State Disaster Management Plan 2024
State Disaster Management Plan 2024
July 2024
State Disaster
Management Plan
1
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
A publication of:
2
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
State Disaster
Management Plan
July, 2024
3
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
4
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
MESSAGE
Taking forward the State’s Agenda for achievement of targets set under
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction - SFDRR (2015 -2030), the Plan
has also focused on achieving a coherence with other international agreements
such as Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris Agreement on Climate
Change (COP 21). The period of these agreements coincide with SFDRR. This
coherence will result in ensuring sustainable and climate resilient development
that will ultimately reduce disaster risk.
I congratulate SDMA for coming out with a revised and more comprehensive
State Disaster Management Plan with some new relevant features to cover more
disasters and adding new dimensions of sustainable development and climate
change. I am sure that this will help in making Goa more resilient to disasters and
our State will lead in the field of disaster management by putting right set of
Disaster Risk Reduction Strategies in place.
5
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
MESSAGE
6
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
M ESSAGE
It is a privilege to acknowledge that the Goa State Disaster
Management Authority (Goa SDMA) has come up with a
revised State Disaster Management Plan (SDMP) aligned as per National Disaster
Management Plan-2019. The SDMP-2024 has been revised with a two pronged
approach-to improve the existing content and to add new dimension to it. The task
of revising the SDMP has been conducted under Sendai Framework for Disaster
Risk reduction Project. The revised SDMP-2024 is comprehensive Disaster
Management Plan and may guide the sustainable development in the State by
incorporating the Disaster Risk Reduction measures in all the developmental
projects. The incorporation Multi-Hazard Maps in the SDMP is vital for
understanding the vulnerability of the State. The SDMP shall guide Departments
and DDMAs to align their Disaster Management Plans accordingly.
I convey my best wishes to the team SDMA for their efforts in bringing out
revised SDMP-2024 and congratulate all associated in this noble assignment.
8
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Preface
A Disaster Management Plan needs to be a dynamic and actionable document, which needs to be
updated and revised periodically. Keeping this in mind, the existing State Plan of 2014 has been
revised enhancing it considerably improving the approach and adding new dimensions. We hope
that the revised version will prove to be more useful and effective in addressing the difficult
challenges of disaster risk reduction facing State Government.
The revision of the existing State Disaster Management Plan 2014 started in November, 2021 after
Goa SDMA appointed a Sr. Consultant under SFDRR Scheme for Strengthening of SDMA. This was
followed by several rounds of extensive consultations internally and with different stakeholders
and experts from different domains. After 3-4 rounds of revision process, a final draft was also
placed on the website of SDMA for one month inviting comments and suggestions from all
stakeholders including common people and was also circulated to all Ministries / Departments and
States / UTs for comments and inputs. Incorporating their comments and suggestions suitably the
revised Plan was finalized and approved by Members of SDMA.
The hazard and vulnerability profile of Goa is now well known as Government has notified the State
Specific Disaster into 02 categories including: Category A-Natural Disasters and Category B-Human
Induced Disasters. Goa’s proneness to multiple disasters caused by natural and human induced
factors aggravated by climate change impacts pose many threats and challenges for communities
and agencies involved in management of Disasters in the State. As per the Disaster Management
Act 2005, Government of Goa has constituted Goa State Disaster Management Authority-SDMA
headed by Hon’ble Chief Minister as Chairperson; State Executive Committee-SEC headed by Chief
Secretary of the State and District Disaster Management Authorities -DDMAs for North and South
Goa headed by respective District Collectors as Chairpersons.
This Plan has been aligned with the National Management Plan 2019, and special emphasis has
been laid on establishing coherence between the three International Agreements (Sendai
Framework for Disaster Risk reduction 2015, Sustainable development Goals 2015 and Paris
Agreement on Climate Change at the 21st Conference of Parties (COP 21) with special consideration
to Prime Minister’s Ten Point Agenda on DRR during Asian Ministerial Conference on DRR 2016 in
New Delhi. This will help the concerned Stakeholders at the State level to achieve the National
Goals.
In the responsibility framework for the State Level Stakeholders, an additional Thematic Area on
Climate Change Risk Management has been incorporated to mitigate the climate change impacts
on frequency and intensity of disasters.
The real essence of this State Disaster Management Plan lies in its effective implementation to
ensure strengthening of Disaster Management Authorities at State, District and Taluka level, to
enhance the level of disaster preparedness for effective response and to “Build Back Better” in
recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction. The Plan lays emphasis on mainstreaming of disaster
risk reduction measures in developmental plans and policies by the State Government and its
implementation by all concerned Stakeholders.
The beauty of the SDMP lies in its inclusive approach to address to the vulnerabilities and capacities
of vulnerable groups of the society based upon the physical, socioeconomic and other factors. An
exclusive chapter of the SDMP on Social Inclusion lays emphasis on addressing to the special
considerations and calls for addressing to the gender-based vulnerabilities, conditions of SC/ST
communities, the elderly, children and persons with disabilities. The idea is to guide inclusiveness
9
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
of all the plans at Departmental level, District level and local level including all other concerned
stakeholders in the State.
As the SDMP 2024 is aligned with the NDMP 2019, the activities in the Plan have been envisaged
as short, medium and long term ending in 2022, 2027 and 2030 respectively. All responsibilities of
the State Government and Line Departments have been placed with a definite time frame, which
start and go on simultaneously with different timelines of completion.
Albeit the revision of the SDMP have been carried out with dedication and utmost care, however,
due to its dynamic nature, the Plan will always have a scope for improvement. The current version
of the SDMP with one volume is the improved version of the earlier SDMP with seven volumes. The
Plan in its implementation phase shall bring more insights to be incorporated in the future versions.
We are sanguine about the Plan to assist all the concerned Stakeholders in the State in their
Disaster Risk Reduction efforts and initiatives in making Goa a disaster resilient State. We shall
appreciate and welcome the valuable suggestions and inputs for the value addition of the Plan.
Shri. Sandip Jacques, IAS Shri. Surendra F Naik Shri. Sandip S Gawde Shri. Gowhar Jeelani
Secretary (Revenue)/ Joint Secretary Under Secretary Senior Consultant
Member Secretary (Revenue), Revenue (Rev-II) (Goa SDMA)
(Goa SDMA), Revenue Department Revenue Department Revenue Department
Department Government of Goa Government of Goa Government of Goa
Government of Goa
10
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Acknowledgements
The process of revising the State Disaster Management Plan started in November 2021 with
an appointment of a Senior Consultant for Strengthening of Goa State Disaster Management
Authority under Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction-SFDRR Scheme by the Government
of Goa. Under this Pan India Scheme, ten deliverables set by National Disaster Management
Authority, New Delhi in the MoU with the Government of Goa are being covered including:
Alignment of State Plan and District Plans in accordance with the National Disaster Management
Plan-NDMP-2019;
The Sr. Consultant revised the existing State Disaster Management Plan-2014 to align the
same as per NDMP-2019. The broad approach was two-pronged – to improve upon the existing
content and to add new dimensions to it.
We gratefully acknowledge the support and contribution of everyone directly or indirectly involved
in the mammoth exercise of revising the Plan.
Shri. Surendra F Naik, Joint Secretary to the Government of Goa, brought novel ideas and
dimensions to the Plan. His inputs and guidance, and his critical review of each successive draft
were instrumental in finalising this Plan. Shri Gowhar Jeelani, Senior Consultant (Goa SDMA)
coordinated with all stakeholders, seeking their inputs and comments, provided technical inputs
and supported the overall revision process. Officials of SDMA, and subject experts also contributed
to the content of sections pertaining to their respective areas of expertise.
The final draft was also shared with all the SDMA members for the kind comments/inputs and
approval thereof. We would like to place on record their contributions of valuable suggestions and
comments, which were suitably incorporated in the revised Plan.
11
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Contents
Message from Hon’ble Chief Minister
Message from Hon’ble Revenue Minister
Message from Chief Secretary
Message from Secretary Revenue
Preface
Acknowledgements
Abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Preliminaries
1.1 Rationale
1.2 Paradigm Shift
1.3 Main Pillars of SDMP
1.4 Three Post-2015 Global Frameworks-Disasters, Sustainable Development and Climate Change: Mutual
Reinforcement and Coherence
1.4.1 Sendai Framework of Actions for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030
1.4.2 Sustainable Developmental Goals
1.4.3 Paris Agreement on Climate Change Action and Disaster Risk Reduction (CoP 21)
1.5 Prime Minister’s 10 Point Agenda towards Disaster Risk reduction
1.6 Social Inclusion
1.7 Mainstreaming DRR
1.8 Vision
1.9 Objectives
1.10 Time Frames- Short, Medium and Long-Term
1.11 State Specific Categories of Disasters
1.11.1 Natural Disasters
1.11.1 Human-Induced Disasters
1.12 Institutional Framework
1.12.1 State Level
1.12.1 District Level
1.13 Plan Implementation
2 Hazard Risks and Challenges
2.1 Background
2.2 Hazard Risks and Vulnerabilities
2.2.1 Multi-Hazard Vulnerability
2.2.2 Natural Hazards
2.2.3 Human-Induced Hazards
2.2.4 Fire Risk
2.3 Areas Requiring Special Attention
2.3.1 Coastal Regions
2.3.2 Riverine Areas
2.3.3 Hilly Areas
2.4 Climate Change
2.4.1 Climate and Human-Induced Climate Change
2.4.2 IPCC Fifth Assessment Report
2.4.3 Goa and Climate Change
2.4.4 Temperature
2.4.5 Impact on Indian Monsoon
2.4.6 Storm and Cyclones
2.4.7 Sea-Level Rise
2.4.8 Coastal Inundation
2.4.9 Integrating DRR and Climate Change
2.5 Livestock – DRR Challenges
2.5.1 Background
2.5.2 National Approaches in Livestock Emergencies
2.5.3 Key Interventions
2.5.4 Risk Management and Insurance
2.6 Environment and Wildlife Conservation
2.6.1 Back Ground
2.6.2 Environment Monitoring and Assessment
2.6.3 Protected Areas, Ecosystem Rehabilitation
12
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
13
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
14
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
15
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
9.7 Rehabilitation
9.7.1 Background
9.7.2 Physical Rehabilitation
9.7.3 Relocation
9.7.4 Social Rehabilitation
9.7.5 Revival of Educational Activities
9.7.6 Rehabilitation of the Elderly, Women, Children and PWD
9.7.7 Economic Rehabilitation
9.7.8 Psychological Rehabilitation
9.7.9 Restoration of Damaged Cultural Heritage Sites, their Precincts and Museums
9.8 Fund Mobilization
9.8.1 Background
9.8.2 Mobilizing, Disbursement and Monitoring
9.8.3 Recovery of Reconstruction Costs
10 Capacity Development- An Overview
10.1 Background
10.2 NIDM, NDRF and Other Institution
10.3 Capacity Development of Local Bodies -Rural and Urban
10.4 Training of Communities
10.5 Disaster Resource Networks-National, State and District
10.6 Capacity Development Themes
11 Financial Arrangements
11.1 Background
11.2 National Disaster Response Fund
11.3 State Disaster Response Fund
11.4 National disaster Mitigation Fund
11.5 Recommendation of the Fourteenth Finance Commission
11.6 Statutory Provisions
11.6.1 Financing Prevention, Mitigation, and Preparedness
11.6.2 Allocation by Ministries and Departments
11.6.3 Provisions in the Act for Disaster Risk Reduction
11.7 Implementation of DRR-Financial Aspects
11.7.1 Public Funded Schemes
11.7.2 Flexi Funds as a part of Centrally Sponsored Schemes
11.7.3 Externally Aided Projects
11.8 Risk Transfer and Insurance
12 Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance
12.1 Background
12.2 Sendai Framework and Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance
12.3 Responsibility Framework for Strengthening Disaster Risk Governance
13 International Cooperation
13.1 Participation in International Efforts
13.2 Accepting Foreign Assistance
13.3 Accepting Multilateral Assistance
13.4 Fostering Partnerships
16
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
List of Figures
Figure 1-1: Disaster Management Cycle
Figure 1-2: Time Frame-Short, Medium and Long Term
Figure 1-3: National-level disaster management-basic institutional framework
Figure 1-4: State-level disaster management-basic institutional framework
Figure 3-1: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction-7 Global Targets
Figure 3-2: Seventeen Sustainable Development Goals
Figure 3-3: Coherence and mutual reinforcement of SDGs and Sendai Framework
Figure 3-4: Main elements of the COP21, Paris Agreement on Climate Changes
Figure 3-5: Common concerns and climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction
Figure 3-6: Post-2015 Global Frameworks-Coherence and Mutual Reinforcement within National Efforts
Figure 3-7: Envisaging coherence and Mutual Reinforcement of SDGs and Sendai Framework
Figure 3-8: Envisaging coherence and Mutual Reinforcement of SDGs and COP21 for climate change action
List of Tables
Table 2.1: Goa-General Profile
Table 2.2: Percentage of population by religion in the State
Table 2.3: GSDP of Goa in 2021-22
Table.2.4: Areas covered by different types of forests in the State.
Table 2.5: Monthly, seasonal and annual rainfall statistics for the State for 2023.
Table 2.6: Rainfall recorded over stations of Goa during January – December 2023
Table 2.7: Major extreme weather events during 2023 which caused loss of human lives occurred in Goa
Table 2.8: Area of MHVM recorded at each district and their percentage with respect to the district’s geographic area
along the Goa coast.
Table 2.9: History of Earthquake Occurrence
Table 2.10: Incidences of forest fires i n past 5 years & Affected Area (in ha)
Table 2.11: Forest fire incidence reported by divisions between 4th March to 15th March 2023
Table 2.12: Number of potential threats and the elements at risk.
Table 2.13: Taluka wise Multi Hazard Vulnerability (Levels of Severity)
Table 2.14: The Flood Prone areas of North Goa District
Table 2.15: The Flood Prone areas of North Goa District
Table 2.16: The Landslide Prone areas of North Goa District
Table 2.17: The Landslide Prone areas of South Goa District
Table 2.18: Hazard Seasonality Matrix
17
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
18
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Abbreviations
AAI : Airports Authority of India
ADWR : Airborne Doppler Weather Radar
AERB : Atomic Energy Regulatory Board
AMCDRR : Asian Ministerial Conference on Disaster Risk Reduction
ANM : Auxiliary Nurse Midwife
AR5 : IPCC's Fifth Assessment Report
ARG : Automatic Rain Gauge
ATI : Administrative Training Institute
AWS : Automatic Weather Stations
BBB : Build Back Beer
BIS : Bureau of Indian Standards
BMTPC : Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council
BPHE : Biological and Public Health Emergencies
CADA : Coastal Area Development Authority
CAPF : Central Armed Police Forces
CBRN : Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear
CCA : Climate Change Adaptation
CCM : Climate Change Mitigation
COP : Conference of the Paris
CDEF : Civil Defence
CIMFR : Central Institute of Mining & Fuel Research
CISF : Central Industrial Security Force
CMG : Crisis Management Group
CM : Chief Minister
COR : Commissioner of Relief
CRZ : Coastal Regulation Zone
CS : Chief Secretary
CSS : Centrally Sponsored Schemes
CUD : Cultural Department
CWC : Central Water Commission
CWWG : Crop Weather Watch Group
CZMA : Coastal Zone Management Authority
DAE : Department of Atomic Energy
DCOP : Department of Captain of Ports
DDMA : District Disaster Management Authority
DEOC : District Emergency Operation Centre
Dept. : Department
DF&ES : Directorate of Fire and Emergency Services
DGM : Directorate of Geology and Mining
DHE : Directorate of Higher Education
DHSF : Directorate of Health Services
DFRI : Disaster Risk Financing Instruments
DITC : Directorate of Industries, Trade and Commerce
DMP : Disaster Management Plan
DOT : Department of Telecommunications
DoA : Directorate of Accounts
DoAg : Directorate of Agriculture
DoE : Directorate of Education
DoI&P : Department of Information & Publicity
19
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
20
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
21
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
22
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
23
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Executive Summary
Background
The Disaster Management Act, 2005 (DM Act 2005) lays down institutional and coordination
mechanism for effective Disaster Management (DM) at the National, State, District and local levels. As
mandated by this Act, the Government of Goa has notified the constitution of State Disaster Management
Authority (SDMA) headed by Hon’ble Chief Minister of the State and the District Disaster Management
Authorities (DDMA) headed by the concerned District Collectors of both North and South Goa districts. In
the State of Goa, Revenue Department is the Nodal Department for coordination of Disaster Management.
The institutional arrangements have been set up consistent with the paradigm shift from the relief-centric
approach of the past to a proactive, holistic and integrated approach for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) by
way of strengthening disaster preparedness, mitigation, and emergency response.
The State Disaster Management Plan (SDMP) provides a framework and direction to the
government agencies for all phases of disaster management cycle. The SDMP is a “dynamic document” in
the sense that it will be periodically improved keeping up with the emerging best practices and knowledge
base in disaster management. It is in accordance with the provisions of the DM Act 2005, the guidance given
in the National Policy on Disaster Management (NPDM) 2009, and other National Level Guidelines prepared
by National Disaster Management Authority.
The SDMP recognizes the need to minimize, if not eliminate, any ambiguity in the responsibility
framework. It, therefore, specifies who is responsible for what at different stages of managing disasters. It
is meant to be implemented in a flexible and scalable manner in all phases of disaster management:
a) Mitigation (prevention and risk reduction), b) Preparedness, c) Response and d) Recovery (immediate
restoration and build -back better). While the names of departments of the State having specific roles and
responsibilities are mentioned in the Plan, in the spirit of the DM Act 2005 and the exigencies of
humanitarian response, every ministry/ department and agency is expected to contribute to DM going
beyond their normal rules of business.
The SDMP of 2014 was revised attempting to incorporate the emerging national approach of bringing about
coherence and mutual reinforcement of the three Post-2015 Global Frameworks. The revised plan also
incorporates the Ten Point Agenda on DRR, enunciated by Hon’ble Prime Minister during Asian Ministerial
Conference on DRR (AMCDRR) in November 2016 in New Delhi.
The period envisaged as ‘Long-Term’ in this revised plan is co-terminus with year 2030, the ending year of
the major post-2015 global frameworks. The activities running concurrently in most cases are grouped under
overlapping time frames—short, medium, and long-term, ending by 2022, 2027 and 2030 respectively in
addition to the recurring/ regular (i.e., routine) ones. They do not si gnify any order of priority. The measures
mentioned here are indicative and not exhaustive. Based on global practices and national experiences, the
plan will incorporate changes during the periodic reviews and updates.
Vision
Make Goa disaster resilient across all sectors, achieve substantial and inclusive disaster risk
reduction by building local capacities starting with the poor and decreasing significantly the loss
of lives, livelihoods, and assets in different forms including economic, physical, social, cultural, and
environmental while enhancing the ability to cope with disasters at all levels.
24
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Multi-Hazard Vulnerability
Goa, is a multi-hazard prone coastal State. Vulnerability to human-induced disasters/emergencies also
exists. The SDMP covers disaster management cycle for all types of hazards—natural and human-induced.
Heightened vulnerabilities to disaster risks can be related to increasing population, urbanisation,
industrialisation, development within high-risk zones, environmental degradation, and climate change.
Besides the natural factors and anthropogenic climate change, various human activities could also be
responsible for aggravated impacts and increased frequency of disasters.
Building Resilience
The role of the central agencies is to support the disaster-affected State or the UT in response to requests
for assistance. The central agencies will play a pro -active role in disaster situations. In the domains of DM
planning, preparedness, and capacity building, the central agencies will constantly work to upgrade Indian
DM systems and practices as per global trends. The priorities of the Sendai Framework and those related to
DRR in SDGs and Paris Agreement have been integrated into the planning framework for Disaster Risk
Reduction under the following Thematic Areas for Disaster Risk
Reduction:
1. Understanding Risk
2. Inter-Agency Coordination
3. Investing in DRR – Structural Measures
4. Investing in DRR – Non-Structural Measures
5. Capacity Development and
6. Climate Change Risk Management
These above themes have been included in the SDMP, and have been elaborated in greater detail. Besides,
there are chapters describing three cross -cutting themes:
a) Coherence and Mutual Reinforcement for DRR of the Post-2015 Global Frameworks
b) Social Inclusion and
c) Mainstreaming DRR
Response
Response measures are those taken immediately after receiving early warning, anticipating an impending
disaster, or post -disaster in cases where an event occurs without warning. The primary goal of response to
a disaster is saving lives, protecting property, environment, and meeting basic needs of human and other
living beings after the disaster. The immediate focus will be on search and rescue of those affected and to
evacuate those likely to be affected by the disaster or secondary disaster that is likely to happen. In the
section on response, roles, function and responsibilities of ministries and agencies that have a key role to
play are described. Since contexts, knowledge base, and technologies change, DM plans must be updated
periodically to reflect any changes in the key roles envisaged to various ministries or agencies.
Government of Goa has notified the Incident Response System-IRS and assigned specific roles/
responsibilities to for coordinating disaster-specific responses. The Incident Response Team-IRT at State
level will ensure liaison with the concerned IRTs of the districts where the disaster has occurred and
coordination among various relevant departments to provide quick and efficient response. The s tate
government will activate the Incident Response Teams (IRT) at state, district, or the Taluka level as per
demand of the situation. The State Government shall seek assistance from the National Authority in the
25
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
response efforts whenever the need arises. The various agencies whose responsibilities are defined in
detailed DM plans for the State/ UT and district will be responsible for specific response measures. The
nodal department for coordination of response at State will be Revenue Department-RD and at the district
level DDMA supported by other agencies.
Capacity Development
Capacity development covers strengthening of institutions, mechanisms, and capacities of all stakeholders
at all levels. The plan recognizes the need for a strategic approach to capacity development and the need
for enthusiastic participation of various stakeholders to make it effective. The plan addresses the challenge
of putting in place appropriate institutional framework, management systems and allocation of resources
for efficient prevention and handling of disasters. The planning needs of capacity development are
described for all phases of disaster management.
Financial Arrangements
The financing of disaster relief has been an important aspect of federal fiscal relations. According to NPDM
2009, the primary responsibility of disaster management lies with the State Governments. This means, the
primary responsibility for undertaking rescue, relief, and rehabilitation measures during a disaster lies with
the State Government. The Central Government may supplement the efforts of State Government through
logistic and financial support. The DM Act 2005 provides the legal framework for disaster management and
all related matters, including the financial aspects. The financing of the entire disaster management cycle
will be as per Items and Norms set by the Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India. The disaster risk
reduction will be achieved by mainstreaming the requirements into the developmental plans.
Changes Introduced—Highlights
This SDMP, the revised version, comprises of single volume with fourteen chapters compared to seven
volumes with multiple chapters in the previous plan including chapters on three cross -cutting themes
relating to DRR: a) coherence and mutual reinforcement of three post-2015 global frameworks b) social
inclusion and c) mainstreaming. Since Government of Goa has notified State Specific Disasters into two
Categories- Category A: Natural Disasters-Gusty Winds, Heavy Rains, Thunder & Lightning
26
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
27
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter 1
Preliminaries
28
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
1 Preliminaries
1.1 Rationale
The revised terminology of the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR) defines
‘disaster’ as:
"A serious disruption of the functioning of a community or a society at any scale due to hazardous
events interacting with conditions of exposure, vulnerability and capacity, leading to one or more of
the following: human, material, economic and environmental losses and impacts." (UNISDR 2016).
The effect of the disaster can be immediate and localized but is often wides spread, often persisting for long
after the event. The effect may challenge or overwhelm the capacity of a community or society to cope
using the resources immediately, and therefore may require assistance from external sources, which could
include neighbouring jurisdictions, or those at the national or international levels. UNISDR considers disaster
to be a result of the combination of many factors such as the exposure to hazards, the condi tions of
vulnerability that are present, and insufficient capacity or measures to reduce or cope with the pote ntial
negative consequences. Disaster impacts may include loss of life, injuries, disease and other negative effects
on human physical, mental and social well -being, together with damage to property, destruction of assets,
loss of services, social and economic disruption and environmental degradation.
"Disaster" means a catastrophe, mishap, calamity or grave occurrence in any area, arising from
natural or manmade causes, or by accident or negligence which results in substantial loss of life
or human suffering or damage to, and destruction of, property, or damage to, or degradation of,
environment, and is of such a nature or magnitude as to be beyond the coping capacity of the
community of the affected area."
The SDMP provides a framework and direction to the government agencies for all phases of disaster
management cycle (Fig. 1-1). The SDMP is a “dynamic document” in the sense that it will be periodically
improved keeping up with the global best practices and knowledge base in disaster management. It is in
accordance with NDMP 2019 with the provisions of the Disaster Management (DM) Act 2005, the guidance
given in the National Policy on Disaster Management (NPDM) 2009, and other National Level Di saster
Management Guidelines prepared by National Disaster Management Authority. The Plan lays emphasis
upon the Disaster Management Strategy that the relevant Agencies – Central or State or District – will carry
out disaster management activities in different phases in the disaster-affected areas depending on the type
and scale of disaster.
Primarily, the State Government shall be responsible for Disaster Management in the State. However, in
situations where the resources of the State are inadequate to cope effectively with the disaster situation,
the State Government may seek assistance from the Central Government. In addi tion, there may be
situations in which the Central Government will have direct responsibilities in certain aspects of disaster
management. While the SDMP pertains to both these exigencies, in most cases the role of central agencies
will be to support the respective state governments. Barring exceptional circumstances, the state
governments will deploy the first responders and carry out other activities pertaining to disaster
management.
29
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The SDMP recognizes the need to minimize, if not eliminate, any ambiguity in the responsibility framework.
It, therefore, specifies who is responsible for what at different stages of managing di sasters. The SDMP is
implemented in a scalable manner over all phases of disaster management: a) mi tigation (prevention and
risk reduction), b) preparedness, c) response and d) recovery (immediate restoration to long-term building
back better).
The SDMP provides a framework with role clarity for rapid mobilization of resources and effective disaster
management by the Central and State Governments and other concerned stakeholders in India. While it
focuses primarily on the needs of the government agencies, it envisages all those involved in disaster
management including communities and non-government agencies as potential users. The SDMP provides
a well-defined framework for disaster management covering scope of work and roles of relevant agencies
along with their responsibilities and accountability necessary to ensure effective mitigation, develop
preparedness, and mobilize adequate response. The measures included in the SDMP, which is a dynamic
document, are indicative and not exhaustive. Based on National practices and State experiences, the plan
will incorporate changes during the periodic reviews and updates.
According to the revised UNISDR terminology, Disaster Management (DM) is “the organization, planning
and application of measures preparing for, responding to and recovering from disasters” and
30
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Disaster Risk Management (DRM) is “the application of disaster risk reduction policies and strategies to
prevent new disaster risk, reduce existing disaster risk and manage residual risk, contributing to the
strengthening of resilience and reduction of disaster losses” (UNISDR 2016a). The sense in which DM Act
2005 uses the term disaster management, covers nearly DM, DRR and DRM without maintaining a strict
distinction between them.
The term Disaster Management as used in the NPDM 2009 and the DM Act 2005 document is
comprehensive covering all aspects – disaster risk reduction, disaster risk management, disaster
preparedness, disaster response, and post-disaster recovery. This document uses the term with the same
meaning as defined in the DM Act 2005:
"A continuous and integrated process of planning, organising, coordina ting and implementing
measures which are necessary or expedient" for the following: 1) Prevention of danger or threat of any
disaster, 2) Mitigation or reduction of risk of any disaster or its severity or consequences, 3) Capacity-
building, 4) Preparedness to deal with any disaster, 5) Prompt response to any threatening disaster
situation or disaster, 6) Assessing the severity or magnitude of effects of any disaster 7) Evacuation,
rescue and relief, and 8) Rehabilitation and reconstruction.
Apart from sudden large-scale disasters (intensive risks), the accumulation of impacts from small frequent
events (extensive risks) and slowly developing health, safety, security and environmental crises have a quiet
but massive effect on society and on sustainable development. Disaster risk is the poten tial loss of life,
injury, or destroyed or damaged assets which could occur to a system, society or a communit y in a specific
period, determined probabilistically as a function of hazard, exposure, vulnerability and capacity. According
to UNISDR (2016), the definition of disaster risk reflects the concept of hazardous events and disasters as
the outcome of continuously present conditions of risk. Disaster risk comprises different types of potential
losses which are often difficult to quantify.
Acceptable risk, or tolerable risk, is the extent to which a disaster risk is deemed acceptable or tolerable
depending on existing social, economic, political, cultural, technical and environmental conditions. In
engineering terms, acceptable risk is used to assess and define the structural and non -structural measures
that are needed to reduce possible harm to people, property, services and systems to a chosen tolerated
level, according to codes or “accepted practice” which are based on
known probabilities of hazards and other factors.
Residual Risk is the disaster risk that remains even when effective disaster risk reduction measures are in
place, and for which emergency response and recovery capaci ties must be maintain ed. The presence of
residual risk implies a continuing need to develop and support effective capacities for emergency services,
preparedness, response and recovery, together with socioeconomic policies such as safety nets and risk
transfer mechanisms, as part of a holistic approach.
The DM Act 2005 and the NPDM 2009 marks the institutionalization of paradigm shift in disaster
management in India, from a relief-centric approach to one of proactive prevention, mitigation and
preparedness. The NPDM notes that while it is not possible to avoid natural hazards, adequate mi tigation
and disaster risk reduction measures can prevent the hazards becoming major disasters.
Disaster risk arises when hazards interact with physical, social, economic and environmental vulnerabilities.
The NPDM suggests a multi-pronged approach for disaster risk reduction and mitigation consisting of the
following:
31
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
In the terminology adopted by the UNISDR, the concept and practice of reducing disaster risks involve
systematic efforts to analyse and manage the causal factors of disasters, including through reduced
exposure to hazards, lessened vulnerability of people and property, wise management of land and the
environment, and improved preparedness for adverse events. While both the terms “Disaster Re duction”
and “Disaster Risk Reduction” are widely used, the latter provides a better recognition of the ongoing nature
of disaster risks and the ongoing potential to reduce these risks. Mitigation consists of various measures
required for lessening or limiting the adverse impacts of hazards and related disasters.
I. Conforming to the national legal mandates – the DM Act 2005, NPDM 2009 and NDMP 2019
II. Participating proactively to realise the global goals as per agreements to which India is a signatory –
Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (SFDRR), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Paris
Agreement on Climate Change – consistent with the international consensus for achieving mutual
reinforcement and coherence of these frameworks
III. Prime Minister’s Ten Point Agenda for DRR articulating contemporary national priorities
IV. Social inclusion as a ubiquitous and cross-cutting principle
V. Mainstreaming DRR as an integral feature
Across these five ‘pillars’, there are both overlapping and non-overlapping themes as well as some nuanced
differences in emphasis. The SDMP has attempted a grand synthesis of all this within a considerably
ambitious and futuristic plan. The period envisaged as ‘Long-Term’ in this plan is co-terminus with year 2030,
the ending year of the major post-2015 global frameworks.
Sub section (1) of Section 23 of the DM Act 2005 mandates that there shall be a plan for disaster
management for every State to be called the State Disaster Management Plan. The SDMP complies with the
National Policy on Disaster Management (NPDM) of 2009 and conforms to the provisions of the DM Act
making it mandatory for the various central ministries and departments to have adequate DM plans. While
the SDMP will pertain to the disaster management for the whole of the State, however, as per clause (g) ,
Sub-Section (2) of Section 38 of the DM Act, every ministry and department of the State Government shall
ensure the preparation of disaster management plans in accordance with the guidelines laid down the
National Authority and the State Authority, detailing how each of them will contribute to the State Level
efforts in the domains of Disaster Prevention, Preparedness, Response, and Recovery. The Section 39 of the
DM Act 2005, states that it shall be the responsibility of every department of State Government to integrate
into their development plans and projects, the measures for prevention of disaster and mitigation.
As per the mandate of the DM Act 2005, the SDMP assigns specific and general responsibili ties to all
stakeholders/departments for disaster management. The DM Act enjoins the SDMP to assign necessary
responsibilities to various departments to support and implement the plan. Therefore, it is incumbent on all
ministries to accept all the implicit and explicit responsibili ties mentioned in the SDMP even if they are
beyond what are explicitly mentioned in the normal rules of business. Disaster management requires
assumption of responsibilities beyond the normal functioning. The SDMP will be complemented by separate
contingency plans, SOPs, manuals, and guidelines at all levels of the mul ti-tiered governance system in the
State.
32
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
DRR, sustainable development and response to climate change. The adoption of SDGs – ‘Transforming Our
World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’ is a global transformative plan of action that has
poverty eradication as an overarching aim. It has, at its core, the integration of the economic, social and
environmental dimensions of sustainable development. The Paris Agreement on global climate change
points to the importance of averting, minimizing, and addressing loss and damage associated with the
adverse effects of climate change, including extreme weather events and slow onset events, and the role
of sustainable development in reducing the risk of loss and damage.
DRR and resilience are recurring common theme in the three global agreements. All three agreements
share a common aim of making development sustainable. The most significant shi ft recognised in the
Sendai Framework is a strong emphasis on disaster risk management in contrast to disaster management.
These three agreements recognize the desired outcomes in DRR as a product of complex and
interconnected social and economic processes, which overlap across the agendas of the three agreements.
Intrinsic to sustainable development is DRR and the building of resilience to disasters. Further, effective
disaster risk management contributes to sustainable development.
First, all development sectors must imbibe the principles of disaster risk management. This will ensure that
all development projects - airports, roads, canals, hospitals, schools, bridges – are built to appropriate
standards and contribute to the resilience of communi ties they seek to serve. Over the next couple of
decades, most of the new infrastructure in the world will come up in Asia. This points to the need for
ensuring that all the infrastructure development conforms to the best available standards of disaster safety.
Such an approach is a smart strategy, which will pay off in the long term. It is necessary that all the public
investments must incorporate disaster risk considerations. In India, the ‘housing for all’ programme and
33
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
‘smart cities’ initiative s represent such opportunities. India will work with other partner countries and
stakeholders to build a coalition or mechanism for promoting disaster resilient infrastructure in the region.
This will help generate new knowledge for hazard risk assessment, disaster resilient technologies and
mechanisms for integrating risk reduction in infrastructure financing.
Second, it is necessary to work towards risk coverage for all – starting from poor households, it must cover
small and medium enterprises as well as large multi-national corporations. Currently, in most countries of
the region, penetration of insurance is limited only to a narrow section, mostly in the middle and upper-
middle income groups. It is necessary to think big and innovatively to widen the risk insurance cover. States
have an important role in not just regulating but also encouraging coverage for those who need it the most.
Some bold steps have been taken to ensure financial inclusion and risk insurance for the poorest. The Jan
Dhan Yojana has brought millions of people into the banking system. The Suraksha Bima Yojana provides
risk insurance to millions who need it the most. The newly launched Fasal Bima Yojana (crop insurance)
will provide risk cover to millions of farmers. These are the basic building blocks of resilience at the
household level.
Third, it is necessary to encourage greater involvement and leadership of women in disaster risk
management. Women are disproportionately affected by disasters. They also have unique strengths and
insights. India must train a large number of women volunteers to support special needs of women affected
by disasters. There is also need for women engineers, masons and building artisans to participate in post-
disaster reconstruction and promote women self-help groups which can assist in livelihood recovery.
Fourth, it is necessary to invest in mapping risks globally. For mapping risks related to hazards such as
earthquakes, there are widely accepted standards and parameters. Based on these, India has mapped
seismic zones, with five as highest seismic risk and two as low risk. For disaster risk related to other
hazards such as chemical hazards, forest fires, cyclones, different types of floods, India needs to adopt
globally accepted standards and categories. This will help India to ensure that there is a shared
understanding of the nature and severity of disaster risks and compare with that in other parts of the
world.
Fifth, efforts must be made to leverage technology to enhance the efficiency of our disaster risk
management efforts. An e-platform that brings together organizations and individuals and helps them map
and exchange expertise, technology and resources would go a long way in maximizing the collective impact.
Sixth, it will be helpful to develop a network of universi ties to work on disaster-related aspects since
universities have social responsibilities too. Over the first five years of the Sendai Framework, an effort can
be made to develop a global network of universi ties working together on problems of disaster risk
management. As part of this network, different universities could specialize in multi –disciplinary research
on disaster issues most relevant to them. Universities located in coastal areas could specialize in managing
risks from coastal hazards, and the ones located in the hill cities could focus on mountain hazards.
Seventh, utilize the opportunities provided by social media and mobile technologies. Social media is
transforming disaster response. It is helping response agencies in quickly organizing themselves and
enabling citizens to connect more easily with authorities. In disaster aer disaster, affected people are using
social media to help each other. Those responsible for disaster management must recognize the poten tial
of social media and develop applications relevant to various aspects of disaster risk management.
Eighth, disaster management must build on local capabilities and initiatives. The task of disaster risk
management, particularly in rapidly growing economies, is so huge that formal institutions of the state can
at best be instrumental in creating the enabling conditions. Specific actions have to be designed and
implemented locally. Over the last two decades, most community-based efforts have been confined to
disaster preparedness and contingency planning for the short term. It is necessary to expand the scope of
community-based efforts and support communities to identify local risk reduction measures and implement
them. Such efforts reduce risk and create opportunities for local development and sustainable livelihoods.
Localization of disaster risk reduction will also ensure that good use is made of the traditional best practices
and indigenous knowledge. Response agencies need to interact with their communi ties and make them
familiar with the essential drill of disaster response. For example, if a local fire service visits one school in its
area every week, it would sensitize thousands of children over a period of one year.
Ninth, ensure that the opportunity to learn from a disaster is not wasted. After every disaster there are
studies and reports on lessons learnt that are rarely applied. Often the same mistakes are repeated. It is
necessary to have a vibrant and visual system of learning. The United Nations could relief, rehabilitation,
reconstruction and recovery afterwards. Post -disaster recovery is an opportunity to not just ‘build back
better’ in terms of physical infrastructure, but also in terms of improved institutional systems for managing
34
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
risk. For this, it is necessary to put in place systems that can quickly provide risk assessments. India must
work with partner countries and multilateral development agencies to establish a facility for technical
support to post-disaster reconstruction of houses.
The tenth and last, it is necessary to bring about greater cohesion in international response to disasters. In
the aftermath of a disaster, disaster responders pour in from all over the world. This collective strength and
solidarity could be enhanced further if the activities are organised under a common umbrella. The United
Nations could think of a common logo and branding under which all those who are helping with relief,
rehabilitation and reconstruction operate.
1.9 Vision
The vision incorporates the goals reflected in national policies, laws and the PM’s Ten -Point Agenda
for DRR as well as international best practices, frameworks and discourses:
Make Goa disaster resilient across all sectors, achieve substantial and inclusive disaster risk reduction
by building local capacities starting with the poor and decreasing significantly the loss of lives,
livelihoods, and assets in different forms including economic, physical, social, cultural, and
environmental while enhancing the ability to cope with disasters at all levels.
1.10 Scope
As per the DM Act 2005, the SDMP shall include:
a) the vulnerability of different parts of the State to different forms of disaster;
b) the measures to be adopted for prevention and mitigation of disasters;
c) the manner in which the mitigation measures shall be integrated with the development plans and
projects;
d) the capacity –building and preparedness measures to be taken;
e) the role and responsibilities of each Department of the Government of the State in relation to the
measure specified in clauses (b), (c) an (d) above;
35
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
f) the roles and responsibilities of different Departments of the Government of the State in responding
to any threatening disaster situation or disaster.
The SDMP provides an over-arching planning framework for DM for the whole country, which must be
reviewed and updated periodically. State Government shall make appropriate provisions for financing the
plan implementation. Disaster management, covering prevention and mitigation, preparedness, response,
and recovery, necessarily involves multiple agencies and it is even more so in a large country like India.
Hence, the inter-agency coordination and collaboration among stakeholders are of utmost importance for
the successful implementation of the SDMP and in ensuring effective risk reduction, response and recovery.
The SDMP provides the framework for mobilization and coordination of the departments and other agencies
among themselves and the devolution of responsibilities of State government in all spheres of disaster
prevention, preparedness, response and recovery within the State. The deployment of armed forces and
central agencies during disaster within State will be subject to norms adopted by the State government and
the relevant protocols agreed upon between Central and State Government. The State may seek the
assistance and support of the Centre and other neighbouring States at any time during a disaster.
Responding to incident specific emergencies is the responsibility of designated agencies.
The SDMP is based on detailed hazard-specific guidelines prepared by the NDMA. Unless otherwise
specified, the guidelines issued by NDMA serve as the primary reference for this document. The Government
of Goa-GoG has notified Incident Response System at State and District level to assign the nodal
responsibilities for overall coordination of disaster management and for coord inating immediate post-
disaster response. In addition, GoG has notified State Specific Disasters into two categories - Category A:
Natural Disasters and Category-B: Human Induced Disasters. These notified Incident Response Teams-IRTs
shall carry out the roles assigned to them. At the same time, each district and department must formulate
respective DM plans specifying how each entity can contribute to effectively manage disasters.
1.11 Objectives
Along with the mandate given in the DM Act 2005 and the NPDM 2009, the SDMP-2024 has incorporated
the national commitments in the domain of DRR associated with the three major post 2015 global
frameworks and the PM's Ten Point Agenda. Accordingly, the broad objectives of the SDMP are:
36
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
While some of the suggested measures in all categories – short, medium, and long-term – are already under
implementation or in need of upgrading, many need to be initiated. The timeframes short, medium and long
do not mean that the three are necessarily sequential in all cases. In fact, in many cases, they may be
overlapping, starting at the same time while in some cases, the work on the medium and long-term targets
may be dependent on the completion of the previous phase. Nevertheless, the medium and long-term
categories do not imply a lower priority but are actions that require time long period for completion
provided they are started as early as possible.
There is considerable variation in the implementation status of the proposed measures across
stakeholders/departments. Each Department of the State Government must appropriately categorize the
items in their DM Plans according to the time frames for implementation while preparing their pl an or at
the time of revising existing plans.
In the case of recovery, there are three recovery periods after a disaster:
a) Early – within eighteen months,
b) Medium – within five years and
c) Long-term – within five to ten years.
These depend on the specific disaster and are relevant only with reference to the types of recovery
programmes. Hence, the SDMP discusses them only in general terms without timelines.
Primarily disasters are triggered by natural hazards or human-induced or result from a combination of both.
The human-induced factors can greatly aggravate the adverse impacts of a natural disaster. Even at a larger
scale, globally, the UN Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has shown that human-induced
climate change has significantly increased both the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events.
While heavy rains, cyclones, or earthquakes are all natural, the impacts may, and are usually, worsened by
many factors related to human activity. The extensive industrialization and urbanization increase both the
probability of human-induced disasters, and the extent of potential damage to life and property from both
37
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
natural and human-induced disasters. The human society is also vulnerable to Chemical, Biol ogical,
Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) threats and events that might escalate to emergencies/ disasters.
1) Geophysical: Geological process or phenomenon that may cause loss of life, injury or other health
impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social and economic disruption, or
environmental damage. Hydro-meteorological factors are important contributors to some of these
processes
2) Hydrological: Events caused by deviations in the normal water cycle and/or overflow of bodies of
water caused by wind set-up
3) Meteorological: Events caused by short-lived/small to meso-scale atmospheric processes (in the
spectrum from minutes to days)
4) Climatological: Events caused by long-lived meso- to macro-scale processes (in the spectrum from
intra-seasonal to multi-decadal climate variability)
5) Biological: Process or phenomenon of organic origin or conveyed by biological vectors, including
exposure to pathogenic micro-organisms, toxins and bioactive substances that may cause loss of
life, injury, illness or other health impacts, property damage, loss of livelihoods and services, social
and economic disruption, or environmental damage.
The NPDM 2009 notes that rise in population, rapid urbanization and industrialization, development within
high-risk zones, environmental degradation, and climate change aggravates the vulnerabilities to various
kinds of disasters. Due to inadequate disaster preparedness, communities, and animals are at increased risk
from many kinds of human-induced hazards arising from accidents (industrial, road, air, rail, on river or sea,
building collapse, fires, mine flooding, urban flooding, oil spills, etc.). Hazards due to CBRN threats and
events rank very high among the causes that are human induced acts. Te rrorist activities and secondary
incidences arising from intentional or non -intentional activities also add to these risks and calls for adequate
preparedness and planning.
State
Government
Relief Commissioner/
Nodal Department
State Em ergency
Operation Centre (SEOC)
State Department/ Line District Disaster
Agencies Management Authority
(DDMA)
Agencies w ith
Disaster Management
Responsibilities
As per the DM Act of 2005, the State shall have its own institutional framework for disaster management.
State will have one nodal department for coordination of disaster management. Among other things, the
DM Act, mandates that the State Government shall take necessary steps for the preparation of State DM
plan, integration of measures for prevention of disasters or mitigation into State’s development plans,
allocation of funds, and establish EWS. Depending on specific situations and needs, the State shall also assist
the Central Government and central agencies in various aspects of DM. The State shall prepare its own State
Disaster Management Plan.
The DM Act mandates the setting of a State Disaster Management Authority (SDMA) in the State. At the
district level, District Disaster Management Authority (DDMA), the District Collector or District Magistrate
or the Deputy Commissioner, as applicable, will be responsible for overall coordination of the disaster
management efforts and planning. Figure -1-3 provides schematic view of the typical State-level institutional
framework. The figure represents merely the institutional pathways for coordination, decision -making and
communication for disaster management and does not imply any chain of command.
As per provisions in Chapter-III of the DM Act, the State Government shall establish a State Disaster
Management Authority (SDMA) or its equivalent as notified by the state government with the Chief Minister
as the Chairperson. The SDMA will lay down policies and plans for DM in the State. The SDMA will approve
the disaster management plans prepared by various departments. It will, inter alia approve the State Plan
in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the NDMA, coordinate the implementation of the Stat e Plan,
recommend provision of funds for mitigation and preparedness measures and review the developmental
plans of the different departments of the State to ensure the integration of prevention, preparedness and
mitigation measures. The State Government shall constitute a State Executive Committee (SEC) to assist the
SDMA in the performance of its functions. The SEC will be headed by the Chief Secretary to the State
Government. The SEC will coordinate and monitor the implementation of the National Policy, the National
Plan, and the State Plan. The SEC will also provide information to the NDMA relating to different aspects of
DM.
(b) such number of officials of the Government, not exceeding four, to be nominated by the
Chairperson of the State Authority;
(c) such number of non-officials, not exceeding four, to be nominated by the Chairperson of the State
Authority; possessing qualifications, knowledge and experience of scientific, engineering or
Management aspect of flood control, environment etc.;
(d) the Chairperson of the State Executive Committee ex-officio Chief Executive Officer of the State
Authority.
(2) The Chairperson of the State Authority may designate one of the members nominated under clauses (b)
and (c) above to be the Vice-Chairperson of the State Authority. The Chairperson of the State Authority shall,
1
Goa Disaster Management Rules_2008_Official Gazette Government of Goa
39
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
in case of emergency, have the power to exercise all or any of the powers of the State Authority but exercise
of such power shall be subject to Ex-post facto ratification by the State Authority.
(1) Save as otherwise provided by or under the Act, a non-official member of the State Authority other than
the Chairperson, shall hold office for a period of three years from the date of his nomination. The term may
be extended by the Government for further period not exceeding one year. Provided that a member shall,
notwithstanding expiration of his term, continue to hold office until his successor enters upon his office.
(2) The term of office of an Official member nominated under clause (b) of sub-rule (1) of rule 3, shall cease
to be member as soon as if he ceases to hold office under the Government.
(2) A non-official member of the State Authority may, at any time, resign his office by writing under his hand
addressed to the Chairperson of the State Authority and on acceptance of his resignation, the office of such
member shall thereafter become vacant.
B. Composition of the State Executive Committee. – Subject to the provisions of the Act, the State Executive
Committee, constituted by the Government to assist the State Authority shall consist of the following
members, namely: -
S. No. Designation SEC Composition
1 The Chief Secretary to the Government Chairperson Ex. Officio
2 The Secretary (P. W. D.) Member Ex. Officio
3 The Secretary (Road and Transport) Member Ex. Officio
4 The Secretary (Science and Technology) Member Ex. Officio
5 The Secretary (Revenue) Member Secretary Ex. Officio
5. Powers and functions of the Chairperson of the State Executive Committee. –
(1) Subject to the provisions of the Act, the Chairperson, in addition to presiding over the meetings of
the State Executive Committee, shall have powers to take all such measures as he deems necessary or
expedient for the purpose of protecting, preventing any disaster and to provide all necessary assistance
in implementation of the State plan prepared by the Government from time to time.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the provision of sub-rule (1), the Chairperson
shall exercise such powers or take such measures in respect of all or any of the following matters, namely:
-
(i) coordinate action of the Government officers and other authorities: -
(b) under any other law for the time being in force which is relatable to the object of the Act;
(ii) planning and execution of the State wise programmes prepared for the prevention, control,
abatement of any disaster in the State;
(iii) inspection of affected area due to disaster and issuing such directions to authority or Officer or
person as he may consider necessary to take appropriate steps for prevention relief control, abatement
of disaster;
(iv) to exercise such other powers and functions as delegated by the State Authority.
40
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
(1) The meeting of the Executive Committee shall be held on such date as may be fixed by its Chairperson.
(2) The Chairperson shall, upon written request of not less than three members of the Executive
Committee or upon a direction of the State Authority for the Government, as the case may be, call a
special meeting of the Executive Committee.
(3) Eight clear days’ notice of an ordinary meeting and two days’ notice of a special meeting specifying
time, the place at which such meeting to be held and an agenda of the business to be transacted thereat,
shall be given by the Chairperson or any other officer of the Executive Committee.
(4) Notice of the meeting may be given to the member by delivering the same by messenger or sending
it at his office or by such other manner as the Chairperson may, in the circumstances of the case, think
fit.
(5) No member shall be entitled to bring forward for the consideration of meeting any matter of which
he has not given five days’ notice to the officer or Chairperson of the Executive Committee, as the case
may be, unless the Chairperson in his discretion permit him to do so.
(6) If the Chairperson or presiding officer adjourns a meeting from day to day or any particular day, he
shall give reason therefor and no fresh notice shall be required for such adjourned meeting.
(2) In case of an equality of votes, the Chairperson or Presiding Officer shall have a second or casting
vote.
9. Quorum. –
(1) Three members of the Executive Committee shall form the quorum for any meeting.
(2) If, at any time fixed for any meeting or during the course of any meeting, a quorum is
not present, the Chairperson or the Presiding Officer shall adjourn the meeting for twenty minutes and
if a quorum is not available after the expiration of twenty minutes from such adjournment, the Presiding
Officer shall adjourn the meeting to such time on the following day or on such other future date as he
may fix.
(3) No matter which had not been on the agenda of the original meeting shall be discussed at such
adjourned meeting.
10. Minutes. –
(1) Records of proceedings of every meeting alongwith the names of members who attended the
meeting shall be kept by the office of the Executive Committee as specified by the Chairperson, in a
book maintained by him exclusively for the purpose.
(2) The minutes of the previous meeting shall be read at the beginning of every succeeding meeting
and shall be confirmed and signed by the Chairperson or Presiding Officer at such meeting.
(3) The proceedings shall be open to inspection by any member at the office of the Executive
Committee, Secretariat, during office hours.
41
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
(2) Except with the permission of the Chairperson or presiding officer no business which is not entered
in the agenda or of which notice as not been given by a member under sub-rule (5) of rule 10 shall be
transacted at any meeting.
(3) At any meeting, the business shall be transacted in the order in which it is entered in the agenda
circulated to the members under sub-rule (3) of rule 10.
(4) Either at the beginning of the meeting or after the conclusion of the debate on a motion during the
meeting, the Chairperson or Presiding Officer or member may suggest a change in the order of business
as entered in the agenda and if the majority of the members present agree, the Chairperson or
Presiding Officer shall agree to such change.
42
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
1. The Chief Executive Officer of the District Authority shall be Member Secretary of the District Authority.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing powers, the Chief Executive Officer
shall exercise such powers and perform such functions in respect of all or any of the following matters,
namely: -
(a) collection and this dissemination of information in respect of matter relating to any disaster likely
to be affected in the District;
(b) co-ordinate action of the Government Officers and other authorities under the Act, and the rules
made thereunder;
(c) give instructions to different authorities at the Taluka levels as well as at the District levels to take
such necessary measures or preventive actions in order to avoid any disaster in the area there of;
(d) direct such persons or authority to desist from taking such action as is likely to cause hardship to
the people in an area affected by disaster;
(e) to inspect an area affected by disaster and to ascertain for the propose of determining whether and
if so, in what manner, any function to be performed by the authority concerned or whether any
provisions of the Act or the rules made thereunder or any notice, order, direction or authorization
served, made, given or granted under the Act is being or has been complied with;
(g) to assist the Chairperson of the District Authority in performance his functions;
(h) to take follow up action, to ensure that decisions taken in the meeting of the District Authority are
implemented time;
(i) to exercise such powers and discharge such functions as assigned by the District Authority from time
to time.
The DM Act 2005 enjoins State Government to make provisions for the implementation of the disaster
management plans. In this respect, the sections of the DM Act 2005 applicable for state, and district DM
plans are 23, and 31. The Chapters V and VI of the DM Act spell out the responsibilities of the state, and
local governments with respect to disaster management. The DM Act states that each Department of the
State Government shall make provisions, in its annual budget, for funds for the purposes of carrying out the
activities and programmes set out in its disaster management plan.
The SDMP sets outs the priorities, time frames and defines the Thematic Areas for DRR along with Sub -
Thematic Areas that must be implemented in a highly distributed, decentralised and coordinated manner
by the central and state governments. It is not one omnibus plan that must be implemented by one agency
with using one overarching budget; instead it is one that must be financed from the union and state budgets
through various ministries and government agencies. The centrally allocated finances are limited to State
Disaster Response Fund meant for immediate relief and emergency response after a disaster. Since DRR
mainstreaming is an integral part of the main plans of States and State -level agencies, there cannot be a
separate financial allocation for it.
43
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The Act mandates that each District must prepare a DMP in accordance with the SDMP. Respective DM
authorities must regularly review and update their DM plans. DDMAs will integrate DRR into their all
development activities. They must adopt a holistic approach and build multi-stakeholder partnerships at all
levels, as appropriate, for the implementation of the DM plans. Depending on its nature, different
components of the SDMP will be implemented within short, medium and long-term timeframes ending in
2030, with the actions under these timeframes often running concurrently and not sequentially. In a broad
sense, the approach described in the SDMP applies to all those working for disaster risk reduction in the
State, be it government, private, not for- profit entities.
The plan is highly ambitious and the complete implementation of all elements across the State may take a
very long time. Nevertheless, both central and state governments have already made considerable progress
and they are expected to make sincere efforts for the implementation of the DM plans.
The DM plans at Departmental and District level must be made in accordance with SDMP -2024 and
consistent with it in terms of goals and timeframes. It is not possible to give an exhaustive list of activities
envisaging all the disaster risk reduction functions pertaining to all the tiers of government (State, District
and local) and all other stakeholders. Hence the DDMAs and Line Departments should go beyond the
activities mentioned in this document in identifying activities based on the context for pro-active disaster
risk reduction using SDMP as a guide rather than as a final word.
44
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-2
Hazard Risks and Challenges
45
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
2
2.1 Background:
Hazard Risk and
Challenges
Goa is a multi-hazard prone western coastal State of India with a hot and humid climate for most of
the year. Goa covers an area of 3702 square kilometres and comprises of two Revenue Districts-
North Goa and South Goa which are further divided into 12 into talukas. Boundaries of Goa State
are defined in the North by Terekhol river which separates it from Maharashtra, in the East and
South by Karnataka State and West by Arabian Sea. The state has a literacy rate of 88.70%. The
State’s main industries include tourism, agriculture, and mining. The State is known for its beaches,
temples, and churches, and is a popular tourist destination in India. The State has a coastline of 105
Km.
Table 2.1: Goa-General Profile
S.No. Feature Description
1. Geographic Location N 14˚53’57’’ and N 15˚47’59’’ latitudes and
E 73˚40’54’’ and E 74˚20’11’’ longitudes
2. Date of Formation 30th May 1987
3. Area 3,702 Km2 (1,429 sq mi)
4. Altitude Sea level to 1,022 mts.
5. States sharing border Maharashtra & Karnataka
6. Capital Panaji
7. Districts 02
8. Talukas 12
9. Villages 320
10. Panchayats 191
11. Municipalities 13
12. Corporations 1
13. Sex Ratio 973
14. Density/Km2 394
15. Climate Hot and Humid
16. Literacy 88.70 %
17. Human Development Index (HDI) 0.779
18. Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) Rs. 53,959.86 crores
19. Net State Domestic Product (NSDP) Rs. 29,396 crores
20. No. of Industrial Estates 24
21. No. of operating industrial units ~ 4000 units
22. P ower demand ~ 500 MW
23. Road network 10,768 km (260 km National Highways)
24. Rail Network 167 km (156 km- Konkan Railway and 69 km-South
Western Railway)
25. Navigable internal waterways 255 km
26. P orts 1 Major (Mormugao), 5 Minor
27. No. of airports 2 (Dabolim and Mopa)
28. No. of bank branches 668
46
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
2.4
Figure 2: The topographic map (topography from SRTM DEM) of Goa and its surroundings.
T he colour scale at the top of the figure gives topography (elevation in m). The blue line marks the border of Goa. Locations at which rainfall data are
available are also shown on the map (black triangles are India Meteorological Department rain-gauge stations and red circles are Indian Space Research
Organisation's Automatic Weather Stations (AWSs).
Social Profile
2.4.1 Religion
Majority of the population in the state practices Hinduism. Religion wise population of the state is
mentioned in Table 2.2.
Table 2.2: Percentage of population by religion in the State
Religion Percent of Total Population
Hindu 66.08%
Christian 25.10%
Muslim 8.33%
Sikh 0.10%
Buddhist 0.08%
47
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Jain 0.08%
Other Religions 0.02%
Sectors: In 2021-22, at current prices, agriculture, manufacturing, and services sectors are estimated
to contribute 7%, 49%, and 44% of the economy respectively. In 2021-22, agriculture,
manufacturing, and services sectors are estimated to grow (at constant prices) by 10.2%, 3.9%, and
6% respectively.
Per capita GSDP: The per capita GSDP of Goa in 2021-22 (at current prices) was Rs 5,44,865; 8%
higher than the corresponding figure in 2020-21. In 2021-22, per capita GSDP of Goa was higher
than the per capita GDP at the national level (Rs 1,72,913 at current prices).
Table 2.3: GSDP of Goa in 2021-22 Source: Goa Budget Documents 2022-23; PRS.
Items 2020-21 2021-22 2021-22 % change from BE 2022-23 % change from RE
Actuals BE RE 21-22 to RE 21-22 BE 21-22 to BE 22-23
Total Expenditure 17,957 24,733 26,419 7% 24,274 -8%
(-) Repayment of debt 3,819 2,264 2,264 0% 2,583 14%
Net Expenditure (E) 14,138 22,469 24,154 8% 21,691 -10%
Total Receipts 18,191 21,088 21,819 3% 22,960 5%
(-) Borrowings 6,783 4,494 4,394 -2% 5,571 27%
Net Receipts (R) 11,408 16,594 17,424 5% 17,388 0%
Fiscal Deficit (E-R) 2,730 5,875 6,730 15% 4,303 -36%
as % of GSDP 2.96% 6.57% 7.53% 4.71%
Revenue Balance -665 58 -19 -133% 434 2348%
as % of GSDP -0.72% 0.07% -0.02% 0.48%
Primary Deficit 1,069 3,981 4,836 21% 2,314 -52%
as % of GSDP 1.16% 4.45% 5.41% 2.53%
N ote: Positive revenue balance indicates a revenue surplus while negative revenue balance shows a revenue deficit.
BE is Budget Estimates; RE is Revised Estimates.
2.5.1 Main Occupation
The per capita GDP of Goa is two and a half times than that of the nation, making it one of the richest
States in the country. Goa solely demands 12.5% of the tourism of India, making tourism one of the
main sources of revenue for the State. The population of the State doubles during certain months
due to influx of tourists. The Economy of Goa has grown at a rapid pace in the past twenty years and
depends on agriculture, mining, industrial and tourism sectors.
2.5.2 Sectors of Economy
The Economy of the State largely depends on the tourism sectors because of the high tourist influx
in the state. In 2010, more than 2 million tourists visited the coastal areas of Goa and 1.4 million
visited the inlands. Goa alone handles 12% of the foreign tourists arriving in the country, making
tourism sector, its primary industry. Goa has two main tourist seasons – summer and winter. Foreign
tourists mainly come during the winter season due to the pleasant climate and in summers, tourists
from India come to Goa to spend their holidays.
The State has a very low excise duty on alcohol, making it relatively inexpensive. This draws many
young tourists from around the globe looking for economical holidays. Along with this, the pristine
beaches, cultural festivals, Gothic churches and temples draw a lot of tourists to the State. The
Portuguese, Dutch and British influence has led to a blend of religion and ethnic history, garnering
much appreciation from Indian and foreign tourists.
48
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
2.5.2.5 Fisheries
Fishing was a hereditary occupation, long established in the Goan culture. But in recent times, the
employment generated by the sector has reduced due to fall in catch and dependence on
technological advancements like large scale mechanized trawling.
Goa has witnessed steady growth over the past few years because of steady growth of tourism
industry and a strong mining industry backed by the agricultural sector.
2.6 Climate
Goa is one of India’s most popular holiday destinations, with its idyllic beaches, lush paddy fields,
coconut plantations and villages dotted with pretty white washed churches and grand mansions. Its
other attractions include the Hindu temples around Ponda and magnificent cathedral of old Goa.
2.7.1 Languages3
Konkani is the mother-tongue of Goans – the people of Goa. It is also the State’s Official Language
having been recognised as so in 1976 and is also one of the languages recognised in the constitution
of India.
49
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
2.7.2 Dance4
The Veerbhadr is a form of ritualistic dance popular during the Shigmo in central region. The ritual
of this dance has a deep meaning. The torch bearing Veerbhadra signifies the light giver and the
sword wielding the protector. The dance assures light and protection to the people. The ritual dance
having a southern origin has acquired a distinct place in Goa's cultural li fe, as most townships in
central region were under the rule of some or the other Southern Kings in the distant past. The
significant dance form known as Talgadi is everywhere in Goa. The other forms are Tonyo, Goff;
Morulo and Diwlyam nach at few places.
2.7.3 Food
Goa has a great cuisine with fish, fish-curry with rice (xit-codi) occupying a central position. A variety
comprising of shell fish, lobsters, prawns, sweets like bebinca, mangane, curries like sol -kadi, dry
salted fish, cashew nuts etc.
The land elevation ranges from sea level to 1022 meters. The highest point is the Wagheri hills in Sattari
taluka. The natural vegetation of Goa consists of dense forest and dry deciduous to moist deciduous
type. Moderately sloping lands with laterite outcrops are covered by grass and shrubs. The habitat of
the flora is of semi-evergreen type. Evergreen forests are seen only on high hills. The vegetation consists
of trees, shrubs, herbs climbers, sedges and grasses. The coastal tracts are namely covered by palms
and mangroves. Goa receives rains from the southwest monsoons. The average annual rainfall of the
State, as recorded is 2776.9 mm. The rainy season is spread over four months from June to September.
Occasional thundershowers are experienced in May and October. Goa experiences a warm and humid
tropical climate. The summer temperature ranges from 24°C to 36°C. In winter, the mercury hovers
between 21°C to 30°C. Due to the Global Warming effect, the picture seems to be slightly changing.
Goa receives rains from the South West monsoons. The average annual rainfall of the State, as recorded
is 2776.9 mm. Rainy season is spread over four months from June to September. Occasional thunder
showers are experienced in May and October. Goa experiences warm and humid tropical climate. The
summer temperature ranges from 24°C to 36°C. In winter, the mercury hovers between 21°C to 30°C.
Due to Global Warming effect, the picture seems to be slightly changing.
50
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
which is 59.94 % of the State’s total geographical area (3720 Km 2). Table 1 mentioned the area covered
by different types of forests in the State.
Table.2.4: Areas covered by different types of forests in the State.
Area in Km2
Altitude Zone Very Dense Forest Moderately Dense Forest Open Forest Total Area
0-500m 444 561 1058 2063
500-1000m 99 24 33 156
Total 543 585 1091 2219
Source: Goa Forest Department
51
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Goa’s mean annual temperature has increased by over 1°C since the beginning of the 20th century till
date (1901-2018), much of it during 1990-2018 period. The mean annual rainfall in Goa has increased
by 68% over the period 1901-2015. With increasing rainfall, the inter-annual rainfall variability in the
state has also increased especially since 1970s. While mean annual rainfall in the state has increased ,
moderate to light rainfall days (IMD category I) in Goa have declined over 1901-2015 period, whereas
very heavy and exceptionally heavy rainfall events (IMD category III) in the state have increased by a
dramatic more than 100%.
Mean annual temperatures in Goa may increase by around 2°C in 2030s compared to 1901-1950
period, and further to by around 4°C by 2080s under high emission scenarios. Goa will start
experiencing heat waves (>40C) beyond the 2040s’, as maximum temperature increases by about 5°C
towards the century end under high emission scenarios. Minimum temperatures are expected to rise
even more by up to 8°C by the century end under the high emission scenarios.
Below shows the mean annual temperature map of Goa over the long-term period of 1951-
2014. Mean temperature in Goa is found to be 26.70ºC, which is higher than the national average
annual temperature i.e. 23.3ºC (Chaturvedi et al 2012). While spatial temperature variability is not
high in Goa, hilly areas in the Eastern parts of the State are generally cooler than the coastal areas in
the West.
Figure 5: Long period average (1951-2014) spatial distribution of mean temperature (˚C) in Goa
Goa experiences a hot summer (April- June) followed by pleasant monsoon (June-September) season,
temperatures temporarily rise again in the month of October, following pleasant winter months
(November to March). Figure 5 shows the mean monthly temperature profile in the Goa, based on the
long-period mean temperature average over the period 1951-2014.7
7 State Action Plan on Climate Change for The State of Goa for Period of 2020-2030
52
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The monthly, seasonal and annual maximum, minimum and mean temperature anomalies averaged
over the State of Goa for the year 2023 is given in the Fig. 7. The anomalies were computed based on
the LPA for the period 1981-2010. Top 10 warmest/coolest months/seasons are marked on the graph.
It may be mentioned that apart from the whole year, some individual months viz. February, March,
June & August and the premonsoon season as a whole was the
Fig. 7: Monthly and Seasonal Maximum, Minimum and Mean Temperature anomalies averaged over Goa during 2023.
warmest since 1901.State was relatively cooler in terms of minimum temperature during the
premonsoon season. The mean temperature for the state was warmer than the average by +0.720C
(2nd warmest year on record since 1901). The annual maximum and minimum temperature averaged
over the state during the year 2023 were warmer by 1.290C (warmest since 1901) & 0.150C (23rd
warmest since 1901) respectively.
8 STATEMENT ON CLIMATE FOR THE STATE OF GOA: 2023 ISSUED BY IMD PUNE
53
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The Spatial pattern of Annual Maximum, Minimum and Mean Temperature anomalies over Goa during
2023 is given in Fig 8. The maximum temperature was above normal by 1 to 20C while minimum
temperature was near normal (anomaly between 0 to 0.50C) over most parts of the state. Over all
mean temperature was above normal by 0.5 to 1 0C over most parts of the state.
Fig. 8: Spatial pattern of Annual Maximum, Minimum, and Mean Temperature anomalies over Goa during 2023
The time series of variation of annual maximum, minimum and mean land surface air
temperature anomalies averaged over the State for the period 1901-2023 is given in Fig 9. A significant
Fig. 9: Annual maximum, minimum and mean land surface air temperature anomalies averaged over the State of Goa for
the period 1901-2023.The anomalies were computed with respect to the base period of 1981-2010. The dotted black line
indicates the linear trend in the annual mean temperature time series
increasing trend of 1.45 0C/100 years is observed in the State averaged annual mean temperature for
the period 1901-2023. It was more significant in respect of maximum temperature (+2.40C/100 years)
and relatively less significant (+0.510C/100 years) in respect of minimum temperature. The five
warmest years on record in order for Goa are 2015(anomaly+0.816°C), 2023(+0.719°C),
2017(+0.615°C), 2021(+0.571°C) and 2020(+0.565°C).
54
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Fig. 10(a and b) shows daily variation of minimum and maximum temperature anomaly during the
year respectively. The anomalies were computed with respect to the base period of 1981-2010. State
was considerably warmer in respect of minimum temperature during November & December
months and cooler during March, April & July months. Except for July month, the state was
considerably warmer in respect of maximum temperature almost during the entire year.
Fig. 10(a): Daily variation of minimum temperature anomaly ( 0C) over Goa during 2023
Fig. 10(b): Daily variation of maximum temperature anomaly ( 0C) over Goa during 2023
Fig. 10(b): Daily variation of maximum temperature anomaly ( 0C) over Goa during 2023
55
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Fig.12(a): Daily variation of rainfall (mm) averaged over Goa during the year.
series of variation of % departure of seasonal and annual rainfall for the state for the period 1901-2023
are shown in Fig. 12(b) and 12(c) respectively. The departures are calculated with respect to the LPA
Fig. 12(b): Time series of % departure of southwest monsoon rainfall averaged over Goa (1901-2023)
base period of 1971-2020. During the monsoon season and the year, the state received 113 % and 111
% of its LPA rainfall respectively.
Fig. 12(c): Time series of % departure of annual rainfall averaged over Goa (1901-2023) 56
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 2.5 shows the monthly, seasonal and annual rainfall statistics for the State for 2023. The state
did not receive any rainfall during the winter season. During the pre -monsoon season it received large
deficient rainfall. During July and September months the state received large excess rainfall (60% more
than its LPA). During the monsoon and post monsoon seasons and the year as a whole, the state
received normal rainfall.
Table 2.5
District-wise trend in annual rainfall for the period 1951-2022 is given in Fig 13. Non-significant
increasing/decreasing trend was observed in North/South Goa.
57
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Fig. 14: District wise Annual SPI Map for Goa for the year 2023
Fig. 15: Loca ti on and frequency of heavy, very heavy a nd extremely heavy ra infall events reported over stations
of Goa during the period January to December 2023
58
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 2.6
Very Heavy (115.6-204.4 mm) or extremely heavy rainfall (>= 204.5 mm) recorded over
stations of Goa during January – December 2023 #
(#: Rainfall figures are for past 24 Hrs. ending on 8:30 Hrs. IST of the date)
The location of impact occurred due to major extreme weather events in Goa during the year 2023 is shown
in Fig 16. The state experienced flood/heavy rains, lightning and Gale events during the year 2023.
Fig. 16: Locations of impact occurred associated with Major Extreme Weather Events
during 2023 (details provided in the Table 3)
59
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 2.7 Major extreme weather events during 2023 which caused los s of human lives occurred in Goa
Event Date Loss of Life Season Affected Districts
Floods/Heavy Rains (7 July) 1 Monsoon (June -Sept.) South Goa
The taluka-wise Estimated Economical Loss (in Lakhs) due to major extreme weather events during 2022 is
given in Fig 17.
Fig.17: Shows the taluka-wise Estimated Economical Loss (in Lakhs of Rupees) due to
major extreme weather events in Goa during 2022
(Source: O/o The Collector and District Magistrate, South Goa District, Disaster Management Cell, Go a)
Vulnerability assessment
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) defines vulnerability as “the propensity or
predisposition to be adversely affected” 9, which encompasses the basic components of exposure,
60
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
sensitivity, and adaptive capacity. Key sector-specific indicators have been utilized to assess the
sensitivity and adaptive capacity of the sector.
The coastal areas of the country, face grave risks due to climate change. There is the risk of cyclones
and tsunamis, the intensity of which is predicted to rise. Rising sea levels, which could flood land
(including agricultural land) and cause damage to coastal infrastructure and other property, pose
another threat.
Coastal Vulnerability: UNDP predicts, Goa stands to lose a large percentage of its land area, including
many of its famous beaches and tourist infrastructure, which are very significant to states' socio -
economic status. A one-metre rise in sea level, it is estimated, will affect 7 percent of Goa's population
and cause damage to the tune of Rs 8,100 crore.1 Because of this, it becomes essential to understand
the vulnerability to different parts of the 100km vast coastline of Goa.
The multi-hazard vulnerability
assessment of the coastline of Goa
carried out by NIO in 2014 provides a
reasonable assessment of coastal
flooding and inundation for Talukas
along the coast. This is accomplished
by using seven physical and geologic
risk variables characterizing the
vulnerability of the coast, including
historical shoreline change, rate of
relative sea-level change, coastal
regional elevation, coastal slope,
mean tidal range, significant wave
height, and geomorphology using
conventional and remotely sensed
data, in addition to two socio-
economic parameters: population
and tourist density data. The results
of this composite vulnerability index-
based study suggest that the 30 km of
Figure 19: Composite Vulnerability Index Source: ISRO
the coastline of the talukas of Salcete,
Bardez, and Tiswadi has a coastal regional elevation of fewer than 35 m and is at the highest risk due
to sea-level rise and flooding. Bardez and Salcete talukas have both experienced erosion rates of more
than 0.6 m/year while the erosion rate for Tiswadi was found to be above 0.3 m/year. These are also
the most populated talukas and most prominent tourist spots, furthe r increasing the risk of erosion in
these talukas.
Levels of Disasters:
Based on severity of the disaster, degree of material and physical losses and assistance requirements
different levels of disasters are being identified. The activation of the plan will be dependent on the
declared level of disaster.
Level 0 (L0) – This is a level during peace and normal times; time will be utilized for monitoring,
prevention and preparatory activities. Capacity building of key departments, mock rescue, reh earsals,
testing evacuation plans is rehearsed during this level. Similarly, response and recovery mechanisms
are reviewed at state, district, level.
61
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Level I (LI) – At this level, district machinery can manage the disaster; state and central governments
will monitor the progress and remain alert to activate other mechanisms if needed. General inundation,
crop losses, livestock losses, minor property losses and disrupted normal life due to disaster/incident.
Level II (LII) – At this level, active participation of state departments, mobilizing resources at the state
level and close monitoring in coordination with district machinery is warranted. Mobilizing rescue and
recovery teams consisting of paramilitary forces may be required at this level. In additio n to losses
identified in LI, human and livestock losses and substantial property losses such as damaged homes,
damaged infrastructure and isolation of an area due to the severity of the disaster are part of Level II.
Level III (LIII) – This is critical and highest level. State and district machinery would need active
assistance from the union government. Mobilizing rescue and recovery teams consisting of paramilitary
forces may be required at this level. Early warning mechanisms both at state and central government
play significant role in identifying situations that may be declared as Level III disasters. Similar levels of
losses are identified in LI and LII at higher proportions.
Activation of the plan would vary depending on the information received from competent agencies like
IMD, INCOIS, DGRE, FSI, etc. and on the level of disasters and intensity as identified; however, at all
levels, certain activities especially preparedness, prevention, mitigation and capacity building are round
the year functions.
62
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
63
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
A combination and geographical factors like climate, geomorphology, drainage pattern, proximity to
the open sea etc. render Goa State prone to
a variety of natural disasters like floods,
cyclones, earthquakes, Tsunamis etc. As per
the all India seismic categorization, Goa falls
in Seismic Zone III which indicates that Goa
has a moderate damage risk due to
Earthquakes. A number of large and small
river systems drain the districts and the
gradient and topography of the region
combined with heavy monsoons and high
tide conditions cause flooding and water
logging in quite a few places in the State.
The occurrence of cyclones / floods,
however, is restricted to the monsoons
only. The impact of cyclonic winds is felt
towards the onset of the monsoons in April
Figure21: Cyclone Hazard Map (100 Year Return Period)
end and May and again towards the fag end
around September/October.
Disaster Risk = Hazard + Vulnerability
Disaster Risk = function (Hazard, Exposure, Vulnerability)
To reduce disaster risk, it is important to reduce the level of vulnerability and to keep exposure as far
away from hazards as possible by relocating populations and property. Growing exposure and delays
in reducing vulnerabilities result in an increased number of natural disasters and greater levels of loss.
(Asian Disaster Reduction Centre).
Hazard Assessment: In order to focus limited resources on to those areas of the state at risk, it is
necessary to understand the pattern of hazard activity precisely and put a quantitative probability to
the likelihood of occurrence of hazards. Information is available through newspaper clippings and
records maintained with the various government departments of the hazard prone areas in the State
with respect to various hazards has been documented for assessing the types of hazards probably
occurring in Goa.
Earthquake Hazard:
Goa falls in Seismic Zone III-Moderate Damage Risk Zone in the country, which indicates that Goa has
Medium probability for occurrence of earthquakes. Though Goa has not directly witnessed any
earthquake however, it has been affected by tremors from devastating earthquakes that occurred in
the neighbouring States like Maharashtra.
Table 2.9: History of Earthquake Occurrence
Disaster Type Year of Occurrence Impact
The tremors of the devastating 1967 Residential as well as public
earthquakes with magnitude 5.0 or structures, infrastructures were
64
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Flood Hazard
If cyclonic winds are accompanied by heavy rainfall then there is possibility of flooding in low lying
areas, in Goa. The rainfall pattern is very heavy in the western Ghats which is over 180 inches and
gradually reduces towards the coastal plains. The rivers in the coastal plain are having tidal influence,
which retard the high flood water drainage during the high tides, there by leading to the flooding of the
low laying areas.
River Basins of the State of Goa:
There are 09 river basins in the State of Goa as indicated in the below Table
Sr. River Basin Length Catchment
No within the area in Sq
State kms
1. Terekhol 26.00 71.00
2. Chapora 32.00 255.00
3. Baga 10.00 50.00
4. Mandovi 52.00 1580.00
5. Zuari 145.00 973.00
65
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
66
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Source: DF&ES
67
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
250 232.6
200
150
117.3
98.22
100 87.37
58 51.87
46
50 34 34
15
0
2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21 2021-22
Fig.23: Forest Fire Area affected area in the past five years in Goa. Source: Goa Forest Department
During last five years, since 2017, a total of 187 forest fire affecting 587.48 ha area were reported. It is
observed that, anthropogenic factors like burning grass lands for pastoral and agricultural purpose,
burning of dry leaf litter in cashew plantations in order to facilitate e ase of collection of cashew fruits
from plantation floor are the primary causes for forest fire in the state of Goa. The matter of prime
concern is that most of the cashew orchards are either contiguous to Forest or Forest rights settlement
pockets inside forest areas, so the spread of fire to the forest is consequential and inevitable in such
situation. As seen from fire data of past five years no significant pattern or rising trend in forest fire
incidences is observed.
68
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
119.8 143.1
140
120
100 84.5
80 62.5
60
40 19 24
16
8 4.325
20 1 5 5
0
North T South T North South Social GFDC
(WL ) (WL ) For
Fig 24: Number of fire incidence &Area affected in different division 4th to 15th March 2023
Source: Goa Forest Department
69
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Heat Wave: Based upon the increasing trend of temperatures in the State especially in the months of
March to May, both North & South Goa districts are experiencing the Heatwave like conditions or
discomfort with temperature ranging from 33-35˚C.
Cloud Burst: Though it is not a regular hazard affecting Goa, it did occur in last decade affecting some
parts of Canacona taluka.
Thunder Storm & Squall: The summer season lasts from mid-March to the end of June, with average
maximum and minimum temperatures of 32˚C to 40˚C; it is characterized by frequent thunderstorms
and squalls, which are most frequent in April and May.
Epidemics Hazard: In Goa, preventive, and curative livestock and poultry health is being looked after
by the department of A.H. & V.S. There are Hospitals, Dispensaries, sub centers supplementing the task.
With the view of detecting epidemics at the earliest, a Disease Investigation Unit has been established
under the Directorate of A.H. & V.S. Therefore, the incide nce of epidemics is negligible over last 15
years.
Road & Rail Accidents: The areas in the vicinity of the Konkan and Western Rail lines are vulnerable to
railway accidents across North and South Goa. Besides, the State is experiencing the increasing tren d
to road accidents. As per the monthly report issued by the Directorate of Transport for the month of
September 2023, 227 road accidents were reported, out of which 14 were Fatal Accidents (North Goa
– 06 and South Goa –08).
Industrial Hazards: Industrial accidents may occur as a result of natural phenomena, such as
earthquakes, forest fires etc., however, most accidents occur as a result of human activity leading to
accidental or deliberate harm. Although there are a number of different definitions of t hese accidents,
the most practical appears to be as follows: any incident connected with an uncontrolled development
(such as leak, fire and / or explosion) of an industrial activity involving a serious immediate or delayed
hazard to man and / or the environment.
CBRN Disaster: Goa being a tourist State is also under the threat of any form of conventional and
contemporary warfare. CBRN threats could be one of the major potential hazards in Goa. With respect
to probability of emergencies due to Nuclear Hazards, the nearest Nuclear Power Plant-NPP is Kaiga
Generating Station in Uttar Kannada District of Karnataka State which is approximately 200 km away
from Goa. There is high threat of biological disaster caused due to bioterrorism. The threat of chemical
attack and chemical disasters caused by hazardous units may not be very high. To address to any Risk
posed by CBRN Emergencies, Government of Goa in collaboration in NDRF and NDMA, conducts the
preparedness and capacity building trainings/mock drills and accordingly, 03 Officials from Directorate
of Fire and Emergency Services have been trained in CBRN Emergency Management by Department of
Atomic Energy-DAE Mumbai. Besides, 02 Basic Trainings on CBRN Emergency Management for Airport
and Seaport Emergency handlers were conducted by Goa SDMA in collaboration with NDMA and DAE
at Manohar International Airport Mopa, North Goa and Mormugao Port Authority Vasco, South Goa.
Terrorist attacks and bomb blasts: Goa being a peaceful and touristic place is also under the threat of
any form of conventional and contemporary warfare. History perceives that generally terrorist attacks
takes place in important government building, air ports, cantonment areas, historical monuments,
populous places and important public gathering etc. Many events of bomb-blasts and terrorist attacks
across India give an insight towards the importance of this issue.
Around 30 odd types of disasters have been identified and they are grouped into 5 broad categories:
1) Water and climate related disasters – drought, flood, cyclone, heavy rains, cloudburst, gale
wind, whirlwind, tornado, hailstorm, lightening, Tsunami, heat wave etc.
2) Geologically related disasters – earthquakes, volcanoes, landslide etc.
70
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The table 2.12 illustrates the number of potential threats and the elements at risk during the disaster
expected in the State:
Table 2.12: Number of potential threats and the elements at risk.
Hazard Risk
Floods Everything located in flood plans. Crops, livestock, machinery, equipment ,
infrastructure, weak buildings, their contents, people, local economy.
Earthquakes Weak buildings, their occupants and contents, machinery, equipment ,
infrastructure, human lives, dairy and poultry infrastructure and livestock
Landslides Anything located on or at the base of steep slopes or cliff tops, roads,
infrastructure, buildings on shallow foundation, human lives, crops,
vegetation, dairy and poultry infrastructure and livestock.
Cyclone Damage to the buildings, infrastructures, crops, vegetation,
telecommunication / power lines, roads, dairy and poultry infrastructure and
livestock. etc.
Tsunami Everything located in the coastal areas upto 500 mts -1 km belt.
Source: DMP AH&VS
Hazard Profile:
Generally, Goa is prone to natural hazards such as flood, oil spills and cyclone. Considering the hazard
potential and existing vulnerabilities in the State, it has become very crucial to enhance the
preparedness level, especially at the Departmental level. The frequent disasters lead to erosion of
developmental gains and restricted options for the disaster victims. Physical safety, especially of the
vulnerable groups, is routinely threatened by natural hazards. Cyclones in recent years in the State,
have very clearly illustrated the need for multi-hazard prevention, response and recovery plans for
natural hazards so that threat to human life and property is minimized. The State is primarily
responsible for the management of natural and human-caused disasters at the state level and has a
shared responsibility with the Government of India for preparedness and for identified catastrophi c
disasters.
Vulnerability Analysis: The vulnerability of a particular element of society is defined as the degree of
loss which is would suffer as a result of a specific hazard event. The nature of vulnerability and its
assessment vary according to whether the element involved represents people and social structures,
physical structures, or economic assets and activities. The vulnerability of an area is determined by the
capacity of its social, physical and economic structures to withstand and respond to hazard events.
Certain groups of people, types of physical assets and economic activities can be particularly vulnerable
or susceptible to damage. The concept of vulnerability implies a measure of risk combined with the
level of social and economic ability to cope with the resulting event in order to resist major disruption
or loss. Vulnerability is thus the liability of a community to suffer stress, or the consequence of the
failure of any protective devices and may be defined as the degree to which a system or part of a
system, may react adversely to the occurrence of a hazardous event.
Table 2.13: Taluka wise Multi Hazard Vulnerability (Levels of Severity)
Taluka Cyclone Flood Landslides Earthquake Chemical Soil Nuclear and Drought
& Mining Erosion Radiological
P ernem H H L L L L L L
Bardez H H M L L L L L
Tiswadi H L L L L L L L
Bicholim L H H L L L L L
Sattari L L H L L L L L
P onda L L L L H L L L
Dharbandora L L L L L L L L
Murmugao H L L L H L L L
71
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Salcete H L M L L L L L
Q uepem L L H L L L L L
Sanguem L L H L L L L L
Canacona H H M L L L L L
Source: DMP AH&VS
Due to strict implementation of Industrial Policy and pollution control norms, the multiple hazard risk
in Goa is very low. Besides rising temperatures and sea levels, climate change is increasingly leading to
extreme rainfall, floods and cyclone to occur a t the same time in the country. For this, synergy of all
the departments should come together towards mitigation and risk reduction.
Goa is exposed to several climate risks like loss of land due to erosion, l oss of life, livelihood, the
outbreak of disease, damage to buildings, drainage, and other infrastructure. It is also exposed to sea -
level rise, storms, high-speed wind, altered runoff, changed wave pattern and sea temperature in
addition to the other threats like rainfall and temperature profile changes. The characteristic of states
other natural and geographical features like Rivers, Khazan Lands, soil type, and moisture and flora and
fauna will result in unique or varied results in different climate scenarios.
The Canacona flash flood is one such event experienced by the state of Goa on 2nd of October, 2009.
It was found that these flash floods were directly related to about 271 mm of rain that fell in a short
span of 7 hours, resulting in flooding of Talpona and Galjibag Rivers. Due to continuous rainfall in the
monsoon season, the soil on slopes was saturated. As a result, on steep slopes with altitude above 300
m, the cascading water led to mudslides. At altitudes of about 50 m or more, agricultural an d
horticultural areas were submerged and cattle were washed away. At lower altitudes (about 50 m or
less), where the topography is flatter, accumulation of water submerged buildings, and as the water
made its way towards the sea, the flow destroyed houses and commercial establishments, particularly
those that were weak (mud houses, for example). There are no records to suggest the precedence of
such a rainfall scenario in the past. It is interesting to note that the flooding on 2 October 2009 was
unprecedented in recorded history, but the total daily precipitation on that day is not. Hence, it implies
that similar rainfall can have different risk profiles depending upon the month in which it occurs.
Cyclone vulnerability
Only coastal belt of Goa is vulnerable to Cyclones. When cyclones and resulting floods occur, the loss
of infrastructure, life of livestock, fodder crops and irrigation infrastructure for the same, due to severe
inundation and cyclonic damages is significant in the coastal belt of Goa. It also affects the animals
directly and indirectly. Probability of electrocution due to snapping of overhead electrical conductor
wires is very high.
Flood vulnerability
Floods in Goa have caused loss to the human lives, livestock, damaged homes and caused crop
destruction over the decades. Infrastructure damage due floods is well recorded. The Valvanti,
Chapora, Kushawati and Talpona rivers have well-defined stable courses; their natural and manmade
banks are capable of carrying flood discharges except when the water is let out from the overflowing
dams of Tillari and Anjunem. Because of lacklustre attitude of the community, unplanned growth, lack
of maintenance of natural tanks and improper upkeep of drainage systems, floods have been construed
as natural although in reality they are human-induced. Traditionally, flood problem in Goa had been
confined to the spilling of smaller rivers and the submersion of marginal areas in Pernem, Bicholim,
Sattari, Bardez, Canacona, Quepem and Sanguem. However, the drainage problem in the municipal
areas of the State has deteriorated in the last couple of decades, thereby multiplying the destructive
potential of increasing flood hazards.
72
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 2.14: Flood Prone Areas North Goa: Source: DDMA North Goa
BBARDEZ TALUKA
Sr. No. Name of the Saza / Village Place
Juvemwaddo (Island), Wadivaddo, Madad waddo,
1 Nadora
Kodxe waddo
Bank of Chapora river at Revora, Tankwaddo at Revora
2 Revora
TISWADI TALUKA
Sr. No. Name of the Saza /Village Place
BICHOLIM TALUKA
Sr. No Name of the Saza/ Village Place
01 Harvalem Supachepudh
02 Bicholim Gaonkarwada, Pirachikond, Katarwada
03 Sal Near Mahadev Bhumika temple Khalchawada Sal
04 Latambarcem Bhatwadi Nanora
05 Amona Mestwada, Kharwada
06 Sanquelim Maulinguem South, Sanquelim Municipal
Market, Muzavarwada
07 Virdi Ghadiwada Gaonkarwada Virdi
08 Gauthan Khalchawada Gauthan
09 Pilgao Bagwada Pilgao
10 Pale Bhamai
11 Surla Deulwada (near siddheshwar temple surla)
12 Karapur Codal, Vithalapur
13 Ona Maulingae Saterkarwada,Paltadwada
14 Curchirem Kelmelkarwada
15 Naveli Madhlawada Maina, Pavlar Naveli
PERNEM TALUKA
Sr. No. Name of the Saza /Village Place
1 Dhargal Shirgal
2 Ibrampur Ibrampur, Hedus
3 Casarvornem Casarvornem
4 Chandel Chandel
5 Allorna Hassapur, Allorna Talarna, Bailapar, Khutwal
73
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
6 Ozori Sangavwada
SATTARI TALUKA
Sr. No. Name of the Saza /Village Place
1 Pissurlem NIL
2 Nagargao NIL
3 Mauxi NIL
4 Keri Ghoteli
5 Guleli Kankire, Melauli, Dhamse
6 Valpoi Velus, Nanus
7 Bhironda Savarshe, Padeli
8 Morlem Gimaiwada
9 Sanvordem Sonal
10 Cotorem Khadki,
11 Poriem Near Bhumika Temple
12 Dongurli NIL
13 Honda NIL
Table 2.15: Flood Prone Areas of South Goa: Source: DDMA South Goa
74
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
75
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 2.16 The Landslide Prone areas in Talukas of North Goa District Source: DDMA North Goa
Sr. No. Taluka Disaster prone areas Vulnerable to Landslide with Survey Number and Location
1 Tiswadi 1. Altinho, Panaji:
Chalta No. 1 PT Sheet No. 123
Chalta No. 1, 2, 41, 34, 45, PT Sheet No. 122
2. Maruti Gad, Panaji:
Chalta No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 13, 14, 15, 22, 23, 24, 25, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, PT
Sheet No. 105
2 Bardez Nil
3 Bicholim 1. Mulgao, Sy. No. 116 & 117
2. Naroa road from Deulwada Naroa to Pilgao village. Sy. No. 151.
4 Pernem 1. Kiranpani at Paliem Sy. No. 218/0
2. Vaidongar at Parcem Sy. No. 55/1, 75/4
3. Mahakhajan at Dhargal road Sy. No. 10/1, 2, 3
5 Sattari 1. Chorla Bealgaum Road Sy. No. 80/0 Charavane Village Satre
Table 2.17: The Landslide Prone areas in Talukas of South Goa District Source: DDMA North Goa
Taluka VP/ Areas vulnerable Households likely Expected Intervention
Municipality to be time needed
vulnerable affected
SALCETE
Salcete Raia House of Mrs. one June to Retaining wall to
Fransquina August be constructed
Mascarenhas,
H.No.1306/A,
Damon(E) Raia
Velim 1. Rangallim NIL NIL Retaining wall
Velim constructed
2.Behind the
house of Caitano
Pinto
(Zoriwado)
3.Behind the
house Santan
Pinto
(Zoriwado)
MORMUGAO
Mormugao Municipality 1) Opp Goa Opp Goa June to Retaining wall to
Vasco Shipyard Shipyard August be constructed
Vaddem Vaddem
Approx 11
Municipality 2)Behind 01 house & June to Retaining wall to
Vasco Shalom Abode residency August be constructed
building
Vollant Vasco
Municipality 3) Kamat Building and June to Retaining wall to
Vasco Road affected August be constructed
Residency Near
Lake Maimollem
Municipality 4) Merces Approximately June to Retaining wall to
Vasco Vaddem & 04 houses August be constructed
Maimollem affected
76
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
15 houses
affected
Municipality 2) Bogda Approximately June to Retaining wall to
Mormugao 15 houses August be constructed
affected
Municipality 3) Rumdawada Approximately June to Retaining wall to
Mormugao 25 houses August be constructed
affected
QUEPEM
NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
SANGUEM
NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
CANACONA
NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
DHARBANDORA
NIL NIL NIL NIL NIL
Drought vulnerability
While drought is an insidious hazard of nature, it originates from a deficiency of the precipitation that
persists long enough to produce a serious hydrologic imbalance. Drought should be considered r elative
to some long-term average condition of balance between precipitation and evapo-transpiration (i.e.,
evaporation and transpiration) in a particular area. Fortunately, the State of Goa has average rainfall of
around 125 inches per annum thereby safeguarding the State from possibility of drought situation in
near future.
77
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Tsunami
Anthropogenic hazards
78
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-3
Coherence and Mutual
Reinforcement of Three Post-
2015 Global Frameworks for
DRR
79
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
3.1 Background
The Post-2015 goals and agenda are set forth in the three landmark global agreements reached in 2015 –
the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (Sendai, Japan, March 2015), Sustainable Development
Goals (UN General Assembly, New York, September 2015) and Climate Change Agreement (Conference of
Parties, COP21, Paris, December 2015). The three documents set the stage for future global actions on DRR,
sustainable development and climate change. These three agreements have created a rare but significant
opportunity to build coherence across different areas having several shared or overlapping concerns. Taken
together, these frameworks represent a nearly complete agenda for building resilience, as that requires
action spanning development, humanitarian, climate change impacts and disaster risk reduction. India is
committed to these global frameworks and the government of India has taken various measures for
realization of the goals through involvement of government, private sector and the non -government
organisations.
The agreements represent a major turning point in the global efforts to tackle existing and future challenges
in all countries. Specific emphasis is apparent to support resilience-building measures, and a shift away from
managing crises to proactively reducing their risks. The agreements have varying degrees of emphasis on
sustainable development, DRR, resilience and climate change. An important element in the Sendai
Framework is to mutually reinforce with the other post-2015 global agendas by deliberately pursuing
coherence across and integration of DRR, sustainable development, responses to climate change and
resilience. In keeping with the global trends and priorities, the NDMP has also been restructured to ensure
coherence and mutual reinforcing of the national initiatives in the domains of DRR, sustainable development
and the responses to meet challenges of global climate change.
80
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Figure 3-1: Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction - 7 Global Targets
2. Number of People affected: Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030, aiming
to lower the average global figure per 100,000 in the decade 2020-2030 compared to the period 2005-2015
3. Economic Loss in Relation to GDP: Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross
domestic product (GDP) by 2030
4. Damage to Critical Infrastructure and Service Disruption: Substantially reduce disaster damage to critical
infrastructure and disruption of basic services, among them health and educational facilities, including
through developing their resilience by 2030
7. Multi-Hazard Early Warning Systems: Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-
hazard early warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to the people by 2030.
The 17 SDGs are integrated- that is, they recognize that action in one area will affect outcomes in others,
and that development must balance social economic and environmental sustainability. They recognize that
ending poverty and other deprivations must go hand in hand with strategies that improve health and
education, reduce inequality, and spur economic growth- all while tackling climate change and working too
preserve our oceans and forests. In strong commitment by all stakeholders to implement the global goals.
81
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The possibilities of attaining SDGs are jeopardized because disasters undermine economic growth and social
progress. No country or sector is immune to the impacts of natural hazards, many of which – the hydro-
meteorological – are increasing in frequency and intensity due to the impacts of climate change. While
necessary and crucial, preparing for disasters is not enough, to realise the transformative potential of the
agenda for SDGs, all stakeholders recognize that DRR needs to be its integral core. Progress in implementing
the Sendai Framework contributes to the progress of attaining SDGs. In turn, the progress on the SDGs helps
to substantially build resilience to disasters. There are several targets across the 17 SDGs that are related to
DRR. Conversely, all seven global DRR targets of the Sendai Framework are critical for the achievement of
the SDGs.
Figure 3-3: Coherence and mutual reinforcement of SDGs and Sendai Framework
Resilience is acknowledged both explicitly and implicitly in the SDG targets. The vision set out in the SDGs –
for people, planet, prosperity and peace – will inevitably fail if shocks and stresses are not addressed. The
pledge that ‘no one will be le behind’ requires a specific focus on the poorest and most vulnerable people,
which is a key challenge: up to 325 million extremely poor people are likely to be living in the 49 most hazard
prone countries by 2030. A focus on strengthening resilience can protect development gains and ensure
people have the resources and capacities to better reduce, prevent, anticipate, absorb and adapt to a range
of shocks, stresses, risks and uncertainties. Fig. 3-3 depicts how the coherence and mutual reinforcement
of the SDGs and Sendai Framework are reflected in outcomes and targets.
3.4 COP21 Paris Agreement on Climate Change Action and Disaster Risk Reduction
The Paris Agreement was adopted on 12 December 2015 at the Twenty-first session of the Conference of
the Parties (COP21) to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCC) held
in Paris from 30 November to 13 December 2015. The agreement builds upon the UNFCCC and brings
together all nations into a common cause to undertake ambitious efforts to combat climate change and
adapt to its effects, with enhanced support to assist developing countries to do so (Fig. 3-4). The
agreement aims at “holding the increase in the global average temperature to well below 2°C above pre-
industrial levels and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C above pre - industrial levels,
recognizing that this would significantly reduce the risks and impacts of climate change”. Article -7 dwells on
establishing “the global goal on adaptation of enhancing adaptive capacity, strengthening resilience and
reducing vulnerability to climate change.
82
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Figure 3-4: Main elements of the COP21, Paris Agreement on Climate Change
The major goals adopted in the agreement are:
i) A consensus on adopting the long-term goal of keeping the increase in global average
temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels
ii) Aim to limit the increase to 1.5°C, since this would significantly reduce risks and the impacts of
climate change
iii) Accepting the need for global emissions to peak as soon as possible, recognising that this will
take longer for developing countries and
iv) To undertake rapid reductions of emissions in accordance with the best available science
adaptation seek to address (Fig. 3-5). The regions already exposed to climate-related hazards and effects
will be at greater risk due to a projected increase in the frequency and/or intensity of those hazards and
effects because of global climate change.
Figure 3-5: Common concerns of climate change adaptation and disaster risk reduction
The agreement aims to strengthen the ability of countries to deal with the impacts of climate change.
To reach these ambitious goals, appropriate financial flows, a new technology framework and an enhanced
capacity building framework will be put in place, thus supporting action by developing countries and the
most vulnerable countries, in line with their own national objectives. The agreement also provides for
enhanced transparency of action and support through a more robust transparency framework. It requires
all signatories to make the best efforts through “Nationally Determined Contributions” (NDC) and to
strengthen these efforts in the years ahead.
83
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Effective reduction of losses and risks from natural hazards and climate extremes requires integrated actions
at different levels of governance. One of the greatest challenges is of creating institutional convergence that
integrates global goals emanating from these agreements. Disaster risk reduction (DRR) and Climate Change
Adaptation (CCA) are part of key agendas being considered in all these recent global agreements. All three
agreements share a common aim of making development sustainable. Strong commitment to ambitious
goals and accelerated implementation of these international agreements must be a global priority. Given
the complementarities between the post - 2015 agendas, leveraging the total impact of these instruments
creates shared value. Efforts must be deployed to ensure that each of them do not build in “policy risks” or,
contradictory policies, that generate more - rather than less - risk in development. Taken together, the
different priorities, targets and actions in the three frameworks constitute a more comprehensive resilience
agenda than when implemented independently without mutual rei nforcement because building resilience
requires action that spans the multiple domains of development, humanitarian initiatives, responding to
climate change and disaster risk reduction.
Figure 3-6: Post-2015 Global Frameworks—Coherence and Mutual Reinforcement within National Efforts
Ideas on ensuring coherence and mutual reinforcement across the global frameworks on development,
disasters and responding to climate change covering almost every aspect of society and all sectors of
economy are at an early and incipient phase. Enhancing resilience is the overarching theme as far as disaster
risk reduction is concerned. All these discussions make it quite clear that these tasks cannot be separated
from the mainstreaming of risk reduction although it is an idea that predates the concepts of coherence and
mutual reinforcement across the global frameworks. The ideas of coherence and reinforcement across
frameworks expand the scope of mainstreaming beyond how it was envisaged earlier (Fig. 3-6). The ways in
which coherence and mutual reinforcement are envisaged for SDGs and Sendai Framework is depicted in
Fig. 3-7. Similarly, that for SDGs and COP21 Paris Agreement on climate change actions is depicted in Fig. 3-
8. The measures envisaged for ensuring coherence and reinforcement will be discussed in the chapter on
mainstreaming. The India’s national initiatives relevant for DRR across the three Global Frameworks are
summarised in Table 3-1.
Figure 3-7: Envisaging coherence and Mutual Reinforcement of SDGs and Se ndai Framework
84
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Figure 3-8: Envisaging coherence and mutual reinforcement of SDGs and COP21 for climate change action
Table 3-1: India’s national initiatives relevant for DRR across the three Global Frameworks
Sendai – Global Sustainable COP21 – Paris National Initiatives
Targets Development Agreement on Climate Relevant to DRR
Goals Change
1. Substantially reduce SDG 1, 2, 11, 13 Changes in the pattern Multiple schemes and
global disaster of extreme events initiatives for DRR,
mortality by 2030 require enhanced economic
(2020- 2030 disaster resilience and development, GACC
compared to 2005- adaptation mitigation and
2015) • Addressing GACC risks is adaptation.
crucial for
eliminating poverty and
reducing economic losses
from disasters
2. Substantially SDG 1, 11, 13 Stresses the need for Allocation of
reduce the accelerated action to resources and
number of build resilience through funds for disaster
disaster-affected risk-sensitive planning prevention and to
people by 2030 and implementation of develop capacities
(2020-2030 DRR for DRR
compared to Strengthening of
2005-2015) the DRR at all levels
Promoting disaster
resilient
development
• Mainstreaming DRR
and
adaptation to GACC
in development
3. Substantially SDG 1, 11 The Paris Agreement aims National commitment
reduce direct to hold global average to DRR evident from
disaster economic temperature the PM Ten Point
loss increase to well below Agenda for DRR
2°C above pre-industrial National
levels and to pursue commitments for
efforts to limit it to 1.5°C, mitigation of and
recognizing that this adaptation to GACC as
would significantly reduce per Intended
the risks and impacts of Nationally Determined
climate Contributions (INDC)
change
4. Substantially reduce SDG 1, 4, 9, 11, Global adaptation goals Enhance the resilience
damage to critical for enhancing adaptive of
capacity, strengthening national health
resilience and reducing systems by
85
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
For monitoring the progress of Sendai Framework, under seven targets of Sendai, a set of 38 indicators
(Annexe-III, same as in 3.2.2) have been listed that must be measured against the _me period of Hyogo
Framework for Action, i.e., 2005-15, in terms of the percentage change with respect to the baseline. This
sectoral segregated baseline data for the period of 2005-15 will be collated by the central Ministry/
Department and States/UTs. Meanwhile, NITI Aayog has adopted a National Indicator Framework (NIF)
comprising 306 national indicators for monitoring the progress of 17 SDGs having 169 targets. As SFDRR and
SDGs have clear cut established linkages, this NIF, besides others, includes national indicators for targets
1.5.1, 1.5.2, 11.5.1, 11.b.1 and 11.b.2 focusing specifically on DRR. The time frames used in the NDMP are
co-terminus with the post-2015 global frameworks, ending in 2030. The State Disaster Management Plan
(SDMP) has tried to envisage coherence across the Goa State’s efforts for DRR, sustainable development,
and the actions in response to climate change.
86
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
11. All development sectors must imbibe the principles of disaster risk management
12. Risk coverage must include all, starting from poor households to SMEs to multi-
national corporations to nation states
13. Women’s leadership and greater involvement should be central to disaster risk
management
14. Invest in risk mapping globally to improve global understanding of Nature and
disaster risks
15. Leverage technology to enhance the efficiency of disaster risk management
efforts
16. Develop a network of universities to work on disaster-related issues
17. Utilise the opportunities provided by social media and mobile technologies for
disaster risk reduction.
18. Build on local capacity and initiative to enhance disaster risk reduction.
19. Make use of every opportunity to learn from disasters and, to achieve that, there
must be studies on the lessons after every disaster.
20. Bring about greater cohesion in international response to disasters
87
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-4
Social Inclusion in Disaster
Risk Reduction
88
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
4
4.1 Background
Social Inclusion in
Disaster Risk Reduction
Disaster situations raise many questions on normative social order and structural inequalities
which need to be reckoned with for an inclusive disaster response. Disaster management tend to
view the affected people as a homogenous group – as internally undifferentiated ‘victims’ or
‘survivors’, particularly in the relief and recovery processes. This leads to an inherent inability to
address the existing disparities and inequities across gender, caste, or class (Fordham 1999). While
hazards do not discriminate, people do. Disaster management could become unfair by being blind
to prevailing inequities. Existing socio-economic conditions mean that disasters can lead to
dissimilar outcomes even for what may seem demographically similar communities. Inevitably, the
most vulnerable groups suffer more than others. This chapter emphasizes the importance of DRR
to address unequal disaster coping capabilities by recognizing that due to inequalities and social
exclusions some sections suffer more than others in extreme events and disasters because of their
place within the social system. Addressing the enormous challenges of social marginalization, social
exclusion and other inequities are beyond the domain of DRR. However, DRR must take cognizance
of social realities to ensure that every possible effort is made to make DRR as socially inclusive as
possible.
The Disaster Management Act 2005 (Chapter 11, Section 61) prohibits all forms of discrimination –
be it based on sex, caste, community, descent or religion – in any activities related to disaster risk
reduction, disaster relief or humanitarian assistance to the affected people. The preamble of
National Policy of Disaster Management 2009 notes that the economically weaker and socially
marginalized sections, women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes tend to suffer more during
disasters. A community’s vulnerability to disaster depends on the social, cultural, economic and
political environment. A cycle of deprivation not only increases their vulnerability but also slowly
alienates them from the decision-making process denying accessibility to the basic entitlements.
The term social exclusion signifies all experiences of discrimination, deprivation and denial be it
based on any attribute, be it caste, gender, differences in abilities, ethnicity, creed, religion, sexual
orientation or any other attribute. The practices and manifestations of social exclusion are deeply
ingrained in a rigid social stratification system influenced by caste, religious affinities, gender bias,
prejudices towards people with disabilities and so on. Social exclusion is understood as the
condition (barriers and process) that impede social inclusion. Social exclusion is a process through
which individuals or groups are wholly or partially excluded from fully participating in all aspects of
life of the society, in which they live, on the grounds of their social identities, such as age, gender,
race, ethnicity, culture or language, and/or physical, economic, social disadvantages.
Exclusion is often most acute when people suffer multiple layers of discrimination and they are
embedded in unequal relations of power. To make matters worse, they often remain ‘invisible’ in
disaster reduction or emergency response programs, even in many cases where they constitute a
significant proportion of population. The socially excluded groups have context specific and
differentiated needs before, during and after a disaster, which are not taken into consideration in
DMPs. Inclusive Disaster Risk Management is about equality of rights and opportunities, dignity of
the individual, acknowledging diversity, and contributing to resilience for everyone, not leaving
aside members of any community based on age, gender, disability or other. In the Indian context,
the added emphasis on social inclusion in the NDMP for DRR will be on the following:
1. Gender-based Vulnerabilities
2. Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC&ST)
3. Elderly
4. Children and
5. Persons with Disabilities (PWD)
89
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Gender refers to the social attributes and opportunities associated with being male and female and
the relationships between women, men, girls and boys, as well as the relations between women
and between men. These attributes, opportunities and relationships are socially constructed,
learned, and changeable over time. Gendered disadvantages – unequal access to resources, legal
protection, decision making and power, their reproductive burden and their vulnerability to
violence – consistently render women more vulnerable than men to the impacts of disasters.
Disasters reinforce, perpetuate and increase gender inequality, making bad situations worse for
women. The potential contributions that women can offer to the disaster risk reduction are often
overlooked and female leadership in building community resilience to disasters is frequently
disregarded.
A gender perspective to DRR helps focusing attention on the distinct gender –specific capacities
and vulnerabilities to prevent, prepare, confront, and recover from disasters (WCDRR 2015). Post-
disaster reconstruction programs could render women more vulnerable when compared to the
pre-disaster situation, defeating the very objective of building back better. An increase in violence
against women, domestic violence and divorce rates have been reported in the aftermath of
disasters (Fothergill 1998). They become more vulnerable to abuse in disaster situations. They face
difficulty in accessing sanitation facilities. There is lack of privacy and increased risk of sexual
assault. In some situations, there are risk of girls and young women being ensnared by traffickers
or an increase in early marriages.
There is a tendency to leave out women from accessing relief and recovery as they do not have
control over resources and institutions (Parkinson 2011). Women headed households, single
women, and widows find it difficult to access information and necessary financial help for recovery
and reconstruction. Following a disaster, there are many situations in which there is likelihood of
women becoming victims of domestic and sexual violence. There are cases women avoiding using
shelters for fear of being sexually assaulted. Women are more likely to suffer from malnutrition
because they have specific nutritional needs when they are pregnant or breast feeding. During
drought, in food scarcity situations, women are the first ones to compromise on their food intake.
They are usually overburdened with many household tasks such as fetching drinking water and
firewood walking long distances. Women and girls are usually denied the opportunity to acquire
lifesaving skills such as swimming because of gender bias rendering them less capable of coping
with hazards. Their traditional gendered role as caretakers and nurturers intensifies in post disaster
situations having to take care of the injured and sick when they themselves are injured.
During post-disaster planning, relief and recovery needs of women and girls tend to be overlooked
because the disaster management is almost entirely male dominated with hardly any participation
of women. They are often ignored during compensation proceedings. While most women do not
possess formal ownership of either movable or immovable properties (land or assets), even those
who have ownership find it difficult to complete the formalities due to various pressures at home
and the lack of gender sensitivity in the proceedings. Their losses usually remain undervalued and
uncompensated. It is necessary to adequately understand how the disaster risks tend to be
amplified by the pre-existing social vulnerabilities and socio-economic stress. Often, unknowingly,
due to social conditioning and
gendered roles, women tend to demand less in the reconstruction process. Many barriers inhibit
women’s participation in the decision-making and rebuilding processes. Yet, disasters do provide
90
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
opportunities for improving women’s status by altering the gender relations and by facilitating
social and behavioural changes. Post disaster recovery presents opportunities to empower women.
Despite these formidable challenges, amidst gender bias and inequality, some of the reconstruction
programs undertaken in India have tried to empower women, taking advantage of the window of
opportunity opened by the disaster.
Post-disaster reconstruction is expected to “present opportunities for new and more progressive
gender roles and relationships to emerge and provide opportunities to rebuild in a way that is
inclusive of women and girls and provide opportunities for women to assume leadership roles and
better influence the direction of development patterns” (UNISDR 2015a). A gender perspective to
DRR helps focusing attention on the distinct gender-specific capacities and vulnerabilities to
prevent, prepare, confront, and recover from disasters (WCDRR 2015). Disaster impacts are not
gender neutral, hence adequate attention must be paid to promote gender justice and equity in
post disaster recovery programs.
In the disaster situations, women need to be centrally involved in planning and implementation
process with the key principle of active contributors in building resilience. The Sendai Framework
emphasizes the need not only to address the issues related to women in post-disaster
reconstruction but also envisages a lead role for women in post-disaster reconstruction: Women
and persons with disabilities should publicly lead and promote gender-equitable and universally
accessible approaches during the response and reconstruction.
To promote gender equity, the reconstructed houses need to be registered in the joint names of
husband and wife. Widows and single women, who do not have land titles, should not be left out
from receiving shelters. Women feel more secure, confident and feel that they will never be
without a roof over their head in their life. Owner Driven Reconstruction (ODR) can be followed
where women can take leadership role in monitoring implementation of safe housing technology.
Programs shall be designed and aimed at empowering women through access to social security
measures and income generation activities. Women Self Help Groups can be formed for livelihood
opportunities. It needs to go beyond traditional income generating activities and aim at enhancing
skills as masons, carpenters, trading of local products, developing local shops for housing,
sanitation and other materials, etc.
91
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Scheduled Castes (SC) and the tribes listed are known as Scheduled Tribes (ST). As per 2011 Census,
the SC and ST comprise about 16.6% (20.14 Cr) and 8.6% (10.43 Cr), respectively, of India's
population.
The amended Prevention of Atrocities Act, 2015 has brought in clarity on some sections, clearly defined
certain offences, fixed roles and responsibilities of the authorities and has clear timelines regarding
investigation and judicial handling of atrocity cases.
Most of the SC and ST communities tend to be poor living on marginal lands that are also highly
hazard prone, such as floodplains, unsafe coastal tracts and unstable hillsides. The dwellings of
scheduled caste and tribal communities are usually on the margins - be it in urban or rural areas.
These settlements tend to be in the less served areas with poor availability of accurate information,
lack of access to basic amenities and inadequate disaster resilient infrastructure. The housing is
usually unsafe and of poor quality. In the urban areas they are usually on unsecure land tenure –
often unauthorized slums. Combined with hazardous living conditions, chronic poverty and lack of
amenities they are most likely to suffer the outbreak of diseases in times of disaster. For women
from the SC and ST communities, the gender-based discrimination and violence become intensified
and more difficult to counter due to the caste-based social marginalization.
It must be ensured that in post disaster situations and in disaster mitigation planning and
implementation activities full attention should be provided to ensure social inclusion practices in
early warning, evacuation, relief support, rehabilitation and any other process so that the inherent
systemic prejudices do not increase their vulnerability. For example, special efforts should be made
to ensure that there are no instances of discriminatory practices in evacuation, distribution of relief
material, damage assessment, allocation of housing plots, etc.
92
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The basic thrust of mitigating the impact of natural disaster should be of two-fold: a) make the
tribal people self-reliant by restoring the natural resource base and b) post-disaster, provide timely
and appropriate relief and rehabilitation packages. The Tribal Development Ministry and the State
Departments in consultation with the tribal leaders and experts shall develop the package of
interventions. Efforts must be made so that there is community participation and ownership over
the interventions. The tribal villages should be able to customize their plans in accordance with
PESA disaster preparedness, relief and rehabilitation plans.
4.4 Children
The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child adopted in 1989 (UN 1989) became the
first legally binding international convention to affirm human rights for all children. It stipulates
that children have the right to adequate food, water, shelter and education. In disaster situations
they ought to be free from abuse, neglect, sexual exploitation or trafficking, and should be able to
grow up in a safe and supportive environment. Children are vulnerable due to their age and
immature psychosocial understanding of the surrounding.
The chaos and erosion of support for care and protection during a disaster could heavily affect their
physical and psychological health causing children to be traumatized. Given their vulnerability,
children require special support and attention during crisis situations to provide basic needs and
ensure that their rights are not violated. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the
Juvenile Justice (care and protection of children) Act 2000 (JJ Act) states that children have the right
to protection from abuse, neglect and exploitation.
In situations of emergency children face isolation, anxiety, trauma, some get separated from their
families, loose their parent(s), face gender violence and trafficking. Some face the risk of getting
recruited as child labourers. During disaster, children’s bodily integrity is at risk when widespread
and/or systematic violence occur. The children often face apathy leading to severe interruption of
education and recreation, poor access to food and nutrition. In the post disaster situations, the
Anganwadi and schools must open as soon as possible. In case of damage to the structures,
temporary/ emergency provision must be created allowing children to access the services. The
state governments may increase the food supplies so that the nutrition support can be doubled in
the Anganwadis and primary schools. Many state governments have been doing this for a limited
duration in disaster situations.
The JJ Act, 2000 provisions for care, protection and rehabilitation of children ensuring setting up of
Child Protection Units. Such units must be set up at village and block level so that children have
access to nutrition, child friendly spaces for recreation, protection against violence and trafficking,
restoration of children to their biological families, promote community -based rehabilitation of the
orphan and children of single parent not in a position to provide care and protection making use of
State specific foster parent support services/ schemes. The Ministry of Women and Child
Development (MWCD) and Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment (MSJE) and the Ministry of
Human Resource Development (MHRD) along with the National Commission for Protection of Child
Rights (NCPCR) and the State counterpart (usually, State Child Protection Society – SCPS) under the
Protection of Child Rights Act, 2005 may develop support mechanisms and periodically oversee the
status of care and protection of children in all major disasters and recommend for timely action.
4.5 Elderly
The world is ageing. Globally, approximately 700 million people or 10 per cent of the world’s
population is already over the age of 60, and by 2030, there will be more people over 60 than under
10. While this represents a triumph of development, the combination of more extreme climate and
disaster events coupled with the failure to adapt DRR responses to the ageing demographic trend
has the potential to increase older people’s vulnerability to risks and disasters. Yet, the specific
requirements and strengths of older people are often not given appropriate consideration in DRR.
A report of the Government of India, ‘Elderly in India’ (CSO 2016), presents detailed statistical
profile of the elderly population based on various official data. The report states that like other
nations, India too has undergone changes in the age structure of the population with the
proportion of older persons increasing due to increased life expectancy brought about by
combination of many factors such as reduction in mortality rates, lower morbidity, better quality
93
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
of life, and better health care. This phenomenon, called population ageing, is a demographic trend
all over the world.
According to national Census 2011, there are nearly 104 million elderly persons (aged 60 years or
above); 53 million females and 51 million males. Both the share and size of elderly population is
increasing over time. From 5.6% in 1961 the proportion has increased to 8.6% in 2011 (men 8.2%,
women 9.0%). In terms of rural and urban distribution, 71% of the elderly are in rural and 29 % is
in urban areas. As per Census 2011, the sex ratio among elderly is 1033 women per 1000 men. The
life expectancy at birth is 69.3 years for females and 65.8 years for males. At 60 years of age, the
average remaining length of life is likely to be about 18 years (16.9 for men and 19.0 for women).
At age 70, it was less than 12 years (10.9 for men and 12.3 for women). The old-age dependency
ratio is 14.2%, as per Census 2011 (females 14.9%, males 13.6%). Most common disability among
the aged persons was locomotor disability and visual disability. According to Helpage India, during
disasters the elderly are usually the last in the line, likely to be lost in the crowd, and highly
vulnerable49. The greater vulnerability of the elderly compared to others during disasters needs to
get more attention in all phases of disaster risk management. The elderly needs to be treated as
priority group by proper design in the disaster management plans. The DRR planning needs to pay
special attention to psychological vulnerabilities, impaired physical mobility, diminished sensory
awareness, poor health conditions as well as weak social and economic limitations that severely
limit the capacity of the elderly to prepare for disasters, hinder their adaptability and constrain
their ability to respond.
The UN Charter 14 (UNISDR 2014) for older people in DRR focuses on three key principles of an
inclusive approach to DRR and there are fourteen minimum standards which underpin these key
principles. The three principles are:
1. In need: Older people have specific requirements which must be understood and responded to
within all DRR activities.
2. Invisible: Older people’s vulnerabilities and capacities are often overlooked; the collection of
data on people’s age and sex is essential to ensure older people and other people at risk are
visible and supported in DRR.
3. Invaluable: Older people have years of knowledge, skills and wisdom which are invaluable
assets in DRR and must be acknowledged, valued and engaged by supporting older people to
participate in DRR.
The Charter calls for stronger commitment from governments, donors and organizations to act on
the shortcomings in DRR policies, strategies and practices that often insufficiently respond to older
people’s disaster risks. They must acknowledge and fulfil older people’s rights and engage older
people’s capacities and contributions. This charter has been developed throug h consultations with
governments, NGOs, DRR and ageing experts as well as older men and women. The Maintenance
and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 provides legal framework for the wellbeing of
senior citizen lacking any support from family or close relatives.
In post disaster situations, it is essential that the needs of elderly are considered separately, rather
than clubbing them with others keeping in mind the specific concerns applicable to them. It is
preferable to have community-based senior-citizen support mechanisms so that the senior citizens
are not uprooted from their immediate surrounding. This should include efforts to educate local
communities about how they can help senior citizens and raise their awareness about supporting
the elderly. The district DRR plan may prepare a list of senior citizens living without any family
support. In the post disaster situation, looking at the gravity of the situation, the District Collector
may take a call to set up temporary arrangements for the elderly and to take care of the personal
needs such as food, medicine, shelter and other requirements. Special arrangements could be
made to protect the property and assets of senior citizens if required.
94
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The Convention, in its articles 11 and 32, requires that persons with disabilities benefit from and
participate in disaster relief, emergency response and disaster risk reduction strategies. The
Adoption of the Dhaka Declaration on Disability and Disaster Risk Management, in December 2015,
acknowledges: “the importance of linking disability inclusive Disaster Risk Management (DRM) with
the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) on the understanding that inclusion builds the resilience
of the whole of society, safeguards development gains and minimizes disaster losses”.
The population of PWD in India, as per census 2011, is 2.68 Cr, which is 2.2% of the population. Of
these 56% are males and 44% are females. In the total population, the male and female population
are 51% and 49% respectively. Majority of the PWD (approx. 69%) live in rural areas, which is nearly
same the share of rural population. A global survey by UNISDR50 in 2013 among 5,717 persons
living with disabilities in 137 countries and eight non-self-governing territories examined why the
number of the dead and injured PWD are disproportionally high in conflict, disasters and other
emergency situations. The survey showed that 72.9% of PWDs have no personal preparedness
plans. PWDs across the world say they are rarely consulted about their needs. The survey found
that in the event of a sudden disaster, only 20% of PWD could evacuate immediately without
difficulty, while the majority would have some level of difficulty or not be able to evacuate at all. A
Handicap International study in 2015 (HI 2015) found that 75% of people with disabilities believe
they are excluded from humanitarian responses to emergencies like natural disasters and conflict.
It has been observed that persons with disabilities (PWD) are often overlooked and thus not only
excluded in risk reduction and disaster response measures but are also subject to at higher risk
than others. The NDMA has brought out relevant guidelines51 which must be consulted. Neglected
throughout the DRM cycle, concerns about inclusion relate to limited social participation in DRR
activities, poor access to information and services, poverty, invisibility during relief operations,
response to basic needs not adapted and specific needs ignored. The most common priority
identified by PWDs in the UNISDR survey of 2013 for improving inclusiveness of PWD in disaster
risk reduction is for the involvement of PWD in DRR-related activities. The survey also emphasized
the need for supportive policies, laws and promotion of support systems involving neighbours and
local community.
DRR efforts must specifically address the vulnerabilities of PWD among the affected population,
rather than clubbing them with others. Special attention must be paid to ensure that no PWD is
abandoned after a disaster. Local community -based efforts and support system including
promoting a buddy system whereby each PWD have one or more persons in the neighbourhood
who are responsible to act as a buddy to assist. The neighbours must be made aware of how they
can help the PWD and provided training. The PWD must also make pro-active efforts to identify
people in the neighbourhood whom they can rely upon for assistance in emergencies. It is good to
have more than one "buddy", particularly in different areas where the PWD spend more time, such
as workplace, home, or school. The more people who can assist are there so much the better. It is
also important for PWD to keep their helpers or buddies well informed about their special needs
and for the helpers to remain in regular touch with those they are responsible for. A detailed
disaster response planning at the local level must include lists of PWD in need special care. In the
post disaster situation, the agencies responsible for disaster management may set up temporary
facilities that are barrier-free and friendly to PWD. The administration can provide special
arrangements to protect the property and assets of PWD, if required.
“All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with
reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.”
The DRR efforts must take up social inclusion as challenge recognizing its complex and diverse
nature. A social inclusion strategy must identify a series of practical objectives and actions that can
significantly decrease or eliminate social exclusion in all aspects of DRR. The DRR efforts need to
design local strategies to promote inclusion. All agencies involved in DRR – government, non-
government or international – must make special efforts to properly assess the needs of all the
95
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
marginalized sections and particularly vulnerable groups and to ensure full compliance with
prescribed standards for assistance. Care must be taken to ensure that the vulnerability mapping
exercises are able to identify properly all relevant factors. Efforts must be made to facilitate the
realization of rights and entitlements of all socially excluded sections. A potential path forward in
promoting social inclusion is to encourage community participation as inclusion depends crucially
on active involvement of diverse sections of society.
Social inclusion is theme cutting across all aspects of DRR. While this chapter provides an overall
perspective on the significance of social inclusion in DRR, its importance is given additional
emphasis in different sections and related responsibility frameworks. Despite social inclusion being
a cross -cutting feature, it is added as a distinct Thematic Area for DRR in the responsibility
framework along with indicative Sub-Thematic Areas.
96
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
123
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
124
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
11
This includes all private and public institutions dedicated for children –foster care centres, kindergartens, pre -schools, facilities for care of children with special needs,
orphanages, children's homes, shelter homes, etc. and all institutions designated for the care and protection of children under Juvenile justice system.
125
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
4. Elderly Lead Agencies: Sensitizing local communities about additional vulnerabilities of the
HFWD, DSJE elderly persons in the communities and promote neighbourhood
Agencies with groups or responsible individuals to assist the elderly
major roles: Make special arrangements for disaster preparedness and safety of
SDMA, DMD$ various institutions for the elderly such as old age homes,
Supporting retirement homes and shelter homes for the elderly
Agencies: Linking organisations working for the welfare of elderly with
All Agencies community initiatives for DRR
Associated with Preparing lists of all the elderly persons living without adequate
DRR directly or support, periodically reviewing their situation and check the status
indirectly of social network (neighbours, relatives, friends) and other
arrangements for their support
I n the risk season or after early warnings, take measures to ensure
that the elderly is informed and prepared
Involve elderly in disaster preparedness and planning to the extent
they can contribute
Assess medical and health support needs of the elderly in each area
and maintain stocks of crucial items
Special attention to the protection of property and assets of the
elderly after evacuation or post disaster situations
5. Persons With Disabilities (PWD) Lead Agencies: Sensitizing local communities about the PWD living in the
DSJE community and their special needs particularly during disasters
Agencies with Promote neighbourhood groups assist PWD or ensure a Personal
major roles: Support Network consisting of at least three persons who are
SDMA, DMD$, trusted for each PWD
HFWD Make special arrangements for disaster preparedness and safety
Supporting of various institutions for the PWD such as school for the blind,
Agencies: hostels for PWD and any facilities dedicated to PWD
All Agencies
Associated with
126
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
DRR directly or Linking organisations working for the welfare of PWD with
indirectly community initiatives for DRR
Preparing lists of all PWD, periodically reviewing their situation
and check the status of social network (neighbours, relatives,
friends) and other arrangements for their support
In anticipation of a hazard or after early warnings, take measures
to ensure that all PWDs are properly informed and prepared
Involve PWDs in disaster preparedness and planning as equal
participants
Special attention to the protection of property and assets of the
PWDs after evacuation or post disaster situations
127
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-5
Mainstreaming Disaster Risk
Reduction
123
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
5
5.1 Background
Mainstreaming
Disaster Risk Reduction
A disaster sets back development of the affected region and at times beyond, depending on its
scale. It can suddenly reverse decades or more of accumulated developmental gains. The
impact can be minimised or reduced significantly if the affected community had incorporated
adequate risk reduction measures into the development. The losses to multiple sectors of a
disaster -affected region disrupts almost every sector of the economy and the quality of life of
the people making it difficult to attain development goals set prior to the disaster because
considerable expenditure must be made on humanitarian assistance and for recovery.
Investment in DRR is required for protecting assets, properties, development opportunities and
outcomes against disasters. According to an UNDP document every dollar invested into DRR
could save seven dollars in disaster aftermath (UNDP 2012). The process of development, and
the kind of development choices made could enhance disaster risks - the existing or by creating
new.
As per the provisions of the DM Act, all ministries, states, UTs, departments and agencies must
have their own DM Plan. Unlike other components of a DMP, mainstreaming DRR must be
incorporated into the overall plans, policies and programs rather than as a subcomponent of
the DMP. DRR must become an integral part of every development plan and the DMP must
provide indications how that will be accomplished in the DMP. At present there is, perhaps,
some lack of clarity on this and this chapter provides both the perspective and a summary of
how the practice of mainstreaming is evolving. Mainstreaming, by its very concept, is not a sub-
component of a disaster-specific plan but an approach that must be woven into all
developmental plans to reduce risks from disasters.
Development without adequate incorporation of DRR could worsen existing risks and has the
likelihood of introducing new risks, increasing the negative impact of potential disasters.
Extensive and sound integration of DRR into development can enhance disaster resilience,
reduce losses and hasten the progress towards development goals. Thus, it is desirable that the
development initiatives and DRR are dealt with concurrently in a seamless manner into all the
relevant policies, planning and implementation. The climate change impacts act as risk
multipliers worsening uncertainties associated with almost every hydro-meteorological hazard.
Therefore, all development initiatives must factor in the likelihood of greater risks and increase
in climate change-induced vulnerabilities. This requires incorporation of risk management and
climate adaptation as an intrinsic feature of all developmental efforts, especially in the areas
where hazards are known to be high. Such an approach, which internalises DRR within
development in a closely integrated manner is called mainstreaming DRR. It means radically
expanding and enhancing DRR so that it becomes a normal practice, fully institutionalised
within each agency’s regular planning and programmes in addition to the preparedness for
disaster response.
124
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
For over two decades, there has been increasing attention on the need to ‘mainstream’ disaster
risk reduction into development. This prompted many nations address risks from natural
hazards within their development frameworks in various ways and at different levels - spanning
the legislative, institutional, sectoral strategies and financial planning (Benson and Twigg, 2007).
Development do not necessarily reduce disaster risk. It can unwittingly create new risks or
exacerbate the existing ones,with disasters likely to be both a cause and a product of
development. The experiences from across the world have highlighted the crucial importance
of social inclusion in DRR. Social exclusion adversely affects both development and the capacity
to cope with disasters. In addition to the special emphasis on making DRR socially inclusive, the
mainstreaming of DRR must also make social inclusion one of the intrinsic features.
The Oslo Policy Forum (2008) concluded that rather than reducing disaster risk, development
processes are in many cases giving rise to new forms of vulnerability impeding efforts to reduce
poverty and promote growth. ‘Win–win’ solutions for securing sustainable development,
reducing poverty and strengthening hazard resilience therefore need to be explicitly and
actively sought, particularly as climate change is likely to increase the extreme weather events
(Benson and Twigg, 2007). This process should take account of the impact of climate change on
the intensity and frequency of hydro-meteorological events in the future, as well as historical
hazard records. The recognition of close linkages between development, disaster risk reduction
and global climate change have resulted in all the major global frameworks having a shared
emphasis on building resilience. The concept of coherence and mutual reinforcement of the
diverse initiatives to achieve the national goals and those of the major global frameworks has
also emerged. Given the highly cross-sectoral nature of these challenges, it is evident that they
are naturally inseparable and almost indistinguishable from mainstreaming.
The strategic objective of mainstreaming is of ensuring that DRR within the ongoing
development initiatives lead to integration of DRR into poverty reduction efforts and
sustainable socio –economic development by covering all aspects – institutional, legislative,
judicial and development policies. The key sub-thematic areas for mainstreaming DRR and
creating the enabling environment for it emerging from the global discussions are:
125
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
These broad themes need to be incorporated into the policies, plans and programs of
government agencies at all levels as an integral part of their general plans, while their DM Plans
will provide an outline or broad indication of how it will be done. These are ideas and concepts
that need to be developed further in operational terms and all agencies must explore ways to
incorporate mainstreaming DRR in their regular planning and formulation of programmes.
Increasing the awareness of disaster risk, ways to reduce it as well as manage it is an important
element of mainstreaming DRR. It may be noted in this context that the Sendai Framework
emphasises the role of improving the understanding and awareness of risk. The DRR policies
and practices must be based on improved understanding of disaster risk in all its dimensions
and communities made aware of various aspects of disaster risk so that they are able to
proactively take preventive measures. Such awareness is most critically essential on the part of
key line agencies, local authorities and communities in high-risk areas. Disaster risk has a
cascading nature with decisions in one sector potentially changing disaster risk in another.
Therefore, decision -makers across diverse sectors and levels of government as well as the
private sector and civil society also must recognise the importance of considering disaster risk
as an intrinsic part of all projects, programmes and initiatives.
Adequate and appropriate legislative arrangements for disaster risk management, including the
mainstreaming of DRR into development, form a key component of an enabling environment.
Revision of land-use regulations and building codes and introduction of judicial and other
measures will be required to ensure enforcement. As a continuous effort, it is necessary to
improve and strengthen various laws having a bearing on DRR. DRR responsibili ties must be
explicitly incorporated in the duties of all branches of government. There is need to strengthen
the vertical and horizontal integration of DRR plans between different levels of government,
various line agencies and neighbouring local bodies. What this implies is the integration of DRR
into all the norms, regulations, approval and monitoring relating to development through
periodic reviews and amendments in addition to those specific to disaster.
A comprehensive disaster risk management strategy, actively involving stakeholders at all levels
of government as well as the private sector, local communities and civil society, is required to
implement the legislative framework and to provide coordination and monitoring mechanisms
and arrangements. Individual disaster risk reduction actions and programs need to be located
within this strategy, rather than treated as discrete, individual measures. Moreover, the
strategy needs to indicate specific entry points and mechanisms for mainstreaming disaster risk
reduction concerns into both the broader development agenda and the design and
implementation of individual development initiatives. The emphasis now is on managing risks
going beyond disaster and emergency management, which tends to be concerned mainly with
management of disaster events rather than risk. The risk management processes are
continuous and embedded within the broader development framework. There are various
options for financing disaster risk management, i.e., Disaster Risk Financing Instruments (DFRI).
126
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
DRFI are commonly classified as ex post (e.g., budget reallocations, loan conversations,
borrowing) or ex ante (accumulated reserves, precautionary savings, contingent credit, risk
transfer/insurance). Insurance is a type of ex ante financing, in which an at-risk party cedes all
or some of its risk exposure to a third party in return for a premium payment. However, none
of these are standalone or universal solutions for DRR. For example, insurance is not a sufficient
instrument for achieving effective disaster risk management and disaster risk reduction at a
societal level. At –risk parties, whether individuals, businesses or governments, must decide
when insurance is appropriate and what other tools to use when it is not. It must be noted that
not all perils can be insured against. Various risk financing instruments must be integrated
within an overall DRR strategy, enabling policies and supporting legal framework.
The processes to facilitate and promote risk transfer involve identifying aspects such as, a)
various layers of disaster risk, b) who bears each level of risk and c) possible risk transfer
instruments available to each layer (Le Quesne et al 2017). As part of risk layering, financing
instruments must be selected based on the frequency and severity of disasters. Ri sks with high
frequency and low severity (e.g., floods) can be self-financed by the insured party (government
or affected populace). Disaster reserve funds or budgetary allocation would be appropriate
instruments in this case. On the other hand, risks with low frequency and high severity are likely
to cause extensive damage and should be transferred to better-equipped third parties.
Integrating risk transfer mechanisms into disaster risk informed development is challenging for
policy-making and planning.
Importance of social inclusion for DRR was discussed earlier in considerable detail. Inclusive
DRR is about equality of rights, equal opportunities and the dignity of the individual irrespective
of social background, community, age, gender or disability. Social inclusion is also a cross cutting
theme that needs to be an integral part of the mainstreaming efforts. A detailed list of Sub-
Thematic Areas for DRR and responsibility framework has been provided in the chapter on
social inclusion. Mainstreaming social inclusion in DRR must be based on the approach
discussed in detail there and it is not necessary to reiterate it here.
5.7 Enabling Coherence and Mutual Reinforcement of Initiatives under the Major Global
Frameworks for Enhancing Disaster Resilience
The process of defining the 2030 global agenda inevitably showed there is much to be gained
from aligning plans, targets, actions and indicators across the separate but interlocking
agreements. It was evident that there is significant potential for designing financing
mechanisms, policies and programmes that can deliver on more than one set of targets or
frameworks. The very idea of coherence and mutual reinforcement implies concerted and
mutually supporting efforts cutting across several ministries and sectors. The efforts to achieve
national goals under different major global frameworks could be made to mutually reinforce
each other, resulting in cost -effective, faster and efficient implementation. Given the way the
ideas have emerged, coherence and mutual reinforcement goes beyond the usual formal inter
-agency coordination to achieve common targets. Instead, it heralds a new approach in which
measures taken under one framework strengthens goals in all the three frameworks. The three
global frameworks and the importance of coherence and mutual reinforcement have been
elaborated in a separate chapter. It is evident from the very nature of coherence and mutual
127
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Improving the understanding of disaster risk – both natural and those introduced or
increased by developmental actions – in all its dimensions is an effort that must be
integral to all development initiatives by understanding risks in a broader sense, i.e., risks
from hazards and those newly created
Understand the cascading nature of risk, of how decisions in one sector alters disaster risk
in another in a cascading manner
Understand not only vulnerabilities from cascading risks, but also better assess the
capabilities to resist, absorb, and accommodate risks
Recognise disaster risk as an intrinsic part of all projects, programmes and ini tiatives (by
all decision-makers and at all levels – Govt., private sector and civil society)
Aligning the risk management approaches
Improving horizontal and vertical integration for DRR within government by making use
of decision-making tools and information technology
Setting targets, timeframes, indicators and monitoring mechanisms to facilitate
consolidation of efforts across sectors to enhance disaster resilience
5.8 Institutional Arrangements and Capacity Development for Disaster Risk Management
DRR is a crosscutting responsibility that needs to be ‘owned’ by all government agencies rather
than by a single nodal department or agency designated for it. That requires the institutions to
explicitly recognise the DRR requirements and pay attention to implementing adequate
institutional arrangements required for addressing relevant accountability and responsibility
concerns. The nodal agencies at the national and state levels must provide leadership,
determine broad disaster risk management policies, oversee implementation and advocate for
the inclusion of disaster risk reduction concerns in broader development. The capacity
development shall cover all aspects such as institutional, human, community and technology
applications.
Since there are multiple line agencies, sectors and levels of administration involved in
development initiatives at national and state levels, mechanisms of inter -agency coordination
and integration must be strengthened to ensure that locally identified needs are reflected in
higher-level plans and strategies. The inter-departmental and inter-ministerial coordination or
horizontal coordination is important given the crosscutting nature of DRR and the potential
implications of one agency ’s decisions on another.
Integration of disaster risk concerns into government budgets should be tackled from two
angles, ensuring that levels of public expenditure on risk reduction are sufficient and that there
are adequate financial arrangements to manage the residual risk. The presence of residual risk
128
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
implies a continuing need to develop and support effective capacities for emergency services,
preparedness, response and recovery, together with socioeconomic policies such as safety nets
and risk transfer mechanisms, as part of a holis tic approach. While there are certain budgetary
allocations to partially address requirements of relief (e.g., National Disaster Response Fund,
State Disaster Response Fund), the mainstreaming of DRR requires each department of the
State/ to make adequate provision for DRR as an integral part of the main budget by ensuring
that all the major activities have incorporated DRR. Goa State Disaster Management Authority
(SDMA) constitutes of State Departments including Fire & Emergency Services, Goa Police,
PWD, Electricity, WRD. Government does not allocate separate funds for Dis aster Management
to these Line Departments. However, as per Sub Sections (1) and (2) of Section 49 of the
Disaster Management Act, 2005:
49. (1) Every Ministry or Department of the Government of India shall make provisions, in its
annual budget, for funds for the purposes of carrying out the activities and programmes set out
in its disaster management plan.
(2) The prevision of sub-section (I) shall, mutatis mutandis, apply to departments of the
Government of the State.
DRR consideration must become part of the appraisal processes of various development
projects to ensure that development gains are sustainable and to ensure that DRR components
and development components of projects are mutually reinforcing. There are some examples
of how development projects have been implemented by properly recognising and without
underestimating risks, thereby avoiding the creation of new risks (e.g., adequately factoring in
seismicity, properly estimating flooding probabilities, ensuring restrictions against urban sprawl
into industrial hazard-prone areas, strengthening land-use regulations by incorporating hazard
risk adequately). The project evaluations at different stages from concept stage to detailed
project report for implementation needs to be as much informed by hazard likelihoods as
possible. The project appraisals and EIA should include DRR and climate change concerns a lot
more systematically than is usually done currently in many parts of the world. Changes must be
incorporated in the budget approval and financial sanctioning procedures employed by the
Expenditure Finance Committee (EFC) and the Standing Finance Committee (SFC) to make DRR
evaluation mandatory.
Capacity to monitor and evaluate disaster risk reduction initiatives, generate hard evidence on
related inputs, outputs, results and impacts, and learn lessons for the future is an essential
component of the enabling environment for mainstreaming. Although mainstreaming is
essentially continuous and pervasive, it is necessary to set targets to achieve DRR outcomes
along with appropriate timeframes, responsibility frameworks and measurable indicators.
Again, it must be recognised that all these apply to all aspects and sectors of development and
governance as mainstreaming will be an ongoing and unending process that would become
more and more tightly interwoven into all developmental initiatives. Nevertheless, given the
fact that DRR mainstreaming had a very slow start, it is necessary to proceed in a phased
manner with the initial phase focussing on how to incorporate it into the overall plans, followed
by the setting medium and long-term goals. Basically, the phasing should be consistent with the
129
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
priorities set in the NDMP in terms of short, medium and long-term goals. What needs to be
done by the centre, state and UTs are described in a broad manner in the chapter on the
responsibility framework for building disaster resilience.
5.13 Implementation
130
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-6
Building Disaster Resilience –
Responsibility Framework:
Part-A, Prelude
131
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
6
Building Disaster Resilience
– Responsibility Framework:
Part-A, Prelude
6.1 Introduction
This chapter is essentially a prelude to the detailed responsibility framework for realising DRR and
building resilience presented in the next chapter. This includes almost all aspects of pre -disaster risk
management. The complex and extensive nature of the tasks is summarised in this chapter and the
detailed responsibility framework described in the next chapter. The responsibility framework provides
a brief description of actions, list of key agencies responsible from the centre and state and relevant
time frames. Four categories of time frames, running concurrently in most cases, are:
It must always be understood that the time frames T1, T2, and T3 run concurrently in most cases and
not necessarily sequentially. Of course, there will be some tasks which can begin only when certai n pre-
requisites are satisfied or can be implemented sequentially in phases, while there are some which must
be started at the earliest for it to be completed within the time frame. Many actions are ongoing and
several are continuation of those in previous version of NDMP. The goal is to implement as many as
possible by 2030. A starting year is not mentioned because many of the actions are ongoing and many
were stated in the previous version of the SDMP.
After the paradigm shift from an approach to addressing disasters that weighed heavily on relief and
response to a radically different one based on DRR and preparedness, there has been another major
shift, partly incremental and partly dramatic, towards building disaster resilience. This global shift
centres on disaster risk management rather than disaster management. The principal features of this
trend are enhancing resilience through reducing risks, be tter preparedness, systematic understanding
of hazards, minimising the creation of new risks as part of development, investing significantly in DRR,
improving governance and mainstreaming DRR. The DM Act 2005 and the National Policy 2009 had
made a paradigm shift towards proactive disaster management by laying emphasis on long -term DRR.
The global frameworks – Hyogo (2005-15) and Sendai (2015-30) – signify calibrated shift towards
internalisation of DRR and making it an integral part of development initiatives.
The SDMP explicitly and implicitly incorporates the coherence among the major post -2015 global
initiatives, the corresponding national efforts, new initiatives of the government, an emphasis on social
inclusion and the mainstreaming of DRR, i.e., making DRR an integral feature of development. As
mentioned in Chapter-1, all these constitute the five main pillars of SDMP (reiterated here for
continuity):
132
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
I. Conforming to the national legal mandates – the DM Act 2005 and the NPDM 2009
II. Participating proactively to realise the global goals as per agreements to which India is a signatory –
Sendai Framework for DRR, SDGs and COP21 (Paris Agreement) – consistent with the international
consensus for achieving mutual reinforcement and coherence of these frameworks
III. Prime Minister’s Ten Point Agenda for DRR articulating contemporary national priorities
IV. Social inclusion as a ubiquitous and cross-cutting principle
V. Mainstreaming DRR as an integral feature
This chapter describes various Thematic Areas (TA) for DRR, the related Sub-Thematic Areas (sub-TA)
and the responsibility framework envisaged for implementation. A major component of DRR,
undoubtedly, is various types of mitigation measures. The DM Act 2005 defines "Mitigation" as
measures aimed at reducing the risk, impact, or effects of a disaster or threatening disaster situation.”
Goal of mitigation is to minimize risks from multiple hazards and the threats from individual hazards
need not always occur in isolation. At times, a hazardous event can trigger secondary events. For
example, an earthquake can produce a tsunami or may create flooding or landslides. Similarly, cyclones
often lead to flooding and various other cascading events spread over an area wider than the primary
event. In addition, demographics, nature of human settlements, and effects of global climate change
can magnify the vulnerability of the communities at risk. The DM Plan focuses on enhancing the
mitigation capabilities for multiple hazards, their likely cascading effects.
The DMP, incorporates key principles enunciated in the DM Act, National Policy, the three major post -
2015 global frameworks, the PM’s Ten Point Agenda, a special focus on social inclusion and an
emphasis on mainstreaming. The guiding principles of Sendai Framework states that disaster risk
reduction requires responsibilities to be shared by different divisions of governments and various
agencies. The effectiveness in disaster risk reduction will depend on coordination mechanisms within
and across sectors and with relevant stakeholders at all levels. For each hazard, the approach used in
this national plan incorporates into the planning framework the key themes enunciated in the Sendai
Framework and additional ones based on a broader approach to DRR elaborated earlier. These are
grouped under the following six Thematic Areas for DRR:
1. Understanding Risk
2. Inter-Agency Coordination
3. Investing in DRR – Structural Measures
4. Investing in DRR – Non-Structural Measures
5. Capacity Development
6. Climate Change Risk Management
Separate chapters (3, 4, and 5) have been devoted to the discussion of three crosscutting Thematic
Areas—a) coherence and mutual reinforcement for DRR of the post-2015 global frameworks, b) social
inclusion and c) mainstreaming DRR.
133
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
This Thematic Area focuses on understanding disaster risk, the Priority-1 in the Sendai Framework and
the integration of numerous actions needed for strengthening disaster resilience. The Sub-Thematic
Areas are: a) Observation Networks, Information Systems, Research, Forecasting, b) Zoning/ Mapping,
c) Monitoring and Warning Systems, d) Hazard Risk, Vulnerability and Capacity Assessment (HRVCA),
and e) Dissemination of Warnings, Data, and Information. Having adequate systems to provide warnings,
disseminate information, and carry out meaningful monitoring of hazards are crucial to disaster risk
reduction, and improving resilience. They are also an integral part of improving the understanding of
risk.
Inter-agency coordination is a key component of strengthening the disaster risk governance - Priority-2
of the Sendai Framework. The Sub-Thematic Areas for DRR are: a) Overall disaster governance b)
Response c) Providing warnings, information, and data and d) Non-structural measures. The central
ministries and agencies mentioned are those vested with hazard-specific responsibilities by the Govt. of
India or those expected to play major roles in the thematic areas given in the responsibility framework.
Undertaking necessary structural measures is one of the thematic areas for DRR and enhancing
resilience. These consist of various physical infrastructure and facili ties required to help communities
cope with disasters. The implementation of these measures is essential to enhance disaster
preparedness, a component of Priority-4 of the Sendai Framework. It is also an important component of
investing in disaster risk reduction for resilience, which is Priority-3 of Sendai Framework.
Sets of appropriate laws, mechanisms, and techno-legal regimes are crucial components in
strengthening the disaster risk governance to manage disaster risk, which is Priority -2 of the Sendai
Framework. These non-structural measures comprising of laws, norms, rules, guidelines, and techno-
legal regime (e.g., building codes) provide the legal regime that facilitates mainstreaming disaster risk
reduction into development activities. It empowers authorities to enhance disaster resilience. The
central and state governments will have to set up necessary institutional support for enforcement,
monitoring, and compliance.
Capacity development is a recurring theme in all DRR efforts. The Sendai Priority -2 (Strengthening DRR
governance to manage DR) and Priority-3 (Investing in DRR for resilience) are central to capacity
development. The capacity development includes training programs, curriculum development, large -
scale awareness creation efforts, and carrying out regular mock drills and disaster response exercises.
134
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The capabilities to implement, enforce, and monitor various disaster mi tigation measures must be
improved at all levels from the local to the higher levels of governance. It is also strengthening the DRR
governance at all levels to better manage risk and to make the governance systems more responsive.
Climate change significantly alters the geographic spread, frequency and intensity of hydro metrological
extreme events. It can also exacerbate their impacts. Investments in DRR can play an important role in
supporting communities to adapt to climate change. As the impacts of climate change are increasingly
felt, more financial and technical resources will be needed to support vulnerable people to adapt to the
negative impacts. Planning for DRR must be informed by the likely climate change impacts and scenarios.
There are major knowledge and data gaps concerning climate change impacts, impact scenarios and its
effects on various hydro-metrological hazards, which need to be kept in mind while examining the time
frames and actions listed under this Thematic Area for DRR.
135
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-7
Building Disaster Resilience –
Responsibility Framework:
Part-B
136
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7 – Responsibility Framework:
Part-B
The chapter provides a complex and extensive nature of the task of building disaster resilience presented
in a concise form along with the necessary detailed responsibility framework. The previous chapter
provides a prelude to this chapter, which may be referred for brief discussion on the broader aspects
related to the subject of this chapter. In order to manage the disaster risks and build resilience, the
involvement of multiple agencies at different levels from the local administrative bodies and
communities to the State Authority, departments and agencies is the prerequisite. It is equally important
that the different agencies at State, district and local level must carry out not only their own
responsibilities but also work in a well-coordinated way with several others. The success of disaster risk
management plans lies in necessarily identifying the various stakeholders/agencies and clearly
specifying their roles and responsibilities for a timely, coordinated and effective response during disaster
situations. All the relevant Authorities from local to State level, must institutionalise programmes and
activities at the department levels to enhance the inter-departmental and inter-agency coordination
and networking. The authorities/agencies must also rationalise and augment the existing regulatory
framework and infrastructure. This chapter covers the roles and responsibilities of the State and District
Level Authorities, Agencies, Departments to mitigate the impacts of the risks/threats posed by below
listed State Specific Hazards notified by the Government of Goa in to two categories:
Category A: Natural Disasters:
1. Gusty Winds;
2. Heavy Rains;
3. Thunder & Lightning Strikes/Cloudbursts;
4. Floods;
5. Landslides;
6. Biological Hazards;
7. Heatwave;
8. Tsunami;
9. Earthquakes;
Category B: Human Induced Disasters
1. Fires;
2. Drowning incidents;
3. Landslides (Mining Areas);
4. Industrial hazards;
5. Boat Capsize;
6. Road/Railway/Aircraft Accidents;
7. Terrorism/Stampede/Riots
Usually in response to requests for assistance, primarily the State Agencies shall play a supportive role
in most disasters and emergencies to the disaster-affected Districts. However, depending upon the
demand of the situation, in certain disasters, the State Agenci es will play a pro –active role. In the light
of trends at the National level, the State Agencies will constantly work for to upgrade the DM systems
and practices in the domains of DM planning, preparedness, and capacity building. For each State
Specific Hazard, in the sub-sections that follow, themes for action are presented in a separate
responsibility framework for each of the six Thematic Areas (TA) for DRR and related Sub-Thematic
Areas.
137
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
145
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
148
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
149
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
SDMA/RD$, DDMA, SDRF/DF&ES, • Promote attitude and behaviour change in the awareness
CDEF, Goa Police campaigns/ IEC
150
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
151
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7.2 Floods
7.2.1 Understanding Disaster Risk
Floods Understanding Disaster Risk
Sub-Thematic Area for DRR State Agencies and their Responsibilities
Department/Agency Responsibility
1. Recurring/ Regular (RR)
• Support and cooperate with central agencies
• Sponsor state-specific efforts; support local efforts for flood
management
• Support local information systems and update data for better flood
Observation Networks, Information management
SDMA/RD$, IRD., WRD, SDMA,
Systems, Monitoring, Research,
DDMA, SLRTI, PRIs, DoUD
Forecasting & Early Warning Short Term (T1)
• Implementing and monitoring of flood preparedness, river basin
and reservoir management plans including updating rule curves,
improve system of water release from reservoirs
• Identification of priority flood protection and drainage improvement
152
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
154
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
156
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
157
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Policy Framework
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporti ng
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the S tate.
158
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
159
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
160
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
161
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
162
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every ministry, department or agency of the government – central and state – not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indirect supporting role
depending on the disaster, location and context. (*) The ministry, department or agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned
have a direct or explicit supporting role. ($) SDMA/RD$—Disaster Management Department: The state government department acting as the nodal department for disaster
management, which is not the same in every state/UT.
163
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Department/Agency Responsibility
Short Term (T1)
All road re-levelling works or strengthening/ overlay works to be
carried out by milling the existing layers of the road so that the road
levels will not be allowed to increase
165
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
167
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
168
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
7.4 Seismic/Earthquakes
7.4.1 Understanding Disaster Risk
Seismic/Earthquakes Understanding Disaster Risk
Sub-Thematic Area for DRR State Agencies and their Responsibilities
Department/Agency Responsibility
• Earthquake Monitoring Services Recurring/ Regular (RR)
• National Seismological Network Share information widely
1. • Real Time Seismic Monitoring Network SDMA/RD$, DDMA, RD
(RTSMN)
• Earthquake Hazard and Risk Assessment (EHRA)
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Scientific Seismic SDMA/RD$, DOUD,
2. Ensuring implementation, enforcement, compliance and monitoring;
Zonation SPWD, DOUD, DDMA
Awareness creation
Long Term (T3)
SDMA/RD$, DDMA, Carry out need assessment from end users, conduct micro-zonation
3. Seismic Micro-zonation
SLRTI studies, prioritize important urban areas for micro-zonation, do
professional review before adoption
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Undertake HRVCA as part of preparing and periodic revision of DM
Hazard Risk Vulnerability and Capacity SDMA/RD$, DSJE, PRIs,
4. plans
Assessment (HRVCA) DoUD, DDMA
Short Term (T1)
169
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
170
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7.5 Tsunami
7.5.1 Understanding Disaster Risk
Tsunami Understanding Disaster Risk
Sub-Thematic Area for DRR State Agencies and their Responsibilities
Department/Agency Responsibility
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Research and
1. SDMA/RD$, DDMA Develop detailed computerized maps and databases of vulnerable
Development Efforts
areas along the coast for planning and coordination of DM activities
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
2. Zoning/ Mapping SDMA/RD$, DDMA, PRIs, DoUD Ensure support to the Central Government agencies in zoning/
mapping and carry out at their level
Observation Networks, Information Recurring/ Regular (RR)
3. Systems, Monitoring, Research, SDMA/RD$, DDMA, SLRTI Support, cooperation for data, collection and updates
Forecasting & Early Warning
Dissemination of warnings, data, and Recurring/ Regular (RR)
4. SDMA/RD$, DDMA, PRIs, DoUD
information
174
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
175
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
176
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
179
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentio ned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Depa rtment for disaster management in the State.
180
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
181
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7.6 Landslides
7.6.1 Understanding Disaster Risk
Landslides Understanding Disaster Risk
Sub-Thematic Area for DRR State Agencies and their Responsibilities
Department/Agency Responsibility
Hazard Zoning, mapping, geological, and Recurring/ Regular (RR)
SDMA/RD$ , State DGM, SRSAC,
1. geotechnical Investigations in regions Support to and cooperation with central agencies
DDMA
prone to landslides and snow avalanches
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
2. Research and Development SDMA/RD$ , DGM, SRSAC, DDMA
Support to and cooperation with central agencies
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Undertake HRVCA as part of preparing and periodic revision of DM
plans
Hazard Risk Vulnerability and Capacity
3. SDMA/RD$ , DSJE, PRIs, DoUD
Assessment (HRVCA) Short Term (T1)
Constitute/ strengthen the mechanisms for consultation with experts
and stakeholders
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Ensure facilities and infrastructure for the implementation of
SDMA/RD$ , SPWD, DDMA, adequate access to communities at risk
4. Dissemination of warnings
PRIs, DoUD Dissemination of warnings to all, down to the last mile – remote,
rural or urban;
Regular updates to people in areas at risk
Monitoring, Warning Systems, and Recurring/ Regular (RR)
5. SDMA/RD$ , DDMA, PRIs, DoUD
Dissemination Support and collaboration in implementation
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Systematic data management of data on disaster damage and loss
Disaster Data Collection and
6. SDMA/RD$ , All Depts. assessments
Management
Short Term (T1)
Disaster Damage and Losses 2005-2015 baseline
182
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
Settlements and other infrastructures Improving infrastructure, roads, and land stabilization work
2. Protection of Heritage Structures SDMA/RD$, State DGM, SRSAC, Recurring/ Regular (RR)
DDMA, PRIs, DoUD Support and collaboration
3. Multi-Hazard Shelters SDMA/RD$, DDMA, PRIs, DoUD Short Term (T1)
Identification safe buildings and sites to serve as temporary shelters
for people and livestock evacuated from localities
at risk
Medium Term (T2)
• Construction of multi-purpose shelters in high risk areas at safe
sites away from hazard-prone locations
• Proper maintenance of roads in risk-prone areas
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indirect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
184
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
• Adopt land use zoning, building byelaws and model code (e.g., NBC
2016) legislation with suitable modification for reducing risk
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Licensing and certification of SDMA/RD$ and all relevant
3. Implement licensing of engineers through appropriate legal
professionals Departments
framework and institutional mechanism
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
4. Public Private Partnerships SDMA/RD$, DDMA
Promote private participation in disaster management facilities
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Implementation of Risk Transfer Arrangements including multi-
hazard insurance for life and property
5. Risk Transfer DOF*, SDMA/RD$, DAG
Short Term (T1)
Policy Framework
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
185
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
186
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
187
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
• Sponsor and promote state-specific efforts and local efforts for GACC
mitigation and adaptation
7.7 Drought
This section relies on the guidelines published by NDMA on drought management listed in Annexure-I and the manual 54 prepared by the MAFW (2016).
188
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
190
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
191
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
194
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
195
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
196
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
197
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
199
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7.9 Cloudburst
Note: Unlike other sub-sections, the responsibility framework given here has a simpler format
Sub-Thematic Area for DRR State Agencies and their Responsibilities
Department/Agency Responsibility
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
• Compile and maintain data on events like cloud bursts and hailstorms –
location, event information, impacts, etc.
measures DOUD, SLRTI, PRI, Undertake slope stabilization measures on a regular basis
DOUD, SPWD, DDMA
Short Term (T1)
Integrated approach to slope stabilization combining bioengineering (plants,
trees) and mechanical structures for slope stabilisation
201
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
203
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
204
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
205
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
• To construct cool shelters, bus stands, etc. that offer shelter from
heat wave
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
• Coordinating the dissemination of warnings to all, down to the last
mile – remote, rural or urban; Regular updates to people in areas at
risk
SDMA/RD$, DRD, DOUD, DWSD,
• Follow the alerts/warning
3. Warnings, Information, Data EDD, PD, FD, AHD, HD, WCD, PRD,
• Do's-and-Don’ts” during a heat wave should be available in local
DOUD, PRIs, DDMA
languages and disseminated through media.
206
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
209
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
210
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
hazardous industries
• Strengthen the conduct of safety audits and enforcement of
disaster prevention norms
Medium Term (T2)
• Promote private participation in off-site disaster management
facilities
• Provide legal support for Mutual Assistance Groups among
2. Public Private Partnerships SDMA/RD$, DDMA, IBTA
industries within clusters
• Encourage private participation in enhancing off-site disaster
response and
Risk Management
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
Implementation of Risk Transfer Arrangements including multi-hazard
3. Risk Transfer DOF*, SDMA/RD$, DAG insurance for life and property
Short Term (T1)
Policy Framework
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
NSS in DRR
persons with disabilities development covering all aspects of disaster management at the
state, district, and local levels
Recurring/ Regular (RR)
• Strengthen ability of communities to manage and cope with
Community-Based Disaster SDMA/RD$, DDMA, PRIs, DoUD,
6. disasters based on a multi-hazard approach
Management IBTA
• Training for PRI, SHG, NCC, NSS, Youth, local community
organizations
Notes: (#) Every department or agency of the State Government not specifically mentioned will also have both direct and indir ect supporting role depending on the disaster,
location and context. (*) The Department or Agency with this symbol has or is deemed to have a nodal or lead role, while others mentioned have a direct or explicit supporting
role. ($) RD—Revenue Department: The State Government Department acting as the Nodal Department for disaster management in the State.
215
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
216
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
217
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
218
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
EDD, PD, FD, AHD, WCD, • Adequate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for all the health
PRI/DOUD, SLRTI, workers associated with the responding to biological emergencies
DDMA
Medium Term (T2)
• Strengthening/mainstreaming the network medical assistance
facilities
• Equipping Medical First Responders (MFRs)/Quick Reaction Medical
Teams (QRMTs) with all material logistics and backup support
223
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
225
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
227
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
DoUD, PRIs, DDMA, DRD, • Advanced training on disaster management CDEF, community, and
SLRTI volunteers
• Promoting culture of awareness, alertness and preparedness
• Awareness generation programs for public, utilities, DoUD, PRIs, and
industries
• IEC materials and ensure wider disseminate to general public through all
medium
• Information on safety, care and protection of disaster-affected animals
• TOT programs on various aspects such as firefighting, managing
collapsed structure, and search and rescue
229
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
230
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
231
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
232
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
233
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
234
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
235
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-8
Preparedness and Response
232
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
8.1 Background
Response measures are those taken immediately after receiving early warning from the relevant
authority or in anticipation of an impending disaster, or immediately after the occurrence of an event
without any warning. The primary goal of response to a disaster is saving lives, protecting property,
environment, and meeting basic needs of human and other living beings after the disaster. Its focus is
on rescuing those affected and those likely to be affected by the disaster. The UNISDR (2016) defines
response as:
Actions taken directly before, during or immediately after a disaster in order to save lives, reduce health
impacts, ensure public safety and meet the basic subsistence needs of the people affected.
233
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Currently a State Emergency Operation Centre (SEOC) is functional in the Secretariat Porvorim Goa and
coordinates with District Emergency Operation Centres for daily situation reporting. It will be
connected to the following control rooms:
• All agencies designated to provide hazard-specific early warnings
• District Emergency Operations Centre (DEOC)
• NDRF
• SDRF/DF&ES
• Goa Police
234
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
As per instructions of National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, Government has
issued a Press Release on 05th April 2024 to popularize the usage of SACHET Application launched by
among general masses to stay updated with the location based live weather forecast, necessary do’s
and don’ts on all disasters including Heatwave and an emergency button (Dial 112) to seek any
emergency support. Other Important Applications included in the Press release which have been
recommended by Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India that the public can make use of include:
Mausam (Weather Forecast), Meghdoot (Agricultural Forecast) and Damini (Lightening Alert).
235
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Additionally, Government has identified 259 schools and 132 community halls as emergency centers in both North and South districts with all basic facilities.
2. Survey No. 115/1 in Saligao village Bardez Goa Pilerne North Goa N15°53’29.42”
E73°79’38.72”
232
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
4. Chalta No 18 of P.T Sheet no, 122 at Althino Althino North Goa N15°48’ 61.70”
of Panji city in Tiswadi Taluka, North Goa E73°82’32.19”
5. Survey No. 53/1 of Dabolim in V.P Chicalim Dabolim South Goa 15°23’22” N
of Mormugao Taluka, South Goa 73° 51’04” E
233
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
6. Survey No. 117/1 of Cuelim in V.P Cuelim of Cuelim South Goa 15°21’28.84” N
Mormugao Taluka, Sourth Goa 73° 54’ 9.84” E
234
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
235
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
236
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
232
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Cyclone/Floods/Heavy Rains. All the Fire Stations across the State are functional 24x7and can be
deployed to attend various emergencies at short notice. The DFES can depute the SAR Team of the State
to the Neighbouring State during the Emergency Period. In accordance with the initiatives taken by
Government of India, the State Government shall comply for institutional reforms and organizational
restructuring of F&ES in the State and shall implement the major changes for the modernization of the
F&ES to make them more effective under Modernisation of Fire Services Scheme from Government of
India.
Besides, Government has trained 400 Aapda Mitra volunteers including 70 Aapda Sakhi (Female
Volunteers) through Directorate of Fire and Emergency Services to assist the responding agencies during
the disaster related incidents like, Floods, Drowning, Cyclone, Earthquake, Landslides, Heatwave, Fire,
Tsunami, etc. All 400 Aapda Mitra Volunteers have been insured under Aapda Mitra Policy by New India
Assurance Co. Ltd, Panaji and their individual policies have been issued. Purchase of Emergency Essential
Resource Reserve (EERR) Equipment under the Scheme has also been completed.
233
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
such multi-state disasters. The SDMA will encourage identification of such situations and promote the
establishment of mechanisms for coordinated strategies for dealing with them by the departments of
the State Government, District Administration and other relevant agencies.
234
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
14. Cultural Heritage Sites, their Precincts and Museums — Protection & Preservation
15. 15. Power
16. Public Health
17. Rehabilitation and Ensuring Safety of Livestock and other Animals, Veterinary Care
18. Relief Employment
19. Relief Logistics and Supply Chain Management
20. Search and Rescue of People and Animals
21. Transportation
235
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Deputy Incident Secretary 1. Will carry out any kind of assignment given by
Commander Urban Development the Incident Commander;
2. Shall officiate as the Incident Commander in the
absence of the permanent incumbent;
3. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Deputy Incident Commander in
the absence of the permanent incumbent;
Information & Media Secretary (Information 1. Prepare and release information about the
Officer (IMO) & Publicity) incident to the media agencies and others with
the approval of Incident Commander (IC);
2. Jot down decisions taken and directions issued
in case of sudden disasters when the I RT has
not been fully activated and hand it over
to the Planning Section (PS) on its activation
for incorporation in the IAP;
3. Monitor and review various media reports
regarding the incident that may be useful
for Incident Planning;
4. Disseminate necessary information to all
concerned;
5. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Information & Media
Officer (IMO) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Liaison Officer (LO) Secretary 1. Maintain a list of concerned line department
Housing agencies (NGOs, etc.) and their representatives
at various locations;
2. Carry out liaison with all concerned agencies
including NDRF and Armed Forces and line
department of State Government;
3. Keep the IC informed about the arrivals of all
the Government and Non-Government
agencies and their resources;
4. Help in organising briefing sessions of all
Government and Non-Government agencies
with the Incident Commander;
5. Maintain record of various activities performed
by each authority / agency;
6. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Liaison Officer (LO) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Safety Officer (SO) Secretary 1. Recommend measures for assuring safety of
Health responders and hazardous unsafe situations
and review at regularly;
2. Review the IAP for safety implications;
3. Review and approve the Site Safety Plan, as and
when required;
4. Conduct Hazard Specific Mock drills on a regular
basis for capacity building;
5. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Safety Officer (SO) in the absence
of the permanent incumbent.
GENERAL STAFF
OPERATIONS SECTION Inspector General of 1. Manage all field operations for the
CHIEF (OSC) Police accomplishment of the incident objectives;
Goa Police Department 2. Deploy, activate, expand and supervise
236
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
organisational elements;
3. Maintenance of On Duty Officers list;
4. Brief the personnel in Operation Section (OS) at
the beginning of each operational period;
5. Prepare Section Operational Plan in accordance
with the IAP, if required;
6. Consult the IC from the time to time and keep
him fully briefed;
7. Determine the need for additional resources
and place demands accordingly with planning
section chief and ensure their arrival;
8. Ensure record of various activities performed
by concerned authorities, units, groups and to
maintain it;
9. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Operations Section Chief
(OSC) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Staging Area Manager Director 1. Establish the Staging Area (SA) with proper
(DFES) layout;
2. Organise storage and despatch of resources
received and dispatch them as per IAP;
3. Report all receipts and despatches to
Operations Sections Chief and maintain their
records;
4. Establish check in function as appropriate;
5. Ensure that communications are established
with the ICP and other required locations e.g.
different SAs, Incident Base, Camps, Relief
Camps, etc.;
6. Maintain and provide resource status to PS and
LS;
7. Demobilise Staging Area in consultation with IC;
8. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Staging Area Manager in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Nodal Officer (Air Director 1. Coordinate with concerned authorities for
Operations) Civil Aviation air operations;
2. Project the type of Air support required to
the appropriate authorities based on the IAP
and place the demand at least 24 hours in
advance or as early as possible;
3. Inform the IC and OSC about the Air
movements and landing schedules in their
respective areas;
4. Ensure that relevant Maps of the incident
locations are available with all agencies
involved in the Air Operations to give the
correct coordinates etc. of the locations
where Air support is required;
5. Determine the suitability of Helipads or
Helibases in coordination with the Air Force
authorities and the State authorities;
6. Maintain communication with Air Traffic
Control and the ground support staff
regarding the Air movements and other
related activities;
237
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7. Assist the IC and the LSC in the procurement
of required ATF etc.;
8. Report on Air Operations activities to the
RO;
9. Perform any other duties assigned by the RO
and IC;
10. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Nodal Officer (Air
Operations) in the absence of the
permanent incumbent.
Transportation Branch Director 1. Activate and manage different Operation
Director Transport Groups like Road, Rail, Water and Air;
2. Coordinate with the Logistic Section (LS) for
required resources and activate Groups of his
Branch;
3. On placement of resources / requisition,
Coordinate with railways, road transport,
waterways and airport authorities for support
as required;
4. Ensure that Organisational Assignment List is
circulated among the Group-in-charge (s) and
other responders of his branch;
5. Provide ground support to the air operations
and ensure appropriate security arrangements;
6. Report to the Operation Section Chief and
Incident Commander about progress of the
Transportation Branch;
7. Prepare transportation plan as per the IAP, if
required;
8. Ensure the maintenance of the Status of hired
resources, their full utilization and timely
release;
9. Ensure that the record of various activities
performed by different operational groups
(Road, Rail, Water and Air) are collected and
sent to the Section concerned;
10. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Transportation Branch
Director (TBD) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
All functional Groups (Road, Rail, Water and Air) of the Transport Branch-TB are managed by the Transport
Branch Director-TDB. Since the air transportation is to be coordinated at the State and District levels, the
TBD also needs to function in close coordination with Responsible Officer-RO, Incident Commander-IC and
Nodal Officer-NO for Air Operations. He will collect the details of all related flights from the concerned NO
and organise the ground support requirement. The TBD will also be responsible for the activation and
expansion of various functional Groups as per the IAP.
Group-in-Charge Dy. SP 1. Ensure transportation of resources by Road
(Road Unit) Traffic Police to the affected sites;
(North/South) 2. Requisition additional personnel support, if
required;
3. Attend planning meetings on the direction
of OSC;
4. Determine coordination procedures with
various destinations as per IAP;
5. Ensure proper parking locations;
6. Resolve conflicts of the Group, if any;
7. Update Road Operations plan as required
and share them with higher authorities;
238
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
8. In case of accidents, inform the TBD, the
local police and provide assistance in
investigation, if required;
9. Ensure that mechanics are available for
repair of vehicles and also ensure adequate
availability of Petrol, Oil and Lubricants
(POL);
10. Maintain the records of all important
activities related to the number of vehicles
deployed, source of vehicles (i.e.
Government or private), locations where
vehicles are deployed along with resource
details they are carrying, etc.;
11. Support and coordinate the Road
Operations part of the Rail, Water and Air
Operations as required;
12. Collect record of various activities
performed by coordinator and other
members and send to TBD or OSC;
13. Perform any other duties assigned by the
TBD or OSC;
14. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Group-in-Charge (Road
Unit) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Group-in-Charge Regional Railway 1. Work under the TBD and coordinate all Rail
(Rail Unit) Manager Operations;
Railways 2. Organise crew for Loading and Unloading;
3. Ensure safe storage and warehousing of the
materials;
4. Evaluate storage locations, ensure safety and
obtain guidance from the TBD, if required;
5. Coordinate with Road Operations Group for
movement of resources;
6. Prepare and provide Rail Operations Summary
including time of departure and arrival,
destinations, resource details, etc. as and when
required by the senior officers;
7. Request for additional personnel support, if
required;
8. Update the TBD from time to time and seek
support, if required;
9. Resolve conflicts within his Group, if any;
10. Update Rail Operations Plan;
11. Establish and maintain communications with
various storage and warehousing areas,
destination points and railway officers;
12. Collect record of various activities performed
under IRS from Coordinator and other in-charges
and send to TBD or OSC;
13. Perform any other duties assigned by OSC or
TBD;
14. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Group-in-Charge (Rail Unit) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Group-in-Charge Captain of Ports 1. Ensure transportation of rescue teams and relief
(Water Unit) materials by motor boats / country boats or by
239
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Department of Captain any other water transport to the affected sites
of Ports with communication facilities and a local guide
for guidance with each team;
2. Requisition personnel support, if required;
3. Determine coordination procedures with various
destinations as per IAP;
4. Supervise all Water Operations and related
activities associated with the incident;
5. Evaluate and ensure docking or harbouring
locations;
6. Resolve conflicts, if any;
7. Update Water Operations plan and share it with
the higher authorities, including the LSC;
8. Arrange for an accident investigation team as
and when required and cooperate with the
appropriate investigating authorities;
9. Ensure availability of POL and other logistic
support for boat operations;
10. Attend to the needs of the personnel working
with him;
11. Collect record of various activities performed
from Coordinator and other in-charges and send
to TBD or OSC;
12. Perform such other duties as assigned by TBD or
OSC;
13. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Group-in-Charge (Water Unit) in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Group-in-Charge Airport Director 1. Provide ground support to Air Operations as per
(Air Unit) Dabolim Airport the IAP;
& 2. Report to TBD the progress of Air Operations and
Chief Operations work in close coordination with the NO, IC, OSC
Officer (COO), MOPA and TBD;
Airport 3. Ensure resources and supplies required for the
Air Operations are available at the concerned
locations;
4. Keep appropriate Maps in order to provide
correct coordinates to the pilots and others
involved in the Air Operations;
5. Requisition of additional personnel support, if
required;
6. Ensure refuelling facilities are available at the
landing and take-off locations;
7. Ensure that Helibase and Helipad locations are
identified and approved by the appropriate
authorities;
8. Determine the need for assignment of personnel
and equipment at each Helibase and Helipad;
9. Ensure identification and marking of Helibases
and Helipads;
10. Ensure that the communication systems are in
place;
11. Update landing and take-off schedule of Aircrafts
and Helicopters as informed by NO;
12. Ensure preparation of the load manifest for
proper loading or unloading of relief supplies;
13. Arrange for unloading and despatch or storage of
relief materials that arrive at the airports,
240
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
helipads and helibase. In order to keep airports
operational, special attention needs to be paid to
unsolicited relief supplies that may arrive. They
should be immediately cleared from the
operational area;
14. Ensure that proper packaging and weighing
facilities are in place and used for loading of
relief materials;
15. Liaise with the road operations group for the
road transportation needs;
16. Ensure the functionality of Aircraft rescue and
firefighting service at Helibases and Helipads,
security, proper lights, smoke candles/devices,
weighing facilities, wind direction socks, etc. are
in place;
17. Collect record of various activities performed
from Helibase and Helipad-in-charge and send to
TBD or OSC or IC;
18. Perform any other duties assigned by the TBD;
19. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Group-in-Charge (Air Unit) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Planning Section Chief Principal Chief 2. Coordinate with the activated Section Chiefs for
(PSC) Engineer planning and preparation of IAP in consultation
(PWD) with Incident Commander;
3. Ensure that decisions taken and directions
issued in case of sudden disasters when the PS
has not been activated are obtained from the
Information and Media Officer (Command
Staff) and incorporated in the IAP;
4. Ensure collection, evaluation and dissemination
of information about the incidents including
weather, environmental toxicity, avai lability of
resources etc. from concerned departments
and other sources. The Joint Secretary (Home)
must have a databank of available resources
with their locations from where it can be
mobilised;
5. Ensure that Incident Status Summary is filled
and incorporated in the IAP
6. Ensure that Organisational Assignment list
(Divisional / Group) is circulated among the unit
leaders and other responders of his Section;
7. Plan to activate and deactivate IRS
organisational positions as appropriate, in
consultation with the Incident Commander and
Operation Section Chief;
8. Determine the need for any specialised
resources for the incident management;
9. Provide periodic projections on incident
potential;
10. Report to the Incident Commander of any
significant changes that take place in the
incident status;
11. Compile and display incident status summary at
the Incident Command Post;
12. Oversee preparation and implementation of
Incident Mobilisation Plan;
241
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
13. Maintain Duty Officers List for the day;
14. Ensure that record of various activities
performed by members of Units are collected
and maintained in the Unit Log;
15. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Planning Section Chief in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Resource Unit Leader Director 1. Maintain and display the status of all assigned
(RUL) Planning, Statistics & resources (Primary and Support) at the incident;
Evaluation-PSE 2. Compile a complete inventory of all resources
available;
3. Ensure and establish Check-in function at various
incident locations;
4. Update the Planning Section Chief (PSC) and
Incident Commander about the status of
resources received and dispatched from time to
time;
5. Coordinate with the various activated Branches,
Divisions and Groups of OS for checking status
andutilisation of allotted resources;
6. Maintain record of various activities performe d
and send to Section concerned;
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Resource Unit Leader (RUL) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Situation Unit Leader Collector 1. Collect, process and organise all incident
(SUL) North & South information;
2. Prepare periodic future projections of the
development of the incident (along with maps
if required) and keep the PSC and Incident
Commander informed;
3. Prepare situation and resource status
reports and disseminate as required;
4. Provide authorised maps, photographic services
to responders, if required;
5. Attend IAP Meeting with required
information, data, documents and Survey of
India maps etc.;
6. Maintain record of various activities
performed and send to Section concerned;
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Situation Unit Leader (SUL)
in the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Documentation Unit Under Secretary 1. Ensure that all the required forms and
Leader (DUL) (Home-II) stationary are procured and issued to all the
activated sections, branches, divisions, groups
and units;
2. Compile all information and reports related to
the incident;
3. Review and scrutinize records and various IRS
forms for accuracy and completeness;
4. Inform appropriate units of errors or omissions
in their documentation, if any, and ensure that
errors and omissions are rectified;
5. Store files properly for post incident analysis;
6. Maintain records of various activities
performed and send to sections concerned;
242
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Documentation Unit Leader
(DUL) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Demobilisation Unit Under Secretary 1. Prepare Incident Demobilisation Plan;
Leader (DEMOB) (Home-I) 2. Identify surplus resources and prepare a
tentative IDP in consultation with the PSC and
give priority to demobilization of surplus
resources;
3. Develop incident check-out functions for
Sections, Branches, Divisions and units in
consultation with all Sections and send to the
PS;
4. Plan for logistics and transportation support for
Incident Demobilisation in consultation with LS;
5. Disseminate Incident Demobilisation Plan-IDP
at an appropriate time to various stakeholders
involved;
6. Brief the PSC on the progress of Demobilisati on;
7. Maintain record of various activities performed
and send to Sections concerned;
8. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Demobilisation Unit Leader
(DEMOB) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Logistics Section Chief Secretary 1. Provide logistic support to all Incident Response
(LSC) Panchayats effort including the establishment of Staging
Area. Incident Base, Camp, Relief Camp,
Helipad etc.;
2. Participate in the development and
implementation of the IAP;
3. Keep RO and IC informed on related financial
issues;
4. Ensure that Organisational Assignment List
(Divisional/Group) is circulated among the
Branch Directors and other responders of his
Section;
5. Request for sanction of Imprest fund, if
required;
6. Brief Branch Director and Unit Leaders;
7. Constantly review the Communication Plan,
Medical Plan and Traffic Plan to meet the
changing requirements of the situation;
8. Assess the requirement of additional resources
and take steps for their procurement in
consultation with the RO and IC;
9. Maintain on Duty Officers List for the day;
10. Ensure that record of various activities
performed by members of branches and units
are collected and maintained in the Unit Log;
11. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Logistics Section Chief (LSC)
in absence of the permanent incumbent.
243
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Service Branch Director Director 1. Work under the supervision of LSC and
(SBD) Directorate of Health manage all required service support for
Services the incident manage me nt;
2. Manage and supervise various Units of the
Branch like Communic ation Unit, Medic al
Unit, Food Unit and any other activat e d
Unit;
3. Discuss with activated Unit leaders for the
materials and resources required and
procure the same through LS;
4. Ensure proper dispatch of personnel, teams,
resources etc. as per the IAP;
5. Keep the LSC informed about the progress of
Service Branch, from time-to-time;
6. Maintain record of various activities performed
and send to sections concerned;
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Service Branch Director
(SBD) in absence of the permanent incumbent.
Communication Unit Director 1. Work under the direction of the SBD;
Leader (CUL) Information & 2. Provide Communications facility as and when
Technology required;
3. Ensure that all communications equipment
available are in working condition and that
the network is functional;
4. Maintain the records of all communicatio n s
equipment deployed in the field;
5. Ensure setting up of a message centre to
receive and transmit radio, telephone and other
messages from various activated Sections,
Branches, Units and higher authorities and
maintain their records;
6. Prepare an alternative communication plan for
execution in case of possible failure of the
normal communications network;
7. Prepare a plan for integration of the
communications set up of the central teams;
8. Maintain record of various activities performed;
9. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Communication Unit Leader
(CUL) in absence of the permanent incumbent.
Medical Unit Leader Under Secretary 1. Work under the direction of the SBD;
(MUL) (Health -II) 2. Prepare the Medical plan and procurement of
required resources as per IAP;
3. Respond to requests of the OS for medical aid,
transportation and medical supplies etc. under
intimation to the SBD and LSC;
4. Maintain the list of medical personnel who can
be mobilised in times of need;
5. Prepare and circulate list of referral service
centres to all the medical team leaders;
6. Maintain minimum level of required medicines,
drug, equipment, etc. at all times;
7. Maintain record of various activities performed
and send to SBD;
8. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Medical Unit Leader (MUL) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
244
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Food Unit Leader (FUL) Dy. Director 1. Work under the direction of the SBD;
WCD 2. Supply food to:
a) Personnel of IRT(s) at ICP, Camps, Incident
Base, SA, etc. and
b) Victims at the temporary shelters, relief
camps etc.,
3. Determine food and drinking water
requirements and their transportation, and brief
the SBD and LSC;
4. Maintain an inventory of receipt and dispatch of
resources;
5. Maintain record of various activities performed
and send to SBD;
6. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Food Unit Leader (FUL) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Support Branch Director Addl. Joint Secretary 1. Work under the supervision of LSC, and
(SBD) Home supervise the function of Resource Provisioning
Unit, Facility Unit and Ground Support Unit;
2. Procure and dispatch required tactical materials
and resources for operations with the
concurrence of the Section Chief;
3. Participate in the planning meeting of the LS;
4. Ensure that organisation assignment list
concerning the Branch is circulated to all Units
under him;
5. Keep the LSC informed about the progress of the
work;
6. Maintain record of various activities performed
and send to section concerned;
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Support Branch Director (SBD) in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Resource Provisioning Under Secretary 1. Work under the supervision of Support BD;
Unit Leader (RPUL) GAD-I 2. Organise movement of personnel, equipment
and supplies;
3. Receive and store safely all supplies required for
the incident response;
4. Maintain the inventory of supplies and
equipment;
5. Maintain the records of receipt and dispatch of
supplies including equipment and personnel;
6. Organise repair and servicing of non-expandable
supplies and equipment;
7. Participate in the planning meeting of LS;
8. Monitor the ‘Kind’, ‘type’ and ‘quantity’ of
supplies available and dispatched;
9. Requisition additional human resource
assistance, if needed;
10. Maintain record of various activities performed
and sent to Support BD;
11. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Resource Provisioning Unit
Leader (RPUL) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
245
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Facilities Unit Leader Chief Engineer (Bldg.) 1. Prepare the layout and activation of incident
(FUL) facilities, e.g. Incident Base, Camp(s), Relief
Camp(s), ICP, etc., and provide basic amenities
to the responders;
2. Report to the Sup. BD;
3. Locate the different facilities as per the IAP;
4. Participate in the planning meeting of the
Section, prepare list for each facilities and its
requirements in coordination with the LSC;
5. Maintain record of various activities performed
as per IRS and send to Sup. BD;
6. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Facilities Unit Leader (FUL) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Ground Support Unit Jt. Director 1. Work under the supervision of the Sup. BD;
Leader (GSUL) Transport 2. Provide transportation services for field
operations to TBD;
3. In case Air operations are activated, organize
and provide required ground support through
TBD;
4. Provide maintenance and repair services for all
the vehicles and related equipment used for
incident management;
5. Develop and implement the Incident Traffic Plan
6. Inform Resource Unit about the availability and
serviceability of all vehicles and equipment;
7. Arrange for and activate fuelling requirements
for all transport including Aircrafts in
consultation with the Sup. BD;
8. Maintain inventory of assigned, available and off
road or out of service resources;
9. Ensure safety measures within his jurisdiction;
10. Maintain record of various activities performed
as per IRS and send to Sup. BD;
11. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Ground Support Unit Leader
(GSUL) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
Finance Branch Director Addl. Jt. Secretary 1. Work under the LSC;
(FBR) Finance 2. Attend planning meetings;
3. Prepare a list of resources to be mobilised,
procured or hired in accordance with the IAP;
4. Obtain orders of the competent Authority as per
financial rules and take steps for their
procurement without delay;
5. Ensure that time records of hired equipment,
personnel and their services are accurately
maintained as per Government norms for
payment;
6. Examine and scrutinize cost involved in the
entire response activity including the
demobilisation, analyse the cost effectiveness
and keep the LSC informed;
7. Ensure that all obligation documents initiated at
the incident are properly prepared, completed,
verified and signed by the appropriate Section
Chief and BD;
246
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
8. Brief the LSC or IC on all incident related
financial issues needing attention or follow-up;
9. Maintain record of various activities performed
as per IRS and send to Sections concerned;
10. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Finance Branch Director (FBR) in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Time unit Leader (TUL) Director 1. Maintain time recording of hired equipment and
Directorate of Accounts personnel and ensure that it is maintained on a
daily basis and according to Government norms;
2. Examine logs of all hired equipment and
personnel with regard to their optimal
utilization;
3. Maintain record of the activities performed as
per IRS and send to FBD;
4. Link Officer appointed by the Government shall
officiate as the Time unit Leader (TUL) in the
absence of the permanent incumbent.
Compensation/ Claim Joint Director 1. Collect all cost data and provide cost estimates;
Unit Leader (CUL) Directorate of Accounts 2. Prepare and maintain a list of requisitioned
premises, services, resources and vehicles, etc.
with correct date and time of such requisition;
3. Follow appropriate procedures for preparation
of claims and compensation;
4. Maintain record of various activities performed
as per IRS and send to FBD;
5. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Compensation/ Claim Unit
Leader (CUL) in the absence of the perma nent
incumbent.
Cost Unit Leader (CUL) Under Secretary 1. Develop incident cost summaries in
Finance (Exp.) consultation with the FBD on the basis of Cost
Analysis Report;
2. Make cost-saving recommendations to the FBD;
3. Complete all records relating to financial
matters prior to demobilization;
4. Maintain record of various activities performed
as per IRS and send to FBD;
5. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Cost Unit Leader (CUL) in
the absence of the permanent incumbent.
Procurement Unit Under Secretary (GAD- 1. Attend to all financial matters pertaining to
Leader II) vendors and contracts;
2. Review procurement needs in consultation with
the FBD;
3. Prepare a list of vendors from whom
procurement can be done and follow proper
procedures;
4. Complete final processing of all bills arising out
of the response management and send
document for payment with the approval of the
FBD, LSC, IC;
5. Brief FBD on current problems with
recommendations on outstanding issues and
follow up requirements;
6. Maintain record of activities performed and
send to FBD;
247
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
7. Link Officer appointed by the Government
shall officiate as the Procurement Unit Leader
(PUL) in the absence of the permanent
incumbent.
248
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Goa
Liaison Officer (LO)
Information & Media Officer Secretary (Housing)
Secretary (Information & Publicity)
Chapter-9
Recovery and Building Back
Better
256
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
9.1 Scope
Recovery is defined as:
"The restoring or improving of livelihoods and health, as well as economic, physical, social, cultural
and environmental assets, systems and activities, of a disaster-affected community or society,
aligning with the principles of sustainable development and "build back better", to avoid or reduce
future disaster risk." (UNISDR 2016)
The recovery task of rehabilitation and reconstruction begins soon after the emergency phase ends, and
should be based on pre-existing strategies and policies that facilitate clear institutional responsibilities
for recovery action and enable public participation. The focus of recovery is on restoring livelihoods,
shifting to a path of sustainable development that reduces disaster risk. Recovery should be conceived
as an integral part of ongoing developmental process at appropriate levels: national, regional, and local.
The context in which it will take place will be necessarily shaped by the prevailing social and economic
conditions and the vulnerability of the affected states and communities. Recovery processes are aimed
at restoring the capacity of the government and communities to recover from the disaster, strengthen
the capabilities to cope with disasters and reduce future disaster risk. Building back better envisages
seizing the opportunity to rebuild to reduce development deficits of the affected areas going beyond
restoration to the pre-disaster ‘normal’. Recovery programmes, coupled with the heightened public
awareness and engagement after a disaster, afford a valuable opportunity to develop and implement
disaster risk reduction measures and to apply the “Build Back Better” principle.
Globally, the approach towards post-disaster restoration and rehabilitation has shifted to one of building
back better. While disasters result in considerable disruption of normal life, enormous suffering, loss of
lives and property, global efforts consider the recovery, rehabilitation and reconstruction phase as an
opportunity to “Build Back Better” (BBB) integrating disaster risk reduction into development measures
and making communities resilient to disasters.
The Sendai Framework expects that after a disaster, the stakeholders will be prepared for BBB. Existing
mechanisms may require strengthening to provide effective support and achieve better
implementation. Disaster recovery tends to be very difficult and long-drawn out. The reconstruction will
vary depending on the actual disaster, location, pre -disaster conditions, and the potentialities that
emerge at that point of time. The NDMP provides a generalized framework for recovery since it is not
possible to anticipate every likely element of building back better.
The plan for reconstruction and rehabilitation is designed keeping in view the worst -case scenarios in
which the capacity of the State and District administration would be overwhelmed and require
assistance from the Central Government for re-establishing normalcy in the disaster affected areas. This
chapter provides a general framework for the role of Government and its development partners in
restoring after a disaster, various essential and basic services. Much of this support will involve the
coordinated working of multiple agencies – government and non-government. All the agencies are
required to closely monitor response activities and to obtain valuable data regarding the severity and
intensity of the event, the affected geographical area and the potential unmet critical needs of the
affected population while evolving a comprehensive recovery plan.
257
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
9.2 Approach
The approach to reconstruction and recovery is guided by the NPDM 2009. Its salient clauses/ sections
are given below:
Para 9.1.1 of the NPDM states that - the approach to the reconstruction process must be comprehensive
to convert adversity into opportunity. Incorporating disaster resilient features to ‘build back better’ will
be the guiding principle.
The appropriate choice of technology and project impact assessment needs to be carried out to establish
that the projects contemplated do not create any side effects on the physical, socio –cultural or
economic environment of the communities in the affected areas or in their neighbourhood. Systems for
providing psycho-social support and trauma counselling need to be developed for implementation
during reconstruction and recovery phase.
Para 9.2.1 of NPDM states that - Reconstruction plans and designing of houses need to be a participatory
process involving the government, affected community, NGOs and the corporate sector. A fter the
planning process is over, while owner driven construction is a preferred option, contribution of the NGOs
and corporate sector will be encouraged. Reconstruction programme will be within the confines and
qualitative specifications laid down by the Government.
Para 9.3.1 of NPDM states that essential services, social infrastructure and intermediate shelters/camps
will be established in the shortest possible time. For permanent reconstruction, ideally, the work
including the construction of houses must be completed within two to three years. Relevant Central
Ministries/Departments and the State Governments should create dedicated project teams to speed up
the reconstruction process.
Para 9.3.2 of NPDM states that plans for reconstruction in highly disaster-prone areas need to be drawn
out during the period of normalcy, which may include architectural and structural designs in consultation
with the various stakeholders.
Para 9.5.1 of NPDM suggest that state governments should give emphasis to restoration of permanent
livelihood of those affected by disasters and to pay special attention to the needs of women-headed
households, artisans, farmers and people belonging to marginalised and vulnerable sections.
258
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
required. A systematic PDNA will provide a credible basis for recovery and reconstruction planning that
incorporates risk reduction measures.
Typically, the PDNA comprises of a ‘Damage and Loss Assessment’ (DALA), a ‘Human Recovery Needs
Assessment’ (HRNA) and a ‘Recovery Framework. The DALA is quantitative in nature that can be used to
value damages arising from a hazardous event, and the subsequent economic losses caused by the
event. The DALA highlights the possible consequences on the growth of the economy, the external
sector and the fiscal balances, as well as the impact due to decline of income and livelihoods of
households or individuals. The HRNA focuses on the social impact of disasters, analysing how disasters
affect local paerns of life, social structures and institutions. A HRNA includes analysis of primary data
from household or other units of analysis and provides insight into the recovery and reconstruction from
the viewpoint of the affected community. The Recovery Framework summarizes the recovery
recommendations from the sectoral assessments within the PDNA. It outlines the short, medium and
long-term priorities for the recovery including plans for financing the BBB.
The UNISDR consultative document on building back better (UNISDR 2017) in support of the Sendai
Framework, states the following: Recovery is the most complex of the disaster management functions,
involving the greatest number and variety of stakeholders and affecting the greatest long-term impact
on a community’s social and economic success. There are numerous relationships that must be formed
and dependencies that must be fostered, many of which are wholly unfamiliar to the recovery
stakeholders that typically operate outside of the post-disaster context. An inclusive and comprehensive
disaster recovery framework serves as an agreed way forward to simplify the recovery process thereby
maintaining or even improving development trajectories while ensuring adherence to Build Back Be tter
principles.
Recovery is most successful when the wide-ranging needs of communities, organizations, and
individuals are addressed in the coordinated manner that recovery frameworks enable.
Disaster recovery process is rarely a set of orderly actions. It will consist of several related activities such
as the following:
Damage and needs assessments (PDNA, DALA, HRNA)
Developing a recovery framework including institutional arrangements and financing plan
Measures to ensure socially inclusive recovery
Focus on sustainable development and climate change adaptation
Demolition of damaged structures, debris clearance, removal and its environmentally safe
disposal
Restoration and even upgrading utilities including communication networks
Re-establishment of major transport linkages
Temporary housing and detailed building inspections
Redevelopment planning
Environmental assessments
Reconstruction
Integrating DRR into various development initiatives
Financial management
Economic impact analyses
The major steps/ processes of the recovery process and the processes involved are summarized in
Table 9-1:
Table 9-1: Major Steps of the Recovery Process and the Key Processes Involved
Major Step Process
1. Post-Disaster Needs Preliminary assessment reports
Assessment and Credible Compilation and transmittal of damage and loss data
Damage Assessment Disaster damage assessments led by government and
assisted by humanitarian response agencies, and the ini tial
damage surveys leading to a comprehensive assessment
259
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
260
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 9-3: Important aspects in mobilizing and managing the funds of a recovery
programme
Recovery Stage Duration Brief Description
Early Within 18 Months Cash for work, resumption of markets, commerce and
trade, restoration of social services, transitional and
temporary shelters
Within 5 Years Recovery plans for assets and livelihoods, reconstruction
Mid-Term (concurrent with plans for housing, infrastructure, public buildings and
early recovery) cultural heritage buildings
Long-Term Within 10 Years Implemented along with developmental plans:
infrastructure strengthening, environmental, urban and
regional planning
9.5 Reconstruction
Long term recovery efforts must focus on redeveloping and restoring the socio-economic viability of the
disaster area(s). The reconstruction phase requires a substantial commitment of time and resources by
the Governments (State and Central) and other agencies. It is important to note that much of this
commitment would be beyond the scope of tradi tional emergency management programmes. The
reconstruction challenge involved would most often be the result of a catastrophic event that has caused
substantial damage over a very large area and/or affected a very large population. These reconstruction
efforts include:
Reconstruction of public infrastructures and social services damaged by the disaster, which can be
completed over the long-term
Re-establishment of adequate housing to replace that which has been destroyed
Restoration of jobs/ livelihood that was lost
Restoration of the economic base of the disaster areas
261
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
9.7 Rehabilitation
9.7.1 Background
Rehabilitation, an integral part of disaster recovery; other being reconstruction, could be defined as an
overall dynamic and intermediate strategy of institutional reform and reinforcement, reconstruction
and improvement of infrastructure and services; aimed towards support to the ini tiatives and actions of
the affected populations in the political, economic and social domains, as well as reiteration of
sustainable development. Generally, rehabilitation package includes reconstruction of damaged
physical infrastructure and measures to address disaster-induced psychological problems, as well as
economic and social rehabilitation of the people in the affected region. The rehabilitation is classified
into the following:
Physical
Social
Economic and
Psychological
262
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
9.7.3 Relocation
Relocation is a very sensitive part of the physical rehabilitation process and it must be ensured that need
based considerations and not extraneous factors should drive the relocation policy. The local authorities,
in consultation with the affected population and under the guidance of the State Government shall
determine relocation needs employing criteria relevant to the nature of the calamity and the extent of
damage. Relocation efforts should invariably include activities such as the following:
Educational facilities may suffer greatly in a major disaster placing considerable stress on children.
Therefore, the following steps will be helpful in helping children to recover and cope with the situation:
263
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The elderly, women, and children are more vulnerable after a major disaster. Hence the following
measures will help in their rehabilitation:
The major components of economic rehabilitation are livelihood restoration and ensuring the continuity
of businesses, trade, and commerce. Restoring employment and income generating opportunities to
disaster affected communities is a vital component of post -disaster reconstruction.
Livelihood opportunities are severely disrupted by the destruction or loss of essential assets; with the
result that people are unable to engage in normal income generating activities; become demoralized
and dependent on humanitarian aid. Economic recovery should be based on:
As per the para 9.5.1 of NPDM, the state governments must give due importance to the restoration of
permanent livelihood of those affected by disasters and special attention to the needs of women -
headed households, artisans, farmers and people belonging to marginalized and vulnerable sections.
264
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Another crucial dimension of disaster rehabilitation is psychological rehabilitation. Dealing with victim’s
psychology is a very sensitive issue and must be dealt with caution and concern. The psychological
trauma of losing relatives and friends, and the scars of the shock of disaster event can take much longer
to heal than the stakeholders in disaster management often realize. Thus, counselling for stress
management should form a continuous part of a disaster rehabilitation plan.
Efforts should be made to focus more on:
9.7.9 Restoration of Damaged Cultural Heritage Sites, their Precincts and Museums
Post disaster repairs and reconstruction of damaged sites/precincts should always be undertaken based
on sound documentation and assessment practices. Poor reconstruction practices cause further physical
damage to heritage structures, may worsen its structural vulnerability and carries the risk of erasing the
heritage features. Reconstruction and rehabilitation approaches need to consider the legislative
frameworks already in place for different typologies of heritage sites and precin cts. In general, the
following principles should be followed:
An approach of minimal intervention should be undertaken for sites of historic and archaeological
importance and any intervention should be based on sound documentation and research. Aspects
of authenticity and visual integrity should form the basis of any reconstruction, repair, and
retrofitting attempt.
As far as possible, traditional skills and technologies where they still exist should be employed in
the repair and restoration of damaged structures. This helps ensure continuity of building and crafts
traditions.
Many cultural heritage sites and precincts hold strong cultural/ socio-economic associations with
the local population and restoring them instils a sense of normalcy after a disaster.
These considerations should facilitate the conservation/ reconstruction of heritage within the
overall recovery plan.
The notion of ‘build back better’ applied to cultural heritage must not undermine the archaeological
and/ or cultural aspects, which means that retrofitting measures for improving the structural
stability of cultural heritage sites, should be undertaken cautiously paying due attention to
restoration of the original.
All restoration and retrofitting of the cultural heritage must be undertaken only after carrying out
due consultation among stakeholders to preserve the cultural, archaeological and heritage aspects.
The impact of retrofitting on integrity and cultural value of heritage structures must be discussed
and properly evaluated with due weightage for restoration to pre -disaster status as closely as
possible
Restoration or reconstruction of heritage after disasters should go beyond buildings and it should
look at heritage livelihood, traditional trades/ crafts etc.
9.8.1 Background
Reconstruction and rehabilitation projects after a major disaster are usually highly resource intensive.
265
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Such projects are typically financed through the State exchequer. Recently, large funds have been raised
from multilateral/ bilateral funding agencies/ international agencies in close coordination with the
national Governments. The State Government, through the relevant ministry of the Central
Government, shall finalize the fund mobilization strategy, incorporating appropriate conditions
governing flow of funds, its disbursement, and usage as per norms decided by the Central Government.
This will include:
• Estimation of funds required based on the detailed damage assessment reports and consolidation of
the same under sectoral and regional heads and
• Contracting with funding agencies and evolving detailed operating procedures for fund flow and
corresponding covenants
The domestic or internal sources of on-budget government funds usually consist of the following:
External resources for post-disaster reconstruction can be sourced from multilateral development
banks, regional development banks, bilateral development partners, international NGOs, private
philanthropies and charities, and remittances. The possible multilateral financing resources for post -
disaster recovery and reconstruction consist mostly of the following types:
Some of the important aspects of mobilizing and managing the funds of a large recovery programme
consist of the following and are summarised in Table 9-3:
Table 9-3: Important aspects in mobilizing and managing the funds of a recovery programme
Major Step Description
266
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
1. Review of the Damage & Loss Quantitative and qualitative baseline for damage, loss, and
Assessment needs across sectors, blocks (taluka) and districts
2. Developing a vision and Develop the scope and goals of BBB
specific time-bound goals for Disaster resilient physical recovery
BBB Options for fast economic recovery
Set phase-wise betterment targets
3. Estimate financial
requirements of the recovery Prepare sector-wise and phase-wise financial estimates
programme Consultations and evaluation of various options
Finalization of financial estimates
4. Identify likely sources of • Domestic resources:
funds and examine various – From the state (on budget) and additional fund-raising
options options (off budget)
– Central grants and other options – on and off the budget
International including borrowing from IFI – facilitated by the
central govt.
• Other Sources:
– Donors
– Community contribution
– Private sector CSR, PPP
5. Defining and enforcing Setting norms and rules to allocate funds for new
robust financial norms for the development, retrofitting, owner-driven reconstruction
financial management (mainly homes),
Defining norms efficient disbursement along with the degree
of flexibility needed in recovery programs
Implementing mechanisms for monitoring proper utilization
including an appropriate MIS
The funds raised through funding agencies are usually accompanied by stringent disbursement and
usage restrictions. It is therefore important to monitor the disbursement of funds to ensure that none
of the covenants are breached. The fund disbursal shall be monitored by:
Prioritizing resource allocation across approved projects
Establishing mechanisms for disbursement of funds to the beneficiaries
Strengthening the monitoring mechanisms for fund utilization and progress of implementation
267
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-10
Capacity Development- An
Overview
268
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
10.1 Background
This chapter provides an overview of the capacity development measures described in
appropriate contexts in the previous chapters presenting both a summary and a perspective to
the capacity building aspects of the plan. The previous chapters describe specific aspects of
capacity development in respective responsibility frameworks and discussion. The list given in
this chapter is not exhaustive but indicative and illustrative supplementing the details present
in the previous chapters. While the themes included are broadly in consonance with na tional,
regional, and global practices, inevitably there will be changes that must be incorporated in the
periodic revisions of the plan and during its implementation. All efforts must be made to follow
the emerging best practices.
The Sendai Framework challenges all stakeholders to focus on establishing and increasing
capacity to manage their country’s disaster risk. It is an important component of investing in
disaster risk reduction. In the domain of disaster risk management, the Sendai Framework
emphasizes the need for enhancing the technical, financial, and administra tive capabilities of
institutions, governments, and communities to deal with the identified risks at different levels.
The framework calls for reinforcing the capacity to implement and enforce risk reduc tion
measures. Capacity development commonly refers to a process that is driven from the inside
and starts from existing capacity assets. The Sendai framework underlines the need for capacity
development of women in disaster management and building their ability to participate
effectively in managing disaster risk.
Investing in capacity development for DRR is a continuing process of enhancing the capability
of individuals, agencies, and communities to improve the performance of their DM functions.
The process of capacity building will include elements of human resource development, i.e.,
individual training, organizational development such as improving the functioning of groups,
and the strengthening of organizations, regulations, and institutions. Involving stakeholders
through participatory approaches is essential to establish ownership and commitment. The
sustainability of capacity development initiatives increases in direct relation to the level of
participation and ownership of the internal partners. Mainstreaming of DRR is incomplete
269
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
without mainstreaming of capacity building on DRR by State and District level Stakeholders for
Disaster Management. Capacity building should also include creating enabling environment by
making relevant provisions in existing laws, rules and regulations etc. of the State.
As capacity development entails activities on various levels, i.e. legal and institutional
frameworks, systems of organisations, organisation and human and material resources, it is
necessary to address challenges on all of them by implementing a mix of activities across all
time frames – recurring, short, medium and long term. The reason for this is that changes at
one level often require changes at other levels too, as the levels are interdependent. Therefore,
the focus of many capacity development efforts for DRR must go beyond human resource
development paying enough attention to organisational and institutional issues. Partnerships
and collaborations are integral to institutional capacity building. In institutional capacity
development, emphasis should also be on use of state-of the- art technologies to upgrade the
existing system s. Public and private investment in disaster risk prevention and reduction
through structural and non-structural measures are essential to enhance the disaster resilience.
Investing in capacity development is the cost-effective way to save lives, prevent or reduce
losses and ensure effective recovery and rehabilitation.
The National Policy on Disaster Management-NPDM, 2009 underlines the need for a strategic
approach to capacity development and notes that the active and enthusiastic participation of
various stakeholders is necessary for it to be effective. The national policy notes that capacity
development must address the challenge of “putting in place appropriate institutional
framework, management systems and allocation of resources for efficient prevention and
handling of disasters.” The capacity development being a continuous process, it must address
challenges of staff turnover, task of educating new recruits, keeping pace with technical
changes and incorporating the rapid advances in scientific knowledge.
The NPDM 2009 envisages capacity development in the domain of DM at all levels of
government including ministries, line departments and across various autonomous ins titutions.
It also stresses the importance of capacity development efforts to promote community -based
DM efforts. The policy notes that to sustain DRR, it is necessary to undertake capacity
development across the education sector covering schools to professional institutions. It
recognizes that skill development in all sectors to incorporate multi-hazard resistant features
along with strengthening of relevant licensing, certification, and standards.
270
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The State shall raise State Disaster Response Force-SDRF on the similar lines of National Disaster
Response Force-NDRF. The SDRF shall be trained by NDRF 5 th Bn. Pune to respond effectively
to any disaster situations in the State and can also support capacity development and training
needs of Aapda Mitra Volunteers, Civil Defence, National Cadet Corps (NCC), National Service
Scheme (NSS) and Nehru Yuva Kendra Sangathan (NYKS), community and volunteers in
preparedness and response. It is important that the SDRF and other agencies involved in
response mechanism are able to work harmoniously for which NDRF must have a role in the
training of all responders. The renowned institutes in the State including GIPARD, imparting
training in DM shall be strengthened with skilled resource persons and financial assistance. Also,
the DM cells in the Training Institutes, Police Academies, Goa Institute of Public Administration
and Rural Development-GIPARD, Directorate of Fire and Emergency Services-DFES,
Airport/Seaport Authorities, Indian Coast Guard-ICG, Indian Navy, Captain of Ports and other
institutes/Departments will contribute most significantly in developing DM related skills. The
capacity of existing institutes needs to be upgraded in accordance with regional and local
requirements. Other training institutions belonging to various Ministries/ Departments/
Agencies/ PSUs at the State level, must include DRR in their training programmes and
departmental examinations.
271
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Table 10-1: Capacity Development for DRR Themes - Centre and State
Chapter (s) where
Sr. No. Thematic Area Sub-Thematic Area Responsibilities are
described
Adopting the best global technologies
Deploying advanced Identifying technology needs based on hazard
1. technology and risk and vulnerability and experiences 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
equipment Procurements of best and most appropriate
equipment
Maintaining the resource network
Monitoring and maintaining the resource data
Regular updating the resource data
Developing fail-safe communications with
advance technology
National and state level disaster informa tion
Disaster
2. system
Information 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 9
Improve data flows across Central Ministries/
System
Dept./ States and other authorised users
Integration of HRVCA data with disaster
information systems
Ensuring reliable and credible database on
disaster losses (direct and indirect) and post-
disaster reconstruction
Mainstream and integrate DRR and strengthen
institutional mechanisms for DRR
Disaster Risk Promote participatory approaches,
3. 12
Governance partnerships and networks
Promote quality standards, certifications, and
incentives
272
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
273
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
274
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
275
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-11
Financial Arrangements
276
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
11 Financial Arrangements
11.1 Background
XV Finance Commission has recommended the creation of funds for disaster mitigation along with
disaster response, which will now together be called National Disaster Risk Management Fund
(NDRMF) and State Disaster Risk Management Funds (SDRMF). 12
In order to set up recovery, reconstruction, preparedness and capacity building facility to address
activities of immediate nature within SDRF/ NDRF have been subdivided into funding window by the
15th Finance Commission. The SDRF would receive 80 per cent of the total SDRMF, while SDMF would
get 20 per cent of the allocation. Within the SDRF allocation, there would be three sub-allocations.
While the funding windows of SDRF and SDMF are not inter-changeable, there could be flexibility for
re-allocation within the three sub-windows of SDRF for that financial year. Distribution of total SDRF
allocation among sub-window is given as under:
(I) Forty percent (40%) of the annual allocation of SDRMF i.e. equal to 50% of SDRF allocation for the
year is kept for Response and Relief activities. These activities would be administrated as per GOI
approved items & norms.
(ii) Thirty percent (30 %) of the annual allocation of SDRMF i.e. equal to 37.50% of SDRF allocation for
the year is kept for Recovery and Reconstruction activities. These activities would be administrated as
per GOI approved items & norms.
(iii) Ten per cent (10%) of the annual allocation of SDRMF i.e. equal to 12.50% of SDRF allocation for
the year is kept for Preparedness and Capacity-building activities. These activities would be
administrated as per GOI approved items & norms.
Disaster (s) covered under SDRF: Cyclone, drought, earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, hailstorm, landslide,
avalanche, cloudburst, pest attack, frost and cold waves.
Local Disaster: A State Government may use up to 10 percent of the funds available under the SDRF for
providing immediate relief to the victims of natural disasters that they consider to be ‘disasters’ within
the local context in the State and which are not included in the notified list of disasters of the Ministry of
Home Affairs subject to the condition that the State Government has listed the State specific natural
277
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
disasters and notified clear and transparent norms and guidelines for such disasters with the approval of
the State Authority, i.e., the State Executive Authority (SEC).
The State Disaster Response Fund shall be used only for mee ting the expenditure for providing
immediate relief to the victims of cyclone, drought, earthquake, fire, flood, tsunami, hailstorm,
landslide, avalanche, cloud burst, pest attack, frost and cold wave. While the State can draw from State
Disaster Response Fund for the emergency response and relief, there are provisions to adjust a portion
of the expense against funds released from National Disaster Response Fund between the fiscal year in
which National Disaster Response Fund is released and the expenses incurred by State in the previous
fiscal year under State Disaster Response Fund. In case the same State faces another severe disaster
during the same year, no reduction will be made while releasing assistance from the National Disaster
Response Fund. The State-specific disasters within the local context in the State, which are not
included in the notified list of disasters eligible for assistance from State Disaster Response Fund and
National Disaster Response Fund, can be met from State Disaster Response Fund within the limit of
10 per cent of the annual funds allocation of the State Disaster Response Fund. The two funds have
provisions for the following:
Gratuitous Relief
Search and Rescue operations, as per actual cost incurred
Relief measures
Air dropping of essential supplies
Emergency supply of drinking water
Clearance of affected area, including management of debris
Agriculture, Animal husbandry, fishery, Handicraft, artisans
Repair/ Restoration (of immediate nature) of damaged Infrastructure
Capacity development
The default period of assistance is as per norms prescribed. However, based on assessment of the
ground situation, the SEC may extend it beyond the prescribed time limit subject to the condition that
expenditure on this account should not exceed 25 per cent of State Disaster Response Fund alloca tion
for the year. The SEC will organize contributions from the relevant State Government, administer the
State Disaster Response Fund and invest the accretions to the State Disaster Response Fund in
accordance with the norms approved by GOI from time to time. State must meet the capacity
development expenses from the State Disaster Response Fund and not National Disaster Response
Fund, subject to a limit of 10 per cent of the State Disaster Response Fund.
278
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
For disasters needing central support over and above the State Disaster Response Fund, the MHA
processes the request of the State Government for support from the Government of Ind ia. The Ministry
of Finance will make the budgetary provisions for the relief funds required for strengthening response
mechanisms, disaster management institutions, capacity development of stakeholders, and DRR. The
effective implementation of these statutory provisions would place Goa on a firm footing for effectively
managing disasters and minimising their negative socio -economic consequences. Another important
aspect of disaster management is financial resilience. This requires a systematic approach, combining
an optimum mix of ex ante and ex post financing mechanisms based inter alia on the country’s current
economic status.
279
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
280
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
iii) In a year up to 5% of the SDMF, funds may be earmarked for small grants window to support small
proposals related to innovation, technology, community leadership, research, studies and learning. The
NDMA and the SDMA will devise a mechanism to fund projects from this window.
iv) Funds available under SDMF shall not be used for general environmental improvement or landscape
beautification and for funding the existing Government programmes/ongoing schemes etc.
v) Mitigation Fund should generally not be used for maintenance and upkeep of any structure or
engineering measure aimed at mitigation. This fund should be used for developing and implementing
new projects. The mitigation measures that have been implemented, should be maintained through
other sources of funding.
vi) Resources under Mitigation Fund cannot be used towards the establishment expenditure such as
salaries, office expenditure etc. to be incurred by the Disaster Management Authorities or other entities,
except for payment of remuneration to technical staff included in the projects costs. Such payments will
be as per the GFR-2017 and extant Government of India guidelines.
281
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
the following Heads and contribute such some of money as it thinks fit for the purpose of carrying out
the activities and programmes set in the Disaster Management Plan by the various Authorities under
the Act. The funds shall be established under the following Heads, namely: -
(i) the State Disaster Response Fund;
(ii) the District Disaster Response Fund;
(iii) the State Disaster Mitigation Fund;
(iv) the District Disaster Mitigation Fund.
The State Executive Committee, the State Authority and District Authority, as the case may be, may
spend such as they think fit for performing their functions under the Act and all such sums shall be
treated as expenditure payable out of respective fund Head. The authority thereof shall maintain all the
expenditure in form as specified by the Government.
11.4.2 Form of Annual Report. - The State Authority shall during each financial year prepare annual
report in respect of the year last ended giving a true and full account of its activities during the previous
financial year furnishing particulars as specified in “Form A” (Annexure-V), appended to the rules. The
annual report shall be forwarded to the Government within three months from the end of the previous
financial year and the Government shall cause every such report to be laid before the State Legislature.
11.5.1 Financing Prevention, Mitigation, and Preparedness
The provisions relating to funding of prevention, mitigation, and preparedness, as per DM Act 2005
are listed below:
i. Section 18 (2) (f) provides that SDMAs may recommend provision of funds for mitigation and
preparedness measures;
ii. Section 38 (2) (d) provides that the State Government may allocate funds for measures for prevention
of disaster, mitigation, capacity -building and preparedness by the departments of the Government of
the State in accordance with the provisions of the State Plan and the District Plans;
iii. Section 39 (c) provides that the departments of the State Government shall allocate funds for
prevention of disaster, mitigation, capacity- building and preparedness.
282
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
283
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
xi. Section 38 (2) (e) provides that the State Government may ensure integration of measures for
prevention of disaster or mitigation by the departments of the Government of the State in their
development plans and projects;
xii. Section 38 (2) (f) provides that the State Government may integrate in the State development
plan, measures to reduce or mitigate the vulnerability of different parts of the State to different
disasters;
xiii. Section 39 (b) provides that the departments of State Government may integrate into its
development plans and projects, the measures for prevention of disaster and mitigation;
The primary mechanism for funding DRR related schemes and projects in Ind ia are through Public
Funded Schemes at Central and State level. Various nodal Ministries play a key role in disaster
management as far as specific disasters are concerned. These nodal Ministries as well as other Ministries
and Departments have dedicated schemes, aimed at disaster prevention, mitigation, capacity building,
etc. within their particular domain. Existing examples include the scheme of MHA for Strengthening of
Fire and Emergency Services, Financial assistance to ATIs and other Training institutions for disaster
management, Integrated Coastal Zone Management programme of MOEFCC, and flood management
and flood forecasting programmes of MOJS. The DOS has a Disaster Management Support Programme
and MOES has a project on Tsunami and Storm Surge Warni ng System. NDMA is implementing an
important World Bank funded project for cyclone risk mi tigation. The National Cyclone Risk Mitigation
Project encompasses cyclone forecasting tracking and warning systems, capacity building and structural
measures.
Apart from this, many of the schemes, which are implemented by various ministries/ departments, have
embedded DRR components, as for example, those implemented by the MOEFCC. There are many other
programmes that improve societal resilience, which is a critical component of DRR, such as the National
Rural Health Mission, Mahatma Gandhi Employment Guarantee Scheme, and the Urban Development’s
Urban Renewal Mission.
Outlay for reconstruction activities are normally embedded in the schemes of the Union Government to
ensure that “Building Back Better” is in consonance with the approved programs. Post disaster
reconstruction work is funded by the Union Government through increased outlay for the on -going
infrastructure projects in the region and providing more untied grant to the affected State. The
284
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Centre/State may also utilize funds from international agencies for specific intervention in a particular
region in the form of an externally aided project.
285
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
in consultation with Ministry of Finance. The amount committed for State Disaster Response Fund is
invested by the Union in government securities. MHA has issued guidelines in consultation with Ministry
of Finance for the maintenance and encashment of the securities as and when required. However, need
for projects or risk transfer instruments by private agencies, is also acknowledged by the Government.
The corresponding policy changes and fund requirement is to be deliberated in detail in consultation
with the IRDA, insurance sector and other stakeholders.
The Ex-Gratia Assistance on account of loss of or damage to houses and restoration of means of
livelihood to the disaster victims shall be provided as per the Items and Norms of Assistance from
SDRF/NDRF issued by Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India and Goa Disaster Management
Fund Scheme (GDMFS) spearheaded by Revenue Department Government of Goa. Also, whichever is
higher among the two, shall be considered as Minimum Standards of Relief as applicable. Furthermore,
whenever the Items and Norms of Assistance from SDRF/NDRF and GDFMS are revised, the Ex gratia
Assistance shall be provided as per the revised notification.
286
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-12
Strengthening Disaster Risk
Governance
287
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
12.1 Background
Strengthening disaster risk governance is considered a cornerstone of the efforts to understand, reduce
and manage risks in global practices (UNDP 2015). Governance encompasses the exercise of poli tical,
economic and administrative authority in the management of a country’s affairs at various levels. It
comprises mechanisms, process and institutions through which groups articulate their interest, exercise
their legal rights, meet their obligations and mediate their differences. Governance transcends
government. It goes beyond governmental systems and powers by encouraging pro –active citizen
engagement. Risk governance encompasses the full range of risks recognized by human socie ties,
including health and medical, safety and security, and environmental risks, such as hazards and disasters.
The concept of governance has its origins partly in the recogni tion that many functions carried out by
public entities are now provided by several governmental as well as private -sector or civil society
entities. Such systems rely on the development and diffusion of various types of norms such as state
regulation, self-regulation and market mechanisms (Tierney 2012). It may also rely on other processes
such as negotiation, participation, and engagement, which facilitate collective decision making and
action. Disaster governance is nested within and influenced by overarching societal governance systems
and various aspects such as state-civil society relationships, economic organization, and societal
transitions have implications for disaster governance. Governance arrangements and stakeholder
participation could vary across different disaster phases, adding to the complexity of governance
challenges. Risk-spreading mechanisms, including insurance and reinsurance, are integral part of
disaster governance.
"The way in which public authorities, civil servants, media, private sector, and civil society at
community, national and regional levels cooperate in order to manage and reduce disaster and
climate related risks. This means ensuring that sufficient levels of capacity and resources are made
available to prevent, prepare for, manage and recover from disasters. It also entails mechanisms,
institutions and processes for citizens to articulate their interests, exercise their legal rights and
obligations, and mediate their differences." (UNDP 2013)
“The system of institutions, mechanisms, policy and legal frameworks and other arrangements to
guide, coordinate and oversee disaster risk reduction and related areas of policy.” (UNISDR 2016)
The concept has evolved considerably, and the current thinking acknowledges that one cannot separate
governance of disaster risk from the governance of other types of risks, including those associated with
global climate change, environmental degradation, financial crises, and conflict situations (UNDP 2015).
From the mid-2000’s onwards, governance was commonly accepted as the crux of DRR, with
comprehensive efforts underway to increase the DRR capacity of national and local institutions; to
strengthen policy, legal and planning frameworks; to develop human and financial capaci ties; and to
promote multi-stakeholder and multi-disciplinary approaches. Effectiveness of disaster governance can
be judged from stakeholder participation, collaboration, accountability and transparency. There is now
greater emphasis on accountability, transparency, responsiveness to the needs of those most at risk,
288
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
and ensuring the rule of law/compliance with adequate legal provisions. These are of crucial importance
in fostering development and promoting risk reduction.
The capacity of relevant individual actors and organisations comes into play when DRR policies – at
various levels from the top to bottom – are implemented. Participation, rule of law, transparency,
responsiveness, consensus orientation, equity, effectiveness, efficiency, accountability and strategic
vision are key factors when implementing a governance structure aimed at sustainable development
and disaster risk reduction (UNDP 2004).
The Sendai Framework emphasises the importance of governance at different levels for an effective and
efficient management of disaster risk. Effective risk governance requires clear vision, plans, competence,
guidance, and coordination within and across sectors, as well as participation of relevant stakeholders,
as discussed earlier. Strengthening disaster risk governance is necessary to fos ter collaboration and
partnerships for the implementation of disaster risk reduction and sustainable development. The Sendai
Framework lays emphasis on the following to strengthen disaster risk governance:
(a) Mainstream and integrate disaster risk reduction within and across all sectors and promote the
coherence and development of relevant laws, regulations, and public policies. It must guide both
the public and private sectors through the legal framework that clearly spells out the roles and
responsibilities. It must address disaster risk in publicly owned, managed, or regulated services
and infrastructures. It must encourage actions by persons, households, communities, and
businesses. It has to enhance relevant mechanisms and initiatives for disaster risk transparency.
It must put in place coordination and organizational structures.
(b) Adopt and implement disaster risk reduction strategies and plans, across different levels (local to
national) and timescales, aimed at preventing the creation of risk, the reducti on of existing risk
and the strengthening resilience – economic, social, health and environmental.
(c) Carry out assessment of the technical, financial and administrative disaster risk management
capacity to deal with the identified risks at different levels
(d) Promote necessary mechanisms and incentives to ensure high levels of compliance with the
safety-enhancing provisions of sectoral laws and regulations, including those addressing land use,
urban planning, building codes 13 , environment, resource management, health and safety
standards, and update them, where needed, for better disaster risk management
(e) Develop and strengthen mechanisms to periodically review and assess the progress on various
DM plans as well as encourage institutional debates, including by parl iamentarians and relevant
officials, on DRR plans.
(f) Assign clear roles and tasks to community representatives within disaster risk management
institutions and processes and decision-making through relevant legal frameworks, and
undertake comprehensive public and community consultations during the development of such
laws and regulations to support their implementation.
(g) Establish and strengthen government coordination forums composed of relevant stakeholders at
the national and local levels, such as national and local platforms for disaster risk reduction.
(h) Empower local authorities, as appropriate, through regulatory and financial mechanism to work
and coordinate with civil society, communities and indigenous people and migrant in disaster risk
management at the local level.
(i) Work with parliamentarians for disaster risk reduction by developing or amending relevant
legislation and setting budget allocations.
289
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
(j) Promote the development of quality standards, such as certifications and awards for disaster risk
management, with the participation of the private sector, civil society, professional associations,
scientific organizations and the United Nations.
(k) Formulate relevant public policies and laws aimed at addressing issues of prevention or relocation,
where possible, of human settlements in disaster risk-prone zones.
The NDMP seeks to strengthen the entire system of disaster risk governance in the country using the
framework presented here. As discussed in chapter-1, the NDMP envisages the implementation of
various measures across the country over the short (T1), medium (T2), and long-term (T3), ending by
2022, 2027, 2030 respectively. Many of these are highly ambitious given the extremely uneven level of
institutional arrangements across various states and districts in the country. Based on the current status
of implementation of the DM Plans, each central Ministry, Department, and the State Government will
restructure the respective DM Plans into these time frames for implementation while preparing plans
or revising existing ones.
The generalized responsibility framework given in this section summarizes the themes for strengthening
DR governance and specifies agencies at the centre and state with their respective roles. The
responsibility framework has six thematic areas in which central and state governments must take
actions to strengthen disaster risk governance:
290
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
291
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
292
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
293
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-13
International Cooperation
294
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
13 International Cooperation
295
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
296
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
domain of disaster management. Goa has the potential to work with countries in the region and beyond
in building resilient nations and communities, against disasters. Goa acknowledges the benefit of
engaging with the international community in providing humanitarian assistance in the State in
emergencies.
Since Goa is one of the most famous tourist destination in the country as well with the inflow of
both Domestic and International tourists; so tourist safety equally becomes important to the State in
wake of disaster/crisis situations. The State Disaster Management Authority is committed to extend best
possible support to the International tourists in the times of disaster emergencies. The SDMA believes
in proactive approach to mitigate the negative impacts of an inevitable disaster situation. SDMA believes
in establishing an appropriate liaising processes with the Consulates of the International Countries to
assist their respective citizen (foreign tourist) visiting the State of Goa. Accordingly, SDMA has initiated
the conduct of introductory meetings the representatives of the Consulate Generals of the other
Countries and conducted one meeting with Foreign Service Officers from Consulate General of the
United States of America Mumbai, India on 13th Feb 2024. Goa SDMA assured the best possible support
to assist all foreign tourists including U.S. citizens as well during unforeseen difficulties in the State.
297
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Chapter-14
Maintaining, Monitoring and
Updating the Plan
298
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
299
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
testing the plan with equal participation of all relevant stakeholders. The process of evaluation and
remedial actions will identify, illuminate, and correct problems with the SDMP. This process must
capture information from exercises, post -disaster critiques, self-assessments, audits, administrative
reviews, or lessons-learned processes that may indicate that deficiencies exist. Members of the
planning team should reconvene to discuss the problem and to consider and assign responsibility for
generating remedies across all mission areas. Remedial actions may involve revising planning
assumptions and operational concepts, changing organizational tasks, or modifying organizational
implementing instructions (i.e., the SOPs/SOGs). Remedial actions may also involve reassessment of
capabilities, revisiting assumptions made in the SDMP, and finding solutions to overcome the
deficiencies. The final component of a remedial action process is a mechanism for tracking and
following up on the assigned actions. As appropriate, significant issues and problems identified through
a remedial action process and/or the annual review should provide the information needed to allow
the planning team to make the necessary revision(s) to the plan.
300
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
301
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure-II:
Hazard Risk Maps for Goa
Vulnerability Atlas of Goa, Third Edition 2019, Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council
(BMTPC)
Earthquake Hazard Map
(https://bmtpc.org/DataFiles/CMS/file/VAI2019/eq-goa.html , accessed March 16, 2024)
302
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
303
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
304
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
305
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
306
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
307
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
308
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
309
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
310
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
311
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
312
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
313
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
314
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
315
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
316
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
317
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
318
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
319
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
320
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
321
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
322
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
323
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
324
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
325
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
326
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
327
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
328
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
A set of 38 indicators was identified to measure global progress in the implementation of the Sendai
Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction. The indicators will measure progress in achieving the global
targets of the Sendai Framework, and determine global trends in the reduction of risk and losses.
Global target A: Substantially reduce global disaster mortality by 2030, aiming to lower
average per 100,000 global mortalities between 2020 2030 compared with 2005-2015.
Global target B: Substantially reduce the number of affected people globally by 2030,
aiming to lower the average global figure per 100,000 between 2020-2030 compared with
2005-2015.
B-1 Number of directly affected people attributed to disasters, per 100,000
(compound) population.
B-2 Number of injured or ill people attributed to disasters, per 100,000
population.
B-3 Number of people whose damaged dwellings were attributed to disasters.
Number of people whose destroyed dwellings were attributed to disasters.
Number of people whose livelihoods were disrupted or destroyed, attributed
to disasters.
Global target C: Reduce direct disaster economic loss in relation to global gross
domestic product (GDP) by 2030.
329
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Global target E: Substantially increase the number of countries with national and local
disaster risk reduction strategies by 2020.
E-1 Number of countries that adopt and implement national disaster risk
reduction strategies in line with the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk
Reduction 2015-2030.
E-2 Percentage of local governments that adopt and implement local disaster
risk reduction strategies in line with national strategies.
Information should be provided on the appropriate levels of government
below the national level with responsibility for disaster risk reduction.
330
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
F-2 Total official international support, (ODA) plus other official flows), for national
disaster risk reduction actions provided multilateral agencies.
F-3 Total official international support, (ODA) plus other official flows), for national
disaster risk reduction actions provided bilaterally.
F-4 Total official international support, (ODA) plus other official flows), for the
transfer and exchange of disaster risk reduction –related technology.
F-5 Number of international, regional and bilateral programmes and initiatives for
the transfer and exchange of science, technology and innovation in disaster
risk reduction for developing countries.
F-6 Total official international support, (ODA) plus other official flows), for national
disaster risk reduction actions capacity building.
F-7 Number of international, regional and bilateral programmes and initiatives for
disaster risk reduction-related capacity-building in developing countries.
F-8 Number of developing countries supported by international, regional
and bilateral initiatives to strengthen their disaster risk reduction related
statically capacity.
Global target G: Substantially increase the availability of and access to multi-hazard early
warning systems and disaster risk information and assessments to the people by 2030.
G-1 Number of countries that have multi-hazard early warning systems.
(compound G2-G5)
G-2 Number of countries that have multi-hazard monitoring and forecasting
systems.
G-3 Number of people per 100,000 that are covered by early warning
information through local governments or through national
dissemination mechanisms.
G-4 Percentage of local governments having a plan to act on early warnings.
G-5 Number of countries that have accessible, understandable, usable and
relevant disaster risk information and assessment available to the
people at the national and local levels.
G-6 Percentage of population exposed to or at risk from disasters protected
through pre-emptive evacuation following early warning.
Member States in a position to do so are encouraged to provide
information on the number of evacuated people.
331
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
332
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
333
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
334
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
335
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Superintending Engineer,
Circle – II, North, Panaji
13. Directorate of Fisheries Dr. Sunita Pauskar – Superintendent of Fisheries 9850764554 [email protected]
North 8806839645
Smt. Preetam Naik -
South
14. Directorate of Panchayats Shri Gurudatta Naik Block Development Officer 9764599548 [email protected]
(HQ)
15. Forest Department Shri Naveen Kumar, Dy. Conservator of Forests 7798986115 [email protected]
IFS (Working Plan)
16. Coast Guard Yogesh Singh Deputy Commandant 7358083769 [email protected]
9895693150
17. Animal Husbandry & Dr. Veena Kumar Dy. Director (Plan), AH&VS 9607918105 [email protected]
Veterinary Services
18. Department of Tourism Shri Dhiraj Vagle Dy. Director, Tourism 9822133053 [email protected]
19. Directorate of Transport Nancy Fernandes Dy. Director (Admn.) 9359272752/ [email protected]
2225606
20. Urban Development Shri GaneshV. Barve Additional Director (Urban 9637017751 [email protected]
.Devt)
21. Department of Civil Shri Amit Sawant Deputy Director 9284375081 [email protected]
Supplies and Consumer 0832-2226084
Affairs
22. Office of Commissioner, Dr. Shubhangi S. Administrative Medical 9423092520 [email protected]
Lab & Employment Lotlikar Officer
23. Labour Department Shri Satish S. Dy. Labour Commissioner 9823476636 [email protected]
Vaghonkar
24. Directorate of Settlement Shri Mandar M. Naik Dy. Director (Admn.) 7875352676 [email protected]
& Land Records
25. Inspectorate of Factories Shri Sanjay R. Naik Inspector of Factories 9923959733 [email protected]
& Boilers
337
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
26. Corporation of the City of Shri Vivek A. Parsekar Municipal Engineer, Grade 9922541999 [email protected]
Panaji I - CCP
27. Department of Shri Anant P. Hoble Asst. Director (INM) 9623287239 [email protected]
Agriculture
28. Directorate of Higher Dr. Gervasio S.F.L. Additional Director 9421094271 [email protected]
Education Mendes
29. Directorate of Education Smt. Sylvia Fernandes Dy. Director _Education 9850108747 [email protected]
30. Technical Education Smt. Sanjana D. Dy. Director (Admn.) 9623834945 [email protected]
Bandodkar
31. Goa State Infrastructure Shri Dilip Joshi General Manager (Civil –I) 9011066777/ [email protected]
Dev. Corp. 2493550
32. Town and Country Shri Vinod Kumar Town Planner (HQ) 9423056571/ [email protected]
Planning Department Chandra 2437352
33. Information and Publicity Shri Kiran B. Munankar Assistant Information 9421874884 [email protected]
Officer
34. Directorate of Industries, Shri Himanchu Dy. Director (Adm.) 9423885859 [email protected]
Trade & Commerce Patnekar Functional Manager 8550916963
Shri Prashant Kamat
35. GIPARD Dr. Seema Fernandes Assistant Director 9822167364 [email protected]
[email protected]
36. National Institute of Dr. Anil Prathihary Principal Scientist 9420924812 [email protected]
Oceanography
37. Department of Science, Shri Nikhil Caerio Assistant Manager 7720856041 [email protected]
Tech. & Waste Mgmt.
338
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure VII-List of Humanitarian Agencies/Organisation in Goa. Source: North and South Goa Collectorate
Name of Type of Organisation Name of Designation of Mobile No. E-mail Id Office
organization (NGO/CSO/CBO/FBO) Contact Contact Person Address
Person
Quepem NGO Shaikh Azim President 9850467765 NO Khushawati
Citizen Enterprises
Committee Quepem Goa
Quepem Civil NGO Dr Mahendra President 9822488727 [email protected] Marcus
Bale Dcunha H.No.
And
71 Condy
consumer
Quepem Goa
Action
Network
Adivasi CBO Caitan President 9822132527 NO 1st floor
Sangatana Carvalho Zeferino
Kepem Commecial
Complex Opp
Bank of India
Quepem Goa
United Tribes CBO Prakash S. President 9822121740 No Saraswati
Association Velip Niwas,
Alliance Bharatkar
(UTTA) Marg
Quepem Goa
339
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
340
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
341
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Harbour,
Mormugao.
Vasco Muslim NGO Hassan Ismail President 8087080147 [email protected] 04, Vasco
Social Trust Khan Residency,
Churc Road,
Sasmolem
Baina, Vasco.
Unumid A NGO Hassan Ismail President 8087080148 [email protected] H.No.53,
Drop of Hope Khan Nr.Khapresh
war Temple,
Patrong
Baina, Vasco,
Goa.
Zindagi Goa NGO Muskhan President 9168397139 [email protected] H.No.53,
Khan Nr.Khapresh
war Temple,
Patrong
Baina, Vasco,
Goa.
El Shaddai NGO Sunil Sharma Central Incharge 9225901276 [email protected] El Shaddai
Charitable Chartable
Trust Trust, EI
Shaddai
House Socol
Vaddo,
342
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Assogao,
North Goa.
343
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
345
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Bardez
OPM NGO/SAA/Unwed Fr. Maverick Director 9423888255 [email protected] H. No.; 425,
Caritas Goa Mothers [email protected] OPM, Caritas
Goa,
Nachinola,
Aldona PO,
Bardez Goa.
Caritas NGO Fr. Maverick Director 98238 [email protected] Near
Centre for 50586 St.Anne's
Deaf & Blind Chapel, Tabra
Waddo,
Saligao Goa
403511
Victory NGO Julia Mathew Managing 7796082607 [email protected] Cottla vaddo,
House - Director muddawadi,
Project of EI saligao goa
Shaddai
Charitable
trust
Sethu - NGO Dr. Nandita Director 77200 https://sethu.in/# Hno 5/84,
Centre for D'Souza 13749 5/48, Dhon
Child vaddo,
Development saligao goa
and Family
Guidance
St. Joseph NGO Deepika - 9407407176 [email protected] Porta wada,
home for Dsouza siolim Bardez
aged Goa
346
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Green Cross NGO Suneel Chairperson 9822123042 [email protected] Office no. 10,
Korajkar 1st Floor, Om
Chamber,
Mapusa Goa
Asha NGO Rui da Gama President 9822166876 - Asha Center,
Charitable Sweet Home
Society building, 1st
Floor,
Rajwaddo,
Mapusa,
Bardez Goa
Goa NGO Robert Lyon Volunteer 9881787338 - H.No.
Outreach 4/88/Acoi,
Bardez Goa
WOW NGO Ketaki Parab Founder 9923312801 [email protected] Karaswada,
Foundation Mapusa, Goa
Goychi Nari NGO Sankalp Secretary 9764362794 - Next to
Shakti Bhonsle Vodafone
Gallery,
Mapusa Goa
Calangute NGO Mr. Secretary 9890288319 calanguteconstituencyforum@gmai C/O Mrs.
Constituency Premanand l.com Clotildes
Forum Diukar Braganca
'D' Block,
Maria Rosa,
Phase - I,
Naikavaddo
Calangute
347
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
348
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
349
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
350
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
351
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
352
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
353
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
354
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
355
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
356
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
357
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
358
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Russiam, Loutolim
Salcete, Goa -403718
148. GOA/1614 Hindustan Waste Treatment Private Limited,
Survey No. 47/1, Village Calangute,
Near Pilerne Fire Station,
Calangute, Bardez, Goa.
149. GOA/1640 Reliance Industries Limited,
Survey No. 10/1, Chicalimlndl. Area,
Vasco, Mormugao, Goa-403726
150. GOA/1642 Aquarius Shipyard Pvt. Ltd,
Survey No. 25/1, H. No. 505,
Sao, Mathias, Naroa,
Tiswadi, Goa-403403
151. GOA/1666 Ion Exchange (India) Limited,
Plot No. U-05/04, Phase IV,
Verna, Industrial Estate,
Verna, Salcete, Goa – 403722
152. GOA/1684 Seahath Canning Company.
Plot No. 8 & 7 (Part),
Margaolndl, Estste, St. Jose de Areal, Margao,
Salcete, Goa – 403709
153. GOA/1686 Fullarton Distilleries Pvt. Ltd.
Survey No. 71/0 & 72/1
Khandepar, Ponda, Goa
154. GOA/1707 Pinto’s Cold Storage and Ice Plant
Plot No. L-5, Cuncolimlndl, Estate,
Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa
155. GOA/1712 M/s. IFB Industries Ltd,
Plot No. N-7, Phase IV, Vernalnd. Estate,
Verna, Salcete, Goa
156. GOA/1719 Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd,
Plot No. A4, Aviation Fuelling Station,
Mormugoa Co. Operative Indle Estate,
157. GOA/1732 Hughes Precision Manufacturing Pvt. Ltd,
Plot No. 99-102, Verna IndlEstt,
Verna Salcete Goa 403722
158. GOA/1736 Syngenta Biosciences Pvt, Ltd,
Survey No. 28, Subdiv No. 1 Santa Monica Works, Corlim Tiswadi
Goa.
159. GOA/1741 Joecons Marine Export Pvt. Ltd,
Plot No. L4 & M23, Cuncolindl. Estate,
Cuncolim, Salcete, Goa.
160. GOA/1754 City Metal Works & Coats,
Plot No. B3-4, B3-5, D3-7, Margaolndl. Estate,
San Jose De Areal, Salcete, Goa
359
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
360
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure-IX
Emergency Operation Centre (E.O.C.)
361
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
362
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure-X
Assessment Report Format
The assessment report may include the following as far as practicable:
Extent of damage in terms of:
Geographical area (administrative units and divisions)
Expected affected population and effect on population (primary affected persons, dead,
injured missing, homeless, displace, orphans, destitute, traumatized population, children
under five, pregnant women, lactating mothers
Districts/Areas worst affected
Damage to infrastructure according to each ESF
Buildings (Major and minor damage/destruction) Infrastructure (road damaged/
destroyed, bridge, communication network, electricity network, telecom network
Health Facilities (Infrastructure damage, condition of equipment, staffs affected,
availability of medicines/drugs, vaccination/immunizations, major health problems
Water & Sanitation (Availability of safe drinking water and sanitation facilities,
environmental sanitation, stock of disinfectants, condition of water supply system, repair
status of water supply system, potable water system
Crop/ Agriculture (crop damage, livestock loss, health services for livestock, cattle feed/
fodder availability, damage to agricultural infrastructures)
Food/nutrition (adequate availability of food for family, relief, PDS, Community Kitchen,
requirement of baby food
Secondary threats (potential hazardous sites, epidemics etc.)
Logistic and Distributions System (Availability of storage facilities, means of
transportation, availability of fuel, distribution of criteria)
Priority needs (needs of search and rescue, need for team/ boats/special equipment and
shelter) Clothing (children clothing, adult clothing, winter clothing
Food items (type of food, baby food, specialized food, cattle feed and fodder)
Sanitation (potable water, chlorine powder and disinfectants, manpower for repair of
drinking water points and disinfections of water bodies
Health (medical staff, drugs, IV fluids, ORS, equipment, Mobile unit, Immunization
vaccine, Cold chain system).
Education (infrastructure both temporary and permanent, teacher kits, reading
materials)
Crop/ agriculture (need of seeds, fertilizers, pesticides, implements)
Equipment and manpower required for restoration of infrastructures
363
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure-XI
Guidelines for preparing Disaster Management Plans by Departments of State Government
1. Introduction:
As per the section 40(1) of Disaster Management Act, 2005, every department of the
State Government should prepare a disaster management plan in conformity with the guidelines
laid down by the State government. The concerned subsections of the DM Act are annexed for
ready reference). This guideline has been prepared in order to facilitate the preparation of all
the disaster management plans by all the state departments under the umbrella of the State
Disaster Management Authority. The state Disaster Management Plan will be prepared in
conjunction with the disaster management plans of the departments and in consultation with
National Disaster Management Authority, Ministry of Home Affairs and other nodal agencies of
the government.
1.1 The preparation of plans will fulfil the statutory requirements as laid down in the Disaster
Management Act and would ensure that efforts have been made by the department to fulfil
statutory duties-failure of which invites stringent liabilities including criminal proceedings by the
law of the State. This planning exercise is an effort made to mainstream all issues concerned
with emergency preparedness, response and mitigation/risk reduction activities. The
department should include the following components in the department plan.
Planning on Emergency Response at all levels,
Planning on providing Relief and Recovery support (post disaster)
Planning on Prevention and Mitigation issues (Including mainstreaming mitigation into the
development programmes supported by schemes financed by the federal / state
government, multilateral/bilateral and donor institutions)
Planning for resources such as financial and human resource to fulfil the above three
components
The roles and responsibilities (in fulfilling the above four components) of all the actors
and agencies within the department should be clearly spelt out in the plan. This will avoid
ambiguity and confusion while executing the plan in the times of crisis. Thus, the roles and
responsibilities under the above listed heads/sections should be prepared and the
responsibilities assigned. Department plan must clearly identify and assess the current capacity
of the department. In other words, the department assess the availability of human resources
/manpower, equipment, need for training and further capacity building through human resource
development plan. In addition, existing resource allocation by the department on disaster
management functions and requirements of additional funds for a minimum period of next three
years must be indicated in the plan.
Each department disaster management plan shall begin with the introduction section
and will essentially cover the following points:
Goal: The goal of the Department Disaster Management Plan should be clearly spelt out.
Objective:
364
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The department should clearly indicate the objective of the departmental plan. For
example, the Health Department can state the following objectives:
To save lives of affected population by effective medical response
Prompt and effective treatment of injured in disasters
Provide medical emergency function support (ESF) to allied institutions / secondary ESF
Members such as Medical Response Teams at state, district and sub-divisional levels,
Indian Red Cross, Civil Defence, Fire Service, NGOs etc.
Prevention of health related outbreak and epidemics
To keep all health infrastructure, equipment and personnel in a state of readiness for
response
To ensure that all health facilities can withstand the actual disaster by adoption of
structural and non-structural measures and ensuring that every facility has All Hazard
Disaster Management Plan.
Preparation of Guidelines for State Health Contingency Plan (This may include typical
SOPs for Epidemics such as H1N1 etc.), Disease Surveillance System etc.
To conduct trainings and capacity building all identified staff including refresher
The above is only illustrative example and is not an exhaustive list for action. The department
can determine the scale of operations as per the functions allocated by the state and accordingly
align the objectives.
Organizational Framework:
365
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
The next section should highlight details of the Organizational Framework which
describes the organizational matrix/structure for implementation of the plan and coordination
with all agencies.
The Organogram must be in the form of a flow chart which can define hierarchy of
actions, jurisdiction arrangements, area of operations/responsibility and communication plan.
Departmental wise actions for identified hazards and vulnerabilities:
This section should highlight on indicative (very broad) Hazard Risk and Vulnerabilities in
the State and broadly indicate the responsibility of the department to minimize the risks.
For example, the Public Health Department of the State could suggest the hazards as follows:
Determine the infrastructure vulnerability of the departments to slow and fast onset hazards
Medical assistance provision required for Quick Onset Hazards such as earthquake, landslide,
flash floods, lightening, forest fire, traffic accidents which rapid medical response and
deployment of medical first responders to the field to access and provide medical aid.
Epidemics and other health disasters which arise in during monsoon or dry seasons
The vulnerabilities in Health Department could include difficulties in access to health
facilities (then planning is needed for mobile teams or medical camps), improper or inadequate
networking within the health sector as seen during disasters, poor transportation arrangements
for emergency action, lack of communication plan/ inadequate communication facilitie s (then
use wireless or police wireless or district EOCs), medical storage and stock pile locations and
coverage issues etc.
The department must make a checklist of action to be taken in particular disasters (The
department can study the experience of past disasters to prepare the plan. Some of the
departments are required to prepare a report on losses and damages and for this methodology
should be clearly spelt out.
This is only an illustrative case and not all details are discussed. The final decision is left to the
department as the final responsibility for action will lie with department.
366
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Mapping of Resources:
Mapping of Resources (that are currently available and those that can be brought to use
at short notice) that are available both within the department and outside at all levels is vital
part of the plan. Mapping of resources should include mapping of all Human Resources, taking
into account of all key assets within the government system and those outside the government
that can be utilized in case of need. For example, the mapping of resources in the health
department will include a comprehensive assessment of resources and should enlist as follows:
Sl.No. Men / Material/ Date of Qty in Qty in Availability
Equipment/ entry* Nos. Wt./Vol. Location
Services
Description/
Specification each
heading need to be
elaborated
1. Manpower
2. Services
3. Material
4. Equipment
* The resources shall be mapped twice in a year
Pre-contracts:
During a large scale disaster, the situation may demand large scale mobilization of
resources. In order to meet this surge, it is suggested that line departments enter into pre-
contracts with the local vendors/suppliers for immediate supply of materials which could be
mobilized in a short period of time. (for example: if the health department is in requirement of
additional 10000 saline bottles, the department can mobilize this with the support of the
medicine shops/suppliers. It is hereby suggested that the department enters into an
367
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
agreement/contract with the suppliers with a payment commitment (say, within a maximum
period of three months or earlier). The details can be highlighted in the plan as specified in the
format below:
Sl.No. Men / Material/ Qty. in Nos. Qty in Pre-contract Pre-contract
Equipment/ Wt./Vol. Location valid up to
Services
Description/
Specification
each heading
need to be
elaborated
1.
Manpower
2. Services
3. Material
4.
Equipment
368
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Similarly, all the departments should make their own assessment of their roles and
responsibilities as per the Disaster Management Act and their role in the disaster and crisis
situations that they have been enjoined upon to play by the government. Another example is
that the departments may mention the need and effort being made to create the mitigation fund
within the department. Another example would be to assess the vulnerability of their
infrastructure to ensure that during serious crisis situation the functioning of the department is
not stopped and if the disaster is catastrophic, there is minimum disruption and plan is made to
ensure that services are continued. This section may also mention the efforts to repair,
strengthen, retrofit the physical infrastructure. And as far as human resources is concerned the
requirement of capacity building of the staff through training needs to be addressed to.
The dept. will need to examine the need to create fund within the dept. budget for addressing
disaster mitigation and response activities. Departments may recall that it was suggested earlier
by Revenue Department to keep aside the 10% of all developmental plan or nonplan budget for
disaster management issues. (The above paragraph also mentioned a bout the fund. It is
suggested to fuse them under one bullet point)
b. Emergency Response Planning
(i) Constitution and Deployment of quick response team (QRT) to disaster affected site/
region:
Every department would do an analysis of their domain and then decide on the deployment
of QRTs at the state, district, subdivision, block level and for various magnitude of the event.
Experiences has shown that deployment of QRT's is vital for early relief efforts. Once the
decision to constitute the QRT is taken the department should locate the manpower and train
them to mount a response suo motto. MENTION FROM THE MHA EXAMPLES OF QRT
On the receipt of information about the occurrence of the disaster, these QRT teams is
deployed quickly. For this the department should prepare a standard operation procedure
(SOP) required for deployment of these teams and the SOP should also indicate the course of
action if the QRT is not able to handle the situation on its own. In other words, the department
should lay down an elaborate sequence that will ensure mobilization and deployment of QRT
on the spot, sending of QRT to other line departments for assistance for handling their own
crisis situations or for carrying out a joint operation as per the need of the situation, type of
further response required, type of further support required from other departments and from
higher levels than being handled. The Department should clearly identify the person/s who
will start the wheels rolling and continuously moving till the situation is ha ndled. While the
situation is being handled by the QRTs, other level of the department may need to keep close
coordination with other line departments, SEOC, and concerned field level offices. The
response may also need the reverse way of action i.e. the department may need the support
from other line departments, SEOC and field offices to carry out joint operation under the
departmental jurisdiction. Another way of ensuring that these QRTs become the essential
part of the system of response is to publicize the details of these teams, their location, their
contact details with all the departments and with the press and public representatives. Care
369
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
should be taken for disseminating information related to terrorist attack or anything matters
to security concerned for the State like publicizing may not always be good idea as terror
groups can use this information for their benefit).
(ii) Mobilization of resources within the department and from outside as per pre-contract
with the agencies: (During disaster, the situation may demand large quantity of materials,
manpower to be mobilized immediately. In this regard, the line departments should assess
whether they need to enter into pre negotiated contracts with the local vendors/suppliers for
immediate supply of materials during the crisis. This prevents the crisis in supplies. (For
example: if health Deptt. needs, additional 10000 saline bottles, these can be mobilized from
local medicine shops at a pre negotiated rate.
(iii) Immediately after the disaster all the departments are required to do rapid loss and damage
assessment. The department should devise formats and earmark men and machinery that
would automatically set in motion as per the devised methodology. This would prevent in loss
of time and would ensure obtaining supplies. It is possible that the state government may ask
the Revenue Department machinery to make the damage and loss assessment also but the
advance action by the concerned action will always save time and the information collected
by the department can be given to Revenue Department which can be easily consolidated .If
needed the damage assessment report can be sent to the EOC at the district and state level
.This will help state govt. to consolidate the report and send to Govt, on India if immediate
financial assistance is needed.
370
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
ensure continuation of services. The department should have the planning done in a way that
some contingent funds are always available and are built into the budgetary heads.
A Table Indicating the Activity to be undertaken (Warning to communities, Evacuation
of communities etc.); Agency responsible; Time schedule; Manpower requirement; Equipment
requirement; Estimated Cost can be highlighted in this sub-section.
It is important to mention that Response Planning need to take into account of various
types of disasters. Some disasters give sufficient lead-time for preparation whereas some
disasters strike without warning. Therefore, the Disaster Management Information System has
to take into account of relay of early warning messages for events with sufficient lead time and
for the ones without warning the information system should be quick enough to plot the hazard
intensity of the event. Disasters such as floods, droughts and tropical cyclones are seasonal in
nature. The role and duties of the department should be worked out for seasonal events. If
there is a prior warning, the department must take the advantage to mitigate the possible
impacts or undertake prevention. If the disaster has a prior warning stage, various activities to
be undertaken before occurrence of the event should be mentioned (for example cleaning of
drains or water channels before the rainy season is an example observed in cities like Surat,
Mumbai or vaccination or immunization or pre-positioning of health officials and medicines at
pre-identified vulnerable locations before rainy or flood season etc. by the Health Department).
If the disaster has a warning stage then the department needs to adopt a method of alerting
the administrative machinery, communities, emergency responders, QRTs, volunteers etc. and
the detail procedure needs to be mentioned in the plan along with an evacuation plan if
necessary for the department. The plan also highlights to activate the departmental emergency
operation centre (control room) with dedicated telephone and other communication lines and
manpower to coordinate, collect and compile and sharing of information with field level
including the community and nodal agencies after receipt of warnings. The important numbers
of the control room and focal points need to be shared with public. Planning should be done
for adequate no. of vehicles, alternate transportation arrangements, POL, manpower,
equipment and other resources which would be required to be mobilized quickly. The
department must have an activation plan highlighting the measures to be taken with time
schedules
The thrust area of the response portion of the plan is post-disaster search, rescue and
relief. Therefore, the plan needs to clearly indicate what should be done, who will do it, when
and how it will be done. (If necessary, an activation matrix format can be used). These details in
this section will vary from departments to departments and should include general details and
details of mobilization of resources including man power and materials that are and may be
available within the department and those that can be requisitioned at short notice from
outsider from both from Govt. or private agencies as per pre-contractual agreement. The
departments should also consider including details of the central govt. agencies. The
departments should link with the district level database and inventory of resources namely
Indian Disaster Resource Network (IDRN) and should get their resources incorporated into the
371
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
database. The literature of IDRN is enclosed with the write up. The State Govt has set up
Emergency Operations Centres (EOCs) at the district and state level and, co-ordination with the
EOC at District and State should be established. Departments should consider whether it is
required to set up a 24X7 EOC (at least during the monsoon period). For example, Health
Department in many states has their own SOP indicating opening of EOC. If the department
decides to have a provision of setting up an EOC then they must have a Standard Operating
Procedure (SOP) as well as a communication pan for smooth operations and for establishing
linkages with the State EOC.
It is understood among the disaster management practitioners that the first 72 hours are
most critical for mounting the search and rescue efforts, saving lives of trapped victims, providing
medical support to the critically/severely injured. The attention span thereafter shifts towards
specific relief and recovery efforts such as providing temporary shelters, food, medicines and
other essential supplies. Of course it is not to deny that essential support such as food and
medicines also continue to be given in the first 72 hours. Thus every department should lay down
an a Activation Matrix clearly laying down the time frame for activation and identification and
allocation/deployment of resources. - The task responsibility matrix shall spell out what actions
should be taken and who should take action 72 hours before and after the disaster strikes. One
such example of activation matrix table is given below;
Table : Activation Matrix for Slow Onset Hazards (this must be Hazard wise)
372
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
T+48 hrs
T+72 hrs
Table : Activation Matrix for Fast Onset Hazards (this must be Hazard wise)
Time Possible Situation Activity Responsibility
T+15 min
T+30 min
T+1 hrs
T+4 hrs
T+6 hrs
T+12 hrs
T+24 hrs
T+36 hrs
T+48 hrs
T+72 hrs
Relief and Recovery Plan
The next chapter of the response plan is towards addressing Relief and Recovery efforts.
This section should reflects the departmental intervention towards the process of mobilization
of relief materials as per need (if required), transportation and storage of relief materials
(perishable items like food, medicines etc., non-perishable items like clothes, tents, tarpaulins,
tents, utensils, shelter items etc./ allocation of funds to the departmental agencies and local
administrations etc., process of distribution of relief materials to the affected communities by
the department and departmental agencies. Many cases require air dropping of relief materials
particularly to the inaccessible areas which needs to take help of air force helicopters and airport
authorities. For this pre-agreement with the concerned department is required to carry out relief
operation without losing precious time.
The department needs to lay down the procedures for acceptance of relief materials
from other State Governments, foreign countries, donors and voluntary organizations. Issues on
humanitarian assistance like inappropriate distribution of relief materials, gender, religious and
unwanted materials have to be taken into consideration and long term relief operation should
not be encouraged unless cleared by the state or central Govt as applicable. The relief and
recovery plan should include reference to provisions of State Relief Norms or SDRF or any other
such documents adopted by the department. The department laid down policy on relief and
rehabilitation phases should be incorporated in the plan.
Relief activities of the department should be highlighted in terms of short, medium and
long term as per the practice and policy of the department.
373
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
374
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
provision for the requirements of forces deployed on these occasions. Availability of funds for
the agencies within the department from the plan should be ensured.)
Regarding human resource planning, the department needs to identify disaster
management nodal officer, alternate nodal officer, quick response team (QRT), master trainers,
identification personnel for specialized skills and details of the contacts needs to be provided in
the plan. The specific roles and responsibilities should be laid down (suggested roles and
responsibility of the nodal officer and QRT are annexed).
375
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Organize the periodic mock drills at least twice a year as per the suitability of the
department and update the plans at all levels and ensure participation of the department
in mock drills of other agencies and other departments.
376
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
drill also organized in combination with the other line department for sectoral responses and
based on the finding there has to be a fix timeline for review and updating the same.
Annexure:
The department needs to provide additional/ detailed information with annexure as
suggested below. But these are not limited as suggested.
a. Important emergency telephone/ contact number and address.
b. List of resources (man power, materials, equipment etc.)
c. Rules, policies (techno legal guidelines) , government orders etc. which are rel ated to
disaster management
d. Formats
e. Maps
f. List of agencies within the department
g. List of field level offices and contact details
h. Checklists
377
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure -X
Checklist for DM/Deputy Commissioner for Disaster Preparedness in the District
Activities (Y/N) Remarks
Institutional Strengthening
Whether DDMA is functioning on quarterly basis
Whether district DM Cell, district nodal officer and Dept. Nodal
Officers have been identified and oriented
Whether the DM activities are delineated and assigned to the
concerned
Officials
Awareness
Whether regular awareness programme organized at all levels
Whether resource materials in CD/ DVDs shared with
ADC/SDMs/BDOs/
Schools/ Panchayat/ Depts
IEC materials like posters, hoardings handouts, resource materials
prepared/ collected and shared with ADC/SDMs/ BDOs/ Schools/
Panchayat/ Depts
Whether line Depts like health, education etc. incorporated disaster
safety components in their awareness programms.
Whether flood awareness programme conducted at all levels in the
district
Whether print and electronic media been involved for dissemination
of warnings, awareness to the public
Whether Dy. Commission / ADC/ SDM/ BDO given flood/ flash flood
preparedness talk in radio/ DDK etc.
EOC (Control Room)
Whether District EOC is functioning round the clock
Whether other control rooms like hospitals, police, fire service,
water resource, CWC linked up with the DEOC.
Whether OIC-DEOC identified and his/her contact no. shared with all
stakeholders
Whether four digit telephone (1077) and IP phones other than the
normal telephone installed in DEOC and publicised
378
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Whether weather report, rainfall info, river flow info etc.are being
received from IMD, CWC, Water Resource Depts. on daily basis
Whether the DEOC has communication redundancy (telephone,
wireless phone, VHF, UHF, IP phone, internet, mega phone, mobile
phone)
Whether daily situation report is being sent to SEOC
Whether the DEOC receives daily weather report from IMD by email/
fax/ phone
Whether the district level hazard and risk maps, maps showing
resources, equipment, safe shelters etc.available and displayed in
EOC
Equipment
Whether the equipment available in the district have been physically
tested
379
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
ANNEXURE-XI
Format for Helipads/Landing Grounds in Goa
380
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
Annexure-XII
381
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
382
State Disaster Management Plan-2024
References:
1. National Disaster Management Plan-2019
2. Goa Disaster Management Rules_2008_Official Gazette Government of Goa
3. Statement on Climate for the State of Goa: 2023 IMD Pune
4. Forest Survey of India (Ministry of Environment, Forest & Climate Change)
5. Disaster Management Plan-2020 of the Directorate of Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Services,
Government of Goa.
6. Bhatla, Rajjev & Verma, Shruti & Pandey, Ritu & Tripathi, A. (2019). Evolution of extreme rainfall events
over Indo-Gangetic plain in changing climate during 1901–2010. Journal of Earth System Science. 128.
10.1007/s12040-019-1162-1.
7. Phases of Disaster Management_AkitaBox
8. UNDP, Sustainable Development Goals, https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/sustainable-
development-goals.html (accessed Sep 20, 2019)
9. Integrated monitoring of the global targets of the SFDRR and SDGs ,
h_ps://www.preven_onweb.net/sendaiframework/sendai-framework-monitor//common-indicators
10. Kerala State Disaster Management Plan.
11. Arunachal Pradesh State Disaster Management Plan
12. District Disaster Management Plans of North and South Goa Districts
13. Forest Fire Report of Goa Forest Department
14. Departmental Disaster Management Plan of AH&VS Goa
15. Web Dynamic Risk Composite Atlas -Web DCRA
16. National Guidelines on Incident Response System
17. Guidelines on Constitution and Administration of the State Disaster Mitigation Fund (SDMF) based on the
recommendations of the Fifteenth Finance Commission 2021-22 to 2025-26
18. Guidelines on Constitution and Administration of Preparedness and Capacity Building Funding Window
under National Disaster Response Fund (NDRF) and State Disaster Response Fund (SDRF)
*******
383