100% found this document useful (1 vote)
24 views35 pages

Inseparable Emma Donoghue PDF Download

The document provides links to download various ebooks titled 'Inseparable' by different authors, including Emma Donoghue. It also includes a section on cases and decisions related to tournament rules in a sport, detailing various scenarios and their outcomes. Additionally, there are results from championship matches in the United Kingdom, listing winners and runners-up for both singles and doubles events.

Uploaded by

hbbyorgqnt209
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
24 views35 pages

Inseparable Emma Donoghue PDF Download

The document provides links to download various ebooks titled 'Inseparable' by different authors, including Emma Donoghue. It also includes a section on cases and decisions related to tournament rules in a sport, detailing various scenarios and their outcomes. Additionally, there are results from championship matches in the United Kingdom, listing winners and runners-up for both singles and doubles events.

Uploaded by

hbbyorgqnt209
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 35

Inseparable Emma Donoghue download

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-emma-donoghue-58829282

Explore and download more ebooks at ebookbell.com


Here are some recommended products that we believe you will be
interested in. You can click the link to download.

Inseparable A Never Before Published Novel 1st Edition Simone De


Beauvoir

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-a-never-before-published-
novel-1st-edition-simone-de-beauvoir-54029602

Inseparable Auryn Hadley Hadley Auryn

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-auryn-hadley-hadley-
auryn-22097718

Inseparable 1 Renata W Mller

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-1-renata-w-mller-46304910

Inseparable 2 Renata W Mller

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-2-renata-w-mller-46435112
Inseparable Who I Am Was And Will Be In Christ Ashley Davis Inscribed

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-who-i-am-was-and-will-be-in-
christ-ashley-davis-inscribed-48921536

Inseparable Desire Between Women In Literature Emma Donoghue

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-desire-between-women-in-
literature-emma-donoghue-2322846

Inseparable The Original Siamese Twins And Their Rendezvous With


American History Hardcover Yunte Huang

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-the-original-siamese-twins-
and-their-rendezvous-with-american-history-hardcover-yunte-
huang-7354438

Inseparable Across Lifetimes The Lives And Love Letters Of The Tibetan
Visionaries Namtrul Rinpoche And Khandro Tare Lhamo Namtrul Jigme
Phuntsok Author

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-across-lifetimes-the-lives-
and-love-letters-of-the-tibetan-visionaries-namtrul-rinpoche-and-
khandro-tare-lhamo-namtrul-jigme-phuntsok-author-7402190

Inseparable Yunte Huang

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-yunte-huang-22052814
Inseparable Rise Of The Iliri Book 4 Hadley Auryn

https://ebookbell.com/product/inseparable-rise-of-the-iliri-
book-4-hadley-auryn-43861924
Another Random Scribd Document
with Unrelated Content
be nearer right than six in actual play. It seems to me impossible
that the number can be determined exactly, because the practical
value of a bisque must vary, and because the moral effect cannot be
gauged. The average number of games to a set is about nine where
advantage sets are not played; therefore fifteen equals nine strokes
on the average, one given in each game. In how many games of the
nine is that stroke actually of value? I do not know; but there are
always a number of games which are hollow for one side or the
other. In one case the stroke given is useless, and in the other it
would probably not have been needed. Let us suppose that fifteen
represents the difference between two players, and that they play
level. Will the weaker player win any games? I fancy that he will win
two or even three games, and he wants a sufficient number of
bisques to win three or four other games. Let us suppose that he
wins two games level. I think that there will be at least two other
games that can be won by a bisque each. Should this be the case,
the score could not be worse than five games to four against him,
and two bisques still in—by no means an uneven set.
For myself, I should never hesitate between five bisques and fifteen,
and I think that I should take four if I could not get five. My own
feeling is that the right number is just over four.
I should say, in conclusion, that I am very ignorant of the
mathematical calculations which bear on the matter, and I offer
these opinions as the result of experience in actual play, and from
watching matches where bisques were given.
CHAPTER VIII.
CASES AND DECISIONS.

The following Cases and Decisions are intended to meet questions


often asked at tournaments; and also to cover points apparently not
provided for in the laws. They have been prepared with the advice
and assistance of Messrs. W. and E. Renshaw, B. C. Evelegh, N. L.
Jackson, and R. D. Sears, to whom the author returns his thanks:—
I. A player standing outside the court volleys the ball or catches it in
his hand, and claims the stroke because the ball was certainly going
out of court.
Decision.—He loses the stroke. It makes no difference where he was
standing. The return is presumed good until it strikes the ground
outside of the court.
II. A player is struck by the ball served before it has touched the
ground, he being outside of the service court. How does it count?
Decision.—The player struck loses the stroke. The service is
presumably good until it strikes in the wrong court. A player cannot
take the decision upon himself by stopping the ball. If it is going to
be a fault he has only to get out of the way.
III. The service is delivered before the striker-out is ready. He tries
to return it and fails. Is he entitled to have it played over again?
Decision.—No. If he attempts to return the service he is deemed
ready.
IV. The striker-out calls “Not ready” for a second service. The ball
strikes beyond the service-line, and the striker-out claims that the
fact that he was not ready makes no difference since a fault cannot
be returned, and therefore that two faults have been served.
Decision.—The second service goes for nothing. A player cannot call
“Not ready,” and then have the service count, or not, as suits his
interests.
V. A ball having been played over the net, bounds back into the
court from which it came. The player reaches over the net and plays
it before it falls. Has he a right to do so?
Decision.—Yes, provided he does not touch the net. He has a right to
play the ball at any time from the moment it crosses the net into his
court until it touches the ground a second time.
VI. A ball is played into the net; the player on the other side,
thinking that the ball is coming over, strikes at it and hits the net.
Who loses the stroke?
Decision.—It is simply a question of fact for the umpire to decide. If
the player touched the net while the ball was still in play he loses the
stroke.
VII. Can a player follow a ball over the net with his racket, provided
that he hits the ball on his own side of the net?
Decision.—Yes. The only restrictions are, that he shall not volley the
ball until it has crossed the net, and that he shall not touch the net
or any of its supports.
VIII. A player’s racket slips out of his hand and flies into the net.
Does he lose the stroke for hitting the net?
Decision.—Yes, if the ball be still in play. It does not matter if the
racket be in a player’s hand or not.
IX. A player’s racket leaves his hand, but meets the ball and returns
it over the net. Is it a good return?
Decision.—Yes. There is no law requiring a racket to be in a player’s
hand when the ball is returned. It would unquestionably be a good
return if the racket were held against the ground by a player’s feet,
and the ball bounded back off of it.
X. A single match is played with a double net and inside posts. A
player touches the net beyond the inside posts, and claims that he
does not lose the stroke, because there should be no net more than
3 ft. outside of the court.
Decision.—He loses the stroke. The net where he touched it is part
of the supports of the net. He might, perhaps, have objected to the
arrangement of the net before the match.
XI. A player returns the ball, and finding that he cannot stop himself
before reaching the net, jumps over it. Is it a good return?
Decision.—Law 5 requires that “the players shall stand on opposite
sides of the net,” and therefore the player invading his opponent’s
court loses the stroke.
XII. A ball passes outside the post of the net and strikes in court. Is
it a good return?
Decision.—Yes. The laws have been changed to make it a good
return.
XIII. A ball going out of court hits the top of the post of the net, and
bounds into the opposite court.
Decision.—It is a good return. (N.B.—It has occurred with the
regular championship posts.)
XIV. The service or the ball in play strikes a ball lying in the court.
Can it be returned?
Decision.—Yes; if it be clear to the umpire that the right ball is
returned; otherwise the stroke should be called a let.
XV. The server claims that the striker-out must stand in the court. Is
this necessary?
Decision.—No. The striker-out can stand wherever he pleases on his
own side of the net.
XVI. A bystander gets in the way of a player who fails to return the
ball. May he then claim a let?
Decision.—Yes, if in the umpire’s opinion he was prevented by an
accident beyond his control. For instance, if the ropes or the seats
are allowed to be so near to the court that a player is interfered with
by them, the stroke should not be played again, because the ropes
and seats form part of the arrangements of the ground. If, however,
a spectator passes in front of those seats, or places a chair nearer
than the original line, and so interferes with a player, the stroke
should be played again.
XVII. A player is interfered with as above, and the umpire directs the
stroke to be played again. The server had previously served a fault.
He claims the right to two services.
Decision.—The fault stands. A let does not annul a previous fault.
XVIII. A return hits the umpire or his chair or stand; the player
claims that the ball was going into court.
Decision.—Unless the umpire can say that the ball was in his opinion
not going into court, he should call a let.
XIX. A player receiving fifteen serves from the left court, his
opponent claims a fault.
Decision.—It is a fault. The service starts from the right court under
all circumstances.
XX.—At fifteen all, the server by mistake serves from the left court;
he wins the stroke and serves again (a fault). The mistake is then
discovered. Is he entitled to the previous stroke? From which court
should he serve next?
Decision.—The previous stroke stands. A fault cannot be claimed
after the next service, good or not, is delivered. The next service
should be from the left court, the score being thirty-fifteen, and the
server has served one fault.
XXI.—A player serves from the wrong court, he loses the stroke, and
then claims that it was a fault.
Decision.—If the stroke was played in his first service it is simply a
fault, but if he serves twice into the wrong court he has served two
faults, and lost the stroke.
XXII.—The partner of the player whose turn it is to serve, serves and
wins the game. The error is not discovered until the first service of
the next game has been delivered.
Decision.—A new game having been begun, the previous game
stands.
XXIII.—The same case as above, except that the error is discovered
after two or three strokes have been played.
Decision.—Any score made before the last service is delivered stands
—i.e., the last stroke does not stand unless another service (fault or
not) has been delivered. The proper server will then serve.
XXIV.—With the score at thirty-forty, the server takes a bisque, and
then serves from the right court. His opponent claims a fault.
Decision.—It is a fault. The service must come alternately from the
right and left courts.
XXV.—A player takes a bisque after the server has served a fault.
Which court does the server next serve from?
Decision.—From the same court.
XXVI.—The score is five games all, and the umpire directs the
players to play an advantage set. The advantage game has been
won when it is discovered that no advantage sets are to be played.
What is to be done?
Decision.—The set is won at the eleventh game. It is no part of the
umpire’s duty to decide on the conditions of the matches.
XXVII.—A player serves. He hears the umpire call, but cannot hear
what he says. He knows that the only two things that the umpire
should call are “fault” and “let,” and that in neither case can the ball
be in play. He therefore does not return it, only to find that the
umpire has called play. Has he any redress?
Decision.—No.
XXVIII.—The umpire calls “fault” and then instantly changes and
says “play.” The striker-out fails to return the ball, and he claims that
he was prevented by the umpire, and also that the umpire cannot
change his decision.
Decision.—The umpire should call a let and the service be taken
again.
XXIX.—A ball drops near a line, the player appeals, and the umpire
calls “play.” The player misunderstands the call, and lets the ball fall.
He then claims to have the stroke played again.
Decision.—The stroke stands.
XXX.—A ball strikes the ground close to a line, the scorer scores the
stroke against the striker. On appeal to the linesman, the latter
decides that the ball was not out. Which decision stands?
Decision.—The scorer has no right to consider a ball out until the
linesman has called to that effect; therefore the decision of the latter
must be accepted. The decision of a linesman affecting his own line
is final.
XXXI.—A return strikes the cord running along the bottom of the net
and bounds over. Is it a good return?
Decision.—Yes.
XXXII.—During play a ball is thrown into the court and the ball in
play strikes it, or a player steps on it. May a let be claimed?
Decision.—Yes.
XXXIII.—The server’s first service strikes his partner. Does he lose
the stroke or is it a fault?
Decision.—He loses the stroke.
XXXIV.—A player serves a fault, and it is then discovered that it is his
partner’s service. Does the fault stand?
Decision.—No. No other service having been delivered, the fault
does not stand.
XXXV.—If the umpire is appealed to, and directs the wrong partner
to serve and the mistake is discovered in the middle of the game,
what should be done?
Decision.—See decisions XX to XXIII. The player who should have
served continues the service.
XXXVI.—In a four-handed competition one player does not to appear
in time to play, and his partner claims to be allowed to play single-
handed against the opposing pair. May he do so?
Decision.—No.
CHAPTER IX.
RESULTS OF CHAMPIONSHIP MATCHES
AND

PRINCIPAL OPEN COMPETITIONS.

UNITED KINGDOM.

THE CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
Winner Championship.
1877 S. W. Gore 1880 J. T. Hartley 1883 W. Renshaw
1878 P. F. Hadow 1881 W. Renshaw 1884 W. Renshaw
1879 J. T. Hartley 1882 W. Renshaw 1885 W. Renshaw

Winner all Comers. Runners Up.


1877 S. W. Gore W. Marshall
1878 P. F. Hadow L. Erskine
1879 J. T. Hartley V. St. Ledger
1880 H. F. Lawford O. E. Woodhouse
1881 W. Renshaw R. T. Richardson
1882 E. Renshaw R. T. Richardson
1883 E. Renshaw D. Stewart
1884 H. F. Lawford C. W. Grinstead
1885 H. F. Lawford E. Renshaw

Double Championship.
Winners. Runners Up.
1879 L. R. Erskine and H. F. Lawford F. Durant and G. E. Tabor
1880 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw O. E. Woodhouse and C. J Cole
1881 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw W. J. Down and H. Vaughan
1882 J. T. Hartley and R. T. Richardson J. G. Horn and C. B. Russell
1883 C. W. Grinstead and C. E. Welldon C. B. Russell and R. T. Milford
1884 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw E. L. Williams and E. W. Lewis
1885 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw A. J. Stanley and C. E. Farrer

Ladies’ Championship.
Winners. Runners Up.
1884 Miss M. Watson Miss Watson
1885 Miss M. Watson Miss Bingley.

IRISH CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1879 V. St Ledger 1882 W. Renshaw 1884 H. F. Lawford
1880 W. Renshaw 1883 E. Renshaw 1885 H. F. Lawford
1881 W. Renshaw

Ladies’ Singles.
1883 Miss M. Langrishe 1884 Miss M. Watson 1885 Miss M. Watson

Doubles.
1879 E. Elliott and R. Kellie
1880 H. F. Lawford and A. J. Mulholland
1881 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1882 E. de S. Browne and P. Aungier
1883 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1884 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1885 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
SCOTTISH CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Singles.
1878 J. Patten 1881 J. G. Horn 1884 R. Gamble
1879 L. M. Balfour 1882 J. G. Horn 1885 Hon. P. B. Lyon
1880 J. Patten 1883 J. G. Horn

Doubles.
1878 A. Graham Murray and C. C. Maconochie
1879 A. Graham Murray and C. C. Maconochie
1880 A. Graham Murray and C. C. Maconochie
1881 W. Horn and J. Galbraith Horn
1882 C. B. Russell and M. C. Lascelles
1883 F. A. Fairlie and A. L. Davidson
1884 The Hon. P. B. Lyon and H. B. Lyon
1885 E. W. Lewis and R. M. Watson

NORTHERN CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1880 R. T. Richardson 1883 H. W. Wilberforce
1881 R. T. Richardson 1884 D. Stewart
1882 R. T. Richardson 1885 J. Dwight

Gentlemen’s Doubles.
1880 R. W. Braddell and J. Coomber
1881 R. W. Braddell and J. Coomber
1882 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1883 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1884 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
1885 W. Renshaw and E. Renshaw
Ladies’ Singles.
1883 Miss Coleridge 1884 Miss E. Davies 1885 Miss M. Watson

Ladies’ Doubles.
1882 Miss Langrishe and Miss M. Langrishe
1883 Miss Coleridge and Miss R. Collier
1884 Miss E. Davies and Miss Eckersley
1885 Miss Dodd and Miss L. Dodd

BATH CHAMPIONSHIPS OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND.


Gentlemen’s Singles.
1881 P. G. Von Donop 1883 E. de S. Browne
1882 G. M. Butterworth 1884 E. de S. Browne
1885 E. de S. Browne

Ladies’ Singles.
1881 Miss G. B. Gibbs 1883 Miss M. Watson
1882 Miss F. Morris 1884 Miss E. Davies
1885 Miss G. B. Gibbs

CHELTENHAM.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1883 D. Stewart 1884 D. Stewart 1885 E. de S. Browne

Ladies’ Singles.
1883 Miss M. Watson 1884 Miss E. Davies 1885 Miss M. Watson
EXMOUTH.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1881 E. D. Maconchy 1883 C. W. Grinstead
1882 C. L. Sweet 1884 C. W. Grinstead
1885 (No meeting held)

Ladies’ Singles.
1881 Miss Cole 1883 Miss M. Watson 1885 (No meeting held)
1882 Miss Cole 1884 Miss M. Watson

LONDON CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1885 C. H. Ross.

Ladies’ Singles.
1885 Miss M. Watson

PRINCE’S CHAMPIONSHIPS.
1880 H. F. Lawford 1882 E. Renshaw
1881 W. Renshaw 1883 H. F. Lawford

BUXTON.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1884 C. W. Grinstead 1885 E. Chatterton

Ladies’ Singles.
1884 Mrs. Watts 1885 Miss Bingley

Gentlemen’s Doubles.
1884 C. W. Grinstead and J. R. Deykin
1885 W. Renshaw and J. Dwight

Ladies’ Doubles.
1884 Mrs. Watts and Miss Noon
1885 Mrs. Watts and Miss Bracewell

EASTBOURNE.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1881 E. Lubbock 1883 E. L. Williams 1885 E. W. Lewis
1882 W. C. Taylor 1884 E. L. Williams

Gentlemen’s Doubles.
1884 E. Renshaw and C. L. Sweet
1885 E. Renshaw and H. Grove

EDINBURGH UNIVERSITY OPEN TOURNAMENT.


Winners of Challenge Cup.
1883 J. Galbraith Horn 1884 W. W. Chamberlain
1885 Hon. H. B. Lyon

CHISWICK.
Gentlemen’s Singles.
1884 C. W. Grinstead 1885 H. Chipp

COVERED COURT CHAMPIONSHIP.


1885 H. F. Lawford
1886 E. L. Williams

AMERICA.

CHAMPIONSHIPS.
Singles.
1881 R. D. Sears 1883 R. D. Sears
1882 R. D. Sears 1884 R. D. Sears
1885 R. D. Sears

Doubles.
J. Dwight and R. D.
1881 C. M. and J. S. Clark 1883
Sears
J. Dwight and R. D. J. Dwight and R. D.
1882 1884
Sears Sears
1885 R. D. Sears and J.
S. Clark
PRINCIPAL OPEN EVENTS—SEASON, 1885.
YOUNG AMERICA TOURNAMENT AT PHILADELPHIA.
Singles—J. S. Clark.

CHAMPIONSHIP OF MIDDLE STATES AT NEW YORK.


R. D. Sears.

HASTINGS.
Singles—R. L. Beekman.

ORANGE, NEW JERSEY.


Singles—Slocum.

CHAMPIONSHIP OF CANADA
J. S. Clark.

WENTWORTH, N.H.
Singles—W. V. R. Berry.
SPECIMEN
ILLUSTRATION
FROM
“SPORT
with GUN
and
ROD.”

“A REPRESENTATIVE BOOK FOR A SPORTSMAN’S LIBRARY.”

In the Edition de Luxe this work became widely known, and was
enthusiastically welcomed by book lovers and Nature lovers as the
most complete and worthy book on American Hunting and Fishing
and Out-Door Life. This limited edition is nearly exhausted; and to
meet the continued demand a new, popular edition has been issued
at the low price of $5.00. It is printed by De Vinne on heavy paper,
and it contains all the illustrations, though none are on Japanese
paper. The Edition de Luxe will be sold for the present at its original
price,—from $10.00 to $18.00, according to binding. Send for further
information to THE CENTURY CO., New York.

THE BEST LAWN-TENNIS SCORE BOOK


IS

“THE PASTIME.”
Used at all the principal Tournaments last Season and gave universal
Satisfaction.

“THE PASTIME” LAWN-TENNIS SCORE BOOK


contains—
Score Sheets for 60 Sets; Hints to Umpires; Instructions for drawing
Byes; and Tabular Arrangements showing the Values of Odds given
and owed in handicaps, which can be understood at a glance
without the calculations necessary if the ordinary scale be used.

“THE PASTIME” LAWN-TENNIS SCORE BOOK is the


CHEAPEST.
Price 9d, each, or 8s. 6d. per dozen.
To be obtained at
“Pastime” Offices, 28, 29, & 30, Paternoster Row, London,
OR OF
Partridge & Cooper, 191 & 192, Fleet Street, London.

Laws of Football (Rugby Union and Association). Price 2d.


each; post free, 2½d.
Laws of Lawn-Tennis. Price 6d.
The “Pastime” Entry Form of Athletic Sports and Cycling
Meetings. Price 2s. per 100.

“PASTIME” OFFICES,
28, 29, & 30, PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, E.C.
“PASTIME,”

THE LAWN-TENNIS JOURNAL


AND

WEEKLY RECORD
OF

FOOTBALL, AQUATICS, CYCLING,


AND

ATHLETIC SPORTS.

EVERY WEDNESDAY.

“PASTIME” is the recognised organ of Lawn-Tennis and Football. All


other Amateur Sports are reported by competent men.
Price 2d; post free 2½d. Subscriptions (payable in advance), 3
months, 2s. 9d.; 6 months, 5s. 6d.; yearly, 10s. 6d.

Offices: 28, Paternoster Row, London, E.C.

AGENTS—
For America: Wright &. Ditson, Boston, U.S.A.
For Australia: Melbourne Sports Depôt, Melbourne, Australia.

THE ATHLETE’S GUIDE.

A Complete Guide to Training for Running, Walking, Cycling,


Swimming, and Rowing,
TOGETHER WITH LISTS OF THE BEST
Amateur Records to Date of Publication,
AND
REMARKABLE PERFORMANCES.

EDITED BY
N. L. JACKSON AND E. H. GODBOLD.

Training for Running. By W. G. George, N. L. Jackson, and H. M.


Oliver.
Training for Walking. By G. P. Beckley.
Swimming and Rowing. By Late Champions.
Best Amateur Records, at all Distances.
Training for Cycling. By G. Lacy Hillier.
Cross-country Running. By E. H. Godbold.
Hints on the Management of Athletic Meetings.
Winners of Championships and all other important events.

PRICE ONE SHILLING.

PUBLISHED AT “PASTIME” OFFICES,


28, 29, and 30, PATERNOSTER ROW, LONDON, E.C.

COVENTRY MACHINISTS’ CO.,


LIMITED.

THE OLDEST FIRM IN THE TRADE.

CATALOGUES FREE.
CATALOGUES FREE.

THE “MARLBORO’ CLUB”


TRICYCLE,
WITH PATENT COIL SPRINGS.
VIBRATION EFFECTUALLY PREVENTED.

“The most successful Tricycle ever invented.”—Vide Opinions of the Press.

WORKS: COVENTRY.
LONDON: 15 & 16, HOLBORN VIADUCT.
MANCHESTER: 9, VICTORIA BUILDINGS.
BOSTON, U.S.A.: 239, COLUMBUS AVENUE.
MELBOURNE: 62 & 64, ELIZABETH ST.

SLAZENGER & SONS,


Manufacturers of every Requisite
for Lawn-Tennis.
THE “ICH DIEN” Price 15/-

To meet the requirements of


those players who desire a bat
similar to the No. 1, we have
introduced a Racket which we
shall designate the “Ich Dien.” It
is made of rent frames, thoroughly
“Handy” Press, Price
3/9 seasoned, but unselected. The gut is
transparent white, English manufacture,
and of excellent quality. The “Ich Dien” is a
useful and sightly bat, and made on the
most approved lines from the recent
decisions of experts. Octagon handle and
oval head.

The “Handy” Press will be found an


improvement, being much lighter in weight
and more portable. Being in parts, it can be
packed into a very small compass. One screw only need be taken
out to remove the Racket.

THE “WATERFALL” LAWN-TENNIS COURT


MARKER.
SECURED BY ROYAL LETTERS PATENT.

This is an entirely new Machine. Since its introduction it has been


thoroughly tested and has proved in every way satisfactory. We can
confidently recommend it as being the SIMPLEST and BEST in
the market.
As will be seen from the illustration, the centre wheel working in the
box, and which we term the water wheel, is made with hollow teeth
or buckets; these carry the composition (with which the box is to be
supplied), and deposit it upon a platform, fixed between the front, or
marking wheel, and the water wheel; thence it is transferred to the
front wheel, which transmits it to the lawn.

MARKS A CLEAR AND DISTINCT LINE 1½


INCHES WIDE.
CANNOT GET OUT OF ORDER.
Price List and Address of Local Agent on Application.

56, CANNON STREET, LONDON, E.C.

THE

Champion Lawn-Tennis Shoe,


SILVER MEDAL, LONDON, 1885.

The CHAMPION LAWN-TENNIS SHOE is made of Specially


Prepared Waterproof Felt instead of India-Rubber, and gives Firm
Foothold, with Lightness, Durability, and greater Flexibility than any
other Tennis Shoe made; does not Blister the Feet, and is the only
Shoe that gives Perfect Foothold on Wet Grass.

OPINIONS OF THE PRESS.


“They undoubtedly fulfil all the conditions required in a lawn-tennis
shoe.”—Boot and Shoe Trades Journal.
“Their extreme lightness should strongly recommend them to
players.”—Pastime (the Lawn-Tennis Journal).
“We have not tried any soles so good in all respects as the
Champion-Felt Soles known as Stoddart’s Patent.“—Field.
“The Champion Shoes take firm hold of the ground, without
damaging the grass.“—The Queen.
Sold by Bootmakers, Cricketing Outfitters, &c.
Wholesale only of DERHAM BROTHERS,
BRISTOL and NORTHAMPTON.

Every Pair
stamped
with
Registered
Trade Mark.

STODDART’S PATENT

N.B.—if any difficulty is found in obtaining the Champion Lawn-


Tennis Shoe (Stoddart’s Patent), please apply direct to the
Manufacturers.

DEVERELL BROS’.

NEW PATENT TENNIS RACKET,


“THE ELECTRIC.”
Four Points we claim for it:—
1. STRINGING NEVER GIVES.
2. CAPITAL DRIVING POWER.
3. STANDS HOTTEST CLIMATES.
4. DEFIES MOISTURE OR RAIN.
Price 25s. Cash Discount 20% 5s. Nett 20s.

Our New Unsewn


TENNIS BALL,
“THE
DURABLE.”
No Stitches to Cut.
See every Ball is stamped as above.

Price per doz., 15s. 6d. Cash Discount 20% 3s. 1d. Nett 12s. 5d.

OUR
“EUROPA”
UNDERSEWN TENNIS BALL
Is THE BEST at the price.
Price per doz., 12s. 6d. Cash Discount 20% 2s, 6d. Nett 10s.

LAWN TENNIS BATS


At every price from 5s. 6d.

All Goods made on the premises, and quality guaranteed.

DEVERELL BROS.,
MAKERS OF EVERY REQUISITE FOR LAWN TENNIS, CRICKET, &c.,
73, CHEAPSIDE, LONDON, E.C.

F. H. AYRES,
Manufacturer of Indoor and
Outdoor
GAMES AND SPORTS.
Welcome to our website – the perfect destination for book lovers and
knowledge seekers. We believe that every book holds a new world,
offering opportunities for learning, discovery, and personal growth.
That’s why we are dedicated to bringing you a diverse collection of
books, ranging from classic literature and specialized publications to
self-development guides and children's books.

More than just a book-buying platform, we strive to be a bridge


connecting you with timeless cultural and intellectual values. With an
elegant, user-friendly interface and a smart search system, you can
quickly find the books that best suit your interests. Additionally,
our special promotions and home delivery services help you save time
and fully enjoy the joy of reading.

Join us on a journey of knowledge exploration, passion nurturing, and


personal growth every day!

ebookbell.com

You might also like