the EMG signal was analyzed through the
carefully analyzed. Currently, much research is being done direct and numerical comparison with force measurement
in various fields of human movement studies [1]. and the final result of human action. Fitts' law is a general
The institution that controls the human body exists in the estimation method of speed and accuracy [9]. Fitts’ law
brain. Human action can be simply defined as a signal that states that the movement time (MT) is linearly proportional
comes out of the brain, passes the central nerve and the to index of difficulty (ID) (ID = log2 (A/W+1)), which can be
peripheral nerve, and acts at the end points of the body. Thus, formulated as follows:
the extraction and analysis of this signal process is necessary
§A ·
Manuscript received April 1, 2008. This work was supported by the
MT a b log 2 ¨ 1¸ (1)
Korean Institute of Construction & Transportation Technology Evaluation ©W ¹
and Planning (KICTEP). (Program No: 06-Unified & Advanced
Construction Technology Program-D01) where a and b are constants.
Jangwoo Park is with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea
Index of difficulty depends on the distance A between an
University, Seoul, Korea, 136-701. ([email protected])
Woongjin Bae is with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, object and a target and the width W of the target. Fitts’ law
Messachusetts institute of technology, Cambridge, USA, MA02139. can be applied to various motion estimations, including 2-D
([email protected]) [10] and 3-D [11] motion, rotation in virtual reality [12],
Hyunkyu Kim is with Samsung Electronics CO., LTD., Suwon, Korea drawing [13], and grip force [14]. Although some
443-742 ([email protected])
Shinsuk Park is with the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Korea researchers argues against the validity of Fitts’ law [15][16],
University, Seoul, Korea, 136-701. ([email protected]) the accuracy of EMG measurement may be improved by
measuring EMG and force in the isometric condition.
1 n 2
In this study, the EMG signals from biceps and triceps and
the force generated by them were measured simultaneously.
xRMS ¦ xi
ni1
(2)
These two muscles play the most important role in the arm
contraction reaction [17]. The measured data was analyzed
using Fitts’ law, where the distance between the targets was C. Measurements
defined by the visual targets that indicated the magnitude of When the EMG signal is measured, its range is assigned
the EMG signal and the force. The width of the target was between 0 - 1.2 V by LAXTHA’s EMG signal measurement
chosen according to the index of difficulty of the task. instrument (QMEG4). This signal range becomes 0 - 1200 V
The results of this study can be applied to telerobotic by 1000 times and finally changes to 0 - 900 V by passing the
manipulation of contact tasks, where the human operator low-pass filter. The study used the EMG signal between
directly controls the robot from a remote location. The EMG 0-450 V to decrease the fatigue effect from muscles, since
signal as a new modality of teleoperation, can be used to the highest point arrival ability of the EMG differs among
control the compliance of the robot arm, which is one people. The range of the force measured by Force-Moment
important factor of robotic manipulation. Sensor (NITTA Corp.) is 200 N on X axis and Y axis, and
400N on Z axis.
As described in Fig. 1, an experiment position is decided
by the position (90o elbow angle) that can best measure the
II. MATERIAL AND METHOD EMG signal and the forces of biceps and triceps [19].
III. RESULTS
A. EMG Space
The average of Fitts' law correlation constant R2 is 0.945 Fig. 8. Example of Fitts’ law on Force space
in an experiment that control the EMG signal directly. The average value of the correlation constant R2, which
The lowest value and the highest value were recorded was calculated by applying the force data obtained from
each 0.884, 0.975 in this result. R2 values for the average, control of the EMG signal to Fitt’s Law, was 0.894. This
highest, and lowest values were all close to 1, and in result was 5.4% less than the average R2 value obtained from
comparison to other work based on the existing Fitt’s Law, the direct control of the EMG signal. The difference when
the resulting values are still favorable. This result talks that compared to the direct control of force was 2.0%. With
control ability of the EMG signal is credit are shown below differences of only 5.4% and 2.0% respectively, the result is
in Table 1. quite good. In addition, because the R2 value is not small
compared to other works that were based on Fitt’s Law, the
results of this study can be considered to be favorable. The However, there may be a difference in the absolute values,
index of difficulty, decided through a normalization process, but control of the EMG signal and control of force can talk
has a range of 1-2. This range is slightly less than the 1.4-2.7 that have almost same principle.
difficulty index of the original experiment, but the difference
was minimal. It should be noted that the width of the target
(W) at each level of difficulty were similar. The results IV. CONCLUSION
suggest that although there is a size difference, EMG The goal of this study was to analyze the control process
signal-based control is almost equivalent to force control. of the EMG signal to evaluate EMG as a novel modality of
The average value of the correlation constant R2, which robot control. The evaluation of the control ability of the
was calculated by applying the EMG signal data obtained EMG signal was performed using Fitts’ Law, which is the
representative method for evaluating speed and precision.
EMG control was directly and numerically compared to the
ability of force control. The comparison with the ability of
force control was based on the linear proportionality
between the two control methods. There were four different
categories for the Fitts’ law correlation constant R2 from the
experiments, and the average, highest, and lowest values
from each experiment are shown in Table 1.
TABLE I
RESULT OF CORRELATION CONSTANT R2
NON- Non-
Control Control
CONTROL Control
EMG Force
EMG Force
from control of force to Fitt’s Law, was 0.812. This result MAX 0.975 0.865 0.951 0.924
was 10.9% less than the average R2 value of 0.912 obtained
from the direct control of force. The difference when MIN 0.884 0.735 0.877 0.823
compared to the direct control of the EMG signal was 14.1%.
Although the difference values of 10.9% and 14.1% are
larger than the difference values shown previously, they are The results of this study indicate that the EMG signal
not large in comparison to other works based on Fitt’s Law control is nearly identical to force control. While previous
and can thus be considered to be good results. The index of studies investigated the movement in task space by
difficulty, which was decided through a normalization analyzing the hand or foot movement, the present study
process, has a range of 1.2-1.8. This is lower than the analyzed the force in task space and the neuromuscular
original experiment’s difficulty index of 1.4-2.7, and the activity in muscle space.
range has also decreased by half. These results suggest that The results of this study show that Fitts’ law applies to the
during force control in the experiment, muscles other than human movement in task space, force in task space and in
the biceps and the triceps came into play. muscle space. This suggests that Fitts’ law is determined in
the level of the nervous system and is not affected by the
dynamics of the limbs.
The EMG can be applied to perform telerobotic contact
tasks by using the EMG signal to modulate compliance of
the robot arm. In addition, EGM signals could be applied to
rehabilitation engineering, such as human-computer
interface for disabled people.
REFERENCES
[1] H. K. Kim, “Strategies for control of neuroprostheses through
brain-machine interfaces,” Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Mech. Eng., Mass.
Inst. Technol., MA, Cambrige, 2005.
[2] D. S. Childress., “An approach to powered grasp,” in 4th International
Symposium External Control Human Extremities: Advances in
External Control of Human Extremities. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia,
Fig. 10. Example of Fitts’ law on EMG by Force Space 1972.
[3] Barreto, A. B., Scargle, S. D., & Adjouadi, M., “A practical
EMG-based human-computer interface for users with motor
disabilities,” Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37,
1-14, 2000.
[4] Choi, C., Han, H., Ha, S., Kim, J., “Development of an EMG-based
computer interface for the physically handicapped,” HCI2007, pp. 222
– 227, 2007.
[5] Artemiadis, P. K., Kyriakopoulos, K. J., “EMG-based Teleoperation
of a Robot Arm in Planar Catching Movements using ARMAX Model
and Trajectory Monitoring Techniques,” Proceedings of the 2006
IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 3244
– 3249, 2006.
[6] Kang, B., Kim, B., Park, S. and Kim, H.., “ Modeling of Artificial
Neural Network for the Prediction of the Multi-Joint Stiffness in
Dynamic Condition,” Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE/RSJ International
Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pp. 1840 - 1845, 2007.
[7] Herzog, W., Sokolosky, J., Zhang, Y. T., Guimaraes, C. S.,
“EMG-Force Relation in Dynamically Contracting Cat Plantaris
Muscle,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology 8, pp. 147 –
155, 1998.
[8] Fimbel, E. J., Lemay, M., Arguin M., “Speed-accuracy trade-offs in
myocontrol,” Human Movement Science 25, pp.165 – 180, 2006.
[9] MacKenzie, I. S., “Movement time prediction in human-computer
interfaces,” in Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pp. 140 – 150, 1992.
[10] Bohan, M., LongstaV, M. G., Van Gemmert, A. W. A., Rand, M. K., &
Stelmach, G. E., “Differential effects of target height and width on 2D
pointing movement duration and kinematics,” Motor Control, 7, pp.
278 - 289, 2003.
[11] Murata, A., & Iwase, H., “Extending Fitts˅ law to a
three-dimensional pointing task,” Human Movement Science, 20, pp.
791 – 805, 2001.
[12] Ruddle, R. A., & Jones, D. M., “Manual and virtual rotation of a
three-dimensional object,” Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, 7, pp. 286 – 296, 2001.
[13] Mottet, D., & Bootsma, R. J., “The dynamics of rhythmical aiming in
2D task space: Relation between geometry and kinematics under
examination,” Human Movement Science, 20, pp. 213 – 241, 2001.
[14] Jungling, S., Bock, O., & Girgenrath, M., “Speedˀ accuracy trade-off
of grasping movements during microgravity,” Aviation, Space and
Environmental Medicine, 73, pp. 430 – 435, 2002.
[15] Smits-Engelsman, B. C., Van Galen, G. P., & Duysens, J., “The
breakdown of Fitts˅ law in rapid, reciprocal aiming movements,”
Experimental Brain Research, 145, 222 - 230, 2002.
[16] Danion, F., Duarte, M., & Grosjean, M., “Fitts˅ law in human
standing: The effect of scaling,” Neuroscience Letter, 277, pp. 131 –
133, 1999.
[17] Coggshall, J. C., Bekey, G. A., “EMG-FORCE DYNAMICS IN
HUMAN SKELETAL MUSCLE,” Med. & Biol. Engng. Vol. 8
Pergamon Press Printed in Great Britain, pp. 265 – 270, 1970.
[18] Milner-Brown, H. S., Stein, R. B., “The Relation Between The Surface
Electromyogram And Muscular Force,” J. Physiol. Printed in Great
Britain, pp. 549-569, 1975.
[19] Valle, A. D., Thomas, C. K., “Motor unit firing rates during isometric
voluntary contractions performed at different muscle lengths,” Can. J.
Physiol. Pharmacol. 82, pp. 769 – 776, 2004.
[20] Santo, F. D., Gelli, F., Ginanneschi, F., Popa, T., Rossi, A., “Relation
between isometric muscle force and surface EMG in intrinsic hand
muscles as function of the arm geometry,” Brain Research 1163, pp.
79 – 85, 2007.
[21] Mercer, J. A., Bezodis, N., Delion, D. Zachry, T., Rubley, M. D.,
“EMG sensor location : Does it influence the ability to detect
differences in muscle contraction conditions?,” Journal of
Electromyography and Kinesiology 16, pp. 198 – 204, 2006.
[22] Englehart, K.m Hudgins, B., “A Robust, Real-Time Control Scheme
for Multifunction Myoelectric Control,” IEEE Transactions on
Biomedical Engineering, Vol. 50, No. 7, pp. 848 – 854, 2003.
[23] Oberg, T., “Muscle Fatigue and Calibration of EMG Measurements,”
Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 239 -
243, 1995.
[24] Konrad, P., “The ABC of EMG,” Noraxon INC. USA, pp. 4 - 58,
2005.