Introduction To Deep Drawing
Introduction To Deep Drawing
net/publication/370730989
CITATIONS READS
0 1,352
1 author:
Araveeti C S Reddy
Osmania University
26 PUBLICATIONS 154 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Araveeti C S Reddy on 17 May 2023.
A C Sekhara Reddy
Director, GVIC- Madanapalli
Since the beginning of the 21st Century, society has witnessed a great increase
in technological advancement and it has been influencing the lifestyle of the
people in various ways. In the present scenario of globalisation, advanced
technology is at the forefront in all areas of the engineering world. The evolution
of this technology in the mechanical engineering industry is glaringly evident in
various metal forming operations.
1
Fig. 1: Classification of metal forming processes [11]
The major reasons for advancement in R&D for sheet metal forming operations
are:
3
parameters involved in it, i.e., type of lubrication, clearance between die and
punch, a profile of die and punch, blank holding type, blank holding force,
blank holding mechanism, blank thickness and material properties. Further,
there is a demand for quick assessment of formability for sheet metal, such
as Forming Limit Diagram (FLD) and Limiting Drawing Ratio (LDR) to bring
down design costs and rejections. The new manufacturing technologies for
deep drawing are developing in the present decade due to the challenges taking
place with sheet forming. The deep drawing process is a complex plane strain
deformation process subjected to biaxial stresses and strains and it is essential
that the designer needs to know thoroughly about the process and its limitations.
This knowledge comes only from experience and involves considerable time and
experimental tests.
It is a known fact that technology is the main source of modern and advanced
facilities of human life and hence the progressive development is widely noticed
in the present manufacturing industries. To meet the technological advances
and to stand in the competitive environment, the manufacturing companies
are developing new techniques for improving the quality of products and
production rates at low costs. Further, it is a very tough job to measure the
quality of the components manufactured in a deep drawing process without the
knowledge of blank metal deformation behaviour at a micro-level. Creating a
proper simulation model of a process provides prior knowledge in predicting
the influence of operating parameters.
4
Fig. 2: Principle of Deep drawing [2]
5
Deformation Phenomenon in Sheet Metal Forming
Processes
All elements in cup drawing are deformed under membrane stresses σ1 and σ2
and the normal stress σ3 is quite small and considered negligible. The sum of
the true strains is zero [21] i.e.,
ε1 + ε2 + ε3 = 0 (1)
p
σ = ( 1 − α + α 2 ) σ1 (2)
r
4
ε= (1 + β + β2 ) ε1 (3)
3
Fig. 4: (a) Grids marked on the sheet. (b) Deformed grid circles into ellipses. (c)
Traction forces transmitted [22]
6
The strain values at different areas of deformation is to be determined through
grid marks as shown in Fig. 4. By convention, the major principal direction is
assigned to the greatest principal stress direction as well as the greatest principal
strain direction. The minor principal direction is considered as perpendicular to
the major principal direction.
Stress-Strain Laws
The deformation in sheet metal is done by stretching it between the punch
and die set which is optimally designed. During the deformation, the blank is
controlled by blank-holder.
The first step in the study of sheet metal forming is the determination of the
stress state concerned with strain at every point. The engineering stress-strain
plot diagram is characterised by an elastic part and a plastic part. To model
the isotropic hardening behaviour, empirical effective stress-strain laws are
necessarily used. The common applicable laws for sheet metal forming shown
in Fig. 6
σ = Ks εn (4)
7
Fig. 6: Isotropic hardening constitutive laws [24]
σ = Ks ( ε0 + ε)n (5)
σ = σy + Ks εn (6)
Anisotropy
The blank used in deep drawing may be produced in cold rolling process and
hence the blank may be of anisotropic in nature. Let l1 , w1 and t1 are length,
width and thickness of un-deformed test specimen respectively and l2 , w2 and
t2 are the corresponding values after elongation. The principal strains in three
l2 w2 t2
directions are εl = ln , εw = ln and εt = ln . For a cold rolled sheet εw ̸= εt .
l1 w1 t1
The anisotropy ratio is defined as [28]
εw
r= (7)
εt
The anisotropy ratio ’r’ is calculated from the test results of specimens prepared
by cutting in 0o , 45o and 90o to the rolling direction. The different values of r, i.e.
r0 , r45 and r90 is determined. The
8
Fig. 7: Variation of anisotropy ratio ’r’ [22]
The average variation is the best measure for planar anisotroy and is expressed
as [22]:
r0 + r90 − 2r45
∆R = (9)
2
The average value of anisotropy ratio or normal anisotropy ratio is defined as
[29]:
r0 + 2 r45 + r90
R= (10)
4
The value of r greater than 1 indicates a higher value of strength in the thickness
direction than other directions. The higher value of r reduces the thinning effect
and avoids the formation of the neck at stressed locations of the sheet and
improves the drawability.
9
of complex stresses of different nature such as radial tensile stresses at wall
portion, bending stresses at punch nose region and die shoulder region and
circumferential compressive stresses at the entire flange portion. Punch load
causes the bending action of the blank around the punch nose and die shoulder
regions. Different stages involved in deep drawing process are shown in Fig. 8.
Downward travel of the punch makes the bent portion of blank further into the
die and forms a shallow cup as shown in Fig. 8 (c). At the end of punch stroke,
the shallow cup forms into a final cup by transforming the flange into a full
wall portion of the cup [30]. During the process, the vertical wall is subjected to
tensile stresses and the flange portion is subjected to circumferential compressive
stresses and the bottom portion is subjected to biaxial tensile stresses. It is
observed that the flange portion and the sidewall region of cup experiences
deformation during the deep drawing process. At the flange, the friction force
plays an important role in the successful operation of deep drawing.
When the drawing force overcomes the frictional forces between the contacting
surfaces of different tool parts, the blank material moves towards the die cavity.
The pulling tendency is generated when the blank is forced to move into the die
opening while the frictional forces obstruct the material from moving into the die.
The blank portion at the flange region is squeezed in the circumferential direction,
creating hoop compressive stresses and a tendency for the development of
wrinkles. The wrinkles are formed when the hold-down force is not sufficient or
the frictional coefficient is less. Hence, the radial tension is the actual source for
hoop compressive stresses [31].
10
Fig. 9: Modes of deformation in deep drawing process [30]
The stress state during the formation of the cup wall is clearly understood by
considering elements at different portions of the cup shown in Fig. 9. The tensile
stresses are developed along the radial direction in the element A and element B
due to transmission of drawing force from the side wall to the flange portion. It
is to be noted that circumferential tensile stresses will be developed when the
blank portion is properly stretched at die shoulder. At the flange, the wrinkling
may occur if the blank holder force is low. The high blank-holder force obstructs
for smooth flow of metal into the die and excessive stretching may take place
leading to the neck formation and subsequent failure by tearing of the wall.
It has been noticed that blank thinning is a normal phenomenon in the deep
drawing, but it should not be more than 25 % of the blank initial thickness [11].
The deformation in deep drawing is summarised as follows.
1. Pure radial drawing of the blank between the die and blank holder.
2. Bending and sliding of blank over the die profile radius.
3. Stretching of blank at the gap between the punch and die.
4. Bending and sliding of blank over the punch profile radius.
5. Stretching and sliding of blank over the punch face.
11
thickness takes place. Otherwise, this variation leads to instantaneous changes
in stress and stress concentration resulting in the wrinkled or fractured cup. It
has to be noticed that the wall portion of the cup is subjected to circumferential
tensile stresses and radial tensile stress and hence both stress components at wall
portion along the cup wall plane are tensile.
Analytical model for the Max punch load vs. blank size
The analytical model for relationship between punch load and blank size is
established by considering the assumptions followed by Fereshteh et al. [32] as
described below.
1. The energy loss due to friction during bending and unbending is negligible.
2. The stress-strain exponent has a negligible effect upon LDR.
3. The material is considered perfectly plastic with strain hardening exponent,
n is equal to zero.
4. No change in thickness of the sheet.
12
According to the principle of volume constancy, the initial blank volume and
volume of cup formed is constant, i.e.,
2 π Ri dRi = 2 π Rc dh (13)
Ri dRi = Rc dh (14)
The strain variation over the flange portion in radial direction (i.e., along x
direction in Fig. 10) can be written as
dRi Rc dh
= (15)
Ri R2i
The true strain in the radial direction of the flange is the ratio of the variation in
radius with instantaneous radius at the given instant.
Hence,
dRi Rc dh
dεx = = (16)
Ri R2i
The incremental work done dW is the product of stress, strain and change in
volume
Rc dh
dW = (σ f ) ( ) (2 π tb Ri dRi ) (17)
R2i
13
The incremental punch load is
dW 2 π Rc tb σ f
dF = = dRi (18)
dh Ri
where,
Ri = Instantaneous radius of the blank
dh = Instantaneous increment in the height of the cup
Rc = Radius of the cup
σ f = Flow stress of the material
For an ideally plastic material, the total work for punch travel is given by
Z Ri
dW 2 π Rc tb σ f
Z
Fp = = dRi
dh Rc Ri
Ri
= 2 π Rc tb σ f ln
Rc
Ro
Fp(max) = 2 π Rc tb σ f ln (19)
Rc
As all the terms except Ro are constant in Eqn. 19 and it can be rewritten as
Fp(max) = K p Ro (20)
Fpmax = K p R0 (21)
The equation 21 is valid for all sizes of blanks below the critical diameter. Above
the critical size of the blank, tearing takes place and maximum punch load
remains constant as tearing load does not vary with blank size above the critical
diameter.
14
Common Failures in Deep Drawing
To produce a defect-free product having the symmetric shape, it needs to align
the blank centre with die centre. The blank-holding force and punch load play a
vital role in the successful drawing of cup.
Fig. 11: Stress status on the flange portion of a formed cup [33, 34]
Various problems with reference to quality in the deep drawing process are
15
formation of ears are minimised through proper modification in the blank
shape to compensate anisotropy.
3 Localized necking or tearing: The appearance of any local neck that
rapidly leads to tearing and failure will obviously terminate a forming
operation. This is considered as local instability that is analysed by
considering a local element without involving the whole process.
4 Fracture: There is a possibility of plastically deforming element to fracture
in almost a brittle manner. This is not common in a sheet used for forming
and is often preceded by some local instability.
Db
Drawing Ratio, DR = (22)
Dp
To assess the formability in sheet metals, finding the LDR for a given material is
an important task for bringing down the tooling cost and rejections. The LDR
is defined as the ratio of successfully drawn largest size of the blank without
failure to the size of the punch used in the drawing operation [38]. The LDR is
estimated using the Egn. 23.
(Db )max
LDR = (23)
Dp
Many parameters concerned with the tool setup design and drawing process
influence the quality of the drawn cup in the deep drawing process [39]. The
main parameters involved in the deep drawing process are needed to be selected
for minimising the problems in the deep drawing process. According to the
16
recent work of Zhou et al. [40], LDR is a function of normal anisotropy, friction
coefficient, strain hardening exponent, die shoulder radius and blank thickness.
1. Blank Holder Force (BHF): From the past research it is found that the
BHF improves the quality of the drawn parts [42–46] and in most of the
cases BHF is described by means of the technological window as shown in
Fig. 12. Higher BHF causes fracture while lesser BHF causes wrinkles. A lot
of research was carried out on BHF, metal flow, stress distribution, strain
path, wall thinning, flange thickening, etc. In the absence of blank-holding
force, wrinkles appear at the flange. A suitable range is found for the BHF
and it depends on different factors such as punch-die clearance, punch
nose radius, die shoulder radius, punch speed, lubrication system, yielding
properties, strain hardening and geometry of the blank/cup [47].
2. Type of Blank Holder Mechanism: Different types of blank holding
mechanisms are available for selection. It is essential to select a suitable
blank holding mechanism for the production of deep drawing product
without defects. Various types are :
(a) Constant BHF mechanism
(b) Constant blank holder pressure (BHP) mechanism
(c) Variable blank holder pressure mechanism
(d) Segmented blank holder mechanism
(e) Constant gap blank holder mechanism
17
(f) Vibration blank holder mechanism.
Constant blank holding mechanism is preferred in majority of the cases
due to its simplicity [48].
3. Punch Load and Speed: The punch load in the deep drawing process
is proportional to punch travel until maximum load and it helps in the
selection of suitable deep drawing press. It has been observed that
if Young’s modulus and yield stress or strain hardening exponent of
a material increases, it results in an increase in the punch load. It is to be
noted that the value of strain hardening exponent ≥ 0.3 produces wrinkles
during the drawing process. When the wrinkle development increases, the
punch force required becomes erratic [49]. Basically, the drawing operation
should be slow and gradual, where the blank material tends to suffer a
critical strain. The blank material needs to be allowed into the die with
a uniform speed. Therefore, the draw speed is also considered to be one
of the highly influencing parameters during the design of deep draw tool
setup [50].
4. Friction and Type of Lubricant: The friction is another important
parameter that essentially influences the deep drawing operation. The
quality of the product produced and the life of the tool are highly
dependent on the lubricating film conditions between the contact surfaces
[51]. The static friction force at the blank-die interface must be lower than
the punch load applied for the inception of the deep drawing operation.
The BHF influences static friction and the draw takes place once the punch
load overcomes the static friction force. The continuous movement of
the punch is quite important after the punch load overcomes the static
friction in order to use the advantage of the dynamic friction since the
dynamic friction force will be less than the static friction force. A definite
lubricating oil film thickness can improve the surface finish of the deep
drawn cup. It is revealed from the earlier research that a larger area of
full film lubrication region results in the uniform strain distribution [51].
The proper lubrication conditions are needed for deep drawing process in
order to get quality surface.
5. Punch-Die clearance: The intentional space provided between the punch
and die is the die clearance and it is one of the critical factors to
18
be considered. Radial clearance of 7 - 14% of the sheet thickness is
recommended. Insufficient clearance may cause shearing of the blank.
It is to be kept in mind while designing the tool setup that if the radial
clearance is less, the cup tends to fail due to ironing action. The die inner
diameter is based on the gap required between the punch and die. This gap
between punch and die depends upon the blank thickness and material,
surface finish and lubricant used.
6. Punch Nose and Die Shoulder Radii: Sharp corner or less Punch Nose
Radius (PNR) could cause fracture of the cup and larger PNR causes
wrinkles on the flange. A less die corner radius causes fracture of the
flange. For large values of punch nose radii, the material lying at the punch
region deforms more than the other regions of the cup wall. It produces
more thinning, leading to high-stress concentration at the PNR due to
excessive bending and stretching of metal. This thinning phenomenon
increases with an increase of PNR and the maximum thinning occurs at
the punch nose region. The PNR has a considerable effect on shear strain,
and the shear stress distribution. It is to be noted that an increase in the
PNR, results in significant variation in shear stress and/or shear strain. In
the deep drawing process, the tearing starts nearer to the upper edge of
the PNR. It has been shown that the PNR less than four times the blank
thickness or greater than 10 times the blank thickness will not have much
influence on LDR. The Die shoulder Radius (DSR) generally depends upon
the size of the workpiece and its thickness. The increase in DSR increases
LDR as well as the punch load [52]. The increase in die shoulder radius
leads to a decrease in the contact area between the blank and blank holder.
It increases the chance of the formation of wrinkles [53]. According to Zaid
et al. the maximum size of die shoulder radius should not be more than 15
times of blank thickness. The die shoulder radius should be in the range of
6 - 10 times the blank thickness [54, 55].
7. Blank Heating System: An appropriate heating system is used to raise
the temperature of blanks for conducting experiments at warm forming
conditions. In case of external heating, the blanks are heated in a furnace,
and transferred to the press without any loss of temperature for deep
drawing operation. During this process, any heat loss at transit may cause
19
a reduction in temperature. In the internal heating process, the blank is
heated in the press itself through which a close control on temperature
is possible. As the temperature gradient is essential for warm drawing
operation to achieve higher LDR, the tool setup has to be heated uniformly
using cartridge or band type heater while keeping the punch at room
temperature. Though the heating may be either external or internal, the
internal heating method is preferred to heat the blank in the tool setup
itself due to its simplicity.
8. Blank Shape: To reduce the defects, thorough knowledge of the influence
of blank shape is essential. The blank optimisation process can be carried
out using the Finite Element Method (FEM) coupled with Taguchi DoE
method. In cases, where the elliptical or square cup deep drawing process
is performed under multistage operation, it requires to configure the blank
shape correctly, as it largely influences the strain distribution all over the
blank and at the corners, in particular. The blank shape optimisation can be
done by various techniques with the use of FEM, Artificial Neural Network
(ANN) models, etc. For optimisation, a meta-model can be developed and
coupled with an optimisation algorithm using numerical methods. It helps
to find the optimum shape of the blank in comparison to the experimental
method which involves more time and cost.
20
REFERENCES
[6] Schuler GmbH and Schuler GmbH. Metal forming handbook. International
Journal, 1998.
[7] A.C. Reardon. Metallurgy for the Non-Metallurgist. ASM International, 2011.
21
[9] ACS Reddy, S Rajesham, PR Reddy, and AC Umamaheswar. Formability:
A review on different sheet metal tests for formability. In AIP Conference
Proceedings, volume 2269, page 030026. AIP Publishing LLC, 2020.
[13] A Erman Tekkaya, N Ben Khalifa, Goran Grzancic, and Ramona Holker.
Forming of Lightweight Metal Components: Need for New Technologies.
Procedia Engineering, 81(1):28–37, 2014.
[18] http://www.fondex.fr/en/deep-drawing.html/.
[19] https://in.pinterest.com/pin/658229301764248066/.
[20] http://www.braxtonmfg.com/parts.htm.
[21] George Z Voyiadjis and Peter I Kattan. Mechanics of composite materials with
MATLAB. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
22
[22] Jack Hu, Zdzislaw Marciniak, and John Duncan. Mechanics of sheet metal
forming. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2002.
[24] Stefan Schindler, Paul Steinmann, Jan C Aurich, and Marco Zimmermann.
A thermo-viscoplastic constitutive law for isotropic hardening of metals.
Archive of Applied Mechanics, 87(1):129–157, 2017.
[25] Jérôme Isselin, Alain Iost, Jocelyn Golek, Denis Najjar, and Maxence
Bigerelle. Assessment of the constitutive law by inverse methodology:
Small punch test and hardness. Journal of Nuclear Materials, 352(1-3):97–106,
2006.
[26] Marek Šiser and Ján Slota. Material Model of AW 5754 H11 Al Alloy for
Numerical Simulation of Deep Drawing Process. Acta Mechanica Slovaca, 20:
32–40, 2016.
[28] Youngsuk Kim and Youngjin Son. Study on wrinkling limit diagram of
anisotropic sheet metals. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 97(1-3):
88–94, 2000.
[29] Weiqin Tang, Shiyao Huang, Dayong Li, and Yinghong Peng. Mechanical
anisotropy and deep drawing behaviors of AZ31 magnesium alloy sheets
produced by unidirectional and cross rolling. Journal of materials processing
technology, 215:320–326, 2015.
[30] Ihsan Khalaf Irthiea. Process analysis and design in micro deep drawing utilizing
a flexible die. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow, 2014.
23
[32] F Fereshteh-Saniee and MH Montazeran. A comparative estimation of the
forming load in the deep drawing process. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, Vol. 140, No. 1:pp. 555–561, 2003.
[33] Stephen Robert Reid. Metal forming and impact mechanics: William Johnson
commemorative volume. Elsevier, 2016.
[36] Wei Liu, Yongchao Xu, and Shijian Yuan. Effect of Pre-bulging on Wrinkling
of Curved Surface Part by Hydromechanical Deep Drawing. Procedia
Engineering, 81:914–920, 2014.
[37] Takashi Jimma, Yukio Kasuga, Nobuyoshi Iwaki, Osamu Miyazawa, Eiji
Mori, Katsuhiko Ito, and Hajime Hatano. An application of ultrasonic
vibration to the deep drawing process. Journal of Materials Processing
Technology, 80:406–412, 1998.
[38] Huihui Nie, Chengzhong Chi, Hongsheng Chen, Xianrong Li, and Wei
Liang. Microstructure evolution of Al/Mg/Al laminates in deep drawing
process. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2019.
[39] Pradeep M Patil and PS Bajaj. Tool design of cylindrical cup for multi-stage
drawing process. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and
Technology, 3(2):100–106, 2013.
[40] Xiaohong Zhou, Lu Lu, Fengjun Wang, Bangjun Ding, and Wenzi Gong.
Prediction of the limiting redrawing ratio.
[41] Gašper Gantar, Karl Kuzman, and Bogdan Filipič. Increasing the stability
of the deep drawing process by simulation-based optimization. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, 164:1343–1350, 2005.
24
[42] Miklós Tisza. Recent development trends in sheet metal forming.
International Journal of Microstructure and Materials Properties, 8(1/2):125–140,
2013.
[44] Satoshi Kitayama, Satoshi Hamano, Koetsu Yamazaki, Tatsuo Kubo, Hikaru
Nishikawa, and Hiroshi Kinoshita. A closed-loop type algorithm for
determination of variable blank holder force trajectory and its application
to square cup deep drawing. The International Journal of Advanced
Manufacturing Technology, 51(5-8):507–517, 2010.
[45] Mihael Volk, Mihael Deželak, Blaž Nardin, and Stanko Stepišnik. Prediction
of the spring-back calculated with numerical simulations for the household
industry. The 8th International Conference and Workshop on numerical simulation
of 3D seet metal forming processes (NUMISHEET 2011), 1:1078–1085, 2011.
[47] Laurent Duchêne and Anne Marie Habraken. Analysis of the sensitivity
of FEM predictions to numerical parameters in deep drawing simulations.
European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 24(4):614–629, 2005.
[48] Lars Gunnarsson and Erik Schedin. Improving the properties of exterior
body panels in automobiles using variable blank holder force. Journal of
Materials Processing Technology, 114(2):168–173, 2001.
[49] V Naranje and S Kumar. A knowledge based system for automated design
of deep drawing die for axisymmetric parts. Expert Systems with Applications,
41(4):1419–1431, 2014.
[50] Ajay Hiremath and N Ramesha. The Significant Variables that Affect Metal
During Deep Drawing Process in Sheet Metal Work. International Journal of
Engineering Research and Technology, 4(05, May-2015), 2015.
25
[51] Chandra Pal Singh and Geeta Agnihotri. Study of Deep Drawing Process
Parameters: A Review. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering
Research, 6(2):103–106, 2015.
[53] Ivana Suchy. Handbook of die design, volume 2. McGraw-Hill New York,
2006.
[54] Adnan IO Zaid and Fadhil A Hashim. Effect of Punch and Die Profile Radii
on Deep Drawing of Galvanized Steel. International Journal of Scientific &
Engineering Research, 8(1), 2017.
26