Food Waste Digestate Composting: Feedstock Optimization With Sawdust and Mature Compost
Food Waste Digestate Composting: Feedstock Optimization With Sawdust and Mature Compost
Bioresource Technology
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/biortech
H I G H L I G H T S
• Food waste digestate can be effectively co-composted with sawdust and mature compost.
• NH4+-N toxicity could be reduced to permissible limit within 2 weeks of composting.
• Good quality compost with SGI > 80% could be produced within 2 weeks of composting.
• Sawdust and mature compost amendments enhanced decomposition rate.
• Significant reduction in NH3 emission was observed during co-composting.
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Keywords: Direct land application of food waste digestate (FWD) leads to 60–70% of nitrogen loss through NH3 volatili
Food waste digestate zation due to its innate characteristics like high ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) (~6000 mg/kg dry matter) and
Composting high moisture content (~75%). Hence, bio stabilization of FWD through composting is a promising solution to
NH3 volatilization
curb the environmental and occupational hazards. Hence the aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of
Ammonium nitrogen
Compost quality
using sawdust and/or mature compost as a bulking agent to achieve effective composting. The results showed
that mixing of FWD with sawdust alone or together with mature compost could produce quality compost with
reduced NH4+-N (<700 mg/kg dry matter) and increased seed germination index (>80%) within 2 weeks of co-
composting. Composting FWD with both sawdust and mature compost effectively reduced ~ 83% of NH3
volatilization demonstrating that this approach can effectively produce mature nitrogen enriched FWD compost.
1. Introduction into bioenergy (Kaur et al., 2020). The residue produced after the AD
process is referred as digestate, which requires further wastewater
Rapid urban growth and change in lifestyle has increased the global treatment before disposal or reuse. The solid fraction obtained after
production of food waste which not just requires careful disposal strat dewatering is the food waste digestate (FWD) which comprises of
egy to reduce its environmental impact but at the same time to reutilize partially degraded organic matter, high NH4+-N and minerals (Manu
the residual energy and nutrient resource in food waste. Among the et al., 2021a). NH4+-N contents in the range 2540–7200 mg/kg dry
available technologies, anaerobic digestion (AD) has evolved as a sus matter and moisture content of 70–96% were reported for FWD from
tainable carbon negative technology for the conversion of food waste various countries irrespective of their food waste type (Manu et al.,
* Corresponding author at: Department of Biology, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.
E-mail address: [email protected] (J.W.C. Wong).
1
Equal contribution.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125759
Received 21 June 2021; Received in revised form 8 August 2021; Accepted 9 August 2021
Available online 12 August 2021
0960-8524/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
2
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
Fig. 1. Schematic representation of compost reactors used in the study. (R1 = digestate control, R2 = digestate + compost, R3 = digestate + sawdust, R4 = digestate
+ sawdust + compost).
determined using spectrometric method whereas CO2 emission was time ‘t’.
measured by a WMA-2 CO2 gas analyzer (PP systems, Herts, UK). The
seed germination index (SGI) was determined by germinating Cress 2.3.3. Levi-Minzi kinetic model
seeds in 1:5 ratio (w:v) extract of compost and distilled water for 72 h In this model, an exponential kinetic model was used to express
(HKORC, 2005). All the analyses were conducted in duplicate, and carbon mineralization as (Levi-Minzi et al., 1990):
means and standard deviation values were represented in results.
Ct = ktm (3)
2.3. Kinetic analysis where Ct is the CO2-C emission (%), k and m are constants which rep
resents units of the variables (mg/kg day) and shape of the curve,
The kinetic models namely, first-first-order, Chen and Hashimoto, respectively.
and Levi-Minzi models were used for fitting cumulative CO2 emission The constants in all three models were estimated using non-linear
(CO2-C) data to determine the degradation rates of rapidly and slowly regression technique after minimizing the sum of the squares of errors
biodegradable carbon content during FWD composting (Tosun et al., by Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm.
2008). Three statistical parameters such as, root mean square error (RMSE),
chi-square (χ2) and model efficiency (EF) were used to assess the models
2.3.1. The first-first-order kinetic model (Külcu and Yaldiz, 2004):
In this model, the rapid and slow decomposition phases follow first √̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅̅
√N
order kinetics and hence it is the sum of two first order equations that √∑
√ (CO2pre,i − CO2exp,i )2
can be expressed as follows: √
RMSE = I=1 (4)
N
C = Cr (1 − exp( − kr t) ) + Cs (1 − exp( − ks t)) (1)
∑n
i=1 (CO2exp,i− CO2pre,i )2
where C is cumulative CO2-C emitted (%) at time ‘t’, Cr and Cs are χ2 = (5)
N− n
percentage of rapidly and slowly decomposable carbon fractions,
respectively, kr and ks are rapid and slow degradation rate constants (∑n ( ( )2 ∑n )2
(day− 1), respectively.
2
CO2exp,i − CO2exp.mean − i=1 (CO2pre,i − CO2exp,i ).
EF = i=1
∑n 2
(6)
i=1 (CO2exp,i − CO2exp,mean,i )
2.3.2. Chen and Hashimoto kinetic model
The percent CO2-C evolution in this model could be expressed using where CO2exp = experimental CO2-C evolution (%), CO2exp,mean = mean
the above equation as follows (Chen and Hashimoto, 1980): value of experimental CO2-C evolution (%), CO2pre = predicted CO2-C
( ) evolution (%), N = number of observations and n = number of
CO2 − C = 100 − 100 × R +
(1 − R)K
(2) constants.
μm t − 1 + K
3
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
2.4. Statistical analyses degree of decomposition was assessed based on CO2 evolution which
was higher in treatment R4 as compared to other treatments as discussed
The experimentally obtained parameter data were analyzed for sta in section 3.2. The thermophilic phase ensured pathogen destruction
tistical significance by analysis of variance (ANOVA) in SPSS 24.0 sta (Tchobanoglous et al., 1993; Manu et al., 2019). Similar temperature
tistical software to determine the significant differences using Turkey’s profile was observed during FWD co-composting with structuring ma
significance difference test at the confidence level of 95% (P < 0.05). terial (i.e., inert fraction after OFMSW ballistic separation before AD)
(Seruga et al., 2020).
3. Results and discussion
3.1.2. pH
3.1. Changes in physico-chemical properties during FWD co-composting The pH of the initial composting matrix in all treatments varied be
process tween 8 and 9. Addition of sawdust alone or with mature compost did
not significantly affect the alkalinity of FWD (Fig. 2b). As the com
3.1.1. Temperature posting process progressed, the pH varied between 7.5 and 9 indicating
Temperature changes during composting indicates the microbial high buffering capacity of FWD. Consumption of easily degradable or
decomposition of organic matter and helps in pathogen destruction ganics such as starch, fat etc. during AD process, and the presence of
(Manu et al., 2017; Wong et al., 2017). Temperature profile showed humic substances increases the buffering capacity of FWD (Adhikari
significant differences (P < 0.05) among the various treatments with et al., 2009; Manu et al., 2019; Haouas et al., 2021). However, pH still
different combinations of feedstock materials (Fig. 2a). Following the plays an important role in FWD composting as it alters the NH4+-N
initial increase of temperature to ~ 65 ◦ C in the control (R1) and oxidation and NH3 volatilization (Awasthi et al., 2017; Cai et al., 2021).
treatment with only mature compost (R2), temperature remain high till The pH stabilization near the process completion in R3 and R4 could be
the end of the composting period. In these treatments (R1 and R2), attributed to the decline in ammonification due to reduction in NH4+-N
presence of indigenous microorganisms in FWD and mature compost content.
initiated the biological activities and thus the sharp rise in temperature
was observed. Oversupply of nitrogen to the microbial needs caused the 3.1.3. Electrical conductivity
elevation in temperature in these treatments resulting in a longer com The salinity of compost provides the information of phytotoxic ef
posting period (Zhou, 2017). In R3, FWD mixed with sawdust only, also fects on the plant growth due to high levels of salt (Voberkova et al.,
achieved a high initial temperature of 55 ◦ C and maintained at this 2020). Addition of sawdust and/or mature compost reduced EC of
temperature range until day 18 before entering the cooling phase. In composting matrix in R3 and R4 (Fig. 2c). As the composting process
treatment with both sawdust and mature compost amendments (R4), the progressed, no/ less changes in EC were observed in these treatments
temperature initially increased to 58 ◦ C, but after a short thermophilic due to the continuous production of humic substances in better com
phase, temperature declined slowly till the end of the composting posting environment (Sun et al., 2021). In the control and treatment
period. The presence of sawdust in R3 and R4 has improved the com with only mature compost addition (R1 and R2), although the EC
posting conditions by increasing porosity for enhanced microbial ac decreased from ~ 12 mS/cm to ~ 5 mS/cm and ~ 9 mS/cm, respec
tivity (Espinosa-Salgado et al., 2020). In R4, addition of mature compost tively, they were still higher (>4 mS/cm) than HKORC standards
significantly influenced the decomposition of FWD, hence the cooling (HKORC, 2005) indicating the possible phytotoxic effect on plants even
phase could be achieved earlier as compared to other treatments. The after one month of composting (Chan et al., 2016).
Fig. 2. Changes in (a) Temperature; (b) pH and (c) EC during the composting of food waste digestate with sawdust and /or compost. (R1 = digestate control, R2 =
digestate + compost, R3 = digestate + sawdust, R4 = digestate + sawdust + compost).
4
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
3.2. Carbon mineralization compost amended treatment (R4). The cumulative CO2 emission
(Fig. 3c) gives a better representation of carbon mineralization and the
Unlike food waste, FWD comprises less TOC content (~34%) due to profile suggested higher carbon loss in the control treatment R1 (40%)
the presence of partially degraded organic matter (Wong et al., 2017; Liu followed by R2 (28%), R3 (20%), and R4 (18%).
et al., 2020). Addition of mature compost in R2 reduced the TOC content Since FWD was the major components in the compost mixtures that
of the compost mixture to 32%. Amending carbonaceous sawdust alone would perform active decomposition, CO2 emission from FWD fraction
or with mature compost in R3 and R4, increased TOC content to ~ 44%. was calculated based on the amount of FWD present in each treatment to
As the composting process progressed, the microbial metabolism of give an assessment of FWD decomposition efficiency (Fig. 3d-3e). Based
organic matter reduced TOC content in first two treatments (R1 and R2) on this, the cumulative CO2 emission was found to be highest in treat
to ~ 27%, whereas in sawdust amended reactors (R3 and R4), the final ment R4 amended with sawdust and mature compost (2147 g/kg FWD)
TOC was found to be ~ 42% (Fig. 3a). Changes in TOC reduction may followed by treatment R2 with only mature compost (999 g/kg FWD). In
not give accurate decomposition ability of composting matrix due to the contrast, cumulative CO2 emission in treatments with only sawdust (R3)
presence of sawdust and mature compost in R3 and R4. Hence, CO2 and control (R1) were 762 g/kg FWD and 367 g/kg FWD, respectively.
evolution was considered to assess the degree of decomposition during This shows that the increased C/N ratio of composting matrix to 29 by
the process (Yang et al., 2020). addition of sawdust and mature compost provided a suitable composting
Daily CO2 emission was higher in the initial stages of composting in condition for the microbial decomposition of FWD. Addition of mature
all treatments due to the provision of aeration that enhanced the mi compost also play a role in providing microbial inoculum to enhance
crobial decomposition (Fig. 3b) (Chan et al., 2016). The highest emis FWD biodegradation by 63% when added alone and by 83% when added
sion was observed from control R1 due to the higher FWD quantity (p > together with sawdust. However, addition of only mature compost
0.05), while the daily CO2 emission followed the order: only mature caused longer composting duration because of the low C/N ratio of
compost (R2), only sawdust (R3) and then both sawdust and mature feedstock. Although actual total CO2 emission from the control R1 was
Fig. 3. (a) TOC; (b) Daily CO2 evolution based on total composting dry mass; (c) Cumulative CO2 evolution based on total composting dry mass; (d) Daily CO2
evolution based on digestate dry mass; and (e) Cumulative CO2 evolution based on digestate dry mass. (R1 = digestate control, R2 = digestate + compost, R3 =
digestate + sawdust, R4 = digestate + sawdust + compost).
5
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
the highest, the cumulative CO2 emission per kg of FWD was the lowest and R4 due to the decomposition of readily available substrates into
indicating its poor composting properties. Hence, addition of sawdust as CO2, which resulted in total mass reduction, and concentration of N
a bulking agent along with mature digestate compost as an inoculum content (Zhou et al., 2018).
could significantly enhance the decomposition of FWD. The temperature and pH could shift the balance of the equilibrium of
NH4+-N and NH3 during composting process (Manu et al., 2021a).
3.3. Nitrogen transformations Under aerobic conditions, oxidation of FWD leads to increase in tem
perature as a result of microbial activities and hence the NH3 volatili
One of the beneficiary reasons to recycle FWD is its higher TKN zation is inevitable. Following an initial rise in NH4+-N due to
content (4–5%) (Peng and Pivato, 2019), but the presence of high ni ammonification process, NH4+-N showed a decreasing trend till the end
trogen content reduces C/N ratio making it unsuitable for effective of the composting process (Fig. 4b). Slight variations in NH4+-N con
composting (Cerda et al., 2019). In addition, most of the nitrogen in centration could be observed on day 7 which could be due to the higher
digestate is present in the form of NH4+-N which inhibits the microbial nitrogen transformation reactions occurring at the initial stages of FWD
decomposition of organics (Ren et al., 2018). Therefore, addition of composting. In the present study, NH4+-N concentration reduced to the
sawdust alone or in combination with mature compost in treatments R3 permissible limit within 15 days only in treatments amended with
and R4 reduced TKN content to ~ 1.5% due to the mass dilution making sawdust alone or with mature compost (HKORC 2005) indicating the
it a more suitable C/N ratio for composting (Fig. 4a). As the composting possible phytotoxic nature in the control and treatment with compost
process progressed, TKN was reduced to ~ 2.8% from 3.5 to 4% in amendment only due to the poor composting properties of FWD even
treatments R1 and R2 due to N loss mostly in the form of NH3 emission after 30 days of composting. The maturation time is important for a
(Rincón et al., 2019). This reduction was prominent until first 10 days of compost plant operation as it directly affects the economic aspects as
composting which is in agreement with the study of Zeng et al. (2012). well as waste retention time.
In contrast, increasing trend up to 2% was observed in treatments R3 NH3 emission is an unavoidable environmental hazardous problem
Fig. 4. Changes in (a) TKN; (b) NH4+-N: (c) Daily NH3 emission based on total composting dry mass; (d) Cumulative NH3 emission based on total composting dry
mass; (e) Daily NH3 emission based on digestate dry mass; (f) Cumulative NH3 emission based on digestate dry mass. (R1 = digestate control, R2 = digestate +
compost, R3 = digestate + sawdust, R4 = digestate + sawdust + compost).
6
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
7
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
Fig. 6. Comparison of different kinetic models fitting into cumulative CO2-C evolution during composting in (a) R1; (b) R2; (c) R3 and (d) R4.
8
B. Song et al. Bioresource Technology 341 (2021) 125759
Acknowledgement Manu, M.K., Kumar, R., Garg, A., 2017. Performance assessment of improved composting
system for food waste with varying aeration and use of microbial inoculum.
Bioresour. Technol. 234, 167–177.
The financial support from the OSCAR Bioenergy Joint Venture, Manu, M.K., Kumar, R., Garg, A., 2019. Decentralized composting of household wet
Hong Kong is greatly acknowledged. biodegradable waste in plastic drums: effect of waste turning, microbial inoculum
and bulking agent on product quality. J. Clean. Prod. 226, 233–241.
Manu, M.K., Li, D., Liwen, L., Jun, Z., Varjani, S., Wong, J.W.C., 2021a. A review on
References nitrogen dynamics and mitigation strategies of food waste digestate composting.
Bioresource Technology 125032.
Adhikari, B.K., Barrington, S., Martinez, J., King, S., 2009. Effective-ness of three bulking Manu, M.K., Kumar, R., Garg, A., 2021b. Effect of microbial inoculum and leachate
agents for food waste composting. Waste Manage. 29, 197–203. circulation on the performance of rotary drum composter used for household wet
Arab, G., McCartney, D., 2017. Benefits to decomposition rates when using digestate as biodegradable waste. Waste Biomass Valorization.
compost co-feedstock: part I - Focus on physicochemical parameters. Waste Manage. Peng, W., Pivato, A., 2019. Sustainable management of digestate from the organic
68, 74–84. fraction of municipal solid waste and food waste under the concepts of back to earth
Awasthi, M.K., Selvam, A., Lai, K.M., Wong, J.W.C., 2017. Critical evaluation of post- alternatives and circular economy. Waste Biomass Valorization 10, 465–481.
consumption food waste composting employing thermophilic bacterial consortium. Ren, L., Cai, C., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., Wu, G., Luo, L., Huang, H., Zhou, Y., Qin, P., Yu, M.,
Bioresour. Technol. 245, 665–672. 2018. Key environmental factors to variation of ammonia-oxidizing archaea
Baptista, M., Antunes, F., Gonçalves, M.S., Morvan, B., Silveira, A., 2010. Composting community and potential ammonia oxidation rate during agricultural waste
kinetics in full-scale mechanical–biological treatment plants. Waste Manage. 30 (10), composting. Bioresour. Technol. 270, 278–285.
1908–1921. Rincón, C.A., DeGuardia, A., Couvert, A., LeRoux, S., Soutrel, I., Daumoin, M., Benoist, J.
Cai, L., Cao, M., Chen, T., Guo, H., Zheng, G., 2021. Microbial degradation in the co- C., 2019. Chemical and odor characterization of gas emissions released during
composting of pig manure and biogas residue using a recyclable cement-based composting of solid wastes and digestates. J. Environ. Manage. 233, 39–53.
synthetic amendment. Waste Manage. 126, 30–40. Seruga, P., Krzywonos, M., Wilk, M., 2020. Treatment of by-products generated from
Cerda, A., Mejias, L., Rodríguez, P., Rodríguez, A., Artola, A., Font, X., Gea, T., anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Waste Biomass Valorization 11,
Sánchez, A., 2019. Valorisation of digestate from biowaste through solid-state 4933–4940.
fermentation to obtain value added bioproducts: a first approach. Bioresour. Sun, C., Wei, Y., Kou, J., Han, Z., Shi, Q., Liu, L., Sun, Z., 2021. Improve spent mushroom
Technol. 271, 409–416. substrate decomposition, bacterial community and mature compost quality by
Chan, M.T., Selvam, A., Wong, J.W.C., 2016. Reducing nitrogen loss and salinity during adding cellulase during composting. J. Clean. Prod. 299, 126928.
‘struvite’ food waste composting by zeolite amendment. Bioresour. Technol. 200, Tosun, L., Gönüllü, M.T., Arslankaya, E., Günay, A., 2008. Co-composting kinetics of rose
838–844. processing waste with OFMSW. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (14), 6143–6149.
Chen, Y.R., Hashimoto, A.G., 1980. Substrate utilization kinetic model for biological Tchobanoglous, G., Theisen, H., Samuel, A.V., 1993. Integrated solid waste management
treatment processes. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 22, 2081–2095. engineering principles and management issues. McGraw-Hill International Edition
Espinosa-Salgado, R., Saucedo-Castañeda, G., Monroy-Hermosillo, O., 2020. Composting (1993), New York.
a digestate from the organic fraction of urban solid wastes. Rev. Mex. Ing. Quim. 19 Voberkova, S., Maxianova, A., Schlosserova, N., Adamcova, D., Vrsanska, M.,
(1), 1–8. Richtera, L., Gagic, M., Zloch, J., Vaverkova, M.D., 2020. Food waste composting - is
HKORC. 2005. Compost and Soil Conditioner Quality Standards. Hong Kong Organic it really so simple as stated in scientific literature? - a case study. Sci. Total Environ.
Resource Centre. http://www.hkorc-cert.org/download/COMPOST-SD-080124-A- 723, 138202.
Eng.pdf (accessed on 15th Sep 2019). Wang, X, Selvam, A, Wong, J.W.C., 2016. Influence of lime on struvite formation and
Haouas, A., Modafar, C.E., Douira, A., Ibnsouda-Koraichi, S., Filali-Maltouf, A., nitrogen conservation during food waste composting. Bioresour. Technol. 217,
Moukhli, A., Amir, S., 2021. Evaluation of the nutrients cycle, humification process, 227–232.
and agronomic efficiency of organic wastes composting enriched with phosphate Wong, J.W.C., Karthikeyan, O.P., Selvam, A., 2017. Biological nutrient transformation
sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 302, 127051. during composting of pig manure and paper waste. Environ. Technol. 38, 754–761.
Kaur, G., Johnravindar, D., Wong, J.W.C., 2020. Enhanced volatile fatty acid degradation Yang, Y., Awasthi, M.K., Du, W., Ren, X., Lei, T., Lv, J., 2020. Compost supplementation
and methane production efficiency by biochar addition in food waste-sludge co- with nitrogen loss and greenhouse gas emissions during pig manure composting.
digestion: a step towards increased organic loading efficiency in co-digestion. Bioresour. Technol. 297, 122435.
Bioresour. Technol. 308, 123250. Zeng, Y., deGuardia, A., Dabert, P., 2016. Improving composting as a post-treatment of
Külcu, R., Yaldiz, O., 2004. Determination of aeration rate and kinetics of composting anaerobic digestate. Bioresour. Technol. 201, 293–303.
some agricultural wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 93 (1), 49–57. Zeng, Y., deGuardia, A., Daumoin, M., Benoist, J.C., 2012. Characterizing the
Levi-Minzi, R., Riffaldi, R., Saviozzi, A., 1990. Carbon mineralization in soil amended transformation and transfer of nitrogen during the aerobic treatment of organic
with different organic materials. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 31, 325–335. wastes and digestates. Waste Manage. 32, 2239–2247.
Lim, S., Park, H., Hao, X., Lee, S., Jeon, B., Kwak, J., Choi, W., 2017. Nitrogen, carbon, Zhao, S., Schmidt, S., Qin, W., Li, J., Li, G., Zhang, W., 2020. Towards the circular
and dry matter losses during composting of livestock manure with two bulking nitrogen economy – a global meta-analysis of composting technologies reveals much
agents as affected by co-amendments of phosphogypsum and zeolite. Ecol. Eng. 102, potential for mitigating nitrogen losses. Sci. Total Environ. 704, 135401.
280–290. Zhou, J., 2017. The effect of different c/n ratios on the composting of pig manure and
Liu, J., Huang, S., Chen, K., Wang, T., Mei, M., Li, J., 2020. Preparation of biochar from edible fungus residue with rice bran. Compost Sci. Util. 25 (2), 120–129.
food waste digestate: pyrolysis behaviour and product properties. Bioresour. Zhou, Y., Selvam, A., Wong, J.W.C., 2018. Chinese medicinal herbal residues as a bulking
Technol. 302, 122841. agent for food waste composting. Bioresour. Technol. 249, 182–188.
Lu, J., Xu, S., 2021. Post-treatment of food waste digestate towards land application: a Zucconi, F., Pera, A., Forte, M., De Bertoldi, M., 1981. Evaluating toxicity in immature
review. J. Clean. Prod. 127033. compost. Biocycle 22, 54–57.
Manu, M.K., Kumar, R., Garg, A., 2016. Drum composting of food waste: a kinetic study.
Procedia Environ. Sci. 35, 456–463.