0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views2 pages

Demo Teaching Observation Sheet

The document is an observation and rating sheet for off-campus practice teaching, assessing various aspects such as lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, questioning skills, communication skills, and the teacher's personality. Each category has a percentage weight and a rating scale from 1 to 5, with corresponding verbal descriptions of performance levels. It also includes space for comments and observer details.

Uploaded by

reymart282004
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
2 views2 pages

Demo Teaching Observation Sheet

The document is an observation and rating sheet for off-campus practice teaching, assessing various aspects such as lesson planning, content knowledge, teaching methods, classroom management, questioning skills, communication skills, and the teacher's personality. Each category has a percentage weight and a rating scale from 1 to 5, with corresponding verbal descriptions of performance levels. It also includes space for comments and observer details.

Uploaded by

reymart282004
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

OFF – CAMPUS PRACTICE TEACHING OBSERVATION AND RATING SHEET

Name of Student Teacher: ________________________ School: ______________________

Subject: ___________________ Date: ___________ Time: ________

Legend: 5–Outstanding 4–Very Satisfactory 3–Satisfactory 2–Fair 1–Needs Improvement

5 4 3 2 1
I. LESSON PLANNING (15%)
A. The lesson plan is well prepared.
B. Objectives were stated in behavioral terms.
C. There was congruence between:
1. Objective and subject matter
2. Objective and teaching procedure
3. Objective and formative test
4. Objective and assignment
II. CONTENT (15%)
A. The teacher demonstrates in-depth knowledge of the subject
matter.
B. He/ She can relate lessons to actual life situations.
C. Keeps abreast of new ideas and understanding in the field.
D. Gives sufficient and concrete examples to create meaningful
learning experiences.
III. TEACHING METHODS (15%)
A. Method/s used was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of
learners.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the
student’s capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the
lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after
teaching.
IV. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT (10%)
A. The teacher has a systematic way of checking:
1. Attendance
2. Assignments/ Homework/ Agreement
3. Practice exercises
4. Group work/ projects
5. Correcting, distributing, collecting papers
6. Passing in and out of the classroom
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom.
C. Visual aids are within easy reach of the teacher during his/ her
teaching.
V. QUESTIONING SKILLS (20%)
A. The teacher’s questioning skill stimulates discussion in different
ways such as:
1. Probing for learner’s understanding
2. Helping students articulate their ideas and thinking process
3. Promotes risk-taking and problem-solving
4. Facilitates factual recall
5. Encourages convergent and divergent thinking
6. Stimulates curiosity
7. Helps students to ask questions
VI. COMMUNICATION SKILLS (15%)
A. The teacher spoke with a well–modulated voice.
B. The teacher used correct grammar in speaking.
C. He/ She observes correct pronunciation.
D. Correct responses were given by the students through the
teacher’s skillful questioning.
E. The board work of the students is free from errors in grammar
and spelling.
F. The teacher’s handwriting on the board was clear enough to be
read and understood.

VII. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY (10%)


A. The teacher is neat and well–groomed.
B. The teacher is free from mannerisms that tend to disturb the
student’s attention.
C. The teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect
and attention.
D. The teacher shows dynamism and enthusiasm.
E. The teacher has well – modulated voice.

TOTAL

Comments
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________

Name of Observer: __________________________________________


Designation: __________________________________
Rubrics

Rate Scale Equivalent/ Rating Verbal Description


Teaching performance is consistently
5 Outstanding (96 - 100)
superior to the set standards.
Teaching performance is consistently
4 Exceeds Expectations (90 – 95)
above the set standards.
Teaching performance consistently
3 Meets Expectations (85 – 89)
meets the set standards.
Teaching performance does not meet
2 Needs Improvement (80 – 84) the set of standards. Extra effort is
needed to improve the skills.
Teaching performance is inadequate to
1 Unacceptable Performance (75 – 79)
the set of standards.

Adopted from: Experiential Learning Courses Handbook: A Project of the Teacher Education
Council (TEC) Department of Education (DepEd) Commission on Higher Education (CHED)
2017

You might also like