LAW
LAW
For an agreement to become a legally enforceable contract in India, it must satisfy certain essential
elements as laid down in Section 10 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872. If any of these elements are
missing, the agreement may be void or voidable.
o There must be a valid offer by one party and an unconditional acceptance of that offer
by the other party. The offer must be clear, definite, and communicated to the offeree.
Acceptance must be absolute and unqualified, and communicated to the offeror.
o Example: A offers to sell his car to B for ₹5,00,000. B unconditionally accepts A's offer.
This forms an agreement.
o The parties must intend that their agreement should have legal consequences and
create legally binding obligations. Social or domestic agreements usually lack this
intention.
o Example: A promises to take B to dinner. If A fails to do so, B cannot sue A because it's a
social agreement, not intended to create legal relations. However, if A agrees to sell his
house to B, it's presumed there's an intention to create legal relations.
3. Lawful Consideration:
o Consideration is "something in return" (quid pro quo). It means that each party must
give something of value in exchange for what they receive from the other party. This
"something" can be an act, abstinence, or a promise. It must be lawful.
o Example: A agrees to sell his car to B for ₹5,00,000. Here, the car is consideration for B,
and ₹5,00,000 is consideration for A.
o The parties entering into the contract must be legally competent to contract. According
to Section 11 of the Act, every person is competent to contract who is:
▪ not disqualified from contracting by any law to which they are subject (e.g.,
insolvents, alien enemies).
o Example: A 16-year-old boy cannot enter into a valid contract to buy a property, as he is
a minor. Such a contract would be void ab initio (from the very beginning).
5. Free Consent:
o The consent of the parties must be genuine and free. Consent is considered free when it
is not caused by:
▪ Undue Influence (where one party is in a position to dominate the will of the
other and uses that position to obtain an unfair advantage).
o Example: A threatens to harm B if B doesn't sell him his house at a very low price. B's
consent is not free, and the contract is voidable at B's option.
6. Lawful Object:
o The purpose or object of the agreement must be lawful. An object is unlawful if it is:
▪ forbidden by law.
▪ of such a nature that, if permitted, it would defeat the provisions of any law.
▪ fraudulent.
o Example: A contracts with B to smuggle drugs. This contract is void because its object is
unlawful.
o Example: A agrees to sell "a reasonable quantity of oil" to B. This agreement is void for
uncertainty. If A agrees to discover treasure by magic for B, it's void due to impossibility
of performance.
o The agreement must not be one that the law expressly declares to be void. The Indian
Contract Act, 1872, specifies certain types of agreements that are void, such as
agreements in restraint of marriage, trade, or legal proceedings, wagering agreements,
etc.
o Example: A and B enter into an agreement that A will pay B ₹1,00,000 if a particular
horse wins a race. This is a wagering agreement and is expressly declared void.
2. All Contracts Are Agreements, But All Agreements Are Not Contracts. Justify.
This statement is a fundamental principle of contract law and accurately describes the relationship
between agreements and contracts under the Indian Contract Act, 1872.
Justification:
• Agreement: Section 2(e) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines an "agreement" as "every
promise and every set of promises, forming the consideration for each other." In simpler terms,
an agreement comes into existence when one party makes a proposal (offer) and the other
party accepts it. It is essentially a meeting of minds (consensus ad idem).
o Example: A agrees to sell his old bicycle to B for ₹1,000, and B agrees to buy it. This is
also an agreement.
• Contract: Section 2(h) of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, defines a "contract" as "an agreement
enforceable by law." This means that for an agreement to become a contract, it must create a
legal obligation, which can be enforced in a court of law.
Why all contracts are agreements: The definition of a contract explicitly states that it is an "agreement
enforceable by law." This implies that the initial step in the formation of a contract is always an
agreement. Without an underlying agreement (offer + acceptance), a contract cannot exist. Therefore,
every contract necessarily begins as an agreement.
Why all agreements are not contracts: For an agreement to become a contract, it must fulfill all the
essential elements of a valid contract as discussed above (lawful consideration, free consent, capacity of
parties, lawful object, intention to create legal relations, certainty, possibility of performance, and not
being expressly declared void). If an agreement lacks any of these essential elements, it remains merely
an agreement and does not acquire the status of a legally enforceable contract.
Illustrative Examples:
• Social/Domestic Agreements: These are agreements that typically do not intend to create legal
obligations.
o Example: A promises to buy dinner for B. If A fails to do so, B cannot sue A because it's a
social agreement, and there's no intention to create a legal relationship. It's an
agreement, but not a contract.
o Example: A promises to give B ₹10,000 out of natural love and affection, but without
any consideration from B. Unless it's in writing and registered (an exception under
Section 25), this is an agreement but not a contract because it lacks consideration.
o Example: A 15-year-old (minor) enters into an agreement to sell his property. This is an
agreement, but it is not a contract because a minor is not competent to contract, and
such an agreement is void.
o Example: A agrees with B to pay him ₹50,000 to steal a car. This is an agreement, but it
is not a contract because its object is unlawful.
In essence, an agreement is a broader term, encompassing all arrangements where parties agree on
something. A contract is a specific type of agreement that has the backing of law and creates legal rights
and obligations.
3. Discharge of Contract
Discharge of contract refers to the termination of the contractual relationship between the parties.
When a contract is discharged, the rights and obligations arising out of the contract come to an end, and
the parties are freed from their respective commitments.
A contract can be discharged in the following ways under the Indian Contract Act, 1872:
1. Discharge by Performance:
o This is the most common and desirable mode of discharge. It occurs when both parties
to the contract fulfill their respective obligations exactly as agreed upon, within the
stipulated time and manner.
▪ Example: A agrees to sell 100 kgs of rice to B for ₹5,000. A delivers the rice, and
B pays ₹5,000. The contract is discharged by actual performance.
▪ Example: A offers to deliver the goods to B as per the contract, but B refuses to
accept them without valid reason. A is discharged from further liability.
o A contract can be discharged when all parties agree to terminate it or alter its terms.
This can happen in several ways:
▪ Novation (Section 62): When a new contract is substituted for an old one,
either between the same parties or between different parties. The original
contract is discharged.
▪ Rescission (Section 62): When all parties to a contract agree to cancel it, and no
new contract is substituted.
▪ Alteration (Section 62): When one or more terms of a contract are changed by
mutual consent of the parties. The original contract is discharged.
▪ Waiver: When one party voluntarily gives up or relinquishes their rights under
the contract.
o A contract is discharged if, after its formation, the performance becomes impossible or
unlawful due to an unforeseen event beyond the control of the parties. This is known as
the "doctrine of frustration."
▪ Example: A contracts to sell his specific horse to B. Before the sale, the
horse dies. The contract is discharged.
▪ Outbreak of war.
o If a contract is not performed within a specified period (as per the Limitation Act, 1963)
and no action is taken to enforce it, the contract may be discharged by lapse of time,
and the remedies become time-barred.
▪ Merger: When an inferior right accruing to a party under a contract merges into
a superior right concerning the same subject matter.
o When one party fails to perform their obligation under the contract, or acts in a way
that makes performance impossible, it constitutes a breach. A breach entitles the
injured party to treat the contract as discharged and seek remedies.
o Actual Breach: Occurs when a party fails to perform their promise on the due date or
during the performance.
▪ Example: A agrees to deliver goods to B on June 1st. A fails to deliver the goods
on June 1st.
o Anticipatory Breach: Occurs when a party declares their intention not to perform the
contract before the performance is due. The aggrieved party can immediately treat the
contract as broken and sue for damages, or wait until the due date.
▪ Example: A agrees to sell his house to B on July 1st. On June 1st, A informs B
that he will not sell the house. B can immediately sue A for breach.
4. Breach of Contract
A breach of contract occurs when a party to a contract fails to perform their obligations under the
contract without any lawful excuse. It is a violation of any of the terms or conditions of a binding
agreement. When a breach occurs, the injured party is entitled to seek remedies under the law.
The Indian Contract Act, 1872, primarily deals with the remedies available for breach of contract,
particularly in Sections 73 to 75.
o This occurs when a party fails to perform their promise on the due date of performance
or during the course of performance.
o Examples:
2. Anticipatory Breach:
o This occurs when a party declares their intention not to perform the contract before the
actual due date of performance. This declaration can be express (by words) or implied
(by conduct).
▪ Treat the contract as immediately broken: They can immediately sue for
damages and discharge themselves from their own obligations, without waiting
for the due date.
▪ Wait until the due date: They can wait until the due date of performance. If the
other party still fails to perform, then they can sue for breach. However, if any
supervening event makes the contract impossible between the date of
anticipatory breach and the actual due date, the contract may be discharged by
impossibility, and the right to sue for breach may be lost.
When a breach of contract occurs, the aggrieved party has several remedies available under the Indian
Contract Act:
o The injured party can treat the contract as rescinded (cancelled). This relieves them
from their own obligations under the contract and also gives them the right to claim
damages for the breach.
o Ordinary Damages: Compensation for losses that naturally arose in the usual course of
things from the breach.
o Special Damages: Compensation for losses that do not naturally arise but were known
to both parties at the time of forming the contract as likely to result from a breach.
o Nominal Damages: Awarded when there's a breach but no actual loss suffered by the
injured party.
3. Specific Performance:
4. Injunction:
o An injunction is a court order restraining a party from doing something. It is typically
granted to prevent a party from committing a breach of a negative covenant (a promise
not to do something) in a contract.
o Example: A, a singer, contracts to perform only for B for a year. If A attempts to perform
for C during that year, B can seek an injunction to stop A from doing so.
o This remedy allows a party who has partially performed a contract to claim payment for
the work done, even if the contract is later discharged due to breach or other reasons. It
applies when the original contract is discharged, and the party has done some work and
is seeking reasonable remuneration for that work.
o Example: A contracts to build a house for B for ₹10 lakhs. A completes half the work
when B wrongfully repudiates the contract. A can claim quantum meruit for the work
done.
Both Guarantee and Pledge are forms of security mechanisms used in transactions, particularly for loans
or obligations, but they differ significantly in their nature, parties involved, and the type of security
provided.
A contract to perform the promise or discharge A bailment of goods as security for the
Definition the liability of a third person in case of his payment of a debt or the performance
default. of a promise.
Secondary and Contingent: The surety's liability Primary (for the debt) and Direct (for
Nature of arises only if the principal debtor defaults. It is the goods): The pawnor's liability is
Liability co-extensive with that of the principal debtor primary for the debt. The pledgee has a
unless specified otherwise. direct right over the pledged goods.
To assure the creditor that the debt will be To provide a tangible asset as collateral
Purpose paid, typically when the principal debtor's for a loan, offering concrete security to
credit is insufficient. the lender.
Export to Sheets
Examples:
Contract of Guarantee:
• A wants to take a loan from Bank B. Bank B is hesitant due to A's limited credit history. C, A's
friend, promises Bank B that if A fails to repay the loan, C will repay it.
o Here, A is the Principal Debtor, Bank B is the Creditor, and C is the Surety/Guarantor.
o If A defaults, Bank B can directly demand payment from C. C's liability arises upon A's
default.
Contract of Pledge:
• A wants to borrow ₹50,000 from B. A gives his gold chain to B as security for the loan, with the
understanding that B will return the chain once A repays the loan.
o B has physical possession of the gold chain. If A defaults on the loan, B can sell the gold
chain (after giving notice) to recover his money.
Module -2
1. Difference Between Sale and Agreement to Sell
The distinction between a 'sale' and an 'agreement to sell' is crucial under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930,
as it determines when the ownership (property) in goods passes from the seller to the buyer, and
consequently, who bears the risk of loss or damage to the goods.
Remedies for Seller can sue for the price: If the buyer Seller can sue for damages: If the
Breach defaults on payment, the seller can sue the buyer defaults, the seller can only sue
buyer for the price of the goods, as ownership for damages for breach of contract,
has already passed. not for the full price of the goods,
unless the price is due irrespective of
delivery.
Export to Sheets
Examples:
Sale:
• A walks into an electronics store, picks up a specific laptop, pays for it immediately, and takes it
home.
o Risk: If the laptop gets damaged after A has paid and taken it, A bears the risk.
Agreement to Sell:
• A agrees to buy a custom-made suit from a tailor, B. The suit will take two weeks to stitch.
Payment is to be made upon delivery.
o Transfer of Property: Ownership passes only when the suit is ready, approved by A (if
agreed), and delivered.
o Risk: If the suit is damaged by fire in the tailor's shop before it's ready, the tailor (seller)
bears the risk.
o Transfer of Property: Ownership will pass only when the wheat is harvested and
appropriated to the contract.
Under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, the term "goods" is fundamental.
Definition of Goods (Section 2(7)): "Goods means every kind of movable property other than actionable
claims and money; and includes stock and shares, growing crops, grass, and things attached to or
forming part of the land which are agreed to be severed before sale or under the contract of sale."
• Exclusions:
o Actionable Claims: These are claims that can be enforced only by legal action (e.g., a
debt due from a person). They are not "goods."
o Money: Current money (currency) is not considered goods for the purpose of buying
and selling. Old or rare coins, if bought for their numismatic value rather than as
currency, can be considered goods.
• Inclusions:
o Growing crops, grass: If they are to be severed (cut) from the land before sale or under
the contract of sale.
o Things attached to or forming part of the land: If they are agreed to be severed (like
standing timber to be cut).
Examples of Goods:
• Wheat standing in a field, if the contract specifies it will be cut and delivered.
Types of Goods:
The Sale of Goods Act classifies goods primarily into three types, which are important for determining
when ownership passes and who bears the risk.
o These are goods that are owned or possessed by the seller at the time of the contract of
sale.
▪ Specific Goods (Section 2(14)): Goods identified and agreed upon at the time a
contract of sale is made. They are distinct and identifiable.
▪ Example: A particular second-hand car (e.g., "that red Maruti Swift with
registration number DL9CXXXX").
▪ Ascertained Goods: These are goods that become identified after the formation
of the contract. Initially, they might be part of a larger lot, but they are
specifically selected or set aside for the contract. (Often used synonymously
with 'specific goods' once appropriation occurs).
▪ Unascertained Goods: Goods that are not identified and agreed upon at the
time the contract is made. They are described by description or sample from a
larger quantity.
▪ Example: A contract to sell 100 kgs of Basmati rice from a seller's stock
(without specifying which 100 kgs).
o These are goods to be manufactured or produced or acquired by the seller after the
making of the contract of sale. The seller does not possess them at the time of the
contract.
o An agreement to sell future goods cannot be a 'sale' in the present, as ownership cannot
pass immediately for non-existent goods. It can only be an 'agreement to sell.'
o Example: A contract to sell a unique piece of furniture that a carpenter will build.
3. Contingent Goods:
o These are a type of future goods, the acquisition of which by the seller depends upon a
contingency which may or may not happen.
o The contract for contingent goods is also an 'agreement to sell,' not a 'sale.'
Concept: It is a fundamental principle of common law that traditionally placed the responsibility on the
buyer to inspect goods before purchase and satisfy themselves about the quality, fitness, and suitability
of the goods they were buying. In essence, it meant that if the buyer failed to do so and later discovered
defects, they generally had no recourse against the seller. The buyer was expected to use their own skill
and judgment.
Underlying Idea: The idea behind caveat emptor was that buyers were assumed to be capable of
protecting their own interests. In a face-to-face transaction, it was expected that the buyer would
inspect the goods and ask any necessary questions. If they didn't, they bought at their own risk.
Historical Context: This principle was very strong in the earlier days of trade, particularly for open,
visible goods where buyers had ample opportunity for inspection.
Modern Relevance (and Limitations under Sale of Goods Act, 1930): While caveat emptor is still the
general rule, its application has been significantly diluted and modified by consumer protection laws and
statutory provisions like the Sale of Goods Act, 1930, in India. The Act introduces several exceptions to
the rule of caveat emptor through implied conditions and warranties, which protect the buyer in various
circumstances.
The Sale of Goods Act shifts some of the responsibility back to the seller by implying certain conditions
and warranties into contracts of sale, thereby protecting the buyer. These are:
o Example: A buyer tells a shoe seller they need waterproof shoes for trekking in the
Himalayas, and the seller supplies a pair of shoes. If the shoes are not waterproof, the
buyer can reject them, as they relied on the seller's skill and judgment for a specific
purpose.
o Where goods are bought by description from a seller who deals in goods of that
description (whether he be the manufacturer or producer or not), there is an implied
condition that the goods shall be of merchantable quality.
o Merchantable quality means that the goods are reasonably fit for the ordinary purposes
for which such goods are used, are free from latent defects, and are of a quality that a
reasonable person would accept.
o Example: A buyer purchases a new refrigerator. If it stops working within a few days due
to a manufacturing defect, it is not of merchantable quality, and the buyer can return it.
o Note: This condition does not apply if the buyer has examined the goods and the defects
ought to have been revealed by such examination.
o Where there is a contract for the sale of goods by description, there is an implied
condition that the goods shall correspond with the description.
o Example: A orders "basmati rice" online. If the seller delivers ordinary rice, it does not
correspond with the description, and the buyer can reject it.
o Where there is a contract for sale by sample, there are implied conditions that:
▪ The buyer shall have a reasonable opportunity of comparing the bulk with the
sample.
▪ The goods shall be free from any latent defect rendering them unmerchantable,
which would not be apparent on a reasonable examination of the sample.
o Example: A farmer sells wheat to a buyer based on a small sample shown. When the
bulk delivery arrives, it must be of the same quality as the sample.
o In a contract of sale, unless the circumstances of the contract are such as to show a
different intention, there is an implied condition on the part of the seller that in the case
of a sale, he has a right to sell the goods, and in the case of an agreement to sell, he will
have a right to sell the goods at the time when the property is to pass.
o Example: If A sells a car to B that A does not legally own, B can later sue A for breach of
this implied condition, even if B used the car for some time.
o There is an implied warranty that the buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the
goods. This means the buyer's possession should not be disturbed by any third party
with a superior title.
o There is an implied warranty that the goods shall be free from any charge or
encumbrance in favour of any third party not declared or known to the buyer before or
at the time when the contract is made.
Conclusion on Caveat Emptor: While caveat emptor remains the underlying principle, the Sale of Goods
Act and other consumer protection laws have significantly curtailed its harshness. Buyers are now much
more protected against hidden defects or misdescriptions, especially in consumer transactions, placing a
greater responsibility on the seller to ensure the quality and fitness of goods.
In a contract of sale, the stipulations (terms) can be categorized into 'conditions' and 'warranties.' This
distinction is vital because the legal consequences of their breach are entirely different.
Definition of Condition (Section 12(2)): "A condition is a stipulation essential to the main purpose of the
contract, the breach of which gives the aggrieved party a right to repudiate the contract (treat the
contract as at an end) and to claim damages."
• Key Characteristics:
o Breach: Entitles the injured party to treat the contract as repudiated (cancelled).
o Remedy: The buyer can reject the goods, return them, and claim damages.
Definition of Warranty (Section 12(3)): "A warranty is a stipulation collateral to the main purpose of the
contract, the breach of which gives the aggrieved party a right to claim damages but not a right to
repudiate the contract and reject the goods."
• Key Characteristics:
o Breach: Does not entitle the injured party to repudiate the contract.
o Remedy: The buyer can only claim damages, but must keep the goods.
In certain circumstances, a breach of condition may be treated as a breach of warranty. In such cases,
the buyer loses the right to reject the goods and can only claim damages. This happens in the following
situations:
1. Waiver by Buyer: The buyer may voluntarily waive the condition or elect to treat the breach of
condition as a breach of warranty.
o Example: A buys a car with a condition that it must have a specific GPS system. The car
delivered doesn't have it. A could reject the car, but instead, he decides to keep it and
demand a discount for the missing GPS.
2. Compulsory Treatment (Acceptance of Goods): When the contract is not severable and the
buyer has accepted the goods, or part thereof, the breach of any condition can only be treated
as a breach of warranty. This is unless there is a term in the contract, express or implied, to the
contrary. Acceptance is deemed to happen:
o When the buyer intimates to the seller that they have accepted the goods.
o When the goods have been delivered to the buyer and they do any act in relation to
them which is inconsistent with the ownership of the seller (e.g., resells them, consumes
them).
o When, after the lapse of a reasonable time, the buyer retains the goods without
intimating to the seller that they have rejected them.
Implied Conditions (Examples): These are conditions that are presumed to be part of every contract of
sale unless specifically excluded.
o What it means: The seller has the right to sell the goods (in a sale) or will have the right
to sell the goods at the time property is to pass (in an agreement to sell).
o Example: A sells a stolen car to B. A did not have the right to sell the car. B can
repudiate the contract, return the car, and claim back the full price from A, as it's a
breach of a fundamental condition.
o What it means: If goods are sold by description, they must correspond with that
description.
o Example: A orders "100 bags of basmati rice" from B. B supplies "100 bags of ordinary
rice." A can reject the entire consignment because the goods do not match the
description.
o What it means: If the buyer makes known their specific purpose and relies on the
seller's skill, the goods must be fit for that purpose.
o Example: A tells a medical store owner they need a hot water bag for a specific medical
condition, relying on the owner's recommendation. The owner gives a bag that leaks,
causing injury. A can reject the bag and claim damages because it was not fit for the
disclosed purpose.
o What it means: Goods bought by description from a seller who deals in such goods must
be of merchantable quality (i.e., reasonably fit for ordinary use and free from latent
defects).
o Example: A buys a brand new washing machine from a dealer. If, after a few washes,
the machine stops working due to a manufacturing defect that was not apparent on
inspection, it is not of merchantable quality. A can return the machine and demand a
refund or replacement.
5. Implied Condition as to Sale by Sample (Section 17):
o What it means: In a sale by sample, the bulk must correspond with the sample, the
buyer must have an opportunity to compare, and the goods must be free from hidden
defects not discoverable by reasonable examination of the sample.
o Example: A agrees to buy 50 meters of fabric from B after seeing a sample. When the
bulk delivery arrives, the fabric is coarser and has a different weave than the sample. A
can reject the entire 50 meters.
o Example: In a trade where certain goods are customarily sold with a guarantee of a
particular lifespan, that guarantee becomes an implied condition.
Implied Warranties (Examples): These are warranties that are presumed to be part of every contract of
sale unless specifically excluded.
o What it means: The buyer shall have and enjoy quiet possession of the goods. No third
party with a superior title should disturb the buyer's possession.
o Example: A buys a car from B. Later, C, the true owner of the car (which B had stolen),
reclaims the car from A. B has breached the implied warranty of quiet possession. A
cannot return the car to B (as C took it) but can sue B for damages (e.g., the price paid,
and any costs incurred).
o What it means: The goods are free from any charge or encumbrance in favour of any
third party not declared or known to the buyer before or at the time of the contract.
o What it means: If the goods are inherently dangerous, the seller must warn the buyer of
the probable danger.
o Example: A sells industrial chemicals to B, knowing they are highly corrosive, but fails to
warn B about the safety precautions. If B gets injured due to this, A is liable for breach of
this implied warranty.
Distinction Summary:
Basis of
Condition Warranty
Difference
Remedy for Repudiation of contract (rejection of goods) Claim for damages only. Cannot reject
Breach and/or damages. goods.
Effect of
Voids the contract. Does not void the contract.
Breach
Export to Sheets
Understanding these distinctions is crucial for both buyers and sellers to know their rights and liabilities
in a contract of sale.
Module -3
1. What do you mean by Negotiable Instruments? Its Features and Its Importance?
A negotiable instrument is a document that guarantees the payment of a specific sum of money, either
on demand or at a set time, and whose payee (the person to whom the payment is due) is named on the
document. More importantly, it is an instrument that can be transferred from one person to another by
delivery (if it's a bearer instrument) or by endorsement and delivery (if it's an order instrument), in such
a way that the transferee (the person receiving it) can acquire a good title, free from any defects in the
title of the transferor, provided they take it for value and in good faith.
The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, primarily deals with three types of negotiable instruments:
1. Promissory Note
2. Bill of Exchange
3. Cheque
o A unique feature is that a bona fide transferee for value, without notice of any defect in
the title of the transferor, acquires a "holder in due course" status.
o A holder in due course gets a title free from any defects in the title of the previous
holders. For instance, even if the instrument was obtained by fraud by a previous
holder, the holder in due course can still enforce payment.
3. Presumptions: The Act presumes certain things regarding negotiable instruments, making them
easier to deal with:
o Time of Acceptance: Every accepted bill of exchange was accepted within a reasonable
time after its date and before its maturity.
o Stamping: That the instrument was duly stamped (though this presumption is
rebuttable).
6. Certainty of Parties: The parties involved (maker, drawer, payee, drawee, acceptor, endorser,
etc.) must be certain.
7. Certainty of Sum Payable: The amount of money to be paid must be certain and not vague or
subject to contingencies.
8. Payment in Money Only: The payment must be in legal tender (money), not in goods or
services.
9. Time of Payment: The payment must be on demand or at a determinable future time (e.g., "30
days after date," "on 1st January 2025").
1. Facilitate Trade and Commerce: They provide a convenient and secure medium for business
transactions, reducing the need to carry large amounts of cash. They enable credit transactions.
2. Promote Liquidity: Being easily transferable, they convert a future payment obligation into a
present asset that can be used for other transactions.
3. Evidence of Debt: They serve as strong prima facie evidence of debt, simplifying legal
proceedings in case of default.
4. Credit Extension: They allow for the extension of credit in a structured and legally enforceable
manner, boosting economic activity.
5. Risk Reduction (for Holder in Due Course): The concept of a holder in due course provides a
higher degree of security and confidence to transferees, as they can acquire a title free from
prior defects.
6. Convenience and Safety: Sending a cheque or bill of exchange is much safer than sending cash
over long distances.
7. International Trade: Bills of exchange, in particular, are widely used in international trade to
settle payments between exporters and importers.
In summary, negotiable instruments are the backbone of the modern financial system, providing a
flexible, secure, and legally enforceable mechanism for payments and credit.
2. What do you mean by Cheque? Explain Types of Crossing in Cheque. And what do you mean by
Dishonour of Cheque?
As per Section 6 of The Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, a cheque is a bill of exchange drawn on a
specified banker and not expressed to be payable otherwise than on demand.
In simpler terms, a cheque is an unconditional written order, issued by the account holder (drawer) to a
bank (drawee), directing the bank to pay a specified sum of money from the drawer's account to a
named person or the bearer (payee) on demand.
• It must be in writing.
Crossing a cheque is a direction to the paying banker not to pay the cheque over the counter but to pay
it only through a bank account. It adds security to the payment.
There are two main types of crossing:
o How it's done: A cheque is generally crossed when it bears across its face an addition of:
▪ The words "and company" or any abbreviation thereof, between two parallel
transverse lines, or
o Effect: The paying banker cannot pay the amount of the cheque over the counter. The
payment must be made only to a banker, who will then credit the amount to the
payee's account. This prevents unauthorized persons from encashing the cheque, even
if they obtain it. It does not restrict further transfer.
o Example:
o --------------------
o || ||
o || ||
o --------------------
or
--------------------
|| & Co. ||
--------------------
o How it's done: A cheque is specially crossed when it bears across its face an addition of
the name of a banker, with or without the words "Not Negotiable." The two parallel
transverse lines are not essential, but often used for clarity.
o Effect: The paying banker must pay the amount of the cheque only to the banker whose
name is specified in the crossing, or to his agent for collection. This offers a higher
degree of security as it directs payment through a specific bank.
o Example:
o --------------------
o || A.B.C. Bank ||
o --------------------
or
--------------------
|| P.Q.R. Bank ||
|| Not Negotiable||
--------------------
• Account Payee Crossing / Restrictive Crossing (Not defined in the Act, but customary):
o How it's done: Adding the words "Account Payee" or "A/c Payee" (or similar words)
between the parallel transverse lines in a general crossing or along with a special
crossing.
o Effect: This crossing is a direction to the collecting banker (not the paying banker) that
the amount of the cheque should be credited only to the account of the named payee. It
does not legally restrict negotiability, but it serves as a warning to the collecting bank
that they would be liable if they collect the cheque for someone other than the named
payee. It significantly enhances the safety of payment.
o Example:
o --------------------
o --------------------
o How it's done: Adding the words "Not Negotiable" in a general or special crossing.
o Effect: This crossing removes the crucial feature of "negotiability" of the cheque. While
the cheque can still be transferred, the transferee (even a holder in due course) will not
acquire a better title than that of the transferor. If the title of the transferor is defective,
the title of the transferee will also be defective. This protects the drawer against loss if
the cheque falls into unauthorized hands.
o Example:
o --------------------
o || Not Negotiable ||
o --------------------
Dishonour of a cheque occurs when the drawee bank (the bank on which the cheque is drawn) refuses
to make payment on the cheque when it is presented for payment. This means the cheque "bounces" or
is "returned unpaid."
Reasons for Dishonour: A cheque can be dishonoured for various reasons, including but not limited to:
• Insufficient Funds (Funds are not sufficient): The most common reason. The drawer's account
does not have enough balance to cover the amount of the cheque.
• Stop Payment Order: The drawer has instructed their bank to stop payment of that specific
cheque.
• Signature Mismatch: The signature on the cheque does not match the specimen signature held
by the bank.
• Cheque is Mutilated: The cheque is torn or damaged in a way that makes it unreadable.
• Date Issues:
o Stale cheque: Presented after its validity period (usually 3 months from the date of issue
in India).
• Payment Stopped by Court Order: A court order restricts payment from the account.
• Drawer's Death/Insolvency: The bank receives notice of the drawer's death or insolvency
before the cheque is paid.
• Discrepancy in amount (words and figures): The amount in words differs from the amount in
figures.
1. The cheque must have been drawn for the discharge of a legally enforceable debt or other
liability.
2. The cheque is presented to the bank within its period of validity (3 months from issue date or
within the period specified, whichever is earlier).
3. The drawer receives a notice from the payee demanding payment of the cheque amount within
30 days of receiving information from the bank regarding the dishonour.
4. The drawer fails to make payment of the cheque amount to the payee within 15 days of
receiving the demand notice.
Punishment under Section 138: If these conditions are met, the drawer can be prosecuted and, upon
conviction, may be punished with:
• Both.
This provision was added to enhance the credibility of cheques as a negotiable instrument and to deter
dishonest drawers.
These three are the primary types of negotiable instruments recognized under The Negotiable
Instruments Act, 1881. While they share some common features of negotiability, they have distinct
characteristics.
Drawn by the debtor Drawn by the creditor (who Drawn by the customer
Drawing
(who promises to pay). orders the debtor to pay). (account holder) of a bank.
Export to Sheets
Simplified Relationship:
• Bill of Exchange: You order someone else to pay me. (Creditor orders Debtor to Pay Creditor)
• Cheque: You order your bank to pay me. (Customer orders Bank to Pay Payee)
Module -4
1. Company and its Types
Definition of a Company:
A company is a legal entity formed by a group of individuals to engage in and operate a business
enterprise, whether commercial or industrial. It is distinct from its owners (shareholders) and has a
separate legal personality. This means it can enter into contracts, own assets, incur debts, and sue or be
sued in its own name. The key characteristics of a company typically include:
• Perpetual Succession: Its existence is not affected by the death, insolvency, or retirement of its
members.
• Limited Liability: The liability of its members (shareholders) is typically limited to the amount
unpaid on their shares.
• Common Seal: It may have a common seal, which acts as its official signature.
• Transferability of Shares: Shares can generally be transferred from one person to another.
Types of Companies:
A. Based on Incorporation:
• Statutory Companies: Formed by a special Act of Parliament or state legislature (e.g., Reserve
Bank of India, Life Insurance Corporation of India).
• Registered Companies: Incorporated under the Companies Act (or similar legislation in other
countries). This is the most common type.
• Company Limited by Shares: The liability of members is limited to the unpaid amount on the
shares they hold. This is the most common type of company.
• Unlimited Company: The liability of members is unlimited, meaning their personal assets can be
used to pay off company debts. These are rare.
C. Based on Number of Members (in India):
• One Person Company (OPC): A company with only one member (shareholder). It has the
advantages of a private limited company, such as limited liability.
• Private Company: A company that restricts the transferability of its shares, prohibits invitations
to the public to subscribe for its securities, and limits the number of its members (typically to
200, excluding past and present employee-shareholders).
• Public Company: A company that is not a private company. It can invite the public to subscribe
for its shares and debentures, and there are no restrictions on the transferability of its shares.
D. Based on Control:
• Holding Company: A company that holds more than 50% of the equity share capital of another
company or controls the composition of its Board of Directors.
E. Other Types:
• Associate Company: A company in which another company has significant influence (holding at
least 20% of voting power), but is not a subsidiary or a joint venture.
• Government Company: A company in which not less than 51% of the paid-up share capital is
held by the Central Government, or by any State Government or Governments, or partly by the
Central Government and partly by one or more State Governments.
• Foreign Company: A company incorporated outside India that has a place of business in India,
conducts any business activity in India in any other manner, or both.
• Small Company: (Under Indian Companies Act, 2013) A private company meeting specific
criteria regarding paid-up share capital and turnover.
The Memorandum of Association (MOA) and Articles of Association (AOA) are two crucial documents for
any company.
Defines the scope and objects of the Defines the internal rules and regulations
Purpose/Nature
company; its constitution. for the company's management.
Deals with the company's relationship with Deals with the company's relationship
Relationship
the outside world. with its members and internal affairs.
Is supreme to the AOA. Any clause in the
Supremacy Is subordinate to the MOA.
AOA that contradicts the MOA is void.
Binds the company to outsiders and vice Binds the company to its members and
Binding on
versa. members to each other.
An act beyond the objects stated in the An act beyond the AOA can be ratified by
Ultra Vires MOA is ultra vires (beyond powers) and the shareholders if it is within the scope
void, even if ratified by all members. of the MOA.
Export to Sheets
Powers of a Director:
Directors are entrusted with the management of the company's affairs. Their powers generally flow
from the Companies Act, the company's Memorandum and Articles of Association, and resolutions
passed by the board or shareholders. Key powers include:
• General Management: To manage the day-to-day operations and business of the company.
• Issuing Shares: To allot shares (subject to restrictions in AOA and shareholder approval for
certain issues).
Restrictions on Powers: Certain powers of directors are restricted and can only be exercised with the
approval of shareholders by way of an ordinary or special resolution (e.g., selling or disposing of the
undertaking of the company, borrowing beyond a certain limit, investing in trust securities).
Liabilities of a Director:
Directors owe fiduciary duties to the company and its stakeholders. Their liabilities can arise from
various sources:
o Duty of Care, Skill, and Diligence: Failure to exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence
in performing their duties.
o Duty to Act in Good Faith: Not acting in the best interests of the company.
• Ultra Vires Acts: Performing acts beyond the powers of the company (as per MOA) or their own
powers (as per AOA or resolutions).
• Misfeasance: Misuse of company funds or assets, or any wrongful act causing loss to the
company.
• Breach of Statutory Duties: Non-compliance with provisions of the Companies Act, tax laws,
environmental laws, etc. This can lead to:
• Insolvency/Winding Up: In certain circumstances, if the company goes into liquidation due to
reckless trading or fraudulent activities, directors can be held personally liable for the company's
debts.
• Joint and Several Liability: Directors can often be held jointly and severally liable for certain
contraventions, meaning each director is individually responsible for the entire liability, and
creditors can pursue any or all of them.
It's important to note that the concept of "limited liability" generally applies to shareholders. Directors,
while not usually personally liable for the company's debts unless they provide personal guarantees, can
face significant personal liabilities for their actions or inactions as directors.
4. Winding Up of a Company
Winding up (or liquidation) is the process by which the existence of a company is brought to an end. It
involves realizing the company's assets, paying off its debts to creditors, and distributing any surplus to
shareholders according to their rights. Once the process is complete, the company is dissolved and
ceases to exist as a legal entity.
This occurs when an order for winding up is passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in
India (or equivalent court/tribunal in other jurisdictions). Common grounds for compulsory winding up
include:
• Inability to Pay Debts: The company is unable to pay its debts as and when they fall due.
• Special Resolution: The company has passed a special resolution for winding up by the Tribunal.
• Act Against National Interest: The company has acted against the interests of the sovereignty
and integrity of India, the security of the State, friendly relations with foreign States, public
order, decency, or morality.
• Fraudulent Conduct: The affairs of the company have been conducted in a fraudulent manner
or the company was formed for a fraudulent or unlawful purpose.
• Default in Filing Financial Statements/Annual Returns: The company has made a default in
filing its financial statements or annual returns for five consecutive financial years.
• Just and Equitable: The Tribunal is of the opinion that it is just and equitable that the company
should be wound up (this is a broad ground covering various situations like deadlock in
management, loss of substratum, etc.).
Process for Compulsory Winding Up:
1. Petition: A winding up petition is filed with the NCLT by the company, a creditor, a contributory
(shareholder), or the Registrar of Companies.
2. Hearing: The NCLT hears the petition and passes a winding up order if satisfied.
4. Realization of Assets: The liquidator takes control of assets, sells them, and collects debts.
5. Payment to Creditors: Proceeds are used to pay off creditors in a prescribed order (e.g., secured
creditors, workmen's dues, government dues, unsecured creditors).
7. Dissolution: Once the liquidation is complete, the NCLT passes an order for the dissolution of
the company, and its name is struck off the Register of Companies.
This occurs when the members or creditors of a company decide to wind up the company without the
intervention of the Tribunal. There are two types:
o Applicable when the company is solvent (able to pay its debts in full).
o The liquidator realizes assets, pays debts, and distributes surplus to shareholders.
o A meeting of creditors is held, and creditors appoint the liquidator (or agree with the
company's nominee).
2. General Meeting: Shareholders pass a special resolution for winding up and appoint a
liquidator.
4. Liquidation: The liquidator carries out the process (asset realization, debt payment).
5. Final Meeting: A final meeting of members (and creditors in creditors' voluntary winding up) is
held to approve the liquidator's accounts.
6. Dissolution: The liquidator files the final accounts and report with the Registrar, and the
company is dissolved after three months from the date of filing.
This is a simpler process for companies that are defunct (not carrying on any business or operation) and
have no assets or liabilities. The Registrar of Companies can strike off the name of such a company from
the Register. Companies can also apply to the Registrar for striking off their names.
The formation of a company (incorporation) involves several steps, primarily governed by the
Companies Act, 2013, in India (or equivalent corporate laws in other countries). Here's a general outline
of the process for incorporating a company in India:
1. Decide on the Type of Company: Determine whether it will be a Private Limited, Public Limited,
One Person Company (OPC), etc., based on business needs and shareholder numbers.
2. Choose a Name: Select a suitable name for the company. The name must be unique and not
identical or too similar to existing companies or trademarks.
3. Obtain Digital Signature Certificate (DSC): All proposed directors and subscribers need a valid
DSC for online filing of documents.
4. Obtain Director Identification Number (DIN): Every proposed director must have a DIN. This can
be applied for along with the incorporation application.
o MOA: This defines the company's constitution, objects, and scope of activities.
o AOA: This contains the internal rules and regulations for managing the company.
6. Prepare Other Necessary Documents:
o Declaration from directors and subscribers regarding compliance with the Companies
Act.
B. Name Reservation:
1. Apply for Name Reservation: File an application (RUN - Reserve Unique Name) with the
Registrar of Companies (ROC) to reserve the chosen company name. Up to two names can be
proposed. The name, if approved, is reserved for 20 days.
1. File SPICe+ Form (Simplified Proforma for Incorporating Company Electronically Plus): This is
an integrated web form for incorporation, covering various services like:
o Application for PAN and TAN (Permanent Account Number and Tax Deduction and
Collection Account Number).
o Application for EPFO (Employees' Provident Fund Organisation) and ESIC (Employees'
State Insurance Corporation) registration (mandatory in most cases).
2. Attach Documents: Upload the signed MOA, AOA, and all other required documents (consent
forms, affidavits, address proofs, etc.) as attachments to the SPICe+ form.
4. Verification and Approval: The ROC examines the application and documents. If everything is in
order and compliant with the Companies Act, the ROC approves the application.
D. Post-Incorporation Stage:
1. Certificate of Incorporation (COI): Upon approval, the ROC issues the Certificate of
Incorporation, which is conclusive evidence of the company's existence. The COI will also include
the CIN (Corporate Identification Number).
2. PAN and TAN: The PAN and TAN for the company are usually generated along with the COI
through the SPICe+ process.
3. Bank Account Opening: The company can now open a bank account in its name.
5. Statutory Registers and Books of Account: Maintain statutory registers (e.g., register of
members, directors) and proper books of account.
6. Other Registrations: Obtain other registrations as required by the nature of the business (e.g.,
GST registration, import/export code, shop and establishment license).
The entire process is increasingly digitized, making company formation more streamlined and efficient in
India
Module -5
1. Defining a Consumer and Consumer Rights
Who is a Consumer?
Under the Consumer Protection Act in India, a "consumer" is generally defined as a person who:
• Buys any goods for a consideration (paid or promised, or partly paid and partly promised, or
under any system of deferred payment). This includes any user of such goods other than the
person who buys them, provided the use is with the approval of the buyer. However, a person
who obtains goods for resale or for any commercial purpose (unless for self-employment) is
typically not considered a consumer.
• Hires or avails of any service for a consideration (paid or promised, or partly paid and partly
promised, or under any system of deferred payment). This includes any beneficiary of such
services other than the person who hires or avails them, provided the services are availed of
with the approval of the person who hires or avails them.
The Consumer Protection Act in India provides for six fundamental rights for consumers:
1. Right to Safety: The right to be protected against the marketing of goods and services which are
hazardous to life and property. Consumers should insist on the quality and guarantee of
products, preferably opting for quality-marked products like ISI or AGMARK.
2. Right to be Informed: The right to be informed about the quality, quantity, potency, purity,
standard, and price of goods or services so as to protect the consumer against unfair trade
practices. This empowers consumers to make informed decisions.
3. Right to Choose: The right to be assured, wherever possible, of access to a variety of goods and
services at competitive prices. In case of monopolies, it means the right to be assured of
satisfactory quality and service at a fair price.
4. Right to be Heard: The right to ensure that consumer interests will receive due consideration at
appropriate forums. It also includes the right to be represented in various forums formed to
consider consumer welfare.
5. Right to Seek Redressal: The right to seek redressal against unfair trade practices or
unscrupulous exploitation of consumers. This includes the right to a fair settlement of genuine
grievances.
6. Right to Consumer Education: The right to acquire the knowledge and skill to be an informed
consumer throughout life. This right aims to empower consumers to be aware of their rights and
exercise them effectively.
The Consumer Protection Act establishes a three-tier quasi-judicial machinery for the redressal of
consumer disputes:
o Jurisdiction: Handles complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as
consideration does not exceed ₹50 lakh.
o Composition: Consists of a President (who is or has been a District Judge) and two other
members (one of whom must be a woman), appointed by the State Government.
o Appeals: Appeals against the orders of the District Commission can be filed with the
State Commission.
o Jurisdiction: Hears complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as
consideration exceeds ₹50 lakh but does not exceed ₹2 crore. It also hears appeals
against the orders of District Commissions within its jurisdiction.
o Composition: Consists of a President (who is or has been a High Court Judge) and at
least two other members (one of whom must be a woman), appointed by the State
Government.
o Appeals: Appeals against the orders of the State Commission can be filed with the
National Commission.
o Jurisdiction: Deals with complaints where the value of the goods or services paid as
consideration exceeds ₹2 crore. It also hears appeals against the orders of State
Commissions and has revisional jurisdiction over orders passed by State Commissions.
o Composition: Consists of a President (who is or has been a Supreme Court Judge) and
four other members (one of whom must be a woman), appointed by the Central
Government.
o Appeals: Appeals against the orders of the National Commission can be filed with the
Supreme Court of India.
The Act also emphasizes alternative dispute resolution mechanisms like mediation to facilitate faster
and amicable settlements.
The procedure for filing a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act is designed to be relatively
simple and does not necessarily require a lawyer. Here are the general steps:
1. Preliminary Steps:
o Send a Legal Notice: Before filing a formal complaint, it's advisable to send a written
notice to the trader or service provider outlining your grievance and seeking a resolution
(e.g., replacement, refund, or compensation). This serves as proof of your attempt to
resolve the matter amicably.
o Gather Documents: Collect all relevant documents, including purchase bills, receipts,
warranty/guarantee cards, written communications, product packaging, and any other
evidence supporting your claim.
o Determine the correct Consumer Commission (District, State, or National) based on the
pecuniary jurisdiction (value of goods/services + compensation claimed) and territorial
jurisdiction (where the opposite party resides/works, where the cause of action arose,
or where the complainant resides).
▪ Facts relating to the complaint and the cause of action (when and where the
problem arose).
o The complaint can be filed online through the e-Daakhil portal or physically by
submitting multiple copies (usually 5 copies plus one for each opposite party) to the
respective Consumer Commission's office.
o Once the complaint is admitted, the Commission will issue a notice to the opposite
party, requiring them to respond within a stipulated time.
o Both parties will be given an opportunity to present their arguments and evidence.
o The Commission will hear the case and pass an order based on the evidence presented.
This order can include directing the opposite party to provide a refund, replace goods,
remove defects, pay compensation, or cease unfair trade practices.
Limitation Period: A complaint must generally be filed within two years from the date on which the
cause of action arises. Delays may be condoned if sufficient reason is provided to the Commission.
"Unfair trade practices" refer to the use of various deceptive, fraudulent, or unethical methods by
businesses to gain an advantage or cause injury to a consumer. These practices are considered unlawful
under the Consumer Protection Act, which aims to ensure that consumers can make informed and
rational decisions about the goods and services they purchase.
The Consumer Protection Act specifically defines and prohibits various unfair trade practices. Some
common examples include:
• False Representation of Goods or Services: Misleading statements about the quality, quantity,
purity, standard, or grade of goods, or the nature, quality, or standard of services. This includes
misrepresenting old goods as new, giving false testimonials, or falsely representing that goods
are of a particular standard, quality, or style.
• False or Misleading Advertisements: Publishing advertisements that falsely represent the goods
or services, or using misleading price indications (e.g., "bait and switch" tactics where a low-
priced item is advertised to lure customers, but then a more expensive item is pushed).
• Bait Advertising: Advertising goods or services at a very low price to attract consumers, with no
intention of supplying them at that price, or with the intention of supplying them at a higher
price.
• False Free Gift or Prize Offers: Offering gifts, prizes, or other items with the intention of not
providing them as offered, or creating a false impression that something is being given free
when its cost is wholly or partly covered by the price of the goods or services.
• Charging Excess Price: Charging a price for goods or services in excess of the price displayed, or
the price fixed under any law.
• Refusal to Accept Goods for Repair/Return: Refusing to accept goods for repair or return within
the stipulated period, or refusing to return the consideration paid within the stipulated period.
• Unfair Contracts: Contracts that cause a significant change in the rights of a consumer, often to
their detriment.
The Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA) was established under the Consumer Protection Act,
2019, with the primary objective of promoting, protecting, and enforcing the rights of consumers as a
class, and for preventing unfair trade practices.
What is a Tort?
A tort is a civil wrong that causes a claimant to suffer loss or harm, resulting in legal liability for the
person who commits the tortious act. Unlike a breach of contract (which arises from an agreement) or a
crime (which is a wrong against the state), a tort is a wrong against an individual or entity for which the
law provides a remedy, typically in the form of monetary damages. The person who commits a tort is
called a "tortfeasor."
• Civil Wrong: It's a dispute between private parties, not a criminal prosecution by the state.
• Breach of Duty: It involves a breach of a duty imposed by law (not by contract) that causes
harm.
• Remedy: The primary remedy is usually financial compensation (damages) to the injured party,
aiming to put them back in the position they would have been in had the tort not occurred.
• Negligence: The most common tort, involving a failure to exercise reasonable care that results
in harm (e.g., a driver causing an accident due to distracted driving).
• Intentional Torts: Deliberate acts that cause harm (e.g., assault, battery, defamation, trespass).
• Strict Liability Torts: Liability imposed regardless of fault, often for inherently dangerous
activities or defective products.
Tort law has significant applications and implications for businesses and organizations, as they can be
both tortfeasors and victims of torts. Understanding tort law is crucial for managing legal risks, ensuring
compliance, and protecting financial health.
1. Product Liability:
o Concept: Businesses that manufacture, distribute, or sell products can be held liable for
injuries or damages caused by defective products. This is often a strict liability tort,
meaning liability can arise even without proof of negligence, just by showing the
product was defective and caused harm.
2. Negligence:
o Concept: Businesses have a duty of care to their customers, employees, and the public.
Failure to exercise reasonable care that leads to harm can result in negligence claims.
o Application:
▪ Premises Liability: A retail store might be liable if a customer slips and falls due
to a wet floor that wasn't properly marked.
▪ Workplace Safety: Companies are liable for injuries to employees resulting from
unsafe working conditions.
o Concept: Businesses or individuals within an organization can be sued for making false
statements that harm another's reputation. Libel is written defamation, while slander is
spoken.
o Application:
o Concept: While often covered by specific IP statutes, many IP violations can also be
framed as torts, involving the unauthorized use of another's intellectual property,
causing harm to their business interests.
o Application: A business using a competitor's registered trademark to sell its own goods,
or illegally reproducing copyrighted material for commercial gain.
o Concept: This is a "business tort" where one party intentionally and improperly
interferes with another's existing contract or reasonable expectation of a future
contract, causing economic harm.
6. Fraudulent Misrepresentation:
o Concept: Intentional deception by a business that induces another party to act to their
detriment.
o Application: A seller making false claims about a product's capabilities to secure a sale,
or a company providing misleading financial information to investors.
7. Trespass:
• Financial Costs: Tort lawsuits can result in substantial monetary damages (compensatory and
sometimes punitive), legal fees, and settlement costs.
• Reputational Damage: Being involved in tort cases, especially those related to negligence or
product defects, can severely harm a company's public image and consumer trust.
• Operational Changes: Businesses might need to revise their processes, safety protocols, or
product designs to prevent future tort claims.
• Insurance: Businesses often purchase liability insurance to cover potential tort claims, making it
a critical aspect of risk management.
• Risk Management and Compliance: Understanding tort law helps organizations develop
effective risk management strategies, implement robust compliance programs, and train
employees to avoid tortious conduct