Sustainable Energy Technologies 1st Edition Eduardo Rincnmeja Instant Download
Sustainable Energy Technologies 1st Edition Eduardo Rincnmeja Instant Download
https://ebookbell.com/product/sustainable-energy-
technologies-1st-edition-eduardo-rincnmeja-6838866
https://ebookbell.com/product/sustainable-energy-technologies-options-
and-prospects-1st-edition-michel-combarnous-4192886
https://ebookbell.com/product/sustainable-energy-technologies-for-
seawater-desalination-1st-edition-marc-a-rosen-230185166
https://ebookbell.com/product/low-carbon-energy-technologies-in-
sustainable-energy-systems-grigorios-l-kyriakopoulos-26149462
https://ebookbell.com/product/progress-in-sustainable-energy-
technologies-generating-renewable-energy-1st-edition-ibrahim-
dincer-4931420
Progress In Sustainable Energy Technologies Vol Ii Creating
Sustainable Development 1st Edition Ibrahim Dincer
https://ebookbell.com/product/progress-in-sustainable-energy-
technologies-vol-ii-creating-sustainable-development-1st-edition-
ibrahim-dincer-4931464
https://ebookbell.com/product/cogeneration-and-district-energy-
sustainable-energy-technologies-for-today-and-tomorrow-oecd-6822872
https://ebookbell.com/product/life-cycle-assessment-of-energy-systems-
and-sustainable-energy-technologies-the-italian-experience-1st-ed-
riccardo-basosi-7323180
https://ebookbell.com/product/proceedings-of-the-international-
conference-on-sustainable-energy-technologies-icset2023-1011-nov-ho-
chi-minh-city-vietnam-djourkov-todor-58445448
https://ebookbell.com/product/the-power-of-design-product-innovation-
in-sustainable-energy-technologies-1st-edition-angele-reinders-4084582
Sustainable Energy
Technologies
Sustainable Energy
Technologies
Edited by
Eduardo Rincón-Mejía and
Alejandro de las Heras
CRC Press
Taylor & Francis Group
6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742
This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been
made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher cannot assume responsibility for the
validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copy-
right holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish
in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged, please write and let us know
so we may rectify in any future reprint.
Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or
utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including pho-
tocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission
from the publishers.
For permission to photocopy or use material electronically from this work, please access www.copyright.com (http://
www.copyright.com/) or contact the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. (CCC), 222 Rosewood Drive, Danvers, MA
01923, 978-750-8400. CCC is a not-for-profit organization that provides licenses and registration for a variety of users.
For organizations that have been granted a photocopy license by the CCC, a separate system of payment has been
arranged.
Trademark Notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered trademarks, and are used only for
identification and explanation without intent to infringe.
Chapter 1 Introduction������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������1
Eduardo Rincón-Mejía, Alejandro de las Heras, and Marina Islas-Espinoza
Chapter 2 Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not�������������������� 9
Alejandro de las Heras, Eduardo Rincón-Mejía, Behrooz Sani, and
Marina Islas-Espinoza
vii
viii Contents
Chapter 15 Towards More Sustainable Aeronautics via the Use of Biofuels����������������������������� 245
Aris Iturbe, W. Vicente, and J.E.V. Guzmán
* c.f., Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014: Climate Change 2014, 5th Assessment Report, Synthesis Report.
http://ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/.
† IRENA, 2017: Rethinking Energy 2017. International Renewable Energy Agency Headquarters, Abu Dhabi, UAE. www.
irena.org. Also REN21 (Renewable Energy Network for the 21st Century) 2016: Renewables 2016 Global Status Report.
http://www.ren21.net/gsr.
xi
xii Foreword
the near future. These cost drops have largely contributed to renewables exceeding nonrenewable
power expansion since 2012. Globally, Photovoltaic (PV) capacity has grown by 20%–30% for the
past 10 years and added approximately 75 GW of capacity in 2016, so that current global capacity
is surpassing 300 GW. In a recent IRENA study,* jobs in the renewable energy sector surpassed
8 million worldwide in 2015, with 2.8 million working in the solar PV sector; overall, annual job
growth in the renewable sector is 5% (over 11% in solar PV).
With the adoption of the Paris Agreement and the rapid emergence of renewable energy tech-
nologies as a viable and significant global business enterprise, Sustainable Energy Technologies
is a timely and important volume. Written primarily by engineers, the book addresses the overall
status and trends of renewable energy technologies (including all of the broad categories of solar
energy, geothermal, wind, tidal, biofuels, and related technologies) and how these technologies can
and must all work together to achieve a clean and resilient energy supply by the end of this century.
Besides adding resiliency to the rapid expansion of electricity supply, renewable technologies can
contribute to all end-use energy sector demands, including heat and transport. This concept of
renewables working together to achieve a 100% renewable energy supply for all end-use energy
needs is a major theme of the International Solar Energy Society.
Sustainable Energy Technologies addresses significant questions and concerns regarding certain
low-carbon emission technologies such as nuclear and fusion energy, which, although on principle
can offer a substantial contribution to clean energy supply, are also bereft with safety, international
security, and cost concerns that may and perhaps should exclude them from a future energy mix.
Further, this volume takes a close look at the real sustainability of energy sources that are typically
viewed as renewable, such as large hydropower and biomass combustion.
Sustainable Energy Technologies supports the energy transformation that is being stimulated
by the rapid growth in renewable energy business opportunities and by the challenges set forth
in the Paris Agreement. The United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goal #7, “Affordable
and Clean Energy,”† calls for doubling the world’s renewable energy supply (to 36% of total
consumption) and making energy accessible to all, including the 1.2 billion people currently
lacking access to reliable energy sources, by the year 2030. To achieve such a goal, global
investments in renewable energy must quadruple from their current level to nearly 1 trillion
USD/year. What makes Sustainable Energy Technologies especially important is that renew-
able energy technologies can address all end-use energy sectors: power, heat, and transport. Of
these sectors, the power sector is experiencing the most rapid growth, as electricity becomes the
energy carrier of choice to meet an ever-expanding array of end-use energy demands. However,
even today, the power sector still represents only about 20% of total end use energy demand.
The heating sector represents 47% of our end use energy consumption, and the transport sector
represents 37%.
Thus, in Sustainable Energy Technologies, you will see thoughtful reports on the broad range of
renewable technologies that address all three sectors. It is essential that these technologies all work
together to achieve a total carbon-free energy supply over the decades to come. The hybridizing
of these technologies is addressed in Part I of this book, and further bioengineering solutions are
addressed in Part II. The book then addresses, in Part III, the technological issues related to secu-
rity, safety, and geopolitical context of energy systems, which of course have national implications,
as well as implications on the energy mixes that will ultimately be chosen by individual countries.
* IRENA, 2016: Renewable Energy and Jobs Annual Review 2016. International Renewable Energy Agency Headquarters,
Abu Dhabi, UAE. http://www.irena.org.
† http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/sustainable-development-goals/.
Foreword xiii
All of this material is presented in a way that bridges the dialogue between sustainable energy
practitioners and the related relevant sciences, security professionals, and experts working in the
fields of socioeconomics and politics. Sustainable Energy Technologies is truly a timely and criti-
cally important volume to support the work of the vast array of professionals and decision-makers
involved in the renewable energy transformation that is sweeping through society.
1. Energy reserves should last for as long as man exists on the planet.
2. The Hartwick rule (1977) should apply to exhaustible reserves. For example, fossil natural
gas can be sustainable only if it is entirely dedicated to producing devices that tap much
more renewable energy than is consumed in the production of that device and if pollution
is offset.
3. Waste materials should all be treated as resources in recycling processes.
4. Working efficiencies should approximate thermodynamic limits.
5. The system should be resilient and dominated by maximally diverse modular and decen-
tralized applications.
6. Energy should be used sparingly by all.
7. All subsystems should have very high energy return on energy invested.
8. Energy and matter transportation and conduction should be minimal thanks to local use of
resources.
9. Profitability must consider both monetary and environmental numeraires on equal terms.
10. Sustainability can only be attained if ecosystems are restored.
BOOK OVERVIEW
This book begins with a reminder in Renné’s Foreword of the 2015 Paris Agreements to further reduce
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. A few months after the Paris Agreements, news came that the price
of electricity from renewable energy sources was, for the first time, lower than the nuclear MWh price.
In Chapter 1, Rincón-Mejía and colleagues link current carbon dioxide levels to the global mix of
energy technologies. They caution against dead-end engineering ideas that could further imbalance
the atmosphere. They also make the essential distinction between renewable and sustainable energy
technologies, thereby questioning nonwaste agro-fuels. Finally, they show the momentous surge of
sustainable energy sources in the worldwide market.
Chapter 2, by de las Heras, and colleagues, explains that fusion in the Sun and radioactive
decay in Earth’s crust and mantle are safe and easy to use while artificial fission poses intractable
xv
xvi Preface
technical issues. Further, Sani’s firsthand experience in nuclear power plants points to the intri-
cate relationships of the oil and nuclear industries with regional and global military interests.
The lack of transparency of nuclear power resonates with citizen concern and involvement, in
Chapter 3 by Leon-Grossmann; firsthand experience in California shows to the world that in one of
the most democratic areas of the world, corporations and highly regarded politicians vie for power
at the expense of the environment and democracy, two pillars of sustainability.
Having stated the current bias in the supply side of energy and the human flaws in energy sys-
tems, engineering takes over with a theoretical viewpoint on technology evolution: dos Santos and
colleagues very didactically expound the intricacies and extremely wide field of application of the
Constructal physical law in Chapter 4. This theory pinpoints many practical applications in sustain-
able energy systems.
In Chapter 5, Walker addresses one of the main challenges in the energy transition toward sus-
tainability, namely the integration of more intermittent renewable energy to grids feeding cities and
buildings. Although energy storage is the main solution, adaptations of sustainable energy sources
are also needed, such as photovoltaic solar distribution over larger areas or different orientations
than south-facing arrays, to even out the effects of partly cloudy days and morning and evening peak
demand times. Hardware standards and load forecasting methods are also enhancing operation in
grids coupling conventional and sustainable energy sources during the energy transition.
Changes in the global energy subsystems in the last four decades are described by Ruiz-
Hernández in Chapter 6. The most salient feature of the global systems is the rise of renewable
sources, and the resistance of the International Energy Agency to acknowledge this fact. Solar
energy in particular has a potential for direct thermal and photovoltaic applications that bolster their
efficiency and, consequently, their economic competitiveness. Ruiz-Hernández draws on the experi-
ence of Spanish top-of-the-line facilities to explore upcoming developments in solar concentrating
thermal and electric applications.
Fundamental physics, mathematical tools, and the economic aspects of energy balance are used
by González in Chapter 7 to show that technology has solved one of the key issues in tropical ener-
getics: sustainable cooling in the face of high humidity. These results also point to the possibility
of sustainable energy independence in islands around the world, and coastal areas, the most endan-
gered areas in relation to global warming and sea level rise.
Taking advantage of a warming atmosphere, absorption thermodynamic cycles now allow for
heat, cold or electricity applications, depending on the needs of the end user, as demonstrated by
Lecuona-Neumann and colleagues in Chapter 8. These applications totally supersede systems that
use ozone-depleting substances.
Weber takes over cooling and heating applications in Chapter 9. He shows the efficiency of
hybridized solar and heat-pump systems. In these systems, the sun is the energy source, and heat is
stored underground. These applications have large potentials in temperate and cold climes, where
seasonal soil-air temperature gradients are elevated.
The field of solar energy storage applications is further explored by Solé and colleagues in
Chapter 10, with a focus on recent developments in thermochemical materials. The full spectrum of
solar energy storage is covered in that chapter.
Solar energy storage and the chemistry thereof are approached from another angle by Cabrera-
Lara in Chapter 11. There, solar photocatalysis is used for hydrogen production, the energy carrier
used for storage. The role of semiconductor catalysts and photoelectrochemical cells is elucidated,
and key parameters are highlighted.
Dispatchability (i.e., use on demand) is fundamental in the competition of renewable energy
systems against fossil fuels. Sattler and colleagues in Chapter 12 also deal with the conversion of
solar energy into solar fuels at higher, more efficient, temperatures, using solid oxide and molten
carbonate electrolyses. The focus is on concentrating solar power thermochemical H2O and CO2
transformation.
Preface xvii
Sustainable electrochemical energy storage can also take place in supercapacitors, whose use in
addition to current storage batteries is developing fast. Fierro and colleagues in Chapter 13 explain
the fundamentals and applications of tannins, some cheap, inexpensive, non-toxic and renewable
compounds as precursors of supercapacitor carbon electrodes.
Transportability is another key parameter in sustainable energy carriers. Hydrogen in particular
lends itself to fuel cell applications, as shown by Reyes-Rodríguez and colleagues in Chapter 14.
Fuel cell thermodynamics, components, and perspectives are dealt with in that chapter.
Transportability is of the essence in aeronautical applications. Iturbe and colleagues in Chapter
15 demonstrate the potential of sustainable biofuels in jet propulsion turbines and the solutions to
the higher viscosities of biofuels. Sprays and droplet-size distribution in ultrasonic actuated fuel
injection are treated in detail.
Global society is highly dependent on air travel, but for billions of people, gathering cooking
fuel is still a highly energy-demanding activity, especially since wood fuel is becoming sparse due
to deforestation. As shown by Lecuona-Neumann and colleagues in Chapter 16, solar cooking is a
powerful alternative to combustion in most kitchens of the world and a climate-change mitigator.
Concentrating solar cookers are now being hybridized with thermal or electrical solar energy stor-
age, for enhanced nighttime and cloudy-day dispatchability.
Both large-scale and small autonomous systems are likely to require windpower in their energy
mix: windpower is one of the lower-cost energy sources and has been harnessed for centuries, a
sure indicator of the robustness of even less-efficient applications. Rincón-Mejía in Chapter 17 gives
account of the principles of windpower and the most viable, up-to-date, applications.
Offshore windpower is but one of the sustainable energy sources that can be drawn from marine
environments. Magar in Chapter 18 shows how tides and their interaction with the sea floor gener-
ate strong tidal currents, close by the sea shores, owing to Venturi effects. Numerical tidal resource
assessment, based on computational fluid dynamics and technology developments in the last
20 years, is explicated.
Any discussion of current energy supply mixes should probably include Brazil, perhaps the
foremost user of renewable energy sources: by 2015, an approximate 44% of the energy mix was
obtained from renewable sources. Several of these however are not sustainable: wood fuel, vegetal
coal, sugar cane ethanol, and hydroelectricity have large environmental and social footprints. Korys
and Latawiec in Chapter 19 cover the environmental and social implications of large-scale hydro-
power dams, with implications of any such future projects in the world. They also discuss small-
scale and run-of-river alternatives to making hydropower more sustainable.
Sustainable energy systems will not be complete if they do not tap the vast stores of energy in the
billions of extant human bodies and the huge amounts of biowaste that they generate, as explained
by Islas-Espinoza and de las Heras in Chapter 20. Starting with fundamentals of bioenergy, they go
on to highlight the main application branches, human power, and waste-based biomethane. Hybrid
applications are also illustrated.
The importance of biomethane can hardly be overestimated. Challenges remain, but Aydin and
colleagues in Chapter 21 highlight solutions. They cover the complex biological essentials of the
topic, key control parameters, and pathways to enhanced biomethane generation, including control
of carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide.
As to fundamentals of human bodily energy, they are provided by Aguilar Becerril and col-
leagues in Chapter 22. These include (an)aerobic biochemical pathways of energy generation, which
interestingly show the hybrid character of human energetics. Food energy substrates are covered, as
is the essential concept of energy recovery via sleep and rehydration. Ergometric, spirometric, and
anaerobic aspects of performance are covered, using as a model athletic performance.
As increasing numbers of humans settle in cities, and emerging economies grow, the already
huge energy demand from homes is bound to soar. Energy generation is not a solution. The Net Zero
Energy concept in building design has emerged as an alternative. Morillón Gálvez and Ceballos
xviii Preface
Ochoa in Chapter 23 develop an energy balance account of a bioclimatic and photovoltaic Net Zero
Energy architectural design in three of the world’s bioclimates.
REFERENCES
Bejan, A. and Llorente, S. (2010). The constructual law of design and evolution in nature. Philosophical
Transactions of the Royal Society B, 365, 1335–1347.
Hartwick, J. M. (1977). Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources.
Review of Economic Studies, 67, 973–974.
Latouche, S. (2009). Farewell to Growth. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Roosevelt, T., 26th President of the US (1910). Speech before the Colorado Livestock Association, Denver,
Colorado, August 19, 1910. Retrieved from quotationspage.com/quote/41325.html.
Acknowledgments
The editors are grateful for the effort dedicated by all the authors to this book. We also wish to
thank Irma Britton, our Purchasing Editor at CRC Press.
xix
Editors
Eduardo A. Rincón-Mejía, Eng, PhD, Engineering Professor.
American Society for Mechanical Engineers, Chair of the Solar Energy Division (2013–2014),
Chair of the Solar Heating and Cooling of the SED Technical Committee (2009–2013). International
Solar Energy Society, Board of Directors Member (2005–2013). Secretary (2008–2009). Mexican
Solar Energy Association, President (2002–2004). International Energy Foundation, Board
of Directors Member (2002–2009). Member of the Joint Public Advisory Committee of the
Commission for Environmental Cooperation of North America (2004–2008). Mexican Renewable
Energy Award (Ministry of Energy, Mexico) (2004).
Professor Rincón-Mejía works primarily in the area of Renewable Energy Technologies, with an
emphasis on affordable solar technologies. His current research focus is the development of solar
concentrators using nonimaging optics for applications such as solar cooking, water distillation,
space heating, steam generation for industrial and residential uses, and high-flux research. Some of
his latest developments include affordable small-scale wind generators, high-efficiency solar ovens,
and solar hotplates.
He has authored over 40 articles in scientific and engineering journals. He has supervised over 60
graduate theses and taught thermal science as well as specific courses on solar energy applications,
wind generators, and renewable energy systems.
Alejandro de las Heras, PhD, has worked with grassroots movements and nongovernmental
organizations in Mali, France, and Mexico. He currently works in R&D related to hybridizing
permaculture and water and energy appropriate technologies. With CRC Press, he has edited
Sustainable Science and Technology: An Introduction, Boca Raton, FL, 2014.
xxi
Contributors
José Antonio Aguilar Becerril Elizaldo Domingues dos Santos
Medicine Department Ocean Engineering Graduate Program
Mexico State University and
Toluca, Mexico Computational Modeling Graduate Program
Federal University of Rio Grande
Jaime Manuel Aguilar Becerril Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Mexican Social Security Institute
Toluca, Mexico Antonio Famiglietti
Thermal and Fluids Engineering Department,
Sevcan Aydin ITEA Research Group
Environmental Biotechnology Department Carlos III University
Istanbul Technical University Madrid, Spain
Istanbul, Turkey
Vanessa Fierro
Luisa F. Cabeza Jean Lamour Institute
GREA Innovació concurrent, INSPIRES National Scientific Research Centre
Research Centre Paris, France
University of Lleida
Lleida, Spain Mateus das N. Gomes
Computational Modeling Graduate Program
Lourdes Isabel Cabrera-Lara Federal University of Rio Grande
Independent Researcher Rio Grande, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Mexico City, Mexico and
Science, Technology and Society Graduate
Francisco Javier Ceballos Ochoa Program
Institute of Engineering Federal Institute of Paraná
National Autonomous University of Mexico Paranaguá, Paraná, Brazil
Mexico City, Mexico
Jorge E. González
Alain Celzard Department of Mechanical Engineering
Jean Lamour Institute City College of New York
University of Lorraine New York, New York
Epinal, France
Alvaro de Gracia
Heriberto Cruz-Martínez Mechanical Engineering Department
Department of Chemistry Rovira i Virgili University
National Polytechnic Institute Tarragona, Spain
Mexico City, Mexico
Bahar Yavuzturk Gul
Alejandro de las Heras Environmental Biotechnology Department
Independent Researcher Istanbul Technical University
Burgos, Spain Istanbul, Turkey
xxiii
xxiv Contributors
Adrián Velázquez-Osorio
Angela Sánchez-Sánchez
Department of Chemistry
Jean Lamour Institute
National Polytechnic Institute
National Scientific Research Centre
Mexico City, Mexico
Epinal, France
W. Vicente
Behrooz Sani Institute of Engineering
Independent Researcher National Autonomous University of Mexico
Toluca, Mexico Mexico City, Mexico
Eduardo Rincón-Mejía
Autonomous University of Mexico City
Marina Islas-Espinoza
Mexico State University
CONTENTS
1.1 State of the Planet......................................................................................................................1
1.2 Geoengineering: Cautionary Word............................................................................................1
1.3 Energy Consumption Increases with Waste..............................................................................2
1.4 Biomass: Drawbacks Aplenty....................................................................................................3
1.5 Wind and Sun Take Markets by Storm......................................................................................5
1.5.1 Cost Reductions.............................................................................................................5
1.5.2 The Generation of Permanent and Well-Paid Jobs........................................................6
References...........................................................................................................................................6
1
2 Sustainable Energy Technologies
405
395
May 2017
390
2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Year
FIGURE 1.1 Keeling curve of the global atmospheric co2 concentration, measured at Mauna Loa, Hawaii.
May 5, 2017 update (Tans and Keeling n.d.). Seasonal variations are due to the photosynthesis cycle in the
Northern Hemisphere, but the salient feature is the unabated increase in the average yearly value. CO2 global
levels are growing 3% per year.
human interventions. Very few studies have been published on the environmental effects, economical
costs, sociopolitical impacts, and legal implications of geoengineering. Deployment of these
technologies has the potential to cause significant negative effects (Williamson and Bodle 2016).
Generally speaking, geoengineering technologies are categorized as either carbon dioxide
removal (CDR) methods or albedo-modification or solar radiation management (SRM) methods.
CDR methods include potentially perilous ocean “fertilization” and “carbon capture and sequestra-
tion” in big caverns. The only reasonable option among the “bioenergy with carbon capture and
storage” proposals is, again, those consisting of afforestation and massive reforestation. In turn,
SRM methods try to address climate change by increasing the reflectivity of the Earth’s atmo-
sphere or surface, the way ice covers do. Aerosol injection and space-based reflectors are unfounded
examples of SRM methods. SRM methods do not remove greenhouse gases from the atmosphere,
but they could be deployed more quickly with relatively immediate global cooling results compared
to CDR methods. SRM methods run counter to improving our capacity to harvest solar energy, our
most abundant, available, and clean source of energy.
TABLE 1.1
Primary Energy Consumption by Source, 2015
Contribution to Total
Energy Source Consumption (EJ) Consumption (%)
Oil 181.34 32.94
Coal 160.77 29.21
Natural Gas 131.26 23.85
Hydropower 23.91 4.34
Nuclear 19.59 3.56
Other renewables 33.58 6.10
Total 550.45 100.00
Sources: BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, 65th ed., BP p.l.c., London, 2016;
IRENA, Renewable Capacity Statistics 2017, International Renewable
Energy Agency, United Arab Emirates, Abu Dhabi, 2017.
The current energy system based on fossil and nuclear fuels cannot be sustained even in the
medium term due to three fundamental factors: (1) their very limited availability, given that they
are scarce and that it is expected that energy consumption will continue to grow in the foresee-
able future; (2) the environmental problem caused by the emission of greenhouse and toxic gases
and long-term persistent radioactive waste; and (3) their increasing economic, environmental, and
social costs. The reason these nonrenewable energies continue to dominate global energy supply is
that these are actually heavily subsidized by governments that consciously or unconsciously serve
powerful interests in the oil, gas, and military industries. These companies maintain expensive
advertising campaigns to deny the unacceptable risk their activities pose.
The top 10 countries in energy consumption are industrial or technological powerhouses (Table 1.2).
What can they do to curb consumption, losses, and global warming and its consequences? First, there
should be subsidy reduction for all energy sources and waste reduction in animal and plant husbandry
since agricultural production in developed countries is energy intensive. These countries should uncouple
economic accounts from consumption statistics and fossil fuel consumption in particular. At the same
time, regulations and taxes should not impede local citizen energy organization or neighborhood grids.
• Agro fuels produce acroleins and acrylamides, volatile organic compounds, and polycyclic aro-
matic hydrocarbons. All of them are directly related to cancer according to the International
Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC 2015). Like so many other organic compounds, agro fuels
produce dioxins upon incomplete combustion, which are often related to the evolution of cancer.
• The worst use for wood is combustion: so far, wood is the only renewable material
produced on a large scale. The jungles now compete for land and water with agro fuels,
crop-based bioplastics, and livestock production. Phosphate fertilizers for agro fuel crops
have radionuclide contents, so biofuels do not free us from increased exposure to radiation.
4
Estimated U.S. Energy Consumption in 2016: 97.3 Quads
Net electricity 0.08
Solar imports
0.34
0.587
8.42 12.6
Electricity
Nuclear generation
8.42 0.16
37.5
24.9
2.46
Hydro
2.48 Rejected
4.8 3.83 energy
0.16 Residential
2.11 66.4
Wind 0.04 11.0
2.11 4.54 0.39 1.02 7.12
0.74 0.03
0.51
Biomass
Transportation 22.0
4.75 1.43
25.7 27.9
0.24
5.86
Petroleum
35.9
FIGURE 1.2 The 2016 energy flowchart for the U.S. 1 Quad ≈ 1.055 EJ. (From LLNL, Estimated USA Energy Consumption, Lawrence Livermore National
Laboratory, Livermore, CA, http://flowchart.lllnl.gov, 2016.)
Introduction 5
TABLE 1.2
Top 10 Countries with Highest Primary Energy
Consumption during 2014
Primary Energy Percentage of Global
Country Consumption (EJ) Consumption (%)
China 104.75 20.30
U.S. 99.31 19.25
Russian Fed. 30.14 5.84
India 24.95 4.84
Japan 18.51 3.59
Canada 12.64 2.45
Germany 11.97 2.32
Brazil 11.10 2.15
Rep. of Korea 11.01 2.13
Iran 10.68 2.07
• In Brazil, the pioneer in agro fuels, giant clouds of smoke from sugarcane preharvest fires
hover over the most populated region around Sao Paulo. Their equivalent, emitted from
China and India, are the atmospheric brown clouds (ABC) traveling to North America
each year. Brownish ABCs are the product of biomass combustion.
• Residual vinasse from ethanol production contaminates water bodies with high concen-
trations of organic matter, metal additives (magnesium, aluminum, iron, manganese), and
chlorides. Treating such waste takes a lot of energy and water. Emissions increase the
air concentrations of aldehyde and peroxyacyl nitrate (PAN); they are toxic and possibly
carcinogens in animals. PAN is highly oxidizing and appears in the photochemical smog,
along with tropospheric ozone. Tropospheric ozone increases with biofuel use due to
higher levels of volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides (De Oliveira et al. 2005).
• Methanol emits irritants and unburned methanol (which is poisonous and may produce
blindness). Methanol produces two times more aldehydes than gasoline (Bromberg and
Cheng 2010). Even waste cooking oil derived biodiesel (WCOB) seems to lead to more
particle emissions than diesel. Of particular health concern are ultrafine metallic particles
from WCOB exhaust (Betha and Balasubramanian 2014).
• Finally, pyrolysis, claimed to be a geoengineering solution, produces acid gases, ashes,
dioxins, and nitrogen and sulfur oxides.
is dual: hardware costs have steadily decreased while technology improvements have ramped up
efficiency. As to capital costs, all solar PV options have much lower costs, and virtually all median
renewable costs are lower than nuclear and coal plants (Lazard 2016).
Similarly, 2016 wind, geothermal, and photovoltaic costs in the U.S. were up to twice as attractive
as nuclear energy, so that projected 2018–2022 capacity additions for wind and PV are more than
tenfold and thrice those of nuclear energy, respectively (EIA 2017a). In the U.S. in 2016, 125 PV
panels were added every minute (Lyons 2017), and wind had outpaced natural gas by 2015 in elec-
tric generation capacity additions (U.S. Energy Information Administration 2016).
In the following years, U.S. electricity generation will rise for only two primary sources of
energy: natural gas closely followed by renewable sources. However, gas-generated electricity may
decrease unless new reserves and technologies are discovered. Further, natural gas prices are likely
to increase. Meanwhile, nuclear capacity retirements will continue through 2040, with no new
plants (EIA 2017a). Other issues in the global nuclear industry have been Westinghouse filing for
bankruptcy (Hals et al. 2017) and the U.S. Watts Bar 2 reactor finally coming online in October
2016, after 43 years under construction, only to go offline five months later and remaining that way.
Watts Bar 2 was the first new reactor in the U.S. in 20 years (Hiltzik 2017). Similarly, dwindling
onshore wind and utility solar costs in the UK compared to rising nuclear costs have made the latter
a more expensive option (The Comptroller and Auditor General 2016).
In the words of International Renewable Energy Agency Director-General (IRENA 2016), “The
age of renewable power has arrived. In every year since 2011, renewable power generation technolo-
gies have accounted for half or more of total new power generation capacity added globally.”
REFERENCES
Betha, R. and Balasubramanian, R. (2014). Emissions of particulate-bound elements from biodiesel and ultra
low sulfur diesel: Size distribution and risk assessment. Chemosphere, 90, 1005–1015. doi:10.1016/j.
chemosphere.2012.07.052.
Bleich, K., Dantas-Guimaraes, R. (2016). Renewable Infrastructure Investment Handbook: A Guide for
Institutional Investors (p. 18). Geneva, Switzerland: World Economic Forum.
Bloomberg New Energy Finance. (2016). New energy outlook: Long-term projections of the global
energy sector. Retrieved from http://first.bloomberglp.com/documents/694813008_BNEF_NEO2016_
ExecutiveSummary.pdf?elqTrackId=431b316cc3734996abdb55ddbbca0249&elq=07da292764ec4fe69c
7a3adaf7981991&elqaid=3873&elqat=1&elqCampaignId.
BP. (2016). Statistical Review of World Energy (65th ed.). London: BP plc.
Bromberg, L. and Cheng, W. (2010). Methanol as an alternative transportation fuel in the US: Options for
sustainable and/or energy-secure transportation. Retrieved from https://www.afdc.energy.gov/pdfs/
mit_methanol_white_paper.pdf.
De Oliveira, M., Vaughan, B., and Rykiel, J. E. (2005). Ethanol as fuel: Energy, carbon dioxide balances, and
ecological footprint. Bioscience, 55, 593–603.
EIA. (2017a). Annual Energy Outlook 2017 with projections to 2050 (p. 64). Retrieved from eia.gov/aeo
EIA. (2017b). International Energy Statistics 2017. Washington DC: US Energy Information Administration.
Introduction 7
Ferroukhi, R., Khalid, A., Garcia-Baños, C., and Renner, M. (2017). Renewable Energy and Jobs. Annual
Review 2017 (p. 24). Masdar City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: International Renewable Energy
Agency. Retrieved from irena.org.
Garrett-Peltier, H. (2016). Green versus brown: Comparing the employment impacts of energy efficiency,
renewable energy, and fossil fuels using an input-output model. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedirect.
com/science/article/pii/S026499931630709X.
Hals, T., Yamazaki, M., and Kelly, T. (2017). Westinghouse bankrupt. Reuters. Retrieved from http://www.
reuters.com/article/us-toshiba-accounting-board-idUSKBN17006K.
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Kharecha, P., Beerling, D., Berner, R., Masson-Delmotte, V., Pagani, M., Raymo, M.,
Royer, D. L., and Zachos, J. C. (2008). Target atmospheric CO2: Where should humanity aim? Open
Atmospheric Science Journal, 2, 217–231.
Hiltzik, M. (2017). America’s first “21st century nuclear plant” already has been shut down for repairs. Los
Angeles Times. Retrieved from http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-nuclear-shutdown-
20170508-story.html.
IARC. (2015). Press Release No. 231. January 13, 2015. Most types of cancer not due to “bad luck.” IARC
responds to scientific article claiming that environmental and lifestyle factors account for less than one
third of cancers.
IRENA. (2016). The Power to Change: Solar and Wind Cost Reduction Potential to 2025. Bonn, Germany:
IRENA Innovation and Technology Centre.
IRENA. (2017). Renewable Capacity Statistics 2017 (p. 60). Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates: International
Renewable Energy Agency.
Lazard. (2016). Lazard’s levelized cost of energy analysis—Version 10.0. New York: Lazard Ltd.
LLNL. (2016). Estimated USA Energy Consumption. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore,
CA. Retrieved from http://flowchart.lllnl.gov
Lyons, M. (2017). Solar Industry Sees Largest Quarter Ever. Solar Energy Industries Association. Retrieved
May 4, 2017, from http://www.seia.org/blog/solar-industry-sees-largest-quarter-ever.
NBC News. (2010). Hawking: Off Earth by 2110? Retrieved May 18, 2017, from http://cosmiclog.nbcnews.
com/_news/2010/08/09/4850998-stephen-hawking-off-earth-by-2110.
Olivier, J. G. J., Janssens-Maenhout, G., Muntean, M., and Peters, J. A. H. W. (2016). Trends in global
CO2 emissions, 2016 Report. PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, the
Netherlands; European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy.
Rincón-Mejía, E. (2011). Tecnologías solares de cero emisiones de carbono. In L. García-Colín and J. Varela
(Eds.), Contaminación atmosférica y tecnologías de cero emisiones de carbono. Mexico City,
Mexico: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana.
Sawin, J. L., Sverrisson, F., Rickerson, W., Lins, C., Musolino, E., Petrichenko, K., Seyboth, K., Skeen, J.,
Sovacool, B., and Williamson, L. E. (2015). Renewables 2015 Global Status Report (p. 251). Paris,
France: REN21 Secretariat.
Tans, P. and Keeling, R. (n.d.). Recent monthly mean CO2 at Mauna Loa. NOAA/ESRL, Scripps Institution of
Oceanography. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/ccgg/trends; scrippsco2.ucsd.edu.
The Comptroller and Auditor General. (2016). Nuclear Power in the UK (p. 48). London. Retrieved from nao.
org.uk.
U.S. Department of Energy. (2017). U.S. Energy and Employment Report. Retrieved from https://energy.gov/
sites/prod/files/2017/01/f34/2017 US Energy and Jobs Report_0.pdf.
U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2016). Wind adds the most electric generation capacity in 2015,
followed by natural gas and solar. Preliminary Monthly Electric Generator Inventory. Retrieved May 4,
2017, from https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=25492.
Williamson, P. and Bodle, R. (2016). Update on Climate Geoengineering in Relation to the Convention
on Biological Diversity: Potential Impacts and Regulatory Framework (Technical Series No. 84).
Montreal, QC: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
2 Solar and Geothermal
Energies Are Sustainable;
Nuclear Power Is Not
Alejandro de las Heras
Independent Researcher
Eduardo Rincón-Mejía
Autonomous University of Mexico City
Behrooz Sani
Independent Researcher
Marina Islas-Espinoza
Mexico State University
CONTENTS
2.1 Introduction............................................................................................................................. 10
2.2 Enough Solar Energy to Fuel 10,000 Earths........................................................................... 10
2.3 Geothermal Energy................................................................................................................. 13
2.3.1 Sustainable Geothermal Energy ................................................................................. 13
2.4 Nuclear Power: Dream Foiled................................................................................................. 14
2.4.1 Quantum Physics Uncertainties................................................................................... 14
2.4.2 On Uncertainties and Catastrophes............................................................................. 15
2.4.3 Uncertainties and Widespread Failures....................................................................... 15
2.4.3.1 Criticality and Load Factor........................................................................... 15
2.4.3.2 Leaks............................................................................................................. 15
2.4.3.3 Waste............................................................................................................. 16
2.4.4 Accidents and the Human Factor................................................................................. 16
2.4.5 Nondemocratic Practices............................................................................................. 16
2.4.6 Small Modular Reactors: Killed in the U.S., a Return Would Spread the Issues....... 19
2.4.7 Medical and Scientific Uses Require Few Reactors.................................................... 19
2.5 Military Drivers of Nuclear Power.......................................................................................... 19
2.5.1 Nuclear Power Is Oil Dependent and Security Intensive............................................20
2.5.2 Cyberwarfare, Intelligence, and Complexity...............................................................20
2.5.3 Ideology and Oil.......................................................................................................... 22
2.5.3.1 Hegemony and Instability (Divide and Rule)............................................... 22
2.5.3.2 The Next Oil Wars........................................................................................ 22
2.5.4 Realpolitik among the U.S., Israel, and Iran............................................................... 23
2.5.5 The Quest for Energy Autonomy and Nonalignment.................................................. 23
2.5.5.1 Security Lessons from Chernobyl................................................................ 23
2.5.5.2 Security Lessons from Furdu........................................................................24
2.5.6 Nuclear Security and Sustainability............................................................................24
References.........................................................................................................................................25
9
10 Sustainable Energy Technologies
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Nuclear fusion taking place in the sun is safe to use directly as photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated
thermal energy or indirectly as wind, wave, or tide energy. Nuclear decay in the Earth’s interior
is also harnessed, with Iceland setting the pace for reliable whole-country supply of geothermal
energy. Conversely, nuclear fission is an ill-understood process making nuclear technologies’
failures surprisingly regular.
This chapter addresses the sustainability of the foregoing types of radiation energy sources. It first
highlights the supply of incident solar energy that can power the geosphere and biosphere and cater to
the needs of a thriving future human civilization. Second, the technological conditions for sustainable
geothermal energy (SGE) are examined. Third, while discounting weak antinuclear arguments (public
perceptions), it shows the absence of technical conditions for sustainable fission nuclear power.
W
( ) ( )
2
ES = GS πRT 2 [ year ] = 1360.8 2 π 6.371 × 10 6 m 3.1536 × 10 7 s
m
= 5.472251 × 10 6 EJ (2.1)
This is almost 10,000 times more than the energy consumed globally (~5.504 × 102 EJ in 2015) (BP,
2016), enough to meet present and future needs with very few or no emissions to the geosphere and
the biosphere. As a reminder, 1 EJ is 1018 J.
But ~30% of this solar energy is reflected by clouds, ice, and Earth’s surface (a factor known as
albedo), so the solar energy caught by Earth is
( )
ES caught ≅ 5.472251 × 10 6 EJ (1 − 0.30 ) = 3830576 EJ (2.2)
And since ~19% of the solar radiation is absorbed by the atmosphere, the solar radiation that finally
reaches the Earth’s surface, the gross solar potential (GSP) is
GSP ≅ ( 5472251 EJ ) (1 − 0.30 − 0.19 ) ≈ 2, 790,848 EJ (2.3)
Most of this energy, in thermal form, is required to move Earth’s oceans and atmosphere. The
photosynthetically active radiation (i.e., the visible range) is used by algae, plants, and bacteria.
If we assume conservatively that only one-hundredth of this energy could be sustainably utilized
with future efficiencies close to the thermodynamic limit, the sustainable solar potential would be
~27,900 EJ, more than 50 times the current world energy consumption.
The technical potential is an even lower figure given by the second law of thermodynamics (no
thermal machine is 100% efficient); by current mature and emerging technologies, not speculative
ones; and by other practical limitations, including the environmental ones. Considering that 29%
of the terrestrial surface is mainland, and assuming that 0.1% of this surface can be populated with
PV modules with 16% mean sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiency, and another 0.1% can be
populated with solar thermal collectors with 60% mean thermal efficiency, the current technical
solar potentials (TSPs) TSPelectric and TSPthermal would be in the order of
TSPelectric ≅ ( 2, 790,848 EJ ) ( 0.29 )( 0.001)( 0.16 ) ≅ 129.50 EJ (2.4)
and
Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not 11
These two conservative technical potentials combined exceed the current world energy consump-
tion, so in principle, all fossil and nuclear plants could be abandoned much before 2050 by using
only conventional solar technologies. Assuming a capacity factor of 0.20, an acceptable mean
value encompassing all latitudes for current PV technologies, the TSPelectric = 129.50 EJ shown in
equation (2.4) would correspond to a ~20.5 TW installed capacity. Considering all technical, infra-
structure, economic, and policy barriers to be overcome, it is feasible to reach 10 TW by 2030
(Haegel et al., 2017).
Green plants convert solar energy with sunlight-to-bioenergy efficiencies greater than 2%
(Bonner, 1962), but much larger efficiencies have been recorded in algae and phytoplankton (Ryther,
1959). The thermodynamic knowledge of photochemical solar energy conversion efficiencies is now
at an advanced stage (De Vos, 1995). A very conservative estimate of a mean photochemical solar
efficiency would be 1% for all photosynthetic organisms. Considering a photosynthetic cover on
50% of the oceans and land, the gross bioenergy potential (GBP) can be in the order of
The current rate of energy capture by photosynthetic processes seems to be ~130 TW (Steger et al.,
2005), which corresponds to 4099.68 EJ, 30% less than the estimate in Equation 2.6. This potential
must factor in reforestation and sustainable agroforestry using perennial plants. It has just been
discovered (Bastin et al., 2017) that drylands, which occupy more than 40% of Earth mainland,
have much more extensive forest than previously reported and cover a total area similar to that of
tropical rainforests or boreal forests. This increases estimates of global forest cover by at least 9%,
approaching the GBP to that given in Equation 2.6. This does not even account for the very exten-
sive soil biological crusts and their photosynthetic role. The current technical bioenergy potential
could conservatively be as large as 1% of GBP, which would amount to 59 EJ.
To understand the amount of photosynthetic activity on Earth, one must realize that it converts
~110 billion metric tons of carbon into biomass each year (Field et al., 1998). Fossil fuels were all
formed during hundreds of million years with biomasses nourished by solar energy via photosyn-
thesis with relatively low solar–biomass energy efficiencies.
Most of the bioenergy potential is used in endoenergetic (metabolic) needs, and only a residual
portion could be used for human exoenergetic applications. The annual human endoenergetic con-
sumption of 10 billion people much before 2100, assuming 100 W per capita metabolic consumption
would be
W
HEEC ≅ 100
inhabitant
( )
1010 inhabitant 3.1536 × 10 7 s = 31.54 EJ
( ) (2.7)
This is ~0.5% of the GBP, but the energy needs of thousands of other species limit the amounts of
bioenergy that could be dedicated to human exoenergetic consumption. Finally, deforestation and
land use emissions since 1850 have totaled ~660 Gt CO2; this figure provides an upper limit to the
physical potential for reforestation to capture CO2 (National Research Council, 2015). Estimating
that complete afforestation is rather unrealistic, and that deforestation emissions have been a tenth
of those from fossil fuel consumption, we must not rely solely on reforestation to return to 350 ppm
atmospheric CO2 in the medium term.
Now, as mentioned in Chapter 17, ~1% of the solar energy caught by Earth is converted into wind
energy (Peixoto and Oort, 1992). Then the gross wind potential (GWP) can be estimated as
Using wind turbines with power coefficients Cp = 0.50, harvesting 0.5% of this GWP gives the
approximate current technical wind potential (TWP):
These and other gross and technical potentials for most renewable sources of energy as well as their
current utilization are summarized in Table 2.1.
In Table 2.2, the proved reserves of oil, natural gas, and coal are shown. By total proved reserves,
we mean those quantities that geological and engineering information indicate, with reasonable cer-
tainty, can be recovered under existing economic and operating conditions. The reserves/extraction
(R/E) ratio is the expected time that a proved reserve would last if extraction were to continue at the
rate of the last year of extraction.
If those proved reserves are expressed in their energetic content in EJ, the magnitude of the oil
reserves is 8,877.10 EJ, the gas reserves contain 6,933.15 EJ, and the carbon ones have 18,327.78 EJ.
Altogether, they have an energetic potential of 34,138 EJ. The GSP of 1 year is more than 80 times
larger. In other words, in just 5 days, the terrestrial surface receives more solar energy than is con-
tained in all fossil proved reserves.
Knowledge of thousands of main sequence stars like our sun, also known as dwarves, indicates
that it will not start growing for at least another 3 billion years, following which life on Earth will be
wiped out. And so, the potential of solar energy is, for all practical purposes, infinitely greater than
that of all fossil energy sources. Nuclear materials, like uranium and thorium, have even smaller
potentials than those of fossils: all nonrenewable sources of energy are insignificant compared to
solar and other renewable sources. According to Table 2.2, fossil (and nuclear) sources cannot sup-
ply energy for much more than half a century. Therefore, their consumption at current rates, even
ignoring the deadly pollution that their use entails, is unsustainable.
TABLE 2.1
Estimated Gross and Technical Potentials of Main Renewable Energy Sources
Gross Potential Current Technical Potential
Energy Source (EJ/year) (EJ/year) Supply in 2016 (EJ)
Solar 2, 790,848 TSPelectric ≈ 129.5 1.5
TSPthermal ≈ 485.6 1.38 [12]
Wind 38,306 TWP ≅ 95.77 3.15
Geothermal 1,400 [13] 60 0.34
Bioenergy 5,860.78 59 9.41 [12]
Ocean tidal 75.69 [14] 4.67 [15] 0.004
Ocean surface currents 255.44 [16] 0.473 [17] –
Hydropower 365.82 [18] 51.40 [19] 37.38 [1]
Total 2,837,111.73 886.41 53.16
TABLE 2.2
Proved Reserves of Fossil Fuels and Relation Reserve/Extraction
Energy Source Total Proved Reserves Extraction in 2015 R/E (Years)
Oil 1697.6 × 109 barrels 34.6779 × 109 barrels 48.95
Natural gas 186.9 × 1012 m3 3538.6 × 109 m3 52.82
Coal 437,749 mtoe 3839.9 mtoe 114
Source: BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, 65th ed., BP plc, London, 2016.
Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not 13
2.3 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY
Geothermal energy is Earth’s heat that can be exploited by technology. This heat source is mostly due
to residual planetary accretion heat and radioactive decay of uranium isotopes (238U, 235U), thorium
(232Th), and potassium (40K) (Lubimova, 1968). At present, the planet undergoes slow net thermal loss
to space (minus 300°C–350°C every 3 billion years, with a current temperature of 4000°C at the bot-
tom of Earth’s mantle). Outgoing heat flows are 44.5 TW from Earth, out of which 19% escape from
the radioisotope-richer crust, 77% from the mantle, and the remainder from the nonradioactive core
(Stacey and Loper, 1988). Half of the mantle’s heat is radiogenic. The total heat content of Earth is
12.6 × 1024 MJ (Armstead, 1983), equivalent to 3.3 years of solar energy captured by Earth.
Current technologies tap convective hydrothermal systems (liquids or steam) and conductive
geothermal systems (hot rock). Larderello, Italy, in 1904 was the first spot to be utilized, both as
a source of direct thermal energy and in electricity generation. By 1928, Iceland started to exploit
hydrothermal sources.
• Although renewable, crust heat is often withdrawn 10 times faster than its replacement
rate. Pressure can decline and cold water can permeate into the geothermal reservoir
(World Energy Council, 2016).
• SGE microgeneration by end users (mostly ground source heat pumps) reduces transport
costs and attendant heat losses but often requires artificial wells. Drilling economic and
environmental costs need to be gauged against longer-term sustainability. These costs can
be modest since drilling is limited to shallow depths where the sun drives the temperature
difference that allows for ground source geoexchange technologies.
• Natural sources are frequently large and become the hub of centralized networks with
extensive piping subject to corrosion.
• Pollutants threaten aquifers. SGE must differ from practices in unsustainable technologies:
fracking (shale gas hydraulic fracturing) uses many pollutants, such as biocides that limit
microbiologically enhanced corrosion of piping and equipment (Sovacool, 2014). Such
biocides only work until microbes develop resistance and contribute to the global health
problem of antibiotic resistance.
• Natural wells and deep artificial ones often bring to the surface brine containing potentially
toxic metals (Baba et al., 2008), including naturally occurring radioactive material (IAEA,
2013). The brine must be recycled in situ, after recovery of pollutants (Premuzic et al.,
1995), all of which are useful. Brine recycling has the advantage of reducing its mineraliza-
tion thereby augmenting the amount of available heat (World Energy Council, 2016).
• Stock must be taken of seismicity lessons from other energy technologies (nuclear power,
large hydropower, fracking): local seismicity hazards endanger both the environment and
utilities; these in turn affect natural seismicity.
• Invasive methods aiming at reservoir stimulation (chemically enhancing permeability,
thermal cracking, or deflagration) (World Energy Council, 2016) put reservoirs and aqui-
fers at chemical and mechanical risk.
Solutions exist for all the above. In particular, Enel S.p.A.’s stillwater solar PV-concentrating solar–
geothermal hybrid plant in Nevada has extended the life of the geothermal reservoir, reduced injec-
tions of water in a water-scarce area, and recycled and reheated spent brine into the reservoir. Also,
coiled tube and wirelines can successfully reduce costs of mineral scale removal (World Energy
Council, 2016) without using biocides.
14 Sustainable Energy Technologies
1400.0 200.0
US Russian Federation
France China
180.0
1200.0 India
Total Europe and
Eurasia Pakistan
160.0 South Korea
Total Asia Pacific
1000.0 Taiwan
Germany 140.0
Japan
120.0
800.0
TWh/year
100.0
600.0
80.0
400.0 60.0
40.0
200.0
20.0
- -
1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 1965 1975 1985 1995 2005 2015
FIGURE 2.1 Nuclear power plants: installed capacity and stalled growth trend among main nuclear power
users. (From BP, Statistical Review of World Energy, 65th ed., BP plc, London, 2016.)
Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not 15
the strong nuclear force binding them to protons. Knowledge gaps are still disturbing: there is a dearth
of “complete fission theory, many puzzles are yet unsolved” (Al-Adili et al., 2015). “Quantitative
understanding [of the nuclear fission process] remains elusive” even though “many nuclear appli-
cations as well as fundamental research rely on a precise description of fission data” (Talou et al.,
2015). “Exact models are seldom available in nuclear physics. Good agreement between different
models (precision) does not guarantee that they are near the truth; all models can be systematically
off due to missing knowledge,” and “systematic uncertainties, on the other hand, are very tough to
assess” (Ireland and Nazarewicz, 2015).
2.4.3.2 Leaks
The drawbacks of technological experimentation are illustrated by widespread leaks demonstrated
by using iodine-129 as a marker. 129I is formed by uranium and plutonium fission in nuclear power
plants and in reprocessing facilities. The nuclear reprocessing plants in La Hague (France) and
Sellafield (UK) are globally the main sources of 129I. But 129I reemission from the sea surface in
the English Channel, and the Irish, North, and Norwegian seas, is the main 129I source washed
out in precipitation farther away, in Denmark (Hou et al., 2009a). Atmospheric transport from the
Marcoule (France) nuclear reprocessing plant (closed in 1998 after 40 years of emissions) is evi-
denced by enriched levels of 129I, 238Pu, and 239+240Pu in collected terrestrial vegetation samples in
Marcoule’s vicinity. Farther away, activity and depositions follow a North–South direction related
16 Sustainable Energy Technologies
to atmospheric discharges; these eventually meet the Rhone River (Duffa and Fréchou, 2003) and
so enter another environmental compartment in a highly populated area. The same pattern of sur-
face water 129I pollution occurs in Western Europe, North America, and Central Asia, especially in
terrestrial surface water of the Northern hemisphere (50°N). Topmost 129I concentrations are found
in England, followed by Israel, Europe, and North America. Direct gaseous emissions from the
nuclear facilities and marine atmospheric reemissions are the most probable sources of 129I polluting
terrestrial surface waters (Chen et al., 2015).
Organic forms of iodine are highly bioavailable to humans through ingestion (via water and
plants). After transport to the thyroid, this organ is exposed to long-term, low-dose, beta radiation
from decaying 129I (half-life 15.7 million years). More nuclear power plants and more spent fuel
reprocessing would largely increase 129I levels (Hou et al., 2009b). As for uranium, cleanup of mill
sites has cost U.S. taxpayers in excess of USD 2 billion; in its U(IV) state, it accumulates in cool
anoxic sediments where it adsorbs to natural organic matter (Bone et al., 2016).
2.4.3.3 Waste
Perhaps the most difficult, and as yet unsolved, issue for the global nuclear power industry is final
confinement of spent nuclear fuel. This is a limiting factor to the expansion of that industry. No
solution has yet been found, and no alternative to the leaks from La Hague, Sellafield, and similar
facilities. Another kind of uncertainties, geological this time, are met by permanent disposal of
waste, according to the U.S. National Academy of Sciences: not all uncertainties can be allayed by
research and development as, over geological time, volcanism, behavior of the (un)saturated zones,
geochemistry, and climate will evolve. Fundamental properties of the rock are further disrupted by
tunnels and the fractured zone they create. Moreover, a radioactive heat pulse creates pore water
movements (Ramana, 2017).
These factors led to the closure in 1998 of the Morsleben (Germany) nuclear waste storage since
salt domes are on the verge of collapse despite temporary stabilization. In Asse II, the overlying
rock shifts 15 cm/year, weakening the mine; the increasing rate of new water breaches predicts
uncontrollable water inflow with ensuing collapse hazard. Brine has to be captured before it reaches
the storage canisters and accelerates radioactivity-induced corrosion.
Geology is not the only set of risks in final confinement. In the WIPP facility in New Mexico, an
alleged error in packaging material (Figure 2.2) caused an explosive release of plutonium and amer-
icium, which reached the surface. The accident, one of the costliest in the U.S. (Ramana, 2017),
provoked the closure of the facility in 2014.
2.4.5 Nondemocratic Practices
The nuclear power industry is therefore exposed to design, human, and institutional failures. Two
resounding cases of institutional failures are the San Onofre nuclear power plant scheduled for
decommissioning by 2030–31, and the Hinkley C reactor currently in the early construction phases.
San Onofre was closed in 2012 following a USD 680 million investment aimed at adding 40 years to
its useful life and instead precipitating its demise. As per an open records request to the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, San Onofre’s operators seem to have recklessly pushed the reactor for the
Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not 17
Walls made of
concrete and steel
Containment 3–5 ft thick
cooling system (1–1.5 m)
H 4 B
Steamline F
I
Reactor vessel
G Turbine
generator
Separators
and dryers Heater J
Feedwater Condenser
3 E
C Condensate
Core pumps
1, 2
Feed
pumps
A
Control
D
rods
Demineralizer
Recirculation pumps
Emergency water
Containment supply systems
structure
FIGURE 2.2 Typical failures and incidents in Indian nuclear reactors. (a) Madras 2 cool water plug slipped
away (1999) and a large amount (4–14 tons) of heavy water leaked out. (b) Large tritium release to the atmo-
sphere in Rajasthan (2004): high levels of tritium in the liquid discharges in Narora and Kakrapar (2003). (c)
Fortuitous hole in the primary heat transfer system as a result of an eroded wall in Rajasthan 2 (2007). Three
heavy-water leaks elsewhere (2009). (d) Failure of the moderator inlet receiving heavy water at high speed,
in Madras (1989). (e) Excessive vibration in the turbine bearings and oil leaks in Narora (1993). This led to
sparking (1981). (f) Vibrations in turbine bearings and failure in turbine blades (1982). Vibrations in the tur-
bine generator bearings and blades sheared off at the base (1983). (g) High bearing vibrations in the turbine
generator in Madras 1 (1986), similar to Rajasthan 1 (1985, 1989, and 1990). (h) Oil leak in the generator
transformer in Madras 1 (1988), with heavy sparking in Madras 1 (1989) and twice in the turbine generator in
Narora 1 (1992). (i) Two fires in the primary heat transport system, oil leak in the turbine valve. (j) Hydrogen
gas leak in the generator cooling system in Madras 2 (1991). (From Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2015.
Boiling Water Reactors. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from nrc.gov/reactors/bwrs.html, 2015; Ramana, M. V., and
Kumar, A., J. Int. Stud., 1, 49–72, 2013.)
sake of profit, leading to definitive damage. The operators later sued the Japanese provider as alleg-
edly responsible for the damage. Then, the USD 4.7 billion settlement between the operators and
the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) included a clause, which left USD 3.3 billion to
be paid by the ratepayers. California’s attorney general has opened a criminal investigation against
the president of CPUC on grounds of possible collusion between the state regulator and San Onofre
operators. This is also the cause for a USD 16.7 million fine to one of the operators (Herchenroeder,
2016; McDonald, 2017). The California Coastal Commission then unanimously approved under-
ground confinement of San Onofre’s spent fuel after 15 months of negotiations behind closed doors
with the operators. While legal, the closed-door sessions gave a lengthy lead time to the operators
18 Sustainable Energy Technologies
FIGURE 2.3 Damaged drum with radioactive waste inside WIPP Panel 7, Room 7, New Mexico, USA,
2014–05–15 during investigations on the cause of radioactive contamination. (DoE Photographer, damaged
drum with radioactive waste inside WIPP Panel 7, Room 7, New Mexico, USA, 2014-05-15 during investiga-
tions on the cause of radioactive contamination. Retrieved June 4, 2017, from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
File:WIPP_DoE_2014-05-15_5_15_Image_lrg.jpg, 2014.)
but only a week’s notice to the public, before the hearings and decision. As a consequence, a lawsuit
against the Coastal Commission was allowed to proceed (Nikolewski, 2017; Sharma, 2017). These
issues have prompted Californian municipalities to opt for community choice aggregation (CCA), a
scheme giving more say to citizens in energy matters and the possibility to transition to renewable
energy; in turn this has led to the emergence of a lobby group against CCA, funded by one San
Onofre operator (Smith, 2017).
In Britain’s Hinkley C project, the government seems to have ended wind power subsidies and
cut back solar subsidies while giving unwavering support to nuclear power. The decision of the gov-
ernment was made despite higher costs of nuclear electricity, faulty components in the same-design
plants having led the French authorities to stop several plants, and an indictment by U.S. authorities
Solar and Geothermal Energies Are Sustainable; Nuclear Power Is Not 19
against the main Chinese financial backer of Hinkley C. Chinese financial support was agreed to
at the top executive level in exchange of Britain purchasing a small modular reactor (SMR), and
the indictment was caused by unauthorized technology exports from the U.S. to China in relation
to said modular reactor. In secret documents that the British government refused to disclose under
a Freedom of Information request, the government also pledged to bear overrun costs, in particu-
lar waste disposal costs. While the government stands by the French and Chinese corporations
involved in Hinkley C, the UN Economic Commission for Europe asked the UK to suspend work on
the site, pending notification of potential impacts of Hinkley C to Germany, Norway, and Holland
in line with transboundary pollution treaties (Dombey, 2016; Doward, 2016; Vaughan, 2016, 2017;
Vaughan and Willsher, 2016).
SMRs like all nuclear power are unprofitable since the raw material, construction, production, and
maintenance are globally dangerous and are extremely costly compared to other industries. Even
the leading SMR developers Babcock & Wilcox and Westinghouse, who had obtained increasing
federal SMR subsidies, decided to stop the development of SMR technologies for lack of customers
and investors. Westinghouse decided to focus on decommissioning existing reactors (Cooper, 2014).
Despite the lack of market in the U.S., other countries pursue SMR development probably due more
to government subsidies than market interest. SMR designs claim that there are only four problems
identified with nuclear power today: costs, safety, waste, and proliferation. Countries like the U.S.,
Russia, China, France, Japan, South Korea, India, and Argentina intend to develop SMRs based on
subsidies; however, the characteristics of the different SMR designs under development suggest that
none of the designs meet all four of these challenges simultaneously (Ramana and Mian, 2014).
50 m belowground
Clean
process
(metal
dust) Coordination:
computer scientists
Control systems:
Process mathematicians
sorting
Security systems:
and
physicists and chemists
security
Reactor data Source of power:
Centrifuges (robots) processing electrical engineers
FIGURE 2.4 Vulnerability areas in the human–computing interface of a nuclear power plant (thick lines and
outlines). Vulnerabilities are numerous in real life. The main risks are as follows: (1) nuclear fission energy >
electricity output; (2) attack to the centrifuges; (3) external cyber- or physical attack during the recovery from
heavy seismic event, and/or technical failure and/or (cyber) attack; and (4) simultaneous electromagnetic pulse
(via nuclear detonation) to knock down all electronic systems and neutron bomb (to kill all human operators).
Issues can occur simultaneously as shown in Fukushima.
Report
Report
Exchange Embassies
Borders abroad
Report
Committee
Intelligence
Oversee
service
Operative
officer Report
Operatives Anti-information
Command
FIGURE 2.5 Intelligence in the Iranian nuclear context. Schematic of the complex information flows
between nuclear plant operatives and intelligence services. The information is both administrative (concern-
ing approved monies and reporting deadlines) and operative. The tricky part for operatives is to always keep
a flexibility margin to accommodate for nonplanned events. Information from abroad is a very early warning
but can in fact be disinformation.
22 Sustainable Energy Technologies
predictable, as its stock-in-trade is mediation in transactions involving arms, politics, and, often,
fuels. The case of Irangate is well known. Another well-documented example (showing that espio-
nage overcomes national loyalties and is driven by profit) is the arms trade that was set up in 2010 by
Arthur Porter, head of the Security Intelligence Review Committee in Canada; former Israeli intel-
ligence officer Ari Ben-Menashe; and Russian arms dealers to provide Sierra Leone with arms of
unknown origins (Harris, 2014). Profit as a motive makes for fickle allegiances and so is a challenge
to the security of national assets. Intelligence and cyberwarfare demonstrate that ever more complex
security systems beget additional vulnerabilities.
in the world transits; 90%, 60%, and 40% of the Chinese, Japanese, and Korean fossil fuel supplies
come from Iran.
When the Democrats took over from G.W. Bush, they returned to action by proxy, such as in
the 2011 Arab Spring, but the end result there is that Libya is now divided between Daesh and the
rebels; Egypt is led by Eghnan El Muslemi after two successive coups; Syria is struggling against
Daesh (which has received help from SA, Turkey, and Qatar, a fact well known by Department of
State secretary Hillary Clinton). One must note that after the destruction of Saddam Hussein’s army
by the U.S. and allies, removed Iraqi officers went on to constitute half of Daesh’s forces; 25,000
warriors were also brought in from Europe. At stake in the conflict in Syria is the control of oil
reserves, where Daesh receives support from the Erdogan regime in Turkey, acting as mediator of
BP’s oil interests.
Future oil wars will depend on the outcome of the conflict surrounding Syria, but likely next
oil conflicts will include Sudan (oil) and then Somalia (gas). Already, gas reserves motivated the
annexation of Crimea by Russia in 2014. The region holds the most gas reserves in the world (Iran >
Russia > Qatar).
"I like the sentiments and expressions of this address; but I think
you must admit that hesitation does not always bespeak reluctance."
"Very true; but it arrests the progress of obedience, and entails
the loss of spiritual privileges and enjoyments."
"I hope, my dear Miss Osbourne," said Miss Chester, "you now feel
no reluctance to yield obedience to the dying command of your
beloved Saviour and Friend; and that you will, by one sacred resolve,
yield yourself to him as one alive from the dead—have your fruit
unto holiness, and the end everlasting life."
"A sublime termination to a painful, and often a depressing
conflict! It would be wrong in me not to confess that I have derived
instruction from the conversation of the evening. Some new ideas
have been suggested to me, and some lingering doubts have been
removed. My hesitation, which sprang from caution, rather than
reluctance, now yields to a sense of duty. I will do what my Lord
commands me; and because it is his command. You will both pray
for me, that my faith fail not, and that I may endure to the end,
steadfast in the path of duty."
She kept her promise; and on the first communion day, with us
commemorated the death of the Lord Jesus Christ in the way of his
appointment. Soon after, I received an interesting letter from her;
and as its conclusion is an appropriate sequel to the long and painful
conflict through which she had to pass, its transcription may serve
as a guide and solace to others.
ebookbell.com