Ncert Solutions Chapter 1. The End of Bipolarity
Ncert Solutions Chapter 1. The End of Bipolarity
1. Which among the following statements that describe the nature of Soviet economy is
wrong?
(a) Socialism was the dominant ideology.
(b) State ownership/control existed over the factors of production.
(c) People enjoyed economic freedom.
(d) Every aspect of the economy was planned and contained by the state.
Answer:
(c) People enjoyed economic freedom.
2. Arrange the following in chronological order:
(a) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan
(b) Fall of the Berlin Wall
(c) Disintegration of Soviet Union
(d) Russian Revolution
Answer:
I. (d) Russian Revolution (1917)
II. (a) Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979)
III. (b) Fall of the Berlin Wall (Nov 1989)
IV. (c) Disintegration of Soviet Union
3. Which among the following is NOT an outcome of the disintegration of the USSR?
(a) End of the ideological war between the US and USSR
(b) Birth of CIS
(c) Change in the balance of power in the world order
(d) Crises in the Middle East
Answer: (d) Crises in the Middle East
1
4. Match the following:
2
3. To democratise the Soviet System.
4. To loosen the administrative system which exempted ordinary people from the privileges.
8. What were the major consequences of the disintegration of the Soviet Union for
countries like India?
Answer:
The major consequences of the disintegration of the Soviet Union for countries like India can
be analysed as follows:
1. Disintegration of Soviet Union gave an end to Cold War confrontations and to ideological
disputes between two superpowers.
2. Military alliances had been abolished and demand arose for world peace and security.
3. Multipolar system was surpassed to exist where no single power could dominate and a
group of countries could play a crucial role in world politics like NAM Countries.
4. The US became the sole superpower and capitalist economy became dominant at
international level. World Bank and IMF became powerful advisors due to their economic
support to these countries during transitional period.
5. The motion of liberal democracy emerged as a way to organise political life.
6. Due to disintegration of Soviet Union many new countries emerged with the independent
aspirations and choices.
7. The Baltic and East European states wanted to join European Union and became the part of
NATO. The Central Asian countries took the advantage of their geographical location and
continued close ties with Russia, West, China and others.
9. What was Shock Therapy? Was this the best way to make a transition from
communism to capitalism?
Answer: Shock Therapy was a painful process of transition from an authoritarian socialist
system to a democratic capitalist system. This transformation system was influenced by the
world bank and the IMF in Russia, Central Asia and East Europe. Though it varies in
intensity and speed amongst the former second world countries but its direction and features
were quite similar.
This was not the best way to make a transition from communism to capitalism due to
following drawbacks:
1. Russia, the large state controlled industrial complex lost about 90 per cent of its industries
through sales to private individuals and companies
2. It created “the largest garage sale in history” which led virtual disappearance of entire
industries for the restructuring was carried out by market forces in place of government
owned policies.
Hence, industries were undervalued and sold at throwaway prices.
3. It systematically destroyed old system of social welfare.
4. The value of „ruble‟, the Russian currency, declined dramatically due to high rate of
inflation and real GDP of Russia also declined between 1989 to 1999.
5. The withdrawal of government subsidies pushed large sections of society into poverty and
it emerged mafia to start controlling many economic activities.
6. Privatisation led to new disparities which divided Russia between rich and poor people
3
creating economic inequality.
7. Hence, Shock Therapy brought ruin to economies and disaster upon the people of entire
region.
10. Write an essay for or against the following proposition. “With the disintegration of
the second world, India should change its foreign policy and focus more on friendship
with the US rather than with traditional friends like Russia”.
Answer:
India should not change its foreign policy and focus more on friendship with US, but India is
required to maintain healthy relations with Russia because India has experienced a long band
of mutual trust, interests and popular perceptions with Russia in the following manner:
1. Russia and India share a vision of multipolar world order i.e. co-existence of several world
powers internationally, collective security, greater regionalism, democratisation with the
decision-making through bodies like the UN.
2. More than 80 bilateral agreements have been experienced between India and Russia as a
part of the Indo- Russia Strategic Agreement of 2001.
3. India has been benefitted from its relationship on the issues like Kashmir, energy supplies,
sharing information on international terrorism, access to Central Asia and balancing its
relation with China.
4. Russia is also important for India‟s nuclear energy plane and assisting India‟s space
industry by giving cryogenic rocket to India whenever needed.
5. Co-operation with Russia and its republics like Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan in the form of
partnership and investment in oil fields has also benefitted India.
6. Russia is also benefitted from India on ground of the second largest arms market for
Russia. Indian military gets most of its hardware from Russia.
7. Russia and India have collaborated on various scientific projects also.
*************************************