GROUP TASK

PROJECT PROPOSAL WRITING and Presentation

GUIDELINES:
1. Consolidate all the data that you gathered during the conduct of Community Needs Assessment
and Consultation with the partner community.
2. Review your PPT on PROJECT PROPOSAL This will guide you in accomplishing your task. Refer to
the different PARTS OF PROJECT PROPOSAL and the guidelines given.
3. Do brainstorming within your group and finalize all your plans.
4. Decide on what plans you will prioritize, consider your resources (review the 8 M’s – man, money,
machine, materials, methodology, minute, market, motivation)
5. Kindly hook your project concept/ ideas to Sustainable Development Goals. You can mention it in
Rationale of the Project.
6. Please take note that your Project Proposal is a requirement prior to project implementation.
7. After finalizing your proposal, plan on how you will present it. Make sure that everybody will have
a role in your presentation. In your presentation, just present your word/ pdf file.
8. Please submit the word file and the pdf version.
9. NO TURN IN means NO HW. It is not the responsibility of the leader to submit your HW.
10. You can provide a hard copy of the proposal to your partner community unless I affix my
signature. I can only sign it unless you revise it after your presentation.

SPECIFICATION:
In writing your PROJECT PROPOSAL, please use 12 Arial font size, 1.5 line spacing, save in word
and convert it to pdf. Use the attached NU letter head. Kindly follow the following format given below.

I. GENERAL INFORMATION:

1.1 Project Title

1.2 Project Proponent
1.3 Project Beneficiaries
1.4 Project Duration
1.5 Project Location
1.6 Total Project Cost
II. PROJECT OBJECTIVES
2.1 General Objectives
2.3 Specific Objectives
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
3.1 Rational
3.2 Background of the Project
3.3 Beneficiaries of the Project
3.4 Benefits Derived from the Project
IV. METHODOLOGIES AND STRATEGIES
V. PROPOSED SCHEDULE OF ACTIVITIES
VI. PROJECT MANAGEMENT
VII. PROPOSED BUDGETARY REQUIREMENTS
VIII. PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION SCHEME
PEER RATING:

✓ Each member will rate his or her team member. This mean that one member will rate all
his/her team members.

REFERENCE:

✓ Rubrics for Project Proposal - 70 PTS.

✓ Group Presentation - 30 PTS.
----------------
100 PTS

OTHERS:

AREAS OF Exceptional Very Good Average Needs Poor

COCERN (10 pts) (8 pts) (6 pts) Improvement (2 pts)
(4 pts)
Project Description is clear, Description is clear The description is Description is not It is unclear
Description concise, and easy to and generally easy adequate though the clear. It may be what is being
(Background, understand. to understand with a need for greater verbose or utilize proposed.
Rationale, few exceptions (e.g. clarity is apparent. a lot of field-
Methodologies) uses some jargon) Description may not specific jargon.
explain project
concisely or with a
clear general picture
of proposed
activities.
Adequacy & Processes and There is a logical Processes and Processes and Processes and
feasibility of procedures are well- and thoughtful plan procedures for procedures procedures are
design stated, manageable, for manageable executing the project outlined are either omitted,
appropriate, and execution of the appear manageable, unclear, do not only vaguely
comprehensive. project. but there is some follow from project stated,
uncertainty. objectives, and/or unmanageable,
do not seem or are
entirely inappropriate
manageable. for the project
proposed.
Likelihood for Project has every High likelihood of Moderate likelihood Likelihood of The project as
success reasonable success. of success. success is designed has
expectation of being questionable. little chance of
completed. being
successful.
Goals & Products The goals of the The goals of the The goals of the The goals of the The goals of
project are clearly project are clearly project are not project are not the project are
stated. Significant stated. Moderate clearly stated. The clearly stated. The not clearly
impact of the project impact of the project proposed products proposed stated or are
is/are properly is/are described are of moderate products are of nonexistent. No
described with very with high impact. minimal impact. products are
reasonable community impact. clearly
community impact described.
Role, Involvement Role, involvement, Role, involvement, Role, involvement, Role, Role,
and Activities of and activities of and activities of and activities of involvement, and involvement,
Student student are carefully student are clearly student are clearly activities of and activities of
presented and presented. Roles described are only student may be student only
explained. It is are appropriate. generally presented. only vaguely vaguely
obvious that the resented. presented.
proposed activities
are student-focused
Budget Budget is Budget is Budget is Budget is not Budget is
(Appropriateness comprehensive, comprehensive, comprehensive and clearly explain unreasonable in
& Justification) clearly explained, clearly explained, reasonable but not and it is not all areas. Costs
and appropriate for and reasonable. be clearly explained. appropriate for the are not justified
the activities Vast majority of Most costs are activities in the budget
proposed. All costs costs are justified, justified, relevant proposed. Budget narrative. Many
are justified, relevant relevant and and essential to this is not costs are not
and essential. essential to this project. comprehensive relevant and
project. and reasonable. essential to this
Some costs are project.
not justified,
relevant, or
essential.
Timeline Timeline is clearly Timeline may not be Timeline meets most Timeline appears Timeline is
presented and is clearly presented of the activities to meet less than not suitable for
clearly suitable for but appears to be proposed. Timeline half of the the activities
and meets all the suitable for all the may not be clearly activities described.
activities described. activities described. presented. proposed. Not
clearly presented.