EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies As Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures
Uploaded by
Stan J. CaterboneEXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies As Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and Related Hearings and Lectures
Uploaded by
Stan J. CaterbonePublished by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J.
Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom
®
From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures
Published by Advanced Media Group September 17, 2016 ©
______________________________________
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Background of Stan J. Caterbone as a Targeted Individual
2. In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom CIA No-Touch Torture Makes
Sense, by Cheryl Welsh 2008
3. Allstate Sworn Testimony of Stan J. Caterbone TRANSCRIPT Volume 2 and
Volume 1 July 12, 2016
4. Transcript of the Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015
Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based Weapons in Support of the
Many Targeted Individuals Suffering Symptoms of the City.
5. Karen Stewart, NSA Whistleblower and Targeted Individual
6. Julianne McKinney, US Army Intelligence Officer, Whistleblower, and
Targeted Individual
7. 8. Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group Executive Summary
8. Dr. Nick Begich, Author and Expert Researcher of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control
9. 1975 TESTIMONY FROM DIRECTOR OF CIA STANSFIELD TURNER for the 1975
United States Senate Select Hearings on Mkultra
10. Proposed U.S. Government Settlement for TI via Change.org Petition by Stan
J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group March 17, 2016 with Affidavit and
Kane Op Ed Letter Sent to President Obama
Total Number of Pages in This Report 1246 Pages
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 1 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
®
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
__________________________________
EXCLUSIVE Transcripts of Whistleblower Testimonies as
Targeted Individuals of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and
Related Hearings and Lectures©
________________________________
June 2, 2016
BACKGROUND
Stan J. Caterbone's International Signal & Control or ISC Whistleblowing History and Mind
Control Relationships are outlined in the following statements and declarations, which have already
been proven and verified and have never been specifically contested in any court of law:
Stan J. Caterbone was a Federal Whistleblower in 1987 regarding ISC
The 29 False Arrests and Prosecutorial Misconduct that Stan J. Caterbone was subject to in 1987
through 2015 was an effort to cover-up the allegations made by Stan J. Caterbone in the Spring and
Summer of 1987 after the Meeting of June 23, 1987 with ISC and United Chem Con Executive Larry
Resch.
The ISC Fraud and Sales of Arms to Iraq Story by the ABC News Nightline with Ted Koppel and the
Financial Times of London in May, July, and September of 1991 was most likely initiated or was
corroborated by Lancaster Newspapers reporter Thomas Flannary.
Thomas Flannary's mysterious death in February of 2004 was either murder or was a cover story to
hide the fact that he was a CIA operative used to control the flow of information, disinformation, and
propaganda. It is highly subject that he began his career with Lancaster Newspapers in 1987 and is not
a native Lancastrian.
The ISC merger was not completed until December of 1987, 3 months after the False Arrests of Stan
J. Caterbone.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 2 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The official meeting with the Pennsylvania Securities Commission Agent Howard Eisler in September of
1987, which was solicited by Agent Eisler was an effort to illegally interrogate Stan J. Caterbone without
a legal subpoena.
In the months after the June 23, 1987 meeting with ISC Executive Larry Resch Stan J. Caterbone had
personally solicited a vast array of local, state, and federal officials, including the FBI and Congressman
Robert Walker, PA State Representative Gibson Armstrong for assistance in the retaliation and slander
campaign that was in progress. There is credible linkage between the ISC Scandal, U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control, Stan J. Caterbone's family VICTIMIZATION of the same, and the participation of
LANCASTER COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA.
The Zook Murder Appeal proves that Lancaster County Detective Michael Landis, Judge James Cullen,
and Judge Farina of the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas were all involved in U.S. Sponsored
Mind Control before 2004 and before Stan J. Caterbone went public with his VICTIMIZATION of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control.
Bobby Ray Inman, former director of the National Security Agency (NSA) was on the Board of
Directors of ISC and was involved in U.S. Sponsored Mind Control Technologies through his company
S.A.I.C. Corporation. Bobby Ray Inman would later be selected by Former President Bill Clinton for his
Director of Defense, but would later remove himself due to allegations and public scrutiny for his role in
the ISC scandal.
In the Fall of 1991 Robert Gates was nominated for Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)
and during his televised confirmation hearings the was subject to brutal array of questions concerning
his participation in the ISC scandal. He went on to be nominated and later would serve both the Bush
Administrations and the Obama Administrations as Secretary of Defense until resigning in 2011.
There have been at least 3 documented attempts on the life of Stan J. Caterbone; 1987, 1991, and
2004, all attempts at vehicular homicide. Thomas P. Caterbone's passing in 1996 was the result of a
wrongful death claim by Fulton Bank. Samuel A. Caterbone was most likely an KULTRA murder tactic in
Santa Barbara, California on December 25, 1984. Samuel P. Caterbone was most likely the result of an
MKULTRA murder tactic on July 20,2001 in New York city.
The above finding of facts and evidence corroborates a vast conspiracy and criminal enterprise that
violates both civil and criminal RICO statutes and antitrust statutes.
The above would constitute treble damages for Stan J. Caterbone and Advanced Media Group in U.S.
District Courts, specifically in the Eastern District for Pennsylvania Case No. 05-2288, 06-4650, 14-
02559, and other related cases; and Case No. 08-13373 in the Lancaster County Court of Common
Pleas.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 3 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom
CIA “no touch” torture makes sense
out of mind control allegations
By Cheryl Welsh
January 2008
Cheryl Welsh was invited to speak about mind control allegations at a recent
workshop on ethics and interrogations by the workshop director, Jean Maria Arrigo PhD.
Dr. Arrigo commented on this article:
In “CIA ‘No Touch’ Torture Makes Sense Out of Mind Control Allegations,”
Cheryl Welsh provides a valuable overview of methods common to
neuroweapons research and torture interrogation. Her essay is informed by
the multitude of self-identified, experimental targets of neuroweapons
researchers whom she represents. Scholars and journalists who are only able
to track neuroweapons research and interrogation methods through
government documents have biased the consensus reality in favor of
government authorities who deceive the public. We owe thanks to Cheryl
Welsh and her colleagues for their pioneering efforts to penetrate government
deception through the phenomenology of self-identified victims of
neuroweapons.
Jean Maria Arrigo, PhD, is an independent social psychologist and oral historian whose
work gives moral voice to military and intelligence professionals. See, for example,
Arrigo, J.M & Wagner, R. (2007). “Torture Is for Amateurs”: A Meeting of Psychologists
and Military Interrogators. [Special issue]. Peace and Conflict, 11 (4).
Dedicated to the courageous and kind-hearted
Peggy Fagan of Houston, Texas,
who is enduring the new scientific version of torture.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 4 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 1
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Table of contents
Introduction
I. A university professor uncovers CIA “no touch” torture
II. The beginnings of CIA “no touch” torture and how it spread
III. What is “no touch” torture?
IV. An example of “no touch” torture
V. The long history of U.S. torture
VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control research
VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research
VIII. Why CIA “no touch” torture has been so successful
IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing the enemy
without killing; for intelligence operations and counterinsurgency
warfare
X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW, (prisoner of war),
a Soviet political prisoner and Abu Ghraib detainees
XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of “no touch” torture
XII. The three key behavioral components of “no touch” torture
XIII. Torture as “a kind of total theater”
XIV. A comparison of “no touch” torture to mind control allegations
XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation
XVI. Comparing “no touch” torture techniques of sensory disorientation
and self inflicted pain to mind control allegations
XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 5 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Introduction
After the horrific pictures of prisoners being tortured at Abu Ghraib were displayed in front pages of
newspapers around the world, the United States maintained that the U.S. government does not
torture; Abu Ghraib was about a few bad officers. Evidence now proves that CIA “no touch” torture
and worse were ordered by the executive branch and approved by top military officers. Surprisingly
this scandal has much in common with another national security issue, neuroweapons, commonly
referred to as mind control.
The field of neuroethics should begin now, according to bioethicist Dr. Jonathan Moreno in his 2006
book Mind Wars, Brain Research and National Defense. The influential book was reviewed in
Nature and JAMA (Journal of American Medical Association). Most neuroscientists agree that
advanced neuroweapons are over a half century away but the ethics of the new weapons need more
planning than occurred for the atomic bomb. Moreno began the first chapter of his book describing
the growing numbers of allegations of illegal government mind control targeting. He immediately
dismissed them as conspiracy theory nut cases. A 2007 Washington Post Magazine article,
“Thought Wars” followed suit. So why should anyone read further given these credible and highly
respected expert opinions?
Much of what the public should know about the issue has gone unreported or uninvestigated. For
example, after over a half century of classified research, not one publicly known neurological weapon
has been deployed. This raises more questions than it answers. Putting aside the major and
undebated points of the consensus position, the mind control allegations do sound crazy and on this
singular point, most people, including experts and news reporters refuse any closer examination.
Clearly, understanding why the mind control allegations sound so crazy would have significant
consequences.
Two analogies help clarify the major problems for the mind control issue, secrecy and the lack of a
thorough, impartial investigation;
Excerpt of a 1970s congressional hearing uncovering illegal CIA activities; [Senator Frank]
Church, ... persisted in blaming the plots [assassinations] on the CIA. The agency, he said, was
a “rogue elephant on a rampage.” For proof, he pointed to the lack of documentary evidence
that any president had ever approved an assassination. Former CIA director Richard Helms
countered that it was absurd to expect to find such evidence. “I can’t imagine anybody wanting
something in writing saying I have just charged Mr. Jones to go out and shoot Mr. Smith,” he
testified. The Agency, he insisted, had simply carried out the wishes of the executive.
Even today, experts don’t understand how the U.S. secrecy system works. Similar to the torture
scandal, until there is a national security scandal about neuroscience weapons, the public will
remain uninformed about a serious public issue.
During a dairyman’s strike in 19th century New England, when there was suspicion of milk
being watered down, Henry David Thoreau wrote; “Sometimes circumstantial evidence can be
quite convincing; like when you find a trout in the milk.” Mind Wars and the Washington Post
Magazine article examined the growing numbers of crazy sounding mind control allegations.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 6 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 3
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
But unlike Thoreau’s account, the publications only reported the convincing circumstantial
evidence of “finding a trout in the milk” and dismissed the suspicions without a fair or
impartial investigation. As a result, the mind control allegations made no sense.
Update: In the 2008 book “The Commission, the Uncensored History of the 9-11 Investigation,”
Philip Shenon explained that explicit, very classified “kill orders” are now put in writing. On page
254 Shenon wrote: “MONs [memorandum of notification] were top-secret orders prepared by the
White House to authorize covert operations abroad by the CIA. ... there was an explicit, if highly
secret, order given by Clinton to the CIA in late 1998 to kill bin Laden.”
I. A university professor uncovers CIA “no touch”
torture
University of Wisconsin professor Alfred McCoy wrote the 2006 book, A Question of Torture, CIA
Interrogation, from the Cold War to the War on Terror. It’s a compelling account of McCoy’s search
for understanding the CIA’s “no touch” torture techniques used in the war on terror and the Iraq
War. McCoy shows how “information extracted by coercion is worthless” and makes the case for a
legal approach, “long and successfully used by the U.S. Marines and the F.B.I.” McCoy documents
why CIA “no touch” torture is a “revolutionary psychological approach” and is the first new scientific
innovation after centuries of torture. “Interrogators had found that mere physical pain, no matter
how extreme, often produced heightened resistance.” Of course, the old brutal forms of physical
torture are still around, for example torture in Argentina in the 1970s described in the classic,
Prisoner Without a Name, Cell without a Number by Jacobo Timerman.
McCoy pieced together what “no touch” torture is and how it was spread globally. The CIA’s new “no
touch” torture works by attacking and destroying the basis of personal identity. McCoy found that
the techniques were bizarre, simple, even banal and yet devastatingly effective. McCoy discovered
that the techniques had been scientifically proven in decades of CIA cold war research. Evidence of
several government manuals helped prove that the techniques were disseminated “from Vietnam
through Iran to Central America.”
“No touch” torture techniques sound strangely similar to mind control allegations. A comparison of
“no touch” torture to mind control allegations raised the possibility that mind control allegations
could be based on the well researched psychological theory for “no touch” torture. Torture victims
exhibit symptoms similar to psychotic processes and organic disorders and experts say this is not
mental illness but an outcome of the psychological component of torture. Psychotherapist Otto
Doerr-Zegers, who has treated Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet stated; “
The psychological component of torture becomes a kind of total theater, a constructed unreality of
lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably with the victim’s self-betrayal and destruction. ...”
This is similar to the technique of “street theater” that mind control victims described in the
Washington Post Magazine article. As torture victims are not mentally ill, mind control victims
would not be mentally ill but rather have undergone and are undergoing a traumatic situation
comparable to torture, such as the alleged illegal targeting with government mind control weapons.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 7 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 4
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The UCDavis Center for the Study of Human Rights in the Americas (CSHRA) and the UCDavis
Center for Mind and Brain (CMB) further explain what psychological torture is and its effects on
torture victims.
[CSHRA and CMB] have initiated a collaboration to investigate theneurobiology of
psychological torture. ...Psychological torture (henceforthPT) is a set of practices that are
used worldwide to inflict pain or suffering without resorting to direct physical violence.
PT includes the use of sleep deprivation, sensory disorientation, forced self-induced pain,
solitary confinement, mock execution, severe humiliation, mind-altering drugs and
threats of violence—as well as the exploitation of personal or cultural phobias.
The psychiatric sequelae of PT are severe. They include delirium, psychosis, regression,
self-mutilation, cognitive impairment, and anxiety disorders, including post-traumatic
stress disorder. Neuroscience research on these and related mental disorders continues
to establish their neurobiological underpinnings, thus challenging the popular view that
PT is not physical, not serious, and perhaps not even torture at all.
The CSHRA and the CMB launched their collaborative efforts by holding The First
UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of Psychological Torture. The goal of this
workshop was to bring together researchers and practitioners from different specialties
and research groups in order to set off a unified, long-term, research program on the
ways in which PT affects the human central nervous system in an effort to understand it
in relation to the more traditional forms of physical torture, and to establish clearly
articulated ethical, legal, and medical descriptions of this set of practices. It is expected
that these descriptions will help treat, document, and deter PT.
Supplemented by studies on the social, historical, and ethical ramifications of PT, the
presentations made at The First UCDavis Workshop on the Neurobiology of
Psychological Torture have been bound into The Trauma of Psychological Torture, a
volume to be published by Praeger on June 30, 2008.
Please note that numerous torture experts, including CSHRA and CMB have completely shunned
suggestions to investigate mind control allegations or to consider the issue. But this information may
be helpful to the therapists of TIs (targeted individuals of mind control) who are coping with mind
control targeting.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 8 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
II. The beginnings of CIA “no touch” torture and how it
spread
The science of psychological torture began because of fears of Russian brainwashing of defendants in
the 1940s Moscow show trials and the Korean War POW (prisoners of war) brainwashing scare in
the 1950s. The 2005 book, World as Laboratory, Experiments with Mice, Mazes, and Men by
Rebecca Lemov described government psychological research for determining whether the
Communists had developed new techniques of brainwashing. “Almost all [scientists] who were
assigned to study the phenomenon of POW collaboration ended up in short order working for the
CIA via one of its various ‘cut-outs,’ conduits, and false fronts, such as the Society for the
Investigation of Human Ecology, the Geschickter Fund for Medical Research, and the Scientific
Engineering Institute, or in one of its own laboratories.” (Lemov, 219) McCoy described the research
behind “no touch” torture and how it spread globally;
From 1950 to 1962, the CIA became involved in torture through a massive mind-control
effort, with psychological warfare and secret research into human consciousness that
reached a cost of a billion dollars annually, a veritable Manhattan Project of the mind. ...
If we trace a narrative thread through a maze of hundreds of experiments, the CIA
research moved through two distinct phases, first an in-house exploration of exotic
techniques such as hypnosis and hallucinogenic drugs, and, a later focus on behavioral
experimentation by contract researchers, several of the most brilliant behavioral
scientists of their generation ...
While this Agency drug testing led nowhere, CIA-funded behavioral experiments,
outsourced to the country’s leading universities, Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc., produced
three key findings that contributed to the discovery of a new form of torture that was
psychological, not physical, ... perhaps best described as “no-touch torture.” (McCoy
outline, 2)
Across the span of three continents and four decades, there is a striking similarity in U.S.
torture techniques, both their conceptual design and specific techniques, from the CIA’s
1963 Kubark interrogation manual, to the Agency’s 1983 Honduras training handbook,
all the way to General Ricardo Sanchez’s 2003 orders for interrogation in Iraq. ...
Guantanamo perfected the three-phase psychological paradigm by attacking cultural
identity and individual psyche. (McCoy outline, 14)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page 9 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
III. What is “no touch” torture?
McCoy explained what “no touch” torture is;
The CIA’s psychological paradigm for “no touch” torture fused two new methods,
“sensory disorientation” and “self-inflicted pain,” whose combination, in theory, would
cause victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily
to their torturers. Refined through years of practice, sensory disorientation relies on a
mix of sensory overload and sensory deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then
intense interrogation, heat and cold, light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic
attack on all human stimuli. The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation
and self-inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum
is a hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 4-5)
In 2004, the Red Cross reported: “The construction of such a system. ... cannot be
considered other than an intentional system of cruel, unusual and degrading treatment
and a form of torture.” (McCoy outline, 9)
IV. An example of “no touch” torture
Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman interviewed journalist Jane Mayer about her August 8, 2007 New
Yorker article, “The Black Sites: A Rare Look Inside the C.I.A.’s Secret Interrogation Program.”
Mayer described detainee Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and his experience with “no touch” torture;
There, he [Khalid Sheikh Mohammed] was subjected to a kind of a weird routine that
someone described to me as kind of Clockwork Orange sort of thing, where he was put in
goggles that blacked out the light and earmuffs of some sort that blocked out sound and
deprived of any normal routine, such as meals or anything that would allow him to know
what time of day it was or really have any kind of marker in his existence. And it’s a
program that’s developed of sort of psychological terror, in a way, to kind of make people
feel that they are completely dependent on other people, have no control over their lives,
and it’s something that, the technique, that really comes out of the KGB days, way back in
the Cold War. And apparently it’s something the CIA has put a lot of research into over
time.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 10 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 7
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
V. The long history of U.S. torture
The history of CIA torture runs parallel to CIA neuroscience-based mind control research and also
CIA nonlethal weapons research. This is important because mind control allegations include
descriptions of techniques that sound like all three CIA programs. It is possible that the related cold
war CIA “no touch” torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control programs have
co-mingled for intelligence purposes. Pulitzer Prize winning New York Times reporter and author
Tim Weiner wrote the 2007 book Legacy of Ashes, History of the CIA. Weiner described the CIA
torture programs and the U.S. secret detention centers around the world. This is a brief excerpt of
the extensive programs;
The project dated back to 1948, when Richard Helms and his [American intelligence]
officers in Germany realized they were being defrauded ... The agency had set up
clandestine prisons to wring confessions out of suspected double agents. One was in
Germany, another in Japan. The third, and the biggest, was in the Panama Canal Zone.
“Like Guantanamo, ... It was anything goes.” ... (Weiner, 64-5)
Senior CIA officers, including Helms, destroyed almost all the records of these programs
in fear they might become public. (Weiner, 66)
The agency, as Cheney said that morning, went over to “the dark side.” On Monday,
September 17, President Bush issued a fourteen-page top secret directive to Tenet and
the CIA, ordering the agency to hunt, capture, imprison, and interrogate suspects around
the world. It set new limits on what the agency could do. It was the foundation for a
system of secret prisons where CIA officers and contractors used techniques that
included torture. One CIA contractor was convicted of beating an Afghan prison to death.
This was not the role of a civilian intelligence service in a democratic society. But it is
clearly what the White House wanted the CIA to do. ...
[The CIA] had participated in the torture of captured enemy combatants before,
beginning in 1967, under the Phoenix program in Vietnam. ...
Under Bush’s order, the CIA began to function as a global military police, throwing
hundreds of suspects into secret jails in Afghanistan, Thailand, Poland, and inside the
American military prison in Guantanamo, Cuba. It handed hundreds more prisoners off
to the intelligence services in Egypt, Pakistan, Jordan, and Syria for interrogations.
(Weiner, 482)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 11 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 8
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
VI. CIA Cold War neuroscience-based mind control
research
Some CIA neuroscience-based mind control research is known to have continued into the 1970s and
is still classified today. A January 29, 1979 Washington Post article entitled “Book Disputes CIA
Chief on Mind-Control Efforts: Work Went on Into 1970s, Author Says,” reported;
Despite assurances last year from Central Intelligence Director Stansfield Turner that the
CIA’s mind-control program was phased out over a decade ago, the intelligence agency
has come up with new documents indicating that the work went on into the 1970s,
according to a new book. John Marks, the author of the book, said the CIA mind-control
researchers did apparently drop their much publicized MK-ULTRA drug-testing
program. But they replaced it, according to Marks, with another super secret behavioral-
control project under the agency’s Office of Research and Development.
The ORD program used a cover organization set up in the 1960s outside Boston headed
by Dr. Edwin Land, the founder of Polaroid, who acted as a “figurehead,” said Marks in
his book. The project investigated such research as genetic engineering, development of
new strains of bacteria, and mind control. The book identifies the Massachusetts
proprietary organization headed by Land as the Scientific Engineering Institute. The
CIA-funded institute was originally set up as a radar and technical research company in
the 1950s and shifted over to mind-control experiments in the 1960s with the exception
of a few scattered programs. According to Marks, however, the ORD program was a full-
scale one and just as secret as the earlier MK-ULTRA project.
In a March 14, 1987, Nation magazine editorial, Louis Slesin, editor of the trade publication,
Microwave News, wrote; “Experts agree that nonionizing electromagnetic radiation (NIER) can
affect behavior, but the question is whether the radiation can be harnessed and used on people at a
distance. With its MKULTRA program the CIA began looking for the answer in the early 1950s.”
Slesin described that in the 1979 book, “Search for the Manchurian Candidate, The CIA and Mind
Control” by John Marks, Marks filed a freedom of information act (foia) request. The CIA replied
that “it had a roomful of files on electromagnetic and related techniques to alter behavior and
stimulate the brain.” But, “[the agency] refused to release the papers, and they remain classified.”
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 12 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 9
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
VII. CIA Cold War nonlethal weapons research
Nonlethal weapons are another outcome of CIA behavior control research. Steven Aftergood wrote
about the initial stages of nonlethal weapons in the September/October 1994 Bulletin of the Atomic
Scientists; “Details about programs to develop so called ‘non-lethal’ weapons are slowly emerging
from the U.S. government’s secret ‘black budget.’ ... The concept of non-lethal weapons is not new;
the term appears in heavily censored CIA documents dating from the 1960s.” Dr. Barbara Hatch-
Rosenberg described nonlethal weapons on page 45,
“Non-lethal” weapons may violate treaties
Development of many of the proposed weapons described on these pages has been
undertaken by NATO, the United States, and probably other nations as well. Most of the
weapons could be considered “pre-lethal” rather than non-lethal. They would actually
provide a continuum of effects ranging from mild to lethal, with varying degrees of
controllability. Serious questions arise about the legality of these expensive and highly
classified development programs. Four international treaties are particularly relevant ...
The Certain Conventional Weapons Convention (also known as the Inhumane Weapons
Convention).
Many of the non-lethal weapons under consideration utilize infrasound or
electromagnetic energy (including lasers, microwave or radio-frequency radiation, or
visible light pulsed at brain-wave frequency) for their effects. These weapons are said to
cause temporary or permanent blinding, interference with mental processes,
modification of behavior and emotional response, seizures, severe pain, dizziness, nausea
and diarrhea, or disruption of internal organ functions in various other ways. In addition,
the use of high-power microwaves to melt down electronic systems would incidentally
cook every person in the vicinity.
Typically, the biological effects of these weapons depend on a number of variables that,
theoretically, could be tuned to control the severity of the effects. However, the precision
of control is questionable. The use of such weapons for law enforcement might constitute
severe bodily punishment without due process. In warfare, the use of these weapons in a
non-lethal mode would be analogous to the use of riot control agents in the Vietnam War,
a practice now outlawed by the CWC. Regardless of the level of injury inflicted, the use of
many non-lethal weapons is likely to violate international humanitarian law on the basis
of superfluous suffering and/or indiscriminate effects.
In addition, under the Certain Conventional Weapons Convention, international
discussions are now under way that may lead to the development of specific new
protocols covering electromagnetic weapons; a report is expected sometime next year.
The current surge of interest in electromagnetic and similar technologies makes the
adoption of a protocol explicitly outlawing the use of these dehumanizing weapons an
urgent matter.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 13 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 10
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
VIII. Why CIA “no touch” torture has been so successful
McCoy explained;
CIA Paradigm: In its clandestine journey across continents and decades, this distinctly
American form of psychological torture would prove elusive, resilient, adaptable and
devastatingly destructive, attributes that have allowed it to persist up to the present and
into the future. ...
1. Elusive: Unlike its physical variant, psychological torture lacks clear signs of abuse
and easily eludes detection, greatly complicating any investigation, prosecution, or
attempt at prohibition.
2. Resilient: Psychological torture is shrouded in a scientific patina that appeals to
policy makers and avoids the obvious physical brutality unpalatable to the modern
public.
3. Adaptable: In forty years since its discovery, the Agency’s psychological paradigm
has proved surprisingly adaptable, with each sustained application producing
innovations. ...
4. Destructive: Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods, the CIA’s “no
touch” torture actually leaves searing psychological scars. Victims often need long
treatment to recover from a trauma many experts consider more crippling than
physical pain. (A Question of Torture, 12)
These characteristics also apply to nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based mind control. All
three are emerging state tools of the future and can neutralize the enemy by controlling the behavior
of the enemy. A 2005 book entitled, Torture, Does it Make Us Safer? Is It Ever OK? was co-
published with Human Rights Watch. Some general reasons for why governments use torture as a
state tool include the following. Governments torture because it is a way to obtain coerced
confessions. The confessions can be used for propaganda purposes. Torture serves a variety of state
purposes: “to terrorize certain elements of the population, to instill a climate of fear in the public
more generally, and to break key leaders and members of these groups, uncovering their networks.”
Other purposes of torture are to “obtain intelligence by any means,” “annihilate subversives” and
“eliminate the enemy.”
Counterinsurgency warfare is taking place in Iraq and major newspapers have reported on the many
detainees that have consistently alleged being subjected to “no touch” torture techniques. As
reported in the September 16th, 2007 Sacramento Bee, General David Petraeus co-wrote the
Counterinsurgency Field Manuel-U.S. Army Field Manual on Tactics, Intelligence, Host Nation
Forces, Airpower, which Newsweek said, is “highly touted as the basis upon which the surge of U.S.
forces this year would be organized.”
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 14 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The book Torture, also included a description of “counterinsurgency warfare, in which torture was a
principal weapon” and was developed “during the French experience in Indochina and Algeria.”
[The] “genesis of this new kind of warfare is the idea that the enemy takes the form of an
invisible political organization hidden among the civilian population. One can know its
leaders and its structure only by waging a war of information: by arresting masses of
civilian suspects, interrogating them, and, if necessary, torturing them. ... In the modern
era, ... the science of torture and similar abusive treatment has developed to break the
physical and mental resistance of subjects before they expire or go mad and thus become
useless as sources of information. ... Torture is still about domination.”
IX. All three programs are state tools for neutralizing
the enemy without killing; for intelligence operations and
counterinsurgency warfare
By comparing mind control allegations to “no touch” torture techniques and the very classified
nonlethal weapons program, the purpose of the bizarre sounding mind control allegations begins to
make sense. Neuroweapons include the CIA’s still classified neuroscience-based mind control
research, “no touch” torture and nonlethal weapons. All three are emerging state tools of the future
that can reliably neutralize the enemy psychologically or without killing. The old, politically
unacceptable methods of brutal physical torture and killing won’t be eliminated but surreptitious,
scientifically proven, alternative methods are available to achieve an even greater national security
advantage. All are ideal for counterinsurgency warfare, psychological operations and intelligence
operations. The characteristics of “no touch” torture, nonlethal weapons and neuroscience-based
mind control make them more inhumane than the atomic bomb.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 15 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 12
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
X. Mind control allegations by a Korean War POW,
(prisoner of war), a Soviet political prisoner and Abu
Ghraib detainees
Three relevant examples out of the numerous available provide a general overview of the decades of
mind control allegations and weapons. The details are compelling and rarely reported by
mainstream press and illustrate why a comparison of “no touch” torture to mind control allegations
is so applicable. The examples share the same Cold War history with CIA “no touch” torture,
neuroscience-based mind control and nonlethal weapons programs.
1. The 1984 BBC TV documentary Opening Pandora’s Box described EMR [electromagnetic
radiation] remote mind control developments and a claim of mind control by a Korean POW;
In the 1950s, intelligence agencies were interested in changing mental states. The
theory is that brain waves can be tuned to a different EMR frequency and can
change moods and character. ... A CIA memo stated that they were looking for
behavior control to enhance consciousness.
The Soviets had realized the same thing. Dr. Ross Adey, famous EMR researcher at
Loma Linda Veterans Hospital, examined the Lida machine, from the Soviet Union.
It was described as a machine to “rearrange consciousness.” The Russians claimed
to use it for treatment of emotional disorders in the 1950s. Dr. Adey stated that the
Lida machine is now obsolete. It used coiled wire inside ear muffs which acted like
an antenna and emitted 1/10 sec pulses of EMR. Dr. Adey demonstrated that
excited animals rapidly quiet down when exposed to the Lida EMR frequencies.
There was one account that the Lida machine was used during the Korean war for
brainwashing American Prisoners.
2. An interview of an alleged Russian victim, Andre Slepucha, was reported in a 1998 ZDF
German TV documentary. He described what seems to be the first reported victim of some type
of “microwave hearing.” Slepucha stated;
In November 1954 I came into contact with what today is referred to as
“Psychotronic Treatment” for the first time. Back then they took me out of the
concentration camp where, under Stalin, I had been imprisoned as a political
prisoner, and brought me into an isolation cell in the KGB prison which was located
in the Lubyanka. After an approximately two week long continuous occupation of
the cell I suddenly experienced in the morning strong sounds in the head, very
strong acoustic and visual hallucinations.
On the CNN news broadcast, Special Assignment by Chuck DeCaro, “Weapons of War, Is there
an RF Gap?” November 1985, Dr. Bill van Bise, electrical engineer, conducted a demonstration
of Soviet scientific data and schematics for beaming a magnetic field into the brain to cause
visual hallucinations. The demonstration on reporter Chuck DeCaro was successful. Dr. van
Bise stated, “In three weeks, I could put together a device that would take care of a whole
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 16 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 13
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
town.” A December 13, 1976, Federal Times article, “Microwave Weapons Study by Soviets
Cited” described the alleged Russian capability of microwave hearing;
The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist
research on microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in
radar, television and microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly
heart attacks in humans. Another biological effect with possible anti-personnel uses
is “microwave hearing.” “Sounds and possibly even words which appear to be
originating intracranially (within the head) can be induced by signal modulation at
very low average power densities,” the report said. According to the study,
Communist work in this area “has great potential for development into a system for
disorienting or disrupting the behavior patterns of military or diplomatic
personnel.”
3. Jon Ronson, author of the New York Times reviewed book, “The Men Who Stare at Goats”
wrote about alleged mind control experiments on Iraqi detainees. In an interview on April 14,
2005 at the Politics and Prose book store in Washington DC., Ronson discussed his book.
(Tape available from Cspan, Book TV at www.booktv.org. Videotape # 186334)
And from the former detainees from Guantanamo Bay that I’ve interviewed it
seems exactly the same things are going on there. I said to a man called Jamal al-
Harith how do you feel, you know how did you feel at Guantanamo Bay and he said
“felt like a laboratory rat.” And he said, “I felt they were trying stuff out on me.” ...
And one example is with Barney the purple dinosaur. When it was announced a
year ago that they were rounding up prisoners of war in Iraq and blasting them
with Barney the purple dinosaur, it was treated as a funny story, because, by all the
major news networks in America, you know... the torture wasn’t that bad. ... It was
disseminated as funny because who wants to replace a funny story with, as Eric
[Olson] once said to me, with one that’s not fun. ...
I was given seven photographs of a detainee who had just been given the Barney
treatment as they called it. It was 48 hours of Barney with flashing strobe lights
inside a shipping container in the desert heat. ...
... The current chief of staff of the Army is a man called General Pete Shoemaker. ...
He’s well known to have an interest in these paranormal esoteric military pursuits.
... So now is the time when I know that these ideas go to the very top [levels of the
military].
One of the things you spoke of, the one that I have knowledge of is the frequencies.
You can follow a trail of patents like footprints in the snow and the patents
sometimes vanish into the world of military classification. And there’s many
patents bought up by a man called Dr. Oliver Lowry. ...
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 17 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 14
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
So we know that these patents have been bought up by the military. ... And the
detainees of Guantanamo I’ve spoken to speak of being blasted withfrequencies, put
inside music, high and low frequencies, masked with music.
...I think there’s no doubt they’re experimenting with this stuff. To add to that
controversial suggestion. I think there’s a good chance that even though they’re
trying this stuff out, it’s not necessarily true that it works. A lot of this stuff doesn’t
work. This may or may not work. I don’t know.
XI. The banal and bizarre techniques of “no touch
torture”
Psychological techniques used at Guantanamo, Abu Ghraib and secret prisons have included
extremes of the following; manipulation of time, loud music, strobe lights, odd sounds, hooding, ear
muffs, heat and cold, light and dark, isolation and intensive interrogation “and most importantly,
creative combinations of all these methods which otherwise might seem, individually, banal if not
benign.” As McCoy explains;
After a visit from the Guantanamo chief General Miller in September 2003, the U.S.
commander for Iraq, General Ricardo Sanchez, issued orders for sophisticated
psychological torture. As I read from those orders, please listen for the combined sensory
disorientation, self-inflicted pain, and attacking Arab cultural sensitivities.
Environmental Manipulation: Altering the environment to create moderate discomfort
(e.g. adjusting temperatures or introducing an unpleasant smell) ...
Sleep Adjustment: Adjusting the sleeping times of the detainee (e.g. reversing the
sleeping cycles from night to day).
Isolation: Isolating the detainee from other detainees. ... 30 days.
Presence of Military Working Dogs: Exploits Arab fear of dogs while maintaining security
during interrogations ...
Yelling, Loud Music, and Light Control: Used to create fear, disorient detainee and
prolong capture shock. Volume controlled to prevent injury ...
Stress Positions: Use of physical posturing (sitting, standing, kneeling, prone, etc.)
(McCoy outline, 9)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 18 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 15
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
XII. The three key behavioral components of “no touch”
torture
McCoy described the principles underlying “no touch” torture;
Through covert trial and error, the CIA, in collaboration with university researchers,
slowly identified three key behavioral components integral to its emerging techniques for
psychological torture.
Discovery #1 Sensory deprivation In the early 1950s ...Dr. Donald Hebb found that he
could induce a state akin to psychosis in just 48 hours. ...after just two to three days of
such isolation [sitting in a cubicle ..with goggles, gloves and ear muffs on.] “the subject’s
very identity had begun to disintegrate.”
Discovery #2 Self-inflicted pain ...Albert Biderman, Irving L. Janis, Harold Wolff, and
Lawrence Hinkle, advised the agency about the role of self-inflicted pain in Communist
interrogation. ...During the 1950s as well, two eminent neurologists at Cornell Medical
Center working for the CIA found that the KGB’s most devastating torture technique
involved, not crude physical beatings, but simply forcing the victim to stand for days at a
time, while the legs swelled, the skin erupted in suppurating lesions, the kidneys shut
down, hallucinations began.
Discovery #3 Anyone can torture ...Finally, a young Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram,
...conducted his famed obedience experiments, asking ordinary New Haven citizens to
torture on command and discovering that, in contravention of conventional wisdom,
anyone could be trained to torture. ...[Milgram] did controversial research under a
government grant showing that almost any individual is capable of torture, a critical
finding for the agency as it prepared to disseminate its method worldwide. (McCoy
outline, 4, Question of Torture, 32-33)
By the project’s end in the late 1960s, this torture research had involved three of the 100
most eminent psychologists of the 20th century-Hebb, Milgram, and Janis, as well as
several presidents of the American Psychiatric Association and the American
Psychological Association. (A Question of Torture, 33)
That notorious photo of a hooded Iraqi on a box, arms extended and wires to his hands,
exposes this covert method. The hood is for sensory deprivation, and the arms are
extended for self-inflicted pain. ... Although seemingly less brutal than physical methods,
no-touch torture leaves deep psychological scars on both victims and interrogators. One
British journalist who observed this method’s use in Northern Ireland called sensory
deprivation “the worst form of torture” because it “provokes more anxiety among the
interrogatees than more traditional tortures, leaves no visible scars and, therefore, is
harder to prove, and produces longer lasting effects.” (Question of Torture, 8-9)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 19 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 16
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
McCoy explained how CIA “no touch” torture changes its victims;
Insights from the treatment of Chilean victims tortured under General Augusto Pinochet’
s regime offer a point of entry into this complex question. Psychotherapist Otto Doerr-
Zegers found that victims suffer “a mistrust bordering on paranoia, and a loss of interest
that greatly surpasses anything observed in anxiety disorders.” The subject “does not
only react to torture with a tiredness of days, weeks, or months, but remains a tired
human being, relatively uninterested and unable to concentrate.”
These findings led him to a revealing question: “What in torture makes possible a change
of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic processes and to disorders of organic
origin?” (Question of Torture, 10-11)
XIII. Torture as “a kind of total theater”
Doerr-Zegers explained that techniques of torture work by creating deception, distrust, fear,
disorientation, a “kind of total theater” that leaves the victim disoriented and “emotionally and
psychological damaged.” The similarity of the explanation below to “street theater” found in mind
control allegations is remarkable;
As Doerr-Zegers describes it, the psychological component of torture becomes a kind of
total theater, a constructed unreality of lies and inversion, in a plot that ends inexorably
with the victim’s self-betrayal and destruction.
To make their artifice of false charges, fabricated news, and mock executions convincing,
interrogators often become inspired thespians. The torture chamber itself thus has the
theatricality of a set with special lighting, sound effects, props, and backdrop, all
designed with a perverse stagecraft to evoke an aura of fear. Both stage and cell construct
their own kind of temporality. While the play both expands and collapses time to carry
the audience forward toward denouement, the prison distorts time to disorientate and
then entrap the victim. As the torturer manipulates circumstances to “maximize
confusion,” the victim feels “prior schemas of the self and the world ... shattered” and
becomes receptive to the “torturer’s construction of reality.”
Under the peculiar conditions of psychological torture, victims, isolated from others,
form “emotional ties to their tormentors” that make them responsive to a perverse play
in which they are both audience and actor, subject and object—in a script that often
leaves them not just disoriented but emotionally and psychologically damaged, in some
cases for the rest of their lives. (A Question of Torture, 10)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 20 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 17
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
XIV. A comparison of “no touch” torture to mind
control allegations
The Washington Post Magazine article included interviews of several TIs, or targeted individuals of
mind control, as some call themselves. Highly acclaimed author Gloria Naylor is most recognized for
her novel Women of Brewster Place, starring Oprah in a 1980s TV mini-series. Naylor wrote the
novel 1996, about her personal experience of mind control targeting and “street theater.” The article
also included an example of drug-induced paranoia for comparison;
Like Girard, Naylor describes what she calls “street theater,” incidents that might be
dismissed by others as coincidental, but which Naylor believes were set up. She noticed
suspicious cars driving by her isolated vacation home. On an airplane, fellow passengers
mimicked her every movement, like mimes on a street.
Voices similar to those in Girard’s case followed, taunting voices cursing her, telling her
she was stupid, that she couldn’t write. Expletive-laced language filled her head. ...
Naylor is not the first writer to describe such a personal descent. Evelyn Waugh, one of
the great novelists of the 20th century, details similar experiences in The Ordeal of
Gilbert Pinfold. Waugh’s book, published in 1957, has eerie similarities to Naylor’s.
Embarking on a recuperative cruise, Pinfold begins to hear voices on the ship that he
believes are part of a wireless system capable of broadcasting into his head; he believes
the instigator recruited fellow passengers to act as operatives; and he describes
“performances” put on by passengers directed at him yet meant to look innocuous to
others.
Waugh wrote his book several years after recovering from a similar episode and realizing
that the voices and paranoia were the result of drug-induced hallucinations.
The psychological terror and mistrust bordering on paranoia of torture victims is remarkably similar
to the mind control alleged by Naylor and the drug-induced paranoia of Waugh. The “street theater”
described by most TIs also appears similar to the paranoia of mental illness and most people think
“street theater” sounds crazy.
The addendum of Naylor’s novel 1996 included this description of some of the most commonly
reported mind control symptoms;
Victims are subjected to various kinds of harassment and torture, twenty-four hours a
day, seven days a week, for years on end. Most believe that some type of technology can
remotely track, target, and control every nerve in their bodies. Heart and respiration rate
can speed up and slow down, and stomach and bowel functions are regulated. Illnesses
and all types of pain can turn on and off in an instant. Microwave burns are reported.
Sleep deprivation is common and dreams are manipulated. Victims say, “They [whoever
is targeting them] can see through my eyes, what I see.” Sometimes victims describe
seeing the images of projected holograms. Thoughts can be read. Most victims describe a
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 21 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
phenomenon they call “street theater.” For example, people around the victim have
repeated verbatim, the victim’s immediate thoughts, or harassive and personalized
statements are repeated by strangers wherever the victim may go.
Emotions can be manipulated. Microwave hearing, known to be an unclassified military
capability of creating voices in the head, is regularly reported. Implanted thoughts and
visions are common, with repetitive themes that can include pedophilia, homophobia
and degradation. Victims say it is like having a radio or TV in your head. Less frequently,
remote and abusive sexual manipulation is reported. Almost all victims say repetitive
behavior control techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or
feedback loops.
The counterintuitive and bizarre torture techniques are discernible within the mind control
allegations. The mind control techniques seem to be psychological techniques to disorient the victim
and cause him to feel completely controlled, dependent and at the mercy of his torturers. Similar to
the “kind of total theater” for torture, “street theater” is almost certainly a part of the process of
breaking one’s personality to gain behavior control over that person.
XV. The phenomenology of the torture situation
“What in torture makes possible a change of such nature that it appears similar to psychotic
processes and to disorders of organic origin?” Doerr-Zegers found the answer lies in the
psychological, not physical, “phenomenology of the torture situation;”
1. an asymmetry of power;
2. the anonymity of the torturer to the victim;
3. the “double bind” of either enduring or betraying others;
4. the systematic “falsehood” of trumped-up charges, artificial lighting, cunning
deceptions, and “mock executions”;
5. confinement in distinctive spaces signifying “displacement, trapping, narrowness
and destruction”; and
6. a temporality “characterized by some unpredictability and much circularity, having
no end.” ...
Thus, much of the pain from all forms of torture is psychological, not physical, based
upon denying victims any power over their lives. In sum, the torturer strives “through
insult and disqualification, by means of threats ... to break all the victim’s possible
existential platforms.” Through this asymmetry, the torturer eventually achieves
“complete power” and reduces the victims to “a condition of total or near total
defenselessness.” (Question of Torture, 10-11)
In torture, a torture situation is created according to Doerr-Zegers. In mind control allegations,
there is a similar phenomenology of a mind control situation. TIs describe this as “an electronic
prison.” Doerr-Zegers described the torture technique, 1) an asymmetry of power. In torture, the
torturer has complete power and the victim is completely powerless. Similarly, TIs are targeted
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 22 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 19
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
remotely and are completely powerless to stop the targeting. Doerr-Zegers described the torture
technique, 2) the anonymity of the torturer to the victim. Torture victims do not know their torturer
and similarly, there is the anonymity of the remote targeting in the mind control situation.
Most TIs described “street theater” or seemingly staged events which matches 3), 4) and 6). Doerr-
Zegers described torture technique, 5) confinement in distinctive spaces signifying “displacement,
trapping, narrowness and destruction.” Although TIs are not physically imprisoned, most victims
describe the experience as very debilitating and compare it to “mental rape, an electronic prison, or
total destruction of the quality of their lives.” Mind control poses a severe restriction on their former
lives. Doerr-Zeger’s technique 6) a temporality “characterized by some unpredictability and much
circularity, having no end” is also similar to sensory deprivation in mind control allegations. TIs
routinely report the simple but extremely repetitive and negative, stimulus-response and feedback
loops of their environment.
XVI. Comparing “no touch” torture techniques of
sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain to mind
control allegations
The psychological effects achieved by torture and alleged mind control are similar. Mind control
targeting tactics described by most TIs seem to contain the underlying “no touch” torture techniques
of sensory disorientation and self inflicted pain. For comparison, here is McCoy’s description;
To summarize, the CIA’s psychological paradigm fused two new methods, “sensory
disorientation” and “self-inflicted pain,” whose combination, in theory, would cause
victims to feel responsible for their own suffering and thus capitulate more readily to
their torturers ... The fusion of these two techniques, sensory disorientation and self-
inflicted pain, creates a synergy of physical and psychological trauma whose sum is a
hammer-blow to the existential platforms of personal identity. (McCoy outline, 5)
The intended effect of sensory disorientation for torture would be similar for mind control; to create
an environment of radical uncertainty to enhance the break down of the person’s will and
personality. Most alleged cases of mind control describe the considerable repetition of seemingly
innocuous and banal stimuli in the TIs environment, as if engineered by computer. The addendum
of Naylor’s book included this description; “Almost all victims say repetitive behavior control
techniques are used and include negative, stimulus-response or feedback loops.” For comparison,
here is McCoy’s description;
The CIA’s “sensory disorientation” became a total assault on all senses and sensibilities,
auditory, visual, tactile, temporal, temperature, and survival. Refined through years of
practice, sensory disorientation relies on a mix of sensory overload and sensory
deprivation via banal procedures, isolation then intense interrogation, heat and cold,
light and dark, noise and silence, for a systematic attack on all human stimuli. (McCoy
outline, 4-5)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 23 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
McCoy described the photos of the hooded detainee with “the arms extended for self-inflicted pain.”
The torturer forces the prisoner to stand with arms extended and the prisoner has no control over
his situation. The prisoner still has a sense of guilt at causing his own pain by his extended arms.
This intended effect of self inflicted pain for torture seems to be similar to mind control. TIs who are
remotely targeted with physical pain cannot escape. Although TIs go to extremes in trying to escape
the physical targeting, they are unsuccessful. The psychological trauma is inflicted by the sense of
causing one’s own pain. Many TIs report that the targeting causes TIs to become isolated from
friends, families and in many cases TIs are unable to work. This common reaction to targeting seems
to be a type of self-inflicted psychological pain.
Carole Sterling’s description of targeting is also found in the addendum of Naylor’s book and seems
to illustrate the techniques of sensory disorientation and self-inflicted pain. It is a typical TI
description;
In 1997, Carole Sterling wrote a letter to the editor of the Star Beacon. She described her
alleged targeting with EMR weapons technologies that within months, led to her suicide.
Dear Star Beacon, I am writing about something that happened to me which goes back to
December 1995. I went to a conference in Nevada. The day following the last night at the
conference, I noticed that I had an injection mark on the base of my spine which was
sore. Then the nightmare started three days after my return to Washington, D.C. ... It
totally scrambled my brain, leaving me unable to think properly, simply functioning on
sheer shock and horror, with total incomprehension of what was going on. It actually was
debilitating. The room felt like a torture chamber. This forced me out of my home. I
believe that the technology used, be it some type of a frequency assault, some sort of
directed energy, in addition to whatever was injected in me, has caused damage to my
brain. [I have] been living with this debilitating and excruciating pain for the last eight
months so far.
TIs describe both psychological and physical targeting similar to torture. It seems logical to surmise
that the successful psychological theories of “no touch” torture would cross over to more technically
based remote, advanced mind control programs. This becomes a significant step forward in
understanding the mind control issue. The mind control allegations are “the secret in plain sight.”
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 24 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 21
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
XVII. Conclusions: what everyone can agree on
Hard questions need to be asked of the experts. Who now controls the neuroscience weapons
research and how advanced is it? As a result of U.S. secrecy, an educated guess is all that is possible.
The public deployment of advanced remote neuroscience weapons will be a world changing event,
affecting the lives of this generation and the next. The weapons involve national security, science,
history, U.S. politics and geopolitics. Most importantly the weapons encompass human nature, good
and evil and suffering. Most people are in agreement about one fact: unlike the atomic bomb, there
has been a total lack of public input for neuroscience weapons and policy even though the research
began in the 1950s and is still classified. Again, this raises more questions than it answers.
This article will be published in March 2008. See www.huntergatheress.com A special thank you to editor, Joan D’Arc for
her encouragement and suggestions.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage 25 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016 22
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
1
1 EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
2 (VOLUME II)
7 TAKEN BY: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
8 BEFORE: DIANE A. SMITH, REPORTER
NOTARY PUBLIC
9
DATE: JUNE 28, 2016, 9:25 A.M.
10
PLACE: LANCASTER BAR ASSOCIATION
11 28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
12
13
14 APPEARANCES:
15 MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
16
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page26
1 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
2
1 WITNESSES
2 NAME EXAMINATION
3 STANLEY J. CATERBONE
4 BY: MR. REESER 3
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page27
2 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
3
1 STANLEY J. CATERBONE, called as a witness, being
2 duly sworn, testified as follows:
3 EXAMINATION
4 THE WITNESS: I wanted to try to give you some
5 background about why people are doing this to me.
6 MR. REESER: Okay.
7 THE WITNESS: Here's one of the first things.
8 This is a book written by the Chief of Police ex-wife.
9 BY MR. REESER:
10 Q Chief of Police of Lancaster?
11 A Lancaster, yes. She accused him of domestic
12 abuse, and I've had the book for over a year. And the
13 other thing is this book here. I have the only live case
14 right now to get her out of prison.
15 Q And why don't you read the title of the book.
16 A Love, Murder and Corruption in Lancaster County,
17 My Story by Lisa Michelle Lambert and David Brown. I
18 communicate with Dave Brown a couple times a week.
19 Q Who is David Brown?
20 A Her attorney that wrote the book. Now if you're
21 not familiar with this case, there were three teenagers
22 that were involved in a murder back in 1992. In 1997, a
23 federal judge named Stewart Dalzell released her saying
24 there was so much prosecutorial misconduct in the case that
25 she was actually innocent. Now Pennsylvania appealed it,
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page28
3 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
4
1 and they had to have another PCRA hearing in front of Larry
2 Stengel. Well, he found -- he reversed everything
3 essentially, and she went back to prison.
4 Now last June, I filed an Amicus on her behalf as
5 to move it in the case. And I currently have a 3rd Circuit
6 appeal case to get her out of prison. Now the case was so
7 controversial that 38,000 people signed a petition from
8 Lancaster to impeach the judge. Of course, they lost.
9 They never impeached him. But in 1997, the attorney that
10 represented her had some dealings with me. Her name is
11 Christina Rainville.
12 Now essentially my Amicus is based on a premise
13 that I suffered the same prosecutorial misconduct that she
14 suffered. Now you couple that with the fact that I'm the
15 federal whistleblower for International Signal Control, the
16 firm selling arms to Iraq to a Black Ops Program with the
17 CIA and the NSA -- I blew the whistle in '87 -- they were
18 indicted in '91 -- and the fact that I'm a victim of mind
19 control, there's ample reason and sufficient evidence of
20 why people break into my house and steal my things and
21 break my things.
22 Now I presented transcripts from Nick Begich, who
23 is a renowned expert in mind control, Karen Stewart, who is
24 a former NSA whistleblower who suffers the same
25 symptomatology as me, and Julianne McKinney, who is a
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page29
4 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
5
1 former intelligence officer of the U.S. Army. They all
2 suffer the same symptoms that I do. In addition, Social
3 Security has been paying me disability benefits since 2008
4 for mind control.
5 Q Do you have a copy of the Disability
6 Determination?
7 A Sure, I have it in here.
8 Q Can I take a look at it?
9 A Yeah, it might take me a couple minutes to find
10 it.
11 Q Sure.
12 A This injunction was filed yesterday at 4:24 p.m.
13 in the Lancaster County Courthouse. I have 191 pages of
14 documentation with SSA. Here is my letter, award letter.
15 Now through the application process, I applied in April of
16 '09 and received a check for $21,000 in August. I was pro
17 se. There were not psychiatric examinations.
18 Q May I take a look at that as you're talking?
19 A Yes. And there were no medical reports. It was
20 all awarded on my documentation of mind control symptoms
21 and illnesses. What they did was -- I applied in April of
22 '09. They awarded me benefits in August of '09 and paid me
23 back one year, retroactive one year. They can only do it
24 one year. But they declared me disabled in December of
25 '05, which is when I declared that I became full-time
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page30
5 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
6
1 telepathic and under harassment with electromagnetic
2 weapons. That's what the '05 date is.
3 Q So I see, you know, the letter saying that you
4 became disabled under our rules on December 1, 2005.
5 A Right.
6 Q It doesn't say anything as to why.
7 A No, they don't do that. They only -- what they do
8 is they give you an award letter and it either says
9 physical or mental, nothing beyond that because of HIPAA.
10 But if you go through all the documentation I have of the
11 entire process, you'll notice that there's no medical
12 reports submitted. And I begged them -- in fact, I went to
13 Joe Pitts' office to try to get them to give me a
14 psychiatric evaluation because I thought it was required.
15 They wouldn't give me one. So it's impossible for it to be
16 for mental illness, impossible. It's just not.
17 Q You don't have a document anywhere from the Social
18 Security Administration that says we've determined that
19 you're disabled because of this condition?
20 A They don't do that. It's either mental or
21 physical. If I had one, I'd present it.
22 Q Yeah. It seems to me I've seen things to the
23 contrary where there's been a determination that somebody
24 is disabled --
25 A Well, they didn't give me any.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page31
6 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
7
1 Q -- for a particular reason.
2 A Now my father collected disability. He was a
3 victim of MKUltra.
4 Q What is that?
5 A That's where mind control came from, a CIA
6 program. It started in the '50s.
7 Q Okay. Why was he a target?
8 A You'll have to ask them.
9 Q I mean I understand what you're telling me about
10 your role as a federal whistleblower but --
11 A He was Navy, a very intelligent person. He was a
12 member of the Air Gunners Squadron, which I have
13 documentation from him that he left, which is like a
14 special option. And he graduated with honors from their
15 school. So that could be why.
16 Q What I'd like to do is go back to what we were
17 doing before and discuss the items that were on Exhibit 1
18 that was marked at the first examination. Before I get
19 started with that, two things. One, have you brought any
20 of the receipts from the items that were damaged or the
21 replacement items that you purchased?
22 A Can you guarantee me you're going to pay the
23 claim?
24 Q No.
25 A No.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page32
7 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
8
1 Q Okay. Second, I don't have the ability to make
2 that guarantee. I mean I could say yes and I --
3 A I'm not going to waste my time.
4 Q All right.
5 A I didn't have to do it for previous insurance
6 claims like this. So I'm not going to do it for this one.
7 Q All right. Second, you had sent me an email I
8 think indicating that you had other items to add?
9 A Every day. Seriously, every day. I'm hoping this
10 injunction takes care of everything. So we'll see.
11 Q I'm not sure it has anything to do with this claim
12 but --
13 A It has everything to do with everything.
14 Q All right. And you filed --
15 A Let me read you the relief I'm requesting,
16 emergency relief.
17 Q Filed in the 3rd Circuit you said?
18 A No, Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas.
19 Q Oh, okay.
20 A I filed one in '09, and the judge ruled on it. So
21 I'm hoping she will on this one.
22 Q What is the docket number?
23 A I didn't get one yet. I just filed it yesterday.
24 Q Okay.
25 A I'll read it. Relief sought by Plaintiff. The
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page33
8 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
9
1 Complainant seeks immediate relief from the above in the
2 form of sanctions and fines for those guilty of extortion
3 and embezzlement and those withholding accounts
4 receivables. Complainant seeks immediate relief from the
5 law enforcement agencies that continue abuse of process.
6 Complainant seeks immediate relief from public officials
7 for obstructing justice and due process. Complainant seeks
8 relief inasmuch as the Courts are able with regards to the
9 harassment and torture from those known of such crimes.
10 The Complainant seeks relief from stalking and
11 harassing neighbors and requires law enforcement to make
12 sure households can identify all occupants and prove they
13 are entitled to the lease and/or deed. The Complainant
14 seeks relief by awarding the Complainant his pro se
15 billings invoice. The Complainant seeks relief by awarding
16 the Complainant summary judgment in all cases filed before
17 the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas in retaliation
18 for the arrogance of both the local law enforcement
19 community and the judicial system for the systematic abuse
20 of process and the extreme nature of the obstruction of
21 justice, which in itself is responsible for putting the
22 Complainant's life in harm's way on a daily basis. Date,
23 June 27th, 2016.
24 Q All right. Changing gears. Going back to the
25 list here of items that you've submitted. I think we left
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page34
9 of 673
34
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
10
1 off talking about the cost of repairs for your computers
2 which were hacked. So we talked about that. And we're
3 going to move onto the next item, which is a wet dry vac.
4 A Okay.
5 Q Tell me about that.
6 A Let's see what they did to that one. Oh, they
7 burnt the motor out.
8 Q Okay. When did that happen?
9 A Oh, boy, that happened fairly recently. That
10 happened -- because I just replaced it. I'm going to say
11 March. Now the wet dry vac I bought when I built my house
12 on Stonehill Road in Conestoga in 1995. Now the one I
13 replaced it with was a compact unit. The one that was
14 broken was full-sized. I think it was, like, a two horse
15 power motor. The one I replaced it with I think was $69.
16 I think the original price of the one I bought -- I want to
17 say it was 150. It was a Craftsman, the original one.
18 Q It was 21-years-old?
19 A Yeah, yeah.
20 Q Okay. Did you use it on a regular basis?
21 A Oh, yeah.
22 Q And one day you started -- you tried to use it and
23 it didn't work?
24 A Yeah, worked the day before and then it didn't
25 work.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page35
10of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
11
1 Q Okay. Cordless phone, tell me about that.
2 A I guess it was February. I have magicJack. Are
3 you familiar with that?
4 Q No.
5 A It's where you use the internet for your phone.
6 Q Like a Voice Over --
7 A Yeah.
8 Q -- what do they call that -- VOI?
9 A Only it's different in that they give you a module
10 that you connect to your computer.
11 Q All right.
12 A Now what I did was -- they came out with a new
13 version where you connect it to your Comcast router so that
14 instead of -- before with the old version, you had to have
15 the computer on for the phone to work. So I switched over.
16 I upgraded to the new version and connected it to my
17 Comcast server. So that means the magicJack is live 24/7.
18 So I went to Radio Shack and bought a new cordless phone.
19 Well, it lasted a month and doesn't work anymore.
20 Q Did you take it back?
21 A No.
22 Q Why not?
23 A Just too busy. What I do on that line -- I
24 forward it anyway to my cell phone number, and I was using
25 it just, you know, sporadically.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page36
11of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
12
1 Q I would think after a month they would -- they
2 would replace it?
3 A They probably would. I'm just too busy, just
4 priorities. I mean I could probably take it back now and
5 replace it.
6 Q I would think so. Cable boxes and modem.
7 A Oh, boy, what a mess that was. Okay. Let's see.
8 I guess in February or March I went to upgrade all my cable
9 boxes. And at the same time, somebody from Comcast told me
10 that if I hook up to Comcast Business I would get a more
11 secure internet connection and a faster connection. So I
12 hook up to Comcast Business on a 60 day trial. They send
13 me a box, a new -- or, in fact, no, they came out and
14 installed it -- a new router. And after two weeks, they
15 reversed everything and said no, it's not more secure. So
16 I disconnected it. Then I went to Comcast and upgraded all
17 my cable boxes, but they never worked. I mean I was going
18 back and forth to Comcast two or three times. Service
19 techs would come out. They couldn't find the problem. So
20 I don't know if people put chips in them. I don't know if
21 they just sabotaged them or what.
22 Q You don't know why they're not working?
23 A Comcast doesn't even know why. They couldn't
24 even -- I'd get billed for HBO for three months, and I
25 never had HBO. I mean it wouldn't work. And I kept
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page37
12of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
13
1 getting on the phone with customer service spending two
2 hours -- one time two and a half hours, and it still didn't
3 work. They still couldn't fix it.
4 Q Okay. How long ago was that?
5 A That was probably two months ago, three months
6 ago, after the first of the year, probably the second
7 quarter.
8 Q Are they still trying to fix the problem?
9 A I stopped trying. I mean I just -- you know.
10 Q Okay. The 100 dollar cost to replace, is that
11 just the value of the cable boxes and the modems or modem?
12 A Yeah, I guess what they did is they billed me.
13 Comcast Business billed me. They all billed me. I mean,
14 yeah, that's basically what it is.
15 Q They billed you more because it was a business --
16 A Oh, yeah -- no, they billed me because they would
17 not accept the return of the modem. I couldn't return it
18 then, and they wouldn't pick it up.
19 Q Do you have any written correspondence between
20 yourself and Comcast over the issue?
21 A Yeah, I have notes. I have -- yeah, I have emails
22 I guess, yeah.
23 Q Do you have any of them with you?
24 A No.
25 Q Would you be willing to forward those to me?
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page38
13of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
14
1 A Yeah, I can dig those up, something pertaining to
2 that. I mean I forget exactly. But it was a mess. I even
3 think I recorded the one tech that came to my door. He got
4 smart with me. I had to throw him off my property.
5 Q I'm probably going to butcher the pronunciation of
6 this. Is it Sakrete or Sakrete?
7 A Oh, Sakrete, yeah. Listen what they did. I
8 had -- I was putting post holes -- putting posts in my back
9 yard for a six foot wooden fence. And what these kids next
10 door were doing was they were going and wetting the bags,
11 ruining the whole bag. Now that's not the issue. Do you
12 know how heavy Sakrete is when it's hardened cement?
13 Q Yeah, I got a sense for that.
14 A I had to break it up and put it in buckets and
15 take it out to the alley.
16 Q So basically they ruined the bags?
17 A Oh, yeah.
18 Q Made them unusable?
19 A Yeah.
20 Q All right. And you have $12 there?
21 A Yeah.
22 Q Is that $4 a bag or --
23 A Yeah. That's not the half of it. They filled in
24 the holes before I could -- I had to dig the holes out two
25 or three times.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page39
14of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
15
1 Q When you say they, again who is they?
2 A I assume it's the people next door. They are the
3 ones who sic the pit bull on me that I had to go to the
4 hospital for two weeks ago.
5 Q Oh, gees.
6 A Oh, yeah.
7 Q Are you all right?
8 A I had to go to the ER and take antibiotics for 10
9 days.
10 Q Okay. The next item I have is just miscellaneous
11 clothes, $100?
12 A Yeah, they are always ruining my clothes.
13 Q Ruining them or stealing them?
14 A Both.
15 Q When you say ruining them, what do you mean by
16 that?
17 A They'll put spots on them so I can't wear them,
18 the shirts, or they'll shrink them. They've done that. My
19 slippers they make big. So I can't wear those. I mean all
20 kinds of tricks.
21 Q I'm sorry? They made --
22 A Slippers big. So I can't wear them.
23 Q They made them big.
24 A If you -- I have those three experts I mentioned.
25 They all talk about -- the first thing they do in these
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page40
15of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
16
1 programs is break into your house, and it's impossible,
2 impossible to find out how they get in.
3 Q And I think we talked about this last time you
4 were here. You don't have any signs of forced entry?
5 A Forced entry?
6 Q Yes, a broken window --
7 A No ---
8 Q -- a broken door.
9 A -- in '87, I did. Well, I had forced entry by the
10 Lancaster City Police last July on a 302 warrant.
11 Q Yeah, you told me about that.
12 A But other than that, forced entry, no, no. Signs
13 of entry, but not forced.
14 Q When you say signs of entry, you define that by
15 the fact things were missing?
16 A Moved, missing, lights on that were off or off
17 that were on, things like that. The other night my
18 porch -- you know, if I go out in the evening, I'll leave
19 my front porch light on. Well, I came home and it's off
20 and, you know, hard to get in, you know, to see your key
21 hole and things like that. It's harassment.
22 Q The next item you have is vapor electronic
23 cigarettes?
24 A Oh, yeah, now they help you reduce smoking regular
25 cigarettes.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page41
16of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
17
1 Q These are the E-Cigs?
2 A Yeah, but they are the pens with cartridges. They
3 are expensive. They are not the ones you buy in the store
4 like at Turkey Hill or something. These are the ones
5 that -- they are three in one. You can smoke waxes, oils
6 or dry herbs. Now what I get is, like, six milligrams of
7 nicotine. It's in liquid form. They stole my fifth one I
8 think, I think one after that.
9 Q All from home?
10 A Oh, yeah, yeah, all from home, yeah, five of them.
11 Q I mean that sounds like the kind of thing -- I
12 mean I'm famous for leaving things behind at restaurants.
13 A Oh, no, no, no, no, no, I don't leave this behind.
14 No, no, they were stolen.
15 Q Same thing, you don't know when they got in, how
16 they got in, but they are just not there anymore?
17 A Well, I mean in 2009 -- let me give you an
18 example. Okay. This is what I used to do. I used to
19 document daily in journals all the incidents that I'm
20 describing. I did that for about a year, very detailed,
21 every day. In 2010, I said I have enough documentation.
22 That's it. I mean it's a full-time job. I can send you
23 those. I mean I have those in PDF form.
24 Q Yeah.
25 A I can send you those. I mean I can email those to
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page42
17of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
18
1 you.
2 Q It looks like this is something that's filed with
3 the Court?
4 A This whole thing is the emergency injunction.
5 Q All right. Well, I mean that should be available
6 online.
7 A I'd say three days.
8 Q This is filed with the prothonotary --
9 A Yes.
10 Q -- in Civil Court?
11 A Yeah, I can show you the stamped pages. I just
12 had to make copies. My toner mysteriously went out, and
13 I'm waiting for a cartridge to be delivered today. But if
14 you page to the left, you'll see the three pages that were
15 stamped.
16 Q That's not what I was supposed to get there.
17 A There you go. If you swipe it -- no, it's up and
18 down. There is four pages stamped there.
19 Q Yeah, it just has the time stamp on it. It
20 doesn't have the docket number.
21 A No, yeah, they didn't -- I guess I could have
22 maybe got them to give me a docket number, but they didn't.
23 You know, I didn't push it.
24 Q All right.
25 A Here you can see the -- there's the state cover
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page43
18of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
19
1 sheet.
2 Q Yeah, they didn't stamp it with a docket number
3 either.
4 A This is the civil cover sheet.
5 Q Okay.
6 A And this is the first page of the injunction.
7 Judge Margaret Miller ruled on mine in '09 and
8 essentially -- it was similar to this. And essentially
9 what she said was that I didn't provide her enough evidence
10 for her to rule in my favor. In a nutshell, that's what
11 she said. Plus she said she didn't really believe I was a
12 victim of mind control. But this time it's a lot different
13 because I got corroborating witnesses.
14 Q Okay. Who are the corroborating witnesses?
15 A Dr. Nick Begich. He's an expert in mind control
16 technologies.
17 Q Where is he out of?
18 A Alaska. His father was killed by the Hoover
19 Administration. He was a U.S. congressman.
20 Q What was the last name again? I'm sorry.
21 A Begich, B-e-g-i-c-h. Now his brother just
22 finished a term in Congress last year in the Senate.
23 Anyway, his father back in -- I forget what year it was --
24 was traveling with the Speaker of the House, Wayne Boggs,
25 and they were both killed in a plane accident. And they
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page44
19of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
20
1 were raising hell about Hoover with his CoIntel Program.
2 So anyway, Nick Begich began doing research on the HARP
3 Installation in Alaska, which is a 180 antenna array that
4 is the focus or the basis for electromagnetic weapons.
5 It's called HARP. Now back about eight years ago, he
6 convinced the European Parliament to ban electromagnetic
7 weapons. So he's a renowned expert. Now I have a
8 transcript of his lecture in October of 2015, and he gave a
9 lecture during the Covert Harassment Conference in Belgium.
10 I think it was Belgium.
11 Q Okay. Do you have other witnesses?
12 A Yes, then I have Karen Stewart.
13 Q You mentioned her.
14 A Karen Stewart is a former NSA whistleblower.
15 Q National Security Agency when you say NSA?
16 A Yeah, yeah. She blew the whistle in 2004. Now
17 she just emailed me three weeks ago. I emailed some
18 information, and she emailed me back and said thank you for
19 it. Anyway, she -- essentially what happened was she
20 determined that some weaponry that was being used over in
21 Afghanistan and Iraq wasn't performing up to standards.
22 And she more or less drew attention to it to the U.S.
23 Military, and somebody took credit for her work. And she
24 became an NSA whistleblower. Then she started having the
25 same problems I did, people breaking in her house,
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page45
20of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
21
1 electromagnetic weapon attacks, things like that.
2 Now the NSA is critical for two reasons. I blew
3 the whistle on ISC, the Lancaster firm selling arms to
4 Iraq. Their first program -- their first contract in 1973
5 was with the NSA. Bobby Ray Inman, who was the former
6 director of the NSA, was on their board of directors. He
7 also owns a company that deals in mind control. In 1994,
8 Bill Clinton nominated him to be the Secretary of Defense,
9 and he withdrew because of the ISC scandal. Plus on March
10 9th, the NSA took me into custody, false imprisoned me for
11 an hour and a half and had eight security police
12 interrogate me for no reason.
13 Q Of this year, March of this year?
14 A Yeah, down in Fort Meade.
15 Q Where is Fort Meade?
16 A That's the NSA.
17 Q Is Fort Meade in Colorado?
18 A Maryland.
19 Q Oh, I'm sorry.
20 A Dogs at my car, handcuffed me, interrogated me and
21 then told me I couldn't go down to Washington, D.C. and
22 told me I wasn't allowed on federal property anymore, which
23 was a lie. I walked away and essentially made a fool out
24 of them.
25 Q Karen Stewart, where is she located?
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page46
21of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
22
1 A Well, she worked down in Fort Meade, Maryland, but
2 she since -- after she blew the whistle and started having
3 symptoms, she moved to Florida -- I believe that's where
4 she's at now -- with family.
5 Q Okay. I got a little sidetracked there. Let me
6 bring you back to the next item, which is HVLP tips. Are
7 they related to the cigarettes?
8 A No, no, that's a high-volume,low-pressure paint
9 sprayer. What they did was -- I bought a used one at the
10 Reuse It Store off of Pitney Road out near Greenfield
11 Industrial Park. And I brought it home, and I put -- tips
12 come with it, so different velocities for the paint, like
13 smaller and larger. It comes with three tips. It had an
14 instruction manual and brushes to clean it. So I put
15 everything in a clear plastic bag to keep it all together.
16 I went to use the sprayer, and the bag was gone. So I had
17 to go out and buy a brand-new HVLP. It cost me $119. The
18 one I bought -- I think I paid 60 for it.
19 Q Okay. You have a quantity lost two and then
20 estimated cost to replace 45. What did you lose two of?
21 A Tips. Yeah, what they did was they put the small
22 tip in. So I'm trying to spray stain for my fence, and,
23 you know, you need the larger tip. But I said 45. I
24 thought I could replace the tips, but you can't. So I had
25 to replace the whole thing.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page47
22of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
23
1 Q Okay. I don't mean to be redundant. So I'm just
2 going to ask you --
3 A That's all right.
4 Q -- a blanket question here if it applies to all of
5 these items here, and I'll show it to you. For all these
6 items, you don't have -- or you're not willing to produce a
7 receipt. Correct?
8 A Only if you give me a guarantee that you're going
9 to pay the claim.
10 Q And I've told you I can't do that.
11 A Okay.
12 Q None of these items have been reported as lost or
13 stolen or damaged to the police. Correct?
14 A To the police?
15 Q Yes.
16 A I'm in this injunction accusing the police of
17 trying to kill me. No, I mean I can't.
18 Q All right. And none of these items --
19 A That's what abuse of process is. It's when the
20 police do not take your complaints.
21 Q And for any of these items, you do not have -- you
22 can't tell me specifically who it was who stole it or broke
23 it or whatever the case may be?
24 A No.
25 Q All right. I'm not going to keep asking that
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page48
23of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
24
1 question.
2 A I can -- I can tell you this. Since 2006, the
3 neighbors at 1252 Fremont Street have been engaged in a
4 constant harassment and threat campaign no matter who is in
5 that house.
6 Q Has there been a change in --
7 A Oh, yeah, three times.
8 Q Is it a rental house?
9 A Yes.
10 Q Do you know who the current residents are?
11 A No, they don't tell me the truth, no. I mean I
12 filed a private criminal complaint against them in the
13 County D.A.'s Office this year. They are Spanish. They
14 harass me. They are the ones who sic the dog on me. That
15 happened June 10th. I went to Lancaster Regional Medical
16 Center on College Avenue. Dr. Westphal gave me antibiotics
17 and 10 Vicodin. Now he wanted me to go through rabies
18 shots, but I didn't do it. I said the dog wasn't rabid. I
19 have the hospital report.
20 Q The next item is a staple airgun?
21 A Right. They stole my staple airgun.
22 Q That was theft. That wasn't damaged. That was
23 theft?
24 A Yeah, theft. That was theft.
25 Q When was that?
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page49
24of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
25
1 A This all -- this all happened when I started
2 erecting the new six foot fence and a screened-in porch in
3 my back. And I started construction March 10th.
4 Q So sometime after March 10th?
5 A Yeah.
6 Q And I don't know if I asked you about the HVLP
7 tips. But when were those taken?
8 A I'm going to say in May.
9 Q Of this year?
10 A Yeah.
11 Q I also don't think I asked you about the five
12 vapor electronic cigarette cartridges.
13 A Okay. I bought my first one -- let me see. I'd
14 say that was all after January 1st. Yeah, they were all
15 after January 1st. I bought one downtown at Puff N' Stuff.
16 I bought one at the convenience store on Manor or
17 Millersville Pike, Hershey Avenue.
18 Q In doing the math here, it looks like they go for
19 about 50 to $60 a piece?
20 A Yeah, some are -- that's the minimum. I think the
21 last one I bought was $79. That's the minimum price.
22 Q Okay. The next one is a belt for $9. Are we
23 talking about, you know, a belt to hold your pants up, that
24 kind of belt?
25 A Yeah, yeah.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page50
25of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
26
1 Q Stolen, damaged?
2 A Stolen.
3 Q When?
4 A Within the past two months.
5 Q The next one is a 36 inch by 100 feet --
6 A Oh, yeah.
7 Q -- black screen?
8 A That was to do my screened-in porch. I had to
9 replace it.
10 Q Stolen?
11 A Stolen. In fact, I just bought that -- I replaced
12 that probably a month ago.
13 Q I'm sorry? You just replaced the screen for the
14 screened-in porch?
15 A Yeah, it's a roll. It's 100 by --
16 Q Right. I'm familiar with them. So it was on the
17 roll. Somebody just took the roll?
18 A Yeah, it was in a plastic bag, yeah, plastic
19 sleeve, yeah, took the whole roll.
20 Q Okay. And the last one is one pair of work
21 gloves?
22 A Yeah.
23 Q I know what work gloves are.
24 A Yeah. Now here's what they do. A lot of times
25 they'll steal it and then a week later they'll return it.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page51
26of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
27
1 I mean they play games like that. It's psychological
2 warfare along with the theft and damages.
3 Q Were any of these items ever returned to you?
4 A Some. Some were. Then they'd steal them again.
5 I mean I can't keep track. It's hard to keep track of it.
6 Q Okay. As of today, are -- here, I'll show you the
7 list. Tell me if any of those items are in your
8 possession.
9 A Let's see. Well, some of these are damaged. I
10 wished they returned the vapor electronic cigarettes. Now
11 the work gloves they did return. I found where they put
12 them.
13 Q So they are in your possession at least as of
14 today?
15 A Yes, they are. I don't know if they'll stay
16 there.
17 Q Now is there anything that you would like to add
18 to supplement to this list?
19 A As far as the list or evidence or what?
20 Q No, as far as the list of items.
21 A Yeah, I could -- you know, I can update, yeah. I
22 can send them to you.
23 Q Of anything that you would add to that list, would
24 they all have been items in which were lost or damaged --
25 stolen or damaged in the same way as the items that we've
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page52
27of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
28
1 discussed?
2 A Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. I got tired of making --
3 keeping lists. But I -- well, let me do it now. Let me
4 think. Let me see. We talked about the new vapor pen.
5 Okay. Here is a for instance. I went to -- this
6 morning -- I produced an exhibit, a DVD, a disk with this
7 case to the Courts. So I have to make a copy today for
8 myself. The DVD recorder doesn't work on my computer.
9 That happened this morning. Yesterday -- oh, this morning
10 I found that two day's worth of photos in my phone were
11 missing from my computer. Yeah, you know, the list goes on
12 and on. I mean there is nothing -- I'm trying to think of
13 anything substantial because I probably -- well, the toner
14 cartridge. What happens is I have a copier. And when the
15 toner gets low, it will give you a warning that you need to
16 soon replace your toner. Well, I'm producing this
17 document. And at the 611th page, it says black ink toner
18 out, but it never gave me the warning. So they have the
19 capability of actually hacking into my copier because it's
20 a wireless copier. So I had to order a new ink cartridge.
21 Q Now you did mention -- and I don't mean to cut you
22 off. Is there anything else that you want to talk about?
23 A No.
24 Q All right. Now you did mention that you had
25 submitted two similar claims to other insurers?
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page53
28of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
29
1 A Yeah, yeah.
2 Q Tell me about those.
3 A They were in '05 I was paid and '06. It's when
4 I -- okay. It's when I lived at 220 Stonehill Road,
5 Conestoga, PA. The claims were about -- I think they were
6 about the same, somewhere around $6,000. I produced a
7 schedule similar to this, and they paid from that schedule.
8 Now what they did was the one they paid the claim, but they
9 inflated the depreciation value. So I filed a complaint
10 with the Pennsylvania Insurance Commission. Now in 2006 --
11 no, 2007 or 8, after I moved to 1250 Fremont Street, I
12 tried to file a claim. But my brother blocked me from
13 filing that on my mother's property casualty policy. So I
14 would have filed another claim.
15 Now the insurance companies, they have a database
16 of all the insurance claims that are paid out. Are you
17 familiar with that?
18 Q No.
19 A Yeah, there's a database that actuaries use. I
20 don't know how you access it or what. The other thing is I
21 have a correspondence from the Southern Regional Police
22 Department in 2006 -- 5 or 6 regarding all my complaints to
23 them about incidents regarding vandalism and thefts. Now
24 Southern Regional Police covered Conestoga Township back
25 then. Now I went to try to find -- I know I had paperwork
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page54
29of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
30
1 on the claims. I had copies of the checks, copies of the
2 claims, but I can't find them in my computer.
3 Q Do you remember who the insurers were?
4 A Harleysville was for one, maybe both of them, you
5 know. And they were the same type of claims.
6 Q Theft or damaged or --
7 A Just like this, yeah. I tried to find them. I
8 have backup disks now. Unfortunately, there is -- I have
9 three laptop drives and two external hard drives from 2005
10 and 6 that are in my safety deposit box. I ordered
11 equipment so that I could more or less connect those drives
12 to my computer and read them, but the equipment would come
13 and it won't work. So I have them stored. But, you know,
14 until I'm more secure with the computer hacking, I can't do
15 anything with them. But I'm sure the claims are in there
16 even though they took them from my current drive.
17 Q Okay. I don't think I have any more questions for
18 you. Is there anything that you'd like to add to this?
19 A No. If you could tell me what you want other than
20 the receipts.
21 Q There was a letter sent to you I believe sometime
22 between the first examination and the second examination.
23 A I couldn't find it. I tried to find it this
24 morning. That's why I asked you what time. They stole
25 that.
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page55
30of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
31
1 Q I don't think I have --
2 A I think I have a hard copy, but I didn't want to
3 root through my file. I tried to find it on my computer
4 and I couldn't find it. Did you email it or did it come in
5 letter format because I scan everything?
6 Q I believe I was emailed a copy of it, but I
7 think -- I assume it was sent to you in letter format.
8 A Are you talking about the one form Allstate --
9 Q Yes.
10 A -- or the one from you?
11 Q No, no, the one from Allstate.
12 A I have that.
13 Q That's what I'm talking about.
14 A Yeah, I have that. That's right. Yeah, I have
15 that.
16 Q They want a document filled out and --
17 A Right.
18 Q -- forwarded back to them.
19 A Was I supposed to bring that today?
20 Q It would have been helpful, but it's not
21 mandatory. If you could get it back to Mr. Eisenhard. You
22 don't have to send it to me.
23 A Okay.
24 Q Other than that, you know, I don't know that there
25 was -- whatever Allstate had requested. The only thing I
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page56
31of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
32
1 was looking for were the receipts.
2 A Okay.
3 MR. REESER: Okay. And we're done. Thank you
4 very much.
5 THE WITNESS: Yeah.
6 (Whereupon, the examination concluded at 10:12
7 a.m.)
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page57
32of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
33
1 COUNTY OF DAUPHIN :
SS
2 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
3 I, Diane A. Smith, a Notary Public, authorized to
4 administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of
5 Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the
6 testimony of Stanley J. Caterbone.
7 I further certify that before the taking of said
8 examination, the witness was duly sworn; that the questions
9 and answers were taken down stenographically by the said
10 Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to
11 typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter.
12 I further certify that the said examination was
13 taken at the time and place specified in the caption sheet
14 hereof.
15 I further certify that I am not a relative or
16 employee or attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or a
17 relative or employee of such attorney or counsel, or
18 financially interested directly or indirectly in this
19 action.
20 I further certify that the said examination
21 constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the
22 said witness.
23 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
24 this 11th day of July, 2016.
_______________________________________________
25 Diane A. Smith, Reporter
Notary Public
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page58
33of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone Testimony
34
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Allstate
U.S.
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Sworn Testimonies
Testimony
Mind Control
of Intelligence OfficersPage
Page59
34of
of673
548
34 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
28,
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1
EXAMINATION UNDER OATH OF
STANLEY J. CATERBONE
TAKEN BY: ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
BEFORE: DIANE F. FOLTZ, RMR
NOTARY PUBLIC
DATE: JUNE 9, 2016, 9:15 A.M.
PLACE: LANCASTER COUNTY BAR
ASSOCIATION
28 EAST ORANGE STREET
LANCASTER, PENNSYLVANIA
APPEARANCES:
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN
BY: CHRISTOPHER M. REESER, ESQUIRE
FOR - ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page60
1 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
1 WITNESSES
2 NAME EXAMINATION
3 STANLEY J. CATERBONE
4 BY: MR. REESER 3
10
11
12 EXHIBITS
13
14 CATERBONE EXHIBIT PRODUCED AND MARKED
15 1. LIST OF ITEMS 13
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page61
2 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3
1 STANLEY J. CATERBONE, called as a witness, being
2 duly sworn, testified as follows:
3 EXAMINATION
4 BY MR. REESER:
5 Q Could you state your name, please?
6 A Stanley J. Caterbone, C-a-t-e-r-b-o-n-e.
7 Q Would you mind if I called you Stan or Stanley?
8 A Stan.
9 Q Stan, okay. And my name's Chris Reeser. You can
10 call me Chris.
11 A All right.
12 Q I'm not a real formal guy. I have been asked to
13 take a statement from you relative to an insurance claim
14 which I understood to have occurred as a result of
15 something on April 3rd of 2016, but by some correspondence
16 that I received from you, my understanding is that is not
17 the date of loss.
18 A No. That date is the date that I started the
19 spreadsheet --
20 Q Okay.
21 A -- of the items lost or vandalized.
22 Q All right. This statement is part of the process
23 of collecting information and evaluating the claim.
24 Allstate's policy, as does just about any insurance
25 company's policy, provides that part of the duty of an
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page62
3 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
4
1 insured is to give an examination under oath --
2 A Okay.
3 Q -- at the request of the insured -- at the
4 request of the insurer, so that is what this is.
5 A I've had --
6 Q Go ahead. Go ahead.
7 A I've had -- I've collected on two or three
8 policies with the same types of claims, and I've never been
9 put under oath --
10 Q Okay.
11 A -- on the record.
12 Q So noted.
13 A Okay.
14 Q And I'll ask you about that.
15 A And I don't mind under oath.
16 Q All right.
17 A I just, you know --
18 Q All right. Well --
19 A -- have never experienced it.
20 Q Okay. Well, a first time for everything. This
21 is --
22 A Sure.
23 Q This is part of what the insurer is allowed to
24 ask of their insured.
25 A Oh, I don't mind at all.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page63
4 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
5
1 Q Okay. Great. So I'm going to ask you some
2 questions about that.
3 A Okay.
4 Q I usually when I take these statements -- and
5 I've taken a couple of them -- have some information about
6 the claim. I have very little information about this
7 claim.
8 A Okay.
9 Q So --
10 A Can I give you a brief history --
11 Q Go.
12 A -- to put it in perspective?
13 Q Yeah. Go.
14 A I am a federal whistleblower. I blew the whistle
15 on International Signal Control or ISC in 1987. They were
16 indicted in 1991 for a billion dollar fraud and selling
17 illegal arms to Iraq. Now, I was a shareholder, and in
18 1987 they --
19 Q I'm sorry. You were a shareholder in ISC?
20 A Yes. They solicited me to finance some
21 operations. So I'm a legitimate, bona fide whistleblower.
22 Q Okay.
23 A Now, since -- I've been trying to get into
24 courts, hired various attorneys from '87 all the way up.
25 In 2005 I entered the federal court system as a pro se
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page64
5 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
6
1 litigant. I filed my own claims.
2 Q Okay.
3 A Okay. Now, here's what happened. I became a
4 victim of organized stalking, electronic harassment or mind
5 control technologies. Now, what happens is -- and I'll
6 show you some expert testimony -- is that what they do is
7 they break into your home, vandalize, steal, move things
8 around. And since '05 I've collected on two or three
9 policies making the same types of claims. Now, these
10 losses are not a single-day loss. They happen over a
11 period of time.
12 Q Okay.
13 A And I can't give you dates as far as when what
14 was taken, when that was taken, but that's just a
15 background for your reference as far as this is not an
16 ordinary claim.
17 Q When you say they, who is they?
18 A Well, I don't know, you know. It's impossible to
19 say. It could be neighbors. It could be police. It could
20 be agents. It could be anybody.
21 Q But you believe that they are all in conspiracy
22 to punish you because of your activity as a federal
23 whistleblower?
24 A I'm going to refer you to documents to explain
25 that. As a victim of electronic harassment and gang
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page65
6 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
7
1 stalking, the victim -- part of the victimization is that
2 they break into your home.
3 Q Okay. But you don't know who the they is?
4 A Well, of course not.
5 Q Have you ever seen anybody in the act?
6 A I have one person on a security camera video.
7 Q Okay.
8 A That was in 2006.
9 Q And was there an insurance claim related to that?
10 A Not to that particular person, no.
11 Q All right.
12 A But there was a claim that year. Harleysville
13 paid me once or twice, and there was another one. But
14 unfortunately I'm also the victim of computer hacking.
15 These are all the reports from the past year on Geek Squad
16 and other companies reviewing and analyzing and fixing my
17 hard drives after they've been hacked.
18 Q Okay.
19 A I filed about, oh, boy, since '06 or '07 probably
20 about four or five IC3 reports with the FBI.
21 Q I don't know what an IC3 report is.
22 A It's an online complaint regarding anything
23 fraudulent online to the FBI.
24 Q Okay.
25 A I've had face-to-face meetings with the FBI
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page66
7 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
8
1 probably about 15 times.
2 Q Locally?
3 A Philly and Harrisburg.
4 Q Is there a particular agent that you meet with?
5 A No. No.
6 Q Could you tell me the names of any of the agents
7 that you meet with?
8 A No.
9 Q Okay.
10 A I can verify the meetings, I mean.
11 Q What -- what's the reason for the meetings?
12 A Complaints --
13 Q Okay.
14 A -- about people, what they're doing to me.
15 Q You said you're a victim of electronic
16 harassment. Now, I understand what computer hacking is.
17 A Okay. Electronic harassment.
18 Q What have been the other forms?
19 A They use microwave technology, microwaves to
20 alter your brain state. It causes extreme -- they can
21 cause extreme pain in any part of your body. They can
22 create synthetic telepathy. They can essentially kill you
23 with the weapons.
24 Now, in the 1950's the Russians used it against
25 our -- the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, the same weapons. Now,
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page67
8 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
9
1 in the 1970's there was what's called the Church Committee.
2 The CIA had to come clean on these programs. They were
3 supposed to have stopped them, but they didn't, and that's
4 -- there's Senate testimony. The Director of the CIA back
5 then was Stansfield Turner. He testified before the
6 Senate, and they admitted to all the programs that I'm
7 describing.
8 Q Okay.
9 A MKUltra was the main program.
10 Q How do you know that?
11 A How do I know what?
12 Q I mean, how do you know you're a victim of
13 microwave technology to alter your brain waves?
14 A Some nights I can't walk. The pain is that bad.
15 What do you mean how do I know?
16 Q I mean, I don't know.
17 A Don't get smart with me, or I'll walk out this
18 door.
19 Q I don't know. I'm not being smart. I'm trying
20 to understand this.
21 A Okay.
22 Q How do I -- you know, how do I know I'm not?
23 A Do you ever complain about it?
24 Q I mean, I have pain. I don't know why I have
25 pain. I just -- I'm trying to understand.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page68
9 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
10
1 A Listen, yesterday I filed 300 pages in the
2 Pennsylvania Supreme Court on a case against Lancaster City
3 Police and the county residents.
4 Q Okay.
5 A There are -- there is expert testimony in here
6 from, one, an NSA whistleblower named Karen Stewart who
7 will back up just about everything I say. The second is
8 from a Julianne McKinney who is a former Army intelligence
9 officer. The third is from a renowned expert named Nick
10 Begich whose father was killed by someone in the Hoover
11 Administration. There are transcripts in here. You can
12 read them.
13 Q Okay.
14 A You can learn all about it.
15 Q May I have this?
16 A No. You can make a copy.
17 Q Okay.
18 A Or I can give you it in electronic format. I
19 have a PDF around my neck. I'll give you a copy.
20 Q Well, I see that it's a Petition for Allowance of
21 Appeal which means that it's --
22 A I'm appealing a Superior Court decision to the
23 Pennsylvania Supreme Court.
24 Q Okay.
25 A I'm a very successful litigator by the way.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page69
10of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
11
1 Q How --
2 A I'm the amicus for Kathleen Kane in her criminal
3 case in the Superior Court in Philadelphia. I'm also the
4 movant for Lisa Michelle Lambert.
5 Q Okay.
6 A I've got three Third Circuit cases now that are
7 awaiting decisions.
8 Q And this is an appeal from the Lancaster County
9 Court of Common Pleas. I assume it went then to the
10 Superior Court?
11 A I took it to the Superior Court, right.
12 Q Okay. And what happened there?
13 A They dismissed it --
14 Q Okay.
15 A -- two weeks before oral arguments. Oral
16 arguments were scheduled for May 24th.
17 Q Okay.
18 A They were scheduled since January. Both cases
19 were arguably -- I mean, maliciously dismissed two weeks
20 before oral arguments. They didn't want me to appear
21 before them.
22 Q Okay. Give me some background. I mean, you said
23 you worked -- maybe I misheard you. Did you work for ISC?
24 A No.
25 Q Okay. You were a stockholder?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page70
11of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
12
1 A Yes. Gib Armstrong sold me the stock in 1983.
2 Q Okay.
3 A He was a stockbroker back then. Do you know who
4 he is? Former Pennsylvania Senator.
5 Q Yeah, I'm familiar with the name. Are you
6 employed right now?
7 A No, I'm -- I collect Social Security disability
8 for symptoms and illnesses related to U.S. mind control,
9 documented, verified.
10 Q Huh.
11 A They've been paying me since '08.
12 Q Okay. Do they -- do they pay you by the month
13 for that? Is it --
14 A You never heard of Social Security disability?
15 Q I have.
16 A Yeah.
17 Q Okay.
18 A My first check was for $21,000. They paid me. I
19 applied in '09. They declared me disabled in December of
20 '05 when I declared I was full-time telepathic, but they
21 could only pay me back one year. So they paid me back '08
22 to '09 in one check, and then I've been getting monthly
23 checks ever since.
24 Q Okay. Well, let's talk about this claim a little
25 bit.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page71
12of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
13
1 A Okay.
2 Q I'm going to have this marked as Exhibit 1.
3 A I have a new one here.
4 Q Okay. Well, why don't you -- why don't we mark
5 -- can I take that, or do you need that?
6 A Yeah. No. This is for you.
7 Q Okay. We won't mark the one I have.
8 A Here. That's updated. Every day I have stuff
9 missing.
10 MR. REESER: Okay. Do you want to put a sticker
11 on there?
12 (List of items produced and marked Exhibit No.
13 1.)
14 BY MR. REESER:
15 Q All right. Now, I'm just going to go through
16 these items that you have --
17 A Yeah.
18 Q -- listed in order from top to bottom. You're
19 making a claim for a dishwasher?
20 A Right.
21 Q Is this a dishwasher that was in your home?
22 A Yeah, but you know -- I'm trying to think what
23 year that was actually broken. That might predate this.
24 Scratch the dishwasher off of that.
25 Q The dishwasher is not being claimed, correct?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page72
13of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
14
1 A Yes. Yes, let's take that off.
2 Q All right. And I should ask you this beforehand.
3 I kind of lost track. Your brief or your petition that was
4 filed to the Supreme Court listed an address of 1250
5 Freemont Street. That's -- that's your home address?
6 A Yes.
7 Q Okay. Does anybody else live there with you?
8 A No.
9 Q All right.
10 A In fact, I sent a copy of the deed in with the
11 claim.
12 Q I believe I saw that, which I think there were a
13 number of grantees.
14 A My brothers.
15 Q Okay. But none of them live there?
16 A No.
17 Q And they wouldn't be insured under the Allstate
18 policy?
19 A Yeah, they're listed as other insureds.
20 Q Okay.
21 A Yeah.
22 Q Okay. Do any of these items -- are they owners
23 of any of the items?
24 A No. I purchased the policy for everybody.
25 Q Okay. Front and back door locks?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page73
14of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
15
1 A Right.
2 Q Tell me about that.
3 A Okay. In July of 2015 -- yeah, July, 2015, the
4 benevolent Lancaster City Police Department served me with
5 a 302 petition, but what they did was they broke into my
6 house, smashed in the front door. Now, they were supposed
7 to pay for all the locks and the door, but they didn't.
8 So I had to get a new front door, and I had to
9 get all the locks changed in the front and back door,
10 rekeyed.
11 Q Okay. 302 petition?
12 A Mental health warrant.
13 Q All right.
14 A I've had about eight of them. That's what they
15 do. That's part of the slander campaign.
16 Q What do they --
17 A That's pretty routine.
18 Q What do they claim?
19 A Well, I'm mentally ill. I make all this up.
20 Q Okay.
21 A That's their -- that's their defense.
22 Q Is there a form of mental illness that they try
23 to pin on you?
24 A Oh, yeah.
25 Q What?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page74
15of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
16
1 A Which one do you want? What year?
2 Q Oh, there's been more than one?
3 A Bipolar, schizophrenic, delusional disorder, you
4 name it.
5 Q Okay. Were you hospitalized or
6 institutionalized --
7 A Oh, yeah.
8 Q -- as a result -- as a result of this one, the
9 one in July?
10 A Oh, yeah, Fairmont.
11 Q For how long?
12 A Oh, that was about five -- eight days, I guess.
13 Q And how did that end?
14 A They always -- they give me a hearing. Then they
15 have to release me.
16 Q Okay.
17 A They're always pretty much the same. It started
18 in '87. The first one was was somebody called up the Stone
19 Harbor Beach Patrol. My resume's in there. But in 1987 I
20 was making a movie with Tony Bongiovi who owns Power
21 Station Studios, one of the world's most famous recording
22 studios.
23 In 1987 we're making a movie. I rented a home
24 for an office down in Stone Harbor. We were going to shoot
25 the movie in New Jersey on the boardwalk. Somebody called
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page75
16of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
17
1 the Stone Harbor Police Department and said I was running
2 to the beach to kill myself, totally made up, fabricated.
3 That's how it all started with the mental illness.
4 Q Okay. So going back to the door for a second --
5 A Okay.
6 Q Smashed in your front door?
7 A Oh, yeah, with -- like a drug raid. I stood
8 there and took pictures of them as they came through.
9 Q Do you actually have the pictures?
10 A Oh, yeah, it's part of it.
11 Q Part of?
12 A The -- they're in here. Oh, let me see. Where
13 are they? No, they're in this one. This one. No. These
14 are black and white. They're hard to see, but the next two
15 pages. Totally illegal what they did. The only way, the
16 only reason you could do that is if someone -- is if you
17 knew that someone was in there with a gun to their head. I
18 was in -- I was in the upstairs window talking to them
19 trying to get them to get away from me quite honestly.
20 Q Okay.
21 A I filed a lawsuit against Lancaster City Police
22 in '08. It's a federal lawsuit. In fact, that's part of
23 one of the documents I have here.
24 Q Is that still ongoing?
25 A I withdrew without prejudice because of the
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page76
17of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
18
1 computer hacking, so I can re-file, go back to it any time
2 I want.
3 Q Okay.
4 A Most of my lawsuits I withdrew without prejudice.
5 I just couldn't litigate with all the hacking.
6 Q Can -- do you have any photographs that show the
7 damage to the door? I mean, I see a door that's open. I
8 see a police officer --
9 A Yeah.
10 Q -- apparently standing there.
11 A Yeah. Yeah, I do.
12 Q Okay.
13 A In fact, I bought the door at the Habitat reuse
14 it store. But what happened was they charged me like $400
15 to change all the locks. Wizard Lock did it.
16 Q Do you have -- do you have the receipt for that?
17 A Yeah, I could dig that up.
18 Q You don't have it with you right now?
19 A No.
20 Q You bought the door -- I'm sorry -- Habitat?
21 A For Humanity.
22 Q Habitat? I'm a little hard of hearing.
23 A Habitat for Humanity.
24 Q Oh, Habitat for Humanity.
25 A The reuse it store.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page77
18of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
19
1 Q Reuse it.
2 A Out on Old Philadelphia Pike back behind
3 Greenfield. The door looks brand new, I mean, a better
4 door than was on there.
5 Q The door, the replacement door you bought there?
6 A Yeah.
7 Q What about the original door, was that -- had
8 that been there for years?
9 A No, that was done in 1996. My mother was part of
10 the Lancaster City Homeowners Rehab or Revitalization or
11 Rehab Program where if you qualify, they'll come in and
12 rehab your home, bring it up to code and put a seven-year
13 lien on your house for the cost of the improvements. Each
14 year 10 -- 10 or 15 percent comes off, so if you stay in
15 the house for 7 years, it's all free.
16 Q I see.
17 A So the doors are part of that.
18 Q Okay.
19 A '96 at the time.
20 Q And you may have said this. I apologize if I
21 didn't get it. How much did you actually pay for the door
22 that -- the replacement door?
23 A $20.
24 Q $20?
25 A Yes.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page78
19of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
20
1 Q But it cost you 400 to get the locks replaced?
2 A Yeah. Yeah.
3 Q And that was done again by?
4 A Wizard.
5 Q Wizard.
6 A Locks.
7 Q And you can get me the receipt?
8 A Yeah.
9 Q And my question about that was going to be did
10 you report this to the police, but I guess given the
11 circumstances --
12 A Here's the situation. I've -- I've been
13 reporting to the police ever since it started, but usually
14 they're part of the program. They won't take my
15 complaints. I mean, I had to sue them. That's why I had
16 to sue them.
17 Q Okay.
18 A I have letters which are a part of the documents
19 going to the police explaining the vandalism and the
20 break-ins that they won't, you know, report on or
21 investigate or...
22 Q And this happened July of '15?
23 A July 8th, I think, yeah, 2015.
24 Q July 8th, 2015, okay. Was there any other damage
25 done, physical damage to your house done --
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page79
20of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
21
1 A No.
2 Q -- as a result of that incident?
3 A Just the door.
4 Q Okay. The next one I have on your list is an
5 Apple Video iPod.
6 A Right. What they did was I can't -- the menu
7 button doesn't work. Now, that iPod I bought back in 2006,
8 '05 or '06.
9 Q Okay.
10 A I since bought a replacement for it.
11 Q All right. You bought -- this particular Apple
12 Video iPod you bought in '05 or '06?
13 A Yeah.
14 Q Where did you buy it at?
15 A I might have bought it at a Best Buy in Florida.
16 Q Okay. Do you remember what you paid for it?
17 A Boy, 3, $400 probably.
18 Q Okay. And then when did you --
19 A It's when they first came out, so the video iPods
20 were expensive.
21 Q Yeah. This wasn't an iPhone. This was --
22 A No.
23 Q -- just an iPod?
24 A Right, video iPod.
25 Q And then you noticed a problem with it when?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page80
21of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
22
1 A The button, you can't push the button, the main
2 button.
3 Q Okay. When did you discover that?
4 A Oh, boy. Let me think. That was probably in the
5 fall of '15.
6 Q Okay. Did you take it to --
7 A No.
8 Q -- Best Buy or a repair store?
9 A No, you can't. No. No.
10 Q Why not?
11 A Why?
12 Q I mean, if I had a problem with my iPhone and
13 I --
14 A I'm not going to pay to get it fixed.
15 Q Okay.
16 A I bought a replacement.
17 Q Okay. Why is that -- I'm not -- I don't
18 understand why that's part of the insurance claim.
19 A Because it was in my house and the house is
20 covered by the insurance.
21 Q I mean, how do you know it just didn't -- I mean,
22 things wear down over time. I mean --
23 A I'm telling you the truth. If you don't believe
24 me, that's fine, but don't -- don't harass me with
25 questions.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page81
22of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
23
1 Q I'm here to ask you questions, sir. I'm just
2 trying to get an understanding as to -- things wear out.
3 A I told you what happened.
4 Q Okay.
5 A They broke it.
6 Q They broke it?
7 A Yes, someone broke it.
8 Q All right.
9 A It's funny. One day the button works, and the
10 next day it doesn't.
11 Q Okay. Bluetooth headset for phone.
12 A Right.
13 Q How old --
14 A I've had probably three stolen.
15 Q Oh, it was stolen?
16 A Oh, yeah.
17 Q Okay. When?
18 A I don't remember. In the past year. I had three
19 or four stolen. I had to buy replacements.
20 Q Okay. Well, you list $60, and that sounds about
21 what the value of a new Bluetooth would be.
22 A Oh, no. No. That's for three of them, I think.
23 Q Oh, okay.
24 A Does it say three beside there?
25 Q No, it doesn't. Well, no. It says item number,
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page82
23of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
24
1 but they're consecutive. I'm assuming that's not -- that's
2 not a quantity.
3 A Oh, didn't the quantity print out? Let me see
4 that. Oh, the quantity didn't print out. No. That should
5 be three.
6 Q All right.
7 A I paid like 20 bucks apiece for them up at Radio
8 Shack. Maybe I didn't put the quantity in.
9 Q Do you have the receipts for them?
10 A I'm not going to dig up all these receipts. I'm
11 really not. I'm a busy guy. I can't be -- you know, this
12 is harassment.
13 Q Does that mean you don't have them, or you're
14 just not going to -- you're not going to dig them up?
15 A I'm not going to take the time to dig them up.
16 Q Okay.
17 A I have all my receipts. I have my tax returns
18 back to '80, '82.
19 Q Okay.
20 A I document everything. I'm an expert in
21 information technologies.
22 Q Where in your house --
23 A I have worked all over the world for the record.
24 I did defense contracts, optical publishing. I was one
25 of -- I was one of four companies in the late '80's, early
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page83
24of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
25
1 '90's that could manufacture CD-ROMs, me alone. I know my
2 business.
3 Q Okay. Where in your house were the headsets that
4 were stolen?
5 A Where did I have them?
6 Q Yeah. In the bedroom, living room?
7 A It depends where I was. What do you mean?
8 Q Where were they stolen from?
9 A Most likely either the bedroom which is in the
10 basement. Yeah, the bedroom. Yeah.
11 Q Was there any sign of unlawful entry?
12 A No, never is. You'll read, the experts tell you
13 about that.
14 Q And I assume there was no report to the police
15 about these --
16 A I can't report to the police anymore.
17 Q Okay. Is it fair to say that with regard to any
18 of these items you haven't -- so I don't have to keep
19 asking you this, that you didn't report it to the police?
20 A They get emails from me, but, no, there's no
21 official report.
22 Q All right.
23 A The last official report I made was two thousand
24 -- was July 8th of 2015. I went down to the police again
25 to report the computer hacking, and that night at 11:30
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page84
25of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
26
1 they signed the mental health warrant on me --
2 Q Okay.
3 A -- and gave me a bogus incident report.
4 Q All right. The Bluetooth headsets, the three of
5 them were taken after that?
6 A After what?
7 Q After the 302 petition.
8 A Let me think. Yeah. Yeah.
9 Q Okay. You don't have any idea who it was who
10 took them?
11 A If I did I'd give you a name and report that to
12 everybody.
13 Q Okay. The hammer drill.
14 A Yes. They broke it. I'd say March 9th I started
15 my -- I'd say in March, 2016. I'm putting on a new
16 screened-in porch on my back and a six-foot fence. One day
17 it worked. The next day it didn't. So I had to go out and
18 buy a replacement.
19 Q How old was it?
20 A I bought that one -- that's about the second or
21 third one they broke. That one I bought on eBay in
22 probably -- when did I buy that one? Maybe '08.
23 Q Do you still have it?
24 A No.
25 Q Did you throw it out?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page85
26of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
27
1 A Yeah.
2 Q All right. You didn't take it someplace to see
3 if it could be fixed?
4 A No.
5 Q What did you buy it for, how much?
6 A How much?
7 Q How much.
8 A Oh, boy. That was a DeWalt. New they're like --
9 I don't know -- $300 I think, 280. I probably paid -- I
10 think I paid 60 something for that, somewhere around $60 --
11 Q Okay.
12 A -- on eBay.
13 Q And then did you buy a replacement for it?
14 A Yeah.
15 Q What did that cost?
16 A The replacement I bought at -- oh, the tool store
17 out there next to the off-track betting. What's the name
18 of it? Harbor Tools.
19 Q Harbor Freight?
20 A Harbor Freight. I paid I think 60 for the hammer
21 drill.
22 Q Okay. But you have -- you have 100 listed here,
23 so --
24 A What is it? Maybe it was 100.
25 Q Maybe 100?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page86
27of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
28
1 A Maybe.
2 Q Okay. Reciprocating saw.
3 A Yeah. What they did was they rigged it so that
4 the blade doesn't stay in. You can't use it. It just --
5 Q When you turn it on it comes out?
6 A Well, when you use it, it comes out when you're
7 sawing.
8 Q Okay.
9 A You can't -- you can't tighten it. It used to
10 work, but it stopped. That replacement I bought -- I think
11 I bought that at Lowe's.
12 Q The one, the one that's broken or the one, the
13 replacement one?
14 A The replacement.
15 Q Where did you buy the one that's broken?
16 A Harbor Tools.
17 Q Harbor Freight?
18 A Harbor Freight.
19 Q Okay. Just so we're on the same page. When did
20 you buy that?
21 A Oh, boy. Let's see. I might have bought that in
22 '06. '05. '05, '06.
23 Q Okay. Did you use that on a regular basis or
24 just once in a while?
25 A What do you mean on a regular basis?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page87
28of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
29
1 Q Did you use it once a week? Did you use it --
2 A No. No. No. No.
3 Q Okay.
4 A No. No. Reciprocating saws I probably used less
5 than any other tool actually.
6 Q I mean, a couple times?
7 A But if I have a project I might use it a lot in a
8 two-week span.
9 Q Yeah. I mean, some people are do-it-yourself,
10 fixer-upper kind of people, and some people --
11 A Well, I used to have a contracting business in
12 college.
13 Q All right.
14 A Stan Caterbone Painting and Renovating.
15 Q But you bought this in '05, '06? I mean, I'm
16 assuming --
17 A Right.
18 Q -- you were out of college by then.
19 A I'm just saying I have experience. I'm not just
20 a do-it-yourselfer.
21 Q Well, no. My -- some people do a lot of work
22 with their tools, and other people --
23 A Oh, I do.
24 Q -- don't.
25 A I do.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page88
29of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
30
1 Q Okay. And that's what I'm getting at. I'm
2 trying to understand.
3 A I do.
4 Q I don't.
5 A Okay.
6 Q So I could have something for ten years, and it
7 doesn't get any use at all.
8 A No. I understand.
9 Q And some people have it --
10 A I use my tools.
11 Q -- for ten years, and they use it every day.
12 A I use my stuff.
13 Q Fair enough. And you got a replacement at
14 Lowe's, and you have $100 here. Is that about what you
15 paid for the replacement?
16 A Uh-huh.
17 Q Do you have the receipt?
18 A Yeah.
19 Q Okay. Is it fair to say you're not going to dig
20 that up?
21 A No. No. I'm not going to do that.
22 Q Okay.
23 A I didn't have to for the other claims. I'm not
24 going to do it for your company.
25 Q Okay. IPhone 5C, was that stolen?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page89
30of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
31
1 A Broken.
2 Q When?
3 A In fact, I got scammed on that, the 5C, the end
4 of last year. Here's what happened. They broke it, right,
5 so I put it on eBay to sell it so someone could reprogram
6 it, the software. I assumed the software was what was
7 broken on it because it functioned, everything, but the
8 software was not functioning. Okay.
9 So I put it on eBay. Right. Somebody bought it.
10 They hacked my PayPal account. So someone said that they
11 paid me with electronic funds. Well, PayPal doesn't use
12 electronic funds. PayPal you use your account to transfer
13 the money. Right.
14 Q Like a Visa account?
15 A What's that?
16 Q Or a PayPal account. Oh, a PayPal account.
17 A PayPal account.
18 Q Okay.
19 A So what they did was they filed a claim saying
20 that I never sent them the iPhone. I wasn't going to send
21 it until I got -- until I verified the money was in my
22 account.
23 Q Uh-huh.
24 A But because my PayPal account was hacked, I
25 couldn't access my PayPal account. Right. Now, in my
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page90
31of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
32
1 PayPal account I had a cash balance of like $400. So eBay
2 went and awarded them judgment. In eBay terms I'm saying
3 judgment.
4 Q Uh-huh.
5 A So they took the $150 or whatever selling price
6 out of my account, so I'm out the phone, plus the $150.
7 Q Okay.
8 A So they scammed me. All my accounts are hacked.
9 I file -- in all the courts I have electronic filing
10 privileges, Third Circuit, U.S. District Court, all the
11 state courts, the local courts. Right. My PACER account
12 which is the system where you file electronically --
13 Q I'm familiar with PACER.
14 A -- I've been hacked since, oh, boy, November. So
15 I got to run down to Philly every two weeks --
16 Q Okay.
17 A -- to get my dockets, just to get dockets for all
18 my cases.
19 Q Let me go back. I'm -- you lost me on the phone
20 at some point.
21 A Okay.
22 Q You had the phone. You were looking to sell the
23 phone?
24 A Right, after it was unusable to me.
25 Q After it was unusable. Why was it unusable to
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page91
32of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
33
1 you? Because there was a software problem?
2 A It just didn't -- it wouldn't function for me.
3 Q Okay. How old was the phone?
4 A So I replaced it. I went to Samsung. I got out
5 of Apple. I had too many problems with Apple.
6 Q How old --
7 A Apple wouldn't fix it. Apple wouldn't do this.
8 They were harassing me on every -- I called customer
9 service about it, and they had harassed me, and I had to
10 report that, so I said the hell with it. So I went to
11 Radio Shack, and under Sprint's program they would pay your
12 old phone off if you're on a contract. So I went and now I
13 have a Samsung.
14 Q How old was the phone at the time that you tried
15 to sell it through eBay?
16 A A couple months old.
17 Q Okay.
18 A Five months old I think.
19 Q Was it under any warranty program with Apple
20 or --
21 A I had a warranty through Verizon, but I had to
22 cut them out.
23 Q I don't follow you.
24 A I had to get off of Verizon.
25 Q Okay. So the phone wasn't fixable; you tried to
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page92
33of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
34
1 sell it; you got scammed on the PayPal?
2 A Yeah.
3 Q And eBay basically ruled against you?
4 A Yeah, I can't even access eBay. I can't buy
5 anything on eBay anymore.
6 Q Okay.
7 A I'm hacked, every -- all my online accounts.
8 Q Okay.
9 A Banking, bank accounts, PayPal, eBay, PACER. I
10 filed complaints with the FBI, the Pennsylvania Attorney
11 General's Office, everybody.
12 Q When did this happen?
13 A What happen?
14 Q The phone, the attempt to sell the phone.
15 A I think January.
16 Q Of this year?
17 A Yes, '16. I think January.
18 Q Did you file a complaint with the Attorney
19 General's Office or --
20 A Oh.
21 Q About this situation?
22 A I file complaints with them all the time.
23 Q Okay.
24 A Like I say, I am the amicus for Kathleen Kane in
25 Superior Court Case 1164 EDA 2016. I filed an amicus brief
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page93
34of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
35
1 May 3rd, so I'm a party to the case now. They have to file
2 everything to me.
3 Q Okay.
4 A Service me everything.
5 Q And I understand, you know, that process to some
6 extent, but what does it have to do with this? I mean, if
7 it has relevance, I'm all ears. I just don't know.
8 A Okay. In 1998 I had a meeting with an agent from
9 the NSA. I was complaining again about things, and he told
10 me, he said, listen, Stan. He goes it's not us. He said
11 it's the good old boys. This was in 1998.
12 Now, when Kathleen Kane started in the press,
13 she's been saying that the good old boys are behind her
14 problems. So November 12th I wrote her a letter, and I
15 stated for the record what the NSA agent told me about the
16 good old boys and how it relates to what she was saying.
17 Q Uh-huh. Okay.
18 A She replied back the next day, said she'd keep my
19 information on file. Ever since then from November till a
20 month or so ago I'd go up there every two weeks and deliver
21 documents to Strawberry Square to the Attorney General's
22 Office.
23 Q Okay. Tell me about the screen door locks.
24 A I finally thought, you know what, I'll put screen
25 door locks on on my screen doors.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page94
35of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
36
1 Q Uh-huh.
2 A It didn't stop anything. They'd break them.
3 They'd work. They wouldn't work.
4 Q Are they still there?
5 A I had to replace one or two of them.
6 Q Did you do that yourself?
7 A Oh, yeah.
8 Q Do they work now?
9 A Yes. Well, supposedly. I mean, one time they
10 didn't work.
11 Q Okay. Where did you buy the replacements?
12 A Lowe's.
13 Q For $30 it looks like?
14 A Yeah. Is that what's on there?
15 Q Yes. Okay. When did you replace them?
16 A That was within two months ago.
17 Q Okay. Sleepy's foam mattress. I'm sorry. Foam
18 memory mattress.
19 A Here's the situation with that. On the record,
20 I've been suffering from back pain since '87. Since I'd
21 say '98 I've been going to the doctors on and off for it.
22 Last year I got a handicapped placard, and in the process I
23 used my medical reports regarding my back. So I got a
24 handicapped placard, and I got a long-term placard which
25 means it doesn't renew until 2020.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page95
36of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
37
1 Q Okay.
2 A Now, what they were doing is that aside from the
3 electromagnetic weapons, people were using some type of
4 device to put under my seats and under my bed that causes
5 excruciating pain.
6 Now, since '05 I was going up and getting laser
7 treatments to Leola Family Health Clinic in Leola.
8 Q Did you say Leola?
9 A Yes.
10 Q Thank you.
11 A Now, the doctor there, the chiropractor, he's the
12 one that signed off on my handicapped placard.
13 Q Okay.
14 A He verified that if they -- they could be using
15 magnets. It can throw my back out to cause pain. So
16 that's what the Sleepy's is for.
17 Q All right.
18 A Now, whether -- I mean, well, go ahead. You ask
19 the questions.
20 Q Have you actually found magnets?
21 A No.
22 Q All right. You're not sure where they are within
23 the mattress?
24 A I'm not sure. No, I'm not. No. I'm not sure
25 how they do it, but they used to do it to my bicycle seat,
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page96
37of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
38
1 my car seat, my bed. Now, some nights I'm fine in the bed.
2 Other nights...
3 Q And you know when they're doing it based upon
4 when you have the pain?
5 A Yes, it's the only way I know.
6 Q Okay. What's the nature of your back problem?
7 Herniated disc, do you have a degenerative condition?
8 A No.
9 Q Do you have -- I mean, you're going to a
10 chiropractor. Is he -- is he treating you for anything?
11 A I was getting laser treatments, but it stopped
12 being effective.
13 Q Okay.
14 A So now the only treatment really is I'm applying
15 to Medicare. I'm trying to get a whirlpool bath put in my
16 house. I'm trying to get them to pay for that. And pain
17 medicines.
18 Q Okay. And what's the diagnosis other than -- I
19 mean, are you -- something other than back pain I presume?
20 A I have that in here, I believe.
21 Q I'm going to get myself some more coffee over
22 there. Would you like any coffee or water?
23 A Water would be good.
24 Q I assume there's water in that pitcher. If not,
25 I can go out and get you some.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page97
38of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
39
1 A Let me see what document I have right here.
2 MR. REESER: And off the record.
3 (Off the record.)
4 THE WITNESS: No, I didn't bring my medical file
5 with me.
6 BY MR. REESER:
7 Q Okay. That's all right. I mean, if you know.
8 A If I know what?
9 Q If you know the answer to that question.
10 A What was the question?
11 Q The question was what's the medical diagnosis?
12 A Oh, it's a medical term. I can't.
13 Q That's fine. If you don't -- if you don't know,
14 that's fine as well.
15 A I went to -- okay. January 29th medical -- Med
16 Express Urgent Care issued me pain medications. March 23rd
17 they issued me pain medications, all for back. May 10th
18 they issued me pain medications.
19 In 2009 I was receiving pain medicines from
20 Dr. Sullivan at the Abbeyville Family Clinic on Abbeyille
21 Road for back pain, severe. It gets severe. I have to use
22 a walker some nights.
23 Q I think you said you went to Leola Chiropractic?
24 A Yeah, Leola Family Health Clinic. Family Health
25 Clinic.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page98
39of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
40
1 Q That's not a chiropractor. That's a medical
2 doctor?
3 A No, he's inside there. It's a -- it's a facility
4 where they have different doctors.
5 Q Okay.
6 A Dr. Newhart, Paul Newhart, he was giving me laser
7 treatments. I saw an article in the paper in '05 or '06 I
8 guess it was about laser therapy. Now they're using it for
9 the NFL. But it was effective for a while, and then it
10 stopped being effective a couple years ago, so I stopped.
11 Q When did you buy the bed?
12 A I bought the bed three months ago.
13 Q Where did you buy it at?
14 A Sleepy's, Manor Shopping Center.
15 Q Okay.
16 A Now, I put the bed on there. You understand why
17 I put it on there? Now, if you went and saw the bed, you
18 wouldn't think anything's wrong with it, but I'm putting it
19 on to document just what I'm telling you.
20 Q Okay. You still use the mattress?
21 A Oh, yeah. Yeah, because it's a memory foam with
22 a -- it vibrates. It moves in three different positions,
23 the head, the mid-section, and for my back it's great.
24 Q Queen size, king size?
25 A Full.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence OfficersPage
Page99
40of
of 673
548
51 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
41
1 Q Is that smaller than queen?
2 A Yeah, not by much though.
3 Q So if you're not having the back issues --
4 A Perfectly normal.
5 Q Then it's perfectly -- okay.
6 A Yeah.
7 Q All right. And $2,300, is that what you paid for
8 it?
9 A Yeah.
10 Q Okay. Laptop computers.
11 A Oh, which ones?
12 Q How many do you have?
13 A How many did I have? How many are broken? How
14 many's listed on there?
15 Q There's no number there.
16 A Let me see. I don't know why those quantities
17 aren't in there.
18 Q Yeah.
19 A Let me see. The policy goes -- the policy goes
20 back to '11, so it would have been one, two -- that would
21 be right. Two.
22 Q Okay.
23 A Two laptops, 400 bucks apiece. That's about
24 right.
25 Q What kind of laptops, what brand?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page100
41 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
42
1 A Oh, boy. HP. What was the last one? Compaq.
2 Q What happened to them?
3 A They just sabotage them. They fry the hard
4 drives and everything. They just fry them. Viruses
5 usually. That's what this document is. It's all in there.
6 Q So they've crashed as a result of the viruses?
7 The hard drives have crashed?
8 A Oh, yeah. Yeah.
9 Q Have you looked into replacing the hard drives?
10 A It is -- cost, it's not effective. It's not --
11 it's not worth it because by the time you pay to do that,
12 it's already outdated technology, so you're going to have
13 an old processor. You know, it just doesn't --
14 Q No, I -- I understand. The economics of it
15 sometimes --
16 A So what happened, so in August of last year, the
17 last laptop I replaced, I got a one-year service for Geek
18 Squad. I've been in there about 20 times.
19 Q The laptops --
20 A Fixing -- fixing the one I have.
21 Q Okay. These aren't -- the ones that the Geek
22 Squad's fixing, they're not the HP or the Compaq?
23 A Oh, no. No.
24 Q Okay.
25 A That's a Lenovo I have now.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page101
42 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
43
1 Q The HP and the Compaq, how old were those?
2 A Within a year, a year old.
3 Q When did they crash?
4 A Well, the last one crashed August of 2015. The
5 one before that was probably -- let's see. Compaq, '15.
6 Maybe 2012. Probably two thousand and -- maybe '13. Maybe
7 2013.
8 Q Did you make any report to your insurance agent
9 or to Allstate about the one that crashed in '13 before --
10 A No.
11 Q -- last month?
12 A No. I do -- no, this is the way I do this. I do
13 it in bulk. It's too time consuming. I'm too busy with
14 litigation. I'm too busy trying to defend myself and
15 everything else, too busy documenting things I have to
16 document.
17 Q Okay. The next item you have is cost to repair
18 computers from hacking.
19 A Right.
20 Q Which -- are you talking about the same
21 computers?
22 A Yeah.
23 Q The --
24 A I went to -- I went to other services after Geek
25 Squad was not performing their service effectively.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page102
43 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
44
1 Q Let me hold you up for a second now. We talked
2 about the HP and the Compaq, and then you said you bought a
3 warranty in August to have a different computer serviced
4 by --
5 A A Lenovo.
6 Q -- the Geek Squad?
7 A Right.
8 Q Denovo?
9 A Lenovo.
10 Q Lenovo?
11 A L-e-n-o-v-o.
12 Q Is that the one that you're making the claim to
13 have repaired?
14 A I had that serviced, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, I had it
15 done by the people on Harrisburg Pike there. He just
16 moved, right there at The Grille there, near the campus. I
17 forget what his name is.
18 Q Near F&M you mean?
19 A Yeah, The Campus Grille. He had a computer
20 repair shop in there, but he just moved. I think he moved
21 out to Liberty Place or somewhere.
22 Q And you paid $400 for that?
23 A No. That was -- to the repair?
24 Q Yeah.
25 A Let me see. Cost to repair computers from
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page103
44 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
45
1 hacking. I guess that's cumulative over the past four
2 years.
3 Q Okay.
4 A That's probably what that is. A Plus on Columbia
5 Avenue. Here's what happened. Last year I made a formal
6 complaint to the Lancaster DA's Office. Okay. I met with
7 the detective. He goes, well, Stan, he goes, listen. He
8 goes you're going to have to do something for me. You're
9 going to have to go get a private firm, analyze your
10 computer and get a report. I did that, paid for it, never
11 seen the detective since.
12 Q Okay.
13 A He never returned my calls. He never -- I guess
14 I called him out on it. I guess he thought, you know, I
15 wasn't going to do it, or it was going to come back saying
16 there wasn't a virus in it or it wasn't hacked, but he was
17 wrong, so he flew the coop from me.
18 Q So the $400 is cumulative --
19 A Yes.
20 Q -- for three different computers?
21 A Three or four.
22 Q And this would be over how many years span?
23 A Three or four years.
24 Q Okay. Do you have the bills for any of those
25 repairs?
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page104
45 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
46
1 A A lot of them are in here.
2 Q I'm sorry?
3 A A lot of them are in here.
4 Q Okay. Could you send me copies of them?
5 A No.
6 Q Why not?
7 A You can see them right now.
8 Q Oh, sure.
9 A I'm getting tired. I had a long week, so let's
10 wrap this up.
11 Q I'm about two-thirds of the way through these
12 items.
13 A Let's make it another day then for the rest.
14 I've had enough.
15 Q Okay.
16 A We can reschedule another time. And I take it
17 I'll get a copy of the transcript?
18 Q I'll get you a copy of the transcript.
19 A Great. You don't mind breaking, do you?
20 Q I would prefer to keep going.
21 A No, I can't. I'm up since 4 o'clock most
22 mornings, so this is enough for me.
23 Q Can you show me where those receipts are that
24 we've just talked about?
25 A Let me see.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page105
46 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
47
1 Q Save you and me some time.
2 A Okay. Here's one. That's $160.
3 Q In the folders that you're looking at right now,
4 are those copies of your receipts?
5 A These are the copies of the reports from the
6 technical people.
7 Q Okay.
8 A The Geek Squad was a one-time fee. Okay. Here's
9 A Plus. Okay. Here's A Plus. Now I got to find the
10 receipt. This is what they wrote. That's on Columbia
11 Avenue. Okay. Let's see. Here's my receipt for the tech
12 service, the Geek Squad. Here's my receipt for the actual
13 computer. Can I have those receipts back? I want to put
14 them where I got them. I don't want the stuff mixed up.
15 Q How can I get a copy of those receipts?
16 A Just take them right now and get them.
17 Q Ask them to copy them, you'd be all right with
18 that?
19 A Sure. Sure.
20 Q Do you have other receipts for any of these other
21 items?
22 A I have 30 years of receipts.
23 Q Here, I mean here in this building. Do you have
24 them with you?
25 A I don't know.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page106
47 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
48
1 Q Could you -- there was another one in there that
2 I was looking at. It was on an 11 -- 8 and a half by 11
3 piece of paper.
4 A Here, that was $160. Let's see. Let me go
5 through there quick and see if I can get the receipts.
6 Here's a receipt. This is a Verizon. What Verizon did was
7 they changed my SIM card thinking that would stop the
8 hacking, but it didn't. This is a receipt, but it's not
9 for -- that's just an in-take. These are the IC3 reports.
10 Let's see if the receipt's in here. Geek Squad. No,
11 they're all the receipts I have.
12 Q Okay.
13 A I believe. I mean, as far as the computers are
14 concerned.
15 Q And then there's no receipts in these documents?
16 A Receipts for what?
17 Q Any of these items that we're talking about.
18 A I don't know.
19 Q Okay.
20 A I don't know.
21 Q I'll make copies of these.
22 A I did not peruse all these files for receipts.
23 Q Would you like -- would you like me to make a
24 copy of that for your records?
25 A No, I gave it to you.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page107
48 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
49
1 Q Okay.
2 A I'm going to have to trust you. I got people
3 changing documents on me all the time.
4 (Off the record.)
5 BY MR. REESER:
6 Q Okay.
7 A Do you want to take these and copy them and bring
8 them back?
9 Q Or I can mail them back to you. Sure.
10 A Well, aren't we going to continue this?
11 Q Actually what I have to do is I have to report
12 back to Allstate, and they let me know if they want me to
13 continue it or not.
14 A Okay. You can take them then. Yeah, that'd be
15 fine. Mail them back.
16 Q Okay. And you will not --
17 A You're going to get educated. You're going to be
18 a changed man, trust me.
19 Q You will not do the continuation, assuming we
20 have one, in the courthouse?
21 A Why?
22 Q Because it's free.
23 A Why don't we do it at Allstate's office, Allen's
24 office?
25 Q Okay. I'll see if I can arrange that.
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page108
49 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
50
1 A Or we can do it at my house. You can come to
2 1250 Freemont Street. It's nice there. It's fixed up.
3 It's nice. I have no problem with that.
4 Q All right.
5 A I had enough of that courthouse.
6 Q Okay. So it's about 20 after 10:00 roughly.
7 A How long did this last?
8 Q Roughly an hour. I don't know what time we
9 started.
10 A That's pretty good.
11 Q So you want to adjourn for the day?
12 A Yeah.
13 MR. REESER: Okay. Very good.
14 (The examination under oath was adjourned at
15 10:19 a.m.)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page109
50 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
51
1 COUNTY OF DAUPHIN :
2 : SS
3 COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA :
4 I, Diane F. Foltz, a Notary Public, authorized to
5 administer oaths within and for the Commonwealth of
6 Pennsylvania, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the
7 testimony of Stanley J. Caterbone.
8 I further certify that before the taking of said
9 statement, the witness was duly sworn; that the questions
10 and answers were taken down stenographically by the said
11 Reporter-Notary Public, and afterwards reduced to
12 typewriting under the direction of the said Reporter.
13 I further certify the said statement was taken at the
14 time and place specified in the caption sheet hereof.
15 I further certify I am not a relative or employee or
16 attorney or counsel to any of the parties, or a relative or
17 employee of such attorney or counsel, or financially
18 interested directly or indirectly in this action.
19 I further certify that the said statement
20 constitutes a true record of the testimony given by the
21 said witness.
22 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand
23 this 13th day of June, 2016.
24
_______________________
25 Diane F. Foltz, RMR
Notary Public
Stan Sponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
J. Caterbone
Testimonies
Mind
Under
Control
Oathof Intelligence Officers
Page
Page110
51 of 51
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
June
27th17,
of
9, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
®
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
Richmond City Council
May 19, 2015
Richmond City Council Public Hearing of May 19, 2015
Passing a City Resolution 5-2 to Ban Spaced-Based
Weapons in Support of the Many Targeted Individuals
Suffering Symptoms of the City
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group, Originally published:
May 19, 2015
Richmond, California City Council hears from victims and advocates and votes “in support of the Space
Preservation Act and the Space Preservation Treaty to permanently ban spaced-based weapons”.
Jovanka Beckles Council Member Introduced This Resolution
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page111
4 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
RICHMOND CITY COUNCIL BANS SPACED-BASED WEAPONS
COUNCIL MEETING HELD MAY 19, 2015
Mayor: One is to adopt a resolution in support of the Space Preservation Act and the Spaced-Based
Treaty to permanently ban Space-based weapons. And we have 15 speakers for this item.
Council Member Beckles, would you like to introduce this?
Beckles : I would. You know I think what I would like to do is just kind of rehash the statement of this
issue for those that don’t have the agenda in front of them. The city of Richmond is a welcoming and safe
area for all of our residents. We have led the way in so many initiatives that protect and provide the rights
for all of our residents to feel safe. And so it’s imperative that Richmond adopt this resolution in order to
stand in solidarity with residents who claim to be under assault with spaced-based weapons that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act.
Now, the thing about this is that we’re not trying something new here. This is in support of what is already
there at the federal level. So we say as a council we support this treaty that’s already in affect and we also
support our residents who are feeling attacked by certain kinds of weapons. And so the purpose of this
resolution is to show support for our residents that identify themselves as targeted individuals by
supporting the Space Preservation Act that’s been passed by Congress and the Space Preservation Treaty
to permanently ban spaced-based weapons.
Now, many targeted individuals believe they have been personally attacked by weaponry that should be
outlawed by the Space Preservation Act. Some years ago one of the residents who is going to talk now, I
met with her. I met with many of them, to talk about this issue. I’ve also spoken with our police
department. The representative from the department was Captain Gagan to figure out how law
enforcement can support these individuals, first of all, by at least listening and not assuming, and actually
just taking reports of incidences that are reported. And the police department was open to that, and is
open to that, and are willing to work with our residents in helping them to feel safe. Because it’s important
that we all feel safe living in our city. And in our city we have put forth our best effort to listen and respect
the voices and wisdom and experiences of our residents.
And so I don’t intend to ignore it and I’m hoping that my colleagues on this (unclear word) won’t ignore,
but support those who suspect they have been exposed to these types of inhumane attacks with the intent
to cause them great emotional and bodily harm. And I’m encouraged by these residents, these citizens of
Richmond, who stood up to protect these other residents here. I’d like to encourage other officials at the
local, state and national level to explore methods to expand support to all residents. And as many … as
you can see … those of us with an agenda in front of us, and those who don’t have an agenda in front of
you, who may be watching, or the livecast on the web, is that there is no financial impact to this. This is
not going to cost anything and it’s not going to hurt anyone to pass it. But it certainly would continue to
cause emotional distress to those who are being targeted if we don’t pass this. And I urge you to support
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page112
5 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
all of our residents in the city.
Mayor: Do we have questions from council members? Okay, Vice Mayor.
V Mayor: Just real quickly. You mentioned that this was passed by Congress. Can you tell me when that
happened because I’m trying to look it up now and I thought that was just introduced in 2001 and never
was…
Beckles: Actually, Ms Anderson can probably answer that question. When was it passed at the federal
level, Ms Anderson?
Anderson: 9/10/2002. Space Preservation Act, former Congressman Dennis Cosenich had introduced
this bill.
Vice Mayor: But was that…
Mayor: We’re sort of getting out of our process here. I think that (word unclear) do you have other
questions?
Vice Mayor: Well, I’m looking at the sheet that you’re looking at. It looks like that’s when the Burkley
City Council passed a resolution, not when Congress passed the law. I’m looking on line at the House
website. And I know that there’s, I understand that there’s been multiple versions of this so I don’t know if
it’s been passed or not. But from what it looks like here, it doesn’t look like that version was passed by
Congress, so I don’t know if it was. But I understand the Burkley City Council passed it on 9/10 of 2002.
Mayor: Other questions from the council?
Mayor: So I had a couple of questions. I’m looking at the resolution and it talks about the Space
Preservation Act. Can you tell me what act that was? There’s never been a Space Preservation Act passed,
right?
Beckles: It wasn’t passed. It was brought forward by the Representative, the Congressman at the time.
Because there were some, you know how it goes in Washington, there’s just a lot of power play. So it
never got…but it did get passed in 2002 in Burkley. So we’re making ours similar to the one that was
passed in Burkley.
Mayor: Well it doesn’t say anything about Burkley here. All it says is the Space Preservation Act. Are you
talking about the resolution Burkley passed or are you talking about one of the two resolutions that
Representative Cosenich introduced in 2001 and 2002?
Beckles: Well because that one didn’t pass we’re just making reference that it was brought forward by
Dennis Cosenich, and of course politics being the way they are, it did not pass. So this is, I’m making
reference to and using the Burkley model as an example of ours.
Mayor: Which one of the Cosenich resolutions did the Burkley model refer to?
Anderson: HR3616. House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: I didn’t hear you, what?
Anderson: House Resolution 3616.
Mayor: 3615.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page113
6 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Anderson: 3616. 1. 6.
Mayor: The research I did on this, that resolution was substantially different than HR2977.
Anderson: Yes sir.
Mayor: And significantly it omitted any references to chem trails, particle beams, electromagnetic
radiation, plasmas, extremely low frequency or ultra-high frequency energy radiation and mind control
technology. So, the question I have is, it seemed to me, it was your intent to include all these in it, right?
So if you go with HR3616 and we approve this, it will not include any of these things I named. Was that
your intent?
Beckles: That was not my intent. My intent, and working with staff, of course, it helped put this together,
because we know that we get help with our staff. The intention was to include all of the things that people
are feeling, yeah, that people are feeling the pressures of and feeling the attacks of, and so I think that…I
don’t know how much of this issue that Burkley had in theirs. But I think that to include these, and this is
the resolution saying we support this treaty, this act. Then I’d like to have it in there. Because again, to
me it’s important that we defend, that we support and that we protect our residents. And so if these are
the things that residents are saying they’re feeling, then it should be in there.
Mayor: Well, all Burkley did, and I’m looking at the Burkley resolution, and it just says, “It is the will of
the council and the city of Burkley that the US Senate and House of Representatives enact, and the US
President sign and enforce the Space Preservation Act.” But I’m confused because there were actually two
Space Preservation Acts introduced and I think if we’re going to do this right, we need to define which one
we’re going to support. Because they’re different.
Beckles: You’re absolutely right. And I want the best one to move forward as well, and I’m sure that the
residents want the best one and so.
Mayor: Which one is the best one?
Anderson: HR2977.
Mayor: So that would be HR2977.
Anderson: Yes.
Beckles: Which is the one that includes …
Anderson: Everything.
Mayor: Ok, so, with that in mind, I don’t have any more council people... oh I do too. Council Member…
yeah, I’ve got a bunch; Council Member Martinez and Council Member McLaughlin.
Martinez: Yes, I wanted to change the language to say that we endorse the intent of the act since the
act is not actually in place.
Mayor: The intent of which act?
Martinez: The intent of the second act.
Mayor: The second one is HR3616.
Beckles: Are you talking about HR2977 which includes all that, right? Which includes the chem trails. Is
that right?
Mayor: That’s my understanding of it.
Beckles: Is that right, Council Member Martinez?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page114
7 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Martinez: Is that the revision? Right.
Mayor: Council Member McLaughlin.
McLaughlin: Actually I did some research on this too. Apparently Representative Cosenich didn’t read
fully the first resolution that was brought forward in his name. He brought it forward based on some
recommendations. And when he realized it was drawn out to the level that it was, he pulled it. And he
brought forward the second one, which is 3616, which I think is more general.
Many of us remember, just to share some input going back, many of us remember in the 80s, Ronal
Reagan brought forth the Strategic Defense Initiative, which was later dubbed Star Wars, you know, that’s
where this all came from. Basically, it was to put weapons technology into space as a global shield, as a
supposed defense against China and the Soviet Union. It was later seen as infeasible. And many others..
many people saw this as… the idea to put weapons in space…was insane. And I happen to think it was a
crazy idea, as did the population at large.
Then the Clinton administration in 1993 morphed it into the Ballistic Missile Defense. Later in 2002, which
is currently now the Missile Defense Agency. But also, along the way, in 2002 Dennis Cosenich introduced
this bill, and it’s the second one that he fully introduced, 3616, which basically called for a ban on spaced-
based weapons. And then it was, I think it was just introduced, a co-sponsor was Representative Barbara
Lee, and at a certain point, this Space Preservation Act that was just introduced was brought to the UN
and the Space Preservation Treaty was linked with it. And actually the UN had previously addressed…set
up…established, I guess the basis for this treaty by saying they wanted a permanent ban on spaced-based
weapons that passed in the United Nations that passed 156 to 0. Then Burkley supported the 2002 the
Space Preservation Act and I believe also, the Space Preservation Treaty.
So that’s what Council Member Beckles is referring to in terms of the resolution that she’s brought
forward. I don’t know how anyone can not support not having weapons in space when it has been
supported by the UN and also been supported, clearly stated by many experts that it’s infeasible this
original Ronald Reagan plan to dub this Star Wars.
I think the resolution is fine as it is. It basically says that the residents…the well-being of our residents is
of importance to us and it also, it doesn’t state pro or con in terms of what individuals are saying. But it
just refers to the fact that our residents deserve to be protected. And in general it states that spaced-
based weapons are something that the city of Richmond does not support. (applause)
Mayor: Okay, so would you call the public speakers?
Anderson: Speakers are Amy Anderson, Jesse Beltrand, Dr. John Hall, Dr. Edward Spencer, Ben
Colonson, Lisa Becker and Derrick Robinson.
Beckles: Amy Lee Anderson.
Anderson: Yes
Mayor: Could you come over here to the podium to speak, please?
Anderson: Good evening Council Members, Council Beckles. I really want to thank you for not deviating
your plan because I went on your Facebook and I saw why you came in office and you never deviated your
plan. You said that you wanted to first put the community first and from you doing that, I want to thank
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page115
8 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you first. And secondly, as a psychologist, a child psychologist, I want to thank you for putting up with
some of those pains I have suffered along this way. But I am here in happiness, in a moment of greatness.
I have a perfect city. Nowhere in the United States, no targeted individual… can get this kind of support
that I have gotten. We just needed just one person, one city. And because of that, you all are our heroes,
and we want to thank you. And I can go on and say much… much.
But we are dying within because the technology is so sophisticated. It’s hard for someone who has no
experience to fathom it. It is so sophisticated. So what we are saying to you all is please let us help you
understand enough, as someone outside looking in to our lives. Because we’re in pain, we are tortured
and we are humiliated every day in our lives because our lives have taken on a path. We don’t even know
how or why we have this type of people on this planet who would harm in this type of way. And I just want
to thank you all. And you, Mayor, for you being in the city…working in the service. Being in the service. For
others to do this, I know that should sadden you. (applause)
Jesse Beltrand: Good evening, Mayor, Vice Mayor and City Council Members. My name is Jesse Beltrand.
I’m the president of the International Center Against the Use of Covert Technologies. Our organization was
formed in 2010 in Sacramento California for the purpose to bring awareness to the general public and
legal systems around the world about serious human rights abuses with regards to the utilization of
remote influencing technologies. My colleagues and co-speakers today, hopefully we’ll get John Hall, who
was the author of Guinea Pigs, Technologies of Control, which have been sent to each of you and signed. I
also have Dr. Edward Spencer, who’s a Neurologist from the Yale School of Medicine and Ben Colonson who
is a PHD in psychology, and therapist, and co-author of a book about PTSD. I myself am a retired
Sacramento City Fire Paramedic and a recent graduate of HMI and do provide therapy to victims.
In 2010 I met Dr. Hall and when meeting him I discovered this phenomenon and asked, “Why isn’t
anything being done about this?” He said it’s because of the symptomology. If everyone went to traditional
medicine and complained about what they were experiencing, they would be railroaded into the mental
health institutions. The fact of the matter is, this is affecting all demographics of society: the poor, the
rich, the elite. I see victims on a monthly basis and hear from hundreds of people every week. I currently
have over 23,000 correspondences from victims not only within, here in the United States, but around the
world.
What we have discovered is that there are hot pockets within the United States where there are victims
that are being exposed to these types of technologies. And as our speakers continue to speak they will
explain to you how that has developed. Currently the hot spots are New York, Florida, Chicago, Texas, and
California. Unfortunately, in California, the East Bay has the highest amount of victims that we have
collected in our database, within our study within our organization. This is why we are currently here
today.
Beckles: Your time has expired Sir.
Beltrand: Okay, thank you.
Beckles: Dr. John Hall. Dr. John Hall.
Beltrand: Dr. Hall is unable to be reached so we’re going to have Dr. Spencer here.
Spencer: Mr. Mayor, City Council, thank you. Thank you for attacking this very difficult problem. And
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page116
9 ofof183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
there are a lot of people around the world, especially in Europe, where I attended a counsel just recently,
in November, who thank you. I’m a retired neurologist. I attended Stanford University, Yale University and
a residency at the University of California in San Francisco.
I’ve studied this sort of problem for a period of time. And it’s been a mystery to me why medicine in
general does not approach this and study the multitude of documents that are out there. But this is the
case. And I won’t answer this for you, because this is an ongoing study, ongoing problem. This is really
intense technology. Essentially what might be described as EEG heterodyning. The entire electrical activity
of the human brain can be captured in this super computer and certainly processed and then put back into
someone else. I’m…it’s science fiction. But unfortunately, it’s not science fiction. So naturally this is
difficult. So the technology is incredible. But basically this is a moral problem. Ethical problem. This is a
violation of the golden rule, any ethics, anything that’s decent. And this is a major thing to consider. It’s
also a violation of our constitutional rights. So that’s an important thing to keep in mind.
To bring it back down to Richmond, I know there are a lot of targeted individuals here, and the police
encounter them. And can’t understand this and help them. The medical community is hobbled by not
having a differential diagnosis. And many of the psychiatric disorders, they should say… rule out
psychotronic disorders, but they don’t. So they can’t face it at all. Thank you.
Beckles: Ben Colonson
Colonson: I thank you all. Two minutes. Okay, let’s go. Thank you all for your endurance. I see you listen
to a lot of humans. I’m gonna talk really fast with two minutes to go. I am a psychologist. I have
evaluated many targeted individuals who have previously been diagnosed as delusional and psychotic and
my job is to deconstruct those diagnoses. Because of the methods of my colleagues that can actually
detect advanced nano-technology present in their bodies both through frequency emissions and
lymphatic…basically…like when you fire a bullet there’s a trajectory and the police can determine the
trajectory. There are chemical tests to do that. I was just gonna, very quickly, since it’s two minutes, this
is this month’s issue of Smithsonian Magazine that says, “The Future is Here: Brain to Brain
Communication is Real.” Targeted Individuals report synthetic telepathy, voices in their skull, people
putting thoughts in their head, things that up until now we’ve been told are complete delusion and “lock
‘em up”. But you know, the capabilities exist.
This is the National Nanotech Initiative. The last 15 years budgets of a billion and a half dollars just by the
federal government’s non-black budgets. We don’t know what they spend on the black budgets. Doing
experimental programs showing how nano sensors in people can give us much more data about humanity.
These technologies can be used for great good but they have apparently also been used for tremendous
evil in non-consensual human experimentation. There is great documentation on this.
I do think it’s a little unfortunate, that confusion about the Space Preservation Act. There are…the systems
SCADAS, they’re called. The acronym stands for Supervisory Control And Data Systems Systems. They
include a component of satellite communication from a central command post as well as components
inside the human beings, or targeted individuals. So although there is a component of these weapons
systems, and they are clearly weapons systems by the major nations on earth, there’s an arms race on for
the mind at this time. Control of the human mind. The Human Brain Initiative is part of it. If I only have
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page117
10 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
two minutes I have to stop there. I hope you will listen to these people. They are suffering greatly as non-
consensual experimentees.
Beckles: A question, really quick, to the speaker. Could you repeat the names of those two references
that you gave, the magazines? Can you give me the names of those again, please?
Colonson: The first one, the current issue of the Smithsonian Magazine. A main stream magazine, which
in this month’s issue, says communicating brain to brain. And this is merely what they are releasing
publicly. The majority of the most advanced weapons systems are classified and we don’t know the full
capabilities. This is just the supplemental to the president’s budget, this year’s Nanotechnology Initiative.
And what I didn’t get to say in my two minutes is the National Registry of Environmental Professionals,
which certifies people to do all kinds of environmental quality testing, has just certified SCADAS,
Supervisory Control And Data Administration Systems, as something that needs to be studied for its
environmental impact on the environment in general. And I am part of the HSCADAS task force, how
these SCADAS systems are impacting human beings. And there are thousands of reports from targeted
individuals that crimes are being committed against them. And my intention in coming here tonight was to
support their claims so that law enforcement, with as much…
Mayor: I think she asked you the names of the magazines…so…
Beckles: Thank you very much. Lisa Becker.
Becker: Hi. Good evening. My name is Lisa Becker and I came here from Racine, Wisconsin. I have been
a victim of this technology for 14 years. I have been tortured for 14 years. My justice department has
failed me. My executive branch has failed me. My senators have failed me. My congressmen have failed
me. You are the only people in this country who have had the courage to even put this on the agenda.
That’s why I flew all this way to thank you, and to address you. This is torture. And it is enslavement. And
any one of these people can tell you the same thing. We have suffered desperately. And I’m sorry if I’m
emotional. But I’m very tired. But if you won’t save us, save yourselves. Because I promise you, this will
come back to every one of you. Every one of us in this country are going to be tapped into these computer
systems and you are gonna see what this feels like. Do something now while you still can. Thank you.
Council Member: I have a question. Could you be more specific in terms of how you feel that you’ve
been…the injustice.
Becker: You mean in terms of the justice department failing me?
Council Member: Well in terms of your being a victim.
Becker: You mean in what I’m feeling?
Council Member: Yeah, explain a little bit to me how you perceive yourself as being….
Becker: Sure, well I have actual photographs of burns on my body. When I went to my doctor, the
response was, “Well how do I know you didn’t do that to yourself?” How do you address that? I’ve passed
two psychological evaluations. Not one but two. The one physician said, “You’re sound as a bell. I have no
idea what’s going on with you.” When I go to sleep, when I go to try to sleep, I feel like I’m being lit up
like a Christmas tree. I feel like every cell in my body just bouncing out of my body. I can’t even describe
it. I get electric shock up my rectum. I get electric shock up my nose. I’ve woken up with burns on the
end of my tongue. I’ve had burns on the palms of both my hands. I vibrate. I vibrate. I can barely hold a
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page118
11 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
piece of paper without quivering. Does that answer your question?
Council Member: I’m trying to find out what’s the source.
Becker: The source are these exotic weapons. They talk about, in 2977, they talk about the space
weapons, spaced-based weapons. Basically in that document they talk about exotic weapons. That’s what
we’re talking about. And the fact of the matter is they did complete that global surveillance network. My
cousin worked for the defense department. She worked on the global mapping of that system. And when I
told her what I was going through, all she could say was, “You’re on your own.” Well, I figured that out. I
figured that out. If you would please, I urge you to pass this. I realize you can’t enforce it, but if you
would pass it, it might give other communities the courage to do the same thing and show our defense
department we are not the enemy. We are not to be attacked. We are not terrorists. Most of us are
defenseless women.
Mayor: Okay, thank you.
Becker: Thank you.
Beckles: Our next speaker is Derrick Robinson, followed by Laquisha Baker, Dolores Hall, Kim, Alex,
Elizabeth Adams, Robert Swegan. Please come forward. Derrick Robinson.
Robinson: Good evening everyone. I’m Derrick Robinson. In regards to the Space Preservation Act that
is before you, many of us have travelled here to say thanks very much for listening and responding to so
many that have come to you over the past couple of years. This is a momentous occasion for our
organization and for humanity. You are one of the very few governing authorities that has considered the
danger of psychotonic technologies. Research in this area has been ongoing since the 50s by government
agencies, corporations, criminal elements, and religious cults, etc. But, only since the arrival of the
internet, has this holocaust been made known to thousands of people who have found that they are
victims of psychotonic technologies. And that they have been sereptisciously victimized by them. And as
the devices proliferate and the public becomes more aware of these covert activities, legislation on a local
and national level will be needed to address the concerns with regard to a vulnerable society. Your
resolution today would be a giant step forward in ensuring the health, safety and well-being for all people.
Thank you.
Beckles: Laquisha Baker
Baker: Hello to all the legislators, and city hall, Javanka, my girl Amy over there. I have been a
Richmond resident 40 plus years. I’ve seen two of my friends try and fight this fight. But their minds are
gone and there’s no coming back. My mother was a Black Panther. They killed her. She was only 58 years
old. And I’m just happy at this moment that somebody in our town, our city, has opened the doors for
many people who couldn’t make it, didn’t make it, and were survivors of it. And I just want to say thank
you.
Beckles: Dolores Hall.
Hall: I did not know you were going to call me to speak. But I will share. I head up the Los Angeles
Freedom from Covert Harassment Group. It’s a support group. And I have about 300 people that is in that
group. And I get over 400 emails on a weekly basis of people asking me to help them, begging me, please
help. No one will listen to me. I am 65 years old and as I walk here, up to this podium, I’m in so much
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page119
12 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
pain. I have burns all over my body. They…my doctor I had treated with for 16 years, my legs swelled up
from the electric magnetic frequencies hitting me on my legs…he told me to go to the hospital. And when I
went to the hospital they were supposed to put an IV in me. They sent me to the mental ward because
they said I did this to myself. I would never hurt me. I have been a victim since 2007. You can’t see this
horrific electric hitting you. Electric is invisible. You take a remote control to turn your tv, turn on your
television. It hurts so bad. I want to thank you for opening your minds and your time today. I am a retired
legal investigator. I have asked all my friends, I have very prominent friends, to help me. They can’t do
anything about this. It is way, way over our heads. They say it’s the shadow government. It is people that
cannot be touched. Please help us.
Beckles: Kim, next speaker.
Buckner: Hello, my name is Kimberly Buckner and I have been a targeted individual for a very long time.
The things that I’ve experienced due to being targeted, they have been unreal. However, I can attest that
they are very real indeed. My life has been destroyed in every possible way and every day has been a
struggle for me. I am very grateful to be before you today due to Amy Anderson’s due diligence and to
everyone else involved. I thank you council members for giving us targeted individuals a chance to speak
and to be heard. And I pray that these atrocities will soon be brought to an end. But we need your help.
Thank you.
Beckles: Alex
Rafter: Good evening, my name is Alec Rafter. I am an NYU graduate and have spent much of my time
working in a financial holding company in San Francisco. I have been a targeted individual for eight years
six months. I’m from Lafayette, California, which is in this county. I am here to support and corroborate
what these other speakers are trying to convey. This technology exists and is being used on a mass scale.
It is torturous, brutal and inhumane. It happens everywhere I go. People don’t understand the capabilities
of this technology. The person I came with here tonight was being shocked and stabbed in this very room
with a directed energy weapon while waiting to speak with the council. My ears are getting frequency
tinnitus while I was sitting here waiting for you as well as technology called voice to skull Dr. Alan Frey.
Like I said, this happens everywhere I go in Northern and Southern California. I’ve been tortured all day,
all night, minute after minute, year after year after year. We need your help and support to stop this, to
save us, and to prevent this from happening to others. Please support banning these so called spaced-
based weapons. Thank you very much.
Beckles: Robert Swegan
Swegan: Good evening. My name is Robert Swegan. I live in Modesto California. I’m here tonight after
being targeted for 12 years with direct energy weapons, voice to skull. I wake up in the middle of the
night in excruciating pain. There’s nobody I can call. There’s nobody to help me. You know, sometimes I
have suicidal idealization because there’s no one to help. You know, I’ve been diagnosed schizophrenic,
delusional, at 53 and 57 years old. I’m a graduate of junior college with a degree in counseling and human
service. I commend you people for what you’re doing here. I want to…I’m here to support my friends. And
I know this has been very difficult for me and my family. My family…I have 4 children. One is in prison
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page120
13 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
right now. I suspect he was here for about 45 minutes. And others will not even talk to me. My family’s
been fragmented. I don’t tell anybody what’s happening to me anymore. It’s a dark secret with me. I
cannot explain to people what’s happening. The police in Modesto are at least talking to me now. They’re
not taking me down to the mental health facility. I thank you very much for listening to me.
Beckles: Marilyn Languist
Languist: Good evening Mayor and Council Members. Marilyn Languist, Richmond resident. I want to
thank Ms Anderson for bringing this topic forward and for bringing so many speakers. I urge you to adopt
this resolution. As has been said, the original Space Preservation Act was originally introduced by
Congressman Cosenich, co-sponsored by Congresswoman Barbara Lee and Congressman Pete Stark of the
Bay Area. And this concept was also voted on and supported unanimously by the United Nations to
prohibit weaponization of space and spaced-based weapons. These are clearly not good for anyone on
earth and not good for anyone in Richmond. You have to be aware that there are a lot of exotic weapons
research programs going on. Some of them covert, some of them not covert. A former Richmond resident
sent me a lot of emails last year about a public comment period for allowing US military testing of directed
energy weapons in the Olympic peninsula in the state of Washington, which is of great concern. In terms
of the types of weapons that are affecting these individuals, before you judge the targeted individuals, I
would suggest that you listen to them, take the time to really listen deeply to their experience. Try to put
yourself in their shoes for a moment. If you can believe them, then please do what you can to support
them. If you’re not sure, then I urge you to take the precautionary principle, when in doubt error on the
side of extra protection for those who are vulnerable. So please do adopt this resolution. Thank you.
Beckles: Sylvia Gray White
White: Good evening. My name is Sylvia Gray White, a very long time Richmond resident. Tonight I’m so
thankful and happy that our city is looking up, waking up and standing up. Approval of this agenda item
will make an impact on the whole world and will help us to restore our mother earth and our health. The
heavy metal toxins falling down on us daily from the chem trails are done by our military without our
approval and knowledge. Lead is one of the many chemicals in the chem trails even though our
government banned it decades ago. Banned it from paint, toys, even bullets, and other manufacturing
processes. This toxin has really negatively impacted my life. Lead is very toxic and there are no safe
levels. It displaces the calcium in your bones among many other illnesses, particularly with children. The
level of lead in my body has drastically increased in the past 3 years. I’ve gotta get the lead out. We need
to stop this constant daily abuse of our universal rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. If you
can’t feel good, you can’t live good. I am not the only one breathing this pollution. If you breathe, you’re
breathing it too. We have rights. Stand up for them! Now in order to stand I’ve got to use a cane. But I
still can stand and will stand up for what’s right.
Beckles: Our last speaker is Elizabeth Adams.
Adams: First and foremost I’d like to pass this cell phone around. This is what electronic burns look like.
This is my 6 year old grand-daughter who has been targeted since birth. So can I just walk around and
show this to you?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page121
14 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mayor: Give it to the clerk.
Adams: This was taken less than 30 days ago at Eden hospital. That’s when you hear of the victim speak
of being electronically burned. That is my 6 year old grand-daughter. I am 59 years old. I have 6
grandchildren and 2 great grand- children. I first and foremost want to say that I thank God for every one
of you. And I mean literally from the bottom of my heart. I thank him for each one of you and I thank him
for the blessings that he’s gonna bring your way just for addressing these issues. These issues are beyond
the average eye. The average eye can’t even see it. So it’s not even worth even talking about in that
sense. I have sent each and every one of you information. Everything that I sent you is just what you
need to know. But there’s one more thing left: your local fusion center. You need to do some deep
research into your local fusion center. Just look it up on line. That is where you will find information, ill
activities of some sort, that is going on within…I’m not going to say city government because I can’t
pinpoint it. But you need to look into your local fusion center. Secondly, mental health of children…(timer
beeping)….May I finish just two minutes please?
Mayor: No, I think we need to give everybody the same amount of time. Thank you.
Adams: Okay, no problem.
Beckles: That was the last speaker.
Mayor: (lady asked to speak) Ma’am, you know, if you didn’t sign up you can’t speak. Okay, I have Vice
Mayor Meyers.
Vice Mayor: I was just gonna briefly say that the weaponization of space as the history that was so
eloquently described by Council Member McLaughlin is something that I think is extremely immoral and we
should not be, as a nation, engaging in and so I’m gonna support this resolution based on that.
Mayor: Do we have any other speakers? Okay, hearing none, do we have a motion?
Beckles: I can make a motion. I share that we adopt the resolution that’s put before us.
Mayor: Motion of second?
Beckles: Pinplay has something…
Mayor: Oh, Councilman Pinplay
Pinplay: I just want to address for a second this whole idea about weaponization of space and there
seems to be this assumption that just because Ronald Reagan supported Star Wars, it’s automatically
become some unmitigated evil. The context in which it was considered a problem was simply because
there was this perception that Star Wars or any kind of strategic defense initiative could not be made
foolproof. And it could not be made foolproof because the opponent, particularly a very well-armed
opponent like the Soviet Union could launch like tens of thousands of dummy missiles at any one point
and so it would be almost impossible to intercept all of them and to distinguish the nuclear missiles from
the dummy missiles. And the understanding was that it would be that there could be a problem created
because based on the overestimation of the effectiveness of Star Wars, namely that America might think
that it was too effective and therefore, go for a first strike and knock out all the Soviet weapons. Or, on
the other hand, the Soviets might feel it was too effective and go for a preemptive strike beforehand. And
it was only in that specific cold war context that Star Wars was considered a horrible idea. Actually, Star
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page122
15 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Wars is not a particularly bad idea, the whole idea is that you can knock out someone’s weapons before
they enter your air space, in fact, long before they enter your air space. And this, for example, was
practiced more than 20 years ago, in the Gulf War, when the Patriot system modification of this was used
when the Patriot system knocked out some of the Iraqi missiles that were launched at Israel. And it is not
just a perfectly valid system, it is actually a particularly useful system, in the time that we have now
where there are nations that are not quite as well armed as the Soviet Union used to be in the 1980s.
Which may not have the capability to launch tremendous numbers of missiles at any one time. And, in
fact, this is a fairly useful system to have. And so this automatic knee jerk reaction that because Reagan
supported Star Wars and at the time it was considered a bad idea and so for that purpose it is considered
a bad idea forever, I just think this is a wrong understanding of the system. And I just wanted to mention
that.
Mayor: So we have Council Member McLaughlin next.
McLaughlin: So, I just…the reason I was interrupting because I don’t think we should get into it. That’s
kind of way off base. I was just giving the history of this in general. I will say that there were some of us
in the 80s that were talking about a nuclear freeze like to stop the arms war rather than weapons in
space. You know, I think space should be for exploration and good things to learn, scientifically. Not for a
weapons trace.
Mayor: Wait, no, we’re not having anything from the audience. Council Member Martinez.
Martinez: Yes, just last week on 60 Minutes there was a special on the reintroduction to the arms war,
with people trying to develop missiles to take out communication satellites. But any kind of war effort is
wrong. And we need to do whatever we can to stop all war efforts. Now when I was in university in the
1980s for humanities class, I did a paper on a science fiction novel. What I actually did was, I took all of
the predictions in this science fiction novel, and then I went to magazines and newspapers, and I was
surprised to find that every single prediction in this science fiction novel, that was written 20 years earlier,
had already come true. And they were happening there, then, in 1980. So it’s easy for me to see that
things which are wrong can happen because we have the wrong mindset. We have the mindset which is a
war mindset and this proposition that was put forth by Cosenich was to change our attitudes towards one
of seeking peace, and that’s why I’m endorsing it.
Mayor: Okay, Vice Mayor.
Vice Mayor: Well, I want to say that I do think this debate is, it is on topic, because the debate on Star
Wars is sort of, was part of what initiated this. And what I would say, and it’s been said, that any sort of…
in my view…the idea that we don’t have enough tools to kill each other here on earth and so that we need
to start doing it in space, that just is simply immoral. And you know, it may be that some wars are
unavoidable. That may be true. But whatever we can do to get our country to move away from that mind
set and move away from utilizing new methods of war, we should support. And so that’s why I support this
resolution.
Mayor: Okay, if there’s nobody else, let’s vote. Wait. Council Member Pinplay.
Pinplay: So the motion before us, does that include things like chem trails and stuff, or no?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page123
16 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mayor: Well, let me, I think he’s bringing up a good point, because, I’m really confused. I think that the
resolution itself is very simple. It simply says, “the city of Richmond thereby supports the Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty to ensure that individuals will not be targets of
spaced-based weapons. So I see that. All the testimony I’ve heard tonight is about targeted individuals.
And so, I mean, I’m confused. Is this about spaced-based weapons or is it about targeted individuals? And
if individuals are targeted, who’s targeting them and why? I just don’t understand it.
Beckles: It’s simple enough. It’s saying that, on the therefore…as you read, we are supporting this Space
Preservation Act and companion Space Preservation Treaty and the reason we’re doing this is that
individuals will not be targets of spaced-based weapons, which is what they’re saying. All this stuff is high
technology, its…and so…that’s what we’re adopting here. And you know, whether you believe it or not, one
thing that was very clear, and I’ve met with folks a lot around this issue, and some of them I’m just
hearing tonight. And even the ones I heard tonight, just out of compassion for folks that are saying “help
us”, and us supporting this, by adopting this resolution, I think it sends out a message that, you know, we
sympathize with you, we support you, and the very least we can do is just pass this resolution to make
sure that you feel the support and love and sympathy that you deserve. It’s simple, it reads right there
Mayor. That’s all we’re trying to pass. What’s there before you. That’s all we’re trying to pass. Don’t
complicate it. It’s simple, so vote it yes or no.
Mayor: I sympathize with everyone who is suffering some kind of affliction. But on the other hand, you
know, in 1967, the US adopted, or the President signed the treaty on the principles guarding the activities
of states in the exploration and use of outer space including the moon and other celestial bodies. So the
US government has acted on this, and they have, within that particular treaty, is a ban on using outer
space for military purposes. So, I just don’t understand what we’re talking about. Are we talking about the
weaponization of space? Are we talking about chem trails? Are we talking about individuals who are being
targeted? If so, by whom and why? I mean, you know, I’m just a dumb city council person and this is way,
way over my head. And I frankly think that it’s sort of way out of the purview of what this city council
could be taking up.
We’ve got real problems here. We’ve got potholed roads, we’ve got a budget that’s out of balance, we’ve
got crime, we’ve got greenhouse gases. We’ve got all these things to worry about and here I’m being
asked to support a resolution that deals with things like chem trails and particle beams and plasmas and
mind control technologies. I just don’t know enough about it. If I were an expert I’d probably take a side,
but I’m not. And so for that reason I’m just not gonna support it. Maybe some time I’ll learn more and be
more oriented…
Beckles: I’d like to call the questions.
Mayor: Council Member Bates
Bates: Well, it is confusing. I’m gonna support the resolution for the simple reason that we’ve voted on
lot of dumber ideas than this resolution represents. And again, we know that we don’t control the
universe, we don’t control Congress. So this is the least of my worries. So, I’m gonna support it. Now call
for the questions.
Mayor: Does anybody else want to talk about it? Okay, let’s just vote.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page124
17 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Beckles: Council Member Pinplay? No. The motion passes 5-2 with Council Member Pinplay voting no,
and Mayor Butt voting no.
Bates: One reason I voted for it was there wasn’t one speaker in opposition of it.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page125
18 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Richmond council passes resolution supporting ban on space-based wea... http://richmondstandard.com/2015/05/richmond-council-passes-resolutio...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Twitter More
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page126
19 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
1 of 1 6/5/2016 6:44 AM
http://www.eastbaytimes.com/portlet/article/html/fragments/print_article....
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Richmond: Space weapons resolution prompts requests to
investigate
By Karina Ioffee [email protected]
East Bay Times
Posted:Mon Jun 01 18:42:20 MDT 2015
RICHMOND -- A city resolution banning space weapons within city limits has prompted dozens of calls to the Richmond Police
Department in recent days to ask the agency to investigate the alleged use of chips, bugs and other devices for mind and body
control.
On May 19, the City Council approved a resolution supporting the Space Preservation Act and Space Preservation Treaty
permanently banning "space-based weapons," such as microchips planted in people's bodies and micro waves that supporters
believe are used by nefarious sources to harm them.
The resolution was written by Councilwoman Jovanka Beckles, who works as a mental health specialist for Contra Costa County,
and aimed at "making all Richmond residents feel safe," she said.
"I don't intend to ignore the concerns from residents who say they have been exposed to these attacks that have caused them great
emotional and bodily harm," Beckles said.
The fallout has prompted worries that Richmond, which is working hard to remold its image in recent years, will be dismissed as
slightly off by the news media and other municipalities.
" I am trying to figure out how we can use this newfound fame to help market Richmond, much as desolate eastern Nevada has
used the Extraterrestrial Highway to lure tourists to an otherwise deserted stretch of desert highway," joked Richmond Mayor Tom
Butt in a recent online posting.
But the issue actually started last June, when Richmond police Capt. Mark Gagan was asked by Beckles to meet with residents who
said they were being targeted by space technology. Eager to show the department was sensitive to residents' concerns, Gagan
agreed.
"My desire was how to better serve this population from a public safety standpoint," said Gagan, a 20-year veteran with the
department. "There are people who have a huge amount of stress, anxiety and fear. These issues have public safety implications
no matter how far-fetched they seem."
The meeting had the best of intentions. But it appears to have also motivated conspiracy theorists who began to see the city as an
ally. Gagan began receiving invitations to speak at conferences organized by the "targeted individuals" community, and a rumor
started that the city had a task force devoted to uncovering government conspiracies. One organization even gave Gagan a
"humanitarian award" for his work on the issue.
"People were thrilled that someone was finally listening to them," Gagan said.
Since that meeting, he estimates that he's received more than 100 calls from people from as far away as Ireland who say they want
Richmond police to investigate their particular situations. Gagan always takes the time to explain that the department looks at facts
and has so far found no evidence to support concerns raised by callers.
"We try to refocus the conversation, and if they are local, get them into a managed program of medication and supervision," Gagan
said.
Contact Karina Ioffee at 510-262-2726 or [email protected]. Follow her at Twitter.com/kioffee
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page127
20 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
1 of 1 6/5/2016 6:47 AM
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUPFreedom From
®
Covert Harassment & Surveillance,
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
CORROBORATING EXPERT AND FORMER NSA WHISTLEBLOWER
KAREN STEWART
DISCLOSURE OF ELECTROGAGNETIC WEAPONS USED TO KILL CERTAIN
TARGETED INDIVIDUALS DURING APRIL 10, 2016 RADIO INTERVIEW
THE DISCLOSURE
Karen Stewart graduated from Florida State University in 1979 with a BS degree in German Language
and a minor or co-major equivalent in Fine Art. She worked for NSA (National Security Agency) from
1982 to 2010. Her resume will follow.
Her video interviews can be seen on the following YOUTUBE links:
Wheel of Freedom (WUA) 4/4/16 Ex-NSA Karen Stewart
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExpCL27ft10
NSA whistle blower Karen Stewart exposes targeted Individuals, 9/11
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ravXai6nfMg
On March 9, 2016 I was detained and falsely imprisoned by no less than 8 NSA Security Police
on the barracks of the Headquarters of the NSA at Ft. Meade Maryland. I was handcuffed, and
interrogated for over an hour, while my car was dog sniffed and searched. I was ordered to return to
Lancaster rather than continue on to Washington, D.C., and was ordered not to enter any federally
owned property again. The following is a video of my statement:
Statement and Video of False Imprisonment re Handcuffed and Interrogation for an hour at NSA
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page128
21 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Headquarters (National Security Agency at Ft. Meade, Maryland) by 8 NSA Police officers on March 9,
2015 Recorded on March 11, 2016
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FeXlaQn5Nhs
Karen Stewart's resume at the NSA is as follows: “I Worked various projects over the years, not
just USSR/Russia, but various countries researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances,
weapons development and proliferation, the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron
Curtain and changing relations among newly liberated countries, economic and diplomatic
developments of certain target countries. I researched and wrote a series of intelligence reports in
support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian countermeasures sold to Iraq from
wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what got me fired because I questioned
why my work was used to promote another employee who had no experience with but, was credited
with my work” .
The following transcript of an interview by Karen Stewart in which she describes the lethal
electromagnetic weapons and her experience on being on the receiving end was taken from the article
titled “NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light” and can be found at:
http://canadafreepress.com/article/nsa-whistleblower-comes-out-of-the-shadows-into-
the-light
The article was written by Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives and published March 28, 2016. The byline is
as follows: In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to
that column. Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower
has decided to come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to
write her story.
KAREN STEWART'S TRANSCRIPT
“First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a “righteous” lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page129
22 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as “paranoid “and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an “investigation” by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my family’s hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011.
All was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from
the Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-
stalking me by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and
NSA Security personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon
County Sheriff’s Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had
personnel land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of
Lake Jackson (near where I now live) for a “secret exercise”, just before the second round of stalking
harassment began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval
Security Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially
stalk and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security
personnel to Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of
the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, “InfraGard”, made up of
civilians recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as
to why the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious
questions about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group
eagerly jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may
add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a “cast-iron target”, meaning
multiple people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home
overnight on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA
also sought out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be
anything from hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page130
23 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
monitor short-distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to
facilitate car stalking and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not
assigned to me on a certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site “the big bad threat” to
report my location and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle
to someone about what I was doing, what I was buying. (“God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the
children!”).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going
for the usual “See, she’s paranoid, reporting harassment every day ‚Äì now just dismiss her lawsuit!”
But I did report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run,
purposely sideswiping my car, (This is exatly what happened to the PETTITIONER on May 9,
2016 enroute to MEDEXPRESS for pain medications) and botching the placement/removal of
a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my spoiler. (They feared my mechanic
would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before my appointment). I
even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular internet
site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly naïve,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that
the greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be
decided, living in Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to recover
my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009 I had
researched “gang-stalking” and discovered it was a real and growing phenomenon, but when
“electrical harassment” was mentioned, I could not really grasp the concept and wondered
about its existence. But I was to find out first hand in November 2015 that it does exist and
is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons emit
multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves modulated to radio
frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I can’t say I understand yet. Now, with the
help of certain mercenary and morally depraved neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now
with the intention being torture and slow-kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time,
cause cancer, autoimmune disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect
stealth murder weapon for a corrupt government.
At this point, when we leave the house, a criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted
by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page131
24 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
to speed up death, with the help of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like
good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriff’s Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department
are dragging their feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when
I try to enlist their help to come up with a strategy to combat this new crime – before I or
one of my family is dead. They can’t quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and
nothing protects the police or any official from this new weapon held and wielded by
criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience using the mobile DEWs in
Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered at Ft. Meade
with NSA, is also called the “Silent Warriors” because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. I’m sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand
and may have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their “secret exercise” in
Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they
say you do. If they use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of
simply “settling” for a tenth of the cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they
can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason and get away with it…including any leader or
politician.”
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page132
25 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
“There is no doubt that NSA is now run by sycophants and sociopaths ”
EXCLUSIVE: Former NSA Employee Speaks Out on its
Corruption – Karen Stewart
By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives February 20, 2014
3 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
At the very least, for the past few months to a year it has become increasingly evident that—although
not all—many agencies of the US Federal government have become increasingly dirty, perverse and
corrupt and require a deep and thorough cleaning.
The US Secret Service has previously been exposed as “including claims of involvement with
prostitutes, leaking sensitive information, publishing pornography, sexual assault, illegal wiretaps,
improper use of weapons and drunken behavior” and the IRS was caught and admitted to denying
Obama’s political enemies (aka “TEA Party, Christians, religious Jews, conservatives) their Constitutional
rights while allowing “progressive” groups (aka Liberals, Leftists, Marxists, Maoists, Socialists,
Communists) theirs. And—love him, hate him or fall somewhere in-between—Edward Snowden shone a
very bright light on the unconstitutional domestic mega-spying of one of these clandestine agencies—
the National Security Agency. Thus far, under Obama’s increasingly iron rule, few-to-no members of
these agencies have even been indicted by Congress for their blatant crimes against the American
people.
The NSA appears to have begun as a patriotic organization that was geared toward protecting the USA
and its citizens. Whether or not that was its original intended purpose is a subject for discussion and
speculation. However, portions of the NSA seem to have devolved into something very sinister. Today’s
interview will concentrate on this agency.
NSA Analyst. Due to a number of substantive reasons, this former Analyst’s identity cannot be divulged
at this time and will be referred to as “W.” I have, however, confirmed this individual’s prior employment
and credentials via a well-known NSA “Whistleblower.” The information disseminated to me, amongst
other things tells a sordid story of corruption and how employees are silenced into submission—via fear
—within the agency,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page133
26 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Interview
Sher:Thanks so much for being with me, today, in order to provide essential additional information to
the public on how many of their tax dollars are really being spent. You were employed by the NSA for
over two decades. Would you tell the readers what initially attracted you to the agency as well as how it
has deteriorated over time?
Karen Stewart: Like many people from families with a strong history of serving our country, coming
out of college, I looked to find a way to best utilize my particular interests and talents in service to my
fellow Americans. The mission of the NSA it seemed to me, was to stop threats coming to our shores.
It’s charter clearly targeted foreign nationals on foreign soil who did or could intend us harm. That
appealed to me as a righteous endeavor and honorable tack for my life to take.
Sher: You’ve shared with me how the NSA deals with its employees who bring legitimate complaints to
their superiors. How thoroughly intimidating and threatening are their behaviors toward those who balk
at their adverse treatment? Would you give a few examples?
Karen Stewart: Apparently the nature of NSA Security degenerated under General Michael Hayden,
the previous Director of NSA (DIRNSA), who promoted a very questionable mid-level Security manager
to a power position within Security. Hayden had originally been tasked to eviscerate NSA since a very
shallow and short-sighted Congress believed that the fall of the Iron Curtain meant no danger existed
anywhere anymore that required the existence of a robust NSA presence. There evolved, under him, a
gratuitously vicious bully mindset that employees were to be intimidated at any opportunity not only to
drive them out of NSA but to cut back on people reporting problems that made NSA look bad, especially
problems involving upper management.
Under Hayden and his successor, General Keith Alexander, the filing of complaints to or requests for
investigations by the NSA EEO or the OIG (Office of the Inspector General) were often inexplicably
blown off despite adequate evidence or the presence of willing witnesses. Then the person who had
filed the complaint would be subjected to an out of cycle “reinvestigation” interview with Security as
well as polygraph exam, wherein the tone of the Security person was not neutral—as it should be—but,
hostile with far-fetched or even ridiculous non-issues presented as potentially problematic. This was a
Security shot across the bow to warn the person that he had crossed the line by filing the complaint. If
he pursued the complaint, Security would lean on his managers to heavily discourage him from doing
what he thought was proper and was indeed a protected action under the law. If he persisted, did his
own amateur investigation, or told coworkers about the situation, he might be called down to Security
multiple times and accused of being “paranoid and delusional” based on his complaint, and his job
threatened.
The worse the infraction reported, especially if a high level manager looked to be involved, the more
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page134
27 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
severe the reaction by Security. In cases of egregious wrong-doing by a manager, Security would
review the personnel files, medical files, and financial statements to find anything they could use to
threaten or blackmail him with, or pretend to misinterpret some tidbit of information as something it
was not.
Some people were forced to sign admissions of guilt of preposterous misinterpretations of facts in order
to keep their jobs, thereby killing their credibility and complaint. When nothing was found in such files
that could be used, a false accusation of espionage or leaking classified materials ginned up by Security,
was used to justify a Security intrusion into the person’s home to search for blackmail material, further
assess the interests and personality of the targeted individual (TI), and plant bugs and abscond with an
extra set of keys for further intrusions. The more the person objected to being bullied, the more heavy-
handed Security became, insisting that hostility toward them indicated wrong-doing on the TI’s part.
Thus the TI would become harried and harassed for a crime he never committed, if it ever
even was committed, and to repeated accusations by Security Psych services of a non-
existent mental illness, more than adequately supported by years of internal, psychological
evaluations stating he was mentally sound (Paranoia with delusions is rare and certainly
never occurs overnight, but that does not deter a Security psychologist attack dog, whose
favorite mode of attack employs reference to this malady).
The more a person stood his ground, the more “personal” it became to Security, which then
became dedicated to the personal destruction of the TI. Under the pretext of the fake
accusation of espionage or leaking classified information, Security would slander the
individual with his coworkers, work friends and managers to isolate him and apply yet more
pressure. Many backed away from supporting the TI in fear for their careers and maybe even
freedom. Certainly this sent a message to the workforce in the TI’s area that NSA Security
was at its essence, a rogue, unaccountable and psychotic entity that was to be greatly
feared.
Once NSA Security had decided upon the removal of the TI for failing to be sufficiently
cowed, then false evidence was given to the FBI liaisons assigned to NSA. This would
engender a fraudulent FISA warrant, which loosed FBI surveillance and investigators upon
the person for a few weeks or months, further slandering him to his work and social circles
and thereby putting pressure on him by their constant presence. When the FBI would find no
basis for the accusation, they would drop the case and move on. However, at that point,
Security would send in their own personnel sans warrant, to overtly stalk and harass the TI ,
24/7.
In some instances, Security has even gone into the person’s
neighborhood to recruit “snitches” and augment harassment with
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page135
28 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
hostile civilians convinced the TI is an enemy of the state, based
on baseless Security slander.
Intrusions would be made into his home to remove gathered evidence or
move things around as a psychological ploy and his car would be secretly
“GPS’d” to facilitate vehicular stalking and aggressive driving games. There
have even been reports of pet murders by poisoning as an escalation of the
harassment with the inferred threat that perhaps it could be the TI’s child or
himself next. The harassment is essentially elevated until the TI either
“breaks” and assaults a harasser or complains to Security about the insane
and sadistic, not to mention criminal way in which he is being mistreated.
This is what Security planned for and is ready to jump on as their
springboard to terminating his employment.
His security clearance is immediately pulled, he is warehoused in a menial job until adequate paperwork
and a back-story can be fabricated or forged to falsely present a termination due to mental instability or
illness, and the person is fired. Of course there is an appeals process, but it is thoroughly corrupted. No
matter how much evidence supports the victim and how little supports NSA, NSA always “wins” these
cases where it is clear the person was targeted for dismissal. Of course, this does nothing but embolden
more degenerate or criminal behavior while making it clear that the person reporting evil will be
considered the problem, and that in reality no labor laws or whistle protection laws can actually protect
an NSA employee, because real watch dog entities don’t exist within NSA and state and Federal
authorities routinely turn a blind eye to the reported abuses even as they become more criminal and
seditious.
I shake my head at sycophant, disingenuous politicians who claim Edward Snowden could have or
should have gone through “proper internal authorities” to report the abuses and criminal acts being
committed within NSA. Would that be to the thoroughly corrupted, attack dog-watch dog entities, or the
thoroughly oblivious or compromised politicians responsible for oversight who are in fact, in the NSA’s
pocket due to bribery, blackmail or stupidity?
Sher: The NSA seems to suffer from the some of the same maladies as did the recent outing of the
Secret Service. Without becoming too specific, would you give us a general idea as to advancement for
sexual favors that have occurred within the agency? How defeating is that to employees who are simply
working to protect the country while their bosses are indulging in sexual liaisons with lower level
employees?
Karen Stewart: In my career, promotions were always hard to come by, meted out perhaps every
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page136
29 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
five years if you were a good or exceptional worker, but male managers discovered that they held the
keys to paradise in regard to attractive or even “acceptable” women willing to take shortcuts. These
were the women who would make promotions in stunningly rapid succession with little to no
accomplishments - of their own, that is. While others killed themselves with years of grueling shift work
or even multiple dangerous foreign assignments only to find themselves evaluated as a 3.6 on a scale
of 5, when an attractive, morally loose recent college graduate would receive a 4.8 for essentially
alphabetizing a shelf of reference books her first 6 months on the job. This made many, many people
bitter and certainly sent the wrong signal to the hardest workers and the most talented. Though many
stopped being as dedicated to their jobs, others did indeed press ahead and worked tirelessly knowing
their reward was the mission accomplished and not likely appropriate recognition. Capable men
despaired of receiving deserved promotions and women almost feared being promoted for exceptional
work, fearing they would be assumed to be one of the typically incapable promotion bimbos among the
bloated management. Expertise and knowledge became commodities to guard and not share with new
workers, fearing you would not reap the benefits of your own work. This of course created a situation
where expertise and insight must be gained and regained from scratch, losing precious time training up
area or target experts to the detriment of the mission.
It was very discouraging to see immature or degenerate bosses spending their time flirting and chasing
skirts, the very same people who were charged with competently reviewing your work, (keeping
apprised of the big picture so people felt free to specialize their research), and whose responsibility it
was to accurately and honestly represent their people before promotion boards. But the atmosphere of
secrecy, the strict laws about divulging names of NSA employees or anything that occurred there,
emboldened certain men to believe that their wives and families would never know of their
indiscretions, and turned work time into play time for them. And now apparently young males are also
being pursued as sexual toys. One has to wonder what is being missed in the realm of highly perishable
intelligence leads by distracted managerial incompetents.
Sher: As an additional example of NSA intimidation, one of the things you’d said may be shared is your
experience with the “3 Amigos.” Would you tell us about them?
Karen Stewart:There were three eccentric looking older males who were often seen in the NSA OPS1
cafeteria together, whom we also got to know by word of mouth, as master electricians well-versed in
computer science. They were nicknamed by some in the analyst field as “Rasputin”, “Santa”, and “Choo
Choo” or “the engineer”, due to their highly unusual appearances and dress. One eye witness being
harassed on yet another NSA Security retaliatory witch hunt, reported seeing one of these men at her
home, on her property, when she discovered indications that her home had been broken into, her cable
box broken into, and her phone hacked, leaving tell-tale clicking sounds at regular intervals whenever
she used her phone. Any phone tap done by warrant is done at the carrier’s hub under their auspices
and will not “click”, only illegal hack jobs “click”. She noted him not only as a trespasser being
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page137
30 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
somewhere he should not have been, but recognized him by his highly unusual appearance from work.
When she attempted to look him up in the NSA data base by career specialty, she found that what
should have been his photo, which should have been a source of pride since he was of the rank to be a
Flag Badger (Manager whose rank is senior enough to garner a photo with the American flag in the
background), was instead a photo of a desert animal called a Meercat indicating that he wanted his
identity hidden from the general NSA population.
Sher: With regards to many who have said that the NSA’s collection of meta-data on all forms of
communication between legal citizens of the USA is unconstitutional, also indicated is the fact that not
one terrorist act has been stopped by said collection. It appears good old-fashioned police work is what
still gets the “perp.” In your opinion, is this accurate?
Karen Stewart: I think it is indeed true that the meta data collection ruse within the USA distracts
from tried and true research and investigation, which the latter method apparently DID INDEED
uncover the 9/11 plot months before it happened, well in time to have prevented it, according to two
separate analysts with whom I have spoken, one just two days after 9/11 as he broke down and
sobbed his heart out, repeating “We could have saved them! We could have saved them! But they
wouldn’t let us report it!”, and the other several years later, who maintained the same story of being
threatened and forbidden to report any warning about 9/11, then being harassed and fired for a non-
existent mentally illness. However, it is a good means to track your political enemies and detractors and
their affiliates within the US - for future reference? It would appear much more for the self-preservation
and expansion of NSA as the ubiquitous Orwellian Big Brother than for the protection of the USA. With
the power the NSA wields, it could easily influence border control issues and immigration issues to
make us not as susceptible to terrorist intrusions and infiltrations, but that would undermine their
power grab and expansion within the US, something never intended at NSA’s creation - and for good
reason.
Sher:As a former long time employee of the NSA, what do you believe—if anything—can be done to
correct the problems within the agency?
Karen Stewart:There is no doubt that NSA is now run by those sycophants and sociopaths who are
the least desirable to have in any position of such sensitivity and trust and are purging NSA ranks of
people with integrity. Compromising activity that would rightfully cost you your clearance, is now
viewed as intrinsic perks of the job once you reach a certain pay grade. These lesser leaders have
turned NSA into an American Gestapo Wanna-Be agency. NSA lost its way with non-serious super grade
playboys not mature enough for the responsibility of the job of managing and directing NSA,
compounding the problem by promoting sycophants to protect their backs as well as lightweights with
whom to have “sexcapades” behind office doors, but in that group also has risen opportunistic
sociopaths and psychopaths attracted to more and more power, any way they can get it, and by
conniving and ruthlessness have blown past incompetent, distracted management to change the very
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page138
31 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
nature of the NSA from watchman to the American people to jack booted prison guard.
If the Legislative Branch is possessed of anyone with the least bit of courage and common sense, they
would demand super clearances for those on the Intelligence Oversight Committees so that years or
decades of abusive behaviors, kingdom building, or even crimes can not continually be swept under the
rug by telling these particular politicians, “You don’t have the need to know, just trust us.” Obviously,
they cannot be trusted. An appointment to that Committee would of course have to become much more
exclusive, requiring a thorough vetting as any job with a Top Secret clearance should. But to deal with
the toxic management at NSA now, I would require every Flag Badger and Security manager to account
for himself and what he adds to the mission. If he is pork, retire him or require him to laterally transfer
to another agency. Before that however, I would require that every single Flag Badger and every
Security group manager take a polygraph by non-NSA affiliated or non-NSA sympathetic sources to
account for the millions of dollars wasted on their vicious and illegal war on NSA employees who
dutifully report fraud, waste, abuse as well as sexual predation and treason. Those who are found to be
guilty of such things as falsifying accusations against innocent employees; fabricating false witnesses
and evidence; engaging in illegal acts of breaking and entering; falsifying FISA warrant justifications;
lying to the FBI about a targeted victim’s criminality; falsifying psychological assessments; subverting
lie detector exams by screaming at the targeted subject during or just before the exam to create false
impressions of guilt; hiding or destroying exonerating evidence supporting their victims’ claims;
intimidating or roughing up witnesses; coordinating or participating in criminal stalking and harassment
activities, illegal break-ins, illegal wire taps, organizing and paying civilian groups under the table to
augment harassment of targeted employees, and lastly, conspiring to effect or cover up any or all of
these actions. And any NSA employee in that group who pleads the 5th, should be fired and stripped of
his retirement since this type of betrayal rots a country from within. NSA must be recreated, and
returned to the stated task in their founding charter of focusing on foreign enemies overseas.
Sher: W, so much of the information you’ve provided is truly astounding! Thanks so much for being
with us today and I hope you’ll be available for another should ongoing events require one.
Click to view 3 Comments
Sher Zieve is an author and political commentator. Zieve’s op-ed columns are widely carried by multiple
internet journals and sites, and she also writes hard news. Her columns have also appeared in The
Oregon Herald, Dallas Times, Sacramento Sun, in international news publications, and on multiple
university websites. Sher is also a guest on multiple national radio shows.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page139
32 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1NSA Whistleblower Comes Out of the Shadows Into the Light – Karen Stewarty
By Sher Zieve -- Bio and Archives March 28, 2016
0 Comments | Print Friendly | Subscribe | Email Us
AddThis Sharing Buttons
Share to FacebookShare to TwitterShare to PrintShare to EmailShare to PinterestMore AddThis Share
options
In February, 2014 I published an interview of an NSA Whistleblower. This is a follow-up to that column.
Due to recent threats to her person and other exigent circumstances, the Whistleblower has decided to
come out of the shadows and into the light. I am honored that she again chose me to write her story.
Her name is Karen Stewart Karen Stewart
BIO
Education
Freshman year - Schiller College, Strasbourg, Fr.
Sophomore - Senior years, graduated from Florida State University (79)
BS in German Language and a minor or co-major equivalent in fine art
Work History: 1982-2010 NSA (National Security Agency
Underwent initial retraining from 1982 - 83, on the job training to become a linguist in a needed foreign
language (chosen to train in depth in Russian since my college major, German was not in demand but I
had also studied Russian and French with good results).
Worked various projects over the years, not just USSR/Russia, but various countries
researching/reporting on foreign military status and alliances, weapons development and proliferation,
the Chernobyl disaster and aftermath, the fall of the Iron Curtain and changing relations among newly
liberated countries, economic and diplomatic developments of certain target countries. I researched and
wrote a series of intelligence reports in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom that kept secret Russian
countermeasures sold to Iraq from wreaking havoc on the American invasion. This ultimately is what
got me fired because I questioned why my work was used to promote another employee who had no
experience with but, was credited with my work.
Note...Due to the Top Secret nature of the work, the above summary is slightly vague, by design.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page140
33 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Interview
Sher: Karen, thanks for taking the time to speak with me and it’s so good to have you back and this
time under your name! As a Whistleblower, what finally made you decide to come out from the
shadows?
Karen: I always intended to link my name with my story because it is a story that needs to be told, but
since I have a lawsuit against NSA (technically an appeal of an unlawful, employer action, i.e. my
termination at the 28 point year of my career for trying to request an investigation by the NSA
Inspector General), sitting under a gag order demanded by NSA, on the docket at the Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) in Baltimore, I could not do so without risking the
adjudication going against me for that reason alone. However, in 2015 NSA Security made the decision
to yet again engage in a massive slander campaign against me in my new location, thus breaking its
own gag order so I feel no compunction to be held to a standard required by the EEOC judge at NSA’s
request that NSA itself clearly holds in utter contempt.
Sher: Since we last talked, a lot has happened with you. You have refused to drop your discrimination
lawsuit against the NSA and have shared with me that the agency has stepped up its efforts against
you…personally.
You’re now being stalked by what appear to be NSA operatives. Is that correct? As you reported to me
they, also, seem to be using electronic emanation technology to both stop and damage you. I believe
former NSA employee and Whistleblower Russel Tice reported on this, also. This is really deep “dark
side” information. Would you tell the readers what they’re doing to you, [possibly] others and why?
Karen: First of all, the case STEWART V. NSA is a “righteous” lawsuit, (brought in 2010) meaning it is a
clear case of employer abuse of power and position to an egregious and even premeditated criminal
level meant to circumvent whistleblower protection laws like the No Fear Act. Simply put, I asked the
NSA Inspector General (IG) to investigate why my award-winning intelligence report series supporting
Operation Iraqi Freedom (2003) was used to promote an entirely different woman twice (2004 & 2005)
one who had nothing to do with my reports whatsoever, and was a known incompetent, but had
methodically sexually compromised many of the male managers within the Weapons & Space (W&S)
Directorate. Instead of following correct procedure, the IG and NSA Security decided to cover up the
infraction by attacking me. Threats were made to paint my complaint as “paranoid “and to fire me for a
non-existent mental illness if I did not drop my effort to get credit for and the promotion for my own
work, given to the wrong woman. These threats quickly took shape as false accusations against me by
the guilty personnel obviously coached by Security, manifested with stalking harassment masquerading
as an “investigation” by NSA Security goons from 2006-2009. In late 2010, despite all evidence
showing my innocence from ridiculous and impossible charges, I was fired by an NSA Kangaroo court
with a predetermined agenda. My EEOC appeal (lawsuit) had been accepted for adjudication and the
judge had ordered no adverse action until its adjudication but NSA ignored his orders.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page141
34 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
I moved from Columbia, Maryland back to my family’s hometown of Tallahassee, Florida in 2011. All
was quiet until February 2015 when I instructed the law firm I had hired to subpoena evidence from the
Maryland Department of Motor Vehicles identifying a burglar (a now retired NSA Executive) who had
broken into my home very shortly after I had tried to make my 2006 Inspector General request for an
investigation, and stolen extra house, car, and mail keys as well as illegally bugging (burst bug) our
home and phone/internet to facilitate further harassment and likely search for blackmail material (no
luck for them there).
After the subpoena, I began noticing Security types in Tallahassee following me and photo-stalking me
by March/April. Their license plates suggested Naval Security Group from Pensacola and NSA Security
personnel from Georgia (Augusta) and Texas (San Antonio). A quick check with the Leon County
Sheriff’s Department, specifically Duty Officer deputy Canon, confirmed that NSA also had personnel
land at a private airport and deputies had escorted them the the Phipps property north of Lake Jackson
(near where I now live) for a “secret exercise”, just before the second round of stalking harassment
began. The sequence of events seems to have been for NSA Security to contact the Naval Security
Group in Pensacola, Florida (Headquartered at Ft. Meade, Maryland along with NSA) to initially stalk
and photograph me under ridiculous false pretenses until NSA could send its own Security personnel to
Tallahassee. Once there, under guise of authority, it appears that NSA enlisted the help of the Florida
Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE) and its civilian group, “InfraGard”, made up of civilians
recruited from their Ride-Along programs. As usual, NSA personnel fabricated some big lie as to why
the civilians should actively and passively stalk and harass me, and despite quite obvious questions
about why laws and due process were to be completely suspended in my case, the group eagerly
jumped at the opportunity for hundreds to gang up on one person (for Federal money, I may add).
Thus, under NSA tutelage and FDLE auspices, suddenly I was a “cast-iron target”, meaning multiple
people covered me wherever I was, whatever I did. Cars were even stationed near my home overnight
on rotating shifts, beeping to each other when changing shifts but also for my benefit. NSA also sought
out willing neighbors to augment their snooping and harassment efforts, which could be anything from
hosting an NSA Security goon for accessibility to my property, both home (to bug and monitor short-
distance transmissions) and car (to install and switch out vehicle GPS trackers to facilitate car stalking
and impeding as harassment. ) Those were the active participants, others not assigned to me on a
certain shift were ordered to quickly text in to a special site “the big bad threat” to report my location
and time I was there. People even snooped in my shopping carts to be able to tattle to someone about
what I was doing, what I was buying. (“God help us, she bought bananas!!! Save the children!”).
This was annoying enough but I tried to ignore it because I thought NSA once again was going for the
usual “See, she’s paranoid, reporting harassment every day ‚Äì now just dismiss her lawsuit!” But I did
report acts of harassment that caused physical damage such as hit and run, purposely sideswiping my
car, and botching the placement/removal of a GPS tracker under my rear spoiler that destroy my
spoiler. (They feared my mechanic would find their tracker so they botched its removal the night before
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page142
35 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
my appointment). I even made fun of my stalkers when I could, using my hobby art shop on a popular
internet site to create bumper magnets making fun of them. After all, they were mostly naïve,
unsophisticated boobs who desperately imagined that they were little James Bonds and that the
greatest existential threat to their country was a woman waiting for her lawsuit to be decided, living in
Tallahassee, walking her dogs, visiting friends.
In late November 2015, however, NSA apparently decided that I was not sufficiently
being intimidated by their civilian confederacy of dunces to back off my lawsuit to
recover my stolen salary and stolen retirement at the appropriate pay level. In 2009
I had researched “gang-stalking” and discovered it was a real and growing
phenomenon, but when “electrical harassment” was mentioned, I could not really
grasp the concept and wondered about its existence. But I was to find out first hand
in November 2015 that it does exist and is a horrific crime against humanity.
NSA and its operatives started using small, mobile devices called Directed Energy
Weapons (DEWs) against me and my family in the night. These mobile weapons
emit multiple types of electrical emanations from ultrasonic, to microwaves
modulated to radio frequencies, to other kinds of wave variations I can’t say I
understand yet. Now, with the help of certain mercenary and morally depraved
neighbors, the effort is almost 24/7 now with the intention being torture and slow-
kill. These types of weapons over a lengthy time, cause cancer, autoimmune
disease, heart attacks, seizures, strokes, etc. It is the perfect stealth murder
weapon for a corrupt government. At this point, when we leave the house, a
criminal base of stalkers has been enlisted by NSA to follow us and aim the DEWs at
us wherever feasible to increase exposure in order to speed up death, with the help
of the InfraGard dimwits still texting in my location like good little sheeple.
The Leon County Sheriff’s Department as well as the Tallahassee Police Department are dragging their
feet, making excuses, denying any such thing exists, or insulting me when I try to enlist their help to
come up with a strategy to combat this new crime ‚Äì before I or one of my family is dead. They can’t
quite grasp the fact that this is domestic terrorism and nothing protects the police or any official from
this new weapon held and wielded by criminals. Yet, plenty of recruits in their ranks have experience
using the mobile DEWs in Iraq. It is very interesting to me that the Naval Security Group headquartered
at Ft. Meade with NSA, is also called the “Silent Warriors” because they specialize in the use of Directed
Energy Weapons. I’m sure the Naval Security Group base in Pensacola has many on hand and may
have even gotten a request from NSA to borrow a few for their “secret exercise” in Tallahassee.
Clearly, NSA is of the opinion that you do not have Constitutional Rights unless they say you do. If they
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page143
36 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
use this to get rid of an inconvenient lawsuit such as mine instead of simply “settling” for a tenth of the
cost of harassment, then they must feel confident they can murder anyone, anywhere, for any reason
and get away with it…including any leader or politician.
Sher: Why in the world do you think the NSA simply didn’t settle the suit? With all of the
documentation you have, it seems that they are guilty of the discrimination and could have spent far
less of the taxpayers’ money to simply pay you off and “make it go away.” They would, also, have
avoided this coming out into the open. Are they that arrogant and Narcissistic?
Karen: This has truly NEVER made any sense to me or any of my friends, even those who worked at
NSA. NSA could have investigated, claimed a “mistake” had been made and retroactively promoted me
without even addressing the unethical behavior of W&S personnel. Instead, the IG refused to
investigate, illegally of course, but I could not have made him do his job. Plus, the guilty were
instructed to blame me for what turned out to be the first leak by ex-NSA executive Thomas Drake,
despite the fact that I had no access to, knowledge of or training in the type of material he leaked
(computer technology) and he was identified as the source of that leak six months before I was fired.
The polygraph section of Security actively tried to sabotage my polygraph exams in response to the
false counter-accusation by inappropriately screaming and threatening me, making it impossible to pass
a polygraph, which ruined my first polygraph in this regard though I passed the next two of the three
given in reaction to the false accusation.
The EEOC is capped at $300,000 actual damages, no punitive allowed. My intention was to get the lost
difference in my wages as a GS-12 when I should have been a GS-14, and to get the appropriate level
of retirement. Yet, clearly, NSA has spent millions organizing and paying civilians (and greasing the
palms of crooked law enforcement) to harass, bully, intimidate,and quite obviously viciously slander
me.
Do they engage in such psychopathic behavior “because they can”? Because they simply have no real
oversight? The operational head of NSA Security is indeed rumored far and wide to be an actual
psychopath who is obsessed with paintings of Dante’s Inferno.
A coworker who worked in NSA Human Resources says she remembered when the resumes of
inappropriate people (criminals, perverts, mentally unstable) were automatically thrown away but
suddenly when General Hayden, a former NSA Director, promoted this particular man, the resumes of
thieves, moral degenerates, etc., were then coveted by Security. She said that she was so upset that
she had to find a different job. I did read an opinion on the Anti-polygraph site that NSA Security
leadership, and hence all of Security in essence, could be said to suffer from Dark Triad personality
disorder, which is a dangerous combination of such things as (malignant) narcissism, sociopathy, etc.
Their egos are such that they are obsessed with winning at all costs…even fighting to keep a known
false accusation from being proven false by their victim, because they exist in their own projected
narrative. They exist in their own lies and cannot stand being exposed. This means they follow their
own agendas. What is good for NSA Security leadership, even at the cost of NSA or the USA. Their
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page144
37 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
allegiances are to themselves. This has made me wonder, of late, if the woman who Security protected
instead of reprimanding or firing for sexually compromising W&S management was not a Security plant,
meant to do just that. And, in so doing, was NSA Security procuring a means to blackmail these
managers for themselves or another entity, perhaps foreign?
Sher: You have multiple photos and even drawings you’ve made of you stalkers. You’ve also indicated
to me that the NSA has been in touch with your local law enforcement. Said law enforcement is siding
with the NSA against you…a private citizen. What do your attorneys have to say about these?
Karen: At the beginning of my search for a law firm to take my case, Melville Johnson PC informed me
that I had potentially two cases, in 2009, an employment law case and a criminal case. I could only
afford to pursue the employment case since I was facing illegal termination on false pretenses within a
few months. While my lawyers have recorded the information about the new assault campaign by NSA
in Florida, thus far their pleas with the EEOC for some kind of response because their client is now in
physical danger have been completely ignored.
What has been going on in Florida is entirely criminal and could be a separate lawsuit, to even include
law enforcement in regard to their depraved negligence…if not complicity. But, at the moment, I am
concerned with surviving the relentless Directed Energy Weapons assaults. If I do not, then my family
will have to consider a wrongful death lawsuit against NSA, FBI (that refuse to get involved because
NSA is involved), and the FDLE, the TPD and Leon County Sheriff’s Department as well as certain
complicit neighbors accepting a new riding mower or new carpeting in exchange for helping NSA
murder an “inconvenient” person who actually thought she had any Constitutional, human, or Civil
Rights.
Sher: With regards to your lawsuit, what are your current plans?
Karen: Good question. Reporting and recording the new barrage of assaults has whittled deeply into
my retainer. This was hard enough to maintain after spending about $110,000, thus far, and often
countering ridiculous and frivolous legal shenanigans by NSA to waste my money. With an outrageously
unresponsive EEOC, which may indeed be a complete and obscene sham for show, one wonders ‘why
continue with the pretense that we exist as a nation of laws’? Clearly, we do not.
The government has no desire for a level playing field to impede its quest for complete tyranny. We are
now a nation of wolves and sheeple. I’m sure that after getting wind of this article, NSA will come to
the EEOC with big crocodile tears claiming they need to win by default because “I” broke the gag order
after they themselves spent millions, bald-faced lying to thousands of civilians, law enforcement and
(apparently) the FBI about me, invoking National Security Letters to swear them to secrecy and to hide
the true nature of their faux “secret exercise” in Tallahassee—i.e., enticing a foolish community to stalk,
harass and commit murder for Big Brother.
But, God forbid the victim would speak out!
It truly sickens me that I spent my career trying to protect and serve my fellow Americans when not
only my government but these unworthy mercenary, sociopaths have stabbed me in the back. Some of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page145
38 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the stalkers have even been Iraqi War veterans…some of whom might not have returned alive without
my reports.
I can’t think a lot about the lawsuit with each nocturnal assault leaving me wondering if I or one of my
family will not wake up tomorrow. I’m sentenced to death for being a patriot. What a country. I read
Psalm 91 & 94 nightly, praying God will want to erase this growing evil from our country. But, I also
remember that Ruth Graham said a while ago, “if God doesn’t judge America, He’ll have to apologize to
Sodom and Gomorrah.”
Americans are just not the people they and we used to be and, therefore, our leaders are either
apathetic cowards who tolerate evil or potentially monsters like NSA Security—who show that they can
be and are not responsible to anyone but themselves.
Is NSA Security even able to be reined in anymore? Or would any potential leader be found dead of a
microwave induced heart attack if he tried to? Someone ought to care but I may not be around long
enough to see it.
Sher: Thanks you so much for all you’ve done and I sincerely hope and pray you’re wrong, Karen. It’s
individuals like you who founded the United States of America on Godly principles and an unwavering
sense of ethics.
*Karen may be contacted for interviews at [email protected]
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page146
39 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
StanJ. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,®
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-669-2163
Greg Szymanski’s Interview
With Julianne McKinney
Microwave Harassment and Mind Control
Transcribed for Advanced Media Group,
05/28/16
This interview contains information from Julianne McKinney’s book “Microwave Harassment and
Mind Control Experimentation”, 1992, as well as current conditions world-wide. Years of
interviews turned Gregg Szymanski from skeptic to believer in the secret world of electronic
harassment, as harassment against Julianne McKinney has turned potentially lethal. They are
taking a stand to help TIs, Targeted Individuals, many civilians, escape this cruel harassment.
“Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of major
source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in this harassment. I
don’t know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV across the street on which I
saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an office environment. Gang stalked. Shows
brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated, sleek, communications operation. Why would it be
used? As I said… either for entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs,
who are to be harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you can’t harass someone if you don’t know
what that person looks like. So it’s a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the TI
looks like.”
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page147
40 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
TRANSCRIPT OF GREG SZYMANSKI’S INTERVIEW WITH JULIANNE MCKINNEY
ON MICROWAVE HARASSMENT AND MIND CONTROL
Published May 28, 2016
Greg Szymanski: (Also) I have a guest who’s never given a radio interview before. Her name is
Julianne McKinney. For those of you who don’t know who she is, she is an expert in electronic
harassment and surveillance…former military background. And those of you who have followed this
story on my show, many may know who she is and the importance she has in this field.
We’re just going to lay some very solid credibility to what we’ve been talking about. So this interview’s
quite important and I want you to remember that, as we go along, she’s a very, very well-read person.
We’re gonna get to that in a minute. The problem on the use of electronic weaponry on a person was
when I was working in a law office. The law office I was working for several…oh a number of years ago,
the law office I worked for prided in taking cases that were difficult. And I listened to a person tell me
about the facts regarding the use of electronic weaponry. And I had a discussion with somebody else at
the law firm and we came to this conclusion …causation… causation… causation Greg, remember that
element. It’s going to be awfully difficult to link what’s happening to the person. The injuries they were
alleging, to actually the person, or the defendants, that were doing it.
So it was a case, I’ll be very honest with you, that I was very skeptical over. But, as a journalist, I
started to interview a number of people, and I would like to say that this issue, after a number of years,
has come up to one of the top of my list as a problem in this country.
I talked to hundreds of people all around the country that are experiencing things that are just
unbelievable. And from a standpoint of the law, you want to get justice for these people. You hate to
see their lives destroyed, and you hate to see what happens, to a person that’s been harassed. But the
biggest problem is it’s very difficult to pinpoint what’s going on.
I have a guest today who is an expert in this field. You, the public, may not know who she is. But those
of you who have been targeted and listen to my show know very well. She’s never been interviewed
before and I feel honored that she’s here. Her name is Julianne McKinney. She’s had an extensive
career in the US Army as an Area Intelligence Case Officer till 1990.
Upon her return to civilian life Julianne became a member of the Association of National Security
Alumni. That is an organization of former intelligence officers dedicated to exposing excesses by the US
Intelligence Services. Julianne became the director of the Electronic Surveillance Project under their
auspices as such she authored the publication Microwave Harassment and Mind Control
Experimentation in 1991. She kept that electronic surveillance project going for four years, funding it
with her own personal funds, obtained by her military benefits and pay.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page148
41 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Julianne did not copy write her work and it is out in the public domain for the public good. Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, the public has taken her hard copy publication and
uploaded it to several thousand domain sites over the past 15 years. It is respected as one of the most
important publications on this subject. And with that, I’d like to say hello, Ms. McKinney, how are you
today?
Julianne McKinney: Please don’t call me Ms. McKinney (laugh).
Greg: Okay, can I say Julianne?
Julianne: Yes, Julianne.
Greg: Now, you’re an expert in surveillance and electronic harassment. The first question I have is
that, in your observation, is there a wider scale of surveillance of average people, people with no threat
to national security, in your estimation?
Julianne: I would say that most of us targeted are not, and never have been, a threat. I think that
what happened initially, when these operations began probably 30 years, ago people were singled out,
perhaps, because of some affiliation, either direct or indirect, with the United States government, and
invited attention. But they were not singled out as being a threat; they were singled out as being
lucrative targets of experimentation.
In the past 15 years, since shutting down the Electronic Surveillance Project, primarily to seek
employment, which I did seek, and did obtain, I had occasion to observe many, many, many instances
of individuals in the corporate environment being singled out and targeted simply because they were
convenient targets of opportunity. And, I have to comment on something I heard you say
Greg: Okay
Julianne: Early on you referred to the difficulty of establishing causation in order to pursue these
claims.
Greg: That, I might add, that was made is a legal sense, based on the fact that we were naïve people,
not really… understand… I have to be honest with you…I had not understood the problem back then,
and felt it would be a difficult problem, based on the fact of how the crime was committed and knowing
how to pin that crime on someone. Go ahead.
Julianne: I understand the legal implications, certainly. There is enough literature, on the internet and
elsewhere, that establishes the existence of these weapon systems. To pinpoint, for purposes of
prosecution, to pinpoint their existence would be difficult and the position I take is that rather than
pinpoint for prosecution purposes, easy enough to single them out by electronic means to destroy
them. But I guess that’s taking the matter a little far left field.
I think, frankly, we still face, until congress establishes laws that forbid the use of these technologies
for involuntary experimental purposes, that we’re going to get absolutely nowhere in attempting to
prosecute.
Greg: Okay, listen, I need to take a break Julianne. And we’ll be back in three minutes on the
Investigative Journal.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page149
42 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Okay, back for the second half hour. My guest is Julianne McKinney. She’s an expert on
surveillance and electronic harassment. And Julianne, I gave you an introduction at the beginning of the
show.
Julianne: Yes
Greg: A brief introduction. But I think our listeners would like to know your background and why
you’re qualified to make these statements. I think it’s important.
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: If you could do that for us.
Julianne: Well, I would take exception to the term “expert” in these weapons systems.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne: I certainly have had experience with them, having, for approximately the past 40 years,
been on the receiving end of this type of harassment. Expertise in surveillance comes with my
employment in the intelligence field. I understand what constitutes surveillance and am capable of
immediately spotting the surveillance and I can see, as in the case of gang stalking, a subject that you
have addressed on prior occasions. I can see those who I label as covert want-to-be’s fumbling through
what they think are covert activities and I’d find it really rather amusing if it weren’t so perverted in the
ultimate objective.
I’m not certain what more I can add. I do have experience with these weapon systems. I’ve had
sufficient opportunity over these past many years to observe the progressive threat of these
harassment operations. And I’m talking specifically about electronic weapon systems.
Greg: Well, you’ve been a voice - I mean a strong voice - for warning people of these systems for at
least the past 10 years regarding the installation of specialized electronic equipment and utilities. What
are these electronics and what are their capabilities?
Julianne: Their capabilities, generally, are to inflict pain in a highly focused fashion, and to alter
mental states. Certainly, when you have a frequency aimed at your brain, your mental functions tend to
alter. In amplified form, they’re sufficient, the frequencies are. They have the capacity to kill. Though
that’s one reason the department of defense refers to them as “less than lethal” rather than “non-
lethal” weapons. As a matter of fact, the Department of Defense has gone so far to eliminate them, to
remove them from the category of even “less than lethal weapons” to bury them in the category of
“electronic weapons” trying to make them a little bit blacker.
Greg: Now is this protocol of surveillance and harassment seemingly patterned after a government
protocol now applied to the general civilian population?
Julianne: It’s difficult to pinpoint everything on the US government exclusively because these are
global operations.
Greg: Okay.
Julianne: The pattern… the protocols, are virtually identical on a global scale so someone is
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page150
43 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
overseeing the entire activity. The government obviously is complicent because otherwise these
operations would not be allowed to exist. Why? It’s hard to say. Whether it’s for testing electronic
weapon systems for future use under combat conditions or whether ultimately there's a holocaust. (no-
intelligible) It’s hard to say.
Greg: Well, you know what I find interesting….how people who aren’t aware of this problem can’t
believe it’s happening to begin with. And I try to mention…I have run stories about the Duplessis
Orphans. It’s a program that’s been verified, that the government actually used money in Canada and
the United States to do medical testing on children, on adults. I’ve talked to people on the POW issue,
one Dr. Joe Douglas, who has documented how, that our government has done …allowed foreign
governments to do illegal experimentation on POWs. So why would people think that they wouldn’t
allow it on just average citizens? Just in your mind. Do you have an answer for people?
Julianne: Why wouldn’t they allow it?
Greg: Yeah, my thing is that they do it, they’re doing it. But some people that deny it can’t believe
that our government would do something like this.
Julianne: I find, even among the community of, I hate using slang terms, but the term TI is common,
referring to targeted individuals. Those are people who know they are on the receiving end of electronic
weapon systems. And even amongst TIs, there is a perception in certain areas that our government
wouldn’t do this; a case of not recognizing reality. First of all if this were not being done by our
government, congress would step in because of the hundreds of complaints they have received,
thousands of complaints, no doubt, over the past 10-15 years, from citizens who recognize what’s going
on. Congress, back in the early 90s, late 80s, took the position that anyone complaining about these
systems were imagining things because they simply didn’t exist. In two years, by 1992, they were off
the drawing boards, and in fact, being fielded and conveyed to law enforcement agencies.
Congress recognizes that these weapon systems exist and funds them, and knows, as a result of
appropriate briefings, what the bio-effects can be. Yet they have passed no legislation prohibiting their
use under unconstrained experimental circumstances.
That’s number 1. Number 2, given the nature, given the nature, given that the systems draw on
existing power grids, it would be necessary for the FCC at a minimum, and the Department of Energy,
as a minimum, give some oversight and control over what is going on. Though obviously, those with
Congress, the FDA and the Department of Energy, the FCC and the Department of Energy are
knowledgeable and yet unwilling to do anything about it. So, there is complicity, but the question is,
who’s knitting, and submitting, the US government, allowing these operations to take place?
Greg: Now from your experience, how intense is this surveillance of targeted individuals? And tell us
about the ways that the targeted …that this is accomplished.
Julianne: From what I have observed, first of all I should explain that the standard that I address this
in Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation, it was a pattern that was unfolding as I
was dealing with other targeted individuals who…that contacted me. It was a pattern of harassment
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page151
44 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
which indicated that there had been some surveillance going on, some monitoring of their private lives.
There had been entry into their houses. There was systematic harassment. And then, ultimately, as part
of a softening up process, and then ultimately, electronic harassment, which followed; which would
include the inducement of auditory input, which is now being referred to as Z2K.
In answer to your question (laugh) I’m not certain if I …I think I’m probably missing the point there,
but in order to target someone, it requires that that person be put under surveillance, so that their
personality traits, their capacity to inter- relate with people, their capacity for corruption or non-
corruption, that seems to be a critical point. And even their religion factors into it.
Following a period of harassments, they are singled out for preliminary stages of harassment which
includes gang stalking, entry of their private homes or apartments, followed by gradually intensified
and ultimately extremely intensified electronic harassment. This is the pattern that has unfolder over
and over and over.
Greg: And so, when you, I guess what I’m getting at…that’s a very good answer. You’re seeing a
pattern amongst these individuals. I guess…yeah…is there any pattern about how they choose them?
Julianne: I can’t speak for men. But it appears that quite a few of the women who have been singled
out appear to be somewhat, too independent; perhaps too intelligent. Tend to live alone or tend to
pursue professional careers. There’s a heavy predominance of those types of women in the TI
community, the community of targeted individuals. Men are in a smaller proportion and seem to be
those who have a propensity to fly off the handle. Have a sense of self-esteem and pride that seems to
invite targeting. And I did mention a curious predominance of a certain lack of religion amongst TIs, as
opposed to a certain predominance of a particular religion amongst those who are participating in these
operations.
Greg: Now you mentioned this was a global problem. Have you communicated with people from across
the Atlantic regarding what’s going on in other countries? Is it similar to here?
Julianne: It’s virtually identical, virtually identical. When I was running the electronic surveillance
project I was in extensive correspondence with people overseas and patterns were the same. The
nature of the gang stalking and harassment were the same.
Greg: Now, when you’re talking about specific numbers I know you’re…you’ve been following this for
years and years and years. Is there any way that you can give our listeners a kind of an idea of how
wide spread this problem is in terms numbers in our country and compared to maybe overseas?
Julianne: I would say that the person who has realized what is going on is just a drop in a bucket. The
persons whom I have seen being targeted are completely unaware of what’s happening. So those who
are complaining of this are, as I said, the tip of the iceberg. I would say this is very, very, widespread.
But I cannot under the circumstances come up with any figures. Many, many, many thousands, no
doubt, are involved. But I would say that the bulk of them are running to their doctors and taking
totally unnecessary prescription drugs to cure ailments that don’t exist.
Gregg: I guess that you have to ask this question even though it’s very difficult to answer. And you
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page152
45 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
mentioned, you said it earlier. But I really have to ask it because it’s on my mind and I know it’s always
in the back of everyone’s mind when they think of this problem. Why?? What is the major reason, I
mean, outside of just pure experimentation… I’m interested; for example, let’s say that they have
targeted 100 people in Oklahoma. What do they, first of all, why are they doing it? Is it for, basically, a
blanket statement ‘controlling the population’? Or…and, what do they do with this information once they
get it?
Julianne: I don’t think they do anything with the information once they get it, other than to establish
a harassment protocol which will follow that targeted individual for the rest of his or her life. Why are
they doing it? I see a number of reasons. First, I don’t know if you’ve done any research on the
phenomenon of capturing a percentage of the population in order to install a dictatorship. There is
always a percentage of the population, roughly 20% or so, that will buckle and throw whatever
constitutions might exist into the toilet and eagerly join the efforts at destroying the remainder of the
population.
Part of the problem or part of the objective they are seeking obviously is testing the latest and greatest
in electronic weaponry and other forms of technologies. A part of it is to control and choreograph those
who are involved in these harassment operations on the dispensing end. And it would appear that those
being targeted are simply objects who I see as ultimately being disposable. In other words, I think that
once full control is established over a major percentage of the population, and enough of the population
is silenced and unwilling to stick their necks out, that we inevitably would be heading toward a
holocaust.
Greg: The question, if I was, for example, let’s say we have a person, who suspects, and let’s just for
hypothetical purposes, say this person is being targeted, okay? Now, tell our listeners, because I’ve
always wondered this myself, okay. I’m sitting in my house and I see around me there’s telephone
poles, there may be a tower in the distance that I don’t see that handles the cell phones. There’s of
course a grid of electric going on around me. I’ve talked to people and I try to say, how does this get
into your house? And I wanted to get your opinion, if a person is targeted, how basically are they
beginning to intrude their premises, and violate their constitutional rights, not only their rights of…not
only trespassing on their property? Go ahead. How would that happen?
Julianne: Now, are you talking about, how would the frequencies impact upon them and how would
they first become aware of it? Or how would they first become aware of the fact that their privacy has
been violated?
Greg: Well no, I guess I didn’t explain the question right. I wanted to know how they physically, are
doing it? I mean are they using a cell tower? Are they using a truck that’s in the distance? How is this
being transmitted into the home to target the person and to use this weaponry on them, from your
experience?
Julianne: Well, first of all, in order to target a person you have to be able to see that person. And
while they may not be able to, they may, on entering the house, plant miniature cameras, miniature
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page153
46 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
microphones, as a means of, for their monitoring a person. But that is not necessarily the means by
which they hone in on a person. There are plenty of technologies that allow for the imaging of a person
that might be sitting in a chair, as you mentioned you might be.
Using infrared imagery techniques, for example, they can capture your image by monitoring the
concentration of heat emanating from your body using certain acoustical frequencies, they can detect
mass. And using sophisticated computer software, they can convert those images to likenesses on
computers, which conceivably could be used in a software program that could be connected to an
electronic weapon system. And in that context I should point out that, while devices draw on the
existing power grid, and while they…yes indeed, they do involve microwave towers…
Sounds like you’ve got a commercial coming on…
Greg: Yes we do, and thank you for making my job easier. We’ll be back in 3 minutes on the
Investigative Journal.
First, I’ve put this in the top 3 of my stories that I believe are important, that the American people need
to deal with, because as Ms. McKinney, who is a, I consider her an expert. She would only say she’s an
authority. But let me tell you, Julianne, you are an expert in this. The reasons could be, like she said at
the…before we went into the break, and a total testing of our population to see, basically, perhaps
maybe there is a holocaust in the future or a dictatorship in the future. And they want to see how
people react to it. That may be a simplistic way to look at it. Not a simplistic way that Julianne looked at
it but my way of explaining it.
But let’s get back to some of the things here, the last few minutes that are important. What can you tell
us, Julianne, about the microwave energy on citizens in terms of the existence of such a program and
the nuts and bolts of what they do?
Julianne: Microwave energy is only one aspect of the entire electromagnetic frequency spectrum.
Microwaves can be lethal depending upon how they’re used. Obviously in order to achieve appropriate
effects on people, they have to be pulsed, because otherwise the individual would be cooked from the
inside out. The objective of using microwaves as opposed to other electromagnetic frequencies would
be to inflict extremes of pain to cause thermal heating. That’s a common complaint which leaves a hot
spot on the scull. Again, primarily, just to inflict extremes of pain. I was just wondering, we kind of
skipped over or didn’t quite complete a preceding topic.
Greg: Oh, go ahead, go ahead. You’ve got free reign.
Julianne: You were talking about the use of the electrical grid throughout the country, the use of
microwave towers, the use of devices affixed to poles that are connected to power lines. But what
wasn’t addressed, what you haven’t mentioned, is also that these weapon systems are used by
neighbors surrounding persons who have been singled out as targets of opportunity.
Greg: Are they solicited to do this or what?
Julianne: That’s something that I’ve been pondering for some time. Again, what I’ve noticed is, there
seems to be a predominant, particular religion that makes it particularly easy for them to cooperate.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page154
47 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Greg: Well listen, let’s talk about that after the break, a short break, and then I’ve got something to,
some business I have to take care of for 3 – 4 minutes. Then we’ll get back for our 2 nd hour with
Julianne McKinney. We’ll take some calls…. Back in 2 minutes on the Investigative Journal.
(In this section there seemed to be jumping around, like maybe the video was edited or there was
some problem with the recording.)
…by some of the Tis – and that’s Targeted Individuals.
…That song rose to number one without any publicity on the internet. And that song called TI, we’ll play
that again Dr. McKinney. I think it hits the nail on the head. I mean there’s a lot of people out there
suffering. And I know you’re one person, an authority in this field. And for my guests who are just
picking us up this hour, Dr…or excuse me, Julianne McKinney is a very highly regarded person in the
field of electronic weaponry, and surveillance in studying this issue. She’s a former area Intelligence
Case Officer until 1990 in the Army. And her credentials can be found, will be found, you can go to
RBNLive.com and go to my archives in the Investigative Journal and read about that. She’s well
qualified. She’s still with us this hour. And Dr…or excuse me, I keep calling you Dr. and you should be.
Julianne: (Laugh) I’m not a Dr., thank you. Dr. Americus.
Greg: Dr. Americus. You know, that’s funny. I have a doctorate in law. And nobody ever calls me that
and I hate being called that, a doctor. But I’m interviewed on a Tehran TV station once every blue
moon, couple months, and they refer to me as Dr. Szymanski. And it’s nice to hear once in a while. I’ll
be honest with you. Every two months is good enough. Otherwise they just call me the jerk on the
radio, which is better.
But, let’s go from here. You’re adding such credibility to this story, adding credibility in my mind as I
speak. Because, I’ve talked to hundreds of these people and was a doubting Thomas in the beginning. I
must mention that. I did not think it existed, and that was years ago. I thought people were either
insane, or crazy, or trying to get attention. But you know something? I will admit I was totally wrong
with that initial…I guess…the look at the situation and have come around to fully believe in most of the
people I talk to and really sympathize with their suffering as I see their lives being ripped apart.
Are there any things you can do…we’re going to get into a few more things here as far as the technical
aspects of this… but what can targeted individuals do to get some peace in their life? I mean that’s one
thing they’re looking for. Is there anything they can do?
Julianne: (prolonged silence)
Greg: Difficult question there.
Julianne: It’s very difficult to advise targeted individuals how to acquire peace. These frequencies can
be blocked or deflected. All of these frequencies I have found, some may contest this, but I have found
can be…are vulnerable, and are subject to deflection. And the pain can be immediately (word unclear),
if not halted all together. Finding peace by writing to members of congress or to state legislators might
not be a better alternative because you will be treated as something worthy of the circular basket. They
just won’t intervene. Writing to the various agencies and calling a meeting with them serves no useful
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page155
48 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
purpose either because they will say there are no laws prohibiting these types of activities. They can’t,
say for example, the FBI…and I was given this statement on a number of occasions….there are no laws
prohibiting experimentation with these weapon systems. You’re talking to the wrong people.
So my advice would be to do what you can to secure your premises, because so long as your house is
or apartment is being entered, you are susceptible to, in addition to being targeted by electronic
weapons, there is a potential for having drugs put in your food. And I’m not exaggerating there.
Greg: I had a few targeted individuals I talked to send me some questions that I’d like to ask you.
Julianne: Certainly.
Greg: And the one was “Are targeted individuals also broadcast around the country via closed circuit
TV?” And, “What purpose does this serve?” I’m fully in the dark on this question, but, go ahead.
Julianne: Okay. I have seen evidence of a closed circuit TV and it seems to be some form of
major source of entertainment and perhaps instruction for the individuals participating in
this harassment. I don’t know who runs it. I have seen aspects of that on a large screen TV
across the street on which I saw surveillance films of a TI being harassed, obviously, in an
office environment. Gang stalked. Shows brain scans and is otherwise a very sophisticated,
sleek, communications operation. Why would it be used? As I said… either for
entertainment, for creating a sense of unity, or for identifying persons, TIs, who are to be
harassed on the street. I mean, obviously you can’t harass someone if you don’t know what
that person looks like. So it’s a means of communicating to the perpetrators, perps, what the
TI looks like.
Greg: Okay, now, before I get to some more, I want to put out that call for people to call. I got a
couple emails. A lot of times Tis don’t want to go public. And they’ve sent me some emails. I want to
get to one in a minute. But one question I have for you is, how can people gather evidence to support
their beliefs that this is happening to them? Many people will say, well it’s only a lack of sleep. I mean,
you have a sleep disorder. Maybe there’s a problem with your joints, I don’t know. It could be anything
that the answers are when you suspect you’re being targeted. What kind of evidence do you tell people
to gather to support their beliefs that this is actually happening to them.
Julianne: Well, when you’re gathering evidence, obviously you have an objective in mind and that
generally is legal. What you want to do with that evidence. There’s really nothing you can do with it. So
in the absence of that, the main thing is to try to protect yourself and to alleviate the pain that you’re
experiencing. Collecting the evidence, if you were to go to, frankly, I’d strongly recommend that you
keep your faculties together and avoid going to see psychiatrists and psychologists, because the pattern
that is evolving is that they are highly complicit of these operations.
And if you go to a medical doctor, you do not talk about it because medical doctors, many, are also
involved. What you do when you see a doctor is that you define your symptoms and get a very clear
statement that, “well, we can’t figure this out”. Well, that’s a clear indication that it is not indigenous,
it’s not part of your system. It’s not coming from within you, so obviously something is happening from
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page156
49 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
outside. If they prescribe drugs and yet can’t find the ecology, the basis for your disease, don’t take
those drugs.
Greg: Now earlier we were talking about the fact that they may, whoever’s doing this, you’ve
delineated, you’ve led a good course into what…you’re tracking these people. But what I was getting at,
we never got to the point where if…you mentioned something about a religious group that may be
targeted. What did you mean by that?
Julianne: The way… I don’t….well let me put it this way. I’m not out to start a religious war. I have
found over the years that the persons involved, both in gang stalking….I’ve made it a point to get to
know these people. I’ve had to necessarily. I’m not the type to…
Greg: You’re talking about the perpetrators or the targets?
Julianne: The perpetrators.
Greg: Okay
Julianne: As well as the…I’ve been drawing distinctions. And what I’ve found is that the perpetrators
appear to belong predominantly to one particular religion; whereas the targeted individuals do not
belong predominantly to that particular religion.
Greg: And what is the particular religion of the perpetrators?
Julianne: Right. So, at this stage, again, I’m not particularly enthused about the idea of starting a
religious war. And I have challenged other TIs to get out there and become acquainted with, and get to
know, the people who are harassing them, to draw those distinctions themselves, because I’m not
going to be making brash claims. This is something I’ve observed over the past 10 years.
Greg: That’s fair enough. And maybe, perhaps, I could talk to you about it just for my own knowledge
off the air.
Julianne: That would be fine.
Greg: And I will keep your name out of it at that point and let people know what the targeted group
may be and what the other group may be.
Julianne: There is a religious influence but that’s not to say these people aren’t just being used as
puppets by some broader interest.
Greg: Very good point. Can you stick with us one more segment of 5 minutes?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: We’re interviewing Julianne McKinney, our last segment. Julianne’s an authority in the use of
surveillance and electronic weaponry. And this is an email question, kind of a technical one from a TI.
Let me read this to you. Perhaps you can answer it. Are the protocols for each individual modified based
to custom tailor it for the specific targeted individual? And if so, how does this process work?
Julianne: Yes indeed they are modified. There is a basic protocol that the perpetrators begin with. But
the TI contributes to the modification. A good example of that would be, if someone…. I’m trying to
think of a good example. If the TI feels the need to cooperate, even in the most subtle fashion, with the
persons who are harassing him or her, he or she will modify his behavior, in pathlobean condition, which
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page157
50 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
alters the protocol. They’re constantly, targets are constantly monitored, and if they respond
emotionally to a particular trigger, that will be built into the protocol. If the target displays a certain
sense of guilt or embarrassment about a subject, that will be built into the protocol. It’s an ongoing
process. And one thing I want to emphasize is no TI should look for a reason as to why this is going on.
It’s a serious, serious mistake. I know I did that myself when they started on me and over the years I
came up with probably 6 different excuses.
Greg: Is it still going on with you?
Julianne: Oh yes. Not to the degree that it was before but certainly in very lethal form.
Greg: Now, how has this hampered your life?
Julianne: It’s come close to being lethal on a number of occasions. I deal, I dealt with gang stalking
head on and I essentially put that to rest. I deal with….I’ve developed a means for communicating with
perps directly and made them feel like the trailer trash that they are. So gang stalking is not one of
their favorite activities in my case. So the primary activity now is to see what I can survive in the way
of an induced brain aneurism or stroke or a heart attack.
Greg: I just had a caller who doesn’t want to get on the air but wants to know, does moving help;
moving your location?
Julianne: Running, if you’re talking about moving to a completely new location, no. This country is
wired to the hilt for immediate transfer. Your protocol follows you wherever you go so it’s a waste of
time. Moving about physically in place will not change anything. Other than, if you make a 180 degree
turn you will notice the targeting will suddenly stop because the weapon systems are programmed to
focus on a particular area of your anatomy. So if you turn, the targeting will suddenly end. If you turn
back it’ll hit you again.
Greg: Interesting. Now, going full circle in the last 2 minutes here, in 1991 you published “Microwave
Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation”. This has been passed around the internet and over
thousands of domain sites over the past 15 years. Can you tell us how someone can get ahold of this
publication to be informed?
Julianne: It’s not copy-writed. All they need to do is plug in my last name, McKinney, and type in the
title Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation and innumerable sites will appear and
just read it from there. It will give you a good insight into what the pattern is when harassment begins.
Greg: Now, let me just spell your name for people that are going to do that. That’s MCKINNEY…
McKinney. And then it’s Microwave Harassment and Mind Control Experimentation for an authority in
the field.
I guess since 1981, have you seen….I guess a question I wanted to ask, from 2001, have you seen any,
from the time of 911, has there been an increase in the last 4or 5 years, with this type of, that you’ve
seen, in the number of people contacting you. Has it been more wide spread since 911?
Julianne: Not since 911. When…I would say back in the early 90’s… I’ve seen a tremendous expansion
of these activities since the early 1990’s. And it has moved forward in consistent fashion. It’s become
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page158
51 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
ever more sophisticated and ever more wide spread. There was no sudden burst or flurry of activity
since 911.
Greg: And you have no help whatsoever with the political arena in this. Correct? Politicians will not
touch this with a 10 foot pole?
Julianne: That’s right. And even those who purport to be liberally inclined, and I’m speaking about
members of the democratic party, will not touch it, because quote unquote, and they know, they know
what’s going on. They don’t …they simply don’t have the funds to be able to pursue it. All sorts of
humma humma excuses will be furnished for not pursuing something like this. Before you close….I hear
the music in the background.
Greg: We can stay another minute if you want.
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Why don’t you come back for 2 minutes on the other side of the break and then we’ll finish up.
Okay?
Julianne: Okay.
Greg: Okay, back with Julianne McKinney and 3 minutes on the Investigative Journal. You wanted to
say something at the break.
Julianne: I did. I want to thank you very, very much for taking on this subject. There are so few in the
media, as a matter of fact, you’re the only one I know of, who has the guts to address it.
Greg: And you know, it really doesn’t… just in defense of every other media person. I don’t think its
guts, in a sense, maybe it is. I don’t consider myself having guts in this issue. I consider it to be an
issue that you need to take time to understand it. And that’s what I would recommend to the people in
the media that haven’t touched this issue. If it isn’t being down right censored by someone above you,
at least take the time to talk, I’ll spend time talking to you about it. Because it took me a little time to
figure it out. And, I’ll tell you what, its people like you that need to be applauded because it’s your
efforts that are bringing this to the forefront. You’re laying the credibility on the line. But I thank you
anyway for your kind words.
And with that, I wanted to say goodbye to you. And we’re going to have to move on. And we’ll have you
on again to talk about this. And thank you so much.
Julianne: And thank you so much.
Greg: And that was Julianne McKinney. And she is an authority in the use of electronic weaponry and
microwave weaponry and she was with us for the last hour and a half.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page159
52 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Dr. Nick Begich – Author and Expert Researcher
of Electromagnetic Weapons
Biography
Dr. Nick Begich is the eldest son of the late United States Congressman
from Alaska, Nick Begich Sr., and political activist Pegge Begich. He is well
known in Alaska for his own political activities. He was twice elected
President of both the Alaska Federation of Teachers and the Anchorage
Council of Education. He has been pursuing independent research in the
sciences and politics for most of his adult life. Begich received Doctor of
Medicine (Medicina Alternitiva), honoris causa, for independent work in
health and political science, from The Open International University for
Complementary Medicines, Colombo, Sri Lanka, in November 1994.
He co-authored with
Jeane Manning the
book Angels Don't Play This HAARP; Advances in
Tesla Technology. Begich has also authored Earth
Rising - The Revolution: Toward a Thousand
Years of Peace and and his latest book Earth
Rising II- The Betrayal of Science, Society and
the Soul both with the late James Roderick. His
latest work is Controlling the Human Mind - The
Technologies of Political Control or Tools for Peak
Performance. Begich has published articles in
science, politics and education and is a well
known lecturer, having presented throughout the
United States and in nineteen countries. He has been featured as a guest on thousands of radio
broadcasts reporting on his research activities including new technologies, health and earth science
related issues. He has also appeared on dozens of television documentaries and other programs
throughout the world including BBC-TV, CBC-TV, TeleMundo, and others.
Begich has served as an expert witness and speaker before the European Parliament. He has spoken on
various issues for groups representing citizen concerns, statesmen and elected officials, scientists and
others. He is the publisher and co-owner of Earthpulse Press. He served as Tribal Administrator/Village
Planner for the Chickaloon Village Council, a federally recognized American Indian Tribe of the
Athabascan Indian Nation for five years and served four years as the Executive Director of The Lay
Institute of Technology, Inc. a Texas non-profit corporation. Currently Begich consults for tribal
organizations, private corporations and others in a number of research areas.
Dr. Begich is a single person with five adult children, and four grandchildren.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page160
53 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 1
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Covert Harassment Conference
1-2 October 2015, Berlin, Germany
2
3 DR. NICK BEGICH
Mind Control: A Brave New World together with HAARP -
4 The Update
5 DR. BEGICH: Hello, and thank you for being
6 here and thank you to Peter and the rest of the team for
7 putting this together.
8 Everyone hears me okay, yes? In the back?
9 Okay. Good.
10 All right. I want to give a little bit of
11 background in terms of my interest in these areas. For
12 those that don't know my family story, it really goes
13 back quite a ways.
14 My father was in the United States Congress in
15 the early 1970s during the Nixon Administration. He was
16 lost in a plane with Hale Boggs. Some of you may
17 remember this if you've got a little bit of gray hair.
18 Hale Boggs was our House majority leader at the time,
19 one of the most powerful people in the United States
20 Congress. He was also a Warren Commissioner. He had a
21 strong dislike for J. Edgar Hoover, because he basically
22 read everybody's mail, tapped everybody's phones,
23 including the United States Congress, and then,
24 essentially, blackmailed political leaders to follow
25 whatever script he laid out.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page161
54 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 2
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Boggs was a pretty outspoken individual. At
2 the time -- it was just before the second election of
3 Richard Nixon -- Boggs came to Alaska to work on my
4 father's campaign, which would have been his second term
5 in the United States Congress.
6 Boggs, before they flew out on October 16th,
7 three weeks before the second election of Richard Nixon,
8 began to talk about this scandal brewing in Washington,
9 DC. In fact, that very scandal, had it unfolded a
10 little bit differently -- for those that remember, the
11 planes disappeared.
12 Three weeks later, Nixon's elected for his
13 second term. It wasn't too much long after that that
14 the Watergate scandal broke. Agnew was thrown out of
15 office. Ford moved up. Then Nixon resigned. Ford
16 moved up again. For those that don't remember,
17 Rockefeller then slid into the Vice President's slot.
18 And then one of the old Manson women from the Charles
19 Manson days tried to assassinate Ford, which would have
20 put Rockefeller in the White House.
21 What would have otherwise happened, most
22 likely, the election would have taken place. Nixon
23 would have won. Agnew and Nixon would have been thrown
24 out at the same time. The Democrats would have
25 controlled the Congress. The Speaker of the House would
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page162
55 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 3
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 have elevated to the Presidency. The Democrats would
2 have been in control. But the opposite, of course,
3 happened and history tells us a lot about what really
4 happened there.
5 Twenty years later there was a report, an
6 investigative report by a publication called "Roll Call"
7 in Washington, DC. That report was looking into all of
8 these various Congressional deaths. You know, plane
9 crashes are kind of the hazard of political leadership,
10 it seems like.
11 But in researching that, what they found in the
12 FBI files were a couple of telexes -- this goes before
13 FAX machines -- and telexes coming from California into
14 Washington, DC reported that two people had been found
15 at a crash site. Those sources were later looked at by
16 the FBI to determine whether they were credible. A
17 follow-up telex came through saying, yes, they were.
18 That plane was never recovered. There were no survivors
19 officially; yet 20 years later, we find out, in fact,
20 there were.
21 So I know about conspiracies. Conspiracies are
22 conversations that happen in a room like this when
23 there's a bunch of people standing on the outside who
24 might not agree with us. But the reality is, even in
25 the political life, even at the highest levels, things
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page163
56 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 4
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 happen. Things happen that aren't easily explained.
2 Maybe a few decades go by before the truth is finally
3 revealed.
4 So I have a strong motivation foundationally in
5 terms of how I approach controversial issues. I don't
6 do it with fear. I've been doing this work for over 20
7 years. Fear isn't part of the equation. In fact, that
8 is the absolute adversary for getting anything
9 accomplished on this planet.
10 My interest in these areas started with HAARP.
11 And how many in this room do not know anything about
12 HAARP?
13 Okay. Well, that's a lot better than it used
14 to be. All right. It used to be the other way around.
15 Twenty years of this work and the work of others have
16 kind of brought this into the public.
17 So the first image -- I'm going to use HAARP as
18 sort of the backdrop as I move into the mind control,
19 mind effects-related technology. This is just an image
20 in my part of the world. I come from Alaska. I don't
21 know if -- maybe I've come the farthest for this
22 presentation. But I appreciate being here and I
23 appreciate the opportunity to inform people about this
24 subject.
25 So HAARP is a large array, a field of antennas
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page164
57 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 5
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 in Alaska, currently 180 antennas. They're
2 approximately 20 meters tall. They have a cross dipole,
3 which you can see, which is the very top of these
4 antennas. And what these are designed to do is focus or
5 concentrate radiofrequency energy into a relatively
6 small space.
7 If you think about the energy of a flashlight,
8 for instance, or a torch, as they say here in Europe, I
9 shine that against the wall, the beam starts out small,
10 and then it broadens as you get further away from the
11 source.
12 The same is true with radiofrequency energy.
13 You can think about it as an inverted funnel starting
14 here at the transmitter and then spreading out and
15 getting thinner and thinner, less dense, which is why
16 the further you get away from radio broadcast antennas,
17 the weaker and weaker the signal.
18 With HAARP, the opposite occurs. They have
19 figured out a way through what's called cyclotron
20 resonance, which would be focusing or concentrating the
21 energy. So if you could visualize it, it would look
22 like sort of a cork-screwing kind of motion that got
23 smaller and smaller as you move further and further away
24 from the transmitter.
25 So it concentrates that energy or focuses that
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page165
58 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 6
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 energy so you can manipulate it in various ways. And so
2 the HAARP array, which was originally designed by a
3 gentleman, Bernard Eastlund, who's now deceased, was
4 intended to do a number of things as a weapons
5 application. This is the earlier version when it was
6 half the current size of the transmitter in Alaska. You
7 can see the field of antennas. In this case there were
8 90 antennas in the array.
9 And here's another image as they expanded the
10 array to 180. And another image showing the array.
11 Now, they also upgraded the technology pretty
12 substantially over the years. So it became much more
13 efficient. So with a much smaller system you create
14 much bigger effects.
15 So what does it do? Essentially, it's sending
16 energy or focusing energy up into an area known as the
17 ionosphere, which in this image in miles -- I apologize
18 for that -- is approximately 37 miles to 620 miles out
19 into space.
20 Now, this is a highly energized area. If you
21 think about radiofrequency signals or shortwave signals,
22 they would come from the earth, they'd bounce off of us,
23 and then bounce back down to the earth to transmit over
24 large distances.
25 The ionosphere also is an area that can be
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page166
59 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 7
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 disturbed by solar radiation, radiation from the sun.
2 When it becomes destabilized, it interferes with
3 terrestrial communications of every kind.
4 So part of the idea in this technology was to
5 learn how to stabilize the ionosphere during these
6 periods or deliberately disrupt the ionosphere to
7 interfere with communications on a global basis.
8 Now, what caught my interest when I first
9 looked at this issue of HAARP was a very short article
10 in a publication, an Australian publication, that talked
11 about this big system in Alaska.
12 Now, I come from a family that's pretty
13 politically engaged. Besides my dad being in the
14 Congress, my younger brother just finished a term in the
15 United States Senate. My family's been involved in
16 politics a very long time.
17 Alaska is a very big region, but we're a really
18 small population; 700,000 people in our entire region.
19 And when you think about big projects, you know, you
20 think you know something about them.
21 Well, I'm reading about this project in my
22 state in a journal in Australia and I'm going, you know,
23 why doesn't anybody know about this?
24 And so I decided I would go in and look into
25 this issue independently. And I did. I picked up maybe
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page167
60 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 8
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 30 articles and papers, design specifications, some
2 things, and with friends encouraging me to publish, I
3 published the first article that I had written on HAARP
4 back in 1994. So it's been a very long time ago.
5 What also caught my interest was the idea that
6 they were primarily utilizing, in some applications,
7 extremely low frequency signals or ELFs. These are
8 signals that can be biologically active, can affect us
9 as human beings and in very specific ways.
10 And in particular, certain applications of the
11 technology -- and this gives you sort of a graphic
12 illustration of the focus. These view graphs, actually,
13 were given to me by the inventor, Bernard Eastlund,
14 prior to his passing. And we utilized them in our
15 publications and in some of our work. So this gives you
16 kind of a graphic showing the radiofrequency from the
17 array, moving up into the ionosphere and focusing that
18 energy.
19 His initial concept was to create a global
20 shield, to be able to utilize the natural magnetic field
21 lines that surround the earth, be able to punch energy
22 into this and then create this kind of global shielding
23 effect. And the idea was that any electronic device
24 piercing that energy would be disrupted, like
25 satellites, intercontinental ballistic missiles,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page168
61 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 9
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 virtually any electronic device that ran into this field
2 of energy that was being amplified would be destroyed.
3 Now, one of the other interesting parts of
4 this -- and this kind of shows that, again, utilizing
5 one of Eastlund's graphics. So you can see like a field
6 line and then you see this cork-screwing energy going
7 around it. That energy naturally is occurring from the
8 southern polar regions into the northern polar regions.
9 And, in this case, they actually couple -- actually
10 utilize the energy on the ground to couple with the
11 natural energy, and then coming from the north to the
12 south, create this cork-screwing effect, which
13 accelerates the electrons and then creates this global
14 shield.
15 Now, that was his initial concept. And as a
16 concept, it caught the attention of a number of people
17 and eventually got funding from the Congress, initially
18 at 30 million, and over the last few decades now over
19 almost 300 million, which in dollars is not a lot of
20 money, but when you consider, this is sort of the
21 pinnacle of billions of dollars spent in ionosphere
22 research over many decades.
23 What caught my attention in terms of the
24 technology of Eastlund -- I'm going to skip some of
25 these that are not so relevant -- was the idea that you
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page169
62 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 10
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 could manipulate the ionosphere -- and I'll use this as
2 a better example. So one of the thoughts was that if
3 you could punch or pulse energy into the ionosphere --
4 so think about this energy going up and, like, a hammer
5 ringing a bell. Every time it hits that ionosphere, the
6 ionosphere itself vibrates and then it begins to send a
7 signal in the ELF range. So you have a high frequency
8 signal going up, punching the ionosphere, the ionosphere
9 which is energized then acts as a broadcast antenna in
10 the sky bringing back an ELF signal to the earth, and in
11 this case covering an entire hemisphere.
12 Now, ELF signals, extremely low frequency
13 signals, are very long wavelengths. They penetrate the
14 earth and sea. They're utilized for communication with
15 submarines, as an example, the depth, because short
16 wavelengths won't penetrate the earth and sea. They're
17 also used for what's called earth-penetrating
18 tomography, which in simple language or by analogy would
19 be like x-raying the earth or looking into the earth for
20 underground structures.
21 But one of the side effects of ELF is the
22 entrainment effect on the human mind. Because ELF
23 signals will lock onto in what's called a frequency
24 following response. And you can use a lot of different
25 techniques to create a frequency following response.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page170
63 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 11
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 You can use flickering light, you can use binaural beat,
2 which I'll explain in a few minutes. You can use
3 electromagnetic fields such as this, or even the power
4 grid itself can be modulated in such a way to create a
5 signal that the human body will join with, will couple
6 with, and begin to follow. It doesn't take a great deal
7 of energy to accomplish this.
8 This is the one that triggered my real interest
9 in HAARP, because this is the one that everybody kind of
10 ignored and said, oh. In fact, the HAARP planners said,
11 well, if ELF has a biological effect, it's a side
12 effect. It's an unintended consequence. We heard that
13 phrase earlier today. But I don't believe that. I
14 believe that it's an intended consequence. It's
15 intended to grade populations in very specific ways.
16 Now, this book was mentioned by my friend
17 earlier today, "Between Two Ages", by Zbigniew
18 Brzezinski. And why this is an important book, it was
19 written, actually, in 1973, when Brzezinski was at
20 Columbia University. This is before he became National
21 Security Adviser to President Carter. This is around
22 the time that Kissinger and he and others were starting
23 to think about the Trilateral Commission organizing this
24 think tank, so to speak.
25 Now, find this book. I really encourage you to
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page171
64 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 12
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 find this book and read it, because it is not a
2 prediction of what will come with technology. It's the
3 blueprint, in fact. You can read this.
4 When I first read it -- he writes in a pretty
5 convoluted style. It's a little difficult even in
6 English to understand. But I really encourage you to
7 read it because he predicted the economic changes that
8 took place, the political changes that took place in the
9 world over the last 40 years with a great deal of
10 accuracy. And some will say it really wasn't the
11 prediction. It was the plan.
12 If you look within this text between Pages 54
13 and 56, you'll see a section that's dedicated to the
14 kind of technologies we're talking about today, a mind
15 control technology. And what Zbigniew referenced was a
16 guy named J. F. Gordon MacDonald. And he was a
17 geophysicist at UCL. He wrote a book -- or, actually, a
18 chapter in a book and the chapter was called, "How to
19 Wreck Your Environment", which this is before Earth Day,
20 okay, so he could get away with that. It was 1969 when
21 that book was actually published. But what he said that
22 caught Zbigniew Brzezinski's attention was, he said, if
23 we could ever figure out how to electronically stroke
24 the ionosphere in just the right way, we could return a
25 signal to the earth that would influence the behavior of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page172
65 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 13
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 people over huge geographic areas.
2 Now, that's a pretty profound thing. But we
3 didn't have a way to stroke the ionosphere in 1969. But
4 we did by the 1990s. And that was, in fact, and is, in
5 fact, the HAARP system that can accomplish this.
6 So the idea was -- and it was kind of, in a
7 gross sort of way, primitive, if you will, but what the
8 intention was, was that if you could pulse the
9 ionosphere, return this ELF signal to the earth, you
10 could agitate the population in very specific ways. You
11 could make them passive, less aggressive, or the
12 opposite by just amplifying that signal. And I'll
13 explain a little bit of that as we go on.
14 The other person that comes out in the last
15 presentations, Jose Delgado, and this book he wrote,
16 "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized
17 Society". And this is, again, a 1960s book. Those
18 images that you saw in just this short video clip of
19 Delgado's work, there is a good section in this text as
20 well showing that.
21 But in those days they used implants. They had
22 to physically put something in the brain. And what Jose
23 Delgado originally did -- he was actually educated in
24 electrophysiology at the University of Madrid. He
25 graduated in 1950. Electrophysiology, as a degree
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page173
66 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 14
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 field, thinking about it in 1950, now 65 years ago, most
2 people don't even realize that's an area of higher
3 education today, much less that far back.
4 One of my mentors, Raul Makayla (phonetic), he
5 actually graduated University of Madrid in 1958, and his
6 area of interest was, essentially, the same, biomagnetic
7 and electric fields, effects on human physiology, and he
8 spent his career studying that.
9 Delgado, at Yale University, he initially was
10 mapping the brain of primates and humans by stimulating
11 various portions of the brain to figure out what was
12 responsible for what kind of activity. And then he
13 began to utilize the implants in those dramatic ways in
14 those film clips with the charging bull and he throws
15 the switch and the bull stops, to demonstrate that you
16 could take a creature from passive to highly aggressive
17 to passive to highly aggressive, just like flipping on
18 and off the lights in your living room.
19 What Delgado discovered by the mid-'80s is that
20 you didn't need any implants. You just needed to
21 manipulate the energy itself. And you didn't need a
22 great deal of energy.
23 Now, we've heard -- I forget the amount of
24 energy surrounding us now. Was it a quintillion? I
25 believe it was 18 zeros after the one that we heard
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page174
67 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 15
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 earlier. Back when I wrote the HAARP book in '94, just
2 radiofrequency energy alone, it was 200 million times
3 more around us every day than nature created in 1994.
4 Now, when you think about it, what did Delgado
5 discover? He discovered that one-fiftieth of the amount
6 of energy in the natural background noise of the earth
7 was sufficient to manipulate the behavior of human
8 beings if you could hit the right frequencies, if you
9 could hit those window frequencies that stimulated that
10 kind of activity.
11 Now, if you think about this -- again, by
12 analogy, think about dialing through the radio stations
13 on a radio. In between the stations you get the white
14 noise, the static, you get no clear signal. But when
15 you have resonance between the transmitter and the
16 receiver, then you get a nice, clear signal.
17 The same is true in our physiology. Whether
18 you're looking at stimulating or affecting a specific
19 element in the body, molecules in the body, cell
20 structures or organ structures or even the human mind,
21 it's about manipulating the underlying energy.
22 When you think about medical science in terms
23 of how the fork in the road is and how this kind of
24 applies to why don't we know more about this today,
25 well, there's lots of literature now. 25,000 sources, I
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page175
68 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 16
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 think we heard quoted earlier today. 25,000 sources
2 talking about the energy interactions with the human
3 body. That is a lot of information.
4 But what happened in medical science? A lot of
5 people that went into life sciences, they were really
6 good in the chemistry, a little weak in the math, so
7 they went to life sciences. People who were a little
8 better in the math, they went to physics. And then once
9 upon a time, these two came together and we got
10 biophysics, which is really the root of real health
11 science. If you really want to get to the meat of it,
12 you've got to get to the energetic interactions that
13 create chemical reactions that then manifest in the
14 body.
15 And that's what we kind of miss in so much of
16 our medicine. We followed a pharmaceutical model as
17 opposed to an electromagnetic model. In the '30s, prior
18 to World War II, that fork in the road was being
19 explored pretty aggressively, the energetic models. But
20 they were somehow lost in that shuffle and we ended up
21 with the pharmaceutical industry, and the results of
22 that, I think we can all not be quite so proud of.
23 In terms of where the technology is going and
24 where a lot of the science is going, it will be
25 electromedicine that cures most of what we call
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page176
69 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 17
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 incurable. It will also be that which enhances or
2 debilitates human consciousness itself.
3 Now, Jose Delgado, when he figured out that you
4 didn't need implants, you just need to manipulate the
5 energy itself, this became kind of the essence of sort
6 of where everything went from there.
7 But I want to roll back a little bit, a little
8 bit back in time, and talk more about the evolution of
9 mind control as technology starting with the work at
10 Harvard University of a gentleman, Estabrook, who was
11 working in the Harvard hypnotherapy labs in the 1920s.
12 You can look Estabrook up. Look him up at the Library
13 of Congress and you'll see his list of publications, and
14 I recommend that you do that.
15 What he decided was that you could create what
16 we would call today a Manchurian candidate. You could
17 take certain individuals, put them in a very, very deep
18 state of hypnosis and then over a period of time train
19 them so they would be like this super spy that you could
20 send into another country and they'd hang out for a year
21 or two, but if they got captured, they wouldn't really
22 remember any of their former self, and then when they
23 came back, in this case, into the United States, that we
24 would then give them the appropriate suggestions and
25 then extract the intelligence from them.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page177
70 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 18
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 And this is what Estabrook was working on. By
2 the 1930s, a lot of his work was being classified and he
3 continued to work in this field up through the 1960s.
4 His last book -- and I always like to read the last
5 thing someone writes, you know, because it tells you a
6 lot about, sort of, the conclusions and there are things
7 that you might discard bits and pieces as science
8 enlightens you and your experience enlightens you. And
9 what he talked about in that last book were the
10 experiments he was involved in using LSD and other
11 hallucinogenics in mind control, which he actually
12 talked about in a favorable sense.
13 And for those of you that remember, the CIA was
14 heavily involved in this in the 1960s and, in fact, the
15 whole area pre-1960s going back even to the Korean War,
16 which is sort of my next mark on the timeline.
17 The Korean War, we had prisoners, patriotic
18 young Americans come back from war and they're handing
19 out Communist leaflets on street corners, and the term
20 or the phrase brainwashing came into being. That's
21 where it came from. It came from that series of events
22 after the Korean War.
23 The idea of being able to manipulate people's
24 behavior and change them so profoundly became of
25 interest to the predecessor of the Central Intelligence
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page178
71 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 19
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Agency and then later the Central Intelligence Agency.
2 And what they looked at were lots of different ways to
3 manipulate human behavior.
4 Now, when I was researching my first book with
5 Jeane Manning, "Angels Don't Play This HAARP", I was
6 looking for a good source document that would speak to
7 this, because you always read about this in secondary,
8 tertiary sources. And so I'm in a book room, a big
9 surplus book room, and I'm telling this guy that I know,
10 I really need this source. And as I'm having this
11 conversation, I reach unconsciously behind me into a box
12 and I pull out this book.
13 This is a really interesting one. This is
14 actually a presidential report. This is a report that
15 was commissioned at the time, 1975, to look at the
16 abuses of the CIA. Now, this came out of the Church
17 Committee reports, which were Congressional hearings
18 that took place in the early '70s to investigate the
19 abuses of the Central Intelligence Agency, the kind of
20 abuses that we read about today, because nothing really
21 changed. Supposedly, this was to change things.
22 Now, what's in this report? The LSD
23 experiments were in this report. The idea the Central
24 Intelligence Agency was domestically infiltrating civil
25 rights groups, antiwar groups, people that, essentially,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page179
72 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 20
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 opposed the government within the United States, which
2 was not part of their mandate, in fact, was illegal.
3 The fact that they were reading people's mail, utilizing
4 unwitting victims and experiments for mind control. All
5 of this came out in this report in 1975. And yet, the
6 CIA continues to do it even to this day.
7 Think about the kinds of activities that have
8 been reported pretty widely over the last few years,
9 whether it's digging through garbage to blackmail other
10 diplomats, which is something our Intelligence community
11 does, whether it's to send pallet loads of money into
12 countries like we did in Afghanistan to bribe officials
13 as a way of doing business, or whether it's to
14 assassinate people with drones, kidnap people and
15 torture them.
16 Now, most of us don't know people like this,
17 but this is the government that I unfortunately have
18 guiding my country right now. It's a government of
19 criminals. Now, people want to talk about, oh, this
20 couldn't happen here.
21 It has happened here. It's happened for
22 decades in the United States. This report by the
23 President's Commission touches the very tip of that
24 iceberg.
25 This is another document. This is -- this guy,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page180
73 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 21
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Captain Tyler, he later became a colonel and retired.
2 He was involved in pretty much the sort of esoteric side
3 of some of the government research. This book -- this
4 chapter out of this book is called, "Low-Intensity
5 Conflict and Modern Technology". It was prepared by
6 Maxwell Air Force Base in 1984. And it was talking
7 about a large -- a variety of technologies.
8 But in this particular one, if you look at,
9 certainly, the subject lines, you have stimulation of ,
10 bones* generation, healing of fractures, treatment of
11 disease, healing of wounds. You look at behavior
12 modification in animals. You know, some of these things
13 that are listed here were kind of under the mysterious
14 category. They couldn't really explain what was
15 happening in 1984.
16 But the idea was to stimulate research in these
17 fields. So a number of things happened. A lot of money
18 started to flow into these areas. One of the reports
19 that came out in the 1980s as a result of some of this
20 was the Radiofrequency Dosimetry Handbook. It was a
21 big, thick handbook. It was produced by the University
22 of Utah under contract to the United States Air Force to
23 determine the radiofrequency dosages that were required
24 to override every vital organ of the human body, whether
25 it be the heart, the liver, the lungs, the kidneys, just
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page181
74 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 22
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 sort of preempt their natural function to be able to do
2 it remotely.
3 And the idea was to take that leap of
4 technology and begin to apply it into weapon systems.
5 Mind control. "The Economist". Cover story. Some of
6 you will remember this one. This is 2002, I believe.
7 Yeah, 2002. And what this cover story was about was
8 about the ethics of mind control. Not saying, hey, does
9 it exist or doesn't it exist? It's just saying it's
10 here right now. We really need to be debating whether
11 we should advance this technology, whether we should
12 limit this technology. "The Economist" is certainly a
13 credible publication. Not too much happened from this
14 story.
15 This is -- unfortunately, it's not showing up.
16 November -- you can get this one on my website. I'll
17 give you my website, because this is a very important
18 document. The Navy set up a new set of regulations for
19 human experiments. It was approved in 2006. You know,
20 in history, that's like tomorrow and yesterday, right?
21 It's, like, now. And in this they specifically call out
22 mind control experiments and who has the authority to
23 approve them. And the persons with the authority to
24 approve them is under secretaries of the Navy in the
25 case of Navy Intelligence or Naval research.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page182
75 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 23
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Now, it's not just CIA. Naval Intelligence
2 does this work. The Marines have a section on
3 non-lethal weapons that this falls under. The Air Force
4 has the electromagnetic directorate, which is working in
5 an area called controlled effects, which deal, again,
6 with mind control and physiological effects on human
7 beings. In fact, they publish a publication called
8 "Technology Horizons". I believe it's the June 2004
9 issue. You can look it up. The cover story is on
10 controlled effects.
11 Now, what are controlled effects? The first
12 effect is attacking hardware; you know, like equipment,
13 like machines, to be able to interfere with the flow of
14 electrons through circuits to disrupt those machines to
15 operate. Not using bombs and bullets and the things of
16 history, but using energy itself to manipulate hardware.
17 The second sort of level of controlled effects
18 talked about in that article is the idea of manipulating
19 the software, the systems that run those systems, so
20 that you can disrupt the software, then you disrupt the
21 hardware, and things collapse.
22 And the third leg of controlled effects is the
23 human operator. And what they say in this particular
24 article produced by the electromagnetic director of the
25 Air Force is that we can target or create the illusion
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page183
76 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 24
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 of all of the senses in the human body; sight, sound,
2 touch, taste, to give people complete memory sets,
3 complete experiential sets that you wouldn't be able to
4 distinguish the synthetic from the real.
5 Now, think about that for a moment. What does
6 that do to court testimony in 20 years if this becomes
7 the norm? They're now talking about using this for
8 post-traumatic stress syndrome folks, people coming back
9 from warfare. This just sort of cleans up the garbage
10 of the mind and gets rid of that stress. Some people
11 think that's a great idea. Personally, I think that's
12 the biggest mistake we could ever make. Because
13 whatever those servicemen and women were engaged in --
14 what used to happen in warfare -- what happened in World
15 War II when everybody came back, they said, I don't ever
16 want to see my children in these things, I don't want to
17 see my grandchildren in these things. Wars need to be
18 put down, not amplified.
19 When you take the human factor out of warfare
20 and it becomes like a videogame, then our willingness to
21 withdraw from direct conflict no longer happens.
22 And think about where our military science has
23 gone. In fact, I want to mention another very important
24 publication. It was produced by the US Army War College
25 in the early 1980s. It's called the "Revolution of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page184
77 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 25
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Military Affairs and Conflict Short of War". And this
2 particular paper was talking about revolution of
3 military affairs. What is that exactly?
4 This is a leap as important as the introduction
5 of gunpowder in the middle ages in Europe, as important
6 as atomic weapons in the last century. And that's how
7 they characterize it. And what this is is the leap
8 where we move from ordinance, from bullets, bombs,
9 things that rip tissue and tear things up, to
10 electromagnetic weapon systems that keep sort of the
11 hardware intact, but debilitate the human operator to
12 the point of being combat ineffective. Or conversely,
13 enhance the possibilities within our own combatants
14 while degrading the abilities of others.
15 There's simple ways that you can achieve this.
16 You can introduce to the battlefield certain elemental
17 compounds that in small background amounts would not be
18 considered dangerous. Let me give you iodine as an
19 example. We all need a certain amount of iodine in the
20 body to maintain thyroid function. But if you have too
21 much iodine, you'll get poisoned. You'll die. You'll
22 get sick.
23 So what can you do? You can send a signal in
24 that resonates the very same signal strength and
25 frequency as iodine, you can send that signal in and the
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page185
78 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 26
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 body will begin to react as if its gotten this massive
2 load of iodine and show all the symptoms of iodine
3 poisoning. You check the thyroid; check the blood, it's
4 not there. Mystery illness.
5 Something as simple as that for manipulating
6 large populations, not necessarily with their consent
7 and not necessarily with clear knowledge, and nothing
8 shows up in the background that would say why this
9 poison actually exists that would account for this. A
10 simple way.
11 One of the other ways that this technology can
12 be exploited is really quite simple. There was an
13 article produced by "Parameters", which is a military
14 publication. "Parameters". You can look it up. It's
15 the -- I believe it was the Fall 1998, but you can look
16 up the article name called, "The Mind has no Firewall".
17 It's a very important article. This article talked
18 about all the various ways in which you could introduce
19 mind effects or mind control technologies using modern
20 technology today. And the original article was actually
21 written in a military journal called "Orienteer"
22 published in what is now Russia.
23 What's interesting about this is it said you
24 could use any electromagnetic carrier, whether it be
25 radio, TV, the Internet, now cell phones; but,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page186
79 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 27
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 essentially, any of these carriers, you can modulate a
2 signal on them that will manipulate behavior of segments
3 of the population.
4 And the Russians demonstrated this in a couple
5 of different ways. There was a program. It was called
6 "Undercurrents". It aired in the CBC, which is the
7 Canadian Public Broadcasting System. "Undercurrents"
8 did two really interesting stories that I got to
9 participate in. One was on HAARP and the other was on
10 mind control. And on the mind control story that they
11 did -- this was a very popular program in Canada at the
12 time and this particular segment was their highest rated
13 that they had ever run. And they had folks that came in
14 who were involved in the "Star Wars" initiative during
15 the Reagan Administration that couldn't talk about what
16 they did in the White House, but they could talk about
17 what they observed in Russia.
18 And one of the things that they talked about
19 was the idea that you could -- you could create, sort
20 of, this white noise and on this white noise carry a
21 signal. And so they put out this message, bring us
22 cake. And Russians at tea time, you know, they eat
23 these little cakes? I guess you do that in other parts
24 of Europe as well.
25 And so at the appointed time they began to
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page187
80 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 28
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 broadcast this. And workers from within that building
2 and on the street were bringing cake into the meeting
3 room without really knowing why they were doing it.
4 They just felt like doing it. Well, that was, in fact,
5 what they were programmed to do.
6 Now, this goes back. We're talking about
7 15-year-old technology. And when you think about sort
8 of where did it go from there, in 2006, there were a
9 couple contracts left by DARPA, which does research for
10 the defense industry in the United States. And DARPA
11 used to be run by a guy named Tony Tether. Tony Tether
12 was a good friend of Ben Eastlund's.
13 Now, what they were doing then was, they had
14 left two contracts to the University of California for
15 what's called electronic telepathy. Okay. Electronic
16 telepathy. The idea of reading another person's mind at
17 a distance by analyzing the emanations coming from this
18 area, being able to analyze that and determine and
19 interpret what it is. And then the other half of the
20 contract was to create complex signals to see if you
21 could transfer that array, so to speak, of signals into
22 another person's consciousness and whether they would
23 perceive the same images.
24 Now, there was work done by Elizabeth Rauscher
25 and her late husband, Bill Van Bise, in this very same
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page188
81 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 29
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 area. In fact, I have a copy of their unpublished paper
2 where they actually built an electronic circuit where
3 they could take a person in one room and a person in
4 another room, attach this person to that circuit and
5 this person to that circuit, and then, you know, the
6 psychic card where they show the triangles, the squares
7 and the circles and the little squiggly lines, a hundred
8 percent accurate with nine test subjects who had never
9 experienced consciously in any way any sense of
10 extrasensory perceptions or psychic perceptions. They
11 did it with hardware, transferring thoughts from one to
12 the other.
13 Now -- which tells me it's probably a little
14 more simple than what DARPA's doing. But when Ben
15 Eastlund was doing work on HAARP and he was doing other
16 work for DARPA at the time and we had talked about him
17 in our first publication, and then actually after
18 publication became friends, and Ben Eastlund's attitude
19 was, you know, some things just shouldn't be done. And
20 one of the things that he had been working on was
21 whether modification technologies, which he was at that
22 time and when we first met, making that technology
23 available to the military. And after some dialogue with
24 us and others, he decided there's certain technologies
25 that are not safe in the hands of military.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page189
82 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 30
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 At one point along the course I began doing
2 quite a bit of work on this whole mind effects issue.
3 And I caught the attention of a woman, Dorothy Lay.
4 Now, Dorothy is one of the heirs to the Lay, as in
5 Frito-Lay and PepsiCo Corporation. So a very wealthy
6 family. Dorothy was very interested in this technology
7 specifically as it applied to victims.
8 And so she approached me at one point and asked
9 if I would become a member of her board of directors for
10 a non-profit that she was setting up to deal with these
11 kinds of technologies. And I've got to think about
12 whether I should tell you the rest of this story, and I
13 think I will, because why not?
14 So I have this thing, intuition. All of us
15 have it. I used to not pay as much attention to it as I
16 do today. When my intuition tells me something, I
17 listen, because when I really think about it, it's never
18 been wrong. Neither has yours, if you really think
19 about it. Or maybe you don't think about it and just
20 start acting on it.
21 So my intuition said -- and this was a very
22 difficult time for me in 2002. In 2002, I had been
23 betrayed by a very good friend, economically was
24 bankrupt in the middle of this work, because I started
25 this work in '94. Economically was being crushed. And
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page190
83 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 31
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 at that point I was deciding whether I was going to stay
2 in this work at all.
3 And I'm going through a bunch of my files and I
4 see this file and it's marked Lay. And I remember this
5 person had contacted us needing some information and we
6 provided it. And we never charge for that. I mean, the
7 way we operated is, I sold books. And people like you
8 bought my books. And they allowed me to do this work.
9 I didn't write for grants where somebody could
10 manipulate me and control me and tell me what to say. I
11 didn't go out and find some publisher that would edit
12 out my work. I risked my own money. I published my
13 book. And then I asked people to help me by supporting
14 that work by buying that book. And I tell you, I made
15 two and a half million dollars and I spent that two and
16 a half million dollars over 20 years doing what I'm
17 doing right now.
18 A VOICE: Thank you.
19 (Applause.)
20 DR. BEGICH: And the whole idea was just to
21 educate. I didn't deal with victims. Okay. And the
22 reason I didn't was because I felt that that was putting
23 the cart before the horse. We first need to educate
24 people that the technology is real, that this could
25 really happen to people and from that foundation, and
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page191
84 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 32
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 that became the foundation of my work in this.
2 So Dorothy calls me on the phone and she says,
3 will you be on my board? And I talked to her for about
4 an hour. At the end of the hour, I said, no, I can't be
5 on your board.
6 She said, well, why not?
7 I said, because my intuition is telling me I
8 really can't be on your board.
9 And she goes, well, I deserve more than that.
10 I said, okay. I don't know your board members,
11 I don't know who your board is, but something in here is
12 saying there's a problem there and I don't want to be
13 associated with them.
14 (Applause.)
15 DR. BEGICH: So it was a couple of months later
16 I got the call back. Because I told her also, I said,
17 you have millions. You have the ability. Go research
18 what they say they're doing. Go see if it's really
19 being done and find out for yourself. Do your due
20 diligence again.
21 And she did. A couple months later she came
22 back and she said, you were right. They were defrauding
23 me a number of ways. I've cleared out my board. It's
24 just me now and my attorney. Will you be on my board?
25 Now, bear in mind, I'm in a pretty desperate
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page192
85 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 33
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 situation economically. At the time I have five
2 children at home. I've got people to take care of. I
3 have an economy that I've got to manage. And I tell
4 Dorothy, no, I can't be on your board.
5 She says, well, why not?
6 I said, well, I need to meet you first in
7 person, eyeball to eyeball. I said, we're going to talk
8 for three days. We're not going to talk about your
9 foundation. I want to know everything I'm ever going to
10 read about you and your family in the newspaper. I want
11 you to have the same knowledge level of me. And I want
12 to know what your world view is before I join with you
13 in achieving that world view, because you have the means
14 and I have the willingness if that world view is shared.
15 So we spent a few days. We decided that I
16 could do this. And for four years I worked with her.
17 And we put together, as her major effort was, a
18 conference on mind effects. But it wasn't open to the
19 public. It was closed to the public. And it was to
20 bring some key people together to have a conversation
21 that would be open and free.
22 And one of those people I invited was Ben
23 Eastlund, who by then I'd gotten to know, had watched
24 what he had done in terms of his career. He was well
25 connected with DARPA at the time.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page193
86 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 34
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 And I called him and I said, you know, Ben,
2 would you consider participating in this conference?
3 And he said, you know, if you had asked me this
4 seven or eight years ago, on a scale of one to ten, ten
5 being the relevance and importance of this, and one
6 being irrelevant and unimportant, I would have given
7 this a one or a two. He goes, but -- he goes, every
8 time I talk to Tony Tether or others at DARPA, nobody's
9 laughing about mind control anymore and it's a nine or a
10 ten and, yes, I'll participate in your conference.
11 The next person I asked was Garth Nicolson.
12 Does that name ring any bells for anybody? Okay. Garth
13 Nicolson was a full professor, I believe it was Texas
14 A&M. He taught medical students. He taught over a
15 thousand medical students. He was the guy that blew the
16 whistle on Gulf War Syndrome and testified in our
17 Congress six times before his wife was fired as a
18 molecular biologist from Texas A&M. And he was tenured;
19 they couldn't fire him. But they definitely harassed
20 him, because he was one of the first courageously enough
21 to step up to the plate and complain about what had been
22 happening in the Gulf War; we depleted uranium and some
23 of the other technologies that were being applied there.
24 Well, the best thing that ever happened to him
25 was he got out of the university system. He formed a
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page194
87 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 35
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 nonprofit to deal with chronic disease. And he was
2 somebody that I watched maintain his course under really
3 difficult circumstances. So he was invited to that
4 conference.
5 I invited the daughter of my mentor, Raul
6 Makayla. She's an electrophysiologist. She serves on
7 one of the boards in Russia that regulates medical
8 applications of lasers. She's an electrophysiologist.
9 Quite brilliant. We invited her.
10 We invited Rosalie Bertell. Does anyone
11 remember Rosalie Bertell? Okay. A few. Rosalie's
12 passed. Also deceased now. She was a mathematician,
13 physicist, biologist. She taught higher mathematics to
14 doctoral students at Berkeley. She was also a nun.
15 It's kind of an odd combination. She was the lead
16 statistician to go in to Bhopal for the World Health
17 Organization after that huge chemical disaster. But she
18 was considered one of the top people in the world for
19 dealing with victims of radiological experiments,
20 including electromagnetic radiation. She actually took
21 some of our work and added to it and published a book on
22 the HAARP system and its effect on human beings on this
23 sort of broad scale. So we had invited Rosalie, who had
24 been through some really difficult times as well, rose
25 out of her own ashes and maintained her ethical
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page195
88 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 36
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 platform.
2 The other person we invited was Alexander
3 Kaivarainen. Does anybody recognize that name? He was
4 the former head of the USSR Academy of Science
5 Biophysics Department for ten years. And this is the
6 area that really gets into the meat of what we're
7 talking about here today. Now, what got -- Alex, I
8 believe, is deceased now also. You know, all these
9 guys, you know, they're a lot older than me and they
10 keep dying of old age. But Alex got his stimulation in
11 science at a young age watching a demonstration of the
12 paranormal, ESP, telepathy, these kinds of things in
13 Russia when he was a teenager. And it just really
14 caught his interest.
15 When I met Alex, he was in his 60s and he was
16 the brightest top five physicists on the planet,
17 recognized by institutions around the world. And what
18 he had determined is that there were rational reasons
19 for why these things manifested. So he was invited to
20 this conference and actually presented a paper giving
21 the mathematics and the physics that lends itself to
22 these extrasensory possibilities, these things that the
23 military now calls anomalous human capabilities. We
24 used to call it extrasensory perception or ESP, but now
25 they give it a new name because there's a lot of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page196
89 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 37
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 connotations with that that kind of get you discredited
2 in certain segments of the scientific community.
3 So I want to talk -- roll back again a little
4 bit -- I want to talk about binaural beat, which I had
5 mentioned earlier in this presentation. And I jump
6 around a little bit. It's kind of my style. I used to
7 not even use these things, but I think people feel more
8 comfortable using them.
9 The binaural beat. We can't hear these really,
10 really low frequency signals, because the human ear
11 doesn't quite work that way. Below a certain frequency,
12 the human ear won't hear.
13 Now, a gentleman by the name of Robert Monroe
14 developed a method using binaural beat where you could
15 send in a signal within the range of human hearing, say,
16 at 15,000 Hertz or pulses per second or cycles per
17 second, coming in one ear at, say, 15,000, another
18 signal coming in the other ear at, say, 15,007. Within
19 the cranium they will cancel each other out and leave a
20 beat frequency of seven, the difference between the two.
21 15,000, 15,007. The beat frequency becomes seven Hertz,
22 seven pulses per second, which happens to be in the
23 upper Theta range, and this is where the brain then
24 drives to.
25 At the same time that that occurs, you get a
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page197
90 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 38
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 hemispheric balance, a distribution of energy across
2 both hemispheres of the brain, the analytical side and
3 the creative side and working together. This is
4 actually how human beings are supposed to function.
5 This is how young children predominantly function, with
6 more of a balance between the hemispheres, where the
7 energy is more balanced. And then we educate them.
8 And with young girls, who we say are more
9 intuitive and have this other operation of the brain,
10 and young boys are more analytical, and now we kind of
11 treat everybody the same so we kind of dumb them all
12 down to the same level. But when you look at young
13 children and you look at where their brain activity is
14 and between 3 and, say, 5 or 6 years old, they have
15 this predominant brain frequencies or a lot of Theta
16 brain frequencies coming in and then some ELF and then
17 higher frequency ranges.
18 Now, what is Theta? Theta states if we're in a
19 Theta state, we're kind of like in that dream-like state
20 between awake and asleep where you're consciously aware
21 of your dreams. That's where 3 to 5 year olds spend a
22 good deal of their time. That's why their imaginations,
23 as we call it, are so active. And we keep saying, oh,
24 don't pay attention to that, don't pay attention to
25 that. This was our first attempt to shut down the
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page198
91 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 39
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 intuitive combinations of the way the brain is actually
2 supposed to work.
3 In fact, for those who have a Christian
4 background, you know Jesus Christ himself said, look at
5 the little children, watch what they do. You know, I
6 think I heard somebody say something about this earlier,
7 little children come to the table kind of innocent with
8 a view of the world that's quite different than the rest
9 of ours. But the brain activity of children is unique
10 and we begin to take that out of them in the structure
11 of the way we educate.
12 So what Robert Monroe -- he was actually a
13 radio engineer. He owned a bunch of radio stations. He
14 had this really weird experience. It's an OBE, an outer
15 body experience, that he had that kind of threw him.
16 You know, it didn't make any sense to him. So he
17 began -- he also noticed that in the background there
18 was this kind of noise that he perceived.
19 So he began to experiment and he created this
20 technique for binaural beat. He developed a whole
21 series. In fact, he actually got US patents on a
22 binaural beat. This is an image taken out of one of
23 those US patents from 1994, and this is showing the
24 brain before the activity, before turning on the
25 Hemi-Sync, and this is after, showing a more even
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page199
92 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 40
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 distribution in a more rhythmic pattern in the
2 brainwaves as you see in the upper right-hand corner.
3 Let me roll back again so you can kind of see
4 the comparison. Normal brain, kind of disorganized
5 activities happening all through the brain, and then a
6 coherent signal creating a hemispheric balance and an
7 optimization of brain potential.
8 So what did he do with this? He developed a
9 whole series of things; audio input technology,
10 essentially, to manipulate behavior, but where you're in
11 control of that manipulation. So you want to quit
12 smoking, you get his CD on quit smoking. It affects the
13 brain in such a way, becomes compelling, very affective.
14 Sleep disorders can be addressed in this way.
15 They have someone be able to relax, meditation,
16 concentration, accelerated learning. A whole array of
17 things can be done. And they did this by working with,
18 over the course of many, many, many, many years, and now
19 his daughter doing the work of working with thousands of
20 people to determine which signals actually created which
21 effects and then developing technology that they could
22 place in the hands of individuals to make the choice on
23 how to use it.
24 Now, that's kind of an interesting way of
25 looking at technology. It was my area of interest, in
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page200
93 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 41
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 the beginning of all of this work, was not looking for
2 the dark side of all of this, but in the mid-'80s I got
3 very interested in light and sound stimulation of the
4 brain that capitalized on sound signals and flickering
5 light for brain entrainment. Entrain the brain where
6 the brain will follow that external signal or what's
7 called FFR, frequency following response. So very
8 little energy.
9 Let me roll back to Delgado again.
10 One-fiftieth of the amount of energy the earth creates
11 is sufficient to move your brain into very specific
12 states. Dialing that radio up, if you will. This is
13 just another technique for altering brain activity that
14 might be beneficial, but you're in control of it, not
15 somebody else.
16 I'm going to skip some of these just because
17 they're not so relevant. And I'm going to close the
18 images and let me just go back into the whole dialogue
19 of this, mind effects.
20 When I think about sort of where do we go with
21 this conference, when we put that conference together
22 with the Lay Institute, our purpose was to put together
23 these really good thinkers to try and see if we could
24 create a synergy between them.
25 And when I first got interested in doing
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page201
94 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 42
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 something actively in science, it wasn't about HAARP and
2 it wasn't about mind control. The role that I thought I
3 would play -- and I was working in a government office
4 at the time, and it was -- my friend said, you make your
5 living with your left foot. Because I could make my
6 living, but the rest of my creativity could be engaged
7 elsewhere and me working in bureaucracy was really a bad
8 match.
9 But the point was, my youngest son, when I was
10 getting really frustrated with my work, said, change
11 channels.
12 You know, I'm thinking about this, because I
13 had just given him this discussion about creativity was
14 like changing the channels on the TV set, right, and so
15 he's feeding it back, time to change the channels, Dad.
16 So I thought about it. And what I decided I
17 would do is -- I read independently in science over 20
18 years. I had read some really compelling things from,
19 say, one guy in one branch of science. I thought, boy,
20 if this person could ever meet that person, you could
21 really see something happen.
22 And the first paper I actually ever presented
23 in science, I was 19 and it was at another obscure
24 conference that I ended up in on biorhythm research.
25 And my paper was contrasting at that time the Soviet
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page202
95 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 43
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 method of research versus the US method. Now, the US
2 method was compartmentalization, separate. You know,
3 distill things down to the smallest subspecialty and
4 then push these people into a corner and let them do
5 this bit of the research. And then you've got nine
6 other people over here and ten other groups over there
7 and fifteen groups over there, and somewhere all of this
8 stuff comes together and it gets really sloppy. Okay.
9 It's sloppy because there's a lot of repetition; it's
10 very expensive.
11 Now, the Russians, Soviets at the time, they
12 didn't have the money for that kind of research, to
13 spread it out that way, and they used a very different
14 method. They took experts from all of these different
15 fields, even though they didn't seem like they should
16 connect. They put them in the same room to work
17 together to develop science. That's why when you look
18 at the exposures that we had seen earlier, what are the
19 regulatory exposures of electromagnetic fields, the
20 Russians in the '90s and the '80s were a thousand times
21 more stringent than they were in the US.
22 Well, why was it? Because they had actually
23 made the observations that we hadn't made and actually
24 connected the dots in a way to say, hey, this is
25 dangerous. That doesn't mean they followed their own
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page203
96 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 44
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 regulations, because they probably didn't. They did
2 whatever was expeditious there. But at least they
3 recognized the physiological responses to
4 electromagnetic fields and the fact that you could
5 manipulate it.
6 What was discovered by a guy named Allan Frey,
7 he was looking at microwaves, and he discovered that
8 there's this flickering effect, but it only occurred
9 when you pulse-modulated the signal. And if you look
10 at -- I heard earlier, it's always scalars. It's always
11 scalars. It's not vectors. It's not electromagnetic
12 fields as we think about them.
13 But if you look at the ones that affect human
14 psychology and physiology, if you look at those signals,
15 they have a very quick rise time and a very fast drop.
16 They're like the punch, like punching that ionosphere to
17 create the ELF. It's like those signals. Those
18 modulations on these other carriers are meant to trigger
19 that effect by you entraining to that pulse, that
20 firing, or some submodulation being carried on a general
21 carrier.
22 Now, if you remember the first Gulf War, the
23 first Bush War, and you remember how the Iraqi Army just
24 sort of gave up. The fourth largest Army in the world
25 just like school children on their first fire drill
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page204
97 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 45
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 throwing their hands up and surrendering, you know,
2 thousands of guys to a few dozen. What was that about?
3 Now, I speculated on this. And then it was
4 Scottish media that later reported on this and said it
5 was Project Solo, which was a project operated by the
6 United States. And what we did is we had this C-130
7 flying over the country at the time and it was taking
8 and piggybacking the signal on the radio broadcast going
9 into the region that were broadcasting the Muslim music
10 and prayers.
11 So all these guys are in their bunkers
12 listening to their favorite radio station. Unbeknownst
13 to them, the subsignals being played on that broadcast
14 created anxiety, high levels of anxiety and fear. And
15 then you watched this Army just collapse under this.
16 And that was kind of the -- in my view, the
17 first test of could you really do this, could you do it
18 in this adversarial environment.
19 And one of my friends joked, hey, it's the
20 perfect Republican weapon, right? You can keep all the
21 hardware in place, but totally wipe out the population.
22 Zbigniew Brzezinski said, in between two ways,
23 it doesn't matter if it's Republicans or Conservatives.
24 They just use different rationale for accomplishing
25 their political ends. On the conservative side, the
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page205
98 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 46
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Neocon side, it might be the fascination with gadgetry
2 and new technology, as Zbigniew Brzezinski said, and on
3 the liberal side it might be the idea that we're doing
4 this for your own good. The government is here, right?
5 And we've all heard that before.
6 The fact of the matter is, when you start
7 thinking about mind control technologies as a concept,
8 the idea that someone believes that they can interfere
9 with your free will, this is something that most
10 religions in the world say God won't even do. Yet, men
11 think this is their appropriate direction in technology,
12 to interfere with the way consciousness flows.
13 Now, think about for a moment what are the
14 things that -- what is the easiest way to manipulate
15 consciousness? The easiest way, the simplest way.
16 Create an environment of anxiety and fear. Because what
17 happens at that point is you cannot reach your higher
18 states of consciousness.
19 If you look at Monroe, rhythmic patterns in the
20 Hemi-Sync as an example, higher states of consciousness
21 are associated with those rhythmic patterns within the
22 brain; not that incoherent scattering of death and
23 information and energy.
24 So if you create a certain environment of fear
25 and anxiety and you look at an EEG monitor and the brain
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page
Page206
99 of
of183
173
548
673 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 47
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 activity of an individual, you see it's kind of
2 scattered in patterns. One person is experiencing
3 higher emotions; love, compassion. You begin to see
4 rhythmic patterns.
5 Another simple way of seeing is something that
6 you can actually measure. Take two people that are in
7 love and they -- you know the saying, and I looked into
8 her eyes, right? If you actually gaze into the eyes of
9 another individual and hold that gaze, you'll begin to
10 mirror each other's brain activity in a pretty unique
11 way. Your breathing will even synchronize if you do it
12 long enough. Two people's breathing begins to
13 synchronize. Their energy fields begin to synchronize.
14 And at the same time, their awareness, their
15 intuitions elevate and their rhythmic patterns in the
16 brain can be seen. If you can create an environment of
17 fear -- think about the advertising you see on
18 television. It's all about how you smell, how your
19 breath is, you know? It's all these things to make you
20 uncomfortable.
21 Think about the 6:00 news. Now, we heard
22 someone talk about the 6:00 news and how that kind of
23 works. You come home from a hard day at work. Most
24 people sit down in front of the television set. They're
25 already fatigued. They begin to watch the television.
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 207
100 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 48
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 And then their spouse hollers, it's time for dinner;
2 it's time for dinner. How many of you've been there,
3 right? Nobody's listening. No one's hearing. Because
4 they're in a light trance-like state.
5 Now, if you look in a dark room -- the
6 television is here -- look behind you at the white wall
7 and look at the flicker rate. If that flicker rate is a
8 coherent signal within a certain range through the optic
9 nerves, your brain will lock onto that signal. If you
10 monitor the brain activity at that time, you'll drop
11 into this highly-suggestive state and now you listen to
12 the advertising.
13 Now, every school of psychology teaches
14 frequency following response today and that you can
15 create these kinds of effects. Would they apply in
16 advertising? Of course they would. That's why
17 advertising works so well. It works because it's
18 convincing and compelling.
19 When you look at the 6:00 news, would somebody
20 utilize that in broadcasting the news of the latest
21 propaganda from whatever source it's coming from? I
22 would speculate -- today I would speculate and say yes.
23 When you think about how simple it is to create
24 that agitation. There was a person at Valencia
25 University who published a paper in 1995 talking about
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 208
101 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 49
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 this whole concept. And what he said back then was you
2 could create a complex signal, broadcast it out over a
3 large area that just created the sense that something's
4 not right. Unease.
5 And then you go watch the 6:00 news and they
6 indict some specific ethnic group, maybe it's Muslims,
7 and then a certain amount of that anger gets diverted
8 that way. Well, in a day where a lot of things are
9 decided on the laser edge of populations, on majorities,
10 this is a very, very powerful tool and one quite simple
11 tool to apply in the modern world.
12 When you think about news feeds today, how much
13 is really investigative reporting and how much of it is
14 just spitting out somebody's press release, right? Very
15 little investigative reporting today because it's
16 expensive, because it's not immediate, and when you look
17 at the news media today, it's almost immediate and most
18 of it is just meant to entertain. It's not meant to
19 inform.
20 You know, freedom of the press, it used to have
21 something to do with keeping an informed public so we
22 could make good decisions and we could govern as a
23 public. Today we debate the media as freedom of speech.
24 Say whatever you want, say it however you want, but
25 nobody takes responsibility and we have the neutered
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 209
102 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 50
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 neutral news. And if you really believe it's neutral,
2 come on.
3 Everybody who assigns a story to a reporter
4 knows that reporter's biased. The editors have bias.
5 It comes out in the news and what gets published and
6 what doesn't. How many stories about mind control hit
7 the news? Occasionally. The economists might pick it
8 up. Somebody might pick up a little bit, a piece of it.
9 But no one has really taken it on as a topic and
10 consistently pursued it.
11 Yet, when you think about modern technology and
12 the resolution -- now, we've been talking about things
13 that have happened in the past, and somebody even
14 mentioned this, MK-ULTRA is a program -- you've heard it
15 alluded to. That was the CIA's program. It had 144
16 subprojects under it.
17 Most of the records surrounding that were
18 shredded by a guy named Gottlieb, who was responsible
19 for that at the Central Intelligence Agency during the
20 Church Committee hearings. We never really got the
21 truth back then. But the resolution, the ability to do
22 this, has become increasingly refined as our technology
23 has advanced.
24 When you think about technological advances,
25 one of the things I read says that technology from the
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 210
103 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 51
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 invention of the wheel to where we are today, it doubles
2 about every nine to ten months. Wow. Think about it.
3 Invention of the wheel to where we are today, ten months
4 from now we're going to double that, and then we're
5 going to keep doing that.
6 It used to be every five years in the 1980s,
7 and it kept shrinking as our computing power increased
8 and our ability to manipulate large amounts of data
9 increased.
10 Now, a super computer, think about a super
11 computer. A super computer will do somewhere, when I
12 was doing this work, about 280 teraflops a second, which
13 at that time would be like six billion people on the
14 planet with hand calculators doing a calculation every
15 60 seconds for 60 hours to do what that super computer
16 could do in a second.
17 Well, the next evolution -- some think it's
18 already here -- are the quantum computers. What will
19 the quantum computer do? A quantum computer in one hour
20 will do what a super computer does in a trillion years.
21 It's back to this analogy of how much EMF do we have out
22 there.
23 Well, think about the same kind of
24 amplification and computing power. You look at privacy
25 as a concept. It doesn't exist in the world today,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 211
104 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 52
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 right? Virtually everything about us is catalogued,
2 tracked, whether it's your GPS on your phone, whether
3 it's your phone conversations -- in the United States,
4 every piece of mail is photographed for who it went to
5 and who sent it.
6 When you think about your telecommunications,
7 your Internet connections, Google, AT&T, Verizon, all of
8 them have violated the very essence of what personal
9 privacy is all about.
10 Because today, in the 21st Century, we need a
11 revolution, an evolution of what privacy is all about.
12 Because you, experiencing the victimization of this
13 technology, are the pinnacle of the abuse. But everyone
14 is subject to abuse of personal privacy.
15 You used to think about it, it would start and
16 end in our physical doorway in our home. It has nothing
17 in your home compared to what is in data banks stored on
18 every single human being in this room.
19 Now, people say, oh, don't worry about it. We
20 don't have the ability to collect. We don't have the
21 resolution to look into it. Quantum computers will give
22 that resolution. Whichever government finds quantum
23 computing first will be able to hack through every
24 security code for every system on the planet within
25 hours. They'll be able to predict with so much accuracy
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 212
105 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 53
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 by collecting all that data and analyzing that data, it
2 will almost seem a spiritual event.
3 But it will only be accurate up to a certain
4 point. And then there will be a little bit of a flaw.
5 And over time that flaw will amplify to where it's big
6 flaws. But we'll rely increasingly on these systems to
7 guide our world, to guide our ideas, our philosophy, and
8 how we pursue the world.
9 The Internet. What people think about that is
10 the world wide mind of the 21st Century. PBS, our
11 Public Broadcasting System, did a special called "The
12 World Wide Mind". And they say within 100 years -- and
13 I say within 20 years or even now -- maybe it already
14 exists now -- but within 20 years that you'll be able to
15 connect the physical minds of all of the people on the
16 planet in a world wide mind.
17 Now, that might appeal to some. It doesn't
18 really appeal to me from the standpoint of technology.
19 I think we already have that on a certain level. I
20 think we already are connected on a certain level. Our
21 belief systems limit our ability to access that level,
22 but I believe it's here.
23 And I've seen enough demonstrations of it. You
24 know, all those scientists I had in that room for that
25 mind effects conference, the part that really blew me
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 213
106 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 54
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 away that I didn't expect was what they really centered
2 on was the idea -- and this was Rosalie Bertell, the nun
3 and physicist, and she said that the next leap is going
4 to be the leap where we realize or we recognize or we
5 remember our extrasensory perceptions, our anonymous
6 capabilities as human beings and that becomes the next
7 evolution of the human kind.
8 And what suppresses that is fear and anxiety,
9 because you cannot reach those cases of consciousness as
10 long as you're in fear and anxiety. And anyone who
11 purports or is a victim of these technologies, do you
12 have anxiety, do you have fear? Of course you do. Do
13 you have the ability to reach those higher states of
14 consciousness in that condition? It's physiologically
15 not possible.
16 So when you think about entire populations,
17 whether it's religion injecting fear or whether it's
18 government injecting fear or as my friend used to say,
19 you know, the king keeps you poor and the church keeps
20 you dumb, kind of was the early idea when you think
21 about how things evolved in Europe several hundred years
22 ago.
23 When you think about modern technology on the
24 backdrop of that concept, what's changed? Nothing's
25 changed. It's just the same deal. You know, 6,000 wars
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 214
107 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 55
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 in 4,000 years, most of them over religion; let me give
2 you a clue, God doesn't need any help killing anybody.
3 God can probably do it himself or herself.
4 The fact of the matter is, the idea that people
5 would just be evil on -- and I think I heard earlier
6 today that the psychopaths are in the minority. I
7 believe they are. I think really evil-to-the-core
8 people, they're out there, but they're not this mass.
9 Most people do things because they believe they're
10 right, and then they want to impose their rightness on
11 other people.
12 And this is kind of a mistake and then we end
13 up in this conflict between ideas without being fair and
14 recognizing people's right to disagree. And I heard it
15 said earlier, certain things you can't say in Germany.
16 Certain things you can't say in a movie theater, too.
17 You know, you can't yell fire. Now, it makes good
18 sense. You don't want to yell fire in a movie theater.
19 Some would say what we're doing here is yelling
20 fire in a movie theater because we're letting people
21 know what we know, what we've concluded from a good deal
22 of research.
23 You know, my books are written, every page at
24 the bottom of each page are the footnotes. Some of you
25 find that distracting. Personally, I want to know where
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 215
108 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 56
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 the information came from as I'm reading it, not a week
2 later as I'm contemplating it. I want to know the
3 source.
4 And so in the publications that I've written,
5 1600 source documents, reviews out of a matrix of a
6 hundred thousand that we had available to us, more or
7 less. 20,000 have made it into my archives and 1600
8 have made it into four books on technology dealing with
9 mind effects, dealing with HAARP, dealing with personal
10 privacy issues. A lot of the things go unreleased in
11 the last four years.
12 You can look at my publications from 1999 and
13 2000, and you'll see the same things, because the old
14 literature showed enough to come to those conclusions.
15 When I testified in the European Parliament in
16 the '90s, at their invitation -- and this was another --
17 a good side story for technology. A gentleman by the
18 name of Thomas Spencer, he was from the UK, he was a
19 Parliamentarian at the time, and he was the Chairman of
20 the Environmental Subcommittee of the European
21 Parliament. And he had contacted me. Somebody had
22 given him the book on HAARP and he was very interested
23 in this. So we had a conversation. And at my expense,
24 I flew to Brussels and spent a few days with him talking
25 about the issue and brought with me a couple feet of
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 216
109 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 57
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 unclassified documents for his research team to take a
2 look at.
3 What happened then is he moved in the European
4 Parliament -- he was a Conservative, by the way, and he
5 moved into a Foreign Affairs Chairman, a very powerful
6 position, an ideal position for dealing with the things
7 that we were dealing with at the time.
8 So we -- at his invitation, I came over to
9 testify in front of the group on security and
10 disarmament in the European Parliament on HAARP and on
11 non-lethal weapons, the kinds of things we've been
12 talking about today, the manipulation of human beings.
13 Now, they do it a lot differently than we do it
14 in the US. In the US, when you have public hearings,
15 the public actually gets to come. In the European
16 Parliament, the public meeting is you have to have an
17 invitation to come. So that's kind of different. You
18 know, I hadn't really thought much about that.
19 And they also -- they can also do things behind
20 closed doors, which, you know, we theoretically can't do
21 in the United States. You can't have a meeting without
22 the public invited or the media invited.
23 So what happened the night before the hearing
24 is the Committee met with myself, one of the other
25 people testifying, and a member of the press and we
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 217
110 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 58
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 spent five and a half hours in a non-official meeting to
2 talk about these issues, so that when we actually gave
3 our testimony the following day, they would have
4 formulated a set of questions to give us the opportunity
5 to follow along. So it was a great way to do it,
6 because then they at least had a good base of knowledge.
7 Now, in that private meeting we demonstrated a
8 technology using infrasound where you could transfer
9 sound through electrodes attached to the skin where you
10 would perceive that proverbial voice in the head. We
11 demonstrated that to the Parliamentarians in that closed
12 session.
13 And then we went into the hearing the following
14 day. And it was Rosalie Bertell, which is where I met
15 her, testifying on our side. It was -- I can't remember
16 the gentleman's name, but he was from a group called
17 GRIP in Brussels that does research on weapon systems
18 particularly and he had done his Master's thesis on
19 HAARP, and so he was there.
20 We had someone from the International Red Cross
21 that had done work on non-lethal weapons and was a
22 specialist in this particular area. And then I was
23 there.
24 We each got 15 minutes to present. And then I
25 got an hour of questions from the committee in the open
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 218
111 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 59
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 hearing where I had the opportunity to talk about some
2 of these things. And right around that time there had
3 been this incident in Japan where children watching a
4 cartoon that had a certain flicker rate had caused over
5 700 children to go to the hospital with epileptic
6 seizures. Now, remember, non-ionizing radiation is not
7 a problem, right? A flicker of the TV caused 700 kids
8 to go into the hospital.
9 Now, some say that was by design. Some say
10 that was by accident. But it was a perfect illustration
11 for talking about non-ionizing radiation in the European
12 Parliament because they had all read that story. It was
13 fresh.
14 The other thing demonstrating infrasound,
15 something that had never been demonstrated, to my
16 knowledge, in that type of a meeting, to show that you
17 could actually transfer sound without necessarily
18 involving the ears.
19 Now, there's another technology that was
20 advanced by a guy named Woody Norris -- he won the
21 Lemelson Prize at MIT for this particular technology,
22 and I believe the year was 2004. You can look up Woody
23 Norris -- and his was using acoustic heterodyne where he
24 could send in two signals from two different sources,
25 point them at an individual in the crowd, and they would
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 219
112 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 60
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 hear this voice in their head and nobody else would hear
2 it.
3 Well, he won a half a million dollars for that
4 prize, organized a company called ATCO. You can look
5 them up. They're a public company. And he sold that
6 technology to the military for perimeter protection.
7 You know, where they could have these sort of alarm
8 systems so when the protestors got too close they'd hear
9 these warning signs that nobody else was hearing.
10 Now, you think about that for a moment.
11 Imagine -- this is why the European Parliament got
12 interested, because we used this illustration. Now,
13 imagine a national leader standing up in front of a
14 group and all of a sudden they hear voices in their head
15 that nobody else hears. That's the end of that guy,
16 right? I mean, he's out of there. And that's exactly
17 what that technology can do. And that was one
18 demonstration.
19 Now, some have said that you can pulse modulate
20 on a single beam and create the same effect or utilize
21 something like HAARP, not so much for voice in the head,
22 but for certainly changing emotional state of large
23 segments of the population.
24 When we looked at all of this, we even looked
25 back -- you know, where else could this have been used?
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 220
113 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 61
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 And there was a device in Vietnam called the Lida
2 machine, L-i-d-a. A guy who researched this was a guy
3 named Ross Adey, who is, unfortunately, also deceased.
4 Ross Adey was brilliant and was utilized by the
5 government, by private sector as an expert in these
6 kinds of areas.
7 Well, he was asked to look at -- this
8 particular device had been captured during the Vietnam
9 War. It was a Russian device. And it created the
10 entrainment effect using flickering light and sound.
11 And they used it for interrogating prisoners by putting
12 them into that, like, trance-like state and then
13 extracting intelligence from them. Now, that's the
14 1960s. Again, this is low resolution, low technology.
15 As computing powers increased, as our knowledge
16 in human physiology has increased, as our knowledge of
17 the electromagnetic nature of human beings has
18 increased, the ability to manipulate large segments of
19 the population comes easily achieved, either as a side
20 effect or unfortunate disaster of our technology.
21 You mentioned Swiss Re, Swiss Re Insurance.
22 Swiss Re Insurance wrote a paper on Electrosmog. I
23 believe it was 2002. And they said to the insurance
24 industry then, don't insure electromagnetic field
25 effects because it will result in a bigger lawsuit than
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 221
114 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 62
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 Firestone on their tires or the smoking industry,
2 because the knowledge is here and now and nobody insures
3 that risk.
4 Lloyd's of London insures anything, but they
5 won't insure that risk. Nobody does. Because insurance
6 companies don't like to lose money. It's as simple as
7 that. And yet the telecom industry on cell phones --
8 before cell phones were invented, the University of
9 Washington had investigated those very same frequencies
10 on chick embryo studies and determined they were
11 harmful. Cell phones didn't exist then.
12 Then cell phones come out and everything's safe
13 all of a sudden. That same guy that did that research
14 says, now, wait a minute, we did all this research.
15 This is a dangerous thing. But the telecom industry is
16 a powerful adversary.
17 So it went to the Congress. You remember this.
18 There was a guy in Florida. Brain cancer. Big
19 controversy. It ended up in the Congress. Congress
20 said, we need a study. So the industry says, oh, we'll
21 pay for the study. They spend 25 million dollars on the
22 study.
23 I can't remember the guy's name who did it, but
24 he eventually published a book because his findings
25 were, hey, this is dangerous. All right. He issues his
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 222
115 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 63
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 report. They figured, hey, they got him. You know,
2 they got the 25 million into his queue. He got to spend
3 it all on these projects. He got to make some money
4 himself. Hey, he's our man.
5 Well, he wasn't. This guy actually had some
6 integrity, and I apologize for not recalling his name.
7 A VOICE: George Carlo.
8 DR. BEGICH: Which one is it?
9 A VOICE: George Carlo.
10 DR. BEGICH: George Carlo, that's correct. And
11 he wrote a book called, "Cell Phones", a very important
12 book.
13 And when it comes to children, one of his
14 observations was -- he had the simple observation of
15 damage to skulls. You know, you have a four-year-old, a
16 five-year-old, 400 percent more energy transfers to the
17 skull into the brain than an adult. Ten-year-old,
18 twelve-year-old, approximately 200 percent.
19 This is one of the main reasons why you don't
20 want children using cell phones or, even worse, the
21 portable phone in the home because it's even less
22 efficient with the battery and the energy with even more
23 leakage. And what do we do? Try and find a hard line
24 phone today where you actually pick it up and talk into
25 it. You can't even find them anymore. They're almost
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 223
116 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 64
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 impossible to find.
2 When you look at what we have learned about
3 human physiology and the effects of electromagnetic
4 fields on the human physiology, it is the revolution in
5 science that will collapse the pharmacuetical industry
6 one day. And one day we're going to wake up and
7 recognize that the pea in the soup of electromagnetic
8 radiation has been the cause and the root to most of the
9 chronic disease we see on the planet today.
10 When you combine that with that concept that I
11 used, that example of iodine, everyone has a little bit,
12 now you have these complex interactions, 5,000 new
13 chemicals are introduced or compounds introduced to the
14 public every year without really any serious studies,
15 and then you add this on top of it, and now you have a
16 very toxic world. And then you take the technology of
17 manipulation from the propaganda of World War II to the
18 downloading of that. What does the military hope to
19 achieve? They want to be able to train military
20 personnel with a download. Blap. There's your 12
21 years' worth of education. Now, let's go on.
22 And now here's the thing. Think about that
23 kind of education. No critical thinking involved. Just
24 programming. It's like writing to a disk. No critical
25 thinking involved. Who controls that? Curriculum
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 224
117 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 65
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 controls the way in which our society goes. This is the
2 risk.
3 What about evidence in courtrooms when you can
4 create a synthetic memory or wipe one out? What does
5 that do to a Democratic Republic or a Democracy where
6 people have the power? That power has been taken from
7 us as we become increasingly transparent to governmental
8 agencies and they become increasingly opaque.
9 It is the opposite of what should be occurring.
10 There shouldn't be a camera in every household. There
11 should be a camera in every government office. Because
12 the technology's there. We should be able to dial in
13 and look at what our employees are doing, right?
14 Wouldn't you like to be able to dial up your
15 Congressional office and see that conversation they're
16 having in real time? And why shouldn't we be able to do
17 that? What do they have to hide?
18 You know, you think about government and you
19 start saying that and, you know, the only people
20 protected from that kind of intrusion in the US are
21 federal employees. They have a higher level of
22 protection than the average citizen within the country
23 that I live in. For what?
24 And when you think about government, everyone
25 points to the politician. I can tell you, most
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 225
118 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 66
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 politicians are ignorant. In fact, most political
2 parties in the United States the preference is to have
3 people that are -- they look like the news announcer,
4 but they couldn't think their way out of a phone booth,
5 right? We don't even have a phone booth anymore, but
6 they couldn't think their way out of one. Because they
7 want people that are smart enough to look good, but not
8 smart enough to think on their own. That's the ideal
9 politician for political parties, because they can be
10 told what to do.
11 Look at how much money is being spent in
12 political outcomes. Huge amounts of money. Some people
13 have pointed and looked at, like, Australia to mandatory
14 voting. Everybody votes now.
15 Worst possible thing that you could ever do.
16 And here's why: When the population doesn't vote, who
17 pulls the lever? Those that are informed, right? So
18 maybe 20 percent of the population votes, but at least
19 they're informed. They've educated themselves.
20 If you force people to vote to keep their
21 driver's license, their medical benefits, or whatever
22 social programs you've got running and you say, you will
23 vote, now who decides what they vote on? Whoever can
24 buy the 30-second or one-minute ad on TV that influences
25 them. The moment they walk into the booth, they go, ah,
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 226
119 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 67
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 and pull the lever. Now we have a dangerous situation.
2 A very dangerous situation.
3 Democracy is something that each of us have to
4 claim internally. The change that people are looking
5 for in this group happens by a change in consciousness,
6 by us recognizing what we are as human beings,
7 recognizing the potential that we have. Because you
8 know what these government programs yielded? Everybody
9 points to the fear side of the equation. But what they
10 really discovered was that every single soul, every
11 human being has this anomalous capability.
12 Now, imagine if we could awaken those
13 capabilities, could you hide anything? I mean, if
14 people could literally look into the mind of another
15 person, that makes a politician pretty vulnerable,
16 wouldn't it?
17 That is the next evolution that I believe is
18 happening and it's the only evolution, the only
19 revolution that can change the way things are. It
20 starts with human consciousness. It starts with what we
21 believe to be right and true and beginning to act on it.
22 Not from a foundation of fear, but a foundation of
23 confidence.
24 You know, somebody asked me once, what do you
25 think about faith? I said, faith is what you know to be
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 227
120 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 68
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 right and true and you step into it on the idea that you
2 can achieve it. You believe it.
3 So many people I've seen in this work, they
4 keep jumping into things beyond their belief. They
5 don't believe they can achieve it. They try it anyway
6 and they fail, and they keep failing. And people who
7 are doing good work otherwise step back, do what you can
8 do with confidence, do what you can do with knowledge,
9 don't wait for a group to form. The group's already
10 here. It's called the human race. Act on what you know
11 to be right and true. If you make a mistake, clean it
12 up, learn from it, and move forward.
13 When you look across this room and you look at
14 all these folks with a little bit of gray hair, and
15 you've got the gray hair not by all of those great
16 things that happened in your life, but by the real
17 disasters that happened in your life. You know, you
18 think about bad news is a stimulation for good news.
19 People ask me, you know your father's
20 disappearance, disappeared off the face of the earth,
21 that must have been a horrible thing. Yeah, it was at
22 the time. I consider it the most important event in my
23 life because it altered my course.
24 The worst things in our lives alter our course,
25 change our direction, activate that higher potential
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 228
121 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand 69
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1 that cause us to rise out of the ashes of our apathy and
2 our defeats and stand on our feet again and move
3 forward.
4 The pain that people experience today is the
5 catalyst for the solutions tomorrow, whether we like it
6 or not, whether it's falling down as a two-year-old or
7 standing up as an adult. If we stand up on the basis of
8 our ethics, on the basis of our values, and we
9 reinvigorate and let go of the fear and recognize what
10 we are as creative beings, we have the potential to make
11 change.
12 And with that, I'll open it to questions.
13 (Applause.)
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 229
122 of 673
173
183
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
Sunday,
September
June
27th17,
of
5, 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
10
18
7
11of
123
230 1of
of
1of
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
Tuesday,
Saturday March
December
15,
December
Sunday,March
April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! "# $
%" "&##'( #$
!"
# $ " " ! #!" ! ! % &! ' ! # ( ' )
* + , ) -
#- ) . - / * ) '
) 0 /- -
/ * . - . 0 ) - - 0 ) #- /
/- . - * - 0 1 /
* ) 0 0 . - 0 - 2 *
) 3 . 0 . /
- 0 ) . 4 * . 5678 0 )
. / 9::; ' - - 9::; /
- 0 - 0 / .1 0 - -
- 0 ) - ) <
)
) * * + + ,, -
* . /+ / , - * ,! + 0
1 , ! 2 3 + ,
- 344/// 4 5
6666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666666
7- , , - * , - , / * * 3
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
11
29
8
22
124
2311of
2of
of
2of
1
of
51
172
173
174
of
51
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
10
12
39
33
125
2322of
3of
of
3of
of
51
172
of
51
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% "
% "
/
4 4 2 1
12! 1 3
" # $ "% $ $ $ & ' $ ($ "
' " & % $ ) $% $ % ) ) " % "
($ ) ' $ ' ) $% $ "" " "& %
!& ! ) "
# $ %" " "% ) " %% ) ) $
* % +, " # -
. ' * %& # & & & ) - ! & $
# &"
& ) " #' % ) $ % '" & $
* % +, "
# $ "% %% '$ "
" !
+ % / 0$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
10
11
13
444
126
2333of
4of
of
4of
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
8 * 9 : * ; < *+ ; ) .
- 7 (
#- 0 - =8 * 9 : * ; < *+ ; )
. >>>
* !
& *
5, #- . - .- ) - - #- "
) )= - 0 - .- - 0 .
- ) - )-
9, 0 ( / 5697 > - ) 0 ) - .-
? 0 - ) - - .- - 0 - ? )
- - - - . - . 0 - .- ?- 0
0 - ) .- - .- 0 4 0 >
@, #- ) ) - 0 . - / - - 0 - -
) - - 0 2 #- 0 . ) -
- - 0 0 ) 0 0 - .
A,#- . 0 0 . - . ) - < -
@ ) - < . # - B 0 ) - 0
" . . # 0 . 0 - 2 .
- < ) ) ) -
.& !
# - . ) - /- ) ) 3
. 0 - . . /
) ) - ) / .C * . - . 0 - - 0 2
- 0) - < 4
$ 8 * 9 : *
) /0 / ) 0 ) / / ) 0
- - /- 0 * - / - - -
) ) - - ) - ) )- - 00 ) 0 - . )
- 0 ) . 4 * . - 0 0 ) 2 0 -
0 - - +D 5 :::, - - ) 0 0
0 0 )
) / 0 + , /- - 0 .
2 - )) - . - - + ,
. - 0 - - - 0 0 - ) / -
)
B - ) - ?- ? 0 . . * / . / ) )
) - 0 0 4 -
0 . - - . 0 E
EE
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
11
12
14
555
127
2344of
5of
of
5of
2
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
B - ) - ? ) ? 0 / 0 .
) 0 - / - . )
/ - - 0 . )? ) ?
B - ) - ? - ? 0 / - . -
) 0 - .- - ) 00 - 0
) 0 ) / 00 0
0 / - - - - - . ) - - )
) - - ) - ) ) - - ) 0
0 / - - - - - /- - .
) - - ) ) - - ) - ) ) - - ) 0
- - ) - -
- - #- ) 0 * . - - -
- / - -
0 . )? - ?
B ) - - 0? 00 ? 0
- - 0 ) F 0 - . -
-
#- . - . . - ) ) 0
/ - - 0 - 0 ) 5: 0 - -
) - . - - . - ) . - )
- ) ) - - ) ) - ) ) - 0 -
- 00 ) 0
B ) - ? 00 ) 0 ? 0 -
. )) / - - . - /- .
- - - /- / - - F0 - . - - -
? ! - , -
/- / ) - 00 0 /- - / - .
2 - / - - ) - - 0 0
/ . 0 ) 00 * - )
- ) . /- - ) - 0
/- - 0 3 00 ) -
- . ) 00 ) F ) - -
- - ) ) - - / ) ) -
- 00 ) 0 G ) - - 0 0 ) F
B - ) - ? 00 ) 0 ? 0 /- - 0 .
- . )) / - - .
- /- . - - - /- / - - F0 - .
- - -
?! 00 ? 0 - -
0 ) F0 - . - -
8 - * + *
+ , ! /- / - - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - -
. . - - - ) 2 -
0 0 ) - - ) 0 . )
0 0 - . - - - 0
. ) -
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
12
13
15
666
128
2355of
6of
of
6of
3
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
+ , ! /- 0 * - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - -
/- - ) 0 0 * . - -
. ) 0 0 - . - - -
0 . ) -
! /- 0 * - 0 *
0 ) 00 / - - - - -
) / * . ) 0 0 - ) ) 0 - -
+D 5 :::, 0 0 ) ) 0 - -
- ) 0 0 - . - - -
0 . ) - #- ) - ) - ) / .
0 F C
+5, #- 0 . 2 -
0 ) - )) - . - - -
+9, #- 0 * - 0 * 0 )
00 / - - - - - )
/ * . 0 - 5: 0 9A=- /- - ) 0
0 * . - - - -
0 - / * ) ) 0 0 /- ) 0
- ) 0 - / - /- 0 - - - - -
. . . 0 - - . . . . 0 -
+ , )) 00 ) - 0 0 - 00 /-
- - / 0 )) 00 )
00 0 0 . - 0 0 - 00
/- - 00 00 / . ) / -
+ , + , + , + , /- - . / - 0 *
- 3 . ) 0 - - + , + ,
+ , . -
+), ) . - F 0 ) )
- - 0 ) - -
.
+., B ) - - 0 ? 00 ?
0 - - 0 ) F 0 - .
- -
+/ - *+ /
/- - ) . 4 * . - 0 00
- ) - / - - 4 . / - -
0 0 ) ) / - ) ) F .
- +D5: :::,
B - ) - 0 - . / ) -
) . . 0+ 0 . 0 0
0 . 0 F 0 / ) 3 +! B, / ) 3 +< B,
. , . - * / . 0 )
) . - 2 1 0 . . . + - . ) - -
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
13
14
16
777
129
2366of
7of
of
7of
4
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
0 - - - 0 / = . ) = =
= 0 . 0 . - - .
. ) - ) 0) / 0
0 . 0 0 ) - 1 F . - 0 .
. - )
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
14
15
17
888
130
2377of
8of
of
8of
5
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
" # #
$ # ! " %
& # ' " ( # ) * ()+
"
, - ." ! %
/ # "" # "
, %/ #
0 " %
1 ( # ) 1 ( #
- ! . # "
%2 3 # %4
" 5%1% "
%4 "' %
#
" !" "
0 % ()
! # %
() 6 7 8 0 # " # "
%9 & : ' "
# ' " %
-4, " # # "
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
Page
15
16
18
999
131
2388of
9of
of
9of
8
of
51
of
51
172
173
174
176
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
.' %
' # # !
# " "
" %'
() ;
" %
<= 0 " %
# " 9 (
" 5%1% " " !
%
( - !; . " ()
( , ! ! " >?
-1 @ . # # % @ #
" 511 @ # " ; ,
# "" # ( %
1 @ ( - ,
" % 5%1% ( 4 A 1
4 1 ) %
() # ;
# 5%1% # # " "
" " % 0 #
%B " #
# %
-4 , " #
. 0 %
, %
- 0 " C 4 $
. %- #
%' # " C%% ,
4 %.
) 7 ) - # . ' ,
" %
-: 5 1 # .)
% -@ ; %' " %@
%4, "
$ " , %.
D $ , !
2 ) $&
, 1 C% E
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
PagePage
10
16
17
19
10
10
132
239910
10
of
of
9of
of51
172
173
174
176
50
of
51
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " # $ % & '(
) *
+ &$ # $'' ,-
* & ./0 1/.2
" #
3 ! 34 0 3 " 0 # &
$* #& ' ) * " " "
& $ 5 " ) & ' $ ) # 3
$ " .678 0 ' " " ) & ) '
) $ 0 & " ' $*0 3 0 & '
0 0 & ' ) $ ' & $& '
& 9$* " : 0 &0 ' ;, &
* "$ , < " ) $ ,0 ' =. > " ' "#
$ ) & $ ) 1/.2 & ' # & $
) & ) ,# & 24.;9	/12269 ) ? $ *$
) 3 & 3 ' ! & ) ! &$ $ )
** 0 .29<;//
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 11
17
18
20
11
10
11
111
133
240 11
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " #$ $ % &
' ( )' %
%) *++
!
" # # $ % " "
# &
' ( ( ) ' *
)' + , - .$
"# - / #
0 * ( 1
2 (34 ( (
( 5 #$ ' ( 6 0 * 7 8 ' ( 69
(922 ( 2 2
* (
( 2' + (
! " ! # $ % &
' % ( )% " * ) %
+ ' ',% " - "% . % . -
/0
! "## $" %& %' ( )*+*
' #% , - +. *+ /
' % , 0! ) * . *++
' , 0! ) . *++
0$
& 1 !%
2 $
$ !%$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 12
18
19
21
12
11
12
212
134
241 12
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
)( )*+,
)*+, "%- " & &. !"& "&/ % 0 ! .
. " ! $ ! " ! % . 3 . ! .
% . " . 3 $ " 4 " ! )
4 ) " % *+ + ) ' 35 .! 0 ! ) " *+ /. 0$
& 1 !% ! "
! " ) ! 5 6 % '$ 1 7$
% ) % ! ! ) ! 3 %! ) ! 8 " "! $ 5)
" ! " *+ + ) . !
$ !%$ 3 ""9 !
)' 35 $
& ) 0$ ! : 3 ; : ! ; "
% ) " < ! ) ! ! . < ! ) 1 5! $
" = " < ! ) - 7 3
% $ 8 10 "% 2 ! / $ 10 /$ 8 !
"" <(> ( 0$ & 1 !%$ .
< )4 ' % 3 $ ! ! 0$ !
" ! " % . ! !
6 ! . 5! ! " . 4 ) ) 1 ? -""
@ @ . 4 ) 4 . 4 ) 1 ). #$ $
. " ! < ! ) ' )? -"" $ ! ! .
*+ / 1 3 A! % " % 8 B ! %!
3 $ - * % $
" )3 )*+, "%- " 4 # 1"& / 5" )*+6 2 -" #
%0 # " / / -' /# /!5" " 1-"% #" +67*),,8 / 5" /# %/! %
9 % 5" # "% /# %/! 9 " #' . / 9 "% 9/ / $ 1/! # 5" ! #" &$"
/ 1 & 4 # 0%"#/&/ $ #/ !" / :# 9/ / $ / )*+6 2 4"."% 5" " / / 4 # -"
-" $% "& & 5" ! #" 4 # # "& ; %/#&/! / 4 - #"& "4 & ! 10" / $
"./&" !" % ! 5"%" 9 5" 1/! # 4 # 9/ "& ! %" 5 &"9/!/" !' 4/ 5 &/%"!
4/ "## ! %% - % / 5" % #"! %/ /#! & ! & !" !" 9 /# /!5" "
1-"% 9 ! 4 % / $ 5" %' 4 # 9/ "& 5 # $$"# "& 5 5" # 10" "%
/!" "0 % 1" " $ $"& / # % "$' 9 < % 01" = 5 " & 5" 9 % "
1 %&"% / +88+ 5/# 4 & 9! %#" 4 4% $9 &" 5 ! /1 -" 9/ "& -' 5"
5 4 9 1/ ' 5" ! #" /# 4 -"9 %" 5" 5/%& /%! / % 9 00" # #" +,>
36** 5"%" %" 5%"" ?3@ A "# / # 5 5" 5/%& /%! / 1 ' % " B 45" 5"% 9%""
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 13
19
20
22
13
12
13
313
135
242 13
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
/# /!5" " 1-"% % $% 5"% 5"% 2 -" # %0 # & 45" 5"% $% 11 %'
&$1" "%- "/ !/./ ! / #/ - 5# " & 9"&"% ! % #
3 . 0! ) . *+ /. ' 3 5 " "
4 " ! )4 ) $ 0$ ! )
! 5 6 % 4 % $ 6 .
%" 1" % $% 1 - ) < ! ) ! " 4 $
0$ ! " ! " ! $ ! ! .
% % % ! % . ( ) C! "
< ! ) ! " 4 $ - ! ! B. *+ / 0$ "
! 3 4 " 4 ) % ) 5 < " 4 ) % !
" .4 ) $ !% D ! ! " ! "
EB++$++$
- 0! ) . *+ / 4 % " ' 35 .
-"" . -"" 5 !%. * ! " % $ %
" ! ! ) " $ < ) 4
' % % " " ! " < & <
. ) ! ) 3 " */+ 8 !
" F+* % $ % ) < ! ) ' )
! ! $ % ! 4 " = ) < ! ) ! "
4 $
- ! ! . *+ / ( ) C! " = " " <
! ) ! " 4 . > $ /9+B /$ C! ) 0! 0 "" )
. " ! $ %% . &' /B . % !% ! "
4 ) $
. ) % *B. *+ / 0$ (
4 . . " ! $ ! " ! ! "
#$ $ 4 %! 3 $
*+ / 0$ " ! < ! )
! )9 9 ! C ! ) ! ) )% $
! ) ) !%% ) 8% 0! & @ ). ) . '$
0 6 $ ! ) )% ) !%% ) % %
7 @ 3 . ! 4$ 0$ $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 14
20
21
23
14
13
14
414
136
243 14
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% " *+ / 0$ 7 ) " %% 8 ) D/
! % " " . ! 4$ $ % "
B$ % % /&" /! % ! 4$
0$ $ % " 4$ . " 0$
. 3 ) 3 ) B+? $ . "
! 4$ 0! ) *+. *++ " " ! . ! ! $
) +? '$ 4 % . . ) >
! "6 . > 6 . '$ $. " " % ! )
" 3 " % (=5->( " )$ 4
" ) " . ! 4$ . 0 $. 3 % $
! ) "
% % ! )" ) 3 #$ $ % & $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 15
21
22
24
15
14
15
515
137
244 15
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
0$ %! "" !
. ) ) " $ " ! #
"" G0 1! % ) . "
F " . 0$ 8 ! 0! *F. .
! ** ) ) )$ ! C ! % ).
& 1 !%. < $. &1. < $. ! ! " %!
"" ! $ ! ) . " ! 0 1! . ""
% % ! ) E 5 ' ! 8% !
" ! ! " A 6! $ 6 . ). % .
"! %! !% ! 9!%
" 0$ " 8 ) $ ! 3 "
# ! " ) " . .
$ ! ) " ! H ! % % )H H
% ! % % )H ! % %! H
! 9 ) % ! $ ) " = 9 9
3 ! " ! $ > . 0$
% ! 3 % " 8 ** ) $
! % % ) 7 ! " ! % $
0$ % ) " $
' % " ' " '-' % #
? ) +? $ - " ? " 4 C I >
! ) ) > " $& .& ) $
! ). " " % " %!
7
- 5/%& ?3%&@ %$"# "10 '"% ! ) " < . 4 ) .
/.+++ % ) $
1"# "%/ 9 &"% & % %
7 ! ) "< .4 ) $
5" C "%% / ! & F 9 " ! #
" *$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 16
22
23
25
16
15
16
616
138
245 16
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
" " %! "" % ,
" %$" 2 D #5. " #$ $ 4 . ' "
) $
-"% "#. " ' " ) !
) "' " $
--' ' 1 . " 5 " ' " . " ' " > .
! ) ) & = 7 $
"E &"% 2 /$. " #$ $ ) " . ) 5 "
' J
#"05 ! &". " 4 ) 6 ! " = % "
%% % " #
$
% # %& " C %& " & # %/"#. C ! %
" ! ! ) A & (
! ! #$ $ $
" ! . % " #$ $
4 -"" $
% F " " 1
5 . H % E " " ?
! $
"4#C / !/ /1"# F % 5 > @ %%
G " % H H ! A
) " ' " =
1 " A$
"4# )*C)* ) G "" !
6! A ! ) . ) " " 4 1! " .
) ! " ) ! A )
$
- 0! ) * " 0$ ! " <
) 0 % = " ! . &1. < $. K
H 5 3. $. " $ 0 %
= ! ) ! "! 0$ ? !
$
% . "%/ >+88*>**(6 < ! ) ! " 4 .
< ) 0 % = % 3. ? 9 !
! . ) " 0$ $
% . "%/ 9 +9++ D < ! ) ! " 4 . 0
1! % E $ / ! ! 5 3.
< . ! )$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 17
23
24
26
17
16
17
717
139
246 17
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% . "%/ 9 +9++ D < ! ) ! " 4 .
5%/# 05"% &"%5/ " 6 . # K 5 ! 3 . % 0
1! $ *++/ % # % & % 4
' % +/9 9** #$ $ ' ! " ( ' "
4 ) (=5->( $ < ! )4 . $ $.$
% . "%/ 9 +9++ D < ! ) ! " 4 .
4 % ) 0 % % 0 1! . *++
0 % % < ) ! " % ! ) #$ $
% 4 ! 7% 3$
2 >
> ) "" !
. ! " " ! H 8 H %! !% H
! H H 9 ! ! % % ) H
) H " H " % H
!% ! ! ! % $ " "
! )$ ) % %! ". !% ! B C! )
$ 3 $ "
! = - ! % 7 " % % $
% ! " 3 . ! !%
. ! % $ " % " "
% % 9!%,
) ) 0$ ) ) )
% $
) " $
) ! % % $
(8 E7 $
@ % ! " )% " !% % $
) " " " . ! . " )
" " $
% ! ! ) " < ! ) !) % "
! ). " . $.
) 3 % ) ) ) ! )
) "" " C! %! ! $
% #$ $ ) . . . 8
) G % " ! $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 18
24
25
27
18
17
18
818
140
247 18
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
) " ! $
2 2
) . " ! *++/ ) " ) ) 3 % !
" ! 3 C! $ '! ) 0$
) ) . " " % " "
% $ ) " > L 3 ) 5 ' "
! !% " 8 5 % 7
) 7 $ 6 . ) "! " %
! ) % $ ! % 8 ! .
! % " % #$ $ . " .
! ! ) $ 5 = %! 4 )
' % " ' " . > . ) !
"! $ ! " C! ! % 3 )! %
! $
6 *++/ 0$ %% %
% ". ! ) ! . # ' ! " (
' "4 ) (=5->( $ < ! ) 4 . $ $. $ +/9 9
** $ 5/# ! #" /# # / #" "& & 5 # -"" 4/ 5&% 4 -' 0 / /99
"%- " / ! -"% 9 )**F 9 "% # !!"##9 % / $ / 5" 5/%& /%! / % 9
00" # ?*(>66(6@ / "0 "1-"% 9 )**F 5" ! #" 4/ -" ! / "& 0 5" #"! %/ '
9 "./&" !" & 5" !" #" & &"#/# 9 -# % ! / 9 ; # /!" & & " 0% !"## - & )
B. *++/ ! ! 4 % . 0$ " ! $
- 3 # 5 3 !% ) ! " ( 4 ) = .
4 ) . %% % . 0$ " % " % !
% 5 3 !% ) . $ +/9*F+/ $
" # ) ! )
! " % 3 % " ! C! 9 - 7 3
' ( ) ' % . ! " ! " % )
& $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 19
25
26
28
19
18
19
919
141
248 19
of
of
ofof
of 51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
D B G H B
D
- 7 3 " %! "" !
$ 7 3 ! ) %
! $ " 3 +? 0$ 3 .
M ) M$ " " " ) 3 .
. % 3 . )% . % ) $ . ! "
4 % ) = . = % < & < < !
! . ! ! $
! ! *++/$ . ! 8 "
% $ = ) % ! ! )
! ! $
*++/ #$ $ % ! 9 ! ! "
% )H ) % )H % ! ! ! " )
% ! ! ) " " A! ) ) $
! ! ! ) " " "
#$ $ ' ! . (=5->( $ < ! ) 4 . $ $. +/9 9** $
! " ) 0$ % )$
"" %% " ) 0$
*DG % % ) "
@ & ! $ 0$ % F) ) " %
! ! $ & #$ $ "! % . 5! ! "
#$ $ )? -"" "! $ ! "
" $
*++B " *++ 0$ 8
% )H H H %
&@ #< = ? ! % $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 20
26
27
29
20
19
20
142
24920
1020
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2
" ) ! % % ! ) " < ! ).
4 ) . ! % " . " ) ) " 0$ 3
" ,
5"% 1 " "%- " %$. 7 % ! " )
! " ! 3 ) ! )
! $ 6 3 " 5 & & )
% $ 6 !% ! 7 ! 3
$
% 5"% 1 " "%- ". !"" " )
" . 7 % . " )3 " ) " $
% 5"% 5 1 # D "%- ". !"" " )
. 0$. 5 % & ' . !
" ) ! ) $
"%- ". !"" " 5% & ' . & ' %
! 3 ) % "
! )$ ! 3 . ) !
) ! %) % 3
$ 6 ) % " ) ! " "
! ! ! ! $
5" 1/ ' 2/# %' " ! 3 B+? ! . 0 $.
" " 0$ . 3 ! %
! # > ) ! $ ! .
0 $. 3 ) % ! " &@ #< = " ? ! % $ 6 . !
$ . 3 ) % " < ' 8% " &@ #< = $ 0$
3 )% " % % ) ' % " ' " . ! ' =4
' " ) ' $ " " 0$ ? !
" ) " ) . ) " !
% . ! H H "" ! % % H
! H 3 9 % ) " % " &@ #< = " ?
! % $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 21
27
28
30
21
20
21
143
25021
1121
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
" " " " ) ),
1 " "%- " % ? 5"%@ > ) " DF DB
! " 1! 0 3 . $ 6 8 %
! G < 6 . % %
% $ 6 )G ! $ " > ). !
! "! ) ! . " ) "
$ 6 % ) & 43 .
% % $ 5) " % ! .
" ) " #$ $ ) % $ 6
! ! 3 ) +? $ 6 !"" " 7
3 . ) % " $ 5 3 B+? .
. ! ) % % $ ! 4$ . 0 $. )
" $ ! 4$ . 0 $. )
3 %)$ ( 3 %) (8% ! % "
&@ #< = $ . % ) ! < )
4 ' % < ! ) ! " 4 $ F ! 4$
. 0$ " " * 3 " . $. 3
! $ 3 0 & & %%
. " " E +$++$ 3 ! <
) 0 " E*++$++ M % M $
) $ ! 4$ . 0 $. ) % )4
0! 0 $ 6 . ! ! * . F " . 0! 0
-='(= " % M ) "
! ) " < . 4 ) M$ 4 0! " < ! ) ! "
4 ) ) " ! " < ! ) " " * 3 "
% $ " ) " " ) % ).
& 1 !%. < $. L ! " " )0 @ -?5
% $ ! . 0 $. " ! ! 3
" " " ! . % ! . . "
" " ) " . " ! " )$ L ! "
$ - ! & ) . *++ ! 4$ 0 $. " )
" ? & ) $ 3 " E +.+++$++$
% > " *+++$ 3 . & ' ) 3
" *++ . > L 3 ) % " $ 6 % "
! $ " 8 B 3 ! ! ! $ %
0! & @ ). " "" " #$ $ ) " #$ $
% & . % ! 3 : )
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 22
28
29
31
22
21
22
144
25122
1222
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " ) " ; % % $ ! )" ?
! . ! $
1 " "%- " ? % 5"%@ # B +$
. 0$ ! # 1 " ! . !
$ " % " < ' 8% . &@ #< = $ 7 "
- *F. " " )1 ! C .
! " " ) 1 0 ! ) D. *$ 5)
" . ! $ 0$ " M < 'M
% $ "' */. D. 0$
A! " " ! . " " ! % ) ! )
% " $ ) 5 . " 5
4! 1! ? -"" . "" 3 ) ! " ! %
! $ ! $ 8 % !
< 6 $ " % ) ) " % .
! " ! ! " > $
5 " . 4 ) . ! % ! " ) ) $ "
< 1 6 % " . ! % "! 3 " $
! !% " " $ 7 %
"< '" 3 7 3 $
5 1 # "%- " ? % 5"%@ ! " ! ! 5 3
! " ! ! $ ! 5% ' &
' % 99 77 8 3 ) " ! B$
! 5 3 " ! 3 E *.+++ "
" ! % 0! " /$ "!
! 5 3 " " "! # ' ! "
( ' " 4 ) (=5->( $ < ! ) 4 . $ $. +/9 9** $
#< -> 5 >@ 4$ . "
) "! 3 ) $ 4$
8 % $ 4 ) " < 6 . 3 & .
6 ! 4 . 4 % ( $ " 0$4$ & 3 )
3 & $ 4$ ) ! "!
% ! " C " 0 ' 4 " #
$ 0 ' 4 " " 4 5 3. )
0 1! $ 4 5 3. ) " *F*F > ' 43 .
. 4 ) . ) 0$ $ ! "
" A! ) 8 % . % " % " &$ @
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 23
29
30
32
23
22
23
145
25223
1323
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
@ . 8 ! " < > % % " ! " < 6
$
"%- " /# %"1 " ./"4"% ? " # " 4 ' / @. % .
" 8 % % ! % " "
! $ % " #$ $ % ! . !
% $ < ). 0$ % . %
! " ! ) %% % .
! 8% " ! $ " "
3 ) 3 ) $ 0$ *9 % & 4 <
6 . " 3$ 0$ 5
" ! ) " O $ 0$ 8
%! . 3 " "! ! /.
! & # ). ! !
+$ 0$ 8 % " ! ) ! % . "
& 1 !%. < $. 3 ) 5 " 4
! M' & MH ! & 1 !%. < $$ -
) . % 7! " ! . 0$ % " "
% ) % "" % " . )
$ ! " ! $ & 1 !%. < $.
E*+.+++ B " %% 8 ) E ++.+++ ) .
% " 8 " " ? ! A! )$
5" 1" 5" 5 5/# %' & 5" !%/1/ %"! %&# % )" .
! ! % %
) " $ - * ) A! 3 ) %! & 6 6 )
= ,
" > "./"4 5" 4 %& J " #/ B &" #/ #B " ! B ) "
! ) % " . " % ) " " )
" . " "" . % %% " "
M ! M$ ) 8 ) )$
4 > "./"4 5" 3 -%/! "& /!/&" "$ / # " " , ! !
+ J . 5! 6 % % & ) ! ) > 0 ) H ! ) J . *++/
) @ ) ( ! = 4 ' % H 0! ) . *++ " F+*
) < )4 ' % < 1 6 % $
5" %/1/ "! %& ) . ) 0$ F "
H" % ! % ! )
%% ! ) " < . 4 ) H " 0$ %%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 24
30
31
33
24
23
24
146
25324
1424
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% % " $ ! % " *++ (=5->(
$ ! ) " < . 4 ) #$ $ ' ! " ( ' "
4 ) $
2
4! = % " ! " 8 #$ $ ! H
4 ) ! H < ! ) ! " 4 $ D+.+++
% " ! " ) " % )
"" $ #$ $ ! < ! ) ! "
4 ! " ! H F.+++ H
" > '9=-& "
8 " ! " ) 0$ & 1 !%.
% "" $ 0$ ++ ! 3 ! " . .
! $
4 ) # % ) % H' % " "
< ! ) -"" H < = ( 8 H < ! )
8 H ! ) 5 " H < 6
% H & # ) % H " 0$ .
! " $
% 1 " "%- " 1' -% 5"%. #
H < 6 % H & # ) % H
! ) H 5 ! ) 1! 4! ' " H
% % ! % " $
% 1 " "%- " 1' 9 5"%. # > . <
6 % H ! ) H < ! )
-"" H < = ( 8 H < ! ) 8
H ! . $. % H = ( ' & H
< ! ) ! " 4 H " ! % %
! % "
D 7
$ !%$
$" "" $
% ,GG $ $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 25
31
32
34
25
24
25
147
25425
1525
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2 D
PP /# /10 % " 5 # 9 5/# 4%/ / $ "1 " /"4/ $ 5 # %"!" '
-"" ! 11"%!/ /K"& -' ! %0 % " 1"%/! & !"% / % " ,** ! 10 /"# %"
#/ $ "1 " /"4"%# # ! # # 9 % %" & '#/# & 1 % " 9 %"! # # 5/# /#
9 " 5" ". / 9 1 # "!5 $/"# - % 9 5" "0 % 1" 9 "9" #"
0 "!%" "E0"%/1" # & 5" %"# / $ "!5 $/! &. !"1" # ! # '
#"!%" /." 9 % # $ 5/# 5 # %"!" ' -"" #"& / # %' 9 5" " "./#/
&% 1 J "&/ 1J 5/# # #" # ' 8 )**F 5 & %"! %&"& % &/ /."
-% &! # D2 # # 4/ 5 $ "# 5 4 # " 9 5" " &/ $ 5'#/!/#
% "& "1 " /"4"% & "E0"% 5 "# /9/"& 5/# # 1" /
' , 0! ) * . *++
0$
& 1 !%
2 $
$ !%$
5" 9 4/ $ %" $"% / #"%./!"7
$ !%$ % $
$ $ G !%+
$" 3$ G
$ $ G
$ $ $ G% " G 0
%,GG $) ! ! $ G !%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 26
32
33
35
26
25
26
148
25526
1626
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"0 "1-"% ( )**8
0$
& 1 !%
*/+
< .4 ) B+F
' 3=
6 !
4$-$ 5 8 +**
.- D/*+
4 9 ++9/ 9/B
8 9 BB9DFF9D +
, " 2" " $
"7 # ' 9 ! # "% " #' . / % & G"% 9 % %$ /K"& / $ &
."% %."/ !"L
' 3.
&) % ! $ ' 3. ) !% ! <
& 6 3. C! " " $ ) ! 3
) ! )$ ! ! ) " ! "! ? " " .
! ) ! 3 8% ! ! "! $
) ) " H 7 3 !
< $ = . < " M ! M
! )$ M . " ) % B/
< ) Q 3 < ) " 7 $M
. ) !, ) +/ $
< ) ! 7 " " " 7 3
? 8% " < $
) < $' 6 "6 ! % !
G $ " )$ > +? C
! % ' 6 6 8 ) % )G & 1 !%$
6 8 !" ! ) % ) & 1 !%
'9=-& " 6 8$ " "! " '9=-& !" !
# 3 $ *++/ " .
( = ." ) 3 % ! " 6 G .
$
> . ) ! < ! )$ 5 3 +?
" < . K .
. " ! . " ! A$
3 " " $
3 < > % % K .
$
3 " 1 <9 > 5 "- F .
" $ #$ $ ' % " 0! #$ $ 4
" 4 % ! ! ! E 5
' ! $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 27
33
34
36
27
26
27
149
25627
1727
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3 " 4 * " 1 <9 5 $
> % ). < ) % ) = %! $ < "
! ) ! ! ! " " ! )$ <
" " " & $< 1 $5!
)M %M$ 1 6$ 5! ) %
. " ! > )M M % K
. $ " % " @ %% 5 > >
A ! )$ %
) ! " > $ *++B9 9* B+ " ( ' "& . ! ' $
> . = 1 . % ) ) " # ' " ' % .
% < $ " . ! % " =
1 ? " % " " ' "
) $ " ) ! " " %% 8 ) ,++,++ ) ! 3 "
A! " &! 3 3 = 1 )
" #$ $
%% " ! ! ! "
A$ -" ! . " $
= 1 < ! ). " "
" . & ) F. *++ $ 0 > ! ! & %.
< ! )$ 6 " & %$
> . ? ) ! 5 > > & ) *F. 8 % > .
> ! ) ),
M ). " ). 3 D$ ? > ! ) ). !% 9
#$ $ ! 3 % % % C I. "
% ! " ? > $ ! " ! %
" ! "" "" " % "1 6 % $ ! ). >
! % ! 3 3 $ ) % ) 1
) $ " . % ) % "" 8 0 $
@ ) % $ 1 ! 9 ! $ $$$ 5! % %%
4 . %% " ! " ? % . #$ $ "
% ) )9 ! 4 $ 5! ! %% .
. ). ! " $ ) +? . ! " ")
"" % $ . %% ! ) ! "
% ! 8 ) ). 8%
" " ! " ? % $ ) 8 ) "
! ! $5 D. " ). 8 ! . ! ).
! "" $M L ! $ % " & ) *F.
5 > G> $
> . 1 6$ 5! " $ M6 " F/ ) . "
0 ! ) F+. B 0 ! ) *+. $R**S 3 ) " .
! ) 3 ! ?
! ! 7 ) . 5! %
)? $R*FS % ) ' . 5! ! ) " 0 )
4 4 9 . ! % ) "
% R*DS ! .M
3% $
> . 5 ) = ) . " > ). ' " > ! ) ) > .
" ' " K . ! ) % " &
! )$ " %% % " ) ,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 28
34
35
37
28
27
28
150
25728
1828
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
M $ $ $ $ F 4 % ) .
? < )?$ %% %
" . ! " " ) " $
5 ) = ) 5 " ' " . $M
) 0 4 . 4 & %) B$ D. " 5 ) = )
A! " 5 ? " ' " ).
% ! ) 3 $
" 9 M M " % ) )
%% 8% $M ) 3% . $
> . " > )% ,
1 6$ 5! . " 4 " # ." ' " $
0 1! .4 ! " K $
5 ) = ) . " ' " > ! ) ) > ' "
K . $
&) " . ! 4$ .0$
6 " . ! 0$ . $
1 > ). " = C! . ! $
1 $ 5! " > )$
0
$
> 8 0 1! ? ) 3 ! *$ 6 0 %
. " 4 % $ 3 3 ) ! ! 0 % . 0 1!
0 % = . ( A$. " < . )" ) " ) 3
$ ! " % *. *++/ " % 4 ! 4 3
7 < ). 4 ' 3 )? " " ""$
< )? 1 0! ) " 3 -% 4
! ) ! $
> ! 8 0! )
" *++/ ) * " ' "
)$ ) & ) &! ! . %
% $ ) . '$ 4 % $ ) )
" $ ! ! * " ' % " ' " ' "
) ! ) 6 - ) 3
" ) ) $ ) ! % " ) ?
& 4 ) 3 !% " $ ) ! ! "
(=5->( $ < ! ) 4 . $ $. > $ *++/9 9+* " #$ $ '
! " ( ' " 4 ) $ ) "" )
" $
*++B % > 8 ! )
%% ! " ) < "
8 $ ' 6 6 1 !% " % 1 "
! 4 3$ 6 ! ! 3 % " 3
8% $ ! " ) ) % 3 5 ) $
! ) . " " $ !
! . " . 3 $ !
) % $
&) " ) ! 5 4" ! . $.
! % )" 3 !% ) F. ! .= 5 .
!% C! + " . 3 " > $
" D /$
" $ 39 9% $
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 29
35
36
38
29
28
29
151
25829
1929
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
0$
& 1 !%
2 $
$ !%$
$ !%$ % $
$ $ G !%+
$" 3$ G
$ $ G
$ $ $ G% " G 0
%,GG $) ! ! $ G !%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 30
36
37
39
30
29
30
152
25930
2030
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " #$ %
%& ' % % (( ' ) #$ % %& % % #$ %& %
% #$ % " #$ % ) * ) %# ' + %
' % ( ' # ) ' & # % '! % % $ ! ( !
! % ' % $ ' %' # % '( *',
" * & % ' # '# # % ! " ! % ( ' # %
" ( % $ ( '' % "' # ( ( " "# )
* ' & " ( - $ ' % % # ' ' ' ( * %'
* ' * ! & ' ( ./01 * % * ' ' #$ & ! !
) ' & ' "' ! 2( " ' 3 3 4 ./05 * ' %
" $# ' ' 3 $ % ! * #% & $ ( & ' ( "
% "' 6 * ' & & % ( #% * ! ' '' * #% % #%
% " ! ( " & ' ( " ( # * ' ( " ( * #' '' '
( # ( 7 "$ + #((" % 8 $ ' % ' % '
% (( %$ ( '' ' ( ! " #$ % ! & %) *
#% ' " % '' ' '' * & '# ' & ! + ' %
" ' ' " 8 798 ! %#' ' + $ :: % + ' + ' # 6
)( #"" ' 3 ;' ' ;' #' '' ) $
% '' % ) " ) ' ( #' 7 ' " " % % + $ :: '
" % '' ' ( ' & # ) < * ! !* "
"" % ( " ( %' % & '
* ! ' '' * #% % # ! % ( " % '
* #% % & " %$ ' < !" & ! ' =
' '% % ! % % !% #" "$ ' " %
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 31
37
38
40
31
21
30
31
153
26031
31
of
of
ofof
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
41
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Saturday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
October
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
10,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 32
38
39
41
32
31
32
154
26132
32
of
of
ofof
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 33
39
40
42
33
32
33
155
26233
33
of
of
ofof
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 34
40
41
43
34
33
34
156
26334
34
of
of
ofof
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
11,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " #
$% &
' ( )! *+ ,
-''.#!' /0 12. )! /01- . !#!-/ 1
1!/ !1.230/. !/4 !45!/ .4 ".4-! #206)
5 ) ! ' 4
! 71 5 & !
4 +( $ %
0 8 ' 9
! "
# $ % & ' " '
()" * " ) ! + !!
, 4 ) ) 4 ) - & & ! *
.//0 1
. . 2 - ( 4 ! (0 -& , ! # .//0
2 3 ( '' ' 0 & ( ) 3
4 5 .//6 - & , ! #
7 ' / ( - ( & # .//6 ' '
! * 5 ! !)8 % 5
& ((! ' 4 ' ./,0
0 2 1 ( " ( ' ( # ( !
.//6 ' 4 ' ./,0
6 ! : 2 3 ( ' 5 # & 5 &
( ! ' ' .//6
9 5 / (' % .//: ' 4 '
: " 2 ( ' ( & #
% .//: ' 4 ' ./,0
; 5 ( ' ( * 5 .//: *
< 8 ' 4 '
,/ 3 ; (' ( & ) .//: ' 4 '
,, ' ' 4 3 ( )= 1
# .//; , ! #
,. ! 3 < 2 3 (' ( # .//; ' 4 '
,2 " 6 # " 6 ( " (
( * ! # * .//;
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 35
41
42
44
35
35
157
26435
35
of
of
ofof
51
172
173
174
176
of
51
51
51
51
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
Tuesday,
Saturday March
December
15,
December
Sunday,March
April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 17,
12,
15,
5, 2015
of 2016
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
,7 1#-& & < (' ( " ( * ./,/ ' 4 '
,0 ' 4 2 3 (' ( > 1 * ./,/ '
4 '
,6 " < (' ( 1 & $ ( !
1 4 ./,/ ' 4 '
,9 0<; < 3 (' (# .0 ./,/ # & ) ' 4 '
,: & 3 (& & ( # .6 ./,/ & 4 &
8
=' # ; (% & % #1 # .0 ./,/ 1 5
& 4 + $& & # !
5
$ 1 & 2 3 ( : ./,0 8 )
$ " 6 ( =( $ %( # $
!
1 +
$$ 5 / ( * .//,0 % 8
$, ' 4 3 ( ./,0 ?
$> 3 ( '' ' 0 #
% ./,, /0 ..::
4 5 $& 1 !
$% ? ) " * ./,0
,.0. 4 &
$+ ) '@ 3 (/ 0 3 ( ' .2 ./,0
+ 1 !8# ( '" 5 > (
1 & + (
! 1
$* " & 3 0 4 ./,6
! ! ( !
1
$A 6 & & ' & # ; ./,6
'& + 3 4 # # +
1!
$& 4 4
1 @ # ,0 ./,6
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Summary
of Summary
Control Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 36
42
43
45
36
3636
158
265 of
of
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
5151
173
183
548
673 Tuesday,
Tuesday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
Tuesday,
Saturday March
15,
December
Sunday,March
April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
27th2016
June 12,
15,
5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 37
43
44
46
37
36
37
159
26637
2737
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 38
44
45
47
38
37
38
160
26738
2838
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 39
45
46
48
39
38
39
161
26839
2939
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! " # " $% &
! " #
$ %
"&# '
$ ( %
' ( " ") " * ) ! " ! + " * " ,
! , "" ! " ! " ! " ! , ,
+ " - ! ! )
*
% ( *
(
%
! .
/"0 ! , * 1 ! + 2"3
4 - 1 " " 1 , ! !
4 1 , ! ! ) ** ! "
! 5 6 ) " " # 4 4 + &,,-
. . $ / ..$/
&,,0
% % 1 2 1
%
&,, 3 &,, %
4 %
%
& , , " " " !, " 5
00 6
7 8 9
%
: 7 - 8, 9 , "2 ! " , , , ! 1 , ** !
, ! : 7 ) , . 4 ;
&,,- ( &<;= 5 (
> $;$ ? $
! % % 4
1 &,,@ &,,= ,
$ >
A 1 B3 .+
&,,=
1 B3 2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 40
46
47
49
40
39
40
162
26940
3040
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
< ) * " ) ! A 24
1 ! ' &,, &, , A %
1 2 5 % % " #9 9
- ! ) " " " ; " , . 4
4 "$ C# &,,@(&,,= A D $
3 1 B 3 24 %
5
! %
% &,,0 4 % %
! %3 %
@ < " - "" * ,! " + , :
! * % E % 0 =
9 9
$ 0 =9 00&9 00 &,,- &, , $
!
% %
! %
D 3 $ ! % %
3
= )) /4 0 ), " $ ;
F G + 0 = / F G %
! + $ 3 00 &,,<
3 * E
3 3 " H %#
$ / %
$ D $ $ . +
&,,- &, ,
4 !- " , - .
3 * &,,@ D $ / B
$ &,,
0 6 -) ! 24 0 = . A * D
/ 4 / 00 3 $ 00=; 00 .
5 :
, # ! 7 3 %
&,,- &, , ! D $
$ ! D $ 3 D 3 $ D % A
D E 7F ! 8F
D $ &,,- &,,0 >
% ! D $
3 D A %
; % . + % %
4 E
$
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 41
47
48
50
41
40
41
163
27041
3141
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
) 7 24 00
F F A $;$ (F 7 8 !
.
,-(&& &,,- 1 $
2 1 3
& # = $ % &,,- D $ /
B 3 1
: 5 " * < :# ) " . 0 = / F G
00 9 00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3
. / $
< > ) "" "" " 0 =
/ ;3 $ &,,@
- #, " ! "" " E % D E $
&,,- $ D 3
@ " " " 24 = 0 = &, &,,- &,,@
$ 3 D $ $ $ 3 !
= " ) " " = , D $ 3 0 =
@, &,,@ ! @, 1
&,,@
9
!
@, !
#" !, ! " "1 , " ! "* # ) ": - " E
0 = / F
G . &,,-
! !
B 3
0 " # ) . 0 = / F G 00 9
00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3 /
$ : &,,-
' 9 9 9 9 9 A
&, ( " , !
. 00 $ 3
$ ! 7 8
&, , !
F &,, &, ,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 42
48
49
51
42
41
42
164
27142
3242
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
& , * " *# ) F ) $
&& " : !- &,,- 4
% A D $ 3 1
&: ;! , ! " > ? " 24 &,,0
5 > ; B
%
&< ) < !- $ / %
$ D $ $ . + &,,-
&, , F $ %
&, , 5 % % (
2 %
&- - A &,,- &, , $ A )
A + .+ $ $
&@ * ! : : , * * @ 7 " . 3
0 = &,, &,,0
3 *
&= 5 ! ! 6 ) " " 7 "! ) " ": )" .
4 &,,@ E 4 &,,@
"
#
& 5 ! !6 ) " " ; . 4 &,,-
&0 ! < ") + " . / 0 = "&# @
- 9 &,,@ : 9 &,,0
9 &, , . $ $ / B
00 &,,
:, 7 ) , * * ! " F
0 =
A ;A 0 =
F 0 =
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 43
49
50
52
43
42
43
165
27243
3343
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3 ! ! 6 0 = 0 =
" $ . .
+ 1 $ . #
I $ $ "2
! $ + # ' J +
. 00&
+$;F &,;&, F 00 ! '
D 3 $ 24
"$ A + 1 . #
$ $ $ 1 1 "1E1# $
K 0=,K
E K 3 > L F F . A
A . F + B + 1 $
+ 1 $ $
$ 1
1 B 6 $ 3 >
+ B 1 $
$ ! 00,K
> 1 B 3 > 1 B3 F
! F ! ! A ! ! >
1 1
00 % F F
) % 3 F 7 8
&,,- & 1 1
! 4 '
A
. 3 ! 4
A F 4 0<,K 4
0=,K 0 ,K 00,K
9 A .
1 3 > % 2! 4
/ &,, F ) %$ A .
0@,K D 1 4 A? D!B
0@,K " # +
$ 0 <9 F $ $ * 00 /
7 D 18
.
E % 0 =
$ % 0 ,K M
M 1 $ 0 = 00
00= E % / % 4 !
&,,- (
9 9
; !
1 $ $ !2B+EF2
D $ 3 ,-( (&&
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 44
50
51
53
44
43
44
166
27344
3444
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
# ") ! "
7! N (
O O
N
.
!
5 4 (
F 5 (
G A 8
A' , ? * ? 1 * " " * #" !, " " , , * 7 "
!, A ,
( > " !, '! B $C * #" !, D ! " &
73 "
# (
K ; 2
.
" #( K !
; 5
7 ! 8 9 9 9 9
9 9 %
! % (
% '
5
% !
7A 8 ! $ ' O 7D .2 (
8 ! 8 *
O
% 8
' + ( -
7 (
' % (
! % % %
4 %
K
K M M M % M
% (
K 8
' + - 6 "
7E %
' N %( (
4 (
; ! (
(
7 8 (
7 8
87 - 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 45
51
52
54
45
44
45
167
27445
3545
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
! * , " 1"
! , * 1 3
@ E ! DD ! 1 * )) )
@ E ! DD -
B &. @ DD
B @ . DD ") ! " , " *" * ( ! ") "
"
B @ & DD ) "
B @ . DD ) * , " ! * 1
B @ & DD ) ! * " *
B @ $ DD ") ! 7
B @ DD 7
B @ E DD "!
" * *
. @ EB& DD ! * ) * , "
. @ EB DD ") ! 1 ,! * , "
& @ & B DD 6, " 1 ) ! "
B @ DD 5 " ! !
B @ & DD 1 "": !
B @ DD ) 1 , 1 "": !
B @ & DD > " 1 "": !
B @ DD ' " ! ! " ! * ! * " "
B@ E DD ) ; !" * , " ) ) " !
) * 1 ,"
B@ % DD *) F ) ! , ! ) F
"E # PPPPPPP " %#
>7 '?
% 4 %
" Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F " Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
1 June 19, 2015
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP $
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Lancaster
19
PPPPPPP June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP 15
&,PP
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 F 3 24 Don't Know When
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC I
. . $ / I $ Q &, , "!
&, , . . $ / I #
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 46
52
53
55
46
45
46
168
27546
3646
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 47
53
54
56
47
46
47
169
27647
3747
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41 06/10/2007
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 48
54
55
57
48
47
48
170
27748
3848
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41 06/10/2007
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 49
55
56
58
49
48
49
171
27849
3949
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 50
56
57
59
50
49
50
172
27950
4050
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Advanced
Stan
15-03984
Stan
Mind
U.S. J. Caterbone
J.Motion
Medi
Media
Caterbone
Whistleblower
Sponsored
Control Group
Grop
Group
For
Executive
Reconsideration
Executive
Press
PressSummary
Executive
Transcripts
Testimonies
Mind Release
ofRelease
Control Summary
Summary Officers
Intelligence Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 51
57
58
60
51
50
51
173
28051
4151
of
of
ofof
of51
172
173
174
176
of
51
50
51
51
51
173
183
548
673
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
TuesdayTuesday,
March
SaturdayTuesday,
March
December
15,
DecemberMarch
Sunday,
Saturday, April
2016
September15,
3/15/2016
June
October27th2016
17,
12,
15,
11,
of 2015
2016
5, 2015
10,
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Cover Page Page 1 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
JOINT HEARING
BEFORE THE
SELECT COMMITTEE ON
INTELLIGENCE
AND THE
SUBCOMMITTEE ON
HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC
RESEARCH
OF THE
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN
RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE
NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS
FIRST SESSION
____________
AUGUST 3, 1977
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 281 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 1 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/cover.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Cover Page Page 2 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Printed for the use of the Select Committee on Intelligence
and Committee on Human Resources
U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE
WASHINGTON: 1977
For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing
Office
Washington, D.C. 20402
Stock No. 052-070-04357-1
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 282 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 2 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/cover.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Staff Page Page 1 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE
ON INTELLIGENCE
(Established by S. Res. 400, 94th Cong., 2d sess.)
DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman
BARRY GOLDWATER, Arizona, Vice Chairman
BIRCH BAYH, Indiana
ADLAI E. STEVENSON, Illinois
WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, Maine
WALTER D. HUDDLESTON, Kentucky
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., Delaware
ROBERT MORGAN, North Carolina
GARY HART, Colorado
DANIEL PATRICK MOYNIHAN, New York
CLIFFORD P. CASE, New Jersey
JAKE GARN, Utah
CHARLES McC. MATHIAS, JR., Maryland
JAMES B. PEARSON, Kansas
JOHN H. CHAFE, Rhode Island
RICHARD G. LUGAR, Indiana
MALCOLM WALLOP, Wyoming
ROBERT C. BYRD, West Virginia, Ex Officio Member
HOWARD H. BAKER, JR., Tennessee, Ex Officio Member
WILLIAM G. MILLER, Staff Director
EARL D. EISENHOWER, Minority Staff Director
AUDREY H. HATRY, Chief Clerk
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 283 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 3 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/staff.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Staff Page Page 2 of 2
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
HARRISON A. WILLIAMS, JR., New Jersey, Chairman
JENNINGS RANDOLPH, West Virginia
CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island
EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts
GAYLORD NELSON, Wisconsin
THOMAS F. EAGLETON, Missouri
ALAN CRANSTON, California
WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, Maine
DONALD W. RIEGLE, JR., Michigan
JACOB K. JAVITS, New York
RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania
ROBERT T. STAFFORD, Vermont
ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah
JOHN H. CHAFEE, Rhode Island
S.I. HAYAKAWA, California
STEPHEN J. PARADISE, General Counsel and Staff Director
MARJORIE M. WHITTAKER, Chief Clerk
DON A. ZIMMERMAN, Minority Counsel
SUBCOMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
EDWARD M. KENNEDY, Massachusetts, Chairman
CLAIBORNE PELL, Rhode Island
GAYLORD NELSON, Wisconsin
WILLIAM D. HATHAWAY, Maine
HARRISON A. WILLIAMS, JR., New Jersey
(ex officio)
RICHARD S. SCHWEIKER, Pennsylvania
JACOB K. JAVITS, New York
JOHN H. CHAFEE, Rhode Island
LAWRENCE HOROWITZ, Professional Staff Member
DAVID WINSTON, Minority Counsel
(II)
Table of Contents
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 284 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 4 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/staff.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 1 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
Prepared Statement of Admiral Stansfield Turner, Director of
Central Intelligence
Mr. Chairman: In my letter to you of July 15, 1977, I reported our recent discovery of seven boxes
of documents related to Project MKULTRA, a closely held CIA project conducted from 1953-
1964. As you may recall, MKULTRA was an "umbrella project" under which certain sensitive
subprojects were funded, involving among other things research on drugs and behavioral
modification. During the Rockefeller Commission and Church Committee investigations in 1975,
the cryptonym became publicly known when details of the drug-related death of Dr. Frank Olsen
were publicized. In 1953 Dr. Olsen, a civilian employee of the Army at Fort Detrick, leaped to his
death from a hotel room window in New York City about a week after having unwittingly
consumed LSD administered to him as an experiment at a meeting of LSD researchers called by
CIA.
Most of what was known about the Agency's involvement with behavioral drugs during the
investigations in 1975 was contained in a report on Project MKULTRA prepared by the Inspector
General's office in 1963. As a result of that report's recommendations, unwitting testing of drugs
on U.S. citizens was subsequently discontinued. The MKULTRA-related report was made
available to the Church Committee investigators and to the staff of Senator Kennedy's
Subcommittee on Health. Until the recent discovery, it was believed that all of the MKULTRA
files dealing with behavioral modification had been destroyed in 1973 on the orders of the then
retiring Chief of the Office of Technical Service, with the authorization of the DCI, as has been
previously reported. Almost all of the people who had had any connection with the aspects of the
project which interested Senate investigators in 1975 were no longer with the Agency at that time.
Thus, there was little detailed knowledge of the MKULTRA subprojects available to CIA during
the Church Committee investigations. This lack of available details, moreover, was probably not
wholly attributable to the
-5-
destruction of MKULTRA files in 1973; the 1963 report on MKULTRA by the Inspector General
notes on page 14: "Present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 285 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 5 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 2 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
programs."
When I reported to you last on this matter, my staff had not yet had an opportunity to review the
newly located material in depth. This has now been accomplished, and I am in a position to give
you a description of the contents of the recovered material. I believe you will be most interested in
the following aspects of the recent discovery:
How the material was discovered and why it was not previously found;
The nature of this recently located material;
How much new information there is in the material which may not have been previously
known and reported to Senate investigators; and
What we believe the most significant aspects of this find to be.
To begin, as to how we discovered these materials. The material had been sent to our Retired
Records Center outside of Washington and was discovered sent to our Retired Records Center
outside of Washington and was discovered there as a result of the extensive search efforts of an
employee charged with responsibility for maintaining our holdings on behavioral drugs and for
responding to Freedom of Information Act requests on this subject. During the Church Committee
investigation in 1975, searches for MKULTRA-related material were made by examining both the
active and retired records of all branches of CIA considered at all likely to have had association
with MKULTRA documents. The retired records of the Budget and Fiscal Section of the Branch
responsible for such work were not searched, however. This was because financial papers
associated with sensitive projects such s MKULTRA were normally maintained by the Branch
itself under the project file, not by the Budget and Fiscal Section. In the case at hand, however,
the newly located material was sent to the Retired Records Center in 1970 by the Budget and
Fiscal Section as part of its own retired holdings. The reason for this departure from normal
procedure is not known. As a result of it, however, the material escaped retrieval and destruction
in 1973 by the then-retiring Director of the Office as well as discovery in 1975 by CIA officials
responding to Senate investigators.
The employee who located this material did so by leaving no stone unturned in his efforts to
respond to FOIA requests. He reviewed all listings of material of this Branch stored at the Retired
Records Center, including those of the Budget and Fiscal Section and, thus, discovered the
MKULTRA-related documents which had been missed in the previous searches. In sum, the
Agency failed to uncover these particular documents in 1973 in the process of attempting to
destroy them; it similarly failed to locate them in 1975 in response to the Church Committee
hearings. I am convinced that there was no attempt to conceal this material during the earlier
searches.
Next, as to the nature of the recently located material, it is important to realize that the recovered
folders are finance folders. The bulk of the material in them consists of approvals for advance of
funds, vouchers, accountings, and the like -- most of which are not very informative as to the
nature of the activities that were undertaken. Occasional project proposals or memoranda
commenting on some aspect of a subproject are scattered throughout this material. In general,
however, the recovered material does not include status reports or other documents relating to
operational considerations or progress in the various subprojects, though some elaboration of the
activities contemplated does appear. The recovered documents fall roughly into three categories:
First, there are 149 MKULTRA subprojects, many of which appear to have some connection
with research into behavioral modification, drug acquisition and testing or administering drugs
surreptitiously.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 286 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 6 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 3 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Second, there are two boxes of miscellaneous MKULTRA papers, including audit reports and
financial statements from "cut-out" (i.e., intermediary) funding mechanisms used to conceal CIA's
sponsorship of various research projects.
Finally, there are 33 additional subprojects concerning certain intelligence activities previously
funded under MKULTRA which have nothing to do either with behavioral modification, drugs,
and toxins or with any other related matters.
We have attempted to group the activities covered by the 149 subprojects into categories under
descriptive headings. In broad outline, at least, this presents the contents of these files. The
activities are placed in the following 15 categories:
-6-
1. Research into the effects of behavioral drugs and/or alcohol:
17 subprojects probably not involving human testing;
14 subprojects definitely involving tests on human volunteers;
19 subprojects probably including tests on human volunteers. While not known, some of these
subprojects may have included tests on unwitting subjects as well;
6 subprojects involving tests on unwitting subjects.
2. Research on hypnosis: 8 subprojects, including 2 involving hypnosis and drugs in combination.
3. Acquisition of chemicals or drugs: 7 subprojects.
4. Aspects of magicians' art useful in covert operations: e.g., surreptitious delivery of drug-related
materials: 4 subprojects.
5. Studies of human behavior, sleep research, and behavioral changes during psychotherapy: 9
subprojects.
6. Library searches and attendance at seminars and international conferences on behavioral
modification: 6 subprojects.
7. Motivational studies, studies of defectors, assessment, and training techniques: 23 subprojects.
8. Polygraph research: 3 subprojects.
9. Funding mechanisms for MKULTRA external research activities: 3 subprojects.
10. Research on drugs, toxins, and biologicals in human tissue; provision of exotic pathogens and
the capability to incorporate them in effective delivery systems: 6 subprojects.
11. Activities whose objectives cannot be determined from available documentation: 3
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 287 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 7 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 4 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
subprojects.
12. Subprojects involving funding support for unspecified activities connected with the Army's
Special Operations Division at Fr. Detrick, Md. This activity is outline in Book I of the Church
Committee Report, pp. 388-389. (See Appendix A, pp. 68-69.) Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI,
the Army Assisted CIA in developing, testing, and maintaining biological agents and delivery
systems for use against humans as well as against animals and crops. The objectives of these
subprojects cannot be identified from the recovered material beyond the fact that the money was
to be used where normal funding channels would require more written or oral justification than
appeared desirable for security reasons or where operational considerations dictated short lead
times for purchases. About $11,000 was involved during this period 1953-1960: 3 subprojects.
13. Single subprojects in such areas as effects of electro-shock, harassment techniques for
offensive use, analysis of extrasensory perception, gas propelled sprays and aerosols, and four
subprojects involving crop and material sabotage.
14. One or two subprojects on each of the following:
"Blood Grouping" research, controlling the activity of animals, energy storage and transfer in
organic systems; and
stimulus and response in biological systems.
15. Three subprojects canceled before any work was done on them having to do with laboratory
drug screening, research on brain concussion, and research on biologically active materials to be
tested through the skin on human volunteers.
Now, as to how much new the recovered material adds to what has previously been reported to
the Church Committee and to Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Health on these topics, the
answer is additional detail, for the most part: e.g., the names of previously unidentified
researchers and institutions associated on either a witting or unwitting basis with MKULTRA
activities, and the names of CIA officials who approved or monitored the various subprojects.
Some new substantive material is also present: e.g., details concerning proposals for
experimentation and clinical testing associated with various research projects, and a possibly
improper contribution by CIA to a private institution. However, the principal types of activities
included have, for the most part, either been outlined to some extent or generally described in
what was previously available to CIA in the way of documentation and was supplied by CIA to
Senate investigators. For example:
Financial disbursement records for the period 1960-1964 for 76 of the 149 numbered MKULTRA
subprojects had been recovered from the Office of Finance by CIA and were made available to the
Church Committee investigators in August or September 1975.
The 1963 Inspector General report on MKULTRA made available to both the Church Committee
and Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee mentions electro-shock
-7-
and harassment substances (pp. 4, 16); covert testing on unwitting U.S. citizens (pp. 7, 10-12); the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 288 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 8 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 5 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
search for new materials through arrangements with specialists in universities, pharmaceutical
houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and private research organizations (pp. 7, 9); and
the fact that the Technical Service Division of CIA had initiated 144 subprojects related to the
control of human behavior between 1953-1963 (p. 21).
The relevant section of a 1957 Inspector General report on the Technical Service Division was
also made available to the Church Committee staff. That report discusses techniques for human
assessment and unorthodox methods of communication (p. 201); discrediting and disabling
materials which can be covertly administered (pp. 201-202); studies on magicians' arts as applied
to covert operations (p. 202); specific funding mechanisms for research performed outside of CIA
(pp. 202-203, 205); research being done on "K" (knockout) material, alcohol tolerance, and
hypnotism (p. 203); research on LSD (p. 204); anti-personnel harassment and assassination
delivery systems including aerosol generators and other spray devices (pp. 206-208); the role of
Fort Detrick in support of CIA's Biological/Chemical Warfare capability (p. 208); and material
sabotage research (p. 209). Much of this material is reflected in the Church Committee Report,
Book I, pp. 385-422. (See Appendix A, pp. 65-102).
The most significant new data discovered are, first, the names of researchers and institutions who
participated in the MKULTRA project and, secondly, a possibly improper contribution by CIA to
a private institution. We are now in possession of the names of 185 non-government researchers
and assistants who are identified in the recovered material dealing with the 149 subprojects. The
names of 80 institutions where work was done or with which these people were affiliated are also
mentioned.
The institutions include 44 colleges or universities, 15 research foundations or chemical or
pharmaceutical companies and the like, 12 hospitals or clinics (in addition to those associated
with universities), and 3 penal institutions. While the identities of some of these people and
institutions were known previously, the discovery of the new identities adds to our knowledge of
MKULTRA.
The facts as they pertain to the possibly improper contribution are as follows: One project
involves a contribution of $375,000 to a building fund of a private medical institution. The fact
that a contribution was made was previously known; indeed it was mentioned in a 1957 Inspector
General report on the Technical Service Division of CIA, pertinent portions of which had been
reviewed by the Church Committee staff. The newly discovered material, however, makes it clear
that this contribution was made through an intermediary, which made it appear to be a private
donation. As a private donation, the contribution was then matched by federal funds. The
institution was not made aware of the true source of the gift. This project was approved by the
then DCI, and concurred in by CIA's top management at the time, including the then General
Counsel who wrote an opinion supporting the legality of the contribution.
The recently discovered documents give a greater insight into the scope of the unwitting drug
testing but contribute little more than that. We now have collaborating information that some of
the unwitting drug testing was carried on in safehouses in San Francisco and New York City, and
we have identified that three individuals were involved in this undertaking as opposed to the
previously reported one person. We also know now that some unwitting testing took place on
criminal sexual psychopaths confined at a State hospital and that, additionally, research was done
on knock-out or "K" drug in parallel with research to develop pain killers for cancer patients.
These, then are the principal findings identified to date in our review of the recovered material. As
noted earlier, we believe the detail on the identities of researchers and institutions involved in
CIA's sponsorship of drugs and behavioral modification is a new element and one which poses a
considerable problem. Most of the people and institutions involved are not aware of Agency
sponsorship. We should certainly assume that the researchers and institutions which cooperate
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 289 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 9 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Prepared Statement of CIA Director Stansfield Tur... Page 6 of 6
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
with CIA on a witting basis acted in good faith and in the belief that they were aiding their
government in a legitimate and proper purpose. I believe we all have a moral obligation to these
researchers and institutions to protect them from any unjustified embarrassment or damage to
their reputations which revelation of their identities might bring. In addition, I have a legal
obligation under the Privacy Act not to publicly disclose the names of the individual researchers
without their consent. This is especially true, of course, for
-8-
those researchers and institutions which were unwitting participants in CIA-sponsored activities.
Nevertheless, recognizing the right and the need of both the Senate Select Committee on
Intelligence and the Senate Subcommittee on Health to investigate the circumstances of these
activities in whatever detail they consider necessary. I am providing your Committee with all of
the names on a classified basis. I hope that this will facilitate your investigation while protecting
the individuals and institutions involved. Let me emphasize that the MKULTRA events are 12 to
25 years in the past. I assure you that the CIA is in no way engaged in either witting or unwitting
testing of drugs today.
Finally, I am working closely with the Attorney General and with the Secretary of Health,
Education and Welfare on this matter. We are making available to the Attorney General whatever
materials he may deem necessary to any investigation he may elect to undertake. We are working
with both the Attorney General and the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare to determine
whether it is practicable from this new evidence to attempt to identify any of the persons to whom
drugs may have been administered unwittingly. No such names are part of these records, but we
are working to determine if there are adequate clues to lead to their identification; and if so, how
to go about fulfilling the Government's responsibilities in the matter.
Next: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner
Previous: Opening Remarks
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 290 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 10 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing02.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 1 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
Testimony of Philip Goldman, Former Employee, Central
Intelligence Agency
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am Philip Goldman.
Senator INOUYE. And you are a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Over 10 years ago.
Senator INOUYE. And you were employed at the time when MKULTRA was in operation?
Mr. GOLDMAN. There were some MKULTRA's in operation at the time I was there.
-51-
Senator INOUYE. And Mr. John Gittinger, are you a former employee of the Central
Intelligence Agency?
Testimony of John Gittinger, Former Employee, Central
Intelligence Agency
Mr. GITTINGER. I am.
Senator INOUYE. Are you still an employee?
Mr. GITTINGER. No.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 291 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 11 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 2 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Were you a member of the Agency at the time MKULTRA was in
operation?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you. Senator Kennedy.
Senator KENNEDY. I want to welcome both of you to the committee. If we could start with
Mr. Goldman. Were you the project engineer for the safe houses in either San Francisco or
New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I know of no safe house in San Francisco.
Senator KENNEDY. How about in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew of one facility that was established there, but I didn't know anything
of its operation.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you a monitor on any testing of drugs on unwitting persons in San
Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have a classified document here that was provided by the
Agency that lists your name as a monitor of the program and I would appreciate it if you
would look--
Mr. GOLDMAN. I think the misunderstanding arises because I was project officer.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, would you take a look at that?
[Mr. Goldman inspected the document.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. This document as it states is correct. However, my--
Senator KENNEDY. That document is correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. As far as I see on the first page, the project. But my--
Senator KENNEDY. Well, could I get it back, please.
That would indicate that you were a monitor of the program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was in charge of disbursing the moneys to Morgan Hall.
Senator KENNEDY. To whom was that?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To the individual whose name was listed at the top of that document.
Senator KENNEDY. And you knew that he was running the project in San Francisco?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 292 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 12 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 3 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew he was the person who was in charge out there.
Senator KENNEDY. All right.
Mr. GOLDMAN. But I had no knowledge nor did I seek knowledge of actually what he was
doing, because there would be other things involved.
I did receive--
Senator KENNEDY. What were you doing?
-52-
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was collecting -- I had to be sure that all the receipts that ever were turned
in balanced with the moneys that were paid out to see that everything was run all right. There
was no illegal use of funds as far as we could determine by the receipts and cash.
Senator KENNEDY. So even though the Agency document indicates that you were a monitor
for the program, one of the few monitors of that particular program which you mentioned for
San Francisco and Mill Valley, Calif., you described your responsibility only as a carrier of
money, is that correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I would say as a disburser or carrying out -- seeing that the moneys were
handled properly. There was within that -- I don't know what's done or what he did do in
conjunction with other people.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you responsible for the disbursement of all the funds?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was responsible for turning over the check to him.
Senator KENNEDY. And what did you know of the program itself?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I knew of the program was what he furnished us in terms of
receipts and that sort of thing. I didn't indulge or concern myself in that.
Senator KENNEDY. You still wrote, and I'll let you examine it -- it's a classified document --
but you wrote a rather substantive review of the program in May of 1963, talking about the
experiments, the factual data that had been collected, covert and realistic field trials, about the
necessity of those particular -- and talked about the effectiveness of the various programs, the
efficiency of various delivery systems. That doesn't sound to me like someone who is only--
Mr. GOLDMAN. Well, if you would refresh my memory, if I could read this I would
certainly agree with whatever is said there, if it was written.
Senator KENNEDY. I am trying to gather what your role was. You've indicated first of all
that you didn't know about -- you knew about a safe house in New York; now we find out that
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 293 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 13 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 4 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you're the carrier for the resources as well and the agent in San Francisco. We find out now
that the CIA put you as a monitor. You're testifying that you only were the courier, and here
we have just one document, and there are many others that talk about the substance of that
program with your name on it and I am just trying to find out exactly what role you were
playing.
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I can tell you about this and I am drawing completely on
my memory is that this individual who was in charge out there conducted these things and
reported them back to the Agency. I didn't participate in any of them. All I know was that he
furnished me with receipts for things that were done and told of the work that they had done.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that document covers more than receipts.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, it tells of what -- they had conducted work out there.
Senator KENNEDY. It describes, does it not? Read the paragraph 2.
Mr. GOLDMAN. "A number of covert"--
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can't read it, it's a classified document, and I don't know why,
quite frankly, but it relates to the substance
-53-
of those programs and your name is signed to the memorandums on it. I am not interested in
you trying to review for us now what is in the document, but I think it would be unfortunate if
we were left with the opinion that all you were was a courier of resources when we see a
document with your name on it, signed, that talks about the substance of the program. And
what we're interested in is the substance of the program. We have the recent documents that
were provided by the Agency, which do indicate that you were at least involved in the
substance, and I'm just trying to find out whether you're willing to tell us about that.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am perfectly willing to tell you everything that I can remember.
Senator KENNEDY. But you can't remember anything.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I can't remember the substantive parts of these, things, I really can't.
Senator KENNEDY. Of the program that was taking place.
Do you have any greater familiarity with what was happening in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, no.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the same function with regards to New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The same function with regard to New York.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 294 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 14 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 5 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you ever go to San Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. Did you meet with the agent in charge?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And why did you meet with him?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To discuss some of the receipts and things that were there to find out if
these were indeed true expenditures and to find out if everything was going along all right for
the work that was being done.
Senator KENNEDY. What work was being done?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, the reports of these things and whatever was being done. I don't know
who he reported to but he did report to somebody.
Senator KENNEDY. You travel out there to find out about the work that's being done, and
what does he tell you, that the work is being done well and--
Mr. GOLDMAN. He told me that the work that they were doing was going along,
progressing satisfactorily, but to be very frank with you--
Senator KENNEDY. But he didn't tell you what the work was?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To be very frank with you, Senator, I cannot remember the things that
happened back in those days. I've been away from the company -- from the Agency for over
10 years, and that is even farther back than that, and that was just about the time when I first
engaged in this, so it was my first--
Senator KENNEDY. Did they disburse a series of $100 checks, to your recollection?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I don't recollect it, but if you have it there, then they did.
Senator KENNEDY. Did you know Dr. Gottlieb?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
-54-
Senator KENNEDY. How did you know Dr. Gottlieb?
Mr. GOLDMAN. He had been head of the division when I was recruited.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 295 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 15 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 6 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you talk to him about these programs? Did you have anything to do
with him during this period of time?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't have anything to do with him until I would say probably in the
sixties.
Senator KENNEDY. And can you tell us what you had to do with him then?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Just what you see there, on the papers.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is the request for the money and he approves it.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That is the request for money and he approves it, and I am quite sure that I
probably discussed with him whether the work was going along all right, whether his reports
were being turned in, and whether he was satisfied with the way things were going and did he
have any complaints about the way other people were requesting him, but I did not engage
myself in anything he was doing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, did you get the impression that Gottlieb knew what was going
on?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't ask.
Senator KENNEDY. But you told him that your impression that what was going on even
though you didn't know what was going on, was going on well, I guess? [Laughter.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. I told Gottlieb what you saw in there was that the things appeared to be
going along all right. I was repeating and parroting back the words that were given to me
while I was there.
Senator KENNEDY. What was the money being spent for, do you know?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; I can't recall that, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you remember if we told you it was red curtains and can-can
pictures--
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Floral pictures and the rest.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders and two-way mirrors.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Wait, hold on. You're slipping a word in there now.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 296 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 16 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 7 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. But you would have authorized those funds, would you not, since you
were the--
Mr. GOLDMAN. Did you say two-way mirrors?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. In the safe houses.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. San Francisco.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. How about New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. You remember now that you approved expenditures for New York?
-55-
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. What were those expenditures for?
Mr. GOLDMAN. That was a transfer of money over for the use in an apartment in New York
by the Bureau of Narcotics. It was for their use.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you have any knowledge of what was going on in the apartment?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir, other than I know that it had been used, according to the
information that I have been given, it was used by the Bureau of Narcotics to make meetings
with individuals who they were interested in with regard to pushing dope -- not pushing dope,
but selling narcotics and that sort of thing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, I am sure you had many responsibilities and it's a long time ago,
but the Agency does indicate that you were project monitor for that particular program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That's correct.
Senator KENNEDY. Your own testimony indicates you went out to review the expenditures
of funds to find out whether they were being wisely used, that you came back and talked to the
project director, Mr. Gottlieb, to give him a progress report about what was going on out there.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 297 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 17 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 8 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, sir, I did.
Senator KENNEDY. All those things are true, and yet you draw a complete blank in terms of
what was the project itself. That's where the record is now.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I did not go out there to review the projects nor did I come back and talk
with Mr. Gottlieb and review what I had observed in terms of any projects that they -- that is,
other parts of the Agency might have in operation there. I simply reported back those things
which were told to me by the individual out there who -- and I carried them back and they --
are contained in the report that you have in front of you, word for word, just as it was given to
me.
Senator KENNEDY. The report that you examined here is a substantive report on the
particular program and project. And I don't think anyone who wasn't familiar with the project -
- this is a personal evaluation -- could write a report on the substance of it without knowing
about it. Now, that's mine. Maybe you can't remember and recollect, and that's--
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; everything I put down in there is things that I was told while I was out
there, and if there was any ancillary information involved in there I can tell you I just don't
remember that. I really don't.
At the time -- that was some years ago. At the time -- a lot of time has passed since then and I
have made quite sure that if I could recollect it at all, I would do it. If you have some papers
and you want me to certify whether yes, this is so or that is so, I can do that, but I can't recall it
mentally.
Senator KENNEDY. You just certified the principal. There are others up here.
I would like to go to Dr. Gittinger.
Mr. GITTINGER. It's Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. How long did you serve with the Agency?
-56-
Mr. GITTINGER. Twenty-six years.
Senator KENNEDY. Excuse me?
Mr. GITTINGER. Twenty-six years.
Senator KENNEDY. Twenty-six years.
And at some point you moved into the operational support side, is that correct?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 298 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 18 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 9 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And did you know Sidney Gottlieb?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And did he inform you about the research projects involving LSD?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. It is my understanding that you were also aware of some of the drug
testing projects conducted on unwitting subjects on the west coast using the Bureau of
Narcotics people in the operation. Is that true?
Mr. GITTINGER. I was.
Senator INOUYE. Excuse me. Would you speak into the microphone? I cannot hear you.
Mr. GITTINGER. Sorry.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know which drugs were involved in those tests?
Mr. GITTINGER. LSD. And I can't remember for sure much of the others. What is the
substance of marihuana, cannabis, is that right, that can be delivered by other than smoking?
Senator KENNEDY. Cannabis?
Mr. GITTINGER. There had been some discussion of that; yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And was heroin also used?
Mr. GITTINGER. Heroin used by CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. No. In the west coast operation.
Mr. GITTINGER. Absolutely not.
Senator KENNEDY. Now, to your knowledge, how were the drugs administered to the
unwitting subjects?
Mr. GITTINGER. I have no direct knowledge.
Senator KENNEDY. Why did you go to the safe houses?
Mr. GITTINGER. It's a very complicated story. Just in justification of myself, this came up
just, day before yesterday. I have not really had enough time to get it all straightened in my
mind, so I ramble.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you take your time and tell us in your own words. We've got
some time here.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 299 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 19 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 10 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. My responsibilities which would involve any of the period of time that
you were talking about really was not directly related to drugs at all. I was a psychologist
charged with the responsibility of trying to develop as much information as I could on various
cultures, overseas cultures, anthropological type data, if you follow what I mean. I was also
engaged in trying to work out ways and means of assessing people and understanding people.
I originally became involved in this through working on Chinese culture, and over a series of
time I was introduced to the problem of brainwashing, which is the thing that really was the
most compelling thing in relationship to this, and became charged with the responsibility of
trying to find out a little bit about interrogation techniques.
-57-
And among other things, we decided or I decided that one of the best sources of interrogation
techniques would be trying to locate and interview and become involved with experienced
police interrogators in the country and experienced people who had real practical knowledge
of interrogation. The reason for this is that we had become pretty well convinced after the
experience of the brainwashing problems coming out of China, that it was the techniques of
the interrogators that were causing the individuals to make confessions and so forth in
relationship to this, rather than any kind of drugging and so forth. So we were very much
interested in interrogation techniques, and this led to me being introduced to the agent in the
west coast, and I began to talk to him in connection with these interrogation techniques.
Senator KENNEDY. OK. Now, that is the agent that ran the tests on the west coast on the
unwitting people. That's where you come in, correct?
Mr. GITTINGER. If I understand -- would you say that again?
Senator KENNEDY. The name Morgan Hall has been -- that is the name that has been used.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And that is the agent that you met with.
Mr. GITTINGER. That is right.
Senator KENNEDY. And you met at the safe house.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Whom did you meet with in the safe house?
Mr. GITTINGER. This is the part that is hard for me to say, and I am sorry that I have to. In
connection with some work that we were doing, we needed to have some information on
sexual habits. Morgan Hall provided informants for me, to talk to in connection with the sex
habits that I was interested in trying to find information. During one period of time the safe
house, as far as I was concerned, was used for just these particular type of interviews. And I
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 300 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 20 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 11 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
didn't see the red curtains.
Senator KENNEDY. Those were prostitutes, were they?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. How many different times were you there that you had similar--
Mr. GITTINGER. I couldn't possibly say with any certainty on that. Four or five times.
Senator KENNEDY. Four or five times.
Mr. GITTINGER. Over -- you remember now, the period that I'm talking about when I
would have any involvement in this is from about 1956 to 1961. So it's about a 4- or 5-year
period which is the only time that I know anything about what you are talking about here
today.
Senator KENNEDY. Did Morgan Hall make the arrangements for the prostitutes to meet
with you?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Did the interviews that you had have anything to do with drugs?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, as I tried to explain earlier when this was being discussed a little bit
beforehand, again I think it is pretty hard for most people now to recognize how little there
was known about drugs at the period of time that we are talking about, because the
-58-
drug age or the drug culture comes later on. Consequently, those of us who had any
responsibility in this area were interested in trying to get as much information as we could on
the subculture, the subculture drug groups, and obviously the Bureau of Narcotics represented
a means of doing this. Consequently, other types of things that were involved in discussions at
that time would have to do with the underground use of drugs. When I am talking about this I
am talking about the folkways in terms of unwitting use of drugs. Did these people that I was
talking to have any information about this and on rare instances they were able to tell me
about their use, and in most cases this would largely turn out to be a Mickey Finn or
something of that sort rather than anything esoteric.
I also was very much interested because we had relatively little information, believe it or not,
at that time, in terms of the various reactions that people were having to drugs. Therefore,
these people were very informative in terms of they knew a great deal of information about
reactions.
Senator KENNEDY. At least you gathered -- or am I correct in assuming that you gathered
the impression that the prostitutes that you had talked to were able to slip the drugs to people
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 301 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 21 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 12 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
as I understand it. Did you form any impression on that?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly did not form the impression that, they did this as a rule or--
Senator KENNEDY. But they bad the knowledge.
Mr. GITTINGER. They had the knowledge or some of them had had knowledge of this
being done. But again, as it turned out, it was largely in this area of knockout drops.
Senator KENNEDY. Looking back now did you form any impression about how the Agency
was actually testing the broad spectrum of social classes in these safe houses? With the large
disbursal of cash in small quantities, $100 bills and the kinds of elaborate decorations and
two-way mirrors in the bedrooms and all the rest, is there any question in your own mind what
was going on in the safe houses, or the techniques that were being used to administer these
drugs?
Mr. GITTINGER. I find it very difficult to answer that question, sir. I had absolutely no
direct knowledge there was a large number of this. I had no knowledge that anyone other than
-- than Morgan Hall was in any way involved in the unwitting administration of drugs.
Senator KENNEDY. But Gottlieb would know, would he not?
Mr. GITTINGER. I believe so, yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Could we go into the Human Ecology Foundation and talk about that
and how it was used as an instrument in terms of the support of research?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Could you describe it to us? Could you describe the Human Ecology
Foundation, how it functioned and how it worked?
Mr. GITTINGER. May I tell something about how it evolved, which I think is important?
Senator KENNEDY. Sure.
Mr. GITTINGER. The Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, so-called, was
actually a -- I am confused here now as to whether I should name you names.
-59-
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not interested in names or institutions, so we prefer that you
do not. That has to be worked out in arrangements between Admiral Turner and the
individuals and the institutions.
But we're interested in what the Foundation really was and how it functioned and what its
purpose was.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 302 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 22 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 13 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it was established to undertake research in the general area of the
behavioral sciences. It definitely had almost no focus or interest in, say, drug-related type of
activities except in a very minor way, because it was largely set up to attempt to gain a certain
amount of information and to fund projects which were psychological, sociological,
anthropological in character. It was established in the sense of a period of time that a lot of us
who are in it wish we could do it over again, but we were interested in trying to get together a
panel of the most representative high-level behavioral scientists we could to oversee and help
in terms of developing the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology type of program.
The Agency in effect provided the money. They did not direct the projects. Now, the fact of
the matter is, there are a lot of innocent people who received the Society for the Investigation
of Human Ecology money which I know for a fact they were never asked to do anything for
the CIA but they did get through this indirectly. They had no knowledge that they were getting
CIA money.
Senator KENNEDY. Over what period of time did this take place?
Mr. GITTINGER. As far as I was concerned , it was the period of time ending in 1961. 1
believe the Human Ecology fund finally phased out in 1965, but I was not involved in this
phasing out.
Senator KENNEDY. Can you give the range of the different sort of individual projects of the
universities in which it was active?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it would have as many as -- I am very fuzzy on my memory on the
number of projects. It is over 10, 20, 30.
Senator KENNEDY. After it made the grants, what was the relationship of the Agency with
the results of the studies? The Foundation acquired the money to make the grants from the
Agency, and then it made the grants to these various research programs.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And that included eight universities as well as individual researchers?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Then what follow-up was there to that, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, in every sense of the word, the organization was run exactly like
any other foundation, and it carried with it the same thing in terms of making certain that the
people that they had given money to used it for the purpose for which it had been granted, that
they had access to any of the reports that they had put out, but there were no strings attached to
anybody. There wasn't any reason they couldn't publish anything that they put out.
Senator KENNEDY. What, sort of budget are we talking about here?
Mr. GITTINGER. I honestly do not remember. I would guess we are talking in the realm of
about $150,000 a year, but don't hold me to that, because I don't know.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 303 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 23 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 14 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-60-
Senator KENNEDY. What is your view about such funding as a professional person, in terms
of compromising the integrity of a university, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, obviously, sir, insofar as today there is no question about it. I will
have to say at the time that we were doing this there was quite an entirely different kind of an
attitude, and I do know for a fact that we moved to start towards phasing out the Society for
the Investigation of Human Ecology and the Human Ecology Fund for the very reason that we
were beginning to recognize that it was moving into an area but this would be compromised.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is commendable, both your attitude and the reasons for it, but
during that period of time it still was involved in behavior research programs, as I understand
it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir. On its own, in connection with this, it participated again, and
these again were not CIA-directed projects, but these were all things which would
theoretically contribute to the general knowledge at the time where the things like the study of
the Hungarian refugees -- obviously, the study of the Hungarian refugees who came to this
country after the Hungarian revolt was a very useful exercise to try to get information about
the personality characteristics of the Communists and so forth.
Senator KENNEDY. Were there other foundations that were doing similar kinds of work?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my knowledge, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You believe--
Mr. GITTINGER. You mean, CIA, other CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. Right.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, my answer is in the sense that I know of no other CIA foundations,
no. There were, of course, other foundations doing similar kinds of work in the United States.
Senator KENNEDY. Have you heard of the Psychological Assessments Foundation?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly have.
Senator KENNEDY. What was that? What function did that have?
Mr. GITTINGER. Now, this was bringing us up to a different era. I believe the functions of
that organization have nothing whatsoever to do with the things that are being talked about
here while I was associated with it.
Senator KENNEDY. Rather than getting into the work, it was another foundation, was it not?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 304 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 24 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 15 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
It was another foundation supported by the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. What, the Psychological Assessment?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GITTINGER. No, sir, it was not.
Senator KENNEDY. It did not get any support at all from the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. Oh, yes, sir. It did get support, but it was a business firm.
Senator KENNEDY. It was a business but it got support from the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. It got money from it, but it definitely was not in MKULTRA or in any
way associated with this.
-61-
Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want to thank you for your helpful testimony, Mr. Gittinger.
It is not easy to go back into the past. I think you have been very fair in your characterizations,
and I think it is quite appropriately indicated that there are different standards now from what
they were 25 years ago, and I think you have responded very fairly and completely to the
inquiries, and I think with a good deal of feeling about it.
You are a person who is obviously attempting to serve the country's interest, so I want to
thank you very much for your statement and for your helpful timeliness.
Mr. GITTINGER. Thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Case?
Senator CASE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am sorry that I had another committee that I had
to complete the hearing with this morning before I got here.
I shall read the testimony with very great interest, and I appreciate your testimony as I have
heard it. I would like to comment just on one point, and that is, it relates to a story in the press
yesterday about part of this program involving the funding of a grant at a foreign university. I
would like to elicit from you a comment as to the additional sensitivity and difficulty that that
practice involves from your standpoint as a scientist, as well as a citizen, if you will.
Mr. GITTINGER. I will say it was after the fact thinking. It was utter stupidity the way
things worked out to have used some of this money outside the United States when it was CIA
money. I can categorically state to my knowledge, and I don't claim a complete knowledge all
the way across of the human ecology functions, but to my knowledge, and this is unfortunate,
those people did not know that they were getting money from CIA, and they were not asked to
contribute anything to CIA as such.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 305 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 25 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 16 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator CASE. It would be interesting to try to examine this by turning the thing around and
thinking what we would think if this happened from a foreign official agency to our own
university. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. Goldman, I wonder if you would tell us what your training and educational background is?
Dr. GOLDMAN. I have already given a biography for the record.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I have not seen it. Who has it? Is it classified? We may have it for
the record, but may I ask you to briefly describe your training and background for us now? I
hope it is no secret.
Dr. GOLDMAN. Well, I was told if I was asked this to say that. I was told that by your staff
people, but I have no objection to telling you. I am a resident from Pennsylvania, southwest
Pennsylvania, Lancaster County. I went to Penn State, and I am in nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. In what?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were you in charge of a section or segment of the CIA in your past
capacity?
Dr. GOLDMAN. During the time I was with that organization, I was in charge of one small
section of it, one small segment of it; yes.
-62-
Senator SCHWEIKER. What was the function or purpose of that section that you headed?
Dr. GOLDMAN. To provide support for the other parts of the division.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Where in the chain of command would that put you in relation to Dr.
Gottlieb?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Pretty far down the line.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, I would just like to ask you a few questions. We
appreciate your frankness and candor with the committee, and we realize this is a very difficult
area to go into. I am not quite clear on two matters that were raised earlier. First, were the safe
houses we were talking about here used on occasion by the prostitutes you referred to?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 306 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 26 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 17 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. I really have not the slightest idea.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were the prostitutes used in any way to slip the customers drugs for
observation purposes?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my direct knowledge.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Would you have been in a position to know the answer to either of
these questions?
Mr. GITTINGER. May I say, probably not, and may I make an aside to explain a little bit of
this, please, sir?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, a moment ago you mentioned brainwashing
techniques, as one area that you had, I guess, done some work in. How would you characterize
the state of the art of brainwashing today? Who has the most expertise in this field, and who is
or is not doing it in terms of other governments?
During the Korean war there was a lot of serious discussion about brainwashing techniques
being used by the North Koreans, and I am interested in finding out what the state of the art is
today, as you see it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, of course, there, has been a great deal of work on this, and there is
still a great deal of controversy. I can tell you that as far as I knew, by 1961, 1962, it was at
least proven to my satisfaction that brainwashing, so called, is some kind of an esoteric device
where drugs or mind- altering kinds of conditions and so forth were used, did not exist even
though "The Manchurian Candidate" as a Movie really set us back a long time, because it
made something impossible look plausible. Do you follow what I mean? But by 1962 and
1963, the general idea that we were able to come up with is that brainwashing was largely a
process of isolating a human being, keeping him out of contact, putting him under long stress
in relationship to interviewing and interrogation, and that they could produce any change that
way without having to resort to any kind of esoteric means.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Are there ways that we can ascertain this from a distance when we
see a captive prisoner either go on television, in a photograph, or at a press conference? In
other words, are there certain signs that you have learned to recognize from your technical
background, to tell when brainwashing has occurred? Or is that very difficult to do?
Mr. GITTINGER. It is difficult to do. I think it is possible now in terms of looking at a
picture of somebody who has been in enemy hands for a long period of time. We can get some
pretty good ideas of what kind of circumstances he has been under, if that is what you mean.
-63-
Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I have, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 307 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 27 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 18 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Before adjourning the hearings, I would like to have the record show that Dr. Goldman and
Mr. Gittinger have voluntarily cooperated with the committee in staff interviews, that they
appear this morning voluntarily, and they are not under subpoena.
Gentlemen, I realize that this experience may have been an unhappy one and possibly a
painful one. Therefore, we thank you very much for participating this morning. We also
realize that the circumstances of that time differed very much from this day, and possibly the
national attitude, the national political attitude condoned this type of activity. So, we have not
asked you to come here as persons who have committed crimes, but rather in hope that you
can assist us in studying this problem so that it will not occur once again. In that spirit we
thank you for your participation, and we look forward to working with you further in this case.
Thank you very much.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman, I would like also to thank the witnesses. These are
difficult matters, and I think all of us are very grateful.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think the witnesses should know that though it may not always
seem that way, what we are trying to do is to probe the past and look at the policies of the past
to affect the future. I think our emphasis really is on the future, not the past, but it is important
that we learn from the past as we formulate policies and legislation for the future, I hope that
all of the witnesses who did come before us voluntarily this morning, including Admiral
Turner respect the fact that we are questioning the past to learn about the future. I think it
should be looked at in that light.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is the spirit in which we have had these hearings. It seems to
me that from both these witnesses and others, Gottlieb knows the information and can best
respond, and we are going to make every effort in the Senate Health Committee to get Mr.
Gottlieb to appear, and we obviously look forward to cooperating with Senator Inouye and the
other members of the committee in getting the final chapter written on this, but we want to
thank you very much for your appearance here.
Senator INOUYE. The hearing will stand in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
[Whereupon, at 12:12 p.m., the hearing was recessed, subject to the call of the Chair.]
Appendix A: Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
Intelligence Community
Appendix B: Documents Referring to Discovery of Additional MKULTRA
Material
Appendix C: Documents Referring to Subprojects
Table of Contents
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 308 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 28 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 1 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
Testimony of Philip Goldman, Former Employee, Central
Intelligence Agency
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am Philip Goldman.
Senator INOUYE. And you are a former employee of the Central Intelligence Agency?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Over 10 years ago.
Senator INOUYE. And you were employed at the time when MKULTRA was in operation?
Mr. GOLDMAN. There were some MKULTRA's in operation at the time I was there.
-51-
Senator INOUYE. And Mr. John Gittinger, are you a former employee of the Central
Intelligence Agency?
Testimony of John Gittinger, Former Employee, Central
Intelligence Agency
Mr. GITTINGER. I am.
Senator INOUYE. Are you still an employee?
Mr. GITTINGER. No.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 309 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 29 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 2 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Were you a member of the Agency at the time MKULTRA was in
operation?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you. Senator Kennedy.
Senator KENNEDY. I want to welcome both of you to the committee. If we could start with
Mr. Goldman. Were you the project engineer for the safe houses in either San Francisco or
New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I know of no safe house in San Francisco.
Senator KENNEDY. How about in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew of one facility that was established there, but I didn't know anything
of its operation.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you a monitor on any testing of drugs on unwitting persons in San
Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have a classified document here that was provided by the
Agency that lists your name as a monitor of the program and I would appreciate it if you
would look--
Mr. GOLDMAN. I think the misunderstanding arises because I was project officer.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, would you take a look at that?
[Mr. Goldman inspected the document.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. This document as it states is correct. However, my--
Senator KENNEDY. That document is correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. As far as I see on the first page, the project. But my--
Senator KENNEDY. Well, could I get it back, please.
That would indicate that you were a monitor of the program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was in charge of disbursing the moneys to Morgan Hall.
Senator KENNEDY. To whom was that?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To the individual whose name was listed at the top of that document.
Senator KENNEDY. And you knew that he was running the project in San Francisco?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 310 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 30 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 3 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. I knew he was the person who was in charge out there.
Senator KENNEDY. All right.
Mr. GOLDMAN. But I had no knowledge nor did I seek knowledge of actually what he was
doing, because there would be other things involved.
I did receive--
Senator KENNEDY. What were you doing?
-52-
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was collecting -- I had to be sure that all the receipts that ever were turned
in balanced with the moneys that were paid out to see that everything was run all right. There
was no illegal use of funds as far as we could determine by the receipts and cash.
Senator KENNEDY. So even though the Agency document indicates that you were a monitor
for the program, one of the few monitors of that particular program which you mentioned for
San Francisco and Mill Valley, Calif., you described your responsibility only as a carrier of
money, is that correct?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I would say as a disburser or carrying out -- seeing that the moneys were
handled properly. There was within that -- I don't know what's done or what he did do in
conjunction with other people.
Senator KENNEDY. Were you responsible for the disbursement of all the funds?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I was responsible for turning over the check to him.
Senator KENNEDY. And what did you know of the program itself?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I knew of the program was what he furnished us in terms of
receipts and that sort of thing. I didn't indulge or concern myself in that.
Senator KENNEDY. You still wrote, and I'll let you examine it -- it's a classified document --
but you wrote a rather substantive review of the program in May of 1963, talking about the
experiments, the factual data that had been collected, covert and realistic field trials, about the
necessity of those particular -- and talked about the effectiveness of the various programs, the
efficiency of various delivery systems. That doesn't sound to me like someone who is only--
Mr. GOLDMAN. Well, if you would refresh my memory, if I could read this I would
certainly agree with whatever is said there, if it was written.
Senator KENNEDY. I am trying to gather what your role was. You've indicated first of all
that you didn't know about -- you knew about a safe house in New York; now we find out that
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 311 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 31 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 4 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
you're the carrier for the resources as well and the agent in San Francisco. We find out now
that the CIA put you as a monitor. You're testifying that you only were the courier, and here
we have just one document, and there are many others that talk about the substance of that
program with your name on it and I am just trying to find out exactly what role you were
playing.
Mr. GOLDMAN. The only thing I can tell you about this and I am drawing completely on
my memory is that this individual who was in charge out there conducted these things and
reported them back to the Agency. I didn't participate in any of them. All I know was that he
furnished me with receipts for things that were done and told of the work that they had done.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that document covers more than receipts.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, it tells of what -- they had conducted work out there.
Senator KENNEDY. It describes, does it not? Read the paragraph 2.
Mr. GOLDMAN. "A number of covert"--
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can't read it, it's a classified document, and I don't know why,
quite frankly, but it relates to the substance
-53-
of those programs and your name is signed to the memorandums on it. I am not interested in
you trying to review for us now what is in the document, but I think it would be unfortunate if
we were left with the opinion that all you were was a courier of resources when we see a
document with your name on it, signed, that talks about the substance of the program. And
what we're interested in is the substance of the program. We have the recent documents that
were provided by the Agency, which do indicate that you were at least involved in the
substance, and I'm just trying to find out whether you're willing to tell us about that.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I am perfectly willing to tell you everything that I can remember.
Senator KENNEDY. But you can't remember anything.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I can't remember the substantive parts of these, things, I really can't.
Senator KENNEDY. Of the program that was taking place.
Do you have any greater familiarity with what was happening in New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, no.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the same function with regards to New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. The same function with regard to New York.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 312 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 32 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 5 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you ever go to San Francisco?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. Did you meet with the agent in charge?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And why did you meet with him?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To discuss some of the receipts and things that were there to find out if
these were indeed true expenditures and to find out if everything was going along all right for
the work that was being done.
Senator KENNEDY. What work was being done?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, the reports of these things and whatever was being done. I don't know
who he reported to but he did report to somebody.
Senator KENNEDY. You travel out there to find out about the work that's being done, and
what does he tell you, that the work is being done well and--
Mr. GOLDMAN. He told me that the work that they were doing was going along,
progressing satisfactorily, but to be very frank with you--
Senator KENNEDY. But he didn't tell you what the work was?
Mr. GOLDMAN. To be very frank with you, Senator, I cannot remember the things that
happened back in those days. I've been away from the company -- from the Agency for over
10 years, and that is even farther back than that, and that was just about the time when I first
engaged in this, so it was my first--
Senator KENNEDY. Did they disburse a series of $100 checks, to your recollection?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I don't recollect it, but if you have it there, then they did.
Senator KENNEDY. Did you know Dr. Gottlieb?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
-54-
Senator KENNEDY. How did you know Dr. Gottlieb?
Mr. GOLDMAN. He had been head of the division when I was recruited.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 313 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 33 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 6 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. Did you talk to him about these programs? Did you have anything to do
with him during this period of time?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't have anything to do with him until I would say probably in the
sixties.
Senator KENNEDY. And can you tell us what you had to do with him then?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Just what you see there, on the papers.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is the request for the money and he approves it.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That is the request for money and he approves it, and I am quite sure that I
probably discussed with him whether the work was going along all right, whether his reports
were being turned in, and whether he was satisfied with the way things were going and did he
have any complaints about the way other people were requesting him, but I did not engage
myself in anything he was doing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, did you get the impression that Gottlieb knew what was going
on?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I didn't ask.
Senator KENNEDY. But you told him that your impression that what was going on even
though you didn't know what was going on, was going on well, I guess? [Laughter.]
Mr. GOLDMAN. I told Gottlieb what you saw in there was that the things appeared to be
going along all right. I was repeating and parroting back the words that were given to me
while I was there.
Senator KENNEDY. What was the money being spent for, do you know?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; I can't recall that, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you remember if we told you it was red curtains and can-can
pictures--
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Floral pictures and the rest.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Recorders and two-way mirrors.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Wait, hold on. You're slipping a word in there now.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 314 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 34 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 7 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. But you would have authorized those funds, would you not, since you
were the--
Mr. GOLDMAN. Did you say two-way mirrors?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. In the safe houses.
Mr. GOLDMAN. Where?
Senator KENNEDY. San Francisco.
Mr. GOLDMAN. No.
Senator KENNEDY. How about New York?
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. You remember now that you approved expenditures for New York?
-55-
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. What were those expenditures for?
Mr. GOLDMAN. That was a transfer of money over for the use in an apartment in New York
by the Bureau of Narcotics. It was for their use.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you have any knowledge of what was going on in the apartment?
Mr. GOLDMAN. No, sir, other than I know that it had been used, according to the
information that I have been given, it was used by the Bureau of Narcotics to make meetings
with individuals who they were interested in with regard to pushing dope -- not pushing dope,
but selling narcotics and that sort of thing.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, I am sure you had many responsibilities and it's a long time ago,
but the Agency does indicate that you were project monitor for that particular program.
Mr. GOLDMAN. That's correct.
Senator KENNEDY. Your own testimony indicates you went out to review the expenditures
of funds to find out whether they were being wisely used, that you came back and talked to the
project director, Mr. Gottlieb, to give him a progress report about what was going on out there.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 315 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 35 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 8 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GOLDMAN. Yes, sir, I did.
Senator KENNEDY. All those things are true, and yet you draw a complete blank in terms of
what was the project itself. That's where the record is now.
Mr. GOLDMAN. I did not go out there to review the projects nor did I come back and talk
with Mr. Gottlieb and review what I had observed in terms of any projects that they -- that is,
other parts of the Agency might have in operation there. I simply reported back those things
which were told to me by the individual out there who -- and I carried them back and they --
are contained in the report that you have in front of you, word for word, just as it was given to
me.
Senator KENNEDY. The report that you examined here is a substantive report on the
particular program and project. And I don't think anyone who wasn't familiar with the project -
- this is a personal evaluation -- could write a report on the substance of it without knowing
about it. Now, that's mine. Maybe you can't remember and recollect, and that's--
Mr. GOLDMAN. No; everything I put down in there is things that I was told while I was out
there, and if there was any ancillary information involved in there I can tell you I just don't
remember that. I really don't.
At the time -- that was some years ago. At the time -- a lot of time has passed since then and I
have made quite sure that if I could recollect it at all, I would do it. If you have some papers
and you want me to certify whether yes, this is so or that is so, I can do that, but I can't recall it
mentally.
Senator KENNEDY. You just certified the principal. There are others up here.
I would like to go to Dr. Gittinger.
Mr. GITTINGER. It's Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. How long did you serve with the Agency?
-56-
Mr. GITTINGER. Twenty-six years.
Senator KENNEDY. Excuse me?
Mr. GITTINGER. Twenty-six years.
Senator KENNEDY. Twenty-six years.
And at some point you moved into the operational support side, is that correct?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 316 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 36 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger, ... Page 9 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And did you know Sidney Gottlieb?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And did he inform you about the research projects involving LSD?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. It is my understanding that you were also aware of some of the drug
testing projects conducted on unwitting subjects on the west coast using the Bureau of
Narcotics people in the operation. Is that true?
Mr. GITTINGER. I was.
Senator INOUYE. Excuse me. Would you speak into the microphone? I cannot hear you.
Mr. GITTINGER. Sorry.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know which drugs were involved in those tests?
Mr. GITTINGER. LSD. And I can't remember for sure much of the others. What is the
substance of marihuana, cannabis, is that right, that can be delivered by other than smoking?
Senator KENNEDY. Cannabis?
Mr. GITTINGER. There had been some discussion of that; yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And was heroin also used?
Mr. GITTINGER. Heroin used by CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. No. In the west coast operation.
Mr. GITTINGER. Absolutely not.
Senator KENNEDY. Now, to your knowledge, how were the drugs administered to the
unwitting subjects?
Mr. GITTINGER. I have no direct knowledge.
Senator KENNEDY. Why did you go to the safe houses?
Mr. GITTINGER. It's a very complicated story. Just in justification of myself, this came up
just, day before yesterday. I have not really had enough time to get it all straightened in my
mind, so I ramble.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you take your time and tell us in your own words. We've got
some time here.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 317 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 37 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 10 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. My responsibilities which would involve any of the period of time that
you were talking about really was not directly related to drugs at all. I was a psychologist
charged with the responsibility of trying to develop as much information as I could on various
cultures, overseas cultures, anthropological type data, if you follow what I mean. I was also
engaged in trying to work out ways and means of assessing people and understanding people.
I originally became involved in this through working on Chinese culture, and over a series of
time I was introduced to the problem of brainwashing, which is the thing that really was the
most compelling thing in relationship to this, and became charged with the responsibility of
trying to find out a little bit about interrogation techniques.
-57-
And among other things, we decided or I decided that one of the best sources of interrogation
techniques would be trying to locate and interview and become involved with experienced
police interrogators in the country and experienced people who had real practical knowledge
of interrogation. The reason for this is that we had become pretty well convinced after the
experience of the brainwashing problems coming out of China, that it was the techniques of
the interrogators that were causing the individuals to make confessions and so forth in
relationship to this, rather than any kind of drugging and so forth. So we were very much
interested in interrogation techniques, and this led to me being introduced to the agent in the
west coast, and I began to talk to him in connection with these interrogation techniques.
Senator KENNEDY. OK. Now, that is the agent that ran the tests on the west coast on the
unwitting people. That's where you come in, correct?
Mr. GITTINGER. If I understand -- would you say that again?
Senator KENNEDY. The name Morgan Hall has been -- that is the name that has been used.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And that is the agent that you met with.
Mr. GITTINGER. That is right.
Senator KENNEDY. And you met at the safe house.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Whom did you meet with in the safe house?
Mr. GITTINGER. This is the part that is hard for me to say, and I am sorry that I have to. In
connection with some work that we were doing, we needed to have some information on
sexual habits. Morgan Hall provided informants for me, to talk to in connection with the sex
habits that I was interested in trying to find information. During one period of time the safe
house, as far as I was concerned, was used for just these particular type of interviews. And I
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 318 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 38 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 11 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
didn't see the red curtains.
Senator KENNEDY. Those were prostitutes, were they?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. How many different times were you there that you had similar--
Mr. GITTINGER. I couldn't possibly say with any certainty on that. Four or five times.
Senator KENNEDY. Four or five times.
Mr. GITTINGER. Over -- you remember now, the period that I'm talking about when I
would have any involvement in this is from about 1956 to 1961. So it's about a 4- or 5-year
period which is the only time that I know anything about what you are talking about here
today.
Senator KENNEDY. Did Morgan Hall make the arrangements for the prostitutes to meet
with you?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Did the interviews that you had have anything to do with drugs?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, as I tried to explain earlier when this was being discussed a little bit
beforehand, again I think it is pretty hard for most people now to recognize how little there
was known about drugs at the period of time that we are talking about, because the
-58-
drug age or the drug culture comes later on. Consequently, those of us who had any
responsibility in this area were interested in trying to get as much information as we could on
the subculture, the subculture drug groups, and obviously the Bureau of Narcotics represented
a means of doing this. Consequently, other types of things that were involved in discussions at
that time would have to do with the underground use of drugs. When I am talking about this I
am talking about the folkways in terms of unwitting use of drugs. Did these people that I was
talking to have any information about this and on rare instances they were able to tell me
about their use, and in most cases this would largely turn out to be a Mickey Finn or
something of that sort rather than anything esoteric.
I also was very much interested because we had relatively little information, believe it or not,
at that time, in terms of the various reactions that people were having to drugs. Therefore,
these people were very informative in terms of they knew a great deal of information about
reactions.
Senator KENNEDY. At least you gathered -- or am I correct in assuming that you gathered
the impression that the prostitutes that you had talked to were able to slip the drugs to people
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 319 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 39 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 12 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
as I understand it. Did you form any impression on that?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly did not form the impression that, they did this as a rule or--
Senator KENNEDY. But they bad the knowledge.
Mr. GITTINGER. They had the knowledge or some of them had had knowledge of this
being done. But again, as it turned out, it was largely in this area of knockout drops.
Senator KENNEDY. Looking back now did you form any impression about how the Agency
was actually testing the broad spectrum of social classes in these safe houses? With the large
disbursal of cash in small quantities, $100 bills and the kinds of elaborate decorations and
two-way mirrors in the bedrooms and all the rest, is there any question in your own mind what
was going on in the safe houses, or the techniques that were being used to administer these
drugs?
Mr. GITTINGER. I find it very difficult to answer that question, sir. I had absolutely no
direct knowledge there was a large number of this. I had no knowledge that anyone other than
-- than Morgan Hall was in any way involved in the unwitting administration of drugs.
Senator KENNEDY. But Gottlieb would know, would he not?
Mr. GITTINGER. I believe so, yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Could we go into the Human Ecology Foundation and talk about that
and how it was used as an instrument in terms of the support of research?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Could you describe it to us? Could you describe the Human Ecology
Foundation, how it functioned and how it worked?
Mr. GITTINGER. May I tell something about how it evolved, which I think is important?
Senator KENNEDY. Sure.
Mr. GITTINGER. The Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology, so-called, was
actually a -- I am confused here now as to whether I should name you names.
-59-
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we're not interested in names or institutions, so we prefer that you
do not. That has to be worked out in arrangements between Admiral Turner and the
individuals and the institutions.
But we're interested in what the Foundation really was and how it functioned and what its
purpose was.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 320 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 40 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 13 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it was established to undertake research in the general area of the
behavioral sciences. It definitely had almost no focus or interest in, say, drug-related type of
activities except in a very minor way, because it was largely set up to attempt to gain a certain
amount of information and to fund projects which were psychological, sociological,
anthropological in character. It was established in the sense of a period of time that a lot of us
who are in it wish we could do it over again, but we were interested in trying to get together a
panel of the most representative high-level behavioral scientists we could to oversee and help
in terms of developing the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology type of program.
The Agency in effect provided the money. They did not direct the projects. Now, the fact of
the matter is, there are a lot of innocent people who received the Society for the Investigation
of Human Ecology money which I know for a fact they were never asked to do anything for
the CIA but they did get through this indirectly. They had no knowledge that they were getting
CIA money.
Senator KENNEDY. Over what period of time did this take place?
Mr. GITTINGER. As far as I was concerned , it was the period of time ending in 1961. 1
believe the Human Ecology fund finally phased out in 1965, but I was not involved in this
phasing out.
Senator KENNEDY. Can you give the range of the different sort of individual projects of the
universities in which it was active?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, it would have as many as -- I am very fuzzy on my memory on the
number of projects. It is over 10, 20, 30.
Senator KENNEDY. After it made the grants, what was the relationship of the Agency with
the results of the studies? The Foundation acquired the money to make the grants from the
Agency, and then it made the grants to these various research programs.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And that included eight universities as well as individual researchers?
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Then what follow-up was there to that, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, in every sense of the word, the organization was run exactly like
any other foundation, and it carried with it the same thing in terms of making certain that the
people that they had given money to used it for the purpose for which it had been granted, that
they had access to any of the reports that they had put out, but there were no strings attached to
anybody. There wasn't any reason they couldn't publish anything that they put out.
Senator KENNEDY. What, sort of budget are we talking about here?
Mr. GITTINGER. I honestly do not remember. I would guess we are talking in the realm of
about $150,000 a year, but don't hold me to that, because I don't know.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 321 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 41 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 14 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-60-
Senator KENNEDY. What is your view about such funding as a professional person, in terms
of compromising the integrity of a university, sir?
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, obviously, sir, insofar as today there is no question about it. I will
have to say at the time that we were doing this there was quite an entirely different kind of an
attitude, and I do know for a fact that we moved to start towards phasing out the Society for
the Investigation of Human Ecology and the Human Ecology Fund for the very reason that we
were beginning to recognize that it was moving into an area but this would be compromised.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, that is commendable, both your attitude and the reasons for it, but
during that period of time it still was involved in behavior research programs, as I understand
it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Yes, sir. On its own, in connection with this, it participated again, and
these again were not CIA-directed projects, but these were all things which would
theoretically contribute to the general knowledge at the time where the things like the study of
the Hungarian refugees -- obviously, the study of the Hungarian refugees who came to this
country after the Hungarian revolt was a very useful exercise to try to get information about
the personality characteristics of the Communists and so forth.
Senator KENNEDY. Were there other foundations that were doing similar kinds of work?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my knowledge, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You believe--
Mr. GITTINGER. You mean, CIA, other CIA?
Senator KENNEDY. Right.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, my answer is in the sense that I know of no other CIA foundations,
no. There were, of course, other foundations doing similar kinds of work in the United States.
Senator KENNEDY. Have you heard of the Psychological Assessments Foundation?
Mr. GITTINGER. I certainly have.
Senator KENNEDY. What was that? What function did that have?
Mr. GITTINGER. Now, this was bringing us up to a different era. I believe the functions of
that organization have nothing whatsoever to do with the things that are being talked about
here while I was associated with it.
Senator KENNEDY. Rather than getting into the work, it was another foundation, was it not?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 322 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 42 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 15 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
It was another foundation supported by the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. What, the Psychological Assessment?
Senator KENNEDY. Yes.
Mr. GITTINGER. No, sir, it was not.
Senator KENNEDY. It did not get any support at all from the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. Oh, yes, sir. It did get support, but it was a business firm.
Senator KENNEDY. It was a business but it got support from the Agency?
Mr. GITTINGER. It got money from it, but it definitely was not in MKULTRA or in any
way associated with this.
-61-
Senator KENNEDY. All right. I want to thank you for your helpful testimony, Mr. Gittinger.
It is not easy to go back into the past. I think you have been very fair in your characterizations,
and I think it is quite appropriately indicated that there are different standards now from what
they were 25 years ago, and I think you have responded very fairly and completely to the
inquiries, and I think with a good deal of feeling about it.
You are a person who is obviously attempting to serve the country's interest, so I want to
thank you very much for your statement and for your helpful timeliness.
Mr. GITTINGER. Thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Case?
Senator CASE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I am sorry that I had another committee that I had
to complete the hearing with this morning before I got here.
I shall read the testimony with very great interest, and I appreciate your testimony as I have
heard it. I would like to comment just on one point, and that is, it relates to a story in the press
yesterday about part of this program involving the funding of a grant at a foreign university. I
would like to elicit from you a comment as to the additional sensitivity and difficulty that that
practice involves from your standpoint as a scientist, as well as a citizen, if you will.
Mr. GITTINGER. I will say it was after the fact thinking. It was utter stupidity the way
things worked out to have used some of this money outside the United States when it was CIA
money. I can categorically state to my knowledge, and I don't claim a complete knowledge all
the way across of the human ecology functions, but to my knowledge, and this is unfortunate,
those people did not know that they were getting money from CIA, and they were not asked to
contribute anything to CIA as such.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 323 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 43 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 16 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator CASE. It would be interesting to try to examine this by turning the thing around and
thinking what we would think if this happened from a foreign official agency to our own
university. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Dr. Goldman, I wonder if you would tell us what your training and educational background is?
Dr. GOLDMAN. I have already given a biography for the record.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I have not seen it. Who has it? Is it classified? We may have it for
the record, but may I ask you to briefly describe your training and background for us now? I
hope it is no secret.
Dr. GOLDMAN. Well, I was told if I was asked this to say that. I was told that by your staff
people, but I have no objection to telling you. I am a resident from Pennsylvania, southwest
Pennsylvania, Lancaster County. I went to Penn State, and I am in nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. In what?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Nutrition.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were you in charge of a section or segment of the CIA in your past
capacity?
Dr. GOLDMAN. During the time I was with that organization, I was in charge of one small
section of it, one small segment of it; yes.
-62-
Senator SCHWEIKER. What was the function or purpose of that section that you headed?
Dr. GOLDMAN. To provide support for the other parts of the division.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Where in the chain of command would that put you in relation to Dr.
Gottlieb?
Dr. GOLDMAN. Pretty far down the line.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, I would just like to ask you a few questions. We
appreciate your frankness and candor with the committee, and we realize this is a very difficult
area to go into. I am not quite clear on two matters that were raised earlier. First, were the safe
houses we were talking about here used on occasion by the prostitutes you referred to?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 324 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 44 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 17 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. GITTINGER. I really have not the slightest idea.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Were the prostitutes used in any way to slip the customers drugs for
observation purposes?
Mr. GITTINGER. Not to my direct knowledge.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Would you have been in a position to know the answer to either of
these questions?
Mr. GITTINGER. May I say, probably not, and may I make an aside to explain a little bit of
this, please, sir?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Mr. Gittinger, a moment ago you mentioned brainwashing
techniques, as one area that you had, I guess, done some work in. How would you characterize
the state of the art of brainwashing today? Who has the most expertise in this field, and who is
or is not doing it in terms of other governments?
During the Korean war there was a lot of serious discussion about brainwashing techniques
being used by the North Koreans, and I am interested in finding out what the state of the art is
today, as you see it.
Mr. GITTINGER. Well, of course, there, has been a great deal of work on this, and there is
still a great deal of controversy. I can tell you that as far as I knew, by 1961, 1962, it was at
least proven to my satisfaction that brainwashing, so called, is some kind of an esoteric device
where drugs or mind- altering kinds of conditions and so forth were used, did not exist even
though "The Manchurian Candidate" as a Movie really set us back a long time, because it
made something impossible look plausible. Do you follow what I mean? But by 1962 and
1963, the general idea that we were able to come up with is that brainwashing was largely a
process of isolating a human being, keeping him out of contact, putting him under long stress
in relationship to interviewing and interrogation, and that they could produce any change that
way without having to resort to any kind of esoteric means.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Are there ways that we can ascertain this from a distance when we
see a captive prisoner either go on television, in a photograph, or at a press conference? In
other words, are there certain signs that you have learned to recognize from your technical
background, to tell when brainwashing has occurred? Or is that very difficult to do?
Mr. GITTINGER. It is difficult to do. I think it is possible now in terms of looking at a
picture of somebody who has been in enemy hands for a long period of time. We can get some
pretty good ideas of what kind of circumstances he has been under, if that is what you mean.
-63-
Senator SCHWEIKER. That is all I have, Mr. Chairman. Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 325 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 45 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testiomony of Philip Goldman and John Gitting... Page 18 of 18
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Before adjourning the hearings, I would like to have the record show that Dr. Goldman and
Mr. Gittinger have voluntarily cooperated with the committee in staff interviews, that they
appear this morning voluntarily, and they are not under subpoena.
Gentlemen, I realize that this experience may have been an unhappy one and possibly a
painful one. Therefore, we thank you very much for participating this morning. We also
realize that the circumstances of that time differed very much from this day, and possibly the
national attitude, the national political attitude condoned this type of activity. So, we have not
asked you to come here as persons who have committed crimes, but rather in hope that you
can assist us in studying this problem so that it will not occur once again. In that spirit we
thank you for your participation, and we look forward to working with you further in this case.
Thank you very much.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman, I would like also to thank the witnesses. These are
difficult matters, and I think all of us are very grateful.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think the witnesses should know that though it may not always
seem that way, what we are trying to do is to probe the past and look at the policies of the past
to affect the future. I think our emphasis really is on the future, not the past, but it is important
that we learn from the past as we formulate policies and legislation for the future, I hope that
all of the witnesses who did come before us voluntarily this morning, including Admiral
Turner respect the fact that we are questioning the past to learn about the future. I think it
should be looked at in that light.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is the spirit in which we have had these hearings. It seems to
me that from both these witnesses and others, Gottlieb knows the information and can best
respond, and we are going to make every effort in the Senate Health Committee to get Mr.
Gottlieb to appear, and we obviously look forward to cooperating with Senator Inouye and the
other members of the committee in getting the final chapter written on this, but we want to
thank you very much for your appearance here.
Senator INOUYE. The hearing will stand in recess, subject to the call of the Chair.
[Whereupon, at 12:12 p.m., the hearing was recessed, subject to the call of the Chair.]
Appendix A: Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
Intelligence Community
Appendix B: Documents Referring to Discovery of Additional MKULTRA
Material
Appendix C: Documents Referring to Subprojects
Table of Contents
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 326 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 46 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing06.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 1 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX A
XVII. Testing And Use Of Chemical And Biological Agents By The
Intelligence Community
Under its mandate [1] the Select Committee has studied the testing and use of chemical and
biological agents by intelligence agencies. Detailed descriptions of the programs conducted
by intelligence agencies involving chemical and biological agents will be included in a
separately published appendix to the Senate Select Committee's report. This section of the
report will discuss the rationale for the programs, their monitoring and control, and what the
Committee's investigation has revealed about the relationships among the intelligence
agencies and about their relations with other government agencies and private institutions
and individuals. [2]
Fears that countries hostile to the United States would use chemical and biological agents
against Americans or America's allies led to the development of a defensive program
designed to discover techniques for American intelligence agencies to detect and counteract
chemical and biological agents. The defensive orientation soon became secondary as the
possible use of these agents to obtain information from, or gain control over, enemy agents
became apparent.
Research and development programs to find materials which could be used to alter human
behavior were initiated in the late 1940s and early 1950s. These experimental programs
originally included testing of drugs involving witting human subjects, and culminated in tests
using unwitting, nonvolunteer human subjects. These tests were designed to determine the
potential effects of chemical or biological agents when used operationally against individuals
unaware that they had received a drug.
The testing programs were considered highly sensitive by the intelligence agencies
administering them. Few people, even within the agencies, knew of the programs and there is
no evidence that either the executive branch or Congress were ever informed of them. The
highly compartmented nature of these programs may be explained in part by an observation
made by the CIA Inspector General that, "the knowledge that the Agency is engaging in
unethical and illicit activi-
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 327 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 47 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 2 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[1] Senate Resolution 21 directs the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Activities to investigate a number
of issues:
"(a) Whether agencies within the intelligence community conducted illegal domestic activities (Section 2 (1)
and (2));
"(b) The extent to which agencies within the intelligence community cooperate (Section 2 (4) and (8));
"(c) The adequacy of executive branch and congressional oversight of intelligence activities (Section 2 (7) and
(11));
"(d) The adequacy of existing laws to safeguard the rights of American citizens (Section 2 (13))."
[2] The details of these programs may never be known. The programs were highly compartmented. Few records
were kept. What little documentation existed for the CIA's principal program was destroyed early in 1973.
(65)
-66-
ties would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles and would be
detrimental to the accomplishment of its missions." [3]
The research and development program, and particularly the covert testing programs,
resulted in massive abridgments of the rights of American citizens, sometimes with tragic
consequences The deaths of two Americans [3a] can be attributed to these programs; other
participants in the testing programs may still suffer from the residual effects. While some
controlled testing of these substances might be defended, the nature of the tests, their scale,
and the fact that they were continued for years after the danger of surreptitious
administration of LSD to unwitting individuals was known, demonstrate a fundamental
disregard for the value of human life.
The Select Committee's investigation of the testing and use of chemical and biological agents
also raise serious questions about the adequacy of command and control procedures within
the Central Intelligence Agency and military intelligence, and about the relationships among
the intelligence agencies, other governmental agencies, and private institutions and
individuals. The CIA's normal administrative controls were waived for programs involving
chemical and biological agents to protect their security. According to the head of the Audit
Branchof the CIA, these waivers produced "gross administrative failures." They prevented
the CIA's internal review mechanisms (the Office of General Counsel, the Inspector General,
and the Audit Staff) from adequately supervising the programs. In general, the waivers had
the paradoxical effect of providing less restrictive administrative controls and less effective
internal review for controversial and highly sensitive projects than those governing normal
Agency activities.
The security of the programs was protected not only by waivers of normal administrative
controls, but also by a high degree of compartmentation within the CIA. This
compartmentation excluded the CIA's Medical Staff from the principal research and testing
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 328 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 48 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 3 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
program employing chemical and biological agents.
It also may have led to agency policymakers receiving differing and inconsistent responses
when they posed questions to the CIA component involved.
Jurisdictional uncertainty within the CIA was matched by jurisdictional conflict among the
various intelligence agencies. A spirit of cooperation and reciprocal exchanges of
information which initially characterized the programs disappeared. Military testers withheld
information from the CIA, ignoring suggestions for coordination from their superiors. The
CIA similarly failed to provide information to the military on the CIA's testing program. This
failure to cooperate was conspicuously manifested in an attempt by the Army to conceal
[3] CIA Inspector General's Survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217.
[3a] On January 8, 1953, Mr. Harold Blauer died of circulatory collapse and heart failure following an
intravenous injection of a synthetic mescaline derivative while a subject of tests conducted by New York State
Psychiatric Institute under a contract let by the U.S. Army Chemical Corps. The Committee's investigation into
drug testing by U.S. intelligence agencies focused on the testing of LSD, however, the committee did receive a
copy of the U.S. Army Inspector General's Report, issued on October 1975, on the events and circumstances of
Mr. Blauer's death. His death was directly attributable to the administration of the synthetic mescaline
derivative.
-67-
their overseas testing program, which included surreptitious administration of LSD, from the
CIA. Learning of the Army's program, the Agency surreptitiously attempted to gain details
of it.
The decision to institute one of the Army's LSD field testing projects had been based, at least
in part, on the finding that no long-term residual effects had ever resulted from the drug's
administration. The CIA's failure to inform the Army of a death which resulted from the
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting Americans may well have resulted in the
institution of an unnecessary and potentially lethal program.
The development, testing, and use of chemical and biological agents by intelligence agencies
raises serious questions about the relationship between the intelligence community and
foreign governments, other agencies of the Federal Government, and other institutions and
individuals. The questions raised range from the legitimacy of American complicity in
actions abroad which violate American and foreign laws to the possible compromise of the
integrity of public and private institutions used as cover by intelligence agencies.
A. THE PROGRAMS INVESTIGATED
1. Project CHATTER
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 329 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 49 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 4 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Project CHATTER was a Navy program that began in the fall of 1947. Responding to
reports of "amazing results" achieved by the Soviets in using "truth drugs," the program
focused on the identification and testing of such drugs for use in interrogations and in the
recruitment of agents. The research included laboratory experiments on animals and human
subjects involving Anabasis aphylla, scopolamine, and mescaline in order to determine their
speech-inducing qualities. Overseas experiments were conducted as part of the project.
The project expanded substantially during the Korean War, and ended shortly after the war,
in 1953.
2. Project BLUEBIRD/ARTICHOKE
The earliest of the CIA's major programs involving the use of chemical and biological
agents, Project BLUEBIRD, was approved by the Director in 1950. Its objectives were:
(a) discovering means of conditioning personnel to prevent unauthorized extraction of
information from them by known means, (b) investigating the possibility of control of an
individual by application of special interrogation techniques, (c) memory enhancement, and (d)
establishing defensive means for preventing hostile control of Agency personnel. [4]
As a result of interrogations conducted overseas during the project, another goal was added -
- the evaluation of offensive uses of unconventional interrogation techniques, including
hypnosis and drugs. In August 1951, the project was renamed ARTICHOKE. Project
ARTICHOKE included in-house experiments on interrogation techniques, conducted "under
medical and security controls which would ensure
[4] CIA memorandum to the Select Committee, "Behavioral Drugs and Testing," 2/11/75.
-68-
that no damage was done to individuals who volunteer for the experiments. [5] Overseas
interrogations utilizing a combination of sodium pentothal and hypnosis after physical and
psychiatric examinations of the subjects were also part of ARTICHOKE.
The Office of Scientific Intelligence (OSI), which studied scientific advances by hostile
powers, initially led BLUEBIRD/ARTICHOKE efforts. In 1952, overall responsibility for
ARTICHOKE was transferred from OSI to the Inspection and Security Office (I&SO),
predecessor to the present Office of Security. The CIA's Technical Services and Medical
Staffs were to be called upon as needed; OSI would retain liaison function with other
government agencies. [6] The change in leadership from an intelligence unit to an operating
unit apparently reflected a change in emphasis; from the study of actions by hostile powers
to the use, both for offensive and defensive purposes, of special interrogation techniques --
primarily hypnosis and truth serums.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 330 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 50 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 5 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Representatives from each Agency unit involved in ARTICHOKE met almost monthly to
discuss their progress. These discussions included the planning of overseas interrogations [8]
as well as further experimentation in the U.S.
Information about project ARTICHOKE after the fall of 1953 is scarce. The CIA maintains
that the project ended in 1956, but evidence suggests that Office of Security and Office of
Medical Services use of "special interrogation" techniques continued for several years
thereafter.
3. MKNAOMI
MKNAOMI was another major CIA program in this area. In 1967, the CIA summarized the
purposes of MKNAOMI:
(a) To provide for a covert support base to meet clandestine operational requirements.
(b) To stockpile severely incapacitating and lethal materials for the specific use of TSD
[Technical Services Division].
(c) To maintain in operational readiness special and unique items for the dissemination of
biological and chemical materials.
(d) To provide for the required surveillance, testing, upgrading, and evaluation of
materials and items in order to assure absence of defects and complete predictability of
results to be expected under operational conditions. [9]
Under an agreement reached with the Army in 1952, the Special Operations Division (SOD)
at Fort Detrick was to assist CIA in developing, testing, and maintaining biological agents
and delivery
[5] Memorandum from Robert Taylor, O/DD/P to the Assistant Deputy (Inspection and Security) and Chief of
the Medical Staff, 3/22/52.
[6] Memorandum from H. Marshall Chadwell, Assistant Director, Scientific Intelligence, to the Deputy
Director/Plans (DDP) "Project ARTICHOKE," 8/29/52.
[8] "Progress Report, Project ARTICHOKE." 1/12/53.
[9] Memorandum from Chief, TSD/Biological Branch to Chief, TSD "MKNAOMI: Funding. Objectives, and
Accomplishments." 10/18/67, p. 1. For a fuller description of MKNAOMI and the relationship between CIA
and SOD, see p. 360.
-69-
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 331 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 51 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 6 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
systems. By this agreement, CIA acquired the knowledge, skill, and facilities of the Army to
develop biological weapons suited for CIA use.
SOD developed darts coated with biological agents and pills containing several different
biological agents which could remain potent for weeks or months. SOD developed a special
gun for firing darts coated with a chemical which could allow CIA agents to incapacitate a
guard dog, enter an installation secretly, and return the dog to consciousness when leaving.
SOD scientists were unable to develop a similar incapacitant for humans. SOD also
physically transferred to CIA personnel biological agents in "bulk" form, and delivery
devices, including some containing biological agents.
In addition to the CIA's interest in biological weapons for use against humans, it also asked
SOD to study use of biological agents against crops and animals. In its 1967 memorandum,
the CIA stated:
Three methods and systems for carrying out a covert attack against crops and causing severe
crop loss have been developed and evaluated under field conditions. This was accomplished
in anticipation of a requirement which was later developed but was subsequently scrubbed
just prior to putting into action. [9a]
MKNAOMI was terminated in 1970. On November 25,1969, President Nixon renounced the
use of any form of biological weapons that kill or incapacitate and ordered the disposal of
existing stocks of bacteriological weapons. On February 14, 1970, the President clarified the
extent of his earlier order and indicated that toxins -- chemicals that are not living organisms
but are produced by living organisms -- were considered biological weapons subject to his
previous directive and were to be destroyed. Although instructed to relinquish control of
material held for the CIA by SOD, a CIA scientist acquired approximately 11 grams of
shellfish toxin from SOD personnel at Fort Detrick which were stored in a little-used CIA
laboratory where it went undetected for five years. [10]
4. MKULTRA
MKULTRA was the principal CIA program involving the research and development of
chemical and biological agents. It was "concerned with the research and development of
chemical, biological, and radiological materials capable of employment in clandestine
operations to control human behavior." [11]
In January 1973, MKULTRA records were destroyed by Technical Services Division
personnel acting on the verbal orders of Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, Chief of TSD. Dr. Gottlieb has
testified, and former Director Helms has confirmed, that in ordering the records destroyed,
Dr. Gottlieb was carrying out the verbal order of then DCI Helms.
MKULTRA began with a proposal from the Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, Richard
Helms, to the DCI, outlining a special
[9a] Ibid. p. 2.
[10] Senate Select Committee, 9/16/75, Hearings, Vol. 1.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 332 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 52 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 7 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[11] Memorandum from the CIA Inspector General to the Director, 7/26/63.
-70-
funding mechanism for highly sensitive CIA research and development projects that studied
the use of biological and chemical materials in altering human behavior. The projects
involved:
Research to develop a capability in the covert use of biological and chemical materials. This
area involves the production of various physiological conditions which could support present
or future clandestine operations. Aside from the offensive potential, the development of a
comprehensive capability in this field of covert chemical and biological warfare gives us a
thorough knowledge of the enemy's theoretical potential, thus enabling us to defend
ourselves against a foe who might not be as restrained in the use of these techniques as we
are. [12]
MKULTRA was approved by the DCI on April 13, 1953 along the lines proposed by ADDP
Helms.
Part of the rationale for the establishment of this special funding mechanism was its extreme
sensitivity. The Inspector General's survey of MKULTRA in 1963 noted the following
reasons for this sensitivity:
a. Research in the manipulation of human behavior is considered by many authorities in
medicine and related fields to be professionally unethical, therefore the reputation of
professional participants in the MKULTRA program are on occasion in jeopardy.
b. Some MKULTRA activities raise questions of legality implicit in the, original charter.
c. A final phase of the testing of MKULTRA products places the rights and interests of U.S.
citizens in jeopardy.
d. Public disclosure of some aspects of MKULTRA activity could induce serious adverse
reaction in U.S. public opinion. as well as stimulate offensive and defensive action in this
field on the part of foreign intelligence services. [13]
Over the ten-year life of the program, many "additional avenues to the control of human
behavior" were designated as appropriate for investigation under the MKULTRA charter.
These include "radiation, electroshock, various fields of psychology, psychiatry, sociology,
and anthropology, graphology, harassment substances, and paramilitary devices and
materials." [14]
The research and development of materials to be used for altering human behavior consisted
of three phases: first, the search for materials suitable for study; second, laboratory testing on
voluntary human subjects in various types of institutions; third, the application of
MKULTRA materials in normal life settings.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 333 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 53 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 8 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The search for suitable materials was conducted through standing arrangements with
specialists in universities, pharmaceutical houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and
private research organi-
[12] Memorandum from ADDP Helms to DCI Dulles, 4/3/53, Tab A, pp. 1-2. [13] I.G. Report on MKULTRA,
1963, pp. 1-2. [14] Ibid, p. 4.
-71-
zations. The annual grants of funds to these specialists were made under ostensible research
foundation auspices, thereby concealing the CIA's interest from the specialist's institution.
The next phase of the MKULTRA program involved physicians, toxicologists, and other
specialists in mental, narcotics, and general hospitals, and in prisons. Utilizing the products
and findings of the basic research phase, they conducted intensive tests on human subjects.
One of the first studies was conducted by the National Institute of Mental Health. This study
was intended to test various drugs, including hallucinogenics, at the NIMH Addiction
Research Center in Lexington, Kentucky. The "Lexington Rehabilitation Center," as it was
then called, was a prison for drug addicts serving sentences for drug violations.
The test subjects were volunteer prisoners who, after taking a brief physical examination and
signing a general consent form, were administered hallucinogenic drugs. As a reward for
participation in the program, the addicts were provided with the drug of their addiction.
LSD was one of the materials tested in the MKULTRA program. The final phase of LSD
testing involved surreptitious administration to unwitting nonvolunteer subjects in normal
life settings by undercover officers of the Bureau of Narcotics acting for the CIA.
The rationale for such testing was "that testing of materials under accepted scientific
procedures fails to disclose the full pattern of reactions and attributions that may occur in
operational situations." [15]
According to the CIA, the advantage of the relationship with the Bureau was that
test subjects could be sought and cultivated within the setting of narcotics control. Some subjects
have been informers or members of suspect criminal elements from whom the [Bureau of
Narcotics] has obtained results of operational value through the tests. On the other hand, the
effectiveness of the substances on individuals at all social levels, high and low, native American
and foreign, is of great significance and testing has been performed on a variety of individuals
within these categories. [Emphasis added.] [16]
A special procedure, designated MKDELTA, was established to govern the use of
MKULTRA materials abroad. Such materials were used on a number of occasions. Because
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 334 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 54 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biolog... Page 9 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
MKULTRA records were destroyed, it is impossible to reconstruct the operational use of
MKULTRA materials by the CIA overseas; it has been determined that the use of these
materials abroad began in 1953, and possibly as early as 1950.
Drugs were used primarily as an aid to interrogations, but MKULTRA/MKDELTA materials
were also used for harassment, discrediting, or disabling purposes. According to an Inspector
General Survey of the Technical Services Division of the CIA in 1957 -- an inspection which
did not discover the MKULTRA project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to
unwitting, nonvolunteer
[15] Ibid, P. 21.
[16] Ibid., pp. 11-12.
-72-
subjects -- the CIA had developed six drugs for operational use and they had been used in six
different operations on a total of thirty-three subjects. [17] By 1963 the number of operations
and subjects had increased substantially.
In the spring of 1963, during a wide-ranging Inspector General survey of the Technical
Services Division, a member of the Inspector General's staff, John Vance, learned about
MKULTRA and about the project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to
unwitting, nonvoluntary human subjects. As a result of the discovery and the Inspector
General's subsequent report, this testing was halted and much tighter administrative controls
were imposed on the program. According to the CIA, the project was decreased significantly
each budget year until its complete termination in the late 1960s.
5. The Testing of LSD by the Army
There were three major phases in the Army's testing of LSD. In the first, LSD was
administered to more than 1,000 American soldiers who volunteered to be subjects in
chemical warfare experiments. In the second phase, Material Testing Program EA 1729, 95
volunteers received LSD in clinical experiments designed to evaluate potential intelligence
uses of the drug. In the third phase, Projects THIRD CHANCE and DERBY HAT, 16
unwitting nonvolunteer subjects were interrogated after receiving LSD as part of operational
field tests.
B. CIA DRUG TESTING PROGRAMS
1. The Rationale for the Testing Programs
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 335 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 55 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 10 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The late 1910s and early 1950s were marked by concern over the threat posed by the
activities of the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China, and other Communist bloc
countries. United States concern over the use of chemical and biological agents by these
powers was acute. The belief that hostile powers had used chemical and biological agents in
interrogations, brainwashing, and in attacks designed to harass, disable, or kill Allied
personnel created considerable pressure for a "defensive" program to investigate chemical
and biological agents so that the intelligence community could understand the mechanisms
by which these substances worked and how their effects could be defeated. [18]
Of particular concern was the drug LSD. The CIA had received reports that the Soviet Union
was engaged in intensive efforts to produce LSD; and that the Soviet Union had attempted to
purchase the world's supply of the chemical. As one CIA officer who was deeply involved in
work with this drug described the climate of the times: "[It] is awfully hard in this day and
age to reproduce how frightening all of this was to us at the time, particularly after the drug
scene has become as widespread and as knowledgeable in this country as it did. But we were
literally terrified, because this was the one material that we
[17] Ibid, 1957, p. 201.
[18] Thus an officer in the Office of Security of the CIA stressed the "urgency of the discovery of techniques
and method that would permit our personnel, in the event of their capture by the enemy, to resist or defeat
enemy interrogation." (Minutes of the ARTICHOKE conference of 10/22/53.)
-73-
had ever been able to locate that really had potential fantastic possibilities if used
wrongly." [19]
But the defensive orientation soon became secondary. Chemical and biological agents were
to be studied in order "to perfect techniques... for the abstraction of information from
individuals whether willing or not" and in order to "develop means for the control of the
activities and mental capacities of individuals whether willing or not." [20] One Agency
official noted that drugs would be useful in order to "gain control of bodies whether they
were willing or not" in the process of removing personnel from Europe in the event of a
Soviet attack. [21] In other programs, the CIA began to develop, produce, stockpile, and
maintain in operational readiness materials which could be used to harass, disable, or kill
specific targets. [22]
Reports of research and development in the Soviet Union, the People's Republic of China,
and the Communist Bloc countries provided the basis for the transmutation of American
programs from a defensive to an offensive orientation. As the Chief of the Medical Staff of
the Central Intelligence Agency wrote in 1952:
There is ample evidence in the reports of innumerable interrogations that the Communists were
utilizing drugs, physical duress, electric shock, and possibly hypnosis against their enemies.
With such evidence it is difficult not to keep from becoming rabid about our apparent laxity. We
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 336 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 56 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 11 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
are forced by this mounting evidence to assume a more aggressive role in the development of
these techniques, but must be cautious to maintain strict inviolable control because of the havoc
that could be wrought by such techniques in unscrupulous hands. [23]
In order to meet the perceived threat to the national security, substantial programs for the
testing and use of chemical and biological agents -- including projects involving the
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting nonvolunteer subjects "at all social levels,
high and low, native American and foreign" -- were conceived, and implemented. These
programs resulted in substantial violations of the rights of individuals within the United
States.
[19] Testimony of CIA officer, 11/21/75, p. 33.
[20] Memorandum from the Director of Security to ARTICHOKE representatives, Subject: "ARTICHOKE
Restatement of Program."
[21] ARTICHOKE memorandum, 7/30/53.
[22] The Inspector General's Report of 1957 on the Technical Services Division noted that "Six specific
products have been developed and are available for operational use. Three of them are discrediting and
disabling materials which can be administered unwittingly and permit the exercise of a measure of control over
the actions of the subject."
A memorandum for the Chief, TSD, Biological Branch to the Chief, TSD, 10/18/67, described two of the
objectives of the CIA's Project MKNAOMI as: "to stockpile severely incapacitating and lethal materials for the
specific use of TSD and "to maintain in operational readiness special and unique items for the dissemination of
biological and chemical materials."
[23] Memorandum from the Chief of the Medical Staff, 1/25/52.
-74-
Although the CIA recognized these effects of LSD to unwitting individuals within the United
States, the project continued. As the Deputy Director for Plans, Richard Helms, wrote the
Deputy Director of Central Intelligence during discussions which led to tile cessation of
unwitting testing:
While I share your uneasiness and distaste for any program which tends to intrude upon an
individual's private and legal prerogatives, I believe it is necessary that the Agency maintain
a central role in this activity, keep current on enemy capabilities the manipulation of human
behavior, and maintain an offensive capability. [25]
There were no attempts to secure approval for the most controversial aspects of these
programs from the executive branch or Congress. The nature and extent of the programs
were closely held secrets; even DCI McCone was not briefed on all the details of the
program involving the surreptitious administration of LSD until 1963. It was deemed
imperative that these programs be concealed from the American people. As the CIA's
Inspector General wrote in 1957:
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 337 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 57 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 12 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Precautions must be taken not only to protect operations from exposure to enemy forces but
also to conceal these activities from the American public in general. The knowledge that the
Agency is engaging in unethical and illicit activities would have serious repercussions in
political and diplomatic circles and would be detrimental to the accomplishment of its
mission. [26]
2. The Death of Dr. Frank Olson
The most tragic result of the testing of LSD by the CIA was the death of Dr. Frank Olson, a
civilian employee of the Army, who died on November 27, 1953. His death followed his
participation in a CIA experiment with LSD. As part of this experiment, Olson unwittingly
received approximately 70 micrograms of LSD in a glass of Cointreau he drank on
November 19, 1953. The drug had been placed in the bottle by a CIA officer, Dr. Robert
Lashbrook, as part of an experiment he and Dr. Sidney Gottlieb performed at a meeting of
Army and CIA scientists.
Shortly after this experiment, Olson exhibited symptoms of paranoia and schizophrenia.
Accompanied by Dr. Lashbrook, Olson sought psychiatric assistance in New York City from
a physician, Dr. Harold Abramson, whose research on LSD had been funded indirectly by
the CIA. While in New York for treatment, Olson fell to his death from a tenth story window
in the Statler Hotel.
[24] Even during the discussions which led to the termination of the unwitting testing, the DDP turned down
the option of halting such tests within the. U.S. and continuing them abroad despite the fact that the Technical
Services Division had conducted numerous operations abroad making use of LSD. The DDP made this decision
on the basis of security noting that the past efforts, overseas had resulted in "making an inordinate number of
foreign nationals witting of our role in the very sensitive activity." (Memorandum for the Deputy Director of
Central Intelligence from the Deputy Director for Plans, 12/17/63, p. 2.)
[25] Ibid., pp. 2-3.
[26] I.G. survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217.
-75-
a. Background. -- Olson, an expert in aerobiology who was assigned to the Special
Operations Division (SOD) of the U.S. Army Biological Center at Camp Detrick, Maryland.
This Division had three primary functions:
(1) assessing the vulnerability of American installations to biological attack;
(2) developing techniques for offensive use of biological weapons; and
(3) biological research for the CIA. [27]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 338 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 58 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 13 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Professionally, Olson was well respected by his colleagues in both the Army and the CIA.
Colonel Vincent Ruwet, Olson's immediate superior at the time of his death, was in almost
daily contact with Olson. According to Colonel Ruwet: "As a professional man... his
ability... was outstanding." [28] Colonel Ruwet stated that "during the period prior to the
experiment... I noticed nothing which would lead me to believe that he was of unsound
mind." [29] Dr. Lashbrook, who had monthly contacts with Olson from early 1952 until the
time of his death, stated publicly that before Olson received LSD, "as far as I know, he was
perfectly normal." [30] This assessment is in direct contradiction to certain statements
evaluating Olson's emotional stability made in CIA internal memorandum written after
Olson's death.
b. The Experiment. -- On November 18, 1953, a group of ten scientists from the CIA and
Camp Detrick attended a semi-annual review and analysis conference at a cabin located at
Deep Creek Lake, Maryland. Three of the participants were from the CIA's Technical
Services Staff. The Detrick representatives were all from the Special Operations Division.
According to one CIA official, the Special Operations Division participants "agreed that an
unwitting experiment would be desirable." [31] This account directly contradicts Vincent
Ruwet's recollection. Ruwet recalls no such discussion, and has asserted that he would
remember any such discussion because the SOD participants would have strenuously
objected to testing on unwitting subjects. [32]
In May, 1953, Richard Helms, Assistant DDP, held a staff meeting which the Chief of
Technical Services Staff attended. At this meeting Helms "indicated that the drug [LSD] was
dynamite and that he should be advised at all times when it was intended to use it." [33] In
addition, the then DDP, Frank Wisner, sent a memorandum to TSS stating the requirement
that the DDP personally approve the use of LSD. Gottlieb went ahead with the experiment,
[34] securing the ap-
[27] Staff summary of Vincent Ruwet Interview, 8/13/75, p. 3.
[28] Memorandum of Col. Vincent Ruwet, To Whom It May Concern, no date, p. 2.
[29] Ruwet Memorandum, p. 3.
[30] Joseph B. Treaster, New York Times, 7/19/75, p. 1.
[31] Memorandum for the Record from Lyman Kirkpatrick, 12/1/53, p. 1.
[32] Ruwet (staff summary), 8/1.3/75, p. 6.
[33] Inspector General Diary, 12/2/53.
[34] Ibid. Dr. Gottleib has testified that he does not remember either the meeting with Helms nor the Wisner
memorandum. (Gottlieb, 10/18/75, p. 16.)
-76-
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 339 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 59 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 14 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
proval of his immediate supervisor. Neither the Chief of TSS nor the DDP specifically
authorized the experiment in which Dr. Olson participated. [35]
According to Gottlieb, [36] " a "very small dose" of LSD was placed in a bottle of Cointreau
which was served after dinner on Thursday, November 19. The drug was placed in the
liqueur by Robert Lashbrook. All but two of tie SOD participants received LSD. One did not
drink; the other had a heart condition. [37] About twenty minutes after they finished their
Cointreau, Gottlieb informed the other participants that they had received LSD.
Dr. Gottlieb stated that "up to the time of the experiment," he observed nothing unusual in
Olson's behavior. [37a] Once the experiment was underway, Gottlieb recalled that "the drug
had a definite effect on the group to the point that they were boisterous and laughing and
they could not continue the meeting or engage in sensible conversation." The meeting
continued until about 1: 00 a.m., when the participants retired for the evening. Gottlieb
recalled that Olson, among others, complained of "wakefulness" during the night. [38]
According to Gottlieb on Friday morning "aside from some evidence of fatigue, I observed
nothing unusual in [Olson's] actions, conversation, or general behavior." [39] Ruwet recalls
that Olson "appeared to be agitated" at breakfast, but that he "did not consider this to be
abnormal under the circumstances." [40]
c. The Treatment. -- The following Monday, November 23, Olson was waiting for Ruwet
when he came in to work at 7:30 a.m. For the next two days Olson's friends and family
attempted to reassure him and help him "snap out" of what appeared to be a serious
depression. On Tuesday, Olson again came to Ruwet and, after an hour long con-
[35] Dr. Gottlieb testified that "given the information we knew up to this time, and based on a lot of our own
self-administration, we thought it was a fairly benign substance in terms of potential harm." This is in conflict
not only with Mr. Helms' statement but also with material which had been supplied to the Technical Services
Staff. In one long memorandum on current research with LSD which was supplied to TSD, Henry Beecher
described the dangers involved with such research in a prophetic manner. "The second reason to doubt
Professor Rothland came when I raised the question as to any accidents which had arisen from the use of LSD-
25. He said in a very positive way, 'none.' As it turned out this answer could be called overly positive, for later
on in the evening I was discussing the matter with Dr. W. A. Stohl, Jr., a psychiatrist in Bleulera's Clinic in
Zurich where I had gone at Rothland's insistence. Stohl, when asked the same question, replied, 'yes,' and added
spontaneously, 'there is a case Professor Rothland knows about. In Geneva a woman physician who had been
subject to depression to some extent took LSD-25 in an experiment and became severely and suddenly
depressed and committed suicide three weeks later. While the connection is not definite, common knowledge of
this could hardly have allowed the positive statement Rothland permitted himself. This case is a warning to us
to avoid engaging subjects who are depressed, or who have been subject to depression.'" Dr. Gottlieb testified
that he had no recollection of either the report or that particular section of it. (Sidney Gottlieb testimony,
10/19/75, p. 78.)
[36] Memorandum of Sheffield Edwards for the record, 11/28/53, p. 2.
[37] Lashbrook (staff summary), 7/19/75, p. 3.
[37a] Gottlieb Memorandum, 12/7/53. p. 2.
[38] Edwards memorandum, 11/28/53, p. 3.
[39] Gottlieb memorandum. 12/7/53, p. 3.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 340 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 60 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 15 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[40] Ruwet memorandum, p. 3.
-77-
versation, it was decided that medical assistance for Dr. Olson was desirable. [41]
Ruwet then called Lashbrook and informed him that "Dr. Olson was in serious trouble and
needed immediate professional attention." [42] Lashbrook agreed to make appropriate
arrangements and told Ruwet to bring Olson to Washington, D.C. Ruwet and Olson
proceeded to Washington to meet with Lashbrook, and the three left for New York at about
2:30 p.m. to meet with Dr. Harold Abramson.
At that time Dr. Abramson was an allergist and immunologist practicing medicine in New
York City. He held no degree in psychiatry, but was associated with research projects
supported indirectly by the CIA. Gottlieb and Dr. Lashbrook both followed his work closely
in the early 1950s. [43] Since Olson needed medical help, they turned to Dr. Abramson as
the doctor closest to Washington who was experienced with LSD and cleared by the CIA.
Ruwet, Lashbrook, and Olson remained in New York for two days of consultations with
Abramson. On Thursday, November 26, 1953, the three flew back to Washington so that
Olson could spend Thanksgiving with his family. En route from the airport Olson told Ruwet
that he was afraid to face his family. After a lengthy discussion, it was decided that Olson
and Lashbrook would return to New York, and that Ruwet would go to Frederick to explain
these events to Mrs. Olson. [44]
Lashbrook and Olson flew back to New York the same day, again for consultations with
Abramson. They spent Thursday night in a Long Island hotel and the next morning returned
to the city with Abramson. In further discussions with Abramson, it was agreed that Olson
should be placed under regular psychiatric care at an institution closer to his home. [45]
d. The Death. -- Because they could not obtain air transportation for a return trip on Friday
night, Lashbrook and Olson made reservations for Saturday morning and checked into the
Statler Hotel. Between the time they checked in and 10:00 p.m.; they watched television,
visited the cocktail lounge, where each had two martinis, and dinner. According to
Lashbrook, Olson "was cheerful and appeared to enjoy the entertainment." He "appeared no
longer particularly depressed, and almost the Dr. Olson I knew prior to the experiment." [46]
After dinner Lashbrook and Olson watched television for about an hour, and at 11:00, Olson
suggested that they go to bed, saying that "he felt more relaxed and contented than he had
since [they] came to New York." [47] Olson then left a call with the hotel operator to wake
them in the morning. At approximately 2:30 a.m. Saturday, November 28. Lashbrook was
awakened by a loud "crash of glass." In his report on the incident, he stated only that Olson
"had crashed through the closed window blind and the closed window and he fell to his death
from the window of our room on the 10th floor." [48]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 341 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 61 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 16 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[41] Ibid., p. 4.
[42] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, p. 1.
[43] Staff summary of Dr. Harold Abramson interview, 7/29/75, p. 2.
[44] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, P. 3.
[45] Abramson memorandum, 12/4/53.
[46] Lashbrook memorandum, 12/7/53, p. 3.
[47] Ibid., p. 4.
[48] Ibid.
-78-
Immediately after finding that Olson had leapt to his death, Lashbrook telephoned Gottlieb at
his home and informed him of the incident. [49] Gottlieb called Ruwet and informed him of
Olson's death at approximately 2:45 a.m. [50] Lashbrook then called the hotel desk and
reported the incident to the operator there. Lashbrook called Abramson and informed him of
the occurrence. Abramson told Lashbrook he "wanted to be kept out of the thing
completely," but later changed his mind and agreed to assist Lashbrook. [51]
Shortly thereafter, uniformed police officers and some hotel employees came to Lashbrook's
room. Lashbrook told the police he didn't know why Olson had committed suicide, but he
did know that Olson "suffered from ulcers." [52]
e. The Aftermath. -- Following Dr. Olson's death, the CIA made a substantial effort to ensure
that his family received death benefits, but did not notify the Olsons of the circumstances
surrounding his demise. The Agency also made considerable efforts to prevent the death
being connected with the CIA, and supplied complete cover for Lashbrook so that his
association with the CIA would remain a secret.
After Dr. Olson's death the CIA conducted an internal investigation of the incident. As part
of his responsibilities in this investigation, the General Counsel wrote the Inspector General,
stating:
I'm not happy with what seems to be a very casual attitude on the part of TSS representatives
to the way this experiment was conducted and the remarks that this is just one of the risks
running with scientific experimentation. I do not eliminate the need for taking risks, but I do
believe, especially when human health or life is at stake, that at least the prudent, reasonable
measures which can be taken to minimize the risk must be taken and failure to do so was
culpable negligence. The actions of the various individuals concerned after effects of the
experiment on Dr. Olson became manifest also revealed the failure to observe normal and
reasonable precautions. [53]
As a result of the investigation DCI Allen Dulles sent a personal letter to the Chief of
Technical Operations of the Technical Services Staff who had approved the experiment
criticizing him for "poor judgment... in authorizing the use of this drug on such an unwitting
basis and without proximate medical safeguards." [54] Dulles also sent a letter to Dr.
Gottlieb, Chief of the Chemical Division of the Technical Services Staff, criticizing him for
recommending the "unwitting application of the drug" in that the proposal "did not give
sufficient emphasis for medical collaboration and for the proper consideration of the rights of
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 342 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 62 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 17 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the individual to whom it was being administered." [55]
[49] CIA Field Office Report, 12/3/53, p. 3.
[50] Ruwet Memorandum, p. 11.
[51] CIA Field Office Report, 12/3/53, p. 3.
[52] Ibid.
[53] Memorandum from the General Counsel to the Inspector General. 1/4/54.
[54] Memorandum from DCI to Chief, Technical Operations, TSS, 2/12/54.
[55] Memorandum from DCI to Sidney Gottlieb, 2/12/54.
-79-
The letters were hand carried to the individuals to be read and returned. Although the letters
were critical, a note from the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence to Mr. Helms
instructed him to inform the individuals that: "These are not reprimands and no personnel
file notation are being made." [56]
Thus, although the Rockefeller Commission has characterized them as such, these notes
were explicitly not reprimands. Nor did participation in the events which led to Dr. Olson's
death have any apparent effect on the advancement within the CIA of the individuals
involved.
3. The Surreptitious Administration of LSD to Unwitting NonVolunteer Human Subjects by
the CIA After the Death of Dr. Olson
The death of Dr. Olson could be viewed, as some argued at the time, as a tragic accident, one
of the risks inherent in the testing of new substances. It might be argued that LSD was
thought to be benign. After the death of Dr. Olson the dangers of the surreptitious
administration of LSD were clear, yet the CIA continued or initiated [57] a project involving
the surreptitious administration of LSD to nonvolunteer human subjects. This program
exposed numerous individuals in the United States to the risk of death or serious injury
without their informed consent, without medical supervision, and without necessary follow-
up to determine any long-term effects.
Prior to the Olson experiment, the Director of Central Intelligence had approved
MKULTRA, a research program designed to develop a "capability in the covert use of
biological and chemical agent materials." In the proposal describing MKULTRA Mr. Helms,
then ADDP, wrote the Director that:
we intend to investigate the development of a chemical material which causes a reversible non-
toxic aberrant mental state, the specific nature of which can be reasonably well predicted for
each individual. This material 'could potentially aid in discrediting individuals, eliciting
information, and implanting suggestions and other forms of mental control. [58]
On February 12, 1954, the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency wrote TSS officials
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 343 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 63 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 18 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
criticizing them for "poor judgment" in administering LSD on "an unwitting basis and
without proximate medical safeguards" to Dr. Olson and for the lack of "proper
consideration of the rights of the individual to whom it was being administered." [59] On the
same day, the Inspector General reviewed a report on Subproject Number 3 of MKULTRA,
in which the same TSS officers who had just received letters from the Director were quoted
as stating that one of the purposes of Subproject Number 3 was to
[56] Note from DDCI to Richard Helms, 2/13/54.
[57] The 1963 IG Report, which described the project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD, placed
the project beginning In 1955. Other CIA documents reveal that it was in existence as early as February 1954.
The CIA has told the Committee that the project began in 1953 and that the experiment which led to Dr.
Olson's death was part of the project.
[58] Memorandum from ADDP items to DOI Dulles, 4/3/53, tab A, p. 2.
[59] Memorandum from DCI to Sidney Gottlieb, 2/12/54; and memorandum from DCI to Chief of operations,
TSS, 2/12/54.
-80-
"observe the behavior of unwitting persons being questioned after having been given a
drug." [60] There is no evidence that Subproject Number 3 was terminated even though the
officers were unequivocally aware of the dangers of the surreptitious administration of LSD
and the necessity of obtaining informed consent and providing medical safeguards.
Subproject Number 3, in fact, used methods which showed even less concern than did the
OLSON experiment for the safety and security of the participants. Yet the evidence indicates
the project continued until 1963. [61]
In the project, the individual conducting the test might make initial contact with a
prospective subject selected at random in a bar. He would then invite the person to a
"safehouse" where the test drug was administered to the subject through drink or in food.
CIA personnel might debrief the individual conducting the test, or observe the test by using a
one-way mirror and tape recorder in an adjoining room.
Prior consent was obviously not obtained from any of the subjects. There was also,
obviously, no medical prescreening. In addition, the tests were conducted by individuals who
were not qualified scientific observers. There were no medical personnel on hand either to
administer the drugs or to observe their effects, and no follow-up was conducted on the test
subjects.
As the Inspector General noted in 1963:
A significant limitation on the effectiveness of such testing is the infeasibility of performing
scientific observation of results. The [individuals conducting the test] are not qualified scientific
observers. Their subjects are seldom accessible beyond the first hours of the test. The testing
may be useful in perfecting delivery techniques, and in identifying surface characteristics of
onset, reaction, attribution, and side-effect. [62]
This was particularly troublesome as in a
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 344 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 64 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 19 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
number of instances,... the test subject has become ill for hours or days, including hospitalization
in at least one case, and the agent could only follow up by guarded inquiry after the test subject's
return to normal life. Possible sickness and attendant economic loss are inherent contingent
effects of the testing. [61]
Paradoxically, greater care seems to have been taken for the safety of foreign nationals
against whom LSD was used abroad. In several cases medical examinations were performed
prior to the use of LSD. [64]
[60] Memorandum to Inspector General from Chief, Inspection and Review, on Subproject #3 of MKULTRA,
2/10/54.
[61] IG Report on MKULTRA, 1903.
[62] Ibid., p. 12.
[63] Ibid. According to the IG's survey in 1963, physicians associated with MKULTRA could be made
available in an emergency.
[64] The Technical Services Division which was responsible for the operational use of LSD abroad took the
position that "no physical examination of the subject is required prior to administration of [LSD] by TSS
trained personnel. A physician need not be present. There is no danger medically in the use of this material as
handled by TSS trained personnel." The Office of Medical Services had taken the position that LSD was
"medically dangerous." Both the Office of Security and the Office of Medical Services argued that LSD
"should not be administered unless preceded by a medical examination... and should be administered only by or
in the presence of a physician who had studied it and its effect." (Memorandum from James Angleton, Chief,
Counterintelligence Staff to Chief of Operations, 12/12/57, pp. 1-2.
-81-
Moreover, the administration abroad was marked by constant observation made possible
because the material was being used against prisoners of foreign intelligence or security
organizations. Finally, during certain of the LSD interrogations abroad, local physicians
were on call, though these physicians had had no experience with LSD and would not be told
that hallucinogens had been administered. [65]
The CIA's project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting human
subjects in the United States was finally halted in 1963, as a result of its discovery during the
course of an Inspector General survey of the Technical Services Division. When the
Inspector General learned of the project, he spoke to the Deputy Director for Plans, who
agreed that the Director should be briefed. The DDP made it clear that the DCI and his
Deputy were generally familiar with MKULTRA. He indicated, however, that he was not
sure it was necessary to brief the DDCI at that point.
On May 24,1963, the DDP advised the Inspector General that he had briefed the Director on
the MKULTRA program and in particular had covered the question of the surreptitious
administration of LSD to unwitting human subjects. According to the Inspector General, the
DDP said that "the Director indicated no disagreement and therefore the testing will
continue." [66]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 345 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 65 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 20 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
One copy of an "Eyes Only" draft report on MKULTRA was prepared by the Inspector
General who recommended the termination of the surreptitious administration project. The
project was suspended following the Inspector General's report.
On December 17, 1963, Deputy Director for Plans Helms wrote a memo to the DDCI, who
with the Inspector General and the Executive Director-Comptroller had opposed the covert
testing. He noted two aspects of the problem: (1) "for over a decade the Clandestine Services
has had the mission of maintaining a capability for influencing human behavior;" and (2)
"testing arrangements in furtherance of this mission should be as operationally realistic and
yet as controllable as possible." Helms argued that the individuals must be "unwitting" as
this was "the only realistic method of maintaining the capability, considering the intended
operational use of materials to influence human behavior as the operational targets will
certainly be unwitting. Should the subjects of the testing not be unwitting, the program
would only be "pro forma" resulting in a "false sense of accomplishment and readiness." [67]
Helms continued:
[65] Physicians might be called with the hope that they would make a diagnosis of mental breakdown which
would be useful in discrediting the individual who was the subject of the CIA interest.
[66] Memorandum for the Record prepared by the Inspector General, 5/15/63, p. 1.
[67] Ibid., p. 2.
-82-
If one grants the validity of the mission of maintaining this unusual capability and the
necessity for unwitting testing, there is only then the question of how best to do it.
Obviously, the testing should be conducted in such a manner as to permit the opportunity to
observe the results of the administration on the target. It also goes without saying that
whatever testing arrangement we adopt must afford maximum safeguards for the protection
of the Agency's role in this activity, as well as minimizing the possibility of physical or
emotional damage to the individual tested. [68]
In another memo to the Director of Central Intelligence in June, 1964, Helms again raised
the issue of unwitting testing. At that time General Carter, then acting DCI, approved several
changes in the MKULTRA program proposed by Mr. Helms as a result of negotiations
between the Inspector General and the DDP. In a handwritten note, however, Director Carter
added that "unwitting testing will be subject to a separate decision." [69]
No specific decision was made then or soon after. The testing had been halted and, according
to Walter Elder, Executive Assistant to DCI McCone, the DCI was not inclined to take the
positive step of authorizing a resumption of the testing. At least through the summer, the
DDP did not press the issue. On November 9, 1964, the DDP raised the issue again in a
memo to the DCI, calling the Director's attention to what he described as "several other
indications during the past year of an apparent Soviet aggressiveness in the field of covertly
administered chemicals which are, to say the least, inexplicable and disturbing." [70]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 346 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 66 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 21 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Helms noted that because of the suspension of covert testing, the Agency's "positive
operational capability to use drugs is diminishing, owing to a lack of realistic testing. With
increasing knowledge of the state of the art, we are less capable of staying up with Soviet
advances in this field. This in turn results in a waning capability on our part to restrain others
in the intelligence community (such as the Department of Defense) from pursuing operations
in this area." [71]
Helms attributed the cessation of the unwitting testing to the high risk of embarrassment to
the Agency as well as the "moral problem." He noted that no better covert situation had been
devised than that which had been used, and that "we have no answer to the moral issue." [72]
Helms asked for either resumption of the testing project or its definitive cancellation. He
argued that the status quo of a research and development program without a realistic testing
program was causing the Agency to live "with the illusion of a capability which is becoming
minimal and furthermore is expensive." [73] Once again no formal action was taken in
response to the Helms' request.
[68] Memorandum from DDP Helms to DDCI Carter, 12/17/63.
[69] Memorandum from DDP Helms to DCI, 6/9/64, p. 3.
[70] Ibid., 11/9/64, p. 1.
[71] Ibid., pp. 1-2.
[72] Ibid., p. 2.
[73] Ibid.
-83-
From its beginning in the early 1950's until its termination in 1963, the program of
surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting nonvolunteer human subjects demonstrates
a failure of the CIA's leadership to pay adequate attention to the rights of individuals and to
provide effective guidance to CIA employees. Though it was known that the testing was
dangerous, the lives of subjects were placed in jeopardy and their rights were ignored during
the ten years of testing which followed Dr. Olson's death. Although it was clear that the laws
of the United States were being violated, the testing continued. While the individuals
involved in the Olson experiment were admonished by the Director, at the same time they
were also told that they were not being reprimanded and that their "bad judgment" would not
be made part of their personnel records. When the covert testing project was terminated in
1963, none of the individuals involved were subject to any disciplinary action.
4. Monitoring and Control of the Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
CIA
The Select Committee found numerous failures in the monitoring and control of the testing
and use of chemical and biological agents within the CIA. [74] An analysis of the failures
can be divided into four sections: (a) the waiver of normal regulations or requirements; (b)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 347 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 67 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 22 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the problems in authorization procedures; (c) the failure of internal review mechanisms such
as the Office of General Counsel, the Inspector General, and the Audit Staff; and (d) the
effect of compartmentation and competition within the CIA.
a. The Waiver of Administrative Controls. -- The internal controls within any agency rest on:
(1) clear and coherent regulations; (2) clear lines of authority; and (3) clear rewards for those
who conduct themselves in accord with agency regulations and understandable and
immediate sanctions against those who do not. In the case of the testing and use of chemical
and biological agents, normal CIA administrative controls were waived. The destruction of
the documents on the largest CIA program in this area constituted a prominent example of
the waiver of normal Agency procedures by the Director.
These documents were destroyed in early 1973 at the order of then DCI Richard Helms.
According to Helms, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, then Director of TSD:
... came to me and said that he was retiring and that I was retiring and he thought it would be a
good idea if these files were destroyed. And I also believe part of the reason for our thinking this
was advisable was there had been relationships with outsiders in government agencies and other
organizations and that these would be sensitive in this kind of a thing but that since the program
was over and finished and done with, we thought we would just get rid of the files as
[74] Section 2(9) of S. Res. 21 instructs the Committee to examine: the "extent to which United States
intelligence agencies are governed by Executive Orders, rules, or regulations either published or secret."
-84-
well, so that anybody who assisted us in the past would not be subject to follow-up or questions,
embarrassment, if you will. [75]
The destruction was based on a waiver of an internal CIA regulation, CSI 70-10, which
regulated the "retirement of inactive records." As Thomas Karamessines, then Deputy
Director of Plans, wrote in regulation CSI-70-10: "Retirement is not a matter of convenience
or of storage but of conscious judgment in the application of the rules modified by
knowledge of individual component needs. The heart of this judgment is to ensure that the
complete story can be reconstructed in later years and by people who may be unfamiliar with
the events." [76]
The destruction of the MKULTRA documents made it impossible for the Select Committee
to determine the full range and extent of the largest CIA research program involving
chemical and biological agents. The destruction also prevented the CIA from locating and
providing medical assistance to the individuals who were subjects in the program. Finally, it
prevented the Committee from determining the full extent of the operations which made use
of materials developed in the MKULTRA program. [77]
From the inception of MKULTRA normal Agency procedures were waived. In 1953, Mr.
Helms, then Assistant Deputy Director for Plans, proposed the establishment of MKULTRA.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 348 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 68 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 23 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Under the proposal six percent of the research and development budget of TSD would be
expended "without the establishment of formal contractual relations" because contracts
would reveal government interest. Helms also voted that qualified individuals in the field
"are most reluctant to enter into signed agreements of any sort which connect them with this
activity since such a connection would jeopardize their professional reputa-
[75] Richard Helms testimony, 9/11/75, p. 5.
Many Agency documents recording confidential relationships with individuals and organizations are retained
without public disclosure. Moreover, in the case of MKULTRA the CIA had spent millions of dollars
developing both materials and delivery systems which could be used by the Clandestine Services; the
reconstruction of the research and development program would be difficult if not impossible, without the
documents, and at least one assistant to Dr. Gottlieb protested against the document destruction on those
grounds.
[76] Clandestine Services Institution (CSI) 70-10. When asked by the Select Committee about the regularity of
the procedure by which he authorized Dr. Gottlieb to destroy the MKULTRA records, Helms responded:
"Well, that's hard to say whether it would be part of the regular procedure or not, because the record destruction
program is conducted according to a certain pattern. There's a regular record destruction pattern in the Agency
monitored by certain people and done a certain way. So that anything outside of that, I suppose, would have
been unusual. In other words, there were documents being destroyed because somebody had raised this specific
issue rather than because they were encompassed in the regular records destruction program. So I think the
answer to your question is probably yes." (Helms testimony, 9/11/75, p. 6.)
[77] Even prior to the destruction of documents, the MKULTRA records were far from complete. As the
Inspector General noted in 1963:
"Files are notably incomplete, poorly organized, and lacking in evaluative statements that might give
perspective to management policies over time. A substantial portion of the MKULTRA record appears to rest in
the memories of the principal officers and is therefore almost certain to be lost with their departures." (IG
Report on MKULTRA, p. 23.)
-85-
tions". [78] Other Agency procedures, i.e., the forwarding of document, in support of
invoices and the provision for regular audit procedures, were also to be waived. On April 13,
1953, then DCI Allen Dulles approved MKULTRA, noting that security considerations
precluded handling the project through usual contractual agreements.
Ten years later investigations of MKULTRA by both the Inspector General and the Audit
Staff noted substantial deficiencies which resulted from the waivers. Because TSD had not
reserved the right to audit the books of contractors in MKULTRA, the CIA had been unable
to verify the use of Agency grants by a contractor. Another firm had failed to establish
controls and safeguards which would assure "proper accountability" in use of government
funds with the result that "funds have been used for purposes not contemplated by grants or
allowable under usual contract relationship." [79] The entire MKULTRA arrangement was
condemned for having administrative lines which were unclear, overly permissive controls,
and irresponsible supervision.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 349 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 69 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 24 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The head of the Audit Branch noted that inspections and audits: led us to see MKULTRA as
frequently having provided a device to escape normal administrative controls for research
that is not especially sensitive, as having allowed practices that produce gross administrative
failures, as having permitted the establishment of special relationships with unreliable
organizations on an unacceptable basis, and as having produced, on at least one occasion, a.
cavalier treatment of a bona fide contracting organization.
While admitting that there may be a need for special mechanisms for handling sensitive
projects, the Chief of the Audit Branch wrote that "both the terms of reference and the
ground rules for handling such special projects should be spelled out in advance so that
diversion from normal channels does not mean abandonment of controls.
Special procedures may be necessary to ensure the security of highly sensitive operations. To
prevent the erosion of normal internal control mechanisms, such waivers should not be
extended to less sensitive operations. Moreover, only those regulations which would
endanger security should be waived; to waive regulations generally would result in highly
sensitive and controversial projects having looser rather than stricter administrative controls.
MKNAOMI, the Fort Detrick CIA project for research and development of chemical and
biological agents, provides another example where efforts to protect the security of agency
activities overwhelmed administrative controls. No written records of the transfer of agents
such as anthrax or shellfish toxin were kept, "because of the sensitivity of the area and the
desire to keep any possible use of materials like this recordless." [81] The
[78] Memorandum from ADDP Helms to DCI Dulles, 4/3/53, Tab. A, p. 2.
[79] Memorandum from IG to Chief, TSD, 11/8/63, as quoted in memorandum from Chief, Audit Branch.
[80] The memorandum suggested that administrative exclusions, because of the importance of such decisions,
should require the personal approval of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence on an individual case basis.
Present CIA policy is that only the DCI can authorize certain exemptions from regulations.
[81] Sidney Gottlieb testimony, 10/18/75, Hearings, Vol. 1, p. 51.
-86-
result was that the Agency had no way of determining what materials were on hand, and
could not be certain whether delivery systems such as dart guns, or deadly substances such
as cobra venom had been issued to the field.
b. Authorization. -- The destruction of the documents regarding MKULTRA made it difficult
to determine at what level specific projects in the program were authorized. This problem is
not solely a result of the document destruction, however. Even at the height of MKULTRA
the IG noted that, at least with respect to the surreptitious administration of LSD, the
"present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test
programs." [82]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 350 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 70 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 25 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
While it is clear that Allen Dulles authorized MKULTRA, the record is unclear as to who
authorized specific projects such as that involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to
unwitting nonvolunteer human subjects. Even given the sensitive and controversial nature of
the project, there is no evidence that when John McCone replaced Allen Dulles as the
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency he was briefed on the details of this project and
asked whether it should be continued . [83] Even during the 1963 discussions on the
propriety of unwitting testing, the DDP questioned whether it was "necessary to brief
General Carter", the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence and the Director's "alter ago,"
because CIA officers felt it necessary to keep details of the project restricted to an absolute
minimum number of people. [84]
In May of 1963, DDP Helms told the Inspector General that the covert testing program was
authorized because he had gone to the Director, briefed him on it and "the Director indicated
no disagreement and therefore the testing will continue." [85] Such authorization even for
noncontroversial matters is clearly less desirable than explicit authorization; in areas such as
the surreptitious administration of drugs, it is particularly undesirable. Yet according to
testimony
[82] IG Report on MKULTRA, 1963, p. 14.
[83] According to an assistant to Dr. Gottlieb, there were annual briefings of the DCI and the DDP on
MKULTRA by the Chief of TSD or his deputy. However, a Nay 15, 1963 Memorandum for the Record from
the Inspector General noted that Mr. McCone had not been briefed in detail about the program. Mr. McCone's
Executive Officer, Walter Elder, testified that it was "perfectly apparent to me" that neither Mr. McCone nor
General Carter, then the DDCI, was aware of the surreptitious administration project "or if they had been
briefed they had not understood it." (Elder, 12/18/75, p. 13.) Mr. McCone testified that lie "did not know"
whether he talked to anyone about the project but that no one had told him about it in a way that "would have
turned on all the lights." (John McCone testimony, 2/3/76, p. 10.)
[84] According to Elder's testimony, "no Deputy Director, to my knowledge, has ever been briefed or was it
ever thought necessary to brief them to the extent to which you would brief the Director."
[85] IG Memorandum for the Record. 5/15/63.
On the question of authorization of the covert testing program, Elder testified as follows:
"But my reasonable judgment is that this was considered to be in the area of continuing approval, having once
been approved by the Director."
The theory of authorization carrying over from one administration to the next seems particularly inappropriate
for less visible, highly sensitive operations which, unless brought to his attention by subordinates, would not
come to the attention of the Director.
-87-
before the Committee, authorization through lack of agreement is even more prevalent in
sensitive situations. [86]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 351 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 71 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 26 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The unauthorized retention of shellfish toxin by Dr. Nathan Gordon and his subordinates, in
violation of a Presidential Directive, may have resulted from the failure of the Director to
issue written instructions to Agency officials. The retention was not authorized by senior
officials in the Agency. The Director, Mr. Helms, had instructed Mr. Karamessines, the
Deputy Director of Plans, and Dr. Gottlieb, the Chief of Technical Services Division, to
relinquish control to the Army of any chemical or biological agents being retained for the
CIA at Fort Detrick. Dr. Gottlieb passed this instruction on to Dr. Gordon. While orders may
be disregarded in any organization, one of the reasons that Dr. Gordon used to defend the
retention was the fact that he had not received written instructions forbidding it. [87]
In some situations the existence of written instructions did not prevent unauthorized actions.
According to an investigation by the CIA's Inspector General TSD officers had been
informed orally that Mr. Helms was to be "advised at all times" when LSD was to be used. In
addition TSD had received a memo advising the staff that LSD was not to be used without
the permission of the DDP, Frank Wisner. The experiment involving Dr. Olson went ahead
without notification of either Mr. Wisner or Mr. Helms. The absence of clear and immediate
punishment for that act must undercut the force of other internal instructions and regulations.
One last issue must be raised about authorization procedures within the Agency. Chemical
agents were used abroad until 1959 for discrediting or disabling operations, or for the
purpose of interrogations with the approval of the Chief of Operations of the DDP. Later the
approval of the Deputy Director for Plans was required for such operations. Although the
medical staff sought to be part of the approval process for these operations, they were
excluded because, as the Inspector General wrote in 1957:
Operational determinations are the responsibility of the DDP and it is he who should advise
the DCI in these respects just as it is he who is responsible for the results. It is completely
unrealistic to consider assigning to the Chief Medical Staff, (what, in effect, would be
authority over clandestine operations.) [88]
Given the expertise and training of physicians, participation of the Medical Staff might well
have been useful.
Questions about authorization also exist in regard to those, agencies which assisted the CIA.
For instance, the project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD to unwitting non-
volunteer human subjects was conducted in coordination with the Bureau of Narcotics and
Dangerous Drugs. There is some question as to the Commissioner of Narcotics' knowledge
about the project.
[86] Mr. Elder was asked whether the process of bringing forward a description of actions by the Agency in
getting approval through the absence of disagreement was a common one. He responded, "It was not
uncommon.... The more sensitive the project the more likely it would lean toward being a common practice,
based on the need to keep the written record to a minimum."
[87] Nathan Gordan testimony, 9/16/75, Hearings, Vol. 1.
[88] 1957 IG Report.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 352 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 72 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 27 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-88-
In 1963, the Inspector General noted that the head of the BNDD had been briefed about the
project, but the IG's report did not indicate the level of detail provided to him. Dr. Gottlieb
testified that "I remember meeting Mr. Anslinger and had the general feeling that he was
aware." [89] Another CIA officer did not recall any discussion of testing on unwitting
subjects when he and Dr. Gottlieb met with Commissioner Anslinger.
In a memorandum for the record in 1967 Dr. Gottlieb stated that Harry Giordano, who
replaced Mr. Anslinger, told Dr. Gottlieb that when he became Commissioner he was "only
generally briefed on the arrangements, gave it his general blessing, and said he didn't want to
know the details." The same memorandum states, however, that there were several
comments which indicated to Dr. Gottlieb that Mr. Giordano was aware of the substance of
the project. It is possible that the Commissioner provided a general authorization for the
arrangement without understanding what it entailed or considering its propriety. A reluctance
to seek detailed information from the CIA, and the CIA's hesitancy to volunteer it, has been
found in a number of instances during the Select Committee's investigations. This problem is
not confined to the executive branch but has also marked congressional relationships with
the Agency.
c. Internal Review. -- The waiver of regulations and the absence of documentation make it
difficult to determine now who authorized which activities. More importantly, they made
internal Agency review mechanisms much less effective. [90] Controversial and highly
sensitive projects which should have been subject to the most rigorous inspection lacked
effective internal review.
Given the role of the General Counsel and his reaction to the surreptitious administration of
LSD to Dr. Olson, it would have seemed likely that he would be asked about the legality or
propriety of any subsequent projects involving such administration. This was not done. He
did not learn about this testing until the 1970's. Nor was the General Counsel's opinion
sought on other MKULTRA projects, though these had been characterized by the Inspector
General in the 1957 Report on TSD as "unethical and illicit." [91]
There is no mention in the report of the 1957 Inspector General's survey of TSD of the
project involving the surreptitious administration of LSD. That project was apparently not
brought to the attention of the survey team. The Inspector who discovered it during the IG's
1963 survey of TSD recalls coming upon evidence of it inadvertently,
[89] Gottlieb, 10/18/75, p. 28.
[90] The IG's report on MKULTRA in 1963 stated:
"The original charter documents specified that TSD maintain exacting control of MKULTRA activities. in so
doing, however, TSD has pursued a philosophy of minimum documentation in keeping with the high sensitivity
of some of the projects. Some files were found to present a reasonably complete record, including most
sensitive matters, while others with parallel objectives contained little or no data at all. The lack of consistent
records precluded use of routine inspection procedures and raised a variety of questions concerning
management and fiscal controls."
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 353 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 73 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 28 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[91] CIA, Inspector General's report on TSD, 1957, p. 217.
-89-
rather than its having been called to his attention as an especially sensitive project. [92]
Thus both the General Counsel and the Inspector General, the principal internal mechanisms
for the control of possibly improper actions, were excluded from regular reviews of the
project. When the project was discovered the Executive Director Comptroller voiced strong
opposition to it; it is possible that the project would have been terminated in 1957 if it had
been called to his attention when he then served as Inspector General.
The Audit Staff, which also serves an internal review function through the examination of
Agency expenditures, also encountered substantial difficulty with MKULTRA. When
MKULTRA was first proposed the Audit Staff was to be excluded from any function. This
was soon changed. However, the waiver of normal "contractual procedures" in MKULTRA
increased the likelihood of "irregularities" as well as the difficulty in detecting them. The
head of the Audit Branch characterized the MKULTRA procedures as "having allowed
practices that produced gross administrative failures," including a lack of controls within
outside contractors which would "assure proper accountability in use of government funds."
It also diminished the CIA's capacity to verify the accountings provided by outside firms.
d. Compartmentation and Jurisdictional Conflict Within the Agency. -- As has been noted,
the testing and use of chemical and biological agents was treated as a highly sensitive
activity within the CIA. This resulted in a high degree of compartmentation. At the same
time substantial jurisdictional conflict existed within the Agency between the Technical
Services Division, and the Office of Medical Services and the Office of Security.
This compartmentation and jurisdictional conflict may well have led to duplication of effort
within the CIA and to Agency policymakers being deprived of useful information.
During the early 1950's first the BLUEBIRD Committee and then the ARTICHOKE
Committee were instituted to bring together representatives of the Agency components
which had a legitimate interest in the area of the alteration of human behavior. By 1957 both
these committees had fallen into disuse. No information went to the Technical Services
Division (a component supposedly represented on the ARTICHOKE Committee) about
ARTICHOKE operations being conducted by the Office of Security and the Office of
Medical Services. The Technical Services Division which was providing support to the
Clandestine Services in the use of chemical and biological agents, but provided little or no
information to either the Office of Security or the Office of Medical Services. As one TSD
officer involved in these programs testified: "Although we were acquainted, we certainly
didn't share experiences." [93]
[92] Even after the Inspector came upon it the IG did not perform a complete investigation of it. It was
discovered at the end of an extensive survey of TSD and the Inspector was in the process of being transferred to
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 354 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 74 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 29 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
another post within the Agency.
[93] Testimony of CIA officer, 11/21/75, p. 14.
-90-
QKHILLTOP, another group designed to coordinate research in this area also had little
success. The group met infrequently -- only twice a year -- and little specific information
was exchanged. [94]
Concern over security obviously played some role in the failure to share information, [95]
but this appears not to be the only reason. A TSD officer stated that the Office, of Medical
Services simply wasn't "particularly interested in what we were doing" and never sought
such information. [96] On the other hand, a representative of the Office of Medical Services
consistently sought to have medical personnel participate in the use of chemical and
biological agents suggested that TSD did not inform the Office of Medical Services in order
to prevent their involvement.
Jurisdictional conflict was constant in this area. The Office of Security, which had been
assigned responsibility for direction of ARTICHOKE, consistently sought to bring TSD
operations involving psychochemicals under the ARTICHOKE umbrella. The Office of
Medical Services sought to have OMS physicians advise and participate in the operational
use of drugs. As the Inspector General described it in 1957, "the basic issue is concerned
with the extent of authority that should be exercised by the Chief, Medical Staff, over the
activities of TSD which encroach upon or enter into the medical field," and which are
conducted by TSD "without seeking the prior approval of the Chief, Medical Staff, and often
without informing him of their nature and extent." [91]
As was noted previously, because the projects and programs of TSD stemmed directly from
operational needs controlled by the DDP, the IG recommended no further supervision of
these activities by the Medical Staff:
It is completely unrealistic to consider assigning to the Chief, Medical Staff, what, in effect,
would be authority over clandestine operations. Furthermore, some of the activities of
Chemical Division are not only unorthodox but unethical and sometimes illegal. The DDP is
in a better position to evaluate the justification for such operations than the Chief, Medical
Staff. [98] [Emphasis added.]
Because the advice of the Director of Security was needed for "evaluating the risks involved"
in the programs and because the knowledge that the CIA was "engaging in unethical and
illicit activities would have serious repercussions in political and diplomatic circles," the IG
recommended that the Director of Security be fully advised of TSD's activities in these areas.
Even after the Inspector General's Report of 1957, the compartmentation and jurisdictional
conflict continued. They may have had a sub-
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 355 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 75 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 30 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[94] The one set of minutes from a QKHILLTOP meeting indicated that individuals in the Office of Medical
Services stressed the need for more contact.
[95] When asked why information on the surreptitious administration of LSD was not presented to the
ARTICHOKE committee, Dr. Gottlieb responded: "I imagine the only reason would have been a concern for
broadening the awareness of its existence."
[96] CIA Officer, 11/21/75, p. 14
[97] IG Survey of TSD, 1957, p. 217.
[98] Ibid.
-91-
stantial negative impact on policymaking in the Agency. As the Deputy Chief of the
Counterintelligence Staff noted in 1958, due to the different positions taken by TSS, the
Office of Security, and the Office of Medical Services, on the use of chemical or biological
agents, it was possible that the individual who authorized the use of a chemical or biological
agent could be presented with "incomplete facts upon which to make a decision relevant to
its use." Even a committee set up by the DDP in 1958 to attempt to rationalize Agency
policy did not have access to records of testing and use. This was due, in part, to excessive
compartmentation, and jurisdictional conflict.
C. Covert Testing On Human Subjects By Military Intelligence Groups:
Material Testing Program EA 1729, Project Third Change, and Project
Derby Hat
EA 1729 is the designator used in the Army drug testing program for lysergic acid
diethylamide (LSD). Interest in LSD was originally aroused at the Army's Chemical Warfare
Laboratories by open literature on the unusual effects of the compound. [99] The positive
intelligence and counterintelligence potential envisioned for compounds like LSD, and
suspected Soviet interest in such materials, [100] supported the development of an American
military capability and resulted in experiments conducted jointly by the U.S. Army
Intelligence Board and the Chemical Warfare Laboratories.
These experiments, designed to evaluate potential intelligence uses of LSD, were known
collectively as "Material Testing Program EA 1729." Two projects of particular interest
conducted as part of these experiments, "THIRD CHANCE" and "DERBY HAT", involved
the administration of LSD to unwitting subjects in Europe and the Far East.
In many respects, the Army's testing programs duplicated research which had already been
conducted by the CIA. They certainly involved the risks inherent in the early phases of drug
testing. In the Army's tests, as with those of the CIA, individual rights were also
subordinated to national security considerations; informed consent and followup
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 356 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 76 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 31 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
examinations of subjects were neglected in efforts to maintain the secrecy of the tests.
Finally, the command and control problems which were apparent in the CIA's programs are
paralleled by a lack of clear authorization and supervision in the Army's programs.
[99] USAINTC staff study, "Material Testing Program, EA 1729," 10/15/59, p. 4.
[100] This same USAINTC study cited "A 1952 (several years prior to initial U.S. interest in LSD-25) report
that the Soviets purchased a large quantity of LSD-25 from the Sandoz Company in 1951, reputed to be
sufficient for 50 million doses." (Ibid., p. 16.)
Generally accepted Soviet methods and counterintelligence concerns were also strong motivating factors in the
initiation of this research:
"A primary justification for field experimentation in intelligence with EA 1729 is the counter-intelligence or
defense implication. We know that the enemy philosophy condones any kind of coercion or violence for
intelligence purposes. There is proof that his intelligence service has used drugs in the past. There is strong
evidence of keen interest in EA 1729 by him. If for no other purpose than to know what to expect from enemy
intelligence use of the material and to, thus, be prepared to counter it, field experimentation is justified. (Ibid, p.
34)
-92-
1. Scope of Testing
Between 1955 and 1958 research was initiated by the Army Chemical Corps to evaluate the
potential for LSD as a chemical warfare incapacitating agent. In the course of this research,
LSD was administered to more than 1,000 American volunteers who then participated in a
series of tests designed to ascertain the effects of the drug on their ability to function as
soldiers. With the exception of one set of tests at Fort Bragg, these and subsequent laboratory
experiments to evaluate chemical warfare potential were conducted at the Army Chemical
Warfare Laboratories, Edgewood, Maryland.
In 1958 a new series of laboratory tests were initiated at Edgewood. These experiments were
conducted as the initial phase of Material Testing Program EA 1729 to evaluate the
intelligence potential of LSD, and included LSD tests on 95 volunteers. [101] As part of
these tests, three structured experiments were conducted:
1. LSD was administered surreptitiously at a simulated social reception to volunteer subjects
who were unaware of the purpose or nature of the tests in which they were participating;
2. LSD was administered to volunteers who were subsequently polygraphed; and
3. LSD was administered to volunteers who were then confined to "isolation chambers".
These structured experiments were designed to evaluate the validity of the traditional
security training all subjects had undergone in the face of unconventional, drug enhanced,
interrogations.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 357 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 77 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 32 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
At the conclusion of the laboratory test phase of Material Testing Program EA 1729 in 1960,
the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI) authorized operational field testing
of LSD. The first field tests were conducted in Europe by an Army Special Purpose Team
(SPT) during the period from May to August of 1961. These tests were known as Project
THIRD CHANCE and involved eleven separate interrogations of ten subjects. None of the
subjects were volunteers and none were aware that they were to receive LSD. All but one
subject, a U.S. soldier implicated in the theft of classified documents, were alleged to be
foreign intelligence sources or agents. While interrogations of these individuals were only
moderately successful, at least one subject (the U.S. soldier) exhibited symptoms of severe
paranoia while under the influence of the drug.
The second series of field tests, Project DERBY HAT, were conducted by an Army SPT in
the Far East during the period from August to November of 1962. Seven subjects were
interrogated under DERBY HAT, all of whom were foreign nationals either suspected of
dealing in narcotics or implicated in foreign intelligence operations. The purpose of this
second set of experiments was to collect additional data on the utility of LSD in field
interrogations, and to evaluate any different effects the drug might have on "Orientals."
[101] Inspector General of the Army Report. "Use of Volunteers in Chemical Agent Research," 3/10/76, p. 138.
-93-
2. Inadequate Coordination Among Intelligence Agencies
On October 15, 1959, the U.S. Army Intelligence Center prepared a lengthy staff study on
Material Testing Program EA 1729. The stated purpose of the staff study was: "to determine
the desirability of EA 1729 on non-US subjects in selected actual operations under controlled
conditions. [102] It was on the basis of this study that operational field tests were later
conducted.
After noting that the Chemical Warfare Laboratories began experiments with LSD on
humans in 1955 and had administered the drug to over 1,000 volunteers, the "background"
section of the study concluded:
There has not been a single case of residual ill effect. Study of the prolific scientific literature
on LSD-25 and personal communication between U.S. Army Chemical Corps personnel and
other researchers in this field have failed to disclose an authenticated instance of irreversible
change being produced in normal humans by the drug. [103]
This conclusion was reached despite an awareness that there were inherent medical dangers
in such experimentation. In the body of this same study it is noted that:
The view has been expressed that EA 1729 is a potentially dangerous drug, whose
pharmaceutical actions are not fully understood and there has been cited the possibility of the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 358 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 78 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 33 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
continuance of a chemically induced psychosis in chronic form, particularly if a latent
schizophrenic were a subject, with consequent claim or representation against the U.S.
Government. [104]
An attempt was made to minimize potential medical hazards by careful selection of subjects
prior to field tests. Rejecting evidence that the drug might be hazardous, the study continued:
The claim of possible permanent damage caused by EA 1729 is an unproven hypothesis
based on the characteristic effect of the material. While the added stress of a real situation
may increase the probability of permanent adverse effect, the resulting risk is deemed to be
slight by the medical research personnel of the Chemical Warfare Laboratories. To prevent
even such a slight risk, the proposed plan for field experimentation calls for overt, if
possible, or contrived-through-ruse, if necessary, physical and mental examination of any
real situation subject prior to employment of the subject. [105]
This conclusion was drawn six years after one death had occurred which could be attributed,
at least in part, to the effects of the very drug the Army was proposing to field test. The
USAINTC staff, however, was apparently unaware of the circumstances surrounding Dr.
Olson's death. This lack of knowledge is indicative of the
[102] USAINTC staff study, "Material Testing Program EA 1729," 10/15/59, p. 4.
[103] Ibid, p. 4.
[104] Ibid, p. 25.
[105] Ibid.
-94-
general lack of interagency communication on drug related research. As the October 1959
study noted, "there has been no coordination with other intelligence agencies up to the
present." [106]
On December 7, 1959, the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence (ACSI, apparently
a General Willems) was briefed on the proposed operational use of LSD by USAINTC
Project Officer Jacobson, in preparation for Project THIRD CHANCE. General Willems
expressed concern that the project had not been coordinated with the FBI and the CIA. He is
quoted as saying "that if this project is going to be worth anything, it [LSD] should be used
on higher types of non-U.S. subjects" in other words "staffers." He indicated this could be
accomplished if the CIA were brought in. The summary of the briefing prepared by Major
Mehovsky continues: "Of particular note is that ACSI did not direct coordination with CIA
and the FBI but only mentioned it for consideration by the planners." [107]
After the briefing, four colonels, two lieutenant colonels and Major Mehovsky met to discuss
interagency cooperation with CIA and FBI. The group consensus was to postpone efforts
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 359 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 79 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 34 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
toward coordination:
Lt. Col. Jacobson commented that before we coordinate with CIA we should have more
factual findings from field experimentation with counterintelligence cases that will
strengthen our position and proposal for cooperation. This approach red to by the conferees.
[108]
Had such coordination been achieved, the safety of these experiments might have been
viewed differently and the tests themselves might have been seen as unnecessary.
3. Subordination of Individual Rights to National Security Considerations
Just as many of these experiments may have been unnecessary, the nature of the operational
tests (polygraph-assisted interrogations of drugged suspects) reflects a basic disregard for the
fundamental human rights of the subjects. The interrogation of an American soldier as part
of the THIRD CHANCE 1961 tests is an example of this disregard.
The "trip report" for Project THIRD CHANCE, dated September 6, 1961, recounts the
circumstances surrounding and the results of the tests as follows:
[The subject] was a U.S. soldier who had confessed to theft of classified documents.
Conventional methods had failed to ascertain whether espionage intent was involved. A
significant, new admission by subject that he told a fellow soldier of the theft while he still
had the documents in his possession was obtained during the EA 1729 interrogation along
with other variations of Subject's previous account. The interrogation results were deemed by
the local operational authority satisfactory evidence of Subject's claim of innocence in regard
to espionage intent. [109]
[106] Ibid, p. 6
[107] Mehovsky Fact Sheet, 12/9/60, p. 1.
[108] Ibid, p. 2.
[109] SPT Trip Report, Operation THIRD CHANCE, 9/6/61, p. 5.
-95-
The subject apparently reacted very strongly to the drug, and the interrogation, while
productive, was difficult. The trip report concluded:
(1) This case demonstrated the ability to interrogate a subject profitably throughout a highly
sustained and almost incapacitating reaction to EA 1729.
(2) The apparent value of bringing a subject into the EA 1729 situation in a highly stressed
state was indicated.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 360 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 80 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 35 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
(3) The usefulness of employing as a duress factor the device of inviting the subject's
attention to his EA 1729 influenced state and threatening to extend this state indefinitely
even to a permanent condition of insanity, or to bring it to an end at the discretion of the
interrogators was shown to be effective.
(4) The need for preplanned precautions against extreme paranoiac reaction to EA 1729 was
indicated.
(5) It was brought to attention by this case that where subject has undergone extended
intensive interrogation prior to the EA 1729 episode and has persisted in a version repeatedly
during conventional interrogation, adherence to the same version while under EA 1729
influence, however extreme the reaction, may not necessarily be evidence of truth but merely
the ability to adhere to a well rehearsed story. [110]
This strong reaction to the drug and the accompanying discomfort this individual suffered
were exploited by the use of traditional interrogation techniques. While there is no evidence
that physical violence or torture were employed in connection with this interrogation,
physical and psychological techniques were used in the THIRD CHANCE experiments to
exploit the subjects' altered mental state, and to maximize the stress situation. Jacobson
described these methods in his trip report:
Stressing techniques employed included silent treatment before or after EA 1729
administration, sustained conventional interrogation prior to EA 1729 interrogation,
deprivation of food, drink, sleep or bodily evacuation, sustained isolation prior to EA 1729
administration, hot-cold switches in approach, duress "pitches", verbal degradation and
bodily discomfort, or dramatized threats to subject's life or mental health. [111]
Another gross violation of an individual's fundamental rights occurred in September 1962 as
part of the Army's DERBY HAT tests in the Far East. A suspected Asian espionage agent
was given 6 micrograms of LSD per kilogram of bodyweight. The administration of the drug
was completed at 1035 that morning:
At 1120, sweating became evident, his pulse became thready. He was placed in a supine
position. He began groaning with expiration and became semicomatose. [112]
[110] Ibid, pp. 17-18.
[111] Ibid, p. 13.
[112] "DERBY HAT" Medical and Pharmacological Report: Case #1, 9/20/62, 1). p. D10-2.
-96-
For the next 28 minutes, the subject remained semicomatose.
At 1148, responses to painful stimuli were slightly improved.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 361 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 81 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 36 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
At 1155, he was helped to a sitting position.
At 1200, he became shocky again and was returned to supine position.
At 1212, he was more alert and able to sit up with help.
At 1220, Subject was assisted to the interrogation table.
At 1230, he began moaning he wanted to die and usually ignored questions. Rarely he stated
"he didn't know."
At 1250, his phasic alertness persisted. He frequently refocused his eyes with eyelid
assistance. He frequently threw his head back with eyes closed.
At 1330, he was slightly more alert. He was forced-walked for 5 minutes. He physically
would cooperate until he became shocky again (sweating, thready pulse, pale). [113]
For the next three hours the subject remained in about the same condition. Continued
attempts at interrogation yielded no relevant answers. Six hours after receiving the drug, the
subject began giving relevant answers to questions. Eight and one-half hours after the initial
dosage, the subject was polygraphed. The interrogation continued for seventeen and one-half
hours after the drug was administered.
There was some psychological and medical screening of the individuals tested within the
United States, in Europe, and in Asia. The proposal for the field experimentation in fact
called for such examinations. The fact of prescreening did not eliminate tile risk of injury;
the availability of medical staff did, however, limit injury and may well have prevented the
death of one or more of the subjects. As the medical corps member of the team which
surreptitiously administered the LSD noted, "one subject... did collapse after the
interrogation and the presence of the medical officer was not only of value to the subject but
to the interrogation team who were thus assured that an unnecessary untoward result would
not occur." [115]
In the October 15, 1959, USAINTC staff study, moral and legal ramifications of covert
administration of LSD in field conditions were considered.
It was always a tenet of Army Intelligence that the basic American principle of the dignity
and welfare of the individual will not be violated. A more meticulous regard for the
prohibition against violence or duress is taken in practice when the suspect is a US citizen or
ally as against an actual or potential enemy, in peace as against war, and in respect to the
nature of the crime.... In intelligence, the stakes involved and the interests of national
security may permit a more tolerant interpretation of moral-ethical values, but not legal
limits, through necessity. Any claim
[113] Ibid., p. D10-3.
[115] SPT Trip Report, Operation THIRD CHANCE, 7/25/61, p. 1.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 362 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 82 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 37 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-97-
against the US Government for alleged injury due to EA 1729 must be legally shown to have
been due to the material. Proper security and appropriate operational techniques can protect
the fact of employment of EA 1729. [116]
On the basis of this evaluation, the study concluded that in view of "the stakes involved and
the interests of national security," the proposed plan for field testing should be approved.
The surreptitious administration of drugs to unwitting subjects by the Army raises serious
constitutional and legal issues. The consideration given these issues by the Army was wholly
insufficient. The character of the Army's volunteer testing program and the possibility that
drugs were simply substituted for other forms of violence or duress in field interrogations
raises serious doubts as to whether national security imperatives were properly interpreted.
The "consent" forms which each American volunteer signed prior to the administration of
LSD are a case in point. These forms contained no mention of the medical and psychological
risks inherent in such testing, nor do they mention the nature of the psychotropic drug to be
administered:
The general nature of the experiments in which I have volunteered have been explained to
me from the standpoint of possible hazards to my health. It is my understanding that the
experiments are so designed, based on the results of animals and previous human
experimentation, that the anticipated results will justify the performance of the experiment. I
understand further that experiments will be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and medical suffering and injury, and that I will be at liberty to request that the experiments
be terminated at any time if in my opinion I have reached the physical or mental state where
continuation of the experiments becomes undesirable.
I recognize that in the pursuit of certain experiments transitory discomfort may occur. I
recognize, also, that under these circumstances, I must rely upon the skill and wisdom of the
physician supervising the experiment to institute whatever medical or surgical measures are
indicated. [Emphasis added.] [118]
The exclusion of any specific discussion of the nature of LSD in these forms raises serious
doubts as to their validity. An "understanding... that the anticipated results will justify the
performance of the experiment" without full knowledge of the nature of the experiment is an
incomplete "understanding." Similarly, the nature of the experiment limited the ability of
both the subject to request its request its termination and the experimenter to implement such
a request. Finally, the euphemistic characterization of "transitory discomfort" and the
agreement to "rely on the skill and wisdom of the physician" combine to conceal inherent
risks in the experimentation and may be viewed as dissolving the experimenter of personal
responsibility for damaging aftereffects. In summary, a "volunteer" program in which
subjects are not fully informed of potential hazards to their persons is "volunteer" in name
only.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 363 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 83 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 38 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[116] USAINTC staff study, Material Testing Program EA 1729," 10/15/59, p. 26.
[118] Sample volunteer consent form.
-98-
This problem was compounded by the security statements signed by each volunteer before
he participated in the testing. As part of this statement, potential subjects agreed that they
would:
... not divulge or make available any information related to U.S. Army Intelligence Center
interest or participation in the Department of the Army Medical Research Volunteer Program
to any individual, nation, organization, business, association, or other group or entity, not
officially authorized to receive such information.
I understand that any action contrary to the provisions of this statement will render me liable
to punishment under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. [119]
Under these provisions, a volunteer experiencing aftereffects of the test might have been
unable to seek immediate medical assistance.
This disregard for the well-being of subjects drug testing is inexcusable. Further, the absence
of any comprehensive long-term medical assistance for the subjects of these experiments is
not only unscientific; it is also unprofessional.
4. Lack of Normal Authorization and Supervision
It is apparent from documents supplied to the Committee that the Army's testing programs
often operated under informal and nonroutine authorization. Potentially dangerous
operations such as these testing programs are the very projects which ought to be subject to
the closest internal scrutiny at the highest levels of the military command structure. There are
numerous examples of inadequate review, partial consideration, and incomplete approval in
the administration of these programs.
When the first Army program to use LSD on American soldiers in "field stations" was
authorized in May 1955, the Arm violated its own procedures in obtaining approval. Under
Army Chief of Staff Memorandum 385, such proposals were to be personally approved by
the Secretary of the Army. Although the plan was submitted to him on April 26, 1956, the
Secretary issued no written authorization for the project, and there is no evidence that he
either reviewed or approved the plan. Less than a month later, the Army Chief of Staff issued
a memorandum authorizing the tests. [120]
Subsequent testing of LSD under Material Testing Program EA 1729 operated generally
under this authorization. When the plans for this testing were originally discussed in early
1958 by officials of the Army Intelligence Center at Fort Holabird and representatives of the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 364 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 84 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 39 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Chemical Warfare Center at Edgewood Arsenal, an informal proposal was formulated. This
proposal was submitted to the Medical Research Directorate at Edgewood by the President
of the Army Intelligence Board on June 3, 1958. There is no evidence that the plan was
approved at any level higher than the President of the Intelligence Board or the Commanding
General of Edgewood. The approval at Edgewood appears to have been issued by the
Commander's Adjutant. The Medical Research Laboratories did not submit the plan to the
Surgeon General for approval (a standard procedure) because
[119] Sample Volunteer Security Statement.
[120] Inspector General of the Army Report, "Use of Volunteers in Chemical Agent Research," 3/10/76, p. 109.
-99-
the new program was ostensibly covered by the authorizations granted in May 1956. [121]
The two projects involving the operational use of LSD (THIRD CHANCE and DERBY
HAT) were apparently approved by the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence
(General Willems) on December 7, 1960. [122] This verbal approval came in the course of a
briefing on previous drug programs and on the planned field experimentation. There is no
record of written approval being issued by the ACSI to authorize these specific projects until
January 1961, and there is no record of any specific knowledge or approval by the Secretary
of the Army.
On February 4, 1963, Major General C. F. Leonard, Army ACSI, forwarded a copy of the
THIRD CHANCE Trip Report to Army Chief of Staff, General Earl Wheeler. [123] Wheeler
had apparently requested a copy on February 2. The report was routed through a General
Hamlett. While this report included background on the origins of the LSD tests, it appears
that General Wheeler may only have read the conclusion and recommendations. [124] The
office memorandum accompanying the Trip Report bears Wheeler's initials. [125]
5. Termination of Testing
On April 10, 1963, a briefing was held in the ACSIs office on the results of Projects THIRD
CHANCE and DERBY HAT. Both SPT's concluded that more field testing was required
before LSD could be utilized as an integral aid to counterintelligence interrogations. During
the presentation of the DERBY HAT results, General Leonard (Deputy ACSI) directed that
no further field testing be undertaken. [126] After this meeting the ACSI sent a letter to the
Commanding General of the Army Combat Developments Command (CDC) requesting that
he review THIRD CHANCE and DERBY HAT and "make a net evaluation concerning the
adoption of EA 1729 for future use as an effective and profitable aid in counterintelligence
interrogations." [127] On the same day the ACSI requested that the CDC Commander revise
regulation FM 30-17 to read in part:
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 365 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 85 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 40 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
... in no instance will drugs be used as an aid to interrogations in counterintelligence or
security operations without prior permission of the Department of the Army. Requests to use
drugs as an investigative aid will be forwarded through intelligence channels to the ACSI,
DA, for approval....
Medical research has established that information obtained through the use of these drugs is
unreliable and invalid....
It is considered that DA [Army] approval must be a prerequisite for use of such drugs
because of the moral, legal, medical and political problems inherent in their use for
intelligence purposes. [128]
[121] Ibid, pp. 135, 137, 138.
[122] Mehovsky Fact Sheet, 12/9/60.
[123] Memorandum from Leonard to Wheeler, 2/4/63.
[124] SGS memorandum to Wheeler through Hamlett, 2/5/63.
[125] Ibid.
[126] Maj. F. Barnett, memorandum for the record, 8/12/63.
[127] Yamaki memorandum for the record, 7/16/63.
[128] Ibid.
-100-
The subsequent adoption of this regulation marked the effective termination of field testing
of LSD by the Army.
The official termination date of these testing Programs is rather unclear, but a later ACSI
memo indicates that it may have occurred in September of 1963. On the 19th of that month a
meeting was held between Dr. Van Sims (Edgewood Arsenal), Major Clovis (Chemical
Research Laboratory), and ACSI representatives (General Deholm and Colonel Schmidt).
"As a result of this conference a determination was made to suspend the program and any
further activity pending a more profitable and suitable use." [129]
D. Cooperation And Competition Among The Intelligence Community
Agencies And Between These Agencies And Other Individuals And
Institutions
1. Relationships Among Agencies Within the Intelligence Community
Relationships among intelligence community agencies in this area varied considerably over
time, ranging from full cooperation to intense and wasteful competition. The early period
was marked by a high degree of cooperation among the agencies of the intelligence
community. Although the military dominated research involving chemical and biological
agents, the information developed was shared with the FBI and the CIA. But the spirit of
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 366 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 86 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 41 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
cooperation did not continue. The failure by the military to share information apparently
breached the spirit, if not the letter, of commands from above.
As noted above, the Army Assistant Chief of Staff for Intelligence was briefed on the
proposed operational testing of LSD under Project THIRD CHANCE, and expressed
concern that the project had not been coordinated with FBI and CIA. Despite this request, no
coordination was achieved between the Army and either of these agencies. Had such
cooperation been forthcoming, this project may have been evaluated in a different light.
The competition between the agencies in this area reached bizarre levels. A military officer
told a CIA representative in confidence about the military's field testing of LSD in Europe
under Project THIRD CHANCE, and the CIA promptly attempted to learn surreptitiously the
nature and extent of the program. At roughly the same time Mr. Helms argued to the DDCI
that the unwitting testing program should be continued, as it contributed to the CIA's
capability in the area and thus allowed the CIA "to restrain others in the intelligence
community (such as the Department of Defense) from pursuing operations. [130]
The MKNAOMI program was also marked by a failure to share information. The Army
Special Forces (the principal customer of the Special Operations Division at Fort Dietrick)
and the CIA rather than attempting to coordinate their efforts promulgated different
requirements which varied only slightly. This apparently resulted in some duplication of
effort. In order to insure the security of CIA operations, the Agency would request materials
from SOD for operational use without fully or accurately describing the operational
requirements. This resulted in limitations on SOD's ability to assist the CIA.
[129] Undated ASCI memorandum, p. 2.
[130] Memorandum from the DDP to the DCI, 11/9/64, p. 2.
-101-
2. Relationship Between the Intelligence Community Agencies and Foreign Liaison Services
The subjects of the CIA's operational testing of chemical and biological agents abroad were
generally being held for interrogation by foreign intelligence or security organizations.
Although information about the use of drugs was generally withheld from these
organizations, cooperation with them necessarily jeopardized the security of CIA interest in
these materials. Cooperation also placed the American Government in a position of
complicity in actions which violated the rights of the subjects, and which may have violated
the laws of the country in which the experiments took place.
Cooperation between the intelligence agencies and organizations in foreign countries was not
limited to relationships with the intelligence or internal security organizations. Some
MKULTRA research was conducted abroad. While this is, in itself, not a questionable
practice, it is important that such research abroad not be undertaken to evade American laws.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 367 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 87 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 42 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
That this was a possibility is suggested by an ARTICHOKE memorandum in which it is
noted that working with the scientists of a foreign country "might be very advantageous"
since that government "permitted certain activities which were not permitted by the United
States government (i.e., experiments on anthrax, etc.)." [131]
3. The Relationships Between the Intelligence Community Agencies and Other Agencies of
the U.S. Government
Certain U.S. government agencies actively assisted the efforts of intelligence agencies in this
area. One form of assistance was to provide "cover" for research contracts let by intelligence
agencies, in order to disguise intelligence community interest in chemical and biological
agents.
Other forms of assistance raise more serious questions. Although the CIA's project involving
the surreptitious administration of LSD was conducted by Bureau of Narcotics personnel,
there was no open connection between the Bureau personnel and the Agency. The Bureau
was serving as a "cut-out" in order to make it difficult to trace Agency participation. The cut-
out arrangement, however, reduced the CIA's ability to control the program. The Agency
could not control the process by which subjects were selected and cultivated, and could not
regulate follow-up after the testing. Moreover, as the CIA's Inspector General noted: "the
handling of test subjects in the last analysis rests with the [Bureau of Narcotics] agent
working alone. Suppression of knowledge of critical results from the top CIA management is
an inherent risk in these operations." [132] The arrangement also made it impossible for the
Agency to be certain that the decision to end the surreptitious administration of LSD would
be honored by the Bureau personnel.
The arrangement with the Bureau of Narcotics was described as "informal." [133] The
informality of the arrangement compounded the problem is aggravated by the fact that the 40
Committee has had vir-
[131] ARTICHOKE Memorandum, 6/13/52.
[132] IG Report on MKULTRA, 1963, p.14.
[133] Ibid This was taken by one Agency official to mean that there would be no written contract and no formal
mechanism for payment. (Eider, 12/18/75, p. 31.)
-102-
apparent unwillingness on the part of the Bureau's leadership to ask for details, and the CIA's
hesitation in volunteering information. These problems raise serious questions of command
and control within the Bureau.
4. Relationships Between the Intelligence Community Agencies and Other Institutions and
Individuals, Public and Private
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 368 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 88 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix A--Testing and Use of Chemical and Biol... Page 43 of 43
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The Inspector General's 1963 Survey of MKULTRA noted that "the research and
development" phase was conducted through standing arrangements with "specialists in
universities, pharmaceutical houses, hospitals, state and federal institutions, and private
research organizations" in a manner which concealed "from the institution the interests of the
CIA." Only a few "key individuals" in each institution were "made witting of Agency
sponsorship." The research and development phase was succeeded by a phase involving
physicians, toxicologists, and other specialists in mental, narcotics, and general hospitals and
prisons, who are provided the products and findings of the basic research projects and
proceed with intensive testing on human subjects." [134]
According to the Inspector General, the MKULTRA testing programs were "conducted
under accepted scientific procedures... where health permits, test subjects are voluntary
participants in the programs." [135] This was clearly not true in the project involving the
surreptitious administration of LSD, which was marked by a complete lack of screening,
medical supervision, opportunity to observe, or medical or psychological follow-up.
The intelligence agencies allowed individual researchers to design their project. Experiments
sponsored by these researchers (which included one where narcotics addicts were sent to
Lexington, Kentucky, who were rewarded with the drug of their addiction in return for
participation in experiments with LSD) call into question the decision by the agencies not to
fix guidelines for the experiments.
The MKULTRA research and development program raises other questions, as well. It is not
clear whether individuals in prisons, mental, narcotics and general hospitals can provide
"informed consent" to participation in experiments such as these. There is doubt as to
whether institutions should be unwitting of the ultimate sponsor of research being done in
their facilities. The nature of the arrangements also made it impossible for the individuals
who were not aware of the sponsor of the research to exercise any choice about their
participation based on the sponsoring organization.
Although greater precautions are now being taken in research conducted on behalf of the
intelligence community agencies, the dilemma of classification remains. The agencies
obviously wished to conceal their interest in certain forms of in order to avoid stimulating
interest in the same areas by hostile governments. In some cases today contractors or
researchers wish to conceal their connection with these agencies. Yet the fact of
classification prevents open discussion and debate upon which scholarly work depends.
[134] Ibid p. 9.
[135] Ibid p. 10.
Appendix B: Documents Referring to Discovery of Additional MKULTRA
Material
Appendix C: Documents Referring to Subprojects
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 369 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 89 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixA.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 1 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX B
Documents Referring To Discovery
Of Additional MKULTRA Material
[document begins] [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
22 June 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Science and Technology
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
1. (U/AIUO) This memorandum is to advise you that additional MKULTRA documents
have been discovered and to obtain your approval for follow-on actions required. Paragraph
7 contains a recommended course of action.
2. (U/AIUO) As a result of John Marks FOIA request (F-76-374), all of the MKULTRA
material in OTS possession was reviewed for possible release to him. Following that
review, the OTS material in the Retired Records Center was searched. It was during that
latter search that the subproject files were located among the retired records of the OTS
Budget and Fiscal Section. These files were not discovered earlier as the earlier searches
were limited to the examination of the active and retired records of those branches
considered most likely to have generated or have had access to MKULTRA documents.
Those branches included: Chemistry, Biological, Behavioral Activities, and Contracts
Management. Because Dr. Gottlieb retrieved and destroyed all the MKULTRA documents
he was able to locate, it is not surprising that the earlier search for MKULTRA documents,
directed at areas where they were most likely to be found, was unsuccessful. The purpose of
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 370 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 90 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 2 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
establishing the MKULTRA mechanism was to limit knowledge of the sensitive work being
performed to those with an absolute need to know. If those precepts had been followed, the
recently found B&F files should have contained only financial and administrative
documents. (In retrospect, I realize that
-104- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
a serious error was made in not having B&F files and other seemingly innocuous files
searched earlier.) As it happened most of the individual subproject folders contain project
proposals and memoranda for the record, which in varying degrees, give a reasonably
complete picture of the avenues of research funded through MKULTRA. For your
information, the original memorandum setting up MKULTRA, signed by Mr. Dulles, is also
among these documents. A copy of the memorandum is attached.
3. (U/AIUO) At this writing, it does not appear that there is anything in these newly
located files that would indicate the MKULTRA activities were more extensive or more
controversial than indicated by the Senate Select (Church) Committee Report. If anything,
the reverse is true, i.e., most of the nearly 200 subprojects are innocuous. Thus, the
overview of MKULTRA is essentially unchanged. With two exceptions, the project find
fills in some of the missing details.
4. (U/AIUO) One of these exceptions is Subproject Number 45 which concerns an
activity that should have been reported earlier. That project deals with the search for a
knockout drug which was concomitant with, and a by-product of, cancer research at a major
university. It is believed that an objective reading of that project would demonstrate the
search for knockout materials and anesthetics were compatible activities. However, the
research proposal stated that "chemical agents... will be subjected to clinical screening... on
advanced cancer patients".
5. (C) Subproject Number 55 contains full details of CIA's contribution of $375,000 to
the [deletion] Building Fund. The Agency was then involved in drug research programs,
many of which were being conducted by [deletion] whose facilities were inadequate. In
order to facilitate the ongoing research programs, it was decided to expedite the building
program by contributing to it through a mechanism that was also being used to fund some
of the research projects.
-105- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 371 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 91 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 3 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The contribution could be controversial in that it was made through a mechanism making it
appear to be a private donation. Private donations qualified for, and [deletion] received, an
equal amount of Federal matching funds. A letter from the Office of General Counsel dated
21 February 1954 attesting to the legality of this funding is in the file.
6. (U/AIUO) The Legislative Counsel has been made aware of the existence of these
additional MKULTRA documents which are still under review and sanitation. The MARKS
case is in litigation and we are committed to advise Mr. Marks of the existence of these files
shortly, and to deliver the releasable material to his attorneys by 31 July. A letter from the
Information and Privacy Staff to Mr. Marks' attorneys informing them of the existence of
this material is in the coordination process and is scheduled to be mailed on 24 June.
7. (U/AIUO) There are now two actions that should be taken:
a. Release appropriately sanitized material to Mr. Marks' attorneys as required by
FOIA litigation.
b. Inform the Senate Select Committee of the existence of the recently located records
prior to informing Mr. Marks' attorneys.
It is recommended that you approve of both of these actions.
8. (U/AIUO) If additional details on the contents of this material are desired, the OIS
officers most familiar with it are prepared to brief you at your convenience.
[signature]
David S. Brandwein
Director
Office of Technical Service
[document ends]
-106- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
The Director of Central Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20505
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 372 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 92 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 4 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
During the course of 1975 when the Senate Committee, chaired by Senator Church, was
investigating intelligence activities, the CIA was asked to produce documentation on a
program of experimentation with the effect of drugs. Under this project conducted from
1953 to 1964 and known as "MK-ULTRA," tests were conducted on American citizens in
some cases without their knowledge. The CIA, after searching for such documentation,
reported that most of the documents on this matter have been destroyed. I find it my duty to
report to you now that our continuing search for drug related, as well as other documents,
has uncovered certain papers which bear on this matter. Let me hasten to add that I am
persuaded that there was no previous attempt to conceal this material in the original 1975
exploration. The material recently discovered was in the retired archives filed under
financial accounts and only uncovered by using extraordinary and extensive search efforts.
In this connection, incidentally, I have personally commended the employee whose
diligence produced this find.
Because the new material now on hand is primarily of a financial nature, it does not
present a complete picture of the field of drug experimentation activity but it does provide
more detail than was previously available to us. For example, the following types of
activities were undertaken:
a. Possible additional cases of drugs being tested on American citizens, without their
knowledge.
b. Research was undertaken on surreptitious methods of administering drugs.
c. Some of the persons chosen for experimentation were drug addicts or alcoholics.
d. Research into the development of a knockout or "K" drug was performed in
conjunction with being done to develop pain killers for advanced cancer patients, and tests
on such patients were carried out.
-107- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
e. There is a possibility of an improper payment to a private institution.
The drug related activities described in this newly located material began almost 25 years
ago. I assure you they were discontinued over 10 years ago and do not take place today.
In keeping with the President's commitment to disclose any errors of the Intelligence
Community which are uncovered, I would like to volunteer to testify before your
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 373 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 93 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 5 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Committee on the full details of this unfortunate series of events. I am in the process of
reading the fairly voluminous material involved and do want to be certain that I have a
complete picture when I talk with the Committee. I will be in touch with you next week to
discuss when hearings might be scheduled at the earliest opportunity.
I regret having to bring this issue to your attention, but I know that it is essential to your
oversight procedures that you be kept fully informed in a timely manner.
Yours sincerely,
[signature]
STANSFIELD TURNER
[document ends]
Appendix A: Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
Intelligence Community
Appendix C: Documents Referring to Subprojects
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 374 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 94 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 1 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
APPENDIX C
Documents Referring To Subprojects
[document begins] [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
DRAFT
1 May 1953
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 2
1. Subproject 2 is being set up to provide a secure and
efficient means to exploit [deletion] in regard to the MKULTRA
program.
2. [deletion] is a practicing psychiatrist in [deletion] and a
faculty member of the [deletion] His past positions have included
Chief Neuropsychiatrist at [deletion] Chief of the Psychiatric
Section at [deletion] and OSS experience during World War II.
He has been of value in the general MKULTRA field as an
overall advisor and consultant, he has been of value in containing
individuals in the [deletion] area and in setting up projects there,
and he has done work himself which has contributed to the
MKULTRA field. His professional activities and known
connections with the [deletion]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 375 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 95 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 2 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3. Subproject 2 would include:
a. Miscellaneous research and testing services in the
general field of MKULTRA.
b. Services as a contact and cut-out for projects in the
MKULTRA field, primarily those located in the [deletion] area.
c. Monitoring of selected projects in the MKULTRA field,
when located in the central [deletion] area.
d. Services as a general consultant and advisor in the
MKULTRA field.
4. The total cost of this project is not to exceed $4,650.00 for
a period of one year.
5. [deletion] is cleared through TOP SECRET on a contact
basis.
[signature deleted]
Chemical Division/TSS
[Multiple deletions at bottom of page]
APPROVED:
-110- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[multiple deletions]
APPROVED:
[Sidney Gottlieb signature]
Chief, Chemical Division/TSS
PROGRAM APPROVED
AND RECOMMENDED:
[signature deleted]
For Research Chairman
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 376 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 96 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 3 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Date: May 5, 1953
Attachment:
Proposal
APPROVED FOR
OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: May 5, 1953
Original Only.
[multiple deletions at bottom of page]
[document ends]
[document begins]
-111- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion at top of page]
PROPOSAL
Objective: To study the possible synergistic action of drugs
which may be appropriate for use in abolishing consciousness.
Proposal: Allocation of $1000 for animal experiments, to be
drawn on as needed. That experiments be conducted informally
at [deletion] without a specific grant, and with appropriate cover.
[multiple deletions]
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 377 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 97 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 4 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-112- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
[deletion]
PROPOSAL
Objective: To study methods for the administration of drugs
without the knowledge of the patient. Preparation of a manual.
Method: A survey of methods which have been used by
criminals for surreptitious administration of drugs. Analysts of
the psychodynamics of situations of this nature.
Proposal: That $1000 be allocated for this purpose, funds to be
requested as needed.
[multiple deletions]
[document ends]
-113- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
DRAFT/[deletion]
11 August 1955
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject [deletion] 2
1. Subproject 2[deletion]is being initiated to provide secure
and efficient means of exploiting [deletion] with regard to the
MKULTRA program.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 378 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 98 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 5 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
2. [deletion] is a practicing psychiatrist in [deletion] and a
faculty member of [deletion] He has been of value in the general
MKULTRA project, serving as an advisor and consultant,
contacting individuals in the [deletion] area, and carrying out his
own research program.
3. Subproject 2 [deletion] would include the following:
(a) Miscellaneous research and testing services in the general
field of MKULTRA.
(b) Services as a contact and cutout for projects in the
MKULTRA field, primarily those located in the [deletion]
(c) Monitoring of selected projects in the MKULTRA field,
when located in the central [deletion]
(d) Services as a general consultant and advisor in the
MKULTRA field.
(e) He would act as medical advisor and consultant to
[deletion] and his [deletion] establishment.
4. [deletion] will be reimbursed for his services and expenses
upon receipt of an invoice at irregular intervals. When travel
expenses are incurred through use of a common carrier, they will
be documented and reimbursed in the usual manner; that is,
consistent with standard Government allowances.
[multiple deletions]
[document ends]
-114- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
DRAFT [deletion]
2 October 1953
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 379 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 99 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 6 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 16
1. Subproject 15 is a continuation of Subproject 3, which
involved the establishment and maintenance of facilities for the
realistic testing of certain research and development items of
interest to CD/TSS and APD/TSS. The facilities were set up
under Subproject 3, and Subproject 16 is intended to provide for
the continued maintenance of the facilities.
2. Subproject 3 was originally intended to provide funds for
the maintenance of the facilities for one year; but it turns out that
the costs of alterations, equipment, and initial supplies were
under-estimated in Subproject 3; hence the necessity to establish
Subproject 16 at this time.
3. Subproject 16 will be conducted by [deletion] a [deletion]
Certain support activities will be provided by CD/TSS and
APD/TSS.
4. The estimated cost for a period of one year is $7,740.00.
[deletion]
SIDNEY GOTTLIEB
Chief
Chemical Division, TSS
PROGRAM APPROVED
AND RECOMMENDED:
[signature deleted]
Research Chairman
Date: -------------
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION
OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 13 Oct 1953
TOP SECRET
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 380 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 100 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 7 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-115- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
[deletion]
May 26, 1953
Dear [deletion]
After our telephone conversation this morning I went to [one
line deleted] and opened an account -- regular checking -- in the
amount of $100.00 using the name [deletion]
It occurred to me that for sake of safety -- if, for example,
anything should happen to me -- it would simplify matters if I
made this a joint account between [deletion] and [deletion] Then,
in case of my absence, illness or death you could recover the
joint funds without any legal difficulties or monkey business.
The bank was a little sticky about opening an account in the
absences of "references" from another bank, and also found it
hard to understand how [deletion] got by all these years without
a bank account. However, I offered to provide an excellent
reference in a government official, a [deletion] who is [deletion]
at [deletion] and that seemed to placate the money-lenders.
Thereafter, I communicated with [deletion] and he immediately
wrote a reference for [deletion] on official stationary. [deletion]
also kindly said he was well acquainted with [deletion] and was
pleased to offer for him a similar recommendation.
If you think this is a good idea, I suggest you sign the Joint
Account Agreement and the three signature cards enclosed and
return them to me.
And now that the account is opened I suggest you have funds
deposited via Cashier's check -- or any other way that seems
easiest -- directly to [deleted] account.
I ordered checks printed with [deleted] name thereon and
have also ordered stationary bearing [deleted] name. I considered
this might facilitate payment of bills, etc., by mail.
What with suspicious banks, landlords, utility companies,
etc., you will understand that creating the Jekyll-Hyde
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 381 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 101 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 8 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
personality in the form of [deleted] is taking a little "doing".
See you Monday, the 8th
Rgds,
[deleted]
[document ends]
-116- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 23
1. The scope of this project is intended to encompass all those
activities now engaged in by the [deleted] in its own facilities
under the direction of CD/TSS. At the present time the various
projects at this facility ([deleted] and [deleted]) are being
concluded and it is deemed desirable from the standpoint of
security and efficiency to replace these projects with a single
project more general in its approach.
2. The attached proposal from Dr. [deleted] indicates the
extent of the investigations that his facilities will allow him to
carry out on the materials developed in the three projects referred
to in paragraph 1, as well as certain other materials of interest to
Cd/TSS. Dr. [deleted] also serves as a general consultant to this
division and provides cover and cut-out facilities to the Agency.
3. The total cost of this project for a period of one year will
not exceed $42,700.00.
4. Dr. [deleted] has been granted a Top Secret Clearance by
the Agency and is fully capable of projecting the security of the
Government's interest in such matters as this.
[signature deleted]
Chemical Division, TSS
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 382 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 102 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 9 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
APPROVED:
[signature deleted]
Chief, Chemical Division, TSS
PROGRAM APPROVED AND RECOMMENDED:
[signature deleted]
Exec. [illegible] Res. Ed.
Date: Jan 28 1954
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 28 Jan 1954
Attachment: Proposal
[document ends]
-117- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
The present investigation is concerned with chemical agents
which are effective in modifying the behavior and function of the
central nervous system.
1 - It is proposed to study a variety of known drugs in this
pharmacological class that are in present day use and to
synthesize new chemical agents or to modify existing ones as
occasion may demand.
2 - The various chemical agents investigated or synthesized will
be tested on animals to determine their acute and chronic
toxicity. Their pharmacological effects will be studied by a
variety of assay technics, such as blood pressure determinations,
bronchial dilation recordings, endocrine effects, etc. Complete
animal facilities will be maintained for this purpose and
pathologic study will be carried out on the affected organs when
the animals are sacrificed.
3 - Preliminary clinical investigation will be carried out on the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 383 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 103 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 10 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
more promising chemical agents, and appropriate laboratory
procedures will be performed, such as blood counts, uninalysis,
etc. to determine the effectiveness and the side reactions of the
drugs under investigation.
4 - Adequate reports will be submitted of the findings at
quarterly intervals.
5 - Proposed budget:
Personnel
Synthetic organic chemist..................$7,500.00
Research medical associate.................$6,500.00
Pharmacological assistant..................$5,500.00
Chemical assistant.........................$4,000.00
Histology technician.......................$2,400.00
Clinical technician........................$3,600.00
Chemical consultant........................$1,200.00
Total salaries for personnel..............$30,700.00
Other Expenditures
Animals, animal maintenance & facilities...$4,000.00
Chemical & laboratory supplies, expendable $4,000.00
Miscellaneous permanent equipment..........$2,000.00
Travel, medical meetings, etc..............$2,000.00
Total other expenditures..................$12,000.00
TOTAL.....................................$42,700.00
[document ends]
-118- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
DRAFT [deleted]
8 October 1954
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 384 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 104 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 11 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
SUBJECT: Increase in the Scope of Subproject 23, Project
MKULTRA
1. Due to a considerable increase in the scope of the work
undertaken by [deleted] at the direction of TSS/CD under
Subproject 23, Project MKULTRA, the $42,700.00 sum
originally obligated for this work is insufficient to cover the
year's costs. It is therefore proposed to add $15,000.00 to that
already obligated under this Subproject.
2. The total cost of this Subproject for the period 28 January
1954 to 28 January 1955 will thus amount to $57,700.00.
3. The increase in scope responsible for this proposal consists
of the development and partial financing of two new sources of
biologically active compounds of interest in the program
TSS/CD is carrying out.
[signature deleted]
Chemical Division, TSS
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[deleted]
Research Director
Date: October 11, 1954
APPROVED:
[Sidney Gottlieb signature]
Chief, Chemical Division, TSS
Original Only.
[handwritten notes at bottom of page:]
1) [deleted]
2) [deleted]
The additional compounds are derivatives of tryptomine not
available from any other sources.
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 385 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 105 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 12 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-119- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
25 August 1955
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Authorization for Payment of Certain Expenses
Under Project MKULTRA, Subproject 23
1. In order to carry on the work of the above Subproject, it
was necessary to test the effects of certain chemical substances
when administered to test the effects of certain chemical
substances when administered to human beings. Certain of the
anticipated effects involved mental functions which precluded
the use of mental defectives for this particular study.
2. In view of these circumstances the project engineer, with
verbal approval from his chief, authorized the contractor to pay
the hospitals expenses of certain persons suffering from
incurable cancer for the privilege of studying the effects of these
chemicals during their terminal illnesses. The total funds
expended in this fashion amounted to $658.05 and full value was
received.
3. It is requested that the Chief, TSS indicate his knowledge
and approval of this particular expenditure for audit purposes.
[signature deleted]
TSS/Chemical Division
APPROVED:
[signature deleted]
[deleted] Chief, TSS
APPROVED:
[Sidney Gottlieb signature]
Chief, TSS/Chemical Division
August 31, 1955
Distribution:
Orig. - TSS/CD
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 386 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 106 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 13 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document ends]
-120- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
21 December 1954
MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Central Intelligence
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 35
1. While the Director's statutory authority to expend funds for
confidential purposes is not limited by law, we believe that a gift
of Government funds as such would exceed the intent of the
Congress in granting that power. However, where a gift is made
for the express purpose of producing something of value to this
Agency which cannot otherwise be obtained and there is
reasonable expectation that the value may be received, the gift
may in effect be an expenditure for proper official purposes.
2. In Subproject 35, it is stated that the donation in question
would achieve certain ends desired by TSS. There seems to be no
question that those ends would be advantageous, so the main
questions appear to be whether they could not be attained by
more direct, normal methods, and, if not, whether the return is
necessary and reasonable in relation to the donation.
3. We are in no position to review the requirements of TSS or
to appraise the advantages that would result from this project.
We do not comment, therefore, on the value received if the
project results in the benefits foreseen . We feel we should
comment on factors affecting the probability of achieving those
ends. In a legal sense, there is little or no control. Once the funds
are donated, the individual, his foundation, or the hospital could
conceivably refuse to work for us or allow us the use of the
facilities.
4. Practically, the control seems to be established as well as
circumstances permit. Certainly, as long as the individual is alive
and in his present position, we have every reason to expect his
complete cooperation in the future as in the past, unless through
some act or fault of our own he is alienated. Even in the event of
his death or incapacity, there appears to be a reasonable
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 387 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 107 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 14 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-121- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
chance of continuing the project. If these probabilities appear
sufficient to obtain an adequate return for the expenditure, there
can be no legal objection to this aspect of the project.
5. It should be noted that there are two circumstances which
require consideration in a final determination. As stated in
Section V, our contribution, by appearing to be from a private
source, would increase the matching Government contribution by
a similar amount which would not be the case if it were known
that this was in fact a Government contribution also. Secondly, it
is the stated policy of the hospital to charge the Government and
commercial organizations 80 per cent overhead on research
contracts, whereas nonprofit foundations pay only direct costs
but no overhead. Because of the ostensible source, our projects
will not be charged overhead. This could be construed as morally
wrongful to the hospital, as normally we would pay the 80 per
cent overhead charge for projects performed directly for us, but I
believe this can be offset, at least to the amount of our donation,
and perhaps by the further amount by which the other
Government contributions are increased by our donation. In any
case, if the project is a proper one and must be performed in this
manner, security dictates these circumstances and they, therefore,
do not present a legal obstacle as such.
6. We raised the question whether funds for the hospital
construction could not be obtained from other normal charitable
sources. It appeared that there was a strong possibility that the
individual concerned could raise adequate funds from private
resources, but it was the position of TSS that if this were the case
we would not obtain the commitment from the individual and the
degree of control which this project is designed to achieve.
[Lawrence R. Houston signature]
LAWRENCE R. HOUSTON
General Counsel
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 388 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 108 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 15 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-122- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
[deletion]
8 April 1955
MEMORANDUM FOR: Chief, DD/P/TSS
SUBJECT: Amendment to Subproject 35 of Project MKULTRA
We have noted your memorandum of 6 April 1955 to the
Director requesting an increase of $250,000 for the TSS R&D
budget for this Project. This request does not affect in any way
the comments in my memorandum of 21 December 1954.
[deletion]
General Counsel
[document ends]
-123- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
DRAFT
[deletion]
5 May 1955
A portion of the Research and Development Program of
TSS/Chemical Division is devoted to the discovery of the
following materials and methods:
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 389 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 109 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 16 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1. Substances which will promote illogical thinking and
impulsiveness to the point where the recipient would be
discredited in public.
2. Substances which increase the efficiency of mentation and
perception.
3. Materials which will prevent or counteract the intoxicating
effect of alcohol.
4. Materials which will promote the intoxicating effect of
alcohol.
5. Materials which will produce the signs and symptoms of
recognized diseases in a reversible way so that they may be used
for malingering, etc.
6. Materials which will render the induction of hypnosis
easier or otherwise enhance its usefulness.
7. Substances which will enhance the ability of individuals to
withstand privation, torture and coercion during interrogation
and so-called "brain-washing".
8. Materials and physical methods which will produce
amnesia for events preceding and during their use.
9. Physical methods of producing shock and confusion over
extended periods of time and capable of surreptitious use.
10. Substances which produce physical disablement such as
paralysis of the legs, acute anemia, etc.
-124- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
-2-
11. Substances which will produce "pure" euphoria with no
subsequent let-down.
12. Substances which alter personality structure in such a way
that the tendency of the recipient to become dependent upon
another person is enhanced.
13. A material which will cause mental confusion of such a
type that the individual under its influence will find it difficult to
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 390 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 110 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 17 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
maintain a fabrication under questioning.
14. Substances which will lower the ambition and general
working efficiency of men when administered in undetectable
amounts.
15. Substances which promote weakness or distortion of the
eyesight or hearing faculties, preferably without permanent
effects.
16. A knockout pill which can surreptitiously be administered
in drinks, food, cigarettes, as an aerosol, etc., which will be safe
to use, provide a maximum of amnesia, and be suitable for use
by agent types on an ad hoc basis.
17. A material which can be surreptitiously administered by
the above routes and which in very small amounts will make it
impossible for a man to perform any physical activity
whatsoever.
The development of materials of this type follows the
standard practice of such ethical drug houses as [deletion] It is a
relatively routine procedure to develop a drug to the point of
human testing. Ordinarily, the drug houses depend upon the
services of private physicians for the final clinical testing. The
physicians are willing to assume the responsibility of such tests
in order to advance the science of medicine. It is difficult and
sometimes impossible for TSS/CD to offer such an inducement
with respect to its products. In practice, it has been possible to
use outside cleared contractors for the preliminary phases of this
work. However, that part which involves human testing at
effective dose levels presents security problems which cannot be
handled by the ordinary contractor.
-125- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
-3-
The proposed facility [deletion] offers a unique opportunity
for the secure handling of such clinical testing in addition to the
many advantages outlined in the project proposal. The security
problems mentioned above are eliminated by the fact that the
responsibility for the testing will rest completely upon the
physician and the hospital. [one line deleted] will allow TSS/CD
personnel to supervise the work very closely to make sure that all
tests are conducted according to the recognized practices and
embody adequate safeguards.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 391 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 111 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 18 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document ends]
-126- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
10 May 1955
SUBPROJECT 35 OF PROJECT MKULTRA
1. Subproject 35 as approved by the DCI on 15 January 1955
contemplated a financial contribution of $125,000 to the
[deletion] to participate in the construction of a new research
wing to cost $3,000,000 exclusive of furnishings and equipment.
Agency funds will be transmitted through the [deletion] as cut-
out which will result in one-sixth of the space in the new
research wing being made available for Agency-sponsored
research involving covert biological and chemical techniques of
warfare.
2. At that time (15 January 1955) [deletion] with CIA
encouragement indicated a willingness to contribute $500,000 to
the construction fund. The building fund was to have been raised
as follows:
$1,000,000 - Contributed by [deletion]
250,000 - Donation from [deletion] of which $125,000 to be
supplied by CIA
1,250,000 - Matching funds under Public Law 221 equal to
the amount of the two above contributions
500,000 - [deletion]
_________________
$3,000,000 - TOTAL
4. The Agency's contribution would thus total $375,000. This
investment, together with the equal sum resulting from matched
funds, is fully justified in the opinion of TSS for reasons which
will be explained by [deletion] Chief, TSS, and Dr. Sidney
Gottlieb, Chief, TSS/Chemical Division. The scope of subproject
35 has not changed since the Director originally approved a
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 392 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 112 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 19 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
request by TSS for permission to spend $125,000 of available
[handwritten note:]
Resume of project circulated to members of [illegible] at meeting
on 11 May '55
-127- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion] funds for this purpose through the controls and
procedures established for MKULTRA. At the time subproject
35 was set up within the scope of the TSS R&D program,
security considerations and cover arrangements were carefully
reviewed, and the Office of General Counsel assisted in legal
determinations. With the exception of funding arrangements, no
changes to the program have since been made.
5. Funds to cover the previously approved sum of $125,000 are
available within the TSS [deletion] budget for FY 55 and have
been set aside. The TSS budget, however, lacks funds with
which to cover the supplemental sum of $250,000, and it is
requested that the TSS [deletion] budget be increased by this
amount. Supplementary funds available for subproject 35 can
definitely be obligated by the end of FY 55.
-2-
[document ends]
-128- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
AMENDMENT TO SUBPROJECT 35, PROJECT MKULTRA
For the Purpose of Establishing a Cover Organization for Highly
Sensitive Projects in the Field of Biological, Chemical and
Radiological Warfare
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 393 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 113 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 20 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
I. Background on Subproject 35.
In January 1955 approval was given by the DCI to Subproject 35
of Project MKULTRA. The documents which lead this approval
(including comments of the OGC) are attached herewith as Tabs
2, A and 3.
Project MKULTRA is the framework of procedures and controls
under which research projects in certain highly sensitive fields
are carried out by TSS. A description of the background of
Project MKULTRA may be found on page 1 of Tab A.
Subproject 35 establishes cover under which the Chemical
Division of DD/P/TSS would conduct certain sensitive projects
in the fields of biological and chemical warfare and consists of a
proposed arrangement whereby the Agency covertly contributes
funds to assist the [deletion] in the construction of a new research
wing. Contribution of these funds is to be made through the
[deletion] as cut-out so that the [deletion] would remain
unwitting of Agency participation in the building program.
Projects would later be carried out by the Chemical Division
using the facilities of the new research wing, and Agency
employees would be able to participate in the work without the
University or the Hospital authorities being aware of Agency
interest. Subproject 35 contemplated the contribution of Agency
funds to assist in the construction of facilities. Future research
work would be carried out through the [deletion] as cut-out and
would be separately funded under existing procedures and
controls.
[deletion] and the background of [deletion] are described on page
2 of Tab A. On the same page there will be found a further
description of the [deletion]
II. Building Fund
The University will require $3,000,000 for the six-story addition
to the hospital exclusive of the cost of land, heating and power
supply which are being provided by the University. Under Public
Law 221, Subappropriation
-129- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
663, dated 26 August 1954, funds are available to match funds
raised for this purpose by the University.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 394 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 114 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 21 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
When Subproject 35 was first prepared, it was hoped and
expected that the funds required would be provided as follows:
The University has allocated $1,000,000 to this project and will
assume upkeep and staffing obligations. [deletion] agreed that if
the Agency would provide [deletion] with a grant of $125,000,
the Fund would match this amount and make a total donation of
$250,000 to the University Building Fund. At that time,
discussions with [one line deleted] indicated that [deletion]
would contribute $500,000 to the building project on the basis
that radiological research would be conducted in the new wing
and that the construction of the new facilities was of interest to
that Agency. In summary, the financial situation was to have
been as follows:
$1,000,000 - [deletion]
250,000 - Donation from [deletion] (of which $125,000 was
supplied by CIA)
1,250,000 - Matched Funds under Public Law 221
500,000 - [deletion]
_________________
$3,000,000 - TOTAL
It was recognized that the Federal contributions of $1,250,000
under Public Law 221 would be seemingly inflated by reason of
the inclusion of the CIA contribution in that of [deletion] It was
felt that the value to the Agency was such that this inflation of
the Federal contribution was more than justified by the
importance of the over-all project and that furthermore, the
inclusion of the CIA contribution in that of [deletion] was the
best means of maintaining security.
III. [deletion]
The original informal commitment on the part of [deletion] was
first obtained through verbal discussions with [deletion] which
were followed up by an exchange of correspondence between the
DCI and [deletion] Unfortunately at that time [deletion] was fully
occupied with the controversy concerning the [deletion] and
continued contact with [deletion] subordinates resulted in a
decision that [deletion] could not or would not contribute to the
Building Fund, but would be willing to support an annual
research program amounting to $50,000 to $75,000. It is not
-130- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 395 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 115 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 22 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
known whether this change in policy was suggested to [deletion]
or whether it originated with him. Be that as it may, when the
change in policy became apparent, it was evident that additional
funds would be required to complete the hospital construction.
IV. Suggested Funding.
It is now suggested that the $3,000,000 required for the hospital
wing be provided as follows:
$1,000,000 - [deletion]
500,000 - Donation from [deletion] (including $375,000
supplied by CIA)
1,500,000 - Matched Funds from Public Law 221
_________
$3,000,000 - TOTAL
The donation from [deletion] would thus consist of the original
$125,000 to be supplied by CIA plus the sum of $125,000 to be
provided by the Fund and a supplemental CIA contributions of
$250,000. Originally Subproject 35 requested permission to
make a contribution of $125,000 to the building fund and
approval was given. This approval is enclosed herewith as Tab 2.
The purpose of this amendment to Subproject 35 is to request
permission to contribute an additional $250,000 to the building
construction fund through [deletion] It should be noted that the
total Government contribution to the hospital fund still remains
unchanged at $1,875,000. The increase in the size of the
contribution by the Fund is not out of keeping with other
operations of [deletion] and will not arouse undue comment
because of its magnitude. The originally approved contribution
has not as yet been transmitted to [deletion] and neither the
original contributions nor the supplement would be paid to
[deletion] until funds adequate to complete the project are made
available. This condition was specified by the DCI in approving
the original contribution.
V. Source of CIA Funds.
Funds to cover the initially approved sum of $125,000 are
available and have been segregated for this purpose within the
TSS FY 1955 Budget for Research and Development.
Insufficient funds remain in the TSS budget to cover the
supplementary sum of $250,000, and it is therefore requested
that the TSS budget be increased by this amount and that the
increase be made available to Subproject 35 of Project
MKULTRA.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 396 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 116 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 23 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-3-
-131- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
VI. Comments by the Office of General Counsel.
Tab 3 is a memorandum from the General Counsel to the DCI
dated 21 December 1954, commenting on Subproject 35, and
stating in part that there are no fundamental legal objections if
the probable benefits are considered a fair return for this
expenditure. The amendment to the Subproject contemplates
only an increase in funds and in no way changes any other aspect
of the project. The project has been referred back to the OGC
even though no change in its structure is contemplated, and Tab
4 contains his comments.
VII. Justification.
The advantages and benefits accruing to the Agency outlined in
Tab A are felt by TSS to provide adequate and complete
justification for the expenditure of the additional sum herein
requested which brings the total CIA contribution to $375,000.
The most important of these advantages and benefits may be
summarized as follows: (Fuller explanations may be found in
Tab A).
a. One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will
be available to the Chemical Division of TSS, thereby providing
laboratory and office space, technical assistants, equipment and
experimental animals.
b. Agency sponsorship of sensitive research projects will be
completely deniable.
c. Full professional cover will be provided for up to three
biochemical employees of the Chemical Division.
d. Human patients and volunteers for experimental use will be
available under controlled clinical conditions within the full
supervision of [deletion]
Subproject 35 was originally conceived in October and
November of 1954, and the ensuing six months have indicated
that increasing emphasis and importance are being placed on the
Chemical Division's work in this field. The facilities of the
hospital and the ability to conduct controlled experiments under
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 397 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 117 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 24 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
safe clinical conditions using materials with which any Agency
connection must be completely deniable will augment and
complement other programs recently taken over by TSS, such as
[deletion]
-4-
-132- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion]
It was originally thought that at least 18 months would elapse
after the building funds had been raised before the facilities
would be finished and could be occupied by TSS. This lengthy
delay has now been overcome. When [one line deleted] has
raised the $500,000 which his Fund will ostensibly contribute, he
will then be allowed to use existing space in the present hospital
in order that he may build up the organization which will later
occupy the new wing. This means that TSS will be able to begin
to take advantage of this cover situation within a matter of
months instead of waiting for a year and a half.
VIII. Security.
Security matters and details are being co-ordinated with the TSS
Liaison and Security Officer. Security of transmittal of the funds
and cover arrangements are described in Tab A and remain
unchanged.
IX. Agreement with [deletion]
The agreement with [deletion] is described in Tab A, and the
extent of his co-operation and the control over his actions
remains unchanged.
X. Resultant Financial Saving.
The total contribution of $375,000 by CIA will result in an
additional $375,000 in matching funds provided under Public
Law 221. It is felt that the expenditure of these total funds is
justified by the importance of the programs which will be
pursued at the new facility. Even though the CIA contribution is
increased under this amended project, the total of Federal funds
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 398 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 118 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 25 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
remains unchanged. The use of this facility will allow work to
proceed under conditions of cover and security which would be
impossible to obtain elsewhere without an expenditure of
equivalent or greater funds. In addition, by funding individual
projects for this facility through the [deletion] no charge will be
incurred for overhead expense. If research projects [deletion] are
openly sponsored by the U.S. Government, it is customary to pay
an overhead rate equivalent to 80% of salaries. However, if a
non-profit fund, such as [deletion] sponsors research, the funds
granted for the work are customarily used only to pay for
salaries, equipment and supplies, but not overhead. The Agency
thus buys considerably more research through [deletion] than
would be the case if no cut-out were used.
-5-
[document ends]
-133- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
MEMORANDUM FOR: [illegible]
Herewith the file on MKULTRA, Sub-project 35, with our
comments on the legal aspects. While there is no legal control
and there are certain incidental considerations, there is no
fundamental legal objection if the probable benefits are
considered a fair return for this expenditure.
[deletion]
General Counsel
22 December 1954
(DATE)
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 399 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 119 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 26 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-134- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
[deletion]
Tab A
SUBPROJECT 35 - PROJECT MKULTRA
For the purpose of establishing a cover organization for highly
sensitive projects in the field of covert Biological, Chemical and
Radiological Warfare
____________________________________
I. Background of Project MKULTRA.
In 1953 the DCI approved Project MKULTRA which established
procedures and controls under which research projects in certain
highly sensitive fields could be carried out by TSS without the
necessity of signing the usual contracts. The approved
procedures apply [deletion] over-all Research and Development
budget, and no additional funds are required. Controls
established in the Project Review Committee approval of the
Research and Development program (other than the signing of a
contract) remain unchanged, and special provisions for audit are
included. All files are retained by TSS.
These procedures and controls were approved since it is highly
undesirable from a policy and security point of view that
contracts be signed indicating Agency or Government interest in
this field of endeavor. In a great many instances the work must
be conducted by individuals who are not and should not be aware
of Agency interest. In other cases the individuals involved are
unwilling to have their names on a contract which remains out of
their control in our files. Experience has shown that qualified,
competent individuals in the field of physiological, psychiatric
and other biological sciences are very reluctant to enter into
signed agreements of any sort which would connect them with
this activity since such connection might seriously jeopardize
their professional reputations.
When Project MKULTRA was approved, it was not
contemplated that it would be used for the establishment of
cover. Over forty individual research and development projects
have been established under this framework and have been
carried out extremely successfully, both from technical and
administrative points of view. The experience gained in handling
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 400 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 120 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 27 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
these projects has emphasized that establishment of better cover
both for the projects and for associated Agency scientists is of
utmost importance. Subproject 35 would establish such cover.
-135- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
II. Background of the [deletion]
The [deletion] was incorporated in [deletion]. It has a Board of
Directors of six members, one of whom is [deletion] who acts as
Executive Director of the Fund. [deletion] it has solicited funds
from various individuals to finance a program of basic research
in the chemotherapy of cancer, asthma, hypertension,
psychosomatic disorders and other chronic diseases. Since 1951
[deletion] has co-operated with the Chemical Division of TSS
and acted smoothly and efficiently, both as a cut-out for dealing
with contractors in the fields of covert chemical and biological
warfare, and as a prime contractor for certain areas of biological
research. Projects presently being handled for the Agency by the
Fund are administered under the controls and procedures
previously approved for MKULTRA.
III. Background of [deletion]
[deletion] is internationally known as a [deletion] in the field of
[deletion] research and is [one line deleted] In the past he has
been associated in a research capacity with both the [deletion]
During the war [deletion] served as a [deletion] in the Bureau of
Medicine and Surgery in the Navy. Since then he has maintained
a consulting relationship to the Navy medical research program,
[deletion] is TOP SECRET cleared and witting of Agency
sponsorship of the programs carried out by the Fund as are two
other members of the Fund's Board of Directors.
IV. [deletion] Fund.
[one line deleted] has been actively engaged in a campaign to
raise funds for the purpose of erecting a new clinical research
wing on the existing [deletion] The research wing will consist of
a building six stories high, 320 feet long and 50 feet wide. Two-
thirds of the space will be research laboratories and offices while
100 research beds will occupy the remainder. [deletion]
participation in the fund-raising campaign outlined below will
result in his having control of one-sixth of the total space in
addition to the base-
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 401 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 121 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 28 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-2-
-136- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion]
ment and general out-patient facilities. In this effort, [deletion]
has secured the enthusiastic support of the medical faculty and
the officers of the University who have carried the preliminary
arrangements forward to the maximum extent of their resources.
V. Financial Situation.
The University will require about $3,000,000 for the [deletion]
story addition. This sum is exclusive of the cost of land and the
heating and power supply, which are already available at the site.
At the present time under Public Law 221, funds are available to
match funds raised by the University. The University has
allocated $1,000,000 to this project and will assume upkeep and
staffing obligations. [deletion] has agreed that if CIA will
provide [deletion] a grant of $125,000, [deletion] will match this
amount and make a total donation of $250,000 to the University
Building Fund. This Agency's contribution will be made under
the condition that it will be refunded if construction does not take
place.
TSS has discussed this situation with [one line deleted] and has
encouraged [deletion] to donate $500,000 to the building project
on the basis that [deletion] will be conducted in the new wing.
[deletion] though aware of our interest in the building, is
unwitting of our specific fields of research and individual
projects. In summary, the financial situation would be as follows:
$1,000,000 - [deletion]
250,000 - Donation from [deletion] ($125,000 supplied by
CIA)
1,250,000 - Matched funds from Public Law 221
500,000 - [deletion]
__________
$3,000,000 - TOTAL
Although it is recognized that the Federal contribution of
$1,250,000 under P. L. 221 is seemingly inflated by reason of the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 402 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 122 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 29 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
inclusion of the CIA contribution in that of [deletion] actually the
value to the CIA is $250,000 and not just $125,000, the amount
of CIA's contribution; furthermore the inclusion of the CIA
contribution in that of [deletion] is the best method of
maintaining security.
-3-
-137- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion]
VI. Difficulties Faced by TSS.
It has been generally recognized for some time that the external
research activities of the Chemical Division of TSS in the field of
covert biological, chemical and radiological warfare are sorely in
need of proper cover. Although Project MKULTRA provides
excellent administrative and financial cover for projects, it does
not afford cover for scientific or technical personnel.
MKULTRA has been used for dealing through [deletion] as a
cut-out and for working directly with individuals or private
companies. The use of [deletion] in the future will be
increasingly limited due to
(a) The increasing number of people who, albeit properly
cleared, are aware of the Agency connection with [deletion]
(b) The feeling by [deletion] that the Agency employees
contacting him (Drs. Gottlieb, [deletion], etc.) have no cover of
any sort and consequently expose him to unnecessary and highly
undesirable personal risk; and
(c) The widespread intra-Agency awareness of the nature of
the relationship between the Fund and the Agency.
Another serious problem faced by TSS/CD as a result of lack of
suitable cover is the difficulty in planning careers for technical
and scientific personnel in the biological field. A long-range
career concept of activities in this field inevitably includes proper
cover for the individual concerned. The availability of research
facilities at [deletion] will offer an excellent opportunity to solve
many of the above problems, and [deletion] is willing and able to
make any reasonable arrangements to suit our needs. Up to three
Chemical Division employees can be integrated into [deletion]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 403 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 123 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 30 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
program for work in the new hospital wing on the Agency's
research projects. Although career planning was not a
consideration when planning the procedures and controls
established by Project MKULTRA, nevertheless this particular
subproject, in addition to its primary objective, will be of very
great secondary help
-4-
-138- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion]
in simplifying and eliminating many of the very awkward and
dangerous conditions facing certain Chemical Division
employees.
VII. Advantages and Benefits Accruing to TSS.
The contemplated arrangements will result in many advantages
and benefits, including the following:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new research wing is to
be available to [deletion] and in turn, will be available to the
Chemical Division of TSS. This will provide laboratory and
office space, technical assistants, equipment and experimental
animals for use of Chemical Division personnel in connection
with specific future projects.
(b) The cost of Chemical Division projects which are to be
carried out under this cover will be covered by funds made
available through Project MKULTRA, and projects will be
subject to the procedures and controls established for
MKULTRA. The funds will be passed through [deletion] as has
been done in the past. [deletion] in turn will either pay expenses
directly or transfer the money to the University for this purpose.
Each project will be individually funded based on its particular
budget, and there will be no other continuing or recurring
charges for items such as space, facilities, etc.
(c) The Agency's sponsorship of sensitive research projects
would be completely deniable since no connections would exist
between the University and the Agency.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 404 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 124 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 31 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
(d) Excellent professional cover would be provided for up to
three bio-chemical employees of the Chemical Division of TSS.
This would allow open attendance of scientific meetings, the
advancement of personal standing in the scientific world. and as
such, would constitute a major efficiency and
-5-
-139- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
morale booster.
(e) Human patients and volunteers for experiment use will be
available under excellent clinical conditions with the full
supervision of [one line deleted]
(f) There would be available the equivalent of a hospital
safehouse.
(g) It is expected that the output of useful results of the
Chemical Division in the bio-chemical field will be greatly
improved through the more efficient use of technical personnel
who would be able to spend more of their time on actual
laboratory work.
(h) [one and a half lines deleted]
(i) Excellent facilities would be provided for recruiting new
scientific personnel since members of the Chemical Division
working under this cover will be in daily contact with members
of the Graduate School of the University.
(j) The regular University library and reprint service will be
available as a source of technical information.
VIII. Funding.
It is proposed that $125,000 be granted to [deletion]. If approval
is granted, TSS will arrange for payment to be made under the
procedures and controls of MKULTRA. These funds would
come out of the presently approved TSS Research and
Development budget for FY 1955 and no new funds are
involved. The funds would be transferred as a grant to [deletion]
In turn [deletion] will match these funds with an equal amount
and donate a total of $250,000 to the University as outlined in
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 405 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 125 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 32 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
paragraph V. The sum of $125,000 would be entirely in the
nature of a grant and would in due
-6-
-140- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
course be merged with the entire $3,000,000 raised for the
construction of the wing. The Agency would retain no residual
interest in the building or title to any equipment or facilities
purchased with this money.
This single grant will constitute the Agency's entire participation
in the new hospital wing, and there will be no recurring
obligations in the form of annual support of the hospital or
additional grants. Transmission of Agency funds to [deletion]
will be made through previously established cover channels set
up by the [deletion] for similar transmittals in the past. The
donation on [deletion]s books will be shown as having been
received from [deletion].
In the future when TSS sponsors sensitive research projects
which are to be carried out in [deletion] each project will be
individually financed through [deletion] as it has been in the past
in accordance with previously established procedures and
controls using allotted portions of the annual Research and
Development budget. The University will be totally unwitting of
Agency sponsorship, and the projects to every outward
appearance will be sponsored by [deletion].
In the event of [deletion] death, [deletion] will continue in being
and any activities under this project will be continued through
[deletion] and will be unaffected by his death.
IX. Memorandum of Agreement.
A memorandum of agreement will be signed with [deletion]
outlining to the greater extent possible the arrangements under
which the hospital space under his control will be made available
to Chemical Division personnel and the manner in which cover
will be provided and other benefits obtained. No contract will be
signed since [deletion] would be unable to reflect any of the
Agency's contractual terms in his arrangements with the
University when [deletion] makes the donation in question. The
memorandum of agreement will be retained in TSS.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 406 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 126 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 33 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
X. Security.
All security matters and details are being co-ordinated with the
TSS/Liaison and Security Office.
-7-
-141- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion]
XI. Resultant Financial Saving.
The $125,000 to be contributed by CIA plus the $125,000 in
matching funds provided under P. L. 221 to the Building Fund
will be more than offset in a few years by the savings which will
result from use of this non-profit fund. If a research project at
[deletion] or other educational non-profit institution is sponsored
by the U.S. Government, it is customary for the Government to
pay for salaries, equipment, supplies, etc. and for overhead as
well. In the case of [deletion] the overhead amounts to 80% of
salaries. However, if a non-profit foundation such as [deletion]
sponsors research at a non-profit institution, the funds granted for
the work are customarily used to pay for salaries, equipment and
supplies but not for overhead. The Government dollar thus buys
considerably more research through [deletion] than would be the
case if no cut-out were used.
XII. Legal Matters.
This matter has been discussed with [deletion] of the Office of
General Counsel, and he is fully aware of all details surrounding
this grant.
-8-
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 407 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 127 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 34 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-142- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
9 April 1958
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Trip Report, Visit to [deletion]
7 April 1958
1. The purpose of this trip was to make arrangements for
closing out the [deletion] project. [deletion] had been given
ample previous notice that such was likely to be the intent of the
visit, and he prepared himself accordingly.
2. It was explained to [deletion] that it would not be possible
to carry over funds beyond the end of the current fiscal year.
Therefore all work would have to be completed and all payments
made prior to 30 June. This deadline approved acceptable to him,
and it was agreed that I would make my final visit there to
receive reports and attend to final details on 16 June. [deletion]
did not have a current financial report, but he estimated that
funds currently on hand would be about sufficient for remaining
expenditures. He agreed to send the Society within the next 10
days a more exact statement of current balance and estimated
remaining expenditures. I tried to impress on him strongly that
transfer of additional funds and/or return of unexpended funds
must be completed well before the end of the fiscal year.
3. Of the 30 cases called for in the original design 18 have
been completed (but only 4 have been transcribed from the
tapes). In addition there are 8 cases in progress (of which two are
already in interview and 6 are worked up to the point of having
the lists of questions prepared). It was agreed that to meet the
deadline we would have to limit the design to these 26 cases.
4. It is apparent that [deletion] is so involved in the
administrative problems of the project that he is not paying any
attention to the results. Since to date only 4 cases have been
transcribed there is no way of telling what is coming out of it. I
assume there were no dramatic reactions, because the
interviewers would have let him know about them had they
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 408 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 128 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 35 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
emerged. It is possible, however, that our own analysis of the
data may dredge up something of value, although I am dubious
on this point.
5. [deletion] gave me his usual long involved talk on the
difficulties he had encountered which account for the delays. He
also talked at some
-143- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
length about his "experiments" with hypnosis, some aspects of
which are mildly hair-raising. Finally he made quite a pitch for
continuing some such project as this next year, "with realistic,
specific deadlines." I told him we would discuss possibilities
after the present project was completed and we had a chance to
closely examine the take.
[deletion]
Distribution:
1 [deletion]
[document ends]
-144- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
[deletion]
July 18, 1958
[deletion]
Dear Mr. [deletion]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 409 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 129 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 36 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The experiment designed to test the effectiveness of certain
medication in causing individuals to release guarded information
has been completed in accordance with the original experimental
design, with the exception that 25 instead of 30 cases were used.
This matter was discussed in more detail in my letter of July 15.
Abstracts on all 25 cases, transcriptions of the interviews,
Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Tests given at the hospital and
previously given at this clinic, post-experimental rankings and
evaluation sheets, and a schedule covering the drug
administration have all been submitted to you under separate
cover.
Enclosed is a financial statement which represents the final
accounting of the funds allocated by you for use in this project.
If, for your purpose, you require a more detailed summary of
what specific professional services were performed or more
detail with reference to travel expenses or any other item, kindly
let me know.
You will note, in this connection, that Dr. [deletion] was
compensated in an amount exceeding that paid to Dr. [deletion]
This was occasioned by the fact that Dr. [deletion] spent much
time checking the files and records at the [deletion] and
[deletion] Prison selecting cases that might be suitable for our
purpose. It was from the cases selected by him that the subjects
used in the experiment were finally chosen.
I have been instructed to write a check to the Society for the
balance in the account as of today. I would like to
-145- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
Mr. [deletion] Page Two July 18, 1958
delay this matter for a few days. Several checks have been
written during recent days, and I would like to be sure they
cleared the bank in [deletion] before closing out the account. You
will receive a check in the amount of $1356.26 early next week.
If there is any additional information required, I will be happy
to cooperate.
[signature deleted]
Executive Director
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 410 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 130 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 37 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[deletion]
Enc.
[document ends]
-146- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
RESEARCH PLAN
LOCATION
The research Project will be carried out at the [deletion]
located at [deletion] which is located [deletion]. The hospital has
one thousand, one hundred and thirty-five (1,135) beds. At the
present time there are one hundred forty-two (142) non-
psychotics classified as criminal-sexual psychopaths. There are
four full-time psychiatrists and varying numbers of medical
interns; two psychologists; four social workers; nurses and
attendants. The superintendent of the Hospital is [deletion], a
witting member of the research team. The institution comes
under the direction of the Executive Secretary of the State
Department of Mental Health and any research project is
normally approved by the Co-ordinator of Research of the State
Department of Mental Health. [deletion] will secure this
approval. [deletion] will make space available and it is possible
for the research team to sleep at the Hospital while carrying out
their investigation.
SUBJECTS
The subjects will be selected from the one hundred and forty-
two (142) criminal-sexual psychopaths on whom there is an
adequate previous investigation including police reports,
physical, psychiatric and psychologic organizations and social
histories. The age range of the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 411 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 131 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 38 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-147- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
subjects varies from twenty to seventy years and there is a wide
variation of intelligence levels and social backgrounds.
INVESTIGATIONS
The following men are suggested for the research team:
[one line deleted], a psychologist who has had extensive
experience in examining criminals; has written extensively on
psychopathic sexual deviations; is an authority on polygraph and
interrogation methods.
[one line deleted] for some thirty years, a psychiatrist who has
spent his life in the treatment of the criminal insane and
rethinking the only institution [deletion] for the care and
treatment for the criminal-sexual psychopath.
[deletion] a psychiatrist who has a large private practice. At the
present time he is exclusively devoting his time to
psychoanalysis. He has had extensive experience examining
criminals. As a Navy psychiatrist he has had extensive
experience in [one line deleted] in the field of eastern cultures,
Oriental psychiatry, brainwashing, etc. He has also done drug
interrogation with criminals and has engaged in narcoanalysis
and hypnoanalysis.
-2-
-148- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[deletion] a psychiatrist who is on the staff of [one line deleted]
and maintains a private practice in the field of psychiatry.
[deletion] has had wide experience in dealing with criminals
going back some twenty-five years, including drug interrogation.
[deletion] a physician for the past twenty-five years, has been
[one line deleted] has had extensive experience dealing with all
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 412 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 132 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 39 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
sorts of criminals and has engaged in drug interrogation. Besides
his city position, he also maintains a private practice in the field
of general medicine.
[deletion] has suggested one of the psychiatrists from his staff
who is interested and has used drugs in the treatment of patients
and has also used hypnosis with mental patients. The research
assistants have not been selected as yet but might well include
psychologists or medics now attached to [deletion]. The secretary
will be [deletion] present secretary who will do all the necessary
stenographic work in addition to her present duties.
EXPERIMENTAL BASICS:
Three teams of two senior professional men each will be
selected. One team working with the selected group of patients
will use straight interrogation, hypnosis and hypnosis and LSD
and hypnosis and a
-3-
-149- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
tetrahydrocannabinol acetate derivative. Another team working
on another group of subjects will use straight interrogation, LSD
with interrogation and a tetrahydrocannabinol acetate derivative
and interrogation. Later the third team with another group of
subjects will use straight interrogation and a combination of LSD
and a tetrahydrocannabinol acetate derivative.
A meeting of all the members of the research project will be
briefed on the drugs to be used and all of the pharmacological
and medical knowledge gained so far in the use of these drugs.
In selecting groups of subjects for experimentation, the
following objectives will be sought:
1) Subjects will be selected who have denied allegations of
various kinds that can be chocked or strongly assumed on the
basis of previously established records.
2) As far as possible, the actual research man administering
drugs will note aware of the drug he is administering and
placebos will be interspersed with drug administration.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 413 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 133 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 40 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3) Precautions will be taken to neutralize age, intelligence,
physical condition, social background and any other controllable
factor in selecting groups. Administration of drugs will be done
both openly and surreptitiously.
4) Sound recordings will be made of the interrogation and
written reports will be obtained in other cases.
-4-
-150- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
5) Due care will be exercised in equating methods of
interrogation as far as this can be done. The results of
interrogation with drugs and other techniques will be checked
against existing records and qualitative and quantitative reports
will be kept and reports will be submitted on the basis of interim
progress and complete projects.
-5-
[document ends]
-151- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
DRAFT/[deletion]
30 January 1961
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 42
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 414 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 134 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 41 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1. Subproject 42 is to be continued for the same purpose as
when originally established: to support [deletion] covert and
realistic field trials of certain research and development items of
interest to TSD, and to maintain the physical facilities required
for these trials.
2. In the past year a number of covert and realistic field trials
have been successfully carried out. The results of these
experiments have provided factual data essential to establishing
protocols for a number of contemplated operations. A
continuation of covert and realistic field trials are necessitated by
the production of new materials in TSD programs, particularly in
areas requiring detailed knowledge of the effectiveness and
efficiency of delivery systems. Additional trials are also
necessitated by the need for better controlled "field-type"
experiments.
3. The estimated cost of the project is $5,000,000 for a period
of six months. Charges should be made against Allotment 1125-
1390-3902.
4. Accounting for funds and equipment under this subproject
has been established on a detailed basis with the auditor and will
continue as in the past.
-152- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
5. [deletion] is approved for TOP SECRET by the Agency
and operates under cover for purposes of this subproject.
[signature deleted]
TSD/Research Branch
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Date:
Distribution:
Original only.
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 415 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 135 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 42 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-153- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
24 January 1955
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 42
Subproject 42 is being established to provide for the
continued support of the [deletion] facilities, and as such, is a
continuation of Subproject 16. Under Subproject 42, it is
intended that the [deletion] facilities be moved from [deletion] to
[deletion] These facilities, in the new location, will continue to
provide a means for the realistic testing of certain R and D items
of interest to CD/TSS and APD/TSS.
2. Subproject 42 will be conducted by Mr. [deletion] a
seaman. Certain support activation will be provided by CD/TSS
and AFD/TSS.
3. The estimated cost for a period of one year is $8,300.00,
starting 1 March 1955.
[signature: Robert Lashbrook for]
SIDNEY GOTTLIEB
Chief
TSS/Chemical Division
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 27 Jan 1955
APPROVED FOR ADDITIONAL OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
($2,089.34)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 416 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 136 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 43 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[signature deleted]
[deletion] Research Director
Date: June 27 1956
Original Only.
[document ends]
-154- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
21 March 1955
[deletion]
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 45
1. The scope of this project is intended to encompass all those
activities now engaged in by the [deletion], in its own facilities
under the direction of TSS, Chemical Division. These activities
will take the form of three lines of biochemical investigation;
namely, the curare-like effect of certain thiols, the preparation of
hydrogenated quinolines and indole alkaloids, and the continued
study of diphenolic compounds. In addition to the above
investigations, the present biological testing and assaying
techniques will be elaborated and broadened to include
cardiovascular and anticarcinogenic effects of compounds
resulting from the above programs.
2. The attached proposal from [deletion] indicates the extent
of the investigations that his facilities will allow him to carry out
on the materials developed in the three lines of research referred
to in paragraph 1, as well as certain other materials of interest to
TSS/CD. [deletion] also serves as a general consultant to this
Division and provides cover and cut-out facilities to the Agency.
3. The total cost of this project for a period of one year will
not exceed $100,000.00 At the present time, the sum of
$40,000.00 is being committed, the balance of the total to be
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 417 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 137 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 44 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
committed at a later date.
4. [deletion] has been granted a TOP SECRET clearance by
the Agency, and is fully capable of protecting the security of the
Government's interest in this matter.
[signature deleted]
TSS, Chemical Division
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 24 Mar 55
APPROVED:
[signature deleted]
Chief TSS/Chemical Division
APPROVED FOR ADDITIONAL APPROPRIATION OF
$27,000:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: Jun 2 1955
Attachments:
Proposal
Original Only.
[document ends]
-155- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
30 January 1956
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 418 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 138 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 45 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORDS
SUBJECT: Project MKULTRA, Subproject 43
1. The scope of this project is intended to encompass all those
activities now engaged in by the [deletion] under the direction of
TSS/CD. These activities take the form of three lines of
biochemical investigation, namely, the Curare-like effect of
certain this, the preparation of hydrogenated quinolines and
indole alkaloids and a program of investigation of toxic cerebral
states. This last investigation will include bio-assay and chemical
analysis of various body fluids of animals in which cerebral
toxemias have been produced. It is the aim of this program to
endeavor to understand the mechanism of such states as toxic
delirium, uremic coma, and cerebral toxicity from poisoning. In
order to continue the established "cover" activities of the
[deletion] and to make available a pool of subjects for testing
purposes, the [deletion] and [deletion] effects of compounds
resulting from the above program will be evaluated.
2. The attached proposal from [deletion] indicates the extent
of the investigations that his facilities will allow him to carry out
on the materials developed in the three lines of research referred
to in paragraph one, as well as certain other materials of interest
to TSS/CD. [deletion] also serves as a general consultant to this
Division and provides cover and cut-out facilities to the Agency.
3. The total cost of this project for a period of one year will
not exceed $100,000. Charges should be made against Allotment
6-2502-10-001.
4. [deletion] has been requested to submit a summary
accounting or a copy of the [deletion] annual audit report be
made available for the sponsor's inspection. Also, it has been
requested that any unexpended funds shall be returned to the
Agency.
5. Title to any permanent equipment purchased by funds
granted [deletion] shall be retained by the [deletion] in lieu of
higher overhead rates.
* other than its activities as a cut-out
-156- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
6. It was mutually agreed that documentation and accounting
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 419 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 139 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 46 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
for travel expenses which are normally reimbursable by the
[deletion] shall conform with the accepted practices of the
[deletion]
7. [deletion] agreed to comply with the requirements of the
Memorandum of Agreement.
[signature deleted]
TSS/Chemical Division
APPROVED:
[Sidney Gottlieb signature]
Chief, TSS Chemical Division
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date: 2 Feb 1956
Attachment:
Proposal
Distribution:
Original Only
[document ends]
-157- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
1960
The research to be undertaken during the twelve month period
for which financial support is requested will be devoted to the
continued analysis of the neural and endocrine mechanism of
stress and the chemical agents that influence it. The screening
procedures are based largely upon a further analysis of phases of
stress and the influences of this physiologic behavior complex
upon both body and skin temperatures as detailed in the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 420 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 140 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 47 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
accompanying report.
The chemical synthesis of new compounds will be continued
at the [deletion] under the supervision of [deletion] and at the
[deletion] under the supervision of [deletion] These chemical
agents will be screened for their capacity to provoke stress or to
suppress the stress reaction in its acute or chronic phases. Animal
testing will include pharmacologic screening and proper toxicity
studies of these compounds as heretofore.
Chemical agents that have been found active and within a
suitable toxicity range will be subjected to clinical screening on
appropriate patients, the initial screening being carried out on
advanced cancer patients. The amount of money devoted to
chemical synthesis, however, has been further reduced. Chemical
compounds available from biologic sources as well as those
synthesized in the project will be screened, particularly those that
are active in either raising or lowering body temperature.
As heretofore any agents which prove to be of interest
[deletion] both on transplant
-158- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
Page 2
animal tumors and on cancer patients. This cancer phase of the
project will be considered a by-product of the major objective,
which will be directed to the problem of stress.
[document ends]
-159- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 421 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 141 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 48 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
SUBJECT: Continuation of MKULTRA, Subproject No. 45
1. The scope of this subproject includes all those activities
now engaged in by [deletion], under the direction of TSD/RB
with the exception of those cutout functions specifically
mentioned in connection with other MKULTRA subprojects. In
general, the research effort under this subproject will continue
along the lines laid down in previous years. These involve the
synthesis and pharmacological and clinical evaluation of
compounds of those chemical families known to have application
in the psychochemical and "K" fields. During the past year
important progress has been made in the area related to stressor
compounds and the relationship of these materials to the
physiological pathways through which both stress and the
reaction to it are mediated in human beings. As indicated in the
attached proposal, the work of the past year has progressed to the
point where more definitive experiments on the stress reaction
can be carried out. Primarily this was brought about by the
characterization of several new materials which produce stress
reaction in humans and the application of some new clinical
methods of measuring the extent of the disturbance produced.
During the next year proportionally more effort will be expended
on the problem of the development of new
-160- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
"knock-out" types of agents since progress has been slower than
is desirable in this direction and because a new approach to the
problem has been worked out.
2. [deletion] also serves as a general consultant to the Agency,
provides services of a sensitive nature on an ad hoc basis, and
serves as a cut-out in procurement problems.
3. The total cost of this project for a period of one year will
not exceed $71,500.00 [handwritten note above: 40,000.00].
Charges should be made against Allotment 0525-1009-4902.
4 [deletion] has been requested to submit a summary
accounting or a copy of the Fund's annual audit report for the
sponsor's inspection. Also, it has been requested that any
unexpended funds shall be returned to the Agency.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 422 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 142 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 49 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
5. Title to any permanent equipment purchased by funds
granted [deletion] shall be retained by [deletion], in lieu of higher
overhead rates.
6. It was mutually agreed that documentation and accounting
for travel expenses which are normally reimbursable by
[deletion] shall conform with the accepted practices of the Fund.
[document ends]
-161- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD
SUBJECT: Continuation of MKULTRA, Subproject No. 45
1. The scope of this subproject includes all those activities
now engaged in by [deletion] under the direction of TSD/RB
with the exception of those cutout functions specifically
mentioned in connection with other MKULTRA subprojects. In
general, the research effort under this subproject will continue
along the lines laid down in previous years. These involve the
synthesis and pharmacological and clinical evaluation of
compounds of those chemical families known to have application
in the psychochemical and "K" fields. During the coming year it
is planned to concentrate more directly on the more practical
aspects of the "knockout" problem. Enough new potent
substances have become available lately to make such a change
in emphasis worthwhile. In connection with this change it should
be noted that certain findings made in [deletion] project at
[deletion] which cannot be further exploited at that facility will
be pursued at [deletion] in the future. For this reason it may be
necessary to supplement the findings of this subproject from time
to time during the year due to increases of scope.
2. [deletion] also serves as a general consultant to the Agency,
provides services of a sensitive nature on an ad hoc basis, and
serves as a cutout in procurement problems.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 423 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 143 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 50 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-162- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
3. The total cost of this project for a period of one year will
not exceed $40,000. Charges should be made against Allotment
2125-1390-3902.
4. [deletion] has been requested to submit a summary
accounting or a copy of the Fund's annual audit report for the
sponsor's inspection. Also, it has been requested that any
unexpended funds shall be returned to the Agency.
5. Title to any permanent equipment purchased by funds
granted [deletion] shall be retained by [deletion] in lieu of higher
overhead rates.
6. It was mutually agreed that documentation and accounting
for travel expenses which are normally reimbursable by
[deletion] shall conform with the accepted practices of the Fund.
[signature deleted]
Chief
TSD/Research Branch
APPROVED FOR OBLIGATION OF FUNDS:
[signature deleted]
Research Director
Date [illegible]
Attachment: Proposal and Budget
Distribution: Original only
[document ends]
-163- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 424 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 144 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 51 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[document begins]
DRAFT
24 January 1964
MEMORANDUM FOR: THE RECORD
SUBJECT: MKULTRA, Subproject 149
1. This subproject is being established for the purpose of
supporting realistic tests of certain development items and
delivery systems of interest to TSD/BB.
[handwritten note: 31 Jan '64 Testing in stand-down until policy
issues (illegible) at DCI level. OK to (illegible)]
2. During the course of development it is sometimes found
that certain very necessary experiments or tests are not suited to
ordinary laboratory facilities. At the same time, it would be
difficult if not impossible to conduct such tests as operational
field tests. This project is designed to provide a capability and
facilities to fill this intermediate requirement.
3. The activities under this subproject will be conducted by
Mr. [deletion], an individual in the import and export business, in
[deletion] Mr. [deletion] holds a TOP SECRET Treasury
Department clearance and a SECRET Agency approval. He is
completely witting of the aims and goals of his activities.
4. Mr. [deletion] possesses unique facilities and personal
abilities which makes him invaluable in this kind of testing
operation. Mr. [deletion] because of his peculiar talents and
-164- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
-2-
capabilities as well as his excellent connections with all of the
local law enforcement agencies, will provide a unique and
essential capability. Because Mr. [deletion] is no longer resident
of the [deletion] area, it is necessary that a suitable replacement
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 425 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 145 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 52 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
be provided in order that a capability for continuance of our
activities be maintained.
5. The estimated cost of the project is $10,000.00 for a period
of one year. Charges should be made against Allotment Number
4125-1390-3902. Reimbursement will be made for services
rendered.
6. Accounting for funds advanced and any equipment under
this subproject will be in accordance with accounting procedures
established by the [deletion] [handwritten note: Administration
Staff/TSD] [deletion]
7. A memorandum of agreement along lines established by
previous audit recommendations in like situations will be
executed.
[signature deleted]
Chief
TSD/Biological Branch
Distribution:
Original only
[document ends]
-165- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
SUBJECT: Request for Support of Research on the Mechanism
of Brain Concussion
1. This is a request for financial support for research on the
mechanism of brain concussion for the period 1 Feb 1956 to 1
Feb 1957.
2. The resonance-cavitation theory upon which this research is to
be based has been presented in the proposal submitted to the
[deletion] dated 27 March 1954.
3. The program as originally submitted estimated the duration of
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 426 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 146 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 53 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the program to be from three to five years requesting a total of
$72,109 for the initial year.
4. At the request of the [deletion] a reduced budget was
submitted.
5. [deletion], amounting to $24,925, was then awarded to the
[deletion] to support this program from 1 Feb 1955 to 1 Feb
1956.
6. The progress made to date under the above contract can be
summarized as follows:
A. RESEARCH FACILITIES
The following research facilities have been established for
the investigation of the very diverse aspects of the problems
being studied:
a. [deletion]
A total of 2500 square feet of laboratory and office
space equipped with much of the diversified machinery and
apparatus necessary for research in this field.
b. Blast Range
A blast range has been established at [deletion] located
approximately [deletion] of the main laboratory. This area is
owned by the [deletion] and is closed to the public. Three blast
test series have been run to date.
c. [deletion]
Arrangements have been made with the [one line
deleted] for use of their human cadavers. A test area has been
assigned for this
-166- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
B. PERSONNEL
Both full-time technical personnel and part-time professional
research personnel have been acquired and indoctrinated relative
to their specific function.
C. TECHNICAL PROGRAMS
Following is the technical progress made under the current
[deletion] contract:
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 427 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 147 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 54 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
a. Specialized instrumentation and numerous testing
techniques have been developed to obtain the desired dynamic
data.
b. Considerable data has now been obtained supporting the
resonance-cavitation theory of brain concussion.
c. Preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
d. Data has been obtained on the nature and the magnitude
of pressure fluctuations within a glass simulated skull subject to
either impact or sound waves propagated in air.
e. Initial studies have been made on the simulated glass
skull attempting to establish the cavitation patterns for various
types of impact.
7. The proposed method and program plan remain the same as
stated in the original proposal, except for the temporary deletion
of the immersion blast study.
8. The current level of activity on this project can be indicated by
the most recent billing to the [deletion] for the month of
November, which amounted to $4,034.61.
9. In the interest of efficiency and economy it is requested that at
least this level of activity be maintained for the coming year.
-167- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
10.0 POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS OF THE RESEARCH
FUNDING
10.1 Trotter, W. defines brain concussion as: "an essentially
transient state due to head injury which is of instantaneous onset,
manifests widespread symptoms of purely paralytic kind, does
not as such comprise any evidence of structural cerebral injury,
and is always followed by amnesia for the actual moment of the
accident."
10.2 The implication of the underlined portion of the above
statement is that if a technique were devised to induce brain
concussion without giving either advance warning or causing
external physical trauma, the person upon recovery would be
unable to recall what had happened to him. Under these
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 428 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 148 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 55 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
conditions the same technique of producing the concussion could
be re-used many times without disclosure of its nature.
10.3 First, considering the possibilities of direct impact to the
head or body, it should be possible from the findings of this
research program to determine the following:
a. Optimum design of impacting devices.
b. Optimum points of impact on skull or body.
c. Intensity of the blow for the effect desired.
10.4 In regard to the potential impacting devices, there are
certain design requisites that are apparent at this time:
a. The impact should be delivered without advance
warning.
b. The area of impact and force distribution should be such
that surface trauma does not occur.
c. The intensity of the impacting force and its duration
should be such as to obtain the desired effect.
d. The device should be as small and as silent as possible.
10.5 The specific impacting devices might take the form of any
of the following:
a. A pancake type black-jack giving a high peak impact
force with a low unit surface pressure.
b. Concealed or camouflaged spring-loaded impacting
devices that trigger upon contact with the head.
(Original and sole copy :agg)
-168- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
c. A projectile type impactor such as an air gun using a
small shot filled sack for a projectile.
d. An explosive pad detonated in contact with the head or
the body.
10.6 Let us now consider the possibilities of exciting the
resonance cavitation directly without impact. There is
considerable evidence that resonance cavitation can be induced
directly in the following ways:
a. A blast wave propogated in air. (Blast Concussion)
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 429 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 149 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 56 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
b. Physical excitation with a mechanical driver or horn,
turned to the resonant frequency of the head.
10.7 A single blast pressure wave propogated in air must have
considerable intensity in order to produce brain concussion.
However, there is considerable evidence (Carver & Dinsley) that
modification of the pressure wave can produce profound effects.
10.8 Excitation of the resonance cavitation by using a tuned
driver at this time appears to be well within the realm of
possibility. The neurotic-like manifestations normally associated
with blast concussion could possibly be induced by this method.
Use of this method, however, would require actual physical
contact with the drivers.
10.9 Excitation of the resonance cavitation by tuned sound waves
also appears to be a reasonable possibility. Concentration of the
sound-field at some remote point could be effected with
acoustical lenses and reflectors. The blast duration would be in
the order of a tenth of a second. Masking of a noise of this
duration should not be too difficult.
11.0 It would possibly be advantageous to establish the
effectiveness of both of the above methods as a tool in brain-
wash therapy. A full knowledge of the method and the resulting
sequela should be of aid to any person forced to submit to such
treatment.
12.0 Possibly the most significant potential aspect of this study
would be in the development of practical means of giving a
person immunity, even though temporary, to brain concussion.
One technique that appears to have potentialities involves the
introduction of a small quantity of gas, approximately 1 cc, into
the spinal cord. This gas bubble would then normally migrate to
the ventricles located at the centrum of the brain. The ability of
this bubble to expand under dynamic loading would be most
effective in preventing resonance cavitation from occurring.
(Original and sole copy :agg)
[document ends]
-169- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 430 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 150 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 57 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
MATERIAL FOR THE RECORD
MKSEARCH, OFTEN/CHICKWIT
MKSEARCH was the name given to the continuation of the
MKULTRA program. Funding commenced in FY 1966, and
ended in FY 1972. Its purpose was to develop, test, and evaluate
capabilities in the covert use of biological, chemical, and
radioactive material systems and techniques for producing
predictable human behavioral and/or physiological changes in
support of highly sensitive operational requirements.
OFTEN/CHICKWIT
In 1967 the Office of Research and Development (ORD) and
the Edgewood Arsenal Research Laboratories undertook a
program for doing research on the identification and
characterization of drugs that could influence human behavior.
Edgewood had the facilities for the full range of laboratory and
clinical testing. A phased program was envisioned that would
consist of acquisition of drugs and chemical compounds believed
to have effects on the behavior of humans, and testing and
evaluation these materials through laboratory procedures and
toxicological studies. Compounds believed promising as a result
of tests on animals were then to be evaluated clinically with
human subjects at Edgewood. Substances of potential use would
then be analyzed structurally as a basis for identifying and
synthesizing possible new derivatives of greater utility.
The program was divided into two projects. Project OFTEN
was to deal with testing and toxicological, transmissivity and
behavioral effects of drugs in animals and, ultimately, humans.
Project CHICKWIT was concerned with acquiring information
on new drug developments in Europe and the Orient, and with
acquiring samples.
There is a discrepancy between the testimony of DOD and
CIA regarding the testing at Edgewood Arsenal in June 1973.
While there is agreement that human testing occurred at that
place and time, there is disagreement as to who was responsible
for financing and sponsorship. (See hearings before the
Subcommittee, September 21, 1977.)
[document ends]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 431 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 151 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 58 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-170- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
THE DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20505
Office of Legislative
Counsel 23 December 1977
Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
During Admiral Turner's 3 August 1977 testimony before
your Committee and the Senate Human Resources Subcommittee
on Health and Scientific Research, you asked whether any
Agency employees had been terminated because of their
participation in MKULTRA Subproject 3. Admiral Turner
indicated he did not believe any employee had been terminated,
but would have Agency records searched on this question. Our
records have been searched and the results confirm the Director's
testimony that no such actions were taken.
Sincerely,
[George L. Cary signature]
George L. Cary
Legislative Counsel
[document ends]
-171- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 432 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 152 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix C--Documents Referring to Subprojects Page 59 of 59
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
QKHILLTOP DEFINITION
QKHILLTOP was a cryptonym assigned in 1954 to a project
to study Chines Communist brainwashing techniques and to
develop interrogation techniques. Most of the early studies are
believed to have been conducted by the Cornell University
Medical School Human Ecology Study Programs. The effort was
absorbed into the MKULTRA program and the QKHILLTOP
cryptonym became obsolete. The Society for the investigation of
Human Ecology, later the Human Ecology Fund, was an
outgrowth of the QKHILLTOP.
[document ends]
Appendix A: Testing and Use of Chemical and
Biological Agents by the Intelligence Community
Appendix B: Documents Referring to Discovery of
Additional MKULTRA Material
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 433 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 153 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixC.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 1 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
TESTIMONY OF ADM. STANSFIELD TURNER,
DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE
Accompanied by Frank Laubinger, Office of Technical Services; Al Brody, Office of
Inspector General; Ernest Mayerfield, Office of General Counsel; and George L. Cary,
Legislative Counsel
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I would like to begin by thanking you and
Senator Kennedy for having a joint hearing this morning. I hope this will expedite and facilitate
our getting all the information that both of your committees need into the record quickly.
I would like also to thank you both for prefacing the remarks today by reminding us all that the
events about which we are here to talk are 12- to 24-years old. They in no way represent the
current activities or policies of the Central Intelligence Agency.
What we are here to do is to give you all the information that we now have and which we did not
previously have on a subject known s Project MKULTRA, a project which took place from 1953
to 1964. It was an umbrella project under which there were numerous subprojects for research,
among other things, on drugs and behavioral modification. What the new material that we offer
today is a supplement to the considerable material that was made available in 1975, during the
Church committee hearings, and also to the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific
Research.
At that time, the CIA offered up all of the information and documents it believed it had available.
The principal one available at that time that gave the greatest amount of information on this
subject was a report of the CIA's Inspector General written in 1963, and which led directly to the
termination of this activity in 1964, 13 years ago.
The information available in 1975 to the various investigating groups was indeed sparse, first
because of the destruction of material that took place in 1973, as detailed by Senator Kennedy a
minute ago, with the concurrence of the then Director of Central Intelligence and under the
supervision of the Director of the Office of Technical Services that supervised Project
MKULTRA.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 434 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 154 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 2 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-9-
The material in 1975 was also sparse because most of the CIA people who had been involved in
1953 to 1964 in this activity had retired from the Agency. I would further add that I think the
material was sparse in part because it was the practice at that time not to keep detailed records in
this category.
For instance, the 1963 report of the Inspector General notes:
Present practice is to maintain no records of the planning and approval of test programs.
In brief, there were few records to begin with and less after the destruction of 1973.
What I would like to do now, though, is to proceed and let you know what the new material adds
to our knowledge of this topic, and I will start by describing how the material was discovered and
why it was not previously discovered. The material in question, some seven boxes, had been sent
to our Retired Records Center outside of the Washington area. It was discovered that as the result
of an extensive search by an employee charged with the responsibility for maintaining our
holdings on behavioral drugs and for responding to Freedom of Information Act requests on this
subject.
During the Church committee investigation of 1975, searches for MKULTRA-related material
were made by examining both the active and the retired records of all of the branches of CIA
considered likely to have had an association with MKULTRA documents. The retired records of
the Budget and Fiscal Section of the branch that was responsible for such work were not
searched, however. This was because the financial paper associated with sensitive projects such
as MKULTRA were normally maintained by the branch itself under the project title, MKULTRA,
not by the Budget and Fiscal Section under the project title, MKULTRA, not by the Budget and
Fiscal Section under a special budget file.
In the case at hand, however, this newly located material had been sent to the Retired Records
Center in 1970 by the Budget and Fiscal Section of this branch as part of its own retired holdings.
In short, what should have been filed by the branch itself was filed by the Budget and Fiscal
Section, and what should have been filed under the project title, MKULTRA, was filed under
budget and fiscal matters. The reason for this departure from the normal procedure of that time is
simply not known, and as a result of it, however, the material escaped retrieval and destruction in
1973, as well as discovery in 1975.
The employee who located this material did so by leaving no stone unturned in his efforts to
respond to a Freedom of Information Act request, or several of them, in fact. He reviewed all of
the listings of material of this branch, stored at the Retired Records Center, including those of the
Budget and Fiscal Section, and thus discovered the MKULTRA-related documents, which had
been missed in the previous searches.
In sum, the agency failed to uncover these particular documents in 1973, in the process of
attempting to destroy them. It similarly failed to locate them in 1975, in response to the Church
committee hearings. I am personally persuaded that there is no evidence of any attempt to conceal
this material during the earlier searches. Moreover, as we will discuss as we proceed, I do not
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 435 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 155 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 3 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
believe the material itself is such that
-10-
there would be a motive on the part of the CIA to withhold this, having disclosed what it did in
1975.
Next, let me move to the nature of this recently located material. It is important to remember what
I have just noted, that these folders that were discovered are finance folders. The bulk of the
material in them consists of approvals for the advance of funds, vouchers, and accountings and
such, most of which are not very informative as to the nature of the activities that they were
supporting. Occasional project proposals or memoranda commenting on some aspect of a
subproject are scattered throughout this material. In general, however, the recovered material does
not include overall status reports or other documents relating to operational considerations, or to
the progress on various subprojects, though some elaboration of the activities contemplated does
appear from time to time.
There are roughly three categories of projects. First, there are 149 MKULTRA subprojects, many
of which appear to have some connection with research into behavioral modification, drug
acquisition and testing, or administering drugs surreptitiously. Second, there are two boxes of
miscellaneous MKULTRA papers, including audit reports and financial statements from
intermediary funding mechanisms used to conceal CIA sponsorship of various research projects.
Finally, there are 33 additional subprojects concerning certain intelligence activities previously
funded under MKULTRA but which have nothing to do either with behavioral modifications,
drugs or toxins, or any closely related matter.
We have attempted to group the activities covered by the 149 subprojects into categories under
descriptive headings. In broad outline, at least, this presents the contents of these files. The
following 15 categories are the ones we have divided these into.
First, research into the effects of behavioral drugs and/or alcohol. Within this, there are 17
projects probably not involving human testing. There are 14 subprojects definitely involving
testing on human volunteers. There are 19 subprojects probably including tests on human
volunteers and 6 subprojects involving tests on unwitting human beings.
Second, there is research on hypnosis, eight subprojects, including two involving hypnosis and
drugs in combination.
Third, there are seven projects on the acquisition of chemicals or drugs.
Fourth, four subprojects on the aspects of the magician's art, useful in covert operations, for
instance, the surreptitious delivery of drug-related materials.
Fifth, there are nine projects on studies of human behavior, sleep research, and behavioral change
during psychotherapy.
Sixth, there are projects on library searches and attendants at seminars and international
conferences on behavioral modifications.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 436 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 156 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 4 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Seventh, there are 23 projects on motivational studies, studies of defectors, assessments of
behavior and training techniques.
Eighth, there are three subprojects on polygraph research.
Ninth, there are three subprojects on funding mechanisms for MKULTRA's external research
activities.
-11-
Tenth, there are six subprojects on research on drugs, toxins, and biologicals in human tissue,
provision of exotic pathogens, and the capability to incorporate them in effective delivery
systems.
Eleventh, there are three subprojects involving funding support for unspecified activities
conducted with the Army Special Operations Division at Fort Detrich, Md. This activity is
outlined in Book I of the Church committee report, pages 388 to 389. (See Appendix A, pp. 68-
69).
Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI, the Army assisted the CIA in developing, testing, and
maintaining biological agents and delivery systems for use against humans as well as against
animals and crops.
Thirteenth, there are single subprojects in such areas as the effects of electroshock, harassment
techniques for offensive use, analysis of extrasensory perception, gas propelled sprays and
aerosols, and four subprojects involving crop and material sabotage.
Fourteenth, one or two subprojects on each of the following: blood grouping research; controlling
the activities of animals; energy storage and transfer in organic systems; and stimulus and
response in biological systems.
Finally, 15th, there are three subprojects canceled before any work was done on them having to
do with laboratory drug screening, research on brain concussion, and research on biologically
active materials.
Now, let me address how much this newly discovered material adds to what has previously been
reported to the Church committee and to Senator Kennedy's Subcommittee on Health. The answer
is basically additional detail. The principal types of activities included in these documents have
for the most part been outlined or to some extent generally described in what was previously
available in the way of documentation and which was supplied by the CIA to the Senate
investigators.
For example, financial disbursement records for the period of 1960 to 1964 for 76 of these 149
subprojects had been recovered by the Office of Finance at CIA and were made available to the
Church committee investigators. For example, the 1963 Inspector General report on MKULTRA
made available to both the Church Committee and the Subcommittee on Health mentions
electroshock and harassment substances, covert testing on unwitting U.S. citizens, the search for
new materials through arrangements with specialists in hospitals and universities, and the fact that
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 437 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 157 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 5 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the Technical Service Division of CIA had initiated 144 subprojects related to the control of
human behavior.
For instance also, the relevant section of a 1957 Inspector General report was also made available
to the Church committee staff, and that report discusses the techniques for human assessment and
unorthodox methods of communication, discrediting and disabling materials which can be
covertly administered, studies on magicians' arts as applied to covert operations, and other similar
topics.
The most significant new data that has been discovered are, first, the names of researchers and
institutions who participated in
-12-
MKULTRA projects, and second, a possibly improper contribution by the CIA to a private
institution. We are now in the possession of the names of 185 nongovernment researchers and
assistants who are identified in the recovered material dealing with these 149 subprojects.
There are also names of 80 institutions where work was done or with which these people were
affiliated. The institutions include 44 colleges or universities, 15 research foundation or chemical
or pharmaceutical companies or the like, 12 hospitals or clinics, in addition to those associated
with the universities, and 3 penal institutions.
While the identities of some of these people and institutions were known previously, the
discovery of the new identities adds to our knowledge of MKULTRA.
The facts as they pertain to the possibly improper contribution are as follows. One project
involves a contribution of $375,000 to a building fund of a private medical institution. The fact
that that contribution was made was previously known. Indeed, it was mentioned in the 1957
report of the Inspector General on the Technical Service Division of CIA that supervised
MKULTRA, and pertinent portions of this had been reviewed by the Church committee staff.
The newly discovered material, however, makes it clear that this contribution was made through
an intermediary, which made it appear to be a private donation. As a private donation, the
contribution was then matched by Federal funds. The institution was not made aware of the true
source of the gift. This project was approved by the then Director of Central Intelligence and
concurred in by CIA's top management including the then General Counsel, who wrote an
opinion supporting the legality of the contribution.
The recently discovered documents also give greater insight into the scope of an unwitting nature
of the drug testing, but contribute little more than that. We now do have corroborating
information that some of the unwitting drug testing was carried out in what is known in the
intelligence trade as safe houses in San Francisco and in New York City, and we have identified
that three individuals were involved in this undertaking, whereas we previously reported there
was only one person.
We also know that some unwitting testing took place on criminal sexual psychopaths confined at
a State hospital, and that additionally research was done on a knockout or K drug in parallel with
research to develop painkillers for cancer patients.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 438 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 158 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 6 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
These, then, are the principal findings identified to date in our review of this recovered material.
As noted earlier, we believe the detail on the identities of researchers and institutions involved in
CIA sponsorship of drug and behavioral modification research is a new element and one which
poses a considerable problem. Most of the people and institutions involved were not aware of
CIA sponsorship. We should certainly assume that the researchers and institutions which
cooperated with CIA on a witting basis acted in good faith and in the belief that they were aiding
their Government in a legitimate and proper purpose.
I believe that we all have a moral obligation to these researchers and institutions to protect them
from any unjustified embarrassment
-13-
or damage to their reputations which revelation of their identities might bring. In addition, I have
a legal obligation under the Privacy Act not to publicly disclose the names of the individual
researchers without their consent.
This is especially true, of course, for those researchers and institutions which were unwitting
participants in CIA sponsored activities.
Nonetheless, Mr. Chairman, I certainly recognize the right and the need of both the Senate Select
Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research to
investigate the circumstances of these activities in whatever detail you consider necessary. I am
providing your committee with all of the documentation, including all of the names, on a
classified basis. I hope that this will facilitate your investigation while still protecting the
individuals and the institutions involved.
Let me emphasize again that the MKULTRA events are 12 to 24 years in the past, and I assure
you that CIA is in no way engaged in either witting or unwitting testing of drugs today.
Finally, I am working closely with the Attorney General on this matter. We are making available
to the Attorney General whatever materials he may deem necessary to any investigations that he
may elect to undertake. Beyond that, we are also working with the Attorney General to determine
whether it is practicable from this new evidence to identify any of the persons to whom drugs
were administered, but we are now trying to determine if there are adequate clues to lead to their
identification, and if so how best to go about fulfilling the Government's responsibilities in this
matter.
Mr. Chairman, as we proceed with that process of attempting to identify the individuals and then
determining what is our proper responsibility to them, I will keep both of these committees fully
advised. I thank you, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much, Admiral Turner. Your spirit of cooperation is much
appreciated. I would like to announce to the committee that in order to give every member an
opportunity to participate in this hearing, that we would set a time limit of 10 minutes per
Senator.
Admiral Turner, please give this committee the genesis of MKULTRA. Who or what committee
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 439 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 159 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 7 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
or commission or agency was responsible for dreaming up this grandiose and sinister project, and
why was it necessary? What is the rationale or justification for such a project and was the
President of the United States aware of this?
Admiral TURNER. Mr. Chairman, I am going to ask Mr. Brody on my right, who is a long-time
member of the CIA to address that in more detail. I believe everything that we know about the
genesis was turned over to the Church committee and is contained in that material. Basically, it
was a CIA-initiated project. It started out of a concern of our being taken advantage of by other
powers who would use drugs against our personnel, and it was approved in the Agency. I have
asked the question you just asked me, and have been assured that there is no evidence within the
Agency of any involvement at higher echelons, the White House, for instance, or specific
approval. That does not say there was not, but we have no such evidence.
-14-
Mr. Brody, would you amplify on my comments there, please?
Mr. BRODY. Mr. Chairman, I really have very little to add to that. To my knowledge, there was
no Presidential knowledge of this project at the time. It was a CIA project, and as the admiral
said, it was a project designed to attempt to counteract what was then thought to be a serious
threat by our enemies of using drugs against us. Most of what else we know about is in the Senate
Church committee report.
Senator INOUYE. Are you suggesting that it was intentionally kept away from the Congress and
the President of the United States?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir. We are only saying that we have no evidence one way or the other
as to whether the Congress was informed of this particular project. There are no records to
indicate.
Senator INOUYE. Admiral Turner, are you personally satisfied by actual investigation that this
newly discovered information was not intentionally kept away from the Senate of the United
States?
Admiral TURNER. I have no way to prove that, sir. That is my conviction from everything I
have seen of it.
Senator INOUYE. Now, we have been advised that these documents were initially discovered in
March of this year, and you were notified in July of this year, or June of this year, and the
committee was notified in July. Can you tell us why the Director of Central Intelligence was
notified 3 months after its initial discovery, why the delay?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. All this started with several Freedom of Information Act requests,
and Mr. Laubinger on my left was the individual who took it upon himself to pursue these
requests with great diligence, and got permission to go to the Retired Records Center, and then
made the decision to look not only under what would be the expected subject files, but through
every file with which the branch that conducted this type of activity had any conceivable
connection.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 440 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 160 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 8 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Very late in March, he discovered these seven boxes. He arranged to have them shipped from the
Retired Records Center to Washington, to our headquarters. They arrived in early April. He
advised his appropriate superiors, who asked him how long he thought it would take him to go
through these and screen them appropriately, clear them for Freedom of Information Act release.
There are, we originally estimated, 5,000 pages here. We now think that was an underestimation,
and it may be closer to 8,000 pages. He estimated it would take about 45 days or into the middle
of May to do that. He was told to proceed, and as he did so there was nothing uncovered in the
beginning of these 149 cases that appeared particularly startling or particularly additive to the
knowledge that had already been given to the Church committee, some details, but no major
revelations.
He and his associates proceeded with deliberateness, but not a great sense of urgency. There were
other interfering activities that came and demanded his time also. He was not able to put 100
percent of his time on it, and there did not appear to be cause for a great rush here. We were
trying to be responsive to the Freedom of Information Act request within the limits of our
manpower and our priorities.
-15-
In early June, however, he discovered two projects, the one related to K drugs and the one related
to the funding at the institution, and realized immediately that he had substantial new information,
and he immediately reported this to his superiors.
Two actions were taken. One was to notify the lawyers of the principal Freedom of Information
Act requestor that we would have substantial new material and that it would be forthcoming as
rapidly as possible, and the second was to start a memorandum up the chain that indicated his
belief that we should notify the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence of this discovery
because of the character at least of these two documents.
As that proceeded up from the 13th of June, at each echelon we had to go through the legal office,
the legislative liaison office and at each echelon about the same question was asked of him: Have
you gone through all of this, so that when we notify the Senate Select Committee we do not notify
half of the important revelations and not the other half? The last thing I want, Mr. Chairman, is in
any way to be on any topic, give the appearance on any topic of being recalcitrant, reluctant, or
having to have you drag things out of me, and my subordinates, much to my pleasure, had each
asked, have you really gone through these 8,000 pages enough to know that we are not going to
uncover a bombshell down at the bottom?
By late June, about the 28th, this process reached my deputy. He notified me after his review of it
on the 7th of July, which is the first I knew of it. I began reading into it. I asked the same probing
question directly. I then notified my superiors, and on the 15th delivered to you my letter letting
you know that we had this, and we have been working, many people, many hours since then, to
be sure that what we are telling you today does include all the relevant material.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to commend Mr. Laubinger for his diligence and expertise, but
was this diligence the result of the Freedom of Information Act or could this diligence have been
exercised during the Church hearings? Why was it not exercised? Admiral TURNER. There is
no question that theoretically this diligence could have been exercised at any time, and it may
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 441 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 161 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 9 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
well be that the Freedom of Information Act has made us more aware of this. Would you speak
for yourself, please.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I really don't attribute it, Senator, to diligence so much as thoroughness. If
you can imagine the pressures under an organization trying to respond, which I think the CIA did
at the time of the Church committee hearings, the hallways of the floor I am on were full of boxes
from our records center. Every box that anyone thought could possibly contain anything was
called up for search. It was one of a frantic effort to comply.
When the pressure of that situation cools down, and you can start looking at things systematically,
you are apt to find things that you wouldn't under the heat of a crash program, and that is what
happened here.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Senator Kennedy?
Senator KENNEDY. Admiral Turner, this is an enormously distressing report that you give to
the American Congress and to the American people today. Granted, it happened many years ago,
but what we are
-16-
basically talking about is an activity which took place in the country that involved the perversion
and the corruption of many of our outstanding research centers in this country, with CIA funds,
where some of our top researchers were unwittingly involved in research sponsored by the
Agency in which they had no knowledge of the background or the support for.
Much of it was done with American citizens who were completely unknowing in terms of taking
various drugs, and there are perhaps any number of Americans who are walking around today on
the east coast or west coast who were given drugs, with all the kinds of physical and
psychological damage that can be caused. We have gone over that in very careful detail, and it is
significant and severe indeed.
I do not know what could be done in a less democratic country that would be more alien to our
own traditions than was really done in this narrow area, and as you give this report to the
committee, I would like to get some sense of your own concern about this type of activity, and
how you react, having assumed this important responsibility with the confidence of President
Crater and the overwhelming support, obviously, of the Congress, under this set of circumstances.
I did not get much of a feeling in reviewing your statement here this morning of the kind of
abhorrence to this type of past activity which I think the American people would certainly deplore
and which I believe that you do, but could you comment upon that question, and also perhaps
give us what ideas you have to insure that it cannot happen again?
Admiral TURNER. Senator Kennedy, it is totally abhorrent to me to think of using a human
being as a guinea pig and in any way jeopardizing his life and his health, no matter how great the
cause. I am not here to pass judgment on my predecessors, but I can assure you that this is totally
beyond the pale of my contemplation of activities that the CIA or any other of our intelligence
agencies should undertake.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 442 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 162 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 10 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
I am taking and have taken what I believe are adequate steps to insure that such things are not
continuing today.
Senator KENNEDY. Could you tell us a little bit about that?
Admiral TURNER. I have asked for a special report assuring me that there are no drug activities
extant, that is, drug activities that involve experimentation. Obviously, we collect intelligence
about drugs and drug use in other countries, but there are no experimentations being conducted by
the Central Intelligence Agency, and I have had a special check made because of another incident
that was uncovered some years ago about the unauthorized retention of some toxic materials at
the CIA. I have had an actual inspection made of the storage places and the certification from the
people in charge of those that there are no such chemical biological materials present in our
keeping, and I have issued express orders that that shall not be the case.
Beyond that, I have to rely in large measure on my sense of command and direction of the people
and their knowledge of the attitude I have just expressed to you in this regard.
Senator KENNEDY. I think that is very commendable.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. I think it is important that the American people understand that.
-17-
You know, much of the research which is our area of interest that was being done by the Agency
and the whole involved sequence of activities done by the Agency, I am convinced could have
been done in a legitimate way through the research programs of the National Institutes of Mental
Health, other sponsored activities, I mean, that is some other question, but I think you went to an
awful lot of trouble, where these things could have been.
Let me ask you specifically, on the followup of MKULTRA, are there now -- I think you have
answered, but I want to get a complete answer about any experimentations that are being done on
human beings, whether it is drugs or behavioral alterations or patterns or any support, either
directly or indirectly, being provided by the Agency in terms of any experimentation on human
beings.
Admiral TURNER. There is no experimentation with drugs on human beings, witting or
unwitting, being conducted in any way.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. How bout the nondrug experimentation our Committee has seen -
- psychosurgery, for example, or psychological research?
Admiral TURNER. We are continually involved in what we call assessment of behavior. For
instance, we are trying to continually improve our polygraph procedures to, you know, assess
whether a person is lying or not. This does not involve any tampering with the individual body.
This involves studying records of people's behavior under different circumstances, and so n, but it
is not an experimental thing. Have I described that accurately, Al?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 443 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 163 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 11 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. BRODY. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is limited to those areas?
Admiral TURNER. Yes; it does not involve attempting to modify behavior. It only involves
studying behavior conditions, but not trying to actively modify it, as was one of the objectives of
MKULTRA.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we are scarce on time, but I am interested in the other areas besides
polygraph where you are doing it. Maybe you can either respond now or submit it for the record,
if you would do that. Would you provide that for the record?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
[The material on psychological assessments follows:]
Psychological assessments are performed as a service to officers in the operations directorate who recruit and/or
handle agents. Except for people involved in training courses, the subjects of the assessments are foreign nationals.
The assessments are generally done to determine the most successful tactic to persuade the subject to accept convert
employment by the CIA, and to make an appraisal of his reliability and truthfulness.
A majority of the work is done by a staff of trained psychologists, some of whom are stationed overseas. The
assessments they do may be either direct or indirect. Direct assessments involve a personal interview of the subject
by the psychologist. When possible the subject is asked to complete a formal "intelligence test" which is actually a
disguised psychological test. Individuals being assessed are not given drugs, nor are they subjected to physical
harassment or torture. When operating conditions are such that a face-to-face interview is not possible, the
psychologist may do an indirect assessment, using as source materials descriptions of the subject by others,
interviews with people who know him, specimens of his writings, etc.
-18-
The other psychological assessments involve handwriting analysis or graphological assessment. The work is done by
a pair of trained graphologists, assisted by a small number of measurement technicians. They generally require at
least a page of handwritten script by the subject. Measurements are made of about 30 different writing characteristics,
and these are charted and furnished to the graphologist for assessments.
The psychologists also give courses in psychological assessment to group of operations officers, to sharpen their own
capabilities to size up people. As part of the training course, the instructor does a psychological assessment of each
student. The students are writing participants, and results are discussed with them.
It is important to reiterate that psychological assessments are only a service to the operations officers. In the final
analysis, it is the responsibility of the operations officer to decide how a potential agent should be approached, or to
make a judgment as to whether any agent is telling the truth.
Admiral TURNER. The kind of thing we are interested in is, what will motivate a man to
become an agent of the United States in a difficult situation. We have to be familiar with that kind
of attitudinal response that we can expect from people we approach to for one reason or another
become our spies, but I will be happy to submit a very specific listing of these.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you do that for the committee?
In the followups, in the MKSEARCH, in the OFTEN, and the CHICKWIT, could you give us
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 444 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 164 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 12 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
also a report on those particular programs?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Did they involve experimentation, human experimentation?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. None of them?
Admiral TURNER. Let me say this, that the CHICKWIT program is the code name for the CIA
participation in what was basically a Department of Defense program. This program was
summarized and reported to the Church committee, to the Congress, and I have since they have
been rementioned in the press in the last 2 days here, I have not had time to go through and
personally review them. I have ascertained that all of the files that we had and made available
before are intact, and I have put a special order out that nobody will enter those files or in any
way touch them without my permission at this point, but they are in the Retired Records Center
outside of Washington, and they are available.
I am not prepared to give you full details on it, because I simply haven't read into that part of our
history, but in addition I would suggest when we want to get into that we should get the
Department of Defense in with us.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you will supply that information to the Intelligence Committee, the
relevant, I mean, the health aspects, obviously, and the research we are interested in?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Will you let us know, Admiral Turner?
Admiral TURNER. I will be happy to.
[See p. 169 for the material referred to.]
Senator KENNEDY. Thank you. I am running out of time. Do you support the extension of the
protection of human subjects legislation to include the CIA and the DOD? You commented
favorably on that
-19-
before, and I am hopeful we can get that on the calendar early in September, and that is our strong
interest.
Admiral TURNER. The CIA certainly has no objection to that proposed legislation, sir. It is not
my role in the administration to be the supporter of it or the endorser of it.
Senator KENNEDY. As a personal matter, since you have reviewed these subjects, would you
comment? I know it is maybe unusual, but you can understand what we are attempting to do.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 445 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 165 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 13 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. From your own experience in the agency, you can understand the value of
it.
Just finally, in your own testimony now with this additional information, it seems quite apparent
to me that you can reconstruct in very careful detail this whole project in terms of the responsible
CIA officials for the program. You have so indicated in your testimony. Now with the additional
information, and the people, that have been revealed in the examination of the documents, it
seems to be pretty clear that you can track that whole program in very careful detail, and I would
hope, you know, that you would want to get to the bottom of it, as the Congress does as well. I
will come back to that in my next round. Thank you very much.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Goldwater?
Senator GOLDWATER. I have no questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to go back to your testimony on page 12, where you discuss the
contribution to the building fund of a private medical institution. You state, "Indeed, it was
mentioned in a 1957 Inspector General report on the Technical Services Division of CIA,
pertinent portions of which had been reviewed by the Church committee staff." I would like to
have you consider this question very carefully. I served as a member o the original Church
committee. My staffer did a lot of the work that you are referring to here. He made notes on the
IG's report. My question to you is, are you saying that the section that specifically delineates an
improper contribution was in fact given to the Church committee staff to see?
Admiral TURNER. The answer to your question is "Yes." The information that a contribution
had been made was made available, to the best of my knowledge.
Senator SCHWEIKER. To follow this up further, I'd like to say that I think there was a serious
flaw in the way that the IG report was handled and the Church committee was limited. I am not
making any accusations, but because of limited access to the report, we have a situ-
-20-
ation where it is not even clear whether we actually saw that material or not, simply because we
could not keep a copy of the report under the procedures we had to follow. We were limited by
notetaking, and so it is rather ambiguous as to just what was seen and what was not seen. I
certainly hope that the new Intelligence Committee will not be bound by procedures that restrict
its ability to exercise effective oversight.
I have a second question. Does it concern you, Admiral, that we used a subterfuge which resulted
in the use of Federal construction grant funds to finance facilities for these sorts of experiments
on our own people? Because as I understand what you are saying, while the CIA maybe only put
up $375,000, this triggered a response on the part of the Federal Government to provide on a
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 446 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 166 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 14 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
good faith basis matching hospital funds at the same level. We put up more than $1 million of
matching funds, some based on an allegedly private donation which was really CIA money.
Isn't there something basically wrong with that?
Admiral TURNER. I certainly believe there is. As I stated, the General Counsel of the CIA at
that time rendered a legal opinion that this was a legal undertaking, and again I am hesitant to go
back and revisit the atmosphere, the laws, the attitudes at that time, so whether the counsel was on
good legal ground or not, I am not enough of a lawyer to be sure, but it certainly would occur to
me if it happened today as a very questionable activity.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I think those of us who have worked on and amended the Hill-
Burton Act and other hospital construction assistance laws over the years, would have a rather
different opinion on the legal intent or object of Congress in passing laws to provide hospital
construction project money. These funds weren't intended for this.
It reminds me a little bit of the shellfish toxin situation which turned up when I was on the Church
committee. The Public Health Service was used to produce a deadly poison with Public Health
money. Here we are using general hospital construction money to carry on a series of drug
experimentation.
Admiral TURNER. Excuse me, sir. If I could just be, I think, accurate, I don't think any of this
$375,000 or the matching funds were used to conduct drug experiments. They were used to build
the hospital. Now, the CIA the put more money into a foundation that was conducting research on
the CIA's behalf supposedly in that hospital, so the intent was certainly there, but the money was
not used for experimentation.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I understand it was used for bricks and mortar, but the bricks
were used to build the facility where the experiments were carried on; were they not?
Admiral TURNER. We do not have positive evidence that they were. It certainly would seem
that that was the intent, but I do not want to draw inferences here --
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, why else would they give this money for the building fund if the
building was not used for a purpose that benefited the CIA program?
Admiral TURNER. I certainly draw the inference that the CIA expected to benefit from it, and
some of the wording says the General
-21-
Counsel's opinion was that this was legal only if the CIA was going to derive adequate benefit
from it, but, sir, there is no evidence of what benefit was derived.
Senator SCHWEIKER. There must have been some pretty good benefits at stake. The Atomic
Energy Commission was to bear a share of the cost, and when they backed out for some reason or
another, the CIA picked up part of their tab. So, at two different points there were indications that
CIA decisionmakers thought there was great benefit to be derived from whatever happened within
the brick and mortar walls of that facility.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 447 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 167 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 15 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. You are absolutely right. I am only taking the position that I cannot
substantiate that there was benefit derived.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The agreement documents say that the CIA would have access to one-
sixth of the space involved in the construction of the wing, so how would you enter into an
agreement that specifically says that you will have access to and use of one-sixth of the space and
not perform something in that space? I cannot believe it was empty.
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not disputing you at all, but both of us are saying that the inference
is that one-sixth of the space was used, that experimentation was done, and so on, but there is no
factual evidence of what went on as a result of that payment or what went on in that hospital. It is
just missing. It is not that it didn't happen.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Admiral Turner, one other--
Senator KENNEDY. Would the Senator yield on that point?
Senator SCHWEIKER. I understand that in the agency's documents on the agreement it was
explicitly stated that one-sixth of the facility would be designated for CIA use and made available
for CIA research are you familiar--
Mr. BRODY. Senator, as I recall, you are right in that there is a mention of one-sixth, but any
mention at all has to do with planning. There are no subsequent reports as to what happened after
the construction took place.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Admiral Turner, I read in the New York Times that part of this series of
MKULTRA experiments involved an arrangement with the Federal Bureau of Narcotics to test
LSD surreptitiously on unwitting patrons in bars in New York and San Francisco. Some of the
subjects became violently ill and were hospitalized. I wonder if you would just briefly describe
what we were doing there and how it was carried out? I assume it was through a safe house
operation. I don't believe your statement went into much detail.
Admiral TURNER. I did mention the safe house operation in my statement, sir, and that is how
these were carried out. What we have learned from the new documentation is the location and the
dates at which the safe houses were run by the CIA and the identification of three individuals who
were associated with running those safe houses. We know something about the construction work
that was done in them because there were contracts for this. Beyond that, we are pretty much
drawing inferences as to the things that went on as to what you are saying here.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, the subjects were unwitting. You can infer that much, right?
Admiral TURNER. Right.
-22-
Senator SCHWEIKER. If you happened to be at the wrong bar at the wrong place and time, you
got it.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 448 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 168 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 16 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Mr. BRODY. Senator, that would be -- contacts were made, as we understand it, in bars, et
cetera, and then the people may have been invited to these safe houses. There really isn't any
indication as to the fact that this took place in bars.
Admiral TURNER. We are trying to be very precise with you, sir, and not draw an inference
here. There are 6 cases of these 149 where we have enough evidence in this new documentation
to substantiate that there was unwitting testing and some of that involves these safe houses. There
are other cases where it is ambiguous as to whether the testing was witting or voluntary. There are
others where it was clearly voluntary.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Of course, after a few drinks, it is questionable whether informed
consent means anything to a person in a bar anyway.
Admiral TURNER. Well, we don't have any indication that all these cases where it is ambiguous
involved drinking of any kind. There are cases in penal institutions where it is not clear whether
the prisoner was given a choice or not. I don't know that he wasn't given a choice, but I don't
positively know that he was, and I classify that as an ambiguous incident.
Senator INOUYE. Your time is up, Senator.
Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, you stated in your testimony that you are convinced there was no attempt to
conceal this recently discovered documentation during the earlier searches. Did you question the
individuals connected with the earlier search before you made that judgment?
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I haven't, I don't think, questioned everybody who looked in the files or
is still on our payroll who looked in the files back in 1975, but Mr. Laubinger on my left is the
best authority on this, and I have gone over it with him in some detail.
Senator HUDDLESTON. But you have inquired, you think, sufficiently to assure yourself that
there was no intent on the part of any person to conceal these records from the previous
committee?
Admiral TURNER. I am persuaded of that both by my questioning of people and by the
circumstances and the way in which these documents were filed, by the fact which I did not and
should have mentioned in my testimony, that these were not the official files. The ones that we
have received or retrieved were copies of files that were working files that somebody had used,
and therefore were slipped into a different location, and again I say to you , sir, I can't imagine
their deliberately concealing these particular files and revealing the other things that they did
reveal in 1975. I don't see the motive for that, because these are not that damning compared with
the overall material that was provided.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is this the kind of operation that if it were continuing now or if there
were anything similar to it, that you would feel compelled to report to the Select Committee on
Intelligence?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. You mean, if I discovered that something like this were going on
without my knowledge? Yes, I would feel absolutely the requirement to --
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 449 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 169 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 17 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-23-
Senator HUDDLESTON. But if it were going on with your knowledge, would you report it to
the committee? I assume you would.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Well, it would not be going on with my knowledge, but theoretically
the answer is yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Well, then, what suggestions would you have as we devise charters
for the various intelligence agencies? What provision would you suggest to prohibit this kind of
activity from taking place? Would you suggest that it ought to be specifically outlined in a
statutory charter setting out the parameters of the permissible operation of the various agencies?
Admiral TURNER. I think that certainly is something we must consider as we look at the
legislation for charters. I am not on the face of it opposed to it. I think we would have to look at
the particular wording as we are going to have to deal with the whole charter issue as to exactly
how precise you want to be in delineating restraints and curbs on the intelligence activities.
Senator HUDDLESTON. In the case of sensitive type operations, which this certainly was,
which might be going on today, is the oversight activity of the agency more intensive now than it
was at that time?
Admiral TURNER. Much more so. I mean, I have briefed you, sir, and the committee on our
sensitive operations. We have the Intelligence Oversight Board. We have a procedure in the
National Security Council for approval of very sensitive operations. I think the amount of
spotlight focused on these activities is many, manyfold what it was in these 12 to 24 years ago.
Senator HUDDLESTON. How about the record keeping?
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I can't imagine anyone having the gall to think that he can just blithely
destroy records today with all of the attention that has come to this, and certainly we are
emphasizing that that is not the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Admiral, I was particularly interested in the activity that took place at
the U.S. Public Health Service Hospital at Lexington, Ky., in which a Dr. Harris Isbell conducted
experiments on people who were presumably patients there. There was a narcotics institution, I
take it, and Dr. Isbell was, according to the New York Times story, carrying on a secret series of
correspondence with an individual at the agency by the name of Ray. Have you identified who
that person is?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I find myself in a difficult position here at a public hearing to confirm or
deny these names in view of my legal responsibilities under the Privacy Act not to disclose the
names of individuals here.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I am just asking you if you have identified the person referred to in
that article as Ray. I am not asking you who he was. I just want to know if you know who he is.
Admiral TURNER. No. I am sorry, was this W-r-a-y or R-a-y?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 450 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 170 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 18 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is listed in the news article as R-a-y, in quotations.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, we have not identified him.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So you have no knowledge of whether or note is still a member of
your staff or connected with the Agency in any way. Have you attempted to identify him?
-24-
[Pause.]
Admiral TURNER. Senator, we have a former employee whose first name is Ray who may have
had some connection with these activities.
Senator HUDDLESTON. You suspect that but you have not verified that at this time, or at least
you are not in a position to indicate that you have verified it?
Admiral TURNER. That is correct.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you.
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, not all of the -- and in no way trying to excuse you of the hideous nature of some
of these projects, but not all of the projects under MKULTRA are of a sinister or even a moral
nature. Is that a fair statement?
Admiral TURNER. That is correct.
Senator WALLOP. Looking down through some of these 17 projects not involving human
testing, aspects of the magician's art, it doesn't seem as though there is anything very sinister
about that. Studies of human behavior and sleep research, library searches. Now, those things in
their way are still of interest, are they not, to the process of intelligence gathering?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I have not tried to indicate that we either are not doing or would not
do any of the things that were involved in MKULTRA, but when it comes to the witting or
unwitting testing of people with drugs, that is certainly verboten, but there are other things.
Senator WALLOP. Even with volunteer patients? I mean, I am not trying to put you on the spot
to say whether it is going on, but I mean, it is not an uncommon thing, is it, in the prisons of the
United States for the Public Health Service to conduct various kinds of experiments with vaccines
and, say, sunburn creams? I know in Arizona they have done so.
Admiral TURNER. My understanding is, lots of that is authorized, but I am not of the opinion
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 451 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 171 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 19 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
that this is not the CIA's business, and that if we need some information in that category, I would
prefer to go to the other appropriate authorities of the Government and ask them to get it for us
rather than to in any way--
Senator WALLOP. Well, you know, you have library searches and attendants at the national
seminars. This is why I wanted to ask you if the bulk of these projects were in any way the kinds
of things that the Agency might not do now. A President would not have been horrified by the list
of the legitimate types of things. Isn't that probably the case?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. And if it did in fact appear in the IG report, is there any reason to suppose
that the President did not know of this project? You said there was no reason to suppose that he
did, but let me reverse that. Is there any reason to suppose that they did not?
Admiral TURNER. No.
Senator WALLOP. Well, you know, I just cannot imagine you or literally anybody undertaking
projects of the magnitude of dollars here and just not knowing about it, not informing your
superior that
-25-
these were going on, especially when certain items of it appear in the Inspector General's report
on budget matters.
Admiral TURNER. Well, I find it difficult when it is that far back to hypothesize what the
procedures that the Director was using in terms of informing his superiors were. It is quite a
different climate from today, and I think we do a lot more informing to day than they did back
then, but I find it very difficult to guess what the level of knowledge was.
Senator WALLOP. I am really not asking you to second-guess it, but it just seems to me that,
while the past is past, and thank goodness we are operating under different sets of circumstances,
I think it is naive for us to suppose that these things were conducted entirely without the
knowledge of the Presidents of the United States during those times. It is just the kinds of
research information that was being sought was vital to the United States, not the means, but the
information that they were trying to find.
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Your question is, was this vital? Did we view it as vital?
Senator WALLOP. Well, your implication at the beginning was that it was a response to the
kinds of behavior that were seen in Cardinal Mindszenty's trial and other things. I mean,
somebody must have thought that this was an important defensive reaction, if nothing else, on the
part of the United States.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, I am sure they did, but again I just don't know how high that
permeated the executive branch.
Senator WALLOP. But the kinds of information are still important to you. I mean, I am not
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 452 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 172 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner Page 20 of 20
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
suggesting that anyone go back and do that kind of thing again, but I'm certain it would be of use
to you to know what was going to happen to one of your agents assuming someone had put one of
these things into his bloodstream, or tried to modify his behavior.
Admiral TURNER. Absolutely, and you know, we would be very concerned if we thought there
were things like truth serums or other things that our agents or others could be subjected to by use
or improper use of drugs by other powers against our people or agents.
Senator WALLOP. Are there? I don't ask you to name them, but are there such serums?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know of them if there are. I would have to answer that for the record,
sir.
Senator WALLOP. I would appreciate that.
[The material referred to follows.]
Next: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation
Continue Reading CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 453 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 173 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing03.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 1 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
"TRUTH" DRUGS IN INTERROGATION
The search for effective aids to interrogation is probably as old as man's need to obtain information from
an uncooperative source and as persistent as his impatience to shortcut any tortuous path. In the annals of
police investigation, physical coercion has at times been substituted for painstaking and time-consuming
inquiry in the belief that direct methods produce quick results. Sir James Stephens, writing in 1883,
rationalizes a grisly example of "third degree" practices by the police of India: "It is far pleasanter to sit
comfortably in the shade rubbing red pepper in a poor devil's eyes than to go about in the sun hunting up
evidence."
More recently, police officials in some countries have turned to drugs for assistance in extracting
confessions from accused persons, drugs which are presumed
-26-
to relax the individual's defenses to the point that he unknowingly reveals truths he has been trying to
conceal. This investigative technique, however humanitarian as an alternative to physical torture, still
raises serious questions of individual rights and liberties. In this country, where drugs have gained only
marginal acceptance in police work, their use has provoked cries of "psychological third degree" and has
precipitated medico-legal controversies that after a quarter of a century still occasionally flare into the
open.
The use of so-called "truth" drugs in police work is similar to the accepted psychiatric practice of narco-
analysis; the difference in the two procedures lies in their different objectives. The police investigator is
concerned with empirical truth that may be used against the suspect, and therefore almost solely with
probative truth: the usefulness of the suspect's revelations depends ultimately on their acceptance in
evidence by a court of law. The psychiatrist, on the other hand, using the same "truth" drugs in diagnosis
and treatment of the mentally ill, is primarily concerned with psychological truth or psychological reality
rather than empirical fact. A patient's aberrations are reality for him at the time they occur, and an accurate
account of these fantasies and delusions, rather than reliable recollection of past events, can be the key to
recovery.
The notion of drugs capable of illuminating hidden recesses of the mind, helping to heal the mentally ill
and preventing or reversing the miscarriage of justice, has provided an exceedingly durable theme for the
press and popular literature. While acknowledging that "truth serum" is a misnomer twice over -- the
drugs are not sera and they do not necessarily bring forth probative truth -- journalistic accounts continue
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 454 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 174 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 2 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
to exploit the appeal of the term. The formula is to play up a few spectacular "truth" drug successes and to
imply that the drugs are more maligned than need be and more widely employed in criminal investigation
than can officially be admitted.
Any technique that promises an increment of success in extracting information from an uncompliant
source is ipso facto of interest in intelligence operations. If the ethical considerations which in Western
countries inhibit the use of narco-interrogation in police work are felt also in intelligence, the Western
services must at least be prepared against its possible employment by the adversary. An understanding of
"truth" drugs, their characteristic actions, and their potentialities, positive and negative, for eliciting useful
information is fundamental to an adequate defense against them.
This discussion, meant to help toward such an understanding, draws primarily upon openly published
materials. It has the limitations of projecting from criminal investigative practices and from the permissive
atmosphere of drug psychotherapy.
SCOPOLAMINE AS "TRUTH SERUM"
Early in this century physicians began to employ scopolamine, along with morphine and chloroform, to
induce a state of "twilight sleep" during childbirth. A constituent of henbane, scopolamine was known to
produce sedation and drowsiness, confusion and disorientation, incoordination, and amnesia for events
experienced during intoxication. Yet physicians noted that women in twilight sleep answered questions
accurately and often volunteered exceedingly candid remarks.
In 1922 it occurred to Robert House, a Dallas, Texas obstetrician, that a similar technique might be
employed in the interrogation of suspected criminals, and he arranged to interview under scopolamine two
prisoners in the Dallas county jail whose guilt seemed clearly confirmed. Under the drug, both men denied
the charges on which they were held; and both, upon trial, were found not guilty. Enthusiastic at this
success, House concluded that a patient under the influence of scopolamine "cannot create a lie... and
there is no power to think or reason." [14] His experiment and this conclusion attracted wide attention,
and the idea of a "truth" drug was thus launched upon the public consciousness.
The phrase "truth serum" is believed to have appeared first in a news report of House's experiment in the
Los Angeles Record, sometime in 1922. House resisted the term for a while but eventually came to
employ it regularly himself. He published some eleven articles on scopolamine in the years 1921-1929,
with a noticeable increase in polemical zeal as time when on. What had begun as something of a scientific
statement turned finally into a dedicated crusade by the "father of truth serum" on behalf of his offspring,
wherein he was "grossly indulgent of its wayward behavior and stubbornly proud of its minor
achievements." [11]
-27-
Only a handful of cases in which scopolamine was used for police interrogation came to public notice,
though there is evidence suggesting that some police forces may have used it extensively. [2,16] One
police writer claims that the threat of scopolamine interrogation has been effective in extracting
confessions from criminal suspects, who are told they will first be rendered unconscious by chloral
hydrate placed covertly in their coffee or drinking water. [16]
Because of a number of undesirable side effects, scopolamine was shortly disqualified as a "truth" drug.
Among the most disabling of the side effects are hallucinations, disturbed perception, somnolence, and
physiological phenomena such as headache, rapid heart, and blurred vision, which distract the subject
from the central purpose of the interview. Furthermore, the physical action is long, far outlasting the
psychological effects. Scopolamine continues, in some cases, to make anesthesia and surgery safer by
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 455 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 175 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 3 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
drying the mouth and throat and reducing secretions that might obstruct the air passages. But the
fantastically, almost painfully, dry "desert" mouth brought on by the drug is hardly conducive to free
talking, even in a tractable subject.
THE BARBITURATES
The first suggestion that drugs might facilitate communication with emotionally disturbed patients came
quite by accident in 1916. Arthur S. Lovenhart and his associates at the University of Wisconsin,
experimenting with respiratory stimulants, were surprised when, after an injection of sodium cyanide, a
catatonic patient who had long been mute and rigid suddenly relaxed, opened his eyes, and even answered
a few questions. By the early 1930's a number of psychiatrists were experimenting with drugs as an
adjunct to established methods of therapy.
At about this time police officials, still attracted by the possibility that drugs might help in the
interrogation of suspects and witnesses, turned to a class of depressant drugs known as the barbiturates.
By 1935 Clarence W. Muehlberger, head of the Michigan Crime Detection Laboratory at East Lansing,
was using barbiturates on reluctant suspects, though police work continued to be hampered by the courts'
rejection of drug-induced confessions except in a few carefully circumscribed instances.
The barbiturates, first synthesized in 1903, are among the oldest of modern drugs and the most versatile of
all depressants. In this half-century some 2,500 have been prepared, and about two dozen of these have
won an important place in medicine. An estimated three to four billion doses of barbiturates are prescribed
by physicians in the United States each year, and they have come to be known by a variety of commercial
names and colorful slang expressions: "goofballs," Luminal, Nembutal, "red devils," "yellow jackets,"
"pink ladies," etc. Three of them which are used in narcoanalysis and have seen service as "truth" drugs
are sodium amytal (anobarbital), pentothal sodium (thiopental), and to a lesser extent seconal
(seconbarbital).
As one pharmacologist explains it, a subject coming under the influence of a barbiturate injected
intravenously goes through all the stages of progressive drunkenness, but the time scale is on the order of
minutes instead of hours. Outwardly the sedation effect is dramatic, especially if the subject is a
psychiatric patient in tension. His features slacken, his body relaxes. Some people are momentarily
excited; a few become silly and giggly. This usually passes, and most subjects fall asleep, emerging later
in disoriented semi-wakefulness.
The descent into narcosis and beyond with progressively larger doses can be divided as follows:
I. Sedative stage.
II. Unconsciousness, with exaggerated reflexes (hyperactive stage).
III. Unconsciousness, without reflex even to painful stimuli.
IV. Death.
Whether all these stages can be distinguished in any given subject depends largely on the dose and the
rapidity with which the drug is induced. In anesthesia, stages I and II may last only two or three seconds.
The first or sedative stage can be further divided:
Plane 1. No evident effect, or slightly sedative effect.
Plane 2. Cloudiness, calmness, amnesia. (Upon recovery, the subject will not remember what
happened at this or "lower" planes or stages.)
Plane 3. Slurred speech, old thought patterns disrupted, inability to integrate or learn new patterns.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 456 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 176 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 4 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Poor coordination. Subject becomes unaware of painful stimuli.
-28-
Plane 3 is the psychiatric "work" stage. It may last only a few minutes, but it can be extended by further
slow injection of drug. The usual practice is to back into the sedative stage on the way to full
consciousness.
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL STUDIES
The general abhorrence in Western countries for the use of chemical agents "to make people do things
against their will" has precluded serious systematic study (at least as published openly) of the
potentialities of drugs for interrogation. Louis A. Gottschalk, surveying their use in information-seeking
interviews, [13] cites 136 references; but only two touch upon the extraction of intelligence information,
and one of these concludes merely that Russian techniques in interrogation and indoctrination are derived
from age-old police methods and do not depend on the use of drugs. On the validity of confessions
obtained with drugs, Gottschalk found only three published experimental studies that he deemed worth
reporting.
One of these reported experiments by D.P. Morris in which intravenous sodium amytal was helpful in
detecting malingerers. [12] The subjects, soldiers, were at first sullen, negativistic, and non-productive
under amytal, but as the interview proceeded they revealed the fact of and causes for their malingering.
Usually the interviews turned up a neurotic or psychotic basis for the deception.
The other two confession studies, being more relevant to the highly specialized, untouched area of drugs
in intelligence interrogation, deserve more detailed review.
Gerson and Victoroff [12] conducted amytal interviews with 17 neuropsychiatric patients, soldiers who
had charges against them, at Tilton General Hospital, Fort Dix. First they were interviewed without
amytal by a psychiatrist, who, neither ignoring nor stressing their situation as prisoners or suspects under
scrutiny, urged each of them to discuss his social and family background, his army career, and his version
of the charges pending against him.
The patients were told only a few minutes in advance that narcoanalysis would be performed. The doctor
was considerate, but positive and forthright. He indicated that they had no choice but to submit to the
procedure. Their attitudes varied from unquestioning to downright refusal.
Each patient was brought to complete narcosis and permitted to sleep. As he became semiconscious and
could be stimulated to speak, he was held in this stage with additional amytal while the questioning
proceeded. He was questioned first about innocuous matters from his background that he had discussed
before receiving the drug. Whenever possible, he was manipulated into bringing up himself the charges
pending against him before being questioned about them. If he did this in a too fully conscious state, it
proved more effective to ask him to "talk about that later" and to interpose a topic that would diminish
suspicion, delaying the interrogation on his criminal activity until he was back in the proper stage of
narcosis.
The procedure differed from therapeutic narcoanalysis in several ways: the setting, the type of patients,
and the kind of "truth" sought. Also, the subjects were kept in twilight consciousness longer than usual.
This state proved richest in yield of admissions prejudicial to the subject. In it his speech was thick,
mumbling, and disconnected, but his discretion was markedly reduced. This valuable interrogation period,
lasting only five to ten minutes at a time, could be reinduced by injecting more amytal and putting the
patient back to sleep.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 457 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 177 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 5 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The interrogation technique varied from case to case according to the background information about the
patient, the seriousness of the charges, the patient's attitude under narcosis, and his rapport with the
doctor. Sometimes it was useful to pretend, as the patient grew more fully conscious, that he had already
confessed during the amnestic period of the interrogation, and to urge him, while his memory and sense of
self-protection were still limited, to continue to elaborate the details of what he had "already described."
When it was obvious that a subject was withholding the truth, his denials were quickly passed over and
ignored, and the key questions would be rewarded in a new approach.
Several patients revealed fantasies, fears, and delusions approaching delirium, much of which could
readily be distinguished from reality. But sometimes there was no way for the examiner to distinguish
truth from fantasy except by reference to other sources. One subject claimed to have a child that did not
exist,
-29-
another threatened to kill on sight a stepfather who had been dead a year, and yet another confessed to
participating in a robbery when in fact he had only purchased goods from the participants. Testimony
concerning dates and specific places was untrustworthy and often contradictory because of the patient's
loss of time-sense. His veracity in citing names and events proved questionable. Because of his confusion
about actual events and what he thought or feared had happened, the patient at times managed to conceal
the truth unintentionally.
As the subject revived, he would become aware that he was being questioned about his secrets and,
depending upon his personality, his fear of discovery, or the degree of his disillusionment with the doctor,
grow negativistic, hostile, or physically aggressive. Occasionally patients had to be forcibly restrained
during this period to prevent injury to themselves or others as the doctor continued to interrogate. Some
patients, moved by fierce and diffuse anger, the assumption that they had already been tricked into
confessing, and a still limited sense of discretion, defiantly acknowledged their guilt and challenged the
observer to "do something about it." As the excitement passed, some fell back on their original stories and
others verified the confessed material. During the follow-up interview nine of the 17 admitted the validity
of their confessions; eight repudiated their confessions and reaffirmed their earlier accounts.
With respect to the reliability of the results of such interrogation, Gerson and Victoroff conclude that
persistent, careful questioning can reduce ambiguities in drug interrogation, but cannot eliminate them
altogether.
At least one experiment has shown that subjects are capable of maintaining a lie while under the influence
of a barbiturate. Redlich and his associates at Yale [25] administered sodium amytal to nine volunteers,
students and professionals, who had previously, for purposes of the experiment, revealed shameful and
guilt-producing episodes of their past and then invented false self-protective stories to cover them. In
nearly every case the cover story retained some elements of the guilt inherent in the true story.
Under the influence of the drug, the subjects were crossexamined on their cover stories by a second
investigator. The results, though not definitive, showed that normal individuals who had good defenses
and no overt pathological traits could stick to their invented stories and refuse confession. Neurotic
individuals with strong unconscious self-punitive tendencies, on the other hand, both confessed more
easily and were inclined to substitute fantasy for the truth, confessing to offenses never actually
committed.
In recent years drug therapy has made some use of stimulants, most notably amphetamine (Benzedrine)
and its relative methamphetamine (Methadrine). These drugs, used either alone or following intravenous
barbiturates, produce an outpouring of ideas, emotions, and memories which has been of help in
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 458 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 178 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 6 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
diagnosing mental disorders. The potential of stimulants in interrogation has received little attention,
unless in unpublished work. In one study of their psychiatric use Brussel et al. [7] maintain that
methedrine gives the liar no time to think or to organize his deceptions. Once the drug takes hold, they
say, an insurmountable urge to pour out speech traps the malingerer. Gottschalk, on the other hand, says
that this claim is extravagant, asserting without elaboration that the study lacked proper controls. [13] It is
evident that the combined use of barbiturates and stimulants, perhaps along with ataraxics (tranquilizers),
should be further explored.
OBSERVATIONS FROM PRACTICE
J.M. MacDonald, who as a psychiatrist for the District Courts of Denver has had extensive experience
with narcoanalysis, says that drug interrogation is of doubtful value in obtaining confessions to crimes.
Criminal suspects under the influence of barbiturates may deliberately withhold information, persist in
giving untruthful answers, or falsely confess to crimes they did not commit. The psychopathic personality,
in particular, appears to resist successfully the influence of drugs.
MacDonald tells of a criminal psychopath who, having agreed to narco-interrogation, received 1.5 grams
of sodium amytal over a period of five hours. This man feigned amnesia and gave a false account of a
murder. "He displayed little or no remorse as he (falsely) described the crime, including burial of the
body. Indeed he was very self-possessed and he appeared almost to enjoy the examination. From time to
time he would request that more amytal be injected." [21]
MacDonald concludes that a person who gives false information prior to re-
-30-
ceiving drugs is likely to give false information also under narcosis, that the drugs are of little value for
revealing deceptions, and that they are more effective in releasing unconsciously repressed material than
in evoking consciously suppressed information.
Another psychiatrist known for his work with criminals, L.Z. Freedman, gave sodium amytal to men
accused of various civil and military antisocial acts. The subjects were mentally unstable, their conditions
ranging from character disorders to neuroses and psychoses. The drug interviews proved psychiatrically
beneficial to the patients, but Freedman found that his view of objective reality was seldom improved by
their revelations. He was unable to say on the basis of the narco-interrogation whether a given act had or
had not occurred. Like MacDonald, he found that psychopathic individuals can deny to the point of
unconsciousness crimes that every objective sign indicates they have committed. [10]
F.G. Inbau, Professor of Law at Northwestern University, who has had considerable experience observing
and participating in "truth" drug tests, claims that they are occasionally effective on persons who would
have disclosed the truth anyway had they been properly interrogated, but that a person determined to lie
will usually be able to continue the deception under drugs.
The two military psychiatrists who made the most extensive use of narcoanalysis during the war years.
Roy R. Grinker and John C. Spiegel, concluded that in almost all cases they could obtain from their
patients essentially the same material and give them the same emotional release by therapy without the
use of drugs, provided they had sufficient time.
The essence of these comments from professionals of long experience is that drugs provide rapid access to
information that is psychiatrically useful but of doubtful validity as empirical truth. The same
psychological information and a less adulterated empirical truth can be obtained from fully conscious
subjects through non-drug psychotherapy and skillful police interrogation.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 459 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 179 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 7 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
APPLICATION TO CI INTERROGATION
The almost total absence of controlled experimental studies of "truth" drugs and the spotty and anecdotal
nature of psychiatric and police evidence require that extrapolations to intelligence operations be made
with care. Still, enough is known about the drugs' actions to suggest certain considerations affecting the
possibilities for their use in interrogation.
It should be clear from the foregoing that at best a drug can only serve as an aid to an interrogator who has
a sure understanding of the psychology and techniques of normal interrogation. In some respects, indeed,
the demands on his skill will be increased by the baffling mixture of truth and fantasy in drug-induced
output. And the tendency against which he must guard in the interrogate to give the responses that seem to
be wanted without regard for facts will be heightened by drugs: the literature abounds with warnings that
a subject in narcosis is extremely suggestible.
It seems possible that this suggestibility and the lowered guard of the narcotic state might be put to
advantage in the case of a subject feigning ignorance of a language or some other skill that had become
automatic with him. Lipton [20] found sodium amytal helpful in determining whether a foreign subject
was merely pretending not to understand English. By extension, one can guess that a drugged interrogatee
might have difficulty maintaining the pretense that he did not comprehend the idiom of a profession he
was trying to hide.
There is the further problem of hostility in the interrogator's relationship to a resistance source. The
accumulated knowledge about "truth" drug reaction has come largely from patient-physician relationships
of trust and confidence. The subject in narcoanalysis is usually motivated a priori to cooperate with the
psychiatrist, either to obtain relief from mental suffering or to contribute to a scientific study. Even in
police work, where an atmosphere of anxiety and threat may be dominant, a relationship of trust
frequently asserts itself: the drug is administered by a medical man bound by a strict code of ethics; the
suspect agreeing to undergo narcoanalysis in a desperate bid for corroboration of his testimony trusts both
drug and psychiatrist, however apprehensively; and finally, as Freedman and MacDonald have indicated,
the police psychiatrist frequently deals with a "sick" criminal, and some order of patient-physician
relationship necessarily evolves.
-31-
Rarely has a drug interrogation involved "normal" individuals in a hostile or genuinely threatening milieu.
It was from a non-threatening experimental setting that Eric Lindemann could say that his "normal"
subjects "reported a general sense of euphoria, ease and confidence, and they exhibited a marked increase
in talkativeness and communicability." [18] Gerson and Victoroff list poor doctor-patient rapport as one
factor interfering with the completeness and authenticity of confessions by the Fort Dix soldiers, caught as
they were in a command performance and told they had no choice but to submit to narco-interrogation.
From all indications, subject-interrogation rapport is usually crucial to obtaining the psychological release
which may lead to unguarded disclosures. Role-playing on the part of the interrogator might be a possible
solution to the problem of establishing rapport with a drugged subject. In therapy, the British narco-
analyst William Sargent recommends that the therapist deliberately distort the facts of the patient's life-
experience to achieve heightened emotional response and abreaction. [27] In the drunken state of
narcoanalysis patients are prone to accept the therapist's false constructions. There is reason to expect that
a drugged subject would communicate freely with an interrogator playing the role of relative, colleague,
physician, immediate superior, or any other person to whom his background indicated he would be
responsive.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 460 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 180 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 8 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Even when rapport is poor, however, there remains one facet of drug action eminently exploitable in
interrogation -- the fact that subjects emerge from narcosis feeling they have revealed a great deal, even
when they have not. As Gerson and Victoroff demonstrated at Fort Dix, this psychological set provides a
major opening for obtaining genuine confessions.
POSSIBLE VARIATIONS
In studies by Beecher and his associates, [3-6] one-third to one-half the individuals tested proved to be
placebo reactors, subjects who respond with symptomatic relief to the administration of any syringe, pill,
or capsule, regardless of what it contains. Although no studies are known to have been made of the
placebo phenomenon as applied to narco-interrogation, it seems reasonable that when a subject's sense of
guilt interferes with productive interrogation, a placebo for pseudo-narcosis could have the effect of
absolving him of the responsibility for his acts and thus clear the way for free communication. It is
notable that placebos are most likely to be effective in situations of stress. The individuals most likely to
react to placebos are the more anxious, more self-centered, more dependent on outside stimulation, those
who express their needs more freely socially, talkers who drain off anxiety by conversing with others. The
non-reactors are those clinically more rigid and with better than average emotional control. No sex or I.Q.
differences between reactors and non-reactors have been found.
Another possibility might be the combined use of drugs with hypnotic trance and post-hypnotic
suggestion: hypnosis could presumably prevent any recollection of the drug experience. Whether a subject
can be brought to trance against his will or unaware, however, is a matter of some disagreement. Orne, in
a survey of the potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation, [23] asserts that it is doubtful, despite many
apparent indications to the contrary, that trance can be induced in resistant subjects. It may be possible, he
adds, to hypnotize a subject unaware, but this would require a positive relationship with the hypnotist not
likely to be found in the interrogation setting.
In medical hypnosis, pentothal sodium is sometimes employed when only light trance has been induced
and deeper narcosis is desired. This procedure is a possibility for interrogation, but if a satisfactory level
of narcosis could be achieved through hypnotic trance there would appear to be no need for drugs.
DEFENSIVE MEASURES
There is no known way of building tolerance for a "truth" drug without creating a disabling addiction, or
of arresting the action of a barbiturate once induced. The only full safeguard against narco-interrogation is
to prevent the administration of the drug. Short of this, the best defense is to make use of the same
knowledge that suggests drugs for offensive operations: if a subject knows that on emerging from narcosis
he will have an exaggerated notion of how much he has revealed he can better resolve to deny he has said
anything.
-32-
The disadvantages and shortcomings of drugs in offensive operations become positive features of the
defensive posture. A subject in narco-interrogation is garbled and irrational, the amount of output
drastically diminished. Drugs disrupt established thought patterns, including the will to resist, but they do
so indiscriminately and thus also interfere with the patterns of substantive information the interrogator
seeks. Even under the conditions most favorable for the interrogator, output will be contaminated by
fantasy, distortion, and untruth.
Possibly the most effective way to arm oneself against narco-interrogation would be to undergo a "dry
run." A trial drug interrogation with output taped for playback would familiarize an individual with his
own reactions to "truth" drugs, and this familiarity would help to reduce the effects of harassment by the
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 461 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 181 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 9 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
interrogator before and after the drug has been administered. From the viewpoint of the intelligence
service, the trial exposure of a particular operative to drugs might provide a rough benchmark for
assessing the kind and amount of information he would divulge in narcosis.
There may be concern over the possibility of drug addiction intentionally or accidentally induced by an
adversary service. Most drugs will cause addiction with prolonged use, and the barbiturates are no
exception. In recent studies at the U.S. Public Health Service Hospital for addicts in Lexington, Ky.,
subjects received large doses of barbiturates over a period of months. Upon removal of the drug, they
experienced acute withdrawal symptoms and behaved in every respect like chronic alcoholics.
Because their action is extremely short, however, and because there is little likelihood that they would be
administered regularly over a prolonged period, barbiturate "truth" drugs present slight risk of operational
addiction. If the adversary service were intent on creating addiction in order to exploit withdrawal, it
would have other, more rapid means of producing states as unpleasant as withdrawal symptoms.
The hallucinatory and psychotomimetic drugs such as mescaline, marihuana, LSD-25, and microtine are
sometimes mistakenly associated with narcoanalytic interrogation. These drugs distort the perception and
interpretation of the sensory input to the central nervous system and affect vision, audition, smell, the
sensation of the size of body parts and their position in space, etc. Mescaline and LSD-25 have been used
to create experimental "psychotic states," and in a minor way as aids in psychotherapy.
Since information obtained from a person in a psychotic drug state would be unrealistic, bizarre, and
extremely difficult to assess, the self-administration of LSD-25, which is effective in minute dosages,
might in special circumstances offer an operative temporary protection against interrogation. Conceivably,
on the other hand, an adversary service could use such drugs to produce anxiety or terror in medically
unsophisticated subjects unable to distinguish drug-induced psychosis from actual insanity. An
enlightened operative could not be thus frightened, however, knowing that the effect of these
hallucinogenic agents is transient in normal individuals.
Most broadly, there is evidence that drugs have least effect on well-adjusted individuals with good
defenses and good emotional control, and that anyone who can withstand the stress of competent
interrogation in the waking state can do so in narcosis. The essential resources for resistance thus appear
to lie within the individual.
CONCLUSIONS
The salient points that emerge from this discussion are the following. No such magic brew as the popular
notion of truth serum exists. The barbiturates, by disrupting defensive patterns, may sometimes be helpful
in interrogation, but even under the best conditions they will elicit an output contaminated by deception,
fantasy, garbled speech, etc. A major vulnerability they produce in the subject is a tendency to believe he
has revealed more than he has. It is possible, however, for both normal individuals and psychopaths to
resist drug interrogation; it seems likely that any individual who can withstand ordinary intensive
interrogation can hold out in narcosis. The best aid to a defense against narco-interrogation is
foreknowledge of the process and its limitations. There is an acute need for controlled experimental
studies of drug reaction, not only to depressants but also to stimulants and to combinations of depressants,
stimulants, and ataraxics.
-33-
REFERENCES
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 462 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 182 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 10 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
1. Adams, E. Barbiturates. Sci. Am., Jan. 1958, 198 (1), 60-64
2. Barkham, J. Truth Drugs: The new crime solver. Coronet, Jan. 1951, 29, 72-76.
3. Beecher, H. K. Anesthesia. Sci. Am., Jan. 1957, 198, p. 70.
4. -----. Appraisal of drugs intended to alter subjective responses, symptoms. J. Amer. Med. Assn., 1955,
158, 399-401.
5. -----. Evidence for increased effectiveness of placebos with increased stress. Amer. J. Physiol., 1956,
187, 163-169.
6. -----. Experimental pharmacology and measurement of the subjective response. Science, 1953, 116.
157-162.
7. Brussel, J. A., Wilson, D. C., Jr., & Shankel, L. W. The use of methedrine in psychiatric practice.
Psychiat. Quart., 1954, 28, 381-394.
8. Delay, J. Pharmacologic explorations of the personality: narcoanalysis and "methedrine" shock. Proc.
Roy. Soc. Med., 1949, 42, 492-496.
9. deRopp, R. S. Drugs and the Mind. New York: Grove Press, Inc., 1960.
10. Freedman, L. Z. "Truth" drugs. Sci. Am., March 1960. 145-154.
11. Geis, G. In scopolamine veritas. The early history of drug-induced statements. J. of Crim. Law.,
Criminal, & Pol. Sci., Nov.-Dec. 1959, 50 (4), 347-358.
12. Gerson, M. J. & Victoroff, V. Experimental investigation into the validity of confessions obtained
under sodium amytal narcosis. J. Clin. and Exp. Psychopath., 1948, 9, 359-375.
13. Gottschalk, L. A. The use of drugs in information-seeking interviews. Technical report #2, ARDC
Study SR 177-D Contract AF 18 (600) 1797. Dec. 1958. Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
14. House, R. E. The use of scopolamine in criminology. Texas St. J. of Med., 1922, 18, 259.
15. Houston, F. A preliminary investigation into abreaction comparing methedrine and sodium amytal
with other methods. J. Ment. Sci., 1952, 98, 707-710.
16. Inbau, F. G. Self-incrimination. Springfield: C. C. Thomas, 1950.
17. Kidd, W. R. Police interrogation. 1940.
18. Legal dose of truth. Newsweek, Feb. 23, 1959, 28.
19. Lindemann, E. Psychological changes in normal and abnormal individuals under the influence of
sodium amytal. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1932, 11, 1083-1091.
20. Lipton, E. L. The amytal interview. A review. Amer. Practit. Digest Treatm., 1950, 1, 148-163.
21. MacDonald, J. M. Narcoanalysis and criminal law. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1954, 111, 283-288.
22. Morris, D. P. Intravenous barbiturates: an aid in the diagnosis and treatment of conversion hysteria
and malingering. Mil. Surg., 1945, 96, 509-513.
23. Orne, M. T. The potential uses of hypnosis in interrogation. An evaluation. ARDC Study SR 177-D
Contract AF 18 (600) 1797, Dec. 1958. Bureau of Social Science Research, Inc.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 463 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 183 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation Page 11 of 11
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
24. Pelikan, E. W., & Kensler, C. J. Sedatives: Their pharmacalogy and uses. Reprint from The Medical
Clinics of North America. W. B. Saunders Company, Sept. 1958.
25. Redlich, F. C., Ravitz, L. J., & Dression, G. H. Narcoanalysis and truth. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1951, 107,
586-593.
26. Rolin, J. Police Drugs. Translated by L. J. Bendit. New York: Philosophical Library, 1956.
27. Sargant, W., & Slater, E. Physical methods of treatment in psychiatry. (3rd. ed.) Baltimore: Williams
and Wilkins, 1954.
28. Snider, R. S. Cerebellum. Sci. Am., Aug. 1958, 84.
29. Uhr, L., & Miller, L. G. (eds.). Drugs and Behavior. New York-London: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
1960.
Next: CIA Director Stansfield Turners Testimony, Continued
Previous: Opening Testimony of CIA Director Stansfield Turner
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 464 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 184 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing04.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony
(Continued -- pp. 33-50)
Senator WALLOP. If they are, I would assume that you would still try to find from either
theirs or somebody else's information how to protect our people from that kind of activity.
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
-34-
Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 465 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 185 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35-
of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 466 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 186 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 467 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 187 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the people who unwittingly or wittingly got involved in experimentation. I would
appreciate it if you would report back to this committee in 3 months on what the Agency
has done to notify these individuals and these institutions, and furthermore, to notify us as
to what steps have been taken to identify victims, and if identified, what you have done to
assist them, monetarily or otherwise.
Admiral TURNER. All right, sir. I will be happy to.
Senator GOLDWATER. Will the Senator yield?
-36-
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir.
Senator GOLDWATER. I wonder if he could include in that report for our information
only a complete listing of the individuals and the experiments done on them, and whether
they were witting or unwitting, volunteer or nonvolunteer, and what has been the result in
each case. I think that would be interesting.
Admiral TURNER. Fine. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy?
Senator KENNEDY. Thank you. It is your intention to notify the individuals who have
been the, subjects of the research, is that right, Admiral Turner? Do you intend to notify
those individuals?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. If you can identify them, you intend to notify them?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And you intend to notify the universities or research centers as well?
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I am torn on that. I understand your opening statement. I put
myself in the position of the president of one of those, universities, let's say. If he were
witting -- if his university had been witting of this activity with us, lie has access to all that
information today. If lie, were not witting, I wonder if the. process of informing him might
put his institution's reputation in more jeopardy than letting them go on the way they are
today, not knowing. I really don't know the equities here.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, the problem is, all you have to do is pick up the newspapers
and you see these universities mentioned. In many instances, I think you are putting the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, where there is a complete change of
administration, and they may for one reason or another not have information that they are,
under suspicion. There is innuendo; there is rumor. I cannot help but believe that it will just
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 468 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 188 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37-
for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 469 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 189 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it--
Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity--
Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
-38-
Senator KENNEDY. All right. You let us know, too.
Admiral TURNER. But I am not sure that I see that there is any great benefit, in my
notifying the public as opposed to the university notifying them. Let him have his choice
whether he wants -- each institution wants to have it made public.
Senator KENNEDY. Yes. The fact would remain that the institution's credibility would be
better served if the institution's president were to deny it and the university indicated that it
did not participate in that program than if the university were to deny it and the Agency
says nothing. It seems to me that that would be the strongest, and the only way that that is
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 470 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 190 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have --
apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 471 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 191 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39-
projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
and there is a blank, something has been deleted.
It seems pretty clear to me what they intended to do in that particular wing. Doesn't it to
you? Why would you go to such elaborate preparations, to buy part of the wing, bring three
of your own personnel there, give them a cover, and give them access to patients? Why
would you go to such trouble and expense to arrange, all that, if you weren't planning to
experiment on people in the hospital?
Admiral TURNER. I agree with you 100 percent, sir. Those were clearly the intentions. I
have no evidence that it was carried out in that way. I am not trying to be defensive,
Senator. I am only trying to be absolutely precise here.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, then, as to the nature of what was done there, the last
paragraph on the same page of the document says, "The facilities of the hospital and the
ability to conduct controlled experimentations under safe clinical conditions using
materials with which any agency connection must be completely deniable will augment
and complement other programs recently taken over by TSS, such as," and then there's
another deletion.
Now, the words following "such as" have been deleted. That is still classified, or at least it
was removed when this document was sanitized and released. It seems to be that whatever
was deleted right there would give you a pretty good clue as to what they were doing, since
it says that the activities would "augment and complement other programs" undertaken by
TSS. So, I have trouble understanding why you don't know what was contemplated. Just
the fact that similar programs are referred to in the document, though what they are is still
deleted, should enable you to check it out.
You could look at what went on in the similar programs mentioned following the "such as"
in the classified version of this document.
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I have not said that we don't know what was contemplated
being done there. We do not know what was done there.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 472 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 192 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40-
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but--
Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 473 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 193 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41-
with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 474 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 194 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[The material referred to follows:]
Mr. Laubinger corrected his testimony regarding Subproject 54 during the September 21, 1977
hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Human Resources
Committee. The relevant portion is reproduced below:
Mr. LAUBINGER. On project 54, it has got a rather sensational proposal in there, in terms of
the work that they propose to do, and you asked about the proposal and I said, in fact, it was
never funded under MKULTRA. Now, I overlooked -- at least, my memory did not serve me
correctly when I went through that file folder to see one memorandum dated January 10, 1956,
which makes it quite clear, as a matter of fact, that that proposal was based on prior work that
was funded by the Agency.
Senator SCHWEIKER. By what?
Mr. LAUBINGER. By the CIA. So, that information was in their file folder. It did not
happen to be in my head when I testified.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think I might have read you that, and that is why I argued at the
time with you, because I think I had in front of me, as I recall, some indication that it was
funded there. I did read that to you. So, you did supply it to us; there is no argument about that
information.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Perhaps I am sort of headstrong, myself, and in my own view, I am
reading under the ULTRA project, that if it had been funded under ULTRA, it would have had
a project number and identified as such. The thing that threw me was that it was funded,
apparently, outside of any MKULTRA activity and it was under the normal contracting
process, so that it was not included in MKULTRA as any work done under that funding
umbrella.
The file folder that you have and I have, right here, makes it quite clear, however, that a year's
work was done through navy funding -- a navy funding mechanism -- on which the proposal
was based that ultimately came into the MKULTRA program. That second proposal was never
funded. So, there was conflict and I, personally, I think, introduced a little bit of confusion in
that in my testimony.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, do you agree or not agree with DOD's statement here that even
though the initial funding was navy, it was really I conduit for the CIA?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I think that is correct.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 475 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 195 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42-
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonance-
cavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 476 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 196 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43-
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember--
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 477 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 197 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator HUDDLESTON. Well, is it accurate to say that this experimentation produced
few useful results or had little application at all to the operations of the Agency or anybody
else as far as we know?
Admiral TURNER. I think that is basically correct. At the same time, I would point out
that we had two CIA prisoners in China and one in the Soviet Union at this time, and we
were concerned as to what kinds of things might be done to them, but I am not saying that-
-
Senator HUDDLESTON. Have you detected any sign that any other nation is continuing
or has in the past conducted experiments similar to this or with a similar objective?
Admiral TURNER. I am not prepared to answer that one off the top of my head, sir, but I
will get it to you.
[The material referred to follows:]
We maintain no files of up-to-date information on the testing of drugs in foreign countries.
Some years ago we occasionally would review foreign research on antibiotics and
pharmaceuticals in connection with public health and civil defense assessments. For a few
years beginning in 1949 we assessed foreign research on LSD under Project ARTICHOKE
because of concern that such drugs might be employed against Agency and other U.S.
personnel. Information relative to this work has already been provided to relevant Committees.
In this early work we also occasionally looked at foreign human experimentation; we long ago
eliminated our holdings on this subject and no collection requirements are any longer served.
As consumer interest in this area has dropped off and higher priority areas need attention, we
have virtually no present coverage with the possible exception of an occasional scanning of
the literature for a specific program. To the best of our knowledge no other unit in the
Intelligence Community is tracking this subject now.
-44-
Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 478 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 198 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 479 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 199 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45-
Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 480 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 200 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Either through the Agency or through the Justice Department?
Admiral TURNER. [Nods in the affirmative.]
Senator KENNEDY. Is it plausible that the director of the program would not understand
or know about the details of the program? Is it plausible that Dr. Gottlieb would not
understand the full range of activities in those particular safe houses?
-46-
Admiral TURNER. Let me say it is unlikely. I don't know Mr. Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. Has anybody in the Agency talked with Mr. Gottlieb to find out
about this?
Admiral TURNER. Not since this revelation has come out.
Senator KENNEDY. Not since this revelation? Well, why not?
Admiral TURNER. He has left our employ, Senator.
Senator KENNEDY. Does that mean that anybody who leaves is, you know, covered for
lifetime?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Why wouldn't you talk with him and find out? You have new
information about this program. It has been a matter of considerable interest both to our
committee and to the Intelligence Committee. Why wouldn't you talk to Mr. Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Well, again, I think the issue is whether this should be done by the
Justice Department or ourselves.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, are we wrestling around because you and Attorney General
Bell can't agree--
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY [continuing]. On who ought to do it?
Admiral TURNER. We are proceeding together in complete agreement as to how to go. I
have, in connection with trying to find all of these Americans or others who were
unwittingly tested, I have some considerable concern about the CIA running around this
country interviewing and interrogating people, because I don't want to give any impression
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 481 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 201 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
that we are doing domestic intelligence.
Senator KENNEDY. I am just talking about one, in this case. That was the man who was
responsible for the whole program, and to find out whether anyone within the Agency
since you have had this new material has talked to Gottlieb since 1975, and if the answer is
no, I want to know why not.
Admiral TURNER. The reason he was not interviewed in connection with the 1975
hearings was that he had left the employ of the CIA and there was a concern on the part of
the Agency that it would appear to the investigators that the CIA was in some way trying to
influence him and influence his testimony before the committee. If these committees have,
no objection, we would be happy to contact Dr. Gottlieb and see if he can augment
anything here in this new information, though I don't think there is much in this new
information that be can add to as opposed to what was available in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you see, Admiral Turner, you come to the two committees this
morning and indicate that now at last we have the information. We don't have to be
concerned about anything in the future on it. Now, I don't know how you can give those
assurances to the members of these committees as well as to the American people when
you haven't since 1975 even talked to the principal person that was in charge of the
program, and the records were destroyed. He is the fellow that was running the program,
and the Agency has not talked to him since the development of this new material.
Admiral TURNER. Our only concern here is the proprieties involved, and we will dig
into this and work with the Justice Department on
-47-
who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 482 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 202 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48-
Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in two-
way mirrors.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 483 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 203 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And they were placed in the bedroom, as I understand.
[Pause.]
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have documents--
Admiral TURNER. I believe that was in the Church record, but I don't have the details.
Senator KENNEDY. And rather elaborate decorations were added, as I understand, at,
least, to the one in San Francisco, in the bedroom, which are French can-can dancers, floral
pictures, drapery, including installation of bedroom mirrors, three framed Toulouse Lautrec
posters with black silk mats, and a number of other -- red bedroom curtains and recording
equipment, and then a series of documents which were provided to the committee which
indicate a wide proliferation of different cash for $100, generally in the $100 range over
any period of time on the particular checks. Even the names are blocked out, as to the
person who is receiving it. Cash for undercover agents, operating expenses, drinks,
entertainment while administering, and then it is dashed out, and then the other documents,
that would suggest, at least with the signature of your principal agent out there, that "called
to the operation, midnight, and climax."
What can you tell us that it might suggest to you about what techniques were being used by
the Agency in terms of reaching that sort of broad-based group of Americans that were
being evidently enticed for testing in terms of drugs and others? Do you draw ally kind of
conclusion about what might have been going on out there, in these safe houses?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
[General laughter.]
Senator KENNEDY. There is a light side to it, but there is also an enormously serious
side. And that is that, at least the techniques which are used or were used in terms of
testing, and trying to find out exactly the range of drugs used and the numbers of people
involved and exactly what that operation was about, as well as the constant reiteration of
the, use of small sums of cash at irregular intervals. A variety of different techniques were
employed but there is an awful lot of documentation putting these matters together.
When you look at the fact that, it is a broad range population that has been tested, tested in
these two areas, with the kind of cash slips that were used in this payment mechanisms and
decorations and all of the rest, we are not able to put a bottom line on it but one thing is for
sure, and that is, Gottlieb knows. That is one thing for sure, because his name appears on
just about every one of these documents, and it is, I think, very important to find out what
his understanding is of the nature of that. So, we will hear more about that.
Admiral TURNER. I believe Gottlieb has been interviewed by the Congress.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right, he has, and in reviewing the record, it is not very
satisfactory, and it just seems with the new information
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 484 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 204 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49-
and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 485 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 205 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir?
Senator KENNEDY. I, too, want to thank Admiral Turner for his responsiveness. I have
had meetings with him in the committees and also conversations, telephone conversations,
and private meetings, and
-50-
I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 486 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 206 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
Next: Testimony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger
Previous: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 487 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 207 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony
(Continued -- pp. 33-50)
Senator WALLOP. If they are, I would assume that you would still try to find from either
theirs or somebody else's information how to protect our people from that kind of activity.
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
-34-
Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 488 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 208 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35-
of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 489 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 209 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 490 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 210 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the people who unwittingly or wittingly got involved in experimentation. I would
appreciate it if you would report back to this committee in 3 months on what the Agency
has done to notify these individuals and these institutions, and furthermore, to notify us as
to what steps have been taken to identify victims, and if identified, what you have done to
assist them, monetarily or otherwise.
Admiral TURNER. All right, sir. I will be happy to.
Senator GOLDWATER. Will the Senator yield?
-36-
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir.
Senator GOLDWATER. I wonder if he could include in that report for our information
only a complete listing of the individuals and the experiments done on them, and whether
they were witting or unwitting, volunteer or nonvolunteer, and what has been the result in
each case. I think that would be interesting.
Admiral TURNER. Fine. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy?
Senator KENNEDY. Thank you. It is your intention to notify the individuals who have
been the, subjects of the research, is that right, Admiral Turner? Do you intend to notify
those individuals?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. If you can identify them, you intend to notify them?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And you intend to notify the universities or research centers as well?
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I am torn on that. I understand your opening statement. I put
myself in the position of the president of one of those, universities, let's say. If he were
witting -- if his university had been witting of this activity with us, lie has access to all that
information today. If lie, were not witting, I wonder if the. process of informing him might
put his institution's reputation in more jeopardy than letting them go on the way they are
today, not knowing. I really don't know the equities here.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, the problem is, all you have to do is pick up the newspapers
and you see these universities mentioned. In many instances, I think you are putting the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, where there is a complete change of
administration, and they may for one reason or another not have information that they are,
under suspicion. There is innuendo; there is rumor. I cannot help but believe that it will just
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 491 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 211 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37-
for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 492 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 212 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it--
Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity--
Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
-38-
Senator KENNEDY. All right. You let us know, too.
Admiral TURNER. But I am not sure that I see that there is any great benefit, in my
notifying the public as opposed to the university notifying them. Let him have his choice
whether he wants -- each institution wants to have it made public.
Senator KENNEDY. Yes. The fact would remain that the institution's credibility would be
better served if the institution's president were to deny it and the university indicated that it
did not participate in that program than if the university were to deny it and the Agency
says nothing. It seems to me that that would be the strongest, and the only way that that is
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 493 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 213 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have --
apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 494 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 214 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39-
projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
and there is a blank, something has been deleted.
It seems pretty clear to me what they intended to do in that particular wing. Doesn't it to
you? Why would you go to such elaborate preparations, to buy part of the wing, bring three
of your own personnel there, give them a cover, and give them access to patients? Why
would you go to such trouble and expense to arrange, all that, if you weren't planning to
experiment on people in the hospital?
Admiral TURNER. I agree with you 100 percent, sir. Those were clearly the intentions. I
have no evidence that it was carried out in that way. I am not trying to be defensive,
Senator. I am only trying to be absolutely precise here.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, then, as to the nature of what was done there, the last
paragraph on the same page of the document says, "The facilities of the hospital and the
ability to conduct controlled experimentations under safe clinical conditions using
materials with which any agency connection must be completely deniable will augment
and complement other programs recently taken over by TSS, such as," and then there's
another deletion.
Now, the words following "such as" have been deleted. That is still classified, or at least it
was removed when this document was sanitized and released. It seems to be that whatever
was deleted right there would give you a pretty good clue as to what they were doing, since
it says that the activities would "augment and complement other programs" undertaken by
TSS. So, I have trouble understanding why you don't know what was contemplated. Just
the fact that similar programs are referred to in the document, though what they are is still
deleted, should enable you to check it out.
You could look at what went on in the similar programs mentioned following the "such as"
in the classified version of this document.
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I have not said that we don't know what was contemplated
being done there. We do not know what was done there.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 495 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 215 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40-
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but--
Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 496 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 216 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41-
with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 497 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 217 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[The material referred to follows:]
Mr. Laubinger corrected his testimony regarding Subproject 54 during the September 21, 1977
hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Human Resources
Committee. The relevant portion is reproduced below:
Mr. LAUBINGER. On project 54, it has got a rather sensational proposal in there, in terms of
the work that they propose to do, and you asked about the proposal and I said, in fact, it was
never funded under MKULTRA. Now, I overlooked -- at least, my memory did not serve me
correctly when I went through that file folder to see one memorandum dated January 10, 1956,
which makes it quite clear, as a matter of fact, that that proposal was based on prior work that
was funded by the Agency.
Senator SCHWEIKER. By what?
Mr. LAUBINGER. By the CIA. So, that information was in their file folder. It did not
happen to be in my head when I testified.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think I might have read you that, and that is why I argued at the
time with you, because I think I had in front of me, as I recall, some indication that it was
funded there. I did read that to you. So, you did supply it to us; there is no argument about that
information.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Perhaps I am sort of headstrong, myself, and in my own view, I am
reading under the ULTRA project, that if it had been funded under ULTRA, it would have had
a project number and identified as such. The thing that threw me was that it was funded,
apparently, outside of any MKULTRA activity and it was under the normal contracting
process, so that it was not included in MKULTRA as any work done under that funding
umbrella.
The file folder that you have and I have, right here, makes it quite clear, however, that a year's
work was done through navy funding -- a navy funding mechanism -- on which the proposal
was based that ultimately came into the MKULTRA program. That second proposal was never
funded. So, there was conflict and I, personally, I think, introduced a little bit of confusion in
that in my testimony.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, do you agree or not agree with DOD's statement here that even
though the initial funding was navy, it was really I conduit for the CIA?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I think that is correct.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 498 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 218 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42-
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonance-
cavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 499 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 219 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43-
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember--
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 500 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 220 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator HUDDLESTON. Well, is it accurate to say that this experimentation produced
few useful results or had little application at all to the operations of the Agency or anybody
else as far as we know?
Admiral TURNER. I think that is basically correct. At the same time, I would point out
that we had two CIA prisoners in China and one in the Soviet Union at this time, and we
were concerned as to what kinds of things might be done to them, but I am not saying that-
-
Senator HUDDLESTON. Have you detected any sign that any other nation is continuing
or has in the past conducted experiments similar to this or with a similar objective?
Admiral TURNER. I am not prepared to answer that one off the top of my head, sir, but I
will get it to you.
[The material referred to follows:]
We maintain no files of up-to-date information on the testing of drugs in foreign countries.
Some years ago we occasionally would review foreign research on antibiotics and
pharmaceuticals in connection with public health and civil defense assessments. For a few
years beginning in 1949 we assessed foreign research on LSD under Project ARTICHOKE
because of concern that such drugs might be employed against Agency and other U.S.
personnel. Information relative to this work has already been provided to relevant Committees.
In this early work we also occasionally looked at foreign human experimentation; we long ago
eliminated our holdings on this subject and no collection requirements are any longer served.
As consumer interest in this area has dropped off and higher priority areas need attention, we
have virtually no present coverage with the possible exception of an occasional scanning of
the literature for a specific program. To the best of our knowledge no other unit in the
Intelligence Community is tracking this subject now.
-44-
Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 501 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 221 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 502 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 222 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45-
Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 503 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 223 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Either through the Agency or through the Justice Department?
Admiral TURNER. [Nods in the affirmative.]
Senator KENNEDY. Is it plausible that the director of the program would not understand
or know about the details of the program? Is it plausible that Dr. Gottlieb would not
understand the full range of activities in those particular safe houses?
-46-
Admiral TURNER. Let me say it is unlikely. I don't know Mr. Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. Has anybody in the Agency talked with Mr. Gottlieb to find out
about this?
Admiral TURNER. Not since this revelation has come out.
Senator KENNEDY. Not since this revelation? Well, why not?
Admiral TURNER. He has left our employ, Senator.
Senator KENNEDY. Does that mean that anybody who leaves is, you know, covered for
lifetime?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Why wouldn't you talk with him and find out? You have new
information about this program. It has been a matter of considerable interest both to our
committee and to the Intelligence Committee. Why wouldn't you talk to Mr. Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Well, again, I think the issue is whether this should be done by the
Justice Department or ourselves.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, are we wrestling around because you and Attorney General
Bell can't agree--
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY [continuing]. On who ought to do it?
Admiral TURNER. We are proceeding together in complete agreement as to how to go. I
have, in connection with trying to find all of these Americans or others who were
unwittingly tested, I have some considerable concern about the CIA running around this
country interviewing and interrogating people, because I don't want to give any impression
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 504 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 224 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
that we are doing domestic intelligence.
Senator KENNEDY. I am just talking about one, in this case. That was the man who was
responsible for the whole program, and to find out whether anyone within the Agency
since you have had this new material has talked to Gottlieb since 1975, and if the answer is
no, I want to know why not.
Admiral TURNER. The reason he was not interviewed in connection with the 1975
hearings was that he had left the employ of the CIA and there was a concern on the part of
the Agency that it would appear to the investigators that the CIA was in some way trying to
influence him and influence his testimony before the committee. If these committees have,
no objection, we would be happy to contact Dr. Gottlieb and see if he can augment
anything here in this new information, though I don't think there is much in this new
information that be can add to as opposed to what was available in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you see, Admiral Turner, you come to the two committees this
morning and indicate that now at last we have the information. We don't have to be
concerned about anything in the future on it. Now, I don't know how you can give those
assurances to the members of these committees as well as to the American people when
you haven't since 1975 even talked to the principal person that was in charge of the
program, and the records were destroyed. He is the fellow that was running the program,
and the Agency has not talked to him since the development of this new material.
Admiral TURNER. Our only concern here is the proprieties involved, and we will dig
into this and work with the Justice Department on
-47-
who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 505 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 225 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48-
Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in two-
way mirrors.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 506 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 226 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And they were placed in the bedroom, as I understand.
[Pause.]
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have documents--
Admiral TURNER. I believe that was in the Church record, but I don't have the details.
Senator KENNEDY. And rather elaborate decorations were added, as I understand, at,
least, to the one in San Francisco, in the bedroom, which are French can-can dancers, floral
pictures, drapery, including installation of bedroom mirrors, three framed Toulouse Lautrec
posters with black silk mats, and a number of other -- red bedroom curtains and recording
equipment, and then a series of documents which were provided to the committee which
indicate a wide proliferation of different cash for $100, generally in the $100 range over
any period of time on the particular checks. Even the names are blocked out, as to the
person who is receiving it. Cash for undercover agents, operating expenses, drinks,
entertainment while administering, and then it is dashed out, and then the other documents,
that would suggest, at least with the signature of your principal agent out there, that "called
to the operation, midnight, and climax."
What can you tell us that it might suggest to you about what techniques were being used by
the Agency in terms of reaching that sort of broad-based group of Americans that were
being evidently enticed for testing in terms of drugs and others? Do you draw ally kind of
conclusion about what might have been going on out there, in these safe houses?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
[General laughter.]
Senator KENNEDY. There is a light side to it, but there is also an enormously serious
side. And that is that, at least the techniques which are used or were used in terms of
testing, and trying to find out exactly the range of drugs used and the numbers of people
involved and exactly what that operation was about, as well as the constant reiteration of
the, use of small sums of cash at irregular intervals. A variety of different techniques were
employed but there is an awful lot of documentation putting these matters together.
When you look at the fact that, it is a broad range population that has been tested, tested in
these two areas, with the kind of cash slips that were used in this payment mechanisms and
decorations and all of the rest, we are not able to put a bottom line on it but one thing is for
sure, and that is, Gottlieb knows. That is one thing for sure, because his name appears on
just about every one of these documents, and it is, I think, very important to find out what
his understanding is of the nature of that. So, we will hear more about that.
Admiral TURNER. I believe Gottlieb has been interviewed by the Congress.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right, he has, and in reviewing the record, it is not very
satisfactory, and it just seems with the new information
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 507 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 227 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49-
and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 508 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 228 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir?
Senator KENNEDY. I, too, want to thank Admiral Turner for his responsiveness. I have
had meetings with him in the committees and also conversations, telephone conversations,
and private meetings, and
-50-
I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 509 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 229 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
Next: Testimony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger
Previous: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 510 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 230 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 1 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
Table of Contents
CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony
(Continued -- pp. 33-50)
Senator WALLOP. If they are, I would assume that you would still try to find from either
theirs or somebody else's information how to protect our people from that kind of activity.
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
-34-
Admiral Turner, I appreciate that these tawdry activities were taking place long before your
watch, and I think you have correctly labeled them as abhorrent, but not only were they
abhorrent, it seems to me that they wee rather bungled, amateurish experiments that don't
seem to have been handled in a very scientific way, at least from the scanty evidence we
have.
It seems to me that there were a minimum of reports and the Agency didn't have the ability
to call it quits. It went on for some 12 years, as you mentioned. What I would like to get to
is, are you convinced now in your Agency that those scientific experiments, legitimate
ones that you were conducting with polygraph and so forth, were being conducted in a
scientific manner and that you are handling it in a correct manner to get the best
information that you are seeking in the end?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 511 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 231 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 2 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, I am, and I also have a sense of confidence that we are limiting
ourselves to the areas where we need to be involved as opposed to areas where we can rely
on others.
Senator CHAFEE. I am convinced of that from your report. I just do hope that you have
people who are trained in not only handling this type of experiment, but in preparing the
proper reports and drawing the proper data from the reports. You are convinced that you
have this type of people?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator CHAFEE. The second point I am interested in was the final lines in your
testimony here, which I believe are very important, and that is that the Agency is doing all
it can in cooperation with other branches of the Government to go about tracking down the
identity of those who were in some way adversely affected, and see what can be done to
fulfill the government's responsibilities in that respect. I might add that I commend you in
that, and I hope you will pursue it vigorously.
A hospital in my State was involved in these proceedings, and it is unclear exactly what did
take place, so I have both a parochial interest in this and a national interest as well, and I do
hope you will press on with it. It involves not only you, I appreciate, but also HEW and
perhaps the Attorney General.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you, sir. We will.
Senator CHAFEE. Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much.
Admiral Turner, MKULTRA subproject 3 was a project involving the surreptitious
administration of LSD on unwitting persons, was it not?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. In February 1954, and this was in the very early stages of MKULTRA,
the Director of Central Intelligence wrote to the technical services staff officials criticizing
their judgment because they had participated in an experiment involving the administration
of LSD on an unwitting basis to Dr. Frank Olson, who later committed suicide. Now, the
individuals criticized were the same individuals who were responsible for subproject 3,
involving exactly the same practices. Even though these individuals were clearly aware of
the dangers of surreptitious administration and had been criticized by the Director
-35-
of Central Intelligence, subproject 3 was not terminated immediately after Dr. Olson's
death.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 512 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 232 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 3 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
In fact, according to documents, it continued for a number of years. Can you provide this
committee with any explanation of how such testing could have continued under these
circumstances?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I really can't.
Senator INOUYE. Are the individuals in technical services who carried on subproject 3
still on the CIA payroll?
Admiral TURNER. I am sorry. Are you asking, are they today?
Senator INOUYE. Yes.
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator INOUYE. What would you do if you criticized officials of the technical services
staff and they continued to carry on experimentation for a number of years?
Admiral TURNER. I would do two things, sir. One is, I would be sure at the beginning
that I was explicit enough that they knew that I didn't want that to be continued anywhere
else, and two, if I found it being continued, I would roll some heads.
Senator INOUYE. Could you provide this committee with information as to whether the
individuals involved had their heads rolled?
Admiral TURNER. I don't believe there is any evidence they did, but I will double check
that.
[See p. 170 for material referred to.]
Senator INOUYE. As you know, Senator Huddleston and his subcommittee are deeply
involved in the drafting of charters and guidelines for the intelligence community. We will
be meeting with the President tomorrow. Our concern is, I think, a basic one. Can anything
like this occur again?
Admiral TURNER. I think it would be very, very unlikely, first, because we are all much
more conscious of these issues than we were back in the fifties, second, because we have
such thorough oversight procedures. I cannot imagine that this kind of activity could take
place today without some member of the CIA itself bypassing me, if I were authorizing
this, and writing to the Intelligence Oversight Board, and blowing the whistle on this kind
of activity.
I am also doing my very best, sir, to encourage an openness with myself and a free
communication in the Agency, so that I am the one who finds these things if they should
happen. The fact is that we must keep you and your committee and now the new committee
in the House informed of our sensitive activities. I think all of these add up to a degree of
scrutiny such that this kind of extensive and flagrant activity could not happen today
without it coming to the attention of the proper authorities to stop it.
Senator INOUYE. A sad aspect of the MKULTRA project was that it naturally involved
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 513 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 233 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 4 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the people who unwittingly or wittingly got involved in experimentation. I would
appreciate it if you would report back to this committee in 3 months on what the Agency
has done to notify these individuals and these institutions, and furthermore, to notify us as
to what steps have been taken to identify victims, and if identified, what you have done to
assist them, monetarily or otherwise.
Admiral TURNER. All right, sir. I will be happy to.
Senator GOLDWATER. Will the Senator yield?
-36-
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir.
Senator GOLDWATER. I wonder if he could include in that report for our information
only a complete listing of the individuals and the experiments done on them, and whether
they were witting or unwitting, volunteer or nonvolunteer, and what has been the result in
each case. I think that would be interesting.
Admiral TURNER. Fine. Yes, sir.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy?
Senator KENNEDY. Thank you. It is your intention to notify the individuals who have
been the, subjects of the research, is that right, Admiral Turner? Do you intend to notify
those individuals?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. If you can identify them, you intend to notify them?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. And you intend to notify the universities or research centers as well?
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I am torn on that. I understand your opening statement. I put
myself in the position of the president of one of those, universities, let's say. If he were
witting -- if his university had been witting of this activity with us, lie has access to all that
information today. If lie, were not witting, I wonder if the. process of informing him might
put his institution's reputation in more jeopardy than letting them go on the way they are
today, not knowing. I really don't know the equities here.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, the problem is, all you have to do is pick up the newspapers
and you see these universities mentioned. In many instances, I think you are putting the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, where there is a complete change of
administration, and they may for one reason or another not have information that they are,
under suspicion. There is innuendo; there is rumor. I cannot help but believe that it will just
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 514 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 234 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 5 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
get smeared all over the newspapers in spite of all the security steps that have been taken.
It seems to me that those universities should be entitled to that information, so that the ones
with other administrations can adapt procedures to protect those universities. The
importance of preserving the independence of our research areas and the communities
seems to me to be a very fundamental kind of question about the protection of the integrity
of our universities and our research centers.
Admiral TURNER. You are saying that you feel that if we identify them privately to
themselves, we can benefit them in an adequate way to cover the risk that this will lead to a
more public disclosure? There are lots of the 80 who have not been identified publicly at
this point.
Senator KENNEDY. I think the universities themselves should be notified. I think then
the universities can take whatever steps in terms of their setting up the procedures to
protect. their own kinds of integrity in terms of the future. I would certainly hope that, they
would feel that they could make a public comment or a public statement on it. I think it is
of general public interest, particularly for the people that are involved in those universities,
to have some kind of awareness of whether they were. used or were not used and how they
were used.
I think they are entitled to it, and quite frankly, if there is a public official or an official of
the university that you notify and be wants
-37-
for his own particular reasons not to have it public, I don't see why those in a lesser echelon
or lower echelon who have been effectively used by it should not have the information as
well.
So, I would hope that you would notify the universities and then also indicate to the public.
I can't conceive that this information will not be put out in the newspapers, and it puts the
university people at an extraordinary disadvantage, and of course some of it is wrong,
which is the fact of the matter, and I think some university official saying, well, it isn't so,
is a lot different than if they know it is confirmed or it is not confirmed in terms of the
Agency itself. I think that there is a responsibility there.
Admiral TURNER. I have great sympathy with what you are saying. I have already
notified one institution because the involvement was so extensive that I thought they really
needed to protect themselves, and I am. most anxious to do this in whatever way will help
all of the people who were perhaps unwitting participants in this, and the difficulty I will
have is, I can't quite do, I think, what you suggested, in that I may not be able to tell an
institution of the extent and nature of its participation.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you can tell them to the best of your information, and it seems
to me that just because the university or an individual is going to be embarrassed is not a
reason for classifying the information. So, I would hope -- I mean, I obviously speak as an
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 515 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 235 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 6 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
individual Senator, but I feel that that is an incredible disservice to the innocent individuals
and I think, a disservice to the integrity of the, universities unless they are notified, to be
able to develop procedures you are developing with regards to your own institution and we
are trying to in terms of the Congress. Certainly the universities are entitled to the same.
Admiral TURNER. Yes. Not all of these, of course, were unwitting.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right.
Admiral TURNER. Many of them were witting, and therefore they can take all those
precautionary steps on their own, but I am perfectly open to doing this. I am only interested
in doing it in a way that when identifying a university it will not lead to the public
disclosure of the individuals, whom I am not allowed to disclose, and so on.
Senator KENNEDY. That could be done, it seems to me.
Admiral TURNER. So, we will see if we can devise a way of notifying these institutions
on a private basis so that they can then make their own decision whether their equities are
best served by their announcing it publicly or their attempting to maintain it--
Senator KENNEDY. Or you. I wonder. What if they were to ask you to announce, or
indicate?
Admiral TURNER. My personal conscience, sir, at this time, is that I would be doing a
disservice to these universities if I notified the public.
Senator KENNEDY. Would you meet with some university officials and ask what their
views are or whether they feel that the preservation of the integrity of the universities
would be better served or not? I think that would be useful to find out from small, large,
private, and public universities' officials how they view the integrity--
Admiral TURNER. Fine. I Will phone several university presidents today who are my
friends and who are not involved in this, and ask them what they think the equities would
be.
-38-
Senator KENNEDY. All right. You let us know, too.
Admiral TURNER. But I am not sure that I see that there is any great benefit, in my
notifying the public as opposed to the university notifying them. Let him have his choice
whether he wants -- each institution wants to have it made public.
Senator KENNEDY. Yes. The fact would remain that the institution's credibility would be
better served if the institution's president were to deny it and the university indicated that it
did not participate in that program than if the university were to deny it and the Agency
says nothing. It seems to me that that would be the strongest, and the only way that that is
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 516 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 236 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 7 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
going to be credible. I would value it if you would get some input from universities as to
what they believe is the fairest way in terms of the preservation of the integrity of the
universities.
Let me, if I could, ask on the question of the uses of these safe houses, as I understand from
information that was provided to us in the course of our last committee, the testing of
various drugs on individuals happened at all social levels, high and low, it happened on
native Americans and also on foreign nationals. That is what I understand was the nature of
the project itself.
Now, I am just wondering whether those tests were conducted at the two locations on the
east coast and the west coast which were known as safe houses. To your knowledge, is that
correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator KENNEDY. In terms of the research in this particular program, it did not go
beyond the safe houses located on the east coast and the west coast? I believe I am correct
on that.
Admiral TURNER. That type of unwitting testing of sort of randomly selected
individuals, yes.
Senator KENNEDY. It was just located in those two places?
Admiral TURNER. To the best of our knowledge, there were only two locations.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, how do we interpret randomly selected?
Admiral TURNER. Well, as opposed to prisoners in a prison who were somehow
selected.
Senator KENNEDY. All right. Do you know from this information how many people
were recruited during this period?
Admiral TURNER. No idea.
Senator KENNEDY. Do you know approximately?
Admiral TURNER. I asked that question the other day, and we just don't have --
apparently we are very -- well, either there were no records kept of the actual numbers and
types of people tested or they were destroyed.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Schweiker.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral Turner, I would like to come back to the experiments which may have been
conducted at the hospital research facilities which the CIA helped to finance. It wasn't clear
to me from your previous answers what kind of work was done there. I gather you are
unclear on that, too, from your remarks, yet I find in the CIA documentation which you
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 517 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 237 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 8 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
have supplied us, a list describing some of the advantages the Agency hoped to gain. It
says:
(a) One-sixth of the total space in the new hospital wing will be available to the Chemical
Division of TSS * * *; (b) Agency sponsorship of sensitive research
-39-
projects will be completely deniable; (c) Full professional cover will be provided for up to
three biochemical employees of the Chemical Division; (d) Human patients and volunteers for
experimental use will be available under controlled clinical conditions with the full
supervision of
and there is a blank, something has been deleted.
It seems pretty clear to me what they intended to do in that particular wing. Doesn't it to
you? Why would you go to such elaborate preparations, to buy part of the wing, bring three
of your own personnel there, give them a cover, and give them access to patients? Why
would you go to such trouble and expense to arrange, all that, if you weren't planning to
experiment on people in the hospital?
Admiral TURNER. I agree with you 100 percent, sir. Those were clearly the intentions. I
have no evidence that it was carried out in that way. I am not trying to be defensive,
Senator. I am only trying to be absolutely precise here.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, then, as to the nature of what was done there, the last
paragraph on the same page of the document says, "The facilities of the hospital and the
ability to conduct controlled experimentations under safe clinical conditions using
materials with which any agency connection must be completely deniable will augment
and complement other programs recently taken over by TSS, such as," and then there's
another deletion.
Now, the words following "such as" have been deleted. That is still classified, or at least it
was removed when this document was sanitized and released. It seems to be that whatever
was deleted right there would give you a pretty good clue as to what they were doing, since
it says that the activities would "augment and complement other programs" undertaken by
TSS. So, I have trouble understanding why you don't know what was contemplated. Just
the fact that similar programs are referred to in the document, though what they are is still
deleted, should enable you to check it out.
You could look at what went on in the similar programs mentioned following the "such as"
in the classified version of this document.
Admiral TURNER. Senator, I have not said that we don't know what was contemplated
being done there. We do not know what was done there.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 518 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 238 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. 33... Page 9 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator SCHWEIKER. Why did you delete that reference? Why is that still classified,
that particular project of whatever it is?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know this particular case. We will get you the exact answer to
that one and inform you about it, but it is quite probable that that other case is unrelated to
this in the -- well, not unrelated, but that that was a project that still deserves to be
classified.
[The material referred to follows:]
Construction of the Gorman Annex was begun in 1957 and the Annex was dedicated in March
1959. Of the several MKULTRA projects conducted at Georgetown only one involving human
testing covered a time span subsequent to March 1959. Subproject 45 ran from 1955 to 1963,
thus it is possible that the final four years 1959-1963) of the subproject could have been spent
in the Gorman Annex. However, there is no reference to the Gorman Annex or a "new Annex"
in Subproject 45 papers, neither is there any mention of the subproject moving to a new
location in 1959 or later years.
Authorization to contribute CIA funds toward construction of the Gorman Annex is contained
in Subproject 35 of MKULTRA. Recently discovered material indicated that Dr. Geschickter
continued his research for sleep- and amnesia-producing drugs under Project MKSEARCH
through July 1967 at Georgetown University Hospital. But it is impossible to determine if the
facilities of the Gorman Annex were involved.
-40-
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think that would give us a pretty good clue as to what was
going to be done in the wing the CIA helped to finance.
Was there any indication at all in the records you found that the project ultimately used
cancer patients or terminally ill patients in connection with this facility?
Admiral TURNER. I'm sorry. I missed your question because I was trying to get the data
on the last one. I will read you the blank.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Go ahead.
Admiral TURNER. QKHILLTOP. It doesn't help you, but--
Senator SCHWEIKER. Can you tell us what that is, or is it still classified?
Admiral TURNER. I don't know, and I assume from the fact that we deleted it, it is still
classified, but I will get you that answer, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you. I'd like to see that information.
[See p. 171 for material referred to.]
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 519 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 239 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 10 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Now my next question was: Is there any indication, Admiral, that projects in that particular
center involved experimentation on terminally ill cancer patients?
Admiral TURNER. I missed the first part of your question, sir. I am very sorry.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Do you have any indication that some experiment in the facility
used terminally ill cancer patients as subjects? You do acknowledge in your statement and
it is clear from other documents that these kinds of experiments were at some point being
done somewhere. My question is, is there any indication that cancer patients or terminally
ill patients were experimented with in this wing?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, it does appear there is a connection here, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. The other question I had relates to the development of something
which has been called the perfect concussion. A series of experiments toward that end were
described in the CIA documents. I wonder if you would just tell us what your
understanding of perfect concussion is.
Admiral TURNER. Is that in my testimony, sir, or in some other document?
Senator SCHWEIKER. Subproject 54, MKULTRA, which involved examination of
techniques to cause brain concussions and amnesia by using weapons or sound waves to
strike individuals without giving and without leaving any clear physical marks. Someone
dubbed it "perfect concussion" -- maybe that was poetic license on the part of our staff
rather than your poets over there. I wonder if you could just tell us what brain concussion
experiments were about?
Admiral TURNER. This project, No. 54, was canceled, and never carried out.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I do believe the first year of the project in 1955 was carried
out by the Office of Naval Research, according to the information that you supplied us.
The CIA seems to have been participating in some way at that point, because the records
go on to say that the experimenter at ONR found out about CIA's role, discovered that it
was a cover, and then the project was transferred to MKULTRA in 1956. Again, this is all
from the backup material you have given us. So, it was canceled at some time. I am not
disagreeing
-41-
with that, but apparently for at least a year or two, somebody was investigating the
production of brain concussions with special blackjacks, sound waves, and other methods
as detailed in the backup material.
Admiral TURNER. The data available to me is that this project was never funded by the
CIA, but I will double-check that and furnish the information for the record for you as to
whether there was ever any connection here and if so, what the nature of the work was.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 520 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 240 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 11 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
[The material referred to follows:]
Mr. Laubinger corrected his testimony regarding Subproject 54 during the September 21, 1977
hearings before the Subcommittee on Health and Scientific Research of the Human Resources
Committee. The relevant portion is reproduced below:
Mr. LAUBINGER. On project 54, it has got a rather sensational proposal in there, in terms of
the work that they propose to do, and you asked about the proposal and I said, in fact, it was
never funded under MKULTRA. Now, I overlooked -- at least, my memory did not serve me
correctly when I went through that file folder to see one memorandum dated January 10, 1956,
which makes it quite clear, as a matter of fact, that that proposal was based on prior work that
was funded by the Agency.
Senator SCHWEIKER. By what?
Mr. LAUBINGER. By the CIA. So, that information was in their file folder. It did not
happen to be in my head when I testified.
Senator SCHWEIKER. I think I might have read you that, and that is why I argued at the
time with you, because I think I had in front of me, as I recall, some indication that it was
funded there. I did read that to you. So, you did supply it to us; there is no argument about that
information.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Perhaps I am sort of headstrong, myself, and in my own view, I am
reading under the ULTRA project, that if it had been funded under ULTRA, it would have had
a project number and identified as such. The thing that threw me was that it was funded,
apparently, outside of any MKULTRA activity and it was under the normal contracting
process, so that it was not included in MKULTRA as any work done under that funding
umbrella.
The file folder that you have and I have, right here, makes it quite clear, however, that a year's
work was done through navy funding -- a navy funding mechanism -- on which the proposal
was based that ultimately came into the MKULTRA program. That second proposal was never
funded. So, there was conflict and I, personally, I think, introduced a little bit of confusion in
that in my testimony.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, do you agree or not agree with DOD's statement here that even
though the initial funding was navy, it was really I conduit for the CIA?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I think that is correct.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Yes; I would appreciate that. I would like to know how it went
from ONR to CIA after a year. Somebody made a decision to make that transfer, and to
make this an MKULTRA subject. There had to be some sort of review that led to a
decision to continue that kind of concussion -- total blackout, maximum amnesia, and
whatever else it was you were interested in -- study and testing.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, if I may try to say a few words on that, the files that were
available to us for inspection, which are limited, indicated that there was a project being
carried on by the Navy having to do with the, effects of brain concussion. The CIA
developed an interest in that, and considered funding it, but actually never did, and as the
admiral testified, the MKULTRA is merely a funding mechanism, a place they go for
money to do such things, but there is no evidence that I know of that that project was ever
funded.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 521 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 241 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 12 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-42-
Senator SCHWEIKER. Well, I am confused, because here again is another quote from a
document that we have seen, which you have released and supplied to us:
Following is the technical progress made under the current [deleted] contract: (a) Specializing
instrumentation and numerous testing techniques have been developed to obtain the desired
dynamic data; (b) considerable data has now been obtained supporting the resonance-
cavilation theory of brain concussion; and (c) preliminary acceleration threshold data has been
obtained for a fluid-filled glass simulated skull.
It goes on to talk about a blast range and a 2,500-square-foot laboratory. The document
notes that "Three blast test series have been run to date." It describes a special blackjack
device, "a pancake-type blackjack giving a high peak impact force with a low unit surface
pressure."
I agree the records are inconclusive as to the results of this work, but it certainly seems that
some testing was done.
Mr. LAUBINGER. Senator, you are putting us in the same position I think you were
stating that you were in earlier referring to documents not before us, but I believe you are
quoting from a proposal that someone sent to the Agency to fund this work, and he is
referring to past work. The past work would have encompassed a lot of things like that, but
CIA was not involved with that.
Senator SCHWEIKER. What do you mean, Admiral, on page 6 of your testimony when
you mention projects using magician's art? How do magicians get into the spook business?
Admiral TURNER. I have interpreted this as to how to slip the mickey into the finn, but I
would like to ask my advisers here to comment.
Mr. BRODY. I think that is essentially it, Senator. It is surreptitious administration of
material to someone, deceptive practices, how to distract someone's attention while you are
doing something else, as I understand it. It was also some type of a covert communication
project involved with the study of how magicians and their assistants perhaps communicate
information to one another without having other people know it. This is the type of thing
that was involved, sir.
Senator SCHWEIKER. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Huddleston?
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Admiral, in your checking these newly discovered documents and interviewing members
of the CIA staff, did you find information that would confirm the contention described by
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 522 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 242 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 13 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
the reporters for the New York Times that this type of experimentation was begun out of a
fear that the Agency that foreign powers might have drugs which would allow them to alter
the behavior of American citizens or agents or members of the Armed Forces who were
taken into custody, and which would have resulted in false confessions and the like? Is my
question clear?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. I haven't personally read the documentation on that. In my
discussions with the people who are well informed in this area at the Agency, I am told that
that is the case.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Was there any evidence or any indication that there were other
motives that the Agency might also be looking for drugs that could be applied for other
purposes, such as debilitating an individual or even killing another person? Was this part of
this kind of experimentation?
-43-
Admiral TURNER. Yes; I think there is. I have not seen in this series of documentation
evidence of desire to kill, but I think the project turned its character from a defensive to an
offensive one as it went along, and there certainly was an intention here to develop drugs
that could be of use.
Senator HUDDLESTON. The project continued for some time after it was learned that, in
fact, foreign powers did not have such a drug as was at first feared, didn't it?
Admiral TURNER. That is my understanding. Yes, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Is there any indication that knowledge gained as a result of
these experiments has been useful or is being applied in any way to present operations?
Mr. BRODY. Senator, I am not sure if there is any body of knowledge. A great deal of
what there was, I gather, was destroyed in 1973. I would like to defer to Frank here. Do
you know of any?
Mr. LAUBINGER. I know of no drugs or anything like that developed under this program
that ever reached operational use or are in use today.
Senator HUDDLESTON. So apparently any information that was gathered was
apparently useless and not worth continuing, not worth further development on the part of
the Agency.
Mr. LAUBINGER. I am having difficulty hearing your questions.
Senator HUDDLESTON. I can hardly hear myself.
Admiral TURNER. I think the answer to your question is that we have no evidence of
great usefulness on this, and yet I think we should remember--
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 523 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 243 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 14 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator HUDDLESTON. Well, is it accurate to say that this experimentation produced
few useful results or had little application at all to the operations of the Agency or anybody
else as far as we know?
Admiral TURNER. I think that is basically correct. At the same time, I would point out
that we had two CIA prisoners in China and one in the Soviet Union at this time, and we
were concerned as to what kinds of things might be done to them, but I am not saying that-
-
Senator HUDDLESTON. Have you detected any sign that any other nation is continuing
or has in the past conducted experiments similar to this or with a similar objective?
Admiral TURNER. I am not prepared to answer that one off the top of my head, sir, but I
will get it to you.
[The material referred to follows:]
We maintain no files of up-to-date information on the testing of drugs in foreign countries.
Some years ago we occasionally would review foreign research on antibiotics and
pharmaceuticals in connection with public health and civil defense assessments. For a few
years beginning in 1949 we assessed foreign research on LSD under Project ARTICHOKE
because of concern that such drugs might be employed against Agency and other U.S.
personnel. Information relative to this work has already been provided to relevant Committees.
In this early work we also occasionally looked at foreign human experimentation; we long ago
eliminated our holdings on this subject and no collection requirements are any longer served.
As consumer interest in this area has dropped off and higher priority areas need attention, we
have virtually no present coverage with the possible exception of an occasional scanning of
the literature for a specific program. To the best of our knowledge no other unit in the
Intelligence Community is tracking this subject now.
-44-
Senator HUDDLESTON. You don't know whether any of your agents anywhere in the
world have been subjected to any kind of procedure like this?
Admiral TURNER. We certainly know of other powers conducting research in these
areas, yes.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know how they go about that research?
Admiral TURNER. It is pretty sketchy, the information we have.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Do you know of any other organization in this country or any
institution that has conducted extensive research on unwitting individuals and through
unwitting institutions?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 524 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 244 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 15 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Well, I have read something in the newspapers about this, but I have
not familiarized myself with it in specifies.
Senator HUDDLESTON. It is not a normal mode of operation for hitman research, is it?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Wallop?
Senator WALLOP. Mr. Chairman, I only have one to follow up on Senator Huddleston's
questions and my earlier ones. You are not really saying, are you Admiral Turner, that
there are no mind-altering drugs or behavior modification procedures which have been
used by foreign powers?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir, I am not.
Senator WALLOP. I drew that inference partly in answer to my question that you knew
of no truth serum. Maybe that is a misnomer, but surely there are relaxants that make
tongues looser than they would otherwise be. Isn't that true?
Admiral TURNER. Yes.
Senator WALLOP. So I think it is fair to say, too, that the experience of many American
prisoners of war in the Korean conflict would indicate that there are behavior modification
procedures in use by foreign powers of a fairly advanced degree of sophistication.
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator WALLOP. Again, I will just go back and say I think this must have been part of
the motivation. I don't think you would have mentioned Cardinal Mindszenty had you
thought his behavior was normal at the time or had anybody else. So, I would just again
say I think it is a little bit scapegoating. I don't think the object of this hearing is in any way
to lay blame on those passed or those dead or otherwise, but I think it is a little bit
scapegoating to say that it stopped with the directors of the CIA or the DCT's of the time.
Also I think it is a little bit scapegoating, to say they didn't even know it, but that it was
some lower echelon acting alone.
I think this was a behavior pattern that was prevalent in those years, and I think the object
lesson is that we have discovered, we think and we hope, through your assurances and
other activities of the Congress, means of avoiding future incidents of that kind. I thank
you, Mr. Chairman.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Chafee?
Senator CHAFEE. No questions.
Senator INOUYE. Senator Kennedy, I think you have another question.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 525 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 245 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 16 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-45-
Senator KENNEDY. Just talking about the two safe houses on the east and west, coast as
being the sources for the unwitting trials, now, the importance of this and the magnitude of
it, I think, is of significance, because we have seen from your records that these we're used
over a period of 8 or 9 years, and the numbers could have been considerable. You are
unable to determine, at least, in your own research, what the numbers would be, and what
the drugs were, how many people were involved, but it could have been considerable
during this period of time.
It would certainly appear to me in examining the documents and the flow charts of cash
slips that were expended in these areas that it was considerable, but that is a judgmental
factor on it, but I think it is important to try and find out what the Agency is attempting to
do to get to the bottom of it.
Now, the principal agent that was involved as I understand it is deceased and has been
deceased for 2 years. The overall agent, Mr. Gottlieb, has indicated a fuzzy memory about
this whole area. He has testified before the Intelligence Committee. Yet he was responsible
for the whole program. Then, the Director had indicated the destruction of the various
materials and unfamiliarity with the project.
Now, you have indicated in your testimony today that there are two additional agents on
page 9 of your testimony, you indicated there were two additional agents which you have
uncovered at the bottom of it, and you say the names of CIA officials who approved or
monitored the various projects. You talk about the two additional agents in your testimony.
Now, I am just wondering if you intend to interview those agents to find out exactly what
is being done. I suppose, first of all, shouldn't the project manager know what was being
done?
Admiral TURNER. Our first problem, Senator, is that we have been unable to associate
an individual with those names at this point. We are still burrowing to find out who these
people are. We haven't identified them as having been CIA employees, and we don't know
whether these were false names.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that down, as I understand it?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. You are tracking that. down, and you have every intention of
interviewing those people to find out whatever you can about the program and project?
Admiral TURNER. My only hesitation here is whether I will do this or the Justice
Department.
Senator KENNEDY. It will be pursued, though, I understand?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 526 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 246 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 17 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Either through the Agency or through the Justice Department?
Admiral TURNER. [Nods in the affirmative.]
Senator KENNEDY. Is it plausible that the director of the program would not understand
or know about the details of the program? Is it plausible that Dr. Gottlieb would not
understand the full range of activities in those particular safe houses?
-46-
Admiral TURNER. Let me say it is unlikely. I don't know Mr. Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. Has anybody in the Agency talked with Mr. Gottlieb to find out
about this?
Admiral TURNER. Not since this revelation has come out.
Senator KENNEDY. Not since this revelation? Well, why not?
Admiral TURNER. He has left our employ, Senator.
Senator KENNEDY. Does that mean that anybody who leaves is, you know, covered for
lifetime?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Why wouldn't you talk with him and find out? You have new
information about this program. It has been a matter of considerable interest both to our
committee and to the Intelligence Committee. Why wouldn't you talk to Mr. Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Well, again, I think the issue is whether this should be done by the
Justice Department or ourselves.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, are we wrestling around because you and Attorney General
Bell can't agree--
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
Senator KENNEDY [continuing]. On who ought to do it?
Admiral TURNER. We are proceeding together in complete agreement as to how to go. I
have, in connection with trying to find all of these Americans or others who were
unwittingly tested, I have some considerable concern about the CIA running around this
country interviewing and interrogating people, because I don't want to give any impression
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 527 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 247 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 18 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
that we are doing domestic intelligence.
Senator KENNEDY. I am just talking about one, in this case. That was the man who was
responsible for the whole program, and to find out whether anyone within the Agency
since you have had this new material has talked to Gottlieb since 1975, and if the answer is
no, I want to know why not.
Admiral TURNER. The reason he was not interviewed in connection with the 1975
hearings was that he had left the employ of the CIA and there was a concern on the part of
the Agency that it would appear to the investigators that the CIA was in some way trying to
influence him and influence his testimony before the committee. If these committees have,
no objection, we would be happy to contact Dr. Gottlieb and see if he can augment
anything here in this new information, though I don't think there is much in this new
information that be can add to as opposed to what was available in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, you see, Admiral Turner, you come to the two committees this
morning and indicate that now at last we have the information. We don't have to be
concerned about anything in the future on it. Now, I don't know how you can give those
assurances to the members of these committees as well as to the American people when
you haven't since 1975 even talked to the principal person that was in charge of the
program, and the records were destroyed. He is the fellow that was running the program,
and the Agency has not talked to him since the development of this new material.
Admiral TURNER. Our only concern here is the proprieties involved, and we will dig
into this and work with the Justice Department on
-47-
who, if either of us, should get into discussions with Dr. Gottlieb so as not to prejudice any
legal rights that may be involved here, or to appear in any way to be improper.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, do I understand you have not contacted the Justice Department
about this particular case since the development of this new material about Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Not about Gottlieb specifically. We have contacted him.
Senator KENNEDY. Well, it is amazing to me. I mean, can you understand the difficulty
that any of us might have in terms of comprehending that when you develop a whole new
series of materials that are on the front page of every newspaper in the country and are on
every television, I mean, that means something, but it does not mean nearly as much as the
interest that we have in the fact about the testing of unwitting Americans, and every single
document that the staff reviews has Mr. Gottlieb's name on it and you come to tell us that
we don't have to worry any more, we have these other final facts, and Mr. Gottlieb has not
been talked to?
Admiral TURNER. Sir, I am not saying that these are in any way the final facts. I am
saying these are all the facts we have available.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 528 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 248 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 19 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And you have not talked to the person who was in charge of the
program, so what kind of value or what kind of weight can we give it?
Admiral TURNER. We are happy to talk to him. I think the issue here again is one of
propriety and how to go about this. We have not, I believe, enough new information about
Gottlieb's participation here to signal that his interview would be that much more revealing
than what was revealed in 1975.
Senator KENNEDY. The importance of it, I think, from our point of view, is, he would
know the drugs that were administered, the volume of drugs, how it was administered, and
in terms of your ability to follow lip to protect these people and their health, to the extent
that it can be done, that opportunity is being lost.
I want to get on to some others, but will you give us the assurance that you will get ahold
of Gottlieb or that you will talk to Attorney General Bell and talk with Gottlieb?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And let us know as to the extent of it. I don't see how we can fulfill
our responsibility in this area on the drug testing without our hearing from Gottlieb as well,
but I think it is important that you do so, particularly since all of the materials have been
destroyed.
These other two agents, have they talked to them?
Admiral TURNER. We don't, know who they are, sir. We are trying to track down and
see whether these names can be related to anybody.
Senator KENNEDY. That is under active investigation by the Agency?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have the intention of talking to those people when you
locate them. Is that correct?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir, under the same circumstances as Gottlieb.
Senator KENNEDY. And you have people working on it? Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir.
-48-
Senator KENNEDY. With regards to the activities that took place in these safe houses, as
I understand from the records, two-way mirrors were used. Is that your understanding?
Admiral TURNER. Yes, sir. We have records that construction was done to put in two-
way mirrors.
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 529 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 249 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 20 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator KENNEDY. And they were placed in the bedroom, as I understand.
[Pause.]
Senator KENNEDY. Well, we have documents--
Admiral TURNER. I believe that was in the Church record, but I don't have the details.
Senator KENNEDY. And rather elaborate decorations were added, as I understand, at,
least, to the one in San Francisco, in the bedroom, which are French can-can dancers, floral
pictures, drapery, including installation of bedroom mirrors, three framed Toulouse Lautrec
posters with black silk mats, and a number of other -- red bedroom curtains and recording
equipment, and then a series of documents which were provided to the committee which
indicate a wide proliferation of different cash for $100, generally in the $100 range over
any period of time on the particular checks. Even the names are blocked out, as to the
person who is receiving it. Cash for undercover agents, operating expenses, drinks,
entertainment while administering, and then it is dashed out, and then the other documents,
that would suggest, at least with the signature of your principal agent out there, that "called
to the operation, midnight, and climax."
What can you tell us that it might suggest to you about what techniques were being used by
the Agency in terms of reaching that sort of broad-based group of Americans that were
being evidently enticed for testing in terms of drugs and others? Do you draw ally kind of
conclusion about what might have been going on out there, in these safe houses?
Admiral TURNER. No, sir.
[General laughter.]
Senator KENNEDY. There is a light side to it, but there is also an enormously serious
side. And that is that, at least the techniques which are used or were used in terms of
testing, and trying to find out exactly the range of drugs used and the numbers of people
involved and exactly what that operation was about, as well as the constant reiteration of
the, use of small sums of cash at irregular intervals. A variety of different techniques were
employed but there is an awful lot of documentation putting these matters together.
When you look at the fact that, it is a broad range population that has been tested, tested in
these two areas, with the kind of cash slips that were used in this payment mechanisms and
decorations and all of the rest, we are not able to put a bottom line on it but one thing is for
sure, and that is, Gottlieb knows. That is one thing for sure, because his name appears on
just about every one of these documents, and it is, I think, very important to find out what
his understanding is of the nature of that. So, we will hear more about that.
Admiral TURNER. I believe Gottlieb has been interviewed by the Congress.
Senator KENNEDY. That's right, he has, and in reviewing the record, it is not very
satisfactory, and it just seems with the new information
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 530 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 250 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 21 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
-49-
and the new documentation and the new memoranda -- and he did not have the checks at
that time -- and with the wide variety of different memoranda with his name on it, his
memory could be stimulated on that.
Thank you.
Senator INOUYE. I would like to thank the admiral and his staff for participating in this
hearing. I believe the record should show that this hearing was held at the request of the
Agency and the admiral. It was not held because we insisted upon it. It was a volunteer
effort on the part of the Agency. I think the record should also indicate that Admiral Turner
has forwarded to this committee a classified file, including all of the names of the
institutions and the persons involved as the experimentors.
I should also indicate that this hearing is just one step involved in the committee's
investigation of drug abuse. Just as you have had much work in going over the 8,000
pages, the staff of this committee has had equal problems, but I would like the record to
show that you have made these papers and documents available to the committee. I thank
you for that.
As part of the ongoing investigation, we had intended to call upon many dozens of others,
experimentors, or those officials in charge, and one of those will be Dr. Gottlieb.
In thanking you, I would like to say this to the American people, that what we have
experienced this morning in this committee room is not being duplicated in any other
committee room in any other part of the world. I doubt that very much. Our Agency and
our intelligence community has been under much criticism and has been subjected to much
abuse, in many cases justified, but this is the most open society that I can think of. For
example, in Great Britain there are about six people who are aware of the identity of the
man in charge of intelligence. In other countries, similar conditions exist. Here in the
United States we not only know Admiral Turner, we have had open hearings with him,
such as this. The confirmation hearings were all open.
In a few weeks, the Senate of the United States will debate a resolution to decide upon
whether we should disclose the amounts and funds being used for counterintelligence and
national intelligence. I would hope that, in presenting this issue to the public, the media
will take note that the Agency has cooperated and will continue to. The abuse that we have
learned about this morning is one I hope will never happen again, but without constant
oversight on the part of the Executive Office, on the part of the Congress, it could happen
again. It is important, therefore that we continue in this oversight activity.
So, once, again, Admiral, I thank yon very much for helping us. We will continue to call
upon you for your assistance. We would like to submit to you several questions that the
members and staff have prepared. I hope you will look them over carefully and prepare
responses for the record, sir.
Senator KENNEDY. Mr. Chairman?
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 531 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 251 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 22 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Senator INOUYE. Yes, sir?
Senator KENNEDY. I, too, want to thank Admiral Turner for his responsiveness. I have
had meetings with him in the committees and also conversations, telephone conversations,
and private meetings, and
-50-
I have found him personally to be extremely responsive, and it is a very difficult challenge
which lie has accepted in heading this Agency. I want you to know, personally, I, too,
would like to see this put behind us. I don't think we are quite there yet in terms of this
particular area that we are interested in. I think the Intelligence Committee has special
responsibilities in this area of the testing, so we look forward to working with you in
expediting the time that we can put it behind, but it does seem to me that we have to dig in
and finish the chapter. So, I want to personally express my appreciation to you, Admiral
Turner, and thank you for your cooperation and your help, and I look forward to working
with you.
Admiral TURNER. Thank you.
Senator HUDDLESTON. Mr. Chairman, I am not sure you emphasized this enough, but I
think the record ought to show that Admiral Turner informed the Select Committee on his
own initiative when the new documentation was found. The documentation has been made
available to us voluntarily, in a spirit of cooperation.
I think this shows a vast difference from the mode of operation that existed prior to the
formation at least of the Church committee, and a difference that is very helpful.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Admiral.
We would now like to call upon Mr. Philip Goldman and Mr. John Gittinger.
Mr. Goldman and Mr. Gittinger, will you please rise and take the oath.
Do you solemnly swear that the testimony you are about to give is the truth, the whole truth
and nothing but the truth, so help you, God?
Mr. GOLDMAN. I do.
Mr. GITTINGER. I do.
Senator INOUYE. Thank you, sir.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, and after that, Mr. Gittinger.
Senator KENNEDY. Before we start in, we had a third witness, Mr. Chairman, Mr.
Pasternac, who planned to testify, traveled to Washington -- he, lives in Washington, and
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 532 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 252 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate Hearing on MKULTRA: CIA Director Stansfield Turner's Testimony (pp. ... Page 23 of 23
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
was contacted recently --with the intention of testifying this morning. And something -- he
called us late this morning and indicated that he wanted to get a counsel before he would
wish to testify.
Senator INOUYE. Mr. Goldman.
Mr. Goldman, will you identify yourself, sir.
Next: Testimony of Philip Goldman and John Gittinger
Previous: "Truth" Drugs in Interrogation
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 533 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 253 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/Hearing05.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 1 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Sign the Resolution
Contents | Feedback | Search
DRCNet Home | Join DRCNet
DRCNet Library | Schaffer Library
Historical References
General Histories | Ancient History | 1800-1850 | 1860 | 1870 | 1880 | 1890
1900 | 1910 | 1920 | 1930 | 1940 | 1950 | 1960 | 1970 | 1980 | 1990
APPENDIX B
Documents Referring To Discovery
Of Additional MKULTRA Material
[document begins] [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
22 June 1977
MEMORANDUM FOR: Deputy Director of Central Intelligence
THROUGH: Deputy Director for Science and Technology
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
1. (U/AIUO) This memorandum is to advise you that additional MKULTRA documents
have been discovered and to obtain your approval for follow-on actions required. Paragraph
7 contains a recommended course of action.
2. (U/AIUO) As a result of John Marks FOIA request (F-76-374), all of the MKULTRA
material in OTS possession was reviewed for possible release to him. Following that
review, the OTS material in the Retired Records Center was searched. It was during that
latter search that the subproject files were located among the retired records of the OTS
Budget and Fiscal Section. These files were not discovered earlier as the earlier searches
were limited to the examination of the active and retired records of those branches
considered most likely to have generated or have had access to MKULTRA documents.
Those branches included: Chemistry, Biological, Behavioral Activities, and Contracts
Management. Because Dr. Gottlieb retrieved and destroyed all the MKULTRA documents
he was able to locate, it is not surprising that the earlier search for MKULTRA documents,
directed at areas where they were most likely to be found, was unsuccessful. The purpose of
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 534 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 254 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 2 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
establishing the MKULTRA mechanism was to limit knowledge of the sensitive work being
performed to those with an absolute need to know. If those precepts had been followed, the
recently found B&F files should have contained only financial and administrative
documents. (In retrospect, I realize that
-104- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
a serious error was made in not having B&F files and other seemingly innocuous files
searched earlier.) As it happened most of the individual subproject folders contain project
proposals and memoranda for the record, which in varying degrees, give a reasonably
complete picture of the avenues of research funded through MKULTRA. For your
information, the original memorandum setting up MKULTRA, signed by Mr. Dulles, is also
among these documents. A copy of the memorandum is attached.
3. (U/AIUO) At this writing, it does not appear that there is anything in these newly
located files that would indicate the MKULTRA activities were more extensive or more
controversial than indicated by the Senate Select (Church) Committee Report. If anything,
the reverse is true, i.e., most of the nearly 200 subprojects are innocuous. Thus, the
overview of MKULTRA is essentially unchanged. With two exceptions, the project find
fills in some of the missing details.
4. (U/AIUO) One of these exceptions is Subproject Number 45 which concerns an
activity that should have been reported earlier. That project deals with the search for a
knockout drug which was concomitant with, and a by-product of, cancer research at a major
university. It is believed that an objective reading of that project would demonstrate the
search for knockout materials and anesthetics were compatible activities. However, the
research proposal stated that "chemical agents... will be subjected to clinical screening... on
advanced cancer patients".
5. (C) Subproject Number 55 contains full details of CIA's contribution of $375,000 to
the [deletion] Building Fund. The Agency was then involved in drug research programs,
many of which were being conducted by [deletion] whose facilities were inadequate. In
order to facilitate the ongoing research programs, it was decided to expedite the building
program by contributing to it through a mechanism that was also being used to fund some
of the research projects.
-105- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
SUBJECT: Request for Guidance on Handling Recently Located MKULTRA Material
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 535 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 255 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 3 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
The contribution could be controversial in that it was made through a mechanism making it
appear to be a private donation. Private donations qualified for, and [deletion] received, an
equal amount of Federal matching funds. A letter from the Office of General Counsel dated
21 February 1954 attesting to the legality of this funding is in the file.
6. (U/AIUO) The Legislative Counsel has been made aware of the existence of these
additional MKULTRA documents which are still under review and sanitation. The MARKS
case is in litigation and we are committed to advise Mr. Marks of the existence of these files
shortly, and to deliver the releasable material to his attorneys by 31 July. A letter from the
Information and Privacy Staff to Mr. Marks' attorneys informing them of the existence of
this material is in the coordination process and is scheduled to be mailed on 24 June.
7. (U/AIUO) There are now two actions that should be taken:
a. Release appropriately sanitized material to Mr. Marks' attorneys as required by
FOIA litigation.
b. Inform the Senate Select Committee of the existence of the recently located records
prior to informing Mr. Marks' attorneys.
It is recommended that you approve of both of these actions.
8. (U/AIUO) If additional details on the contents of this material are desired, the OIS
officers most familiar with it are prepared to brief you at your convenience.
[signature]
David S. Brandwein
Director
Office of Technical Service
[document ends]
-106- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
[document begins]
The Director of Central Intelligence
Washington, D.C. 20505
The Honorable Daniel K. Inouye, Chairman
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 536 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 256 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 4 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Select Committee on Intelligence
United States Senate
Washington, D.C. 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
During the course of 1975 when the Senate Committee, chaired by Senator Church, was
investigating intelligence activities, the CIA was asked to produce documentation on a
program of experimentation with the effect of drugs. Under this project conducted from
1953 to 1964 and known as "MK-ULTRA," tests were conducted on American citizens in
some cases without their knowledge. The CIA, after searching for such documentation,
reported that most of the documents on this matter have been destroyed. I find it my duty to
report to you now that our continuing search for drug related, as well as other documents,
has uncovered certain papers which bear on this matter. Let me hasten to add that I am
persuaded that there was no previous attempt to conceal this material in the original 1975
exploration. The material recently discovered was in the retired archives filed under
financial accounts and only uncovered by using extraordinary and extensive search efforts.
In this connection, incidentally, I have personally commended the employee whose
diligence produced this find.
Because the new material now on hand is primarily of a financial nature, it does not
present a complete picture of the field of drug experimentation activity but it does provide
more detail than was previously available to us. For example, the following types of
activities were undertaken:
a. Possible additional cases of drugs being tested on American citizens, without their
knowledge.
b. Research was undertaken on surreptitious methods of administering drugs.
c. Some of the persons chosen for experimentation were drug addicts or alcoholics.
d. Research into the development of a knockout or "K" drug was performed in
conjunction with being done to develop pain killers for advanced cancer patients, and tests
on such patients were carried out.
-107- [View JPEG Document Scan of This Page]
e. There is a possibility of an improper payment to a private institution.
The drug related activities described in this newly located material began almost 25 years
ago. I assure you they were discontinued over 10 years ago and do not take place today.
In keeping with the President's commitment to disclose any errors of the Intelligence
Community which are uncovered, I would like to volunteer to testify before your
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 537 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 257 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
1977 Senate MKULTRA Hearing: Appendix B--Documents Referring To Discovery Of ... Page 5 of 5
Published by the Advanced Media Group and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
Committee on the full details of this unfortunate series of events. I am in the process of
reading the fairly voluminous material involved and do want to be certain that I have a
complete picture when I talk with the Committee. I will be in touch with you next week to
discuss when hearings might be scheduled at the earliest opportunity.
I regret having to bring this issue to your attention, but I know that it is essential to your
oversight procedures that you be kept fully informed in a timely manner.
Yours sincerely,
[signature]
STANSFIELD TURNER
[document ends]
Appendix A: Testing and Use of Chemical and Biological Agents by the
Intelligence Community
Appendix C: Documents Referring to Subprojects
U.S. SponsoredTestimonies
Whistleblower Mind Control
of Intelligence Officers
Page 538 of 673
548 Tuesday
Saturday
December
September
27th17,
of 2016
Page No. 258 of 258
http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/history/e1950/mkultra/AppendixB.htm 1/22/2009
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
" #"
!
"#$ %&"'(
) * ++ , - . + * / +,0
/ ,* + ! 1"&&$&&& ! - . /
+,$ ! + - . - * , - ,
$% & ' ' !' ( ) * '
+ %
$% & ' ' !' ) ' , * * *
$% & ' ' !' - . * . . * *
. ' . ' . . * ' '!'
$% & ' .* '& $ / * $ ' 0 '!' ' /
' * $ ' 0 '!' 1 0 ' ** ' ! '
+ $% . ' % ' ! * !' ' 2 '
'
* ' % * 3
4 ' ' '( ) % 5'
' % ( * % * % 6 %! ) 5 '
& ! . % % . 7 % % ' ' ') %
+ !' , % / % / '% - % 6 %! '
1 8% ' . ' ' 9! % : ' '!' *%
/ ' , % % ; .* ' < * % . % ( 7
6 %! ) = 4 '> '* = '
1 ? % % * ' @#< * % ! . % (
$% . ."
! / ., -
! , + 2! . ., = % ! '
A41 ) $086B 9 B B ' .B .B
' : 0$0? $086B ' A4 4 A1> * ' '
! * % * '! ' ) ' ? ' ** ' '
C 1 =>8 4
C 1 . ' % ? ' ' ' A %
) ! & ! . * # % * % % ' '
)D& $A ' ' 8% ' ' ' % * B * B
B ' % %.
C 1 ' '! ' ) ' ? E E
. ' * ' ' E F . ' 'F '
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
174
539111of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
C 1 ' % '! ' ) ' ? % ! ' ' ' * ' ' .
' ' ' #7 ' 9=% , : % * ' '
* ' % 0 G 1 * 90 1 ' ' .
0 2 ! % * ' ( , ' ## : & * . * '
' * ' ' % % % % ' * * ' % ' % %
' . ' - = H %
* % ' / . ' =
* % * ; % % % 1 ' *
% * ; '! ' ) ' ? * % '
A . * . % ! ' * 1 > 1 . '
1 . %' '1 1 ! "& . =% , * % 0 1 ' I
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
175
540222of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
!
" #"
%%$ %&"'
3 4 + 5 , * 67 8 + 8 !
0 % ! % ! * ' ' ! ' . % ' /
#7 ' * % ! . % D % D % J ' ' . J 0
#7 0 % % . 0 G 1 0 1 %
' '* ' 0 2! % * % % ' ' * % 10
' % 6 0 % ' % % ! ' ( , + 0
% ! * ' ' % ! " % % ' %
' ' #* * ' * ' ' %
% ' .
D % D ' ' * % ' % ' * /
% * ' ' '* % & 1 ' % * % % .
% . % ' $% . ! ' ' % ** %
% . ! % ' % .! - . % % $%
' * % % % ; ' . ' * ' . %
' ' % % ' 1 . ' . 0 %
4 6$ * % & $% ' 1 1 * % ! ! % >
1 * ! ' ' ' ) % ' % . ## E
% ' * % ## & + C ' + H * ' % .
' J * % * ' % 4 % /
J ' ' % * $% ' ' % %
.! . ? % )/ % ' % % * # % .
% % * % * ' % > 1
$ / 7 ' ! % >
+ H * % * ' %
)/ % ' . ' ) % / % #
% % % / % 1 .1 *1 $% >
C ' % ' %% % % * ' . ' '
* $% ! ' . % $ " ' . G4 '
, 1 ' ' @7 > ' * ) ! ' !
$% . % J? ' 8 ' , . J ' ' ** * . ** *
) % % 0 % ' ' . ' ** ! . %' % )85 6$
' '! 0 . ' % % . ' % * %
. * % ' . * % ! . % ) %
* ! ). ** ' * % % % '
. % ' % * % % 0 % .
* % % % > 1 % * ' ) . * @ 0 % & +
C ' . ! ! ' ' ' . * ' % /
% * * * . '*
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
176
541333of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
% ' 0 * ' ' * * % #7 E %
% ' ' '
# ' *# % 0 %
' #7 E
. ## E 0 *
' % % ' % * *
1+A8)E % ' '
% % ' % ' ' ' ! '*
' #7 . * ' ' ' $ . , ! ' % *
' ' ' * 6 K / ' ! ' ' % *
J' ! J $% . % ' % A018 % . .
* ' %* % J? ' 8 ' , . J % '
LLLLLLLLLLLLLF FLLLLLLLLLLL
$ 9
!
*** . + + . ! .
/ /
/ - !! +, 1 6 " @#B " @ B " B "@@ @
, , , - 1 6 " #7@B @" #B " 77B "@
! - , + 1 6 )+ B # )+
9 , - .. + ,1 6 7" B " B " @#
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
177
542444of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
:: /
$ 9
--
"%;& : .
9 , $ "#'&<
/ + ! 3 #"#=>%'=;<;?
* .!
1 . *
). C 1 ' . ''
0 . . * ' . '' * '
* 0 % ** ' % * ' . *
' % * * . * C 1
0 % ** % 0 % ! ' . & ' ) ' 1 % B '
% ! - ' % * B ' ' % % ! * . ; ' .
'. ! % % ' ; 0 % ** % 0 % ! / '
. 9 '!' . ' :0 % ** % 0% ! '
* 3 9 , + $ . / * , ! + $
+ + $ : + 5 - , $ -- $ , +
-- $ 9 , , $ 9 , -- 0
% ! ' % , + +$ , -- $ 6 + @ -- $
+ ! $ 5 , - . , * 8 A 5
+ $ . ' % * % .! ? .
' ! ; ! . . % ' % ' ' %
* . %
0 % ** % ! ' * . ' % %. .% ' '
. ** . ' ! 0 % ** % . * % ' 0
. 0 / ' . / ' ' . * .
% '
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
178
543555of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
0 % ! ! * 9 / % -
! * ' ' % . ' % % %
* ' ' . % & ' ! % * % % ' ! '
* ' ' ! ' + *+ * + ! @ " M
' M > 4- 9 & ' % : * 0
% ' % > A % 0 % ! ! ! * % * .
'. .* . . . % ' * % & ' !
' . % . . . ** ' %
' * . . '!' % % ' % % % . '. *
. ' * % ! ' ' $ * % % . '
% % + * + * C $
% 3FF F* F' * F' 'F' L' 'L; L '*B +8+ C $ *
0 '!' ' ? % ! ! % & ' NC 1% * * 1 'O ' % & '
9>> : > % ' > ! ! ! . % ! % '
' * ! . H % H % ' .* ' !
* % B
0 % ** * % ** ' ! ' ; % ' * . '. ' * 0
'' % ! ' . ' % % % . *
' * H * % . 0 ' ; % + * + *
+ ! @ " M ' % % ' % ' * .% % %
% ' % - ' * ' ' % ! % . - % ' '
! ' % . * ' * H $% % '
* 3
"< B / "< "< C / / B 5 / :
/ 99
"< " 9 5 9 /D $% ' - % ; * %
- ' ' . % * * + + $% '
' . - ;
"< % C 9 / : : / "< % " 4- % -
. % ! . ! ! % ; % . - % ;
% . * . ; . 9 ' %. . % '
' ' % * % : . ' % / * ; . % % % ;
' . - ' % ' . !
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
179
544666of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"< % % 2! . ' ' % * * + + *
' ' ' % % + +1 * % * * %
% 2 * % ' * % - *
%
"< % < B . , E , % - ' . % % %
& ' 1 A814+&A4 1 4- % ;
' ' . % * * + + . ' / . % %
* ' * % ; ' % ' ' . % + *
> % ' > ! ' % * ' % * * % ;
7
0% . % % * ! % * ./ ' 0 * %
% * % % ' ' ! * %
' 9 : '!' % % % 0 * % . 3
F+ G -- HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ --
$ - , + $ - 9 , $ - 9 , $
,$ HHHHHHHHH - HHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ %&HHHH$ - . ! + $
, F! . G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH$ ! , ++
!! - . $ 6 * . F , ,- + ! - -- 2
, G HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH ! , * , . ,
, , , . $ 6 *+ , 2 , . -
! ! , , * ,, -$ , . -- +
, + HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
+ HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH .. ,, 2! ,
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
180
545777of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ... http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
December 9, 2015 Letters to the Editor, News and Commentary
" "#
$ % $
$ $
!
% &
' $ ( )*$
"# + "#
&
, " # $ +
- . $/ $ 0 1 2
&
, "# " # 3 1
$ 45)4&
6 $
+ $ &
" # !
' $
&
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
181
546888of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
1 of 4 3/22/2016 2:11 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ... http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
"#
$ $
&
3 "# 8
&
)9*5$ "#
& :1
$ )9*5$
" &;
, $ 8
, "#7 !
&
< " #
- $ $ $
+ &
0 $ &
$ $
&3 $ $ "#
&
3 "#
&
3
$ &=
% &
3 $ $ 3
&
"# # $ . $ 6 1
$ &
#
&
3 # "#
. $
+ &
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
PagePage
Page
182
547999of
of
of113
of 23
27
23
183
548
673 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
2 of 4 3/22/2016 2:11 AM
KEISLING: Palace coup: what the Kathleen Kane prosecution is really ... http://newslanc.com/2015/12/09/keisling-palace-coup-what-the-kathleen...
Published
Publishedby
bythe
theAdvanced
AdvancedMedia
MediaGroup
Groupand
and Stan J. Caterbone Copyright 2016
3 $ # $ "# .
&. 8
&
$1 " $ $ >: "#; .
$ &?
3 $" & # $
&
>3 # $? " &> &?
( $
"# &
0 $
&
3 $ 8 $
&
$ $
$ &
0 $ $
8 $ 8 &
' &
3 &@ &
. $ " #
8 $ $
8 . 1 $ > ? & #<
&
( A $ $ &# &3 6
"# &
, 8 $# &6
+ &
3 + 8 &
' $ #< # &6
&
B $ &
Affidavit
AFFIDAVIT of Stan
MindSponsored
U.S.
Whistleblower
Control of Transcripts
Stan
J.Mind
J Caterbone
Caterbone
J. Caterbone
Testimonies re
reState-of-Affairs
Control
of Current
re State-of-Affairs
State-of-Affairs
Intelligence Officers Page
Page
Page
Page 10
183
54810
10of
of
of
of673
113
23
27
23
183
548 TuesdayTuesday,
Saturday
December
Sunday,March
27th22,
September
June 5, 2016
17,
of
3 of 4 3/22/2016 2:11 AM
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 549 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 550 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 551 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 552 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 553 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 554 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 555 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 556 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 557 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 558 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 559 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 560 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 561 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 562 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 563 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 564 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 565 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 566 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 567 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 568 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 569 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 570 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 571 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 572 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 573 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 574 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 575 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 576 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 577 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 578 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 579 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 580 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 581 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 582 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 583 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 584 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 585 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 586 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 587 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 588 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 589 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 590 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 591 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 592 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 593 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 594 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 595 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 596 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 597 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 598 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 599 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 600 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 601 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 602 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 603 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 604 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 605 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 606 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 607 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 608 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 609 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 610 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 611 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 612 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 613 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 614 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 615 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 616 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 617 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 618 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 619 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 620 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 621 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 622 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 623 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 624 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 625 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 626 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 627 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 628 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 629 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 630 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 631 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 632 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 633 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 634 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 635 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 636 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 637 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 638 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 639 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 640 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 641 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 642 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 643 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 644 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 645 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 646 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 647 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 648 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 649 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 650 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 651 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 652 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 653 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 654 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 655 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 656 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 657 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 658 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 659 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 660 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 661 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 662 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 663 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 664 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 665 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 666 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 667 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 668 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 669 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 670 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 671 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 672 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
Published by the Advanced MediaPACTS
Group and
- Testimonials
Stan J. Caterbone
of Targeted
Copyright
Individuals
2016
Whistleblower Testimonies of Intelligence Officers
Page 673 of 673 Tuesday December 27th of 2016
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
NEW AND UPDATED EVIDENCE AND
SUPPORTING INFORMATION
FRIDAY
MONDAYJuly 21st, 2023
December 2nd, 2024
__________________________________
Popular Mechanics 2018
19 Symptoms of Electromagnetic Weapons
1. Forced Memory
Blanking And
Induced Erroneous
Actions
2. Induced Changes
To Hearing – Both
Apparent
Directions And
Volume And
Sometimes Even
Content
3. Sudden Violent
Itching Inside
Eyelids
4. Forced
Manipulation Of
Airways, Including
Externally
Controlled Forced
Speech
5. Wildly Racing Heart
Without Cause
6. Remotely Induced
Violent No-Rash
Itching, With
Preference For Hard-To-Reach Areas, Often During Delicate Or Messy Work
7. Forced Nudging Of Arm During Delicate Or Messy Work Causing Injury Or Spills
8. Special Attention To Genital Area Itch And Forced Orgasm Intense Pain
9. Intense General Pain Or Hot Needles Pushed Deep Into Flesh Sensations
10. Also Wild Flailing Sometimes Followed By Short Periods Of “Rigor Mortis”
Total
TotalNumber
NumberofofPages
PagesininThis
ThisReport
Report 464
464 Pages
Pages
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
383
386
342
383
386 386
133
132
376
383
No.of
of1482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
11. Hard-To-Reach Itch Site, Top And Bottom, Never Any Rash Which Often Starts At
The Head - Sensation Of Small Electrical Shocks
12. “demo” Neuro-Control By Bending Each Toe Backwards Almost 90 Degrees, One At
A Time Over A Couple Of Minutes
13. General Effects - Sudden Body Heat Induced Sensations - All-Body Pain - Forced
“caffeine Field” - Sleep Prevention - Forced Drop-In-Your-Tracks Sleep Inducement
- Irresistible Go-Here Or Go-There Commands – Microwave Burns – Electric Shocks
14. **Involuntary Test Subjects Also Experience Frequent Break-and-Enters At Home
And At Work With Clothing, Furniture, Business Pagers, Computer Files Sabotaged
or Modified or Stolen, Psychological Warfare Research the Likely Motive
15. Reading And Broadcasting Thoughts
16. Controlled Dreams
17. Forced Waking Visions, Some Synced With Body Motions
18. Microwave Hearing
19. Transparent Eyelids
20. Artificial Tinnitus
21. Forced Movement Of Jaws And Clacking Of Teeth
22. Forced “muscle Quacking”Of The Large Muscles On Back
23. Forced Precision Manipulation Of Hands, Sometimes Synced To The Waking
Dreams
24. **In 1974 The First Unclassified Transmission Of Human Voice Directly Into
The Skull Of A Living Person Was Performed By Dr. Joseph Sharp, Of The Walter Reed
Of The Army Institute Of Research In 1974. By Transforming A Hypnotists Voice By
Using The Lowery Silent Sound Or Smenov Scramble Methods Used In The Gulf War, It
Is Possible To Hypnotize A Target Without The Target Being Aware, From Hiding
Leaving Zero Trace Evidence.
**Thursday December 30, 2021 From WIKIPEDIA - Joseph Sharp received his B.S., M.S.,
and Ph.D. in Psychology and Neuroanatomy from the University of Utah.[1]
In 1961, Joseph Sharp began his career as a research psychologist at the Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research where, in 1970, he was appointed Deputy Director of
Neuropsychiatry. He has also served as Chief of the Department of Experimental
Psychology and Behavioral Radiology at Walter Reed, and in 1969 and 1970, was Deputy
Commissioner of Public Health for the State of New York. He came to ARC in 1974, and
the last five of those years, served as Director of Space Research at the Ames Research
Center. Currently he is on the faculty at the College of Science at the Southern Utah
University, Cedar City, Utah. References "Joseph Sharp".
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
384
387
343
384
387 387
134
133
377
384
No.of
of2482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
Popular Mechanics LEAK on Whitleblower Bryon
Kofron Video at 22 minutes 55 seconds
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
385
388
344
385
388 388
135
134
378
385
No.of
of3482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
Washington State Fusion Center accidentally
releases records on remote mind control
Written by Curtis Waltman
Edited by JPat Brown
When you send thousands of FOIA requests, you are bound to get some very weird
responses from time to time. Recently, we here at MuckRock had one of our most bizarre
gets yet - Washington State Fusion Center’s accidental release of records on the effects
of remote mind control.
As part of my ongoing project looking at fusion centers’ investigations into Antifa and
various white supremacist groups, I filed a request with the WSFC. I got back many
standard documents in response, including emails, intelligence briefings and bulletins,
reposts from other fusion centers - and then there was one file titled “EM effects on
human body.zip.”
Hmmm. What could that be? What does EM stand for and what is it doing to the human
body? So I opened it up and took a look:
Hell yeah, dude.
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
386
389
345
386
389 389
136
135
379
386
No.of
of4482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
EM stands for electromagnetic. What you are looking at here is “psycho-electronic”
weapons that purportedly use electromagnetism to do a wide variety of horrible things to
people, such as reading or writing your mind, causing intense pain, “rigor mortis,” or
most heinous of all, itching.
Now to be clear, the presence of these records (which were not created by the fusion
center, and are not government documents) should not be seen as evidence that DHS
possesses these devices, or even that such devices actually exist. Which is kind of
unfortunate because “microwave hearing” is a pretty cool line of technobabble to say out
loud.
You know what’s even cooler? “Remote Brain Mapping.” It is insanely cool to say. Go
ahead. Say it. Remote. Brain. Mapping.
Just check the detail on these slides too. The black helicopter shooting off its
psychotronic weapons, mapping your brain, broadcasting your thoughts back to some
fusion center. I wish their example of “ELF Brain stimulation” was a little clearer though.
It’s difficult to source exactly where these images come from, but it’s obviously not
government material. One seems to come from a person named “Supratik Saha,” who is
identified as a software engineer, the brain mapping slide has no sourcing, and the image
of the body being assaulted by psychotronic weapons is sourced from raven1.net, who
apparently didn’t renew their domain.
It’s entirely unclear how this ended up in this release. It could have been meant for
another release, it could have been gathered for an upcoming WSFC report, or it could
even be from the personal files of an intelligence officer that somehow got mixed up in
the release. A call to the WSFC went unreturned as of press time, so until we hear back,
their presence remains a mystery.
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
387
390
346
387
390 390
137
136
380
387
No.of
of5482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
DRAFT ONLY by Stan
StanJ.J.Caterbone,
Caterbone,Pro
ProSe
SeLitigant
Litigantand
andTHE
THEADVANCED
ADVANCEDMEDIA
MEDIAGROUP
GROUPCopyright
Copyright2024©
2023©
2024©
Next
Section
Updated
Part
Part
2018 1Popular
1
Multi-Media
Multi-Media
Part 1 Mechanics
Multi-Media
Library
Library
Research
ofLibrary
of
Research
Research
Documentofand
Research
and
& &
Evidence
Evidence
Re Evidence
Evidence
& Evidence
34 SymptomsPage
Page
Page
Page
No.
No.No.
Page No.
388
391
347
388
391 391
138
137
381
388
No.of
of6482
587
589
588
479
423
591
484
595
597
600
of
of
of594
214
213
567
574
591
Pages
6Pages WEDNESDAY
SATURDAY
SATURDAY
SUNDAY
MONDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
FRIDAY
TUESDAY
POPULARFRIDAY
FRIDAY
February
November
December
December
August
January
August
June
August
July 18th,
MECHANICS 11th,
21st,
13th,
30th,
24th,
27th,
20th,
2nd,
6th,
In2024
2023
2023
2024
2018
©
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,®
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-327-1566
©
THE HATE CRIME REPORT
re The City and County of LANCASTER, Pennsylvania
Sunday June 17, 2018
____________________________
This report is the culmination of 31 years of research, documentation, trials and
tribulations that grew from the founding of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and
the meeting of June 23, 1987 with an executive from International Signal & Control,
or ISC. THE PROGRAM (my own term), as I call it, started out as a cover-up of the
Federal Whistleblowing activities regarding ISC in 1987 utilizing a harassment
campaign; false arrests; and fabricated mental illness and suicide attempts. Then
in 2005 as I filed my first Federal complaint in U.S. District Court; it dramatically
turned into a victimization of Organized Gang Stalking and Electromagnetic Weapon
Attacks. Then in 2017 under the TRUMP Administration it turned into a Landmark
FEDERAL HATE CRIME.
Through my research and close inspection of family documents, including files,
audio recordings, photos, etc., I came to the horrific realization that the U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control and the criminal acts of the Lancaster City Police
Department were started back in the 1960's from the victimization of Samuel P.
Caterbone, Jr.,my father. During the course of years, he had personally described
his own victimization of synthetic telepathy, believing he was communicating with
aliens. I started investigating the murder of my brother, Sammy, immediately
following his death on Christmas Day of 1984. Through his declaration to me on the
beach of Santa Barbara, California regarding the LSD administered to him while in
the U.S. Air Force in the late 1960's. This is how the family victimization of U.S.
Sponsored Mind Control was proven.
Today, THE PROGRAM consists of the utilization of remote neural monitoring by
federal, state, and local law enforcement to read my mind, coupled with
COINTELPRO-LIKE surveillance and harassment campaigns that culminate into an
environment where intellectual property and privacy rights are turned against me
to form a LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATION and a FEDERAL HATE CRIME.
_____________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.11
44of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
I) OBJECTIVES OF THE HATE CRIME
OBSTRUCTION OF DUE PROCESS AND JUSTICE OF ALL LEGAL PRECEEDINGS
EXTORTION OF ALL FINANCIAL ASSETS
LIBEL AND SLANDER PROFESIONAL REPUTATION
FABRICATION OF CRIMINAL RECORD
FABRICATION OF MENTAL HEALTH RECORD
PROVIDE DEFENSE FOR ALL DEFENDANTS IN LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL
COURTS
RECONSTRUCT HISTORY OF STAN J. CATERBONE, SAMUEL P. CATERBONE, JR.,
(FATHER); SAMMY CATERBONE, (BROTHER), AND TOMMY CATERBONE,
(BROTHER)
CONTINUE TO COVER-UP THE ORIGINAL 1987 WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES
REGARDING INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND CONTROL, Plc., OR ISC
DISPUTE ALL FACTUAL EVIDENCE OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL
HISTORY AND CURRENT ACTIVITIES OF MILITARY-INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES
DISPUTE THE ALLEGATIONS OF GROUND-ZERO AS IT RELATES TO THE
SYNERGY AND HISTORY OF BOBBY RAY INMAN, ROBERT ZOOK, Mathew
Baurash, STAN J. CATERBONE, SAMUEL P. CATERBONE, AND SAMMY
CATERBONE
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.22
45of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
II) TACTICS USED TO FACILITATE THE HATE CRIME
UNJUST ENRICHMENT: A general equitable principle that no person should be
allowed to profit at another persons expense without making restitution for the
reasonable value of any property, services, or other benefits that have been
unfairly received and retained.
COINTELPRO-LIKE TACTICS BY LOCAL AND STATE POLICE, AND FEDERAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES
COMMUNITY GANG-STALKING
EXTENSIVE HARASSMENT CAMPAIGNS
EXTENSIVE COMPUTER AND ELECTRONICS HACKING CAMPAIGNS
EXTENSIVE ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS ATTACKS THROUGH MICROWAVE
TECHNOLOGIES
EXTENSIVE CAMPAIGNS OF VANDALISM AND THEFTS OF PERSONAL AND
REAL PROPERTY
THE USE OF POISONING AND TAINTING OF FOODS
THE USE OF THE ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS TO CAUSE SYMPTOMS SUCH
AS A RUNNING NOSE, CHOKING, AND THE INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENTS OF
THE BODY
THE CRIPPLING OF THE LEGS AND CORE TO THE POINT OF MAKING IT NEAR
IMPOSSIBLE TO WALK
THE DISSEMINATION AND DISTRIBUTION ON A MASS SCALE OF FORGED AND
FABRICATED DOCUMENTS AND NARRATIVES THAT COMPLETELY DISCREDIT
THIS REPORT
THE USE OF A DATE-RAPE DRUG, POSSIBLY ROHIPNOL AT NIGHT
THE USE OF AEROSOL SPRAYS AND OTHER MEANS OF CHLOROPHORME-LIKE
AGENTS
EXTENSIVE CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ESPECIALLY WITH REGARDS TO
COMPLAINTS TO LAW ENFORCEMENT REGARDING ANY OF THE ABOVE
THE SIGNING OF 3 NEW EXECUTIVE ORDERS IN THE FIRST 3 MONTHS BY THE
TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO EXPAND COMMUNITY POLICING AND
ENCOURAGING UNFETTERED ABUSES BY LAW ENFORCEMENT
EXTENSIVE CAMPAIGN TO SABATAGE ALL COURT FILINGS BY PERPETRATORS
AND THE CLERKS OF THE RESPECTIVE COURTS; KNOWING THERE IS NO
PROCEDURE OR NO AUTHORITY THAT PROVIDES ANY OVERSIGHT,
INCLUDING JUDICIAL REVIEW BOARDS THAT ONLY INCLUDE JUDGES
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.33
46of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
III) THE EVIDENCE
STAN CATERBONE ONLINE EVIDENCE FOR REVIEW FOLDERS
LINKS TO 4 ONLINE FOLDERS OF OVER 700 DOCUMENTS, AUDIO RECORDINGS,
VIDEOS, AND COURT FILINGS SUPPORTING AS EVIDENCE OF THE FOLLOWING
CLAIMS (CLICK HERE)
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwT2QmkUTiXcQlZ6YWR3MTZJTkE
THE SUPPORTING FILES AND EVIDENCE PROVIDES SUBSTANTIAL PROOF OF THE
FOLLOWING CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS:
1. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND DUE PROCESS UTILIZING A FEDERAL
COINTELPRO-LIKE PROGRAM USING FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL LAW
ENFORCEMENT AND THE FORGING, DELETING, AND MANIPULATION OF
COURT FILINGS BY CLERKS AND JUDGES SINCE 1987
2. IN DR. JOHN HALL'S BOOK, “SATELLITE TERRORISM IN AMERICA” AND IN
HIS MANY INTERVIEWS, HE DETAILS THAT THE VICTIMIZATION OF HIS THEN
GIRLFRIEND WAS BEING CARRIED OUT BY FORMER FBI AGENTS
3. VICTIMIZATION OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL AND RELATED
ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS SINCE 2005 AS PROVEN IN THE SOCIAL
SECURITY DISABILITY FILE
4. THE AWARDING OF SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFITS IN AUGUST
2009 SPECIFICALLY FOR THE VICTIMIZATION OF U.S. SPONSORED MIND
CONTROL SINCE DECEMBER OF 2005
5. THE LONG-TERM CLASSIFICATION OF A PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION HANDICAP PLACARD FOR PHYSICAL AILMENTS RELATED
TO THE SUSTAINED DEGRADATION OF THE LOWER EXTREMETIES AND CORE
DUE TO THE EXTREME FREQUENCY OF THE ATTACKS OF THE ELECTROMAGNET
WEAPONS SINCE 2015
6. THE UTILIZATION OF LOCAL ORGANIZED GANG-STALKING GROUPS TO
INDUCE BULLYING AND HARASSMENT CAMPAIGNS OF EXTREME NATURE
SINCE 1987
7. THE FABRICATION AND FALSE STATEMENTS OF WITNESSES, POLICE, AND
SOME JUDGES RESULTING IN OVER 30 FALSE ARRESTS AND OVER 40
ILLEGAL NO-TRESPASS NOTICES SINCE 1987
8. THE UTILIZATION OF LAW ENFORCMENT AND CITIZENS TO INDUCE A
FEDERALY FUNDED NATIONAL HATE CRIME
9. THE DAILY VANDALISM AND THEFTS OF BOTH THE HOME AND AUTO
RESULTING IN TENS OF THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS OF CASH LOSSES
10. THE CUMULATION OF SOME $1,000,000 IN LEGAL PRO SE BILLINGS FOR THE
OVER 160 COURT CASES SINCE 2005 WITH CASE LAW SUPPORTING THAT
THE BILLINGS WILL BE PAID
11. THE CUMULATIVE VALUE OF THE FEDERAL ANTI-TRUST CASE WORTH OVER
$250 MILLION DOLLARS SINCE 1987
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.44
47of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
12. THE FEDERAL FALSE CLAIMS ACT AND WHISTLEBLOWING ACTIVITIES
REGARDING LOCAL DEFENSE CONTRACTOR INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL AND
CONTROL, PlC., (ISC) AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF A COVERT OPERATION
WITH THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, CIA AND THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY, NSA SINCE 1987
13. THE FACT THAT LOCAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY CRAIG STEDMAN IS A FORMER
AND MAYBE PRESENT DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE AND ARMY INTELLIGENCE
OFFICER WHO CAME TO LANCASTER IN 1991, THE VERY SAME YEAR THAT ISC
WAS FEDERALLY INDICTED FOR THE $BILLION DOLLAR FRAUD AND FORMER
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE AND DIRECTOR OF CIA ROBERT GATES WAS
NOMINATED, IRRESPECTIVE OF THE ALLEGATIONS OF HIS ISC
CONNECTIONS.
14. THE MANY LINKS AND SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT LANCASTER MAYBE
GROUND ZERO FOR SOME OF THE U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL
TECHNOLOGIES, ESPECIALLY CONSIDERING THE FORMER ISC BOARD
MEMBER AND MILITARY RESUME OF BOBBY RAY INMAN
15. THE RECENT EFFORTS BY THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION TO EXECUTE
UNCHECKED AND ABUSIVE POLICE POWERS THAT ARE THE RESULT OF 3
EXECUTIVE ORDERS SIGNED INTO OFFICE IN THE FIRST FEW MONTHS OF
OFFICE IN 2017.
16. THE COMPLETE FABRICATION OF BOTH THE CRIMINAL AND MENTAL HEALTH
RECORDS OF THE PAST 31 YEARS SINCE 1987
17. EVIDENCE THAT STAN J. CATERBONE'S FATHER, SAMUEL AND BROTHER
SAMMY WERE BOTH VICTIMS OF THE CIA MIND CONTROL PROGRAM
MKULTRA.
18. EVIDENCE THAT THE CASH ACCOUNTS OF SOME $60,000 HELD IN JUNE OF
2015 WERE DRAINED IN SIMILAR FASHION, THAT HAS BEEN DONE ON 4
OCCASSIONS SINCE 1987 AND THAT THE CONTINUED VANDALISM AND
THEFS ARE THE TOOLS OF CHOICE TODAY TO DRAIN CASH ASSETS.
19. THAT ALL THREE DECENDANTS, SAMUEL, FATHER; SAMMY, BROTHER; AND
TOMMY, BROTHER ALL DIED OF SUSPICIOUS DEATHS IN NEW YORK, SANTA
BARBARA, CA AND KILL DEVIL HILLS, NC RESPECTIVELY.
20. THAT THE CURRENT PENDING AND PAST PROTECTED FEDERAL CLAIMS OF
STAN J. CATERBONE V. THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT IN
FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS AND THE CRIMINAL CASE OF FATHER SAMUEL
P. CATERBONE BY THE LANCASTER CITY POLICE ARE ALL AREAS OF INTEREST
TO THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL AND DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
WHICH ARE BEING COVERED-UP.
21. THAT THE PREMATURE DEATHS OF U.S. ATTORNEY JONATHAN LUNA, FOUND
IN A CREEK IN LANCASTER COUNTY AND THOMAS FLANNER OF LANCASTER
NEWSPAPERS WHO WAS ONE OF THE ORIGINAL JOURNALIST ON THE 1991
ABC NEWS NIGHTLINE EPISODE EXPOSING THE COVERT CIA/ISC OPERATION
- MAY BE RELATED.
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.55
48of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
22. THAT THE STATEMENT BY THE NSA AGENT IN 1998 REGARDING THE “GOOD
OLD BOYS” AND THE ALLEGATIONS BY FORMER PENNSYLVANIA ATTORNEY
GENERAL KATHLEEN KANE DEPICTING THE “GOOD OLD BOYS” AS THE
CAUSE .
23. THAT THE AMICUS BRIEFS RECORDED IN THE KATHLEEN KANE CASE, THE
LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT CASE, THE CIA TORTURE CASE, (WHICH THE CIA
PSYCHOLOGISTS LOST AND SETTLED), THE ACLU v. The NSA CASE, THE
TABITHA BUCK CASE, THE SIRHAN SIRHAN CASE (BOBBY KENNEDY
ASSASINATION CASE - WHICH A FEW WEEKS AGO FAMILY MEMBERS
PETITIONED TO BE RE-OPONED AND BELIEVED SIRHAN WAS NOT THE
KILLER), THE LANCASTER COUNTY CONVENTION CENTER CASE, THE ESTABAN
SANTIAGO CASE, THE NIKOLAS CRUZ CASE, AND THE MEHGAN LIAPPATT
CASE WERE ALL MOTIVES IN THE PREVIOUS ACTS BY THE CORRUPT
LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY.
24. THAT THE RECENT FINDINGS THAT LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT
ATTORNEY, CRAIG STEDMAN, AND THE FACT THAT HE CAME TO LANCASTER
IN 1991 WITH A RESUME WITH MILITARY-INTELLIGENCE MAYBE MORE
CENTRAL TO THE PROGRAM THEN ONCE REALIZED
25. THAT THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, THE
LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, AND THE LANCASTER COUNTY
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT MAY ALL BE BONA FIDE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISES AS
DEFINED IN FEDERAL RICO LAWS
26. THAT THE PENDING AMICUS BRIEFS IN THE ESTABAN SANTIAGO CASE AND THE
NIKOLAS CRUZ CASE IN FEDERAL AND STATE COURTS IN FLORIDA ARE CAUSING
THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE TO PUSH THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT TO
ILLEGALLY HOLD STAN J. CATERBONE IN FABRICATED CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS
IN ORDER TO DISCRDIT ALL THE CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS CONTAINED IN
THIS REPORT
June 17, 2018
Respectfully,
_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance, ®
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-327-1566
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.66
49of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and publicly
discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud within International
Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in
1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media,
which would normally prosecute and expose public corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and
malicious attacks on our person, our property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and
some communications are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County and Lancaster
City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture from U.S. Sponsored Mind
Control)?
STAN J. CATERBONE IS ACTIVE IN THE FOLLOWING COURTS FOR 2018
U.S. SUPREME COURT
UNITED STATES THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES ELEVENTH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT, EASTERN DISTRICT
PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT, MIDDLE DISTRICT
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CIVIL DIVISION
LANCASTER COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, CRIMINAL DIVISION
6 LANCASTER COUNTY MAGISTERIAL DISTRICT COURTS
ACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Pending U.S.C.A. Third Circuit 17-1904 PENDING
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 17-1904 CATERBONE v. NSA, et.al.,; Case No. 17-3400
Habeus Corpus; Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;15-3400
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S.C.A. ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Court of Appeals, Atlanta, GA – Case No. 18-10134-C Ft. Lauderdale
Shooter AMICUS Appeal
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-5133 Chapter 11 Appeal; Case No. 17-01233
Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No. 17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case
No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States, et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for
Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650, 08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board – Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA
2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-
03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-16204; Case No. 17-
10615; Case No. 16-10157
The
U.S.
Stan
HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE CRIME
For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
Relief Page
PageNo.
No.77
50of
ofof
3451
212
82 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
June
June
June
17,
19,
18,
2018
2018
2018
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
STAN Caterbone
COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE Lancaster
HATE CRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
Relief Page
REPORT Page
PageNo.
No.
No.88
51of
ofof
of 3451
212
82
3159 Sunday
Tuesday
Tuesday
Sunday June
June
June
June 17,
19,
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Tuesday June 12, 2012
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
Hate crime - Wikipedia
This article needs to be updated. Please update this article to reflect recent
events or newly available information. (March 2017)
A hate crime (also known as a bias-motivated crime or bias crime[1]) is a
prejudice-motivated crime which occurs when a perpetrator targets a victim because
of his or her membership (or perceived membership) in a certain social group or race.
Examples of such groups can include and are almost exclusively limited to: sex,
ethnicity, disability, language, nationality, physical appearance, religion, gender
identity or sexual orientation.[2][3][4] Non-criminal actions that are motivated by
these reasons are often called "bias incidents".
"Hate crime" generally refers to criminal acts which are seen to have been motivated
by bias against one or more of the social groups listed above, or by bias against their
derivatives. Incidents may involve physical assault, damage to property, bullying,
harassment, verbal abuse or insults, mate crime or offensive graffiti or letters (hate
mail).[5]
A hate crime law is a law intended to deter bias-motivated violence.[6] Hate crime
laws are distinct from laws against hate speech: hate crime laws enhance the penalties
associated with conduct which is already criminal under other laws, while hate speech
laws criminalize a category of speech. Hate speech laws exist in many countries. In
the United States, hate crime laws have been upheld by both the Supreme Court [7]
and lower courts, especially in the case of 'fighting' words and other violent speech,
but they are thought by some people to be in conflict with the First Amendment right
to freedom of speech, but hate crimes are only regulated through threats of injury or
death.[8]
History[edit]
The term "hate crime" came into common usage in the United States during the
1980s, but the term is often used retrospectively in order to describe events which
occurred prior to that era.[9] From the Roman persecution of Christians to the Nazi
slaughter of Jews, hate crimes were committed by both individuals and governments
long before the term was commonly used.[4]
As Europeans began to colonize the world from the 16th century onwards, indigenous
peoples in the colonized areas, such as Native Americans increasingly became the
targets of bias-motivated intimidation and violence.[citation needed] During the past
two centuries, typical examples of hate crimes in the U.S. include lynchings of African
Americans, largely in the South, and lynchings of Mexicans and Chinese in the West;
cross burnings to intimidate black activists or to drive black families from
predominantly white neighborhoods both during and after Reconstruction; assaults
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
Relief Page
REPORT Page
PageNo.
Page No.
No.
No.99
52
1of
ofof
ofof
3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
1 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
on white people traveling in predominantly black neighborhoods; assaults on lesbian,
gay, bisexual and transgender people; the painting of swastikas on Jewish
synagogues; and xenophobic responses to a variety of minority ethnic groups.[10]
The verb "to lynch" is attributed to the actions of Charles Lynch, an 18th-century
Virginia Quaker. Lynch, other militia officers, and justices of the peace rounded up
Tory sympathizers who were given a summary trial at an informal court; sentences
handed down included whipping, property seizure, coerced pledges of allegiance, and
conscription into the military. Originally, the term referred to extrajudicial organized
but unauthorized punishment of criminals. It later evolved to describe execution
outside "ordinary justice." It is highly associated with white suppression of African
Americans in the South, and periods of weak or nonexistent police authority, as in
certain frontier areas of the Old West.[4]
The murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom and the Wichita
Massacre were not classified as "hate crimes" by U.S. investigative officials or the
media. In the early 21st century, conservative commentators David Horowitz,
Michelle Malkin (Fox News channel and author) and Stuart Taylor Jr. (journalist) did
describe these events as "hate crimes against whites by blacks."[11]
Psychological effects[edit]
Hate crimes can have significant and wide-ranging psychological consequences, not
only for their direct victims but for others as well. A 1999 U.S. study of lesbian and
gay victims of violent hate crimes documented that they experienced higher levels of
psychological distress, including symptoms of depression and anxiety, than lesbian
and gay victims of comparable crimes which were not motivated by antigay bias.[12] A
manual issued by the Attorney-General of the Province of Ontario in Canada lists the
following consequences:[13]
Impact on the individual victim
psychological and affective disturbances; repercussions on the victim's identity
and self-esteem; both reinforced by a specific hate crime's degree of violence,
which is usually stronger than that of a common crime.
Effect on the targeted group
generalized terror in the group to which the victim belongs, inspiring feelings of
vulnerability among its other members, who could be the next hate crime
victims.
Effect on other vulnerable groups
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.10
1010
53
2of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
2 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ominous effects on minority groups or on groups that identify themselves with
the targeted group, especially when the referred hate is based on an ideology or
a doctrine that preaches simultaneously against several groups.
Effect on the community as a whole
divisions and factionalism arising in response to hate crimes are particularly
damaging to multicultural societies.
Hate crime victims can also develop depression and psychological trauma.[14]
A review of European and American research indicates that terrorist bombings cause
Islamophobia and hate crimes to flare up but, in calmer times, they subside again,
although to a relatively high level.[15] Terrorist's most persuasive message is that of
fear and fear, a primary and strong emotion, increases risk estimates and has
distortive effects on the perception of ordinary Muslims.[15] Widespread
Islamophobic prejudice seems to contribute to anti-Muslim hate crimes, but
indirectly: terrorist attacks and intensified Islamophobic prejudice serve as a window
of opportunity for extremist groups and networks.[15]
Hate crime laws[edit]
Hate crime laws generally fall into one of several categories:
1. laws defining specific bias-motivated acts as distinct crimes;
2. criminal penalty-enhancement laws;
3. laws creating a distinct civil cause of action for hate crimes; and
4. laws requiring administrative agencies to collect hate crime statistics.[16]
Sometimes (as in Bosnia and Herzegovina), the laws focus on war crimes,
genocide, and crimes against humanity with the prohibition against
discriminatory action limited to public officials.
Eurasia[edit]
European Union[edit]
Since 2002, with an amendment to the Convention on Cybercrime, the European
Union mandates individual states to punish as a crime hate speech done through the
internet.[17]
Andorra[edit]
Discriminatory acts constituting harassment or infringement of a person's dignity on
the basis of origin, citizenship, race, religion, or gender (Penal Code Article 313).
Courts have cited bias-based motivation in delivering sentences, but there is no
explicit penalty enhancement provision in the Criminal Code. The government does
not track hate crime statistics, although they are relatively rare.[16]
Armenia[edit]
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.11
1111
54
3of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
3 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Armenia has a penalty-enhancement statute for crimes with ethnic, racial, or
religious motives (Criminal Code Article 63).[16]
Austria[edit]
Austria has a penalty-enhancement statute for reasons like repeating a crime, being
especially cruel, using others helpless state, playing a leading role in a crime, or
committing a crime with racist, xenophobic or especially reprehensible motivation
(Penal Code section 33(5)).[18]
Azerbaijan[edit]
Azerbaijan has a penalty-enhancement statute for crimes motivated by racial,
national, or religious hatred (Criminal Code Article 61). Murder and infliction of
serious bodily injury motivated by racial, religious, national, or ethnic intolerance are
distinct crimes (Article 111).[16]
Belarus[edit]
Belarus has a penalty-enhancement statute for crimes motivated by racial, national,
and religious hatred and discord.[16][19]
Belgium[edit]
Belgium's Act of 25 February 2003 ("aimed at combating discrimination and
modifying the Act of 15 February 1993 which establishes the Centre for Equal
Opportunities and the Fight against Racism") establishes a penalty-enhancement for
crimes involving discrimination on the basis of gender, supposed race, color, descent,
national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation, civil status, birth, fortune, age, religious
or philosophical beliefs, current or future state of health and handicap or physical
features. The Act also "provides for a civil remedy to address discrimination."[16] The
Act, along with the Act of 20 January 2003 ("on strengthening legislation against
racism"), requires the Centre to collect and publish statistical data on racism and
discriminatory crimes.[16]
Bosnia and Herzegovina[edit]
The Criminal Code of Bosnia and Herzegovina (enacted 2003) "contains provisions
prohibiting discrimination by public officials on grounds, inter alia, of race, skin
colour, national or ethnic background, religion and language and prohibiting the
restriction by public officials of the language rights of the citizens in their relations
with the authorities (Article 145/1 and 145/2)."[20]
Bulgaria[edit]
Bulgarian criminal law prohibits certain crimes motivated by racism and xenophobia,
but a 1999 report by the European Commission against Racism and Intolerance
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.12
1212
55
4of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
4 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
found that it does not appear that those provisions "have ever resulted in convictions
before the courts in Bulgaria."[21]
Croatia[edit]
The Croatian Penal Code explicitly defines hate crime in article 89 as "any crime
committed out of hatred for someone's race, skin color, sex, sexual orientation,
language, religion, political or other belief, national or social background, asset, birth,
education, social condition, age, health condition or other attribute".[22] On 1 January
2013, a new Penal Code was introduced with the recognition of a hate crime based on
"race, skin color, religion, national or ethnic background, sexual orientation or gender
identity".[23]
Czech Republic[edit]
The Czech legislation finds its constitutional basis in the principles of equality and
non-discrimination contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Basic
Freedoms. From there, we can trace two basic lines of protection against hate-
motivated incidents: one passes through criminal law, the other through civil law.
The current Czech criminal legislation has implications both for decisions about guilt
(affecting the decision whether to find a defendant guilty or not guilty) and decisions
concerning sentencing (affecting the extent of the punishment imposed). It has three
levels, to wit:
a circumstance determining whether an act is a crime – hate
motivation is included in the basic constituent elements. If hate motivation is
not proven, conviction for a hate crime is not possible.
a circumstance determining the imposition of a higher penalty – a
hate motivation is included in the qualified constituent elements for some types
of crimes (murder, bodily harm). If hate motivation is not proven, the penalty is
imposed according to the scale specified for the basic constituent elements of
the crime.
general aggravating circumstance – the court is obligated to take the hate
motivation into account as a general aggravating circumstance and determines
the amount of penalty to impose. Nevertheless, it is not possible to add together
a general aggravating circumstance and a circumstance determining the
imposition of a higher penalty. (see Annex for details)
Current criminal legislation does not provide for special penalties for acts that
target another by reason of his sexual orientation, age or health status. Only
the constituent elements of the criminal offense of Incitement to hatred towards a
group of persons or to the curtailment of their rights and freedoms, and general
aggravating circumstances include attacking a so-called different group of people.
Such a group of people can then, of course, be also one defined by sexual orientation,
age or health status. A certain disparity has thus been created between, on the one
hand, those groups of people who are victimized by reason of their skin color, faith,
nationality, ethnicity or political persuasion and enjoy increased protection, and, on
the other hand, those groups that are victimized by reason of their sexual orientation,
age or health status and are not granted increased protection. This gap in protection
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.13
1313
56
5of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
5 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
against attacks motivated by the victim's sexual orientation, age or health status
cannot be successfully bridged by interpretation. Interpretation by analogy is
inadmissible in criminal law, sanctionable motivations being exhaustively
enumerated.[24]
Denmark[edit]
Although Danish law does not include explicit hate crime provisions, "section 80(1) of
the Criminal Code instructs courts to take into account the gravity of the offence and
the offender's motive when meting out penalty, and therefore to attach importance to
the racist motive of crimes in determining sentence."[25] In recent years judges have
used this provision to increase sentences on the basis of racist motives.[16][26]
Since 1992, the Danish Civil Security Service (PET) has released statistics on crimes
with apparent racist motivation.[16]
Estonia[edit]
Under section 151 of the Criminal Code of Estonia of 6 June 2001, which entered into
force on 1 September 2002, with amendments and supplements and as amended by
the Law of 8 December 2011, "activities which publicly incite to hatred, violence or
discrimination on the basis of nationality, race, colour, sex, language, origin, religion,
sexual orientation, political opinion, or financial or social status, if this results in
danger to the life, health or property of a person, are punishable by a fine of up to 300
fine units or by detention".[27]
Finland[edit]
Finnish Criminal Code 515/2003 (enacted January 31, 2003) makes "committing a
crime against a person, because of his national, racial, ethnical or equivalent group"
an aggravating circumstance in sentencing.[16][28] In addition, ethnic agitation
(Finnish: kiihotus kansanryhmää vastaan) is criminalized and carries a fine or a
prison sentence of not more than two years. The prosecution need not prove that an
actual danger to an ethnic group is caused but only that malicious message is
conveyed. A more aggravated hate crime, warmongering (Finnish: sotaan
yllyttäminen), carries a prison sentence of one to ten years. However, in case of
warmongering, the prosecution must prove an overt act that evidently increases the
risk that Finland is involved in a war or becomes a target for a military operation. The
act in question may consist of
1. illegal violence directed against foreign country or her citizens,
2. systematic dissemination of false information on Finnish foreign policy or
defense
3. public influence on the public opinion towards a pro-war viewpoint or
4. public suggestion that a foreign country or Finland should engage in an
aggressive act.[29]
France[edit]
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.14
1414
57
6of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
6 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
In 2003, France enacted penalty-enhancement hate crime laws for crimes motivated
by bias against the victim's actual or perceived ethnicity, nation, race, religion, or
sexual orientation. The penalties for murder were raised from 30 years (for non-hate
crimes) to life imprisonment (for hate crimes), and the penalties for violent attacks
leading to permanent disability were raised from 10 years (for non-hate crimes) to 15
years (for hate crimes).[16][30]
Georgia[edit]
"There is no general provision in Georgian law for racist motivation to be considered
an aggravating circumstance in prosecutions of ordinary offenses. Certain crimes
involving racist motivation are, however, defined as specific offenses in the Georgian
Criminal Code of 1999, including murder motivated by racial, religious, national or
ethnic intolerance (article 109); infliction of serious injuries motivated by racial,
religious, national or ethnic intolerance (article 117); and torture motivated by racial,
religious, national or ethnic intolerance (article 126). ECRI reported no knowledge of
cases in which this law has been enforced. There is no systematic monitoring or data
collection on discrimination in Georgia."[16]
Germany[edit]
The German Criminal Code does not have hate crime legislation, but instead
criminalizes hate speech under a number of different laws, including
Volksverhetzung. In the German legal framework motivation is not taken into
account while identifying the element of the offence. However, within the sentencing
procedure the judge can define certain principles for determining punishment. In
section 46 of the German Criminal Code it is stated that "the motives and aims of the
perpetrator; the state of mind reflected in the act and the willfulness involved in its
commission."[31] can be taken into consideration when determining the punishment;
under this statute, hate and bias have been taken into consideration in sentencing in
past cases.[32]
Hate crimes are not specifically tracked by German police, but have been studied
separately: a recently published EU "Report on Racism" finds that racially motivated
attacks are frequent in Germany, identifying 18,142 incidences for 2006, of which
17,597 were motivated by right wing ideologies, both about a 14% year-by-year
increase.[33] Relative to the size of the population, this represents an eightfold higher
rate of hate crimes than reported in the US during the same period.[34] Awareness of
hate crimes and right-wing extremism in Germany remains low.[35]
Greece[edit]
Article Law 927/1979 "Section 1,1 penalises incitement to discrimination, hatred or
violence towards individuals or groups because of their racial, national or religious
origin, through public written or oral expressions; Section 1,2 prohibits the
establishment of, and membership in, organisations which organise propaganda and
activities aimed at racial discrimination; Section 2 punishes public expression of
offensive ideas; Section 3 penalises the act of refusing, in the exercise of one’s
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.15
1515
58
7of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
7 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
occupation, to sell a commodity or to supply a service on racial grounds."[36] Public
prosecutors may press charges even if the victim does not file a complaint. However,
as of 2003, no convictions had been attained under the law.[37]
Hungary[edit]
Violent action, cruelty, and coercion by threat made on the basis of the victim's actual
or perceived national, ethnic, religious status or membership in a particular social
group are punishable under article 174/B of the Hungarian Criminal Code.[16] This
article was added to the Code in 1996.[38]
Iceland[edit]
Section 233a of the Icelandic Penal Code states "Anyone who in a ridiculing,
slanderous, insulting, threatening or any other manner publicly abuses a person or a
group of people on the basis of their nationality, skin colour, race, religion or sexual
orientation, shall be fined or jailed for up to two years."[39]
Ireland[edit]
"The Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred Act 1989" makes it an offense to incite
hatred against any group of persons on account of their race, color, nationality,
religion, sexual orientation, ethnic or national origins, or membership of the Traveller
community, an indigenous minority group."[16]
Ireland does not systematically collect hate crime data.[16]
Italy[edit]
Italian criminal law, at Section 3 of Law No. 205/1993, the so-called Legge Mancino
(Mancino law), contains a penalty-enhancement provision for all crimes motivated by
racial, sex/gender, ethnic, national, or religious bias.[16]
Kazakhstan[edit]
In Kazakhstan, there are constitutional provisions prohibiting propaganda promoting
racial or ethnic superiority.[16]
Kyrgyzstan[edit]
In Kyrgyzstan, "the Constitution of the State party prohibits any kind of
discrimination on grounds of origin, sex, race, nationality, language, faith, political or
religious convictions or any other personal or social trait or circumstance, and that
the prohibition against racial discrimination is also included in other legislation, such
as the Civil, Penal and Labour Codes."[40]
Article 299 of the Criminal Code defines incitement to national, racist, or religious
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.16
1616
59
8of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
8 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
hatred as a specific offense. This article has been used in political trials of suspected
members of the banned organization Hizb-ut-Tahrir.[16][41]
Russia[edit]
Article 29 of the penal code of the Russian Federation bans incitement to riot for the
sake of stirring societal, racial, ethnic, and religious hatred as well as the promotion
of the superiority of the same. Article 282 further includes protections against
incitement of hatred (including gender) via various means of communication,
instilling criminal penalties including fines and imprisonment.[42]
Spain[edit]
Article 22(4) of the Spanish Penal Code includes a penalty-enhancement provision for
crimes motivated by bias against the victim's ideology, beliefs, religion, ethnicity,
race, nationality, gender, sexual orientation, illness or disability.[16]
Sweden[edit]
Article 29 of the Swedish Penal Code includes a penalty-enhancement provision for
crimes motivated by bias against the victim's race, color, nationality, ethnicity, sexual
orientation, religion, or "other similar circumstance" of the victim.[16][43]
United Kingdom[edit]
For England, Wales, and Scotland, the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 makes hateful
behaviour towards a victim based on the victim’s membership (or presumed
membership) in a racial group or a religious group an aggravation in sentencing for
specified crimes.[44] The Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001 (c. 24)
amended sections of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998.[45] For Northern Ireland,
Public Order (Northern Ireland) Order 1987 (S.I. 1987/463 (N.I. 7)) serves the same
purpose.[46] A "racial group" is a group of persons defined by reference to race,
colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins. A "religious
group" is a group of persons defined by reference to religious belief or lack of religious
belief. The specified crimes are assault, criminal damage, offences under the Public
Order Act 1986, and offences under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Sections 145 and 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 require a court to consider
whether a crime which is not specified by the Crime and Disorder Act 1998 is racially
or religiously aggravated, and to consider whether the following circumstances were
pertinent to the crime:
(a) that, at the time of committing the offence, or immediately before or after
doing so, the offender demonstrated towards the victim of the offence hostility
based on—
(i) the sexual orientation (or presumed sexual orientation) of the victim,
or
(ii) a disability (or presumed disability) of the victim, or
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.
No.
No.17
1717
60
9of
of
of3451
of
of 212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
9 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
(b) that the offence is motivated (wholly or partly)—
(i) by hostility towards persons who are of a particular sexual orientation,
or
(ii) by hostility towards persons who have a disability or a particular
disability.[47][48]
The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) reported in 2013 that there are an
average of 278,000 hate crimes a year with 40% being reported according to a victims
survey, although police records only identified around 43,000 hate crimes a year.[49]
It was widely reported that police recorded a 57% increase in hate crime complaints
in the four days following the UK's European Union membership referendum,
however a press release from the National Police Chief's Council stated that "this
should not be read as a national increase in hate crime of 57 per cent”.[50][51]
In 2013, police in Greater Manchester began recording attacks on goths, punks and
other alternative culture groups as hate crimes.[52]
On December 4, 2013 Essex Police launched the ‘Stop the Hate’ initiative as part of a
concerted effort to find new ways to tackle hate crime in Essex. The launch was
marked by a conference in Chelmsford, hosted by Chief Constable Stephen Kavanagh,
which brought together 220 delegates from a range of partner organisations involved
in the field. The theme of the conference was ‘Report it to Sort it’ and the emphasis
was on encouraging people to tell police if they have been a victim of hate crime,
whether it be based on race, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or
disability.[53]
Crown Prosecution Service guidance issued on 21 August 2017 stated that online hate
crimes should be treated as seriously as offences in person.[54]
Perhaps the most high-profile hate crime in modern Britain occurred in Eltham,
London, on 24 April 1993, when 18-year-old black student Stephen Lawrence was
stabbed to death in an attack by a gang of white youths. Two white teenagers were
later charged with the murder, and at least three other suspects were mentioned in
the national media, but the charges against them were dropped within three months
after the Crown Prosecution Service concluded that there was insufficient evidence to
prosecute. However, a change in the law a decade later allowed a suspect to be
charged with a crime twice if new evidence emerged after the original charges were
dropped or a "not guilty" verdict was delivered in court. Gary Dobson, who had been
charged with the murder in the initial 1993 investigation, was found guilty of Stephen
Lawrence's murder in January 2012 and sentenced to life imprisonment, as was
David Norris, who had not been charged in 1993. A third suspect, Luke Knight, had
been charged in 1993 but was not charged when the case came to court nearly 20
years later.
Scotland[edit]
Under Scottish Common law[citation needed] the courts can take any aggravating factor
into account when sentencing someone found guilty of an offence. There is legislation
dealing with the offences of incitement of racial hatred, racially aggravated
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.18
No.
No. 18
18
61
10of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
10 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
harassment, prejudice relating to religious beliefs, disability, sexual orientation, and
transgender identity.[55] A Scottish Executive working group examined the issue of
hate crime and ways of combating crime motivated by social prejudice, reporting in
2004.[56] Its main recommendations were not implemented, but in their manifestos
for the Scottish Parliament election, 2007 several political parties included
commitments to legislate in this area, including the Scottish National Party who now
form the Scottish Government. The Offences (Aggravation by Prejudice) (Scotland)
Bill was introduced on 19 May 2008 by Patrick Harvie MSP,[57] having been prepared
with support from the Scottish Government, and was passed unanimously by the
parliament on 3 June 2009.[58]
Eurasian countries with no hate crime laws[edit]
A photograph of the famous fresco Bathing of the Christ, after being vandalized by a
Kosovo Albanian mob during the 2004 unrest in Kosovo
Albania, Cyprus, San Marino, Slovenia and Turkey have no hate crime laws.[16]
North America[edit]
Canada[edit]
"In Canada the legal definition of hate crime can be found in sections 318 and 319 of
the Criminal Code". [59]
In 1996 the federal government amended a section of the Criminal Code that pertains
to sentencing. Specifically, section 718.2. The section states (with regard to the hate
crime):
A court that imposes a sentence shall also take into consideration the following
principles:
The
U.S.
Stan
THE HATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.19
No.
No. 19
19
62
11of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
11 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
(a) a sentence should be increased or reduced to account for any relevant
aggravating or mitigating circumstances relating to the offence or the offender,
and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
(i) evidence that the offence was motivated by bias, prejudice or hate based on race,
national or ethnic origin, language, colour, religion, sex, age, mental or physical
disability, sexual orientation, or any other similar factor, . . . shall be deemed to be
aggravating circumstances.'' [59]
A vast majority (84 per cent) of hate crime perpetrators were "male, with an average
age of just under 30. Less than 10 of those accused had criminal records, and less
than 5 per cent had previous hate crime involvement (ibid O’Grady 2010 page 163.)."
[60] "Only 4 percent of hate crimes were linked to an organized or extremist group
(Silver et al., 2004)." [61]
As of 2004, Jewish people were the largest ethnic group targeted by hate crimes,
followed by blacks, Muslims, South Asians, and homosexuals (Silver et al., 2004).[61]
During the Nazi regime, anti-Semitism was a cause of hate related violence in
Canada. For example, on August 16, 1933 there was a baseball game in Toronto and
one team was made up of mostly Jewish players. At the end of the game, a group of
Nazi sympathizers unfolded a Swastika flag and shouted ‘Heil Hitler’. That event
erupted into a brawl that had Jews and Italians against Anglo Canadians and the
brawl went on for hours.[59]
The first time someone was charged with hate speech over the internet occurred on
27 March 1996. "A Winnipeg teenager was arrested by the police for sending an email
to a local political activist that contained the message ‘Death to homosexuals’ it’s
prescribed in the Bible! Better watch out next Gay Pride Week.’ (Nairne, 1996)."[61]
Robert suggests that "Canada lags behind other nations in collecting comprehensive
statistics on hate crime." [62][context?]
United States[edit]
Hate crime laws have a long history in the United States. The first hate crime[63] laws
were passed after the American Civil War, beginning with the Civil Rights Act of 1871,
to combat the growing number of racially motivated crimes being committed by the
Reconstruction era Ku Klux Klan. The modern era of hate-crime legislation began in
1968 with the passage of federal statute, 18 U.S. 245, part of the Civil Rights Act
which made it illegal to "by force or by threat of force, injure, intimidate, or interfere
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.20
No.
No. 20
20
63
12of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
12 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
with anyone who is engaged in six specified protected activities, by reason of their
race, color, religion, or national origin." However, "The prosecution of such crimes
must be certified by the U.S. attorney general.".[64]
The first state hate-crime statute, California's Section 190.2, was passed in 1978 and
provided for penalty enhancement in cases where murder was motivated by prejudice
against four "protected status" categories: race, religion, color, and national origin.
Washington included ancestry in a statute passed in 1981. Alaska included creed and
sex in 1982 and later disability, sexual orientation, and ethnicity. In the 1990s some
state laws began to include age, marital status, membership in the armed forces, and
membership in civil rights organizations.[65]
Criminal acts which could be considered hate crimes in various states included
aggravated assault, assault and battery, vandalism, rape, threats and intimidation,
arson, trespassing, stalking, and various "lesser" acts until in 1987 California state
legislation included all crimes as possible hate crimes.[66]
Defined in the 1999 National Crime Victim Survey, "A hate crime is a criminal
offense. In the United States, federal prosecution is possible for hate crimes
committed on the basis of a person's race, religion, or nation origin when engaging in
a federally protected activity." In 2009, the Matthew Shepard Act added actual or
perceived gender, gender identity, sexual orientation, and disability to the federal
definition, and dropped the prerequisite that the victim be engaging in a federally
protected activity.
Forty-five states and the District of Columbia have statutes criminalizing various
types of hate crimes. Thirty-one states and the District of Columbia have statutes
creating a civil cause of action in addition to the criminal penalty for similar acts.
Twenty-seven states and the District of Columbia have statutes requiring the state to
collect hate crime statistics.[67]
According to the FBI Hate Crime Statistics report for 2006, hate crimes increased
nearly 8% nationwide, with a total of 7,722 incidents and 9,080 offenses reported by
participating law enforcement agencies. Of the 5,449 crimes against persons, 46%
were classified as intimidation and 32% as simple assaults. 81% of the 3,593 crimes
against property were acts of vandalism or destruction.[68]
However, according to the FBI Hate Crime Statistics for 2007, the number of hate
crimes decreased to 7,624 incidents reported by participating law enforcement
agencies.[69] These incidents included 9 murders and 2 rapes(out of the almost
17,000 murders and 90,000 forcible rapes committed in the U.S. in 2007).[70]
Attorney General Eric Holder said in June 2009 that recent killings show the need for
a tougher U.S. hate crimes law to stop "violence masquerading as political
activism".[71]
The 2011 hate crime statistics show 46.9% were motivated by race and 20.8% by
sexual orientation.[72]
In 2015, the Hate Crimes Statistics report identified 5,818 single-bias incidents
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.21
No.
No. 21
21
64
13of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
13 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
involving 6,837 offenses, 7,121 victims, and 5,475 known offenders[73]
Prosecutions of hate crimes have been difficult in the United States. Recently though,
state governments have attempted to re-investigate and re-try past hate crimes. One
prominent example is Mississippi's decision in 1990 to retry Byron De La Beckwith
for the murder of Medgar Evers, a prominent figure in the NAACP.[74] This would be
the first time in U.S. history that an unresolved civil rights case would be re-opened.
Byron De La Beckwith, a member of the Ku Klux Klan, was tried for the murder on
two previous occasions and it resulted with a hung jury. However, he was finally
sentenced to life in prison in 1994. Presented with testimony of two FBI informants
who had infiltrated the KKK, the missing transcript from the first trial, the relocation
of missing witnesses, numerous witness admissions of Beckwith bragging about his
role in the murder and Beckwith’s own racist writings, a mixed race jury found
Beckwith guilty of murder. Even though De La Beckwith was 73 years of age when he
was sentenced to life in prison, the 1994 conviction has been interpreted as a way for
Mississippi to shed its racist past.[75]
According to a November 2016 report issued by the FBI hate crime statistics are on
the rise in the United States.[76] The number of hate crimes increased from 5,850 in
2015, to 6,121 hate crime incidents in 2016,an increase of 4.6 percent.[77][78][79]
Victims in the United States[edit]
The largest single category of hate crimes in the United States are committed against
African Americans: of the 8,208 hate crimes reported to the FBI in 2010, 48% were
race related – with 70% of those having an anti-black bias.[80] This is believed to be
based on the history of African slavery in this country. One of the largest waves of
hate crimes took place during the civil rights movement. During the 1950s and 1960s,
both violence and threats of violence were common against African Americans, and
hundreds of lives were lost due to such acts. Members of this social class faced
violence from groups such as the Ku Klux Klan as well as violence from individuals
who were committed to maintaining segregation.[81] At the time, civil rights leaders
such as Martin Luther King Jr. and their supporters fought hard for the right of
African Americans to vote as well as for equality in their everyday lives. African
Americans have been the target of hate crimes since the Civil War,[82] and the
humiliation of this social class was also desired by many Anti-black individuals. Other
frequently reported bias motivations were bias against a religion, bias against a
particular sexual orientation, and bias against a particular ethnicity/national
origin.[80] At times, these bias motivations overlapped, because violence can be both
anti-gay and anti-black, for example.[83]
Analysts have compared groups in terms of the per capita rate of hate crimes
committed against them, to allow for differing populations. Overall, the total number
of hate crimes committed since the first hate crime bill was passed in 1997 is
86,582.[84]
Hate Crimes in the US (2008–2012) by Population Group
Jewish 5,248,674[91] 4,457 84.9 411 7.8
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.22
No.
No. 22
22
65
14of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
14 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Hate Crimes in the US (2008–2012) by Population Group
LGBT 9,000,000[92] 7,231 66.9 3,849 35.6
Muslim 1,852,473[91] 761 41.1 258 13.9
Black 38,929,319[93] 13,411 34.4 4,356 11.2
Aboriginal 2,932,248[93] 364 12.4 161 5.5
Hispanic 50,477,594[93] 3,064 6.1 1,482 2.9
Asian & Pacific Islander 15,214,265[93] 798 5.2 276 1.8
White 223,553,265[93] 3,459 1.5 1,614 0.7
Catholic 67,924,018[94] 338 0.5 32 0.0
Atheist & Agnostic 17,598,496[94] 47 0.3 5 0.0
Protestant 148,197,858[94] 229 0.2 17 0.0
Heterosexual 297,939,444[92] 118 0.0 42 0.0
Among the groups currently mentioned in the Hate Crimes Statistics Act, the largest
number of hate crimes are committed against African Americans.[95] During the Civil
Rights Movement, some of the most notorious hate crimes included the 1968
assassination of Martin Luther King Jr., the 1964 murders of Charles Moore and
Henry Dee, the 1963 16th Street Baptist Church bombing, the 1955 murder of Emmett
Till,[82] as well as the burning of crosses, churches, Jewish synagogues and other
places of worship of minority religions. Such acts began to take place more frequently
after the racial integration of many schools and public facilities.[95]
High-profile murders targeting victims based on their sexual orientation have
prompted the passage of hate crimes legislation, notably the cases of Sean W.
Kennedy and Matthew Shepard. Kennedy's murder was mentioned by Senator
Gordon Smith in a speech on the floor of the US Senate while he advocated such
legislation. The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act
was signed into law in 2009. It included sexual orientation, gender identity and
expression, the disabled, and military personnel and their family members.[96][citation
needed] This is the first all-inclusive bill ever passed in the United States, taking 45
years to complete.[clarification needed]
Gender-based crimes may also be considered hate crimes. This view would designate
rape and domestic violence, as well as non-interpersonal violence against women
such as the École Polytechnique massacre in Quebec, as hate crimes.[97][98][99]
In May 2018, ProPublica reviewed police reports for 58 cases of purported anti-
heterosexual hate crimes. ProPublica found that about half of the cases were anti-
LGBT hate crimes that had been miscategorized, and that the rest were motivated by
hate towards Jews, blacks or women or that there was no element of a hate crime at
all. ProPublica found not a single case of a hate crime spurred by anti-heterosexual
bias.[100]
South America[edit]
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.23
No.
No. 23
23
66
15of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
15 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Brazil[edit]
In Brazil, hate crime laws focus on racism, racial injury, and other special bias-
motivated crimes such as, for example, murder by death squads[101] and genocide on
the grounds of nationality, ethnicity, race or religion.[102] Murder by death squads
and genocide are legally classified as "hideous crimes" (crimes hediondos in
Portuguese).[103]
The crimes of racism and racial injury, although similar, are enforced slightly
differently.[104] Article 140, 3rd paragraph, of the Penal Code establishes a harsher
penalty, from a minimum of 1 year to a maximum of 3 years, for injuries motivated by
"elements referring to race, color, ethnicity, religion, origin, or the condition of being
an aged or disabled person".[105] On the other side, Law 7716/1989 covers "crimes
resulting from discrimination or prejudice on the grounds of race, color, ethnicity,
religion, or national origin".[106]
In addition, the Brazilian Constitution defines as a "fundamental goal of the
Republic" (Article 3rd, clause IV) "to promote the well-being of all, with no prejudice
as to origin, race, sex, color, age, and any other forms of discrimination".[107]
Chile[edit]
In 2012, the Anti-discrimination law amended the Criminal Code adding a new
aggravating circumstance of criminal responsibility, as follows: "Committing or
participating in a crime motivated by ideology, political opinion, religion or beliefs of
the victim; nation, race, ethnic or social group; sex, sexual orientation, gender
identity, age, affiliation, personal appearance or suffering from illness or disability."
[108][109]
Support for and opposition to hate crime
laws[edit]
Support[edit]
Justifications for harsher punishments for hate crimes focus on the notion that hate
crimes cause greater individual and societal harm.[citation needed] It is said[110] that,
when the core of a person’s identity is attacked, the degradation and dehumanization
is especially severe, and additional emotional and physiological problems are likely to
result. Society then, in turn, can suffer from the disempowerment of a group of
people.[citation needed] Furthermore, it is asserted that the chances for retaliatory
crimes are greater when a hate crime has been committed. The riots in Los Angeles,
California that followed the beating of Rodney King, a Black motorist, by a group of
White police officers are cited as support for this argument.[10] The beating of white
truck driver Reginald Denny by black rioters during the same riot is also an example
that supports this argument.
In Wisconsin v. Mitchell, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found that penalty-
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.24
No.
No. 24
24
67
16of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
16 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
enhancement hate crime statutes do not conflict with free speech rights, because they
do not punish an individual for exercising freedom of expression; rather, they allow
courts to consider motive when sentencing a criminal for conduct which is not
protected by the First Amendment.[111] Whilst in the case of Chaplinsky v. New
Hampshire the court defined "fighting words" as "those which by their very utterance
inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace."[112]
Opposition[edit]
The U.S. Supreme Court unanimously found the St. Paul Bias-Motivated Crime
Ordinance amounted to viewpoint-based discrimination is in conflict with rights of
free speech, because it selectively criminalized bias-motivated speech or symbolic
speech for disfavored topics while permitting such speech for other topics.[113] Many
critics further assert that it conflicts with an even more fundamental right: free
thought. The claim is that hate-crime legislation effectively makes certain ideas or
beliefs, including religious ones, illegal, in other words, thought crimes.[114][115]
[116][117][118][119][120]
In their book Hate Crimes: Criminal Law and Identity Politics, James B. Jacobs and
Kimberly Potter criticize hate crime legislation for exacerbating conflicts between
groups. They assert that by defining crimes as being committed by one group against
another, rather than as being committed by individuals against their society, the
labeling of crimes as "hate crimes" causes groups to feel persecuted by one another,
and that this impression of persecution can incite a backlash and thus lead to an
actual increase in crime.[121] Some have argued hate crime laws bring the law into
disrepute and further divide society, as groups apply to have their critics silenced.[122]
Some have argued that if it is true that all violent crimes are the result of the
perpetrator's contempt for the victim, then all crimes are hate crimes. Thus, if there is
no alternate rationale for prosecuting some people more harshly for the same crime
based on who the victim is, then different defendants are treated unequally under the
law, which violates the United States Constitution.[123] American forensic
psychologist Karen Franklin said that the term hate crime is somewhat misleading
since it assumes there is a hateful motivation which is not present in many
occasions;[124] in her view, laws to punish people who commit hate crimes may not be
the best remedy for preventing them because the threat of future punishment does
not usually deter such criminal acts.[125] Some on the political left have been critical
of hate crime laws for expanding the criminal justice system and dealing with
violence against minority groups through punitive measures.[6]
See also[edit]
Bashing (pejorative)
Communal violence
Disability hate crime
Documenting Hate
Fighting Discrimination
Hate group
Racial hoax
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.25
No.
No. 25
25
68
17of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
17 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Thoughtcrime
Violence against LGBT people
References[edit]
1. Jump up ^ {cite web| url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/hate-
crime%7Cwebsite=Dictionary.com%7Cquote="Also called bias crime."}
2. Jump up ^ Stotzer, R. (June 2007). "Comparison of Hate Crime Rates Across
Protected and Unprotected Groups" (PDF). Williams Institute. Retrieved
2012-03-17. "A hate crime or bias motivated crime occurs when the perpetrator
of the crime intentionally selects the victim because of his or her membership in
a certain group."
3. Jump up ^ "Methodology". FBI.
4. ^ Jump up to: a b c Streissguth, Tom (2003). Hate Crimes (Library in a Book),
p. 3. ISBN 0-8160-4879-7.
5. Jump up ^ "Home Office | Hate crime". Archived from the original on 26
November 2005.
6. ^ Jump up to: a b Meyer, Doug (2014). "Resisting Hate Crime Discourse:
Queer and Intersectional Challenges to Neoliberal Hate Crime Laws". Critical
Criminology. 22: 113. doi:10.1007/s10612-013-9228-x.
7. Jump up ^ Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 315 U.S. 568, 572 (1942)
8. Jump up ^ "Do Hate Crime Laws Violate the First Amendment?".
www.criminaldefenselawyer.com. Retrieved 2017-11-27.
9. Jump up ^ "Hate Crimes". FBI. Retrieved May 26, 2015.
10. ^ Jump up to: a b "A Policymaker's Guide to Hate Crimes" (PDF). Retrieved
2011-11-14.
11. Jump up ^ Stuart Taylor, Jr. "'Hate Crimes' and Double Standards", The
Atlantic, 29 May 2007
12. Jump up ^ Herek, Gregory M.; Gillis, J. Roy; Cogan, Jeanine C. (1999).
"Psychological Sequelae of Hate-Crime Victimization Among Lesbian, Gay,
and Bisexual Adults". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 67 (6):
945–51. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.67.6.945. PMID 10596515.
13. Jump up ^ "Crown Policy Manual" (PDF). 21 March 2005. Retrieved
2009-06-21.
14. Jump up ^ Cox, William T. L.; Abramson, Lyn Y.; Devine, Patricia G.;
Hollon, Steven D. (2012). "Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Depression: The
Integrated Perspective". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 7 (5): 427–49.
doi:10.1177/1745691612455204. PMID 26168502.
15. ^ Jump up to: a b c Borell, Klas (2015). "When Is the Time to Hate? A Research
Review on the Impact of Dramatic Events on Islamophobia and Islamophobic
Hate Crimes in Europe". Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations. 26 (4):
409–21. doi:10.1080/09596410.2015.1067063. Retrieved 2015-12-15.
16. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u "Michael McClintock:
''Everyday Fears: A Survey of Violent Hate Crimes in Europe and North
America''" (PDF). Humanrightsfirst.org. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
17. Jump up ^ Arias, Martha L.
18. Jump up ^ § 33 StGB Besondere Erschwerungsgründe, StGB, accessed
2015-02-15.
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.26
No.
No. 26
26
69
18of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
18 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
19. Jump up ^ Criminal Code of the Republic of Belarus, § 64 (1), para. 9
(translated from the Russian), June 9, 1999.
20. Jump up ^ Office of the High Representative, Criminal Code of Bosnia and
Herzegovina, January 2003.
21. Jump up ^ ECRI, "Second Report on Bulgaria", adopted on June 18, 1999, and
made public on March 21, 2000.
22. Jump up ^ "71 28.6.2006 Zakon o izmjenama i dopunama Kaznenog
zakona". Narodne-novine.nn.hr. 2006-06-28. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
23. Jump up ^ "Centar za LGBT ravnopravnost » Vlada prihvatila prijedloge
Centra za LGBT ravnopravnost". Ravnopravnost.hr. Archived from the
original on 2012-03-31. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
24. Jump up ^ "Zpráva o násilí z nenávisti v České republice za rok 2011" (PDF).
Retrieved 2012-11-11.
25. Jump up ^ ECRI, Second Report on Denmark, adopted on June 16, 2000, and
made public on April 3, 2001, para. 9.
26. Jump up ^ Chahrokh, Klug, and Bilger, Migrants, Minorities, and Legislation.
27. Jump up ^ Criminal Code of Estonia of 6 June 2001, entered into force on 1
September 2002, with amendments and supplements and latest amendment by
the Law of 8 December 2011, published in RT I, 29.12.2011, 1 and entered into
force on 1 January 2012 (excerpts), accessed 27 August 2017
28. Jump up ^ EUMC, Racism and xenophobia in the E.U., p. 51.
29. Jump up ^ Penal Code (39/1889) as of 1006/2004. §§ 6:5.1.4 (ethnic hatred
as an aggravating factor), 11:8 (ethnic agitation) and 12:2 (warmongering). The
points cited remain in force on the day of retrieval, checked from the Finnish
version: Rikoslaki. The Government proposal HE 55/2007 Archived 2011-03-11
at the Wayback Machine. will move the § 11:8 to §11:10 without changing the
content, if the proposal is passed by the Parliament of Finland. Retrieved
11-23-2007.
30. Jump up ^ Loi n° 2003–88 du 3 février 2003 visant à aggraver les peines
punissant les infractions à caractère raciste, antisémite ou xénophobe
31. Jump up ^ "Criminal Code (Strafgesetzbuch, StGB)". Iuscomp.org. Retrieved
2011-11-14.
32. Jump up ^ Marc Coester (2008): Das Konzept der Hate Crimes aus den USA
unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Rechtsextremismus in Deutschland.
Peter Lang: Frankfurt/Berlin/Bern/Bruxelles/New York/Oxford/Wien
33. Jump up ^ "EU Xenophobia Report: Racism On the Rise in Germany". Der
Spiegel. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
34. Jump up ^ "2006 Hate Crime in the U.S". Fbi.gov. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
35. Jump up ^ "Interview with Racism Expert: 'Awareness of Ethnic
Discrimination Is Low in Germany'". Der Spiegel. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
36. Jump up ^ ECRI, Second Report on Greece, adopted on 1999-12-10, and made
public on 2000-06-27.
37. Jump up ^ Sitaropoulos, N.: Executive Summary on Race Equality Directive,
State of Play in Greece Archived 2005-05-13 at the Wayback Machine., section
5, 2003-10-12. Retrieved on 2007-08-02.
38. Jump up ^ "Treaty Bodies Database – Document – Concluding
Observations/Comments – Hungary". unhchr.ch. United Nations.
39. Jump up ^ "Icelandic Penal Code (in Icelandic)". Althingi.is. Retrieved
2011-11-14.
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.27
No.
No. 27
27
70
19of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
19 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
40. Jump up ^ CERD, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties under
Article 9 of the Convention; Concluding Observations: Kyrgyzstan, 1999.
Retrieved on 2007-08-02.
41. Jump up ^ Human Rights in the OSCE Region: Europe, Central Asia and
North America, Report 2004 (Events of 2003) Archived 2011-07-26 at the
Wayback Machine., International Helsinki Federation, 2004-06-23. Retrieved
on 2007-08-02.
42. Jump up ^ "The Criminal Code Of The Russian Federation (in English)"
(PDF). Wipo.int. Retrieved 2017-08-09.
43. Jump up ^ "Swedish Penal Code" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on
2012-10-01. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
44. Jump up ^ "Crime and Disorder Act 1998". legislation.gov.uk.
45. Jump up ^ "Anti-terrorism, Crime and Security Act 2001".
46. Jump up ^ "Public Order (Northern Ireland) Order 1987".
47. Jump up ^ Sections 145 and 146 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003
48. Jump up ^ "Hate crime" legislation is distinct from "hate speech" legislation.
See Hate speech laws in the United Kingdom.
49. Jump up ^ Arnett, G., Hate crime in England and Wales: how prevalent is it?,
The Guardian, 17 December 2013, accessed 29 June 2016
50. Jump up ^ Cameron condemns xenophobic and racist abuse after Brexit vote,
The Guardian 27 June 2016, accessed 29 June 2016
51. Jump up ^ "Hate crime is unacceptable in any circumstances say police".
National Police Chief's Council. 27 June 2016. Retrieved 13 October 2016.
52. Jump up ^ "Manchester police to record attacks on goths, emos and punks as
hate crimes". The Guardian. London. 2013-04-03.
53. Jump up ^ "Launch of 'Stop the Hate' initiative". Stop the hate. 2013-12-04.
Retrieved 2014-07-12.
54. Jump up ^ Hate crimes: Fresh guidance on online offences, accessed 21
August 2017
55. Jump up ^ "Offences (Aggravation by Prejudice) (Scotland) Act 2009".
www.legislation.gov.uk.
56. Jump up ^ [1] Archived October 12, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
57. Jump up ^ "Offences (Aggravation by Prejudice) (Scotland) Bill".
Scottish.parliament.uk. Archived from the original on 2011-08-25. Retrieved
2013-01-21.
58. Jump up ^ MSPs approve new hate crime laws BBC News 3 June 2009
59. ^ Jump up to: a b c O'Grady, William (2011). Crime In Canadian Context:
debates and controversies. Oxford University Press. p. 161.
ISBN 978-0-19-543378-4.
60. Jump up ^ O'Grady, William (2011). Crime In Canadian Context: debates
and controversies. Oxford University Press. p. 163. ISBN 978-0-19-543378-4.
61. ^ Jump up to: a b c O'Grady, William (2011). Crime In Canadian Context:
debates and controversies. Oxford University Press. p. 162.
ISBN 978-0-19-543378-4.
62. Jump up ^ O'Grady, William (2011). Crime In Canadian Context: debates
and controversies. Oxford University Press. p. 164. ISBN 978-0-19-543378-4.
63. Jump up ^ "Hate Crime Statistics, 2015" (PDF). ucr.fbi.gov. Fall 2016.
64. Jump up ^ Streissguth (2003), p. 20.
65. Jump up ^ Streissguth (2003), pp. 20–21.
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.28
No.
No. 28
28
71
20of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
20 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
66. Jump up ^ Streissguth (2003), p. 21.
67. Jump up ^ State Hate Crime Laws Archived 2007-06-14 at the Wayback
Machine., Anti-Defamation League, June 2006. Retrieved 2007-05-04.
68. Jump up ^ Statistics, 2006 Hate Crime Statistics, 2006, Federal Bureau of
Investigation Archived July 17, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
69. Jump up ^ Statistics, 2007 Hate Crime Statistics, 2007, Federal Bureau of
Investigation Archived July 9, 2014, at the Wayback Machine.
70. Jump up ^ Statistics, 2007 FBI Crime in the United States 2007, Federal
Bureau of Investigation Archived May 4, 2015, at the Wayback Machine.
71. Jump up ^ "Attorney general urges new hate crimes law – Crime & courts".
MSNBC. 2009-06-16. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
72. Jump up ^ "FBI releases 2011 hate crime statistics". Lakeconews.com.
2012-12-11. Archived from the original on 2013-05-17. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
73. Jump up ^ "Hate Crime Statistics, 2015" (PDF). ucr.fbi.gov.
74. Jump up ^ Labuda, P. (2011). "Racial Reconciliation in Mississippi: An
Evaluation of the Proposal to Establish a Mississippi Truth and Reconciliation
Commission". Harvard Blackletter Law Journal. 271: 1–48.
75. Jump up ^ Alston, A.A.; Dickerson, J.L. (2009). Devil’s Sanctuary: An Eye-
Witness History of Mississippi Hate Crimes. Chicago, IL: Lawrence Hill
Books.
76. Jump up ^ "Latest Hate Crime Statistics Released - Annual Report Sheds
Light on Serious Issue". FBI. FBI. Retrieved 18 December 2016.
77. Jump up ^ Licthblau, Eric (14 November 2016). "U.S. Hate Crimes Surge 6%,
Fueled by Attacks on Muslims". New York Times. Retrieved 18 December
2016.
78. Jump up ^ Mathias, Christopher. "Hate Crimes Rose About 5 Percent In
2016, FBI Report Says". The Huffington Post. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
79. Jump up ^ "2016 Hate Crime Statistics". FBI. Retrieved 14 November 2017.
80. ^ Jump up to: a b "Hate Crime Statistics, 2010". Federal Bureau of
Investigation. Retrieved March 16, 2012.
81. Jump up ^ "Hate Crimes that Changed History | Criminal Law".
CriminalDefenseLawyer.com. Retrieved 2016-12-02.
82. ^ Jump up to: a b "10 Of The Worst Hate Crimes and Violence in Domestic
American History". americansperspective.com. 2015-06-22. Retrieved
2016-12-02.
83. Jump up ^ Meyer, Doug (2010). "Evaluating the Severity of Hate-motivated
Violence: Intersectional Differences among LGBT Hate Crime Victims".
Sociology. 44 (5): 980–95. doi:10.1177/0038038510375737.
84. Jump up ^ Shepard, Mathew; Byrd, James Jr. (2011–2014). "Hate Crimes
Law". Human Rights Campaign.
85. Jump up ^ FBI Hate Crimes 2008. Retrieved May 17, 2014
86. Jump up ^ FBI Hate Crimes 2009. Retrieved May 17, 2014
87. Jump up ^ FBI Hate Crimes 2010. Retrieved May 17, 2014
88. Jump up ^ FBI Hate Crimes 2011. Retrieved May 17, 2014
89. Jump up ^ FBI Hate Crimes 2012. Retrieved May 17, 2014
90. Jump up ^ Violent Hate Crimes include: Homicide, Robbery, Aggravated
Assault, Simple Assault and Sexual Assault/Rape
91. ^ Jump up to: a b In US, 77% Identify as Christian. Retrieved May 17, 2014
92. ^ Jump up to: a b How many people are lesbian, gay, bisexual, and
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.29
No.
No. 29
29
72
21of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
21 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
transgender? Retrieved May 17, 2014
93. ^ Jump up to: a b c d e American Fact Finder. Retrieved May 17, 2014
94. ^ Jump up to: a b c "Nones" on the Rise, Retrieved May 17, 2014
95. ^ Jump up to: a b "Reports and Curricula". The Leadership Conference on Civil
and Human Rights. Retrieved 2016-12-02.
96. Jump up ^ "The Matthew Shepard And James Byrd, Jr., Hate Crimes
Prevention Act Of 2009 | CRT | Department of Justice". www.justice.gov.
Retrieved 29 March 2017.
97. Jump up ^ Angelari, Marguerite (1997). "Hate Crime Statutes: A Promising
Tool for Fighting Violence Against Women". In Karen J. Maschke.
Pornography, Sex Work, and Hate Speech. Taylor & Francis.
ISBN 9780815325208.
98. Jump up ^ Gerstenfeld, Phyllis B. (2013). Hate Crimes: Causes, Controls, and
Controversies. Sage. ISBN 9781452256627.
99. Jump up ^ McPhail, Beverly (2003). "Gender-Bias Hate Crimes: A Review".
In Barbara Perry. Hate and Bias Crime: A Reader. Psychology Press.
ISBN 9780415944076.
100. Jump up ^ "Police Are Mislabeling Anti-LGBTQ and Other Crimes as Anti-
Heterosexual — ProPublica". ProPublica. Rachel Glickhouse,Rahima Nasa.
2018-05-15. Retrieved 2018-05-21.
101. Jump up ^ "L8072". www.planalto.gov.br.
102. Jump up ^ "L2889". www.planalto.gov.br.
103. Jump up ^ Law 8072/1990 (aforementioned link), Article 1st, I and single
paragraph.
104. Jump up ^ "Racismo ou injúria racial? - Boletim Jurídico".
Boletimjuridico.com.br. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
105. Jump up ^ "DEL2848compilado". Planalto.gov.br. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
106. Jump up ^ "L7716". Planalto.gov.br. Retrieved 2013-01-21.
107. Jump up ^ http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao
/Constituiçao_Compilado.htm
108. Jump up ^ "COD-PENAL 12-NOV-1874 MINISTERIO DE JUSTICIA - Ley
Chile - Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional". www.leychile.cl.
109. Jump up ^ "LEY-20609 24-JUL-2012 MINISTERIO SECRETARÍA GENERAL
DE GOBIERNO - Ley Chile - Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional".
www.leychile.cl.
110. Jump up ^ Marian Duggan and Vicky Heap, Administrating Victimization:
The Politics of AntiSocial Behaviour and Hate Crime Policy, Palgrave
Macmillan, 2014.
111. Jump up ^ "Wisconsin v. Mitchell". Enotes.com. Retrieved 2011-10-12.
112. Jump up ^ Sumner, L.W. (2005), "Hate crimes, literature, and speech", in
Frey, R.G.; Heath Wellman, Christopher, A companion to applied ethics,
Blackwell Companions to Philosophy, Oxford, UK Malden, Massachusetts:
Blackwell Publishing, pp. 89–101, doi:10.1002/9780470996621.ch11,
ISBN 9781405133456.
113. Jump up ^ R. A. V. v. City of St. Paul, 505 U.S. 377 (1992).
114. Jump up ^ The Essayist (1998). Hate Crime Premise. 24 Jul. 1998.
115. Jump up ^ Evenson, Brad (2003). Looking for thoughtcrime to crimestop.
National Post. February 8, 2003.
116. Jump up ^ Schwartz, L., I.T. Ulit, & D. Morgan (2006). "Straight talk about
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.30
No.
No. 30
30
73
22of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
22 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate crime - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
hate crimes bills: Anti-gay, anti-transgender bias stall federal hate crimes
legislation". Georgetown Journal of Gender & the Law. 7 (2): 171–86.
117. Jump up ^ Icke, David (2003). Tales from the Time Loop. Bridge of Love.
ISBN 0-9538810-4-0. [2]
118. Jump up ^ Smith, Peter J. (2007). Democrats refuse religious freedom
amendment to hate crimes bill. LifeSite, 26 April 2007.
119. Jump up ^ Kamine, Wendy. The Return of the Thought Police: "Hate crime"
legislation is an assault on civil liberties. The Wall Street Journal. October 28,
2007.
120. Jump up ^ Wolski, Chris (1999). Hate Crime Laws Will Spawn Thought
Police. Capitalism Magazine Website. Retrieved 2009-06-18.
121. Jump up ^ Jacobs, James B. & Kimberly Potter. (1998). Hate Crimes:
Criminal Law and Identity Politics. New York: Oxford University Press, pp.
130–44
122. Jump up ^ Troy, Daniel E. (1999-08-04). "AEI – Short Publications". Aei.org.
Archived from the original on 2011-06-10. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
123. Jump up ^ "Constitutional Challenges to Hate Crimes Statutes". Adl.org.
Archived from the original on 2011-10-12. Retrieved 2011-11-14.
124. Jump up ^ Frontline (PBS),Interviews, Accessed July 26, 2014, "...forensic
psychologist, Karen Franklin's dual interests in psychology and the law brought
her to question the roots of anti-gay hate crimes... badly needed empirical data
on the nature and extent of negative reactions to gays..."
125. Jump up ^ Dan Quinn (Jun 10, 1997). "the crime that's not necessarily a
crime". Here Publishing; The Advocate. Retrieved September 1, 2015. “...No.
735, ISSN 0001-8996, page 51...Karen Franklin ... in the real world, criminals
don't calculate their moves based on the specific punishment they will suffer if
caught...”
External links[edit]
Hate crimes information, by Dr. Gregory Herek
Alexander Verkhovsky Criminal Law on Hate Crime, Incitement to Hatred and
Hate Speech in OSCE Participating States – The Hague: SOVA Center, 2016 -
136 pages. ISBN 978-5-98418-039-9
Hate Crime Survey, annual Human Rights First report on the prevalence of
hate crimes in the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe region.
Hate Crime Statistics, annual FBI/U.S. Department of Justice report on the
prevalence of hate crimes in the United States. Required by the Hate Crime
Statistics Act.
A Policymaker's Guide to Hate Crimes, a publication by the National Criminal
Justice Reference Service, part of the U.S. Department of Justice. Many parts of
this article have been adapted from this document.
Tolerance.org, a web project sponsored by the Southern Poverty Law Center
Peabody, Michael "Thought & Crime," Liberty Magazine, March/April 2008,
review of recently proposed hate crime legislation and criminal intent issues.
"Hate Crime." Oxford Bibliographies Online: Criminology.
OSCE Hate Crime Reporting website
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
Caterbone
WIKIPEDIA
STAN COURT
Report
- THE
Re
- Injunction
J. CATERBONE
- HATE Lancaster
HATE
CRIMESCRIME
HATE For
City
Emergency
REPORT©
CRIMEand County
ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.31
No.
No. 31
31
74
23of
of
of
of
of3451
212
82
3159
23 Sunday
Tuesday
TuesdayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
JuneJune
12, 17,
19,
2017
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
23 of 23 6/12/2018, 7:43 PM
Hate Crimes — FBI https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/hate-crimes
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
" #
$ % % & ' ())*
+
! ,
,
! " " -
' .*/0
!
! #
$ ' 1 % & #
% .*/0
' ' # 2 3 4
# 5
# - - () .*/6
! '
# $ % ' 1
# .*/0
' !
7
,
8 9
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
THE
STAN Caterbone
COURT
Report
FREMONT - THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE
STREET
J. CATERBONE CRIME
For
HATE
HATE City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
CRIMES
CRIME ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.32
No.
No. 32
32
75
2 of
of
of3451
of 212
82
324
3159 Sunday
Tuesday
MondayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
June
11,
June 17,
19,
2018
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
1 of 3 6/11/2018, 12:34 PM
Hate Crimes — FBI https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/hate-crimes
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
!
:
' '
!
!
:
;
!
!"" ; ! < <
, , =
#
- >
%
? *@ 2 $ % >
# ! ;
2$ ' - > >
% &
,
$ % & !" ' $& () :
" ! 1 " ! 1
#!* +! ;
+
+
' =' ' => ' ' 2
" ' => A ' ' % '
A
3 ' ' &
3 B? 3 % "
3 > 3 ! 3 1 A ! 3
- + " $! ' A > B
$! $ & A
; !
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
THE
STAN Caterbone
COURT
Report
FREMONT - THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE
STREET
J. CATERBONE CRIME
For
HATE
HATE City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
CRIMES
CRIME ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.33
No.
No. 33
33
76
3 of
of
of3451
of 212
82
324
3159 Sunday
Tuesday
MondayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
June
11,
June 17,
19,
2018
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
2 of 3 6/11/2018, 12:34 PM
Hate Crimes — FBI https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/hate-crimes
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
+
B
, , "!* ,
-../0 +! " )
()./
().@
().0
().C
().(
()..
().)
D $
$ < '
" ,2 , !
# $ % % & ' ())*
E
The
U.S.
Stan
THEHATE
DISTRICT
J. Crime
THE
STAN Caterbone
COURT
Report
FREMONT - THE
Re
- Injunction
Lancaster
HATE
STREET
J. CATERBONE CRIME
For
HATE
HATE City
Emergency
REPORT©
and County
CRIMES
CRIME ReliefPage
REPORT Page
Page
Page
Page No.
No.
No.34
No.
No. 34
34
77
4 of
of
of3451
of 212
82
324
3159 Sunday
Tuesday
MondayTuesday
JuneJune
Sunday June
June
11,
June 17,
19,
2018
17,18,
2018
2018
2018
2018
3 of 3 6/11/2018, 12:34 PM
COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW OF 2010 - Published by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2018©
Stan J. Caterbone
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment &
Surveillance,®
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-327-1566
SATURDAY JANUARY 6, 2018
COAST TO COAST WITH GEORGE NOORY - TRANSCRIPT
INTERVIEW WITH DR. JOHN HALL, AUTHOR OF THE BOOK
A NEW BREED SATELLITE TERRORISM IN AMERICA
__________________
February 8, 2010
[GEORGE NOORY]
People started hearing Voices in their head so I started checking into it and Dr
John Hall is now convinced that there’s much more going on up next is work A
NEW BREED SATELLITE TERRORISM IN AMERICA that’s next on Coast to
Coast AM author of the book I’m holding in my hand A NEW BREED SATELLITE
TERRORISM IN AMERICA that’s next on Coast to Coast AM
DR. JOHN HALL in San Antonio Texas author of the book I’m holding in my hand
A NEW BREED SATELLITE TERRORISM IN AMERICA he is an active member
of the Mind Science Foundation dedicated to the study of human consciousness he
sits on the medical Committee of the human rights organization FREEDOM
FROM COVERT HARASSMENT AND SUERVEILLANCE, FFCHS, you are going
to love this program tonight here’s Dr John Hall John how are you,
[DR. JOHN HALL]
I'll tell you I’m a big fan of the show I really good Georgia tell you I’m a big fan of
the show and I’m really honored to be I’m glad you’re helping people out.....
[GEORGE NOORY]
I can’t put your book down John it’s already and it’s scary it’s informative and I’ve
got to ask you just to start how did this all start for you was that what happened I
was in a relationship with a woman began getting stalked started with stocking
and we have noticed that people following her to and from my home meat
following me to and from her home in conversations with people that weren’t
there.... being drugged with a Rohypnol a date rape drug and raped by people
that were breaking into her condominium.
[DR. JOHN HALL]
So I started writing down the plate (license) numbers of the stalkers and they all
The
U.S.
HATE
DISTRICT
CrimeCOURT
Dr. John Report
Hall Re
- Injunction
LancasterFor
Transcript City
Emergency
and County
Relief Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.35
781of
of
of212
82
5 Saturday Tuesday
Tuesday
January June
6,June
19,
201818,
2018
2018
COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW OF 2010 - Published by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2018©
traced back to a private investigative service owned by a former FBI guy
and some of his relatives, some of which were former members of the
Department of Defense so I did a little checking into what was going on with
her. She has no evidence of mental illness in the past or anything like that. So I
started checking into what the technologies could do this and heard a little bit
about SATELLITE SURVEILLANCE in the past and luckily have a friend in the
intelligence business and spoke to a friend in the CIA AND FBI that verified
some of the technology and it seemed to be following her everywhere and
indeed they said - yeah the can use x-ray Imaging to see you indoors and there
are directed energy weapons on it to attack you with and as well as some AUDIO
HARASSMENT TOOLS, two of which we found out about being what you
covered on your show before which is called VOICE TO SKULL (SYNTHETIC
TELEPATHY).
I know I’ve heard from other people that you had on – and mentioned having
voice to skull. some people think they’re hearing the voice of God. One of your
guests went for a couple of months thinking that she’s been anointed before she
become a profit - before somebody explain to her she was being harassed.
[GEORGE NOORY]
In your particular case with your girlfriend at the time - would did they want with
her?
[DR. JOHN HALL]
In our case it was purely a sexual assault and based on other victims that I’ve
spoken with and that we’ve interviewed - there’s a lot of reasons - some people
are WHISTLEBLOWERS, some people are what we like to call social outliers,
possibly people that have had some drug problems that are easily discredited by
their lifestyles. So when this starts to happen to them nobody listens.
(AUTHORITIES, FAMILY, FRIENDS, MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS)
[GEORGE NOORY]
How long has it been going on?
[DR. JOHN HALL]
It's all over the place. I know most of the victims I talked to including several
people here in San Antonio that it's been going on for over a decade. Probably
one of the earliest reports that I’ve gotten was a victim that was in a motorcycle
accident - he was taken to UC Davis and in 1981 and his problem started after
being released from the hospital. It included not only directed energy
attacks but stalking as well as hearing voices.
[GEORGE NOORY]
Was a point where you said to yourself was something wrong with her I got to get
her some help was something wrong with her?
The
U.S.
HATE
DISTRICT
CrimeCOURT
Dr. John Report
Hall Re
- Injunction
LancasterFor
Transcript City
Emergency
and County
Relief Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.36
792of
of
of212
82
5 Saturday Tuesday
Tuesday
January June
6,June
19,
201818,
2018
2018
COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW OF 2010 - Published by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2018©
[DR. JOHN HALL]
That’s one of the problems with this technology – it was developed to
simulate mental illness or delusional disorder or schizophrenia. That’s one
of the things that myself and several other doctors, including a PhD that are
looking into this. We are trying to develop some criteria for distinguishing
between true mental illness and someone who’s being victimized.
It is very hard to do but as mean as you know mental illness does exist and with
schizophrenic there are certain delusions that include auditory delusions – they
will hear voices.
Now the biggest difference that I’ve seen is that most schizophrenics will tell you
that the voices kind of sound like garbled voices in a Subway multiple voices. The
Voice to Skull voices of these victims here are usually very clear, very distinct,
sometimes multiple people talking not only to them but to each other. Sometimes
using their real name sometimes the victims know the names of the people that
are doing the watching - you know it’s obviously surveillance combined with
attacks. A lot of the people are being attacked 24/7. Some of the goals of the
attack is to keep people up 24 hours a day, or sleep deprivation, which is one of
the other reasons that were looking at this as possible GOVERNMENT
EXPERIMENTATION (PROGRAM).
[GEORGE NOORY]
I was going to ask you that it it sounds like that they may be picking people and
then just testing
We done through THE FREEDOM FROM COVERT HARASSMENT AND
SURVEILLANCE, A HUMAN RIGHTS ORGANIZATION we’ve done some
pretty extensive surveys. 70% are women. TO BE CONTINUED......
SATURDAY JANUARY 6, 2018
_______________________
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Freedom From Covert Harassment & Surveillance, ®
Registered in Pennsylvania
1250 Fremont Street
Lancaster, PA 17603
www.amgglobalentetainmentgroup.com
[email protected]
717-327-1566
Notice and Disclaimer: Stan J. Caterbone and the Advanced Media Group have been slandered, defamed, and
publicly discredited since 1987 due to going public (Whistle Blower) with allegations of misconduct and fraud
The
U.S.
HATE
DISTRICT
CrimeCOURT
Dr. John Report
Hall Re
- Injunction
LancasterFor
Transcript City
Emergency
and County
Relief Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.37
803of
of
of212
82
5 Saturday Tuesday
Tuesday
January June
6,June
19,
201818,
2018
2018
COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW OF 2010 - Published by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2018©
within International Signal & Control, Plc. of Lancaster, Pa. (ISC pleaded guilty to selling arms to Iraq via
South Africa and a $1 Billion Fraud in 1992). Unfortunately we are forced to defend our reputation and the
truth without the aid of law enforcement and the media, which would normally prosecute and expose public
corruption. We utilize our communications to thwart further libelous and malicious attacks on our person, our
property, and our business. We continue our fight for justice through the Courts, and some communications
are a means of protecting our rights to continue our pursuit of justice. Advanced Media Group is also a
member of the media. Reply if you wish to be removed from our Contact List. How long can Lancaster County
and Lancaster City hide me and Continue to Cover-Up my Whistle Blowing of the ISC Scandel (And the Torture
from U.S. Sponsored Mind Control)?
ACTIVE COURT CASESACTIVE COURT CASES
J.C. No. 03-16-90005 Office of the Circuit Executive, United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals -
COMPLAINT OF JUDICIALMISCONDUCT OR DISABILITY re 15-3400 and 16-1149; 03-16-900046 re
ALL FEDERAL LITIGATION TO DATE
U.S. Supreme Court Case No. 16-6822 PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI re Case No. 16-1149
MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert
U.S.C.A. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-3284; Case No. 16-1149 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle
Lambert;15-3400 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert;; 16-1001; 07-4474
U.S. District Court Eastern District of PA Case No. 17-01233 Chapter 11 Appeal for 17-10615; Case No.
17-0867 Preliminary Injunction from Middle District; Case No. 16-4014 CATERBONE v. United States,
et.al.; Case No. 16-cv-49; 15-03984; 14-02559 MOVANT for Lisa Michelle Lambert; 05-2288; 06-4650,
08-02982;
U.S. District Court Middle District of PA Case No. 16- 2513 INJUNCTION; Case No. 16-cv-1751
PETITION FOR HABEUS CORPUS
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Judicial Conduct Board – Case No. 2016-462 Complaint against
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge Leonard Brown III
Pennsylvania Supreme Court Case No. 353 MT 2016; 354 MT 2016; 108 MM 2016 Amicus for Kathleen
Kane
Superior Court of Pennsylvania 3575 EDA 2016 Amicus for Kathleen Kane; Summary Appeal Case No.
CP-36-SA-0000219-2016, AMICUS for Kathleen Kane Case No. 1164 EDA 2016; Case No. 1561 MDA
2015; 1519 MDA 2015; 16-1219 Preliminary Injunction Case of 2016
Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Case No. 16-05815 Injunction; Case No. 16-08472
INJUNCTION re Pain Meds; Case No. 15-10167 Film Commission; Case No. 08-13373; 15-10167; 06-
03349, CI-06-03401
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for The Eastern District of Pennsylvania Case No. 17-10615; Case No. 16-10157
The
U.S.
HATE
DISTRICT
CrimeCOURT
Dr. John Report
Hall Re
- Injunction
LancasterFor
Transcript City
Emergency
and County
Relief Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.38
814of
of
of212
82
5 Saturday Tuesday
Tuesday
January June
6,June
19,
201818,
2018
2018
COAST TO COAST INTERVIEW OF 2010 - Published by Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2018©
HOME ABOUT US EVENTS VIDEO AUDIO MEDIA WEB LINKS CONTACT
ICAACT was created to bring awareness to the
general public and the legal systems around
the world about serious human rights abuses
utilizing remote influencing technologies. Our
aim is to obtain evidence.
DR. JOHN HALL’S BOOK TO BECOME MOVIE RECOMMENDED
81 SCANNING PHASE III MR. MAGNUS
OLSSON
Home / Articles Latest update: 2013-09-01
“What we do in life echoes in eternity.”
-- Quote from Gladiator
This podcast is unavailable or has been deleted.
When Dr. John Hall wrote the book “A new
Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America”, Lecture on History of Remote
information about the technologies and Influencing Technologies: Lars
techniques for remote influencing, where Drudgaard
basically unknown to most people. The case of
one individual – a woman that Dr. John Hall
knew – was used in the book to illustrate the
daily horror, harassment and torture that many
people in our world today have to experience.
These people are the victims of a new form of
worldwide terrorism – an endless orgy of abuse
and torture; People who could have lived happy
healthy existences, but whose lives have been
ruthlessly destroyed without warning or a good
reason. Worst of all: there is nowhere to run!
This world becomes because of this remote
technology the victim’s prison: A prison without walls or bars, yet
inescapable.
Convincing a large majority of people of a phenomenon that is real but that
cannot be seen is a great challenge. And what societal means can one use
to spread a message that cannot be put in words but that only experienced
can be fully understood?
You read the headline of this article! Dr. John Hall’s book is going to become
a movie.
Movies are not just entertainment. Over decades movies have been used as
one of the most powerful tools in bringing about social change and
promoting new ethical value systems by taking the spectator into the
subjective and often complicated realms of the underprivileged and the
unheard. In this way, movies have been a tool for reaching goals that have
to do with social justice by promoting social responsibility, values and
ethics.
Unfortunately, in movies, given their influence, remote influencing
technologies and microchips, those tools that plague victims of the cause
ICAACT represents, often fall into the genre of science fiction. Nonetheless,
as mirrors of what’s going on in society at a particular time, these films play
their role and do their job. As historical evidence, films show the attitudes of
the time regarding social issues.
For Dr. John Hall, making a movie based on a real life event means doing all
of that: changing attitudes in society, reflecting a very important matter and
making history.
Support The New Breed Movie: Newbreedmovie.com
©Carmen Lupan ([email protected])
Copyright © Icaact.org 2012. All rights reserved.
The
U.S.
HATE
DISTRICT
CrimeCOURT
Dr. John Report
Hall Re
- Injunction
LancasterFor
Transcript City
Emergency
and County
Relief Page
Page
PageNo.
No.
No.39
825of
of
of212
82
5 Saturday Tuesday
Tuesday
January June
6,June
19,
201818,
2018
2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
STAN J. CATERBONE - EVIDENCE OF BB AND GUN SHOTS AT MY HOME
Tuesday June 19, 2018
LEFT SIDE PICS RIGHT SIDE PICS
1. BATHROOM WINDOW Monday June 18, 2018 4. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017
2. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017 5. FRONT PORCH LIGHT Sunday June 10, 2018
3. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017 6. BATHROOM WINDOW Monday June 18, 2018
THERE WAS NO BULLET FRAGMENTS OR BULLETS LEFT INSIDE THE HOUSE WHICH
IS EVIDENCE THAT SOMEONE RIGGED THE SHOOTINGS AND EITHER HELD A BACKSTOP
INSIDE THE BATH AND BEDROOMS OR SHOT FROM INSIDE TO THE OUTSIDE WHILE I WAS AWAY
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.401ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.412ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.423ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.434ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.445ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.456ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.467ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.478ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
CRAIG STEDMAN, LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY
MILITARY INTELLIGENCE 1986 TO 1994 - Page 2
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.48
1 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.49
2 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.50
3 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.51
4 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.52
5 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.53
6 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.54
7 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.55
8 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.56
9 of 19
212 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.57
10of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.58
11of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.59
12of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.60
13of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.61
14of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.62
15of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.63
16of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.64
17of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.65
18of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
PUBLISHED BY STAN J. CATERBONE and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - GOOGLE SEARCH
The HATE
CRAIG
Crime
STEDMAN
Report Re
LANCASTER
Lancaster City
BARand
QUESTIONAIRE
County Page
PageNo.
No.66
19of
of212
19 Sunday
Tuesday
April 15,
June
2018
18, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
STAN J. CATERBONE - EVIDENCE OF BB AND GUN SHOTS AT MY HOME
Tuesday June 19, 2018
LEFT SIDE PICS RIGHT SIDE PICS
1. BATHROOM WINDOW Monday June 18, 2018 4. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017
2. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017 5. FRONT PORCH LIGHT Sunday June 10, 2018
3. 2004 SANTA FE WINDSHIELD November 2017 6. BATHROOM WINDOW Monday June 18, 2018
THERE WAS NO BULLET FRAGMENTS OR BULLETS LEFT INSIDE THE HOUSE WHICH
IS EVIDENCE THAT SOMEONE RIGGED THE SHOOTINGS AND EITHER HELD A BACKSTOP
INSIDE THE BATH AND BEDROOMS OR SHOT FROM INSIDE TO THE OUTSIDE WHILE I WAS AWAY
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.671ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.682ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.693ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.704ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.715ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.726ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.737ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
Stan J. Caterbone and ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP - Pro Se Litigant - Victim of a Federal Hate Crime
TheBB
HATE Crime
& Gun Report
Shots at Re
MyLancaster
Home City and County Page
PageNo.
No.748ofof212
8 Tuesday
Tuesday JuneJune 18, 2018
19, 2018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
____________________
Commonwealth of Pennslvania
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis- Preliminary
Re
and-Lancaster Injunction
FORMS City
Preliminary and County
Injunction PageNo.
Page
Page No.75
No. 11 of 10
of 448
13
212 Friday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June 25,
June 2018
June
20, 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
XXXXXXXX May 25, 2018
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis
17-5311 - Preliminary
Re
and
IN FORMA -Lancaster
FORMS Injunction
City
Preliminary
PAUPERIS and County
Injunction Page
Page
Page No.
PageNo.
No.
No.76
222of
of 10
13
212
of448
7 SundayFriday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June
March 25,
June
4, 2018
June
20,
2018 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
__________
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
May 25, 2018
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis- Preliminary
Re
and-Lancaster Injunction
FORMS City
Preliminary and County
Injunction PageNo.
Page
Page No.77
No. 33 of 10
of 448
13
212 Friday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June 25,
June 2018
June
20, 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
0.00
276.00
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis
17-5311 - Preliminary
Re
and
IN FORMA -Lancaster
FORMS Injunction
City
Preliminary
PAUPERIS and County
Injunction Page
Page
Page No.
PageNo.
No.
No.78
444of
of 10
13
212
of448
7 SundayFriday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June
March 25,
June
4, 2018
June
20,
2018 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
1/4 Ownership With 3 Brothers
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis
17-5311 - Preliminary
Re
and
IN FORMA -Lancaster
FORMS Injunction
City
Preliminary
PAUPERIS and County
Injunction Page
Page
Page No.
PageNo.
No.
No.79
555of
of 10
13
212
of448
7 SundayFriday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June
March 25,
June
4, 2018
June
20,
2018 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis
17-5311 - Preliminary
Re
and
IN FORMA -Lancaster
FORMS Injunction
City
Preliminary
PAUPERIS and County
Injunction Page
Page
Page No.
PageNo.
No.
No.80
666of
of 10
13
212
of448
7 SundayFriday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June
March 25,
June
4, 2018
June
20,
2018 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis
17-5311 - Preliminary
Re
and
IN FORMA -Lancaster
FORMS Injunction
City
Preliminary
PAUPERIS and County
Injunction Page
Page
Page No.
PageNo.
No.
No.81
777of
of 10
13
212
of448
7 SundayFriday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June
March 25,
June
4, 2018
June
20,
2018 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $ (-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
3-(-4 /)-5(*..
6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 7,
88888888888888888888888888888888888888888888888
6 6 9 $ : 88888888888888
" ! !;;
0 " < ; '" !
, # ' ; "
;
, 6 6 6 6
, 6
,, 6 6 6 9 = 6 6 6 7 6 66
6 ,, > 6 6 6 6
, 6
)+(* < , # ' ; " & # 1 !& ; 7
1 ! 11"!# ! $ ! & < # # 0! < " &! !
1 ! ! ;; & ! < " 0 ; 1 #
# ! ; ? !# 6< 1 ! < ; "" 0 $ ! < ! !# ! <!
# ' & ! 6<! 0 !&< ;; @ ! ; < ,, 6
! < " & A !# ; < # 1" ! # 1 <! ! ! < ; # <
,! !& 0! < 1 ! $ ' " 0$ # ! ; !# ; < , #
' < !;; < < "" 6<! # !#$ ! < $ 0 " < ;; # ! "'
! ! "" " &! ! #" ! ; < ,, 6
6 , 9 6 6 6 9 6 6 6
7 6 6$ 6 6 6 6 , $6 , 6
67 6 , B9 6 , ,$ 6 6 6 6
6 6 6 6 , $ 6 6 6 6 9 C 6 7
6 6 6 6 6 7,
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis- Preliminary
Re
and-Lancaster Injunction
FORMS City
Preliminary and County
Injunction PageNo.
Page
Page No.82
No. 88 of 10
of 448
13
212 Friday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June 25,
June 2018
June
20, 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
67 , 9 , 67 6 ,7 9 6 6 D($/-E ++ 6
6 66 , 6 , ,6 B 6
6 9 < # "" # ! & #! " # ! ' 9 ;! ; ' 1 !""
! # " ; < 7 6 ,, , 6 6 6 ,
6 , ! # )++F$ < #! " # ! ' ! ! ! #" 6
6 9 6,7 9, # *$ )++*G < < 6
6 9 #" !# ! ; )HI- ' < !# " 1 <'
11"! ; ;! ! 1 !" ; )++E & ).$ )++E # !
#< #A ; D)($H*. ++ 6 ' ; # ! ;! $ <"' ;!
& ! 1 ; )++E 9 ;! & ! 1 !" ; )+(+ 6 , 6
)++ , , 9, 9 6 , ,
6
; )+(* J 0 11 @! "' D.+$+++ ++ !
! # < ## 6 -++
6<! ; # ! ! # ! < 11"!# ! ; 0 < !"! ! & 0! <
< ! ' ; , # ' 0< < 6 1 ! ! ! < ><!
< # < 0 11 @! "' D(($)++ ++
6< # < < 1" 11 @!
"' D+ ++ < &< ' !#
# "# " 1 & ; "! $ < ; $ ; $ @ 6< !
"! ! ' ? # !
; & #' "! ; ;!" ! " 66 6 6 6 6 <
1 & ? # ! < ;!" ; < 1 (+ ' ! ! # <
6 !@ ; , (F$ )+(- ; !" 6 7 , 9
6 , K 3H4 6 (EF-
D(++$+++ ++ 5 (EFF 6 , , L6 6 $ 6 $, 6 C > 97
6 6 9 > 97 $ ,6 $ D()*$+++ ++$ 6
D)+$+++ ++ (EF. 6 > , 6
> , 9 , $ ,6 $ (EFE 6 (EE) 6 6
K 6 L6 6 6 7 6 6 > 6
6 6 , 9, 6 5 6
D)*$+++ ++ 5 (EEF 6 6 ,, 6 ,
6 6 $ $ 6 9 > 7 97 6 6 75
> 6
DH/$+++ ++ B )++( 6 6 6 ,
6 9 $ 3 6 4 6 ,6 6 > 6 6 ,
> , , D*$+++ ++ 6 6 $
6 , 6 $ ) > C 6 6
6
D.+$+++ ++ B 9 , ) C 6 (*$ )+(* 5
, 6 , 67 9 , 67 , 7 6 D)($H.+
)++E$ D(-$+++ 6 , ))+ 6 ,, $ 6 $
, 6 6 > L6 6 6 7 6 6
, , 6 , $6 6 $ $ L6 6
6 ' # ! 6 ,7 9 6 6
, 6 6 , 6 67 ,
, 6 9 C 7 6 6 7$ 6 7 7 (+$ )+(F 6
6 9 ,7 DE( ++ 6 6
9 , 67 9 6 6 > C
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis- Preliminary
Re
and-Lancaster Injunction
FORMS City
Preliminary and County
Injunction PageNo.
Page
Page No.83
No. 99 of 10
of 448
13
212 Friday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June 25,
June 2018
June
20, 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
$ $ > 6 6 7 , 7
,7 9 $ 6 6 , 6 6 , 6 6 $
,,7 6 L 6 , 6 6 B 6 , 9,
,
7 )*$ )+(F
88888888888I I888888888888
$ ,! !&
%
!"" # $
&! ! '" !
()*+
, # $ (-.+/
000 &&" " ! & 1#
# 2& !" #
-(-5/)-5(*..
In Forma
TheINFORMA
HATE Crime
Forma Pauperis
PAUPERIS
Report
Pauperis- Preliminary
Re
and-Lancaster Injunction
FORMS City
Preliminary and County
Injunction PageNo.
Page
Page No.84
No. 10of
10 10
of212
of 13
448 Friday
Tuesday
Wednesday May
Tuesday
June 25,
June 2018
June
20, 19,
201818,
20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
TheINFORMA
HATE
U.S.Crime
PAUPERIS
ReportCLERK
DISTRICT Re
andLancaster
FORMS
LETTER City and County Page
PageNo.
Page No.85
No. 11
12of
of
of212
13
29 Tuesday
Tuesday
Saturday June
June 2,June
19, 18,
2018 20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
TheINFORMA
HATE
U.S.Crime
PAUPERIS
ReportCLERK
DISTRICT Re
andLancaster
FORMS
LETTER City and County Page
PageNo.
Page No.86
No. 12
13of
of
of212
13
29 Tuesday
Tuesday
Saturday June
June 2,June
19, 18,
2018 20182018
U.S. DISTRICT COURT FOR EASTERN PENNSYLANIA - Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se
TheINFORMA
HATE
U.S.Crime
PAUPERIS
ReportCLERK
DISTRICT Re
andLancaster
FORMS
LETTER City and County Page
PageNo.
Page No.87
No. 13
14of
of
of212
13
29 Tuesday
Tuesday
Saturday June
June 2,June
19, 18,
2018 20182018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 88 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 89 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 90 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 91 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 92 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 93 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 94 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 95 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 96 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 97 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 98 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 99 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 100 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 101 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 102 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
The HATE Crime Report Re Lancaster City and County Page No. 103 of 212 Tuesday June 18, 2018
Gmail - Stan Wants You to See This https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=acf0584318&view=pt&search=all...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Stan Caterbone <[email protected]>
Stan Wants You to See This
2 messages
Stan <[email protected]> Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 2:38 PM
Reply-To: Lowe's <reply-fecc167271640d7f-23_HTML-118527015-1060694-662775@e.lowes.com>
To: [email protected]
Check It Out
Stan wants to share an item with you.
1252 Fremont Street and the CATERBONE
BROTHERS, IN SYNC WITH THE LANCASTER CITY
PIGS/STEDMAN/REINAKER HAVE OUT DID
THEMSELVES AGAIN - YOU FOOLS!
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year
Limited 4500-Watt Double Element Electric
Water Heater
Item #: | Model #:
BUY NOW
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.104
1 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
1 of 5 12/17/2018, 11:36 AM
Gmail - Stan Wants You to See This https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=acf0584318&view=pt&search=all...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
<[email protected]>, Paul Newhart <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Peter Anders <[email protected]>, Peter Anders
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Phil Caterbone
<[email protected]>, Phil Caterbone <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Raymond Pennino <[email protected]>,
rebeca shinsky <[email protected]>, RentalZone of PA <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Richard Cosmore
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Robbie Millward
<[email protected]>, Robert Yeagley <[email protected]>, Ron
<[email protected]>, Ron Harper <[email protected]>, Ron Harper <[email protected]>, Ron Soltes
<[email protected]>, Ron Southwick <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Samuel Myers
<[email protected]>, Sarah Guggenheimer <[email protected]>, Sarah Schmehl
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Scott Rhoades <[email protected]>, Scott Rhoades
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Sector 9 <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Senator Leach
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]
harbor.nj.us" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Soleilmavis
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Stan J.
Caterbone" <[email protected]>, "Stan J. Caterbone" <[email protected]>, "Stan J. Caterbone"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Steve Caterbone <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Susan Shapiro <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, Synchrony Bank <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Tee Grossi <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Todd Stephens
<[email protected]>, Tony Bongiovi New October 18 <[email protected]>, Tracy Lin Horst
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, Verizon
Wireless <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, W M <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>,
"[email protected]" <[email protected]>, YourHealthPartners <[email protected]>
FINAL - STAN J. CATERBONE - U.S. District Court...
December 16, 2018 - PHOTOS OF LAST VANDALIZED …
STAN J. CATERBONE & THE HATE CRIME REPORT - …
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.105
2 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
4 of 5 12/17/2018, 11:36 AM
Gmail - Stan Wants You to See This https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=acf0584318&view=pt&search=all...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant
Advanced Media Group
www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com
Linkedin Professional Networking Profile (click here)
PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL: Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant, and the Advanced Media Group are
victims of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and has been engaged in litigation in both Federal and State courts
seeking financial and social remedies and a resolution of his Civil Liberties and his Constitutional Rights. These
communications are our way of defending and protecting those rights. In 1987 Stan J. Caterbone, while
managing the financial firm the he founded, Financial Management Group, Ltd., Stan J. Caterbone became a
Federal Whistleblower when, as a shareholder, he claimed fraud and misconduct within the international arms
dealer and local start-up International Signal & Control, Plc., Some 4 years later ISC was indicted and plead
guilty to the 3rd largest fraud in U.S. history, some $1 Billion, and for selling arms to Irag via South Africa. In
June of 2015 Stan J. Caterbone became the Movant in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania case No. 5:14-cv-02559-PD for the Habeus Corpus Petition of Lisa Michelle Lambert. The case is
now before the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, Case No. 15-3400.
[Quoted text hidden]
[Quoted text hidden]
View our Privacy Statement. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC.
FUCK YOU ALL
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.106
3 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
5 of 5 12/17/2018, 11:36 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
UP TO 40% OFF SELECT TOOLS + FREE PARCEL SHIPPING WITH MYLOWE’S. SHOP NOW >
Prices, promotions, styles, and availability may vary.
Open until 9PM! Our local stores do not honor online pricing. Prices
E. Lancaster Lowe's and availability of products and services are subject
to change without notice. Errors will be corrected
where discovered, and Lowe's reserves the right to
revoke any stated offer and to correct any errors,
inaccuracies or omissions including after an order
has been submitted.
Item # 839933 Model # E6-30R45DV
$
299.28
PLUS, up to $50 in Rebates >
Perfect for optimizing hot water output in
households with 1-2 people
27 Ratings
Community Dual 4500-watt copper heating elements
Recommend
this Q&A
4.5 Average
product View Now Adjustable thermostat can be set for desired
comfort
Ships to Store Delivery Feedback
FREE
Ready for
Ready for pickup: delivery:
Need this water heater installed? Lowe's can help, Estimated by Estimated on
simply call 1-877-GO-LOWES prior to purchase; In 01/01/2019 01/01/2019
use/lifestyle images - accessories not included
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.107
4 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
1 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Description
Perfect for optimizing hot water output in
households with 1-2 people
Dual 4500-watt copper heating elements
Adjustable thermostat can be set for desired
comfort
Non-CFC polyurethane foam reduces heat loss
and energy costs for maximum efficiency
Fused ceramic shield tank for anti-corrosion
protection
Short design is ideal for crawlspace or closet
installation
6-year limited warranty gives you peace of mind
CA Residents: Prop 65 WARNING(S)
Feedback
Specifications
Nominal Capacity Diameter (Inches) 22
30
(Gallons)
Height (Inches) 43
Warranty 6-year limited
Point of Use
Installation Location Indoor
Insulation Thickness
3
Element Wattage (Inches)
4500
(Watts)
Commercial/Residential Residential
Family Size 2
Series Name Signature™
Uniform Energy
0.89 Mobile Home
Factor
Compatible
Voltage (Volts) 240
Element Type Copper
Wi-Fi Compatibility
Rated Storage Capacity 27-Gallon
Water Connection
3/4-in Number of Elements 2
Size
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.108
5 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
2 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Temperature and GPH Recovery at 90
20.7
Pressure Relief Valve Degrees F (Gallons)
Water Heater Style Short Bluetooth Compatibility
Foam Insulation ENERGY STAR
Certified
UL Listed
Hybrid Heat Pump
CSA Listed Technology
ETL Listed Water Connection
Top
Location
Weight (lbs.) 94
CA Residents: Prop 65
Yes
Warning(s)
Water Heater Maintain a Water
Feedback
Installation Heater
From the Manufacturer | Powered by
What to expect from this water heater
Performance predictions are estimated based on a typical installation in Lancaster, PA. For more personalized results, change your location
or advanced settings.
11 MINUTES 1.4 SHOWERS
single shower back-to-back
length
1.3 SHOWERS
at the same time
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.109
6 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
3 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
25 GALLONS $758/YEAR
max tub size estimated energy cost
Many factors affect the actual performance of a water heater. This represents our closest approximation of your likely experience with this
water heater in Lancaster PA, but actual performance may vary depending on factors beyond our ability to control or estimate. To view or
adjust our assumptions of the most common factors that impact this product’s performance in Lancaster PA, please view the advanced
settings. *Annual Estimated energy costs are estimated from the energy efficiency of each water heater, your household’s estimated hot
water usage & set temperature, the average groundwater temperature for your location, and residential energy prices for your location as
reported by the Department of Energy and the Energy Information Administration.
Feedback
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.110
7 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
4 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Features
Signature Standard T&P Relief Valve Nylon Drain Valve
Electric Factory installed Tamper-Proof valve that
The Signature Standard temperature and pressure prevents unintended water
Electric water heater is the relief valve. discharge and provides a
reliable choice when you way to drain the water
are looking to maximize from the heater for
your hot water output and maintenance purposes.
is designed with
environmentally-friendly
insulation to reduce
standby heat loss.
How it Works
Cold water enters the water heater through an internal “dip tube” which forces the cold water to the bottom of the tank
and pushes hot water out through the outlet connection. This arrangement provides the most hot water for a given tank
Feedback
size. There are two thermostats on a typical residential water heater. The thermostat at the bottom controls the lower
heating element while the top thermostat controls the upper heating element. Usually, only one heating element is
active at a time. Because the lower element sees the cold water first, the lower heating element does most of the work,
while the upper heating element is used only when the entire tank is cold. Because water can corrode the steel tank,
we glass line the inside of the tank and install an anode rod to help reduce corrosion. The temperature and pressure
relief valve is a safety device designed to open if the internal temperature or pressure of the tank exceeds certain
limits. Water heaters should be large enough to provide adequate hot water even when temperatures are cold and
household demand is greatest.
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.111
8 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
5 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
A.O. Smith Signature 30-Gallon Short 6-year Limited 4500-Watt Double... https://www.lowes.com/pd/A-O-Smith-Signature-30-Gallon-Short-6-yea...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Call 1-800-445-6937
Call 1-877-GO-LOWES
© 2018 Lowe's. All rights reserved. Lowe's and the gable design are registered trademarks of LF, LLC.
Feedback
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.112
9 ofof109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
6 of 6 12/17/2018, 11:41 AM
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Installa on Instruc ons and
Use & Care Guide
Residen al Electric
Water Heater
DO NOT RETURN THIS UNIT TO THE STORE
Read this manual and the labels on the water heater before you install,
operate, or service it. If you have difficulty following the direc ons, or
aren’t sure you can safely and properly do any of this work yourself:
• Call our Technical Assistance Hotline at 1-877-817-6750 or visit http:// www.
AOSmithAtLowes.com . We can help you with installation, operations, trouble-
shooting, or maintenance. Before you call, write down the model and serial
number from the water heater’s data plate.
Incorrect installa on, opera on, or service can damage the water heater, your house
and other property, and present risks including fire, scalding, electric shock, and
explosion, causing serious injury or death.
AHRI Cer fica on® applies to residen al electric water heaters with rated capaci es
of 20 to 120 gallon and input ra ngs of 12 kw or less.
Table of Contents Page
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION ................................. 3
GETTING STARTED ............................................................ 6
INSTALLATION ................................................................... 7
TROUBLESHOOTING ....................................................... 17
MAINTENANCE ............................................................... 20
DIAGRAMS ..................................................................... 24
REPAIR PARTS ..........................................................25
LOW LEAD
CONTENT
Keep this manual in the pocket on heater for future reference whenever maintenance, adjustment or service is required.
Retain your original receipt as proof of purchase.
2000536050 (VER 01) 100277325 (REV B)
November 2016
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.113
10 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
COMPLETED INSTALLATION TYPICAL
Water
shut off
Expansion
tank
Hot
water
line
Cold
water
line
Electrical
junc on
box
T&P
relief
Upper valve
Element and
Thermostat
access
ECO Reset
Bu on
(on most
models) T&P
discharge
pipe
Lower
Element and
Thermostat
access
Drain pan
discharge
pipe
Drain valve
Drain pan
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.114
11 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
SAFETY
Read and follow all safety messages and instruc ons in
Important informa on to keep
this manual.
Fill out this sec on and keep this
manual in the pocket of the water
This is the safety alert symbol. It is used to alert you to heater for reference.
poten al physical injury hazards. Obey all safety mes-
sages that follow this symbol to avoid possible property Date Purchased:
damage, serious injury or death. Do not remove any
permanent instruc ons, labels, or the data plate from either the outside of
the water heater or on the inside of the access panels. Keep this manual
Model number:
near the water heater.
Serial number:
DANGER indicates hazardous
DANGER situa on that, if not avoided, will
result in death or serious injury.
Maintenance performed:* Date:
WARNING indicates a hazardous
WARNING situa on that, if not avoided, could
result in death or serious injury.
CAUTION indicates a hazardous
CAUTION situa on that, if not avoided, could
result in minor or moderate injury.
NOTICE indicates prac ces not
NOTICE related to physical injury.
*Drain and flush tank and remove and
inspect anode rod a er first six months
of opera on and at least annually
therea er. Operate the Temperature
and Pressure Relief Valve (T&P) annu-
ally and inspect T&P valve every 2-4
years (see the label on the T&P valve for
maintenance schedule). See the Main-
tenance sec on for more informa on
This product is certifi ed to comply with a maximum weighted average of about maintaining this water heater.
0.25% lead content as required in some areas.
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 3
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.115
12 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
IMPORTANT SAFETY INFORMATION
SAFETY
T o reduce the risk of property
damage, serious injury or death,
read and follow the precau ons below,
RISKS DURING OPERATION
Scalding Risk
For informa on about changing the
factory thermostat se ng(s), refer to
the “Adjus ng Temperature” sec on in
all labels on the water heater, and This water heater this manual (“Step 10” on page 15).
the safety messages and instruc ons can make water hot
throughout this manual. enough to cause Even if you set the water heater
severe burns instantly, resulting in thermostat(s) to a low se ng, higher
RISKS DURING INSTALLATION severe injury or death. temperatures may occur in certain
circumstances:
AND MAINTENANCE • Feel water before bathing or show-
ering. • In some cases, repeated small
Electric Shock Risk draws of water can cause the
Contact with the electrical • To reduce the risk of scalding, hot and cold water in the tank to
parts in the junction box and install Thermostatic Mixing Valves “stack” in layers. If this happens,
behind the access doors can (temperature limiting valves) at the water can be as much as thirty
result in severe injury or death from each point-of-use. These valves degrees hotter than the thermo-
electrical shock: automatically mix hot and cold stat setting. This temperature varia-
tion is the result of your usage pat-
water to limit the temperature at
• Disconnect power by opening the tern and is not a malfunction.
the tap. Mixing valves are available
circuit breaker or removing the from Lowe’s®. Follow manufactur- • Water temperature will be hot-
fuses before installing or servicing. ter if someone adjusted the
er’s instructions for installation and
adjustment of the valves. thermostat(s) to a higher setting.
• Use a non-contact circuit tester to
confirm that power is off before • Problems with the thermostat(s),
• The thermostat(s) on this water
working on or near any electrical or other malfunctions may result in
heater have been factory set to
parts. higher than expected water tem-
approximately 120°F to reduce the
peratures.
risk of scalding. Higher tempera-
• Replace the junction box cover and
tures increase the risk of scalding, • If the water heater is in a hot envi-
access doors after servicing.
but even at 120°F, hot water can ronment, the water in the tank can
Lifting Risk scald. If you choose a higher tem- become as hot as the surrounding
perature, Thermostatic Mixing air, regardless of the thermostat
WARNING! The setting.
Valves located at each point-of-use
water heater is
are particularly important to help • If the water supplied to the water
heavy. Follow these
avoid scalding. heater is pre-heated (for example,
precau ons to
by a solar system) the temperature
reduce the risk of property damage,
Temperature Time to Produce a in the tank may be higher than the
injuries from li ing or impact injuries water heater’s thermostat setting.
Serious Burn
from dropping the water heater.
120°F (49°C) More than 5 minutes To reduce the risk of unusually hot
• Use at least two people to lift the
125°F (52°C) 1½ to 2 minutes water reaching the fixtures in the
water heater.
130°F (54°C) About 30 seconds house, install Thermosta c Mixing
• Be sure you both have a good grip Valves at each point-of-use.
135°F (57°C) About 10 seconds
before lifting.
140°F (60°C) Less than 5 seconds If anyone in your home is at par cular
• Use an appliance dolly or hand risk of scalding (for example, the el-
145°F (63°C) Less than 3 seconds
truck to move the water heater. derly, children, or people with disabili-
150°F (66°C) About 1½ seconds es) or if there is a local code or state
155°F (68°C) About 1 second law requiring a certain water tempera-
ture at the hot water tap, then these
4 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.116
13 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
SAFETY
precau ons are par cularly important. ing wet. Immediately shut the water Maintain the T&P Relief Valve properly.
heater off and have it inspected by a Follow the maintenance instructions
According to a na onal standard qualified person if you find that the provided by the manufacturer of the
American Society of Sanitary Engineer- wiring, thermostat(s) or surround- T&P Relief Valve (label attached to T&P
ing (ASSE 1070) and most local plumbing ing insulation have been exposed to
codes, the water heater’s thermostat Relief Valve) and the procedure that
water in any way (e.g., leaks from
should not be used as the sole means to starts on page 23.
plumbing, leaks from the water
regulate water temperature and avoid heater itself can damage property An explosion could occur if the T&P
scalds. and could cause a fire risk). If the Relief Valve or discharge pipe is
Properly adjusted Thermosta c Mixing water heater is subjected to flood blocked. Do not cap or plug the T&P
Valves installed at each point-of-use al- conditions or the thermostat(s) have Relief Valve or discharge pipe.
low you to set the tank temperature to been submerged in water, the entire
a higher se ng without increasing risk water heater must be replaced. Fire and Explosion Risk if Hot Water is
of scalds. A higher temperature se ng Not Used for Two Weeks or More
allows the tank to provide much more • Make electrical connections prop- CAUTION! Hydrogen gas builds up in
hot water and can help provide proper erly, according to the instructions a hot water system when it is not used
water temperatures for appliances such on page 14. Use 10 gauge solid for a long period (two weeks or more).
as dishwashers and washing machines. copper wire. Use a UL listed or CSA Hydrogen gas is extremely flammable.
Higher tank temperatures (140°F) approved strain relief. Connect If the hot water system has not been
also kill bacteria that cause a condi- ground wire to green ground screw. used for two weeks or more, open a
on known as “smelly water” and can hot water faucet for several minutes at
Explosion Risk
reduce the levels of bacteria that cause the kitchen sink before using any elec-
High temperatures and
water-borne diseases. trical appliances connected to the hot
pressures in the water water system. Do not smoke or have
Water Contamination Risk heater tank can cause an an open flame or other igni on source
Do not use chemicals that could con- explosion resulting in property near the faucet while it is open.
taminate the potable water supply. Do damage, serious injury or death. A
not use piping that has been treated new Temperature and Pressure (T&P)
with chromates, boiler seal, or other Relief Valve is included with your water
chemicals.
heater to reduce risk of explosion by
Fire Risk discharging hot water. Additional
To reduce the risk of a temperature and pressure protective
fire that could destroy equipment may be required by local
your home and serious- codes.
ly injure or kill people:
A nationally recognized testing labora-
• Do not store things that can burn
tory maintains periodic inspection of
easily such as paper or clothes next
the valve production process and certi-
to the water heater.
fies that it meets the requirements
• Be sure the junction box cover and for Relief Valves for Hot Water Supply
the access door covers are in place. Systems, ANSI Z21.22. The T&P Relief
These covers keep debris from Valve’s relief pressure must not exceed
entering and potentially being ignit- the working pressure rating of the wa-
ed, and help keep any internal fires ter heater as stated on the rating plate.
from spreading.
• Keep the water heater from becom-
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 5
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.117
14 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
GETTING STARTED
Review all of the instruc ons pipe, use threaded connectors suit-
1 before you begin work. able for the specific type of plastic
If you aren’t sure that you pipe used: CPVC and PEX (cross-
can safely and properly do this work linked polyethylene). Do not use
PVC pipe.
yourself, call your Lowe’s® store to
arrange for Professional Installa on • For homes with copper pipes,
Figure 1 - Flexible connectors use compres-
sion fittings and do not require soldering. (you may also call a qualified person you may purchase connector
GETTING STARTED
of your choice, such as a licensed kits with compression fittings
plumber or electrician, to have the that don’t require soldering
work done). Improper installa on can (Figure 1). Compression fittings
damage the water heater, your home are easier to install than sol-
and other property, and can present dering copper pipes.
risks of serious injury or death. • Teflon® tape or pipe joint com-
Figure 2 - Use a non-contact circuit tester
to insure that the power is off before you pound approved for potable water
work on a circuit. Check with your local and
2 state authori es for any local • Tools to make the electrical connec-
or state codes that apply to tions (for example, screwdrivers,
your area. In the absence of local and wire strippers)
state codes, follow Na onal Fire
• Non-Contact circuit tester to check
Protec on Associa on (NFPA-70) and
for power (Figure 2)
the current edi ons of the Na onal
Electric Code (NEC) and the Interna- • Water Pressure Gauge (Figure 4)
onal Plumbing Code (IPC). The
instruc ons in this manual comply with Recommended Accessories:
na onal codes, but the installer is
responsible for complying with local • Suitable drain pan (Figure 6 on page
Figure 3 - Install a Pressure Reducing Valve
set to 50 to 60 PSI. codes. 8)
Massachuse s code requires this wa- • Automatic leak detection and shut-
ter heater to be installed in accordance off device
with Massachuse s 248-CMR 2.00 and
• Pressure Reducing Valve (Figure 3
248-CMR 5.00: State Plumbing Code.
on page 6)
Other local and state authori es may
have similar requirements or other • Thermal Expansion Tank (Figure 5
codes applicable to the installa on of on page 7)
this water heater.
• Point-of-use Thermostatic Mixing
Before you start, be sure you Valves (Figure 7 on page 8)
3 have, and know how to use, the
following tools and supplies:
• Plumbing tools and supplies appro-
priate for the type of water pipes in
your home
• Threaded connectors (Figure 1) for
the cold and hot water pipes
• For homes plumbed with plastic
6 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.118
15 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
Follow these steps for proper
installa on: ✓ Water pressure
increase caused by
Step 1: thermal expansion
✓ Verify that your Verify that you have a properly sized
Thermal Expansion Tank (Figure 5). We
home is equipped recommend installing an expansion
and up-to-date for tank if your home does not have one.
proper opera on Figure 4 - Use a Water Pressure Gauge to
Codes require a properly pressurized,
make sure your home’s water pressure is properly sized Thermal Expansion Tank
Installing a new water heater is the not too high. in almost all homes. (See photo on
perfect me to examine your home’s To limit your home’s water pressure: inside front cover.)
plumbing system and make sure the Locate your home’s Pressure Reduc-
system is up to current code standards. ing Valve (PRV) on the main incoming
There have likely been plumbing code (cold) water supply line and adjust the
changes since the old water heater was water pressure control to between 50
installed. We recommend installing the and 60 psi. If your home does not have
following accessories and any other a Pressure Reducing Valve, install a
needed changes to bring your home up PRV on the home’s main water supply
INSTALLATION
to the latest code requirements. line and set it to between 50 and 60
psi. Pressure Reducing Valves are avail-
Use the checklist below and inspect able at Lowe’s®.
your home. Install any devices you need
to comply with codes and assure that BACKGROUND: Over the years, many
your new water heater performs at its u li es have increased water sup-
Figure 5 - A Thermal Expansion Tank helps
best. Check with your local plumbing ply pressures so they can serve more protect the home’s plumbing system from
official for more informa on. homes. In some homes today, pres- pressure spikes.
sures exceed 100 psi. High water HOW: Connect the Thermal Expan-
✓ Water pressure
We recommend checking your
pressures can damage water heaters,
causing premature leaks. If you have
sion Tank (available at Lowe’s®) to the
cold water supply line near the water
home’s water pressure with a pressure replaced toilet valves, had a water heater. The expansion tank contains
gauge (Figure 4.) Most codes allow a heater leak, or had to repair applianc- a bladder and an air charge. To work
maximum incoming water pressure of es connected to the plumbing system, properly, the Thermal Expansion Tank
80 psi. We recommend a working pres- pay par cular a en on to your home’s must be sized according to the water
sure no higher than 50-60 psi. water pressure. When purchasing a heater’s tank capacity and pressurized
PRV, make sure the PRV has a built-in to match the home’s incoming water
HOW: Purchase an inexpensive water
bypass. pressure. Refer to the installa on
pressure gauge available at Lowe’s®.
instruc ons provided with the Thermal
Connect the Water Pressure Gauge
Expansion Tank for installa on details.
to an outside faucet and measure the
maximum water pressure experienced
throughout the day (highest water
pressures o en occur at night).
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 7
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.119
16 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
BACKGROUND: Water expands when bathroom sink, bath, shower). Con-
heated, and the increased volume sult the valve manufacturer’s instruc-
of water must have a place to go, or ons or a qualified person.
thermal expansion will cause large WARNING! Even if the water heater
increases in water pressure (despite thermostat is set to a rela vely low
the use of a Pressure Reducing Valve temperature, hot water can scald.
on the home’s main water supply Install Thermosta c Mixing Valves at
each point-of-use to reduce the risk of
line). The Safe Drinking Water Act of
scalding (page 4).
1974 requires the use of backflow
preventers and check valves to restrict
BACKGROUND: A Thermosta c Mix-
water from your home reentering
Figure 6 - A suitable drain pan piped to an ing Valve, installed at each point-
the public water system. Backflow adequate drain can help protect flooring
from leaks and drips. of-use, mixes hot water from the
preventers are o en installed in water
• Install a suitable drain pan (avail- water heater with cold water to more
meters and may not be readily visible.
able at Lowe’s®) under the water precisely regulate the temperature of
As a result, most all plumbing systems
heater (Figure 6) to catch condensa- hot water supplied to fixtures. If you
today are now “closed,” and almost all tion or leaks in the piping connec-
aren’t sure if your plumbing system
homes now need a Thermal Expan- tions or tank. Most codes require,
and we recommend, installing the is equipped with properly installed
sion Tank.
water heater in a drain pan that is and adjusted Thermosta c Mixing
piped to an adequate drain. The Valves at each point where hot water
INSTALLATION
A Thermal Expansion Tank is a prac - drain pan must be at least two inch- is used, contact a qualified person for
cal and inexpensive way to help avoid es wider than the diameter of the
more informa on.
damage to the water heater, washing water heater. Install the drain pan
machine, dishwasher, ice maker and so the water level would be limited
to a maximum depth of 1-3/4”.
even toilet valves. If your toilet oc-
casionally runs for no apparent reason
(usually briefly at night), that may be
due to thermal expansion increasing
✓ Water tempera-
ture regula on
the water pressure temporarily.
Water pipe and tank
leaks
Leaks from plumbing pipes or from
the water heater itself can damage
property and could cause a fire risk.
• Install an automatic leak detection
and shutoff device (available at
Lowe’s®). These devices can detect
water leaks and can shut off the
water heater’s water supply if a Figure 7 - Thermostatic Mixing Valves
installed at each point -of-use can help
leak occurs.
prevent scalds.
Install Thermosta c Mixing Valves
(Figure 7) to regulate the temperature
of the water supplied to each point-
of-use (for example, kitchen sink,
8 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.120
17 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Step 2: 5
The loca on is not prone to
2
Locate the water heater’s
physical damage by vehicles, circuit breaker and turn it OFF
Verify that the loca on flooding, or other risks. (or remove the circuit’s
is appropriate fuses).
On the old water heater,
Before installing your water heater, 3 remove the electrical
ensure that:
junction box access panel.
Vehicle
Stop Using a non-contact circuit tester,
The water heater will be:
1 • Installed indoors close to check the wiring to make certain the
the center of the plumbing Drain Drain power is OFF.
Pan
system. WARNING! Working on an energized
Figure 8 - In a garage, install a vehicle stop circuit can result in severe injury or
• In a suitable drain pan piped to an to avoid water heater damage.
adequate floor drain or external death from electrical shock.
to the building (Figure 6 on page Avoid loca ons such as a cs, Disconnect the electrical
8).
6 upper floors, or where a leak 4 wires.
might damage the structure
• In an area that will not freeze or furnishings. Due to the normal Open a hot water faucet and
• In an area that is suitable for install- corrosive ac on of water, the tank will 5 let the hot water run un l it is
ing the water heater vertically eventually leak. To minimize property cool (This may take 10
INSTALLATION
damage from leaks, inspect and minutes or longer).
The loca on has adequate maintain your water heater in accor-
2 space (clearances) for periodic dance with this manual’s instruc ons.
servicing. Install a suitable drain pan under the
water heater piped to an adequate
The floor can support the drain. Inspect the drain pan, pipes, and
3 weight of a full water heater. surrounding area regularly and fix any
leaks found. Drain pans are available at
Your area is not prone to Lowe’s®. Leaks are frequently in the
4 earthquakes. If it is, use plumbing system itself and not the
special straps as required by water heater. Figure 9 - Let the hot water run until it is cool.
local building codes.
NOTICE: The state of California re- Step 3: WARNING! Be sure the water runs
cool before draining the tank to reduce
quires bracing, anchoring, or strapping
the water heater to avoid its moving
Removing the old water the risk of scalding.
heater Connect a garden hose to the
during an earthquake. Contact local
6 drain valve and place the
u li es for code requirements in your Read each installa on step other end of the hose in a
area, visit h p://www.dsa.dgs.ca.gov, 1 and decide if you have the drain, outside, or a bucket. (Note that
or call 1-916-445-8100 and request necessary skills to install the sediment in the bo om of the tank
instruc ons. Other loca ons may have water heater. Only proceed if you can may clog the valve and prevent it
similar requirements. Check with your safely perform the work. If you are not from draining. If you can’t get the
local and state authori es. comfortable, have a qualified person tank to drain, contact a qualified
perform the installa on. person.)
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 9
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.121
18 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
Turn the cold water supply Disconnect the water pipes. Install a suitable drain pan
7 valve OFF. 11 Many water pipes are 2 that is piped to an adequate
connected by a threaded drain.
Open the drain valve on the union which can be disconnected with
8 water heater. wrenches. If you must cut the water Set the water heater in place
pipes, cut the pipes close to the water 3 taking care not to damage
heater’s inlet and outlet connec ons, the drain pan.
leaving the water pipes as long as
possible. If necessary, you can make NOTICE: Most codes require se ng
them shorter later when you install the water heater in a suitable drain
the new water heater. pan piped to an adequate drain. The
drain pan helps avoid property dam-
12 Remove the old water heater. age which may occur from condensa-
on or leaks in the piping connec ons
or tank. The drain pan must be at
Figure 10 - Draining the old water heater.
WARNING! Use two or more people least two inches wider than the diam-
Also open a hot water faucet to remove or install water heater. eter of the water heater. Install the
9 to help the water in the tank Failure to do so can result in back or drain pan so the water level is limited
drain faster. other injury. to a maximum depth of 1-3/4”.
INSTALLATION
When the tank is empty,
10 disconnect the Temperature & Step 4:
Verify that the water heater
Pressure (T&P) Relief Valve
Installing the new 4 is properly set in place. Check
discharge pipe. You may be able to that:
reuse the discharge pipe, but do not water heater • The T&P Relief Valve will not be in
reuse the old T&P Relief Valve. A new Completely read all instruc- contact with any electrical parts.
T&P Relief Valve comes installed on 1 ons before beginning. If you • There is adequate space to install
your water heater (or on some models, are not sure if you can the T&P Relief Valve discharge pipe
is in the carton with the water heater). complete the installa on, DO NOT and that it can be piped to a sepa-
RETURN THIS UNIT TO THE STORE. rate drain (and not into the drain
pan).
Seek assistance from any of the
following sources: • There is adequate access and space
• Lowe’s® Professional Installation around the water heater for future
is available for this product and maintenance.
the work is guaranteed. Call your
Lowe’s® store to have this water
heater installed.
• Schedule an appointment with
Figure 11 - Removing the T&P Relief Valve a qualified person to install your
discharge pipe. water heater.
• Call our Technical Assistance Hot-
line at 1-877-817-6750
10 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.122
19 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
only copper or CPVC pipe. Do not Relief Valve. Do not cap, block, plug,
DO NOT CONNECT ELECTRICAL use any other type of pipe, such as or insert any valve between the T&P
WIRING UNTIL YOU ARE PVC, iron, flexible plas c pipe, or any Relief Valve and the end of the dis-
INSTRUCTED TO DO SO. type of hose. charge pipe. Do not insert or install
any reducer in the discharge pipe.
NOTICE: Connec ng electrical power
to the tank before it is completely
full of water (water must run FULL
STREAM from a hot water tap for a full
three minutes) will cause the upper
hea ng element to burn out.
Step 5:
Connect the Tempera- Figure 12 - The T&P Relief Valve discharge
ture and Pressure (T&P) pipe must be installed properly and piped to
an adequate drain.
Relief Valve/Pipe • Terminate the discharge pipe a maxi-
Most T&P Relief Valves are pre-installed mum of six inches above a floor drain
at the factory. In some cases, they are or outside the building. Do not drain
shipped in the carton and must be
INSTALLATION
the discharge pipe into the drain
installed in the opening marked and pan; instead pipe it separately to
provided for this purpose and according an adequate drain. In cold climates,
to local codes. terminate the discharge pipe inside
WARNING! To avoid serious injury the building to an adequate drain.
or death from explosion, install a T&P Outside drains could freeze and
Relief Valve according to the following obstruct the drain line. Protect the
instruc ons: drain from freezing.
If your water heater does not
1 have a factory installed T&P DISCHARGE
Relief Valve, install the new PIPE
T&P Relief Valve that came with your DRAIN
water heater. Do not reuse an old T&P PIPE
Relief Valve. Install a T&P Relief Valve
discharge pipe according to local codes
and the following guidelines:
• The discharge pipe should be at least
Figure 13 - The end of the T&P Relief Valve
3/4” inside diameter and sloped for discharge pipe must stop no more than
proper drainage. Install it to allow six inches above a floor drain or terminate
complete drainage of both the T&P outside the building.
Relief Valve and the discharge pipe.
• Do not place any valve or other re-
• The discharge pipe must withstand
stric on between the tank and T&P
250°F (121°C) without distor on. Use
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 11
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.123
20 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
Step 6: system (or any other pre-hea ng
system), always install a Thermosta c IF YOU HAVE COPPER
Install shutoff and Mixing Valve or other temperature PIPES:
limi ng device in the inlet water supply
tempering valves line to limit water supply inlet
If your home has copper water
pipes, you can solder the water
If one is not already installed, temperature to 120°F. Solar water
1 install a manual shutoff valve hea ng systems can supply water with
pipe connec ons or use compres-
sion fi ngs which don’t require
in the cold water line that temperatures exceeding 170°F and
soldering. Compression fi ngs
supplies the water heater. Install the may result in water heater
are easier to install than soldering
shutoff valve near the water heater so malfunc on.
pipe. Check with local plumbing
that it is readily accessible. Only use
officials to determine what types
valves that are compa ble with WARNING! Hot water provided
of pipe materials are suitable for
potable water. Use only full-flow ball by solar hea ng systems can cause
your loca on. Do not use lead-
or gate valves. Other types of valves severe burns instantly, resul ng in
severe injury or death (page 4). based solder.
may cause excessive restric on to the
water flow.
Step 7:
Install a Thermosta c Mixing
2 Valve at each point-of-use 1 Connect the water
supply
INSTALLATION
(for example, kitchen sink,
bathroom sink, bath, shower). Determine the type of water pipes in
Consult the valve manufacturer’s your home. Most homes use copper
instruc ons or a qualified person. water pipes, but some use CPVC or NOTICE: Do not solder pipes while
cross-linked polyethylene (PEX). Use they are a ached to the water
fi ngs appropriate for the type of pipe heater. The water heater’s inlet
in your home. Do not use iron or PVC and outlet connec ons contain
pipe – they are not suitable for potable non-metallic parts which could be
water. damaged. The proper way to con-
nect the water heater to copper
Connect the cold water water pipes is as follows:
2 supply using 3/4 inch
Na onal Pipe Thread “NPT” • Solder a short length of pipe
Figure 14 - Install Thermostatic Mixing to the cold water inlet nipple. (about a foot or so) to a thread-
Valves at each point where hot water will For ease of removing the water heater ed adapter using only 95/5 n-
be used.
for service or replacement, con- an mony or equivalent solder.
WARNING! Even if the water nect the water pipes with a coupling A ach the threaded adapters to
heater’s thermostat(s) are set to a the water heater’s connec ons
called a union. We recommend using
rela vely low temperature, hot water (using Teflon® tape or pipe joint
a dielectric-type union (available at
can scald. Install Thermosta c Mixing compound). Connect the home’s
Lowe’s®). Dielectric unions can help
Valves at each point-of-use to reduce
prevent corrosion caused by ny elec- water pipes by soldering, keep-
the risk of scalding. (page 4.)
tric currents common in copper water ing the connec ons at the water
pipes and can help extend the life of heater cool with wet rags.
For water heaters that are fed
3 by a solar water hea ng
the water heater.
12 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.124
21 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
NOTICE: Most water heater models Turn the cold water supply
contain energy saving heat traps in the 2 back on.
inlet and outlet connec ons. Do not
remove the heat traps.
Connect the hot water supply
3 using 3/4 inch NPT to the hot
water outlet. Follow the same
connec on guidelines as for the cold
water supply.
Install insula on (or heat tape) Full-flow ball valve
4 on the water pipes especially if Figure 15 - A Pressure Reducing Valve is
the indoor installa on area is required if your home’s water pressure is Figure 17 - Fully open the cold water supply
subject to freezing temperatures. above 80 psi. valve.
Insula ng the hot water pipes can Open a hot water faucet and
increase energy efficiency. 3 allow the water to run un l it
flows with a full stream.
Double check to make sure the
5 hot and cold water pipes are Let the water run full stream
connected to the correct hot 4 for three full minutes.
INSTALLATION
and cold water fi ngs on the water
heater. Close the hot water faucet and
5 replace the aerator.
If needed, install (or adjust) the
6 home’s Pressure Reducing Check inlet and outlet connec-
Valve to 50-60 psi and install a
6 ons and water pipes for leaks.
Thermal Expansion Tank. Dry all pipes so that any drips
or leaks will be apparent. Repair any
Figure 16 - The Thermal Expansion Tank
should be pressurized with air, to match the leaks. Almost all leaks occur at connec-
home’s incoming water pressure. ons and are not a tank leak.
Step 8:
Verify connec ons and
completely fill tank
To remove air from the tank and allow
the tank to fill completely with water,
follow these steps:
Remove the aerator at the
1 nearest hot water faucet. This
allows any debris in the tank or
plumbing system to be washed out.
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 13
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.125
22 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
Step 9:
Make electrical
connec ons
WARNING! Working on an ener-
gized circuit can result in severe injury
or death from electrical shock.
NOTICE: Do not turn electrical power
NOTICE: The tank must be com- on unless you are sure all of the air is
pletely empty of air and full of out of the tank and the tank is com-
water before connec ng electri- pletely full of water. If power is applied Figure 18 - The water heater’s electrical
cal power to avoid “Dry Firing.” requirements can be determined from the
before the tank is completely full of data plate.
Dry Firing may result in the upper water, the upper element will burn out Install wiring in an approved
element burning out. This is a
common installa on mistake. Af-
(Dry Fire). 5 conduit (if required by local
codes). Use a UL listed or CSA
ter you make the water connec- Be sure the electrical power to
ons, but before you connect the 1 the water heater is turned
approved strain relief to secure the
electrical wiring to the water heater.
electrical power, open a hot wa- OFF at the circuit breaker
ter faucet and let the water run panel (or remove the circuit’s fuses). Connect the ground wire to
INSTALLATION
full un l all the air is removed.
Using a non-contact circuit
6 the green ground screw.
Let the “hot” water run full for
three minutes or longer before
2 tester, check the wiring to
Connect the home’s two
power wires to the water heater’s two
connec ng any electrical wires. A make certain the power is OFF.
power wires. Use suitable wire nuts or
Dry Fired upper hea ng element other approved means to make the
Check the water heater’s data
is an installa on error and is not 3 plate and ensure that the power connec ons.
covered under warranty.
home’s voltage, wiring size
If Dry Firing occurs, replace the (ampacity) and circuit breaker ra ng
upper hea ng element according and type are correct for this water
to the instruc ons on page 21. heater. Refer to the wiring diagram
located on the water heater for the
correct electrical connec ons. Ensure
that wire sizes, type, and connec ons
comply with all applicable local codes.
In the absence of local codes, follow
NFPA-70 and the current edi on of the
Na onal Electric Code (NEC).
Remove the cover on the
4 electrical junc on box on the
Figure 19 - Connecting the electrical wires.
top of the water heater.
14 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.126
23 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Replace the junc on box cover • Fold the insulation back in place and
7 and secure with the screws replace the access panels.
provided.
WARNING! Be sure panels are
WARNING! Be sure cover is secured secured to reduce the risk of fire and
to reduce the risk of fire and electric electric shock.
shock.
Turn the electric power back
2 on.
Step 10:
Adjus ng the Figure 20 - Adjust Thermostat Mixing Wait for the water to heat up.
Temperature Valves at each point-of-use 120°F or 3 It may take several hours for a
lower. tank of cold water to heat up.
With the installa on steps completed,
To adjust the water heater’s thermo- If you have no hot water a er two
you may adjust the water heater’s tem-
stat: hours, refer to “TROUBLESHOOTING”
perature se ng if desired.
Section on page 17.
Set the thermostat(s) to • Be sure the electrical power to the
1 water heater is turned OFF at the WARNING! If you have increased
desired temperature. The
circuit breaker panel (or remove the the temperature se ng and the
thermostat(s) on this water
circuit’s fuses). Thermosta c Mixing Valves are not
heater have been factory set to
INSTALLATION
set properly (or not installed) you
approximately 120°F to reduce the risk WARNING! Working near an ener- could scald yourself while checking the
of scald injury. You may wish to set a gized circuit can result in severe injury temperature.
higher temperature to provide hot or death from electrical shock. Check
water for automa c dishwashers or wires with a circuit tester to make sure Check water temperature at
laundry machines, to provide more hot power is off. 4 several points of use in your
water capacity, and to reduce bacterial home (for example, bathtub
growth. Higher tank temperatures • Remove the upper and lower access
faucet, shower, or lavatory sink) and
(140° F) kill bacteria that cause a panels and fold away the insulation.
adjust the Thermosta c Mixing Valves
condi on known as “smelly water” and • Turn the water temperature dial as needed. If you aren’t sure how to
can reduce the levels of bacteria that clockwise ( >>) to increase the tem- adjust the Thermosta c Mixing Valve
cause water-borne diseases. perature, or counter clockwise ( << ) se ngs, or aren’t sure if you have
to decrease the temperature. Adjust Thermosta c Mixing Valves, contact a
WARNING! Higher temperatures in- both thermostats to the same tem-
qualified person.
crease the risk of scalding, but even at perature setting. To avoid a shortage
120°F, hot water can scald (page 4). of usable hot water, do not adjust
the upper thermostat to a tempera-
If you increase the water heater’s tem- ture setting that is higher than the
perature se ng, install Thermosta c lower thermostat’s temperature
Mixing Valve(s) at each point-of-use to setting.
reduce the risk of scalding.
NOTE: Most models have two thermo-
stats, but some models may only have
one. If your water heater has only one
thermostat, it is located behind the
lower access panel.
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 15
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.127
24 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
INSTALLATION
Step 11:
Opera on
The water heater is now ready for
normal opera on. To keep your water
heater working safely and efficiently
and extend its life, perform mainte-
nance according to the schedule on
page 20.
Vaca on
To save energy, lower the temperature
se ng on the thermostat(s) if you
plan to be gone for an extended me.
Follow the instruc ons in Step 10 for
adjus ng the thermostat to a lower
temperature se ng before you leave
and to properly raise the temperature
se ng when you return.
CAUTION! Hydrogen gas builds up
INSTALLATION
in a hot water system when it is not
used for a long period (two weeks
or more). Hydrogen gas is extremely
flammable. If the hot water system
has not been used for two weeks or
more, open a hot water faucet for
several minutes at the kitchen sink
before using any electrical appliances
connected to the hot water system.
Do not smoke or have an open flame
or other igni on source near the fau-
cet while it is open.
Need Assistance?
Call our Technical Assistance Hotline at 1-877-817-6750 .
We can help you with installa on, opera on, troubleshoo ng, or maintenance.
Before you call, write down the model and serial number from the
water heater’s data plate.
16 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.128
25 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TROUBLESHOOTING
WARNING! Working near an • Identify the two power wires. The Check the top two screws of
energized circuit can result in severe power wires are usually black/black 3 the upper thermostat using a
injury or death from electrical shock. or black/red—the green or copper non-contact circuit tester and
wire is the ground wire. confirm that power is off (screw
WARNING! When you are finished,
be sure all covers are secured to re- terminals 1 and 3 in photo on next
duce the risk of fire and electric shock. page).
• With the electrical power off, remove
No Hot Water the two power wires from the upper
The most likely reasons for an electric wa- hea ng element.
Figure 21 - Use a non-contact circuit
ter heater to produce NO hot water are:
tester to check for electrical power.
• No electric power—a common prob- • Turn the circuit breaker back on
lem with new installations (or install the fuses) and check the
power on both incoming power
• Burned out upper element (Dry wires using a non-contact circuit
Fired) — a common problem with tester.
new installations
• Turn the power off and replace the
• Tripped Energy Cut Off (red button cover on the electrical junction box.
on upper thermostat)
If the water heater is not ge ng power,
• The water heater’s inlet and outlet
contact a qualified person to have
connections are reversed (usually
your home’s wiring or circuit breakers Figure 22 - Use a multimeter to check
only in new installations)
checked. the resistance of the upper heating
• Broken upper thermostat (or wiring) element.
Check the upper hea ng
• A leak in the hot water side of the 2 Check the resistance of the
element. If the water heater is 4
plumbing system that exceeds the upper hea ng element using a
ge ng electrical power, check
water heater’s heating capacity and mul meter. Measure the
to see if the upper hea ng element has
makes it appear that the water heater resistance between the two screw
burned out. If the upper element is
is producing little to no hot water terminals on the upper hea ng
burned out, you’ll have no hot water. To
element. A good element will have a
Follow these steps to diagnose and check the upper element, you’ll need a
resistance ranging between 5 and 25
correct common electrical problems: mul meter capable of reading resis-
Ohms. If the resistance is:
tance.
TROUBLESHOOTING
Check the electric power to Outside this range. Replace the ele-
1 the water heater. No hot • Turn the power OFF at the circuit
ment (see the Rou ne Maintenance
breaker or remove fuses.
water is o en caused by a sec on on page 20). On a new water
problem with the home’s electrical • Remove the upper access panel. heater, a burned out upper hea ng ele-
wiring or circuit breakers. You’ll need a ment is almost always caused by turn-
non-contact circuit tester. Follow these • Remove the insulation to access the
ing the power on before the tank was
guidelines: upper thermostat and heating ele-
ment. completely full of water (Dry Fire). (See
• Locate the water heater’s circuit Step 8 in the Installa on sec on.)
breaker and turn it off (or remove
the circuit’s fuses). Within this range. Rea ach the power
wires, making sure the wires are in
• Locate the electrical junction box on good condi on and the connec ons
top of the water heater and remove are clean and ght. Next, check the
the cover. following:
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 17
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.129
26 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
Check/Reset Energy Cut Off • Turn off the power to the water heater. Undersized water heater. If your water
5 (ECO) Bu on. WARNING! Be sure all covers are secured heater runs out of hot water too quickly,
to reduce the risk of fire and electric it may be too small for your needs. If the
water heater is old, consider replacing it
shock.
with a larger model. If the water heater
Insufficient Hot Water or is in good condi on, you may be able to
meet your family’s hot water needs with
Slow Hot Water the exis ng water heater by installing
Recovery Thermosta c Mixing Valves at each point-
WARNING! Because of the increased of-use and then turning the thermostat(s)
risk from scalding, if you set the water to a higher se ng. See “Step 10” on page
heater’s thermostat(s) higher than 120°F, 15.
Thermosta c Mixing Valves at each You can also reduce your home’s hot
Figure 23 - Energy Cut Off (ECO) button
point-of-use are par cularly important water needs by washing clothes in cold
The Energy Cut Off (ECO) shuts off power (page 4). water, installing flow restrictors on shower
to the water heater’s elements if the heads, repairing leaky faucets, and taking
If the hot water is simply not warm
temperature of the water in the tank gets other conserva on steps.
enough, there are several possible causes:
too hot. If the ECO has tripped, you’ll have Reversed connec ons or melted dip
no hot water. A tripped ECO can usually • Faulty Thermostatic Mixing Valve in a
tube. Check the hot and cold connec ons
be reset, but you should have a qualified faucet or shower control (check other
faucets in the house for hot water) and make sure your home’s hot water
person inves gate the cause of the over- pipe is connected to the hot water outlet
hea ng and repair the problem. Do not • One (or both) of the thermostats set
too low on the water heater. Usually, reversed
turn the power back on un l the cause of connec ons are found soon a er the
the overhea ng has been iden fied and • Water heater’s capacity too small (or
installa on of a new unit. If copper pipes
repaired. usage too high)
were soldered while they were a ached
• Reversed plumbing connections or to the water heater, the dip tube may
To check the Energy Cut Off (ECO)
melted dip tube (usually found soon
• Turn off the power to the water heater. have melted. The dip tube is a long plas c
after new installation)
tube inside the tank a ached to the cold
WARNING! Working near an energized • Plumbing leak
water inlet. If the dip tube has melted,
circuit can result in severe injury or death • Bad lower heating element (or lower it can be replaced by removing the cold
from electrical shock. Check power wires thermostat) water inlet connec on, removing the old
TROUBLESHOOTING
in the electrical junc on box with a non- • Low supply voltage dip tube and installing a new one.
contact circuit tester to make sure power Thermosta c Mixing Valves. If the hot Plumbing leak. Even a small leak in the
is off. water is simply not warm enough, make hot water side of the home’s plumbing
• Press the red ECO reset button (see sure the faucet you are checking doesn’t system can make it appear that the water
photo above). have a defec ve Thermosta c Mixing heater is producing li le to no hot water.
• The ECO was tripped if you hear a Valve. Many shower controls now have Locate and repair the leak.
click when it is reset. In most cases, built-in mixing valves. If these devices fail, Lower hea ng element not working.
a tripped ECO indicates that the tank they can reduce the amount of hot water
overheated due to a problem with one If the lower hea ng element (or, more
the shower or faucet delivers even though rarely, the lower thermostat) is not work-
of the elements or thermostats—have
there is plenty of hot water in the tank. ing, you will have some hot water but not
a qualified person check the upper and
lower elements and thermostats and Always check the water temperature at as much as before. Because the lower
replace if necessary. several faucets to make sure the problem element does most of the work, the lower
is not in a faucet or shower control. element usually wears out before the up-
• The ECO was not tripped if you didn’t
hear a click. In that case, the upper Thermostats set too low. If the water per element. Replace the lower element
thermostat should be checked by a temperature at several faucets is too cool, and/or thermostat if necessary (see page
qualified person. adjust the thermostat(s) according to the 21).
• Replace the insulation and the upper instruc ons in Step 10 of the Installa on
access panel. sec on of this manual.
18 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.130
27 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TROUBLESHOOTING
Temperature Too High Drips from T&P Relief If the water pressure is between 50
and 60 psi, a Thermal Expansion Tank
If the water temperature is too hot: Valve Discharge Pipe is installed and properly pressurized,
• Install or adjust the Thermostatic A small amount of water dripping from and the valve has been cleared of any
Mixing Valves for each point-of-use the Temperature and Pressure (T&P) debris, and it s ll drips, the valve may
(see manufacturer’s instructions), or Relief Valve usually means the home’s be broken—have a qualified person
water pressure is too high or you need replace the T&P relief valve.
• Adjust the thermostat(s) on the
a properly sized and pressurized Ther-
water heater (see Step 10 in the
mal Expansion Tank. Refer to Step 1 in Water Odor
installation section of this manual).
the Installa on sec on of this manual Harmless bacteria normally present in
A nonfunc oning thermostat or a for more informa on. A large amount tap water can mul ply in water heat-
shorted hea ng element can cause of hot water coming from the T&P ers and give off a “ro en egg” smell.
extremely hot water. If the Temperature discharge pipe may be due to the tank Although elimina ng the bacteria that
and Pressure Relief Valve (T&P Valve) overhea ng. causes “smelly water” with a Chlorina-
releases large amounts of very hot wa- on system is the only sure treatment,
WARNING! Do not cap or plug the in some cases, the standard anode rod
ter, it is likely due to a shorted hea ng
T&P relief valve or discharge pipe, that came with your water heater can
element, or more rarely a nonfunc on-
and do not operate the water heater be replaced with a special zinc anode
ing thermostat, or the thermostat does
without a func oning T&P Relief Valve rod which may help reduce or eliminate
not fit snuggly against the tank. Very
- this could cause an explosion. the odor. Contact a qualified person.
high water temperatures can also cause
the Energy Cut Off (ECO) to trip (see Water pressure too high. High water NOTE: To protect the tank, an anode
page 18). Turn power off un l this pressure can cause the T&P Relief rod must be installed in the water
problem is fixed. Valve to drip. Install a Pressure Reduc- heater at all mes or the warranty is
ing Valve (PRV) on the main cold water void.
supply line. Adjust the PRV to between
Low Water Pressure 50 and 60 psi. In cases where the “ro en egg” smell
Check both the cold and hot water at a is pronounced, you can raise the tank
sink to determine if the lower pressure Thermal Expansion Tank. Install a temperature to 140°F in order to re-
is only on the hot water side. If both hot Thermal Expansion Tank. If a Thermal duce bacteria growth in the tank.
and cold faucets have low pressure, call Expansion Tank is already installed and
your local water u lity. If the low pres- the T&P Relief Valve discharge pipe WARNING! Because higher tempera-
TROUBLESHOOTING
sure is only on the hot water side, the drips, the Thermal Expansion Tank may tures increase the risk of scalding, if
primary causes of this are: be pressurized to the wrong pressure or you set the thermostat(s) higher than
the internal bladder may be defec ve. 120°F, Thermosta c Mixing Valves
• Melted heat traps or dip tube. Solder- Refer to the instruc ons that came with at each point-of-use are par cularly
ing copper pipes while they are con- the Thermal Expansion Tank for more important (page 4).
nected to the water heater can melt
informa on.
the heat traps inside the hot and cold
water connections or the dip tube Debris. In rare cases, debris can s ck
(cold water side). Melted heat traps or
inside the T&P Relief Valve preven ng
a melted dip tube can restrict the flow
of hot water. If that’s the case, replace the valve from sea ng fully. In that case,
the heat traps or dip tube. the T&P Relief Valve discharge pipe will
drip. You may be able to clear debris
• Partially closed supply valve. Open from the T&P Relief Valve by manu-
the water heater’s supply valve fully. ally opera ng the valve, allowing small
quan es of water to flush out the
debris. See the label on the T&P Relief
Valve for instruc ons.
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 19
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.131
28 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
MAINTENANCE
Rou ne Maintenance elements than trying to remove NOTICE: DO NOT turn electrical power
heavy lime deposits. back on unless the tank is completely
Rou ne maintenance will help your full of water.
water heater last longer and work bet- To drain and flush the tank:
Remove and inspect the
ter. If you can’t perform these rou ne Locate the water heater’s 7 anode rod (see Repair Parts
maintenance tasks yourself, contact a 1 circuit breaker and turn it OFF Illustra on on back cover for
qualified person. (or remove the circuit’s fuses). loca on of the anode rod). Replace the
anode rod if it is depleted. Turn power
Water Heater Maintenance off. Run hot water un l it’s cool. Turn
A er the first six months, drain and cold water supply valve off. Open a hot
flush the water heater and inspect the water faucet to depressurize tank.
anode rod. Depending on the hardness Locate and remove the black plas c
of your water, repeat this process at cover marked “Anode” Use a “key
Figure 24 - Circuit Breaker
least annually, or more frequently if hole” saw or similar tool to remove the
needed. From me to me, you may Open a hot water faucet and foam insula on covering the anode
need to replace a hea ng element or
2 let the hot water run un l it is rod. Once the anode rod is exposed,
a thermostat. All three maintenance cool. use a 1 1/16” socket wrench with an
extension to remove it. Inspect the
tasks are described below.
anode rod and replace if depleted.
Draining and Flushing the Apply Teflon® tape or pipe joint
compound and reinstall the anode rod
Water Heater ghtly. It is not necessary to replace
Tap water contains minerals that can the foam removed to access the
form lime deposits on hea ng ele- anode. Turn cold water supply valve
ments or sediment in the bo om of on. When hot water runs full, close hot
Figure 25 - Water Faucet
the tank. The amount of lime deposits water faucet. Check for leaks and
or sediment depends on the hardness WARNING! Be sure the water runs repair if necessary. Turn power on.
of your tap water. The rate at which cool before draining the tank to
sediment builds up depends on water reduce the risk of scalding.
quality and hardness in your area,
the temperature se ngs, and other Connect a garden hose to the
variables. We recommend draining and
3 drain valve and place the
flushing the water heater a er the first other end of the hose in a
six months of opera on to determine drain, outside, or in buckets.
the amount of sediment build up. Turn the cold water supply
Draining sediment extends the life of 4 valve OFF.
the tank, hea ng elements, and drain Figure 27 - Anode Rods from new (top) to
valves. Open the drain valve on the partially depleted (middle) to fully depleted
• In areas with very hard water, 5 water heater. stage (bottom)
remove and check the heating Anode Rod. The anode rod is a sacrificial
elements whenever you drain the metal rod that helps reduce corrosion
tank. If you have heavy lime depos- and premature failure (leaks) in the tank.
its on heating elements, you will The anode rod is a consumable item.
need to replace them more often. Inspect the anode rod a er the first six
• Sediment may form large masses that months of opera on when you drain and
MAINTENANCE
can prevent the tank from draining. Figure 26 - Drain Valve flush the tank. Replace the anode rod if
Have a qualified person use a de-lim- it is substan ally worn out or depleted.
ing agent suitable for potable water Open a hot water faucet to Therea er, inspect the anode rod annu-
to remove the sediment buildup. 6 help the water in the tank ally or more frequently if needed. If you
• In most cases, it is easier and drain faster. use a water so ener, your anode rod will
cheaper to replace lime-encrusted deplete faster than normal. Inspect
20 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.132
29 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
the anode rod more frequently, replac- Steps for Replacing the Hea ng
ing the anode rod as needed. Obtain Element:
new anode rods from your local Lowe’s®
Turn the power OFF at the circuit
or have a qualified person replace it. 1 breaker or remove fuses.
(Anode rods are a consumable item and
are not covered under warranty).
If the sediment was present Figure 28 - Non-Contact Circuit Tester
8 when the tank was drained, • Always turn power OFF and check
flush the tank by opening the the power wires with a non-contact
cold water supply valve and le ng the circuit tester before working on the Figure 31 - Circuit Breaker
water run un l no more sediment water heater. Open the electrical junc on
drains from the tank. Close the drain 2 box on top of the water heater.
valve when you are done. Using a non-contact circuit
NOTICE: Do not turn power back on tester, check the power wires to make
un l the tank is completely full of water. Figure 29 - Heating Element (with certain the power is OFF.
For complete instruc ons on filling the gasket)
tank, follow Step 8 in the Installa on • Check your water heater’s data
sec on. plate for the correct wattage and
Refill the tank by opening the voltage. Heating elements are
9 cold water supply valve. Make
available Lowe’s®.
sure a hot water faucet is open
and the drain valve is closed. Allow the
hot water to run full for at least three
Figure 32 - Non-Contact Circuit Tester
minutes to make sure the tank has all
the air removed and is completely full
Open a hot water faucet and
of water. Failure to perform this step Figure 30 - Element Wrench 3 let the hot water run un l it is
can cause the upper hea ng element to • Some regular sockets (1 1/2 inch) cool.
burn out. Once you are certain the tank may work, but regular sockets are
is completely full of water, close the hot often beveled and may slip. Inex-
water faucet. pensive element wrenches are avail-
Restore power to the water able at Lowe’s®.
10 heater. It may take two hours • Garden hose to drain the tank
for the tank to heat up.
Replacing the Hea ng Element • Hand dishwashing soap to lubricate
the gasket
WARNING! Working on an ener-
Figure 33 - Water Faucet
gized circuit can result in severe injury • A clean cloth to clean the threaded
or death from electrical shock. Turn opening WARNING! Be sure the water runs
power off. Check wires with a non-con- cool before draining the tank to reduce
tact circuit tester to make sure power • A flat blade and a Phillips screw- the risk of scalding.
driver
is off. When you are finished, be sure
Connect a garden hose to the
all covers are secured to reduce the
risk of fire and electric shock.
4 drain valve and place the other
end of the hose in a drain or
If you are not comfortable replacing a
MAINTENANCE
outside (or use buckets). Turn OFF the
hea ng element or thermostat your- cold water valve that supplies the water
self, have this work done by a qualified heater. Open the drain valve on the
person. To replace the hea ng element, water heater. Opening a hot water
you’ll need the following tools and sup-
plies:
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 21
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.133
30 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
MAINTENANCE
faucet will help the tank drain faster. air removed and is completely full of turn power OFF
Remove the upper or lower water. Failure to perform this step can and check with a non-contact circuit
5 access panel on the water cause the upper hea ng element to burn tester before working on the water
out. Once you are certain the tank is heater.
heater, and then fold back the
insula on and remove the plas c completely full of water, close the hot
element/thermostat cover. water faucet.
Figure 35 - Drain Valve
Check the newly installed
Figure 34 - Access Panel 11 element for leaks. If a leak is Figure 36 - Upper and Lower Thermostats
With the tank drained and present, ghten the element • A replacement thermostat (available
6 power off, remove the power un l the leak stops. If you cannot stop at Lowe’s®). Note that the upper
the leak, drain the tank and remove the and lower thermostats are different
wires from the element you
(above). Some models only have one
intend to replace. element. Inspect the gasket for damage.
thermostat.
If the gasket is damaged, replace the
Remove the bad element • A business card to check the gap
7 using an element wrench.
gasket and re-install the element.
between the thermostat and the tank
Once the element is success- • Tape and a permanent marker to
Make sure the new element is 12 fully installed and there are no mark the wires
8 the correct replacement by
leaks, replace the power wires, • A flat blade and a Phillips screwdriver
referring to the water heater’s
thermostat cover, insula on, and access
data plate for voltage and wa age Steps for Replacing the
panel. Make sure all wire connec ons
informa on.
are ght. Replace the cover on the Thermostat:
Clean the threads in the tank electrical junc on box. Turn the power OFF at the
9 opening with a rag. Insert the 1 circuit breaker or remove fuses.
Restore power to the water
new element equipped with a
rubber gasket. NOTE: Use a drop of hand
13 heater. It may take two hours NOTICE: It is not necessary to drain the
for the tank to heat up. tank to replace a thermostat.
dishwashing liquid to lubricate the gasket
to help avoid damaging the gasket as it is Open the electrical junc on box
Replacing the Thermostat
being ghtened. Tighten with an 2 on top of the water heater.
element wrench. WARNING! Working on an ener- Using a non-contact circuit
gized circuit can result in severe injury tester, check the power wires to make
NOTICE: Do not turn power back on un l
or death from electrical shock. Turn certain the power is OFF.
the tank is completely full of water. For
power off. Check wires with a non-con-
complete instruc ons on filling the tank,
tact circuit tester to make sure power is
follow Step 8 in the Installa on sec on.
off. When you are finished, be sure all
Refill the tank by opening the covers are secured to reduce the risk of
10 cold water supply valve. Make fire and electric shock.
MAINTENANCE
sure a hot water faucet is open
To replace the thermostat, you’ll need
and the drain valve is closed. Allow the
the following tools and supplies:
hot water to run full for at least three
• A non-contact circuit tester. Always Figure 37 - Non-Contact Circuit Tester
minutes to make sure the tank has all the
22 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.134
31 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
T&P Relief Valve Maintenance mined when a qualified person
MAINTENANCE removes and inspects the valve and
Remove the upper or lower Read and follow the opera ng and an- its components.
3 access panel on the water nual maintenance instruc ons provided
heater and carefully fold back by the manufacturer of the T&P Relief • Note that a dripping T&P Relief
the insula on and plas c element/ Valve is usually caused by the
Valve (yellow label a ached to T&P
thermostat cover. home’s water pressure being too
Relief Valve). Minerals in the water can high or the lack of a Thermal Expan-
form deposits that cause the valve to sion Tank. If your T&P Relief Valve
Make sure the replacement
4 s ck or create blocked passages, mak- drips, see page 19.
thermostat matches the
ing the T&P Relief Valve inopera ve.
original thermostat.
Follow these guidelines:
Mark the wires with tape so
• At least annually, operate the T&P
5 you’ll know how to put them Relief Valve manually to ensure the
back on. waterways are clear and the valve
mechanism moves freely (above).
Disconnect the wires from the Before operating the valve manually,
6 bad thermostat and remove check that it will discharge in a place
the thermostat from the metal for secure disposal. If water does
moun ng clip. not flow freely from the end of the
discharge pipe, turn OFF the power
Install the new thermostat in to the water heater. Call a qualified
7 the metal moun ng clip. person to determine the cause.
Make sure the new thermostat WARNING! Hot water will be
8 fits snuggly against the tank. released. Before opera ng the T&P
You should NOT be able to slip relief valve manually, check that it
a business card between the thermo- will discharge in a safe place. If water
stat and the tank. If you can, bend the does not flow freely from the end of
thermostat moun ng clip un l the the discharge pipe, turn the power to
thermostat fits ghtly against the tank. the water heater OFF. Call a qualified
person to determine the cause.
A ach the wires following the
9 wiring diagram on the water
heater’s label. Make sure all
wire connec ons are ght.
Replace the plas c element/
10 thermostat cover, insula on,
and access panel.
Replace the cover on the
11 electrical junc on box.
Restore power to the water Figure 38 - T&P Relief Valve
12 heater. It may take two hours • At least every five years, have a
for the tank to heat up. qualified person inspect the T&P
MAINTENANCE
Relief Valve and discharge pipe.
Damage caused by corrosive water
conditions, mineral deposits, or
other problems can only be deter-
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 23
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.135
32 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
DIAGRAMS
Thermostat Wiring Diagram
DIAGRAMS
24 • Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.136
33 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
REPAIR PARTS
Repair parts may be ordered through your
Key No. Part Descrip on
plumber, local distributor, Lowe’s, or by calling
1 ACCESS DOORS 1-800-817-6750. When ordering repair parts
2 THERMOSTAT COVERS (UPPER AND LOWER) always give the following information:
3 UPPER THERMOSTAT 1. Model and serial number.
4 LOWER THERMOSTAT 2. Item number and part description.
5 ELEMENT
6 ELEMENT GASKET
7 TEMPERATURE & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES
8 HEAT TRAP NIPPLE
9 HEAT TRAP/DIP TUBE COMBINATION
10 ANODE ROD
11 HEAT TRAP/ANODE ROD COMBINATION
12 JUNCTION BOX COVER
13 DRAIN VALVE
LEGEND
Special anode rod (See “Anode Rod/Water Odor” section)
Temperature and Pressure Relief Valve is required, but may not
be factory installed.
Specifiy thermostat type when ordering
REPAIR PARTS
25
Residen al Electric Water Heater Use and Care Guide • 25
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.137
34 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
REPAIR PARTS
Repair parts may be ordered through your
Key No. Part Descrip on
plumber, local distributor, Lowe’s, or by calling
1 ACCESS DOORS 1-800-817-6750. When ordering repair parts
2 THERMOSTAT COVERS (UPPER AND LOWER) always give the following information:
3 UPPER THERMOSTAT 1. Model and serial number.
4 LOWER THERMOSTAT 2. Item number and part description.
5 ELEMENT
6 ELEMENT GASKET
7 TEMPERATURE & PRESSUE RELIEF VALVES
8 NIPPLE/DIP TUBE COMBINATION 10 9
9 ANODE ROD
SIDE WATER CONNECTIONS
10 JUNCTION BOX COVER
11 DRAIN VALVE 12
12 NIPPLE/J-TUBE COMBINATION
LEGEND 6
5
Special anode rod (See “Anode Rod/Water Odor” sec- 3
tion) 2
Temperature and Pressure Relief Valve is required, but
1 7
may not be factory installed.
Specifiy thermostat type when ordering
8
11
5
4
1
REPAIR PARTS
26
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.138
35 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
REPAIR PARTS
Repair parts may be ordered through your
Key No. Part Descrip on
plumber, local distributor, Lowe’s, or by calling
1 THERMOSTAT COVERS (UPPER AND LOWER) 1-800-817-6750. When ordering repair parts
2 UPPER THERMOSTAT always give the following information:
3 LOWER THERMOSTAT 1. Model and serial number.
4 ELEMENT 2. Item number and part description.
5 ELEMENT GASKET
6 TEMPERATURE & PRESSURE RELIEF VALVES
7 HEAT TRAP/NIPPLE COMBINATION
14
8 HEAT TRAP/DIP TUBE COMBINATION
9 ANODE ROD
10 JUNCTION BOX COVER
9
15
11 DRAIN VALVE
12 DRAIN ACCESS PANEL
13 FRONT PANEL 7
14 TOP PANEL
15 INSULATION TABLE TOP 10
MODEL
LEGEND 6 8
Special anode rod (See “Anode Rod/Water Odor”
section)
13
Temperature and Pressure Relief Valve is required, but 5
2 4
may not be factory installed. 1
Specifiy thermostat type when ordering
5
4
1 3
12
11
REPAIR PARTS
27
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.139
36 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
®Teflon is a registered trademark of E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.140
37 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
50 Gal Electric Hot Water Heater - appliances - by owner - sale https://lancaster.craigslist.org/app/d/50-gal-electric-hot-water/677195058...
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After- by
CL lancaster, PA > for sale > appliances Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
owner
Contact Information: [email protected] ☎ (717) 314-3840
50 Gal Electric Hot Water Heater - $10 (Elizabethtown)
image 1 of 4
condition: good
GE 50 gallon electric hot water heater. Just replaced today with a heat pump water heater. Worked fine for 9 years.
QR Code Link to This Post
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.141
38 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
1 of 1 12/16/2018, 2:50 PM
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.142
39 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.143
40 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.144
41 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.145
42 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.146
43 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.147
44 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.148
45 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.149
46 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.150
47 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.151
48 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.152
49 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.153
50 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.154
51 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.155
52 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.156
53 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.157
54 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.158
55 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.159
56 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.160
57 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.161
58 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.162
59 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.163
60 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.164
61 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.165
62 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.166
63 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.167
64 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.168
65 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.169
66 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.170
67 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.171
68 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.172
69 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.173
70 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.174
71 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.175
72 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.176
73 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.177
74 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.178
75 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.179
76 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.180
77 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.181
78 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.182
79 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.183
80 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.184
81 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.185
82 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.186
83 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.187
84 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.188
85 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.189
86 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.190
87 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.191
88 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.192
89 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.193
90 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.194
91 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.195
92 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.196
93 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.197
94 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.198
95 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.199
96 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.200
97 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.201
98 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page
PageNo.
No.202
99 of
of109
212 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 203
100 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 204
101 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 205
102 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 206
103 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 207
104 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 208
105 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 209
106 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 210
107 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 211
108 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA
After Each Repair The Perps Placed Another Hole In The Tank; Identical to The Conair Tup Spa Mattres
TheTHE
HATE
VANDALISM
Crime Report
OF Re
THE
Lancaster
WATER HEATER
City and County Page No. 212
109 of 212
109 Sunday Tuesday
DecemberJune
16, 18,
20182018
Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
Affidavits
and
Summaries
Re Stan J. Caterbone
Family Victimizations
with
CHRONOLOGY OF
ASSAULTS
From 1904 to 2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults Page No. 1 of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
MICROWAVE WEAPONS, DIRECTED ENERGY DEVICES AND ORGANIZED
STALKING.
Organized stalking and harassment began in 1987 following the public allegations of
fraud within ISC. This organized stalking and harassment was enough to drive an ordinary
person to suicide. As far back as the late 1980's Stan J. Caterbone knew that his mind was
being read, or "remotely viewed". This was verified and confirmed when information only
known to him, and never written, spoken, or typed, was repeated by others. In 1998, while
soliciting the counsel of Philadelphia attorney Christina Rainville, (Rainville represented Lisa
Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case), someone introduced the term remote
viewing through an email. That was the last time it was an issue until 2005. The term was
researched, but that was the extent of the topic. Remote Viewers may have attempted to
connect in a more direct and continuous way without success.
In 2005 the U.S. sponsored mind control turned into an all-out assault of mental
telepathy; synthetic telepathy; and pain and torture through the use of directed energy
devices and weapons that usually fire a low frequency electromagnetic energy at the
targeted victim. This assault was no coincidence in that it began simultaneously with the
filing of the federal action in U.S. District Court, or CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison,
et. al., or 05-cv-2288. This assault began after the handlers remotely trained Stan J.
Caterbone with mental telepathy. The main difference opposed to most other victims of this
technology is that Stan J. Caterbone is connected 24/7 with a person who declares that she
is Interscope recording artist Sheryl Crow of Kennett Missouri. Stan J. Caterbone has spent
3 years trying to validate and confirm this person without success. Most U.S. intelligence
agencies refuse to cooperate, and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the U.S.
Attorney's Office refuse to comment. See attached documents for more information.
In 2006 or the beginning of 2007 Stan J. Caterbone began his extensive research into
mental telepathy; mind control technologies; remote viewing; and the CIA mind control
program labeled MK ULTRA and it's subprograms.
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
2 of1136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
FAMILY HISTORY
If you listen to the propaganda machine and the community of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania, including professionals, the family history of Stan J. Caterbone goes
something like the following:
Father, Samuel Caterbone, Jr., Schizophrenic who ran out on his family
because of nervous breakdowns while trying to run a small dry cleaning
business. He traveled the world looking for the Blessed Mother Mary and Space
Aliens. He ended up living in government subsidized housing broke and with a
severe mental illness.
Brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, suffered from the very same illness has
his father, Schizophrenia, who finally killed himself trying to live in
California.
Brother, Thomas W. Caterbone, suffered from the very same mental
illness as his brother, Stan J., Bipolar Mood Disorder, who ran a lawn
business and finally committed suicide at an early age.
Stan J. Caterbone, suffered from Bipolar Mood Disorder, or Manic
Depression and had a nervous breakdown in 1987 trying to compete in
the financial services industry. When he has his nervous breakdowns, he
always threatens to sue everyone in court and is deeply paranoid in
thinking the whole world is against him. He always spends all of his
money during his fits of mania and has delusions about his success as a
businessman.
The Family History was formulated back in the 1960's when Samuel Caterbone, Jr.,
father of Stan J. Caterbone, became engaged in a black budget mind control program that
began during his service in the United States Navy as a radioman and air gunner. Samuel
Caterbone, Jr., was most likely a direct product of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms. His
brother, Samuel A. Caterbone, was most likely part of the LSD experiments of MK ULTRA.
Stan J. Caterbone is most likely part of a program sponsored by the Department of Defense
Agencies, such as DARPA or the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). The facts of Stan J.
Caterbone's intimate discussions with both his father and brother over the years before
they died, the totality of documents that were preserved in their estate, including service
records; letters; official court papers; high school documents; and the like - all will prove
that they were in fact part of MK ULTRA or one of it's subprograms.
The following are the facts and the real record of the family history:
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
3 of2136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., (Father) served in the Navy from 1943 to 1946 and
graduated with honors from Air Gunners School in Jacksonville, Florida, which by the
MANUAL depicts a “Special Ops” type of service recruiting only the “most physically and
mentally fit” of all of the branches of service. I have secured his ENTIRE NAVY RECORD
WITH JOURNALS AND PHOTO ALBUMS in safety deposit boxes. He was an exceptional
student/athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic High School, participating in the band as
well as sports. He was also his senior class secretary/treasurer. After the Navy, he went
on to build a successful dry cleaning business, which he is credited with inventing a
filtration system for the solvents. He also developed a very good investment in real estate
along the Manheim Pike, owning several properties. By his own writings, A NOTARIZED
AFFADAVIT FROM 1996, and from his personal accounts to me, he was a victim of
SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY and possibly a COVERT CARRIER as proven by his 3 PASSPORTS
which depict him traveling the world visiting countries like Hong Kong, Lispin, Mexico, Saudi
Arabia, Canada, France, etc. The PASSPORTS ARE SECURED IN MY SAFETY DEPOSIT BOXES.
His viewing is documented to have begun back in the early 1970's. He also suffered from
organized stalking, and was considered an enemy and prisoner of the state. Back in the
1960's, he was a world traveler, this is documented by his passports. Samuel P. Caterbone,
Jr., may have been a covert carrier for someone in intelligence. Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr.,
had his mental health history laced with electro shock therapy. Electro Shock Therapy
Experiments is another subprogram of MK ULTRA. In addition, and especially disturbing is
his criminal record with the Lancaster City Police Department and the Lancaster County
Court of Common Pleas. In 1973 Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr. was convicted of forging a 2
checks from the Caterbone Cleaners, Inc., checking account. The one check to Joe the
Motorists Store at the Manor Shopping Center was never entered into evidence, it was for a
total of $70.00. The other check was made out to Lancaster Attorney James Coho for
$200.00 with "divorce proceedings" written in the memo. This was his only criminal record.
Samuel P. Caterbone, Jr., was sentenced to one year probation by President Judge William
Johnstone. However, on August 29, 1973 after nine months, Judge Johnstone wrote an
ORDER releasing him from probation and ordering him to "leave the vicinity of the County of
Lancaster, Pennsylvania". The President Judge of Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas
literally threw my father out of Lancaster County for forging 2 checks from his own
corporation. In 1987 I was arrested for stealing my own files from my own company,
Financial Management Group, Ltd., You can research the life of Candy Jones and Kate
O'Brien to learn more on this topic. Samuel Caterbone, Jr., has left enough writings and
documentation to know that his life fits the model for targeted individuals, complete with
economic ruin, isolation, disenfranchised from family and friends, and of course a fabricated
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
4 of3136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
mental illness history. You can view most of his record online. On or about May 18, 2001
Samuel P. Caterbone Jr., finally received an inheritance from his mother's (Mary Caterbone)
estate. The check was for some $70,000.00. The estate was probated in November of
2000. Some two weeks later, on Memorial Day Weekend of 2001, he had called me to come
to New York City to help care for him. He was in perfect health until this time. In a matter
of six (6) weeks he had succumbed to lung cancer. As per Julianne McKinney, former
intelligence officer for the U.S. Army and victim activist of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, the
weapons are lethal enough to kill and “the one thing that I worry about is that of dying of
cancer” (paraphrase). There is no doubt now that my father's death was a murder, not
natural.
Samuel A. Caterbone, (Brother) served in the United States Air Force in 1968
to 1970. In 1991, Stan J. Caterbone accused the United States Government of using his
brother, Samuel A. Caterbone for part of the LSD experiments on mind control, or MK
ULTRA. A notarized letter of October 23, 1991 was sent certified mail to the California
Attorney General on the subject matter, with a return letter from the California Attorney
General on January 14, 1992. By his own admission before his death, Samuel A. Caterbone
disclosed to Stan J. Caterbone of the "bad LSD" trips while in the Air Force. Since his death
of December 25, 1984, Stan J. Caterbone and others questioned the classification of suicide,
and made allegations of foul play that was ultimately responsible for his death. Finally in a
meeting in Santa Barbara, California with the Santa Barbara Public Guardian's Office, an
office admitted that the death was more likely due to foul plan than suicide. Samuel A.
Caterbone was also an exceptional student and athlete while attending Lancaster Catholic
High School. After playing varsity football as a sophomore, he had an unfortunate accident
while deer hunting the following November. While in the woods in Bellefonte, Pennsylvania,
his hunting pants caught fire trying to stay warm. It left him in the Lancaster General
Hospital for months, going through painful skin grafts and isolation. The hunting accident
interrupted his athletic career and scared his legs for life. The Schizophrenia diagnosis was
a combination of LSD flashbacks and organized stalking and harassment.
Thomas P. Caterbone, (Brother) had an unfortunate transaction at Fulton Bank
that set a course of action that resulted in a suicide. Although diagnosed with Bipolar
Disease and Manic Depression -- embezzled and extorted monies were most likely the
reason for his suicide in 1996. THE PROBLEM WITH TOMMY'S DEATH IS THAT HE DIED ON
KILL DEVIL ISLAND, NORTH CAROLINA AND MY BROTHER SAMMY WAS MURDERED ON
CHRISTMAS DAY OF 1984, WHICH SUGGESTS SOME SORT OF ATHEIST THEME. Fulton Bank
was involved in a fraud that took $72,000 from a real estate settlement closing and lead to
his total financial ruin and collapse in June of 1995. The funds were never recovered and
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
5 of4136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Fulton Bank is a defendant for a wrongful death claim in the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in CATERBONE v. Lancaster County Prison, et. al., 05-
cv-2288. FULTON BANK triggered a severe and lethal death blow to Thomas P. Caterbone,
and as of this day has refused to acknowledge any wrongdoing or remorse. Thomas P.
Caterbone was also an exceptional athlete. Playing for Lancaster Catholic High School,
Franklin and Marshall College, the Harrisburg Patriots, and even the Philadelphia Eagles.
Tom also coached football at J.P. McCaskey and Franklin and Marshall College. Thomas P.
Caterbone had a very successful lawn and landscaping business before joining forces with
John DePatto of United Financial Services and selling residential mortgages. John DePatto
was the former head of Parent Bank, owned by James Guerin and ISC. Parent Bank, owned
by ISC also foreclosed on 2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, Pennsylvania in 1988, which
was owned by Stan J. Caterbone. Thousands of dollars of equity was extorted in the
process, despite still being short sold for a profit to Mr. Keith Kirchner, an executive of
Lancaster Newspapers and former graduate of Lancaster Catholic High School.
Stan J. Caterbone is Victimized by Microwave Weapons and Directed Energy Devices,
and a federal whistleblower with an exceptional entrepreneurial record in spite of all of his
adversaries and their assaults. In spite of the U.S. Sponsored mind control and torture, he
has endured and will prevail. Legally, Stan J. Caterbone has been able to preserve his
claims, and progress his legal challenges and claims through both the federal and state
court system appearing pro se, without the aid or expense of additional legal counsel. Some
of his claims and briefs will most likely be landmark decisions in years to come. Stan J.
Caterbone was a 2-Sport MVP at Lancaster Catholic High School, in both football and track.
Stan J. Caterbone never received less than a B grade in his four years of high school and had
an 87+ average. Stan J. Caterbone excelled in computer technologies, taking his first full
term course in 1975, while in high school and continuing into college at Millersville
University, graduating with a degree in business administration in 1980. Stan J. Caterbone
excelled profoundly at building his companies, first beginning with Financial Management
Group, Ltd., then working with Tony Bongiovi of Power Station Studios and the "Digital
Movie"; then building Advanced Media Group, Ltd.. Over the years, despite the illegal
seizures and foreclosures, Stan J. Caterbone has amassed a portfolio of impressive real
estate deals that have always paid off in profits, no matter how or when they were sold.
The same was true of his businesses. Financial Management Group, Ltd., was a $20,000
dollar investment in 1986 and was still sold for approximately $100,000 two years later,
despite the false arrests and the extortion of most of it's real value and equity.
The mental health history and the criminal records were completely fabricated, and a
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
6 of5136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
close review and investigation into the actual court records and hospital records can prove
that in very short fashion. There are TWO (2) ways to quickly dispute the Mental Health
History and Record:
One - Review the word "Delusional; delusions; etc.,; every instance of the word used
by mental health professionals, and the false reports by friends and family were associated
with facts, and matters of the official record, the complete opposite of the meaning of the
word "delusional". And they still exist to this very day.
Two - Review the 3 Fabricated Suicide Allegations of the following dates: August
10(?), 1987 at Burdette Tomlin Hospital (Cape May County New Jersey); February 18th(?),
2005 by Kerry Egan and the Southern Regional Police Department; and July 19, 2009 for the
302 Commitment by the Lancaster City Police Department at Lancaster General Hospital.
The Criminal Record is very similar, since 1987 Stanley J. Caterbone has had 31 false
arrests; formal charges and convictions dismissed prior to court proceedings or won on
summary appeals in the County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania; most of which Stan J. Caterbone
appearing as pro se (representing himself). These have resulted in civil complaints filed in
2008 in CATERBONE v. The County of Lancaster, Pennsylvania in U.S. District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
7 of6136
of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 127
37
88
37
36
37
37
2737
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults Page No. 7 of 128
135
Page No. 8 of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 128
38
89
38
37
38
38
2838
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults Page No. 8 of 128
135
Page No. 9 of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 129
39
90
39
38
39
39
2939
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults Page No. 9 of 128
135
Page No. 10 of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
! " # " $% &
! " #
$ %
"&# '
$ ( %
' ( " ") " * ) ! " ! + " * " ,
! , "" ! " ! " ! " ! , ,
+ " - ! ! )
*
% ( *
(
%
! .
/"0 ! , * 1 ! + 2"3
4 - 1 " " 1 , ! !
4 1 , ! ! ) ** ! "
! 5 6 ) " " # 4 4 + &,,-
. . $ / ..$/
&,,0
% % 1 2 1
%
&,, 3 &,, %
4 %
%
& , , " " " !, " 5
00 6
7 8 9
%
: 7 - 8, 9 , "2 ! " , , , ! 1 , ** !
, ! : 7 ) , . 4 ;
&,,- ( &<;= 5 (
> $;$ ? $
! % % 4
1 &,,@ &,,= ,
$ >
A 1 B3 .+
&,,=
1 B3 2
>
%
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 130
40
91
40
39
40
3040
40
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 10136
11 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
< ) * " ) ! A 24
1 ! ' &,, &, , A %
1 2 5 % % " #9 9
- ! ) " " " ; " , . 4
4 "$ C# &,,@(&,,= A D $
3 1 B 3 24 %
5
! %
% &,,0 4 % %
! %3 %
@ < " - "" * ,! " + , :
! * % E % 0 =
9 9
$ 0 =9 00&9 00 &,,- &, , $
!
% %
! %
D 3 $ ! % %
3
= )) /4 0 ), " $ ;
F G + 0 = / F G %
! + $ 3 00 &,,<
3 * E
3 3 " H %#
$ / %
$ D $ $ . +
&,,- &, ,
4 !- " , - .
3 * &,,@ D $ / B
$ &,,
0 6 -) ! 24 0 = . A * D
/ 4 / 00 3 $ 00=; 00 .
5 :
, # ! 7 3 %
&,,- &, , ! D $
$ ! D $ 3 D 3 $ D % A
D E 7F ! 8F
D $ &,,- &,,0 >
% ! D $
3 D A %
; % . + % %
4 E
$
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 131
41
92
41
40
41
3141
41
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 11136
12 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
) 7 24 00
F F A $;$ (F 7 8 !
.
,-(&& &,,- 1 $
2 1 3
& # = $ % &,,- D $ /
B 3 1
: 5 " * < :# ) " . 0 = / F G
00 9 00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3
. / $
< > ) "" "" " 0 =
/ ;3 $ &,,@
- #, " ! "" " E % D E $
&,,- $ D 3
@ " " " 24 = 0 = &, &,,- &,,@
$ 3 D $ $ $ 3 !
= " ) " " = , D $ 3 0 =
@, &,,@ ! @, 1
&,,@
9
!
@, !
#" !, ! " "1 , " ! "* # ) ": - " E
0 = / F
G . &,,-
! !
B 3
0 " # ) . 0 = / F G 00 9
00=( 00 9 &,,- &, , . 3 B
B 3 1 $ 3 /
$ : &,,-
' 9 9 9 9 9 A
&, ( " , !
. 00 $ 3
$ ! 7 8
&, , !
F &,, &, ,
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 132
42
93
42
41
42
3242
42
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 12136
13 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
& , * " *# ) F ) $
&& " : !- &,,- 4
% A D $ 3 1
&: ;! , ! " > ? " 24 &,,0
5 > ; B
%
&< ) < !- $ / %
$ D $ $ . + &,,-
&, , F $ %
&, , 5 % % (
2 %
&- - A &,,- &, , $ A )
A + .+ $ $
&@ * ! : : , * * @ 7 " . 3
0 = &,, &,,0
3 *
&= 5 ! ! 6 ) " " 7 "! ) " ": )" .
4 &,,@ E 4 &,,@
"
#
& 5 ! !6 ) " " ; . 4 &,,-
&0 ! < ") + " . / 0 = "&# @
- 9 &,,@ : 9 &,,0
9 &, , . $ $ / B
00 &,,
:, 7 ) , * * ! " F
0 =
A ;A 0 =
F 0 =
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 133
43
94
43
42
43
3343
43
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 13136
14 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
3 ! ! 6 0 = 0 =
" $ . .
+ 1 $ . #
I $ $ "2
! $ + # ' J +
. 00&
+$;F &,;&, F 00 ! '
D 3 $ 24
"$ A + 1 . #
$ $ $ 1 1 "1E1# $
K 0=,K
E K 3 > L F F . A
A . F + B + 1 $
+ 1 $ $
$ 1
1 B 6 $ 3 >
+ B 1 $
$ ! 00,K
> 1 B 3 > 1 B3 F
! F ! ! A ! ! >
1 1
00 % F F
) % 3 F 7 8
&,,- & 1 1
! 4 '
A
. 3 ! 4
A F 4 0<,K 4
0=,K 0 ,K 00,K
9 A .
1 3 > % 2! 4
/ &,, F ) %$ A .
0@,K D 1 4 A? D!B
0@,K " # +
$ 0 <9 F $ $ * 00 /
7 D 18
.
E % 0 =
$ % 0 ,K M
M 1 $ 0 = 00
00= E % / % 4 !
&,,- (
9 9
; !
1 $ $ !2B+EF2
D $ 3 ,-( (&&
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 134
44
95
44
43
44
3444
44
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 14136
15 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
# ") ! "
7! N (
O O
N
.
!
5 4 (
F 5 (
G A 8
A' , ? * ? 1 * " " * #" !, " " , , * 7 "
!, A ,
( > " !, '! B $C * #" !, D ! " &
73 "
# (
K ; 2
.
" #( K !
; 5
7 ! 8 9 9 9 9
9 9 %
! % (
% '
5
% !
7A 8 ! $ ' O 7D .2 (
8 ! 8 *
O
% 8
' + ( -
7 (
' % (
! % % %
4 %
K
K M M M % M
% (
K 8
' + - 6 "
7E %
' N %( (
4 (
; ! (
(
7 8 (
7 8
87 - 7 > !,
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 135
45
96
45
44
45
3545
45
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 15136
16 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
! * , " 1"
! , * 1 3
@ E ! DD ! 1 * )) )
@ E ! DD -
B &. @ DD
B @ . DD ") ! " , " *" * ( ! ") "
"
B @ & DD ) "
B @ . DD ) * , " ! * 1
B @ & DD ) ! * " *
B @ $ DD ") ! 7
B @ DD 7
B @ E DD "!
" * *
. @ EB& DD ! * ) * , "
. @ EB DD ") ! 1 ,! * , "
& @ & B DD 6, " 1 ) ! "
B @ DD 5 " ! !
B @ & DD 1 "": !
B @ DD ) 1 , 1 "": !
B @ & DD > " 1 "": !
B @ DD ' " ! ! " ! * ! * " "
B@ E DD ) ; !" * , " ) ) " !
) * 1 ,"
B@ % DD *) F ) ! , ! ) F
"E # PPPPPPP " %#
>7 '?
% 4 %
" Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
F " Stan J. Caterbone
# PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
1 June 19, 2015
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Pennsylvania
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP $
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Lancaster
19
PPPPPPP June
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP 15
&,PP
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
Stan J. Caterbone - I was a notary from '94-'98 F 3 24 Don't Know When
PPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP
SJC I
. . $ / I $ Q &, , "!
&, , . . $ / I #
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 136
46
97
46
45
46
3646
46
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 16136
17 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 137
47
98
47
46
47
3747
47
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family
THEAffidavits
ADVANCED&MEDIA
Chronology
GROUP of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
1835
Page 17of136
of of
41135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
06/10/2007
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 138
48
99
48
47
48
3848
48
of
of
of
ofof
51
of
51
414
50
51
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family
THEAffidavits
ADVANCED&MEDIA
Chronology
GROUP of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
1936
Page 18of136
of of
41135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
06/10/2007
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 100
139
49
49
48
49
49
3949
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
50
51
414
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 19136
20 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 101
140
50
50
49
50
50
4050
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
50
51
414
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 20136
21 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced
Stan
CATERBONE
Stan
J. Caterbone
J. Media
Medi
Caterbone
Family
Group
Grop
Group
Executive
Executive
U.S.
Press
Press
Executive
Mind
Summary
Release
Release
Summary
Control
Summary Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page
Page 102
141
51
51
50
51
51
4151
of
of
ofof
of51
of
51
50
51
414
453
51
51
41 Tuesday,
Thursday,
Tuesday,
Friday,
Tuesday,
March
Tuesday
Saturday, March
December
15,
March
2016
October15,
3/15/2016
July2016
17,
15,
11,
5, 2015
10, 2015
2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 21136
22 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
CATERBONE Family U.S. Mind Control Page 142
103 of 453
414 Tuesday July 5, 2016
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 22136
23 of of 135
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
24 23
1 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
25 24
2 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
26 25
3 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
27 26
4 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
28 27
5 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
29 28
6 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
30 29
7 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
31 30
8 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.of
32 31
9 of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 10136
32
33 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 11136
33
34 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 12136
34
35 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 13136
35
36 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 14136
36
37 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 15136
37
38 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 16136
38
39 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 17136
39
40 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
Published J.
byCaterbone,
Stanby
J. Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Caterbone Litigant
and THE and THE ADVANCED
ADVANCED MEDIAMEDIA
GROUPGROUP Copyright
Copyright 2023©2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
Page 18136
40
41 of 106
128
of 135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 19136
41
42 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
NAVAL AIR GUNNERS SCHOOL
--
%
JUNE 1 1943
5 E
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 20136
42
43 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
*hi ah it *$&I b~ *%
tiwr s%Ppi aun' st a& %%@.ol).-b f l him3 l e ~ s ,bag= i~ U r i n g r -
-a-a
-.,
tsllring knd ta\ink,iBg,,
. . ps@#&@''-
?,a- -.
Bra been Ch&kataMw-&-5:-;:;
.--.
-.
the d ag; .?'Lpa$& ta~t&ki* %-6'&~ii* P h e ~be foUg&:f@ -
&
c,
B o w iou@ for pcraonrl g a b . Then f o ideala.
~
m.n f ighf;r feC h i s sxis%mce/~ h ~ ; Z f U ~ h&be
oit
mpn-tm-, .h&-to-hend sawrmts~ahave held
!-
have made Che hddlinea, The inBivldual sto& I-.@@ e
L .
- e b reg,
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 21136
43
44 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 22136
44
45 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 23136
45
46 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
NAVAL AIR GUNNERS SCHOOL
JACKSONVILLE, FLORIDA
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 24136
46
47 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 25136
47
48 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 26136
48
49 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 27136
49
50 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 28136
50
51 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 29136
51
52 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 30136
52
53 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 31136
53
54 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 32136
54
55 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 33136
55
56 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
As a reault o f n w r c r u s recomenc3atfr>ns f ~ m t'ns
Fleet, an Air Crew Xnslgn3.a hrna been approved, giving
ogni$ion t o the a l p - f i g h t i n g a b i l l t ~ jof f l i c b t crawd*
The i n s i g n i a (gold p i n ) f a intended prharilg frrx,
e n l i s t e d ratinger, 5ut commissic:ned w ~ dwar~an* officers,
o t h e r 'than t h o s e designstted as naval a v i a t o ~ sor RBV&
obsemera, mag be e l i g i b l e $ 0 receive and s e a r it.
e l u d e d also are e n l i s t e d r a t i n g s . w i t h t b a 8esfgnati.a-n of
naval a v i a t i o n p i l o t s ,
The Insignla is t o be a o r n on the l e f t breast.
Fihen worn wit!i ribbon@ op medafs, t h e A i r Grew Inafgnla
w i l l be uppernost. A miniat3ll!d, s o s l e om-half of
o r f g i n a l , %a t o be worn when minfkture medals e m r e -
scrfbed,
I Tha requiremsnta Par sward of t h e A ~ FCmw hsignfra
a r e as followst
(ei) Hav9ng aepved, subaepwnt t o Dece~&er'7, 1941, f o p a
t o t a l period of three m n t h s a3 a r e g u l a r l y asstgned
I
member of t h e $& Cmw of a ccmbatant a i ~ c i ? a f $ .
11) "Combatant aircrafta she33 be co;:s9de2@d aa all o p
crating a w o r a f k o f t h e F l e e t o r Ihvntfsr F o r w e , and
except 8 at k l i t g a i ~ c r awhlckl
~ SPB ~ f e i t i h 9de&fi-fln%d
~
- nor fitted ouC for ofSansfvs top tlefeasfva) a g & n - l i ~ ~ s I r
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 34136
56
57 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 35136
57
58 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
$a g --
"'-"W
the:':.! 4
-,
, .
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 36136
58
59 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 37136
59
60 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 38136
60
61 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 39136
61
62 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults (Page
Page v eNo.
oNo. 40136
62
63r )of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 41136
63
64 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 42136
64
65 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 43136
65
66 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 44136
66
67 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 45136
67
68 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 46136
68
69 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 47136
69
70 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 48136
70
71 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 49136
71
72 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 50136
72
73 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 51136
73
74 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 52136
74
75 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 53136
75
76 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 54136
76
77 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 55136
77
78 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Page 1 of2024©
2
1466/1470 MANHEIM PIKE
Stan
AND
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
1280 PLAZA BLVD
3 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS & 1 LOT
FOR SALE
LOCATTION: THE NUMBERS:
Known As: David’s Furniture, Enterprise and Avis Sale Price: $2,850,000
Address: 1466/1470 Manheim Pike & 1280 Plaza Blvd RE Taxes: 1280 Plaza Blvd = $7,761.15
Township: Manheim Twp 1466 Manheim Pike = $4,812.56
1470 Manheim Pike = $1,370.95
NOI: Actual—$66,000, Projected—$162,453
BUILDING/SITE
BUILDING/SITE INFO: AERIAL:
PLOT PLAN:
Total Bldg. SF: 3 buildings totaling 7,613SF
Available SF: 4,593SF (Vacant Bldg)
No. of Floors: 1
Parking: 80
1470 Manheim Pk
1466 Manheim Pk
Lot Size: 3 lots totaling 1.33 acres
HVAC: Central Air/Heat Pump
Construction: Frame and Brick
Zoning: Commercial/B-4
Sewer: Public
1280 Plaza Blvd
Water: Public
Gas: Available/UGI
Electric: All buildings with large capacity panels
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
This offering consists of 3 parcels, consisting of three buildings and a vacant lot. The first parcel is 1280 Plaza Blvd - this parcel
has a 4,593SF vacant building on .60 acres with a projected income of $96,453. The second parcel is 1466 Manheim Pike - this
parcel has two buildings that are currently leased on .48 acres. Avis leases one building that is 1560SF @ $3,000/mo, lease expires
04/2010 with no renewals. Enterprise is 1460SF @ $2,500/mo, lease expires 11/2015 with two 5yr renewal options. The last par-
cel is a .25 acre lot that is currently included with the Enterprise lease for parking use. The owner will not consider selling sepa-
rately.
PLEASE CALL FOR A TOUR OR MORE INFORMATION:
BENNETT WILLIAMS REALTY
TOM TROCCOLI OR DENISE ARCHER
717-390-9858
(NOTE:Information furnished regarding property for sale or lease is from sources deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed and should be independently
verified by
Family the prospective
Affidavits buyer or tenant.
& Chronology of All information is subject
Assaults toNo.
PagePage change
No. or withdrawal
56136
78
79 of of 135
106
128
Pages without notice.) THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Page 2 of2024©
2
1466/1470 MANHEIM PIKE
Stan
AND
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
1280 PLAZA BLVD
3 COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS & 1 LOT
1280 PLAZA BLVD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Known As: David’s Furniture Road Frontage/Access: 114’ on Plaza Blvd
Tax Map & Parcel #: 3903986900000 Traffic Count: Pending
Condition/Age: 1976/Good/Interior renovated in 2001 Rail: No
Floor Type: Carpet Environmental Reports: None known
Roof Type/Condition: Restrictions: Zoning
Ceiling Height: 8’-10’ Availability: Immediate
Drive In Door: No Permitted Uses: Automotive, Business, Food Service,
Sprinklers: No Medical, Dental, Office, Hair Salon, Retail and church
1466 MANHEIM PIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Known As: Avis and Enterprise Rent a Car Road Frontage/Access: 129’ on Manheim Pike
Tax Map & Parcel #: 3905025600000 Traffic Count: Pending
Condition/Age: 1975/Good Rail: No
Floor Type: Tile Environmental Reports: None known
Roof Type/Condition: Rubber/Good (Enterprise had roof Restrictions: Zoning
improvements of $80,000 in 2006) Availability: Leased, see property summary
Ceiling Height: 8’-10’ Permitted Uses: Automotive, Business, Food Service,
Drive In Door: No Medical, Dental, Office, Hair Salon, Retail and church
Sprinklers: No
1470 MANHEIM PIKE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Known As: Vacant Lot Rail: No
Tax Map & Parcel #: 33904131100000 Environmental Reports: None known
Road Frontage/Access: 40’ on Manheim Pike Restrictions: Zoning
Traffic Count: Pending Availability: Leased, see property summary
Permitted Uses: Automotive, Business, Food Service,
Medical, Dental, Office, Hair Salon, Retail and church
PLEASE CALL FOR A TOUR OR MORE INFORMATION:
BENNETT WILLIAMS REALTY
TOM TROCCOLI or DENISE ARCER
717-390-9858
(NOTE:Information furnished regarding property for sale or lease is from sources deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed and should be independently
verified
Family by Affidavits
the prospective buyer or tenant. of
& Chronology AllAssaults
information is subject
Page toPage
change
No. 80orof
No. withdrawal
57
79 of 135
136106
128 without notice.)
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Page 1 of2024©
2
1280 PLAZA BLVD Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
COMMERCIAL BUILDING
LANCASTER, PA
FOR LEASE
LOCATTION: THE NUMBERS:
Known As: David’s Furniture Lease Rate: $21/SF
Address: 1280 Plaza Blvd NNN’s: $3/SF+/-
Township: Manheim Twp
BUILDING/SITE INFO:
Total Bldg. SF: 4,593SF AERIAL:
Available SF: 4,593SF PLOT PLAN:
No. of Floors: 1
Parking:
1470 Manheim Pk 1466 Manheim Pk
Lot Size: .67
HVAC: Central Air/Heat Pump
Construction: Frame and Brick
Zoning: Commercial/B-4
Sewer: Public
Water: Public 1280 Plaza Blvd
Gas: Available/UGI
Electric: Large capacity panels
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
Prime location at Entrance to Park City Mall. Open space 4593 SF building updated in 2006. High Visiblity from
Plaza Blvd and Manheim Pike. 10 Acre CarMax being built across the street. Perfect location for Restaurant, Retail,
etc. with ample parking.
PLEASE CALL FOR A TOUR OR MORE INFORMATION:
BENNETT WILLIAMS REALTY
TOM TROCCOLI OR DENISE ARCHER
717-390-9858
(NOTE:Information furnished regarding property for sale or lease is from sources deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed and should be independently
verified by
Family the prospective
Affidavits buyer or tenant.
& Chronology of All information is subject
Assaults toNo.
PagePage change
No. or withdrawal
58136
80
81 of of 135
106
128
Pages without notice.) THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Page 2 of2024©
2
1280 PLAZA BLVD Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2023©
1280 PLAZA BLVD ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Known As: David’s Furniture Road Frontage/Access: 114’ on Plaza Blvd
Tax Map & Parcel #: 3903986900000 Traffic Count: Pending
Condition/Age: 1976/Good/Interior renovated in 2001 Rail: No
Floor Type: Carpet Environmental Reports: None known
Roof Type/Condition: Restrictions: Zoning
Ceiling Height: 8’-10’ Availability: Immediate
Drive In Door: No Permitted Uses: Automotive, Business, Food Service,
Sprinklers: No Medical, Dental, Office, Hair Salon, Retail and church
ADDITIONAL PICTURES
PLEASE CALL FOR A TOUR OR MORE INFORMATION:
BENNETT WILLIAMS REALTY
TOM TROCCOLI or DENISE ARCER
717-390-9858
(NOTE:Information furnished regarding property for sale or lease is from sources deemed reliable, but is not guaranteed and should be independently
verified
Family by Affidavits
the prospective buyer or tenant. of
& Chronology AllAssaults
information is subject
Page toPage
change
No. 82orof
No. withdrawal
59
81 of 135
136106
128 without notice.)
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 60136
82
83 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 61136
83
84 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced Media Group Page 1 of 2 Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc. From 1948 to 1973
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 62136
84
85 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Advanced Media Group Page 2 of 2 Sam Caterbone Cleaners, Inc. From 1948 to 1973
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 63136
85
86 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
LAW OFFICES
MAY, GROVE, STORK& BLAKINGER
48 NOUTH O W K E STRf ET
UNCASTER. PENNSYbVANlk 17602
JOHN 5. MAY
Mrs- Yolanda M, C a t e r b o n e
1250 Fremont S t r e e t
Lancaster , Pennsylvania 17603
13tB: Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc-
DissoPutlon
Dear Yoliet
I am enclosing youz: Certificate of Dissolution for
Samuel CaLerboncr Cleaners, Inc. This sAgniffes the end of
the corporation's requizemcats for any aort of filing-
v e r y truly yours,
l3JY/kf c
Enclosure
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 64136
86
87 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 65136
87
88 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 66136
88
89 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 67136
89
90 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 68136
90
91 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
LAW OFFICES
MAY, GROVE, STORK& BLAKINGER
48 NOUTH O W K E STRf ET
UNCASTER. PENNSYbVANlk 17602
JOHN 5. MAY
Mrs- Yolanda M, C a t e r b o n e
1250 Fremont S t r e e t
Lancaster , Pennsylvania 17603
13tB: Samuel Caterbone Cleaners, Inc-
DissoPutlon
Dear Yoliet
I am enclosing youz: Certificate of Dissolution for
Samuel CaLerboncr Cleaners, Inc. This sAgniffes the end of
the corporation's requizemcats for any aort of filing-
v e r y truly yours,
l3JY/kf c
Enclosure
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 69136
91
92 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 70136
92
93 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 71136
93
94 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 72136
94
95 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 73136
95
96 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 74136
96
97 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 75136
97
98 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No. 76136
98
99 of of 135
106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage No. 99
No. 100 77
of of
136106
128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.100
101 78
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.101
102 79
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.102
103 80
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.103
104 81
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.104
105 82
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.105
106 83
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.106
107 84
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.107
108 85
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.108
109 86
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.109
110 87
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.110
111 88
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.111
112 89
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.112
113 90
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.113
114 91
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.114
115 92
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.115
116 93
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.116
117 94
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.117
118 95
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.118
119 96
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.119
120 97
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.120
121 98
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
Page
No. No.
No.121
122 99
of of
of106
136128
135
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
123122
100 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
124123
101 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
125124
102 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
am group01@m sn.com
ht t p: / / www.am gglobalent ert ainm ent group.com /
Blog: ht t p: / / advancedm ediagroup.wordpress.com /
Research Blog: www.advancedm ediagroupresearch.wordpress.com
Video Biography at : ht t p: / / www.yout ube.com / profile?user= advancedm ediagroup
St an J. Cat erbone, Pro Se
Advanced Media Group
1250 Frem ont St reet
Lancast er, PA 17603
February 26, 2008
Ms. Debbie Foch
Disclosure Proj ect
PO Box 4556
Largo, MD 20775
Re: Em ail of February 22, 2008 and Account s of Sam uel Cat erbone for Dr. St even Greer
Dear Debbie:
The following is a list ing of files t hat I have enclosed on a CD- ROM t it led “ Sam uel Cat erbone, Jr.
Disclosure Proj ect Report of February 26, 2008” . I also enclosed a copy of m y em ail t o you on Friday
February 22, 2008 t hat present s m y fat her’s sit uat ion.
I t ried t o give you som e order of sem blance t o t he files, and t ried t o include what I t hought you would
find m ost int erest ing t o your effort s and research in t he field of ET. Unfort unat ely, I do not possess
any docum ent s from any of t he hospit als or psychiat rist s t hat have t reat ed m y fat her. I will event ually
have t o at t em pt t o int erview t he psychiat rist s or recover som e of t he docum ent s.
I have a case wit h t he Cit izens Com m ission for Hum an Right s ( CCHR) and am in t he m idst of filing a
com plaint for m y own psychiat ric abuses. I m ay at som e point involve t hat organizat ion. I can t ell
you t hat during t he 1960’s m y fat her was subj ect t o shock t reat m ent s, psychiat ric em ergency and
evaluat ions, and a few short hospit al st ays, not hing longer t han 30 days. During m ost of t his t im e,
t here were significant business int erest s and asset s t hat were ext ort ed. You will find t his under t he
“ Sam Cat erbone Dry Cleaners” . This was t ypical prot ocol and t he MO for t he perpet rat ors and t heir
agenda.
I hope t his inform at ion is useful t o you and Dr. Greer, and t he Disclosure Proj ect . I would appreciat e
your feedback on m y at t em pt t o deliver t his inform at ion. I am t rying t o provide you wit h as m uch
inform at ion as possible wit hout wast ing your t im e. Please let m e know how I did. I would also not in
any way be insult ed if t his inform at ion was not of your int erest .
Again, I t hank you for your t im e and look forward t o hearing from you.
Wit h Kindest Regards,
St an J. Cat erbone
Advanced Media Group
Enclosure
Advanced Media Group Page 1 of 3 February 26, 2008
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
126125
103 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
CD - ROM “Sa m ue l Ca t e r bon e , Jr . D isclosu r e Pr oj e ct Re por t of Fe br ua r y 2 6 , 2 0 0 8 ” File List :
00 Let t er t o R Scot t Sm it h Fult on Bank Dec 3 2007
01 Sam uel P Cat erbone UFO Research February 21 ZOOS
02 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr. Passport Renewal February 3 1964b
03 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr. Passport Renewal February 3 1964 bw
04 Sam uel Cat erbone I D Com parison j an 22 2008
05 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Honors 1943
06 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr Naval Air Gunners School Cert ificat e 1943
07 Naval Air Gunners Training Manual June 1 1943
08 Naval Air Technical Training Cent er Phot o Abum
09 Sam uel Cat erbone Naval Air Gunners Honors 1943
10 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr Navy Phot os
11 John Lehm an On Seas of Glory Book & Aut ograph of Feb 7 2008
12 Sam Cat erbone Cleaners Docum ent s Feb 14 2008
13 Sam uel Cat erbone 1973 Tax Ret urn Docs Jan 21 2O08
14 President Judge Farina & My Fat her Sam uel Cat erbone
15 Sam uel P. Cat erbone ( My Fat her) Crim inal Charges
16 Sam uel P. Cat erbone 1942 LCHS Diplom a
17 Tree Top St ables Uncle Jim Cat erbone Winners Circle 1963- 1969
18 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr and Yolanda Roda Cat erbone
19 Sam uel Cat erbone Jr Childhood Phot os
19 Sam uel Cat erbone Fam ily Phot os
Fe br ua r y 2 2 , 2 0 0 8 – Em a il t o fr om D e bbie Foch of t he D isclosur e Pr oj e ct
“ Hi St an,
We know t hat people who have real ET cont act experiences ( usually t hese people are very sensit ive
t elepat hically or wit h rem ot e viewing, et c) get t he at t ent ion of t hose in cont rol, who t hen use
psychot ronics, et c t o give t he person som e sort of false ET cont act experience. So, what you're t elling
us m akes sense.
I f you want t o send t he docum ent at ion for us t o keep safe and use if needed ( wit h your perm ission) ,
t hat would be fine. The address is Disclosure Proj ect , PO Box 4556, Largo MD 20775.
Perhaps som e day you could m eet Dr. Greer - we shall see.
Thanks so m uch,
Debbie Foch”
Fe br ua r y 2 2 , 2 0 0 8 – Em a il t o D e bbie Foch of t h e D isclosu r e Pr oj e ct :
“ I am j ust finishing a dossier on m y fat her's writ ings, account s, and his life's accom plishm ent s.
My fat her was a very int elligent m an. He graduat ed wit h honors from radio school in t he U.S. Navy. He
once t old m e t hat he used t o fly over t he Berm uda Triangle on t raining m issions and on one occasion
som et hing happened. He t hen went on t o build a successful dry- cleaning business and invent ed som e
t echniques and filt rat ion syst em s for t he dry cleaning business.
My fat her was an avid world t raveler and was very learned regarding Middle East Affairs and visit ed
t here. During t he Persian Gulf War we would discuss t he st rat egies of t he Middle East on a daily basis,
and m y fat her was very accurat e in his conclusions. I have done t he sam e wit h t his current war in
I raq.
Advanced Media Group Page 2 of 3 February 26, 2008
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
127126
104 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
I t hink m y fat her st art ed doing research and som ehow t hreat ened t he U.S. Governm ent . I believe t hey
used t he m ind invasion t o quell his curiosit y. My fat her was int o t he ET phenom enon wit h respect t o
com m unicat ions. I t was his belief t hat t hey were com m unicat ing. His conclusion was always t hat we
would never be able t o garner t he evidence t hat we peruse. He was learned about t he U.S. Navy Blue
Book and SETI .
I n t he 90's he had a quit e ext ensive m ailing list of research, academ ic, and scient ific people t hat he
would writ e on a m ont hly basis in an effort t o t ry t o have som eone help him underst and his sit uat ion.
I n Decem ber of 2005, I becam e t elepat hic. I knew t hat since m y whist le blowing act ivit ies on
I nt ernat ional Signal and Cont rol in 1987 I at t ract ed t he I nt elligence com m unit y. ABC News 20/ 20 and
Night line aired 4 program s on I SC and Arm s t o I raq rom I SC in Lancast er, PA. Defense Secret ary
Robert Gat es had t o convince t he Senat e t hat he had no t ies wit h I SC on bot h of his confirm at ion
hearings for Direct or of t he CI A.
I knew t hat I was being rem ot e viewed over t he years, however in May of 2005 I filed m y first civil
com plaint in t he U.S. Dist rict Court for t he East ern of Pennsylvania, which included a Federal False
Claim s Act . I know t hat t hey began using t he m ind cont rol t o disrupt m y lit igat ion and t o harass m e.
Aft er I began researching, I began reviewing m y fat her's inform at ion and research and have cam e t o
t he conclusion t hat he was t he t arget of m ind invasion and t hey used t he ET phenom enon as t he
subj ect m at t er.
The U.S. Governm ent has a problem wit h m e right now. I n 1987 when I began t o whist le blow on I SC,
I also began docum ent ing everyt hing. I im m ediat ely m icrofiche 10,000 docum ent s and recorded m y
phone conversat ions wit h governm ent officials t o prove t he t rut h and t he cover- up. I also learned a
great deal having wit ness m y fat her's experience and having him t each m e t he im port ant aspect s of
life and wit h Christ ian values. I was t he closest person t o m y fat her, even t hough t hrough his ordeal,
he lived a fairly reclusive life.
Anyway, for what it is wort h, I would like you and Disclosure t o have m y report when it is com plet ed. I
will send it via a CD- ROM at your address, or I would be able t o drive it t o your Maryland office. I had
spent m uch t im e working in Washingt on, D.C. and t he area. I was a part ner wit h NI ST in voice
recognit ion syst em s, so I know t he Maryland area as well.
I appreciat e your help, and hope t o som eday m eet . I would love t o, if at all possible have t he
opport unit y t o m eet Dr. Greer, if he would have t he t im e.
Let m e know what address would be best .”
St an J. Cat erbone
Advanced Media Group
Advanced Media Group Page 3 of 3 February 26, 2008
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
128127
105 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
129128
106 of 135
of 136106
128
Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Fifth and 118th Street, New York City
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
130129 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
131130 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
132131 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
133132 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
134133 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
135134 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
Stan
Published
J. Caterbone,
by Stan
Pro
J. Se
Caterbone
Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2024©
2023©
Family Affidavits & Chronology of Assaults PagePage
No. No.
136135 of 135
of 136 Pages THURSDAY August 1st, 2024
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CHRONOLOGY OF ASSAULTS
1904
1. THE ASSAULTS ON THE CATERBONE FAMILY BEGAN IN 1904 - November 15, 1904 The
LANCASTER NEW ERA ran a story about CATERBONE'S Great Grandfather, Joseph
Catrabone regarding an arsonist burning down his home and killing his monkey, which he
used as an Organ Grinder. The spelling of the last name is confirmed by the original
CERTIFICATE OF BAPTISM which states as my father SAMUEL CATRABONE, See attached.
The article reads:
“FIRES IN CITY AND COUNTY A HOUSE DAMAGED AND BARN BURNED The Barn on
J.M.E. Rudys Farm Destroyed Monday Night - Quite a stubborn fire occurred on
Monday night shortly after 10 o'clock at No. 119 Beaver street, a twosided & half
story frame building occupied by Joseph Catrabone (CATERBONEMY GREAT GREAT
GRANDFATHER), an Italian who keeps a boarding house for his fellow countrymen,
most of them being street musicians. Most of the boarders were in bed when the
alarm of the fire was raised outside and Catty and a couple of his compatriots were
greatly excited upon learning that the rear end of their establishment was in flames.
Everybody in the place was aroused, but the excitable Italians were not in condition
to do anything but rush about, jabbering and making confusion worse confounded.
Word of the fire was sent to Fire Chief
Vondermuth at No. 5 engine house and he hurried to the scene of the fire, after
sending orders to the other companies. He took with him the new Clapp & Jones
reserve engine, which proved its merit in service, sending a heave stream and with
such force as to require three men to hand the nozzle. The fire at Catrabone's had
worked it's between the partitions and was hard to get at and the Chief kept his
men there until after midnight, before he was satisfied the fire was slumbering
between partitions. The building was badly damaged by the fire and water. The
building is owned by Frances Frailey, and her loss will be about $500. Catrabone lost
considerable furniture and his boarders a great of their effects, one of the being
minus the monkey. The poor fellow, the Italian, not the ******, went about
afterwords-bewildering the loss of “de monk”, which doubtless perished in the fire.
After the fire fifteen of Catty's boarders were sheltered at the police station for
the night and they had enough ***** with them to fill out an immigrant train for a
trip across the plains. The fire is supposed to have been of incendiary origin. While
at the fire driver Edward Samoon, of No. 4 house carriage had his left foot so badly
trampled and out by his horse that Dr. Boiendies had to put four stitches in the
wound. He will be laid up for some time.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
1 of54
2110
1 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1940's
2. December 15, 1942 Samuel Caterbone, Jr. (CATERBONE'S FATHER) enlists in the United
States Navy and receives basic training in Bainbridge, Maryland.
3. August 21, 1943 Samuel Caterbone, Jr. GRADUATES from NAVAL AIR GUNNERS SCHOOL
with HONORS as an ARM3c rank and the Lancaster Newspapers puts an article with his
photo in the evening edition with the headlines “Graduates With Honors”.
4. 1943 Samuel Caterbone, Jr. GRADUATES from the Dry Cleaning Institute of America of
Baltimore, Maryland.
5. The NAVAL AIR GUNNERS TRAINING MANUAEL CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIPTION OF THE AIR GUNNER:
“Drawing flight pay – a full 50% raise – from the day of the first flight, the aerial
gunner is the envy of all branches of service. Selected only from the best of men
available to the armed forces, the aerial gunner is the “Raider” of naval aviation.
He is the one man out of many who has qualified physically and mentally for the
most dramatic and important position in modern warfare. Teamed with the finest
flight crews in the world, flying the best planes, the aerial gunner has the unique
and rare opportunity to play the outstanding personal role in bringing the world
conflict to a satisfactory and speedy end.”
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
2 of55
3110
2 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1960's
6. In the 1960's Samuel Caterbone starts several Dry Cleaning companies with relatives, in
both Lancaster and Stamford, Conneticut. He, his father, and Uncle Tony Caterbone start
the DELUXE CLEANERS, located on Chesapeake Street, Lancaster, CATERBONE CLEANERS
located on the corner of East Orange and Plum Streets, Lancaster, and finally build
CATERBONE CLEANERS, INC., at 1470 Manheim Pike, Lancaster, Pennsylvania.
7. The 1960's Samuel Caterbone, Jr. is served numerous mental health warrants by the
Lancaster City Police Department, hospitalized, and subjected to rounds of electro-shock
therapy, one of the main tactics used in the MKULTRA Program. Documents from the JOINT
HEARING BEFORE THE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE AND THE SUBCOMMITTEE
ON HEALTH AND SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH OF THE COMMITTEE ON HUMAN RESOURCES
UNITED STATES SENATE NINETY-FIFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION AUGUST 3, 1977 it
reads:
8. Under CIA's Project MKNAOMI, the Army assisted the CIA in developing, testing, and
maintaining biological agents and delivery systems for use against humans as well as
against animals and crops. Thirteenth, there are single subprojects in such areas as the
effects of electroshock, harassment techniques for offensive use, analysis of extrasensory
perception, gas propelled sprays and aerosols, and four subprojects involving crop and
material sabotage.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
3 of56
4110
3 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1970's
9. August 4, 1972 the Lancaster City Police file FORGERY charges against Samuel
Caterbone Jr., for signing a check from SAM CATERBONE CLEANERS, INC., for $200.00
made payable to Lancaster City Attorney James Coho without the authorization of his wife,
(CATERBONE'S MOTHER) YOLANDA RODA CATERBONE. Other charges are filed for robbery
and burglary in the alleged theft of $2,500 from the basement of his parents home at 1550
Book Road, Lampeter that was supposedly the property of Samuel Caterbone Jr., nephew,
Joseph Riccuero III.
10. Samuel Caterbone Jr. is imprisoned and denied bail for a period of 90 days until trial.
11. February 13, 1974 Samuel Caterbone Jr., appearing Pro Se, gets a split verdict and is
found guilty of forgery, and NOT GUILTY of the other charges. He is sentenced to one (1)
year probation.
12. August 29, 1973 Samuel Caterbone Jr., is ORDERED by President Judge William
Johnstone, Jr., released from PROBATION and ORDERED “TO LEAVE THE AREA AROUND
LANCASTER COUNTY PENNA. AS OF AUGUST 29, 1973”.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
4 of57
5110
4 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1980's
13. In On Christmas Day, December 25, 1984, Sammy CATERBONE, CATERBONE 'S oldest
brother and best friend, is MURDERED in Santa Barbara California after being thrown out
of Lancaster in 1976 by relatives. SAMMY was stationed in California in 1969 during a 2
year stint with the United States Air Force – he was dishonorably discharged after 2 years
of a 4 year enlistment.
14. On one of several visits to Santa Barbara - SAMMY CATERBONE made a declarative
statement and told Stan J. Caterbone "I GOT BAD LSD IN THE SERVICE" while sitting on
the beach in Santa Barbara.
15. On Christmas Day, December 25, 1984 Stan J. Caterbone and his roomates, Kevin
Hobday and Jerry Sullivan had their annual CHRISTMAS PARTY at 433 West Marion Street.
In attendance were about 50 people, including friend and owner of the Snyder Funeral
Home Chip Snyder and his wife Dorean.
16. The next day, Stan J. Caterbone received a telephone call from a West Lampeter Police
officer who was at his Grandmother's home, Mary Lombardo Caterbone of 1550 Book Road
- informing him of the death of his brother Sammy Caterbone in Santa Barbara, California
on Christmas Day, December 25, 1984. Stan J. Caterbone drove out to the house of his
Grandmother and retrieved the notes his Grandmother made while the police were
informing her of Sammy's Death.
17. The number one problem is that Stan J. Caterbone and his mother, Yolanda Caterbone
were in contact, and named next of kin on the Santa Barbara County Conservertorship
(Legal Guardian) Documents, and often talked with case workers over the years. WHY
DID THE WEST LAMPETER TOWNSHIP POLICE AND LANCASTER CITY POLICE OFFICER DON
FLICK, WHO LIVED NEST TO TEE GROSSI ON UNION STREET, ACROSS THE ORCHARD FROM
STAN J. CATERONE'S HOME AT 1250 FREMONT STREET - CONTACT HIS GRANDMOTHER.
18. Stan J. Caterbone immediately called Chip Snyder to make the arrangements to fly the
body back to Lancaster, PA from Santa Barbara, California. A few days later, Chip Snyder
called Stan J. Caterbone with alarming information that there were "NO LIGATURE MARKS,
OR ANY MARKS ON THE NECK OF SAMMY CATERBONE - CONTRARY TO THE DEATH
CERTIFICATE WHICH STATES "LIGATURE STRANGULATION"?
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
5 of58
6110
5 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
19. This started the research and the trips to Santa Barbara, California to meet with Santa
Barbara County Officials to learn the truth. The last visit and meeting with Santa Barbara
Officials occured in 2005 where officials made the declaration that a few weeks later there
was another murder at the Group Home on Cottage Avenue in Santa Barbara, California
and the home was CLOSED back in 1985 and that "Your Brother Probably Was
MURDERED", See Documentation.
20. In January of 1985 Stan J. Caterbone went to the office of Joe Roda's law firm and
supplied documentation asking him to review the file. Joe Roda played football at
Lancaster Catholic with Sammy Caterbone. Joe Roda had an assitant write Stan J.
Caterbone a letter advising him there was nothing he could do. Later, Joe Roda would
represent ISC Legal Counsel William Clark in the Blackmail Tape disputes in Clark v. James
Guerin, of ISC.
21. This is absolute evidence that sammy caterbone, like his father, and brother Stan J.
Caterbone were victims of U.S. Sponsored mind control. Remember, Tommy Caterbone
died in Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina in 1996 and Sammy died on Christmas day of 1984 -
both with deep religious connotations.
22. In May of 1987 Lancaster Aviation arrange for the selected aircraft to be flown in from
the Midwest to be inspected by CATERBONE. Pete Wolfson of Lancaster Aviation conducts
the meeting, as an official agent of Lancaster Aviation. Commonwealth Bank has approved
the financing of $97,000 for the purchase. The additional $25,000 required is not yet
available. Pete Wolfson insists that the plane must be purchased before being flown back
to the Midwest. Pete Wolfson requests a post-dated check from CATERBONE for the
remaining balance. CATERBONE refuses, citing that the remaining funds must be liquidated
from the Keystone Mutual Fund, and the exact receipt of the moneys is not guaranteed,
and could take up to 10 days. Pete Wolfson agrees not to deposit the check until
CATERBONE confirms that the funds have been received and deposited in order to cover
the check for the remaining $25,000. CATERBONE makes sure that Pete Wolfson has the
authority to make the arrangement, and Pete Wolfson agrees. The purchase of the
airplane was also subject to a pre-purchase inspection by Lancaster Aviation. Lancaster
Aviation also advises CATERBONE to have his airplane included in their Fleet Insurance
plan. CATERBONE also advises Lancaster Aviation that he would like to offer the airplane
to his business associates for use in order to subsidize the costs and maintenance.
23. Chuck Smith, president of Lancaster Aviation, later discloses to CATERBONE that he
had deposited CATERBONE’s pre dated check for $25.000, without the confirmation by
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
6 of59
7110
6 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CATERBONE that the funds had been transferred from accounts. CATERBONE had argued
with Pete Wolfson, the salesman for Lancaster Aviation, that he did not want to give them
a post dated check, however Chuck Wolfson insisted. Now, Chuck Smith had told
CATERBONE that Pete Wolfson did not have the authority to complete the transaction.
However CATERBONE reminded Chuck Smith that he was acting as an agent for Lancaster
Aviation, and that was not material to this dispute.
24. Lancaster Aviation and Commonwealth Bank engaged in Count IV - extortion,
defamation of character, slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful
interference with contracts, obstruction of justice, trespass to person, unfair competition,
fraud, conspiracy, embezzlement, breech of contract and several violations in lender
liability; in later repossessing the aircraft on July 1, 1987 with no advanced notice and no
reason or cause. Commonwealth Bank was the mortgagor on the property of Olde Hickory,
which CATERBONE had a loan commitment of $5 million to refinance that property.
Lancaster Aviation will deny CATERBONE ’s airplane to provide service to a scheduled
charter by Jim Bly of Source Management of Virginia on June 27, 1987. CATERBONE had
an agreement for $300.00 per hour and an estimated 6-hour charter planned.
25. On June 23, 1987 Larry Resch, an executive of both International Signal & Control,
Plc,.(ISC) And United Chem Con visits CATERBONE at Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
headquarters in Lancaster, as scheduled to discuss business opportunities. Larry Resch
explains "we had to fly Carl Jacobson out of the country early this morning" as the reason
for his not being able to attend the meeting as planned. Larry Resch discusses possible
strategies to rescue Chem Con’s Minority 8A Set-aside contracts, and solicits financing for
new facility. CATERBONE becomes annoyed the context of the conversation, especially the
lack Of disclosure, and discusses allegations of wrongdoing by Guerin and International
Signal & Control, Plc, and the relationship to United Chem Con. After evaluating the
financial statements, CATERBONE also suggests there is approximately $15 to $18 million
in missing funds.
26. Mr. Larry Resch failed to inform CATERBONE of his association and position with
International Signal & Control, Plc., while CATERBONE formally began his whistle blowing
activities on International Signal & Control, Plc..
27. On June 23, 1987, at 2:00 pm immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control Executive, Mr. Larry Resch, CATERBONE has his locks changed to his
office by Russell Locksmith of Lititz, in order to secure confidential personal and business
files in light of the current internal power struggle between himself, Michael Hartlett and
Robert Kauffman, and given the conversation with Mr. Larry Resch of International Signal
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
7 of60
8110
7 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
& Control, Plc., a few hours earlier.
28. CATERBONE was a personal guarantor of a 5 year lease agreement with the Developer,
Fishcer Spounagle, Ltd., for the offices of Financial Management Group, Ltd., at 1755
Oregon Pike, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, that began in 1986 and did renew until 1991.
29. Robert Kaufman, President of FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., and other
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., executives burglarize CATERBONE's office
removing confidential personal and business tiles. Some of the mortgage banking and
other business files have yet to be found. Kauffman and Robert Long illegally issue
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., stock certificates to Peter Peneros and Scott
Robertson. Robert Long signs the stock certificates as Secretary of FINANCIAL
MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., when CATERBONE was acting Secretary, and was the only
person duly authorized to issue FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd., stock certificates.
CATERBONE learned of the burglary by Robert Kauffman, President, in a telephone
conversation while at Stone Harbor, NJ; Kauffman inadvertently mentioned that the stock
certificates were issued, however, with all documents at risk of being stolen, CATERBONE
did not mention the incident, in hopes to first recover any potentially stolen business and
personal files.
30. Financial Management Group, Ltd., executives engaged in obstruction of justice, in
unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal
trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental
duress, slander, defamation of character, wrongful interference with business relations,
and violated several bylaws of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
31. On May 20, 1987, CATERBONE and Attorney Ric Fox, of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, draft
the legal Letter of Intent for investors of Power Productions I, which CATERBONE was
general partner. CATERBONE had several interested parties some which have made
verbal commitments, including Norris Boyd and Dave Cook, an executive of Turkey Hill
Minit Markets.
32. On June 29, 1987, CATERBONE received patent research materials from patent
attorney Joel S. Goldhammer, of the prominent Philadelphia law firm Siedel, Gonda,
Goldhammer & Abbot regarding the "Digital" Movie, and the national franchising of
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,. CATERBONE had retained the services of Siedel,
Gonda, Goldhammer, and Abbot in order to investigate all relevant matters concerning the
technology, merchandising, and marketing of the "Mutant Mania" project, and the use of
the "Power Station" label. Research was required for the merchandising of consumer
electronics, professional audio/visual digital mixing consoles, and the "Power Station
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
8 of61
9110
8 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Digital Movie System (PSDMS)”, as created by CATERBONE in the proposal for SONY
Corporation of Japan.
33. On May 11, 1987, CATERBONE invested and paid Scott Robertson, executive vice
president of Financial Management Group, Ltd., $2,000 dollars from a personal account for
an advance for work on mortgage banking projects and the “Digital Movie”. On the same
day CATERBONE paid film producer Marcia Silen, of Flatbush Films, Hollywood, California,
an advance of $750.00 for a cash advanced for work with the “Digital Movie” project.
34. CATERBONE was executor producer of the project, general partner of Power
Productions I, the investment group, and named in the “Mutant Mania” budget to receive a
salary of $100,000. In addition CATERBONE had agreements to receive royalties on all
revenues associated with both the distribution of the film and video release and all
branding of the merchandise from the project.
35. Financial Management Group, Ltd., it’s officers and employees, along with other
Defendants including but not limited to Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank)
(Mellon), Fulton Bank, the Manheim Township Police Department engaged in unfair
competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass,
forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress,
slander, defamation of character, obstruction of justice, wrongful interference with
business relations, and other anti trust violations pertaining to the “Digital Movie” project.
36. CATERBONE, on behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., began research and
discussions with corporate attorney, Jeff Jamanou of the law firm McNesse, Wallace and
Nurick regarding franchising the concept of Financial Management Group, Ltd, on a
national scale and considerations for a stock split. CATERBONE handled all legal
endeavors of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
37. Beginning in April of 1987, Financial Management Group, Ltd, officers and executives
engaged in a pattern of unfair competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass
to person, obstruction of justice, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character,
wrongful interference with business relations, and other anti trust violations.
38. On June 18, 1987, CATERBONE and Randy Grespin, corporate attorney for The Life
Underwriters Group, fly to Atlanta, Georgia, to visit with executives of Planners Securities
Group, a nationally known Broker Dealer, and joint venture partner that was in the midst
of a deal in which Financial Management Group, Ltd., had negotiated an equity interest.
CATERBONE had initially consulted with both Kauffman and Hartlett concerning the trip,
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
9 of10
62
9110
of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
however when both disagreed, CATERBONE questioned why CATERBONE was the only
principal to personally visit the operations of Hibbard Brown & Company, which lead
CATERBONE his decision to terminate the ill fated merger.
39. Planners Securities Group, was regarded as the most successful Broker Dealers in the
financial planning community, and included several former presidents of the national
board of the International Association of Financial Planners. The company had previously
been recruiting Financial Management Group, Ltd.,., and offering an attractive equity
interest. Randy Grespin agreed to reimburse $600 to CATERBONE for the expense and use
of his aircraft.
40. CATERBONE had the following agenda for the trip and meeting:
Visit and discuss the joint venture and merger with Financial Management
Group, Ltd., and evaluate the various departments necessary to administer
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,'s., stock transactions and private real
estate offerings.
Discuss and evaluate the opportunities of utilizing insurance products from
Randy Grespin's firm, and all matters related to the structuring of business.
Familiarize Greg Burie, a personal friend and recruitment of CATERBONE ’s
who was also visiting from Florida to consider opening a Florida office for
Financial Management Group, Ltd..
Conduct an extensive and thorough due diligence investigation of the stability,
efficiency, and security of the operations, in order to prevent a similar
situation that facilitated the previous termination of the recent Hibbard Brown
& Company deal. CATERBONE left the meetings with very optimistic and
impressive findings, that only left more questions as to the decision of
Kauffman and Bartlett to affiliate with Hibbard Brown & Company, knowing
that the Atlanta group had been aggressively pursuing talks of a merger since
the inception of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,., On the return flight home,
CATERBONE confided to Randy Grespin, requesting legal advise, regarding the
recent problems and his allegations of misconduct by Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,., President Robert Kauffman. Randy Grespin advised CATERBONE
to take some time and seek legal counsel. On June 18, 2007, after arriving at
the corporate offices of Upon entering the offices of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., Robert Kauffman pulls CATERBONE into his office and abruptly
shouts "Who is running this corporation, me or you?". CATERBONE quickly
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
10 of
11
10
63110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
answers "I don't give a damn who runs this company. as long as it's run right,
and for the right reasons!" CATERBONE immediately left the office.
41. On June 18, 1987, later in the evening, Robert Kauffman, President visits the home of
CATERBONE and engaged in a contractual dispute when CATERBONE refused to agree to
approve the new contract and salary increase of Robert Kauffman, President,. Robert
Kauffman, President, engaged in retaliatory and activities, including fraud, Count IV -
extortion, libel, defamation of character, obstruction of justice, and conspiracy.
42. June 22, 1987, CATERBONE hires Todd Dellinqer, a planner in Financial Management
Group, Ltd.,., to help administrate the daily activities of his personal clientele and to
perform administrative duties necessary due to the amount of time CATERBONE is
conducting business out at the office, allowing CATERBONE to focus attention on the
Strategic Planning, and allowing him to better manage his time. CATERBONE sends a
memo to client and shareholder Dr. William Umiker that introduces his new assistant, in
addition to information regarding his pension accounts.
43. FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd, Board of Directors meet to vote on
CATERBONE's request and demand to ratify the recent joint venture agreement/contract
with Hibbard Brown & Company, after CATERBONE learned of dire inefficiencies within
Hibbard Brown & company, and the "Born Again" relationships of Kauffman, that placed an
unprecedented amount of risk to FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT GROUP, Ltd.,. CATERBONE
voted by telephone from the Chicago Airport, in the midst of his travel to Palm Springs and
Hollywood California. The Board also voted to negotiate and approve a deal with the
Planners Securities Group, of Atlanta, GA. CATERBONE had won the votes of Alan Loss and
Robert Long, overturning the decision of Robert Kauffman, President, and Michael Bartlett
and officially terminating the agreement. This vote, in and above itself, took control of the
Board of Directors from Kauffman and Bartlett, and put the power of the Board in the
direction of CATERBONE. This will eventually lead to the Coup conspired by Kauffman and
Hartlett to find a way to get CATERBONE out of the corporation.
44. On January 20, 1987, CATERBONE and Al Dannatt, a principal and managing partner
with the commercial mortgage banking company Institutional Investors of Houston,
Texas, consummate a joint venture agreement where CATERBONE will market and solicit
clients on the eastern part of the regional for commercial mortgages with a lending
authority of $3 to $100 million dollars. The agreement also calls for CATERBONE to
develop other joint venture proposals and business transactions with a bank the
Institutional Investors was in the process of purchasing. CATERBONE in turn would began
to offer the joint venture to members of Financial Management Group, Ltd., to offer finder
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
11 of
12
11
64110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
fees to both Financial Management Group, Ltd., and any members of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., which referred clients and projects.
45. CATERBONE alleges that the following revenue sources:
46. CATERBONE has the following violations Count IV - extortion, defamation of character,
slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful interference with
contracts, trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy, embezzlement,
breech of contract
47. On June 25, 1987, Financial Group Executives burglarized CATERBONE ’s office and
began to extort CATERBONE business interests in the Institutional Investors joint
partnership. Up to that point in time, CATERBONE had developed a pipeline in excess of
$100 million in projects, a firm commitment for a satellite office in Hollywood, California,
and a commitment for a $5 million second mortgage on the Olde Hickory Properties, of
Lancaster, County. CATERBONE was able to offer more attractive financing arrangements
than that of the local commercial lending institutions, including Fulton Bank and
Commonwealth Bank. Both banks would eventually engage in anti-trust violations.
48. On June 29, 1987, CATERBONE visits with Dave Schaad, President of the York based
real estate firm of Bennett Williams, Inc., CATERBONE was finalizing plans to secure
financing of a $2.5 million office complex for the new headquarters of Bennett Williams, as
well as 3 or 4 additional anchor tenants. CATERBONE had been working with Dave Schaad
for the past 3 months, along with Scott Robertson. CATERBONE had previously discussed
the deal with Dave Cook, and executive and former owner of the Turkey Hill Convenience
Stores. Dave Cook indicated a serious interest in providing the entire $2.5 million
investment. The above deal would have provided over $150,000 of fees upon settlement
to CATERBONE upon settlement. Prior to the meeting, Dave Schaad had indicated by
telephone, that Robert Kauffman had invited himself to the meeting, without prior consent
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
12 of
13
12
65110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
or notice to CATERBONE , During the meeting, CATERBONE disclosed the current criminal
activities within the principals of Financial Management Group, Ltd., being facilitated by
Robert Kauffman himself.
49. June of 1987, Jill Carson, a Fulton Bank Branch Manager libeled and slandered
CATERBONE in notifying Mr. Chuck Smith, owner operator of Lancaster Aviation,
CATERBONE was bankrupt and had no liquid funds, which was totally fabricated. At the
time of this infringement and at least until August 8, 1987, CATERBONE ’s credit rating as
reported by the Lancaster Credit Bureau was perfect, with all creditors “paid in full within
30 days, as agreed”. The credit report included 22 creditors. Being that CATERBONE was
a customer, borrower, and a client in good standing with Fulton Bank, this amounts to
defamation of character, slander, wrongful interference with business relations, wrongful
interference with contracts, trespass to person, unfair competition, fraud, conspiracy,
embezzlement, breech of contract.
50. On July 1, 1987, CATERBONE retained the counsel of Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., of
Lancaster, to arrange for a meeting to discuss the recent events and Coup attempt by
Kauffman and Hartlett that included several criminal and security violations. CATERBONE
visits with Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. and describes the incidents in detail, including the
"Digital Movie", ISC, and all related activities. Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. instructs
CATERBONE to have all of the files copied and arranges for the return of all Financial
Management Group, Ltd., corporate files. CATERBONE had questioned Mr. Joseph F. Roda,
Esq. for a legal opinion as to his right of any moneys in Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
checking accounts that he was authorized to sign for. Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. advised
that CATERBONE had no right to any funds. All checks were returned to Financial
Management Group, Ltd., along with all other documents.
51. CATERBONE advises Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq. that he is in fear that someone is
deliberately orchestrating all of the recent incidents, which were quite extraordinary and
extremely criminal and have been coming from all directions. CATERBONE advised Mr.
Joseph F. Roda, Esq. that he would like to take all of his files to Stone Harbor, New Jersey
for safekeeping while he pursued his legal recourse. CATERBONE also explained that he
would feel safer leaving Lancaster until these circumstances were brought under control.
52. Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., failed to provide any advocacy representation; colluded with
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; failed to inform CATERBONE of any conflicts of
interests with current clients (Mr. William Clark, in house legal counsel for International
Signal & Control, Plc.,); was negligent in not reviewing the hundreds of documents
CATERBONE delivered and for not identifying causes of actions, which United States
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
13 of
14
13
66110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
District Judge Mary McLaughlin identified from similar documents in June of 2006; was
negligent in not believing CATERBONE detailed account of the Commonwealth National
Bank (Mellon Bank) wrongful repossession, may have conspired to cover-up CATERBONE ’s
Federal False Claims Act against International Signal & Control, Plc,.
Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed fraud in invoicing CATERBONE for services rendered,
without any actual benefit afforded to CATERBONE .
The Defendants conspired to discredit CATERBONE with a massive campaign of libel,
slander and deceit when immediately following the meeting with International
Signal & Control, Plc., meeting of June 23, 1987 the following contracts were
terminated without cause:
Planners Securities Group, Ltd., NASD Series 22 Securities License
Planners Securities Registered Representative Agreements
William O. Umiker Executor of Estate
Michael T. Caterbone Power of Attorney
53. On July 2, 1987, CATERBONE negotiates with Romar Aviation to provide pilot; storage;
and insurance with his aircraft after many very questionable occurrences at Lancaster
Aviation, just a few hundred feet away. CATERBONE secures insurance and pays $1,000
to Romar Aviation for the flight to Stone Harbor and insurance, which was conducted by
Victor M. of Romar Aviation. In addition, at the referral of Victor, CATERBONE calls Sam
Goode, of Sam Goode Assoc., to bind insurance for the aircraft. Sam Goode Binds the
insurance and instruct CATERBONE to mail a payment of $750. The conversation took
place in Romar Aviation, at the time the $1,000 was paid to Victor. CATERBONE loads his
aircraft with all of his personal and business files to be transported to the Cape May
County Airport, just a few miles outside of Stone Harbor, in the morning of July 4.
54. On July 3, 1987, at approximately 12:00 am, Victor Miasnikowcs, owner operator of
Romar Aviation (Currently Venture Jets, Inc.) calls CATERBONE to notify him that his
aircraft was reposed some hour earlier, and locked in the hanger of Lancaster Aviation,
with all of his personal and business files on board. Victor only would say that
Commonwealth Bank had taken part in the repossession, with no reasons given. The first
payment of the loan agreement with Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) was not
due until July 25, 1987 and the $25,000 cash deposit for the airplane was now officially
extorted from CATERBONE . There was no money due to Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank). CATERBONE also becomes quite suspicious, after learning a few weeks
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
14 of
15
14
67110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
earlier that his efforts to provide a refinance of some $6 million to Boyd Wilson Properties,
was more favorable than the existing or proposed financing arrangements now place with
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank), which not only has a lender relationship with
CATERBONE , but is also a competitor for his mortgage banking activities. It was also
known that CATERBONE 's lending authority was larger and more competitive than most of
the local banking community. CATERBONE now becomes in fear for his life due to
this incident, and all other unexplained incidents in the preceding days and weeks.
55. Commonwealth Bank engaged in an illegal repossession, conversion, replevin,
trespass, fraud, breach of fiduciary duty, and/or breach of contract arising out of the
alleged repossession, Count IV - extortion, lender liability, interference with business
contracts and relations, civil conspiracy, fraud, and violated anti-trust and lender liability
laws.
56. On July 4, 1987 at approximately 9:00 am in the morning, CATERBONE calls his
attorney Mr. Joseph F. Roda, Esq., under emotional duress from the previous conversation
with Victor and the repossession of his aircraft with all documents on board; Mr. Joseph F.
Roda, Esq. responds "Stan, you have to quit fabricating these allegations, it is July 4th,
what do you want me to do. This conversation reaffirms a conspiracy theory within
Lancaster to ruin him, and supports his efforts to leave Lancaster with his files to solicit
aid and support from legal and law enforcement authorities to suppress the conspiracy.
CATERBONE realizes that the documents were authentic proof and evidence of all of his
allegations, and most importantly all of his business activities for the past 5 or more
years. The loss of the files would have devastating consequences for his life.
57. Mr. Joseph F. Roda committed fraud in invoicing CATERBONE for services rendered,
without any actual benefit afforded to CATERBONE .
58. On July 4, 1987, at approximately 9:30 am, after the disturbing phone, CATERBONE
drives to the Cape May County Airport to solicit the services of a pilot to fly to Lancaster to
retrieve his files. Brad Donahue accepts the job, and agrees to a $200 tee, and an
additional $200 it there are any difficulties in obtaining the files. CATERBONE provides
Brad Donahue with all documentation showing legal title to the aircraft in the event
authorities are notified. CATERBONE gives explicit instructions to notify the police in the
event personnel will not return all of the files. Brad Donahue arrives a few hours later,
with boxes of files. Brad Donahue briefly describes an encounter at Lancaster Aviation,
and demands payment of $400 as agreed. An invoice is signed by all parties as proof of
payment and the activity, and $400 in cash is paid to Brad Donahue. Pilot Dave Austin, of
the Cape May County Airport witnesses the transactions and the event.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
15 of
16
15
68110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
59. In the following weeks, Dave Austin, would later disclose to CATERBONE that Brad
Donahue was killed in a mysterious "Air-Accident", while over water, with an unexplained
and questionable flight chart.
60. CATERBONE solicits the legal services of Ric Fox, a Harrisburg attorney that has
prepared legal documents for the "Digital" Movie. Rio Fox flies his aircraft to the Cape May
County Airport, and arrives at CATERBONE 's house accompanied with another attorney
Robert Chercicoff. All of the recent activities were detailed and described concerning
Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; the "Digital Movie"; and the illegal repossession of the
aircraft. CATERBONE questioned Mr. Fox and his associate of any relationship with
Commonwealth Bank, which headquarters were also in Harrisburg, and both gave a very
ambiguous answer. The meeting ended with both attorneys failing to recognize or admit to
any wrongdoing by any and all related parties, and further demanding a $2,000 retainer
fee to look further into the matters. CATERBONE suspects the conspiracy theory again,
especially in light of the acknowledged relationship with Commonwealth Bank, and an
indirect relationship with Robert Kauffman, through Life Underwriters of Harrisburg, a
joint venture arranged by CATERBONE some months earlier. By July 5, CATERBONE had
already made two legitimate attempts to solicit legal aid for the unexplained events and
circumstances, both of which were maliciously sabotaged.
61. Ric Fox and Robert Chercicoff engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with
business contracts, interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and
cover-up CATERBONE ’S Federal False Claims Act complaint.
62. On July 6, 1987, In an effort to document the conspiracy theory, CATERBONE requests
Tom Caterbone to call Robert Kauffman, President, to inquire about the status of his
affairs, and to tape the conversation. Tom Caterbone identifies himself as John Green, a
client of CATERBONE's and Robert Kauffman, President, states the following: "CATERBONE
has moved his office to Stone Harbor, NJ.. he is not taking care of business, and I need to
see to it that his clients are taken care of for the time being.. he has been spending a lot of
money, an airplane, a place at the shore, and he seems to think that he is too important
for his traditional clientele.. There is some history of mental disorders in his family
history.. I can't come right out and say that that is what's going on,.... I wish Stan would
get some professional help.. However for the time being, Stan is not taking care of
business, and I need to be concerned for his clients.”
63. On July 6, 1987, CATERBONE telephones Dr. Al Schulz, psychiatrist at St. Joseph
Hospital, and client of CATERBONE's in order to thwart the allegations of insanity. Dr. Al
Shulz had disclosed that several persons, including Mary Lynn Dipaolo and Jere Sullivan
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
16 of
17
16
69110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
had called him concerning CATERBONE's behavior and activities.
64. From the allegations, Dr. Shulz advised that CATERBONE was suffering from illusions of
grandeur, and prescribed Lithium treatment, and to return to Lancaster for consultation.
CATERBONE insisted that the allegations were purely fabricated, and that no one had any
legal right to interfere with his business and or legal affairs, let alone his confidential
medical records.
65. On July 6, 1987, CATERBONE contacts David Drubner, of Boston, Ma, a friend of
CATERBONE's brother’s Mike, and an attorney. During the conversation, David Drubner
questions CATERBONE about "taking some medication", and supports the allegations of
insanity.
66. On July 17, 1987 CATERBONE travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with
Ted Gamillion and Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted
Gamillion had previously solicited the consulting of CATERBONE in order to help reorganize
the financing of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina had gone
sour. CATERBONE had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted Gamillion
agreed to allow CATERBONE to represent the studio in order to secure the required
financing. Ted Gamillion provided CATERBONE with substantial amounts of confidential
financial, legal, and tax documents for the project.
67. During the visit, Marcia Silen had disclosed to CATERBONE that Scott Robertson had
made allegations of insanity about him (CATERBONE) to persons at Power Station Studios
and and Flatbush Films.
68. In the following days, CATERBONE had made numerous telephone calls to local, state,
and federal authorities, for intervention and help regarding all of the preceding events and
circumstances. The following is a brief description of each: Manheim Township Police
Department, responded "what bank branch repossessed your aircraft"; Pennsylvania State
Senator Gib Armstrong, responded, "I will call the Pa Attorney General's Office and have
them call you; the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the Philadelphia-based field
office; U.S. Representative Robert Walker (R-Pa), a detailed and explicit conversation with
Mrs. Robert Walker, who would only advise CATERBONE to put his situation in writing and
submit it to the Congressman in his Washington, D. C. office. In addition: David Wouls
(Executive Vice President of the Lancaster chamber of Commerce & Industry), CATERBONE
talked at length, and in detail, making allegations of misconduct with members of the
same; National Association of securities Dealers (NASD), in Washington, D.C., CATERBONE
discussed the securities related violations. And also: the Securities & Exchange
Commission (SEC), also in Washington, D.C., and discussed securities laws violations; the
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
17 of
18
17
70110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Pennsylvania Securities Commission, of Harrisburg, Pa, discussed the implications of
CATERBONE's illegal lock-out, and his legal and formal positions, including incorporating
officer of Financial Management Group, Ltd., CATERBONE received no support or follow-up
communications concerning all of the above requests, despite his apparent emotional
duress, and extreme situation.
69. In July and August of 1987 Mr. Robert Kauffman, President, had several meetings with
Millard Johnson, client of CATERBONE since 1982, in efforts to coerce Millard Johnson to
provide false statements to a bonding company that a legitimate loan from Millard Johnson
to CATERBONE was instead an act of embezzlement of $25,000 of funds that were
transferred to CATERBONE for an investment. Mr. Millard Johnson testified in person on
September 29, 1987 before Mr. Howard Eisler of the Pennsylvania Securities Commission
in a recorded interview and attested to the preceding. Mr. Millard Johnson refused and
notified Mr. Robert Kauffman that his attempt was a serious crime.
70. Mr. Kauffman and Mr. Michael Hartlett, a principal and partner of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., contracted with an insurance company on June 29, 1987 an
errors and omissions insurance policy for corporate officers of Financial Management
Group, Ltd., in an effort to collude, conspire, and defraud that insurance company of a
claim, while at the same time committing slander, libel, and conspiracy to extort
CATERBONE ’s stock holdings, and all other business interests.
71. On July 24, 1987, Michael M. Hartlett sends a letter to all creditors of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., informing them that stated the following: “CATERBONE is no
longer an officer of the corporation; he was removed from office on July 1, 1987; he had
been purchasing items under Financial Management Group, Ltd., and obtaining corporate
discount and rates; and formally notifying them that CATERBONE had never had the right
to purchase items through Financial Management Group, Ltd., or make corporate
commitments on behalf of Financial Management Group, Ltd., or contract or in any way
obligate Financial Management Group, Ltd.,.”
72. Mr. Michael M. Hartlett engaged in slander, libel, defamation of character, conspiracy
to commit fraud, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference with business
relations, and interference with business contracts.
73. On July 7th, 1987, CATERBONE contacts the law firm of Capello & Foley, of Santa
Barbara, California. CATERBONE had conducted research (American Bar Association
Journal) in "Lender Liability", which had became a very popular legal issue, where banks
participate in illegal activities resulting in the financial ruin of it's borrowers. CATERBONE
intended to file suit against Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) for the illegal and
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
18 of
19
18
71110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
unjustified repossession of his aircraft. CATERBONE discussed the case briefly with Diane
Campell that day, and CATERBONE made arrangements to deliver supporting documents
to the office in Santa Barbara the following week, while visiting with Gamillion Studios, in
Hollywood.
74. On July 8, 1987, A formal notification of the termination of CATERBONE 's Registered
Representative Securities license with the Planners Securities Group Inc., of Atlanta, GA is
received, with a "cc: Robert Kauffman".
75. Planners Securities Group, Inc., engaged in conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion,
conspiracy, fraud, libel, defamation of character, slander, Count IV - extortion,
interference with business relations, interference with business contracts, and had
violated several anti-trust violations.
76. No explanation was provided, or any reasons for the termination. CATERBONE ’s
reprisal for disclosing criminal activities to the proper authorities is that he will illegally
loose his privilege to sell securities without any merit.
77. On July 8, 1987, CATERBONE 's brothers, Steve, Phil, Mike, and Tom, arrive
unexpectedly and uninvited at the residence of CATERBONE 's in Stone Harbor, NJ, and
refuse to leave until CATERBONE agrees to take Lithium and return to Lancaster to
undergo treatment by Dr. Al Schulz, for mental illness.
78. Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, and Tom Caterbone had engaged in
conspiracy, libel, slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV -
extortion, interference with business relations, interference with business contracts,
invasion of privacy, and civil trespass.
79. On July 9th, 1987, CATERBONE receives a notice by regular 1st class mail from
Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) regarding the repossession of 9 days prior.
The following reasons are given for the repossession: Failure to provide adequate
insurance; Removal of aircraft from Lancaster Aviation; Intended plan to fly aircraft to
Florida without prior written notice.
80. Commonwealth National Bank (Mellon Bank) engaged in violations of lender liability by
not providing advanced notice of the repossession with any opportunity for CATERBONE to
cure any legitimate deficiencies in the lending agreements.
81. On July 10, 1987, CATERBONE receives a formal notarized notification from Dr. and
Mrs. William Umiker of Financial Management Group, Ltd., removing CATERBONE as the
former Trustee for their Estates.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
19 of
20
19
72110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
82. On July 10, 1987, Mr. Robert Kauffman also sends a personal letter to all of
CATERBONE ’s clients informing each and every one “ that he has moved to Stone Harbor,
NJ; that he may not handle investments at all; and that people close to CATERBONE had
requested that he, Robert Kauffman, personally service his clientele.
83. Robert Kauffman engaged in Count IV - extortion, fraud, libel, slander, defamation of
character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference with business relations,
interference with business contracts, invasion of privacy, and civil trespass, and violated
several anti-trust statutes.
84. On July 15, 1987 CATERBONE travels to Boston, Massachusetts to research lender
liability and other legal matters in a law library of Suffolk Community College.
85. On July 16, 1987, CATERBONE travels to New York, from Boston, MA, to visit with Bob
Walters of Power Station Studios, to discuss the allegations of Blackmail, and to find out
who is involved, including Scott Robertson and Power Station Studios.
86. On July 17, 1987, CATERBONE travels to Hollywood, California to meet and visit with
Ted Gamillion and Gamillion Studios (Film Studio), and Marcia Silen of Flatbush Films. Ted
Gamillion had previously solicited the consulting of CATERBONE in order to help
reorganize the financing of the film studio, after earlier arrangements in North Carolina
had gone sour. CATERBONE had spent several days visiting and touring the studio. Ted
Gamillion agreed to allow CATERBONE to represent the studio in order to secure the
required financing. Ted Gamillion provided CATERBONE with substantial amounts of
confidential financial, legal, and tax documents for the project. During the visit, Marcia
Silen had disclosed to CATERBONE that Scott Robertson had made allegations of insanity
about him (CATERBONE ) to persons at Power Station Studios and at Flatbush Films.
87. CATERBONE discusses the illegal repossession and other related matters, however
during the conversation, becomes suspicious when Bob Walters and Tony Bongiovi
disclose that the "Digital" Movie project is suddenly suspended until a later time.
88. On July 21, 1987, At 2:30 pm CATERBONE visits the law firm of Capello & Foley, in
Santa Barbara, California, and delivers 3 large blue binders for Diane Cambell and attorney
Barry Capello to review, concerning his allegations of dire violations of lender liability with
specific regards to the illegal repossession of his aircraft by Commonwealth National Bank
(Mellon Bank). CATERBONE research the law firm of Capello & Foley at the Suffolk law
library and learned that it was the leading law firm in the nation leading the way in
violations of lender liability litigation.
89. The law firm of Capello & Foley and CATERBONE had numerous communications,
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
20 of
21
20
73110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
although there was never any commitment for representation by Capello & Foley, it is
alleged that the law firm engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business
contracts, interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up
CATERBONE ’S Federal False Claims Act complaint by not acting in good faith with the
solicitation of CATERBONE .
90. On July 24, 1987 CATERBONE conducts a three (3) hour meeting at his residence in
Stone Harbor, NJ, with attorney Lew Schweller regarding legal action concerning all events
and activities of the prior days and months. CATERBONE also gives Lew Schweller a
$500.00 retainers fee, for his representation.
91. Lew Schweller engaged in conspiracy, collusion, interference with business contracts,
interference with business relations, and had attempted to thwart and cover-up
CATERBONE ’S Federal False Claims Act complaint.
92. On July 24, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda invoices CATERBONE $527.00 for the time and
services of July 1 & 2, 1987.
93. On July 30, 1987, CATERBONE had paid $600 to Dr. Levine, a Psychiatrist from North
field, New Jersey, for an objective evaluation of his mental state of mind, in order to prove
the fabricated allegations of 'insanity". Dr. Levine had conducted a 2-hour meeting in his
residence in Stone Harbor, NJ, and required CATERBONE to complete the Minneapolis
Multiphase Personality Inventory (MMPI). CATERBONE completed the test, and
immediately returned it to Dr. Levine. After several weeks without any communications
from Dr. Levine, CATERBONE had called for the results. Dr. Levine had explained that he
had conducted telephone interviews with members of CATERBONE 's family, without notice
or consent, in addition to the original request of CATERBONE to conduct an objective and
confidential examination. In addition, Dr. Levine prescribed Lithium drug therapy, and
disclosed a diagnosis of Bi-Polar Mood Disorder.
94. Dr. Levine engaged in Count IV - extortion, conspiracy to commit fraud, defamation of
character, slander, libel, and obstruction of justice.
95. On August 6, 1987, the law firm of Appel, Yost & Sorentino, of Lancaster, Pa., sends a
formal notice to CATERBONE , demanding the return of a facsimile machine leased from
the ACM Company of Lancaster, Pa. Attorney Appel advises CATERBONE that it is the
property of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and should be returned at once or legal
action will follow.
96. Appel Yost & Sorentino and Attorney Appel engaged in fraud, collusion, libel, slander,
defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, interference with
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
21 of
22
21
74110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
business relations, interference with business contracts.
97. On August 7, 2007 CATERBONE receives a Credit Report from the Credit Bureau of
Lancaster County as requested. The credit report up to the date of August 1, 1987 verifies
and confirms that his credit report was excellent, without any blemishes. The history of
all accounts was "paid within 30 days, or as agreed".
98. On August 8, 1987, John M. Wolf, Executive Vice President of Commonwealth National
Bank (Mellon Bank) sends CATERBONE a formal letter advising that the repossession of
July 2, 1987 was both lawful and appropriate, and declines to accept a settlement of $5
million for lender liability violations.
99. On August 10, 1987, CATERBONE receives a facsimile from the Board of Directors of
Financial Management Group, Ltd., signed by Robert Long as “The FMG Board of Directors”
threatening to file criminal charges for "embezzlement (we have checks to prove it),
burglary, employee theft, corporate opportunity and slander against our firm".
100. Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in obstruction of justice, in unfair
competition, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass,
forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress,
slander, defamation of character, wrongful interference with business relations, and
violated several bylaws of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
101. On August 12, 1987, Yolanda Caterbone, mother of CATERBONE , Steve, Phil, Mike,
and Tom Caterbone, all brothers, arrive unexpectedly and uninvited to the residence of
CATERBONE in Stone Harbor. After several requests for the visitors to leave the premises
are denied, several brothers refuse to let CATERBONE leave the premises. CATERBONE
flees, and the brothers chase after him. CATERBONE runs into a neighbors house to ask to
use the telephone to phone the police. However, after realizing that he is scaring the
occupants, he flees to the Stone Harbor Police Department, a few blocks away, in an effort
to obtain a restraining order and to lawfully have the unwanted persons vacate his
residence and personal property. Officer Steve Conners and Officer Henry Stanford refuse
the request, and hold CATERBONE in custody. After some 30 minutes, the officers,
accompanied by Steve and Tom Caterbone, place CATERBONE into a Police Cruiser and
proceed to the Burdette Tomlin Hospital, in Stone Harbor. Upon arriving, CATERBONE is
interrogated and questioned extensively about a "gun". A hospital staffer then accuses
CATERBONE of an attempted suicide and keep him in custody for 4 or more hours. An
extensive mental health evaluation is performed by another hospital staffer. CATERBONE
is given an ultimatum of signing a contract in order to be released form the hospital, the
contract stated: "I Stanley J. Caterbone will not take my life tonight or at anytime".
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
22 of
23
22
75110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
102. Yolanda Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom Caterbone
engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice, wrongful interference
with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy,
embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of character,
wrongful interference with business relations; and engaged in psychiatric abuse.
103. The Stone Harbor Police, James Warner (Current Executive Director of the Lancaster
County Solid Waste Management Authority) and Burdette Tomlin Hospital engaged in
obstruction of justice, wrongful interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal
trespass, forgery, undo influence, conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental
duress, slander, defamation of character, wrongful interference with business relations
and engaged in psychiatric abuse.
104. On August 13, 1987, CATERBONE At approximately 9:30 am, CATERBONE returns to
the Burdette Tomlin Hospital to obtain a formal copy of the incident the preceding night.
After some arguments1 hospital officials provide explicit records of the event, including
the following summary: "Stan was brought to the ER (emergency room) by two
brothers and police. Police received a phone call from Jim Warner, (872-9081, friend
staying at the Conestoga residence of CATERBONE ), who told them he believed ‘Stan
planned to take a gun, go to the beach & kill himself’. Client denied any such statement,
thoughts or plans. He has legal and difficult times, financial deals which have fallen
through; license to do financial planning (his business) revoked; repossessed material
goods (airplane); being blackmailed; and several major financial deals (in which he had
invested personal funds) fall through-but NO PROBLEMS! Denied any Depression”.
105. On August 14, 1987, the same family members again arrive unwanted at the
residence of CATERBONE in Stone Harbor, NJ. After another confrontation, similar to the
incident of two evenings before, CATERBONE fleas to the Avalon Police Department for
another attempt to get a restraining order. However, en route, just a few blocks from the
Avalon Police Station, an Avalon Police cruiser pulls CATERBONE over and arrests him for
the following violations: A) Driving Beyond the speed limit. B) Driving an
unregistered vehicle (all required registration materials were in Lancaster, PA) C)
Containing an empty beer can in his vehicle (which was at .1 east three days old)
106. In addition, the Avalon Police Department repossessed his car and locked it in the
Avalon Police Department compound, which was his only means of transportation and
communication by car phone.
107. Again, Yolanda Caterbone, Steve Caterbone, Phil Caterbone, Mike Caterbone, Tom
Caterbone engaged in invasion of privacy, civil trespass, obstruction of justice, wrongful
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
23 of
24
23
76110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
interference with contracts, trespass to person, criminal trespass, forgery, undo influence,
conspiracy, embezzlement, Count IV - extortion, mental duress, slander, defamation of
character, wrongful interference with business relations; and engaged in psychiatric
abuse.
108. The Avalon Police Department engaged in false arrest, false imprisonment, false
statements, civil conspiracy, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process
claims arising out of the charges and arrest; and (2) civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. §
1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions during court scheduled hearings
in 1987.
109. On August 24, 1987, Robert Kauffman sends a letter to Millard Johnson, CATERBONE
's client, regarding his previous intentions of paying the $25,000 demand note of
CATERBONE to Millard Johnson. Robert Kauffman had previously promised to pay the
debt to Millard Johnson during a meeting. Robert Kauffman, told Millard Johnson to
contact the Financial Management Group, Ltd., attorney, Craig Russell in order to file legal
claim, and formally disclosed that he would: “ no longer handle any discussions concerning
Stanley J. Caterbone”. In the last paragraph, Robert Kauffman discloses "attorney Mr.
Patterson, no longer represents CATERBONE family regarding his pending bankruptcy or
guardianship". CATERBONE never gave any legal jurisdiction or rights to any family
member, has never filed for bankruptcy, was not bankrupt, or even knew of an attorney
named Mr. Patterson.
110. Robert Kauffman and Craig Russell engage in conspiracy to commit fraud, libel,
slander, defamation of character, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, and false
statements.
111. On September 1, 1987, in an attempt to resolve issues, CATERBONE calls Financial
Management Group, Ltd., board member P. Alan Loss and requests a meeting with Robert.
long and Scott Robertson to explain allegations of misconduct of Robert Kauffman and
Michael Hartlett and the illegal lockout of CATERBONE . P. Alan Loss agrees and a meeting
is set for September 4, 1987 at 10:00 am in the aide Hickory Inn, a mile away from
Financial Management Group, Ltd., CATERBONE requests that the meeting be in the
strictest of confidence.
112. On September 3, 1987, Attorney Joseph Roda sends CATERBONE a letter requesting
payment of $525.48 in outstanding legal tees for the meetings of July 1 & 2 and copying
charges.
113. CATERBONE calls Victor of Romar Aviation (no charge) to schedule a charter flight
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
24 of
25
24
77110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
from Cape May County Airport to the Lancaster Airport for September 3rd at approximately
2:00 pm, the day before the meeting with Financial Management Group, Ltd., executives.
114. On September 3, 1987, Robert Kauffman calls detective Larry Sigler of the Manheim
Township Police Department to report an alleged Terroristic threat made two days prior,
on September 1, 1987, by CATERBONE between the hours of 9:00 and 1 pm noontime.
Detective Larry Sigler issues a warrant for the arrest of CATERBONE with District Justice
Murray Horton that was issued at about the same time as the arrival of CATERBONE at
Romar Aviation.
115. On September 3, 1987, Larry Sigler and the Manheim Township Police Department
engage in false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious prosecution and/or malicious abuse
of process claims arising out of the charges and arrest in September 1987; and (2) civil
rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of the Department's actions or inactions
in July and September 1987, and January 1991.
116. On September 3, 1987, At approximately 3:00 pm Mary Lynn Dipaolo picks
CATERBONE up at Romar Aviation for a scheduled visit and dinner. After CATERBONE
becomes annoyed at Mary Lynn Dipaolo's unjustified allegations, CATERBONE borrows her
car to go home to his residence in Conestoga and to go play basketball.
117. On September 3, 1987, at approximately 7:00 pm, upon leaving the playground, he is
approached by Nancy Arment, Financial Management Group, Ltd., secretary, who is
elaborated and crying, asking "why are you doing this?".
118. Nancy Arment of Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in harassment and
conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion.
119. On September 3, 1987, At approximately 9:00 pm, in an attempt to recover additional
stolen personal and business tiles, CATERBONE proceeds to the offices of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., where he is greeted by employee Stacy Waters and allowed to
enter the building. CATERBONE insists that Stacy Walters accompany him throughout the
building as he recovers files in the offices of Robert Kauffman, Michael Bartlett, and Robert
Long. In addition retrieving a Back-Up (Financial Management Group, Ltd., records and
communications) copy of the computer system which he integrated. Upon leaving,
CATERBONE temporarily disconnect the systems which he had integrated and developed
for Financial Management Group, Ltd., which fall under intellectual property rights. Stacy
Walters assists CATERBONE in loading the tiles in his automobile, and CATERBONE kisses
Stacy Walters goodbye, and awaits for her safe return to the building until leaving.
120. Stacy Walters engaged in criminal trespass, conspiracy to commit Count IV -
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
25 of
26
25
78110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
extortion, undo influence, mental duress, slander, defamation of character, and wrongful
interference with business relations.
121. On September 4, 1987, after midnight, upon entering his residence, CATERBONE is
taken into custody by the Conestoga Police, and requests that the files that he had taken
out of the offices of Financial Management Group, Ltd., be taken along to prove his rights
to the property, and his position within the company. CATERBONE was then taken to the
jurisdiction of Manheim Township Police, at Where the New Danville Pike meets South
Prince Street, where he is arrested and taken into custody.
122. On September 4, 1987, at approximately 2:00 am, CATERBONE is arraigned before
District Justice Richard R. Reeser for the following charges: Terroristic threats; burglary;
unlawful restraint; unlawful use of computers; theft by unlawful taking; robbery; and
criminal mischief.
123. Bail is set at $20,000 and CATERBONE is placed in the Lancaster County Prison. He
was not permitted to post real estate for bail.
124. The Manheim Township Police Department, Detective Larry Mathias and the Lancaster
County Prison engage in (1) assault, battery, false imprisonment, false arrest, malicious
prosecution and/or malicious abuse of process claims arising out of the charges and arrest
in September 1987; and (2) civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, arising out of the
Department's actions or inactions in July and September 1987, and January 1991.
125. September 5, 1987 - The Lancaster New Era and the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal
report the alleged crimes, reporting that CATERBONE is an ax-employee; that Financial
Management Group, Ltd., sustained $60,000 because of his actions; and that he
threatened 2 female employees.
126. The Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., engaged in libel, slander, defamation of character,
conspiracy to commit fraud, conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, conspiracy to
commit obstruction of justice.
126a. The entire arrests and reports fail to acknowledge that CATERBONE is an individual
lessee of the property, and in accordance with law, still holds all of his offices of PING,
Ltd., and is the founder of the company. The above incident further facilitates the ongoing
conspiracy, and publicly discredits CATERBONE in every way, financially, professionally,
and most importantly conveniently supports the continued allegations of insanity.
127. On September 6, 1987, all attempts to post bail are denied. Robert Beyer appears for
visitation at the Lancaster county prison, completely unexpectedly and unsolicited. Robert
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
26 of
27
26
79110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Beyer offers his services and representation with regards to only defending the criminal
charges.
128. On September 9, 1987, CATERBONE is given an ultimatum by the Lancaster county
prison authorities, Robert Bayer, Yolanda Caterbone, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo of posting the
required bail only if CATERBONE voluntarily admits himself into the Psychiatric Unit of St.
Joseph Hospital, or remains in the Lancaster County prison.
129. CATERBONE is released from Lancaster County prison, and immediately escorted to
St. Joseph Hospital and admitted into the Psychiatric Unit.
130. On September 9, 1987, Yolanda Caterbone, Robert Beyer, and Mary Lynn Dipaolo
engage in conspiracy to commit fraud, false statements, and conspiracy to commit Count
IV - extortion, obstruction of justice, and false imprisonment.
131. On September 15, 1987, CATERBONE questions the legality of the ultimatum for
posting bail, and upon learning that it is unlawful, arranges for his discharge - Upon his
discharge, the St. Joseph Hospital administrators learn that Financial Management Group,
Ltd., had terminated his health insurance, and demand payment of $3, 064.60 for the six
days of hospitalization. CATERBONE is not able to pay, and leaves the hospital and returns
to his residence of Conestoga, PA.
132. St. Joseph Hospital engaged in collusion to commit fraud, Count IV - extortion, libel,
slander, and defamation of character, false imprisonment, obstruction of justice, and false
statements.
133. On September 15, 1987, CATERBONE receives an invoice from St. Joseph Hospital for
$3,064.00.
134. On September 16, 1987, CATERBONE receives a call from Howard Eisler, an
Investigator for the Pennsylvania Securities Commission who requests a meeting with
CATERBONE . A meeting is scheduled for September 29, and CATERBONE arranges for
Robert Beyer and Millard Johnson to attend.
135. On September 21, 1987, ISC and the British Ferranti firm agree in principal to merge,
creating what appeared to be a $1.5 billion defense/electronics conglomerate, after six
months of negotiations.
136. On September 22, 1987,CATERBONE and James Warner settle on the real estate deal,
of 433 w. Marion Street, which CATERBONE had sold to James Warner, at a distressed
price, which still yielded a profit. The profits of the transaction were paid directly to
Millard Johnson, with CATERBONE getting none of the proceeds. Millard Johnson’s funds
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
27 of
28
27
80110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
were extorted by Commonwealth National Bank and Lancaster Aviation.
137. The parties engaged in Count IV - extortion of funds, collusion to commit fraud, and
civil conspiracy.
138. On September 25, 1987, Art Kerst visits CATERBONE at his residence and accuses
him and his cousin of being connected with the Mafia, and conspiring together, in order to
provide the financing of the $50 million shopping center in Florida, that was originally
owned by the Fisher/Sponougle Group, and diverting the profits of the deal away from him
(Art Kerst) and the Fisher Sponougle Group.
139. CATERBONE becomes infuriated, not only at the absurd allegation, but the timing,
when in fact CATERBONE had bean fighting for his life for the past 4 months, and to even
consider such activities would be insane.
140. On September 29, 1987, Howard Eisler conducts a meeting at the Residence of
CATERBONE , with all parties consenting to have the meeting recorded by CATERBONE .
141. Howard Eisler was not able to provide a believable explanation of what he was
investigating or why he had contacted CATERBONE . CATERBONE explains all of the
circumstances regarding his prior meeting with ISC/Chem Con executive Larry Resch, and
details his allegations of wrongdoing of James Guerin/ISC/Chem Con6 and the discussions
of that meeting on June 23, 1987, with ISC executive Larry Resch. CATERBONE also
discloses his ISC stock holdings, and his relationships with ISC and Chem Con associates.
142. Howard Eisler, the Pennsylvania Securities Commission, and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania engaged in a cover-up, obstruction of justice, public corruption, collusion
and conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion.
143. Millard Johnson testifies to Howard Eisler during the meeting regarding a previous
meeting in August with Robert Kauffman, where Robert Kauffman tried to persuade Millard
Johnson to fabricate a story that a legitimate personal loan of $25,000 to CATERBONE in
June of 1987, was instead intended for investment and embezzled by CATERBONE . Robert
Kauffman wanted Millard Johnson to support this story to authorities. CATERBONE spent
more than 4 hours explaining and detailing all of his allegations and business activities
including how he founded and built Financial Management Group, Ltd.,; his mortgage
banking activities; the illegal repossession of his aircraft; all of the fabricated arrests; and
the chronology of events after the June 23 meeting with ISC executive Larry Resch.
Howard Eisler ended the meeting and requested copies of documents from CATERBONE .
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
28 of
29
28
81110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
144. On September 1987, Scott Robertson, begins work with American Helix founder,
David Dering, to secure financing for the venture and manufacturing facility to
manufacture CD Audio & CD-ROM Compact Discs, an extension of the "Digital"
technologies activities of CATERBONE .
145. David Dering solicited Financial Management Group, Ltd., to provide help in securing
the necessary $5 million of capital required .for the venture. David Dering was referred to
Financial Management Group, Ltd., by Norris Boyd (Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
shareholder) and Bob Fogarty, who had previously been working with CATERBONE on
various financing arrangements. It was CATERBONE that elected to allow both Scott
Robertson and Rob Long to participate in the venture capital markets. Scott Robertson
would later conduct negotiations with High Industries, Inc., to provide the entire $5
million financial package. Scott Robertson also was named executive Vice President of
American Helix Technology Corporation, and would resign from Financial Management
Group, Ltd., in order pursue the venture on a full time basis.
146. David Deering, Scott Robertson, and Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in
collusion and conspiracy to commit Count IV - extortion, and violated several anti-trust
violations.
147. James Boyer, formerly the lead recording engineer for Billy Joel, was also recruited to
form the principals of American Helix, consisting of Dave Dering, Scott Robertson, and
James Boyer In mid December of 1990, David Dering will confirm the above formation of
American Helix to CATERBONE , after CATERBONE alleges violations at the 1934 Sherman
Antitrust Act, concerning his activities in the digital technologies industries, and the undo
influence by Scott Robertson, Robert Long, and High Industries, as well as criminal
conspiracy, of all parties concerned in the destruction of his business affairs that began in
June at 1987.
148. On October 2, 1987, District Justice Murray Horton conducts a preliminary hearing for
all criminal charges against CATERBONE . Attorney Robert Beyer refuses to discuss any
issues regarding his individual lease of the Financial Management Group, Ltd., offices, or
any issues resulting in the illegal activities of anyone other than CATERBONE District
Justice Murray Horton orders CATERBONE to defend all of the criminal charges in the next
term of criminal court in Lancaster County. CATERBONE ordered to be bound over for the
next term of criminal court of Lancaster County and remain free on bail.
District Justice Murray Horton engaged in obstruction of justice, collusion and conspiracy
to commit Count IV - extortion, public corruption, and violated several anti-trust violations
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
29 of
30
29
82110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
149. On October 4, 1987, CATERBONE meets with high school classmate and attorney
Mike McDonald at CATERBONE 's residence, to discuss legal action and recourse against all
involved. Mike McDonald accepts the case, and CATERBONE provides all of the relevant
information and documentation.
150. Mike McDonald will engage in negligence, and collusion to commit Count IV -
extortion.
151. On October 12, 1987, CATERBONE travels to New York city to the offices of Intercon
Special Services (white collar crime detective agency) in order to attempt to obtain
assistance in all of the circumstances. Intercon Special Services, which is staffed with ax
FBI agents, estimates that the services would cost at least $25,000.
152. On October 16, 1987, CATERBONE survives a near death collision on the New Danville
Pike, when a driver ran through a stop sign at the intersection of Long Lane, while
traveling at a speed of 45 mph. The driver hit CATERBONE 's Jeep Cherokee directly in the
passenger’s door, sending CATERBONE in a free tall, spinning a full 180 degrees and
landing upside down in a field, facing the opposite direction. CATERBONE was trapped in
the car, while a passerby attempted to brake the windshield to get him out. CATERBONE 's
car was completely demolished, and he sustained a whiplash. CATERBONE was now
without any means of transportation, in addition to all of his other mitigating
circumstances.
153. On October 18, 1987, The Unemployment Compensation Review Board formally and
officially decides against a claim for benefits by CATERBONE and cites misconduct and
wrongdoing as the reasons; states that CATERBONE managed the day to day operations,
and used the false arrests as the reason to deny benefits.
154. The Pennsylvania Unemployment Office of the Department of Public Welfare
committed fraud, and were negligence in providing benefits.
155. On October 27, 1987, Lancaster Aviation files a civil suit with District Justice Murray
Horton for alleged unpaid bills of some $5,000.
156. In late October or early November, CATERBONE was driving in the Southern end of
the County, in Conestoga, when he noticed a vehicle following closely. It was about 9:00
pm in the evening, and the roads were deserted in this rural area. CATERBONE began
turning, not going in any particular direction. The ensuing vehicle kept following, and
CATERBONE quickly found himself in a high-speed car chase, that lasted at least 30
minutes. Finally, CATERBONE arrived near Millersville, and was able to loose the vehicle.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
30 of
31
30
83110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
157. On November 9, 1987, CATERBONE visits with Parent Federal Savings and Loan's
president, John Depatto, to discuss him problems in meeting his current mortgage
payments. John Depatto immediately disclosed to CATERBONE that foreclosure
proceedings have officially begun, and that the full loan of approximately $110,000 is
immediately due. CATERBONE stands up from the conference table and declares, "You tell
Mr. James Guerin he is in trouble", and abruptly walks out of the offices.
158. John Depatto engaged in collusion to commit Count IV - extortion, and conspiracy to
commit fraud.
159. On November 11, 1987, CATERBONE meets with representatives of Tabor Community
Services, of Lancaster, Pa, in order to formally apply for assistance to the Pennsylvania
Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Fund, in order to subsidize his monthly mortgage
payments, in an effort to avoid becoming homeless. CATERBONE supplies Tabor
community services with financial data and supportive documents relating to his
circumstances, which must be found to be out of the applicants control in order for
financial assistance.
160. On November 18, 1987, ISC-Ferranti settlement takes place with Guerin becoming
the deputy chairman of Ferranti and exchanges his is million shares of ISC stock for over
32.2 million shares of Ferranti stock.
161. On November 19, 1987, CATERBONE contacts attorney Jeff Jamounou of McNeese,
Wallice, and Nurick, who CATERBONE retained as legal counsel for the security law, and
demanded a legal opinion as to the offices that CATERBONE formerly held, including his
Financial Management Group, Ltd., Board of Directors seat. Jeff Jamounou disclosed that
he no longer represented Financial Management Group, Ltd., in that capacity, and that
Craig Russell was the attorney now handling issues such as that.
162. On November 23, 1987, A Referees Decision by the unemployment Compensation
Review Board upholds a recent decision to deny CATERBONE from collecting any benefits,
again citing misconduct and wrongdoing. CATERBONE calls Howard Eisler, of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission and demands an explanation for not returning to
obtain any documents as promised in the meeting of September 29th. The phone call was
recorded.
163. On November 25, 1987, CATERBONE receives a letter from the Pennsylvania
Securities Commission, Howard Eisler, citing a misunderstanding and lack of
communication, and now requests that CATERBONE submit a written complaint of all
allegations discussed in the meeting of September 29, 1987.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
31 of
32
31
84110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
164. On November 30, 1987, CATERBONE fears that the conspiracy now involves local and
state authorities, and delivers 9,079 documents to the Good Sheppard Industrial Services,
of Allentown, PA to be transferred to microfiche in order to preserve the authenticity of
the documents.
165. CATERBONE feared that an attempt would be made to destroy all incriminating
evidence, and given the number of documents, and the lack of money, their safekeeping
was becoming at great risk.
166. For security reasons, and to remain anonymous, CATERBONE uses the Global
Entertainment Group, Ltd., company for the transaction with the Good Sheppard Industrial
Services company.
167. On November 26, 1987 , CATERBONE visits the Pennsylvania State Police barracks in
Lancaster, to file a formal complaint to the White Collar Crime Division. CATERBONE was
treated as if he was making the entire story up, and received no help.
168. On December 1, 1987, In continuing the efforts of the intervention of authorities,
CATERBONE visits the PA State Capitol building and personally delivers documents to the
offices of: Pennsylvania Governor Casey; the Pennsylvania Securities Commission; and
Financial Management Group, Ltd., attorney Jeffrey Jamounou of McNeese, Wallice, &
Nurick, all of Harrisburg, PA. During the same day, at a press conference being held by
Mark Singleton, CATERBONE approaches State Senator Sib Armstrong and Sen. Armstrong
refused to talk and literally ran away in the middle of the State Capitol.
169. On December 4, 1987, Financial Management Group, Ltd., holds its first annual
shareholders meeting, for the year ended June 30, 1987, at the Treadway Resort Inn
(Eden Resort Inn owned by Drew Anthon). In an effort to promote propaganda against
CATERBONE , and to support the fabricated allegations of insanity, Financial Management
Group, Ltd., president hired armed security personnel to guard the doorways of the
meeting, insinuating that the meeting was under a threat of violence, and to collaborate
his recent allegations of Terroristic threats, which CATERBONE was previously arrested
and awaiting trial.
170. Financial Management Group, Ltd., engaged in libel, slander, and defamation of
character.
171. On December 17, 1987, The United States Postal Inspector acknowledges receipt of
formal complaint from CATERBONE regarding executives from Financial Management
Group, Ltd., illegally changing or address; opening of confidential personal and business
mail; and withholding and possibly destroying confidential personal and business mail at
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
32 of
33
32
85110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CATERBONE 's leased property of 1755 Oregon Pike, Lancaster, PA, also the headquarters
of Financial Management Group, Ltd.,.
172. On January 15, 1988, CATERBONE drives to San Diego, California, and meets with
attorney Sandra Gray, and International Signal & Control, Plc., uses his dire illegalities and
to find access to due process of the law. In an effort to avoid the political consequences
of obtaining legal counsel, CATERBONE thought that it would be easier to find adequate
and effective counsel from out of state. In addition, CATERBONE needed some time away
from his persecutors.
173. On January 26, 1988, the Pennsylvania Homeowners Emergency Mortgage Assistance
Program formally and officially denies CATERBONE of benefits citing the following: "
Applicant was terminated from job Financial Management Group, Ltd.,), therefore was not
suffering from circumstances beyond his control".
174. On March 14, 1988, CATERBONE is served notice by Lancaster Constables regarding
Parent Federal Guerin' Bank) v. CATERBONE Mortgage Foreclosure of his residence at
2323 New Danville Pike, Conestoga, PA. Tom Caterbone is preparing for his real estate
license and is working for Realtor John DeSantis and helps in the SHORT-SALE of the
Property. All EQUITY is EXTORTED AND THE BUYER IS KEITH KIRCHNER OF Lancaster
Newspapers, who's wife is a Charles, Sister-In-Law to Bob Gramola and Sister to 1975
LCHS Grad Karen Charles, both former friends of Stan J. Caterbone.
175. On May 1988, CATERBONE is forced to sell his residence, and subdues to the undo
influence that he was responsible for all circumstances, and moves to Florida with his
brother Mike.
176. On October 23, 1988 CATERBONE , destitute, without a personal residence,
automobile, or any income, and with accumulated debts of more than $65,000 from all
related incidents in the 1987 "Blackmail", sells his Financial Management Group, Ltd.,
holdings to Robert Kauffman and is given $72,000 in proceeds at settlement. This by and
of itself will be proven to be Count IV - extortion. Robert Kauffman was in fear of
CATERBONE exercising his large voting rights in the upcoming Financial Management
Group, Ltd., annual shareholders meeting, which included the election off Financial
Management Group, Ltd., Board of Directors. CATERBONE had approximately 19% of the
outstanding shares of Financial Management Group, Ltd., and had the potential to vote
someone of his selection to a Board seat. Scott Robertson had solicited the deal for both
parties, and acted as negotiator for both.
177. On November 23, 1988 CATERBONE completes a management-consulting proposal
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
33 of
34
33
86110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
for Scott Robertson, Tony Bongiovi, and American Helix for Power Station Studios of New
York. Scott Robertson had solicited CATERBONE to New York to review the current
management and to author a proposal to help Tony Bongiovi manage the recording studio
and all special projects. CATERBONE spent time in New York and interviewed the Power
Station management team and personnel. The Digital Movie, “Mutant Mania” project had
already been terminated in 1987.
178. On March 13, 1989, Scott Robertson, cofounder and executive vice president of
American Helix Technology Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of High Industries,
Inc., of Lancaster, Pa, recruits CATERBONE for marketing help. CATERBONE accepts a
weekly consulting contract, with no long-term commitment, in light of his efforts with
Radio Science Laboratories, Inc., Scott Robertson wanted CATERBONE to help develop the
new and emerging CD-ROM business, which was essentially "Digital" technologies.
American Helix was one of 10 domestic manufacturing facilities located in the continental
U.S., for the production of CD-Audio International Signal & Control, Plc., (CD's or Compact
International Signal & Control, Plc.,), and one of only a few CD-ROM manufacturers.
179. On April 17, 1989, CATERBONE incorporates Radio Science Laboratories, Inc., to
further his interest in microwave technologies, and the telecommunications industry. The
company is a venture with James & Lynn Cross, both capable design engineers with over
30 years experience. The company was trying to secure financing for the development of a
manufacturing enterprise for Low Noise Amplifiers, or LNA's as they are commonly
referred.
180. On July 8, 1989, William A. Clark, Guerin's former top INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL &
CONTROL, PLC., attorney, sues Guerin for $2 million, the balance Clark claims is owed him
in a $2.75 million settlement (over an employment dispute) accepted by Guerin in March.
Joe Roda is legal counsel for William Clark. Joe Roda was the first attorney that
CATERBONE had gone to for help, who told CATERBONE to “quit fabricating things”.
181. On July 19, 1989, CATERBONE , Scott Robertson, and American Helix agree on a one
year employment contract, which American Helix will never fulfill in its entirety, and will
be terminated in the following April.
182. On October 10, 1989, British Labor unions urge Ferranti to drop all INTERNATIONAL
SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., related companies, claiming job loss in Scotland alone could
exceed 8,000 workers.
183. On October 16, 1989 , A 1987 report commissioned by Sebastian de Ferranti surfaces
showing that the company bearing his family's name was cautioned not to merge with
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
34 of
35
34
87110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., by Lazard Brothers. Ferranti chairman, Sir
Derek, Alun Jones comes under tire by stockholders who demand his resignation during
the company's annual meeting in London.
184. On October 24, 1989 , Scotland Yard joins the U.S. in the Guerin probe. Federal
agents will travel to London in January to coordinate the investigation.
185. On November 1989, Ferranti begins firing INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL,
PLC., executives still within the company.
186. On December 1, 1989, Ferranti sues Guerin and three former INTERNATIONAL
SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., executives, including Larry Resch, for $198 million each,
claiming all of INTERNATIONAL SIGNAL & CONTROL, PLC., worth was a sham built on
bogus contracts.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
35 of
36
35
88110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1990
187. On April 1990, The American Helix Board of Directors, lead by S. Dale High/High
Industries, vote to terminate Scott Robertson of American Helix, continue the financing of
the CD-ROM business which CATERBONE was directly managing. The joint venture
agreement with Network Technologies, or Washington, D.C., had lost an estimated
$450,000 in the past 9 months, and the technologies, which were to be delivered, had
proven to be worthless. Scott Robertson had solicited, negotiated, and administer the
deal, CATERBONE had raised serious concerns at to the capabilities of the technologies,
the business, and Network Technologies, early in the project. High Industries then
conducted several meetings with CATERBONE to purchase the business, however,
CATERBONE had told the executive in a meeting on Good Friday, that he was solely
responsible for any business that was left, and any there was no real value. High
Industries agreed to pay CATERBONE his weekly consulting tee only until June 30, in
hopes of negotiating an agreement to keep American Helix in the CD-ROM business, which
was only feasible with CATERBONE , because of his knowledge and expertise in "Digital"
technologies.
188. On May 5, 1990, CATERBONE is awarded his first government contract for CD-ROM
technologies with the National Institute of Standards and Technologies (NIST), of
Gaithersburg, Maryland. NIST is the technology arm of the federal government, similar to
the National Institute of Health (NIH), of Bethesda, Maryland. Because of the
technological complexities of the project surrounding the UNIX system environment,
Phillips DuPont (PSO) was the only other competitor in the U.S.. Computer Scientist, John
Garofolo, will coordinate the project, which is responsible for the research and
development of speech recognition systems for the Defense Advanced Research Projects
Agency Information Science and Technology Office (DARPA-ISTO) The Automated Speech
Recognition Group, will supervise the project for MIST. The group will develop CD-ROM'S
containing speech corpora for the scientific I community, including: Massachusetts
institute of Technology (MIT); Texas instruments (TI); SRI International; and other
academic institutions.
189. On May 21, 1990 CATERBONE and American Helix Technology Corporation,
represented by David D. Dering, sign an agreement authorizing CATERBONE and Advanced
Media Group to continue all CD-ROM activities and to market the services to the markets-
at-large.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
36 of
37
36
89110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
190. On October 1, 1990 CATERBONE and American Helix Technology Corporation,
represented by David D. Dering, sign another agreement authorizing CATERBONE and
Advanced Media Group to continue all CD-ROM activities with an agreement for payments
from all activities. CATERBONE was afforded office space, secretarial, office supplies,
marketing materials, and the continuation of all support personnel of American Helix
without expense to CATERBONE . CATERBONE was entitled to represent all CD-ROM
services to the markets-at-large. CATERBONE was to be paid on all replication,
premastering, and mastering charges to the clients. All other services were billed directly
by CATERBONE . The contract and agreement will continue until the negotiation of
another agreement is reached and agreed upon. Both David D. Dering and CATERBONE
have signed and executed the agreement. The agreement was dated and signed on
November 2, 1990. All previous invoices and work by CATERBONE was grandfathered into
this agreement.
191. On October 11, 1990, Department of Justice claims proceeds from the sale of his
Naples home after paying the $600,000 outlined in his guilty plea agreement to the Justice
Department. Ferranti has asked the court to assist in collecting over $189 million from
Guerin, an amount awarded the firm by a British court when it said Guerin failed to
convince the court he had nothing to do with the 31 billion fraud. CATERBONE begins to
organize. all relevant documents, stored in some 30 boxes, regarding all circumstances
involving the "1987" blackmail and criminal conspiracy, in hopes of finally resolving all
outstanding issues, by taking action tar legal recourse. In response from the effects of
Post Traumatic Stress Syndrome, CATERBONE had rescinded efforts for due process
immediately after loosing his home and businesses. In similar matter of being
“brainwashed”, CATERBONE was fearful of pursuing due process of the law in fear of
continuing reprisals, intimidation, and retaliation. However, upon the public disclosure of
the Federal courts indictments into illegal ISC activities, CATERBONE began to review his
case, and find distinct and substantiated activities associated directly to his disclosure of
fraud within ISC.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
37 of
38
37
90110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1991
192. On January 9, 1991 Lt. Madenspacher of the Manhiem Township Police Department
call CATERBONE at his lab/office in him home at approximately 2:00 pm. Lt.
Madenspacher explains that he had received a copy of the letter to the Department of
Defense, that Detective Larry Mathias had forwarded to him. Lt. Madenspacher questioned
his motives of the letter and stated: "What are you going to do.. We (Manhiem Township
Police Department) just don't want to see a multi-million do00000000023llar law suit
come down our way.." CATERBONE responded, "You know that I was an individual
leassee of that property, and in addition I had never resigned any offices or my Board of
Director's seat of Financial Management Group, Ltd., .. You also know that I had met with
Larry Resch of ISC on June 2S, 1987, and that I made allegations of misconduct.." Lt.
Madenspacher responded, "We were forced into that (the arrests of CATERBONE on
Sept. , 1987), we were caught between a rock and a hard place, we were forced into
that". Lt. Madenspacher then changed the subject to "Digital" technologies, and described
the activities of the police department of using the same in the telephone surveillance of
criminal suspects. Lt. Madenspacher then requested to meet with CATERBONE .
CATERBONE agreed, however due to his current busy schedule, confirmed he would
contact him later to schedule a meeting.
193. On January 10, 1991 CATERBONE sends a letter to Lt. Madenspacher of the Manheim
Township Police Department, to schedule a meeting for Thursday, Jan. 17th at 3:00 pm, at
his office at American Helix Technology Corporation, at the Green field Corporate Park.
CATERBONE requested a response only if the time was in conflict of his schedule.
194. ON January 17, 1991 Lt. Madenspacher fails to show up for the scheduled meeting
with CATERBONE at Amen can Helix, and never contacted him before that date to change
the meeting, or called to apologize for not being able to keep the prior commitment.
195. On January 18, 1991 CATERBONE sends documents concerning the Blackmail" of
1987 to several reporters of the Lancaster Newspapers,: Tim MeKeele; Earnest Schriber;
and Thomas Planner. Tim MeKeele also received a tape with some excerpts of the
September 29, 1987 meeting with the PA Securities Commission, where CATERBONE
discusses allegations of misconduct against J. Guerin and ISC.
196. On January 19, 1991 CATERBONE , Al Thornburg, with Dave Dering. On Saturday
morning, CATERBONE went to the American Helix facility to pick up some computer
hardware. Upon attempting to unlock the side door entrance with his 24-hour access
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
38 of
39
38
91110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
security card, the door would not unlock. Assuming something may have been wrong with
the security system, CATERBONE drove to the residence of Al Thornburg (former SONY
DADC engineer from Terre Huette, Indiana), the engineer for American Helix. CATERBONE
asked Al to drive over to see if his access card was operable. CATERBONE and Al
Thornburg entered the building with Al Thornburg's access card and found that his access
card was inoperable throughout the building. Al then said, "Stan, your locked out".
CATERBONE said, "I was in here until 5: 00pm last evening and my access card worked
fine. CATERBONE proceeded to pick up the tape back-up and said "Let's go. I don't want
to be arrested for burglary, like I was 3 years ago. I don't know what the Hell is going
on".
197. As CATERBONE and Al Thornburg left the computer room, Dave Dering appeared. This
was quite unusual, since Al Thornburg and CATERBONE often work on Saturdays, and
Dave Dering had not been in the plant on a Saturday for the past few months. CATERBONE
said to Dave "Dave, why am I locked out?" He said "talk to Jim Boyer". CATERBONE ,
quite emphatically said, "why am I locked out?". "Stan, you'll have to talk to Jim".
CATERBONE said, "Dave, you are the president, my contract is with you, not Jim Boyer".
Dave said "Now, Stan, just calm down. This isn't a conspiracy against CATERBONE ."
CATERBONE told Al “I'm getting out of here. CATERBONE and Al Thornburg left the
building, and Al was especially suspicious of the events and especially why suddenly Dave
Dering showed up at the building on that particular Saturday, only moments after we
arrived at the building.
198. On January 21, 1991 CATERBONE Faxed a letter to David D. Dering, afraid of the
"LOCKOUT" and the lack of any events or activities that would explain such a drastic and
damaging action of American Helix citing Dave Dering in breach of CATERBONE ’S
business agreement and in conspiracy to eliminate or sabotage CATERBONE ’S business
and reputation. The fax also contained a cc: to High executives, that was never sent.
199. On January 22, 1991 CATERBONE and Dave Dering Dave Dering had a telephone
conversation; "Stan, how did you get in here last night?". Stan "Dave, what are you talking
about?, I won't go near that building, the last time I went back into my own building after
being illegally locked out, I ended up in jail". Dave Dering " How did you get in here and
steal your fax?". CATERBONE replied, “Dave, why would I want to steal the fax that I
wrote?" Dave Dering "You have caused a big problem. You put me in a difficult position —
I don't know if I can rectify things with the 'High's' and especially Allon Lefevre. I always
went to bat for you — how do I trust you?" A meeting was set up for 6:00 pm later that
day.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
39 of
40
39
92110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
200. January 22, 1991 CATERBONE met with Dave Dering and he gave three (3) reasons
for the "LOCKOUT", although never willing to engage in any real conversations relating to
those issues:
201. The computer system went down, causing a problem in the security system.
202. Jim Boyer did not reinstall CATERBONE ’S access identification number for the
security system.
203. Jim Boyer was to talk to CATERBONE on Friday, the day before the Lockout,
concerning eliminating your access to the facility.
204. Dave Dering said "Jim Boyer said that he can take over the CD-ROM business — no
problem". Dave Dering talked about trust and who to trust. Dave Dering reluctantly
agreed to continue the business relationship and adhere to the agreements, however' only
on an arms length basis. CATERBONE was no longer allowed in the building except during
normal business hours. CATERBONE was no longer to have a private office.
205. Dave Dering never addressed the issues or the circumstances that preceded the
"LOCKOUT", and never addressed the reasons as to why there was any reason to modify
the agreement concerning my business American Helix that was established back in June
of 1990. There were no disputes, activities, or conversations that gave any indication
that American Helix, Dave Dering, or Jim Boyer intended to change or modify our
relationship.
206. On January 24, 1991: CATERBONE met with Allon Lefevre (Executive Vice President
of High Industries responsible for overseeing all subsidiaries). CATERBONE called a
meeting Allon Lefevre to discuss the following:
207. The R.R. Donnelly merger and acquisition of American Helix.
208. The "LOCKOUT".
209. Allon Lefevre asked questions regarding CATERBONE ’S contact with R.R. Donnelly
and Barry Click (President of R.R. Donnelly GeoSystems, former MAPQUEST). CATERBONE
quickly made it clear that Barry Click contacted CATERBONE in December after seeing
CATERBONE ’S advertisement in the CD-ROM Enduser magazine, published by Linda
Helgerson. Barry Glick was elated to see someone in the local area that was involved with
CD-ROM technologies and asked to visit with CATERBONE . Allon asked many questions
about Donnelly and Barry Click. CATERBONE made it clear that during the visit, and from
the discussions regarding the strategic plan of Donnelly, CATERBONE suggested that
there might be an opportunity for a merger or acquisition with American Helix.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
40 of
41
40
93110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CATERBONE also discussed the capabilities for the facility to be a dedicated CD-ROM
manufacturing facility. CATERBONE notified Allon Lefevre that Barry Glick was awaiting a
call from CATERBONE the next day concerning the appropriate contact to discuss the
subject of an acquisition. Allon assured CATERBONE that the High's would not contact
Donnelly directly and would await a call from Barry Click.
210. Regarding the "LOCKOUT" CATERBONE gave the three reasons that Dave Dering had
provided during our meeting a few days before to Allon Lefevre. CATERBONE told Allon
that after "CATERBONE had built a strong foundation for the CD-ROM business —
everybody suddenly wants it back, six months ago, nobody wanted anything to do with it,
not to mention the capital that CATERBONE had invested in it".
211. Allon Lefevre was only concerned with why CATERBONE had sent the Fax. "Why did
you send the Fax? I just don't understand why you sent the Fax". Allon was not
concerned with or wanted to discuss the issue of why CATERBONE was "LOCKED OUT".
Allon asked CATERBONE the problems surrounding American Helix and what solutions
CATERBONE thought could help restore the company to stability. CATERBONE discussed
the lack of systems, the lack of a strong business foundation, and most Importantly the
lack of management. He asked CATERBONE about Dave Dering and CATERBONE
responded, "Dave Dering is an engineer, not a manager, he has no real management
skills". Allon then asked me how to approach the meeting with Donnelly. CATERBONE
suggested that they just sit and listen to their ideas. CATERBONE asked Allon to assure
me that this meeting would be kept confidential between the two of us. He said
"CATERBONE will have to tell Dave sooner or later, and that he was not gong to get in the
middle of the two of us".
212. February 15, 1991 CATERBONE met with Jim Tritch & Allon Lefevre. Allon Lefevre
had requested a meeting to be certain that CATERBONE was not representing the High's
or American Helix. CATERBONE had told Allon that CATERBONE was not concerned with
the merger issue, that the Advanced Media Group was continuing discussions with Barry
Click on various information technologies, which were strictly my business. CATERBONE
also informed him that Barry Click had told me "Stan, we are quite honestly more
interested in you rather than the facility or American Helix". CATERBONE also informed
Allon that Barry asked if CATERBONE would make a trip the Chicago, the corporate
headquarters to discuss the technologies and specifically the manufacturing technologies
of CD-ROM.
213. CATERBONE made it perfectly clear that the two (2) contacts for a merger or
acquisition that CATERBONE had provided to the High's were contacts that approached
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
41 of
42
41
94110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CATERBONE . CATERBONE also notified Lefevre and Tritch that Dave Dering had
requested CATERBONE to look for a joint venture partner as far back as November.
CATERBONE also made it perfectly clear that CATERBONE would not solicit any leads:
unless CATERBONE was to be compensated. Alien Lefevre suggested that it may help
CATERBONE to look for contacts, and CATERBONE quite emphatically restated my
contentions that CATERBONE would not do any work without compensation.
214. Jim Tritch acknowledged that CATERBONE was the only person responsible for the
development of the CD-ROM business, and the only person with any real technical
expertise in information technologies and CD-ROM, and that neither American Helix nor
High Industries had the capabilities to manufacture CD-ROMs without CATERBONE . Jim
Tritch also admitted that the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., would have to be a purchased
separately in the case of any merger or acquisition of American Helix. Jim Tritch also
stated that in his initial meeting with Donnelly that they like me and wanted to continue to
work toward a business relationship. Both Allon and Jim stated that they would like to
continue to work with me in the CD-ROM business.
215. On February 15, 1991 American Helix conducted a Staff Meeting. Through an
employee that was present during the meeting, CATERBONE had learned that Dave Dering
"spent 20 minutes "slimming", or slandering and defaming the character of CATERBONE ,
and called CATERBONE “a RUNAWAY EX-CONVICT THAT WOULD END UP IN JAIL SOON".
Dave Dering also told the group that CATERBONE had almost ruined the company, and
CATERBONE should not be trusted. CATERBONE was also informed the previous day that
David Dering was telling persons that the reason that CATERBONE was out of town in
December was because "CATERBONE was on the run from authorities".
216. CATERBONE was in Captiva, Florida, scanning documents and indexing the CD-ROM
“AMG Legal Prototype Disc” concerning the ISC “Cover-UP”.
217. On January 19, 1991 High Industries American Helix illegally and without notice
locks CATERBONE out of his office and the facility of American Helix, who was currently
under a joint venture agreement with CATERBONE and his Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
for his digital technologies business. This "Lock-Out" was similar to that of Financial
Management Group, Ltd., on July 1, 1987. Again conveniently when CATERBONE had
raised issues and allegations involving Guerin and ISC.
218. On January 21, 1991 In fear and confused about his involvement, and in respect
to the massive fraud of the ISC/Ferranti merger, CATERBONE sends a package to
Ferranti’s legal counsel in England by way of United Postal Service' Overnight
International Delivery Service (Tracking Number 1773 0619 670).CATERBONE was in fear
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
42 of
43
42
95110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
that a potential "Cover-Up" by U.S. authorities, and specifically the Lancaster community,
would place his life in danger, and wanted to insure that the information concerning his
knowledge of ISC misconduct before the lSC/Ferranti merger, and his disclosure to local,
state, and federal authorities in the summer of 1987, at least would be received by
Ferranti, reducing the possibility of someone terminating his life in order so that these
circumstances would not be used as an asset in the present Ferranti Legal efforts.
219. On Jan 22, 1991 In an effort to support his allegations of misconduct and the
allegedly threatening activities of CATERBONE , American Helix president Dave Dering has
all of the locks in the building changed by a professional locksmith, which is nothing more
than an act of propaganda. Later that day, CATERBONE and David Dering meet. David
Dering resolves to only allow CATERBONE in the building during normal business hours,
and does not allow him to occupy his own office. CATERBONE has never been given any
reason why he was locked out in the first place.
220. On February 1, 1991 ABC News 20/20 features the story "Weapons Sales to Iraq"
about the ISC/Cardoen cluster bomb technology and how it got to Saddam Husain.
221. On Feb 17, 1991 CATERBONE receives a letter from Sandra K. Paul, of the Citizens
Ambassador Program, a division of People to People International, notifying him that he
has been selected to participate in the upcoming Printing and Publishing Delegation to the
Soviet Union and Eastern Europe in the coming August. People to People International is a
nonprofit organization started by the late Dwight D. Eisenhower to facilitate the
communications of experts from various professions throughout the world. The objective
of the delegation was to exchange ideas, information, and technologies of the printing and
publishing industries with American counterparts in the Soviet Union, and various Eastern
European countries.
222. On February 22, 1991 Federal prosecutors seize $800,000 from Clark, claiming he
was privy to information about ongoing criminal acts within ISC that generated the tainted
cash.
223. On February 1991 In an American Helix staff meeting, with all employees present,
but CATERBONE , president David Dering had spent approximately 20 minutes alleging
that CATERBONE almost ruined his company, and that he "is a runaway ex-convict, that
will end up in jail very soon". Engineer Al Thornburg, immediately following the meeting,
disclosed the above discussion.
224. On May 23, 1991 At approximately 2:00 pm, Jay Curtis, (appearing as a Department
of Defense contractor, who had recently solicited the services of CATERBONE and his
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
43 of
44
43
96110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Advanced Media Group, Ltd., to provide engineering in the development of "Digital"
simulation and training applications for various U.S. Military Logistics bases) had called
CATERBONE . The following is synopsis of the conversation: "Because of your recent
discussions concerning your knowledge and information about the ISC Scandal, and an
alleged "Cover-Up", I had to do a background check on you, to insure against any
problems when including you in by proposal to the U.S. Department of Defense... Everyone
backs up your story, and is looking over your documents now, including the CIA, IRS, SEC,
FBI, Scotland Yard, Attorney General, the British M-4, and others. They are all verifying
and confirming your "cover-up" allegations.. They don't know what to tell the Press and
Media "I also know that you submitted documents to Mr. Thomas Flannery of the
Lancaster Intelligencer Journal". "How did you know about the CIA and its involvement
with ISC, how did you know that, and what do you know?" Jay Curtis kept pushing
CATERBONE on the CIA issue, and what he had known and how he knew, CATERBONE
kept telling him that the whole situation was to emotional, and that he was afraid for his
life. CATERBONE had to eventually tell Mr. Curtis that he could not discuss this anymore.
He abruptly changed the subject and hung up on Mr. Curtis. CATERBONE immediately
went to a friend’s house, and disclosed that fact that he was in fear for his life. He quietly
sat on the steps with his friend, Abby (2 years old). Later that night, his friend Dave
Pflumm would take him to the corner bar for a few drinks, while unknowing to
CATERBONE , Ted Koppel was disclosing the story of the CIA’s involvement with ISC.
Several hours later, Ted Koppel broke the story about the CIA and ISC's covert operations
to sell arms to Iraq.
225. Immediately following the conversation with Mr. Jay Curtis regarding the CIA and
ISC, CATERBONE packed a suitcase and confidential information assets, in preparation to
leave Lancaster, in total and legitimate fear for his life.
226. On May 23, 1991 ABC News/Nightline and Ted Koppel feature the first in a series of
stories, relating to CIA knowledge of a covert operation to supply munitions to south
Africa implemented by ISC and Carlos Cardoen. The story featured Lancaster and ISC. The
report ties Guerin to the National Security Agency project in the 1970’s. ABC News, the
Financial Times of London, and the Lancaster Intelligencer News investigated the report.
Tom Flannery of the Lancaster Intelligencer Journal appeared on the program and was
given credits on the show.
227. On May 24, 1991 The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal reports on the above story. At
approximately 1:30 pm, CATERBONE drives out of Lancaster, en route to a safe haven,
and stops at a convenience store and reads the early edition of the Lancaster New Era,
learning for the first time of ABC News/Nightline story about ISC and the CIA the evening
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
44 of
45
44
97110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
before, just hours after his conversation regarding the same to Jay Curtis.
228. On June 7, 1991 CATERBONE is again arrested by the Stone Harbor Police. After
passing several sobriety tests, and two Breathalyzer tests, CATERBONE is placed in a jail
cell, and refused to be released. Several hours later, CATERBONE is cited for outstanding
arrests warrants of Avalon, NJ, dated back to August 14, 1987, by an officer of the Avalon
Police department who suddenly appeared. Both arresting officers demanded $340.00 for
the posting of bail. CATERBONE requested that the required cash be retrieved from his
car, located just a few blocks away. The Avalon police officer responded by saying, "we
can't let you go to your car, you may have a gun in there". CATERBONE was immediately
escorted to the cape May county Prison, fingerprinted and processed.
229. ATTEMPTED MURDER: On June 8, 1991 CATERBONE calls Mike Orstein, Lt. of the
Stone Harbor police patrol, and requests that he retrieve the required cash from his car,
and post the required bail. At approximately 2:30 pm, CATERBONE is released on bail. On
June 11, 1991 CATERBONE left the Stone Harbor Marina at approximately 12:30 am en
route to Lancaster, Pa, to retrieve some files concerning the ISC cover-up. Upon driving
north on Route 47 (the normal route to Lancaster), approximately 10 miles outside the
Cape May county Courthouse, CATERBONE noticed a car following him closely.
Suspicious, CATERBONE decreased his speed from 55 mph to 35 mph, in order for the car
to pass him. However, the car remained directly behind, adjusting the speed accordingly.
In an effort to elude the car, without raising suspicion, CATERBONE gradually increased
his speed, while also increasing the distance between the cars, resulting in the loss of his
taillights to the ensuing vehicle - Because of the winding road, CATERBONE looked for an
abrupt turn-off, in hopes of dashing the eluding vehicle, by loosing sight of his taillights.
There was little or no traffic on the route during the early morning hours, and CATERBONE
stopped at an intersection, and noticed that the headlights of the ensuing vehicle were not
visible in his rear view mirror, meaning that his taillights were also not visible to the
ensuing vehicle. Immediately upon pulling from the intersection, CATERBONE noticed a
narrow dirt road that lead into a field of small trees, the perfect place to sit for the ensuing
auto to pass him, unnoticed. The ensuing vehicle pulled to the intersection, and continued
north on route 47, in the direction of Lancaster. CATERBONE sat in his vehicle a few
minutes, until continuing on his travel, north on Route 47. Approximately five (5) minutes
later, a car traveling in excess of SS mph, approached CATERBONE , traveling south on the
same road (2 lanes).As the two cars approached each other, and approximately 30 yards
from reaching each other, the approaching vehicle drove directly into the lane of
CATERBONE , with its high beams on, and continued straight for his vehicle, or what
appeared to be a head-on-collision. CATERBONE drove off of the berm of the road,
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
45 of
46
45
98110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
missing a line of trees by less than 12 inches (eluding a life threatening disaster), and
passed the vehicle that was still in the north bound lane, heading south. CATERBONE ,
shaking and sweating furiously, noticed the cars brake lights go on, and the car apparently
turned around, and began pursuing CATERBONE again. CATERBONE drove as fast as he
could to Route 55, hoping to find traffic in order to hide and loose the pursuing car.
CATERBONE arrived in Lancaster, at approximately 3:00 am, and again noticed a car
sitting in the parking lot of the vacant "Sportsman's Den", at the intersection of the New
Danville Pike and Prince Streets. Upon driving west on Hershey Avenue, CATERBONE
noticed the car following him. In an effort to identify the license plate, CATERBONE made
a few turns in the area of Hamilton Watch, and followed the car heading north on S. West
End Avenue. The car was a late model, gold or tan, Cougar or possibly a Buick Park
Avenue. CATERBONE watched the car increase his speed, and finally changed directions
and proceeded to his residence, and parked a few blocks away, and walked through the
woods, to his apartment in the Hershey Heritage complex. CATERBONE then used a
flashlight, in order not to reveal his presence, and returned to his vehicle, sometime in the
early morning, during daylight.
230. On June 10, 1991 two independent U.S. courts uphold a $189 million award by
Britian's High Court against ISC executives Shireman and Larry Reach for their role in the
fraud. Ferranti makes its first open statement against Guerin saying a similar decision is
expected to uphold the High Court's decision against him.
231. On June 19, 1991 - CATERBONE leaves Stone Harbor, in constant fear for his
life, and remains in seclusion, in various parts of the Eastern Seacoast, spanning from
Captiva Island, Florida, to Boston, MA, in order to prepare an official request for a
Congressional Investigation of all related matters.
232. On Jul 11, 1991 CATERBONE files an official request C300 pages) for a Congressional
Investigation into all of the ISC and preceding issues with U. S. Representative Robert
Walker CR-Pennsylvania), and Speaker of the House, U. S. Representative Thomas Foley.
Overnight Mail Service of the United States Post Office, outside of Baltimore, Maryland,
sent both requests.
233. On July 12, 1991 CATERBONE returns to his home, in Lancaster, PA, at approximately
1200 pm, after remaining in seclusion immediately following the phone conversation of
May 23, 1991 with Jay Curtis, regarding the CIA and ISC. ABC News/NightLine features
it's second story about Lancaster's ISC and Arms to South Africa and Iraq.
234. On July 18, 1991 U.S. Representative Robert Walker sends a letter to CATERBONE
relating to his request for a Congressional Investigation into all of his allegations of
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
46 of
47
46
99110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
misconduct and criminal wrongdoing regarding his alleged ISC/Fraud "cover-up". The
letter said : "Thank you for your recent letter and information on International Signal &
Control corporation. I appreciate your thinking of me; however, since this case is before
the courts, it is unethical for me to interfere with the judicial process. If you think I may
be of assistance with other matters, please feel free to contact me".
235. On July 25, 1991 Christian is released from prison after serving two years and a day
for his role in the Chem Con fraud and toxic waste dumping.
236. On August 1, 1991 CATERBONE receives a notice of a warrant for his arrest by the
Stone Harbor (NJ) Municipal Court, regarding summons #081370. CATERBONE called the
Court Clerk, Pam Davidson, to explain the circumstances. The Court Clerk refused to
identify herself, and did not have time to listen to his explanation. She then questioned
why he (CATERBONE ) wanted to write to the Judge to explain. CATERBONE writes a
formal letter to Judge Peter M. Tourison, of the Stone Harbor Municipal Court explaining
his allegations of misconduct, and the issues surrounding his recent arrest of June 7th,
and all of the arrests dating back to August of 1987. CATERBONE had described in detail
his assertions and evidence that the arrests were conveniently orchestrated while he was
seeking legal recourse for the alleged ISC "Cover-Up'. CATERBONE also explained his fear
for not returning to the Stone Harbor Municipality, in light of the fabricated arrests, and
other questionable incidents. CATERBONE requested another means of settling all
outstanding frivolous traffic violations, other than appearing in Stone Harbor Municipal
Court.
237. On August 8, 1991 Stone Harbor Municipal Court Judge, Peter M. Tourison, sends
CATERBONE an official letter acknowledging receipt of his previous letter and
explanations. Judge Tourison concluded his notice by demanding that CATERBONE appear
in Court, as scheduled, "to have this matter taken care of in the proper manner
238. On August 13, 1991 Ferranti announces it has recovered $650,000 hidden by Guerin
in a number of Swiss Hank accounts. Ferranti also announces a fiscal 1991 loss of $282
million. CATERBONE responds to Judge Tourison letter of August 8, and discloses the
recent attempt on his life, the past June, just outside or Stone Harbor, and states that
because of the apparent criminal conspiracy within the same municipality, CATERBONE
formally notifies the Judge that he refuses to return to Court, as requested.
239. On August 15, 1991 Guerin and Cardoen are shown to have been deeply involved in a
failed $100 million arms procurement plot linked to the infamous Iran-Contra scandal.
240. On August 16, 1991 CATERBONE receives a formal notice and demand from
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
47 of
100
48110
47 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
American Helix President David D. Dering, for the return or equipment, currently in the
possession of CATERBONE , and notice of the termination of the business agreement,
dated October 1, 1990 between Stan J. Caterbone and American Helix Technology
Corporation. CATERBONE receives a facsimile from Mike Hess (former ISC engineer who
frequented S. Africa and who solicited CATERBONE in late 1989 for work), and refuses to
sign a non-disclosure agreement with CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
as requested to continue a further relationship considering the recent activities from the
May 23rd phone call and the national media publicity regarding the ISC Scandal.
241. On August 19, 1991 CATERBONE sends a letter to attorney Timothy Lanza via the
Lancaster Bar Association, and asks for an explanation as to his misrepresenting to
CATERBONE for the past month that his order for Advanced Media Group, Ltd., stock
certificates were ordered, when in fact CATERBONE verified with authorized personnel of
the H. Burr Kein company that the order was never placed. Timothy Lanza had personally
disclosed to CATERBONE on several occasions that he was awaiting the delivery of the
certificate kit via UPS. CATERBONE responds to the previous letter of David D. Dering, and
his request for the return of American Helix equipment, currently in the possession of
CATERBONE . CATERBONE formally notifies David Dering that the equipment will be held
as collateral, according to statutes of the Pa. Uniform Commercial Credit code, that the
equipment will not he returned until the past due invoice {# 1018), of the Advanced Media
Group, Ltd., of July 12, 1991 for $4,914.00, which was due upon receipt according to their
business agreement, was paid in full.
242. On August 29, 1991 A federal judge dismisses Christian's $93 million suit against
Guerin, but Christian vows to re file the suit.
243. On September 13, 1991 ABC News/Nightline features another story about ISC, the
CIA, and Arms Deals, in preparation for the beginning of the-Confirmation Hearings of
George Bush's nomination or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Gates,
which begins just three days away, by the Senate Intelligence Committee.
244. On September 16, 1991 The first day of the Robert Gates' Confirmation Hearings
brings questioning by Senator Murkowski, of the Senate Intelligence Committee, about
knowledge of the ISC operations by Robert Gates. Gates, whose candor about Iran-Contra
resulted in his 1987 withdraw when nominated for the same slot by then President
Reagan. In a less-than sincere line of questioning, Robert Gates denies any knowledge of
ISC, Guerin, or Carlos Cardoen, including any operations to sell munitions to Iraq or south
Africa. In addition, he denies any knowledge of any CIA involvement in the same.
245. On September 19, 1991 CATERBONE visits the office of Senator Bill Bradley (D-New
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
48 of
101
49110
48 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Jersey), in the Hart Office Building, Washington, D.C., and delivers documents, tapes, and
a video, all relating to his allegations of an alleged "Cover-Up" regarding the ISC Scandal.
The materials were taken by assistant Jackie Widrow, who signed a receipt.
246. On September 21, 1991 CATERBONE delivers a contract for the consulting services
he has agreed to provide to J. Oman Landis, in order to insure against any wrongdoing,
and especially in light of Mr. Landis' assertion the previous Friday that "you (CATERBONE )
are taking a break (from business) to rest your mind". This assertion conveniently
supports the alibi of mental insanity, that has been made by numerous persons, including
Mr. Landis' friends, the High's, who wholly own American Helix Technology corporation.
Several hours after delivering the contract to Mr. Landis, and after beginning to work, as
outlined in the contract, Mr. Landis called CATERBONE into his office and said "there were
some developments over the weekend, why don't you continue on your normal duties of
driving (limousines), this has nothing to do with the contract that you asked me to sign".
247. On September 25, 1991 CATERBONE mails a cover letter and accompanying materials
to attorney Howard Corny, of New York city, as previously discussed, via UPS regular way
service.
248. On October 1, 1991 CATERBONE receives a facsimile from David Dering, President of
American Helix, formally charging CATERBONE with charges of 16,730.00. David Dering
also demands that the equipment be returned, and upon receipt, American Helix would
forgive $11,816.00 ($16,730 - $4914)(Caterbone's invoice) of unpaid charges to
CATERBONE and or the Advanced Media Group, Ltd.,
249. On October 1, 1991 CATERBONE sends by certified mail, a copy of a recent complaint
(filed Sep. 6, 1991) to the New Jersey Department of Motor Vehicles, and a demand for the
title to his boat, and again allegations of criminal wrongdoing by the Stone Harbor Marina,
for not delivering title, given the bill of sale was satisfied on June 10, 1991, and a fee for
the title was paid as well.
250. On October 1, 1990 CATERBONE personally meets with Ted Koppel, of ABC
News/Nightline, at the Washington National Airport, at approximately 5:30 pm.
CATERBONE questioned Ted Koppel if he knew a Mr. Jay Curtis, and why he was
questioned about the CIA's involvement with the ISC affairs, just hours before the
broadcast. Ted Koppel denied any knowledge of Mr. Jay Curtis, and stated that Thomas
Flannery was involved in the broadcast by the Financial Times of London. The letter of
August 28, 1987 to Diane sawyer was also mentioned. Ted Koppel requested the phone
number of CATERBONE , and said that he would contact him later, due to his present time
constraints, and asked, "what do you want, and what is the story line?" CATERBONE
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
49 of
102
50110
49 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
responded, "Justice and protection, someone is trying to cover me up, and someone
already made attempts on my life... someone keeps getting information from me, while
I'm left sitting in Lancaster like a sitting duck".
251. On October 2, 1991 CATERBONE responds by facsimile, to the Oct. 1,
correspondence, to David D. Dering. CATERBONE requested supportive documentation
regarding the suspicious charges of $16,730.00 as declared, in order to consider the
request for the return of the equipment. David C. Dering responds by facsimile, demanding
for CATERBONE to meet him at the Holiday Inn, in Lancaster on Friday, Oct 4th, with the
equipment in his possession, and states that he will deliver the required supportive
documentation of the charges as requested.
252. On October 2, 1991 CATERBONE responds by facsimile to Ted Koppel, as to his
question concerning the "story line".
253. On October 27, 1991 CATERBONE writes a letter to Sandra Woods, Associate
Managing Editor, of the Philadelphia Inquirer, regarding the recent feature story, "What
went wrong in America" CATERBONE describes his experience and present situation
regarding the ISC scandal, and cites corruption as the cause of the present dire and
destitute circumstances controlling his life.
254. On October 31, 1991 Guerin and 19 others, including Larry Reach, are indicted on 75
criminal counts by the Philadelphia based grand jury.
255. On October 31, 1991 Laura McQueen, administrator for the New Jersey Department of
Motor Vehicles, called CATERBONE at approximately 3:30 pm, to notify him that she was
trying to sort out the problem with his complaint regarding title to his boat. Ms. McQueen
acknowledged that the Stone Harbor Marina had submitted an application for a title,
apparently dated on or about June 10, however the identity of the boat did not match that
of CATERBONE ’s. Ms. McQueen also admitted that there seemed to be evidence of
wrongdoing, but denied to state whether the matter was presently being investigated. Ms.
McQueen also stated that the title in question was being microfiche, and that within a few
days, they should be able to trace the title, and resolve the problem.
256. On October 31, 1991 Robert Clyde Ivy, Terrance Faulds, Wayne Radcliffe, Gerald
Schuler, and Thomas Jaslin enter a not guilty pleas to all charges handed down by the
Philadelphia grand jury.
257. On November 24, 1987 Robert Shireman, ISC financial executive pleads his guilt in
the ISC $billion fraud and scandal. Anthony Stagq, ISC executive in charge of Singapore
operations, pleads guilty in the Arms Export violations.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
50 of
103
51110
50 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
258. On November 27, 1987 ISC Executive Larry Resch pleads guilty to his role in the
massive contract fraud in the Ferranti/ISC merger of November, 1987.
259. On December 3, 1991 Philadelphia grand jury hands down a "superseding
indictment", clarifying the money-laundering portion of the charges. The indictment states
that between November of 1986 and June of 1989, Guerin looped $450 million through
phony bank, vendor, -and customer accounts to give the appearance several of the bogus
ISC contracts were real. The preceding information also allows for the possibility of an
indictment of William Clark, and possibly his attorney Joseph Roda. The largest of the fake
contracts was the Pakistan Missile deal, in which Larry Resch was charged and indicted by
the grand jury for managing.
260. On December 3, 1991 Mike Hess, a former ISC engineer that also has done work for
CATERBONE , visits CATERBONE to deliver all materials in his possession which is the
property of the Advanced Media Group, Ltd., CATERBONE and Mike Hess engage in an
argument when Mike Hess becomes annoyed at CATERBONE ’s continued caution and
suspicion of Mike Hess's real motives and agenda for the relationship. CATERBONE had
witnessed several incidents of inconsistencies with the attitude of Mike Hess, with specific
respect regarding CATERBONE 's efforts for justice and legal recourse concerning the
affairs of 1987. CATERBONE admitted in several occasions that he will never trust anyone,
especially given his former association with ISC, and most importantly his activities and
travel to South Africa.
261. On December 4, 1991 CATERBONE calls the Citizens Commission of Human Rights,
after seeing the organization featured on the Murray Povich Show, and talks to Roy
Griffen. The organization's mission is to investigate abuses within the mental illness
profession. Roy Griffen requests information, and agrees to investigate his allegations.
CATERBONE states that he will Federal Express a copy of this chronology.
262. On December 5, 1991 At approximately 10:00 am, CATERBONE sent a package of
information via Federal Express (tracking number 9734766S93) to: Roy Griffen, Citizens
Commission for Human Rights, 6362 Hollywood Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90028, (800) 869-
2247. The package was received at 9:56 am (PST) by L. Mezkerlsl, at the front desk.
263. On December 5, 1991 At approximately 4:52 pm, James Guerin pleads guilty to eight
(B) grand jury indictments of October 31. The indictments are as follows: Criminal
Conspiracy, Violation, Arms Export Control Act Violation, Comprehensive Anti-Apartheid
act. Money Laundering, Securities Fraud, Filing False Income Tax Return, Aiding and
Abetting the Commission of crime. Sentencing is scheduled for February 25, 1992, with a
minimum of 14 years, and a maximum of Life in prison.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
51 of
104
52110
51 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
264. On December 4, 1991CATERBONE receives uninvited visitors at his residence, cousin
Sam Miller family, who in September left him stranded in Florida. They conveniently need
a place to stay, while visiting in Lancaster, and purposely cause distractions to his efforts
for legal recourse.
265. On December 11, 1991 CATERBONE finally requests that Michelle and Jason Miller
vacate his residence.
266. On December 20, 1991 CATERBONE receivers a notice from the Internal Revenue
Service regarding a discrepancy in income reported on his 1989 Federal Income Tax
Return. The items in question were his "disability income" from Monarch life insurance
and American Helix "non-employee income".
267. On December 23, 1991 CATERBONE responds to the IRS letter and submits a copy of
the chronology of this conspiracy, along with the entire audio transcript (2 - 90 minute
cassettes) of his meeting of September 29, 198? with the Pennsylvania Securities
Commission and requests assistance in his ordeal. The correspondence was sent via
'Return Receipt Requested" in order to insure proof of delivery. CATERBONE sends an
updated chronology to Roy Griffen of the Citizen's Commission for Human Rights.
268. On December 28, 1991 CATERBONE sends a formal notice to attorney Howard Cerny,
245 Park Avenue, New York, informing him to return the previously submitted information
and tapes regarding this case, and also informing him that he no longer wishes to discuss
these issues with him or any member of his firm.
269. On December 30, 1991 CATERBONE travels to the U.S. 9:50 am courthouse in
Philadelphia, PA, and personally delivers the chronology and a copy of the "1987"
Pennsylvania Securities Commission meeting to Chief Judge Bechtle, who is presiding over
the ISC court preceding. At 10:00 am CATERBONE visits the U.S. Attorney Generals office
in the same building and files a formal complaint, "Criminal Conspiracy to "cover-up" the
International Signal a Control scandal. The proper form is filed with the clerk. Assistant U.
S. Attorney General Gray asks CATERBONE to briefly describe his complaint. CATERBONE
gives Gray the chronology along with the tapes. CATERBONE briefly describes the meeting
of June 23, 1987 with Larry Resch, the May 23, 1991 phone call from Jay Curtis, the
arrests by Manheim Township, and the attempts on his life. Agent Gray took notes, and
said he is not familiar with the case, but would personally see that the information is
passed to the proper authorities involved in the case. During the conversation, Mr. Gray
asked the exact same question that was asked by both Joe Roda and Investigator Eisler of
the PA Securities Commission) "But you did not work for them (ISC), you were not
involved with them?" CATERBONE gave this response to all questions by Mr. Gray: It's all
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
52 of
105
53110
52 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
in there (the chronology), all of the information and events".
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
53 of
106
54110
53 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1992
270. On January 6, 1992 CATERBONE sends a copy of the criminal conspiracy chronology
and a complete audio transcript of the PA SEC meeting of 1987 to the legal counsel of the
Pennsylvania Securities Commission via Certified Mail Return Receipt Requested: P825
695 935.
271 On January 8, 1992 At a "Town Meeting" in Columbia, Pennsylvania held by U. S.
Senator Arlen Specter, CATERBONE personally delivers a copy of the criminal conspiracy
chronology to Anon Specter after the meeting and asks Arlen Specter to read the letter,
Mr. Specter replied, " I will do that".
272. On January 9, 1992 CATERBONE receives the Return Receipt from the Pennsylvania
SEC, signed by Sharon F. Heinspach on January 8, 1992.
273. My brother Tom goes to work for John and Sylvian Depatto. John Depatto was the
President of Parent Federal Savings and Loan for ISC's Jim Guerin, John Depatto and
Parent Federal Bank had the MORTGAGE for my home in 1986 at 2323 New Danville Pike,
Conestoga, Pennsylvania.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
54 of
107
55110
54 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1995
274. In 1995 my brother, Tom, had his accounts with FULTON BANK. He was given a check
in the amount of approximately $60,000 ($70,285.00) by an account from Ms. John
Depatto (Wife of John Depatto of ISC's Parent Federal Bank). Tom Caterbone went to the
Manor Branch to deposit that check, and was refused on at least 3 occasions from making
that deposit. I know this because he was calling me asking for advise and help. I
remember telling him to seek legal counsel because this was not right. FULTON BANK
tellers refused to take the check for deposit because there were no funds available. I kept
telling him that this was wrong and that he should make the deposit in case funds became
available the check would be honored. But FULTON BANK tellers kept refusing to make
that deposit.
275. I then went on to learn that funds did become available and were paid to other
entities that had NSF checks waiting for funds, which would have been behind my brothers
check had your tellers accepted that deposit.
276. If you carefully review the financial problems my brother encountered prior to his
death, you would see that this was the one transaction that started a spiral of events that
caused him a great amount of stress and duress. And I know this because I was trying to
help him. I eventually took him to the emergency room of St. Joseph Hospital just 4 days
prior to his death.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
55 of
108
56110
55 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1996
277. On April 29, 1996 just one week after our entire family returned home from the
WEDDING of my brother Mike in Ft. Lauderdale, including Tom, and my Mother, Thomas
Phillip Caterbone was found DEAD in Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
56 of
109
57110
56 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1997
278. On November 8, 1997 CATERBONE solicits Attorney Matt Samley, of the law firm of
Xelkallis, Reese and Pugh (Pflumm Contractors Corporate Attorney and David Pflumm’s
Attorney), to provide a legal opinion as to the circumstances involved in the cover up. Mr.
Samley quickly asks if anyone had called Stan Caterbone about the issues. Mr. Samley
agrees to review the documents and will provide a legal opinion of any criminal and
prosecutorial misconduct.
279. On November 23, 1997 - CATERBONE delivers materials to Mr. Samley and also sends
via Federal Express the same materials to Christina Rainville, of Shnader, Harris, Lewis,
and ……. With a letter requesting a legal opinion from Ms. Rainville. Stan Caterbone had
read the biography of Ms. Christina Rainville parts of which were published as part of a
story for the Lisa Michelle Lambert murder trial and was impressed with her experience in
the litigation of securities violations, software and computer cases, entertainment, and of
course the wide array of allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in the Lancaster County
District Attorney’s Office and the East Lampeter Police Department. CATERBONE knew he
needed someone that was not afraid to challenge and take on the “Lancaster
Establishment”.
In 1997 CATERBONE had solicited Attorney Christina Rainville of Philadelphia and
pro bono attorney for Lisa Michelle Lambert in the Laurie Show murder case. The
murder trials and appeals of the Lambert case demonized Ms. Christina Rainville and
U.S. District Court Judge Stewart Dalzell. After CATERBONE submitted documents
and audio recordings, Ms. Christina Rainville had communicated with CATERBONE
that she was not able to take his case due to the fact that her Philadelphia law firm
had banned her from taking on any more Lancaster County residents, despite the
fact that many more sought her legal counsel. On December 31, 1997, CATERBONE
had also personally delivered a CD-ROM to the chambers of U.S. District Court Judge
Stewart Dalzell in an effort to bring attention to his case. In May of 1998
CATERBONE submitted an AFFADAVIT to the law firm of Schneider and Harrison
outlining the prosecutorial misconduct or Finding of Facts of the 1987 cover-up for
Ms. Christina Rainville. CATERBONE alleges that these facts were part of the attitude
and the motives for the law enforcement-at-large of Lancaster County and the
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to ignore the rule of law and procedure in order to
bring these false arrests and malicious prosecutions. The Lancaster County
community-at-large had the same attitude toward CATERBONE. The Lambert case
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
57 of
110
58110
57 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
received national notoriety when U.S. District Judge Stuart Dalzell freed Lambert on
a Habeus Corpus appeal hearing citing she was “actually innocent” beyond a
reasonable doubt. Judge Dalzell was quoted in chambers as saying, "I can tell you,
Mr. Madenspacher, that I've thought about nothing else but this case for over three
weeks, and in my experience, sir, and I invite you to disabuse me of this at oral
argument, I want you and I want the Schnader firm to look for any case in any
jurisdiction in the English-speaking world where there has been as much
prosecutorial misconduct, because I haven't found it.” The case was covered by a 3
part series in the Los Angeles Times by writer Barry Seigel on November 10, 1997
and a television episode on the A&E Network American Justice Series. The Lancaster
community gathered over 10,000 signatures on a petition to impeach U.S. District
Judge Stewart Dalzell for his rulings. In the end, the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania took control of the case and appealed the ruling that freed Lambert
sending her back to prison. The case went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in
2005, after being denied any review. The case accentuated the rights of Federal Law
vs. State Law and the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania solicited a team of attorney
generals from across the nation to help their cause. CATERBONE attended a hearing
before Judge Larry Stengel in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas and to
this day, due to his knowledge and experience with the Lancaster County Judicial
System and Law Enforcement believes the case should have never been conducted
without a jury trial, and that the over zealous prosecution proves that prosecutorial
misconduct was never thoroughly investigated or prosecuted in the Lambert case.
CATERBONE will not let that happen in his cases.
280. On December, 8, 1997 - Ms. Pam Pflumm call Dr. Albert Shultz regarding the behavior
of CATERBONE .
281. On December 15, 1997 - CATERBONE telephones Jim Christian to again confirm that
he did not have knowledge of his meeting with Mr. Larry Resch. Jim Christian began
threatening CATERBONE from public disclosure of these issues, he said “you have to
forget about it. Your life will be worse off than it is now, you better just forget it……”
282. In December of 1997 CATERBONE had made a journal of all of the mental and
psychological duress that the employees of the firm of Pflumm Contractors, Inc., had
engaged. CATERBONE started to log incidents of mental duress in December of 1997 after
the incidents became consistent and demonstrated not be random acts of mere
occurrences. This behavior and malicious treatment was an extreme divergence from the
previous 45 months of my tenure and a polarization of CATERBONE ’S relationships with
all employees involved, including Mr. David Pflumm. Prior to these incidents CATERBONE
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
58 of
111
59110
58 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
was credited with saving the company from near bankruptcy (1993) and leading the
company to the highest level of profitability, marketability, financial stability, and respect
in the 20 year history of the company. Pflumm Contractors, Inc. was generating over $4
million dollars per year in revenues.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
59 of
112
60110
59 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
1998
283. On January 14, 1998 CATERBONE visits with Fr. Edward Lavelle for advice and
guidance concerning his situation. CATERBONE only asked that Fr. Lavelle call Mr. David
Pflumm, and ask he and is key employees refrain from inflicting any additional mental
duress upon his person Fr. Lavelle refuses unless he is told to do so by Dr. Al Shulz. He
offers no further assistance. 1:00 pm A few hour later, CATERBONE visits Dr. Al Shulz
for his quarterly appointment. Immediately upon entering the appointment, and before
CATERBONE will speak any words, Dr. Al Shulz will contemporaneously accuse
CATERBONE and declare: “Stan, you are very sick. You are not well! You need to take
additional medications”. The recorded transcript will prove the horrid implications of these
conversations.
284. On February 20, 1998 CATERBONE is forced to vacate his position of Controller of
Pflumm Contractors, Inc., due to the purposeful and intentional infliction of mental duress,
perpetrated as a direct reprisal against CATERBONE ’S rightful pursuit of due process of
the law concerning all issues contained herein. Later CATERBONE will learn that this is a
classic tactic used against TARGETED INDIVIDUALS AND WHISTLEBLOWERS CALLED
WORKPLACE MOBBING.
285. On April 21, 1998 The Pennsylvania Department of Labor and Industry will again
illegally deny CATERBONE of his legitimate claim for Unemployment Compensation
Benefits, which again is an act of reprisal against his rightful pursuit of fair access to the
law, and his disclosures of the incidents contained herein. The Pennsylvania Department
of Labor and Industry’s 1987 rulings against CATERBONE have been also proven to be in
err, which conveniently and intentionally subjects CATERBONE to financial hardship and
mental duress, all purposefully hindering CATERBONE ’s right to access the law. The
record of CATERBONE ’s claim for Unemployment Compensation Benefits is corrupted.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
60 of
113
61110
60 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2004
286. On November 25, 2004, Thanksgiving day, CATERBONE was inside his residence with
the doors locked. At approximately 11:30 am Dave Pflumm, Lizzy Pflumm, and Keagan
Pflumm began knocking on the back patio door. CATERBONE did not want to accept the
visitors and would not answer the door. The visitors had not been at the residence for at
least 4 or 5 months and CATERBONE had not been to the residence of the Pflumm’s since
July of 2002. After the unwanted visitors would not leave, CATERBONE went downstairs
to the back bedroom hoping they would leave. Lizzy Pflumm and Keagan Pflumm then
began banging on the lower daylight door and the front door. CATERBONE then began
lifting weights. After approximately 20 minutes Keagan and Lizzy Pflumm appeared inside
the back bedroom. CATERBONE quickly questioned them how they got into the residence
of CATERBONE . Keagan Pflumm said he used a credit card to open the back patio door.
They both said that their father, Dave Pflumm was upstairs sitting at CATERBONE ’S
kitchen bar. They walked upstairs and CATERBONE immediately questioned Dave Pflumm
as to how they broke into CATERBONE ’s residence. Dave Pflumm responded that “I have
keys, everyone has keys to your house”. The visitors stayed for about an hour before
leaving. This incident has been reported to the Southern Regional Police Department and
CATERBONE had questioned the Southern Regional Police Department if the incident was
ever investigated. CATERBONE never received a response.
287. On December 15, 2004 CATERBONE sends a complaint to Agent Sarsfield of the
Pennsylvania Attorney General’s Office in Pittsburg regarding illicit telephone activities.
CATERBONE made complaints and amended the formal Verizon Customer Relations
Complaint number C-006142-2004, which was made pursuant to the Pennsylvania Do Not
Call statute. The complaint alleged that his telephone calls were often being intercepted,
misdirected, or impersonated. CATERBONE also made complaints of harassing calls from
“Out of the Area” caller identification that were occurring several times a day with no
response after answering. CATERBONE has had endured these activities for years.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
61 of
114
62110
61 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2005
288. On February 12th, 2005, Pamela Pflumm invited CATERBONE for dinner after
CATERBONE ’s return from a trip to Florida on the same day. Pamela Pflumm was
attending to CATERBONE ’s cats and mail during his trip to Florida at his residence at 220
Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, Pennsylvania.
289. On February 12th, after dinner, Pamela Pflumm’s asked CATERBONE to drive her and
a boyfriend of Abby Pflumm to Kegel’s Restaurant to pick up Abby Pflumm from work. The
boyfriend of Abby Pflumm and Keagan Pflumm entered the rear seats of CATERBONE ’s car
and the boyfriend held a green tennis ball in his hand and aggressively put in CATERBONE
’s face and said “I found a tennis ball in your back seat”. CATERBONE drove down the
driveway and Keagan Pflumm and Abby Pflumm’s boyfriend made a comment about
CATERBONE ’s car audio system that was previously vandalized. CATERBONE became
upset, turned around and told Pamela Pflumm to drive herself to pickup up Abby Pflumm
from work. When CATERBONE arrived back home at his residence, the green tennis ball
that hangs from CATERBONE ’s garage to align his parking, was suspiciously missing and
was reported stolen that night to the Southern Regional Police Department.
290. On February 17th, 2006, as CATERBONE drove down Main Street, in Conestoga, while
CATERBONE noticed a four-wheeler driving in the horse pasture of the Plfumm Property.
CATERBONE stopped and questioned the unknown persons because it was a school night
and Pamela Pflumm was residing at the residence alone without her husband. No member
of Pflumm family was on the scene at that time. CATERBONE did immediately vacate the
property as soon as a member of the Pflumm household walked out of the house indicated
that the persons on their property did have permission. A few months previous to these
incidents, Mr. David Pflumm separated from his wife and was not living at the residence.
CATERBONE was called upon by Pamela Pflumm on several occasions to help her around
the house and property.
291. On February 17, 2005, at approximately 2:20am Officer Fedor of the Southern
Regional Police Department abruptly entered CATERBONE ’s home, awakening
CATERBONE, and falsely accused CATERBONE of harassment for driving on the residence
of David and Pamela Pflumm. Pamela Pflumm calls CATERBONE during the altercation
with Officer Fedor on CATERBONE s cell phone.
292. Immateriality after the altercation with Officer Fedor, CATERBONE wrote a letter and
sent it the Chief Fiorill (formerly of the Lancaster City Police Bureau) of the Southern
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
62 of
115
63110
62 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Regional Police Department.
293. At 1:00 pm on February 17, 2005 CATERBONE did visit the Lancaster County District
Attorney’s Office and requested to meet with District Attorney Donald Totaro. The Chief of
Detectives, Mr. Michael Landis (Former Chief of the Lancaster City Police Bureau)
conducted a meeting in a conference room where CATERBONE complained about the
conduct of the Southern Regional Police Department and the harassment of the Officer and
clearly stated that CATERBONE was preparing a Federal Civil Action (05-2288) and was
concerned about obstruction of justice, anit-slapp, and civil rights violations concerning
Federal Civil Action 05-2288 which was filed a few months later on May 16, 2005 in the
United States District Court for the Eastern Court of Pennsylvania.
294. On February 18,2005 CATERBONE did meet with the Chief of the Southern Regional
Police Department, Chief Fiorill, at the precinct located at 3284 Main Street, in Conestoga.
The meeting was initiated by request of Chief Fiorill. Officer Robert Busser (formerly of
the Pennsylvania State Police) was outside Chief Fiorill’s office listening to the meeting.
295. At the meeting of February 18th, 2005, Chief Fiorill did libel and slander CATERBONE
by stating that “I don’t believe anything that you say”, regarding the incidents of the week
of February 17th and the allegations contained in Federal Civil Action 05-2288.
296. At the meeting of February 18th, both Chief Fiorill and Officer Robert Busser did libel
and slander CATERBONE by stating that CATERBONE was “nuts” and questioned
CATERBONE ’s mental health. This assault on CATERBONE ’s mental health was done to
discredit CATERBONE ’s allegations in the Federal Civil Action 05-2288.
297. At the meeting of February 18 th 2005, Officer Fiorill disclosed that he had called
CATERBONE ’s brother, Mike in Plantation Florida (who has been residing in Florida for the
past 18 years), to discuss the incidents without permission, thus violating CATERBONE ’s
civil rights and privacy rights.
298. At the meeting of February 19 th 2005, Officer Robert Busser threatened and assaulted
CATERBONE by taking his nightstick and raising it up in a position to strike CATERBONE
on the head. Chief Fiorill grabbed Officer Robert Busser’s forearm just in time to stop him
from hitting CATERBONE .
299. Both Officer Busser and Chief Fiorill demanded CATERBONE out of the office, thus
violating his civil rights, and placing CATERBONE in harms way of future threats,
harassment, and numerous criminal activities.
300. On February 18th, 2005, CATERBONE visited the establishment of the Alley Kat Bar
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
63 of
116
64110
63 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
and Restaurant, located on Lemon Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania from approximately
10:00pm until 11:30pm. CATERBONE had a brief conversation with Ms. Kerry Egan
immediately before leaving to proceed directly home.
301. On February 19th, 2005, at approximately 5:00am, Officer Fedor pounded on
CATERBONE ’s front door to awaken him. CATERBONE refused to open the door and let
the Officer in due to the preceding incidents and went into his bathroom and called the
Pennsylvania State Police. The Pennsylvania State Police refused to answer the plea for
help to intervene in the altercations with the Southern Regional Police Department.
302. Approximately 20 minutes later, Officer Fedor and Pamela Pflumm illegally entered
into the residence of CATERBONE by breaking and entering.
303. Officer Fedor stated he was responding to a 911 call about an attempted suicide.
CATERBONE tried to tell Officer Fedor that he did not know what he was talking about.
Officer Fedor handcuffed CATERBONE and was physically abusive by pushing and shoving
CATERBONE directly in front of CATERBONE ’s loveseat and handcuffing CATERBONE .
Officer Fedor asked him why he sent an email to Kerry Egan threatening to commit suicide.
Pamela Pflumm was standing in front of CATERBONE ’s back door. CATERBONE kept
trying to tell Officer Fedor that he came home and was sleeping all night. CATERBONE
and Officer Fedor kept arguing about an incident that never occurred. Officer Fedor
violated several civil rights of CATERBONE .
304. Officer Fedor stated the Kerry Egan made a call to 911 at approximately 4:00 am and
stated that she received an email from CATERBONE early that morning with a threat to
commit suicide. CATERBONE called Comcast cable during the altercation to try to get an
activity list of CATERBONE ’s online activities to prove that CATERBONE did not send any
email to Kerry Egan. Officer Fedor slandered and libeled CATERBONE by not believing his
account. CATERBONE kept asking why Pamela Pflumm was summoned to CATERBONE ’s
home and received no explanation. CATERBONE did not see Pamela Pflumm before that
she entered the residence with Officer Fedor.
305. It was later determined that there never was an email, and the Southern Regional
Police Department never withdrew their allegations of mental health issues.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
64 of
117
65110
64 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2006
306. On April 5, 2006 Officer Buzzer did knowingly and willing falsely imprison
CATERBONE and maliciously attack CATERBONE and accompanied several police officers in
theft of a white envelope containing approximately $743.00 in cash in a police chase from
the Conestoga Wagon Wheel Restaurant in Conestoga to Duke Street in Millersville,
Pennsylvania, via Kendig Road.
307. On April 5th, 2006, Officer Fedor did make false statements to authorities in the 302
petitions to Lancaster General Hospital and to Crisis Intervention of Lancaster,
Pennsylvania with regards to the incarceration of CATERBONE in the Psychiatric ward
from the period of April 5th to April 10th, 2006.
308. On April 5th, 2006, Officer Busser did harass, threaten, and physically abuse
CATERBONE in the apprehension that took place on South Duke Street, Millersville,
Pennsylvania and did knowingly draw his weapon upon CATERBONE without any threat,
merely to incite public attention to CATERBONE that defamed his character, and slandered
his name.
309. All of the preceding acts of retaliation by the Southern Regional Police Department
were a direct result of undo influence upon CATERBONE and his attempts to remedy
causes of action that have been disclosed in the Federal Civil Action 05-2288, and the
Federal False Claims Act filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern Court of
Pennsylvania.
310. On April 5th, 2006, Defendants did falsely imprison Defendant at Approximately 3:15
EST at the emergency intake unit of the Lancaster General Hospital, Duke Street,
Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
311. On April 5th, 2006, upon request, staff of the Lancaster General Hospital failed to
produce any official documentation to support the apprehension of CATERBONE or the
holding of the CATERBONE in said facility.
312. The Defendants did open locking cell and CATERBONE again asked for documentation,
CATERBONE walked out of the holding cell, and not documentation was produced, agent
for defendant picked CATERBONE up and literally threw CATERBONE back into holding cell.
313. Between 3:30pm and 7:15pm Dr. Riley examined CATERBONE by asking the following
questions: Do you drink alcohol? Do you take drugs? May I listen to your heart and drugs?
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
65 of
118
66110
65 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
314. The preceding examination took under 2 minutes and was not near sufficient for the
requirements as outlined in the 302 petition, whether legal or not.
315. Mental Duress: Agents, employees, and staff of the Lancaster General Hospital did
engage in planned and occasional events to inflict, cause, and provoke extreme mental
duress.
316. Agents, employees, and staff did obstruct justice and cause CATERBONE to suspend,
neglect, and or cease all activities relating to CA 05-0288 and TMT 05-23059 in an overt
attempt to interfere with CATERBONEs constitutional right to due process.
317. Agents, employees, and or staff did subject CATERBONE to a life threatening
environment when patient William X was intentionally given a ball point pen immediately
after Angela X administered a drug, and William X stood 1 foot away from CATERBONE and
held ball point pen as a knife. CATERBONE had to immediately remove himself from the
immediate area.
318. Agents, employees, and or staff subjected CATERBONE to further harm by condoning
and further provoking situation. As of April l0th, 2006, CATERBONE is still falsely
imprisoned.
319. Agents, employees, and or staff did take from CATERBONE’s possession a white bank
envelope containing Seven Hundred and Forty-Three dollars ($730.00), which was not
included in CATERBONE’s Possession Form.
320. On July 23rd, 2006 CATERBONE speaks with Governor Ed Rendell at a Campaign
Speech at Binns Park, in Downtown Lancaster, and requests his assistance in his Civil
Rights Obstruction of Justice Complaint filed a few weeks earlier in the Office of Attorney
General.
321. On October 14th, 2006 CATERBONE files a RICO complaint in the United States District
Court against Shawn Long, attorney for Fulton Bank, MDJ Leo Eckert, Commins, Simms,
Case No. 4650.
322. On October 17 th, 2006 CATERBONE attends a Bail Supervision (of the Lancaster County
Sheriff’s Department) Intake meeting at the Bail Administrators Office in the Lancaster
County Courthouse. CATERBONE serves the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department, the
Lancaster County District Attorney’s Office, and the Lancaster County Public Defenders
Office Civil Actions. The Lancaster County Public Defenders Office literally took the
Certificate of Service signing sheet from CATERBONE and CATERBONE immediately told
Judge Joseph Madenspacher about the incident while he walked to the Bus Terminal to go
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
66 of
119
67110
66 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
the Office of MDJ Commins. The document was never returned even after several emails
to the contrary by the Public Defender, Mr. Karl.
323. On October 20th, 2006 CATERBONE files a Federal False Claims Act for Whistle-
Blowing against ISC in the United States District Court For The Eastern District of
Pennsylvania, Case No. 06-4734.
324. On October 26 th, 2006 The Pennsylvania Superior Court received a Brief for the
Appeal Challenging the Fulton Bank Judgment of June 29, 2006.
325. October 30th, 2006 The Pennsylvania Superior Court sends a letter to CATERBONE
requesting (7) more copies of the brief, which CATERBONE will not receive until January
4th, 2007. An amended complaint to CATERBONE’s Southern Regional Police Department
Civil Action, Case No. 06-3401, is due in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County
on exactly this date. An Unsecured Bail Bond was revoked by Officer Adam Cramer of the
Southern Regional Police Department and (2) Bench Warrants were issued for the Arrest
of CATERBONE by Adam Cramer of the Southern Regional Police Department and MDJ Leo
Eckert, Jr.. CATERBONE filed the Amended Complaint and mailed it from the Bausman Post
Office Substation, and did not go to the Lancaster County Courthouse in fear it would not
get filed. At 2:20pm (2) PA Constable arrest and apprehend CATERBONE at 1250 Fremont
Street, Lancaster, PA, and take him to Magisterial District Justice Eckert’s Office on the (5)
Bench warrants for summary citations and then COMMITT CATERBONE to the Lancaster
County Prison, stating that an Indigent Hearing will be held within 10 days, and challenges
CATERBONE ’S Indigent status and his Superior Court Cases. Magisterial District Justice
Eckert complains to CATERBONE about being named a Defendant in Federal Case No. 06-
4650, and remarks that CATERBONE may have to be taken to Dauphin County Prison for
suing all of the District Justices in Lancaster County. He also said “You are not even close
to getting to the Superior Court”.
326. On November 1st, 2006 CATERBONE appears before Judge Paul K. Allison who
reinstates his Bail Bond as Secured, which required CATERBONE to post $5,000 to get out
of the Lancaster County Prison instead of just signing an Unsecured Bail Bond, which
should have happened, and is not released from the Lancaster County Prison, as expected.
327. On November 6th, 2006 CATERBONE files his first Appeal for Reconsideration to the
ORDER of Judge Paul K. Allison to Reinstate the Bail Bond as Unsecured, and Release him
from Lancaster County Prison.
328. November 20th, 2006 The United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania records 28 U. S. C. §2241 Habeas Corpus Petition Case No. 06-5138
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
67 of
120
68110
67 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
(Challenging the Detainer and Imprisonment) filed from the Lancaster County Prison on
November 14th, 2006. This case is still
329. On November 30th, 2006 Judge Paul K. Allison Denies CATERBONE’s Appeal to
Reinstate Bail as Unsecured.
330. On November 8th, 2006 CATERBONE is transported to Magisterial District Justice Leo
H. Eckert, Jr., and signs a document that was missed on October 30th, 2006, and is not
given an Indigent Hearing as promised.
331. On December 2nd, 2006 CATERBONE files an Appeal to Judge Paul K. Allison ORDER
of November 30th, 2006.
332. On December 4th, 2006 the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department is ORDERED to
transport CATERBONE to both residences, 1250 Fremont Street, and 220 Stone Hill Road to
obtain files and evidence for a Trial, as a Pro Se Litigant and representing himself on the
East Lampeter Township summary citations. There were no Sheriff Sale Posting on 220
Stone Hill Road, and both residences look fine.
333. On December 5th, 2006 The Lancaster Intelligencer Journal publishes the Story “The
Next Sound You Hear…” regarding former business partner Tony Bongiovi, which is central
to all of the litigation in the United States District Courts. The worlds of pro audio and
consumer electronics were bridged at New York City's Avatar Studios in December, where
Bongiovi Acoustics unveiled the Digital Power Station car radio. Demonstrated by audio
icon Tony Bongiovi (pictured) in Avatar’s Studio A (former Power Station Studios), the
patent-pending technology being manufactured by JVC made a very impressive debut.
334. On December 6th, 2006 Honda Financial repossess a Honda Odyssey stored at the St.
Dennis Towing Company’s facility from August 31, 2006; the Honda was take because of
the illegal repossession of the drivers license and there were no funds available for the
tow that was just a few blocks away. The Honda was protected under the pending Chapter
11 Bankruptcy Petition and was conveniently taken while incarcerated. CATERBONE had
talked to Honda Financial in August and there was no problem with the lease, even though
CATERBONE had not made a payment since May of 2005. The St. Dennis Towing Company
was charging $25.00 per day, and has never filed or sent CATERBONE an invoice for the
storage, which is very suspect.
335. On December 8th, 2006 CATERBONE files a Writ of Mandamus against Magisterial
District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr, and Mary Commins for the fraudulent activities leading to
the false imprisonment of October 30th, 2006, and Bench Warrants.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
68 of
121
69110
68 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
On December 12th, 2006 CATERBONE files for Continuances in all of the following Civil
Complaints in the Commonwealth Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania: CI-06-07330; CI-06-08742; CI-06-08490; CI-06-07376; CI-06-07188; CI-
06-06658; CI-06-04939; CI-06-03403; CI-06-03401; CI-06-03349.
336. On December 13th, 2006 The Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department (Maluskus) and
Chief John Fiorill tried to get CATERBONE to change his address to the Lancaster County
Prison and Judge Perezous refused to get ORDER CATERBONE to comply with the demand
and Judge Perezous CONTINUED the Appeal Hearing because CATERBONE did not have any
files to conduct a Trial.
337. On December 20th, 2006 The Lancaster County Sheriff’s Department (Hiem & N/A-
names given by Sheriff Simone) refused CATERBONE to wear his suit into the courtroom,
or take his files into the Pre-Trial Conference before Judge Farina, which caused
CATERBONE to forget to discuss material motions for the Trial, and caused CATERBONE to
be defamed by appearing in a Lancaster County Prison uniform before the Court and in
front of 20 or so other people in the Courtroom.
338. On December 20th, 2006, while in the Lancaster County Prison, the Lancaster County
Sheriff’s Department and Fulton Bank conduct a Sheriff Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road,
Foreclosure CI-06-02271, with NO notification before or after the SALE to CATERBONE;
and sold the property to Central Penn Settlement Company of Akron, Pennsylvania.
339. On December 28th, 2006 Judge Paul K. Allison overturned his previous ORDER and
Granted CATERBONE his Appeal ORDER and signed the Unsecured Bail ORDER and the
RELEASE from Lancaster County Prison.
340. On December 29th, 2006 CATERBONE is RELEASED from Lancaster County Prison, and
walks to the Lancaster County Courthouse to report to Court Administration and the
Prothonotary Office to get a print out of all of the Civil Dockets for all cases in Civil Court,
including the Fulton Bank Foreclosure and finds out for the first time that the Sheriff Sale
on December 20th took place. CATERBONE retrieves a check for $19.34 from Attillio Grossi,
which is all the funds has available for food, and all other necessities.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
69 of
122
70110
69 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2007
341. On January 2, 2007 CATERBONE files and records (4:09pm) a Petition To Set Aside
Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of
Lancaster County and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriff’s
Department.
342. January 4th, 2007 At 1:15pm CATERBONE visits 220 Stone Hill Road and finds 2
unidentified individuals on his property loading the entire contents of 220 Stone Hill Road
onto 2 Penske moving trucks, to an unidentified location, and is ordered off the Property
for Trespassing. The 2 individuals said they were from Noble Real Estate Company. Mr.
Joseph Caterbone accompanied him as a witness and driver. CATERBONE takes several
pictures of the individuals and the Penske Trucks. At 1:35pm CATERBONE retrieves his
mail from the Conestoga Post Office from dating back to October 25th, 2006 up to the
present and temporarily forwards mail to 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA. CATERBONE
visits the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Office and speaks to Lt. Lancaster and Mr. Bergman
about the incident at 220 Stone Hill Road and is told that Southern Regional Police have
already responded, and would not give any information about the incident. At 3:00pm
CATERBONE attends the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-0003179-2006 (Fleeing &
Eluding filed by Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional Police Department on April 5 th, 2006) in
Courtroom 1 of the Lancaster County Courthouse and moves for a Motion for a
Continuance due to the incident at the property at 220 Stone Hill Road an hour before.
The Honorable Judge James P. Cullen Denies his Motion.
343. On January 5th, 2007 At 8:30am CATERBONE files and records an Addendum to the
Petition To Set Aside Sale for 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga in the Pennsylvania Court of
Common Pleas of Lancaster County and personally serves Fulton Bank and the Lancaster
County Sheriff’s Department regarding the theft of all of his personal possessions,
including business files of Advanced Media Group, and all Legal files and evidentiary assets
for all pending litigation. At 9:00 am the Lancaster County District Attorney Deborah
Muzereus moves for A Continuance in the Trial for Criminal Case No. CP-36-CR-0003179-
2006 and the Honorable James P. Cullen Grants a Continuance until the February Trial
Schedule.
344. On January 7th , 2007 CATERBONE files a claim with Harleysville Insurance
Homeowners Policy HOAI 93468 for the theft of his personal possessions and the property
at Stone Hill Road. CATERBONE files for a Change of Venue for the Hearing scheduled for
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
70 of
123
71110
70 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
January 18th, 2007 in Intercourse before Magisterial District Justice Leo H. Eckert, Jr..
CATERBONE does not have all of his evidentiary files and no transportation because of the
illegal revocation of his Red Rose Transit Authority Monthly Bus Pass.
345. On January 8 th, 2007 CATERBONE files an Emergency Petition for Food Stamps and
other in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster after his Food Stamps and
Red Rose Transit Authority Monthly Pass was illegally terminated, thus leaving him
without food and transportation for all court preceding. CATERBONE files for a
Continuance for Summary charges by District Justice Leo H. Eckert Jr., a Defendant in U.S.
District Civil Action 06-4650, scheduled for January 18 th, 2007., again for not having
access to all of his evidentiary files and without transportation. CATERBONE files and
sends his Brief to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania Case No. 1463 MDA 2006 for the
challenge to Fulton Bank’s 220 Stone Hill Road Foreclosure, via U.S. Postal Priority Mail
Return Receipt No. 0306 2400 003 1072 4451; the request stated: “Other - We need 7
copies of this brief, also all copies need to be bound on the left like a book and if you use
staples they must be covered with tape”. CATERBONE borrows $50.00 from Joseph
Caterbone for food, paper, and postage for the Superior Court Brief.
346. On January 9th, 2007 CATERBONE files for Continuance in all of his pending Civil
Actions before the United States District Courts for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania;
05-2288; 06-4650; 06-5138; 06-4734; 06-CV-4154; 06-5117; 06-2236; 05-23059BKY.
CATERBONE files for a Change of Venue and Continuance for Summary Citations (TR-
0008735-2006; TR-0008578-2006; TR-0008721-2006; TR-0008503-2006; TR-0007528-
2006) Scheduled for a Hearing on January 23, 2007 before District Magistrate Richard H.
Simms, a Defendant in U.S. District Civil Action 06-4650. CATERBONE receives a Notice to
Change the Hearing Scheduled for January 18 th, 2007 from Magisterial District Justice Leo
H. Eckert, Jr. to Isaac Stoltzfus of Intercourse. CATERBONE Petitions the Pennsylvania
Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County to vacate the Bail Supervision Ordered by
Magisterial District Justice Mary Commins on October 10 th, 2006. The Bail Supervision was
without merit or cause.
347. January 10th, 2007 CATERBONE reports a theft of the Digital Recorder used containing
an authentic and original audio recording of the incident for the Case No. CP-36-CR-
0003179-2006 (Fleeing & Eluding filed by Sgt. Busser of Southern Regional Police
Department on April 5th, 2006) to Officer Cole of the Lancaster City Police Department who
responded at approximately 10:25pm to 1250 Fremont Street and filed the incident as
Case No. 0701-014878.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
71 of
124
72110
71 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
348. January 11th, 2007 The Honorable Judge James P. Cullen Orders CATERBONE’s
Petition to vacate the Bail Supervision as Denied Case No. 4771-2006. CATERBONE writes
the following in an email to the Red Rose Transit Authority: “I am having a problem with
my monthly passes. I have not received my January Monthly Pass, and my forwarded mail
has not been received from 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga. Today, your driver Dave on
the 3 8th Ward/Park City 8:35 bus made me pay him for the fare. Some drivers let me on
with my December Pass and my Letter of Acceptance from September of 2006. I never
received a termination letter, and on January 5th, filed an Emergency Petition against the
Lancaster County Assistance Office to have all benefits that have been terminated,
reinstated. What is the status of my Monthly Pass? Below is an excerpt from the Civil
Action, Case No. CI-07-00150 in the Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County,
Pennsylvania. The Petitioner has not received his January Red Rose Transit Authority
January Monthly Bus Pass, sponsored by the RRTA and the Lancaster County Assistance
Office. The Petitioner did receive his December Monthly Bus Pass, and complained to the
Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal Station on Queen Street, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, on
January 5th,2007. The staff worker told the Petitioner that his Monthly Pass was “deleted”
because he was incarcerated. The Petitioner explained that the Red Rose Transit Authority
Monthly Bus Pass was issued for a (2) year period. The incarceration was not valid and I
was released upon the Success of my Appeal, which was signed by the Honorable Judge
Paul K. Allison on December 28th, 2007.” CATERBONE , in the Pre-Trial Conference moves
for a Continuance for 0004771-2006 before Judge Ashworth and it is GRANTED.
349. January 12th, 2007 CATERBONE receives the following email from Ms. Gail Parenteau,
of Bongiovi Acoustics: “What is Advanced Media Group? It is our policy not to open
unsolicited attachments. What's your tel. no. I've been with Tony since 1986 and neither
of us remembers what this is. I've highlighted your type-os in red below”. CATERBONE
responds with the following email to Ms. Gail Parenteau: “I (Financial Management Group,
Ltd.,) was at Power Station from February until July in 1987 working extensively with
Tony, Ellen, and all of the Producers from Flatbush Films in Hollywood. Tony named me
Executive Producer of the project, and that is in the budgets. Now, are you really
associated with Tony, or are you covering for someone? I have still photos, audio recorded
meetings with Bob Walters (Co-Owner of Power Station Studios), business plans for
"Mutant Mania", Tony's Digital Movie, with budgets, screenplays, joint venture
agreements, Patent and Copyright materials for Power Station Studios and Tony. I also
have documents for the Pier in Wildwood, which Tony owned. I personally authored many
of these materials with Tony, at his request. I spent many days and nights working at
Power Station on this project. I had a Navajo Chieftain twin turbo prop that I flew to
Power Station for some of my meetings, the other times me and Scott Robertson drove. I
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
72 of
125
73110
72 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
even have another management consulting proposal that I developed for Tony in 1989,
when he wanted me to restructure Power Station from top to bottom. If, you were not
privy to these projects, then maybe you should at least talk to Tony. I was just providing
a professional courtesy to Tony, especially, since I have admitted many documents
pertaining to my claims in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania. Tony is not a Defendant in my claims. I have authored a Joint Venture
Proposal for Sony, which details the Power Station Digital Music System, and I have
noticed what Tony is doing. I will not call, for security reasons, I cannot tell who is on the
other end. You can have a legal representative or Tony forward correspondence to:
CATERBONE, 1250 Fremont Street, Lancaster, PA 17603”.
350. January 13th, 2007 CATERBONE visits the Red Rose Transit Authority Terminal at
Queen Street again attempting to get his January Monthly Bus Pass, which he thinks is
missing in the mail. CATERBONE borrows $20.00 from Richard Hobday, for food, postage,
and paper; and ride home from the Lancaster County Courthouse. CATERBONE receives a
letter and a Distribution Schedule from the Lancaster County Sheriff’s Office that states:
“On December 20,2007 your property located at 220 Stone Hill Rd. was sold at Sheriff Sale
to a third party buyer, Central Penn Property Services, Inc. for $156,000.00. Attached, you
will find a Schedule of Distribution, which we are required to do. On this schedule you will
see that there is a balance of proceeds to be paid to you, Stanley J. Caterbone. You, the
defendant, will receive this balance of $17,306.80, however, you have served Sheriff
Bergman with a petition to set aside the sale (PARCP 3132). Please note that we, the
Sheriffs Office, do not have a dated and signed copy by the court of your petition. At the
advice of our solicitor, the distribution of any payouts regarding this property will not be
made until the matter is resolved.” Fulton Bank and the Lancaster County Sheriff’s
Department embezzle over $50,000 in Fees, Costs, and the Distribution of Sale associated
with the Sale Proceeds of 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA. The Praecipe-Writ of
Execution filed on July 31sth, 2006 by Fulton Bank for Foreclosure Case No. CI-06-02271
stated: “FILED. WRIT ISSUED. AFFIDAVIT OF NON-MILITARY SERVICE. PRINCIPAL:
$88,568.53; INTEREST TO 03/02/2006 AT A RATE OF $14.56 PER DIEM: $4,442.96;
NEGATIVE ESCROW BALANCE: $1,096.38; LATE CHARGES: $317.20; ATTORNEYS' FEES:
$3,000.00; TOTAL: $97,425.07. FILED BY SHAWN M. LONG, ESQ”. CATERBONE receives a
letter from the Superior Court of Pennsylvania regarding the Fulton Bank Foreclosure
Challenge, notifying him that “AND NOW, this fourth day of January, 2007 the appeal in
this matter is DISMISSED for failure to file a brief.” This DISMISSAL is highly suspect
considering that the Superior Court placed no time conditions on receiving the additional
(7) Copies and it was received several days AFTER CATERBONE had already mailed the
required (7) Copies and fulfilled the obligations to the Superior Court, thus furthering the
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
73 of
126
74110
73 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
fact that Fulton Bank and the Sheriff’s Office of Lancaster County held an illegal sale on
December 20th, 2006. CATERBONE receives DENIED on an ORDER from Change of Venue
and Continuance for the Hearings for January 18th, 2007, signed by Judge Dennis
Reinaker of the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas of Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.
352. CATERBONE , Stanley J. Caterbone (CATERBONE), alleges that the City of Lancaster
and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police and others colluded to deliberately ignore
CATERBONE’S complaints, an abuse of process, in an effort to interrupt and sabotage
current and ongoing litigation and civil complaints against several major businesses and
government agencies with headquarters in the City of Lancaster and the Commonwealth of
Pennsylvania. Those would include the Lancaster General Hospital; High Industries (Penn
Square Partners and the Lancaster County Convention Center); Fulton Bank and Fulton
Financial Corporation; Wachovia Bank branches; Lancaster Newspapers; the County of
Lancaster; the Lancaster County Prison; the Hotel Brunswick; James Street Investment
District; Aurora Films; Haverstick Films; and the Lancaster City Bureau of Police.
353. CATERBONE also alleges that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police were used to
retaliate and sabotage other litigation and civil complaints against other police
departments, namely the Southern Regional Police Department, Manheim Township Police
Department, East Lampeter Police Department, Millersville Boro Police, Avalon Police
Department and the Stone Harbor Police Department.
354. CATERBONE alleges that by ignoring his complaints the Lancaster City Police
Department gave the green light for others to continue a long and successful period of
harassment, thievery, property damage, computer and electronic hacking, deletion and
manipulation of court related documents, records and evidence, mail fraud, and the like.
These activities are so intense that they have taken on the characteristics of hate crimes.
355. CATERBONE alleges that the gross abuse and negligence defamed his name and that
of his company, ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, which discredited his reputation in an effort to
diminish credibility in the courts and to disrupt and thwart any possible business relations
and operations of ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP resulting in direct and immediate financial
losses and loss of income.
356. Chief Keith Sadler and the Lancaster City Police Bureau rejected and refused to
resolve these disputes through mediation when CATERBONE opened a case with the
Lancaster Center for Mediation in May of 2008 and Keith Sadler communicated on May 8,
2008 that he would not cooperate and mediate with CATERBONE.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
74 of
127
75110
74 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
357. On several occasions in 2007 several police officers of the Lancaster City Bureau of
Police instructed CATERBONE, in person upon responding to complaints, not to call 911 or
the Lancaster City Police Department and that the Lancaster City Bureau of Police would
not respond or take complaints.
358. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police only took one (1) incident of gas siphoned and
stolen from CATERBONE’s 1991 Dodge pickup truck, and refused to take the over 50 (from
December 20, 2007 to present), or so other incidents as a complaint, regardless of the
efforts to have Lancaster City Mayor Rick Grey and the Lancaster City Solicitor to look into
the allegations and complaints. CATERBONE had meticulously documented the incidents in
a journal and a log of gas receipts, photographs, and odometer miles for all of the
incidents.
359. The Lancaster City Bureau of Police had responded to approximately 10 or so 911
calls in the last eighteen (18) months to 1250 Fremont Street, residence of CATERBONE,
for complaints of property damage; stolen property, legal and business files and evidence
for litigation; computer and electronic hacking with deleted electronic files; harassment;
terrorist threats, stalking, stolen mail, etc.,.
360. CATERBONE had complained of abuse of process to state and federal law enforcement
of the situation, including U.S. Senator Arlen Specter’s office. CATERBONE had also visited
the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in both Harrisburg and Philadelphia for help and
intervention.
361. CATERBONE also had personal meeting with Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray in
Lancaster City Hall on at least 4 occasions to find a solution to the problems and for help
to mediate the problems and resolve the conflicts and the pain and suffering, as well as
loss and destruction of property and that CATERBONE was undergoing.
362. In November of 2007, CATERBONE and the Advanced Media Group went public with
their Downtown Lancaster investments and business plans that were culminated over the
past 9 years. The Advanced Media Group also formerly and publicly introduced their
Downtown Lancaster Action Plan via handouts, websites, and blogs; and began meetings
and negotiations with major stakeholders, City of Lancaster Public Officials, Developers,
and investors.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
75 of
128
76110
75 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2008
363. On or about April 14, 2008 1999 HP Notebook n5150 laptop was rendered useless by
intruder shorting the power cord. This was the third computer rendered useless since
November of 2007, and the last computer available for use in the home and office. The
only computer available for use was the public computer at the Lancaster County Library
on North Duke Street in downtown Lancaster.
364. On March 18, 2008 CATERBONE went to the Hotel Brunswick in Downtown Lancaster
to continue his take measurements of the Movie Theater for his continued efforts of a
business and development plan to open the Brunswick Movie Theater, which had been
closed since 1995. CATERBONE and Advanced Media Group had an agreement with the
Owner of the Brunswick, Hamid Zahedi, to make a formal proposal and offer for leasing
the site. CATERBONE noticed that the United States Department of Justice Office of
Trustee was conducting hearings for Chapter 11 petitioners in the Presidential Room of
the Hotel Brunswick. CATERBONE had not received ORDERS from his United States Third
Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 08-3054 for his appeal of an issue in his Chapter 11 Case
No. 05-23059. CATERBONE alleged that the ORDERS were stolen or never mailed from the
clerk of courts. CATERBONE thought maybe Dave Adams, the trustee for the United States
Department of Justice Office of Trustee might be conducting the hearings. The following
day CATERBONE received a disturbing email from Mr. Barry A. Solodky, Esquire, of
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C., 28 Penn Square, Lancaster, PA 17603. CATERBONE had
known Mr. Solodky since the 1980’s and had even solicited him to review his bankruptcy
matters before the Appllent filed his Chapter 11 case on May 23, 2005. The following email
exchanges detail the incident and the false reports and allegations from a member of
Blakinger, Byler & Thomas, P.C.
365. Sometime in February of 2008 by way of hacking or the staff of the Clerk of Court of
the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, CATERBONE was erroneously and maliciously placed on
electronic email distribution with no paper copies for all of his ORDERS for all of his cases,
which at that time numbered four (4), without the knowledge of CATERBONE. After
receiving one of the email alerts and ORDERS CATERBONE personally visited the Clerk of
Court for the Third Circuit and was told by staff that it was just a new courtesy copy. The
staff did not notify CATERBONE that his cases would not be eligible for paper copies of
ORDERS. CATERBONE was alleging since February that his ORDERS were being stolen in
the U.S. mails, and only received information in April on the bottom of a copy of a letter
attached to an ORDER for Case No. 3054 that he was switched to electronic email
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
76 of
129
77110
76 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
distribution with no paper copies. This makes no sense since, filing as pro se, CATERBONE
is not eligible to file any electronic documents in any U.S. or Pennsylvania Courts.
366. On several occasions since February, CATERBONE was not able to open the Third
Circuit electronic ORDERS on the first attempt, which denied CATERBONE access or
knowledge of the Third Circuit ORDERS with no way of retrieving them again. CATERBONE
was not even able to respond or know how the United States Third Circuit Court of Appeals
had ruled or what ORDERS were handed down, which also denied CATERBONE any chance
to follow court mandated responses in a timely fashion.
367. On April 17, 2008 CATERBONE went to respond to the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals for case no. 3054-07 and CATERBONEs paper copies of his briefs and filings were
stolen and were not in his home and office.
368. From April 14, 2008 to April 19, 2008 CATERBONE was electronically hacked by
professional computer hackers at the Lancaster County Library in a more hostile manner
than usual. At one time CATERBONE had lost three or more hours of work for the
Downtown Theater at Hotel Brunswick business and development plan, and the hackers
had also deleted sensitive research and data files for the project.
369. On April 15, 2008 CATERBONE had his brakes rigged on his bicycle while riding in
downtown Lancaster, which almost caused CATERBONE to loose control and again
rendered his bicycle unfit to ride. CATERBONE reported the incident to Lancaster County
Sheriff Terry Bergman and deputy Bourne at the Lancaster County Courthouse. The
Lancaster County Sheriff provided tools to CATERBONE to fix the brakes at the Lancaster
County Courthouse.
370 From April 14th to May 6th, 2008, CATERBONE had his gas siphoned out of his 1991
Dodge Dakota Pickup truck on at least 7 different occasions. On April 29 th, 2008,
CATERBONE was scheduled for oral arguments before the Superior Court of Pennsylvania
at 9:30 am and had his gas siphoned the evening or day before and had missed the
7:39am Amtrak train to Harrisburg and missed the Superior Court Appeal Hearing for Case
No. 855 MDA 2007.
371. On April 7th, 2008, CATERBONE had $200 of fraudulent fees charged to his Wachovia
Bank checking account via a clever guise of posting transactions and erroneous
statements of the account.
372. During the month of April and up until the Pennsylvania Primary CATERBONE has
documented several incidents of harassment at the Lancaster Campaign Headquarters for
Senator Hillary Clinton at Queen and Chestnut Streets. CATERBONE had formally
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
77 of
130
78110
77 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
volunteered for the campaign. CATERBONE had alleged misconduct by several key
Lancaster Officials and politicians that have influence in Lancaster City. Most were Obama
Supporters and two were Obama elected delegates. It was ironic that Lancaster County
was one of only 7 of 67 counties in Pennsylvania to vote for Obama.
373. On April 18, 2008, CATERBONE received a fraudulent invoice and collections letter
from the Lancaster County Credit Bureau for $96.00 from the Lancaster County Prison.
CATERBONE immediately went to the Lancaster County Prison and met with Vincent
Guirnir, the Warden, who made certain he would take care of the matter and have the
Lancaster Credit Bureau delete the invoice and the charge from CATERBONE’s record.
374. On several days in April his U.S. Postal Carrier, Mr. Mitchell, in delivering his mail had
harassed CATERBONE. For the past year or so, CATERBONE had a sign on his front door
that instructed the U.S. Postal Carrier to ring the bell if the screen door was locked, which
they had done. Then suddenly the U.S. Postal Carrier refused to ring the door or deliver
the mail if the screen door was locked and lied and said he never did it that way before.
375. For the past 2 years CATERBONE had problems and numerous complaints (drug
trafficking, prostitution, thefts, harassment, destruction of Appellants property, thefts of
stolen files, siphoning of gas, stalking) with local law enforcement and the City of
Lancaster officials regarding the next-door occupants of 1252 Fremont Street, and it’s
owner, Mr. William “Lefty” Plank, a convicted felon (vehicular homicide with DUI, Robbery,
Assault, False Identification, Driving Under Suspension, Probation Violations, etc., and
career criminal.
376. CATERBONE had made formal complaints to Lancaster City Mayor Rick Gray regarding
the incidents and allegations of 1252 Fremont Street during personal meetings during
February, March, and April “Open Door” public one on one meetings for the public with the
Mayor. During February, March, and April, CATERBONE pleaded with Lancaster City Mayor
Rick Gray to intervene with the Lancaster City Police to try to resolve the disputes and to
take CATERBONEs complaints and incident reports. After the Mayor failed to bring any
change to the situation, CATERBONE notified Mayor Rick Gray that CATERBONE would file
for mediation with the Lancaster Center for Mediation after the newly appointed Chief of
Lancaster City Police, Keith Sadler was sworn into office on or about April 23, 2008.
377. After almost 2 months of complaints regarding an unregistered and un-inspected old
junk pickup truck (Owned by William “Lefty” Plank, parked in the alley behind 1252
Fremont Street, on April 15, 2008 the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections
placed a Red “Public Nuisance and/or Hazardous Vehicle” sticker on the truck. The sticker
requires the owner to remove the vehicle within 48 hours or face a $1,000 per day fine
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
78 of
131
79110
78 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
and have the vehicle towed at the owners expense. CATERBONE again complained to both
the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections and the Lancaster City Police after it
was not removed. Finally, on April 21, 2008 CATERBONE visited the Lancaster City Bureau
of Housing and Inspections and again complained. Within hours the vehicle was finally
towed. In April of 2007, CATERBONE had his mint condition 1991 Dodge Dakota Pickup
delivered to his home and office at 1250 Fremont Street after being stolen by Parula
Properties, LLC on December 20, 2006. The Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and
Inspections placed the Red “Public Nuisance and/or Hazardous Vehicle” on the truck
because CATERBONE’s could not afford insurance or registration. CATERBONE removed
his 1991 Dodge Dakota pickup truck within 24 hours after being threatened with the
$1,000 per day fine and having the truck towed away at a location with a per diem charge.
378. On April 22, 2008 while CATERBONE was polling for the Lancaster Campaign Office to
elect Hillary Clinton, at the Helena Greek Orthodox church on Hershey Avenue. First on
the way to the voting precinct, which was only 5 blocks from CATERBONE’s home and
office, CATERBONE ran out of gas because some one again siphoned his gas tank.
Lancaster City Councilman Nelson Polite, who showed up to poll for Barrack Obama,
harassed CATERBONE. CATERBONE did not want to take any more harassment and went
back to the Lancaster Office to elect Hillary Clinton and filed a formal complaint.
379. On April 22, 2008 the 1252 Fremont Street property, and it’s owner, Mr. William
“Lefty” Plank had the house “CONDEMNED” by the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and
Inspections. The notice read as follows: NOTICE THIS PROPERTY HAS BEEN CONDEMNED
As Being Unfit For Human Habitation and May Not Be Occupied Until Repaired. The penalty
for violation of this notice can be a fine of $1,000 per day or a term of imprisonment up to
90 days per offense. Do not obstruct or remove this notice under penalty of law. CITY OF
LANCASTER DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENT (717)291-
4705. The property of 1252 Fremont Street was never evacuated, and persons continued
to Habitat the property no matter how many times CATERBONE complained to officials of
the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections, the Lancaster City Police
Department, or the Mayor of Lancaster, Mayor Rick Gray. The Lancaster City Housing and
Inspections Bureau advised CATERBONE during personal visits to the office that 1252
Fremont Street was CONDEMNED for “water shut-off”, and that no one was permitted in
the property. They advised CATERBONE to notify the Lancaster City Police if anyone was
seen in the house. CATERBONE has constantly heard voices and persons inside the 1252
Fremont Street during the entire period of Condemnation.
380. On or about April 24, 2008 a female and a Hispanic male approached 1252 Fremont
Street from the back alley. CATERBONE instructed the two individuals that no one was
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
79 of
132
80110
79 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
allowed in the property, under the condemnation laws. They argued and entered the
property with a key. CATERBONE called 911 for the Lancaster City Police. Two Lancaster
City Police officers arrived within 10 minutes and William “Lefty” Plank and Lee Schopf
appeared. They argued that they were permitted in the house to retrieve things. The two
individuals were not seen. The Lancaster City Police ORDERED everyone out of the house
and advised them to vacate the property. The Lancaster City Police instructed me to keep
calling if anyone is seen in the house.
381. On April 26, 2008 a white mail approached 1252 Fremont Street from the front while
CATERBONE was outside working on his property next door. CATERBONE advised the
person not to go inside and the person threatened CATERBONE with physical violence and
walked into the house at 1252 Fremont Street. CATERBONE called 911 to report the threat
to his person and that a person had just went inside 1252 Fremont Street. One Lancaster
City Police officer arrived on foot within approximately 10 minutes and waited for backup
before pounding on the door of 1252 Fremont Street. Another Lancaster City Police Officer
arrived on foot walking up Fremont Street from the Euclid Avenue vicinity. CATERBONE
then went inside his home and office next door at 1250 Fremont Street. After several
minutes of pounding on the door, William “Lefty” Plank opened the door and Lee Schopf
walked out of the door. CATERBONE watched through his screen door and was waiting for
the tall white male that threatened him to appear. CATERBONE opened his screen door
and told the Lancaster City Police that they were not seen when the tall white male
entered 1252 Fremont Street. Both Plank and Schopf said there was no one else inside of
1252 Fremont Street. Later more Lancaster City Police officers arrived and they
handcuffed Lee Schopf and escorted him to a Lancaster City Police cruiser waiting in front
of 1250 Fremont Street. The tall white mail apparently left out the back door before the
Lancaster City Police arrived, or before they inspected the house. The Lancaster City
Police vacated the premises and rang on the door of CATERBONE. The Lancaster City
Police Officer explained that they would call on the Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and
Inspections on Monday morning to confirm the story by Plank that he was allowed in the
house to retrieve items. Plank said he needed his cell phone charger. If the Lancaster
City Bureau of Housing and Inspections confirmed that they were not allowed in the
house, then the Lancaster City Police officer said they would charge the two with trespass.
The Lancaster City Police officer said that Lee Schopf had outstanding warrants on him.
After the Lancaster City Police had left the scene William “Lefty” Plank knocked on
CATERBONE’s door to argue that they were allowed inside and that he was going back
inside the house. CATERBONE slammed the door and told William “Lefty” Plank to stay
away from him. On Monday, April 28, 2008 CATERBONE went to the office of the
Lancaster City Bureau of Housing and Inspections and talked to a male who said he was
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
80 of
133
81110
80 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
the supervisor, he confirmed to CATERBONE that no one was allowed inside 1252 Fremont
Street and told CATERBONE to keep calling the Lancaster City Police, but said it in a
sarcastic manner to irritate CATERBONE because no one would enforce the Condemnation
Notice.
382. On the early morning of April 24, 2008 at the Brickyard Bar and Restaurant on North
Prince Street CATERBONE was assaulted by a tall black male. CATERBONE went up to the
bar to pay for his tab, one drink, and the assailant started to harass CATERBONE about
what was inside his backpack. CATERBONE left and went downstairs to the lobby where
his bicycle was locked. The assailant followed and kept harassing CATERBONE.
CATERBONE warned the assailant to stay away from CATERBONE or he would call the
police. The assailant pulled out his cell phone and kept saying he has the “police” in his
back pocket, or something to that extent. CATERBONE walked his bicycle out the door as
other patrons arrived and rode down the Brickyard pavement toward North Prince Street.
The assailant chased CATERBONE and grabbed his backpack tearing it in half and stopping
CATERBONE. CATERBONE quickly reached back so that all of the legal files would not spill
and kept yelling at the assailant to get away. The assailant kept asking CATERBONE if he
was a “Federali” or Federal Agent. CATERBONE saw a Lancaster City Police cruiser on the
west side of Lemon street at a stop light and quickly rode to flag the police down. The
Lancaster City Police drove across the intersection and stopped in the middle of the street.
CATERBONE told the officer what happened and he said he would drive around to Prince
Street to the front of the Brickyard. CATERBONE went back to Prince Street for his bicycle
and saw the assailant approaching him again. CATERBONE sped away following the police
cruiser to the corner of the alley at Market Street and Lemon Street to hide from the
assailant. The Lancaster City Police cruise was out of sight. After the assailant
disappeared CATERBONE went back to the Brickyards via Lemon Street to look for the
Lancaster City Police. After a few minutes the Lancaster City Police cruiser appeared from
James Street and turned down Prince Street. The Lancaster City Police took a statement
from CATERBONE and CATERBONE asked the Lancaster City Police for a ride home because
CATERBONE could not ride and hold the backpack together at the same time. CATERBONE
explained that there were Federal case files in the backpack, but they refused and told
CATERBONE to call a taxi. CATERBONE wrapped his backpack up with a bungi cord and
went home. A few days later CATERBONE went back to the Lancaster City Police Bureau
and requested a report of the incident. Officer Cosmore printed CATERBONE a summary of
the call from County-Wide Communications with a log of the time of the call, a description,
and the responding officers names, and instructed CATERBONE to check back later for a
complete report. CATERBONE did and was instructed to go to the records office of the
Lancaster City Police Bureau where they demanded $15.00 for a “verification letter”.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
81 of
134
82110
81 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
CATERBONE waited for about ten minutes after the clerk said she would print one out, but
left after no one came back to the window.
383. On May 2, 2008 CATERBONE opened a case for mediation with the Lancaster City
Police Bureau and Chief Keith Saddler at the Lancaster Center for Mediation.
384. On May 8, 2008 Lancaster City Police Bureau and Chief Keith Saddler communicated
with the Lancaster Mediation Center that they refuse to mediate with CATERBONE.
385. On May 1, 2008 the Advanced Media Group Website at
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/ was hacked and only 1 hit showed up on
the statistics report.
386. On May 6, 2008 the scanner and printer was again rendered inoperable.
387. On May 6, 2008 the Advanced Media Group Website at
http://www.amgglobalentertainmentgroup.com/ was hacked and shut down with only 44
hits showed up on the statistics report.
388. On May 7, 2008 Wachovia Bank illegally charged CATERBONE a $10.00 fee for a
cahiers check in an effort to incite and harass. The Wachovia Bank has processed at least
10 cashier checks prior to this date without ever charging a fee. Joe Caterbone, uncle of
CATERBONE was present in line and walked out after CATERBONE ignored him.
389. May 7, 2008 was one of most painful days of electromagnetic radiation for
CATERBONE.
390. On May 8, 2008 the Lancaster City Water Department turned on the water at 1252
Fremont Street and the CONDEMNED NOTICE was removed.
391. ON May 8, 2008 the electronic version of a brief filed by CATERBONE for Superior
Court Case No. MDA 2053-07 was hacked and changed.
392. On May 9, 2008 the link to the Downtown Lancaster Action Plan of the Advanced
Media Group website was hacked and turned off.
393. On May 10, 2008 after noise all night at 1252 Fremont Street, the home of William
“Lefty” Plank and Lee Schopf, the hot tub jet switch was turned on twice during the day in
an effort to run up the electric bill. At about 8:30 am a long grey haired male started an
altercation and screamed and threatened CATERBONE from the backyard of 1252 Fremont
Street, the home of William “Lefty” Plank and Lee Schopf.
394. On May 12, 2008, as with most mornings CATERBONE tried to get a free breakfast at
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
82 of
135
83110
82 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
the St. James Episcopal Church Food Kitchen. The church had a policy of placing all
backpacks outside the facility and hanging them on the wooden fence in the rear. On
several occasions when CATERBONE had very sensitive court related materials inside, he
had left the backpack at Lancaster City Hall, and even at the Lancaster Public Library. On
one occasion a few weeks ago an alternate Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer
locked up the backpack in an office inside St. James Episcopal Church. On this day, May 12,
2008, CATERBONE decided to request some sort of exception from the administrators of
St. James Episcopal Church. The woman administrator in the office of St. James Episcopal
Church allowed CATERBONE to place the backpack with court documents and filings
insider the church administrators office. She said she would inform George Dunn, the
Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer that he had her permission. CATERBONE
proceeded to the line for breakfast and Mr. George Dunn immediately made him leave the
line and told him it was not her decision. CATERBONE was instructed to take the backpack
with court related documents and filings out of the building. He told George Dunn, the
Schadd Detective Agency Security Officer that the matter would be taken up with his
Superiors. The James Street District Security employee stood close by trying to insinuate
that CATERBONE was in the wrong and causing problems. Immediately following the
incident, CATERBONE went to the Lancaster County Library, which was located right next
door, and Googled Schaad Detective Agency to find an email address to file a complaint
and found the following article: Schadd Detective agency owner to stand trial on
prostitution charge by MATTHEW KEMENY, The Patriot- News Friday February 01, 2008,
3:28 PM Provided PhotoRussell L. Wantz Jr. The owner of one of the largest private
detective and security agencies in central Pennsylvania will stand trial on a charge of
criminal attempt to solicit a prostitute, a Dauphin County district judge ruled today.
Russell Leroy Wantz Jr., 57, who owns the York-based Schaad Detective Agency, Inc., was
arrested Dec. 10 in Swatara Twp., after police said he arraigned to meet a woman for sex
at the Red Roof Inn.
395. On May 13, 2008 CATERBONE went to the office of Spiziri Insurance to use a
computer offered by owner John Spiziri. CATERBONE was hacked and windows explorer
would not work while trying to make a CD-ROM backup of files from a thumb drive.
396. Again on May 13, 2008 the statistics report for Advanced Media Group was hacked
and not displayed.
397. On May 15, 2008 CATERBONE was hacked at the Lancaster County Library while
trying to display the electronic ORDER of the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals, thus
denying him access to the document. There is only 1 (one) view allowed per electronic
email. The Library staffer that was in the Duke Street Business Center of the Library
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
83 of
136
84110
83 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
during that time made a remark before the incident as if she was involved.
398. On May 18, 2008 immediately following the Sunday mass at St. Mary’s Catholic
Church, which CATERBONE attends on a regular basis and is a member, had made
arrangements with Charles “Chip” Snyder, owner operator of Snyder Funeral Home, to
pick up the remaining estate files of his brother, Sammy Caterbone (December 25, 1984
death). The Snyder Funeral Home and Chip Snyder was the mortician and the first to raise
concern and doubt that the suicide on the death certificate did not make sense since there
were no marks of any kind on the neck of the Sammy Caterbone when the remains were
retrieved from Santa Barbara, California. That observation and notification to CATERBONE
started the formal process and investigation into Sammy Caterbone’s cause of death back
in 1984. They agreed to that the files would be available at the King Street Office of
Snyder Funeral Home. At that Mass, Fr. Leo Goodman had announced to the congregation
that St. Mary’s was going to start a video broadcast of the Sunday morning mass on
network television and a web cast for those that are homebound; and requested feedback
from the congregation. CATERBONE waited to offer his services to Fr. Leo Goodman and
talked to him outside after mass. Father Leo Goodman tried to humiliate and harass
CATERBONE, as he has done on so many occasions.
399. On May 19, 2008, CATERBONE observed the owner of 1242 Fremont Street, Wally
(last name unknown), leaving a note for the occupants at the front door. CATERBONE has
also been making formal complaints regard the activities of that residence and had an
illegally parked car removed from the back alley a few weeks before. CATERBONE
informed Wally of suspicious activity that looked like drug trafficking with people going in
and out during the day and night, similar to 1252 Fremont Street. Wally thought they
were selling drugs also. Wally confirmed that they were not paying rent and he was
evicting the tenants. CATERBONE went back to his residence and heard yelling and
screaming from 1242 Fremont Street, and heard the tenants threaten Wally with physical
threats and Sylvia Boas, 1244 Fremont Street also yelling at Wally. Wally was walking to
his car and threatening to call the police.
400. On May 20, 2008, CATERBONE left his residence in his 1991 Dodge truck and within a
half of block was stalked by Mr. Joseph Caterbone and Ms. Dee Stover Butz. Blocks away
CATERBONE got out of his car at a red light and asked Mr. Joseph Caterbone (Uncle) if he
was following him, and went back to his car, where Dee Stover Butz was directly behind
CATERBONE. CATERBONE asked her while she was waiving to him in a sarcastic manner, if
she was 12 years old. CATERBONE went immediately to the Headquarters of WGAL-TV
where there was supposed to be a protest of the TV Station for the bias of the media
coverage of the Clinton-Obama presidential race. CATERBONE received an email the day
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
84 of
137
85110
84 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
before soliciting protesters from Rebecca Lytle, a Clinton campaign person for Lancaster
County. In the parking lane of WGAL-TV CATERBONE ran out of gas due to another
incident of someone stealing his gas. He found only one (1) person protesting and
suggested that the email was a fraud to the person protesting.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
85 of
138
86110
85 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2009
401. On August 19, 2009 or there about, CATERBONE received the NOTICE OF AWARD from
the Social Security Administration (SSA) for his DISABILITIES BENEFITS from the
application of April 8, 2009. The application was for symptoms and illnesses from the
victimization of U.S. SPONSORED MIND CONTROL TECHONOLOGIES. The application and
due diligence process by the SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION included documentation
related to the victimization of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and did NOT INCLUDE ANY
MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS OR ANY PSYCHIATRIC EVALUATIONS BY THE SOCIAL SECURITY
ADMINISTRATION OR THIRD PARTIES. CATERBONE continues to receive his benefits to
this day. Key elements of the BENEFITS are as follows:
402. The SSA considered CATERBONE DISABLED AS OF DECEMBER OF 2005; the date of
which he became a victim of full-time 24/7 synthetic telepathy as documented.
403. A check in the amount of $21,456.00 was received as payment for benefits
retroactive for one year to April of 2008.
404. CATERBONE’S case was UPDATED in May of 2015 with a NOTIFICATION LETTER of
July 26, 2016 stating that “WE DO NOT NEED TO UPDATE YOUR CASE AT THIS TIME”. It
should be noted that all beneficiaries are required to go thru the UPDATE at least once
every 3 years, with the exception of chronic cases and/or those over the age of 50.
405. A NOTIFICATION LETTER OF BENEFITS was received on December 19, 2016 with NET
MONTYLY BENEFITS of $1379.00 per month.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
86 of
139
87110
86 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2010
406. In March of 2010 FULTON BANK illegally filed a No Trespass Notice against
CATERBONE and in the process illegally and maliciously took possession of CATERBONE 'S
three (3) safe deposit boxes containing files, electronic media, evidence, medications,
social security documents, audio files, court filings, personal legal documents such as birth
certificates, etc,., and most importantly $31,000.00 in Cashiers Checks amounting to theft
of property, extortion, obstruction of justice, and mental duress.
407. In April of 2010, during the week in which CATERBONE was to attend a PRESS
RELEASE CONFERENCE in Kentucky for the Human Rights Organization, FREEEDOM FROM
COVERT HARASSMENT AND SURVEILLANCE in and in retaliation for CATERBONE filing an
EMERGENCY INJUNCTION FOR RELIEF in Federal Court Detective Clark Bearinger, of the
Lancaster City Bureau of Police filed a fabricated and malicious 302 mental health warrant
in an effort to cover up the Fulton Bank criminal act and the Federal Emergency
Injunction. Detective Clark Bearinger used a fabricated Youtube Video that allegedly
depicted CATERBONE saying it was “KILL A COPY TIME”. The Lancaster City Detective
never produced the video to anyone, or presented it to the Judge at the 303 Hearing.
408. In an effort to get released CATERBONE agreed to suspend all social media accounts.
409. While incarcerated in the Psychiatric Emergency Unit of the Lancaster General
Hospital, all Medical Professionals did engage in a wholesale program of psychological
torture.
410. First of all there was no 302 delivered with any of the Lancaster City Police upon
arrival to the emergency psychiatric unit until hours later.
411. The Charge Nurse was the main culprit of the psychological torture and would later
stalk CATERBONE at the local WALMART on at least 2 occasions.
412. Second, they refused to give CATERBONE an interview only after making several
complaints to see the 302 Warrant.
413. The MD that did finally interview CATERBONE would not listen to the facts and
release CATERBONE , and LGH purposefully held CATERBONE for about 6 hours until
moving him to FAIRMOUNT.
414. While incarcerated at the FAIRMOUNT BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SYSTEM, in Philadelphia
all Medical Professionals did engage in a wholesale program of psychological torture.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
87 of
140
88110
87 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
414. After CATERBONE refused a blood test and medications 3 Psych-techs walked into
CATERBONE 'S room, held him down, and administered a psychotropic drug in his ass,
which after a few hours dummed CATERBONE down to a state of semi-consciousness,
slurred speech, and total compliance for days on end, making it impossible to defend
himself during the 303 HEARING, which he immediately demanded upon arrival.
415. Derrick Robinson, President of the Human Rights Group FREEEDOM FROM COVERT
HARASSMENT AND SURVEILLANCE did make calls to FAIRMOUNT hospital in an effort to
get CATERBONE released. CATERBONE had previously served on the OUTREACH
COMITTEE, which Derrick Robinson presided over weekly teleconference meetings during
2009 and the beginning of 2010.
416. The Public Defender assigned to the 303 Hearing was in collusion with the
Psychiatrist, who was Dr. Gratz, the Administrators, and Detective Clark Bearinger.
417. During the stay at FAIRMOUNT CATERBONE and FULTON BANK attorney Stephanie
Carfly (CATERBONE and Stephanie Carfly had a very civil relationship), of the firm Barley
Snyder, LLP, did consummate a verbal agreement to allow the PLAITNIFF to go to the
FULTON BANK and empty CATERBONE 'S safe deposit boxes, which would later be
rescinded by higher authorities. Stephanie Carfly would later leave Barley Snyder and
George Warner would file an APPEARANCE for FULTON BANK in August of 2011, without
the knowledge of CATERBONE .
418. CATERBONE erroneously agreed to a stay up to 20 days, which amounted to a total
stay of about 10 days, and three (3) months of outpatient treatment consisting of weekly
visits to Erin, a counselor at Pennsylvania Counseling Services on Pearl Street in
Lancaster.
419. CATERBONE finally agreed to a see the resident psychiatrist after consistent
badgering by Erin, however, after showing up for the scheduled appointment, the
Psychiatrist refused to keep the appointment due to the fact the medical records were not
transferred to Pennsylvania Counseling Services, so CATERBONE was told.
420. CATERBONE filed the appropriate papers and received the medical records to
Pennsylvania Counseling Services, however the meeting was not kept due to the 3 months
had ended.
421. Derrick Robinson, President of the Human Rights Group FREEEDOM FROM COVERT
HARASSMENT AND SURVEILLANCE did write a letter addressed to “Erin” stating the fact
that CATERBONE was a victim of Electromagnetic Weapon Assaults and listed several
symptoms. The letter was hand delivered during one of the weekly sessions.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
88 of
141
89110
88 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
422. CATERBONE did enjoy the appointments due to the fact it was the only person that
would listen to CATERBONE 'S accounts of the torture and abuse by electromagnetic
weapons.
423. CATERBONE did request to keep seeing Erin after the 3 months had ended, however
PENNSYLVANIA Counseling Services refused saying that CATERBONE 'S insurance would
not pay.
424. In May, Detective Clark Bearing did agree to drive CATERBONE to the FULTON BANK
branch at Manor Shopping Center to accommodate CATERBONE 'S request for a witness
and transportation to empty and deliver home the contents of 3 safe deposit boxes, which
resulted from the illegal and intentional NO TRESPASS NOTICE.
425. CATERBONE had previously arranged and had delivered and installed a safe from
425. Neffsville Lock and Safe on North Queen Street, Lancaster, prior to arranging for the
emptying of the FULTON BANK safe deposit boxes to provide safe passage for the all of the
legal assets contained in the safe deposit boxes.
427. Detective Clark Bearinger notified Fernando Sanchez while CATERBONE was
emptying his safe deposit boxes on the other side of the 4 ½ foot partition that his son
worked for the Central Intelligence Agency, or CIA.
428. FULTON BANK provided CATERBONE a check for some $350.00 at that time to
compensate him for the outstanding time left on the contracts for the safe deposit boxes.
429. On or about August 26, 2010 CATERBONE 'S brother Steve Caterbone arrives at 1250
Fremont Street with their Mother, Yolanda Caterbone, who was brought home to rest and
live out the remaining years of her life at home after living 5 years in Southern Florida
with son's Steve and Mike. Both Steve and CATERBONE attend full-time to the care of
their mother on a daily basis. Their mother was suffering from congestive hear failure, a
decreased renal failure that technically was borderline for daily dialysis, full-blown
dementia, had a heart pacemaker and stint, and the inability to walk. CATERBONE
possesses all of the medical reports to confirm the preceding.
430. In September of 2010 CATERBONE 'S computer was hit by one of the first “RANSOM”
viruses, which requires a money transfer to cyberhackers in order to gain access to all of
the data stored on the computer. A-Plus Computers on Columbia Avenue in Lancaster
provides the service of scrubbing the hard drive, loosing all of the data, and installs the
anti-virus software from AVAST. The next month WGAL TV8 would report on the virus
during the daily scam alerts. The cost was about $100.00. Because of the expertise of the
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
89 of
142
90110
89 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
431. CATERBONE, no important or vital data was lost, and all was contained on other back
up media. Due to the fact that CATERBONE had by this time shut down all social media
sites, there was not much data to loose. Most activities surrounding CATERBONE 'S
ongoing litigation was shut down after the purposeful and malicious attack and illegal 302
Mental Health Warrant by Lancaster City Detective Clark Bearinger. It was, at that time a
successful strategy.
432. In the week before Christmas of 2010, Yolanda Caterbone was hospitalized via a 911
Emergency call in one of three hospitalizations prior to her passing on June 29, 2011. This
hospitalization was for a urinary tract infection, which lasted about 3 weeks. Upon arrival
back home, in home nursing visits by VISITING NURSES would continue until her passing.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
90 of
143
91110
90 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2011
433. In March of 2011 Yolanda Caterbone falls while sneaking out of bed in the middle of
the night and breaks her hip requiring a total hip replacement at the tender age of 84.
This hospitalization last about a month.
434. In April of 2011 another hospitalization was required for fluid in the lungs.
435. On June 29 th 2011, while under the care of HOSPICE, an on the Birthday of
CATERBONE 'S youngest brother and Yolanda Caterbone’s youngest son Tommy (who
deceased on April 29, 1996 in Kill Devil Hills, North Carolina – SEE WRONFUL DEATH
COMPLAINT v. FULTON BANK) died. The funeral and celebration took place on July 2,
2011 at St. Joseph Church. A CELEBRATION was held in the back yard of 1250 Fremont
Street. My MOTHER literally died of a broken heart due to all of the circumstances
surrounding the 60 some years of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control, COINTELPRO, and
Community Stalking.
436. In August of 2011, while Benadeth, Anna, and Alex (Anna's Boyfriend) come to visit
during the TOMMY CATERBONE MEMORIAL GOLF TOURNAMENT, Steve Caterbone vacates
1250 Fremont Street and returns to Miami, Florida with his family.
437. CATERBONE will spend the next several holidays with the RODA Family.
438. On New Years Eve, 2011, former friend and now living in Florday, Kevin Hobday
makes an unannounced visit to 1250 Fremont Street with his family, wife Jill, and 2
daughters.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
91 of
144
92110
91 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2012
439. In November of 2012, a few days before the U.S. Presidential election, Steve
Caterbone returns with the infamous BIG BOY [ALLEGEDLY A VICTIM OF MIND CONTRO
HIMSELF] AND BIG GIRL, the dogs from Hell (THEY LITTERLY ATE THE ENTIRE BACK YARD
DRIVING CATERBONE NUTS)! Just Kidding. RIP BIG GIRL!
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
92 of
145
93110
92 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2015
440. In December of 2015, Fernando Sanchez, the branch manager responsible for the
illegal no trespass notice was indicted and imprisoned on federal charges for embezzling
more than $99,000 from the MANOR SHOPPING CENTER ASSOCIATION account held at
FULTON BANK. Fernando was also a basketball coach at Lancaster Catholic High School.
The presiding Judge Was Judge Edward Smith, chambers and court in Easton,
Pennsylvania, who in 2016, was illegally given the cases of CATERBONE when the clerk of
courts of the eastern district of Pennsylvania wrote an order transferring a case from
Philadelphia Judge Anita Brody. The alleged reason was that the perps keep hacking the
gps system of CATERBONE and the fact that it was a danger and threat to CATERBONE to
attend hearings in a foreign city.
441. On June 23, 2015 CATERBONE files an AMICUS BRIEF in the Lisa Michelle Lambert
Habeus Case in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case No. 14-
02559 and is captioned on the Case as MOVANT. THIS WILL CAUSE EVEN MORE
INCENTIVE FOR RETALIATION BY THE LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT AND COMMUNITY WITH
A MORE INTENSE COMMUNITY-WIDE TORTURE AND HARASSMENT PROGRAM.
442. August 6, 2015 CATERBONE voluntarily seeks out and submits to a polygraph in West
Chester, Pennsylvania, in an effort to provide credit to the ongoing public relations
campaign of slander and libel by the Lancaster City Police Department. The Polygrapher
was Ms. Bonnie Lee of Polygraph Solutions LLC, 257 W. Uwchlan Ave, Downingtown, PA
19335. On the evening of August 6, 2015 Ms. Bonnie Lee called and NOTIFIED
CATERBONE THAT HE HAD FAILED THE POLYGRAPH. The following are CATERBONE'S
response which was used to file a complaint and refund from the credit card company
EPIC, which was on the record as COMPLAINT NO. SR1-2637592483. The response is as
follows:
443. I had chosen a one issue test and she kept changing the terminology of my question -
dealing with telepathy. Ms. Lee looked up the term on her smartphone and gave me
definitions that were not consistent with the technology, I had to provide me own
definition on the fly without any documents and write it down for her on her tablet for the
test. My polygraph question was "Am I a Victim of U.S. Sponsored Mind Control?" - I have
the Social Security Disability Benefits to prove that I am
444. As usual, there had to be some form of uninfluenced, typical of Targeted Individuals
and Federal Whistleblowers
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
93 of
146
94110
93 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
Ms. Miller failed to inform me yesterday that she only accepts cash the day of the
polygraph test; I luckily read it on her website. It was buried on a 3 ½ long screen text
message
445. As usual my Apple Iphone GPS was again hacked and lead me in the wrong direction
to the middle of a development some miles away, fortunately I had prepared for this and
had Ms. Lee provide me with verbal instructions the day before
446. Again, as they did on my way to Carlisle, I was again given the electromagnetic
attacks that produce an intense need to sleep while driving
447. When I arrived early in the pre-test interview she tried to talk me out of continuing
on with the test; I had to almost threaten legal action due to the fact that I had paid a
$300.00 credit card deposit the day before the test. Maybe she does this to avoid taxes?
448. The entire process lasted from 1:50pm until 4:30pm and was exhausting. She
admitted that she performed more than the usual 3 chart test. I had actually fallen asleep
for a few seconds due to the electromagnetic sleep attack, and fought myself during the
entire process not to fall asleep
449. I had to sit motionless for almost an hour and a half and she barked at me for the
slightest movement; which does not seem to be normal
450. She had tailored the profile questions to include any hint of behavior for my entire
lifespan
451. During the profile interview I had warned her that the only way that I would fail
would be due to either her machinery or her conduct
452. SHE GUARANTEED ME THAT IF I TOLD THE TRUTH – I WOULD PASS THE TEST; SHE
FLAT OUT LIED TO ME! I TOLD THE TRUTH DURING THE ENTIRE PROCESS!
453. CATERBONE filed a complaint with his credit card company to hopeful recover the
$300.00 deposit.
454. She had 2 books in the corner of her office titled “Brain Mapping” and one on
“Interrogation Techniques”.
455. There were no breaks in between the charts. I finally had to ask to go to the
bathroom before the final chart.
456. During the profile session regarding personal integrity she had asked “do you have
any bad behavior within the past 55 years. I had asked her if she would release the results
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
94 of
147
95110
94 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
to third parties and she said that was alright however she said she would have to include
all my answers regarding the profile of my personal information. I kept questioning why
she would not just release the report she released to me and she would not budge on her
position.
457. On September 2, 2015 CATERBONE files a MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGEMENT FOR
THE IMMEDIATE RELEASE OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBER FROM PRISON, in the Lisa Michelle
Lambert Habeus Case in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, Case
No. 14-02559, which will wind through the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Case No. 16-
1149 and 15-3400, which is now in the U.S. Supreme Court as Case No. 16-6822. THE
FEDERAL LAW DICTATES THAT LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT BE RELEASED FROM
INCARCERATION. THE COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA HAS CONCEADED ANY AND
ALL CREDIBILITY INVOLVING THAT CASE OVER THE PAST 2 YEARS WITH THE
INTENTIONAL AND MALICOUS CONDUCT AND RETALIATION AGAINST CATERBONE .
458. In August of 2015 Steve Caterbone vacates again to live with brother, Phil (Doctor,
D.O. Family Practitioner), who had just moved from Austin, Texas, to Carlisle
Pennsylvania.
459. In December of 2015, the week before Christmas, Steve, Big Boy and Big Girl leave
Carlisle Pennsylvania and return to Miami Florida. Our brother Mike Caterbone and his
family (4 children) have been living in Plantation, Florida since 1999.
460. On July 8, 2015 another ILLEGAL AND FABRICATED 302 MENTAL HEALTH WARRANT
BY LANCASTER CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER.
461. In November of 2015 CATERBONE and Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane
correspond to one another re the 1998 encounter with the NSA when CATERBONE was told
that his PERPETRATORS AND ENEMIES were the “GOOD OLD BOYS”.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
95 of
148
96110
95 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
2016
462. On May 6, 2016 Sanchez was sentenced to 15 months in Federal Prison when the
Prosecutors argued during a sentencing memorandum “his actions reveal a pattern of
misbehavior rather than a sudden and single departure from an otherwise law abiding
life”.
463. On February 13, 2016 Associate Justice Antonin Scalia was found dead of apparent
natural causes Saturday on a luxury resort in West Texas, federal officials said.
NOTE: From the In Contravention of Conventional Wisdom - CIA “no touch” torture makes
sense out of mind control allegations, By Cheryl Welsh January 2008
“The Defense Intelligence Agency has released a report on heavy Communist research on
microwaves, including their use as weapons. Microwaves are used in radar, television and
microwave ovens. They can cause disorientation and possibly hear noices”.
464. On February 19, 2016 another ILLEGAL AND FABRICATED 302 MENTAL HEALTH
WARRANT BY LANCASTER CITY POLICE DETECTIVE CLARK BEARINGER.
465. February 20, 2016 LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT Releases her book titled “LOVE, MURDER
AND CORRUPTION in LANCASTER COUNTY”. The book is sold at the local Barnes and Noble
bookstore in the RedRose Commons Shopping Center on the Fruitville Pike in Lancaster,
PA.
466. On April 28, 2016 CATERBONE files an AMICUS BRIEF for then Pennsylvania Attorney
General Kathleen Kane in the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Philadelphia, Case No. 1164
EDA 2016 and in named the AMICUS on the Caption.
467. On July 15, 2016 CATERBONE sends another invoice to Secretary of Defense Ash
Carter for approximately $3,245,000.00 million dollars for 29 years of “Mind Control
Victimization”.
468. On August 6, 2016 CATERBONE files yet another FBI IC3 ONLINE COMPLAINT with
the FBI and delivers a hard copy to the Harrisburg Office.
469. On August 15, 2016 LNP reports ANOTHER SUSPICIOUS DEATH. “Convicted killer
Robert Zook Jr. dies in state prison”. A few days prior CATERBONE has a conversation
regarding his allegations of Robert Zook being a Targeted Individual with 3 Lancaster
County Sheriff's at the Marion Courtroom outside dining area. Robert Zook testified during
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
96 of
149
97110
96 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
a Pennsylvania Supreme Court Appeal and the following come from the December 11,
2000 OPINION :
470. Appellant claims that he cannot effectively communicate with counsel any longer due
to his fixed delusional belief that a radio transmitter has been inserted in his brain which
monitors his every move and which can prove that he is innocent of the charges. At the
competency hearing, Dr. Robert Sadoff, M.D. and Dr. Larry Rotenberg, M.D. testified on
behalf of the defense and Dr. Timothy Michals, M.D. testified on behalf of the
Commonwealth. Appellant also testified. Appellant testified regarding his belief that the
Department of Corrections implanted a radio transmitter in his head that enables “them”
to control his thoughts, pump conversation into Appellant’s head, and project images into
his field of vision. Additionally, Appellant claims that his counsel is involved in a number of
illegal activities and is part of a conspiracy to defraud his family of large sums of money
which initially started in 1979.1 Appellant testified that in 1979, there was a drug raid in
counsel’s law office involving members of the Pagan motorcycle gang and Appellant’s
mother. He claims that during this raid, a radio transmitter, similar to the one he claims is
implanted in his head, was removed from his mother’s abdomen “with a knife.” Appellant
is disturbed that his counsel will not litigate this issue of the radio transmitter. He believes
that some type of technology would enable the prosecution and/or the defense to explore
the actual crime scene via the radio transmitter and that, therefore, the issue of the radio
transmitter must be explored in the [J-205-2000] – 5 pending PCRA proceedings.7
Appellant insists that he is not mentally ill and that he is innocent of the murders. He also
believes that his counsel actively is seeking to have him executed. The court explicitly
disagreed with counsels’ claim that Appellant’s delusional beliefs interfere with his ability
to trust and work with his counsel. In support of that conclusion, the court noted that
Appellant has not terminated his relationship with counsel despite his attempts to advance
his theory regarding the Transmitters; he was extremely polite and respectful to counsel
during the hearing and demonstrated no hostility or animosity towards either of his
counsel; and that if Appellant honestly believed that his attorneys were working to have
him executed, or that they had defrauded his family in the past, he would not treat them
so congenially. The court ultimately concluded that Appellant was not mentally ill and not
incompetent to proceed.
471. August 22, 2016 CATERBONE files a Preliminary Injunction for Emergency Relief,
Case No. CI-05842 in the Lancaster County Court of Appeals in order to have a JUDGE
ORDER attending physicians to continue the practice of prescribing pain medications to
treat the pain associated with CATERBONE'S back and legs, which has been the practice
since at least 2009. THE LANCASTER COUNTY JUDICIAL BENCH REFUSES TO EVEN
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
97 of
150
98110
97 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
ADDRESS THE CIVIL ACTION – ANOTHER CRIME OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND
TORTURE. A COMPLAINT WAS FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE JUDICIAL CONDUCT BOARD
OF PENNSYLVANIA IN HARRISBURG, PA in December of 2016
472. On October 1, 2016 CATERBONE'S 2004 Santa Fe was stolen via a tactic of a
perpetrator named John Keener physically harassing and restraining CATERBONE from
exiting Hildy's Bar on the corner of East Frederick and N. Mary Street in Lancaster, while
the towing company LANCASTER FLEET AND AUTO, known as LFA, towed the car away to
the impound lot. After a stolen car claim was filed to CATERBONE'S insurance carrier
GEICO, on October 27, 2016 LFA called CATERBONE to notify him that the car was towed
and impounded on October 1, 2016 and demanded the payment of $960.00 in order to get
the car back – A Classic Case of Extortion and Theft by Deception.
473. On October 7, 2016 perpetrators vandalized and rendered useless CATERBONE'S
Xerox Copier/Fax/Scanner causing costs of several thousand dollars in travel expenses,
printing costs, time, and energy due to the fact that Harrisburg was the most cost effective
location for copy services. The cost at Harrisburg State Street Copy was $.07 cents v. $.20
in Lancaster. The Xerox was printing at about $.02 per copy and replacement is
approximately $500.00. Another item on the ALLSTATE INSURANCE CLAIM for
damaged/stolen property, which totals approximately $10,000 to date.
474. On November 6, 2016 the SUNDAY NEWS OF LNP reports “Feds probe Fulton Bank, 3
others for possible fair-lending violations”. The article states “Fulton Bank, the biggest
bank in Lancaster County, and three sister banks are being investigated for possible
violations of federal fair-lending laws. The newly widened probe was disclosed Friday by
Fulton Financial, the holding company for the banks, inside a routine filing about its
quarterly profits. According to Fulton Financial, the U.S. Department of Justice is looking
into “potential lending discrimination on the basis of race and national origin” at the four
banks that may have occurred since Jan. 1, 2009. The link to the article is
http://lancasteronline.com/insider/feds-probe-fulton-bank-others-for-possible-fair-
lending-violations/article_3e0bfacc-a2d2-11e6-baba-f35c4009ce63.html
475. On November 12, 2016 CATERBONE writes and produces the document titled “FALSE
IMPRISONMENT AND ILLEGAL INTERROGATIONS by U.S. Intelligence Agencies November
12, 2016”. The document contains the following:
476. DEFENSE INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (DIA) - July of 2005, Austin Texas – Brigadier
General John C. L. Scribner Texas Military Forces Museum: A. Upon getting clearance by
the Military Police at the gate to enter I was apprehended by 2 white male DIA Agents
dressed in suit and ties while viewing old Huey Helicopter, and escorted outside in front of
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
98 of
151
99110
98 of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
my 2005 Honda Odyssey. The 2 DIA Agents identified themselves and interrogated me for
approximately 1 ½ hours. Interrogation included International Signal and Control, PLC., or
ISC Whistleblowing and Claims in U.S. Federal Court, 05-cv-2288. Agents searched my
vehicle and reviewed documents that I had with me. They would not allow me to leave
until they confirmed that I was staying with my brother, Dr. Phillip Caterbone of Austin,
Texas by calling his medical office and confirming with his office manager. I was ORDERED
NOT TO VISIT ANY MILITARY BASES OR FACILITIES NOW OR IN THE FUTURE before being
released.
477. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) March 8, 2016 – NSA Headquarters, Ft. Meade,
Maryland: A. At about 8:00pm I entered the back parking lot of the Lancaster City Police
Station to deliver a document to the front desk for Detective Clark Bearinger. After pulling
into a parking spot 3 or 4 patrol cars moved into position around my car and Lt. McCord
approached my window. I told him why I was there and he ORDERED me to leave
immediately. I had intended to go to the Office Depot to mail via USPS Priority Mail my
Request for the COMMUTATION OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S PRISON SENTENCE
addressed to President Obama. After the incident at the Lancaster City Police Station I
decided to drive to Washington, D.C. Either deliver the prepared priority mail package at
the White House Guard Gate, or mail it from another copy center inside Washington, D.C.
On Route 95South I saw the exit for Ft. Meade and thought I would take a few pictures of
the NSA Headquarters building that is always depicted in official photos. Along the exit
ramp to Ft. Meade, there was a sign for the NSA Museum. I could not find the right ramp,
it was very confusing in the dark and saw the NSA Guard Gate and a female NSA
Policewoman standing outside the guard gate. I decided to approach the guard gate and
ask directions, but as soon as I entered the guard gate, the female officer got in a car a
drove through the gate. I stopped at the booth and asked the male NSA Police Officer
where the museum was. He asked what I was doing and where my destination was. I
explained and he asked me if I wanted to talk to someone. I responded yes, and he took
my USPS Priority Mail my Request for the COMMUTATION OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERT'S
PRISON SENTENCE addressed to President Obama and inspected it inside the security
booth. He requested me to pull through the guard gate and instructed me to park inside
the guarded NSA complex. As soon as I pulled into the designated parking spot, another 2
or 3 NSA Police Cruisers arrived. I was instructed to shut off my engine and exit the
vehicle. 2 NSA Police Officers said for security purposes to empty my pockets and place my
belongings on top of the hood of my 2007 Honda CRV. Then, suddenly they handcuffed me
and a few more NSA Police Cruisers arrived. They began asking questions and asked if
they could inspect my car, and I said of course. I later turned around and they had a NSA
Canine sniffing my car. It soon turned hostile and at least 8 NSA Police took turns
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
Page
No.No.
No.
99 of
100
152
99110
of
of110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
interrogating me on everything from International Signal and Control, PLC., or ISC
Whistleblowing and Claims in U.S. Federal Court to my mental health record, employment
status, and my recent online job applications. In the past, in order to counter the
HARASSMENT PROGRAM, I would apply for various employment postings by the
intelligence community. They kept asking if I had applied to the NSA, and I kept telling
them that I could not remember. The interrogation lasted about 1 1/12 hours before I was
ORDERED TO RETURN TO LANCASTER AND NEVER TO ENTER ANY FEDERAL FACILITY IN
THE FUTURE. I immediately returned home to Lancaster, prepared a USPS Priority Mail
Envelope in my home/office at 1250 Fremont Street, then went to a USPS Drop Box. I later
closed down my FACEBOOK account, never to open it again.
478. NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY (NSA) 1998 – A Job Fair at a converted Car Dealer in
York, Pennsylvania: After attending the Job Fair I was getting ready to get into my car
when a older white male dressed in a suit approached me. At the time, I was again the the
midst of community stalking and harassment. He identified himself as being from the
National Security Agency, or NSA. I asked him if he could stop the harassment and
stalking and he replied, “Stan, it is not us, it is the 'Good Old Boys'”. We then had a cordial
conversation for about 15 minutes or so, then parted ways.
479. On November 15, 2016 CATERBONE sends via USPS Priority Mail a Letter to President
Obama and asks for the COMMUTATION OF LISA MICHELLE LAMBERTS SENTENCE. THE
LETTER WAS RECIEVED AND CONFIRMED. THE FOLLOWING IS A LINKS TO THE LETTER:
https://www.scribd.com/document/331229947/Letter-REQUEST-for-COMMUTATION-of-
the-Sentence-of-Lisa-Michell-Lambert-to-President-Obama-November-15-2016
480. On November 18, 2016 CATERBONE sends a letter to Judy Astacio, Consumer
Services Investigator, Pennsylvania Department of Insurance, Bureau of Consumer
Services which contains the following:
481. As per you letter of November 7, 2016 and GEICO's Letter of October 27, 2016 it
seems that this case is another example of an attempt to slander and libel my person and
character. It is quite peculiar that on the very same date, OCTOBER 27, 2016 Lancaster
Fleet and Auto Service (LFA) Clerk, named Clark, called me at about 8:25am and informed
me that LFA had my 2004 Santa Fe auto stored in their IMPOUND LOT. Now, of course my
first question was why did you not call me on October 1, 2, or 3 rd? LFA informed me that
per protocol for every tow, they immediately notify the Lancaster City Police Department.
As per my statement, John Keener Assaulted me at about 2:05am on Saturday, October 1,
2016 and stood between me and the exit door and would not let me leave HILDEY's Bar.
As you can see in my documentation, the LFA Tow Log and My Photo prove that this event
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
100 100
101
153
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
was set up in advance to ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING MALICOUS AND PURPOSEFUL
AGENDA:
482. Make it appear my 2004 Santa Fe was stolen THEFT BY DECEPTION - Extort the Tow
and Impound Fees of $860.00 EXTORTION Leave me without transportation and making
me ride my bike and take the RRTA Bus - PAIN AND SUFFERING DUE TO BACK AND GROIN
PAIN
483. Because of item no. 3, the Lancaster Community fabricated stories that my PA Drivers
License was REVOKED and my 2004 Santa Fe was REPOSSED for NON PAYMENT ON A
LOAN. LIBEL AND SLANDER (Written of Social Media Sites) In addition, GEICO had forged
my STATEMENTS for the DECLARATION and REFUSE TO ADHERE TO MY REQUEST FOR HALF
TORT AND CHARGED ME FULL TORT, ANOTHER METHOD TO EXTORT A HIGHER PREMIUM,
EVEN AFTER MY REPEATED PHONE CALLS TO REMEDY THE ACT.
484. On November 21, 2016 CATERBONE updates the Anti-Stalking Legislation handout
and visits the Pennsylvania Capital to distribute to the members of the Judiciary
committee, which were originally visited back in the summer of 2015.
485. On November 25, 2016 CATERBONE sends a USPS Priority Mail letter to the law firm
of A. Barry Cappello and Leila J. Noel, known as Cappello & Noel, LLP which reads: “In
1987 I visited your firm and delivered 3 blue binders for your review of my Lender Liability
Case. Well, my legal journey has certainly progressed since that visit. If you would like to
litigate the Lender Liability of my claims, you are more than welcomed to it.Attached is a
document for your review, titled “Documents for LETTER to Barry Cappello of Santa
Barbara, CA November 25, 2016”. In addition the following links may be helpful:”
486. On November 30, 2016 CATERBONE files another AMICUS BRIEF for former
Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane in the Middle District Superior Court in
Philadelphia, in person, case no. 3576 EDA 2016. CATERBONE will find that the
Prothonotary inadvertently in an attempt to cover up the filing lists the AMICUS BRIEF as
filed by APPELLANT KATHLEEN KANE ON THE DOCKET SHEET, and despite repeated calls to
the PROTHONOTARY OFFICE, they refused to list CATERBONE as the filer. For reference
CATERBONE kept referring the clerks to 1164 EDA 2016, which lists Stanley J. Caterbone,
Pro Se as the filer from the beginning.
487. On December 8, 2016 in case no. 1219 MDA 2016 CATERBONE v. The Lancaster City
Police in the Pennsylvania Superior Court CATERBONE files a brief which is due on
January 7, 2017.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
101 101
102
154
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
488. On December 8, 2016 the LANCASTER CITY POLICE are represented by the attorneys
Handwerger, Barry Nathan and Neil Albert of Zimmerman, Pfannebecker, Nuffort & Albert
489. On December 8, 2016 the United States House of Representatives passed HR 4919,
which given the current circumstances the LANCASTER CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT MOST
LIKELY ALREADY APPLIED FOR A GRANT TO CHIP CATERBONE - the following is from an
article in the ATIVIST POST by Whitney Webb on December 13, 2016 - Last Thursday, the
House passed HR 4919, also known as Kevin and Avonte’s Law, which would allow the US
attorney general to award grants to law enforcement for the creation and operation of
“locative tracking technology programs.” Though the program’s mission is to find
“individuals with forms of dementia or children with developmental disabilities who have
wandered from safe environments,” it provides no restriction on the tracking program’s
inclusion of other individuals. The bill would also require the attorney general to work
with the secretary of health and human services and unnamed health organizations to
establish the “best practices” for the use of tracking devices. Those in support of the
legislation maintain that such programs could prevent tragedies where those with mental
or cognitive disabilities wandered into dangerous circumstances. Yet, others have called
these good intentions a “Trojan horse” for the expansion of a North American police state
as the bill’s language could be very broadly interpreted.
490. On December 12, 2016 CATERBONE files a complaint to the Pennsylvania Judicial
Conduct Board v. Judge David Ashworth for the following:
491. On September 22, 2016 A Preliminary Injunction For Emergency Relief For Pain
Medications And A Therapeutic Spa Via His Medicare Supplemental Insurance Was Filed By
Stan J. Caterbone, In Pro Se
492. On September 22, 2016 The Caption Entry Was Listed As: Stan J. Caterbone Vs.
Lancaster General Hospital; Abbeyville Family Medicine; Patient First Urgent Care;
Southeast Medical; Medexpress Urgent Care; Lancaster Regional Medical Center And The
Lancaster City Police Department
493. On October 3, 2016 A Motion For A 30-Day Continuance, Was Filed By Stan J.
Caterbone
494. On October 3, 2016 An Exhibit Was Filed By Stan J. Caterbone In Pro Se
495. On October 31, 2016 The Case Was Assigned To Judge Ashworth
496. On November 15, 2016 A Motion For Summary Judgment, Was Filed By Stan J.
Caterbone
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
102 102
103
155
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
497. Legal question And Complaint – Why Did The Judge Not Rule On The In Forma
Pauperis And The Preliminary Injunction For Emergency Relief? This Is A Clear Violation Of
Due Process, A Violation Of The Obstruction Of Justice Clauses, And Furthers The Torture
Program By Not Allowing The Plaitiff The Relief Requested And Covering Up The Entire
Case.
498. On December 12, 2016 CATERBONE 'S last printer was vandalized making it
impossible to scan the stamped documents from the Pennsylvania Superior Court
Prothonotary for Case No. 1219 MDA 2016 and the stamped copy from the Pennsylvania
Judicial Conduct Board complaint v. Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas Judge David
Ashworth, both located at the Pennsylvania Judicial Center on Commonwealth Avenue in
Harrisburg. CATERBONE is also in the midst of litigation in the U.S. Supreme Court, as a
PRO SE LITIGANT, in Case No. 16-6822 for the Lisa Michelle Lambert Habeus Corpus Case
14-02559 of the Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania, which CATERBONE is named
MOVANT. The case is going to be distributed to the Supreme Court Justices on January 7,
2016 for that Conference. The Case was appealed from the U.S. Third Circuit Court of
Appeals Case No. 16-1149 by CATERBONE .
499. Again, as usual, CATERBONE was harassed while trying to relax and have a drink at
the Marriott Bar at Penn Square, by an unknown female patron, who was suspiciously
seated next to him.
500. On Wednesday, December 14, 2016 AS USUAL THE DAY STARTED WITH AN
UPRECEDENTED AMOUNT OF COMPUTER/SMART PHONE HACKINGING. CATERBONE had
an electric blanket, flashlight stolen, had the air in his 2004 Santa Fe tires deflated, twice,
(MOST LIKELY THE SPANISH LOW-LIFE'S OF 1252 FREMONT STREET) had the attendant at
the SHEETZ store on Manheim Pike turn the pump to the tire pump off, as to deflate the
tires, and was again harassed and treated as a VICTIM OF A HATE CRIME while out for a
drink and music at the VILLAGE NIGHTCLUB. While filing court mandated papers at the
PROTHONOTARY OFFICE OF THE PENNSYLVANIA SUPERIOR COURT IN HARRISBURG, PA
was again harassed by the PENNSYLVANIA CAPITOL POLICE with unnecessary banter at
the security check. THE SAME BLACK MALE CAPITOL POLICEMAN has been harassing for
the past few months. AGAIN THE NEIGHBORS AT BOTH 1252 AND 1248 ENGAGED IN
SHADOWING CATERBONE 'S MOVEMENTS WITH MAKING NOISES WHEN MOVING ABOUT
HIS HOME, AND AGAIN WALK OUT THE DOOR WHENEVER CATERBONE LEAVES HIS HOME,
A CLASSIC GANG-STALKING TACTIC TO HARASS.
501. On December 16, 2016 CATERBONE learns that Attorney Christopher Patterson is
running for a judgeship in the Lancaster County Court of Common Pleas. CATERBONE
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
103 103
104
156
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
tweets the document titled “CHRISTOPHER PATTERSON Candidate for JUDGESHIP and His
1987 EFFORT FOR MY GUARDIANSHIP Friday December 16, 2016” which outlines and
provides evidence of the continued strategy and tactic of the following:
502. Guardianship Outlined In August 24 And August 10 Letters From Robert Kauffman,
Then President Of Fmg,Ltd., The Company I Founded Christopher Patterson Was A Former
Partner Of Lancaster Mayor Rick Gray. In 2006 I Went To Christopher Patterson's Office
Across From The Lancaster County Courthouse And Confronted Him – He Denied My
Allegations. Every Sunday I Attend The 9:00 Mass At The Chapel In Lancaster Regional
Medical Center He Walks In After Me No Matter What Time I Arrive
503. A Guardianship – Still A Prime Strategy By The Law Enforcement Today Would Allow
My Guardians To Dismiss Every Civil Complaint And Every Court Proceeding On My Behalf.
It Was Effective For The Targeting Case Of Pop Singer Brittany Spears
504. On December 17, 2016 after again being hacked while working on legal documents
CATERBONE calls the FBI Harrisburg Office and leaves a voice message with the DUTY
AGENT with his address and phone number after the receptionist transfers the call to the
duty agent voice mail. OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS THESE CALLS HAVE TEKEN
PLACE ON SOMETIMES A WEEKLY BASIS AFTER COMPLAINTS TO LOCAL AND STATE
OFFICIALS CONTINUE TO FALL ON DEAF EARS. THE FBI, OF COURSE, DOES NOTHING TO
STOP THE COMPUTER HACKING. IN THE SUMMER OF 2015, THEN CHIEF OF DETECTIVES
FOR THE LANCASTER COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, MICHAEL LANDIS, IN A
MEETING ON THE 5th Floor of the Lancaster County Courthouse, Detective Landis made a
declaratory statement that the FBI was the computer hacker.
505. On December 18, 2016 The learns for the first time that the wedding of April 25, 2009
at St. John Neuman when the former Secretary of Defense, Director of CIA Robert Gates
came to Lancaster was for his niece, Venessa Dziuba, who was a 1997 Graduate of
Lancaster Catholic High School. CATERBONE never reviewed who the niece was until this
date and had connected to her on LINKDIN a few hour later with her accepting. Her
father, Theodore Dziuba resides in Lancaster while the couple reside in the state of
Washington.
506. IMPORTATANT FOR THE CASE v. City of Lancaster. In November of 2004 CATERBONE
'S mother, Yolanda Roda Caterbone required a surgical procedure to implant a stent in a
clogged thoracic artery at Lancaster Regional Hospital. CATERBONE had agreed to spend
several days with his mother at 1250 Fremont Street after taking her to the hospital for
the procedure, however the break-ins at his home at 220 Stone Hill Road, Conestoga, PA
thwarted those plans and instead CATERBONE 'S brother, Steve, agreed to come home
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
104 104
105
157
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
from Miami, FL to accompany his mother. After the procedure one of the hard wired
smoke detectors began to go off. CATERBONE 'S uncle, Ben Roda, brother of Yolanda Roda
Caterbone was then a Lancaster City Code Inspector and summoned a Lancaster City
Employee and an inspector from the local UGI Gas Company. Both had determined that
the 22 year old furnace was omitting carbon monoxide and required IMMEDIATE
REPLACEMENT. Ben Roda (Uncle Benny) instructed Steve to go to LANCASTER CITY HALL
and meet with staff regarding a Homeowners Grant to replace the furnace. That did not
work, and instead of both Steve and Yolanda waiting until Christmas, both immediately
took a train to FLORIDA, vacating 1250 Fremont Street. CATERBONE attended the family
home and found the entire furnace ordeal was a ploy to get CATERBONE 'S mother out of
the City of Lancaster in an effort to clear the way for the EXTREME HARASSMENT AND
TORTURE BY ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPONS PROGRAM TO TAKE PLACE. THE FURNACE
WAS NOT INSPECTED OR REPLACED UNTIL 2015 WITHOUT ANY PROBLEMS UP UNTIL
THAT TIME. CATERBONE BELIEVES THE CITY OF LANCASTER WAS THAT DECIEVING IN
EVEN CONVICING BEN RODA THAT THE FURNACE DIS MALFUNCTION. THE CITY OF
LANCASTER HAS A LONG HISTORY OF DECIEVING AND BRAINWASHING YOLANDA
CATERBONE’S BROTHERS TO ADVANCE THE AGENDA AGAINST CATERBONE 'S FATHER,
SAMUEL CATERBON JR., WHICH BEGAN IN THE EARLY 1960'S WHEN HIS TARGETING
BEGAN, A PROGRAM INTIATED WHILE SERVING IN THE U.S. NAVY.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
105 105
106
158
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
ILLEGAL NO TRESPASS NOTICES AGAINST STAN J. CATERBONE
AND ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
With Violations of Public Accommodations Law re Discrimination and Anti-Trust Violations
with False Statements to Authorities
1. David Pflumm Properties by David Pflumm – Served by State Constable in June of 2005,
original not signed by David Pflumm
2. Eden Resort Inn, by Drew Anthon, Owner – Sent via 1 st Class Mail in 2005.
3. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, by Shawn Long, Esq., Attorney representing Fulton
Bank in 2006 – Sent via 1st Class Mail
4. Lancaster Newspapers, Inc., by Steve Weaver, Manager in 2006, No Notice,
Corraborated by Jack Buckwalter, Chairman and CEO and George Warner, Atty with Barley
Snyder, LLC, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
5. Ruby Tuesday, Manor Shopping Center, Lancaster, by Manager and Lancaster City Police
in 2006, No Formal Notice, allowed to reenter in 2015.
6. Alley Kat Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster by Bartender Ms. Santinello, Brett Stabley, and
Lancaster City Police, No formal Notice in 2006
7. Village Nightclub, Lancaster by George in 2008, No Formal Notice
8. Marion Court Restaurant, Lancaster, by Security Personnel, corroborated by Michael
Geesey, in 2008, No Formal Notice, allowed to enter in 2015.
9. Valentinos Cafe, Lancaster, by Jeanine, Bartender,in 2008, corroborated by John
Valentino, Owner, No Formal Notice
10. Brunswick Hotel, Lancaster, by Staff Employees, in 2008, No Formal Notice
11. Lancaster County Library and Duke Street Business Center, by Executive Director in
March of 2009, by 1st Class Mail
12. Anne Bailey's Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Manager in 2009, No Formal Notice
13. Millersville University Graduate Studies and Millersville University, Millersville, by Lori
Austin, Judicial Affairs, via Certified Mail in June of 2009.
14. TGIF Friday's, Lancaster, by Manager, in January of 2010, No Formal Notice
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
106 106
107
159
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
15. Lucky Dog Restaurant and Bar, Lancaster, by Robert Donnelly, in January of 2010, No
Formal Notice
16. Saint Mary's Catholic Church, Lancaster, by Don Spica, Usher and Lancaster City Police
Department in Feb of 2010, No Formal Notice
17. O'Halloran's Bar, Lancaster, March 25, 2010 by Male Staff Employee. No Formal Notice.
18. Fulton Bank, Fulton Financial Corporation, March 26, 2010 by Susan Follmer, Security
Officer.
19. Lancaster General Hospital, Gary S. Gehman, MD, May 25, 2010, for recording Dr. Brian
Sullivan of Abbeyville Family Health re U.S. Sponsored Mind Control and posting on my
Wordpress Blog.
20. Tobias Frog Restaurant and Bar, August 8, 2015 by Owner of Establishment, reason
was for complaining of harassment and stalking.
21. Millersville University, July 9, 2015, served notice by Millersville University Police Chief
Pete Anders, for negotiating a civil rights complaint with Assistant to the President, Debra
Hoeckler
22. Village Nightclub, July of 20015, by George..........., Owner, tried to enter several times,
with no reason and no written notice.
23. Lucky Dog Bar, August of 2015, met Abby and Keagan Pflumm outside, went inside and
was told by bartender to leave and not come back.
24. Barley Snyder, LLC Lancaster Office, receptionist Ms. Woods refused to let me
communicate with Attorney George Werner, who in 2011 entered appearance in 05-2288
for Fulton Bank in U.S. District Court.
25. Wennerstrom Property Management Company, June 2015, went to complain regarding
harassment, threats, etc., at 1252 Fremont Street and told to leave building.
26. Pennsylvania Liquor Control Board, Northwest Office Building, November 23, 2015,
Harrisburg, PA, Delivered COMPLAINT re Bars and Restaurants in Lancaster engaged in
Discrimination, Stalking, Harassment, Assaults, etc., Would not allow access to Legal
Counsel, and female who took complaint would not provide ID.
27. Southeast Medical Facilities and Brightside Church Office, February 2016, Would not
issue pain medication and filed a Private Criminal Complaint with the Lancaster County
District Attorney, no opinion as of yet.
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
107 107
108
160
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
28. Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office in Strawberry Square, Harrisburg, PA – I
arbitrarily received a phone call while delivering a CD-ROM to PA Attorney General
Kathleen Kane re “CORRUPTION OF JUDICIAL, LAW ENFORCEMENT, AND POLITICIANS” of
Pennsylvania.
29. U.S. Federal Facilities per the National Security Agency Interrogation of March 9, 2016
at the NSA Headquarters in Ft. Meade, Maryland. Handcuffed and Interrogated for over an
hour and finally let go and told not to continue on to Washington, D.C. And said I was no
longer permitted to visit any U.S. Federal Facilities.
30. Lancaster Newspapers – In June of 2016 I arbitrarily received an email the day I was
supposed to participate in a “town meeting at LNP” and warned me that I was banned and
had been for years although in the year before I had meetings with editors regarding my
MOVANT standing in the Lisa Michelle Lambert case.
31. TELLUS360, May of 2016, I went to enter on a weekend night and the doorman told me
I could not enter that night without any explanation or reason.
32. Yorgos Restaurant and Bar, The owner, Mrs. Arbitrarily barred me during the month of
March, right before the false imprisonment at the NSA in Ft. Meade, Maryland
33. Annie Baily's Irish Pub, A bartender arbitrarily barred me in July, then they allowed me
in then again a so called “Manager” banned me again. I recorded the last incident.
34. Altana Club, Bar, and Meeting Space – On Thursday, July 14, 2016 Scott, the bartender
arbitrarily banned me, which again I recorded.
35. The Press Room Bar and Restaurant – A bartender arbitrarily barred me, then again on
Thursday July 14, 2016 another bartender banned me, which again I recorded.
36. The New Marriott EXCHANGE, at Penn Square Lancaster, Security on December 6, 2019
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
108 108
109
161
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
29 FALSE ARRESTS FROM 1987 TO 2007
1. September 1, 1987 Cc2706 Terroristic Threats – M1 Quashed/Dismis/Demur Sus
2. September 3, 1987 Cc2902-1 Unlawful Restraint – M1 Quashed/Dismis/Demur
Sus
3. September 3, 1987 Cc3304a2 Criminal Mischief – F3 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
4. September 3, 1987 Cc33502 Burglary – F1 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
5. September 3, 1987 Cc3701a1 Robbery – F1 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
6. September 3, 1987 Cc3921a Theft by Unlaw Tak F3 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
7. September 3, 1987 Cc3933a1 Unlaw Use Comp F3 Nolle Prossed/Withdrawn
8. December 5, 2006 1 18 §5503 §§ A2 Disorderly Conduct – Unreasonable Noise/
Withdrawn
9. December 5, 2006 1 18 §3926 §§ A4 Theft of Services-Aquisition / Withdrawn
10. December 5, 2006 1 18 §2709 §§ A7 Harassment Repeat In Manner/ Withdrawn
11. January 18, 2007 1 75 § 1543 §§ A Driving While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked /
Withdrawn
12. January 18, 2007 1 75 § 1786 §§ F Driving Without Reqd Insur / Withdrawn
13. January 23, 2007 1 285-21d No Parking or Stopping Permitted / Withdrawn
14. January 23, 2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation / Withdrawn
15. January 23, 2007 1 18 § 6501 §§ A1 Scatter Rubish Upon Land / Withdrawn
16. January 23, 2007 1 285-21d No Parking or Stopping Permitted / Withdrawn
17. January 23, 2007 1 285-30a Meter Violation / Withdrawn
18. April 30, 2007 1 18 § 5503 §§A4 Disorderly Conduct Hazardous/Phys Off Not
Guilty
19. April 30, 2007 2 18 § 5507 §§A Obstruction of Hwy / Not Guilty
20. April 30, 2007 1 18 §2709 §§ A7 Harassment Repeat In Manner/ Not Guilty
21. April 30, 2007 1 75 § 3111 §§A Disregard Traffic Control Device / Not Guilty
22.May 10, 2007 M2 18 § 5104 Resist Arrest/Other Law Enforcement / Withdrawn
23.May 10, 2007 3M1 18 § 1543 §§ Make Rep/Sell/Etc Off Weap / Nolle Pros
24.May 29, 2007 1 75 § 1543 §§ A Driving While Oper Priv Susp Or Revoked / Not
Guilty
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
109 109
110
162
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by Stan J. Caterbone, Pro Se Litigant and THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2021©
25. November 1, 2007 S 75 § 3714 §§ A Careless Driving / Nolle Pros
26. November 1, 2007 S 75 § 3802 §§ A1* DUI: Gen Imp/ Inc of Driv Safely / Nolle
Pros
27. July 3, 2008 TR000185-08 Driving Under Suspension By PA State Police / Erased
– Records Wrong
28. July 3, 2008 TR000185-08 DUI Charge By PA State Police / Erased – Records
Wrong THE CHARGE WAS FROM A COUNTY OUTSIDE PITTSBURG, PENNSYLVANIA,
AND THE REAL DEFENDANT HAD THE SAME JULY 15 BIRTDAY AND LAST NAME
STARTING WITH CAT...
29. February 12, 2012 1 18 § 2709 §§ A1 HARASSMENT MJ-02203-NT-0000648-2017
DISMISSED
30.MJ-02203-NT-0000790-2017 PARKING TICKET – FALSE ARREST WARRANT
ISSUED ON MAY 3, 2018
31.MJ-02203-NT-0000791-2017 PARKING TICKET – FALSE ARREST WARRANT
ISSUED ON MAY 3, 2018
32.MJ-02203-NT-0003466-2017 PARKING TICKET – FALSE ARREST WARRANT
ISSUED ON MAY 3, 2018
The
Preliminary
TheChronology
Chronology
Emergency
ofof
Assaults
Assaults
Injunction
or- Causes
and Causes
Causes
Forof
of
Relief
ofActions
Action
Actions Page
Page
No. No.
110 110
111
163
of 110
of 110
111
179
Pages SUNDAY
Saturday
THURSDAY
SundayDecember
December
January
February
24th,
25,
16,
10,
2021
2022
2023
2022
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 1 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
1 of1109
of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
https://www.corporations.pa.gov/Search/corpsearch
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Corporations Search Business Entities (corpsearch.aspx)
Search UCC Transactions (uccsearch.aspx) Forms
Contact Corporations (http://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Pages/default.aspx)
Register (../Account/Register_account) Login (../Account/ValidateUser)
Search entity / Select entity / Order documents
Select Business Entity
Search Results for term Advanced Media Group type: Starting with
Show 10 entries Filter Records
Business
Name Entity Entity
Entity Address Status Citizenship
Type Number Type
Name
220 STONE
ADVANCED HILL RD
Current Fictitious
MEDIA CONESTOGA 2924396 Active Domestic
Name Names
GROUP LANCASTER
PA 17516-0
615
ADVANCED WYNCROFT
MEDIA Current LANE #2 Business
2027298 Active Domestic
GROUP, Name LANCASTER Corporation
LTD. LANCASTER
PA 17603-0
Showing 1 to 2 of 2 entries Previous 1 Next
Please click on an entity name or number for viewing details
<< Back to Search
Stan J. Caterbone Registrations Page 1 of 6 Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
2 of2109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
1 of 1 2/9/2016 5:43 AM
https://www.corporations.pa.gov/Search/corpsearch
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Corporations Search Business Entities (corpsearch.aspx)
Search UCC Transactions (uccsearch.aspx) Forms
Contact Corporations (http://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Pages/default.aspx)
Register (../Account/Register_account) Login (../Account/ValidateUser)
Search entity / Select entity / Order documents
Order Business Documents
Date: 02/09/2016
Business Name History
Name Name Type
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Current Name
Business Entity Details
Officers
Name ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP
Entity Number 2924396
Entity Type Fictitious Names
Status Active
Citizenship Domestic
Entity Creation Date 02/14/2000
Effective Date 02/14/2000
State Of Inc PA
Address 220 STONE HILL RD
CONESTOGA
PA
17516-0
Name
Title OWNER
Stan J. Caterbone Registrations Page 2 of 6 Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
3 of3109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
1 of 2 2/9/2016 5:42 AM
https://www.corporations.pa.gov/Search/corpsearch
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Address
Filed Documents
The information presented below is for your reference. To place an order you will need to log in. If you do
not have a PENN File account, you may register for an account. For unavailable images please complete
the form (http://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Business/RegistrationForms/Documents/RegForms
/15-133_145_153%20Copy_Certification%20request.pdf) and submit with the required fee to process this.
Show 25 entries Filter Records
Plain Certified Certified
Copy Copy Copy Microfilm Microfilm
Select Date Document Pages Quantity# Price Quantity# Price # Start
02/14/2000 Fictitious $3.00 $40.00 200012
Creation
1
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries Previous 1 Next
Certified Documents
Select Date Document Pages Quantity# Price Line Total
02/09/2016 Index and 1 1 $15.00
Docketing
Report
02/09/2016 Index and 1 1 $55.00
Docketing
Certified
Report
Order Total :
<< Back to Search
Login
Stan J. Caterbone Registrations Page 3 of 6 Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
4 of4109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
2 of 2 2/9/2016 5:42 AM
https://www.corporations.pa.gov/Search/corpsearch
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Corporations Search Business Entities (corpsearch.aspx)
Search UCC Transactions (uccsearch.aspx) Forms
Contact Corporations (http://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Pages/default.aspx)
Register (../Account/Register_account) Login (../Account/ValidateUser)
Search entity / Select entity / Order documents
Order Business Documents
Date: 02/09/2016
Business Name History
Name Name Type
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD. Current Name
Business Entity Details
Officers
Name ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP, LTD.
Entity Number 2027298
Entity Type Business Corporation
Status Active
Citizenship Domestic
Entity Creation Date 06/03/1991
Effective Date 06/03/1991
State Of Inc PA
Address 615 WYNCROFT LANE #2
LANCASTER
PA
17603-0
Name STANLEY J CATERBONE
Title PRESIDENT
Stan J. Caterbone Registrations Page 4 of 6 Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
5 of5109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
1 of 3 2/9/2016 5:43 AM
https://www.corporations.pa.gov/Search/corpsearch
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Address 1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER
PA
17603-36
Name STANLEY J CATERBONE
Title TREASURER
Address 1250 FREMONT ST
LANCASTER
PA
17603-36
Filed Documents
The information presented below is for your reference. To place an order you will need to log in. If you do
not have a PENN File account, you may register for an account. For unavailable images please complete
the form (http://www.dos.pa.gov/BusinessCharities/Business/RegistrationForms/Documents/RegForms
/15-133_145_153%20Copy_Certification%20request.pdf) and submit with the required fee to process this.
Show 25 entries Filter Records
Plain Certified Certified
Copy Copy Copy Microfilm Microfilm
Select Date Document Pages Quantity# Price Quantity# Price # Start
06/03/1991 Creation $3.00 $40.00 9133
Filing 1
Showing 1 to 1 of 1 entries Previous 1 Next
Certified Documents
Select Date Document Pages Quantity# Price Line Total
02/09/2016 Subsistence 1 1 $40.00
Certificate
02/09/2016 Index and 1 1 $15.00
Docketing
Report
02/09/2016 Index and 1 1 $55.00
Docketing
Certified
Report
Order Total :
Stan J. Caterbone Registrations Page 5 of 6 Tuesday, February 9, 2016
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
6 of6109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
2 of 3 2/9/2016 5:43 AM
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 2 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
7 of7
2109
of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 3 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
8 of8
3109
of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 4 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
9 of9
4109
of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 5 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
10
No.of
10
5 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 6 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
11
No.of
11
6 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 7 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
12
No.of
12
7 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 8 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
13
No.of
13
8 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 9 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
14
No.of
14
9 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 10 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
15 of
10109
15 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 11 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
16 of
11109
16 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 12 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
17 of
12109
17 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 13 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
18 of
13109
18 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 14 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
19 of
14109
19 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 15 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
20 of
15109
20 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 16 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
21 of
16109
21 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 17 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
22 of
17109
22 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 18 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
23 of
18109
23 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 19 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
24 of
19109
24 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 20 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
25 of
20109
25 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 21 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
26 of
21109
26 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 22 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
27 of
22109
27 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 23 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
28 of
23109
28 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 24 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
29 of
24109
29 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 25 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
30 of
25109
30 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 26 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
31 of
26109
31 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 27 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
32 of
27109
32 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 28 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
33 of
28109
33 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 29 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
34 of
29109
34 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 30 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
35 of
30109
35 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 31 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
36 of
31109
36 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 32 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
37 of
32109
37 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 33 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
38 of
33109
38 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 34 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
39 of
34109
39 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
40 of
35109
40 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
41 of
36109
41 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 37 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
42 of
37109
42 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 38 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
43 of
38109
43 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 39 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
44 of
39109
44 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 40 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
45 of
40109
45 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 41 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
46 of
41109
46 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 42 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
47 of
42109
47 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 43 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
48 of
43109
48 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 44 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
49 of
44109
49 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 45 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
50 of
45109
50 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 46 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
51 of
46109
51 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 47 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
52 of
47109
52 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 48 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
53 of
48109
53 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 49 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
54 of
49109
54 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 50 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
55 of
50109
55 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 51 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
56 of
51109
56 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 52 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
57 of
52109
57 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 53 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
58 of
53109
58 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 54 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
59 of
54109
59 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 55 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
60 of
55109
60 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 56 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
61 of
56109
61 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 57 of 57
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
62 of
57109
62 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January04.29.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
63 of
58109
63 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
(Correct Date is July 5, 2005 - It was changed by a Hacker)
The INVITATION from the CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE
was the result of an application with an ESSAY on your
PERSPECTIVE and EXPERIENCE to World Events. I used
my Experience as a Federal Whistleblower to the ISC/CIA
scandal of Selling Arms to Iraq and other Middle Eastern
countries and my SELECTION to People to People as an
Ambassador in 1991.
Clinton Global Initiative Invitation Page 1 of 4 July 5, 2005
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
64 of
64109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Clinton Global Initiative Invitation Page 2 of 4 July 5, 2005
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
65 of
65109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Clinton Global Initiative Invitation Page 3 of 4 July 5, 2005
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
66 of
66109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
Clinton Global Initiative Invitation Page 4 of 4 July 5, 2005
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
67 of
67109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No.No.
68 of
68109
of 649
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday
1991 Thursday
January 26,
June2008
2018
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 1 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
69 of
59109
69 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 2 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
70 of
60109
70 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 3 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
71 of
61109
71 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 4 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
72 of
62109
72 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 5 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
73 of
63109
73 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 6 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
74 of
64109
74 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 7 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
75 of
65109
75 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 8 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
76 of
66109
76 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 9 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
77 of
67109
77 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 10 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
78 of
68109
78 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 11 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
79 of
69109
79 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 12 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
80 of
70109
80 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 13 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
81 of
71109
81 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 14 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
82 of
72109
82 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 15 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
83 of
73109
83 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 16 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
84 of
74109
84 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 17 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
85 of
75109
85 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 18 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
86 of
76109
86 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 19 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
87 of
77109
87 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 20 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
88 of
78109
88 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 21 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
89 of
79109
89 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 22 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
90 of
80109
90 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 23 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
91 of
81109
91 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 24 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
92 of
82109
92 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 25 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
93 of
83109
93 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 26 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
94 of
84109
94 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 27 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
95 of
85109
95 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 28 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
96 of
86109
96 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 29 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
97 of
87109
97 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 30 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
98 of
88109
98 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 31 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
No. No.
99 of
89109
99 of 649
328
550
560
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 32 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
100
No.100
90
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 33 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
101
No.101
91
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 34 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
102
No.102
92
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 35 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
103
No.103
93
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 36 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
104
No.104
94
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 37 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
105
No.105
95
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 38 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
106
No.106
96
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 39 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
107
No.107
97
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 40 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
108
No.108
98
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
by STAN J. CATERBONE, PRO SE - A LANDMARK HUMAN RIGHTS, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, and ANTI-TRUST CASE
PUBLISHED BY THE ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Copyright 2017
ADVANCED MEDIA GROUP Page 41 of 41
Advanced
ADVANCED
Media Group
MEDIA
CAPABILITIES
GROUP CAPABILITIES
Profile PROFILE
Page
Page
Page
No. No.
109
No.109
99
of 109
of
of550
328
560
649
Pages From 1991 - Archived
1991From
- Archived
Friday January05.03.2007
1991 Thursday 26,
June
2018
2008
8th, 2023
