Science, Technology and Society Finals
Science, Technology and Society Finals
- Karl Popper is the known proponent of this view. was requires one to excel in various dimensions, such as linguistic, kinetic, artistic, and
notorious for stating that up-and-coming theories of the socio-civic. Thus, he understands that he should not focus on one aspect alone.
2 views of happiness
How is science perceived by those who graduated from this field? 1. Hedonistic view - is the polar experience opposite of
suggests that the aforementioned kind of academic environment has made suffering the presence of happiness indicate the absence of
students unwelcoming of objections against science. It will thus reinforce their pain, because of this hedonist believed that the purpose of
imagination and allow some level of unorthodoxy, bringing forth novel discoveries life is to maximise happiness and minimise misery
that otherwise would not be considered had they stuck to the default
2. Eudaimonia view - good spirited and focuses more on
methodology. Innovations are brought forth by the visionaries, not the prude
becoming better person coined by aristotle describe the
legalists, and several notable figures in science even consider themselves as
outsiders. pinnacle of happiness that is attainable by human
If one is really in pursuit of human flourishing, it would make sense for them to Characteristics of Human Flourishing
pursue it holistically. Simply mastering science and technology would be 1. All humans aim to flourish -
inadequate if we are to, say, socialize with people or ruminate on our inner self. 2. Human flourishing putting into one's action, capacities,
Aristotle's cudaimonie person is required to be knowledgeable about science,
capabilities and virtue
among other things of equal importance. They are supposed to possess
3. Human Flourishing depends on free will
intellectual virtues that will enable them to determine truth from falsehood or
good reasoning from poor reasoning. A true eudaimon recognizes that flourishing 4. Human Flourishing is sustained overtime
BSAIS 1A
CRUZ
5. Human flourishing involves doing well in a broad domain of Practical Sciences:
human life ● Good
● Aim: Guiding human action and societal structure for
Nicomachean Ethics well-being.
- considers the nature of human action and ethics, rooted in ● Examples: Ethics, Politics.
the concept of eudaimonia, often translated as happiness.
However, it means the highest good, that which humans Aristotle’s teaching on Happiness
seek for its own sake and not for the sake of something else. -For Aristotle, eudaimonia—is the highest goal of life.
- lecture notes of Aristotle
- compilation of lecture notes Comparison with Plato’s Ideas
- turned into 10 books - Plato and Aristotle had very different views on reality. Plato
believed in two worlds: the world of forms, where perfect
Nicomacheus - Aristotle's son and unchanging ideas exist, and the world of matter, which
is full of imperfect copies. For him, everything we see in this
Components of Human Flourishing world is just a reflection of a perfect version that exists in
1. Phronesis - practical wisdom or advice the world of forms. He also saw change as problematic
2. Power - because, despite physical changes, things retain their
3. Wealth essence.
4. Friendship - Aristotle rejected the idea of a separate world of forms. He
believed that reality is based on what we can observe and
Principles of Human flourishing experience. Unlike Plato, he saw change as a natural
1. dignity of the human person - respect process and argued that everything starts with potential
2. common good - sacrifice self interest to provide for the and moves toward actuality. For Aristotle, change is not a
basic human needs of everyone to make the whole flaw in reality but an essential part of how things grow and
community flourishing develop.
3. preferential option for the poor - when decisions are made
by first considering the poor The Personal Motivation and Understanding of each person's
4. stewardship of creation - duty to care for the earth and a purpose
gift of personal responsibility0 - According to Aristotle, every person has a purpose (telos)
that guides their actions. Every choice we make is directed
toward a goal, whether small or big. Simple actions, like
WATERMILL VILLAGE
eating, are driven by immediate needs, while bigger life
decisions, like pursuing a career, are motivated by
Central Theme long-term aspirations. Ultimately, all these lead to the
- Story depicts the difference between the current life and pursuit of happiness. To achieve true fulfillment, a person
before must strive to reach their full potential by making choices
- Importance of nature that align with their purpose and contribute to a meaningful
- Rely on technology innovations life.
- Current life is not sustainable ensure happiness
- Technology cannot ensure happiness HAPPINESS AS THE GOAL OF A GOOD LIFE
- Can't' live w/o nature
Utilitarianism
Symbols and it means - In the eighteenth century, John Stuart Mill declared the
- Respect to the traveller as it dies Greatest Happiness Principle by saying that an action is
- Celebration of burial ceremony right as long as it maximizes the attainment of happiness
for the greatest number of people. At that time people were
skeptical about claims on the metaphysical, and they could
THE GOOD LIFE not make sense of the human flourishing that Aristotle used
to talk about in the days of old. That's when Mill said that
Good life as eudaimonia or human flourishing achieved thr living the happiness of each individual should be prioritized and
virtuously according to reason. collectively dictates the kind of action that should be
endorsed.
Eudaimonia - ultimate good that is uniquely human - Consider the pronouncements against mining. When an
Pleasure, wealth, and fame do not constitute a good liffe action benefits the greatest number of people, said action is
deemed ethical. Does mining benefit rather than hurt the
Plato perspective majority? Does it offer more benefits rather than
- The necessity of inner knowledge for a flourishing soul. disadvantages? Does mining result in more people getting
- Emphasis on the link between self-understanding and happy rather than sad? If the answers to the said questions
understanding the world. are in the affirmative, then the said action, mining, is
deemed ethical. The Ethical is, of course, meant to lead us
Aristotle to a good and happy life.
Theoretical Sciences: - History has given birth to different schools of thought, all of
● Truth which aim for a good and happy life.
● Aim: Accurate understanding of reality.
● Examples: Logic, Biology, Physics, Metaphysics.
BSAIS 1A
CRUZ
views of happiness
cardinal virtues
● courage
● temperance
● justice
● wisdom