The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing and

Its Legal Implications

Apoorva Roy1, Neetu Neetu*2 and Ajay Raj Singh3
1
Galgotias University, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India,
Mail: [email protected]
2
School of Law, GD Goenka University, Gurugram, Haryana, India
Corresponding Mail: [email protected]
3
Faculty of Law, Swami Vivekanand Subharti University, Meerut, Uttar
Pradesh, India
Abstract

This instant study explores the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on

predictive policing and examines the significant legal implications of this
practice. By identifying patterns and trends in past crime data, predictive
policing uses AI algorithms to improve law enforcement tactics and foresee
criminal activities. These AI systems raise urgent questions about privacy,
justice, responsibility, and bias even while they have the potential to improve
public safety. The study will offer a thorough analysis of modern AI techniques
used in predictive policing, with a focus on data-centric instruments like
geographic forecasting and risk assessment frameworks. It examines the
potential for these algorithms to reinforce or magnify ingrained prejudices in
policing procedures, particularly with regard to location, socioeconomic status,
and race. Additionally, the study aims to examine the legislative frameworks
that control the use of AI in law enforcement, highlighting important concerns
including due process, civil liberties, and the possibility of discriminatory
consequences. The study evaluates the effects of AI-driven police on
underserved groups by looking at relevant case studies and court rulings, and
it makes suggestions for enacting regulations to control its application. In the
end, it aims to achieve a balance between the benefits of predictive policing
and the necessity of strict legislative safeguards that guarantee responsibility,
transparency, and the preservation of fundamental rights. The insights reached
will serve as a roadmap for future legislative decisions, encouraging a
responsible integration of AI in law enforcement while reducing moral and
legal risks.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Predictive Policing, Legal Implications,
Bias, Fairness, Law Enforcement, Civil Rights, Criminal Justice,
Accountability, Data Privacy, Discrimination.

© The Author(s) 2025

T. Teena et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the National Seminar on Enhancing Privacy Protection in the Digital Age:
Legal Challenges & Innovations (NSEPPDA 2025), Advances in Social Science,
Education and Humanities Research 936,
https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-426-6_7
96 A. Roy et al.

1. Introduction

A cutting-edge approach to law enforcement, predictive policing makes use of

artificial intelligence (AI), machine learning, and data analysis to foresee
criminal activity before it happens. Predictive policing seeks to improve crime
prevention efforts, maximize police resource allocation, and increase public
safety by examining historical crime data, finding trends, and forecasting high-
risk locations or individuals. This strategy has changed dramatically with the
incorporation of AI, giving law enforcement organizations strong instruments
to fight crime more effectively. But putting it into practice brings up a number
of moral, legal, and societal issues that need serious thought.

The foundation of predictive policing is the idea that crime does not occur at
random but rather adheres to recognizable trends and patterns. Large volumes
of data are gathered by law enforcement organizations, including social
behaviour, geographic data, and crime records.

Predictive policing can be categorized into two primary types:

•
Place-Based Predictive Policing – This method focuses on identifying high-
crime areas where offenses are likely to occur. AI-driven algorithms analyse
crime mapping data, environmental factors, and temporal patterns to predict
locations with a high probability of future crimes.
•
Person-Based Predictive Policing – This approach targets individuals who are
likely to engage in criminal activities. By evaluating social networks, criminal
records, and behavioural indicators, law enforcement agencies can assess
potential risks and intervene before a crime occurs.
The fundamental goal of predictive policing is to prevent crimes proactively
rather than responding reactively. By deploying police forces strategically
based on predictive insights, law enforcement can deter criminal activities,
optimize resources, and enhance community safety (Ferguson, 2017).

Over the years, AI have started playing a crucial role in modern predictive
policing by enhancing data processing, pattern recognition, and real-time
decision-making. AI technologies enable law enforcement agencies to analyze
vast datasets rapidly, identify hidden correlations, and develop actionable
insights. With the help of Machine Learning Algorithms, Natural Language
Processing, Facial Recognition Technology, Big Data Analytics, Predictive
Mapping Tools and Automated Decision Support Systems, the law
enforcement agencies throughout the world has been able to use predictive
policing to curb certain specific types of criminal activities. Predictive policing,
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 97

powered by AI, represents a significant advancement in modern law

enforcement. By leveraging machine learning, big data analytics, and
automation, AI enhances crime prevention, improves policing efficiency, and
strengthens public safety.

However, barring these positive changes in the law enforcement system, there
are also certain ethical and legal challenges which are associated with the AI-
driven policing that needs to be addressed through strict regulations,
transparency, and accountability measures. A balanced approach that
safeguards civil liberties while harnessing AI’s potential is essential for the
responsible implementation of predictive policing in the future.

In the instant research paper, the researchers are aiming to portray a

comprehensive picture of how the AI as a whole is being used by the executive
authorities, what are the advantages they are providing to the states, how are
these changes are benefiting the society at large along with the issues
concerning its negative utilization affecting the rights of the common people
whom they are vouched to protect at the first place. The concluding part of the
paper shall aim to guide future policymakers to foster a responsible integration
of AI in policing while minimizing legal and ethical hazards.

2. Mechanisms of AI in Predictive Policing

Predictive policing refers to the use of data analysis and machine learning
algorithms to predict criminal activity before it happens. The goal of predictive
policing is to enhance law enforcement’s ability to prevent and solve crimes by
identifying patterns and trends in crime data. Artificial Intelligence (AI) plays
a significant role in the mechanisms of predictive policing, providing law
enforcement agencies with powerful tools to analyse large datasets and identify
emerging patterns in criminal activity. Major mechanisms which are used in
the predictive policing are as follows (Hassib, Pfeiffer, Schneegass, Rohs, &
Alt, 2017):

2.1 Data Collection and Preparation

The first step in any predictive policing system is the collection of data. Law
enforcement agencies gather vast amounts of data from a variety of sources,
including:

▪ Historical Crime Data: This includes details about past criminal activities,
such as the type of crime, location, time, and method of crime.
98 A. Roy et al.

▪ Publicly Available Data: This can include social media posts, online forums,
and open-source intelligence (OSINT) that may provide indications of criminal
activity.
▪ Geospatial Data: Geographic data, such as the location of crimes, street
layouts, and demographic information, is vital for understanding spatial
patterns in crime.
▪ Weather and Environmental Data: Certain environmental factors, such as
temperature or weather patterns, may correlate with the likelihood of specific
types of crime.
AI in predictive policing relies on the assumption that historical patterns can
be used to predict future events. The data collected is processed to create a
foundation for the machine learning models that will analyze it.

2.2 Role of Machine Learning Algorithms

At the core of predictive policing systems is machine learning (ML), which is

a subset of AI that enables systems to learn from data and improve over time
without being explicitly programmed. Several machine learning techniques are
employed to forecast crime, including:

▪ Supervised Learning: This approach uses labelled datasets, where past crimes
are labelled with specific outcomes (e.g., type of crime, location, and time).
The model is trained to recognize patterns in these features to predict future
crimes. Common algorithms in supervised learning include decision trees,
random forests, and support vector machines (SVM).

▪ Unsupervised Learning: In this method, the system identifies patterns without

labeled outcomes. Clustering techniques, such as K-means, can be used to
group similar instances of crime together, helping to identify trends and
patterns in regions where crimes may occur more frequently.

▪ Neural Networks and Deep Learning: These more advanced algorithms are
capable of analysing large, complex datasets, such as images, videos, and
sensor data. Deep learning models, such as convolutional neural networks
(CNNs), have shown promise in analysing patterns in crime data to predict
incidents based on highly intricate relationships.

▪ Predictive Analytics: Predictive models use statistical techniques, such as

regression analysis and time-series forecasting, to estimate the probability of
crimes occurring in specific areas at particular times. By applying these models
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 99

to historical data, AI can generate crime hotspots or times when specific

criminal activities are more likely to happen (Crump, 2017).
2.3 Crime Hotspot Mapping

One of the most common applications of AI in predictive policing is crime

hotspot detection. Using machine learning algorithms, law enforcement
agencies can analyze historical crime data to identify regions with a higher
likelihood of criminal activity. These areas are referred to as "hotspots."

Hotspot mapping involves the creation of geospatial models that predict where
crimes are most likely to occur. AI systems can combine location-based data
with temporal data to create high-resolution maps that show areas with elevated
crime risks at specific times of day or week.

This approach allows for more efficient resource allocation, as officers can be
directed to these high-risk areas in real time, increasing the chances of
preventing crime before it happens. Predictive policing technologies like
PredPol (a widely used predictive policing tool) have implemented such
models, which show the likelihood of criminal events in specific geographic
regions, allowing for targeted police presence and interventions (Crawford &
Calo, 2019).

2.4 Risk Assessment of Offenders

Artificial Intelligence (AI) helps evaluate the risks associated with specific
criminals. In predictive policing, recidivism risk assessments predict the
chances of someone committing another crime. These assessments use past
data like previous arrests, criminal records, social and economic factors, and
behavior patterns. Machine learning algorithms analyze this data and give
people a risk score. This score can influence decisions about parole, sentencing,
or monitoring. An example of such a system is the COMPAS algorithm. This
tool is used in the United States to determine the chance of someone
reoffending based on their past criminal behavior. Even though these systems
can identify individuals at a higher risk, there are concerns about fairness and
bias. Some people worry that these algorithms might favor certain groups over
others, especially affecting minority populations more heavily than others.

2.5 AI in Surveillance and Monitoring

AI also plays a role in surveillance and monitoring, which are key components
of modern predictive policing strategies. Tools such as facial recognition
software, video surveillance analytics, and sensor networks are increasingly
being used by law enforcement agencies to monitor public spaces. AI-powered
100 A. Roy et al.

systems can analyse video feeds to detect suspicious activity, track individuals,
and identify potential criminal behaviour in real time.

Facial recognition technology has become a major component of surveillance-

based predictive policing, helping police identify suspects or locate missing
persons. However, its use has raised significant ethical concerns, particularly
regarding privacy violations, misidentifications, and the potential for
surveillance overreach.

Additionally, AI can process data from Internet of Things (IoT) devices, such
as smart cameras or sensors placed in public spaces. These devices can relay
real-time data about movements and behaviours, which AI systems analyse to
detect anomalies and predict criminal events before they occur.

3. Major Benefits and Advantages of Usage of AI in Predictive Policing

The aim is to help police and law enforcement find patterns and trends in crime
data to act before crimes happen. Using AI in predictive policing is a big step
forward. It changes policing from just responding to crimes to preventing them.
There are discussions about privacy, fairness, and ethics, but the benefits are
clear. AI helps prevent crimes, manages resources better, and makes law
enforcement more effective. Here are the main advantages of using AI for
predictive policing (Brayne, 2012).

3.1 Proactive Crime Prevention

AI brings great benefits to predictive policing by enabling police to stop crimes

before they happen. Traditionally, police respond after a crime. With predictive
policing, the focus shifts to predicting where and when crimes might occur so
that police can prevent them. AI uses machine learning and data analysis to
look at lots of past crime data. It finds patterns, looking at the time, place, type
of crime, and even things like weather and social conditions that may affect
crime. With these insights, police can focus on high-risk areas, reducing crime
and the need for a reaction after a crime.

An example is tools like PredPol, which use data to find areas likely to have
crime. When officers know these places, they can be more present there,
discouraging would-be criminals. This helps stop crimes like burglary,
vandalism, and violence before they happen.

3.2 Efficient Allocation of Resources

AI helps law enforcement make better use of their resources by providing

insights into crime patterns and predicting future crimes. These agencies often
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 101

have limited resources, making it difficult to decide where and when to send
officers and equipment. Predictive policing uses crime predictions to guide the
placement of officers, vehicles, and gear, improving the efficiency of their
operations. For example, predictive models can show which areas might soon
experience more crime. This allows departments to focus their patrols and
resources in those spots, ensuring officers are in high-risk areas at the right
times, boosting the chances of preventing crimes before they occur. AI systems
also help prioritize law enforcement activities by analyzing crime trends and
pinpointing the most urgent issues needing attention.

3.3 Improved Officer Safety

AI technology supports police work by predicting crime and ensuring officer

safety. It examines crime trends to foresee situations where officers might
encounter danger, like violent incidents. This information helps police be better
prepared and informed. Predictive technology identifies places where officers
might meet violent criminals, enabling them to take preventive actions and
avoid danger. Additionally, AI works alongside body cameras and surveillance
systems to oversee interactions between officers and the public, enhancing
officer safety in the field. Furthermore, AI can forecast areas where crime could
rise, allowing police to modify their strategies and act before issues escalate.
For example, if an uptick in gang activities is detected in a specific area, AI can
alert officers to potential conflict zones, such as gang disputes or acts of
retaliation.

3.4 Data-Driven Decision Making

AI in predictive policing helps the police make smarter decisions with data.
Traditional methods often rely on gut feelings, experience, and human
judgment, which can be biased or wrong. AI gives the police access to large
amounts of past and current data, which allows for more impartial decisions.
Machine learning looks at information from crime reports, arrest records,
community details, and environmental factors. It predicts where and when
crime might happen next. This way of using data improves accuracy in policing
and reduces the need for guesswork or faulty information. AI also provides up-
to-the-minute crime data, helping police change strategies quickly to be more
efficient and effective. For example, if an area has a lot of robberies, AI can
show patterns like the specific times or places they happen. The police can use
this information to plan patrols better, decide when to step in, and lower the
number of robberies overall.

3.5 Targeting and Deterring Criminal Behavior

102 A. Roy et al.

AI-driven predictive policing systems are designed to identify people or groups

who might be at a higher risk of committing crimes. By analyzing information
about past criminals, their behaviors, and the conditions they live in, these
systems can predict who might commit a crime and where it might happen.
This lets police concentrate on individuals or areas that are more at risk, making
their actions more precise and timely. Predictive policing also acts as a
deterrent. When potential criminals know that the police are focused on certain
places, they might be less likely to commit crimes. The knowledge that their
actions are being watched and that the chance of being caught is high can
prevent criminal behavior. These tools are also valuable in identifying people
who might need support or intervention.

For example, individuals with a history of drug abuse or gang activity might be
helped to stay away from crime. A practical example is when predictive
policing highlights someone who has frequently been arrested for theft in one
area. In these cases, the police can take specific actions like offering support
services, closely monitoring the area, or placing more officers there to prevent
future crimes.

3.6 Enhancing Public Trust and Accountability

Using AI in predictive policing can help improve trust in the police and bring
more fairness to their work. Predictive policing relies on facts and data to
prevent crime, ensuring that police actions are more consistent and fair. AI
ensures that everyone follows the rules by allowing data checks to make sure
officers are doing their jobs correctly. AI can also help get rid of unfair biases
in policing. By focusing on data, AI systems make decisions based on facts,
not personal opinions or past experiences, which can have biases. However, it's
important to use fair and diverse data, and the results need to be monitored
closely to maintain fairness. To build trust, it's essential for police departments
to be open about their use of AI systems. They need to clearly communicate
the benefits and limits of AI. This openness helps people understand AI and
feel confident that it is being used in the right way. In many cities, residents
can access crime data used in predictive policing, showing how and where
resources are distributed. This transparency helps build trust between law
enforcement and the community, as everyone can see the process and
outcomes.

3.7 Cost Reduction and Operational Efficiency

AI helps police departments save money. Regular policing costs a lot because
it needs a lot of people, equipment, and resources for dealing with crimes after
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 103

they happen. With AI, police can see crime patterns and manage their resources
smarter. This means less need for too many patrols, overtime, or reacting to
crimes after they occur. By predicting where crimes might happen, the police
can use their resources more effectively, which saves money and improves how
they operate. AI also cuts down the time officers spend on paperwork. It can
automate tasks like writing reports, entering data, and managing cases, which
gives officers more time for important work like patrolling, investigating, and
talking to people in the community. This boosts their productivity and
efficiency.

3.8 Improving Crime Solving and Investigation

AI tools can greatly enhance how police investigate crimes by making the
process much faster and efficient. These tools use machine learning to study
how criminals act. This helps officers connect different crimes, find suspects
more easily, and even predict what a criminal might do next. By using
predictive analytics, AI can go through pieces of evidence, listen to what
witnesses have said, and check the history of criminal records. This makes it
possible to solve cases more quickly and accurately. AI is also good at finding
links between events or suspects that don't seem related at first, which helps
solve difficult cases. In forensic analysis, AI provides tools to look at crime
scene details closely and spot clues that might be missed. Predictive policing
with AI offers many advantages. It changes traditional police work to be more
about anticipating problems and using data. This way, police can stop crimes
before they happen, use their resources wisely, improve officer safety, and
create more trust with the public. However, there are important things to
consider, like privacy, bias, and accountability, to ensure AI is used in a fair
and responsible way. Addressing these issues is crucial if we want to fully
benefit from AI's capabilities. As AI continues to improve, it will play a bigger
role in law enforcement. This will make policing more focused on data and
improve how communities stay safe. With good management and fairness, AI
can significantly boost public safety and the justice system.

4. Significant Challenges of AI in the Field of Predictive Policing

Like all scientific innovations, the Artificial Intelligence also is considered as

a double aged sword. With all its advantages and benefits, it also provides
several challenges too. The most significant challenges posing by AI in the
process of predictive policing are discussed herein under (Smith, 2020).
104 A. Roy et al.

4.1 Reinforcing Existing Biases: AI tools learn from past data, which often
includes biases related to race, ethnicity, or socio-economic status. If this data
includes biased policing practices, AI might continue or even worsen these
biases, unfairly affecting certain groups, especially minorities. Research shows
that crime prediction tools can unfairly focus on Black, Hispanic, and low-
income communities. This creates inequalities in policing, affecting these
groups more than others.

4.2 Lack of Transparency and Accountability: Many AI systems don’t

reveal how they make decisions, making it hard to understand their actions.
This lack of transparency creates problems in holding these systems
accountable, especially if they lead to unfair outcomes. Without understanding
how AI systems function, it is difficult to ensure that they are fair, accurate,
and ethical.

4.3 Privacy Invasion: Predictive policing uses technologies like facial

recognition and social media tracking, which can invade personal privacy by
making people feel constantly watched. AI systems often gather large amounts
of personal information without clear consent, leading to privacy violations.

4.4 Over-policing and Resource Misallocation: AI can incorrectly predict

crime if the data is flawed, leading to excessive policing in certain areas or of
certain people who aren't more likely to commit crimes, wasting important
resources. AI uses data patterns that might lead to increased surveillance or
arrests based on statistics rather than actual individual actions.

4.5 Erosion of Trust in Law Enforcement: If communities believe they are

being unfairly targeted by AI, trust in the police can decrease, damaging
important relationships needed for good policing. People flagged by predictive
tools might be wrongly labeled as criminals without real evidence, harming
their lives and reputations.

4.6 Overreliance on Technology: Relying too much on predictive policing

can cause law enforcement to defer to AI over human judgment, potentially
leading to unjust outcomes. - Excessive use of predictive tools might lead to
over-reliance on technology at the expense of community-based or traditional
investigative methods.

5. Legal and Constitutional Implications of Using AI in the Predictive

Policing
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 105

The advent of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in predictive policing raises

significant legal and constitutional concerns that need to be carefully examined.
Predictive policing uses AI algorithms to analyse historical crime data and
forecast future criminal activity, helping law enforcement agencies allocate
resources and predict potential threats. While AI-driven approaches hold the
potential to improve efficiency and effectiveness, they also introduce complex
legal and constitutional challenges related to privacy, due process,
discrimination, and accountability. To address these challenges, legislative
bodies, law enforcement agencies, and the courts must work together to create
legal frameworks that both allow the responsible use of AI in policing and
protect individuals from the potential harms of algorithmic decision-making.

6. Policy Recommendations and Conclusion

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is being increasingly used in predictive policing, an

emerging field that could significantly improve policing methods. AI tools help
forecast where crimes might occur, identify high-crime areas, and assess the
risk level of individuals by analyzing data patterns. This makes AI a powerful
tool for police work today. However, as AI becomes more integrated into these
strategies, it brings ethical, social, and legal concerns. Addressing these
challenges is critical, so it's essential to discuss how AI will be used in the
future of policing. Developing comprehensive policies is necessary to ensure
these technologies are applied in a responsible, effective, and fair manner for
all.

6.1 Future Perspectives of AI in Predictive Policing

▪ Advancements in AI Capabilities: AI technology is rapidly advancing,

especially in crime prediction. Soon, AI systems will handle complex data
better. Using deep learning and neural networks, AI could recognize intricate
crime patterns, looking at things like social media, communications, and even
emotions to forecast criminal activities. Eventually, AI might predict not only
where crimes could occur but also people’s specific actions, enabling more
tailored prevention measures. Another exciting development is merging AI
with Internet of Things (IoT) devices. For example, smart cameras, sensors,
and wearable tech could send real-time data to AI systems. This integration
would let AI predict and react to crimes instantly, helping the police respond
quickly and improve public safety.

▪ Integration with the Larger Justice System: AI might soon be part of the
entire justice process, not just for police. It could aid in every aspect, from
investigations to court rulings and parole choices. AI could evaluate the
likelihood of someone reoffending by assessing their behaviour, psychological
 106 A. Roy et al.

tests, and rehabilitation status. This entire system integration would create a
more unified and data-driven justice approach, allowing police, courts, and
prisons to collaborate more effectively. Ensuring fairness and preventing abuse
of power in areas like sentencing and parole decisions remain critical.

▪ Real-Time Predictive Policing: Predictive policing could advance to real-time

crime prediction. Right now, it mainly focuses on crime hotspots and predicting
future crimes from past data. But with AI advancements and real-time data
from various sources, this could shift to immediate crime forecasting. AI might
analyze environmental factors, live surveillance, and social interactions to
predict ongoing crimes. This capability would allow law enforcement to act on
potential incidents quickly, enhancing their ability to prevent crimes and
respond swiftly in risky scenarios. Balancing public safety with privacy is
crucial, as real-time surveillance poses over-policing concerns.

▪ Cross-Border and Global Applications: As AI-driven predictive policing

grows, there's potential for international law enforcement collaboration. AI can
analyze global crime trends, aiding countries in fighting transnational crimes
like human trafficking, drug smuggling, and terrorism. With crime increasingly
interconnected worldwide, sharing and examining extensive data can bolster
international security efforts. However, these advancements raise worries about
data privacy and national sovereignty. Countries have different data laws, so
creating international standards for AI use in policing is vital to ensure
cooperation respects citizens' rights and prevents data misuse.
6.2 Policy Recommendations for AI in Predictive Policing

To ensure that AI in predictive policing is used ethically, transparently, and

effectively, several policy recommendations must be considered. These
recommendations aim to address the challenges posed by the technology while
maximizing its benefits for public safety and law enforcement efficiency.

▪ Establish Rules for AI in Law Enforcement: A major concern with AI in

police work is the risk of unfairness and discrimination. AI systems learn from
past data, which might contain biased practices, leading to ongoing inequality.
For example, predictive tools could unfairly target minority communities if the
data is skewed. To address this, comprehensive rules are needed for AI use in
law enforcement. These rules should ensure fairness, responsibility, and
openness. AI programs must be designed to identify and remove any bias,
preventing them from unfairly affecting specific groups. Regular checks and
evaluations of AI systems are crucial to ensure they comply with these rules.
Third-party organizations could monitor AI development and usage to prevent
misuse and guarantee fair decisions.
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 107

▪ Increase Public Transparency and Accountability: AI tools in policing must

be transparent to the public, aiding trust between communities and law
enforcement. It's important for people to understand AI's role in policing, the
data it uses, and the decision-making processes involved. This requires sharing
details on technology, data sources, and decision logic. Accountability
measures must be in place to prevent misuse of AI tools. Police departments
should regularly report on the effectiveness of their AI systems, their outcomes,
and how they impact communities. Transparent reporting helps mitigate
concerns over excessive surveillance, racial profiling, and discrimination.
Strengthen Data Privacy and Protection Data collection is central to AI in
policing, making data privacy a critical issue. Personal information like
criminal records, demographics, and social media activities are used in AI for
policing, bringing concerns about privacy and surveillance. To protect privacy,
strong data protection laws must be enacted.

▪ AI systems should incorporate privacy safeguards, protecting sensitive

information: Wherever possible, data should be anonymized, and police
departments must adhere to strict data handling guidelines. People should be
informed if their data is used in AI systems and allowed to challenge AI-based
decisions affecting them.

▪ Encourage Human-AI Collaboration: Though AI is powerful, it should

complement human efforts, not replace them. Police should focus on systems
that integrate AI with human judgment, rather than relying solely on AI for
final decisions. Human officers provide necessary context, empathy, and
ethical judgment. AI should serve as a tool to assist officers, offering data-
driven insights and predictions. Policies should emphasize human oversight,
and officers need adequate training to use AI outputs appropriately.

▪ Enhance Public Education and Community Engagement: AI deployment in

policing may face resistance from those worried about surveillance and over-
policing. Public education and community engagement are essential to address
these concerns. Police should actively engage the public, clarifying how AI in
policing works, its benefits, and protective measures in place to prevent misuse.
Involving communities in developing and evaluating AI systems aligns them
with public concerns and needs, fostering accountability and trust. Public
feedback should inform policy decisions related to AI in policing.

▪ Promote Global Collaboration and Common Standards: As AI in policing

advances, international collaboration is vital to establish shared standards for
ethical AI usage. Organizations like the United Nations and the European
Union can help set guidelines that ensure ethical AI use in law enforcement
worldwide.
108 A. Roy et al.

6.3 Way Forward

The future of AI in predictive policing is promising. AI can help prevent crime,

manage resources better, and improve public safety. As AI technology grows,
we must consider the ethical, social, and legal issues it brings. Making smart
rules like ethical guidelines, transparency measures, data protection laws, and
involving the public will help police use AI effectively while avoiding risks.
Policymakers, police, and tech developers need to work together. AI tools must
be used responsibly and fairly to gain public trust. By doing this, we can use
AI to make our communities safer and more just.

RERERENCE
1. Brayne, S. (2012). The American surveillance state: Big Data, police,
and the law. Michigan Law Review, 110(8), 1563-1600.
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 109

2. Crawford, K., & Calo, R. (2019). There is a blind spot in AI research.

Nature, 311-313. Retrieved from
https://www.nature.com/articles/538311a

3. Crump, C. (2017). Predictive policing and the Fourth Amendment: Legal

boundaries and the future of surveillance. Yale Law && Policy Reviw,
35(2), 221-234.

4. Ferguson, A. G. (2017). The Rise of Big Data Policing Surveillance,

Race, and the Future of Law Enforcement. New York University Press.
doi:https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479854608.001.0001

5. Hassib, M., Pfeiffer, M., Schneegass, S., Rohs, M., & Alt, F. (2017).
Emotion Actuator: Embodied Emotional Feedback through. CHI, 6-11.
doi:10.1145/3025453.3025953

6. Smith, E. (2020). Algorithmic justice: Legal and ethical implications of

AI in Policing. Stanford Law Review, 42(8), 1235-1265
7. L. Strikwerda, Predictive Policing: The Risks Associated with Risk
Assessment, The Police Journal 94:3 (2020), 422- 36, https:/ /
dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/ 0032258X20947749.
8. Recent Developments and Challenges, Mugari and E.E. Obioha,
Predictive Policing and Crime Control in the United States of America
and Europe: Trends in a Decade of Research and the Future of Predictive
Policing, Social Sciences 10:6 (2021), 234, https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.3390/
socsci10060234.
9. D. Castelvecchi, Can We Open the Black Box of Ai?,Nature538:7623
(2016), 20- 3, https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.1038/ 538020a.
10. J . Burrell, How the Machine? Thinks?: Understanding Opacit y in
Machine Learning Algorithms, Big Data & Society 3:1(2016), 1- 12,
https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/ 2053951715622512.
11. K. Blair, P. Hansen, and L.Oehlberg, "Participatory Art for Public
Exploration of Algorithmic Decision- Making" (paper presented at the
Companion Publication of the 2021ACM Designing Interactive Systems
Conference, Virtual Event, USA2021), 23- 6, https:/ / doi.org/ 10.1145/
3468002.3468235.
12. K. Yeung, A Study of the Implications of Advanced Digital Technologies
(Including Ai Systems) for the Concept of Responsibility within a
Human Rights Framework, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, https:/
/rm.coe.int/ a- study- of-the-implications- of- advanced- digital-
technologies-including/ 168096bdab.
13. S. Buranyi, Rise of the Racist Robots ? How Ai Is Learning All Our
Worst Impulses, 8 Aug. 2017, https:/ / www.theguardian.com/
110 A. Roy et al.

inequality/ 2017/ aug/ 08/rise- of-the-racist-robots- how- aiis-learning-

all- our- worst-impulses (Accessed 2 Aug. 2022).
14. R. Rieland, Artificial Intelligence Is Now Used to Predict Crime. But Is
It Biased?, 5 Mar. 2018,https:/ / www.smithsonianmag.com/ innovation/
artificial-intelligence-is- now- used- predict crime-is-it- biased-
180968337/ (Accessed 2 Aug. 2022).
15. S. Dillon and C. Collett, Ai and Gender: Four Proposals for Future
Research, 2019, https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.17863/ CAM.41459.
16. K. Crawford, K. Miltner, and M.L. Gray, Critiquing Big Data: Politics,
Ethics, Epistemology, International Journal of Communication 8 (2014),
1663- 72.
17. K. Lum and W. Isaac, To Predict and Serve?, Significance 13:5 (2016),
14- 9, https:/ / dx.doi.org/ https:/ / doi.org/ 10.1111/ j.1740-
9713.2016.00960.x.Zavr?nik,
18. Algorithmic Justice: Algorithms and Big Data in Criminal Justice
Settings, European Journal of Criminology18:5 (2019), 623- 34, https:/
/ dx.doi.org/ 10.1177/ 1477370819876762.
19. L.J . Skitka, K. Mosier, and M.D. Burdick, Accountability and
Automation Bias, International Journal of Human- Computer
Studies52:4 (2000), 701- 17, https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.1006/
ijhc.1999.0349.
20. S.D. Ramchurn, S. Stein, and N.R. Jennings, Trustworthy Human-Ai
Partnerships, iScience 24:8 (2021), https:/ / dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/
j.isci.2021.102891.
21. Kraft, Microsoft Shuts Down Ai Chatbot after It Turned into a Nazi, 25
Mar. 2016, https:/ / www.cbsnews.com/ news/ microsoft-shuts- down-
ai- chatbot- after-it-turned-intoracist- nazi/ (Accessed 2 Aug. 2022).
22. Helsinki and Amsterdam First Cities in the World to Launch Open AI
Register, 20 Sept. 2020, https:/ / news.cision.com/ fi/ cit y- of-
helsinki/r/helsinki- and- amsterdam-first- cities-in-theworld-to-launch-
open- ai-register,c3204076 (Accessed 2 Aug. 2022).
23. Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political
Philosophy. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness,
Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 149-158). DOI:
10.1145/3287560.3287598
24. Brayne, S. (2017). Big Data Surveillance: The Costs of Predictive
Policing. The Harvard Law Review, 130(8), 2246-2271. DOI:
10.2307/44618038
25. Brayne, S. (2020). Big Data Surveillance: The Costs of Predictive
Policing. American Sociological Review, 85(1), 96-116. DOI:
10.1177/0003122419895741
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 111

26. Burrell, J. (2016). How the Machine 'Thinks': Understanding Opacity in

Machine Learning Algorithms. Big Data & Society, 3(1). DOI:
10.1177/2053951715622512
27. Chainey, S., & Ratcliffe, J. (2005). GIS and Crime Mapping. In Crime
Mapping: A GIS Approach (pp. 1-23). DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-4897-
2_1
28. Chouldechova, A., Gelman, A. (2018). A Comparative Evaluation of
Classifiers for the Prediction of Recidivism. In International Conference
on Machine Learning. Retrieved from
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/chouldechova18a.html
29. Cohen, M. (2019). Community Engagement in Policing: A Guide for
Practitioners. National Institute of Justice.Retrieved from
https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/communityengagement-
policing-guide-practitioners
30. Cohen, S. (2020). Los Angeles Police Department’s Predictive Policing:
A Review of the Program’s Impact and Ethical Concerns. Journal of
Criminal Justice Ethics, 4(2), 45-60.
DOI:10.1080/19369118.2020.1801170
31. Crawford, K. (2021). Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary
Costs of Artificial Intelligence. Yale University Press. DOI:
10.12987/9780300263150
32. Eck, J. E. (2017). The Effect of Predictive Policing on Crime: A Case
Study of HunchLab in Chicago. University of Chicago Crime Lab.
Retrieved from https://criminallaw.uchicago.edu/news/effect-
predictivepolicing-crime-case-study-hunchlab-chicago
33. Ferguson, A. G. (2017). Policing Predictive Policing. University of
Chicago Law Review, 83(1), 155-252. DOI: 10.2307/44804185
34. Fridell, L. (2018). The Implementation of SARA in Memphis: A Study
on Predictive Policing. University of Memphis. Retrieved from
https://www.memphis.edu/
35. Harries, K. D. (1999). Mapping Crime: Principles and Practices.
National Institute of Justice. Retrieved from
https://nij.ojp.gov/library/publications/mapping-crimeprinciples-and-
practices
36. Hoffman, A. (2019). The Future of Policing: Training Officers in Data-
Driven Practices. Police Chief, 86(1), 44-49.
37. Huang, K., Hu, Z., & Ma, H. (2021). Big Data and Predictive Policing:
A Review and Research Agenda. IEEE Access, 9, 131536-131548.
DOI:10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3114481
38. Liu, A., Lentz, R., & Cohen, M. (2019). Legislation in the Age of
Artificial Intelligence: The Case of Predictive Policing. Harvard Journal
of Law & Technology, 33(2), 531-580. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3403203
112 A. Roy et al.

39. Lipton, Z. C. (2016). The Mythos of Model Interpretability.

Communications of the ACM, 59(10), 36-43. DOI:
10.1145/2347736.2347755
40. Mann, J., & Lentz, R. (2019). Community Oversight of Predictive
Policing: A Primer for Advocates. Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved
from https://www.brennancenter.org/our-
work/researchreports/community-oversight-predictive-policing-
primeradvocates
41. McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., & y Arcas, B. A. (2017).
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from
Decentralized Data. In AISTATS. Retrieved from
http://proceedings.mlr.press/v54/mcmahan17a.html
42. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data
Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Publishing
Group. DOI: 10.1017/9781108278613
43. Perry, W. L., McInnis, B., Price, C., & Smith, S. (2013). Predictive
Policing: The Role of Crime Forecasting in Law Enforcement
Operations. RAND Corporation. Retrieved from
https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR233.html
44. Ratcliffe, J. H. (2016). Crime Mapping and the ProblemOriented
Policing Approach. In The Oxford Handbook of Police and Policing (pp.
83-102). DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199935347.013.16
45. Regan, P. M. (2015). Privacy, Data Protection and the Law. Journal of
Information Law and Technology, 2015(2), 1-20. Retrieved from
https://www.jilt.org.uk/
46. Richardson, R., Schultz, J., & Crawford, K. (2019). Dirty Data, Bad
Predictions: How Civil Rights Violations Impact Police Data and
Predictive Policing. New York University Law Review, 94(3), 1343-
1400. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3367470
47. Stoyanovich, J., & V. D. (2017). Data and Justice: The Role of
Computational Tools in Modern Policing. Journal of Computer &
Communications, 5(7), 1-12. DOI: 10.4236/jcc.2017.57001
 The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predictive Policing 113

Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-
NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/),
which permits any noncommercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any
medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the
source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's
Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material
is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not
permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain
permission directly from the copyright holder.